Carl Dilcher Graduate Portfolio 2022 by Carl Dilcher

carl dilchergraduate portfolio

georgia institute of technology college of design m.arch ‘22

table of contents x=4 inequities grasshopper shoreditch kendeda geographies MoFD integration plutocracy information

3 6 18 20 23 25 32 44 50 52

light space matter modulator | x=4 arch6039 advanced architectural design studio prof. michael gamble fall 2020

confronting our history of inequities arch6039 advanced architectural design studio prof. michael gamble fall 2020

confronting our history of inequities contextualizing hypertrophic memory with history site relevance

narrative

collection

location+program

Bellwood Quarry was operating for more than 100 years and began as a prison labor camp, supplying Fulton County with white granite for government buildings and other civic projects. The neighborhoods it is situated in are predominantly black communities. As prison labor became outlawed, it became operated by Vulcan Materials. Its cameos in many popular movies and prominence as the centerpiece of Atlanta’s new Westside Park gloss over the site’s clouded history.

This collection seeks to sift and separate history from the qualifiable attributes associated with it through memory and tradition. The memorials, monuments, statues, plaques and other artifacts that celebrate figures under certain narratives serve as tools of oppression and mockery for those who have been victimized by them. Collecting these artifacts and grounding the attributable memory of them with the factual history that surrounds them provides an opportunity for confrontation.

An index and database make up the largest part of the program. Figures, events, symbols, and places that honor genocide, oppression, discrimination, murder, hate rhetoric and more will make up the database. The index physically manifests throughout the scheme. The collection is also composed of physical artifacts. Digital projections accommodate a larger collection for the physical space and will ground the objects of hypertrophic memory in their factual histories in order to dispatch their oppressive authority.

The project’s origin is situated on the north side of the quarry. The scheme is a living organism, intended to grow in either direction along its axis, wrapping around the edge of the quarry. Vacancy acts as a significant part of the program, leaving the implication that there will always be a supercedence of hypertrophic memory over history for this project to collect. A modern medieval garden along the scheme provide opportunity for remembrance, rest, reconciliation, and healing.

geometric order

material+lighting

kern + kunst

ritual of use

This proposal upholds an equity of access, open and transparent for people of all abilities to experience. This manifests in a linear scheme, with potential to grow at either end. Interior and exterior circulation provide countless points of arrival and departure. The container holds stern rectilinear form on the exterior, and dramatically sharpens along the profile of the index text in the interior conditions. Organized in three levels, vertical transition is minimized and handled with handicap-accessible escalators.

Granite from the site and other local quarries will contribute to the main shell of the project. The rigid edge of the index’s profile shall be cast in place concrete. Laminated glass screens divide the container providing surface for the index and allowing transparency throughout the scheme. A weatherable soapstone rounds out the jagged edge of the index. Natural light will penetrate the scheme in the openings. Artificial light will illuminate the index and artifacts as well as display the projections.

The core system is the container whose depths vary from 10’, 20’, and 30’. It is a modular kern system, heaviest in mass where the soapstone fills the void of the jagged profile of the index. The soapstone also acts as a symbolic element, meant to weather away and expose the jagged edges of the collection, legible from the exterior only in its terrorizing form. The transparency of the laminated glass throughout the scheme leaves a subliminal depth intending to disorient and weigh in its length.

Procession becomes the ritual of use in this project. It is a journey of acknowledgment. The predominant experience lies in traversing the scheme, reading the index, contextualizing the artifacts with their histories through projections and giving users the control of perspective. It is a record of the time at which the narrative and memory of the collection’s artifacts are seized and history is realized for what it is. This experience is not to be limited by time of day, weather, or accessibility. It belongs to each of us.

Fulton County Prison

Bellwood Quarry Georgia Tech

Downtown Atlanta

lameinated glass

64’

128’

240’

prefabricated concrete + soapstone

locally-sourced marble

exercises in grasshopper arch7030 media and modeling 3 james park fall 2020

Krispy Kreme Rejects

Three Mathematicians Walk Into A Grasshopper Script...

