Vaak Sep 2020

Page 1


CONTENT


T

he COVID-19 lockdown left us with so much time in our hands. It was

during this time that I decided to start my Instagram

page.

The

love

and

encouragement that I received from wellwishers, family, and friends made me dive deeper into my passion, and thus Vaak was born. In Carnatic music, there is a term that is used for composers: vaakgeyakara. A vaakgeyakara is one who creates both the Vaak (lyrical) and Geya (musical) aspects of a composition. The word Vaak means “that which is being said”. The abstract meaning of this word makes it the perfect name to describe a magazine that is meant to discuss and promote this nuanced art form. Our ancient Tamil poetess has said that to have a good mind one should have a good vaak. Vani, the goddess of all art forms dwells in our vaak. I hope and pray that she manifests herself in this VAAK as well. It is fascinating to think about how one line in the Sangeetha Sampradaya Pradarshini has led to the development of the article ”A rendezvous and a varna” by Ravi Rajagopal. The article describes the grandeur of the meeting that took place between the two trinity composers: Shyama Sastri & Muthuswamy

Dikshitar. It was this article that allowed me to envision that scene and further

kindled my imagination to digitally represent it through a line drawing. Dr. Aravindh TR‘s article “A journey of the raga Hindolam” beautifully brings together the past and the present and takes us through a journey in time. He explains the changes the raga has had in three different periods: pre trinity, trinity, and post trinity. We have also put together interactive sections in this edition with the motive to connect with you all. Please provide your feedback as that will be instrumental in the progress and evolution of Vaak.

Shreeraam Shankar

carnaticmusic@gmail.com


VAAK

PAGE 3

SUN

MON

TUE 1

WED

Kontegadu – Suruti

2

Thillai Isanai – Kambhoji

7

6

Sri Venugopala – Kurinji

8

Saraguna Palimpa – Kedara Gowla

Tavadasoham – Punnagavarali

13

Mumurtulu – Atana

14

15

RTP – Kapi

16

Soundararajam Asraye – Brindavana Saranga

21

20

Vadika Gopaluni – Mohanam

Chala Kallala – Aarabhi

22

Sarasiruhanana – Mukhari

27

Upacharamu – Bhairavi

23

Tolijanma – Bilahari

Sujanajeevana – Kamas

28

29

Sogasuga – Sriranjini

T Brinda Madurai Mani Iyer T Viswanathan M L Vasanthakumari Ariyakudi Ramanuja Iyengar S Balachander Musiri Subramania Iyer M S Subbulakshmi Papa K S Venkatramaiah Radha & Jayalakshmi M D Ramanathan

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 11

Palani Subramaniam Pillai Ramnad Krishnan D K Pattammal T R Mahalingal Maharajapuram Viswanatha Iyer G N Balasubramaniam Semmangudi Srinivasa Iyer, M S Subbulakshmi & K S Narayanaswamy D K Jayaraman M Balamuralikrishna

30

Giripai – Sahana

Sloka – Ragamalika

01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11

Nadopasana – Begada

9

21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

Veenai Dhanammal T K Rangachari Alathur Brothers Lalgudi Jayaraman Srirangam Gopalarathnam Voleti Venkateshwarulu T N Rajaratnam Pillai T Balasaraswati S Kalyanaraman Palladam Sanjeevana Rao


VAAK

PAGE 4

THU 3

FRI 4

RTP – Manirangu

SAT 5

Vazhi Marai – Nattaikurinji

10

Muruga Muruga – Saveri

Elavathara – Mukhari

11

12

Thani Avarthanam

19

Muthuswamy dikshitar’s compositions – LecDem

Samajavaragamana – Hindolam

17

RTP – Kalyani

18

Dakshinamurthe – Shankarabharanam

24

Deva Sri – Madhyamavathi

25

Chakkani Raja – Karaharapriya

26

Kshitija – Devagandhari

Picture Credits: Nirupa Rao



VAAK A RENDEZVOUS AND THE VARNA

PAGE 6 Picture taken at VD Swami’s House

PROLOGUE have

the cognoscenti rasikas, musical jam sessions during

together in combinations.

break from work or on weekends is de rigueur, wherein the participants meet and take turns in singing

compositions,

alapanas,

neravals,

svaraprastaras etc to their heart’s content. It is certainly a way to enjoy music by singing to one’s heart’s content. Such a session would acquire novelty if the participants were leading musicians of an era! We do have one such recording of a session held at the country residence of Industrialist and patron V D Svami wherein a galaxy of musicians including the Alathoor

Brothers,

Musiri

Subramanya

performed

impromptu,

In the modern world of music, especially amongst

individually

and

And one wonders if there were musical sessions or a musical rendezvous with the musical greats of an era long bygone taking part, from our past. And luckily, we have one such instance, documented in the Sangita Sampradaya Pradarshini (SSP) the magnum opus authored by Subbarama Dikshita who was the adopted son and natural grandson of Balasvami Dikshita, a brother of Muthusvami Dikshita. The Trinitarian.

