Design Portfolio - Carly De La Hoz

Page 1

carly de la hoz design portfolio


Research experience T h e Fa v e l a Ty p o l o g y : A r c h i t e c t u r e i n t h e S e l f - B u i l t C i t y, R i o d e J a n e i r o, B r a z i l , 2 0 1 2  –  2 0 1 3 F l o o d R i s k M i t i g a t i o n i n t h e Ya n g t z e R i v e r D e l t a , S h a n g h a i , C h i n a , 2 0 1 2  –  2 0 1 3 P r o f e ss i o n a l e x p e r i e n c e B e y e r B l i n d e r B e l l e A r c h i t e c t s & P l a n n e r s LL P [ B B B ] , N e w Yo r k , NY, 2 0 1 1  –  p r e s e n t M e t r o p o l i t a n M u s e u m o f A r t L o n g Te r m Fe a s i b i l i t y P l a n , N e w Yo r k , NY W h i t n e y M u s e u m , B r e u e r B u i l d i n g I n t e r i o r Fi t - o u t , N e w Yo r k , NY 2 1 5 C h r y s t i e S t r e e t H o t e l , N e w Yo r k , NY | E x e c u t i v e A r c h i t e c t : B B B | D e s i g n A r c h i t e c t : H e r z o g & d e M e u r o n C h a r l t o n S t r e e t C o n d o m i n i u m s , N e w Yo r k , NY C a r l e s Va l l h o n r a t , A s s i s t a n t D r a f t s p e r s o n , P r i n c e t o n , N J , 2 0 1 2 Awa r d s & R e c o g n i t i o n School of Architecture Senior Thesis Prize, 2013 Awarded to the senior in the architec ture depar tment who has written the most outstanding thesis Kenneth A. Maxwell Senior Thesis Prize, 2013 A w a r d e d t o t h e s e n i o r w h o h a s w r i t t e n t h e m o s t o u t s t a n d i n g t h e s i s i n B r a z i l i a n a n d Po r t u g u e s e S t u d i e s Urban Studies Thesis Prize, 2013 Awarded to the seniors who have written the most outstanding theses on urban topics Princeton University Viewbook, 2013 A p u b l i c a t i o n s e n t t o a l u m n i a n d p r o s p e c t i v e s t u d e n t s ; w a s o n e o f f o u r t h e s e s f e a t u r e d Skills R e v i t , A u t o CAD, R h i n o, G r a s s h o p p e r, E c o t e c t , A r c GI S

C a r ly d e l a h o z

e d u c at i o n P r i n c e t o n U n i v e r s i t y, A . B . i n A r c h i t e c t u r e , m a g n a c u m l a u d e , P h i B e t a K a p p a , C l a s s o f 2 0 1 3 Cer tificates in Urban Studies and Latin American Studies


C a r ly d e l a h o z

s e n i o r t h e s i s 0 1 T h e Fa v e l a Ty p o l o g y A c a d e m i c w o r k 04 Milam Guest Residence 0 9 Ta i h u C o a s t e r Pa r k 13 Landscape Studio 14 Multi-spor ts Complex 1 6 Pa r a m e t r i c C h a i r 2 1 K i l d e n Pe r f o r m i n g A r t s R e s e a r c h 2 3 Ya n g t z e R i v e r D e l t a 2 4 S a n d , S t r i p, A s p h a l t 25

P r o f e ss i o n a l W o r k

28

sk e t c h e s


C a r ly d e l a h o z T h e Fa v e l a Ty p o l o g y

My thesis presents the favela as a viable housing model for Rio de Janeiro, as opposed to a housing problem. In studying how homeowners have constructed and improved their own homes, I examine how this raw, hand-crafted urbanism leads to the longevity and vitality of the favela as an architectural typology. From asking, “What is architectural about the owner-built dwelling,” to comtemplating theories of the oblique and sensory design within the context of the topographically dynamic hillside favela, my thesis urges architects and planners to reconsider their approach towards design interventions in informal urban settlements. Instead of upgrading favela communities to the standards set by formal cities – often based on broad generalizations – designers and planners should learn from each favela’s specific spatial logic, absorbing the urban fabric of the formal city into the texture of favelas, and producing a gradient typology that spans formality and informality. By disassembling the ideological constructs associated with the favela typology, this thesis has proposed a theoretical project for reconsidering architecture in the self-built city.