Suave Surface Curvature + Tantalizing Tilings

Donuts of All Different Sizes These donuts are different sizes, getting smaller due to their proximity to 5 points. The donut cut-outs are all randomly generated. Each of these Krispy Kreme Rejects is 100% unique due to both of these factors.

Klein Surface x(u,v): (1+cos(u/2)*sin(v)sin(u/2)*sin(2*v))*cos(u) y(u,v): (1+cos(u/2)*sin(v)sin(u/2)*sin(2*v))*sin(u) z(u,v): sin(u/2)*sin(v)+cos(u/2)*sin(2*v)

9 Layers of Surface Curvature Hell The surface is subdivided based on the amount of curvature. Amounts of curvature higher than the mean is further subdivided. The gradient representing the curvature runs from red to yellow to blue in homage of Dante’s Inferno.

These Donuts Aren’t Circles[?] The donuts are polygons with 5 to 10 faces. The number of faces and the size of the donuts are determined by their proximity to a wavy curve -- the closer, the fewer/smaller. The cut-outs’ sizes are randomly scaled to their host donut sizes.

Mobius Strip x(u,v): sin(u)*(-2+v*sin(u/2)) y(u,v): cos(u)*(-2+v*sin(u/2)) z(u,v): v*cos(u/2)

Fields of Gold Grasshopper tested. Sting approved. A flowerinspired motif is morphed onto a wavy surface. The result is a magnificent, flowing field of barley that would make Grammy-Award-Winning artist Sting shed a tear of joy.

You’re A Star All of these Krispy Kreme Rejects have a starshaped cut-out that varies in size due to their proximity to the lines that make up the Krispy Kreme logo. The star-shaped cut-outs also rotate and scale depending on their distance to the logo.

Stereographic Sphere x(u,v): 2*u/(u*u+v*v+1) y(u,v): 2*v/(u*u+v*v+1) z(u,v): (u*u+v*v-1)/(u*u+v*v+1)

Diamonds Aren’t Forever, 008 This tiling includes a “+” motif that generates octagon and diamond voids. A different wavy surface creates some exciting depth to the tiling. Its generative surface is not infinite...So, sorry Ian Fleming. Diamonds are not forever.

Assignment 1: Attractor Fields

Assignment 2: Mathematical Surfaces

Assignment 3: Morphing Tilings

the monolith of shoreditch arch7030 media and modeling 3 james park fall 2020 project with kathryn dayton + monica rizk + suzanne shorrosh [all work shown is personal work]

as a team of 4, we selected the monolithic shoreditch hotel in london by aqso arquitectos to investigate, analyze, and generate a parametric model of in grasshopper. each group member extracted a formal compositional logic and diagrammed them. my contribution to the analysis was a formal geometric study through section drawings. we identified the massing, facade, floor slabs + atrium, and interior partitioning systems to be the critical building systems that we would model in grasshopper. the script must allow variations for each individual system that would work individually and collectively. i scripted the floor slab + atrium system of the project.

FLOORS SLABS/ ATRIUM

ANALYSIS STEP 1

ANALYSIS STEP 2

18.34°

ANALYSIS

12.64°

In section, form is generated from a series of volume cuts and control point shifts

Cut the rectangular prism volume at a -18.34° angle from the top of the prism

Cut the rectangular prism volume at a 12.64° angle from the left side of the prism

ANALYSIS STEP 3

ANALYSIS STEP 4

ANALYSIS STEP 5

8.14°

5.09°

The left face of the prism becomes curved in profile; see formal analysis A & D

A courtyard is cut out from the figure at a -8.14° angle on its left face and a 5.09° on its right face; See formal analysis A, B or D for more information of the courtyard’s profile

The control point of the northwest corner roof is stretched vertically, to align with the slope of the cut from step 1

ANALYSIS STEP 6

ANALYSIS STEP 7

ANALYSIS STEP 8

The control point of the northwest corner roof is stretched along the axis of the cut from step 1, pulling the envelope of the northwest corner towards the intersection

Clad the figure with the envelope

Add the floor slabs, partitions, and internal structural elements

FLOORS SLABS/ ATRIUM

DERIVATION STEPS 1-4: FLOOR PLATE GENERATION

Establish the ground plane.

