TheProsAndConsOfAnimalTesting
AboutAnimalTesting?KayleeSmith9-6-2017AGR199IntroductionandBackgroundNotverymanypeople thinkaboutthefactthatamajorityoftheproductstheybuyhavebeentestedonanimals,letaloneanimaltestingin generalAnimaltestinghasbeengoingonformanyyears,withtheuseofdogs,cats,mice,rabbits,minipigs,and farmanimals.Whensomeonebringsupanimaltestingthereusuallyisanargumentabouttheprosandcons.Many peopleareagainstitbecausetheanimalsarebeing...
TheProsAndConsOfAnimalTesting
Thereareover26milliondifferenttypesofanimalbeingtestedonforresearcheachyearintheUnitedStates Animalsareusedfortestingeveryyearforhumanresearch.Differentanimalsgothroughseriouspain,inorderfor humanstofacilitategrowthindifferentfieldsofstudyManyanimalsareusedinordertostudydiseasesand potentialcuresforthediseases.Newresearchchemicalsaretestedonanimalswithsimilarstructurestohumans,to seeifthemedicinecanhelpwithcertaindiseases
ProsAndConsOfAnimalTesting
AnimalTestingisaenormousupsetinthewordtoday.Animalactivisthavebeentryingtoputanendtoitfor years,buttonoavail.Animaltestingiswhenscientistwilluseanimalstodoexperimentson.Theywilleither hookheavymachinerytothesepoordefenselessanimalsorinjectthemwithharshchemicalsjusttoseeifitsokay forhumanuse.Over26millionsofanimalsareusedeveryyearinjusttheunitedstatesaloneforthesecruelacts bythehandofmanTestingonanimalshave
ProsAndConsOfAnimalTesting
useanimalstotesttheirproducts.Therearedifferentsidesoftheargumentaboutcompaniesdoinganimaltesting. Thetwosidesarethepeoplewhowantittostopsinceitsagainstanimalrightsandit'sinhumanebuttheotherssay thatithelpsmajorlywithmakingmedicalbreakthroughsonproductsandcures."Thistopicfirststartedaround 400BCandwasusedbyAristotleandErasistratus"(wwwncbinlmnihgov)Thefirstsidearetheonesthatsay animaltestingisagainsttheanimalsrights...
TheProsAndConsOfAnimalTesting
andwhoisinvolvedwithcreatingit?Well,ifyouknowthesourcesandingredientsofmosthygieneproductson today'smarket,youmaybeawarethatanimaltestingisthemethodusedtocreatetheproductAnimaltesting startedbackintheyearof1966,whichwaspassedbythefederalAnimalWelfareAct,themethodinvolvestesting cosmeticsonanimalstodeterminethesafetyandpossibilityofallergicreactionscausedbyproductsthathumans use.JeremyBenthamoncesaid"Thequestionisnot,can...
ProsAndConsOfAnimalTesting
exploresfourarticlesrelatingtoexperimentingonlaboratoryanimalsinordertoanswertwoquestions:shouldwe continuetouseofanimalsfortestingandwhatarethealternativesofanimaltesting.Itfirstexplorestwopublished articlesthatdescribesproandconsofuseofanimalfortestingStephanie(2009)arguedaboutissueandethicsfor laboratoryanimalsDokeandDhawale(2013)suggestanalternativeofanimaltestingItexploresthestrategyof3 Rsthatisreduction,refinement...
