Shift - Thomas Lemon

Page 1

ARCHITECTURE JOURNAL


N O W.

We are living in a world best defined by its inability to balance progress and destruction.

Editorial

It is important to understand how, as both architects and individuals, we fit into these clashes of interest and the role we can take to promote change. As individuals, our decisions are unlikely to be able to have a meaningful impact on the environment - but what difference does an industry-wide approach such as Architects Declare make? Or, importantly, what can we do to better our lives and the lives of the people around us? To do this, we must ask ourselves how our lives are being affected by things such as: pollution, technology and the economy.


-03

“The memory of everything is very soon overwhelmed in time� Marcus Aurelius

Unfortunately, 2020 is inevitably going to go down

The

in history for one thing - coronavirus. It may not

consequences globally but it has also forced us,

fit in with a typical architectural theory narrative

for once, to stop and evaluate our existence. It has

but I decided to completely engage with this and

coronavirus

pandemic

has

had

terrible

given opportunities for the world to discover what

let it occupy the space in my magazine relative to

happens when the globalist society we have been

the space it is occupying in all our lives. Alongside

working on for centuries is completely torn apart

this, is the most important struggle of our time -

and to experiment with important concepts, such

saving the planet.

as working-from-home. It has also reminded a lot Coronavirus has had significant impact on the

of people how much they value social interaction

environment. With industry and trade forced to

and the company of others. It is with this

an almost complete shut-down during the COVID

perspective that we must move forward.

pandemic,

this period will also prove to be a

significant indicator to what degree we are able to salvage our dying planet.

It is the greatest

test of our capacity to reduce our consumption. The economic collapse will also present us with another great obstacle moving forward - wherein we must ensure leaders choose a sustainable path out into economic prosperity and not simply fall back on non-renewable resources such as coal and industrial production.

Shift


Listen and

SHIFT SHIFT SHIFT S H IConnect FT SHIFT


Contents 6 Time For Work

A short text with illustration by Thomas Lemon reflecting on how our organisation and approach to work has adjusted in response to COVID-19.

Architecture nd Environmentalism 8 Beyond the Pandemic An interview by Thomas Lemon with Dr. Jon Goodbun reflecting on the implications of COVID-19 on the environment and how architects should act in response.

The Curious Case of Japan in the 16 COVID Times An article by Callum McCrow examining Japan’s response to COVID-19 and why exactly they found themselves on a different trajectory to the response of the world.

26 Planet Maker Revisited

An text by Thomas Lemon reflecting on the successes and failures of his 2019 travelling design studio with RMIT and TU Delft, Planet Maker.

30 Architects Declare Explained

A short text by Thomas Lemon assessing the effect of Architects Declare Australia and understanding what exactly the movement is and what they are doing.

Review: The Water Dissapears 34 Eventually

A review by Thomas Lemon of Thomas Woodman's dance performance: The Water Dissapears Eventually, performed as part of Melbourne Dance Festival 2019.

Amazon Workers Safe to Assume 36 Work Unsafe

A short-essay by Daniel Bickle-Lazarow examining the ethics of Amazon's work practices and radical efficiency and optimisation in the background of the coronavirus pandemic.

40 Balenciaga F/W Show Review

A review by Yuchen Gao of Balenciaga's runway show exhibiting their 2020 fall/winter collection which highlights the environemtal effects of the fashion industry.


Time For Work

Time For Work APRIL 2020

With almost all physical places of assembly now closed, we are left to rely on technology to perform our work duties, study, shop and to fill a social and cultural void. Within the last month, we have been transitioning towards a virtual existence. We can now visit a museum or zoo1, partake in fitness classes, as well as study or work - online, from our own homes. Our homes, previously mostly limited to the fulfilment of our daily routines, are now the location for all elements of life. The way in which we distinguish these activities can no longer be defined by moving from one place to another, or separated by a daily commute. This line between work, leisure and the domestic was already blurred2 but social isolation restrictions have made things markedly harder to define. If current predictions are to be believed, working-from-home will become much more common post-lockdown but for some it has been a difficult adjustment.3 This shift in household activity may change the way we design and consider the home, in order to create the physical and psychological boundaries that previously existed between work, leisure and the domestic. Although, long before the invention of the office in 17264, the traditional homes of the Ancient Greeks and Romans (although very different) both distinguished between work and leisure ambiguously and this was primarily executed within the mechanisms of time5. Time, for those who are not privileged enough to have a dedicated home office, has similarly been the primary way in which many are able to distinguish between work and leisure throughout the current period of lockdown, in the face of endless distraction and concurrent domestic duties. As working from home continues beyond the pandemic, into the future, it seems likely that society will rely less on the built environment, distance and physical space for work. On the other hand, the impact of enforced isolation on anxiety, and loneliness has highlighted the need for ‘socially connected, vibrant public spaces’.6

1 https://www.kidsnews.com.au/technology/take-a-virtual-tour-around-theworlds-best-sites-galleries-zoos-museums-and-even-mars/news-story/5717c73be2321b a8dcfeedf35bf4d9c8 2 https://techtalk.gfi.com/survey-81-of-u-s-employees-check-their-work-mailoutside-work-hours/ 3 https://www.smh.com.au/business/workplace/working-from-home-a-newnormal-for-many-but-it-s-no-cure-all-20200406-p54hh0.html 4 https://k2space.co.uk/knowledge/history-of-office-design/ 5 AURELI, Pier Vittorio; GIUDICI , Maria Shéhézade. (2018) ‘The Form of Otium: Labor and Leisure in Ancient Greek and Roman Domestic Space’. in: Marina OteroVerzier (ed.), Work, Body, Leisure, Rotterdam, Berlín: Het Nieuwe Instituut, Hatje Cantz Verlag GmbH, pp. 155-162. 6 https://theconversation.com/reconnecting-after-coronavirus-4-key-wayscities-can-counter-anxiety-and-loneliness-136606


-07

Shift


“We need to do differently, and very differently, at that. One of the problems of contemporary capitalist development is that it makes us all poorer by depleting and destroying environments... yes it adds commodities to the world, but these are generally designed to quickly fail or become redundant, which is a part of the design of scarcity actually - whilst environments are permanently depleted.�


Architecture and

Architecture and environmentalism beyond the pandemic Interview with Dr. Jon Goodbun Dr. Jon Goodbun is now based in Athens, Greece where he runs Rheomode, a small experimental studio working at the intersection of architecture, technology, art and ecological pedagogy. He remotely contributes to the MA Environmental Architecture and the cross-college PhD programme at the Royal College of Art in London and similarly runs a research seminar at the Bartlett. He has published widely on questions of architecture, urbanism, environmental design and systems thinking, and is currently working on a book called ‘The Ecological Calculus’, which builds on his doctoral thesis ‘Critical Urban Ecologies: The Architecture of the Extended Mind’.

Jon is a family friend and I hadn’t had a chance to speak with him since starting my architecture degree. Considering his unique academic positioning, I spoke to him in April, as I wanted to hear what he had to say about the role of the architect during and beyond the multifaceted crisis we are all experiencing.