01

research

The Favela Typology

Senior Thesis ; 2012 – 2013 Mario Gandelsonas and Bruno Car valho


C a r ly d e l a h o z

T h e Fa v e l a Ty p o l o g y research

02


C a r ly d e l a h o z

T h e Fa v e l a Ty p o l o g y research

03


C a r ly d e l a h o z Milam Guest Residence 04

Academic

Milam Guest Residence

Junior Independent Studio Spring 2012 ; Paul Lewis


C a r ly d e l a h o z

PROJECT: Modify an iconic home by designing a guest residence on site. original house: Paul Rudolph’s Milam Residence in Ponte Vedra, Florida

The various levels are inspired by Paul Rudolph’s emphasis on subtle sectional shifts, and allow for visual access from the main house to the guest house, and from the guest house to the ocean. Space flows continuously throughout the guest house, with unimpeded views enhanced by floorto-ceiling glass and half-wall partitions.

Milam Guest Residence

CONCEPT: Situate the guest house at the bottom of the hill on which the Milam Residence sits. The guest house responds to the angle of the hill, and is organized by successive levels of program, starting from the public (living room, indoor/outdoor bathroom facing the beach), spiraling up to the private (kitchen, bedroom). The house fluidly pulls the outdoors in and the indoors out with exterior walls that slide open and roofs that become terraces. The bedroom and kitchen have half walls to allow for air flow through the house and down into the living room.

mILAM rESIDENCE GUEST HOME views

Sliding walls

Private

half wallS

Public

Ocean

Terraces 05

academic

[left to right] Plans of guest residence; lower levels on bottom; upper levels on top; Sections cut from the left side of the house to the right side [view drawings from bottom to top]; Sections cut from the front of the house to the back


C a r ly d e l a h o z Milam Guest Residence 06

academic

Sectional analysis of the original house; drawings and physical model


models: The program sketch models helped inform the arrangement of the final design, with public spaces on the lower levels for guests coming in from the beach, and private spaces above.

o

Ki Bed

o ro

in v i L

p

c or

Milam Guest Residence

c

p ar

or o td g u o inin d

rt

e h c t

C a r ly d e l a h o z

Constraints: Residence must include a living room, bedroom, kitchen, garage, and full bath

n

m

g

o Ro

m

th ba

h

h 07

academic

c a e b


C a r ly d e l a h o z Milam Guest Residence

CONCEPT: A bookshelf that fits into the space and also creates space, forcing circulation either through or around the structure. The bookshelf takes the motif of elevational shifts and sliding planes, and collides shaped frames with conventional shelves, creating cutouts for storing large objects or for viewing the waterfront, as well as smaller nooks for tiny books or knick knacks. MATERIAL: basswood, Elmer’s glue SCALE: 3” = 1’-0”

[top and right] photographs of bookshelf [bottom] final product next to study model

08

academic

milam bookshelf


EDLE PEAK

TUNNEL

C a r ly d e l a h o z Ta i h u C o a s t e r Pa r k

Tourist Map LEISURE COASTER START

THRILL COASTER

END

TEA HOUSE TEMPLE + GIFT SHOP

M

TICKETS / INFO / RESTROOMS

M

METRO TUNNEL / FUNNEL ENTRANCE GATE

ENTER HERE!

VIEW POINTS

x

x x x

END

x

Site Plan

09

academic

Taihu Coaster Park

ARC 4 0 4 ; F a l l 2 0 1 2 Mario Gandelsonas

START


C a r ly d e l a h o z

Task: Design an amusement park in Suzhou’s “HiTech” District based on findings from the garden case study, charrette at Tongji, and site visit.

Tunneled gate

Taihu Rock

Concept: A coaster that plays upon and perforates the existing topography of the hill. Visitors can choose to board a coaster that leisurely strolls down the hillside, or one that provides the thrill of a hydraulic coaster. The simultaneous roller coasters would intersect at certain points, so that the riders come face to face with each other at “high-thrill” moments.

Ta i h u C o a s t e r Pa r k

Precedent: The Taihu Scholar Rock, one of the most visually interesting textures in the traditional Chinese Garden, was the inspiration for my park. Likened to “miniature cosmic mountains,” the Taihu Rock has been used by scholars and philosophers for centuries as a visual stimulus for contemplation. He Hill

Tunnel Conditions: Just as the Chinese garden stimulates the observer with pavement juxtapositions across courtyards, the Taihu Coaster keeps the observer on his toes with contrasting tunnel conditions.

