Against Animal Rights Essay by Buy Cheap Essays Online Glendale

AnimalRightsThesis

Thesis:(All)Althoughsomemaynotvalueanimalrights,attentionshouldbedirectedtowardsthis epidemicasanimals'healthandwell–beingaffectsus.

Itissaidthatpresentlawshavebegunarevolutionaryoutlookonthewayhumanstreatanimals; however,itismisplacedthatarevolutiontoconserveanimals'liveshastrulydonejustthat.Inthe presentagegroup,namedGenerationPeterPan,a'trend'ofendingthereckless'murdering'of animalshasbeenbirthedtobattleagainstcruelty–goingvegan.Thoughithashaltedthe overproductionofslaughter,ithasfailedintrulyprotecting,aswellassecuring,therightsof animalsintheirlife,liberty,andtheirpursuitofinevitablehappiness.InGenerationBabyBoomers, theirconcernsliedelsewhere,inwarfareandsurvival,causinglittletononepursualoflawful reactiontothedeathsofanimalsshowmorecontent

Theyrefusetoeateggs,milk,andallotherthingscomingfromanimals.Becauseoftheanimal productsbeingbrutallyforcedfromthebodiesandsystemsofanimals,therehasbeencontroversy tothepurposesofstoppingthisredmeatandothersortsofproductioninthisclassofages.

TheBabyBoomerGenerationandGenerationXwerebothagesthatfailedtoprovideanygreater solutionstotheanimalrightsepidemicBabyBoomershadmoreontheirmindthansimplyfighting fortheanimalsthatgavethemlife.Consumedbywar,greedwasanefficientwayofsurvival.In GenerationX,fashionstatementsweremadethroughtheuseoffauxesandotheritemsretrieved fromanimalsoverall.Laterinthe80's,anewerabeganwhereanimalsbegantohavemorerights thaneverenvisionedbythefuture

DoAnimalsHaveRights?

Animalshaverights,oratleasttheyshould.Animalsarenotforustoeat,experimentson,wearor abuseinanywhichway.Itiscrueltotreatanimalsliketheyarenotlivingsouls.Animalsarenot toolsthatwecanusehoweverwewantTheytoohaveheartsandbrainslikeushumansTherefore, animalshavealltherightstolivetheirownliveswithoutsufferingandfreefromexploitation (Why).

AnimaltestingisperformedforthemakingofhumanproductsEvenafterhearingaboutthe millionsofcasesinvolvinganimalabuse,mostanimalabusingcasesdon'tevengetreported (Animal).Overahundredmillionanimalsareburned,skinned,beat,poisonedorabusedintesting labsaroundtheUS.Dogsarethemostabusedandexperimentedonanimals.Thepitbullspeciesis ontherise.In2001pitbullsmadeupthirteenpercentofthedogabusecases.In2007pitbulls becametwentyfivepercentoftheendangereddogspeciesAnimalsthataretorturedforfurcome fromfurfarmswheretheyarekeptincrampedcagesandarekilledaroundsixmonthsold.People placetheanimalsinfreezingtemperaturessotheywouldgenerateathickercoatthatcanbeusedfor themakingoffurproducts.Eveniftheanimalsdiewhiletheprocess,theircoatscanstillbeused afterwards.Therefore,theyshownomercyonhowcoldthetemperatureisinwhichtheanimalsare placedinInchina,thenumberonefurproducer,animalsareskinnedalivefortheirfurcoats

...Getmorecontent...

ArgumentsAgainstAnimalRights

AnimalRightsManyquestiononwhetheranimalsshouldhavelegalrightsornot.Tosaythat animalsshouldhaverightsisbothethicalandunethical.Theanimalcivilrightsmovementstartedin 1975.Civildisobediencewasusedasatactictogainpublicattentionfortheircause.Itwasargued thatsincenon–humananimalscannotenterasocialcontract,theycannotpossessanylegalrights. Tosaythatpeopleopposetheideaofanimalsbeingasfree–willedashumansdoesnotmeanthat theyareadvocatesforanimalabuse;butitwasdeclaredimmoraltogiveanimalsirrelevantand uselessrightsthattheywouldnotunderstand.Thoseforanimalrightscertainlyagreethattheillegal traffickingofanimalsisagoodreasontofightforthemBythem,irefertorights,thesamerights weashumanshavetokeepusfrombeingtorturedandharmed.AccordingtothedatabasebyMolly McGinnis,"ThaiofficialsinJunediscoveredthebodiesof40frozentigercubsinsideafreezerata BuddhistmonasterywestofBangkok."Forhundredsofyearsanimalshavebeenkilledandtortured bypoachersandhunters,andthoughthegovernmentcannotimposehuntingrestrictionsin othershowmorecontent