DERIVATION STEPS 5-7: FLOOR AGGREGATION + ATRIUM PROFILE

Copy plane vertically to desired floor slab thickness.

4’

35’ 3.

Identify intersection of planes and building massing.

Loft between the intersection curves to create side edges for the slabs. Close the slab with planar surfaces.

FLOORS SLABS/ ATRIUM

Repeat floor plate generation steps for each floor level.

DERIVATION STEPS 8-10: CARVING THE ATRIUM

Repeat per floor.

Generate a lofted surface through the atrium profile curves.

47’

35’

Offset edge of slab curves inward to desired atrium geometry.

Close atrium profile curves. 10. Split and trim floor slabs with atrium lofted surface.

VARIATION 1: OFFSET CONTRACTION

VARIATION 2: INCREASING OFFSETS

VARIATION 3: RANDOM OFFSETS

The volume of the atrium cuts squeezes down to half of its profile on the first and fifth floors, creating a wave-like gesture.

Offsets for the atrium cuts start as a smaller profile on the first floor and increase by two feet in each direction on each floor.

The atrium follows the original’s conditions, but on each floor one of the border offsets is randomized. The changed condition alternates around the atrium at each step.

combined systems variation parameters manipulated: massing + facade + atrium + partitions 22

the kendeda building in seattle arch8833 integrated building systems 1 prof. tarek rakha + russell gentry fall 2020 project with caite canfield + stephen conschafter + kathryn dayton + sebastian foxley + tasha snedaker [all work shown is personal work]

this team assignment tasks groups to design a new lateral load resisting system for the kendeda building for innovative sustainable design at the georgia institute of technology, but reimagined in seattle, washington. a braced frame proposal replaces the “x” frames with diagonal bracing. inspiration was drawn from the group’s lateral load resisting system tower design, build, and analysis. the braced frame tower utilized pairs of parallel, diagonal members in directions that perform in compression rather than tension. most of the new bracing system is embedded in the exterior to unburden interior circulation as much as possible. more bracing units were added to compensate for seattle’s increased seismic risk coefficient.

section oblique

axonometric from the northwest

axonometric from the northeast

axonometric from the southwest

axonometric from the southeast

transformable geographies arch6049 portman prize studio prof. david yocum spring 2021

traditional architecture has failed to combat omnipresent systems of white supremacy. an architecture that is static maintains the status quo of the white gaze. it does not challenge the perspectives that uphold injustices, nor does it take the opportunity to remedy this through the built environment. an architecture for a new reconstruction is reflective of the communities it has failed and serves; intentionally minimizes the construction process’ impact on a climate crisis that disproportionately affects historically and modernly oppressed communities; leaves a physical legacy of its informative nature; and embraces differences.

all architecture of the near future must reject the sub-liminal stimuli of white ethnocentrism. liminality is a state of intermediacy – a heterotopic condition of ambiguity that marks a nonnegotiable transition. and this transition can manifest in an architectural geography that transforms various modes of difference between people into an occupiable, liminal space. the near future of architecture is informed by the social conditions of difference – it is a cohesive, cartographic architecture of heterogeneity that creates revelatory experiences that challenge the white status quo. it is an outward-facing architecture that engages its reflective community and carries a social agenda. its programming, and most importantly, its experience map heterogeneity in a legible architectural environment that addresses exploitive and divisive injustices. this proposal minimizes its physical footprint, utilizes passive systems, and leaves a permanent legacy that fights the climate crisis and leaves a physical reminder of its impact.