ProsAndConsOfAnimalTesting
TestsAreForStudents-NotAnimalsAnimaltesting;appealingoratrocious?Eachyear,morethan100million animalsareexperimentedonandkilledinlaboratoriesformedicinaltraining,classroomlessons,andchemical, drug,food,andcosmeticstestingAnimalsarenotobjectsManyAmericansfightovertheprosandconsofthis two-sidedargument.Althoughanimaltestingmayfurtheradvancethemedicalfield,scientificexperimentationon animalsisunfavorableamongalargeportionofthe
TheProsAndConsOfAnimalTesting
beawareofthetopicanimaltesting.Animaltestingisaworldwidediscussionandisalwaysatopicfordebate. Therearecountriesthatalreadyhavebannedanimaltesting,theyareEuropeanUnion,Norway,Israel,andIndia TheUnitedStates,Australia,andNewZealandareconsideringbanninganimaltesting.Theanimalsbeingtested onforcosmeticsismice,rats,rabbits,andguineapigs.Theseanimalsdon'tdeservethiskindoftreatment. AlthoughthereareprosandconstothisissueSomepeople
TheProsAndConsOfAnimalTesting
Inregardstoanimalresearch,myopinionisthatitisextremelybeneficialtomedicalandcosmeticresearch,but thereshouldberegulationsinordertoensurethatthesesubjectsaretreatedashumanelyaspossibleCosmetic testingisatypeofanimaltestinginwhichcosmeticcompanieswilltestthesafetyoftheirproductsforhumanuse. Thiswillallowthecosmeticcompanytodetermineifacertainproductcausesanyrashes,reactions,etcAnimal testingformedicalresearchistheuseof...
ProsAndConsOfAnimalTesting
achievetheseadvancesinmedicinemanyanimalshavepaidthepricebysufferingthroughexperimentation Medicalresearchersstudyanimalstogetabetterunderstandingthecomparisonbetweenthehumanandanimal bodiesTherearemanyprosandconstotheuseofanimaltestingSadly,neitherseemtofullytipthescaletoa sidethatpleaseseveryone,includingthegeneralpublic,governmentandscientists.Itisforthisreasonthatanimal testingisconsideredvitalforimproving...
ProsAndConsOfAnimalTesting
AcademicsP101Dec2017Therearemanydifferentopinionsaboutwhetherusinganimalsfortestingdifferent cosmeticsandmedicinesishumaneornot.Therearemanydifferentprosandconsforeachsideoftheargumentof whethertestingonanimalsisagoodthingandisbeneficialorifitisinhumaneandcruelIbelievethattestingon animalsisgoodandisbeneficialtoscientificresearch.Testingonanimalshasallowedscientiststocreatemany differentcuresandtreatmentsformanydifferent
TheProsAndConsOfAnimalTesting
throughanimaltesting.Animalsincaptivityarenotonlyusedtoadvancemedicalresearch,butalsotoprevent speciesextinctionandforeducationalpurposes.Thedebateaboutholdinganimals'captivehasbeenalongand heatedonethathasnoendpointanywhereinsightThemainargumentoftheoppositiontousinganimalsin biomedicalresearch,zoosandaquariumsisthatanimalsaretreatedininhumanely.Whileitmaybetruethatin certaininstancesanimalsdohavetoundergoharshtestingsuch
ProsAndConsOfAnimalTesting
"Eachanimalbredorusedforresearch,whetheramouse,fish,ormonkey,isanindividualcapableofexperiencing pain,suffering,anddistress"("Animal"2013)Theadvancementsintechnologytodayhadsparkedadebate worldwideonwhetheritisrightorwrongtouseanimalsforexperimentationinlaboratories.Withnewlyadvanced scientifictechnology,expertsareabletoutilizeadvancedtechnologytosimulatefunctionsofthehumanbodyona muchsmallerscale,includingmicrochipsofhuman...
TheProsandConsofAnimalTesting
cabinethasbeentestedonananimalatonepointoranotherAgovernmentfundedcorporationcalledtheFood andDrugAdministration,abbreviatedastheFDA,isinchargeofmakingsurethatalldrugs,cosmetics,biological products,andmoreareefficient,secure,andsafeforhumanusage.TheFDAwillnotallowanydrugtobe releasedorsoldtothehumanpopulationifithasnotfirstbeentestedonanimalsInfact,whenadrugisfirst createditistestedonanimalsbeforehumansareevenallowed...
TheProsAndConsOfAnimalTesting
todayasaresultofanorganorbonemarrowtransplantwithoutanimalexperimentation"Animalexperimentation isresearchconductedonlivespecimenssuchasmice,rats,andchimpsinordertodevelopmedicinesandmedical procedures.Ithashelpeddevelopmanycuresfordiseases,andhasgreatlyincreasedourknowledgeinthemedical fieldAnimaltestingisethical,beneficial,andnecessaryforhumansResearchconductedonanimalsiscompletely ethical.Theyhavenomoralcompass,andnojudgment...
TheProsAndConsOfAnimalTesting
peoplebeokaywiththistinyanimalbeingtortured?Animalexperimentationiswrongandcrueltoanimalspecies. Medicalandcosmetictestinghasbeendoneforyearsandithasbeenacontroversialissueforsometime.Some peoplehavingbeendebatingwhetherornotthereshouldbeanimaltestingforpastyearsAsstatedbySally DriscollandLauraFinley,animalexperimentationhasbeenusedforbeneficialresearch,butisnotworththelives andabuseoftheanimalsSadly,theProConorganization
TheProsAndConsOfAnimalTesting
topicssuchasanimaltestinghavemorphedintoavarietyofdifferentquestions.Scientistsarealwayscomingup withnewtopicstodebateManypeopleoftenoverlooktheeffectsofanimaltestingThishasbeengoingonfor decadessincemanyareunawareoftheresultsandthedamagesanimaltestingcancause.However,astime progresses,morepeoplearebecomingmoreinformedaboutthisandtakingitintoaction.Animaltestingiscruel andinhumanesincemanyinnocentanimals'livesarebeing
TheProsAndConsOfAnimalTesting
Health,animaltestinghasbeenaroundsincethedaysofphilosopherAristotle.AccordingtoProCon.org,thereare anestimated26millionanimalsusedforscientificandcommercialtestingintheUSaloneAnimaltestinghas broughtmanygoodthingstothemedicalworld,suchasthetreatmentvariousdisease.Also,theanimalisbeing testedbymanycosmeticscompaniesOntheotherhand,organizationslikePETA-PeopleofEthicalTreatmentof Animalshavefoughtagainstthemedicaltestingofanimals...
AnimalTestingProsAndCons
ThereismanyprosandconswhenitcomestoanimaltestinginmanyindustriesAnimalshavebeenusedfor testingformanydecadesinrecenthistory,andeveninthepresent.Therearemanytypesofanimaltesting,the morepopularonesbeeninusedformakeup,scientificexperiments,clothingbrandsandmoreAtfirst,hearing aboutanimaltestingisasadandcruelthingtodoorthinkof.Butthenumberonereasonwhywedoit,isforthe safetyofhumanlives.Thereasonwhyitisthenumber...
TheProsAndConsOfAnimalTesting
cosmetics,householdproducts,andmedicaldeviceshavebeentestedonanimalssuchasmice,rabbitsandrats, andmoreforanumberofyears.Itisassumedthatahumans'responsetothesetypesofproductswilloften correlatewiththeresponsesofananimal(Testing)Animalsaretestedbecausetheyaredeemedaskey informationtohelpdevelopnewmedicines,anddiscovermoreabouthumanhealthandbiology.Somebelieve usinganimalsonlyforhumanadvantageismorallywrong,whileothersbelievenot
TheProsandConsofAnimalTesting
IntroductionEachyearinUSAlaboratoriesmorethen100millionanimalsareburned,poisonedandlamed(Top5 ShockingAnimalExperimentationFacts).Eachyearscientistsuseanimalsinordertoprogress,toimprovelifeof peopleandanimalsHowever,manytestinganimalssufferanddieButothersdonotagreeandsupportthefact thatweshoulduseanimalsbecauseofadvance.Sowhatareadvantagesanddisadvantagesofusinganimals?This problemwillberesearchedfromdifferentareassuchas
TheProsAndConsOfAnimalTesting
Millionsofanimalssufferpainfullyandevendieasanoutcomeofscientificresearch.Theeffectsofdrugs,food additives,cosmeticsandotherchemicalproductsslowlykillinnocentanimalseveryyearAlthoughsomepeople believeanimaltestingisnecessary,othersfirmlybelievethatthealternativeschoicesthathavebeendiscovered overtheyearsarethewaytogoEspeciallybecausethesechoicesarecheaper,morereliableanddonotharm animals.Thisessaylooksintotheprosandconsofanimal...
TestingOnAnimals:TheProsAndConsOfAnimalTesting
Animaltestingissomethingthatisextremelyprevalentinourworld.Itiscrucialforanymedicalissuesandmany otherday-to-daythingswedoandusePeople,though,donotlikethefactthatwekillinnocentanimalseveryday Inoursociety,thereisalotofanimalabuse.Itissanctionedandlegaltotestonanimals,evenifthatmeansthat weharmandabuseanimalsThereisnolimittohowmuchtheanimalsareharmedbecausetheyarenotprotected bylawssincetestingiscompletelylegal...