Wood & stone

Speed & light

Textured cave

Smooth & shiny

Pop-up view

10

academic

[middle photo strip] surface perforation studies


C a r ly d e l a h o z

THRILL PATH THRILL PATH

LEISURE PATH

LEISURE PATH

Ta i h u C o a s t e r Pa r k

High Intensity Moments

DROP

EDLE PEAK

LOOP SPIRAL

DROP THROUGH TUNNEL

“HEAD CHOPPER”

DROP

NEEDLE PEAK

LOOP

LOOP SPIRAL

“HEAD CHOPPER”

DROP THROUGH TUNNEL

LOOP

LEISURE COASTER START

THRILL COASTER

END

TEA HOUSE TEMPLE + GIFT SHOP

M

TICKETS / INFO / RESTROOMS

M

METRO TUNNEL / FUNNEL ENTRANCE GATE

Sections through hill at 20 meter increments

VIEW POINTS

Perforations

Paths

Sections

11

academic

ENTER HERE!


-u

t

d

es

t

th

C a r ly d e l a h o z

un

r de

ze ili

d pe

n ria

y wa u r

SITE: Boston City Hall Plaza Task: Transform the under-utilized plaza into a “successful� public space.

Landscape Studio

CONCEPT: Break up the sea of brick into floating platforms, freeing the ground from what before was a completely impermeable surface, and allowing for different programs to inhabit each platform. Platforms could become completely inaccessible and overgrown with vegetation, or could connect in a labyrinthine configuration, inviting people to explore the site and interact with it, rather than use it simply as a transitive space, as it is used today.

[top] Program and site studies; [bottom left] Photograph of existing site on a warm summer day, showing the desolate plaza, and [bottom right] the proposed, more activated site

12

academic

Landscape Studio

Career Discovery ; Harvard GSD Summer 2010 ; Chris Sherwin


C a r ly d e l a h o z

[left] hand drawing+collage, study of Shaquille O’Neal’s footwork during a layup [right] hand drawing+collage, temporal scaffold of a basketball game

LIFTOFF

Multi-spor ts Complex

PROPULSION

PIVOT

TASK: After studying spatial and temporal relationships within a chosen sport, students were ask to design a “spectator apparatus” that would provide the optimal viewing experience for three sports: basketball, archery, and sumo wrestling.

FOOT PLANT

ARC 2 0 4 ; A r c h i t e c t u r a l D e s i g n S t u d i o Spring 2010 ; Lindy Roy

13

academic

Multi-sports Complex

CONCEPT: A system of moveable cubes, operated by hydraulic pumps, that could raise to different levels in a tournament-like setting based on which sports are being played. The spectators would have boxed seats that follow specific sports or provide sightlines through multiple games at once.


C a r ly d e l a h o z Multi-spor ts Complex

Hand-drawn plans and sections, with collaged figures

academic

14


C a r ly d e l a h o z Pa r a m e t r i c C h a i r

expansion 40 in

15

academic

Parametric Chair

J u n i o r I n d e p e n d e n t S t u d i o ; Fa l l 2 0 1 2 Jesse Reiser and Nanako Umemoto

contraction 20 in


C a r ly d e l a h o z Pa r a m e t r i c C h a i r

[learning from the body] hand-drawn sections of a baby doll

[learning from contours] testing material tautness in relation to the model

process: structure & skin

16

academic

void contour forms; sketches inspired by bunching and contouring


C a r ly d e l a h o z

FROM BABY DOLL TO CHAIR: Using wire to trace the contours of the sectional model, I was intrigued by the ability of the custom mesh to expand, contract, and mold with movement.

Pa r a m e t r i c C h a i r

TRANSITION: I explored several possibilities for using wire mesh as a means for responding to bodily movement and contours, creating a chair that would mold specifically to each user.

