G lo b al St r ateg i c H u m an Re s o u r ce Manage m ent
269
Mexico, Poland, and the United States are about 46.7 percent, 56.5 percent, and 69.9 percent respectively.2 The nature of work engaged in also varies considerably in countries throughout the world. For instance, only 1.3 percent and 1.5 percent of the civilian workforces in the United Kingdom and the United States, respectively, work in the agriculture, forestry, and fishing sector of the economy, while 14.1 percent of the labor force is employed in this sector in Mexico and 15.8 percent of the population in this sector in Poland. International trade rules and treaties, such as NAFTA, that have an impact on agricultural trade barriers and subsidies, can strongly influence the growth or decline of employment in this sector. In fact, the percent of Mexican workers employed in the agricultural sector has declined fairly considerably since the ratification of NAFTA. Statistics also reflect how immigration rules and the ability of foreign born individuals to work in a given country vary widely throughout the world. For example, in Australia 25.7 percent of the labor force is foreign-born, but in Japan this figure is less than 1 percent. Selfemployment and entrepreneurship also varies widely; 36.3 percent of workers in Greece are self-employed versus only 8.5 percent in Norway. Norms also differ widely regarding the prevalence of part-time versus full-time employment. In the Netherlands, 36.1 percent of the workforce works on a part-time basis as opposed to only 3.5 percent in the Czech Republic. Finally, although the global economic recession that began in 2008 increased unemployment rates throughout the world, some countries have faced persistently higher rates of unemployment than others. For example, unemployment rates in Eastern European countries like Poland and the Slovak Republic have consistently been in the 15 percent range, with unemployment rates for young workers in those countries (age 24 and under) in the 20 percent range. These unemployment rates have been more than twice those in European countries like Denmark and the Netherlands.3 What does all of the above mean in terms of global strategic human resource management planning? Perhaps a lot. A business in need of a very plentiful available labor supply of young workers, for example, might find Poland a great place to open an operation. If it is looking for a location where workers are interested in part-time employment, though, the Netherlands (with a 36.1 percent part-time employment rate) might be a far better place than Poland (10.1 percent part-time employment rate) and certainly better than the Czech Republic (only a 3.5 percent part-time employment rate). Global human resource statistics give us a helpful clue into establishing and running operations in various countries, as well as into given national cultures.
11-1-2 Cultural Issues and Differences As we saw in our discussion above, considerable cultural differences exist among countries, differences that have a profound impact on the practices of international human resources management. For example, in certain Asian and other countries the general expectation is that women will not be full-time participants in the workforce, while in certain Scandinavian countries, the exact opposite is true. In some countries, certain jobs are highly respected and remunerated while in other countries this is not the case; for example, medical doctors hold very high status in the United States, but a much more moderate status in Russia. In some countries, a large premium is put on long-term employment relationships, while in other countries much shorter-term relationships are expected. In a classic study of national culture, Dutch social scientist Geert Hofstede identified five major dimensions of national culture as they apply to work throughout the world.4
Copyright 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
