Bryce Willis Portfolio 2013 by Bryce Willis

Bryce Willis architecture portfolio

Digital Morphogenesis Graduate Thesis

Fall 2011-Spring 2012

A COMPUTATIONAL HOUSING TYPOLOGY

PROJECT MENTOR:

Timothy Hemsath

My thesis was a design project that explored the integration of computational tools into an architectural design process through the means of a parametrically driven, multi-criterion framework. Architecture firms use computers to streamline processes and largely engage computers for standard representation and documentation purposes. This has increased the efficiency of the traditional approach to architecture. However, through computational methods, the nature of an architectural design can be imbedded within a system of internal parametric relationships. This process allows for the creation of computationally designed systems where an interactive framework aids in the design process. The project used parametric design methods to generate housing types based on multiple criteria of site constraints, typological features and pragmatic housing functions and details. At the end of my thesis project, I submitted a paper summarizing my work to ACADIA, the Association for Computer Aided Design in Architecture. It was accepted for presentation at the 2012 conference in San Francisco and subsequently published in the conference’s annual book. SPEAKING ENGAGEMENT AND PUBLICATION: Willis, B., Hemsath, T., Hardy, S. A Parametric Multi-criterion Housing Typology. “Association for Computer Aided Design in Architecture” (ACADIA) 2012 National Conference, San Francisco, CA. October 25-27.

Diagram of computationally developed framework

Grasshopper script for computational framework; residential planning strategies throughout Lincoln, Nebraska; and selected planning strategies for testing the computational framework

Diagrams of selected framework controls for footprint and roof generation

Model of framework-generated variation based on control variation and model of framework-generated variation across a residential site based on site input variation

Diagram of discursive grammar to create programmatical organization

Selection of programmatic typologies expressed by grammar logic within the computational framework

Floorplans of each programmatic type-developed output by the computational framework

Computationally created and hand-detailed selection of homes output by the framework

Computationally created and hand-detailed bungalow-type home output by the framework

Bungalow-type home model from two views

Bent ranch-type home model from two views

Rendering of framework-generated variation across a residential site based on site-input variation

Digital Morphogenesis presentation board

West Haymarket Redevelopment Studio Project

Spring 2011 IN COLLABORATION WITH: Holden Rasmussen, Craig Weflen and Corey Hess

This was a team project for the hypothetical development or redevelopment of a mile-by-mile sector of Lincoln, Nebraska. Project team members focused on a significantly blighted area located directly northwest of Lincolnâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s downtown, bordering the University of Nebraska-Lincoln. Due to the complex assemblage of road and natural features, including protected wetlands, parks and lakes, flood mitigation, flood plains and high water tables, the buildable site area was made of a sequence of smaller areas. The resulting urban design solution deployed two separate system types: a scripted branching structure of the neighborhood roads and a warped grid system to allow the irregular area of blight to link into the existing grid system. These strategies, coupled with the projectâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s urban context, lent themselves to the development of several types of mixed-use facilities, raising density in areas adjacent to downtown and campus, and then stepping down to single-family dwellings in the surrounding neighborhoods.

Comprehensive City Network Public Industrial andTransportation Semi-Public Areas Areas

Comprehensive CommercialSite Areas Open Space Areas

Current site network transportation diagram; diagram of existing spacial context; and diagram of current zoning

Comprehensive Site Built Environment Areas

PROGRAMMATIC VARIATIONS

Comprehensive City Floodplain Areas

Refined Site Boundary

Node DiagramOptimal Blight Elimination

Initial Site Constraints Programmatic Nodes

Diagram of the existing floodplains; diagram of urban node strategy adopted for the project; and specification of sites for project development

Diagram of computationally based tower typegram for urban development

Deployment of redevelopment strategy for a single node of the overall site

Redevelopment site plan and Haymarket redevelopment rendering

Diagram of network strategy and programmatic deployment across the project site and west Haymarket redevelopment site model

Clockwise from left: West Haymarket renovation site model; residential development in floodplain zone rendering; and urban development in floodplain rendering

West Haymarket redevelopment rendering and site model

Grasshopper House Studio Project

Spring 2011 INDEPENDENT PROJECT

This project is an example of the possibilities computation brings to the field of architecture. The Grasshopper House explores the power of parametrics and generative algorithms through using existing software tools: Rhino 4.0 NURBS modeling for Windows; Grasshopper, generative modeling for Rhino; and Galapagos, a generative algorithm plug-in for Grasshopper. At the projectâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s core is a computationally driven bubble diagram that uses an adjacency matrix and Galapagosâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; generative algorithm to create unique floor-plan layouts each time the script runs. Onto this basic plan, the roof, circulation, interior and exterior framing, walls, windows and doors are all parametrically added. A series of user-driven controls are then used to fine tune each set of elements. The end result is a series of completely unique homes developed with the same program and criteria. They were rendered as a series of homes under construction.

Parametric House Definition Single Story Version Grasshopper Script

Floor Plan Solver Roof Framing

Interior Framing

Exterior Framing

Diagram of the Grasshopper definition for the Grasshopper House

Floor Plan Definition Grasshopper Script

Extents of Plan

Program Inputs

Test for Overlap

X and Y Position

Room Proportion

Test for Adjacency Dimensions in 18in. Increments

Galapagos Evolutionary Solver Evolutionary Principles applied to Problem Solving

There is nothing particularly new about Evolutionary Solvers or Genetic Algorithms. The first references to this field of computation stem from the early 60's when Lawrence J. Fogel published the landmark paper "On the Organization of Intellect" which sparked the first endeavours into evolutionary computing. The early 70's witnessed further forays with seminal work produced by -among others- Ingo Rechenberg and John Henry Holland. Evolutionary Computation didn't gain popularity beyond the programmer world until Richard Dawkins' book "The Blind Watchmaker" in 1986, which came with a small program that generated a seemingly endless stream of body-plans called "Bio-morphs" based on human selection. Since the 80's the advent of the personal computer has made it possible for individuals without government funding to apply evolutionary principles to personal projects and they have since made it into the common parlance. The term "Evolutionary Computing" may very well be widely known at this point in time, but they are still very much a programmers tool. 'By programmers for programmers' if you will. The applications out there that apply evolutionary logic are either aimed at solving specific problems, or they are generic libraries that allow other programmers to piggyback along. It is my hope that Galapagos will provide a generic platform for the application of Evolutionary Algorithms to be used on a wide variety of problems by non-programmers.