Iyer,

This article is all about that musical rendezvous

Semmangudi Srinivasa Iyer, M S Subbulakshmi,

which took place perhaps during the first quarter of

D K Pattammal, K V Narayanasvami et al seem to

the 19th century.

Picture courtesy: Sir Roderick Glossop youtube channel


VAAK A RENDEZVOUS AND THE VARNA

PAGE 7

MUTHUSVAMI DIKSHITA’S TANJORE SOJOURN Tanjore was known once upon a time as the Eden of

been at Chennapatna during this period.

South India. But during the period of 1785-1799 AD it

This being so reigning sovereign of Tanjore, Prince

was roiled by famine and political turmoil. The

Amarasimha of the Mahraatta Royal House of

resulting

and

Bhosales who was in the gaddi as a Regent of the

musicians leave Tanjore for safer & greener pastures.

minor Prince Serfoji was deposed by the British, who

Many left for Chennapatna or Madras, which was an

took matters into their hands and installed Serfoji II

oasis being under the direct control and rule of the

as the King of Tanjore in AD 1799. And thus, with AD

British East India Company. Ramasvami Dikshita the

1800, dawned a new era in the history of Tanjore. And

father of Muthusvmai Dikshita too along with his

the first quarter of the new century was marked by

family migrated to Chennapatna to be under the

the return of peace and stability which in turn

benevolent patronage of Manali Cinnayya Mudaliar, a

spawned the return of musicians and performers of

Dubash of a senior ranking British East India Co

art back to the Tanjore Kingdom. Ramasvami

Official. A number of other musical greats of those

Dikshita too returned with his family, taking Tiruvarur

times

and

as his residence. And as Muthusvami Dikshita his

Srinivasayya too moved to Chennapatna. This is

eldest son blossomed forth, his sisyas, the Tanjore

decadence

including

made

Pallavi

many

artisans

Doraisamayya

vividly catalogued in Sanskrit works dating to

Quartet

being

Ponnayya,

Chinnayya,

that period such as “Sarva Deva

Sivanandam & Vadivelu become the

Vilasa”. The Dean of the musical

AstAna vidvAns of the Tanjore

corps of theTanjore Court,

Court of King Serfoji.

the Guru Sreshta Sonti Venkatasubbaya too is recorded as having

Illustration of King Serfoji II of Tanjore Picture courtesy: Bangalore International Centre


VAAK A RENDEZVOUS AND THE VARNA

PAGE 8

Chinnayya

Ponnayya

Sivanandam

Vadivelu

It was then that the Quartet fervently requested their

which Dikshita so composed the kritis in rAgAnga

Guru to visit and stay with them for a while in

rAgas include Lord Brihadeesvara and Goddess

Tanjore. And Dikshita too did so sometime, during

Brihannayaki, Lord Narasimha, Goddess Balambika

the first decade or the first quarter of the 19th

the consort of Lord Sankaranarayana, Lord Prasanna

Century. It was during this time, as Dikshita’s

Venkatesvara and Goddess Anandavalli consort of

biographers recount, that the Quartet earnestly

Lord Tanjapureesvara all of whom can be found in

requested him to compose kritis in every one of the

and around Tanjore.

rAgAnga rAgAs listed out in the Anubandha to the Caturdandi Prakasika, which we today rightly or

Thus, the Tanjore sojourn of Dikshita marked a

wrongly refer to as the Asampurna Melas Scheme.

musical milestone as he embarked on this project to

The biography of Muthusvami Dikshita as profiled by

invest every rAgAnga rAga with a kriti as an

Justice T L Venkatarama Iyer and Dr. V Raghavan,

exemplar. And during this sojourn as stated earlier

record this sojourn to Tanjore and Dikshita’s project

he was hosted by his disciples the Tanjore Quartet

to thus compose a kriti in every rAgAnga raga. As

which must have lasted for atleast a few years.

evidence of the same, the perusal of the SSP itself would show that the kritis of Dikshita in many of the

And it was perhaps during this sojourn or one of his

rAgAnga rAgas, will be found composed on the

subsequent visits to Tanjore that Dikshita, met with

principal deities of the temples in and around

the other great co-Trinitarian, Syama Sastri, which for

Tanjore. Prominent examples of such dieties on

us becomes another milestone, of the musical variety.

Picture courtesy: sahityakalp


VAAK A RENDEZVOUS AND THE VARNA

PAGE 9

THE RENDEZVOUS The senior most of our Trinitarians, Syama Sastri born

sections, three or five appended to the carana refrain.

in AD 1762 and more than 12 years older to Dikshita

This piece was thus incomplete having just one

was already a permanent resident of Tanjore having

ettugada svara line. It must have been that

firmly settled there, near the Bangaru Kamakshi

Ramasvami Dikshita died leaving the composition

Temple. In so far as Dikshita’s visit to see his senior

incomplete.

contemporary goes, when he visited Tanjore, we do not know the exact circumstances or the details of

Upon hearing about this part-done varna Syama

the interactions as between the two Trinitarians etc.

