







It has been said by a political commentator that facts don’t care about your feelings. While this may well be true, can feelings–or sentiments–count as much as facts for firms trying to decide what they should do as the demand for their products changes? Sentiments and real business cycles, a recent paper, seeks to answer this question by exploring whether individual firms react to sentiments as much as they do to facts despite being, as per economic theory, purely rational actors.
Many standard real business cycle (RBC) models predict that overall economic outcomes are entirely driven by changes in fundamental conditions. Thus, as firms encounter technological shocks such as the introduction of ChatGPT, they will – on aggregate –make accurate estimates about market demand and adjust their production accordingly, a situation dubbed traditional equilibrium. But what happens when firms only have incomplete information on demand (a state of affairs that seems intuitively more realistic)? Unable to differentiate the exact proportion of demand that is driven by fundamentals, the research suggests that
optimistic managers will interpret favorable sentiments as equivalent – at least partly – to strong demand for their firm’s products. Excited about these developments, firms will increase production and investments. As total supply rises due to new capacity being added across the industry, selling prices eventually decline just as real wages surge, leading to even higher household consumption while bringing more idle individuals back to work. In such a sentiment-driven equilibrium model, waves of either pure optimism or unadulterated pessimism can thus trigger large fluctuations in the business cycles. So can sentiments drive business cycles or are business cycles purely rational?
It turns out that sentiments do matter! Using data from the US economy to study real business cycles across various scenarios, it appears that the volatility of output under the fundamental equilibrium is as much as 31% lower than that occurring under the sentiment-driven equilibrium. This is explained in part by the lack of information that producers of intermediate goods have about both the demand for their own products and the demand for final goods. Lacking a direct connection
with consumers, they react mostly to the information embedded in the orders they receive from the producers of final goods. Prone to confuse market exuberance and/ or gloom with fundamental changes in demand, they are thus vulnerable to adjusting production or making investments based on the market’s mood swings. The notion that such sentiment shocks can play an important role in amplifying fluctuations in real business cycles is further supported by the fact that labor market volatility under the sentiment-driven equilibrium is empirically more reasonable than that predicted by the
fundamental equilibrium: more workers get hired quickly in the early stage of an optimistic boom, although the momentum dies quickly once the pendulum swings in the opposite direction. Reality always bites at the end!
The Centre for Sustainable Development Studies (CSDS) of the HKBU School of Business organised an international workshop themed “China and the World: Growth, ESG outcomes and Impact Investment” on 21 February 2023. The one-day event gathered distinguished academics, researchers from influential think tanks and experienced practitioners in impact investment to share ideas and experiences on China’s ESG efforts, outcomes and impacts after decades of high growth.
Prof. Ed Snape, Dean of the HKBU School of Business, welcomed the guests to the HKBU campus, highlighting how this important topic resonates with the School’s long-standing commitment to inspire and promote corporate sustainability. ‘As part of the School’s endeavour to nurture ethical business leaders with global vision, the CSDS was founded to conduct research and organise knowledge transfer activities related to the achievement of the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). This workshop provides a platform for stakeholders to examine the evolving ESG practices of Chinese companies and to consider next steps.’
Sharing insights on China’s ESG practice and outcomes, speakers assessed the latest developments and discussed recent findings on the performance of China’s ESG investment, the nexus between common prosperity and China's current economic slowdown and the implications of the rapid expansion of China’s renewable energy industry. To channel more funding for sustainable development, the importance of adopting a common policy framework for sustainable finance across countries was highlighted. Speakers also discussed the ESG impacts of Chinese companies in overseas investments in the context of the government’s “going out” strategy. A number of case studies helped analyse how the growing concern for ESG impact created opportunities and challenges for China’s outward investments and overseas infrastructure projects.
The panel discussion on “China’s ESG practice and impact investment from the perspectives of practitioners” featured panelists working on projects aimed at generating social and environmental impact with positive financial returns. Speakers from global and Chinese impact investing networks assessed the development and prospects of impact investment in China as well as around the world. Experts on microcredit and financial inclusion shared their changing practices in response to the rapidly evolving social and economic environment in China.