Shift


Interview with Dr Jon Goodbun

Thomas Lemon: Hi Jon, thanks for taking the

from the communities (indeed not just human

time to speak to me. I’ll start with a broader

communities) and users of those buildings, needs

question. How do you think architects will need

to be questioned.

to adapt in the economic aftermath of this global pandemic?

The simple fact is that there is no future worth having on the basis of our current models of

Jon Goodbun: The key fact to remember here

extractive and consumer capitalism, which is

is that this pandemic, terrible as it is, is not the

based upon violence and domination: of both

biggest problem that we are facing right now:

each other and the broader web of life within

our biggest problem remains global heating,

which we exist.

the climate crisis, and the broader collapse and degradation of ecosystems around the planet. In

TL: Your research has centred on scarcity,

fact, the pandemic is better understood as one

as a concept. How does this factor into the

of the effects produced by the destabilisation

exploitative

and reduction of diversity and complexity of the

industry?

nature

of

our

economy

and

planetary ecosystem. And in all of these cases, we need to think about our responses to these

JG: I was a part of a design research collective

problems in terms of social and ecological justice.

project that looked at questions of scarcity in

These are not simply technical problems – and

relation to architecture and design, a few years

treating them as just technical or design problems

ago. We produced a couple of publications which

is, in fact, a part of the bigger problem.

I think have stood the test of time quite well so far – a special issue of Architectural Design

Yes of course architects have an important

journal entitled ‘Scarcity: Architecture in an age

role to play but equally, most of the decisions

of depleting resources’, published in 2012, and

about building happen long before architects

then a small book called ‘The Design of Scarcity’

are involved… the site, the client, the budget, the

published in 2014 by Strelka.

programme of use, just the entire logic driving building development, which is in almost every

The question of scarcity has multiple dimensions.

case, directly or indirectly, capital accumulation.

It is a question of actual resource scarcities, literal

Almost every major decision has been made

limits to the quantities of given minerals on the

before architects are appointed and whilst on

planet. But it also enables us to understand how

occasion these decisions can be investigated and

most scarcities are actually socially produced –

shifted, on the whole, the very division of labour

in fact deliberately socially produced – to enable

that separates the design of buildings from

markets to function, and geopolitical power to

the making of buildings etc, and the decisions

be deployed. So whilst circular economy thinking

about building and urban and planetary space

can help to manage the first kind of scarcity, only


-011

social and political change can really affect the

within existing just in time commodity flows. One

second, and a shift to a more ecologically sensitive

of the things that we know from cybernetics and

and socially useful production, which doesn’t

systems theory is that highly efficient systems

externalise all sorts of costs and resources.

have very low flexibility in any kind of deep sense. And one of the things that we know from climate

There is still, in general, a flow of violently

studies is that we are now entering a period of

extracted resources from the so-called global

extreme instability – so in a basic sense, we need

south to the economically dominant centres

to

of power, and a flow of waste in the opposite

and systems… we need to start building in lots

direction. These relations are central to how

of spare capacity and redundancy… especially

global capitalism is currently working, whilst there

into whatever we define to be core and essential

are some interesting shifts being signalled – for

services and systems. And yes, whilst there are all

example, Holland saying that they will try to use

kinds of reasons that it makes sense to use ‘local’

this moment to reorganise their economy on a

materials in many contexts, it is just as important

more circular basis, what we are generally seeing

for workers - including architects - along existing

is those in power using the crisis in a disaster

global commodity supply chains to be forming

capitalist mode, and reinforce existing patterns.

new solidarities and new forms of collective

Architects, in general, are peripheral to all of this…

awareness at this moment.

start

encouraging

‘inefficient’

economies

construction sites and development plans are in general more likely to stop or delay rather than

There is a proposal that I sketched out for Derailed

become ‘better’, and architects will work with

last year – in the context of some Environmental

whatever systems they are told to work with,

Architecture research work at the RCA – to

although they can play a progressive role in at

take Andean lithium workers and community

least imagining and visualising other modes of

activists that we are working with, in Chile, on a

existence and other forms of spatial development.

long-distance train and boat journey following the lithium through the port at Antofagasta and through China and beyond, meeting with and

TL: In the path out of this pandemic, supply-

picking up the various other lithium workers

chain restrictions may force architects’ hands

along the journey. (Derailed Lab is an occasional

in returning to locally-sourced materials and

nomadic teaching and research vehicle, which

production methods. Could this form part of a

uses long-distance train rides to take ‘geopolitical

solution to the current model?

sections’ across the planet.)

JG: Exactly what ‘local’ resources are in a context of global capitalism is complicated. One of the things that COVID has shown is the lack of robustness

Shift


Interview with Dr Jon Goodbun

TL: One positive from this period of extreme

capitalism use this crisis to actually reinforce

instability has been the sharp reduction of

themselves, by for example removing existing

pollution and greenhouse gas emissions. Is this

environmental legislation as is happening in the

the first real example of the possibilities of a

US and China, and no doubt soon in Australia and

coordinated global climate effort?

elsewhere, in order to facilitate ‘recovery’! And by creating vast new quantities of public money and

JG: Yes it is very interesting to see what the effects

handing it over to large corporations, as we have

have been, and the crisis certainly demonstrates

already seen.

that quick changes to economies, and the damage that they do, can happen. However, one

At the same time, the media is and will prepare

of the things that is so concerning actually, is that

populations for a new wave of ‘austerity’ whilst

even the level of shutting down of production that

rebooting fossil fuel and extractive industries,

the pandemic has resulted in is still producing

and new forms of surveillance and control. Any

nowhere near the level of emissions reduction

crisis

needed in for example just meeting the Paris

– and COVID will hit unevenly – affecting the

Agreement. So yes, there is an interesting raising

poorest and most vulnerable hardest, and that is

of awareness of how quickly some systems can

because, in an epidemiological sense, poverty is

start to repair themselves, and also it reveals just

an existing pre-condition that through pollution,

how easily we can change economic systems

poor nutrition, stress, etc means that the poorest

if the urgency is there… but equally, it shows

sections of society, both within every country,

the scale of the changes required to meet the

but also globally, will suffer and die in the largest

demands that the environmental crisis – which

numbers… and that is what we are seeing.

always

amplifies

existing

inequalities

incidentally will make COVID look like a mild cold – actually requires.

We see that in construction… architects and the cognitive disciplines shift to working from home,

TL: Do you think we will continue to see reduced

while builders – in London for example – are

emissions in the aftermath of COVID-19?

expected to continue working.