Sastri’s curiosity must have been aroused and at his

Yet in the SSP, as a foot note to a composition

bidding one of the Dikshita scions must have sung

therein, Subbarama Dikshita provides a single line

the incomplete composition for his benefit. And what

narrative of perhaps one such meeting between the

would become a singularly great moment in our

two great vaggeyakaras.

musical history, Syama Sastri must have then suggested that the varna should be completed as

One can surmise that it must have been possibly one

between them. And so, he went on to perform the

evening, Muthusvami Dikshita must have paid a visit

honours and composed the 2nd ettugada svara

to pay his respects to his senior contemporary and

section and then bade Cinnasvami Dikshita to

possibly perform some compositions as well. He was

compose the 3rd and finally Muthusvami Dikshita to

accompanied by his brothers Cinnasvami for sure

compose the 4th and final ettuagada svara section to

and Balasvami as well perhaps. It is well likely that

the carana of the varna and thus completing the

Syama

half-finished composition of Ramasvami Dikshita in

Sastri

Dikshita’s

must

father

have

known

Ramasvami

Muthusvami

Dikshita

and

his

one stroke. It should be noted that the three not only

proficiency as a vaggeyakara as well. And so most

composed the svara section but also composed the

probably from that angle, the conversation between

corresponding sahitya as well, so as to segue

the two Trinitarians must have veered to the musical

seamlessly with the carana refrain which goes as

compositions of Ramasvami Dikshita.

“Ata-pAta-la-dhAti”. And what a sight and an aural feast it must have been to those fortunate few, who

Muthusvami Dikshita must have then proceeded to

might

confide

to

Syama

Sastri

about

a

have

witnessed

the

composition

being

half-finished

completed and perhaps Syama Sastri, Muthusvami

composition of Ramasvami Dikshita, a cauka varna in

Dikshita and Cinnasvami Dikshita taking turns to

the raga Sriranjani starting “sAmi ninnE kOri”, which

sing and ensure that the composition was lyrically &

was left incomplete with just the pallavi, anupallavi

musically complete. All we can surmise is that it

and the carana refrain with just one ettugada svara

must have been a performance fit for the celestials!

section. Varnas as a rule had multiple ettugada svara

Background picture: Entrance to Syama Sastri’s house where the meeting could have taken place Courtesy: kaminidandapani.typepad.com


VAAK PAGE 10

A RENDEZVOUS AND THE VARNA

Background picture: Entrance to Syama Sastri’s house where the meeting could have taken place Courtesy: kaminidandapani.typepad.com


VAAK A RENDEZVOUS AND THE VARNA

PAGE 11

Muttusvami Diksita

Syama Sastri

Cinnasvami Diksita

In this cauka varna, both the anupallavi muktayi svara section as well as the 4 carana ettugada svara sections have been invested with sahitya as well. All of this recorded history is wrapped in that cryptic one line foot note to the Sriranjani raga cauka varna of Ramasvami Dikshita “sAmi ninne kOri� in Adi tala, in the SSP recorded by Subbarama Dikshita which just runs thus:

In these carana svaras, the second, third, and fourth svaras were composed respectively by Syama Sastri, Cinnasvami Diksita and Muttusvami Diksita.

Picture: An illustration by Shreeraam Shankar of Shyama Sastri, Cinnasvami Diksita and Muttusvami Diksita Composing svaras for the Varna


VAAK A RENDEZVOUS AND THE VARNA

PAGE 12

And thus, lies this novel composition in the SSP, as a

Subbarama Dikshita in his Vaggeyakara Caritamu.

grand confluence of the musical acumen of 4

Thus, most likely the meeting must have taken place

composers,

after 1817 AD but certainly before 1827 A.D, which is

Ramasvami

Dikshita,

Syama

Sastri,

Cinnasvami Dikshita and Muthusvami Dikshita. It has to be pointed out that the SSP records that Cinnasvami

Dikshita

too

was

a

musician

and

composer in his own right. We can also narrow down the exact period when this rendezvous between the Trinitarians might have happened. Ramasvami Dikshita passed away in

just about 200 years ago. Barring one another instance, in the history of our Carnatic Music this far, this is the only other known instance where a composition was jointly produced by two or more great composers! And let us move on to hear a rendering of the same.

1817 AD and Syama Sastri in 1827 AD, according to

(Excerpt above of the carana portion of the varna “sAmi ninE kOri� in the raga Sriranjani from the English Translation of the SSP as available at http://ibiblio.org/guruguha/ssp_cakram1-4.pdf with the commentary/footnote provided by Subbarama Dikshita on whose authority we can say that these musical greats met and completed the hitherto unfinished varna of Ramasvami Dikshita)


VAAK A RENDEZVOUS AND THE VARNA

PAGE 13

H N Bhaskar

TM Krishna

Manoj Siva

B S Purushotham

DISCOGRAPHY In this section I present this varna a novel joint

a lineal MDNS. Contrastingly in the SSP and in this

production of 4 great musical luminaries including

composition it can be seen that almost as a rule the

the incomparable Syama Sastri and Muthusvami

prayoga is MNDNS and not MDNS, thus reinforcing

Dikshita, sung by Vidvan T M Krishna. He first

the older 18th century raga architecture concept

prefaces the composition with his commentary

which always posited jumps, turns, bends and twists

followed by a raga vinyasa. This is from his concert for

for a raga’s progression. Ragas seldom proceeded

Guruguhamrutha, held on 13th Nov 2016 @ Raga

lineally.

