Fig 88- Context Mapping

ITERATION 2

PROS:

1. The total height of the structure complies with the development control as well.

2. The total number of seats, comply as per the requirements specified in the brief.

3. Form of the stands obtain a bit of height at east and west stand and thus cut the rising and setting sun from those angles.

CONS:

1. Ideal C- Value, ranging between 90-120 is achieved for only Tier B. This means majority of the spectators would be devoid of a good viweing angle, experience and sightline.

ITERATION 3

Fig 155- Resolving Stands: Iteration 2 Source- Author

PROS:

1. The total number of seats, comply as per the requirements specified in the brief.

2. Form of the stands obtain substantial height at east and west stand and thus cut the rising and setting sun from those angles. It would provide good amount of shade to spectators and at the same time would even shade ground for a good amount of time.

CONS:

1. Ideal C- Value, ranging between 90-120 is achieved for only Tier B. This means majority of the spectators would be devoid of a good viweing angle, experience and sightline.

2. The height of the structure exceeds the maximum height as allowed by developmental controls.

3. The angle of Tier C is around 40 ° (and exceeds the maximum of 34°), which makes the Tier C a lot steep and might cause a sensation of vertigo in spectators.

Fig 156- Resolving Stands: Iteration 3 Source- Author