AnimalTestingProsAndConsEssay
millionanimalsareusedeverysingleyearintheUSforscientific,andcommercialtestingAnimalsareusually usedtodevelopmedicaltreatments,determinethetoxicityofcertainmedications,oranyproductsmeantfor humanuse,orotherbiomedical,commercial,andhealthcareuses.Testingonanimalshasbeenlastingfromat least500BCSomegoodusesforanimaltestingthathascomeouttobegoodisthatithadbroughtus developmentofmanylife-savingtreatmentsforbothanimalsandhumans...
AnimalTestingProsAndConsEssay
CONPosition:Proponents/PerspectivesAgainst:Whiletheprostoanimalresearcharepositivesonhumans,itis negativelyaffectingtheanimalsthemselves.Usinganimalsformedicalresearchisinhumanebecausetheyareleft intheseawfulconditionsTheseanimalsarebeingmistreatedincaptivitybecausehumansneedthemfortheirown research.Theanimalsusedintheseexperimentsaretreatedverypoorlybecause,theyaresubjectedtoforce feeding,forcedinhalation,deprivedoffoodandwater
EssayOnProsAndConsOfAnimalTesting
Knowingthatinmanycasesanimaltestshavenotproducedstableorevencapableresultstoputintoeffecton humansthisallowsforalargewasteofmoney,time,andresourcesthatcouldhavebeenbetterwellspentin furtheringtechnologicaladvancesmadeforhumanrelevanttesting.Scientistshavedevelopedmoremodernand effectiveresearchmethodsthatdonotincludeanimals.Newtechnologiessuchashuman-basedmicrodosing,orin vitrotesting,actashuman-patientsimulatorsThesenewly
ProsAndConsOfAnimalTestingForResearch
usinganimalsasresearchsubjectsishighlydebatedofwhetheritisnecessarytosavelivesorinhumanetothe animalsEveryyear,animalsareexperimentallyusedtodeterminetheeffectiveness,sideeffects,toxicityand safetyofmedications.Personally,Iwasawareofthetestingbeingdoneonanimals,butdidnotknowmuchabout it,andwasthereforeindifferentinthedebateHowever,afterdoingresearch,Ihavecometotheconclusionthat theconsoutweightheprosandanimaltestingisinhumane...
ProsAndConsOfAnimalTesting
alreadybannedanimaltestingforcosmetics,andthesaleorimportofnewlyanimal-testedbeautyproductsMajor companieshaveturnedtheirbackscompletelyonanimaltestingandnolongeruseingredientsthatweretestedon animals–andanumberofanimaltestshavebeencompletelyreplacedwithsuperior,cheaperandmoreeffective non-animalmethods.Proponentsofanimaltestingsaythatithasenabledthedevelopmentofmanylife-saving treatmentsforbothhumansandanimals,thatthereis...
ProsAndConsOfAnimalTesting
world,therehasbeenanenduringcontroversialissueandthatisanimaltestingandresearchSincethebeginning ofmedicine,animalswereusedinthetestingofdrugs,vaccines,andmedicaldevicestodeterminethesafetyofa productduetotheirsimilaritiesindiseaseswithhumansHoweverthisisconsideredunnecessaryduetothe creationofalternativesforanimaltesting.Despitethesealternativesthemajorityofanimaltestingstillhasnot cometohaltThisissuedeservestobeattentive
TheProsAndConsOfAnimalTesting
Overonehundredmillionanimalseveryyeardiefromanimaltesting,inthemedicalandcosmeticfieldsalone ("ExperimentsonAnimals:Overview").Animaltestingisasbigofaproblemtodayasithasbeeninthepast. MostpeopledonotagreewithanimaltestingtodaybutyearsagoitwasoneoftheonlywaysoftestingItwas considered,ifnottheonly,effectiveandefficientwaysoftestingaproduct'stoxicity.Todate,animaltestingisnot warrantedbecauseofthedevelopmentofnewtechnology
TheProsAndConsOfAnimalTesting
Animaltestingreferstoproceduresthattakeplaceinhumanclinicaltrialsanditinvolvesdosing,toxicityand efficiencyofdrugs"Humansbeingshavelongusedanimalsastestsubjectsforavarietyofpurposes"("Animal") whichviolatesthelivingrightsofanimals.Animalsandpeoplearealikeinmanyways,ascloserelativesweboth feel,think,behaveandexperiencepainthereforeanimalsshouldbetreatedwiththesamevalueandrespectas humans.Animaltestingisinhumaneandit...