Togiveanimalstheirrightswouldbesayingthatashumanbeings,wemaynotexperimenton animals,onecannotbreedandkillanimalsforfoodorclothesormedicine.Onecannotuseanimals forhardlabour,hunt,andcannotdisplaytheanimalatazooorusethemforanysourceof entertainment.Inthearticle"introductiontoanimalrights,"byJosephLubinski,itstates,"Tothe law,animalsareproperty:theyaregoodstobeboughtandsold,acquiredandmaintained"Human beingshavegrownaccustomedtoemotionallyattachingthemselvestoanimalsthatonceweresolely usedforthepurposeofhardlabour.Advocatesagainstanimalrightsdonotagreethatanimals shouldbetreatedwiththesameprivilegesahumanbeing

...Getmorecontent...

Weliveinaworldtodaywherepeopleadvocateforequalandfairtreatmentofallhumanbeings, regardlessofrace,culture,gender,oreconomicstatus.Itwouldbeunfairtotheothercounterparts onthisplanetthatarealsoliving,breathing,andfully–functioningifweweretonotconsideror includetheminthiskindofequalityaswell.Animalrightsaredefinedas"therightsofanimalsto livefreefromhumanexploitationandabuse,"accordingtotheEnglishOxfordDictionaryThereis aplethoraofanimalrightslawsthathavebeenpassedworldwide,andtheselawsaresupposedtobe strictlyenforcedtoensurethesafetyandwell–beingofallanimalseverywhere.However,there seemstobeamisunderstandingwhenitcomestoanimalshowmorecontent

ThefirstactivistwasBryanPease,alawyerandthefounderoftheAnimalProtectionandRescue League(APRL).Peasewasoneofthemostinfluentialpeopletocallattentiontotheissueofforce–feedingandfoiegrasproductioninCalifornia.Hewasoneofthefourindividualsthatwentto SenomaFoieGrasFarmandtookactualvideofootageofanimalabuse,whilealsomanagingto rescuefourbirdsonthevergeofdeathWhilesomemaybelievethatforce–feedingcanbedone humanely,thevideodepictedthousandsofbirdspackedinfilthycratesdefecatingoneachother, ratseatingthedefenselessbirdsalive,andmultipletrashcansfilledwithdeadbirds,whichis anythingbuthumane.ArnoldgoesontointerviewDr.ElliotKatz,thefounderofInDefenseof Animals,andaskedforhismedicalopiniononforce–feeding.Katzresponsecompared"force–feedingbirdstoahumanthatweighedaround150poundsandforcing30–40poundsofcornmash intotheirbodiesovera3–4–weekperiod.Thiswouldcauseahuman'slivertoexpand,degenerate, andstopfunctioningproperly,"(Munchies).Heexplainsfurtherthatbirdsbegintoexperience "diarrhea,seizures,lossofbalance,andvomiting,likeahumanthat

PersuasiveEssayAgainstAnimalRights

ArgumentAgainstAnimalRights

AnimalRights

Whenitcomestothetopicofanimaltestingmostofuswillreadilyagreethatitisadebatabletopic. Wherethisagreementusuallyends,however,isonthequestionofshouldmedicaltreatmentsbe developedthroughtheuseoftestingonanimalsWhereassomeareconvincedthattreatmentsare effectiveandsuccessfullydeveloped,othersmaintainthatanimalsaredifferentfromhumanbeings suchasourgenetictraits.Myownviewisanimaltestinghashelpedimprovehumanshealthand alsohasgivengreatadvancestoscienceManypeopleassumethatwhenitcomestotestinganimals, theybelievetheyarebeingneglected,abused,andfocusedmedicaldrugs.Accordingtothejournal NatureGenetics,"Toensurewearehavingthebestresultspossibleweneedtheanimalstobe healthyineverywayshowmorecontent

Iftheycanevencureahumanbeingjustbytestingonananimalwhenbothchromosomesandother varietyofgenesareverydifferent"Genomicknowledgehasmadeitsothatanimalresearchcanbe muchmorespecificallytargetedandaccuratewhenrepresentingahuman,thuscorrectlypredicting ahowahumanwillreact."(Cook).Whileitistruethatwemaynothavethesamegeneticsasan animal,itnecessarilytofollowthattheanimalsaregreatsubstitutesforushumans.Inconclusion, animaltestinghasimprovedinmanyadvancestoscience.Andalsohasbeenproventhatwecannot haveastressanimaltodoresearchonortheresultswontbereliable"Researchanimalsarecared forbyveterinarians,husbandryspecialists,andanimalhealthtechnicianstoensuretheirwell–being andmoreaccuratefindings."Evenscientistknowthatthebestresultsdocomefromawelland healthyanimalbypervadingallthenecessarycarethateachanimalnotonlyneedsbutisforthe lifespanandhealthofahuman

...Getmorecontent...