1. locate the most racially-diverse clusters in metro-Atlanta based off of non-racial majority census tracts

2. construct spacial voronoi units based on proximity of clusters; smaller cells are closer to other diverse cells than larger cells

3. map differences in household income for each voronoi cell using the gini coefficient; the taller, the greater the income disparity

4. connect data with tensile fabric form

5. apply color based on probability of racial + ethnic diversity between residents using ESRI Diversity Index

6. elevate on heavy timber columns and temporary concrete footings; the proposal has a lifespan of nine months and sources local materials

7. add structural heavy timber members; vertical members act in compression and create a legibility of the unit height from under the structure

8. suspend enclosure from heavy timber beams; partitions do not touch the ground, leaving as minimal a footprint as possible to minimize environmental impact

9. develop wall types based on entry, transparency, and porosity; programmatic elements are outwardfacing, with increasing density towards the center

museum of fortunate decay | MoFD arch6049 design + research studio 1 prof. john peponis fall 2021

merging architecture and exhibit - through ambiguity in order to create congruence between display and building, the museum must itself become exhibit in a manner that is complementary and correlative to the material. under the theme of beautiful weakness: softening the city galleries are broken up and exposed en plein air. they are registered as a group, only by their thematic material and their positioning under a canopy that gesturally collapses into an evaporation pond. the structure is punctured with moments of ‘fortunate fall’ and upon the galleries, as decay and the notion of breaking down rigidity offer opportunities for growth and revealment. the roof structure is a two-way optical device: it manages the gaze in and out, from above and below. although host to rotational exhibits, the architecture of the museum of fortunate decay provides conditions which maintain the museum’s ethos. galleries’ irregularities in form offer spaces for prescribed exhibit types and modes, but remain malleable for future interpretation. the variety of conditions offers different fields of view of its contents and does not specify a singular vantage point - as does the circulation between galleries. the site is returned to the public realm, allowing it to convey its message to passerby. 33

MoFD galleries

strata permanent material: petrichor basin | scissoring ramps to garden | seasonal hydroponics | small-scale displays

interstitiality rotational material: segregated sculpture | temporal pieces | floor sculpture| visual art | land art

juxtaposition rotational material: floor sculpture| suspended sculpture | projections | temporal pieces | visual art

intimacy permanent material: experiential | audio | phenomena

portland office building integration arch8873 integrated building systems 3 prof. michael gamble + russell gentry + jennifer hsiaw + todd mowinski fall 2021 project with shenelle campbell + katie reilly + tasha snedaker + will reynolds

The project is a reinforced concrete infill building for commercial office use in Portland, Oregon. We Group 2 and Architects Instructors: Campbell, Shenelle Location: had to design the structural MEP layouts of the building in addition to the architectural design. The Georgia Institute of Technology Michael Gamble Dilcher, Carl Portland, proposal’s design drivers focus on passive systems to maintain thermal comfort, airflow, and shading. School of Architecture Jennifer Hsiaw Katie Oregon, USA Our building’s performance was simulated in Cove.tool. The overall Reilly, design strategy utilizes a double-skin ARCH 8833 Russell Gentry Reynolds, Will facade atop a reinforced concrete structural bowl.Todd Mowinski Integrated Building Systems 3 Snedaker, Tasha 12/13/2021 I served as the primary project architect: I modeled most of the project’s architectural phase in Revit, all of the structural systems, coordinated details, and delegated duties. I also handled most of the BIM management and created the sheets, titleblock, logo, and sheet layouts. Additionally, I worked on the spatial planning in our MEP phase, designed the roof drainage system, laid out the concrete structural system, drew the foundation plan, and drew some of the structural details.

Georgia Institute of Technology School of Architecture ARCH 8833 Integrated Building Systems 3 Group 2: Campbell, Shenelle Dilcher, Carl Reilly, Katie Reynolds, Will Snedaker, Tasha

