Editor’s Note

Albert Camus called suicide the only “really serious philosophical problem,” and Shakespeare apparently agreed. “To be or not to be”: wasn’t that the question?

Begging Albert and Hamlet’s forgiveness, the question isn’t what it used to be. After all, in Shakespeare’s pox-ridden London, the average life expectancy was around 30. Even as late as 1900, the world average life expectancy was only 32. Today, the figure is 72. The current pandemic will no doubt put a dent in the actuarial tables, but nothing like the influenza of 1918, which cut life expectancy in America by a full 12 years, from 51 to 39.

We can thank advancements like plumbing, pasteurization, antibiotics, vaccines, and even synthetic fertilizers for our longer leases on life. But with the blessing of extra days and years come some accursed questions: not just whether ’tis nobler to suffer the slings and arrows, etc., etc., but also, how much life is enough? When we feel our time has come, should we be extended the same courtesy afforded to most pets—namely, a comfortable passage into death, surrounded by loved ones—or should we be compelled to live to the bitter end, through incontinence and dementia and all the other outrageous fortunes that attend to old age?

Our cover story in this issue (see “Last Will,” p. 24) eloquently argues for the former. The piece came to us unsolicited (“over the transom” as we say in the biz) from 83-year-old alumna Ruth Dixon-Mueller and nearly swamped the boat. The article so impressed us that we also did a podcast installment with her. (Listen to episode 11 of The Edge, “A Completed Life.”)

Ruth, whose own title for her piece was “Don’t Call it Suicide,” got her Ph.D. at Cal in 1970 and taught for many years at UC Davis before moving to Costa Rica to grow coffee and pineapples. Now, approaching the end of a long, full life, she is a proponent—for herself and those who share her way of thinking— of what is generally known as physician-assisted suicide but which advocates like Ruth prefer to call medical aid-in-dying.

As UCSF physician Lonny Shavelson, chair of the American Clinicians Academy on Medical Aid-in-Dying, stresses on the podcast, we shouldn’t let semantics cloud the issue. “Let me just clarify when we say medical aid-indying, I don’t like beating around the bush. So my language will be blunt. It’s taking medications to die. We want to know what we’re talking about.”

T h i s m a y s t r i k e s o m e r e a d e r s a s depressing, but Ruth feels quite differently. “To me, selecting a departure date rather than struggling with uncertainty until the medical battle is lost is an affirmation of my life, not a negation of it,” she writes. “Indeed, it relieves me of anxiety, knowing that I have a plan in place. Cheers me, even.”

No matter how one feels, there is difficult ethical terrain to traverse here, including a slippery slope or two. It’s something we asked Dr. Guy Micco of Berkeley’s Program for the Medical Humanities to discuss with us in the sidebar on p. 28. Among other things, Micco warns: “Fear of severe disability and age-related illness is near-universal, including among physicians. … If the life of a person with a severe disability is thought not worth living, how easy might it be to push that person toward medical aid-in-dying ? The same might be said regarding elders toward the end of their lives: ‘You’ve lived a good life. Why are you hanging on?’”

Rest assured, there’s more in the pages ahead than heavy questions about end-oflife decisions. In this issue, you’ll also find a profile on author Joe Di Prisco, the colorful Brooklyn boy-cum-Berkeley author behind the Joyce Carol Oates Prize (“Betting on Literature,” p. 36), writer/Berkeley alum Andrew Leonard’s engaging essay about learning the truth of his “cautionary tale” uncle (“Finding Ken,” p. 40), a piece about psychologist David Buss and the evolutionary origins of male sexual misbehavior (“Men Behaving Badly,” p. 30), and a discussion with Asian studies pioneer Elaine Kim (“ We the People,” p. 49). All that, plus a newly launched student column contest (Student View, p. 55) and an installment of our regular Spotlight roundup (p. 59) featuring “Bears in Space”—Cal alumni who have become astronauts, rocket scientists, and the like.

I hope you enjoy the issue. Even more importantly, I hope it makes you think— yes, even about death—then moves you to seize the day.

$200

cash back bonus offer*

Cal Alumni Association Cash Rewards credit card from Bank of America

Maximize your cash back by choosing how you earn rewards

Carry the only card that helps support Cal Alumni Association

• Get a $200 cash back bonus if you make at least $1,000in purchases in the first 90 days of account opening* • To change your choice category for future purchases, you must go to Online Banking, or use the Mobile Banking app.1

You can change it once each calendar month, or make no change and it stays the same.

• Contactless card – The security of a chip card, with the convenience of a tap

To apply for a credit card, please visit bofa.com/CalAlumni

Earn 3% and 2% cash back on the first $2,500 in these combined purchases each quarter, then earn 1% thereafter.

For information about the rates, fees, other costs and benefits associated with the use of this card or to apply, please visit bofa.com/CalAlumni

Residents of the US and its territories only. See full disclosure for details. *Bonus Cash Rewards Offer. You will qualify for $200 bonus cash rewards if you use your new credit card account to make any combination of purchase transactions totaling at least $1,000 (exclusive of any fees, returns and adjustments) that post to your account within 90 days of the account open date. Limit 1 bonus cash rewards offer per new account. This one-time promotion is limited to customers opening a new account in response to this offer and will not apply to requests to convert existing accounts. Your account must be open with active charging privileges in order to receive this offer. Other advertised promotional bonus cash rewards offers can vary from this promotion and may not be substituted. Allow 8–12 weeks from qualifying for the bonus cash rewards to post to your rewards balance. The value of this reward may constitute taxable income to you. You may be issued an Internal Revenue Service Form 1099 (or other appropriate form) that reflects the value of such reward. Please consult your tax advisor, as neither we, nor our affiliates, provide tax advice. 1 Mobile Banking. Mobile Banking requires that you download the Mobile Banking app and is only available for select mobile devices. Message and data rates may apply.

By opening and/or using these products from Bank of America, you’ll be providing valuable financial support to Cal Alumni Association.

This credit card program is issued and administered by Bank of America, N.A. Visa and Visa Signature are registered trademarks of Visa International Service Association, and are used by the issuer pursuant to license from Visa U.S.A. Inc. Bank of America and the Bank of America logo are registered trademarks of Bank of America Corporation. The Contactless

Symbol and Contactless Indicator are trademarks owned by and used with permission of EMVCo, LLC. ©2021 Bank of America Corporation 3145528 AD-03-21-0335.A