3 minute read

ID4010 The Big Rethink: Production and processes in interior design practice Kireet Patel Rishav Jain Aparajita Basu

ID4010

The Big Rethink: Production and processes in interior design practice

Advertisement

Program

Interior Design

Unit Assistants

Shail Sheth Paramdeep Dayani

Students

Aashna Chheda Apurva Pandey Ayooshi Jain Devika Unnikrishnan Dhyey Chag Harsh Barua Hithasini R Isha Goel Ishita Sahai Jhanavi Parikh Gohil Mayuri Jitendra Namraota Jain Prachi Jindal Sanjana Sreedhar Shagun Gupta Shiva Shishodia Shivani Vijay Shruti Kohli Siddharth S Sri Sailesh A Sucheetra Pradhan Uttara Haridas Vishakha Soni Kireet Patel Rishav Jain Aparajita Basu

The intention of this studio was to develop a multitude of notions, approaches,positions and arguments with reference to interior techniques and its implications on the interior design practice. Here interior technique was defined as “A method, tool and medium that modifies, alters, conceals, exposes an interior element, thus transforming the transformable quality of the space.” The studio offered an opportunity to develop a design position in different contexts by questioning preconceived notions of interior design. It emphasized the relationship between interior techniques and its expression, identity and design outcome.

The first four weeks were part of the common foundation program, where students from all streams worked together to develop common skills and abilities. The later part of the studio was largely divided into two modules: the first module built an argument on interior techniques through existing projects and the second module intended to develop a systematic approach to the application of the argument in three different contexts. It was an opportunity to develop an individual design position for disparate sites keeping the program constant.

Fig 1

Fig 1 Apurva Pandey Role 3 Collaborative practices representing “Identity” Fig 2 Harsh Barua Role 1 Historical Practices representing an ‘Era’ Fig 3 Hithasini Rajagopal Role 1 Historical Practices representing an ‘Era’ Fig 4 Suchetra Pradhan Role 1 Historical Practices representing an ‘Era’ Fig 5 Isha Goel Role 1 Historical Practices representing an ‘Era’ Fig 6 Apurva Pandey Role 2 Current Practices representing ‘Standardisation’ Fig 7 Hithasini Rajagopal Role 2 Current Practices representing ‘Standardisation’

Fig 2 Fig 4

Fig 8 Jhanvi Parikh Role 3 Collaborative practices representing “Identity” Fig 9 Uttara Haridas Role 3 Collaborative practices representing “Identity” Fig 10 Isha Goel Role 3 Collaborative practices representing “Identity” Fig 11 Shivani Vijay Role 3 Collaborative practices representing “Identity” Fig 12 Sanjana Sreedhar Role 3 Collaborative practices representing “Identity” Fig 13 Jhanvi Parikh Role 3 Collaborative

practices representing “Identity”

Fig 3 Fig 5

Fig 6

Fig 7

Fig 8

Fig 9

Fig 10

Fig 11

Fig 12

Fig 13

Sanil Dishika, Satish Pallavi  UD4001-C Master Plan Studio Brijesh Bhatha, Vipuja Parmar

FACULTY OF PLANNING

This article is from: