Pro Football Draft Guide 2017 by Cheesehead TV

THE ONLY DRAFT GUIDE CREATED BY PACKERS FANS FOR PACKERS FANS

2017

PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE TJ WATT OLB | Wisconsin ORIGINAL PHOTO COURTESY OF

Wisconsin Communications

OJ HOWARD TE | ALABAMA ORIGINAL PHOTO COURTESY OF

Alabama Communications

contents TABLE OF

Meet the Draft Guide Team....................................................... 04 Letter from the Editor.................................................................05 FEATURED ARTICLES:

Evolve or Die: The Ultimatum Facing Aaron Rodgers and the Packers' Offense...........................................................06 The Clay Matthews Conundrum Looms Large Over Packers' Offseason.......................................................................10 Why Ted is Always Going to Ted: Looking Behind the Curtain........................................................ 12 Team Needs....................................................................................16 He Reminds Me Of......................................................................... 21 Top 100 Prospects........................................................................25 NFL Mock Draft............................................................................. 27 POSITION GROUP ANALYSIS

Quarterbacks.................................................................................35 Running Backs...............................................................................45 Fullbacks / H-backs......................................................................55 Wide Receivers..............................................................................64 Tight Ends...................................................................................... 74 Offensive Tackles......................................................................... 84 Interior Offensive Linemen........................................................94 3-4 Defensive Linemen............................................................. 104 Edge Defenders.............................................................................114 Inside Linebackers......................................................................124 Cornerbacks................................................................................ 134 Safeties......................................................................................... 144 Kickers........................................................................................... 154 Punters...........................................................................................162 Return Specialists.......................................................................170 Packers Mock Draft.....................................................................178 Packers Position Analysis......................................................... 180

All Stats are from 2016 unless indicated otherwise. All player measurements are from the NFL Combine unless the player did not participate, then they were taken from his Universityâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s web site.

*Click to return to the Table of Contents

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

All player videos courtesy of DraftBreakdown.com. Player photos courtesy of USA Today and the communications departments at Wisconsin, Alabama and LSU.

DRAFT GUIDE TEAM MEET THE

JASON B. HIRSCHHORN Matthews Feature Jason B. Hirschhorn is an award-winning journalist and Pro Football Writers of America member. He covers the NFL for Sports on Earth and SB Nation. He also serves as the senior writer and editor for Acme Packing Company, a Green Bay Packers blog.

"JERSEY AL" BRACCO OT, Packers Mock, Managing Editor Founder of PackersTalk.com and ALLGBP.com, in 2015 Al and his merry band of Packers writers merged with CheeseheadTV, where he is now Editor-In-Chief. A NJ native his entire life, Jersey Al became a Packers fan after watching the first Super Bowl as a child and a Draftnik in the 70s when the only hope for those awful Packers teams were to get some new players.

"PIGSKIN PAUL" GUILLEMETTE Top 100, "He Reminds Me Of" "PIGSKIN PAUL" Guillemette has been a Draftnik for 50 years, to use a round number. He has been a football writer, website owner, podcast participant, on-air radio personality for the last 15 years. Paul is currently Associate Editor and Chief Scout for The GBNReport.com

ROSS UGLEM 3-4 DL, Edge, Packers Position Analysis Ross Uglem covers the Packers for Cheesehead TV and Packers Talk, and is co-host of "The War Room" podcast. Uglem also covers North Dakota State football and menâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s basketball for Scout Media. He is a small-town, North Dakota native. ERIK FRETLAND S, P, K, KR, FB Erik Fretland is an avid Packers and Sooners fan attending the University of Oklahoma. He works as a player participation analyst for Pro Football Focus and coaches middle school tennis in his spare time. Follow him on Twitter at @erikfretland ZACHARY RAPPORT Editor Zach is a professional wordsmith, part-time musician and full-time Packer fan. A Milwaukee native, he now resides in Queens, New York. His go-to karaoke song is Hey Jealousy by the Gin Blossoms. C.D. ANGELI Thompson Philosophy Feature C.D. Angeli is a lifelong Green Bay Packer fan and co-owner of PackersTalk.com. He resides in Northeast Wisconsin, close enough to Lambeau Field to take in a few games a year. When he is not co-hosting the Cheesehead Radio podcast, you can find him enjoying any number of nerdy pursuits (as if podcasting weren't enough of a clue about that). Follow him on Twitter at @TundraVision.