TheIssueOfAnimalRightsEssay

Animalshavetherighttoequalconsiderationinregardstotheirbeingusedforhumanneedsasmost peopleuseanimalsfortheirownneedsonadailybasisevenifonlyindirectlywhethertoentertain us,ortoattaintheproductweareusing,oronourdinnerplate.Thecontroversyofthetreatmentof animalsrangefromsomeactivistsandphilosophersthatareoutspokenagainstanimalsbeingused byhumansinanywayforourownpersonalneeds,whileothersarecandidintheirbeliefthat animalsareheresolelyformeetingourneedsandhavenorightsatall.Althougheveryoneisableto tailortheiractionstofittheirmoral,ethicalandindividualbeliefs,andmanydifferentcategoriesof uniquedietshavecomeaboutfromthefreedomofdefiningpersonalstandardsitisacontroversial topic.Withvegetarianandvegandiets',becomingmoreandmorecommondecidingwhatismorally justifiableinrespectstothetreatmentofanimalsisanessentialissueforeveryone.Thedisputeof animalrightsisessentiallyfocusedonwhatrightsanimalsdeservetohaveandhowtheyshouldbe treatedinregardstobeingexperimentedon,forhumans'entertainment,andtheirbeingusedas livestockAcontroversialissueinthedebateofanimalrightsisthehealthofthepeoplethatdonot consumeanimalsoranimalproductsandthosethatdo.Alargeareaofthedebateiscenteredaround thefactthatiswidelybelievedthatmeatfromanimalsisnecessaryforahealthyand

...Getmorecontent...

ArgumentsAgainstAnimalRights

SkyHer Mrs.Framke E.L.A. 14March,2017

Animalrights

Ibelievethatanimalsshouldbetreatedjustaswellashumans."Whenitcomestofeelingslikepain, hunger,andthirst,"Aratisapigisadogisaboy,"saysIngridNewkirk.Animalrightsarerights believedtobelongtoanimalstolivefreefromuseinmedicalresearch,hunting,andotherservices tohumans.Becauseanimalshavefeelingsandaremuchlikehumans,theydeservetohaverights justlikepeopledo.

Ibelievethatanimalsdeservebettertreatmentthantheygetnowbecausetheyhavehumanemotions andfeelthesamesufferingandpaintoo.Asbreathingcreaturesareabletofeelpainandtorturejust ashumanbeingsdo,animalsdeservequalitytreatmentandmoreappreciationshowmorecontent Idonotagreethatanimalsshouldn'tbehuntedthough.Weneedthatmeattolive.Animalcrueltyis definedasinflictingsufferingorharmuponanimalsforareasonotherthanselfdefence.Thereisa largerangeofthingsthatcanbeconsideredanimalcruelty.Suchashoraceracing,dogfighting,and circusesbecauseanimalsaresufferingthrewitallforhumanentertainment.OtherpeoplesayAs longasthey'redoingithumanlythereisnothingwrongwithitIagreethataslongasthey'redoing everythingwhiletakingcareoftheanimalscorrectlyandtheanimalsarebeingtreatedwellthatitis notanimalcrueltybutinmostcaseswheretheyarenottreatedwelltheanimalsareinconstant sufferingsoinawayyesitisanimalcrueltyAlthoughhumansthinktestingonanimalsisgoodfor thehumanracebecauseithasmademedicalbreakthroughs,theanimalsaretreatedcruellyand inhumaneanditisnotfairtotheanimals."Humanbeingshavenorighttouseanimalsasifthey weredisposableobjects,evenifit

...Getmorecontent...