Portland, Oregon, USA

Phase 4

09/28/21

Cover Sheet

CS000 01 COVER SHEET

05 MECHANICAL

CS000

M101

Mechanical Ground Floor Plan

M102

Mechanical Second Floor Plan

M103

Mechanical Third Floor Plan

M201

Mechanical RCP - Ground Floor

M202

Mechanical RCP - Second Floor

M203

Mechanical RCP - Third Floor

M300

Mechanical Riser Diagram

Cover Sheet

02 GENERAL G000

Sheet Index

G001

General Information

G002

Code Review

G003

Cove.tool EUI & Water

G004

Cove.tool Radiation

G005

Cove.tool Humidity & Psychrometric Chart

G006

Cove.tool Wind & Solar

03 ARCHITECTURE A000

Diagrams

A001

Program Diagram

A101

Ground Floor Plan

A102

Second Floor Plan

A103

Third Floor Plan

A104

Roof Plan

A200

Elevations

A300

Sections

06 ELECTRICAL E101

Electrical Ground Floor Plan

E102

Electrical Second Floor Plan

E103

Electrical Third Floor Plan

E105

Electrical Riser Diagram

E106

Lighting Ground Floor Plan

E107

Lighting Second Floor Plan

E108

Lighting Third Floor Plan

Georgia Institute of Technology School of Architecture ARCH 8833 Integrated Building Systems 3 Group 2: Campbell, Shenelle Dilcher, Carl Reilly, Katie Reynolds, Will Snedaker, Tasha

Portland, Oregon, USA 04 STRUCTURAL S000

Structural Cover Sheet

S100

Foundation Plan

S101

Ground Floor Framing Plan

S102

Roof Framing Plan

S300

Structural Buliding Section

S400

Details

S401

Details

S402

Details

Phase 4

10/12/21

Sheet Index

G000 drawing set includes general, architecture, structural, mechanical, and electrical series

Georgia Institute of Technology School of Architecture ARCH 8833 Integrated Building Systems 3 Group 2: Campbell, Shenelle Dilcher, Carl Reilly, Katie Reynolds, Will Snedaker, Tasha

Portland, Oregon, USA

Phase 4

10/12/21

Diagrams

A000 *drawn by Katie Reilly, included for design comprehension

17' - 4"

11' - 0"

Roof 36' - 0"

11' - 0"

6 Level 2 14' - 0"

14' - 0"

36' - 0"

Level 3 25' - 0"

4' - 0" 12' - 0"

Short Section 1/16" 1'-0" 30' - 0"

30' - 0"

12' - 0"

11' - 0"

Roof 36' - 0"

11' - 0"

Level 3 25' - 0"

Portland, Oregon, USA

Phase 4

14 Level 2 14' - 0"

09/19/21

14' - 0"

36' - 0"

Georgia Institute of Technology School of Architecture ARCH 8833 Integrated Building Systems 3 Group 2: Campbell, Shenelle Dilcher, Carl Reilly, Katie Reynolds, Will Snedaker, Tasha

Level 0 -4' - 0"

30' - 0" F

Event space Individual restrooms Storage room Coat closet Office lobby Open office space Private offices Office storage Pantry Conference rooms Staff lounge / pantry Restrooms Elevator Egress Stair Utility rooms

10 Level 1 0' - 0"

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15.

4' - 0"

Level 1 0' - 0" Level 0 -4' - 0"

Long Section 1/16" 1'-0"

Sections

A300

building sections

Georgia Institute of Technology School of Architecture ARCH 8833 Integrated Building Systems 3 Group 2: Campbell, Shenelle Dilcher, Carl Reilly, Katie Reynolds, Will Snedaker, Tasha

Portland, Oregon, USA

Phase 4

12/11/21

Structural Cover Sheet

S000 reinforced concrete structural isometric drawing

54' - 0"

17' - 4"

4' - 0"

12' - 0" 3' - 0"

4' - 0"

30' - 0"

10' - 0"

Group 2: Campbell, Shenelle Dilcher, Carl Reilly, Katie Reynolds, Will Snedaker, Tasha

30' - 0"

150' - 0"

30' - 0"

Georgia Institute of Technology School of Architecture ARCH 8833 Integrated Building Systems 3

Portland, Oregon, USA E

30' - 0"

Phase 4

10/12/21

2 A300 F

foundation plan

Level 0 1/16" 1'-0"

3' - 0" 12' - 0"

Foundation Plan

S401

A300

S300

S100

Georgia Institute of Technology School of Architecture ARCH 8833 Integrated Building Systems 3 Group 2: Campbell, Shenelle Dilcher, Carl Reilly, Katie Reynolds, Will Snedaker, Tasha

#8 Rebar Double skin facade vent

#8 Rebar

0' - 8"