TheProsAndConsOfAnimalTesting
Morethan100millionanimalsarekilledintheUnitedStatesannuallyforbiologylessons,medicaltraining, curiosity-driventesting,andchemical,drug,food,andcosmeticstestingAnimaltestinginAmericahaslastedfor manyyears.Ithaslongbeenviewedasawaytofindcuresforhumandiseasesandtestthesafetyofconsumer productsHowever,animaltestingisverycostlyandwastestimecomparedtootheroptionsManytestsubjects evendieduetoexperiments.Humananatomyisalsovery...
TheProsAndConsOfAnimalTesting
Theworld'slargestcosmeticmarketshavebannedanimaltestingforcosmeticsMajorcompanieshaveturnedtheir backscompletelyonanimaltestingandnolongeruseingredientsthatweretestedonanimals–andanumberof animaltestshavebeencompletelyreplacedwithsuperior,cheaperandmoreeffectivenon-animalmethods. Proponentsofanimaltestingsaythatithasenabledthedevelopmentofmanylife-savingtreatmentsforboth humansandanimals,thatthereisnoalternativemethodforresearching...
TheProsAndConsOfAnimalTesting
Althoughanimaltestinghelpswithmedicalresearch.Itisnotright,sinceitisbasicallyanimalcruelty.Animal testingiswronginmanyways,sinceanimalsdon'tknowwhat'sgoingon.Sothebigquestionis,isanimaltesting reallynecessary?AnimaltestinghappenseverydayinlaboratoriesAnimalsshouldn'thavetobeharmedwhen beingtestedon,theyhavefeelingsjustlikehumansdo.Therearemanydifferentkindsofanimalsthatgettested onsuchas:rats,mice,rabbits,hamsters,and
TheProsAndConsOfAnimalTesting
TreatmentofAnimals(PETA)thatoveronehundredmillionanimalsarekilledeachyearbyanimaltesting.The term"animaltesting"referstoexperimentationthattakesplacebeforehumanclinicaltrialstodeterminethe dosing,toxicity,andefficiencyofproductsforhumans.Thisincludesanimalsbeingtestedformedicalresearch, cosmeticproducts,andcuriosity-drivenexperimentation.Manytimesthisleadstoanimalsbeingtreated inhumanelyandhasledtoseriouscontroversyoverwhetheranimaltesting
TheProsAndConsOfAnimalTesting
wasadogwholivedinanimaltestinglaboratoryProfessionalLaboratoryandResearchServicesInc.Inthis laboratory,pharmaceuticalcompanieswouldpaytheProfessionalLaboratorytoinfectthedogsandcatswith worms,fleas,andticks.Thelaboratorywouldthenforcefeedtheanimals,smeartoxicchemicalsontheirfaces, kick,throw,anddragdogsbytheirnecks,andscreamcruelthingstotheanimalsInfallof2010,thePeoplefor theEthicalTreatmentofAnimals(PETA)investigatedthe...
TheProsAndConsOfAnimalTesting
Eachyearover100millionanimalsareabusedandtorturedbyUSlabsTheremustbeaneliminationofthis testingbecauseitisinhumanetotreatanimalsinthatmanner,thereisalsodifferentmethodsoftestingproducts thatdon'tinvolveanimals,andlastly,manycountriesaroundtheworldalreadyhavetakenthegiantstepin eliminatingthetesting.Animalsaresufferinginlabsuptotwoyearsstraightwithoutanyformofresttimefrom testing.Theseanimalsundergoextremeamountsofstress...
TheProsAndConsOfAnimalTesting
don'tstoptothinkaboutalltheproductsthatweuseandtheanimallivesthataretakenjustfortheproductstobe putontheshelves.Frankly,wearenotlosinganythingbutourmoneywhenwepurchasetheproducts,whetherit behairproducts,cleaningproducts,bodyproducts,ormakeupproducts,butforthesetoevenbeputontheshelves forourliking,animalsarepunished,killedandtormentedtotheirabsolutedeath.Animaltestingisalsousedfor findingwaystocurehumandiseasesandfinding
TheProsAndConsOfAnimalTesting
totalcombinedamountofanimalsusedforresearchisonly26million,with95%theanimalsbeingrodents,birds andfish.Thiswouldaccounttonearly340chickensconsumedperanimalusedinresearch(USStatistics,2016). Consequently,evenwiththisknowledge,peoplecontinuetoignorefactsandstatistics;callingthispractice unethicaloreveninhumane.ThisisduetheriseofsocialmediaandorganizationssuchasPETA(Peopleforthe EthicalTreatmentofAnimals),whosetacticsrelymore
TheProsAndConsOfAnimalTesting
peoplethinkaboutanimaltestingtheythinkofanimalsthatarebeingtorturedandkilledtofindoutanewmedical treatmentThedefinitionof"Animaltesting"istheuseofnon-humananimalsinexperimentsthatseektocontrol thevariablesthataffectthebehaviororbiologicalsystemunderstudy.Animaltestingusuallyfocusesonfindinga cureforadisease,butkeepingananimaltoseeifacertainkindofdiseasecanbecuredusingananimalfirstisnot right.Animalsshouldnotbeused...
TheProsAndConsOfAnimalTesting
AnimalshavehadaroleinscientificresearchsincetheadventofmodernmedicineinearlyGreecearoundtheyear 300BC(Hajar,MD)However,inrecentyears,agrowthinattentionandfundinghasledtoanincreaseinthe numberofanimalsbredandraisedforthesolepurposeofuseintesting.Withthisincreasehascomethedivision inopinionofwhetherornotscientistsshouldcontinuetheiruseofmammalsandamphibiansintheirresearchor abandonsuchapracticefornewer,potentially...
TheProsAndConsOfAnimalTesting
areavailableatthesacrificeofanimals?Doyouknowasofrightnow,rats,rabbits,dogs,cats,monkeys,andmore arebeingexperimentedoninthenameofscienceandhumanadvancement?Animalexperimentationhasbeen prevalentsinceGreciantimeswherephilosophersandscientists,AristotleandErasistratus,performedexperiments onlivinganimalsDissectionshavebecomepopularamonghighschoolsanduniversities,especiallyinmedical fields.Animaltestingisusedforbiomedicalresearchas...
TheProsAndConsOfAnimalTesting
AnimalResearchIsInvalidExperimentationofanimalshasanimalrightsadvocatesandsomescientists questioningtheeffectivenessandvaliditythatanimaltestinghasameaningfulimpactonmedicaladvancement. Datingbacktothe2ndcenturyBC,earlyGreekscientistsperformedexperimentsonlivinganimalsforthe purposeofadvancingtheirknowledgeandunderstandingofthehumanbody.However,recentresearchhasproven thatanimalsrarelyserveasgoodmodelsforthehumanbody(AnimalTesting
ProsAndConsOfAnimalTesting
Ananimaltestisanyscientificexperimentortestinwhichaliveanimalisforcedtoundergosomethingthatis likelytocausethempain,suffering,distressorlastingharmAsrightnow,millionsofmice,rats,rabbits,primates, cats,dogs,andotheranimalsarelockedinsidebarrencagesinlaboratoriesacrossthecountry.Theylanguishin pain,sufferfromextremefrustration,achewithloneliness,andlongtobefree.Thecompletelackof environmentalenrichmentandstressoftheirliving
TheProsAndConsOfAnimalTesting
HereyesgetallredandherarmandkneestartstobleedandshestartstogetablackandblueAnimalsarethe same.Ithurtsthem,buttheycan'tsayordoanythingaboutit.Justbecausesciencesneedtotestanimalsthatdoes notmeanthepeopleshouldkillanimalsthatdonenothing.SallyDriscollandLauraFinleystates"Didyouknow approximately95percentofthemillionsofanimalsusedinexperimentsaremiceandrats,withtheremaining5 percentcomprisedmostlyofdogs,cats,guinea...