-David Rutten

Diagram of the Grasshopper definition for the floor plan of the house

Variation in Typology Manipulations in form

Shotgun 1

Garage

L Shape 1

Bath Bedroom

Square shape 1

Dining

Bedroom

Shotgun Style 2

Bedroom Bath

Bath Kitchen

Bath Bath Bath

Garage

Kitchen Bedroom

Roof Height Factor Roof Condition Floor height Dormers Main Roof Peak Dormer Peak Main Roof Overhang Dormer Overhang

11 0 13’ 0 0 X 1.5’ X

Dining

Bath

Bedroom

Bedroom Dining

Living

Kitchen

Bedroom

Bath

Dining

# Of Windows # Of Doors Garage Size Galapagos Calc. Square Feet Frames Stories Bedrooms

Bath

Bedroom

Bath

Bath Garage

Dining Stair

Stair

Bedroom

Stair

Bedroom

Living

Square Shape 2

Living

Kitchen

Bath

L Shape 2

Living

Bedroom

Kitchen

Stair

Dining

Bath

Stair

Bath

Bedroom

Kitchen

Bedroom

Bath

Bedroom

Bath

Living Bath

15 13 1 5522.38 1719.0 602.55 ft3 1 2

Roof Height Factor Roof Condition Floor height Dormers Main Roof Peak Dormer Peak Main Roof Overhang Dormer Overhang

9 1 11’ 0 .5 X 3’ X

# Of Windows 14 # Of Doors 9 Garage Size 2 Galapagos Calc. 5171.20 Square Feet 1705.5 Frames 620.40 ft3 Stories 1 Bedrooms 2

Diagram of different houses generated with the Grasshopper script

Roof Height Factor Roof Condition Floor height Dormers Main Roof Peak Dormer Peak Main Roof Overhang Dormer Overhang

7 0 9’ 0 .75 X 4.5’ X

# Of Windows 13 # Of Doors 11 Garage Size 1 Galapagos Calc. 4695.70 Square Feet 1716.75 Frames 547.10 ft3 Stories 1 Bedrooms 2

Roof Height Factor Roof Condition Floor height Dormers Main Roof Peak Dormer Peak Main Roof Overhang Dormer Overhang

10 1 14’ 0 0 X 1.5’ X

# Of Windows 19 # Of Doors 10 Garage Size X Galapagos Calc. 3027.98 Square Feet 1475.0 Frames 562.56 ft3 Stories 2 Bedrooms 3

Roof Height Factor Roof Condition Floor height Dormers Main Roof Peak Dormer Peak Main Roof Overhang Dormer Overhang

8 0 12’ 0 .25 X 3’ X

# Of Windows 19 # Of Doors 10 Garage Size X Galapagos Calc. 4017.95 Square Feet 1475.0 Frames 574.69 ft3 Stories 2 Bedrooms 3

Roof Height Factor Roof Condition Floor height Dormers Main Roof Peak Dormer Peak Main Roof Overhang Dormer Overhang

6 1 10’ 0 .5 X 4.5’ X

# Of Windows 15 # Of Doors 12 Garage Size X Galapagos Calc. 3116.74 Square Feet 1475.0 Frames 569.19 ft3 Stories 2 Bedrooms 3

Rendering of Grasshopper houses under construction

Ice Garden MIN|DAY

Spring 2010 IN COLLABORATION WITH: Jeff Day, E.B. Min and Jeff Davis

Commissioned by the Omaha World Herald, Omaha’s daily newspaper, the Ice Garden is a design proposal for a temporary public space made from ice located on Gene Leahy Mall in downtown Omaha. The series of two open courtyards and eight closed “domes” are conceived as social gathering spaces and the site for a pop-up restaurant featuring winter foods prepared by local chefs and served outdoors. The project combines the tradition of ice harvesting with contemporary digital fabrication techniques. PUBLICATION: “Ice Designers Have a Ball” by John Pitcher, Omaha World Herald (March 2010) http://www.omaha.com/article/20100301/LIVING/703019959

CalmDome diagram; Courtyard diagram; and Circle-packing plan generator

Oriented Views 0

CalmDome sight lines diagram; Ice Garden plan; and Ice Garden construction rendering

Ice Garden graphic section drawing

Ice Garden courtyard and interior renderings

Salina Art Center FACT

Spring-Fall 2011

IN COLLABORATION WITH:

FACT Team Spring 2011, Holden Rasmussen, Fact Team Fall 2011

The redevelopment and renovation of the Salina Art Center is an ongoing collaboration with FACT (Fabrication and Construction Team) and Min|Day Architects. FACT is a design lab at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln and an adjunct practice of Min | Day. FACT engages design-intensive projects with creative, non-profit clients in collaborations spanning design and construction. During the spring and summer of 2011, the FACT team developed a master plan to renovate the Salina Art Center and participated in the schematic design phase for the bench wall, “pentables” and cabinet wall. The following semester started with work on the initial design development phases and progressed through to the initial construction and installation. Specific contributions to the project included documentation of initial conditions; precise drawings; development of a master plan for the main art building; schematic design of interior elements; bench wall; cabinet wall; front desk; and basic design development of “pentables,” including a computational script used to derive the final design.