ArgumentativeEssayOnAnimalRights

2015 Animalrights Introduction

Inancientyears,philosophershadalottosayabouthowhumanstreatanimals.However,expertsin socialscienceshavetakenpartinissuesconcerninghumansandotheranimalsEveryyear, thousandsofanimalsareinatormented,andthendiedduringtheanimalexperiments.Anotherfact isfromVivisectionInformationNetwork,thereisaroughestimatefromtheEuropeanUnionthat 105millionvertebrateanimalswereusedinanimalexperiments,whichis28,800perdayorone everythreeseconds.Around18.5millionanimalswereusedintheUSAperyear(Updated,2013). AndalsotheevidenceintheemergingfieldofHuman–Animalstudy,(HAS),showsthatanimal protectionisnottakenseriously.AreviewofMarxistrealism,feminism,ecofeminism,social constructionisttheoristsandapproachesthatshowsthehuman–animalstudyishighlyconcerned. Animalprotectionmovementinvolvesanimalwelfare,animalliberation,andanimalrightsOur focusonthisargumentwillbeonanimalrights....showmorecontent...

Thisisincorrectbecauseanimalshavefeelings,andsomehaveameasureofspeech.Inaddition, sometakecareoftheiryoungonesandprotecteachother.Thisprovesthatsimilartohumans animalsalsohavefeelings,desiresandemotions,and,therefore,deservetohaverights.According toReneDescartes,everybeingthathasaminddeservestobetreatedfairlybecauseitshowsthatthe animalhastheabilitytothinkrationally.CharlesDarwin,whocameupwiththetheoryofexistence throughevolution,cameupwithahypothesisthatshowsacorrelationbetweenhumansand nonhumanbeingsInhishypothesis,heconcludedthatanimalshaveemotionsandfeelingsthathave evolvedthesamewayashumans'emotions(Francione&Garner,

...Getmorecontent...

WhatAreTheArgumentsAgainstAnimalRights

AnimalRightsArgumentTherewasonceatimeinourworldwhereouranimalsweretreatedlike goldtoushumansbecausetheyprovidedourfoodweeat.However,accordingtotheASPCA,"99% offarmanimalsnationwideliveinfactoryfarms",wheretheyonlyfocusonmakingmoneyand keepingtheirbusinessstrong.Factoriesdonotcareaboutwhathappenstotheanimals,butIbelieve thatweshouldAnimalsarenotjustpetsorfood,theyarelivingcreaturesontheplanetjustlikeus humans.Ifweareraisingalltheseanimalstobeslaughteredforourfood,thenwhynottreatthem fairly?Theirlivesarebeingtakingtokeepusaliveandhealthy,theleastthingwecandoistreatthe animalsgoodsotheycandieinpeaceIbelievethatanimalcrueltyshouldbeaverybigissueinthe U.Sandweshouldfindawaytomakesureanimalsaretreatednicely.Animalstodayaretreatedso inhumanethatmostpeoplecannotevenbeartowitnesstheabusetheyget.Peoplearecaringmore lessforalltheanimalsbecausetheybelievethatanimalsdonotshowmorecontent

However,thepeoplewhodothesethingsonlygetamisdemeanorandafine,maybeevensomejail timeThisissueisnotveryconcerningtosomepeople,butitshouldbeaverybigissueFor example,aneventinGeorgiainvolvedadogsittinginahotvehiclewithallthewindowsrolledup. Aveteranmansawthedoginthereandbrokeoutoneofthewindowstosavethedog,however,itis illegaltobreakacarwindowtosaveadoginthestateofGeorgia.Therefore,themanwasarrested andtheladywholeftthedoginthecarwasonlygivenafine.Thisisinsane!Animalcrueltyneeds tobeheardaboutworldwideandpeopleneedtorealizethattheyarehurtingacreaturewhocan haveorfeelemotionsjustaswecan!Soifwewouldnothurtanotherhuman,whywouldyouhurta defenseless

ArgumentAgainstAnimalRights

AnimalRights

EversincemanhaseverruledtheEarth,historyhaveshownwedisposeeverythingtofurtherour ownspeciesandtheircause.Becauseofthis,mostofeverythingthatwedisposeareattheexpense ofanimalsandweashumanstendtohavesuchadrivetoruleouttheanimalsthatareviewedas worthlesscreaturesWhichleadstobadbehaviorinawaythatthesocietythinksaboutanimal rights.AnimalRightsshouldbefocusedmoreonratherthanusingthemasatool.However, researchershavecomeupwithwaysandtechnologiestodevelopanewfaceofanimalrights. Withthehumanracebeingsoopinionated,itisquiteimpossibletosolveasolutionasawholefor animalrights.Somuchhashappenedanditmadeadrasticturnintheworldthatpeoplestartedto developamovementtoprotecthumanrights.Withthatbeingsaid,groupslikePETA(Peopleforthe EthicalTreatmentofAnimals),foundedinthe1980swereformedtocreateafocalpointonthe areasthatincludemainlyofanimalsuffrage.PETAconcentratesontheareasthatharmtheanimals suchasplaceslike,factoryfarms,clothingindustries,laboratories,andtheentertainmentindustry ThePETAhascometothefactthatitisthelargestanimalrightsorganizationonEarth.Formedin the1980'sPETAisthelargest...showmorecontent...