TheProsAndConsOfAnimalTesting
isthelifeofananimalkeptasatoolforscientificresearchThedebateoverhumananimaltestinghasbeen ongoingformanyyears,startingasearlyasthe19thcentury.However,animaltestinghasbeenrecordedasearly as500BC,andhasbeenpracticedeversincePeoplehavebeenadvocatingformorehumanepracticesforanimal testingsincethe19thcentury,whenQueenVictoriapubliclydisplayedherdisgustatthesepractices.Scientists shouldnotcontinueanimaltestingbecausethereare...
TheProsAndConsOfAnimalTesting
knowover100millionanimalsareburned,crippled,poisoned,andabusedinUSlabseveryyear?Animaltesting forscientificresearchhasbecomeanepidemicinthescientificcommunity.Thesetestshavebeenproventobe inefficientandunnecessarybuttheanimalsusuallyexperienceimmenseamountsofpainandfearThroughoutthis paper,Iwillhighlightkeypointsandprovideareliableamountofinformationtoproveanimaltestingisunneeded, tortures,andinhumanAnimalexperimenterswillargue
TheProsAndConsOfAnimalTesting
humanuse,therearetestedbyscientistinanimalstoseetheireffectivenessTherearepositivesidesofanimal testing.Animaltestinghelpsresearchersdiscovernewdrugsandtreatment.Ruggeri,Camp,andMiknyoczki (2013)describethatanimalmodelscanhelppeopletounderstandthepathologyofcancer,identifythetherapy method,helpthedrugresearchanddevelopmentofhumancancerTherearemanytestsandmedicalresearcheshad beendonetoanimalsthathadledtothediscoveryofmanymedicines
TheProsAndConsOfAnimalTesting
organizationcalledPeoplefortheEthicalTreatmentofAnimals(PETA)notedthatmorethan100millionanimals areharmedorkilledduringanimaltesting.Animaltestingiscruelandinhumane.Animalsarebeingusedfor medicaltesting,butarenotbeingcaredforbefore,during,oraftertestingAnimalsandhumansareverysimilar,in thatwehavethesameorgansystemwhichperformsthesametasksinasimilarfashion.Eventhoughanimalsand humanssharecomparableDNA,wefailtoseethesimilarities
ProsAndConsOfAnimalTesting
astowhyanimaltestingisanunethicalandoutdatedpractice,yetitisstillbeingcarriedoutinthisdayandage. Thankstoadvancesinscientificresearch,animaltestingisnolongeranecessaryevil,soitsuseismoreofan inconveniencethananadvantage.Andalthoughtherearemanyreasonsastowhyanimaltestingshouldbe discontinued,costs,alternativetesting,anditspsychologicaleffectsonanimalsarethestrongestargumentsasto whyitshouldbebannedAnimaltestingisavery
ProsAndConsOfAnimalTesting
Itiswidelyknownanimaltestinginjuresandkillsmanyanimalseachyearforthesakeofproductdevelopment andscientificresearch.Accordingtopreventativemedicine/publichealthspecialistAyshaAkhtar,worldwideover 15millionanimalsareusedinexperimentationformedicinetobeusedonhumans,andoftensuffer,eventhough alternativestoanimaltestingexist.Animaltestingshouldnolongerbepracticedbecauseitisunethical,theresults canbemisleading,andalternativesareavailable
TheProsAndConsOfAnimalTesting
Despitecontroversyoveranimaltesting,accordingtostatisticsconductedbytheFoundationforBiomedical Research,roughly95%ofalllabanimalsaresomestrainofmouseorrat.()Scientificresearchersrelyonmiceand ratsforseveralreasons,onebeingconvenienceRodentsaresmall,easilyhousedandmaintained,andadaptwell tonewsurroundings.Theyalsoreproducequicklyandhaveashortlifespanoftwotothreeyears,allowingseveral generationstobeobservedinarelativelyshort
TheProsAndConsOfTestingOnAnimals
2,2015Areyoucomfortableknowingthateverydayanimalsaretorturedandexperimentedonsothatyoucanlive inalifeofcomfortandease?Atanytimeanimalssuchasratsandguineapigs,orevenanimalswecommonlysee aspetssuchasdogs,cats,andfish,couldbeusedforcrueltests.(hsi.org)Thisallforresultsaspettyashow cosmeticsaffectus!Howcouldthisbetherightwaytogoabouttesting?Ibelievethattestingonanimalsforour benefitissimplycruelandbeyondreasonin
ProsAndConsOfAnimalTesting
ShouldAnimalExperimentationBeAllowed?"Threebabymicefoundsealedaliveinaplasticbaggieandleft unattendedonalaboratorycounter…"(Guillermo,Kathy)Howisthatkindofcruellazinesssupposetodetermine whetherornotourmedicineissafe?Ibelieveanimaltestingisanunproductiveformofexperimentationthat shouldnotbelegalAnimalexperimentationisusedeverydayinlaboratoriesliketheUniversityofCaliforniaat DavisCenterforNeuroscience,knownfortheunattended...