Salina Art Center desk options diagram; internal partition and cabinet configurations; and full renovation diagram

Existing elevations and existing floor plans with proposed renovations in red

“Pentables” diagram and renderings and 1’=1/2” scale model of the west elevation

1’=1/2” scale model of the east elevation

Bench and cabinet walls with â&#x20AC;&#x153;pentablesâ&#x20AC;?

Current renovation progress of the Salina Art Center

Antelope Valley Mixed-Use Building Studio Project

Spring 2009 IN COLLABORATION WITH: Justin Brouillette and Darin Russell

This group project called for the design of a mixed-use residential building and day-care facility hypothetically located in a newly rezoned area of downtown Lincoln, Nebraska. The hypothetical building shows a stark contrast between each programmatical use because the buildingâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s form physically separates the residential tower from the day care. While the tower reflects a modern image of steel and glass, the day care integrates organic materials like wood and reflects the landscape in two ways: by its integration into the landscape and by pulling the terrain onto the roof of the building This creates a ground-level exit from both the first and second floors and a sense of playfulness not found in the residential section.

Top row: West and north elevations. Bottom row: Section drawing and model

Top row: East and south elevations. Bottom row: Model and section drawing

First and second floor plan

Antelope Valley Mixed-Use typical residential floor plan and model

Camp Cornhusker Studio Project

Spring 2009

IN COLLABORATION WITH:

Justin Brouillette and Darin Russell

Camp Cornhusker, a Boy Scout camp in southeast Nebraska, was the site for a projected design that converges landscape and architecture. Although a part of a larger group project, the building shown was largely an independent effort â&#x20AC;&#x201C; a Game and Parks Office for research and Boy Scout education. It was positioned on the site near a run of trees along a small creek, hidden within the folds of the landscape to minimize the visual pollution of its natural and relatively clean surroundings. The design features an undulating roof that reflects the rolling hills of the area. The topography was manipulated to create an outdoor amphitheater and to allow vehicular access, while masking the road. The project also features an eidetic image that is an abstract interpretation of the landscape. The final building models show the Game and Parks Office buildingâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s integration into the landscape.

Camp Cornhusker site plan and cut-and-fill diagram

Camp Cornhusker site models

Game and Parks Office first and second floor plans and site model

Game and Parks Office elevations and model

Haymarket Hotel Studio Project

Fall 2009 IN COLLABORATION WITH: Megan Hammond

The studio project brief was developed to mirror a local firm’s commission for the design of a hotel in the Haymarket District of Lincoln, Nebraska. The hotel was being built as a part of a larger urban plan that includes a sports arena and art museum extension. Developed as a group, the final design solution was a 150-room hotel that used varying layers of exposure, balconies and a pedestrian bridge to let patrons experience the city. The structural system of the hotel cantilevers a third of the distance of the base, emphasized by the ascending spiral the room layout makes on the upper floors. It starts off by mimicking the material and scale of the surrounding buildings, and then ascending to fulfill the programmatically required space, ending with a prominent building feature that uses structure to express the building’s formal qualities and structural feats. The building’s materials also help to tie into the predominantly brick historic Haymarket District by using a ruddy brown panelized metal on the base of the building, which extends into the precast concrete tower to create unity.

First and third floor plans

Haymarket Hotel floor plans; rendering; and 1â&#x20AC;&#x2122;=1/4â&#x20AC;? scale section model

Skin and Bones SPACE[D] FRAME Digital Fabrication Project

Spring 2011 IN COLLABORATION WITH: Erik Leahy

Space[D] Frame was a project developed by integrating digital design and manufacturing techniques with rapid prototyping to produce a double-curved surface. The project utilizes the integration of two distinct digital fabrication techniques, sectioning and folding, one for the production of structure and the other for its cladding. A sectioning technique defines the structural grid lines, or ribs, and then extrapolates to define a truss system. An integrated series of joints and members through which the system could be hand-assembled and the integrated cladding further enhances this grid. With the cladding, by changing the inherent memory of a material, in this case by folding, the project was able to take a flat surface to define a three-dimensional condition and hold its shape. The cladding enhances the undulations of the surface by exploring the variability of a single-folded system parametrically applied to a double-curved surface. PUBLICATIONS: Hemsath, T. 2012. Teaching Digital Fabrication Techniques. InForm Journal, vol. 11: 38-51. Hemsath, T. 2012. Hybridizing Digital Fabrication Techniques. Proceedings of the 6th International Arab Society of Computer Aided Design in Architecture, Manama, Baharain. Feb. 21-23.

Diagram of double-curved surface with structure and cladding; laser file for structure production; and a photo of a laser cutting pieces for the model

Various steps of the assembly process

Various views of the model

Fish Hatchery Museum Studio Project

Fall 2007 INDEPENDENT PROJECT

The site for this museum originally was a fish hatchery, but was repurposed for use as a state park. The goal was to design a building to house artifacts and act as a visitors’ center for Schramm Park. A simple fishing knot inspired the design. The form binds together a horizontal line with the looping knot, creating three levels on the interior to fulfill various programming functions. The museum’s design creates scenic views along the main axis of the park. Maintaining the connection to the site’s past, the building overhangs an old pond formerly used to raise fish

Maniktala Residence phDesign

Summer 2011 IN COLLABORATION WITH: Mr. Maniktala and Timothy Hemsath

The client, Mr. Maniktala, contracted with Timothy Hemsath and phDesign in Omaha, Nebraska, to produce a permit drawing set based on his own sketches for his familyâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s dream home. As a subcontracted employee for phDesign, I refined the clientâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s sketches into working floor plans and then produced the necessary documents for the client to secure building permits through the city of Omaha. Timothy Hemsath advised and edited the drawing sets and provided additional code review as needed.