ANDREW GARDA QB, WR, Full Mock Draft Andrew Garda (Sports On Earth, Footballguys.com, CHTV) has spent way more time than he should have on the NFL over the last ten years and is unsure if his family just thinks he's a renter who keeps a room. He'll be in Chicago covering his seventh straight NFL Draft, has been credentialed for Giants, Patriots and Eagles games, discovering that the press box spread in Philly is the superior one. He grew up a Jets fan, don't hold it against him.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

DAN DAHLKE RB, ILB Dan Dahlke currently covers the Packers and NFL Draft at the FanSided blog LombardiAve.com. He also contributes draft content to CheeseheadTV.com and DraftBreakdown.com, as well as work as a video editor for the draft site. In addition to writing and creating video cut-ups for prospects, Dan is a weekly analyst on the Packers Tundra Talk podcast. PETER BUJOWSKI "Evolve or Die" Feature Peter Bukowski s a freelance writer, broadcaster, and podcast host living in New York City, but born and raised in Wisconsin. He once caught a pass from Robert Brooks. You can follow him on Twitter @Peter_Bukowski. RALPH MANCINI CB, TE Ralph Mancini is a former newspaper journalist for the Times Newsweekly in Queens, NY from 2006 through 2011. He later joined forces with the NFL Draft Bible where he penned and edited draft content for six years, as well as interview NFL prospects yearround. Mancini is currently a Certified New York State teacher, who also contributes a variety of Green Bay Packers-related content as a member of LombardiAve.com's team of writers. JACOB WESTENDORF IL Jacob is a graduate from the University of Wisconsin-Green Bay with a journalism degree. He is a former intern at Scout.com's Packer Report where he covered the 2013 NFL Draft including working on the NFL Scouting Combine research series. Jacob has also been involved with Packers Talk since 2012 and worked on separate projects and podcasts. He is currently the co-host of Pulse of the Pack. MICHELLE BRUTON Team Needs Michelle is an NFL Gameday Correspondent and Green Bay Packers Featured Columnist for Bleacher Report. She is also an editor at the sports book publisher Triumph Books, columnist at CheeseheadTV, and co-host of Cheesehead Radio. JAMES ZACHMAN Designer James is originally a WI native, but has been living in the heart of Bears country as a creative professional since 2007. He takes a humanistic approach to the creative process through a balance between conceptual and strategic thinking. You can view his work at zachmandesign.com.

THE EDITOR LETTER FROM

Welcome to the seventh iteration of the CheeseheadTV Pro Football Draft Guide. If you’re a repeat subscriber, we are thrilled that you’re back and extremely appreciative for your support. If this is your first time here, where have you been? But seriously, we hope you’ll enjoy the guide, find it useful and come back again next year. The 2016 season saw the Packers make another run at the Super Bowl, ultimately falling flat on their faces in the NFC Championship game. While they didn’t lose on the last play of the game as they had the previous three seasons (what are the odds?), they did get blown out. The question of which type of exit hurts more is subject to opinion, but they both leave a bad, bad taste in your mouth. Soon after the loss to the Falcons (or as it was still playing out, to be more accurate), the onrushing ire of Packers fans swept across the Internet, reaching all corners of the globe. The podcast pitchforks and twitter torch mobs were assembled, leaving no one even loosely affiliated with the Packers safe from the swath of criticism. But is the criticism justified? To help answer that question, this year’s feature articles examine how and why the Packers operate the way they do and what might have to change to produce different results. Our outstanding features writers skillfully address a number of topics, from Ted Thompson’s methods to Clay Matthews’ struggles to Aaron Rodgers’ role in the Packers offense. Every year, we endeavor to improve the guide by tweaking a few things here and there. This year's mantra was to cater even more to our target audience – you, the Green Bay Packers fan. As a result, our player rankings now include a “fit with the Packers” section, which examines if the player would be a good choice for Green Bay. Producing this guide is more of a labor of love than anything else. If you knew how much time the writers devoted to this endeavor, you would buy two copies! (Hey, I can try…) But seriously… Last year's designer James Zachman returns, truly outdoing himself with the new design and layout—I think it’s visually stunning. The Copy Editor on this project is Zach Rapport, without whose help this project could not have been completed on time. Of course, none of this would be possible without two close friends who decided to create a Packers blog over a decade ago—Corey Behnke and Aaron Nagler.