Sudha Hall, Chennai. The accompanists in this

Further, another beauty of this composition is that,

recording are Vidvans Sri H N Bhaskar on the violin,

stylistically as well as lyrically, the appendages

Sri Manoj Siva on the mrudangam and Sri B S

composed by these three musicians, seamlessly

Purushotham on the kanjira:

segue as if it were composed as one unit together.

https://soundcloud.com/ravi-rajagopal-

It is sad that this varna is not performed at all and

165020074/sami-ninne-sriranjani

one does hope that it is done more in the days to come. And the next time one gets to visit the house

Incidentally there is a video recording online of

of the great Syama Sastri in Tanjore, in Kamakshi

Vidvan Krishna’s rendering, albeit a much older one:

Agraharam, behind the Bangaru Kamakshi Temple,

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QekBcbROvtM

one should pause for a minute and look at those walls and the wooden rafters in the hall ( kUdam in

A commercial recording featuring this composition

Tamil) for they are the only surviving mute witnesses

by Vidusi Sumitra Vasudev too is available.

to that wonderful evening, roughly 200 years ago

From a musical standpoint as we know the raga

when the two Trinitarians met and completed this

lakshana of Sriranjani is presented conventionally

varna.

with the arohana progression in the uttarAnga being

Picture courtesy: Purnaviolin.com, sangeethamrutham, First Edition Arts, samauniversal.


VAAK A RENDEZVOUS AND THE VARNA

PAGE 14

EPILOGUE My introduction to this piece was through my

(Sriranjani, Khanda Eka tAla) which too he taught me

teacher/guru the revered Prof C S Seshadri (Prof CSS)

in a wonderfully languorous slow kAlapramAnam.

who taught me this composition, interpreting it right

And this cauka varna too in Sriranjani being taught

from the SSP. Prof CSS passed away a couple of

by him, makes me offer this article as a homage &

weeks ago. A mathematician par excellence and a

musical remembrance to his cherished memory.

winner

and

And needless to add the unique varna “sAmi ninnE

recognitions including the alternative Nobel Prize for

kOri” being a joint production of Syama Sastri,

Mathematics, , Prof CSS was an amateur vocalist

Cinnasvami Dikshita and Muthusvami Dikshita along

musician as well. He was a student of the Late

with the original portions being that of Ramasvami

Rangaramanuja Iyengar and also inherited his

Dikshita make this unique and special that too for

enviable repertoire of Tyagaraja Kritis through his

the first edition of “vAk”!

of

innumerable

awards,

honours

grandmother who in turn had learnt it from Kancipuram Naina Pillai. To date Prof CSS remains

Acknowledgement: I thank Vidvan T M Krishna for

one of the exalted few who had sung before Sangita

granting me permission and sharing this recording

Kalanidhi T Brinda, quite a few times and earned her

of the varna “sAmi ninnE kOri” in Sriranjani.

approbation for his immaculate rendering.

Author: Ravi Rajagopalan a lawyer based in Chennai And for him the raga Sriranjani was a personal

is a musical enthusiast and a student of the music of

favourite.

and

Muthusvami Dikshita and that of the Sangita

practicing kritis to him, he would always insist on

Sampradaya Pradarshini. He blogs on music at

rendering Muthusvami Dikshita’s “Sri Dhum Durge”

http://guruguha.org/articles-ravi-rajagopalan/

Every

time

Prof CS Seshadri

I

went

for

singing

Rangaramanuja Iyengar

Kancipuram Naina Pillai

T Brinda

Picture courtesy: Portrait of Prof CSS by R. Mohan, Picture of Rangaramanuja Iyengar, Naina Pillai and Brinda from Sruti Magazine.



VAAK A JOURNEY OF THE RAGA HINDOLAM

PAGE 16

_ _ THE RAGA HINDOLAM Rāga-s too change over a period and this change can

Hindōlam is not new to a music aficionado and

be related to their lakṣaṇa, svarasthāna-s or selective

almost all prominent composers have a composition

phrases. Contrastingly, very few rāga-s resisted this

in this rāga. It is also much fortunate that many of

transformation and are with us in a form that they

these compositions are quite popular. Kṛti-s like

were few centuries back. Interestingly, there are few

sāmaja vara gamana and manasulōni

rāga-s in an intermediate zone. They neither got

Svāmigal), nīrajākṣi kāmākṣi (Muddusvāmy Dīkṣitar),

transformed completely nor remain intact. This

māmavatu śrī sarasvati (Maisūru

article will try to trace the journey of one such rāga.

and mā ramaṇan (Pāpanāsam Sivan) can be cited as

(Tyāgarāja

Vāsudēvācārya)

examples.