Ext. Street view

GENERAL NOTES

ABBREVIATIONS

1. WORK SHALL BE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL CODE REQUIREMENTS DURING THE ENTIRE DURATION OF THE PROJECT

A.B. A.C. A.C.P. ACC. ACOUST. ADJ. A.F.F. AHJ ALUM. ALT @ BD. BITUM. BLDG. BLK. BO BRG. BRK. BTW. B.S. CAB. C.M.U. C.T. COMB. CONC. CONC. BLK. CONST. CONT. CONTR. CLG. CLR CORR. CPT. C.J. COL. D.F. DIA. DBL. DTL. DIM. DISP. DR. DWG. EA. ELEC. ELEV. EL. EQ. EXST. E.J. EXT. F.D. F.E. F.F. F.F.L. FIN. FLR. FR. FTG. FT. GA GALV. G.C. GLZ GWB H.C. HDW. H.M. H.R. H.T. HORZ I.D. IN. INCL. INT. INSUL.

2. THESE DRAWINGS DO NOT CONTAIN INFORMATION WITH REGARD TO CONSTRUCTION SAFETY, THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION SAFETY 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL EXISTING WORK 4. PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE OF SURFACE WATER AWAY FROM BUILDINGS WITHOUT PONDING OF WATER ADJACENT TO BUILDINGS DURING THE ENTIRE DURATION OF THE PROJECT 5. ENSURE FINISH MATERIALS WILL BE FLUSH WITH ADJACENT SURFACES AND JOINTS, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISED

17120 Howard Plz

6. PROVIDE A CONTAINER FOR ON-SITE CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS 7.

DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS

8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY DIMENSIONS AND COORDINATE TRADES 9. SYMBOLS, ABBREVIATIONS AND NOTES MARKED AS SIM OR TYP (SIMILAR OR TYPICAL) SHALL APPLY IN SIMILAR CIRCUMSTANCES UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE 10. PROVIDE ADEQUATE BLOCKING AS REQUIRED FOR FIXTURES

SITE LOCATION DESCRIPTION THE SITE IS LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF HARNEY STREET AND NORTH OF SOUTH 174TH STREET IN OMAHA, 17120 HOWARD PLZ, OMAHA, NE 68118

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

TYPE VB - NON SPRINKLERED, R-3 OCCUPANCY CLASS

11. GRID LINES ARE AT THE CENTER OF COLUMNS, PIERS, FOOTINGS, ETC 12. ROOM DIMENSIONS ARE CENTER OF WALL TO CENTER OF WALL, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE 13. TRUSS AND JOIST MFG TO SIZED MEMBERS, FASTNERS, HANGERS AND SET SPACING FOR ALL TRUSSES AND JOISTS

1125 SQUARE FOOT, ONE STORY, TWO BEDROOM, ONE BATHROOM, SINGLEFAMILY HOUSE

14. WINDOW SUPPLIER TO VERIFY AT LEAST ONE WINDOW IN ALL BEDROOMS TO HAVE A CLEAR EGRESS OPENIN OF 5.7 SF WITH MIN. DIM. OF 24" HEIGHT AND 20" WIDTH, SILL HEIGHT SHALL NOT BE GREATER THAN 44" AFF

CODE COMPLIANCE

15. ALL HANDRAIL BALLUSTERS SHALL BE SPACED SUCH THAT A 4" SPHERE CANNOT PASS BETWEEN BALLUSTERS

THIS PROJECT SHALL BE DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED IN CONFORMANCE WITH ALL CURRENT APPLICABLE CODES AND LAWS OF THE AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION

16. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL LOCATIONS OF ELECTRICAL AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT AND METERS 17. PROVIDE FIREBLOCKING AND CAULKING AS REQUIRED BY CODE 18. GRADE CONDITIONS MAY VARY FROM DRAWINGS VERIFY ON SITE CONDITIONS BEFORE BEGINNING WORK 19. ALL JOINTS IN FRAMING (TOP AND BOTTOM PLATES, JOINTS BETWEEN MODULAR SECTIONS, ETC) SHALL BE SEALED TO PREVENT INFILTRATION OR EXFILTRATION 20. TOPOGRAPHY IS BASED ON GIS DATA AND SHOULD BE REVIEWED BY PROFESSIONAL CIVIL ENGINEER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION

ANCHOR BOLT AIR CONDITIONING ACCESS CEILING PANEL ACCESSIBLE ACOUSTICAL ADJUSTABLE, ADJACENT ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION ALUMINUM ALTERNATE AT BOARD BITUMINOUS BUILDING BLOCK, BLACK BOTTOM OF BEARING BRICK BETWEEN BOTH SIDES CABINET CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT CERAMIC TILE COMBUSTIBLE CONCRETE CONCRETE BLOCK CONSTRUCTION CONTINUOUS CONTRACTOR CEILING CLEAR CORRIDOR, CORRUGATED CARPET CONTROL JOINT COLUMN DRINKING FOUNTAIN DIAMETER DOUBLE DETAIL DIMENSION DISPENSER DOOR DRAWING EACH ELECTRICAL ELEVATOR, ELEVATION ELEVATION EQUAL EXISTING EXPANSION JOINT EXTERIOR FLOOR DRAIN FIRE EXTINGUISHER FINISHED FLOOR FINISHED FLOOR LEVEL FINISH FLOOR FRAME FOOTING FEET GAUGE GALVANIZED GENERAL CONTRACTOR GLASS, GLAZING GYPSUM BOARD HOLLOW CORE, HANDICAPPED HARDWARE HOLLOW METAL HAND RAIL HEIGHT HORIZONTAL INSIDE DIAMETER, IDENTIFICATION INCH INCLUDE INTERIOR INSULATION