[top] scans of hand drawings, overlaid sections of doll; [middle] wire model based on section overlay; [bottom] chair sketch models

academic

17


C a r ly d e l a h o z Pa r a m e t r i c C h a i r 18

academic

fabrication

[counterclockwise from top left] hand drawings of design; Grasshoppergenerated variations; steel frame, unpainted; custom steel form for welding


C a r ly d e l a h o z Pa r a m e t r i c C h a i r

Process: The cushion consists of a thin steel CHAIR: The final product is able to withstand the mesh whose plan is a doubly-dense replica of weight of two adult males. It can be stretched the criss-cross plan of the chair. Over the mesh, to 40 inches or compressed to half its length. the cushion was stuffed and sewn onto the chair frame, fastening all pieces of the chair together, and allowing for uniformity of movement across cushion and frame. academic

19


C a r ly d e l a h o z

Grasshopper definition

K i l d e n Pe r f o r m i n g A r t s 20

academic

Kilden Performing Arts

ARC 3 7 4 ; C o m p u t a t i o n a l D e s i g n Fall 2011 ; Steve Sanderson


C a r ly d e l a h o z K i l d e n Pe r f o r m i n g A r t s

Original building (left) and geometry-based iterations

Building: Kilden Performing Arts Center in Kristiansand, Norway, by ALA Architects Task: Introduce parametric variability into the facade by recreating the structure in Rhino and Grasshopper. Then, run analyses and create an alternate version of the building based on different performance requirements. The redesign should critique and improve upon the original design. Process: I reconstructed the geometry of the building in Rhino and used Grasshopper to introduce variation in ceiling height, mullion spacing, wood panelization, and roofline curve degree. I then inserted the model into Ecotect Analysis and ran wind and solar radiation analyses to see which parts of the building were most effected by the elements. Final Design: I optimized the geometry of the facade by creating a simpler sweep of glass and wood that echoes the shipbuilding tradition of the region. My simpler geometry is more elegant and would reduce fabrication costs (relative to the original design), due to the decreased need for individually-crafted, custom-shaped wooden panels.

[2]

Final design by layers: [1] structure, [2] wood paneling, [3] glass, [4] mullions

Performance-Based Iteration

Incident Solar Radiation | Original Design

Summer Solstice

Winter Solstice

Incident Solar Radiation | New Model

Summer Solstice • Max Wh/m2: 400.0+ • Min Wh/m2: 7.0

Winter Solstice • Max Wh/m2: 13.0+ • Min Wh/m2: 0.0

Prevailing Winds | All Year

Based on: • Incident Solar Radiation (yellow) • Total Sunlight Hours (yellow) • Prevailing Winds (blue)

[3]

[4] 21

academic

[1]

Ecotect Environmental Analyses


C a r ly d e l a h o z Ya n g t z e R i v e r D e l t a

East China Sea

Hangzhou Bay

Evolving Waterfront Edge 1886 1920 1927 1936

[above] Photographs from the exhibition at Tongji University in Shanghai, where the Yangtze River Delta Project was presented by Guy Nordenson alongside projects on flood risk mitigation in Manhattan and New Orleans.

1959 1972 1995 2012

Research: The “nose” of the Pudong district has continuously extended into the East China Sea over the last 200 years as a result of various land reclamation strategies, such as enclosing wetlands and draining polders, to accommodate population growth. I analyzed the edge using satellite imagery and map archives, and researched possibilities for design interventions that would help alleviate flood inundation, such as barrier islands and inland mounds.

natural | Sand

hard encloSure

Polder

Mud (drained Polder)

ParK | graSS

PaVeMent | Buildin g

Pier | Jetty | groin

golF courSe

PerForated enc loSure

locK

channel | riVer | StreaM

encloSed Wetlan d

Product: I developed an Evolving Edge drawing and an Edge Conditions drawing [both above] that detail the various land types along the waterfront. The Edge Conditions drawing was used by our team’s civil engineer to inform and help develop an ArcGIS database for the region.

Pudong District, Shanghai, China 2012 – 2013 ; Advisor: Guy Nordenson

22

Research

Yangtze River Delta

Waterfront Edge Conditions


00

0.375 .5

1.5 Miles

1010 minutes mins 15 mins

Walking Distance

S a n d , S t r i p, A s p h a l t

New Jersey

7 .75

C a r ly d e l a h o z

Point Pleasant Canal Bridge Proposed Parking Garage Locations

Point Pleasant

[Mapping Software: ArcGIS]

Site: Point Pleasant, New Jersey With 18,000 residents in Point Pleasant and 4,600 in Point Pleasant Beach, the two boroughs of Point Pleasant comprise a bustling beach town and tourist hot spot. The main form of transportation in the area is the automobile, congesting highways and streets from the Point Pleasant Canal Bridge to the boardwalk. Proposal: Replace parking with parks and displace parking to the downtown’s main entrance – the Point Pleasant Canal Bridge.