JG: What we are facing now is the most

TL: Does this pandemic show us that simply

phenomenal political struggle… it should be clear

doing less might be a more effective response?

to anyone who can think that we simply cannot allow things to return to the previous normal. We

JG: Yes – well, doing less damage, rather than just

need to try to use this moment to unseat and

doing less. But even doing less doesn’t really help…

marginalise those forces that are busy destroying

it just delays at best the same damage. We need

the planet. Will that happen? – unlikely… already

to do differently, and very differently, at that.

we are seeing the most criminal forces within

One of the problems of contemporary capitalist


-013

development is that it makes us all poorer by

existing extractives capitalist production wreaks

depleting and destroying environments… yes

upon the planet, people and the broader web of

it adds commodities to the world, by these are

life… that is the kind of thing that we are involved

generally designed to quickly fail or become

in on the MA Environmental Architecture course

redundant, which is a part of the design of scarcity

that we set up at the RCA in London recently. And

actually – whilst environments are permanently

then there is just trying to make the design and

depleted. So the degrowth movement – I don’t

construction that does happen, and also that

like the name ‘degrowth’, it is confusing – but

could happen, more sophisticated in terms of its

the growing body of ideas associated with that

environmental design, using passive and clean

is certainly interesting, and actually is about

technologies where possible and so on. The MSc

a different kind of growth, driven by different

in Architecture and Environmental Design that I

imperatives…but it barely scratches the surface

helped to set up at the University of Westminster

of the scale of changes that we need to see.

is oriented in that direction.

Yes, I think that this crisis is giving people a

TL: Thanks again for your time. For those

chance to reassess what their values are… but

of us in architecture who are interested in

the point is that it really doesn’t matter unless we

environmentalism, who are some architects/

take power away from those forces and systems

theorists we can learn from?

that currently have it… JG: Well the movement is certainly going to miss TL: Large-scale ‘green’ projects are often a

the radical architect Michael Sorkin who died as a

lot less sustainable than they seem. Is there

result of COVID in New York recently. His mixture

space for environmentalism in commercial

of political, social and environmental engagement

architecture?

was a wonderful example of how architects can engage with the world.

JG: Of course, by definition, the mainstream environmentally

conscious

is

In terms of understanding some of the key

barely anything of the kind, simply because it

principles behind environmental design thinking,

reproduces

models.

I was fortunate a decade or so ago to be the

But that doesn’t mean that there isn’t work for

teaching assistant of Ezio Manzini, the important

environmental architects to do… and this falls

environmental service design theorist, and the

into a few categories… firstly there is a kind of

industrial chemist Michael Braungart, one of

environmental forensic work that needs to be

the co-authors of Cradle to Cradle, an incredibly

done – using architectural, spatial and other

significant book that really launched the whole

analysis to reveal the uneven development and

circular economy concept. There is much that

inequalities,

we can all learn from in both of their respective

capitalist

and

architecture

development

violence

and

damage

that

Shift


Interview with

projects still today. And I often recommend Fritjof

absolutely essential for understanding what is

Capra as an introduction to ecological systems

happening at the moment – both in terms of her

thinking in general.

absolutely key theorisation of what she termed ‘disaster capitalism’ – which describes the way

More broadly there are many wonderful teachers

that whole sections of the most criminal sectors

and voices that we can learn from. There are

of corporate capitalism have set themselves up

incredible bodies of knowledge contained within

to exploit exactly the kind of crisis now unfolding

Indigenous cultures around the planet, and those

and to use them to funnel vast quantities of public

voices must be allowed to speak loudly. There

wealth and democratic power into private hands.

are also fantastic insights contained within the

(So, for example, the COVID finance deal that

anarchist and green left movements – the reading

Trump recently pushed through, is rightly being

of Marx and Engels as ecological thinkers going on

described as the biggest theft in global history,

at the moment is incredibly powerful and useful,

with 90 percent of its funds going straight to the

as is the continuing relevance of anarchist and

very richest.) But also I’m thinking of Klein’s work

social ecology theorists such as that of Murray

as a part of the emerging discourse around a

Bookchin and Colin Ward, who have influenced

Green New Deal (GND). This is perhaps the most

the

movement.

important discussion going on right now, and one

The whole engagement of feminist theory with

that architecture and design students absolutely

ecological thought and science more generally –

must be keeping up with and participating in.

contemporary

Permaculture

Donna Haraway, Karen Barad, Anna Tsing and so on – is absolutely essential.

The

GND

discourse

asks

what

kind

of

reorganisation is required to rapidly transition In my own work, I have found the work of the

our current national and global economies onto

ecological

Bateson

a footing that both mitigates against increasing

incredibly useful for thinking about the way that

the unfolding environmental crisis, whilst dealing

ecological systems broadly conceived – in which I

with questions of climate and social justice.

would include both the living biological web of life

Unfortunately, two of the main politicians who

on this planet, as well as our social and technical

had embraced Green New Deal ideas – Jeremy

systems – are always cognitive and semiotic

Corbyn in the UK, and Bernie Sanders in the US

systems in various ways.

– have both recently been defeated and so, right

anthropologist

Gregory

now, it can feel like the future is indeed bleak (and This allowed him to propose the powerful thesis

it is interesting that groups such as Extinction

that when we damage ecological systems, we are

Rebellion have spent so much of their effort

actually damaging our own minds.

dealing with the sense of ecological grief and mourning that we all increasingly feel). But still,

And of course, someone like Naomi Klein is

the GND discourse is still a massive step forward,


-015

and a vital and vibrant area of discussion, although one that needs to widen its references and to find multiple new articulations, beyond the political imaginary of depression-era USA (i.e. the original New Deal). This is something that I am writing about at the moment.

Beyond all of that, I’d just recommend just getting involved in actually understanding how biological systems work through growing food – and watching these processes carefully, and exploring how environmental technologies work by building DIY heaters, coolers and the like. These kinds of practices and trainings are just as important as the theoretical and activist work.

Shift


The Curious Case of Japan in the COVID Times:

Where it all went wrong for the Abe administration

WRITTEN BY CA L LU M M CC R OW

This article answers two seemingly paradoxical questions. First, how did Japan control COVID-19 for so long while defying WHO protocols? Second, given that success, why have they recently lost control of the virus?

On the 25th of March, Japan announced that the Olympics would be postponed till 2021. The next day, 40 new cases of COVID-19 were found in Tokyo, a record increase in infections.

For many people, this confirmed their worst suspicions about the Japanese government’s response

to

the

coronavirus

epidemic.

For

months, the country’s experience with COVID-19


-017

had defied expectation. Japan, similar to South

Conspiracy Alone?

Korea, Hong Kong, Singapore and Taiwan, had

So how is it that Japan’s case count is so much

experienced a far slower spread of coronavirus

lower than other countries, given its minimalist

than its western counterparts.

approach to preventative measures?

Yet where most east Asian nations stilled the

The most common theory is that Japan’s unusually

spread of coronavirus with various combinations

low levels of testing reflect a deliberate strategy

of early border closures, intense testing regimes,

to suppress infection numbers, motivated by

aggressive

significant

a desire to host the olympics in 2020. There is

social distancing, the response of the Japanese

some evidence for this thesis. Japan’s number

government has been to do… not much.

of deaths due to COVID-19 is suspiciously out of

For instance, the Japanese government has,

alignment with its number of cases, usually a sign

against WHO instructions, done some of the least

that only the most severely afflicted are being

tests per capita in the developed world.

tested, resulting in undercounting.