ABBREVIATIONS 1" = 60'-0"

MATERIAL LEGEND JST. LAM. LAV. MAS. MATL MAX. MECH. MFR. MIN. MISC. M.O. MTL. NO. N.I.C. N.T.S. O.C. O.D. OPG. PAN. PFIN. PNT PART. PBD. P.LAM. P.V.C. PWD. POLY. PT. Q.T. RAD. R.D. REF. REINF. REQ. RES. REV. RF.H. R.M. R.O. SECT. SLR S.S.V. SST. ST & V. S.C. S.D. SHT.V. SHTG. SIM. SPEC. ST. STD. STL. STRUCT. SQ. T.& B. TEL. TEMP. THRES. TO TYP. U.N.O. VAR. V.B. V. VER. VERT. V.C.T. V.I.F. V.T. V.W.C. W.C. WD. W/ W/O WDW.

JOIST LAMINATED LAVATORY MASONRY MATERIAL MAXIMUM MECHANICAL MANUFACTURER MINIMUM MISCELLANEOUS MASONRY OPENING METAL NUMBER NOT IN CONTRACT NOT TO SCALE ON CENTER OUTSIDE DIAMETER OPENING PANELING PREFINISHED PAINT PARTITION PARTICLE BOARD PLASTIC LAMINATE POLY VINYL CHLORIDE PLYWOOD POLYETHYLENE POINT QUARRY TILE RADIUS ROOF DRAIN REFER (ENCE) REINFORCED REQUIRED RESISTANT REVERSE ROOF HATCH ROOM ROUGH OPENING SECTION SEALER SAND, SEAL& VARNISH STAINLESS STEEL STAIN AND VARNISH SOLID CORE SMOKE DETECTOR SHEET VINYL SHEATHING SIMILAR SPECIFICATION STAIN STANDARD STEEL STRUCTURAL SQUARE TOP AND BOTTOM TELEPHONE TEMPORARY, TEMPERATURE THRESHOLD TOP OF TYPICAL UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE VARIABLE VAPOR BARRIER VARNISH VERIFY VERTICAL VINYL COMP. TILE VERIFY IN FIELD VINYL TILE VINYL WALL COVERING WATER CLOSET WOOD WITH WITHOUT WINDOW

EARTH GRANULAR FILL SAND/STUCCO/PLASTER CONCRETE CONCRETE BLOCK BRICK STONE, MARBLE, GRANITE METAL (LARGE SCALE) METAL (SMALL SCALE) ALUMINUM DIMENSIONED LUMBER

DRAWING LIST A101 A102 A103 A104 A105 A106 A107 A108 A109 A110 A111

Cover Steet Site Plan Roof Framing Plan First Floor Plan Basement Plan Floor Framing Plan Elevations N S Elevations E W Stair Section Wall Section Schedules and Views

FINISHED WOOD STRUCTURAL FACING TILE PLYWOOD PARTICLE BOARD RIGID ROOF INSULATION RIGID INSULATION BLANKET INSULATION EXPANSION MATERIAL GLASS (LARGE SCALE) GYPSUM BOARD ACOUSTIC MATERIAL QUARRY/CERAMIC TILE

Maniktala

CARPETING

Residence Cover Steet

QUARRY/CERAMIC TILE

Project number Date Drawn by

MATERIAL LEGEND 3/32" = 1'-0"

Checked by

0002 6-9-2011 Willis, Bryce R Hemsath, Timothy L

A101 Scale

As indicated

6/9/2011 9:43:29 PM

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCT

LOCATION MAP

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCT

A107

R5 ZONING

166' - 5 5/8"

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCT

SETBACKS Front 25ft Side 15ft Interior 5/10ft Rear 25ft Allowable Building Coverage 45% MAX Allowable Height

A107

35ft

Allowable Impervious Coverage 55%

25' - 0"

CALCULATED COVERAGE Site Area 16,99.5106 Sq. Ft. BLD Footprint 3,352.6893 Sq. Ft. Impervious Surf 5227.0709 Sq. Ft. PERCENT BLD COVERAGE

8 '02

2" 3/3

19.73%

PERCENT IMPERVIOUS 30.75%

BUILDING FOOTPRINT

GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS

5' " -0

A108

5' -

25' 0"

10 ' 0"

-0 "

5' -

GUTTERS

/8"

3 19 /32"

" 5 5' -

A108

7.1 EXTERIOR SIDING A. HardiePlank速 Lap Siding for Horizontal Siding. 1. Finish by Owner. B. HardiePanel速 vertical siding is factory-primed fibercement vertical siding. 1. Finish by Owner. C. HardieSoffit速 vented soffit to match vertical siding. D. Installation 1. Install per manufacturers recommendations. Provide starter strip, corner trim and flashing as required. 2. Provide Reveal Horizontal Trim between vertical siding and horizontal siding. 3. Fasteners must be corrosion resistant, galvanized, or stainless steel. Electro-galvanized are acceptable but may exhibit premature corrosion. James Hardie recommends the use of quality, hot-dipped galvanized nails. James Hardie is not responsible for the corrosion resistance of fasteners. Stainless steel fasteners are recommended when installing James Hardie即 products near the ocean, large bodies of water, or in very humid climates.