Established in July 2022, the CSDS focuses on how institutions, policies and practices affect the achievement of the selected SDGs in the global and local context. The Centre is currently working on projects in two major areas: poverty, inequality and mobility (addressing SDG 1 “No Poverty” and SDG 10 “Reduced Inequalities”) and climate policy, clean energy and environmental protection (addressing SDG 7 “Affordable and Clean Energy” and SDG 13 “Climate Action”).
research
Centre’s website
Visit the for more details on its and future activities. (From left) Ms. Maud Savary-Mornet, Senior Advisor, The Global Impact Investing Network Hong Kong Office; Dr. Duoguang Bei, President, Chinese Academy of Financial Inclusion; Dr. Enjiang Cheng, Program Officer, Ford Foundation, Beijing; Dr. Zhong Wu, Director General, The Finance Centre for South-South Cooperation; Ms. Yigu Lin, Vice President, China Impact Investing Network; Mr. Dongwen Liu, Chief Executive Officer, Chongho Bridge (From left) Prof. Xiuli Xu, Dean, College of International Development and Global Agriculture, China Agricultural University; Dr. Shui Ki Wan, Associate Dean, HKBU School of Business; Dr. Jun Ma, President, Hong Kong Green Finance Association; Prof. Kevin Chen, International Dean, China Academy for Rural Development, Zhejiang University; Dr. Fusheng Li, Deputy Director General, The New Century Academy of Transnational CorporationsDepartment of Accountancy, Economics and Finance
Employee Output Response to Stock Market Wealth Shocks
Journal of Financial Economics
http://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jfineco.2021.11.005
Department of Management, Marketing & Information Systems
Informal institutions and absorptive capacity: A cross-country metaanalytic study
Journal of International Business Studies
http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41267020-00361-7
Department of Management, Marketing & Information Systems
Fast or Slow: How Temporal Work Design Shapes Experienced Passage of Time and Job Performance
Academy of Management
Journal
http://doi.org/10.5465/ amj.2019.1110
Prof. Christy M. K. CHEUNG
Department of Management, Marketing and Information Systems
How Technostressors Influence Job and Family Satisfaction: Exploring the Role of Work–Family Conflict
Information Systems Journal
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ doi/10.1111/isj.12431
Prof. Cheung has been recently appointed as
• Associate Editor Information System Research
• Senior Editor
Prof. Liqun WEI
Department of Management, Marketing & Information Systems
Informal Institutions, Entrepreneurs' Political Participation, and Venture Internationalization
Journal of International Business Studies
https://doi.org/10.1057/ s41267-021-00402-9
Workplace ostracism: Its nature, antecedents, and consequences
http://doi.org/10.1111/ peps.12531
Date Speaker Topic Economics
3 March 2023
9:00-10:30
Zoom
Joint with NTU, NYU-Shanghai, Sinica, and SMU
17 March 2023
16:00-17:30
Zoom
Joint with NTU, NYU-Shanghai, Sinica, and SMU
22 March 2023
9:00-10:30
Zoom
Joint with CEIBS, NTU, and NUS
18 April 2023
16:00-17:30
Zoom
Joint with Kyoto, NTU, Osaka, and Sinica
7 March 2023
9:00-10:30
Zoom
Dr. Scott DAVIS
Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas
Prof. Ricardo REIS
London School of Economics and Political Science
Prof. Lynette ONG University of Toronto
Prof. Francesco GIOVANNONI University of Bristol
A Theory of the Global Financial Cycle
Jumpstarting an International Currency
Outsourcing Repression
Pricing Novel Goods
Centre for Business Analytics and the Digital Economy
Joint with Kyoto, NTU, Osaka, and Sinica
8 March 2023
9:00-10:30
Zoom
Joint with CEIBS, NTU, and NUS
22 March 2023
9:00-10:30
Zoom
Joint with CEIBS, NTU, and NUS
Prof. Alexander WOLITZKY
Massachusett Institute of Technology
Monitoring versus Discounting in Repeated Games
Prof. Kenneth SHOTTS
Stanford University
Prof. Lynette ONG
University of Toronto
Veto Players and Policy Development
Outsourcing Repression
The Research Espresso, a bimonthly e-publication covering everything you need to know about the latest research developments at the HKBU School of Business, focuses on four key areas: Research Insights (the main research topic of the month), Research Excellence (recognition of faculty members’ research achievements), News (research-related updates), and Seminars (sharing research skills and knowledge).
The idea is to provide business practitioners with the most recent research findings from the School‘s faculty. We want to build links between research and practice and to ensure that the School's research has business and societal impact.
Enjoy reading, and your feedback and input is always welcome!