Finally, the primary thanks goes to you, the reader, for supporting all involved by purchasing this guide and frequenting CheeseheadTV.com. Without you, CheeseheadTV would not exist and be thriving. CheeseheadTV's goal is simple: to provide you with the best possible Packers content on a daily basis. Our site is always free for you to enjoy—no subscriptions, no pay wall, no begging for donations. We absorb all of the costs of running and improving the site with help from our sponsors and advertisers. Our annual draft guide is the only thing we ever ask you to pay for and frankly, our only financial goal is merely to be able to pay the people who put it together and then hopefully break even. So, if you’re here reading this, our staff thanks you. One last thing: As you may know, CHTV sadly lost one of our own this year. Adam Czech, a fine writer, husband and father passed way too young after a year-battle with stage IV colon cancer. If you have contributed to the GoFundMe for his family, thank you. If not, please consider donating whatever you can—you can find a link on the CHTV homepage. I firmly believe this is the best CHTV Draft Guide yet and I’m proud to present it to the greatest fan base in the NFL. Enjoy it and Go Pack Go!

“Jersey Al” Bracco Editor-In-Chief

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

Evolve or Die: THE ULTIMATUM FACING AARON RODGERS AND THE PACKERS' OFFENSE Peter Bukowski

For all the superlatives used to discuss Aaron Rodgers, “youngest” just doesn’t apply. Perhaps he’ll find the same fountain of youth as Tom Brady (maybe it’s the Himalayan sea salt), playing into his 40s, as the Packers signal caller recently insisted he could. But if Packers fans and brass alike are being honest about the window of “Prime Rodgers”—that sliver of history that has earned him the affectionate nickname “Godgers”— the clock is ticking. We know Father Time’s record in these situations. Rodgers turns 34 this year. While the list of quarterbacks succeeding well into their 30s may be growing, It may be naive to assume that Green Bay’s aging quarterback fits into that mold. An essential facet of his brilliance is the artistry of his escapes. The laser to Jared Cook on the sidelines to set up the game-winning field goal against Dallas in the playoffs doesn’t happen without a unique escape ability, flexibility, and a preternatural gift for making throws no one else in recorded history can make. What happens when his feet lose their juice? What happens when hot yoga and a ketogenic diet aren’t enough to keep his quick-twitch muscle fibers sharp and his body lose? How much of what makes Rodgers “Aaron F’ing Rodgers” will remain? More importantly for the Packers, how does the offense evolve around him? The onus is on Rodgers to find new ways to continue to be effective. The first step is staying healthy. Rodgers suffered through lower leg injuries in 2014 and 2016, which limited his effectiveness at times, and may have been the difference in a trip to the Super Bowl in Seattle. Between those injuries, he had a bout of amnesia—forgetting he was Aaron Rodgers, machine sent from the future to destroy defenses. In golf, older pros will tell you that putting is the hardest skill to keep sharp. When you’re young, your nerves are strong; you have confidence, optimism, and hope. As the years go by, the wounds of the game tear into your psyche.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

Your nerves fray, and eventually the cup looks like the size of an aspirin. For quarterbacks, the football equivalent to “putting” is accuracy and timing. The crispness tends to fall off. Tom Brady remains indefatigably brilliant, but his deep ball has grown inconsistent with age and he’s not as deft in the pocket. Peyton Manning lost his battle with Mother Nature, with his precision and power evaporating as he got older. For nearly all of 2015 and for most of 2016 it was fair to wonder if Rodgers had lost it—the equanimity of being the best player in the world and with it his exacting precision, swagger, and command. Missed reads. Happy feet. Off-target throws. Every time you’d hear a TV announcer say “Well, no one is open,” a replay would inevitably show that at least one if not two receivers were, in fact, open. Rodgers either didn’t see them or didn’t pull the trigger. The throwing windows that Rodgers always made look more like garage doors, may have appeared to him like key holes. This is the part within Aaron’s control. No one competes with more intensity or prepares harder than Rodgers. He has to trust this offense, trust his eyes, and trust his guys. The jumpiness in the pocket, the improvisation and Houdiniesque escapes will turn into David Blaine-level anti-climaxes as his physical tools dull. He needs to be willing to risk some of that historical efficiency by making a throw or two downfield into coverage—to just get the ball out. For all of Rodgers’ estimable gifts, he’s often reticent to take a checkdown for four yards in favor of hoping a deeper receiver can break free. But often it leads to incompletions and sacks, or scrambles. Save those miles on the odometer. Packers fans may be loath to remember, but the iconic moment of John Elway’s career was the helicopter hit in the Super Bowl after a scramble. He was 36.

EVOLVE OR DIE CONTINUED...

