Thesis Statement: Apartheid may have been a horrible era in South African history, but only so because the whites were forced to take action against the outrageous and threatening deeds of the blacks in order to sustain their power.
United Nations members, and fellow concerned citizens, the world must discuss with the consequences of the initiation of apartheid. Apartheid, the separation of races completely, has become a horrible era in South African history, and has killed many innocent victims. However, the blacks of South Africabrought death upon themselves. Therefore, please pledge your support to the whites of South Africa in an attempt to save as many lives as possible in as short a time as we have. One must acknowledge that...show more content...
In the blacks' case, each tribe or village has been given a separate "homeland," or designated place to live, where they would be "a small community of men, women, and children, self–assured and confident" (Achebe, 159). Unfortunately, just as the blacks misinterpreted the Christians' intentions in Things Fall Apart, the blacks of South Africa have interpreted Mr. Verwoerd's intentions differently, and think he is out to hurt them. This misunderstanding has led to a boycott of the homelands, and greater tension between whites and blacks in South Africa. As the blacks have now started to rebel against the government, and create "toyi–toyis," it is said that Verwoerd is beginning to get frightened. The militant blacks carry AK–47s and machetes at their side. These so–called peaceful people have unwillingly become his own worst enemy, and are "honest in nothing / but in [their] clothes" (Measure, 5.1.300–301). Because of one misunderstanding, the blacks have become unreliable, just as the Duke in "Measure for Measure." It is sad to think that one man's caring wishes have brought out violent qualities in the worst of ways. Horrific things have happened. There have been reports of people gathering in the streets in mobs, and resisting any form of peaceful negotiation that the troops try to offer every day. It sadly, troops have had to resort to tear gas and weapons in self–defense. The blacks, however, are no longer rebelling; they are ready to fight a war. It seems Get
![](https://assets.isu.pub/document-structure/230627160037-dd7ef5e01610c9d9dbcff6bae74c0570/v1/dfe1549e093a976e67708d85a6dcf2fd.jpeg)
History is subjective because it is a subject that is based on a person's knowledge and opinions. While some events have obvious causes, other events must be analyzed to find their true impetus. One complicated era from history that has a debatable cause is Apartheid. While some historians cite complex causes for Apartheid, most people in the general public simply believe racism was the root of the institution. While racism did factor into later practices of Apartheid, racism was merely a byproduct of the social and cultural effects of the institution. When evidence is examined, the real cause of Apartheid becomes obvious. This era of South African history was not simply based on social practices such as racism; Apartheid was rooted...show more content...
The Afrikaners formed a separate linguistic and cultural identity that included a set of religious beliefs that shaped their worldview. These developments not only separated Afrikaners from native Africans ethnically, but also provided a template from which nationalist beliefs were based. This connection between the cultural identity of Afrikaners and their nationalist ideology is found in the events that occurred shortly after Great Britain annexed South Africa. Afrikaners believed that the British would undermine the culture that had developed among Afrikaners by supporting the mixing of Afrikaner and native cultures. In response to this threat to their ethnic identity, Afrikaners created numerous political parties that advocated both a separate culture and country for Afrikaners. Drawing upon the reformed theology of Afrikaners, political organizations such as the Afrikaner Broederbond claimed that, "...God intended for each nation to develop separately...moreover, God had specifically created the Afrikaner nation as His chosen people to fulfill a divine destiny in southern Africa" (Beck, 2000, p. 111). Using a religious belief from the Afrikaner culture, political parties were able build a nationalism that promoted the segregationist agenda that would later be used for justifying Apartheid. So, Apartheid was not racist institution, it was merely a product of the nationalist belief that the Afrikaner people had the right to develop as a
Get more content
![](https://assets.isu.pub/document-structure/230627160037-dd7ef5e01610c9d9dbcff6bae74c0570/v1/dfe1549e093a976e67708d85a6dcf2fd.jpeg)
Apartheid was an act that South Africa performed. It seprated whites, blacks, asians, and others. The rule didnt allow them to go to the bathroom together, live together, and they couldnt marry each other. This happened because the afrikaners (dutch) took over this land from the blacks, and in order to stay in power against them they seprated them. Unfair living conditions, country events, and incredible people helped to stop Apartheid in South Africa. In South Africa a big part of Apartheid that was unfair was the difference between the whites living conditions and the blacks. To put this in perspective the blacks had 15 million more people yet they only had 13% of the entire land of the country (6). Even though the whites had 4.5 million to the blacks 19 million the whites had much more land than them,...show more content...