Similarly, Japan has put only minimal effort into

Australia, for instance, by the 29th of March, had

social distancing. While the country was ahead of

3,809 confirmed cases of COVID-19, and 14 deaths.

the curve in closing schools and cancelling public

Japan meanwhile, had only 1,693 confirmed cases

events on March 2nd — shops and restaurants

of coronavirus, but a worrying 52 deaths, more

remain open, while working from home is rare. As

than twice as many as Australia, even though

one Japanese journalist puts it:

they had half the number of cases. Similarly, by

contact

tracing

and

the time South Korea had the same number of The contrast between Beijing and Tokyo is

deaths as Japan, they had three times as many

striking and unflattering to Japan. Downtown

confirmed cases. In fact, Japan’s death to case

Beijing is deserted as people try to avoid

ratio looks quite a lot like Italy’s did at one point,

spreading the virus by staying home. Tokyo

which isn’t the most comforting of comparisons.

looks like business as usual, with trains and subways still packed.

Yet it seems highly unlikely that under-testing

The messages have been mixed. Media remains

alone would explain Japans’ low COVID-19 case

optimistic, reporting that the virus is mild and

count. Japan was one of the first countries to

will likely taper off as summer arrives. Only

import COVID-19, hitting more than 100 cases mid

healthcare workers are voicing real concern,

February, before Italy, and well before the United

while the public struggles to judge how to

States. Since then, both of those countries have

protect itself from this ‘very mild’ yet deadly

seen their case numbers explode, Italy with their

virus.

health system overwhelmed, and the US now

Shift


The Curious Case of Japan in the COVID Times

leading the world in infections. Japan, in contrast,

it’s not obvious that the culture in Japan is actually

has seen only a gentle, if persistent, increase in

more ‘hygienic’, rather than simply being better at

cases.

policing its slobs in public spaces.

Flushing Out Culture

Realistically, the most relevant form of hygiene in

If under testing alone cannot explain the divergent

the fight against COVID-19 is handwashing, with

outcomes between Japan and other countries

soap, for a long time. Some do claim that Japan’s

with slow and small responses to COVID-19, then

culture of cleanliness extends to the lavatory. Vox

what can?

for instance, cites a survey on handwashing which claims that only 15% of Japanese people don’t

The most common set of explanations are to do

wash their hands after using the toilet, compared

with culture. From Reddit threads to news articles,

to 40% of Americans.

Japan is portrayed as a place where people are just naturally more hygienic than those in the

Unfortunately, survey data on handwashing is

West. A whole set of cultural traits are often

famously inaccurate, with upwards of 50% more

lumped together. Japanese people wash their

people claiming to wash their hands than actually

hands more, clean their shoes, don’t spit, wear

do. Handwashing surveys are better as a proxy to

masks, don’t litter, obey government instructions,

national honesty than hygiene, and you can bet

heck, even their own health minister said their

that if people were going around claiming that

policies

COVID-19 spread in China because people there

were

successful

because

Japanese

people were “sheep”.

are unhygienic and don’t wash their hands, Vox would be making the exact same criticisms.

Ideally, we would be able to identify which of these behaviours are more than mere stereotypes, and

The truth is that when it comes to handwashing

actually reliably slow the spread of COVID-19.

with soap, most of the world is pretty disgusting,

There is reason to be skeptical of many of the

and Japan is no exception. The specific numbers

specific claims in the “Japanese people are clean

vary a lot between observational studies, but

and obedient” narrative. As noted earlier the

almost all of them put the number of people who

government’s mixed messages mean that even if

wash their hands with soap after going to the

the population is particularly obedient, they don’t

toilet below 60%, no matter what country you

know what to obey. Furthermore it’s not clear that

pick. This WHO study for instance, suggests that

some generalised sense of cleanliness is useful

only 22% of people in Japan wash their hands with

in fighting COVID-19. The virus doesn’t spread

soap (compared to 52% in the states by the way).

through litter or shoes. Even the extent that

Which might explain the weird number of google

cleanliness does prevent disease from spreading,

searches for people complaining about a lack of


-019

soap in Japanese bathrooms.

greeting of bowing is far more hygienic than the handshake. That sort of change makes a

Even when people do wash their hands, they don’t

big difference when you aggregate it across a

do it well, with “as many as 80% of individuals retain

whole population. Using some incredibly spurious

some disease-causing bacteria after washing”. So

numbers, the average person in the will shake

the next time you go to a business meeting/party/

hands 15,000 times in their life, or 15 times a

volleyball meeting, remember that at least one in

month. Japan has a population of 127 million, and

two people’s hands are literally covered in fecal

COVID-19 has been around for two months, so by

matter.

avoiding handshakes over that time period Japan has prevented 4.2 billion possible opportunities

Can’t Touch This

for COVID-19 to spread — which is pretty truthy,

All of which makes handshakes a particularly

but you get the picture. While leaders like Boris

intriguing greeting. Offering them makes people

Johnson were busy catching COVID-19 by shaking

like you, and a good handshake will make it more

hands with infected hospital patients, Japan was

likely you get that dream job, which is unfortunate

slowing the spread of coronavirus with the simple

for millenials, because they’ve been told to “get a

act of the bow.

grip” on their weak handshakes. You also want to be careful because if you shake for too long (more

Face Off

than three seconds), people will start looking

A more recent cultural habit, but possibly no less

pretty anxious.

important is the normalisation of mask wearing.

Yet if germs wanted to invent a human greeting

Mask wearing has been controversial in the West,

by which to spread, they wouldn’t do much better

with many deriding them as unnecessary and

than the handshake. For this reason, even before

unhelpful, encouraging people to wash their hands

COVID-19 there was a movement to remove

instead (which has pretty limited effectiveness by

handshakes from a hospital setting, (even doctors

the way, only 53% of people washed their hands

aren’t hygienic, with less than 40% obeying correct

more frequently during the swine flu pandemic).

handwashing

more

As more evidence came out that masks actually

germs than high fives or fist bumps, and those

were useful, they switched to saying that we

“good strong handshakes” where a salesperson

should reserve them for healthcare workers,

crushes your hand while looking you dead in the

which is fair enough, but a non-issue in Japan

eye are particularly effective at transferring their

where the wearing of surgical masks has been

feces to your skin.

widespread for some time.

All of which is to say that Japan’s traditional

SlateStarCodex has already written an excellent

protocols).

They

spread

Shift


The Curious Case of Japan in the COVID Times

post on why mask wearing is actually helpful — the

Religion is Good for Spreading More Than Just

summary of which is that masks are especially

Ideology

helpful at preventing outgoing droplets from ill

Travel across the Sea of Japan, and you’ll see

patients from infecting others. They are also, to a

hints of the answer.

lesser extent, useful in protecting healthy people, especially in crowded spaces. Crucially however,

South Korea is now widely lauded for its response

when the norm is for everybody to wear a mask,

to COVID-19, but only a few weeks ago it was the

it is easy for the sick to do so as well, without the

source of the world’s biggest outbreak outside

cost in terms of social stigma. While we don’t know

of China and Italy. Indeed, the fact that the virus

exactly how effective masks are at preventing

spread so far in South Korea was something of

COVID-19, we do know that actions which don’t

a surprise. Having experienced both SARS and

make a huge difference on an individual level can

MERS the country was, like much of east Asia,

be very impactful when a whole population agrees

relatively prepared for COVID-19.

to engage in them. Mask wearing is no exception. Up till February 17th, it looked like South Korea had Drops of Jupiter

the virus under wraps. They had only 31 cases of

Taken in tandem, mask wearing and bowing are

COVID-19 and 30 of them had been successfully

powerful ways of slowing the spread of COVID-19.

traced and quarantined.

But Japanese culture cannot just be reduced to a set of norms around eschewing physical contact

The 31st case however, escaped the net. On the

during greetings and hiding the nose and mouth

18th of February Patient 31 attended a church

in public.

meeting of near 10,000 members, even though they were experiencing flu like symptoms. By 22nd

It is also about fitting lots of people onto trains.

February, 1,261 attendees of the church reported

As has been pointed out elsewhere, it is absolutely

symptoms of COVID-19. Within three weeks, South

bizarre that Japan has not been harder hit by

Korea went from 31 cases to more than 7000.

COVID-19 given that the WHO guidelines for social distancing call for four square metres of

To the Japanese government, this story is typical

space between people… Yet trains in Tokyo get so

of how COVID-19 spreads. On their government

crowded during peak hour that people have to be

websites they claim that while on average COVID-19

stuffed in by officials. How is it that mask use and

spreads to two people from each person who is

hand shake avoidance are able to compensate for

infected, 80% of infections do not infect others.

flaunting the advice on social distancing?

This means that unlike seasonal flu, which tends to spread in a pretty even way, COVID-19 transmits through large clusters, created by ‘superspreaders’.


-021

From the Japanese government’s perspective,

Do Viruses Dream?

this 80% has huge implications for how best to

This infection model also points us to the third

fight COVID-19. If only a small number of people

reason Japan has been so successful at slowing

are responsible for the vast majority of cases,

COVID-19. While Japan has still not reached the

then we can fight coronavirus by targeting the

levels of social distancing seen in many other

20% of people who do infect others, while the lives

nations, they did suspend both large scale

of ordinary citizens can continue with minimal

gatherings and schools as March began — well

disruption. By figuring out why what differentiates

before many places in the West. While these

superspreaders from the average citizen, the

suspensions may not seem particularly significant

government could avoid expensive policies like

relative to the lockdowns now occurring around

broad scale testing and social distancing.

the world — there is some evidence that large

And as it turns out, superspreaders are not

scale gatherings are an important vector for

defined

between

the spread of COVID-19 in the early stages of an

themselves and other people. Rather, it is to do

outbreak. Aside from South Korea’s experience

with location and behaviour. COVID-19 is much

with patient 31, the acceleration of outbreaks in

more likely to spread in some places than others.

Europe (a champions league game), Iran (prayer

From the same government website:

at Qom), and India (one man leads to 40,000

by

biological

differences

being quarantined) have all been linked to large The locations where mass infections were

gatherings.

confirmed so far are places where the following three conditions were met simultaneously: (1)

Furthermore, because of the exponential nature

closed space with poor ventilation, (2) crowded

of COVID-19’s spread, social distancing measures

with many people and (3) conversations and

taken early have an outside effect on the speed

vocalization in close proximity (within arm’s

with which the disease spreads.

reach of one another). Even though Japan did not implement particularly It’s the third of these criteria which explains why

intense

the densely packed and poorly ventilated trains of

compensate by being speedy and strategic with

Tokyo do not lead to infection outbreaks. Nobody

the restrictions it did put in place.

social

distancing,

it

was

able

to

talks on the train — not even on their phone — and of course, everybody wears a mask. Conversely, a

Success Sows Seeds of Failure

mega-church where people shake hands, hug, and

So Japan implemented modest but efficient social

talk in close proximity is a dream infection vector

distancing, normalised the wearing of face masks,

for COVID-19.

and eschewed the voluntary exchange of germs via handshake. This explains why, for weeks, the

Shift


The Curious Case of Japan in the COVID Times

country has seen such a gradual increase in cases

at home instead of encouraging them to head to

relative to countries such as Italy and the US.

hospitals prevents the disease from making its way through the medical system. This is a valid

What it fails to explain however, is why Japan has

concern given what happened to South Korea

seen such a surge in cases over the past week. If

during the last outbreak of MERS where a single

all of these national traits were slowing the spread

patient infected 28 people across various hospital

before, why are we suddenly seeing exponential

visits.

growth in Tokyo? More strangely, the Japanese government has The answer lies in the unusual path Japan has

also been unwilling to do widespread testing

taken to fight the virus. The Japanese government

throughout the community. Initially, this was due

decided very early on in the fight against COVID-19

to a lack of tests, but Japan now has far more

that total suppression was not a viable option, and

capacity than it uses. The government’s claim is

instead decided to opt for mitigation. Essentially,

that it wants to avoid an influx of false positives.

it accepted that people would catch the virus, and

Essentially, it seems to think that while tests

wanted to flatten the curve. It’s unclear exactly

are broadly reliable, even the small likelihood of

why Japan chose this path, but it is better placed

incorrect results leads to lots of false positives

than other countries around the world to do so.

when you begin testing large sections of the

Japan has the highest number of hospital beds

population. This, in turn wastes medical resources

per capita than anywhere in the world, by a long

on unnecessary contact tracing, and creates

shot, and is excellent at treating pneumonia,

panic.

which is the main way COVID-19 kills.

Why this is a concern for just Japan, and not South

In order for this strategy to be successful, the

Korea, Australia, or the WHO is unclear. Regardless,

government decided that conserving medical

instead of following the WHO’s exhortation to

resources was key. The main policy implication

“test test, test”, Japan has adopted a strategy of

being that the government would place limits on

controlling infection clusters.

testing, and play down the risk of the virus. Partly, this was to ensure that not everybody with flu

Essentially, the Japanese government seems to

symptoms would rush to the hospital, wasting

believe that it doesn’t have to trace or prevent

both tests and precious protective equipment for

literally every infection. Rather, they explain in

medical staff. In some ways, the decision makes

their policy documents that:

sense. Hospitals in New York and Australia have faced just this problem, backlogs of patients with

“The important thing is to minimize the spread

minor illnesses seeking unnecessary tests for

of infection in the country by preventing one

COVID-19. As an added benefit, keeping people

cluster of patients from creating another cluster”


-023

To balance the spread of infection clusters against

The fact is that even as the outbreak in Hokkaido

the desire to conserve medical resources, the

was being suppressed, it was obvious that Japan’s

policy of the Japanese government has been that

strategy was based on spurious statistics, deeply

only those presenting with very severe symptoms

flawed, and ultimately unsustainable.

of infection, and direct links to known cases, are tested. If someone does turn up positive, the

Let’s first look critically at the theory underlying

government has plenty of resources to engage

Japan’s response. Many of the policy documents I

in aggressive contact tracing and localised

came across while researching this piece cited the

shutdowns.