However,AnimalRightsisveryimportantintoday'sworldbecausenoanimalofanykindshould everhavetosufferthepainofabusementnordotheydeserveiteither.Theorganization,PETA (PeoplefortheEthicalTreatmentofAnimals),wascreatedtopreventfromanimalcrueltyfrom happening.Also,theycaretocontinuethemovementtotakeastandinanimalcrueltyalloverthe world.PETAisthereasonsomanyanimalsaresavedandtreatedwithprotectionandcare.Weasa societyshouldappreciatemanygroupsandorganizationsthatwereformedtostopanimal

WhatAreTheArgumentsAgainstAnimalRights

Animalsareheldagainsttheirwillandforcedtoworkininhumaneareas.Animalshavefamiliesto takecareofjustlikehumansdo.Violationstowardsanimalshavebeenhappeningandtheyendup extremelyhurtordead,intheendnothinghappenstopreventmoreofthistohappenagain.Workers forthelabsdonotcarefortheanimalsandleavetheminunstableplaces.Otheranimalssuchas monkeysarekeptinsmallfacilitiesthatcanonlyfitasmallamountTheUniversityofLouisiana caused3monkeystodiewhentheywerestuckinachute.

Theoppositionbelievethatanimalshaverightsinthesamewaythathumanshaverights.Since animalsdonotfollowthelawandhavenowaytothinkandactOpponentsbelievethathuman interestshould

AnimalRightsAgainstAnimals

magineeatingadeliciouspieceofbaconwiththefatjuicedrippingoffwhilebitingintothebacon,it crunches.Nowimaginethepigthatthebaconcamefrom.Aninnocentcreaturenowhasbeen shockedwithelectricprods,haditsthroatcut,andhasbledouttodeath.Pigsarenottheonly creaturestosuffersuchadespicabledeath.Animalslikesheep,cows,chickens,andgoatsare slaughteredfortheirmeatTheanimalsareallbutcheredinaplacecalledaslaughterhouse Slaughterhousesarehorribleplaceswherehumansbelievetheyhavetherighttotreatanimalsany waytheywantaslongastheygetthemeattheyneed.Peoplewhoeatmeatneedtounderstandwhat happenstoananimalbeforeitwindsuponaplateAnimalscannotdefendthemselvesagainst humans.Therefore,someoneelsemustdefendtheanimals.Slaughterhousesmustbestopped. Slaughterhousesarethecheapestwaysforhumanstogetmeat.Ratherthanpayinglargesumsof moneytoputtheanimalsdownhumanely,theyarejustmurdered.Animalsareseparatedin slaughterhousesfromtheirfamiliesafterbeingwiththemforweeks.Imagineonenevergettingto knowhismother,thenbeingrippedawayfromtheirchild,whiletryingtomanageto survive.Animalsshouldhaverightsjustlikehumansdo.Animals'heartsbeatjustlikeany human's.Ifanimalshavetoberaisedanddie,theyshouldnotsuffer.Mostanimal'snaturalinstincts aretoprotecttheirchildren,andthatisrippedawayfromthemwiththeir

ArgumentsForAndAgainstEatingAnimals

MoralArgumentsForandAgainstEatingAnimalsAllthroughouttheworldtherearearguments aboutwhetheritismorallyrightormorallywrongtoeatanimals.Throughoutthisclasswehave readmanyarticlesandtalkedaboutthemoralitybehindthisargumentinlectures.Weseepeople whoarestronglyforbothsidesandthroughoutthispaperIwillmentionwhyindividualsbelieve whattheybelieveistherightthingtodointhisargument