For example, Desmond Tutu was a black Anglican bishop and civil rights leader. He convinced other regions to boycott South African product and supply. So it put pressure on the government to make theblack people free(8). He was a key part to ending apartheid he managed to get a bunch of countries on board to stop South Africa. Also F.W. de Klerk, a white South African, became president of South Africa in 1989. He relized how horrible they were to blacks and he stepped up and handed the leadership to the blacks(8). He handed the leadership over to Nelson Mandela in 1990 and was the last country to have seperation due to color and race. Finally Nelson Mandela was a black South Africa and he stepped up and gave a speech that motavated the blacks to step up, also he led a group called the ANC which was a group of blacks who wanted to end apartheid(5). He became the president when F.W de klerk gave it up. Also before this he was in prison for 27 years for sticking up for him self, and his race. In conclusion there were many leaders the blacks had and whites, who helpe end this horrible
Get more content
![](https://assets.isu.pub/document-structure/230627160037-dd7ef5e01610c9d9dbcff6bae74c0570/v1/dfe1549e093a976e67708d85a6dcf2fd.jpeg)
There were many factors which contributed to the ending of apartheid. After years of segregation and oppression of blacks, many different chronological events put together led to an eventual reform in South Africa of equality and democracy for everybody.
However, the factor which I think played the mostimportant part in the ending of apartheid was releasing ANC leader Nelson Mandela in 1990. Not only did it symbolise a fresh start for the country, but also a new found uniformity of its people.
At the time, this move by the government was quite unexpected, but in retrospect, an inevitability. The prime minister of SouthAfrica in 1989 was PW. Botha, however after having a stroke, and being forced into bitterresignation, was replaced...show more content... However, the most probable reason was that apartheid was no longer practical or possible to maintain in the country. This underlying fact had been brought about by several events.
Fourteen years prior to Mandela's release in 1976 school pupils had rioted in Soweto, the result of which had been many deaths amongst the children. The cause of the riot had been because of the appauling conditions in black township schools. Classes were over–crowded, there were no facilities and most importantly the pupils were being taught in Afrikaan. The language was not spoken anywhere else in the world, and they felt that they were simply being prepared as slaves for the whites.
The horrifying incident caused uproar in many other townships which lasted for months. Although the government claimed the riots were unpolitical, the Soweto troubles let loose by far the largest period of unrest in South Africa's history. It showed that officials were beginning to loose control.
In 1985 a partial state of emergency was declared in South Africa. This was as a result of further violent uprisings and clearly showed the national's weakening hold over the townships. Black resistance made many parts of the country ungovernable.
On top of all this, there were many economic pressures. In the 1970's, western business leaders found that apartheid laws were effecting
![](https://assets.isu.pub/document-structure/230627160037-dd7ef5e01610c9d9dbcff6bae74c0570/v1/dfe1549e093a976e67708d85a6dcf2fd.jpeg)
economic progress and people began to feel that imposong sanctions on South Africa would be the only way
Get more content
The Effect of Apartheid on The Lives of Africans In this thesis I will be explain the ways in which the lives of the black distorted. There lives were very good after the Second World War, they had everything going well for them, but it didn't last long. The foreword of Apartheid in the 1950's 1960's and 1970's destroyed this optimism. Their lives got worse and worse and they had lost charge of their lives. I will be explaining how their personal lives changed, how their movement was restricted, how their most valuable rights were taken away, how they had to live poorly and how they had lost their education as well and last of all I will be telling you which I think was the main reason for...show more content...
The act divided South Africans at birth into four racial categories Black, White, Coloured, and Asian though these classifications were largely random, based on considerations such as family background and cultural acceptance as well as on appearance. They wanted to make it easier for themselves when putting everyone into racial groups. The mixed race families made it a problem there was no way they could do it precisely because they weren't white or black. One reason for this law was to stop the Cape Coloureds from being classified as whites. This made their lives worse, especially the coloured families because in most cases each member of a family was placed in a different groups which simply implies they were possibly going to see each other again, and they would have to rebuild their lives with strangers, and they also had to stand up for themselves because they had no one else. An example is the Du Proft family. Raymond Du Proft was white and Diane Bassick his wife was coloured. They fell in love but had to hide so they wouldn't get found out. They were lucky because they had five children and weren't caught. They tried to be accepted as whites but their claims where denied. One of their sons ended up Get more content
![](https://assets.isu.pub/document-structure/230627160037-dd7ef5e01610c9d9dbcff6bae74c0570/v1/dfe1549e093a976e67708d85a6dcf2fd.jpeg)
Blacks shared the pain of Apartheid in one of the darkest periods in history. Blacks were horribly oppressed by tyrants who obliterated their happy, healthy lives for nothing more then their own interests. Many Laws were passed that restricted blacks from the freedoms that all people should rightfully obtain from birth. White South Africans took the black population by the throat, making it hard for blacks to live as happy people. Black South Africans were held in a form of imprisonment and could do little to fight back, causingApartheid to be one of the darkest periods in black history.