6' -

19 '-

1 5' -

2 A107

10 13 /16 "

HOW ARD PLZ

3 A108

2 23 /32"

8' - 0

11 1 5/16

13' -

2 2' -

8' -

11 5

13' -

2.11 CONCRETE MIXTURES FOR BUILDING ELEMENTS A. Footings: Proportion normal-weight concrete mixture as follows: 1. Minimum Compressive Strength: 4000 psi (27.6 MPa) at 28 days. 2. Maximum Water-Cementitious Materials Ratio: 0.42. 3. Slump Limit: 3 inches (100 mm), plus or minus 1 inch (25 mm). 4. Air Content: 6 percent, plus or minus 1.0 percent at point of delivery for 1-inch (25-mm) nominal maximum aggregate size. B. Slabs-on-Grade: Proportion normal-weight concrete mixture as follows: 1. Minimum Compressive Strength: 4000 psi (27.6 MPa) at 28 days. 2. Minimum Cementitious Materials Content: 611 lb/cu. yd. (363 kg/cu. m). 3. Slump Limit: 3 inches (100 mm), plus or minus 1 inch (25 mm). 4. Air Content: Do not allow air content of polished concrete slabs.

Maniktala

Residence Site Plan 0002 6-9-2011 Author Checker

Project number Date Drawn by Checked by

A102 Scale

1" = 10'-0"

6/9/2011 9:43:37 PM

NORTH ARROW Site 1 1" = 10'-0"

6' -

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCT

SEC 55-201 Omaha Municipal Code

2x8 Rafters 18" x 42" Deep 'Column Footing Below

1' - 6"

Beam

1' 10

1/2"

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCT

8x8 Wood Post Column

2x6 Wall

Roo f Tru

sses

2' 4

1/8"

(3)2x12 Header

Roof Framing Plan 1/4" = 1'-0" GENERAL NOTE

1/2"

2x6

2' 1

1. ENGINEERED TRUSS FRAMING SIZE, SPACING AND BRAND AND SPECIES PROVIDED AT TIME OF FRAMING INSPECTION 1' 6"

2' -

3 7/3 2"

Maniktala Residence Roof Framing Plan 0002 6-9-2011 Author Checker

Project number Date Drawn by Checked by

A103

3 A108

Scale

1/4" = 1'-0"

6/9/2011 9:43:43 PM

@1 8" O .C.

1' - 6"

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCT

(2)2x12 Wood Beam

8' - 1 3/4"

10' - 11 1/4"

11' - 0"

7' - 11"

13' - 8 11/32" 18' -

1 A110

3' - 6"

10' -

Closet Closet 13

5' 4"

1 3/4 "

11' -

18.00째

5' - 6"

4' - 0"

5' - 6"

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCT

5' - 5 1/4"

10 1 /4"

Bedroom

Main Bath 4

Room

8' -

Bedroom

Bathroom

S.D.

DN 2

A109

Butler Pantry

8' - 0"

Study

Entry Closet

11' 4"

Powder

Vestibule DOWNSPOUTS

3 A109

Stair

Main Bedroom

24' -

Kitchen

Dining Room

Hall

S.D.

14' - 0"

Living Room

S.D.

Two Car Garage

14 8

18' - 6"

STEP

22' 0"

11 11 16' -

First Floor Plan 1 1/4" = 1'-0"

Garage 12' -

13 1 3/4 "

12' 0"

CONCRETE DRIVE

23' -

GENERAL NOTES

CON TRO L

JOIN TS

Maniktala

Residence First Floor Plan

1. ROOM DIMENSIONS ARE FROM CENTER LINE OF PARTITION TO CENTERLINE, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE 21' -

2. PROVIDE BLOCKING FOR ALL CABINETS AND FIXTURES AS NEEDED

0002 6-9-2011 BW TLH

Project number Date Drawn by

3. PROVIDE MOISTURE RESISTANT GYPSUM BOARD ON WALLS AND CEILING IN BATHROOM

Checked by

4. SMOKE DETECTORS IN ALL SLEEPING ROOMS AND EACH LEVEL OF HOME

A104

3 A108

Scale

1/4" = 1'-0"

6/9/2011 9:43:51 PM

14' - 0"

Main Closet

2' - 6"

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCT

12' - 6"

7' - 6"

12' - 0"

1' -

18' -

Closet 25 30

11 3 /4" 18' 1' -

12' - 3 5/16"

Bedroom

13' - 10 1/4"

Closet

7' - 0"

28' -

5' - 3 5/16"

Bathroom 24 1' - 5 3/16"

S.D.

2" 8' -

4 1/4 "

6 15 /32"

24' -

Bar/Theater

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCT

1' -

8 1/4 "

S.D.

15' -

3/16 "

Family Room

2' -

16' 0

8' - 3 1/2"

22' 0"

A109

24' -

MECH 6' - 0"

5' 11

7 3/8 "

18' - 0 1/8"

Basement 1/4" = 1'-0"

18' -

22' 0" 0"

13/1 6"

6 23 /32" 0' -

6' 7

15' -

4' 0

6' 8"

3/16 "

19' - 2"

10" 11' -

10"

23' 23' -

12' 0"

18' - 6"

30' -

3/16 "

1' 4"

8' - 0"

13/1 6"

1' 4"

22' 0"

4' 0

21' -

Maniktala Residence Basement Plan 0002 6-9-2011 Author Checker

Project number Date Drawn by Checked by

A105

3 A108 Scale

1/4" = 1'-0"

6/9/2011 9:43:58 PM

14' - 1 3/4"

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCT

2' - 10"

INSULATE CAVITY

2' - 10" CANTILEVER

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCT

TRU SS

GIR DER

18" DEEP TRUSS 24" O.C.

18"

2x6 BEARING WALL 18"

ENG INE ERE D TR USS 24" O.C .