Boardwalk/Beaches

Paved Parking Lots

PARK & RIDE SYSTEM:

Light Rail to Beach & Boardwalk

ARC 4 9 2 ; S p r i n g 2 0 1 2 Mario Gandelsonas

Bike Shares at Transit Stops

Boat Shares along Canals

23

Research

Sand, Strip, Asphalt

Result: By displacing most of the parking to the area around the Point Pleasant Canal Bridge, the streets are relieved of a large amount car traffic, freeing up space for “greenways” and “blueways.” People could take advantage of bike shares, boat shares, and light rail. This system of infrastructure would force people to slow down by strolling on foot, leisurely riding a bike, or meandering along in a boat.


161 SF

Conference Room

677 SF

677 SF

W Toilet

192 SF

161 SF

Toilet 1 Wkst

603 SF

Lauder Research Center

224 SF

180 SF

8,060 Construction GSF

4 Wkst

Private Office 3 Private Office 2 Private Office 1 125 SF

8,060 Construction GSF

Custodian's Closet

1 WkstOffice 5 Private

Private Office 4 180 SF

Library 603 SF

192 SF Screen

1149 SF

Reception

Admin

Private Office 14

144 SF

144 SF

Mechanical 1 Wkst Private Office 12 121 SF

Private Office 11 15 Private (25)Office 5H Letter Files 121 SF

Screen

159 SF

144 SF

1 Wkst 159 SF

1 Wkst Private Office 6 Private Office 7 Private Office 8 Private Office 9 Private Office 10 138 SF 126 SF 137 SF 138Intern SF 126 SF Private Office 11 Intern (25) 5H Letter Files

159 SF

126 SF

(10) 7H Lateral Files

Admin

121 SF OPEN BELOW

Screen

FOURTH FLOOR FIFTH FLOOR

Private Office 17 120 SF

UP 13R

Door/ wall to be MET Management & Facilities Service demolished Private Office 6 Private Office 7 Private Office 8 Private Office 9 Private Office 10 137 SF 125 SF Meeting Room Modern & ArtSF WMAA Test Fit Growth 135Contemporary SF 137 125 SF Total Seat Count (Current + Proposed): 37

Intern

Intern

Digital Media TBD

Meeting Room

Modern & Contemporary Art

WMAA

13R

Door/ wall to be demolished

Test Fit Growth

TBDUP 8R 2 Wkst

159 SF

2420Wkst

Construction GSF

UP 13R

Digital Media

FOURTH FLOOR MEZZANINE

PARTIAL FOURTH 290sf+130sf FLOOR

Total Seat Count (Currentd): 0

2,160 Construction GSF 420 Available Current SF 420 Construction GSF

Total Seat Count (Current): 2

420 Available Current SF 420

Construction TBD 2 Wkst Private Office 6 Private Office 7 Private Office 8 Private Office 9 Private Office 10 FLOOR MEZZANINE PARTIAL FOURTH 137 SF

135 SF

125 SF

137 SF

Private Office

Workstation

125 SF

Total Seat Count (Current + Prop

Hot Desk Intern Hot Desk

Total Seat Count

Meeting Rm

Area

2

11

24

4

4

43

8,800 Program NSF

Test Fit Option 1B Current

2

11

24

4

4

43

9,070 Available Current NSF

Delta

0

0

0

0

0

FOURTH FLOOR MEZZANINE

Private Office

FOURTH FLOOR MEZZA

GSF

Total Seat Count (Current): 2

Current Program

Seat Count (CurrentOffice + Proposed): 15 MeetingTotal Rm Private Workstation

PARTIAL FOURTH FLOOR 0

10,640 Construction GSF

(Current): 2 Total Seat Count Hot Desk Intern Hot Desk Total Seat Count

Area

Current Program Proposed Growth Current + Proposed Growth

Current Program Proposed Growth Current + Proposed Growth

2 +0 2

Hot Desk Intern Hot Desk Total Seat Count Area 1/16" = 1'-0" Program 8,800 24 44 4 4318 Nov 2013 Door/ wall to be NSF 11 24 4 43 8,800 NSF MET Management & +0 Facilities +0 Service +8 24 +5 +13 +2,000 NSF NSF Fit 9,070 Available Current Test demolished 4 4 43DRAFT 19 29 4 4 56 10,800 Program NSF