#6 Rebar

Portland, Oregon, USA

Phase 4

10/12/21

Details

Front Facade Foundation 1/2" 1'-0"

Front Facade Floor to Wall 1/2" 1'-0"

S401

connection details at front facade *drawn by Carl Dilcher + Will Reynolds

Terminal Unit

Supply Air Duct A

Supply Air Diffuser

ZONE 2

Return Air Duct Return Air Diffuser

B ZONE 11

ZONE 1

ZONE 3

Georgia Institute of Technology School of Architecture ARCH 8833 Integrated Building Systems 3 Group 2: Campbell, Shenelle Dilcher, Carl Reilly, Katie Reynolds, Will Snedaker, Tasha

ZONE 10

ZONE 9

ZONE 4

Portland, Oregon, USA E

ZONE 8

Phase 4

ZONE 5

11/09/21

ZONE 7

ZONE 6

Level 1 - Mechanical 1 1/16" 1'-0"

Mechanical Ground Floor Plan

M101

level 1 mechanical duct plan *drawn by Katie Reilly for scope of work comprehension

plutocratic palaces arch8833 constructing the visual prof. harris dimitropoulos fall 2021

an architecture of information arch6050 design + research studio 2 prof. herman howard spring 2022

social justice is about providing equal opportunities and access to resources to all people. it is a product of the past, present, and future. there can be no social justice without transparency. injustices are hidden and out of reach through the use of human senses. transparency yields accountability. a space that excels in being socially just is one that promotes: listening, conversation, and action. architecture has long been a tool of oppression, but it can also be a tool of elation and elevation. the ethos of this can easily translate into academic institutions like atlanta university center’s robert w. woodruff library. the library is the predominant shared resource of all of the auc hbcus. however, it can serve as a catalyst of social justice for the larger public, beyond the center’s academic population. with an emphasis on assembly, conversation, and empowerment, a revitalized robert w. woodruff library can be a primer for greater unity and equity. ff the aim of social justice is to empower people in equitable and just ways, then the tool for this action is education. the robert w. woodruff library is an apt environment to elevate the accessibility and transparency of information. access to information is a human right. the modern library should not only be a repository of information that preserves significant artifacts and provides static terminals of learning -- it can also be a physical presence of information.

PROJECT STATEMENTS LIBRARY STATEMENT

LIGHT

Social Justice is the door to learning. It is a lens that sheds light on knowledge and learning. It is only through a study and grounding of social justice that we can truly lead impactful lives.

Light is a powerful tool. The existing library is in need of more daylighting. It should be controlled in order to protect important contents, but it can be intentfully sculpted to construct empathy for the building in a poetic manner. More openings can be surgically created on the north and south faces that reflect the human scale in a way that the existing facades do not. The roof can also be punctured in ways that don’t compromise the existing superstructure/column grid by creating openings at the columns.

social justice center --> library --> housing (resident scholars) The library has additionally become a place of social justice, equipping students and the community with information in order to learn about systems of inequities and arm them to challenge the systems that uphold them. This is an opportunity to create a new method of learning and understanding about the issues that social justice seeks to address. URBAN MOVES James P. Brawley Dr is a significant point of departure (because of its campus-unifying axis) but it should not be the exclusive urban fabric factor. The RWW Library should also enrich the Beckwith St corridor to bring ITC and Morris Brown into the fold as well. There is an opportunity to use a residential program to frame an E/W axis to the entrance of the RWW Library. Additionally, the James P. Brawley Drive corridor should provide more direct access to Spellman College and be extended to the Morehouse School of Medicine. Situated at the intersection of these two inclusive routes can elevate the library’s connection to all AUC campuses and its role as an outward facing constitution to the public.

PROGRAM SOCIAL JUSTICE CENTER

LIBRARY

The Center for Social Justice will serve as the physical and metaphysical threshold for the project. It is a space for discussion, expression, and agency. The Center for Social Justice will be open to the public during all standard building operating hours.

The Library is a natural beacon of activity for its constituent campuses. In order to provide a public living room without compromising the library’s program, the roof can be transformed to an accessible space that is open to the public during the day. The ascension begins through the social justice center.