Apartheid was introduced as a part of the National Party's campaign in the 1948 elections. With the National Party victory, Apartheid became a national...show more content...
In the 1950's some changes occurred. The migrant labor act was abolished because the government did not feel the need to segregate the cities as much as they did in the past. So initially blacks were stuck on rural reserves most of the time and were being treated worse and worse. This was called the Bantu authorities act, established 1951. On a good note, there were people on the Black African's side from the beginning. Prime Minister Smuts wrote, "The idea that natives must all be removed and confined in their kraals is in my opinion, the greatest nonsense I have ever heard." (Smuts 1) Steven Biko wrote, " The government of our nation is full of tyranny" (Biko 1) Despite all the fighting back, apartheid was a loosing battle for blacks in South Africa until the late 1900's. Apartheid took off in 1948 when the national party won the election. It was all downhill from there for the blacks. In 1950 the population registration act was passed. This act classified people as either white, black, or Bantu. The apartheid fooled other countries into believing it was a lifting in a state of emergency. In 1951 many whites did not like the black people so a commission was formed to set and regulate segregation laws. In 1952, Nelson Mandela and Tambo opened the first black legal firm. This was a small step for the blacks at the time. In 1953 the public safety act and criminal law amendment were passed which allowed the government to enforce
![](https://assets.isu.pub/document-structure/230627160037-dd7ef5e01610c9d9dbcff6bae74c0570/v1/dfe1549e093a976e67708d85a6dcf2fd.jpeg)
1.INTRODUCTION
![](https://assets.isu.pub/document-structure/230627160037-dd7ef5e01610c9d9dbcff6bae74c0570/v1/dfe1549e093a976e67708d85a6dcf2fd.jpeg)
In post–apartheid South Africa, access to sufficient and effective basic services cannot be viewed as a privilege, but as a right that must be granted to all citizens especially the previously disadvantaged. The local government is the only sphere that is able to manage and implement this right. The provision of public services to the community is an indicator that is used to determine whether local government is being developmental. Public participation is essential to ensure that the community's needs are taken into consideration and disparate areas are prioritized with the resources that are available. The Integrated Development Plan was developed to ensure that local government implements its constitutional obligations...show more content...
Step 4: Internal analysis and assessment
Internal controllable factors are identified as well as the community's strengths and weakness. Critical issues are prioritized according to variation in the strengths and weakness as well as the potential impact that may be caused.
Step 5: Attainable goals and measurable objectives
To ensure short and long term sustainable growth, attainable goals, realistic objections, measurable objectives as well as the internal and external analysis needs to be considered. Step 6: Strategy development
Specific actions are formulated that will achieve realistic goals and measurable objectives. Strategy prioritization is essential to ensure that the strategy that is developed is implemented with the resources that are available. Decision–making in the community is essential but priorities need to be formulated.
Step 7: Plan development
All 6 stages are analyses and detailed strategies and action plans are formulated and distributed to all the stakeholders.
Step 8: Implementation
Strategic planning entails the allocation of scares resources to critical issues. The action plans need to be linked to the financial plan and
implementation programme. The action plan needs to be recurrently monitored and updated.
Robinson (2009, 7) further highlights the importance of strategic planning in any organization due to the fact that it aids in assessing current issues and formulates strategies to address them. Strategic planning aids
Get more content
Apartheid, the Afrikaans word for "apartness" was the system used in South Africa from the years 1948 to 1994. During these years the nearly 31.5 million blacks in South Africa were treated cruelly and without respect. They were given no representation in parliament even though they made up most of the country. It was not until 1994 when ablack man named Nelson Mandela came to power in the South Africa congress. Once elected Mandela removed all racist laws against blacks and all other minorities. Nelson Mandela is one of the great leaders of our time.