Test Fit Option 1A Current Test Fit Option 1A Proposed Growth Test Fit Option 1A Current + Proposed

2 +0 2

11 +6 17

Delta

0

-2

2 +0 2

Workstation

25 +4 29

4 +0 4

0

0

Test Fit Option 1A (Current + Proposed Growth Program) The Metropolitan Museum of Art

Breuer Building Fit-out

Machine Rm

Test Fit Option 1A Current Option 1A Proposed Growth Test Fit Option 1A Current + Proposed Test Fit Growth 10,640 Construction GSF 9,620 Available Current NSF

2 +0 2

1.0 B

4 +0 4 0

0

WMAA

44 +10 54

0

+1,300 Available Growth NSF 10,920 Available NSF

Delta

0

P RO F E S S IONAL W OR K

Service

Current SF 11 Private Office

120 SF

7 Wkst

Program 11 Breuer Building Interior Fit-Out (Current Program) 2 Door/ wall to be Test Fit Option 1B Current responsibilities: Designed multiple schemes based on Circulation Circulation MET Management & Facilities layout TheService Metropolitan Museum of Art demolished Test Fit Option 1B Current 2 11 Meeting Room Modern & Contemporary Art Meetingconstraints, Room Modern & Contemporary and Art WMAA Test Fit Growth programmatic capacity, historic preservation Delta 0 0 0 0 considerations. With one other colleague, built a full Revit Breuer of Building Interior Fit-Out Breuer Building Interior Fit-Out Test Fit Option 1B (Current Program) reconstruction the building. MET Management & Facilities

290sf+130sf 420 Available

UP 13R

290sf+130sf

Meeting Rm

Circulation

1 Wkst Digital Media

(25) 5H Letter Files

120 SF

Meeting Rm

Circulation

The Metropolitan Museum of Art

UP 8R

13R

Total Count (Current + Total SeatSeat Count (Currentd): 0 Proposed): 37

project: Retrofit the Whitney Museum Breuer Building interiors for FIFTH FLOOR office and library use for the Met’s Modern & Contemporary Art staff

UP 8R

4 Wkst Hot Desks

Machine Rm

Private Office 16 1,600 Available Current SF + 250 Available Growth SF

Private Office 15

7 Wkst

Breuer Building Interior Fit-Out

Stair 1

1149 SF

2,160 7 Wkst Construction GSF

7 Wkst

The Metropolitan Museum of Art

120 SF

13R

Machine Rm

1,600 Available Current SF + 250 Available Growth SF

Custodian's Closet

CLIENT: The Metropolitan Museum of Art

Private Office 14

144 SF

12

Private Office 17

Screen

Private Office 13

Private Office 16

Hot Desks

126 SF

126 SF

747 SF

S.R.

Custodian's Closet

Private Office 11

7 Wkst

138 SF

127 SF

and Library

2 Wkst

Stair 1

1149 SF

Private Office 6 Private Office 7 Private Office 8 Private Office 9 Private Office 10 137 SF

126 SF

DN 15R

4 Wkst Exhibition Private Office Planning, Art 121 SF Viewing, and StorageResearch Lauder

2,160 Construction GSF

4 Wkst

Total Seat Count (Current): 41

Stair 2

Hot Desks

2 Wkst

FIFTH FLOOR 138 SF

8,060 Construction GSF

Screen

4 Wkst Private Office 13

1 Wkst

36 LF Bookshelves

Growth SF

Admin

Private Office 3 Private Office 2 Private Office 1

UP 22R

OPEN BELOW

7,600 1,850 Available Pantry Available Current Growth SFSF Machine Machine RmRm +Toilet 1,050 2,160 Stair 1 Available Construction 1,850 Growth SF GSF Available

1 Screen Wkst

Private Office 3 Private Office Hot Desks 6 Wkst2 Private Office 1 126 SF 127 SF 126 SF

(25) 5H Letter Files Closet Custodian's 7,600 Available Current SF Machine Rm 2+Wkst 1,050 Available Growth SF

7 Wkst

S.R.