HISTORY The rāga Hindōlam with the present pentatonic

Mahābharata Cūḍāmaṇi does not differ in their

structure, a ṛṣabha - pañcama varjya rāga having

description. The name Hindōlam could have been

sādhāraṇa

madhyamam,

quite common in the past is revealed by a mention,

suddha dhaivatam and kaiśiki niṣādham can be seen

more than once in the literature. Despite sharing a

at least from the period of Sadrāgacandrōdaya of

common name, these rāga-s have a different

Paṇḍarīka Viṭṭala. A rāga with a similar structure is

lakṣaṇa. Since we are dealing with the changes seen

also seen in the treatises written by Śahāji and Tulaja

in the rāga Hindōlam, which is now in vogue, these

(Hēma 2004:549). Later, Subbarāma Dīkṣitar details

variants are not dealt herewith.

this

further, it is pertinent to discuss the phrases

gāndhāram,

suddha

1

rāga

a

lakṣaṇa

ślōka

attributed

to

Before proceeding

Vēṅkaṭamakhī.

described in these granthā-s as this is the locus

Hindōlam is also described in the texts like Saṅgraha

which shows much variation.

Cūḍāmaṇi,

1

with

2

Sarvārtha

Sāra

Saṅgrahamu

and

A rāga by name Hindōla can also be seen in the text Svaramēlakalānidhi of Rāmamāṭya. Though the svara-s taken

by this rāga is same as that of the present day Hindōlam, this is a different rāga as this lacks ṛṣbha and dhaivata.

2

We find a hexatonic scale with the name Hindōlam in a manuscript preserved in The Tanjāvūr Maharāja Śerfōji

Sarasvati Mahāl Library (TMSSML). This is considered as a janya of Vasantabhairavi mēla and also has a gītam.


VAAK A JOURNEY OF THE RAGA HINDOLAM

PAGE 17

We will start our discussion from the grantha Rāga Lakṣaṇa of King Śahāji. This treatise

is

said

to

have

been

anywhere

between

CE

considering

the

of

period

written 1684-1711,

Śahāji.

He

mentions, the svara movement in this rāga occurs in a straight course and then proceeds

to

explain

further

by

giving

phrases like SNDNS, SGGM, MDM, GMDNS and SGGMGGNNS. The last phrase is of paramount speculated

importance. that

the

It

can

non-linear

be

(vakra)

nature of this phrase could have been the reason for its specific inclusion. Tulaja closely follows Śahāji while describing this rāga

and

mentions

the

phrase

SGGMGGMNNS . 3

Though the texts Saṅgraha Cūḍāmaṇi, Sarvārtha

Sāra

Saṅgrahamu

and

Mahābharata Cūḍāmaṇi unanimously gives the scale as SMGMDNS SNDMGS, only the first text explains in detail by giving a lakṣaṇa gīta. A close inspection of this gita ‘ārē

raṅganātha

perception

of

bhujaṅga’ Hindōlam

reveals

the

by

this

granthakārta is much different from the discernment of Hindolam by Śahāji and Tulaja. Hindōlam of Saṅgraha Cūḍāmaṇi always goes as SMGM in the upward movement (ārōhaṇam) with SGS occurring rarely. This has a straight course without a

Shahaji of Tanjore, Source: The Hindu

devious twist and the tāra ṣaḍja is always reached through the phrase MDNS from madhyama. Contrastingly, the Hindōlam of Śahāji and Tulaja is a vakra rāga with phrases like SGGMGG(M)NNS, despite being described as a rāga with a straight course!

GNNS and MNNS in the works of Śahāji and Tulaja respectively is intriguing. This could be an error on the side of the scribe. MNNS appears to be the correct reading if we consider the alternate sources.

3

The phrase SGGMGGNNS and SGGMGGMNNS is to be interpreted with caution. There is an insertion of madhyama

after the second second janṭa gāndhāra in the text by Tulaja. Since the text by Tulaja is an acute reproduction of Śahāji’s work (with respect to Hindōlam), the difference seen in this phrase alone


VAAK A JOURNEY OF THE RAGA HINDOLAM

PAGE 18

_ HINDOLA OF THE PRE-TRINITY PERIOD A rāga lives only through the compositions and a

composition (Aravindh 2019:39). Even in this varṇa,

deeper analysis of these compositions alone make us

MNDNS is the only phrase used to reach tāra ṣaḍja

to contemplate a rāga. We will now concentrate on

from madhyama and the phrase MNS is strikingly

few compositions, which will help us to get a much

seen at the beginning line itself.

clear picture about Hindōlam of the Pre-Trinity period. The first example is a gīta attributed to