Inthetextbookthereisanarticlecalled,"TheCaseforAnimalRights"writtenbyTomRegan.In thisarticleReganelaboratesonhowanimalshaverightsandshouldbetreatedappropriately.Regan isapartoftheanimalrightsmovementandsaysinordertosolvethisproblemweneedtoreach threegoalswhichare,totalabolitionoftheuseofanimalsinscience,totaldissolutionofcommercial animalagriculture,andtotaleliminationofcommercialandsporthuntingandtrapping(Regan360). What'swrongwithhowanimalsaretreatedisn'tthepain,suffering,anddeprivationitisthatwe viewanimalsasourresources.Regansays,"Onceweacceptthisviewofanimals–asourresources–therestisapredictableasitisregrettable"(Regan361)Reganissayingoncewegetthatideaand mindsetinourheadsweareautomaticallynotgoingtocareabouttheirpain,suffering,ordeath sincetheyareonearthtobenefitus.Inthearticleittalksabouthowsomeindividualsbelieveitis alrightiftheanimalsaretreatedmorehumanelybutReganbelievesotherwiseIthinksweneeda totaldissolutionofcommercialanimalculture.InthearticleRegantalksaboutcontractarianism. Thisiswhenmoralityconsistsofasetofrulesthatindividualsagreetoabidebyandifyoudoso yousignacontract.Regangoesontoexplainthistheoryindepth.Hesays,"Thosewhounderstand andacceptthetermsofthecontractarecovereddirectly;theyhaverightscreatedandrecognizedby, andprotectedin;thecontract"(Regan363)Doesthismeanthatthoseyoucan'treadorunderstand thecontractaren'tprotected?Notexactly.Regangoesontomentionthatifyoucan'tunderstandthe moralityandcannotsignthecontractyouarestillprotectedbytheoneswholoveyouandcan

ArgumentforAnimalRights

Theargumentforanimalrightsassumesthatanimalspossestheirownlivesanddeservetobe assignedrightsinordertoprotecttheirwellbeing.Thisviewinsiststhatanimalsarenotmerely goodsutilisedonlytobenefitmankindandtheyshouldbeallowedtochoosehowtheywanttolive theirlives,freefromtheconstraintsofman.Butifanimalsaregivenabsoluterights,thensurely theyshouldn'tbeallowedtokilleachother,asthiswouldbeaviolationoftheserights.Should murderousanimalsbeadministeredprisonsentencesorevencapitalpunishment?

Onemethodofpreventinganimalskillingeachotherwouldbetoprovideanimalswitha vegetarianshowmorecontent

Thisisironicbecausewearemoralbeingsandcanthinkaboutouractions,yetwekillandmistreat animalsastheyarelesserbeingsandcan'tthinkabouttheiractionsHowever,beforewecananswer thequestionofwhetherornotanimalshavetherighttokilleachother,wemustaskwhetherornot theyevenhaverights.

Itcanbearguedthat,asgreaterbeings,weshouldtakeresponsibilityforthewellbeingofthose speciesthatarelessdevelopedthanus,ratherthanusingourpowertomanipulateandexploitthem AccordingtoRawls'scontractualism,animalsarenotrationalagentsandhumansare.Thisimplies that,ashumansaretheoneswhohavecreatedtheconceptofrights,theyshouldonlyapplyto humansHowever,PeterCarruthersextendsthistheorysothatitdefendstherightsofanimalsHe suggeststhatarationalagentcouldenterintoacontractforananimal,representingtheirinterestsin 'theformulationofthebasiccontract'.Therearealsosomehumanbeingswhocannotspeakfor themselvesorquestiontheiractions,forexample,fetuses,infants,thecomatose,thesenileandthe severelyretarded.Thesepeoplearestillassignedrightsdespitethefactthattheyarenotmoral agentsTheymaymakethesamesimpleinstinctivedecisionsasanimals,yetaregivenrightsbased upontheirspecies.Itcanbe

...Getmorecontent...

ArgumentforAnimalRightsEssay

AnimalRightsControversy

Forthefifthtimethatday,Mrs.JacobswalkspasttheMiller'swindowwhereshestaresattheir familypug.Allofherefforttonotopenthedoorisconfinedinhatred,thisanimalthatdoesn't deservetobecoopedupallday,beingtakenadvantageof.Allanimalsshouldbeloved,animal criticsargue,butitisnotnecessaryforanimalstobegivenrightsbecauseoftheirlackof communicationwithhumansTheargumentofanimalrightshasexplodedinthelastdecade, creatingorganizationslikeP.E.T.A.(PeoplefortheEthicalTreatmentofAnimals)andA.L.F. (AnimalLiberationFront)bothofwhicharetryingtoenforcethegovernmenttocreatelawsfor animalrightsAnimalrightshavebeenatopicofdiscussionasearlyasAncientRome,showmore content...