Foyer

1009 SF

136 SF

Total Seat Count (Current): 41

36 LF Bookshelves

Mechanical

8,060 Construction GSF

125 SF

Lauder Research Center

Private Office 5

FIFTH FLOOR

122 SF 50 LF shelving

S.R.

136 SF

1 Wkst

Screen

Machine Rm

Reception

Electrical Rm

136 SF

8,650 Available Current SF

677 SF

Stair 1

1149 SF

Mechanical

6 Wkst

Conference Room

614 SF

1009 SF

Machine Rm

Toilet Library

Private Office 4

Admin

192 SF

Screen

Meeting Room

Private Office 4 180 SF Exhibition Planning, Art Viewing, and Storage Private Office 5

Pantry

Foyer

50 LF shelving

Mechanical

S.R.

Interns

Whiteboard

36 LF Bookshelves

677 SF

W Toilet Wkst Option Conflict Electrical161 SF Rm

(10) 7H Lateral Files

1 Wkst

Reception

Conference Room

M Toilet

Stair 2

125 SF

Mechanical

122 SF

(10) 7H Lateral Files

8,650 Available Current SF

1

Whiteboard

136 SF

Lauder Research and Library 747 SF 2 Wkst

Library

614 SF

Meeting Room Private Office 3 Private Office 2 Private Office 1SF 232

Mechanical

Private Office 5

Toilet

OPEN BELOW

Stair 2

Library

125 SF

4 Wkst

Pantry

Foyer

50 LF shelving

Whiteboard

11/20/2013 12:30:16 PM

MSFToilet 192 Option Conflict

Stair 2

11/20/2013 12:30:24 PM

(10) 7H Lateral Files

180 SF

224 SF

Pantry

Foyer

50 LF shelving

36 LF Bookshelves

Electrical Rm

Meeting Room

Reception

Private Office 4

DN 15R

B r e u e r B u i l d i n g Fi t - o u t

1 Wkst

UP Stair22R 2

Conference Room

232 SF

Interns

161 SF

StairStair 2 2

Electrical Rm

Meeting Room

W Toilet

C a r ly d e l a h o z

Stair 2

M Toilet Option Conflict

Whiteboard

W Toilet

11/20/2013 12:30:24 PM

M Toilet Option Conflict

Test Fit Option 1A (Current + Proposed Growth Progra DRAFT 1.0 B 1.1 A

1/16" = 1'-0" -2

1/16" = 1'-0"