A hero whose lifelong struggle to the fight against Apartheid in South Africa won him the Nobel Peace Prize and the presidency of his country. Since his release from prison in 1990,...show more content... However, his successful evasion of the police earned him the title of the Black Pimpernel.
At this time, he and other leaders of the ANC created a new section of the liberation movement, Umkhonto we Sizwe, with a view to preparing for armed struggle, Mandela said, "I and some colleagues came to the conclusion that as violence in this country was inevitable; it would be wrong and unrealistic for African leaders to continue preaching peace and non–violence at a time when the government met our peaceful demands with force." He was elected President of the ANC in 1991, and on May 10th 1994, he was inaugurated as President of South Africa. I definitely have to say that Nelson Mandella had a totally positive influence on everyone in South Africa, not just the black majority but everyone. The reason is because things were really bad under the all white leadership and many white people did not agree with the apartheid system. It is difficult to pick just one or two significant event in apartheid history, so I would like to just briefly mention some laws that were made.
The White South Africa government came up with many unfair laws to keep the black people of the country segregated, these are just a few of the most unfair ones. – Mines & Works Act 1911 & 1926–Imposed color ban on certain jobs, a white salary was to be higher than a black at all times. –Natives (Urban Areas) Act 1923
Get more content
![](https://assets.isu.pub/document-structure/230627160037-dd7ef5e01610c9d9dbcff6bae74c0570/v1/dfe1549e093a976e67708d85a6dcf2fd.jpeg)
The term "apartheid" was one of the most politically charged words in the second half of the 20th century, and still remains notorious today. Apartheid translated from Afrikaans means "separateness" or "apartness". However when the National Party came to power in South Africa in 1948, it took on a much more sinister meaning and today is associated with racial and ethnic discrimination. The roots of apartheid stem deep into South African history. It started way back during European settlement, and was enforced and maintained right up until the end of the 20th Century. It will forever leave a mark onSouth Africaand indeed the world; a dark period in human history from which we have and will continue to learn.
Tensions between Europeans...show more content... Apartheid came about in South Africa because of anAfrikaner belief of their god–given right to Africa, which was also a racist one. Apartheid was therefore a means to support and institutionalize their view on how the country should be run.
![](https://assets.isu.pub/document-structure/230627160037-dd7ef5e01610c9d9dbcff6bae74c0570/v1/dfe1549e093a976e67708d85a6dcf2fd.jpeg)
Apartheid was kept in place through various means, mainly the use of legislation and technology. The main way that the government implement apartheid was through legislation. There were countless laws and bills passed, which over time stripped black Africans' of their rights, all the while favoring the white elite of South Africa. Race laws affected every social aspect of life in apartheid South Africa. The early policies that were made when the National Party first came into power set the base for the later policies to take effect and branch off. These policies embodied what the apartheid regime was all about, notably two of the earliest policies made, being the Population Registration Act and the Group Areas Act. Both were made in 1950, with the Population Registration Act requiring al South Africans to be racially classified into either white, black or colored, and the Group Areas Act which geographically separated the racial groups.
These laws and policies prevented the black population having the same privileges, standards of living and status as the white South Africans. Under the apartheid system everyday life was greatly affected by Get
Apartheid Rusty Keller ENG 125 David Makhanlall October 15, 2013 Apartheid Children are often different from adults because they are often unaware of the rules that adults abide by. Nadine Gordimer held strong feelings of opposition to apartheid, which was a socioeconomic system in South Africa after 1948 that focused on the oppression and segregation of the non–white citizens who formed the majority of South Africa's population, and her feelings are usually a dominate theme in most of her writing (Clugston, 2010). In her short story "Country Lovers," Gordimer tells not only how this socioeconomic system has determinately affected the interracial relationship between the main charters, who were childhood playmates who...show more content...