Don’t stop being Aaron Rodgers. Don’t stop using those skills all together. Just be smarter about when to use them. It’s a weapon to be unsheathed more judiciously, not only because it will become less effective as athleticism wains, but also because it saves Rodgers’ legs and his body from hits. Playing with discipline within the confines of the offense while holding that ace in his back pocket— only pulling it out every now and then—can lead to optimal outcomes as he gets older. Like an aging scorer in the NBA who develops a post game or a three-point shot, Rodgers is smart and competitive enough to undergo such a transformation, but will Mike McCarthy be able to likewise adapt? The head coach did a masterful job of assimilating a diminished Jordy Nelson into this offense, an absolutely critical factor in the reemergence of the team down the stretch of 2016. Nelson was his usual dynamic self in the red zone, but between the 20s, the Packers had to find ways to get him in motion, use him in the slot, and free him up across the middle of the field. If Nelson can assume the mantle of the “big slot” receiver in this offense, something Larry Fitzgerald has done in Arizona, the Packers can continue to flourish. However, that success is predicated on an important factor: Davante Adams’ breakout season can’t be a mirage. Adams, still just 24, showed flashes of brilliance as a rookie, slumped as a sophomore, and absolutely shined in 2016, with 75 catches, 997 yards and 12 touchdowns. When the former Fresno State standout is healthy, he’s nearly unguardable on in-breaking routes, which helped him set up double-moves and establish himself as a vertical threat despite a lack of blazing speed. Adams emerging as a legitimate No. 1 outside threat, or at the very least someone defenses have to account for consistently, would make Nelson’s presence in the slot even more effective.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

Heading into the offseason, the Packers didn’t have an obvious option opposite Adams on the outside with Nelson assuming more and more slot duty. Free agency altered that calculation, but more on that in a second. Until recently, there was a critical missing piece: a mismatch player. It was Jermichael Finley in the early 2010s, and Randall Cobb of late. Play them anywhere and they’re a problem. A neck injury cost Finley his career, and unceasing injuries have robbed Cobb of his burst and explosiveness. Jared Cook provided that spark last year and his impact was both highly important and widely publicized. In six games without their athletic tight end, Rodgers was normal, everyday, very good: 178/275 for 1,793, 15 touchdowns and 6 interceptions for a passer rating of 92.3. Plenty of offenses would take those numbers in a heartbeat. But with Cook, Rodgers was a ridiculous 248/375 for 2,997 yards, 29 touchdowns and 1 interception. That’s a 115.1 quarterback rating and I may need a lie down. An agent blunder essentially cost Cook a chance to return to Green Bay this offseason, but that mishap opened the door for the Packers to bring in Martellus Bennett fresh off a Super Bowl victory, and Lance Kendricks, a former University of Wisconsin standout who had his best season as a pro in 2016. If we assume Rodgers will lose a little bit off his fastball and accuracy over time, what better way to mitigate those concerns than by bringing in big-bodied tight ends who can stretch the field and create mismatches? The quarterback doesn’t have to be as precise if he’s throwing to a 6’6’’, 270-pound tight end who can run. Not to mention, this mitigates the concerns about playing another outside receiver with Adams and Nelson. McCarthy loved to line Cook up outside and match him up with corners, something Bennett and Kendricks could each do with alacrity. Green Bay could use 11 or 21 personnel and still line up 5 wide with above-average receivers at every position.

EVOLVE OR DIE CONTINUED...

One important addendum to this discussion: Green Bay already had a mismatch player on its roster McCarthy and the coaches should have better utilized in 2016. Ty Montgomery is a matchup nightmare no matter what number he’s wearing. At times, the Packers would use formation and motion to force the defense to declare the coverage, and Rodgers would calmly sling it to Ty Montgomery in the flat for an easy first down. Against zone, they’d flood the side and take the corner out of play, forcing a linebacker or a safety to arrive late to the play. In man, they’d motion him out and lock in that same matchup in space. The former wideout can run any route in the tree, making him difficult to cover. It was so effective at times, Montgomery appeared to become the engine of the offense. Unfortunately, his battle with sickle cell trait caused the Packers coaching staff to be cautious with the second-year player in the midst of a position change. Nonetheless, his lack of involvement in the NFC Championship Game—where he had just four touches— was a game-plan blunder that can’t happen again. Montgomery will assume more full-time running back duties in 2017, but his versatility as a former receiver can’t be overlooked. He can become essentially the reverse of what Cobb was to this offense early in his career: a running back you can line up wide, as opposed to a wide receiver who can play running back. Linebackers and safeties can’t cover him and corners either can’t or don’t want to tackle him. Put Montgomery in the bunch formation with Martellus Bennett and Jordy Nelson—defensive coordinators must already have indigestion. Fittingly, there’s one way the Packers can evolve as their dynamic offensive duo of Rodgers and Nelson age that has absolutely nothing to do with the offense: The defense has to get better. Tom Brady has won countless games because his defense keeps him in games, giving him a chance to make plays late (and Bill Belichick is a direct descendent of Merlin). Russell Wilson didn’t lose a game by double-digits until this season, not because he’s so transcendent, but his defense was. Clay Matthews aged out of dominance. Nick Perry could age in, along with HaHa Clinton-Dix. I have more hope for the Packers young secondary than most, and the defensive line showed promise with rookie Kenny Clark displaying immense