Based on the above discussion it can be understood

Vēṅkaṭamakhī by Subbarāma Dīkṣitar. This gīta was

that MNDNS is an arterial phrase, used to reach the

much popular and recorded at various places in the

tāra sthāyi ṣaḍja from madhyama and MDNS was not

literature. This can also be seen in the text Saṅgīta

used, as given in the lakṣaṇa gīta mentioned. The

Sampradāya Pradarśini of Subbarāma Dīkṣitar and

phrase MNS or MMNNS, which is now typical to the

has a mudra ‘vēṅkaṭēṣvara dīkṣitya’. This gīta is also

rāga Rītīgaula, was used in Hindōlam also. However,

seen in a manuscript preserved in TMSSML. The gīta

Saṅgraha Cūḍāmaṇi (and perhaps its allied texts)

starts with madhyama, an important gṛha svara (the

differed in not using these two phrases. Instead they

svara on which a segment of a composition

preferred using the phrase MDNS in lieu of MNDNS.

commences) and we see the phrase MNDNS immediately therein. We do find the phrase SGS here

Our knowledge is much limited with respect to the

and the glide from madhyama towards tāra ṣaḍja is

rāga lakṣaṇa prevailed during the period of the

always through MNDNS. Interestingly the phrase

celebrated Trinity or prior. Though followers of

MNNS appears here and Tulaja’s description is to be

Vēṅkaṭamakhī

definitely

remembered here.

discipline,

must

Another composition that would be of interest to us is the varṇa by Rāmasvāmy Dīkṣitar, father of Muddusvāmy Dīkṣitar. This varṇa ‘rammanave’ was notated by Subbarāma Dīkṣitar and is on the deity Tyāgēśa of Tiruvārūr. Rāmasvāmy Dīkṣitar has not used his usual mudra ‘vēṅkaṭakṛṣṇa’ in this

we

formed

have

had

a other

separate coeval

functioning schools. It is unfortunate that we are totally in the dark with respect to these other systems and their proponents. This lacuna becomes more transparent when we analyze the lakṣaṇa of this rāga.


VAAK A JOURNEY OF THE RAGA HINDOLAM

PAGE 19

TMSSML is a repository of manuscripts and majority

Contrarily, there also existed another school, which

of them remain untouched. It is in these records we

felt SGMDNS is the vital phrase and the phrases

find few gīta-s, ‘rajaninnade’ and ‘sudhā sindhura’ in

MNDNS or MNNS were not used by them. The

the rāga Hindōlam, but with a different structure.

phrases SGS and SGMS were common to both. The

Hindōlam is handled in a linear fashion in the

composers like Rāmasvāmy Dīkṣitar, Muddusvāmy

mentioned gīta-s. We cannot see the phrases

Dīkṣitar and Tyāgarāja Svāmigaḷ were the followers

SMGMNDN, MNN or MNDN even at a single place.

of the first school. With the available evidences the

Also we find profuse use of the prayōga SGMDNS in

proponents of the latter school cannot be identified.

5

these gīta-s. Though it is to be accepted that we are not

in

a

identify

position

the

to

ārōhaṇa

karma phrases used by Śāhāji and Tulaja, it is much

understandable

from

the

above

discussion

that

Hindōlam

is

their much

different from the one extant

in

the

gīta-s

‘rajaninnade’ and ‘sudhā sindhura’.

We

can

conclude

this

section by saying there were

(atleast)

two

different schools in the past.

The

consider nonlinear

first this

school

rāga

rāga

as with

phrases like MNDNS and MNNS. They never used a straightforward SGMDNS.

Maharaja Tukkoji alias Tulaja I, Source: Serfoji memorial hall

5

The composer of these gīta-s remain anonymous as the mudra segment is not available.


VAAK A JOURNEY OF THE RAGA HINDOLAM

PAGE 20

_ HINDOLA OF THE TRINITY PERIOD We will move on to the next period in the history of Karnāṭaka Music, the period of Syāmā Sāstrigaḷ, Tyāgarāja Svāmigaḷ and Muddusvāmy Dīkṣitar. We have two compositions of Svāmigaḷ and one composition of Muddusvāmy Dīkṣitar. We don’t have any compositions attributed to Sāstrigaḷ extant in this rāgaṃ.

Nīrajākṣi of Muddusvāmy Dīkṣitar

compositions display the Hindōlam of the present

This is a grand composition on Dēvi Kāmākṣi. This kṛti has a pallavi,anupallavi,caraṇa and a citta svara segment.

Subbarāma

Sampradāya composition.

Dīkṣitar

Pradarṣini 6

has

in

his

Saṅgīta

notated

this

Hindōlam seen here is an exact

replica of ‘rammanave’ with own innovations of the composer.

Muddusvāmy

Dīkṣitar

assiduously

reproduced the main rules followed by Rāmasvāmy Dīkṣitar in approaching this rāga. An important point here is the absence of the phrase MNS, seen in the earlier compositions. This could be due to the disappearance of this phrase during the period of Muddusvāmy Dīkṣitar or the composer’s wish to not opt for this phrase.

old

Hindōlam.