Whatwillhappentoalltheadvancementsinmedicalresearch,andwillanimalsbeputinprisonor broughttojury?TheAmericanCollegeofSurgeonshasannouncedthatanimalresearchfor educationandscientificstudieswillnotbeabletobereplaced,becauseofthelifechangingmedical advancesthatanimalshaveaccomplishedforhumansCancerandHIVmedicationshavedepended onanimalstotesttheeffectivenessofthedrugandthesafety."In2005,AIDSpatientadvocates campaignedagainstPETA,criticizingthegroupforstandinginthewayofresearchthatrequiresthe useofanimalsfortoxicitytesting."(LeeandCushman4).Animalcriticsbelievethatanimalsshould nothaverightsbecauseofthehugeimprovementtheyhadmadeonmedicineswithanimaltesting. Animaltestingisnotsupposedtoharmanimalsitssupposetofindwaystohelpfightdiseasesfor humanslike:Insulininjectionsfordiabetespatients,chemotherapyforcancerpatients,stemcell transplants,vaccinesforsmallpox,polio,andyellowfever(Rich).Ifanimalsweregivenrights, researcheswithanimalswouldhavetobediscontinuedbecauseitwouldbeagainstthelaw Scientistssayitwouldbedevastatingandwouldbeaholdtoscientificadvancementinthemedical field(Rich).Ifanimalsweregivenrights,wecan'tunderstandthemandtheycan'tcomprehend morality.Animalrightssupportersarguethateverythinginlifeshouldhavethesameequalvalue. Somewithhigherthinking,suchasformingbeliefsabouttheworldandtorespondemotionallyand animalsthatcandothiscanbegrantednaturalhumanrightsThishasraisedaquestiontothelogical end,"Consider,forinstance,therelativevalueofahighlyfunctioninggreatape,capableofcomplex communicationsandsophisticatedtooluse,andthatofahumanchildwithseverecognitive disabilities,whowillneverlearnlanguage

CarlCohen'sArgumentAgainstAnimalRights

Ontheotherhand,CarlCohen,whoisaphilosopherwhoagainstanimalrights,concludesthatif humansdonotuseanimalstohelpthemforliving,theywillsuffermore.Ifhumanswanttoagainst human'sright,theyhavetobereadytonotconsumingwhetherintentionallyorunintentionally animals.Inmedicalfield,itwillbeimpossibletofindcuresforhumanifthescientistsdonottestit tootherbeings,inthiscase,animalsAccordingtoCohen,humansuseanimalfortheirexperiment becauseanimalsarenotabletohavemoraldecisions.Also,animalsarenotcapableofexercisingor respondingtomoralclaims,andtheycannothaveanyrights.Whereashuman,ontheotherhand,are capableofmoralclaims,andtheyareeligibletohave

AnimalRightsAndHumanRights

AnimalRights"Nearlyasmany,68percent,wereconcernedorveryconcernedaboutthewell–beingofanimalsusedin'sports'orcontestsaswellasanimalsinlaboratories(67percent)(Kretzer, 1)."Manypeoplequestionwhetherananimaliscapableofthoughtandemotions.Othersfeelas thoughanimalsaretheequivalentofhumansandshouldbetreatedassuch.Sincethe1800's,animal rightshasbeenatopicthathasseveraldifferentsidesincludingtwoextremesIfanimalscanreactto theirenvironment,emote,andareawareofthingsdonetoorwiththem,thentheyshouldhave similarrightstohumans.Someofushaveanimalsaspets,forcompetitions,forourjobs,andsome tosurviveMuchliketaskingaskedofhumansindaytodaylifeThoseofuswhohavepets,see themasapartofthefamily,makingusbelievetheyarenodifferentthanachildwegavebirthto. Whenwebringhomeournewbornchildren,welovethem,nurturethem,andteachthemasthey growtobeadults.Whathappenstomostfamilieswhentheybringhometheirsweetlittlepuppies, kittens,orotherbabyanimalofourchoosing?Iwouldimaginethatthegoalistoraisethemtoadapt totheirnewfamilyThisisnodifferentthanthatofasmallchildLookingatabehavioralstand pointandcomparinghouseholdpetstohumanbeings,thereactionsareverysimilar.Whenchildren arephysicallyandmentallyabusedonaregularbasis,thesmallestactmayhaveasimilarreaction asthatofa

ArgumentsAgainstAnimalRights

"Neverbeafraidtodowhat'sright,especiallyifthewell–beingofapersonorANIMALisatstake."

