AB Case Study Assignment Help by Gayathri Muniandy Submission date: 24-Jul-2017 01:12PM (UTC+1000) Submission ID: 832700865 File name: 31215_59881709_1064177977_AB_case_study.docx (28.34K) Word count: 1884 Character count: 10966
Incorrect Spelling Methodology Limitations (weaknesses)
Methodology Limitations (weaknesses)
Methodology Limitations (weaknesses)
6 7 8 9
Support Structure of essay Support Vague
Improper Citation
Support Support Needed:<br>A well-written paper will include strong support f or its thesis. Support f or your thesis should come f rom primary (original documents, interviews, and personal experiences) and secondary (inf ormation that has been processed or interpreted by someone else) sources. To use your support ef f ectively, you must elaborate upon the inf ormation, quotations, and examples taken f rom your sources and connect them to your thesis. It is also important to remember to cite the sources of the evidence and support you use in your paper. Structure of essay Incomplete. Ref er to the instructions and Health Writing and Ref erencing guide
QM Support Support Needed:<br>A well-written paper will include strong support f or its thesis. Support f or your thesis should come f rom primary (original documents, interviews, and personal experiences) and secondary (inf ormation that has been processed or interpreted by someone else) sources. To use your support ef f ectively, you must elaborate upon the inf ormation, quotations, and examples taken f rom your sources and connect them to your thesis. It is also important to remember to cite the sources of the evidence and support you use in your paper. QM Vague Unclear:<br>When making a point in one of your body paragraphs, one of the most common mistakes is to not of f er enough details. A paragraph without much detail will seem vague and sketchy. A paper is always strengthened when your claims are as specif ic as possible, The more detailed evidence you of f er, the more ref erence points your reader will have. Remember that you are communicating your argument to a reader who has only your description to go by. Someone who reads your essay will not automatically know what you mean to express, so you have to supply details, to show the reader what you mean, not just tell him or her. QM Improper Citation
Improper citation:<br>Improperly cited material. Please use the link below to f ind links to inf ormation regarding specif ic citation styles: http://www.plagiarism.org/plag_article_citation_styles.html GRADING FORM: 1203NRS UNDERSTANDING RESEARCH GAYATHRI MUNIANDY
45
COMPONENTS OF THE ESSAY Annotated Bibliography: 3 articles have been chosen from the list provided. (1) Justification for your choice of sources: The chosen articles have been justified as relevant for the case study using 9 different sources from scholarly literature. (2) Recommendations for clinical practice supported from the same sources of scholarly literature. COMPREHENSION AND EVALUATION A high level response will provide: • Accurate discussion of the importance of the articles to the topic provided. (10) • All the annotations include accurate detailed descriptions of each article in a clear & consistent, succinct manner. (10) • Provide evidence of a deep understanding of each article’s conclusions from the research as described. (10) • Evaluation links all aspects including methodology, findings, conclusions, limitations of the topic. (10) • Use of scholarly literature appropriately to support the discussion. Description of each article insufficiently summarised. 20 Lack of understanding with articles ready demonstrated. SELECTION OF LITERATURE A high level response will provide: Evidence of accurate comprehension of each article (6) Evidence of an exploration of the literature to justify the annotation. selections reflecting understanding of the clinical issue & its connection to your clinical practice. (6) The evidence based sources provided have been read, understood and annotated. (6) The justification of the selections and the recommendations demonstrate all relationship points between the topic and clinical practice. (6) Use of scholarly literature appropriately to support the discussion. (6)
Strengths and justifications of selected article not 13 discussed. Lack of scholarly evidence to justify annotation sections reflecting understanding of the clinical issue discussed. PRESENTATION AND STRUCTURE A high level response will provide: The writing is clear and concise. (2) The annotations are clear & succinctly convey the key information about the source. (2) Conforms to the Health Writing and Referencing Guidelines.(2) Word limits for assessment items are strictly adhered to. (2) Essay is well presented, with correct spelling, grammar, with well-constructed sentence and paragraph structure. (2) Writing is unclear and discussion is vague . Multiple 4 grammatical and spelling errors found . At times, the writing is awkward and illogical making ti difficult to understand the student argument REFERENCING Referencing as per APA Style 6th Edition.(4) Essay is supported with no fewer than 9 different sources from the scholarly literature & free of APA errors (4) Separate page for reference list. (2) Some referencing and intext citation errors. Please 5 refer to APA6th ed for referencing.
AB case study ORIGINALITY REPORT
25%
19%
7%
22%
SIMILARITY INDEX INTERNET SOURCESPUBLICATIONS STUDENT PAPERS
PRIMARY SOURCES
Submitted to Griffth University 14%
1 Student Paper
Submitted to Southern Illinois University 2
2% Edwardsville Student Paper
Submitted to University of Sydney 2%
3 Student Paper
Submitted to Chamberlain College of Nursing 2%
4 Student Paper
Submitted to Australian Catholic University 2%
5 Student Paper
onlinelibrary.wiley.com 1%
6 Internet Source
jdc.jefferson.edu <1%
7 Internet Source
pure.york.ac.uk 8
<1% Internet Source
9medicine.exeter.ac.uk
Internet Source
<1%
monash.edu <1%
10 Internet Source
Exclude quotes
Of f
Exclude bibliographyOf f
Exclude matches
Of f