“fact” that 80% of people infected with COVID-19 do not spread the disease to others . Remember,

This is the strategy that was successfully used

this statistic undergirded their whole response,

in Hokkaido, where the Sapporo Snow Festival

because if the disease mostly transmits through

attracted more than two million attendees, and

superspreaders,

became the source of the largest outbreak in the

through the cracks didn’t matter, because they

country (is this a familiar story yet?). A state of

probably won’t spread it at all.

then

a

few

people

slipping

emergency was declared, schools were closed, infections were located and quarantined, and

Unfortunately, the statistic is deeply implausible.

within three weeks the outbreak was controlled.

The one paper I found investigating the variance of COVID-19’s R0 across people suggested that

Everyone’s Got A Plan Till They’re Diagnosed

while superspreaders can exist for COVID-19, they

With Pneumonia

are not the main transmission vector. It is also

The Japanese government took this as a sign that

quite strange that none of the many, many papers

their cluster control focused method was likely

investigating the R0 of COVID-19 noticed the quite

to be successful. They stuck with it, and Japan’s

important fact that 80% infected people fail to

case count stayed low relative to the west.

spread the disease. Similarly, no other government

So why then, have things suddenly gone so wrong?

or health body has made this statistic part of

Tokyo has seen its new cases skyrocket over the

their health policy, just Japan. Possibly because,

past few days, each day beating the previous

frankly, it simply defies common sense. There

record

estimates

is fairly broad consensus that on average, each

suggest that Japan is undercounting it’s infection

person with COVID-19 infects about 2.3 others.

numbers by a factor of five. A government panel

If 80% of people don’t transmit the disease to

said that infections were “rampant”, an emergency

anyone, then the remaining 20% must be infecting

task force has been convened, and the odds on

more than eleven people each. That seems

Tokyo entering lockdown increase every day.

especially ludicrous given that there is solid data

for

new

infections.

Some

from Wuhan indicating that the most common

Shift


The Curious Case of Japan in the COVID Times

location for transmission of COVID-19 is the home.

In The Harshest Soil The Virus Blooms Brightest

Either those 20% of people absolutely love dinner

The early implementation of moderate social

parties and large polygamous families, or there is

distancing — combined with a culture of mask

something wrong with Japan’s statistics.

wearing and a strong sense of personal space around the hands slowed the spread of COVID-19

Even if the superspreader theory was completely

in Japan. Unfortunately, those same policies

correct however, Japan’s cluster control strategy

and

was equally flawed in implementation. Essentially,

to get away with a pandemic strategy that

because the system is reliant on activating when

was based on bad data, poor logic, and worse

somebody tests positive in a hospital, it has

implementation. Under-testing, a deliberate part

difficulty locating outbreaks amongst people

of that strategy, prevented the government from

who do not end up in ICU, which, as it happens,

being accountable, meaning that just as COVID-19

represents a pretty significant chunk of COVID-19

was taking root in the country, people began

cases. Up to 50% of all people diagnosed with

abandoning the very social distancing which

COVID-19 are asymptomatic, while young people

protected them in the first place. One hopes that

in particular often experience extremely mild

Japan has managed to retain plenty of medical

symptoms. This means that outbreaks can rip

supplies with their conservative approach to

through young populations before showing up in

fighting COVID-19, because soon, they might need

a hospital, by which point it is too late for small

them.

cultures

also

allowed

the

government

scale interventions. *Originally

posted

on:

https://medium.com/@

The systematic under testing also had the effect

cut tlefishification/the-curious-case-of-japan-

of lulling the Japanese population into a false

i n - t h e - c ov i d - t i m e s - w h e r e - i t - a l l - w e nt - w r o n g -

sense of security. Because confirmed cases grew

2d0194b6d779

so slowly for so long, social distancing measures were being relaxed or ignored, even as the virus gained momentum and spread through the population. On the weekend of the 24th of march, thousands attended events like the Hanami cherry blossom festival or martial arts shows in Saitama. Just days later, cases started to rise in Tokyo. Sound familiar?


-025

Shift


The Curious Case of Japan in the COVID Times:

Planet

SHIFT SHIFT SHIFT S H I FMaker T SHIFT


-027

Planet Maker

How to simulate the future planet? RMIT Travelling Studio

In 2019, I went with RMIT to TU Delft to work with The Why Factory on Part 2 of the Planet Maker project. Planet Maker was an attempt to simulate and evaluate many possible futures, on a global scale. Primarily through visualisation of data on a sphere, representing Earth, we speculated on how

Studio Leaders Ben Millbourne (RMIT) Vivian Mitsogianni (RMIT) Winy Maas (TU Deflt/T?F) Felix Madrazo (TU Delft/T?F)

The idea of investigation in my group, Health and Body,

2019

was that the human body could be the changing factor in

our world may change in the future.

our attempts to rectify or minimise the effects of climate change.

Our idea of proposing the human body to be the changing factor in the effort to address emissions was to highlight the absurdity of pursuing global change by forcing lifestyle changes on individuals, as opposed to pursuing and campaigning against the actions of mass-industry - who, in all acounts, are the real offenders in the climate emergency.

Shift


Planet Maker Revisited


-029

The

data

we

put

into

“Can we simulate possible scenarios which can change the planet? How do we script those future planet scenarios? What do we need to know to achieve this? Who are our key planet actors? How do we test their needs and capacities?”

the

visualisations was (although made to look like it) in no way accurate. We tried our best to get the numbers to work but felt that it was more important to deliver an important message and were content with

producing wealth at any cost and

pseudo-science, particularly if it

driven by a culture which values the

served to attract attention.

ego disproportionately against the eco.

In the end, the project required many hours of work to achieve

Propositions such as “What if...

perfect

we

everyone in the world ate Nutella?”

really didn’t know the kind of world

do nothing to alter the notion that

we were attempting to visualise to

it is the individual who must take

begin with.

action on climate change - rather

visualisations,

when

than industry, who could solve many As a class, we proposed that the

of the problems Nutella creates

way to achieve systemic balance

simply by changing their recipe and

between the eco (the planet) and

production methods. What it does

the eco (the individual) was to find

achieve, is to highlight that there is

harmonious solutions, wherein both

a problem in the first place.

parties could benefit. It was a highly

Top: Laura Walters and I speaking to

optimistic approach but if I were to

Reflecting back, this project was an

approach this topic now, I think ‘ego

interesting experience and if it did

vs ego’ is an interesting mechanism

nothing else, it at least highlighted

to do it with. Decisions which harm

the fact that our decisions today

the planet are in every case driven

will have a significant impact on our

by the ego of an individual intent on

world future.

Winy Maas, prior to presentation. Bottom: Screenshots from the final presentation.