Vālājāpēṭṭai

version

Vēṅkaṭaramaṇa

notated

Bhāgavatar,

by an

available to us (Aravindh 2020:46). Vālājāpēṭṭai version has only the phrase MNDNS and there is a total lack of the phrase SGMDNS unlike the common version that we hear today. kṛti-s,

there

is

a

domination

7

of

In both the downward

(avarōhaṇa) phrases, and we do not find two other vital phrases SGS and MNS. Perhaps, the composer wishes to not use these phrases. Instead we do find a phrase MGMDNS in both these kṛti-s.

8

We wish to

remind the readers that the phrase GMDNS is seen in the description given by Śahāji and Tulaja in their treatises. A similar structure can also be seen in few

Svāmigal

other manuscripts written in early part of the last the

common

versions

of

these

century.

We do have two other compositions attributed to Muddusvāmy Dīkṣitar, ‘gōvardhana girīṣam’ and ‘sarasvati

Vālājāpēṭṭai version reconstructed by this author can be heard in the link:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UxR8mXEbAno 8

such

amanuensis and a prathama bhakta of Svāmigaḷ is

vidhiyuvati’. These kṛti-s are not seen in Pradarṣini. 7

One

Sāmaja vara gamana and Manasulōni of Tyāgarāja Whereas

6

era, we do have versions exhibiting all the features of

It is to be noted that the phrase used here is MGMDNS and not SGMDNS.


VAAK A JOURNEY OF THE RAGA HINDOLAM

PAGE 21

_ HINDOLA OF THE TRINITY PERIOD Subbarāma Dīkṣitar in his treatise explores the

even during the early years of the last century. We do

lakṣaṇa and lakṣya of this rāga by giving illustrative

have

phrases and compositions. He gives SGGMNDNS

advocating the use of lower dhaivata. One such

SNDMGS as a mūrccana for this rāga. All the

example that might be of use to us here comes from

representative compositions notated by him follow

an article by Tiger Varadācāryār. He not only

the structure crystallized in the works of Rāmasvāmy

advocates the use of śuddha dhaivata, but also

Dīkṣitar and the gīta attributed to Vēṅkaṭamakhī.

recommends the usage of this svara in its allied rāga-

musicians

condemning

this

trend

and

s like Mārgahindōla, Hindōlavasanta, Sāramati and Harikēśanallur Muttiah Bhāgavatar has composed

Śuddhadēśi (Tiger Varadācāryār 1930:236).

two compositions in this rāga, of which the kṛti ‘nava lāvaṇya’, one among the Cāmuṇḍāmbā aṣtōttara śata kṛti-s deserve a special mention. Hindōlam seen here

is

in

total

agreement

with

the

kṛti

of

Muddusvāmy Dīkṣitar (as notated by Subbarāma Dīkṣitar) and the two kṛti-s of Svamigaḷ, as notated by the Vālājāpēṭṭai disciples. It has the phrases MDNDS, MGMDNS and interestingly MNS. It is to be noted that the phrase MNS, which has disappeared even during the period of Svāmigaḷ and Muddusvāmy Dīkṣitar has resurfaced again in this kṛti. Complying with the rule, SGMDNS is not seen. This shows the interest shown by the composer to incorporate the

Harikēśanallur Muttiah Bhāgavatar

Tiger Varadācāryār

lost prayōga-s. However, this phrase is no more heard in the versions available in the public domain. The last century also witnessed another problem with respect to the variety of dhaivata to be used in this rāga. Whereas the rāga Hindōlam in all of the mentioned treatises prescribe the use of suddha dhaivata (and is still followed by many), we do have versions of ‘sāmaja vara gamanā’ and ‘manasuloni’ with catuśruti dhaivata.

9

This alternate version with

the higher dhaivata for these kṛti-s were popular Subbarāma Dīkṣitar

9

Hindōlam with catuśruti dhaivata is also called as Varamu


VAAK PAGE 22

A JOURNEY OF THE RAGA HINDOLAM

Many discussions regarding the rāga lakṣaṇa happened in the conference proceedings organized by The Music Academy and all of them were well recorded. Of these, a discussion happened in the year 1935 (Proceedings of the Experts Committee of the Madras Music Academy 1935-1937:155) is of much relevance. Hindōlam was discussed in detail and two important decisions were taken - Hindōlam is a janya of mēla 20 and the ārōhana avarōhaṇa of this rāga is SGMDNS SNDMGS. This could have been a landmark event as this discussion could have been a pivot to change the lakṣaṇa of Hindōlam, SMGM centric Hindōlam to SGMDNS centric Hindōlam.

10

Though the practice of

handling this rāga in a purely linear form with only using SGMDNS was prevalent even before the period of Svāmigaḷ and Muddusvāmy Dīkṣitar, the latter composers preferred to use only the non-linear form for reasons unknown to us. Some later composers too followed this system. For untrained ears, this might not create a big difference; but if we need to consider the musical thought process of the composers who have created these compositions, this discussion makes sense, as the linear Hindōlam is certainly different from the rāga envisioned by these composers. Jānakirāman (2009:62) accepts the usage of śuddha dhaivata and gives some additional points. He elucidates the phrases from various texts and accepts all the prayōga-s – SMGM, MNDN and SGMDNS. Hindōlam what we hear today is an admixture of both these traditions. Though we hear SGMDNS in plenty, we do have an opportunity to listen to phrases like MNDNS, SGMS and SGS. The phrase MN(N)S totally disappeared.