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

growth over the course of his rookie season. But there’s no field-tilter. No playmaker. In 2010, the Packers had Matthews in his prime, and a future hall of famer in Charles Woodson. Clinton-Dix has a chance to be one of the elite safeties in the league, and if Perry can stay healthy, the newly extended linebacker can be a destructive force in both the run and passing downs. That being said, they’re still at least a body short. Ted Thompson has done a splendid job of making this defense faster with players like Damarious Randall, Kentrell Brice, Blake Martinez, and the move of Morgan Burnett to a hybrid linebacker position. But Green Bay desperately needs another speed corner, potentially in the slot after adding Davon House this offseason. Randall and House on the outside with Rollins playing the Hyde-style rover role would suit me just fine. Rollins excelled near the line of scrimmage as a playmaker in his rookie season. What they lack is speed and playmaking in the slot. Casey Hayward and Micah Hyde offered the playmaking to make up for their lack of speed and they got paid. Right now, the Packers don’t have either (Hello Adoree Jackson?). And as Matthews gets older, moving him inside could actually make more sense, where his instinctive, aggressive style would pay dividends much as it did for the early part of 2015, when his versatility made him an early Defensive Player of the Year candidate. If Green Bay had one more pass rusher—even if it’s a subpackage-only player much like the Broncos’ Shane Ray or the Vikings’ Danielle Hunter—it would inexorably alter this defense for the better. Then, all of that speed could cover ground on the back end while Dom Capers doesn’t have to rely on sending five or six guys to create pressure. In the Rodgers era, the Packers have struggled to win when their quarterback isn’t Superman. No team in football has given up more late leads since Rodgers assumed the starting role. Getting stops and creating turnovers lessens the burden on a player who has shown himself capable of leaping tall defenses in a single bound. On the northeastern shores of

EVOLVE OR DIE CONTINUED...

Lake Michigan, a rising defensive tide would help lift all boats. The transformation of this offense began in earnest two years ago when Jordy Nelson went down. Luckily for the Packers that slog of a 2015 campaign wasn’t a harbinger of things to come, as McCarthy synthetized a new, deadly strain of his offense lead by Rodgers, Nelson, and Jared Cook. The addition of Bennett and Kendricks provide a critical next step and the evolution of Montgomery should offer a dynamic boost, as well. Most of the pieces needed to carry this team forward are in place. It’s up to Ted Thompson to make the final alterations. There’s no way to know whether he has two years or six with Aaron Rodgers at the helm, and frankly he can’t worry about it. All that matters is he’s on the roster in 2017.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

To quote QB1, “I don’t think we need to rebuild. We need to reload.” “We've just got to make sure we're going all-in every year to win.” That’s not just a call to Thompson, but to McCarthy, Capers, and all the players on this team. The sands in the hourglass are falling and I’m running out of metaphors to describe it at the same rate at which Packers fans are losing patience with “In Ted we trust.” For the Packers, the calculation is truly Darwinian: evolve, or die.

The Clay Matthews CONUNDRUM LOOMS LARGE OVER PACKERS' OFFSEASON Jason B. Hirschhorn