Shift


Architects Declare

Explained


Architects declare explained

Architects declare explained: why architects are declaring a climate emergency and what that means In July 2019, a group of Australian architects followed their peers, in the United Kingdom and Norway, in declaring a climate and biodiversity emergency. Included among the 31 founding signatories in Australia were 11 Australian Institute of Architects’ Gold Medallists and Glen Murcutt, Australia’s only Pritzker Architecture Prize winner. Less than a year later, in June 2020, the Architects Declare Australia website lists an evergrowing 912 signatories.

Shift


Architects declare explained

The declaration is as follows:

“The twin crises of climate breakdown and biodiversity loss are the most serious issue of our time. Globally, buildings and construction play a major part, accounting for nearly 40% of energy-related carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions whilst also having a significant impact on our natural habitats.

For everyone working in the construction industry, meeting the needs of our society without breaching the earth’s ecological boundaries will demand a paradigm shift in our behaviour. Together with our clients, we will need to commission and design buildings, cities and infrastructures as indivisible components of a larger, constantly regenerating and self-sustaining system.

The research and technology exist for us to begin that transformation now, but what has been lacking is collective will. Recognising this, we are committing to strengthen our working practices to create architecture and urbanism that has a more positive impact on the world around us.

We will seek to: – Raise awareness of the climate and biodiversity emergencies and the urgent need for action amongst our clients and supply chains. – Advocate for faster change in our industry towards regenerative design practices and a higher Governmental funding priority to support this. – Establish climate and biodiversity mitigation principles as the key measure of our industry’s success: demonstrated through awards, prizes and listings. – Share knowledge and research to that end on an open source basis. – Evaluate all new projects against the aspiration to contribute positively to mitigating climate breakdown, and encourage our clients to adopt this approach. – Upgrade existing buildings for extended use as a more carbon efficient alternative to demolition and new build whenever there is a viable choice. – Include life cycle costing, whole life carbon modelling and post occupancy evaluation as part of our basic scope of work, to reduce both embodied and operational resource use. – Adopt more regenerative design principles in our studios, with the aim of designing architecture and urbanism that goes beyond the standard of net zero carbon in use. – Collaborate with engineers, contractors and clients to further reduce construction waste. – Accelerate the shift to low embodied carbon materials in all our work. – Minimise wasteful use of resources in architecture and urban planning, both in quantum and in detail.

In Australia, we as architects are aware that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples have long espoused the cultural, social, economic and environmental benefits embedded in the holistic relationship of Caring for Country.”


-033

What does it achieve? The above declaration is undeniably admirable, and if all 911 signatories (including most of the largest firms in Australia) do adhere to the statements made in the declaration, then a massive shift in the sustainability of architectural practice, as a whole, is inevitable.

Unfortunately, within a year of operation, the strategies and outcomes for Architects Declare Australia (A.D.A.) are still ambiguous. It is impossible to evaluate its success without any real evidence to work with. Some architectural practices have used A.D.A. branded Instagram posts to declare, for example, that they utilise “100% GreenPower by 30 Jan 2020” but exactly how many of the signatories have achieved this, and their accountability if they did not, is unclear. According to social media, the group is also working for some time on ‘a guide to going carbon-neutral’ but this has yet to become public.

In an online webinar, A.D.A. spokesperson and award-winning Australian architect Caroline Pidcock explains that “instead of relying on governing bodies or associations to take the lead, it urges each architect to take responsibility for action in their own lives and practices”. Currently, this is the only real option. In a perfect world, the A.D.A. could utilise the platform to monitor the efforts of architects who have signed up to this declaration. Realistically, this would require an impossible amount of administrative work for an organisation led primarily by volunteers.

In the United Kingdom, RIBA (The Royal Institute of British Architects), has also declared a climate and biodiversity emergency. Alongside this, they have produced the ‘2030 Challenge’, a well-researched, sciencebased sustainable outcome target and metric table. The Australian Insitute of Architects, on the other hand, moved quickly to simply endorse the declaration by A.D.A. and has been quiet on the matter ever since.

Comment On the whole, A.D.A. is doing really important work and without them, sustainability efforts across the industry of architecture would not be making much progress. Their declaration has been incredibly important in defining a clear pathway for sustainability for practising architects in Australia, and in creating a cohesive movement and vision. In the future, I would like to see more openness in how they are planning to achieve their targets and for them to utilise their platform to hold architects to account who are working against their targets and best-practices. Importantly, I imagine that they would benefit hugely from more engagement and support from the Australian Insitute of Architects.

Shift


The Water Dissapears Eventually

Review: The Water Dissapears Eventually ★★★★★

DANCE PERFORMANCE BY THOMAS WOODMAN

Themes of temporality and ‘human-non-human'

Squirming,

interaction

leave trails of water on the ground - as icecubes

are

performance

explored

in

soundtracked

this and

energetic guided

by

ambient noise and lo-fi technology.

crawiling,

contorting

movements

are dragged and manipulated intermittently reminding us of how immediate and animated the performance is.

This 40-minute solo dance performance shifts in momentum through dynamic and drifting

What could be seen as a bare gallery, lacking in

sections guided by the technology at hand. Ice

sound and atmosphere sets the perfect contrast

cubes, water, a de-tuned radio and an e-reader

for a monochrome figure to display their pure

prompt and advise the choreographer/dancer

physicality and stamina in a gripping, sometimes

through the performance. What manifests is

shocking

a series of fluid, trance-like expressions and

performance.

sequences.

and

often

uncomfortably

*all photography by Thomas Lemon

intense


-035


Amazon workers safe to assume work unsafe WRITTEN BY DANIEL BICKLE-LAZAROW

Large

scale

machinery

is

dangerous.

The

industrial revolution introduced machinery to workers which allowed them to work the land at a previously unimaginable rate. With new forms of technology comes new safety hazards and protection from these risks determines which workers live and die.

In 1885 at the famous brickworks in Brunswick, a 16 year old boy lost his life working with machinery. The newspaper Mercury and Weekly Courier reported “...a terrible machinery accident occurred at the no.2 Hoffman’s Brick Company’s works, Brunswick, the sufferer being a youth sixteen years of age named John Delahunty. The unfortunate lad was employed clearing out dirt from underneath one of the rolling tables, when he lost hold of his shovel, and , in endeavouring to regain it, became entangled in the powerful machinery, the result being that his


-037

right leg was torn away above the knee joint.” This

looking technology” it caught the attention of the

is by no means an unusual story for it’s time, and

public unlike most patents that fly under the radar.

it’s unfortunately one of many examples available.

The patent was to claim ownership of a piece of technology that would protect a factory worker,

In the 21st century, Amazon’s technological

not by making the innovative technology safer,

innovation is speeding ahead as rapidly as the

but instead to simply enclose the factory worker

brickworks in Brunswick was in the 19th century.

inside of a metal cage then provide mechanisms

By using drones and robots to collect packages

for the worker to operate pulleys and levers from

when an order is made online, the company is able

inside the cage.

to offer some of the cheapest prices available for online shopping.