Transparency is key to any social justice programming. The open-air, atrium-like volume ushers light into the existing RWW Library and displays the activity within to all passersby along Brawley. Sub-programming is organized into 3 loose categories that are oriented in a vertical hierarchy: inequities, progress, and exhibition. The bottom level (the only full floorplate) is for the presentation and discussion of inequities and injustices. The stories, lessons, and experiences shared here are the foundation for future social justice action. The middle zone covers social justice in progress. The highest area is a space for education, sharing successful case studies and movements to be replicated across the world.

RESIDENCES There will be 2 components of the residential program: resident scholar/guest lecturer housing + mixed student housing split between all AUC campuses. The resident scholar/guest lecture housing are communal living units with single bedrooms. Creating community through shared living spaces serves to elevate collaboration and discussion.

EXISTING SITE PLAN MLK JR DR SW

ATLANTA STUDENT MOVEMENT BLVD

ID E

JAMES P BRAWLEY DR SW

JOSEPH E LOWERY BLVD SW

BECKWITH ST SW

PROPOSED SITE PLAN MLK JR DR SW

RT H

SID

ED RS W

ATLANTA STUDENT MOVEMENT BLVD

JAMES P BRAWLEY DR SW

JOSEPH E LOWERY BLVD SW

BECKWITH ST SW

X IS T B IN R G A W R L ES E I Y D H EN A T L I L A

X IS O T T IN IS G M R O ES S I S D S EN U IT T E IA S L

HIS

FAC

ULT

OW -

X IS

C G A R U E S S U ID IT E E N S T IA

TO RIC

James P. Brawley Dr SW (pedestrian only)

James P. Brawley Dr SW (vehicular traffic)

Student Residential Courtyard

Existing Parking Lots

Otis Moss Suites (Morehouse) 360 students | CAU Suites (CAU) - 300 students | Brawley Hall (CAU) - 400 students

Library 148,900 sqft

Social Justice Center 69,595 + 8,800 sqft

Public Space 85,600 sqft

Student Public Space 15,345 sqft

Student Apartments 240,800 sqft

Communal Apartments 27,080 sqft

Cafe 1,050 sqft

Food Court 74,500 sqft

Parking Deck 250 parking spots

Pedestrian Brawley + Beckwith Corridor

MEDIA SUPPORT

RESEARCH

LIBRARY

STUDY ARCHIVE

GATHERING/ SOCIAL

MULTIPURPOSE

LECTURE

SOCIAL JUSTICE

FOOD

EXHIBITION DISCUSSION

RESIDENTIAL COLLECTIVE RESIDENCE

STUDENT SUPPORT

STUDENT APARTMENT

PUBLIC ACCESS CONTROLLED ACCESS

PROPOSED PROJECT - DESIGN PROCESS

existing library

social justice center as new face of library

new archives facilities + residential component

social justice center massing is battered, but stands resolute in its mission

bring more light into the library with column lightwells and windows

unify the composition with an envelope that reflects the human scale

EXISTING - EAST

128 FT

PROPOSED - EAST

128 FT

EXISTING - WEST

128 FT

PROPOSED - WEST

128 FT

EXISTING - NORTH

128 FT

PROPOSED - NORTH

128 FT

EXISTING - SOUTH

128 FT

PROPOSED - SOUTH

128 FT

FLOOR PLAN EXISTING - LEVEL 1

128 FT

144

192 FT

FLOOR PLAN PROPOSED - LEVEL 1

FLOOR PLAN EXISTING - LEVEL 2

128 FT

144

192 FT

FLOOR PLAN PROPOSED - LEVEL 2

FLOOR PLAN EXISTING - LEVEL 3

128 FT

144

192 FT

FLOOR PLAN PROPOSED - LEVEL 3

SECTION

EXISTING - LATITUDINAL / AT MAIN ENTRANCE

128 FT

PROPOSED - LATITUDINAL / AT MAIN ENTRANCE

EXISTING - LONGITUDINAL / AT MAIN ENTRANCE

PROPOSED - LONGITUDINAL / AT MAIN ENTRANCE

CARL DILCHER