There are a number of internal and external conflicts in Gordimer's short story "Country lovers that she uses to illustrate the control apartheid has over not only the main characters, but society as well. We all are aware of the heightened racial tension between African Americans and the Caucasians in the south within our own history which helps us to understand the oppression, segregation, and control that this form of legislation can have on personal relationships and society (Custodio, 2012). So, it is not hard to understand how powerless Thebedi must have felt to prevent the death of her child, if only she had some form of self–esteem or dignity, maybe she could have stood her ground enough to save her child's life. Paulus when he returned from Veterinary College was totally oblivious about the birth of Thebedi's nearly white child's birth until he overheard the servants speaking about getting someone to do her chores until she could return to them. Even though, Thebedi's husband Njabelo had claimed the child as his own, Paulus still struggles with his fear of the child being discovered, and his anger and self–pity with his failure to protect himself from allowing such things from happening in the first place. This is Get more content
![](https://assets.isu.pub/document-structure/230627160037-dd7ef5e01610c9d9dbcff6bae74c0570/v1/dfe1549e093a976e67708d85a6dcf2fd.jpeg)
Seventeen years have passed and the Apartheid era has ended, but the legacy it has left behind has caused South Africa's rehabilitation and self–determination to be an obstructed undertaking. Unaddressed security problems of belligerent crimes and HIV/AIDS are a direct cause of the failure to manage the aforementioned legacy (Vercillo n.p.). Back in 1947, the growing desegregation which was caused by the liberation of India and Pakistan, helped spread the evidential racial equality. The Afrikaaner Nationalists ofSouth Africa, led by Dr. Malan, believed that the whites were a superior race and that the blacks were a subservient people; a menace in society that the whites must be protected from. In 1948, when the Nationalists won the...show more content...
He fought to keep the ANC alive and in 1989, when F.W. de Klerk replaced P.W. Botha as leader of the National party, Nelson Mandela was freed from Robben Island after 27 long years. Also under F.W. de Klerk's regime was a special vote held wherein 69% of the white population agreed to the equal distribution of power between the blacks and the whites ("South Africa's Anti–Apartheid Movement" 31, 50, 52.). The first democratic elections of 1994 in South Africa and the Mandela regime then followed suit.
After the seemingly unmanageable and age–old problem in South Africa was brought to a peaceful resolution, the country had then become an exemplar for negotiating conflicts globally. The ANC then travelled the globe, immersing themselves in the recognition that came with assuming the position of the aforementioned exemplar which they have become (Johnson, 4). However, as R.W. Johnson stated, "[...] the real miracle lay not in their being willing to enjoy the fruits of victory but in the way that the National Party leader , F.W. de Klerk, had led the white minority to surrender its power peacefully." (4)
Aside from working towards the reconciliation of the whites and blacks, President Mandela declared the implementation of the 100 Days Plan directly after his inauguration. However, due to the lack of funding, proper planning and the absence of a heads up to clinics and hospitals, the Get more content
![](https://assets.isu.pub/document-structure/230627160037-dd7ef5e01610c9d9dbcff6bae74c0570/v1/dfe1549e093a976e67708d85a6dcf2fd.jpeg)
What Is Apartheid ?
What is apartheid?
The word apartheid means "to keep apart" in Afrikaan, which is the language, that most of the white people in South Africa speaks. Apartheid is a racist ideology, and the goal is to separate the different races, and to give the white people all the power in the society.
The apartheid ideology was developed in South Africafor hundreds of years ago, but it wasn't a part of politics before 1948. In apartheid, you split the population into four groups.
The black
The colored
The white
The Asian.
And it is your appearance that decides which group you belong to. Where did it exist?
Apartheid existed in South Africa from 1948–1994. And in that period, thewhite people had better conditions than the black, the...show more content...
In prison, he began to negotiate with the apartheid regime. And it was also the negotiations that got him released from prison in 1990, and in 1991 he was elected as the president of ANC. The election in 1994 was the first election ever, where Mandela and the rest of the black population in South Africa voted. And ANC got 60 % of the votes. And Nelson Mandela was the new president of South Africa until 1999, where he chose to retire. As retired he has been trying hard to solve South Africa's AIDS problem. 25 % of the population got HIV or AIDS, and the number is increasing.
Influence in South Africa (and the rest of the world)
![](https://assets.isu.pub/document-structure/230627160037-dd7ef5e01610c9d9dbcff6bae74c0570/v1/dfe1549e093a976e67708d85a6dcf2fd.jpeg)
Nelson Mandela was the most important person in the fight against apartheid in South Africa. It is hard to say, how South Africa would be today, if it wasn't for Nelson Mandela. Maybe there would still be apartheid?
Nelson Mandela is known all over the world, and he's a symbol of struggle for freedom and justice.
The Nobel Peace Prize:
I 1993 Nelson Mandela and the white president of South Africa Frederic de Klerk received the Nobel Peace Prize. My thoughts about Nelson Mandela:
I think Nelson Mandela is a role model for a lot of people in the world, because he kept fighting for his believes and he never quitted, even though he was in prison for 28
Get more content