2 A109

2x6 BEARING WALL STAIR OPENING TRUSS GIRDER

Floor Framing Plan 1/4" = 1'-0"

GENERAL NOTE 1. ENGINEERED TRUSS FRAMING SIZE, SPACING AND BRAND AND SPECIES PROVIDED AT TIME OF FRAMING INSPECTION

Maniktala Residence Floor Framing Plan 0002 6-9-2011 Author Checker

Project number Date Drawn by Checked by

A106 Scale

1/4" = 1'-0"

6/9/2011 9:44:03 PM

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCT

LATERAL BLOCKING

2 A110

8" / 1'-0"

" '-0 /1

Exterior finish, roofing

/ 8"

0" 1'-

8" /

Max Height 18' - 8 23/32" 1'0"

Level 2 10' - 0"

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCT

First Floor Plan 0' - 0"

Exterior finish, roofing Colomn Wood

Bracket

Exterior Stone 2

Exterior Siding

Exterior finish, roofing

Exterior Stone 1

Bracket

Basement -10' - 6"

Exterior finish, roofing

South 1/8" = 1'-0"

Exterior finish

Exterior finish, roofing

8" / 1'-0"

Max Height 18' - 8 23/32"

0" 1'-

Level 2 10' - 0" Exterior Siding

First Floor Plan 0' - 0" Exterior Stone 2

Colomn Wood Exterior Siding

Basement -10' - 6"

Exterior finish Bracket

North West 1/8" = 1'-0"

8" / 1'-0"

Exterior finish, roofing

8" /

/ 8"

0" 1'-

1'-0 "

Max Height 18' - 8 23/32" 1'-0 "

" '-0

Level 2 10' - 0"

Exterior Siding

First Floor Plan 0' - 0"

Maniktala

Exterior Siding Exterior Stone 2

Residence Elevations N S

Colomn Wood

Basement -10' - 6" Bracket Exterior finish

0002 6-9-2011 Author Checker

Project number Date

North 1/8" = 1'-0"

Drawn by Checked by

A107 Scale

1/8" = 1'-0"

6/9/2011 9:44:20 PM

8" /

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCT

Exterior Siding

'-0"

Exterior finish

Max Height 18' - 8 23/32" 1'-

'-0"

8" /

0" 1'-

8" / 1

1 8" /

8" / 1'-0"

Exterior finish, roofing

Level 2 10' - 0"

Exterior Stone 1

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCT

Colomn Wood

Exterior Stone 2

First Floor Plan 0' - 0"

Exterior finish, roofing Bracket

Basement -10' - 6"

0" 1'-

8" /

1'0"

8" /

'-0"

/ 8"

Exterior finish, roofing

East 1/8" = 1'-0"

8" / 1'0"

8" /

1'0"

Max Height 18' - 8 23/32" 1'0"

8" / 1'-0"

1 8" /

Level 2 10' - 0" Exterior Siding

Exterior finish, roofing Bracket

Exterior Stone 2

Colomn Wood

Bracket Exterior finish, roofing

First Floor Plan 0' - 0"

Exterior Stone 1

STEP FOUNDATION W/ GRADE

Basement -10' - 6"

Exterior Stone 1

South East 1/8" = 1'-0"

Exterior finish, roofing

8" /

8" / 1'-0"

1'-0 "

Max Height 18' - 8 23/32" 8" /

Level 2 10' - 0"

Exterior finish

Exterior Siding

First Floor Plan 0' - 0"

Exterior Siding

Exterior Stone 1

Bracket

Basement -10' - 6"

Maniktala

Exterior finish, roofing

Residence Elevations E W

West 1/8" = 1'-0"

0002 6-9-2011 Author Checker

Project number Date Drawn by Checked by

A108 Scale

1/8" = 1'-0"

6/9/2011 9:44:31 PM

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCT

Exterior Siding

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCT

Stair 10' - 0"

9 0' - 4"

10' - 6"

0' - 10"

10' - 6" (=21 RISERS @ 6"

0' - 6"

First Floor Plan 0' - 0"

6' - 8"

Basement -10' - 6" 16' - 8" (=20 TREADS @ 10")

Stair Section 1/2" = 1'-0"

Maniktala

2 A109

Residence Stair Section 16' - 8" (=20 TREADS @ 10")

0002 6-9-2011 Author Checker

Project number Date Drawn by

Callout of Level 1 1/2" = 1'-0"

Checked by

A109 Scale

1/2" = 1'-0"

6/9/2011 9:44:37 PM

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCT

Level 2 10' - 0"

Window Sill

Max Height

4" Wood Trim Sheathing

18' - 8 23/32"

Lath Mortar Scratch Coat 2x6 Sill Plate 1 layer (House Wrap) 2" Spray Foam 3 1/2" R11 Batt Unfaced

Vapor Barrier (6 mil Poly) Attic Wrap Radiant Barrier 20" Blown Batt insulation Shingles

PT Sill Plate

Finish Floor

Anchor Bolt 24â&#x20AC;? OC

Vented Soffit

1/2" Gypsum Board Ceiling

0' - 5 1/2"

Drip Edge Wood Fascia Gutter

Slope Grade 2% Min.

2" Spray Foam Insulation

Ventilation Shute BTW each Truss Blocking

Truss

Exposed CIP Conc. PTD.