18 Nov 10,640 Construction GSF 2013

21 Nov 2013 DRAFT

The Metropolitan Museum of Art 2013 ; Beyer Blinder Belle

24


tranSForMatiVe

Priority Project 1 9.5 years

Priority Project 2 10 years

Priority Project 3 7 years

Priority Project 4 7 years

Priority Project 5 7 years

Priority Project 6 Stand-alone

6.5 years

Stand-alone Priority 5

10,031 gSF

SKylight

Priority 1 * Skylight replacement: 5.5 years

60,000 gSF

Skylight Priority 2

34,500 gSF

Skylight Priority 3

61,500 gSF

Skylight Priority 4

41,300 gSF

Skylight Priority 5

9,700 gSF

Skylight Priority 6

17,000 gSF

Skylight Priority 7

19,000 gSF

replacement: 3 years

replacement: 3.5 years

inFraStructure

replacement: 3.5 years

* MeP/FP Priorities exterior Wall Priorities

1

2

3

2017 4

1

2

3

2018 4

1

2

3

2019 4

1

2

2020

3

4

1

2

3

2021 4

1

2

3

2022 4

1

2

3

2023 4

1

2

3

2024 4

1

Pre-conStruction

PhaSe i

PhaSe ii

art

3 yrs

3 yrs

2.5 yrs

1 yr

Pre-conStruction 3 yrs

2

3

2025 4

1

2

2026

3

4

PhaSe i

PhaSe ii

PhaSe iii

art

2 yrs

2.5 yrs

2 yrs

.5 yr

**

1

2

3

2027 4

1

2

3

2028 4

1

2

3

20 YEARS

15 YEARS

10 YEARS

M an e t n 150 iV t er h Sa ry

5 YEARS

lP aP c/ Pr Pd o c/ Va d lS oB

Fe co i S M no Pl t i e t ce io o n F

Stand-alone Priority 4

6,618 gSF

replacement: 4.5 years

2016 4

2029 4

1

Pre-conStruction

conStruction

art

2.5 yrs

3.5 yrs

1 yr

2

3

2030 4

1

2

3

conStruction

art

2.5 yrs

4 yrs

.5 yr

Pre-con 1.5 yrs

Pre-con 1 yr

PhaSe ii 4 yrs

PhaSe iii

conStruction 3 yrs

PhaSe i

interiM 9 mo

Pre-con

1

3

2034 4

1

2

3

Pre-conStruction

conStruction

art

2.5 yrs

3 yrs

1 yr

4

art .5 yr conStruction 1.5 yrs

art 1 yr

Pre-con 1.5 yrs

conStruction

1 yr

PhaSe ii

PhaSe iii 6.5 yrs

PhaSe iV

PhaSe V

art .5 yr

conStruction 3 yrs

art .5 yr

art .5 yr conStruction 1.5 yrs

art .5 yr conStruction 2 yrs

art .5 yr

Pre-con 1 yr 17 high Priority ProJectS 10 8 9 2

2

1 yr

interiM 9 mo 7

1

art

Pre-con 1 yr

6

2033 4

3.5 yrs

interiM 9 mo

5

3

conStruction 2 yrs

Pre-con 1 yr

4

2

conStruction

Pre-con 1 yr

3

1

conStruction 2 yrs

interiM 9 mo

2

2032 4

art .5 yr Pre-con 1 yr

1

3

art .5 yr Pre-con 1 yr

Pre-con

2

2.5 yrs

conStruction 2 yrs

Pre-con 1 yr PhaSe i

1

Pre-conStruction

Pre-con 1.5 yrs

Pre-con 1 yr

2031 4

Pre-conStruction

68,160 gSF

18,040 gSF

* replacement: 8 years

3

69,917 gSF

Priority 3 * Stand-alone 3 years

replacement: 4.5 years

2

169,389 gSF

18,557 gSF

3 years

1

170,060 gSF

Stand-alone Priority 2

3 years

2015 4

207,736 gSF

7,095 gSF

4 years

3

344,508 gSF

Stand-alone Priority 1 4 years

2

11

12

4 high Priority ProJectS 3

13

14

15

16 4

17

18

19 5

9 Second Priority ProJectS 20 21 22 23 24 6

25

26

27

28

Second Priority ProJectS 7 8

29

conStruction 2 yrs

10 third Priority ProJectS 33 30 31 32 9

34

art .5 yr 35 10

36

Responsibilities: As one of the core “Met Team” members, I was able to see the project through from proposal submission in 2011 to the completion of the Long Term Feasibility Study in the fall of 2013. I worked in Revit and CAD and on book production. Project: The graphic to the left is the schedule I designed that would become one of the key components of the Study. It was utilized in most planning meetings, including meetings with the Board of Directors and Trustees, and is a result of my collaboration with Founding Partner Jack Beyer and Project Manager Carolyn Straub in determining the duration and timeline of each of our proposed projects.

L o n g Te r m Fe a s i b i l i t y S t u d y

2014 1

C a r ly d e l a h o z

20-year Scenario For PhaSing the Priority ProJectS

Client: The Metropolitan Museum of Art

* does not require eiS approval ** For planning purposes it is recommended to coordinate Priority Project 3 and the third phase of Priority Project 2.

All project names have been removed.

25

P RO F E S S IONAL W OR K

Long Term Feasibility Study

The Metropolitan Museum of Art 2011–13 ; Beyer Blinder Belle


C a r ly d e l a h o z Chr ystie Street Hotel I rendered these images in Rhinoceros 5.0

CLIENT: Ian Schrager Company Executive architect: Beyer Blinder Belle Design Architect: Herzog & de Meuron project: New construction hotel, nightclub, and condominium

Chrystie Street Hotel

N e w Yo r k C i t y ; 2 0 1 3 Beyer Blinder Belle

26

P RO F E S S IONAL W OR K

Responsibilities: Worked with the Interior Design Partner to determine the finish schedule for the residential bathrooms. Produced renderings [left and above], CAD plans, elevations, and sections.


C a r ly d e l a h o z

Pencil and charcoal

27

S K ETCHE S

Sketches

Pencil


C a r ly d e l a h o z

Pencil and charcoal

Pencil and charcoal [next page] Black dye on white paper

S K ETCHE S

28


C a r ly d e l a h o z S K ETCHE S


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.