TheProsAndConsOfAnimalTesting
Overonehundredmillionanimalseveryyeardiefromanimaltesting,inthemedicalandcosmeticfieldsalone ("ExperimentsonAnimals:Overview").Animaltestingisasbigofaproblemtodayasithasbeeninthepast. MostpeopledonotagreewithanimaltestingtodaybutyearsagoitwasoneoftheonlywaysoftestingItwas considered,ifnottheonly,effectiveandefficientwaysoftestingaproduct'stoxicityTodate,animaltestingisnot warrantedbecauseofthedevelopmentofnewtechnology...
ProsAndConsOfAnimalTesting
BasedonPeta,aninternationalanimalprotectionagency,itwasfoundthat"morethan100millionanimals–includingmice,rats,frogs,dogs,cats,rabbits,hamsters,guineapigs,monkeys,fish,andbirds–arekilledinU.S. laboratoriesinvolvingmedicaltraining,curiosity-drivenexperimentation,andchemical,drug,food,and cosmeticstesting."TheUnitedStates'controversyonanimaltestingisadebatabletopicthatvariesbasedon multiplefactors.InanarticleconductedbyVirenSwami...
TheProsAndConsOfAnimalTesting
aboutmyopiniononvivisection(animaltesting).Iquiteagree…itisasubjectthatmakesmesickwithhorror,soI willnotsayanotherwordaboutitelseIshallnotsleepto-night,"Soyou'dthink,thatnearly150yearsafter Darwin'swordstherewouldbesomechangeinopinion.You'dthinkthatwhenascientist'sidolshowsabsolute disgustforanimaltestingthey'dstop,especiallyastherearemoreeffectiveandmoney-savingmethodstoday. Experimentingonanimalsiscruelandmorallywrong
TheProsAndConsOfAnimalTesting
AnimalTestingIntheUnitedStates,26millionanimalsareusedannuallyforcosmeticorscientificresearchand testingAnimaltestingiswidelycontroversialbecauseitcouldpotentiallyharmtheanimalsbeingusedwhilethere arealternativemethodsthatcouldbeusedinplaceofanimals.But,fromascientificstandpoint,animalsintesting areoneofthemainreasonswehavebeenabletomakeadvancesinmedicineanddiseasesThesefactsmakeit trickytopinpointexactlyifanimal...
TheProsAndConsOfAnimalTesting
Innocentanimalsmightbetormentedandslaughteredforthecleanseryoumightutilize,foodyoueat,the cosmeticsyoumightwear,thecleanerthatmightbeutilizedinyourhome,oranymedicineyoumaytakeAlarge numberofcreaturesayearareliabletobeingdetainedandhavingexcruciatingtestsdoneonthem.This incorporatestrials,forexample,vivisection―thedemonstrationofcuttingorexperimentingwithlivecreaturesor havingunforgivingchemicalsutilizedonthemthatonecouldnever...
TheProsAndConsOfAnimalTesting
Theuseofanimalstotestmedicines,cosmeticsandnewdrugshasbeenacontroversialdebateforyearsItis estimatedthateveryyear,theUnitedStatesaloneuses26millionanimalstotestcommercialproductsandmedical treatmentstodeterminethedifferenttoxicityratesofdrugsthatwillpotentiallybeusedbyhumans (https://speakingofresearch.com/facts/statistics/).Theuseofanimaltestinghasbeenproventimeandtimeagainto beineffectiveanditalsoisapracticeofanimalcruelty;