SubFloor

Exterior Sheating

First Floor Plan 0' - 0"

Foundation Weep Screed Extended Adhered Concrete Masonry Veneer Min 1" Below Top of Foundation 8" Min. at Grade

Silicon Sealant

Roofing Felt

Rim Joist Lap WRB Over Woop Screed Flange

Baseboard

Ice and water dam membrane, 30" past exterior wall

Adhered Concrete Masonary Veneer Mortar Joint (Where Used) Floor Framing

1/2" GWB

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCT

Grade Insulation protection

Level 2 10' - 0"

Waterproofing layer Rigid plastic foam insulation for heated basement

Trim

2x12 top plate Concrete Basement wall

Prefabricated drainage mat

1' - 8 7/8"

Isolated Joint

Window Frame

Reinforced Concrete slab

Glass

Waterproofing Layer

Filter fabric Crushed Stone Perforated pipe connect to storm sewer

Vapor Barrier 4-6" Loose Fill

Basement -10' - 6" 2

Wall Section 2 1" = 1'-0"

Maniktala

Wall Section 1 1" = 1'-0"

Residence Wall Section

BASEMENT WALL DESIGN STEEL SPECIFICATIONS USE 8" THICK WALL WITH: #6 @ 17" c/c (VERTICAL) #6 @ 24" c/c (HORIZONTAL)

0002 6-9-2011 Author Checker

Project number Date Drawn by Checked by

A110 Scale

1" = 1'-0"

6/9/2011 9:44:41 PM

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCT

Mortar Setting Bed

Ext. SW Corner

Casework Schedule Width Height

Count

Depth

12"

1' - 0"

2' - 10 1/2"

2' - 0"

12" Depth

0' - 0"

4' - 0"

1' - 0"

24"

2' - 0"

2' - 10 1/2"

2' - 0"

24"

2' - 0"

2' - 6"

1' - 0"

24" 24" Depth

2 1

2' - 0"

2' - 5 1/2" 3' - 0"

2' - 0" 2' - 1"

24" Depth

3' - 0"

2' - 1"

24" Depth

3' - 0"

2' - 1"

24" Depth 24" Depth

5 2

2' - 7" 3' - 0"

2' - 1" 2' - 1"

30"

2' - 6"

2' - 10 1/2"

2' - 0"

30"

2' - 6"

2' - 10 1/2"

2' - 0"

36"

3' - 0"

2' - 10 1/2"

3' - 0"

36"

3' - 0"

2' - 6"

1' - 0"

48"

4' - 0"

48" Depth

2' - 5 1/2"

2' - 0"

3' - 0"

3' - 4 7/32"

Level

Name

First Floor Plan First Floor Plan First Floor Plan First Floor Plan

Bathroom

Type

Count

Window Schedule Width Height

Designer_S 10 eries-Clad_ Wood-Doub le-Hung_Co ttage_Vent_ Unit

4' - 0"

Designer_S 3 eries-Clad_ Wood-Doub le-Hung_Co ttage_Vent_ Unit 2_with trim 2

4' - 0"

Designer_S 12 eries-Clad_ Wood-Doub le-Hung_Ve nt_Unit

2' - 9"

Level

5' - 5"

First Floor Plan

3' - 6 1/4"

First Floor Plan

5' - 5"

Description

Type Mark

Double-Hun g - Cottage Units

Double-Hun g - Vent Units

Type

Count

Door Schedule Width

Height

First Floor Plan First Floor Plan First Floor Plan First Floor Plan First Floor Plan First Floor Plan First Floor Plan First Floor Plan First Floor Plan First Floor Plan

Thickness

8' x 7'

8' - 0"

7' - 0"

18" x 84"

1' - 6"

7' - 0"

0' - 2"

5 3 1 34 11

30" x 80" 32" x 84" 36" x 84" 48" x 84" 68" x 84"

6 7 6 1 3

2' - 6" 2' - 8" 3' - 0" 4' - 0" 5' - 8"

6' - 8" 7' - 0" 7' - 0" 7' - 0" 7' - 0"

0' - 2" 0' - 2" 0' - 2" 0' - 1 1/2" 0' - 2"

108" x 84"

9' - 0"

7' - 0"

0' - 2"

Level

First Floor Plan Bedroom 143 SF First Floor Plan Bedroom 153 SF First Floor Plan Butler 174 SF First Floor Pantry Plan Closet 21 SF First Floor Plan Closet 21 SF First Floor Plan Dining 157 SF First Floor Room Plan Entry Closet 11 SF First Floor Plan Hall 77 SF First Floor Plan Kitchen 181 SF First Floor Plan Living 388 SF First Floor Room Plan Main Bath 214 SF First Floor Plan Main 240 SF First Floor Bedroom Plan Main Closet Redundant First Floor Room Plan Powder 39 SF First Floor Plan Room 19 SF First Floor Plan Stair 70 SF First Floor Plan Study 126 SF First Floor Plan Vestibule 31 SF First Floor Plan 2132 SF

Grand total: 29

Type Mark

Room Schedule Area 68 SF

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCT

Room Schedule basement Name Area Level

Level First Floor Plan First Floor Plan

Bar/Theater Bathroom Bedroom Bedroom Closet Closet Family Room MECH

Basement First Floor Plan First Floor Plan

967 SF 58 SF 158 SF 159 SF 16 SF 25 SF 325 SF

Basement Basement Basement Basement Basement Basement Basement

358 SF 2066 SF

Basement

Grand total: 25

WINDOWS

DOORS

2' - 6"

1' - 6"

Maniktala

4' - 0"

Residence Schedules and Views 0002 6-9-2011 Author Checker

Project number Date Drawn by

Window & Door 1/4" = 1'-0"

Checked by

A111 Scale

1/4" = 1'-0"

6/9/2011 9:44:53 PM

2' - 8"

7' - 0"

3' - 0"

7' - 0"

9' - 0"

6' - 8"

5' - 8"

7' - 0"

8' - 0"

7' - 0"

2' - 9"

INTERIOR 11

7' - 0"

4' - 0"

5' - 5"

4' - 0"

1' - 6 1/4"

2' - 0"

INTERIOR FINISHED FLOOR

4' - 0"

5' - 5"

EXTERIOR

2' - 0"

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCT

Type