Determining whether or not this machine is an effective

Through

this

streamlined

process

of

and reasonable measure to keep the

online

workers safe is hard to judge without an in depth

delivery, Amazon has become a household name

knowledge of how Amazon warehouses work,

for shopping. It’s founder, Jeff Bezos, has reaped

however what has shocked the general public

the rewards, becoming one of the richest people

more clearly is it’s similar aesthetic to a prison

on the plant with a net worth of over $110B, nearing

cell. It might be fair to criticise this reaction as

the same sum of money that the Australian

a superficial way to view technology; whether

government has commited to the JobKeeper

it looks oppressive as opposed to whether it

scheme to bail out companies employing almost

actually is oppressive. Conversely it could be

one third of the Australian population during the

interpreted that the aesthetic of something isn’t

COVID-19 pandemic.

meaningless because it provokes memories and understandings of learned experiences, meaning

Amazon is now the 7th largest private employer in

if you want to design a prison it shouldn’t look like

the world, employing 798,000 employees totalling

a prison.

more employees than the entire population of some small countries such as Luxembourg

While both of these analysis’ are interesting and

(interestingly the single largest employer in the

probably both correct to a certain extent, what

world is the American military with 3.2 million

might instead be the key to understanding why this

employees). The importance of safety in their

form of cage-safety equipment has garnered so

warehouses has become a significant issue to

much attention, instead of a forklift driver’s cage,

contend with.

could be commonly understood sub standard

Safety equipment has just as many innovations as

working conditions of Amazon employees.

the machinery that it’s keeping us safe from, but when Amazon filed for a patent in 2016 for “forward

On the 30th of March, right in the middle of the

Shift


Amazon workers safe to assume work unsafe

Covid-19 crisis, Amazon workers in New York

comes to a measly $28,446 per year, far below the

walked out of their workplace and refused to

minimum wage of workers in Australia.

continue working due to Amazon not providing a safe workplace. “Strikers at the JFK8 warehouse

If we take the background information about

in Staten Island demanded Amazon temporarily

Amazon into account, it offers us a clearer

shut down the large facility for cleaning, after

picture as to why the safety equipment is

reports of multiple employees testing positive for

viewed so negatively by the public. But perhaps

Covid-19”. The Guardian reported the story after

the more important lesson to learn from taking

multiple workers in the Amazon warehouse tested

the broader situation into account is that the

positive for Covid-19.

viewer of the safety equipment is neither naive for simply reacting to the aesthetics of the

Amazon has been considered an essential service

cage, nor is the rationalist critic intellectually

so that shoppers can reduce risk of infection by

superior

shopping at home and not exposing themselves,

implications of the equipment.

however unlike many other professions, little to

layman’s reaction is the most profound because

no support has been offered to Amazon workers

they instantly understand that Amazon is not to

to keep them safe. Bezos wrote [Amazon has]

be trusted. They don’t need a higher education

“placed purchase orders for millions of face masks

to realise the simple truth that even when

we want to give to our employees and contractors

Amazon

who cannot work from home,” but very few have

safety equipment, they ultimately couldn’t care

been fulfilled.

less about the well being of their employees.

for

considering

might

be

only

effectively

the

practical

Instead, the

implementing

Amazon workers work to fulfill quotas that prove their productivity, however whilst the 1.5 meter distancing rule still applies at their workplace, no reduction in their quota has been established. They have also not offered sick pay for workers that need to self quarantine. Nor have they been offered medical expenses paid for if they were to contract the virus in a country with a severely lacking public healthcare system, putting workers working pay check to pay check between a rock and a hard place if they show minor symptoms. This lack of help is compounded by the fact that the median wage of all workers at Amazon

1 Mercury and Weekly Courier, 28 August 1885 2 https://www.forbes.com/sites/bil lions/2018/09/04/jeff-bezos-is-18-billion-richer-as- amazons-market-cap-briefly-hits-1-trillion/ 3 https://craft.co/amazoncom 4 https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/ americas/amazon-worker-cages-warehouse-en closure-metal-a8537876.html 5 https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/ mar/31/amazon-strike-worker-fired-organiz ing-walkout-chris-smallls 6 https://www.inc.com/bill-murphy-jr/ jeff-bezos-open-letter-amazon-employees-coro navirus.html 7 https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2020/04/01/ dtw1-a01.html 8 https://www.theverge.com/2018/10/2/17927478/ amazon-minimum-wage-15-dollars-increase-ber nie-sanders


-039

Shift


Balenciaga FW 2020

Balenciaga FW 2020 Review WRITTEN BY YUCHEN GAO

Demna

Gvasalia,

Balenciaga’s

director

both in the clothes and stage set curates a

presented his 2020 fall/winter collection in

sinister tone, whilst the model glides on water

Paris. The inspiration for the season blends

under a sky of hellish fire, waves and lighting. The

Demna’s personal experience and his concern

oversized LED screen hovers over the stadium

of the environmental effects by the fashion

as the water reflects and warps the visual. The

industry of today into one. The collection

audience is unabe to escape and must embrace

focuses on the direct link between the fashion

the disastrous conditions.

industry, consumerism, and the production of masses of waste that will inevitably lead us to

There is a strong silhouette and an extremely

the end of our existence.

visible reference to uniforms within this collection. Demna always had a fascination with workwear,

Demna offers a peak into the post-apocalyptic

which has been translated this season through

world, submerging a portion of the amphitheater.

materiality, edge conditions and small motifs.

The two-front rows of seating are inundated with

The garments encapsulate the understanding

water, forcing the audience to be immersed within

of priest’s robe, nun’s habit and football jersey,

Demna’s creation of the fearful and ominous.

motifs that are easily recognized by the audience.

The shades of black throughout the collection

The uniform references are just subtle enough


-041

to

avoid

the

collection

looking

“costumey”, but instead it explores the

idea

of

social

politics

and

constraints within this workwear.

“I

had

in

my

a

a

lot

of

research.

country

clerical

wear

come

from

I

where

the

Orthodox

religion has been so predominant,” he

“I

said.

went

to

church

to

confess every Saturday. Back then, I remember looking at all these young priests and monks, wearing these

long

robes

and

thinking,

‘How beautiful.’ You see them around Europe

with

their

beards,

hair

knotted back and backpacks. I don’t know, I find it quite hot—but that’s my fetish.”

Parallel to the workwear, Demna’s

the near future whether they will

religious

actually deliver on the promises

motifs

are

extremely

recognizable. Growing up in Georgia,

of sustainability.

his memories of the Orthodox church and

catholic

traditions

shaped

Although the collection carries a

his design. His own fetishization of

strong

Catholicism

moments

one does wonder if their words

of religious purity, femininity and

are accompanied with any actions.

ostentatiousness.

This

navigates

environmental

fashion

many

other

empire, major

amongst

houses,

mentioned

utilises

their

theme

of

in ways which does not create a

environmental consciousness, they

sustainable industry. I’m willing to

will be donating all of the chairs

remain hopeful and wait to see

used

children’s

next season, perhaps they might

centre and water to the city of

address the issue of sustainability

Paris as grey water. We will see in

more directly.

that

to

in

has

further

the

show

to

Shift

and

still

also

Balenciaga

materials

message,

resources


The End.


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.