Illustration of raga Hindola in Sri Tattva Nidhi by Krishna Raja Wodeyar of Mysore

9

We do have compositions by Post-Trinity composers who have used plenty of SGMDNS.


VAAK A JOURNEY OF THE RAGA HINDOLAM

PAGE 23

Illustration of raga Hindola in Sri Tattva Nidhi by Krishna Raja Wodeyar of Mysore

"Hindola Raga" man on a swing surrounded by women Source: British Museum

CONCLUSION Hindōlam is one of the very few rāga, which have reached us without much change. In the past, we had two traditions in approaching this rāga. The first one is a nonlinear approach, followed by Rāmasvāmy Dīkṣitar and his family, Svāmigaḷ and later by Muttiah Bhāgavatar. The other tradition is to see this as a linear rāga. Now, both these traditions got combined and we hear an amalgamated form of Hindōlam. It is a general contention that Svāmigaḷ and Muddusvāmy Dīkṣitar were the followers of two different traditions. This rāga is an example that can be cited to disprove this hypothesis.


VAAK PAGE 24

A JOURNEY OF THE RAGA HINDOLAM

Acknowledgement

I sincerely thank Dr Arati Rao, Researcher and Academician for parting the manuscripts in her possession. References Aravindh, T, Ranganāthan. 2019. Mudra used by Sri Rāmasvāmy Dīkṣitar. Śanmukha, Issue 2, p 38-40.

Aravindh, T.R. 2020. Unpublished varnas of Wālājāpēt Vēṅkaṭaramaṇa Bhāgavatar. Śruti, Issue 429, p 46-47. Hēma Ramanāthan. 2004. Rāga Lakṣaṇa Saṅgraha (Collection of Rāga Descriptions) from Treatises on Music of the Mēla Period with translations and notes. Published by N Rāmanāthan, Chennai, p 539-551. Jānakirāman, S R. 2009. Rāga lakṣaṇaṅgal – Part 1. The Music Academy, Madras, p 59-62. Proceedings of the Experts Committee of the Madras Music Academy. 1935-1937. The Journal of Music Academy, Volume 5, p 154-155. Tiger Varadācāryār. 1930. A note on Hindōla and allied ragas. The Journal of Music Academy, Issue 4, p 235-236. Author

The author is a Chennai based dentist and is presently researching on the old versions of the compositions of Śyāmā Sāstrigaḷ, Tyāgarāja Svāmigaḷ and Muddusvāmy Dīkṣitar by analyzing the manuscripts. His renditions and lectures on this topic can be heard in his YouTube channel https://www.youtube.com/user/Vathathmaja

Ragamala Painting - Hindola ragini, Kṛṣṇa and Rādhā on a swing, with female attendants and clouds with Hindi inscription. Gouache on paper. Source: British Museum


VAAK

PAGE 25

Down

Across

1. Mridangam maestro who was equally at home on the kanjira. In addition, his ability to sing provided an added musicality to his percussion work

4. Musician whose style was filled with slow and bhavaladen rendition which was deeply contrasted by his guru’s brisk madhyama kala renditions.

2. These musicians brought the illustrious Thirupugazh compositional form into the forefront of the Carnatic performance stage. Where do they hail from?

6. The artist who was known to have sung a lot of concerts without accompaniments in the Thathachari farmhouse near Trichy. Where was this artist from?

3. A musician famous for unearthing and giving life to numerous compositions of Purandara Dasa

7. Musician that introduced the grahabhedam technique and applied it in healthy moderation. The musician was also highly influenced by the nadaswaram tradition.

5. A musician that seamlessly blended the GNB bani filled with lavish brikas and elaborate alapana singing and the veena Dhanammal bani complete with raga bhava and rare Padams and Javalis.

3. It is rumoured that this artist mortgaged raga Thodi to get loaned some money. He kept his promise and never performed the raga Thodi till the loan was paid back.

8. The Musician that stimulated an era of “madhyama kala� music and increased the number of krithis in a concert

10. A pathbreaking musician that developed a style that revolves around filigree work and uncompromising raga bhava.


VAAK

PAGE 26

WORD

SEARCH

ATANA DHANYASI KALYANI KANADA SRIRANJANI BEGADA GOWLA KAMAS MOHANAM THODI BHAIRAVI HINDOLAM KAMBHOJI SAVERI VARALI

Guess the

RA GA

GN Balasubramaniam – Jayamanohari Musiri Subramania Iyer – Andolika Abishek Raghuram – Ahiri TM Krishna – Nari reetigowla ML Vasanthakumari - Pushpalatika

Sudha Ragunathan - Hemavathi S Sowmya - Navroj - Kshetrayya padam Charumathi Raghuram - Nalinakanthi TR Mahalingam - Navarasa kanada Lalgudi Vijayalakshmi - Rishabhapriya


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.