–MartinLutherKingJr.Theanimalwelfareactistoregulatetheuseandcareofanimalsina laboratorysetting.Animalrightsistherightbelievedtobelongtoanimalstolivefreefromusein medicalresearch,hunting,andotherservicestohumans.Thefirstanimalprotectiongroupwas calledASPCAortheAnimalSocietyforthePreventionofCrueltytoAnimalsfoundedbyHenry BerghinApril1866("11factsaboutanimal").Animalsshouldn'tbeusedinmedicalresearch becausetheanimalsaren'tprotectedbytheAnimalWelfareAct,andtherearealternativesfor testingproductsthatdon'tinvolveanimals,despitethefactthatsomeofthesetestsledtomedical breakthroughs("shouldanimalsbeused").Thefirstargumentfortheretonotbeanimaltesting anymoreisanimalsaren'tprotectedbytheanimalwelfareact("shouldanimalsbeused").Animals aretestedinlabstotesthumandiseases,products,andbreedingpurposes(BenWilliamson2).Over 115millionanimalsayeardiefrombeingtestedinlabs.Whentestinganimalsforskinsensitivity productstheyputtheshowmorecontent

Ifyou'veevertakenantibiotics,hadavaccine,abloodtransfusion,dialysis,anorgantransplant,ora jointreplacement,youhavebenefittedfromanimaltestingandresearch("Humanesociety").It's truetherearemedicalbreakthroughshowever,ifyouuseanalternativetotestinganimalssuchas genetictestingmethodsthananimalswouldn'thavetosuffer("11factsaboutanimal").Over115 millionanimalsayeardiefrombeingtestedinlabexperimentsDuringanimalexperimentation micegettumorsthesizeoftheirownbodiesandkittensarepurposelyblindedtotestmakeup("11 factsaboutanimal").Testinganimalsarenot100%accurateforhumansbecausetheirbodiesare differentthanhumans(Woodwardkay

AnimalRights:AnExampleOfSocialism

Animalrightsisanexampleofsocialism.Socialismisthereasonsomeanimalsarealivetoday. Animalrightsisanexampleofsocialismbecauseanimalshavethesamerightshumanshave. Harminganimalsisseenmainlyindogcommercialsnow.Thecommercialssometimesshowhow peopletreatmostanimalsathome.Peopleshouldnotstandaroundaletotherpeopleharmanimals theyshouldspeakupMostpeopleattitudetowardsanimalsissometimesrudeandnotrespectful Peopletreatthemliketheyarenotasimportantastheyare.Animalrightsisanexampleofsocialism becauseitshowsyouthatyoudonothavetobeahumantohaverights.Rightsforanimalscouldnot beanexampleofcapitalismbecausethatmeansnobodywouldhavecaredabout

Animalrightshasalwaysbeenconversionalsubject,whatrightsdotheyhave,whattypeof treatmenttheymayendure,andwhatiswildlifeversuswhatarepets.Societyasitawholeasalways hadusedanimalsasformentertainmentforexamplelikezoos,circuses,aquariums,rodeos,animal fightingandhunting.Thoughthesetypesofentertainmentsprojectasinnocentformsoffunforall ageswhenit'senslavementfortheanimalsTheseanimalsaretakenfromtheirhomestobeforced behindcages,glassandconcertwallstoperformforthepayingcustomer.Theanimalsseemillions ofhumanfacespressedagainstthesewallsstaringinhopingtoseethemdotricksorjustmovein generalTheseanimalsarealsoforcedtoperformandtrainforhoursoninjusttobeamealticket fortherightbuyer.

Theadvertisementaboveillustrateshowanimalsareusedlikepuppetsforentertainment.Whenyou thinkofpuppets,youthinkofapuppetmasterpullingthestrings,tomakethepuppetdance,sing andentertainyou.Nowjustpictureawildanimalhavinginvisiblestringsattachedtothemwitha puppetmastergivingordersInsteadofstringstheyuseactualforceandpunishmenttogetwhatthey want.Whileinthepictureitstates,"Theshowmustgoon",whenyouhearthisphraseyouknow meaningthatregardlessofwhathappens,whatevershowhasbeenplannedstillmustbeperformed forthepayingguests,thesamegoesforanimalstoo.Whichsuggestnomatterhowmuchforce,pain

ArgumentativeEssayOnAnimalRights