For all the work performed by NFL general managers, a key decision or flashpoint can become the defining moment of their careers. Ron Wolf staked his reputation on a trade for Brett Favre, a quarterback with substance and motivational issues who could not pass a physical. For Bill Polian, his decision to select Peyton Manning over Ryan Leaf in the 1998 NFL Draft brought over a decade of prosperity to the Indianapolis Colts. In more recent times, Ted Thompson earned his place in the football pantheon by virtue of his highly controversial 2008 decision to shift the Green Bay Packers away from Favre in favor of a 24-yearold former first-round pick, Aaron Rodgers. For those executives, their legacy rests on one decision made out of hundreds. But this myopic view misses a larger truth: great teams form out of years of construction and planning, not merely a single player or personnel choice. In reality, Polian's Colts became champions after he paired Manning with multiple Hall of Fame-caliber receivers (Marvin Harrison and Reggie Wayne) and uncovered enough field-tilters on defense (Dwight Freeney, Robert Mathis and Bob Sanders) to balance the roster. Wolf didn't just secure one Hall of Famer during his time in Green Bay, landing all-world defensive end Reggie White in the first year of free agency to further re-establish credibility for a long-downtrodden franchise. As for Thompson, moving on from Favre for Rodgers remains his most important call, with the latter earning multiple Most Valuable Player awards and a Super Bowl ring in his nine seasons and counting as the Packers' starting quarterback. However, the general manager has logged a number of crucial moves around Rodgers, signing future Hall of Famers Charles Woodson and Julius Peppers in 2006 and '14 respectively. Thompson has also managed to

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

construct one of the league's premier offensive lines largely on the final day of the draft, uncovering blockers such as Josh Sitton, T.J. Lang and David Bakhtiari after the start of the fourth round. Still, while no player acquired by Thompson during his 12 seasons at the helm can rival the impact of Rodgers, pass rusher Clay Matthews makes the most compelling case as the GM's second-most significant addition. Matthews arrived in Green Bay in 2009 with a limited collegiate track record and some questions regarding his ability to succeed Aaron Kampman as the defense's leading edge rusher. Though Matthews did not immediately become a starter, he took little time to make his mark. He recorded his first sack in his second game and his first defensive touchdown two weeks later, ripping the football from Adrian Peterson's grasp and running 45 yards to pay dirt. The outside linebacker finished with 10 sacks as a rookie, dispelling any concern about his abilities. Matthews returned for his second year stronger, becoming an All-Pro and Defensive Player of the Year candidate and the key defensive figure during the Packers' successful Super Bowl run. While names and faces have shifted in and out of Green Bay's defense over the last eight years, Matthews has remained a constant throughout. In addition to serving as the team's top pass rusher, he has sacrificed personal glory and statistics to fill a void at inside linebacker. Matthews has also played through a series of soft-tissue and shoulder issues, managing to miss only four games since 2014 despite a reputation as injury-prone player. While other Packers defenders have performed at a higher level in given seasons, no one has done more to help the unit since 2009. At some point in 2017, Matthews expects to move ahead of Kabeer GbajaBiamila as the franchise's all-time sacks leader.

THE CLAY MATTHEWS CONUNDRUM CONTINUED...

Few dispute that Matthews has earned his place as one of the Packers' greatest stars of the modern era. Without his contributions, the franchise would not have secured its 13th world championship, nor could it have qualified for the conference championship twice in the last three years. Only a handful of Matthews' peers possess his versatility and playmaking ability, and those that do have mostly entered the league as top-15 draft selections well out of the reach of a perennial contender such as Green Bay. At the same time, another reality requires acknowledgement: As Matthews approaches his 31st birthday, the Packers can no longer rely on him to tilt the field over the course of an entire season. Matthews remains position versatile and heady, but his pass-rush production has fallen off since he entered his 30s. In seven of the 12 regular-season games he appeared in last season, the linebacker failed to register a single sack or quarterback knockdown. Even more damning, Matthews registered no defensive statistics of any variety in games against the Houston Texans and Chicago Bears. Factors such as the shoulder injury he suffered at the tail end of November certainly account for some of that drop off. However, even before the injury, Matthews did not generate pressure consistently, leaving the onus on 15-year veteran Julius Peppers and the oft-injured Nick Perry to disrupt opposing offenses. Matthews' regression as a pass rusher doesn't merely affect the team on the field. With the linebacker's contract accounting for more than $15 million against the Packers' salary cap in 2017 â&#x20AC;&#x201D; behind only Rodgers' deal as the largest cap hold on the team's books and most by a Green Bay defender by roughly $4.6 million â&#x20AC;&#x201D; the front office needs to either hope for a bounce-back campaign or evaluate whether it can realistically procure a pay reduction. Though Matthews should enter next season healthy (he successfully avoided surgery on his damaged shoulder), that hardly guarantees a return of his traditional pressure numbers. Pass rushers of all stripes typically experience sharp decline as they reach his age, and the Packers expect to phase in some new front-seven defenders in the coming months that could require significant adjustments from Matthews. Furthermore, the progression or lack thereof of Green Bay's young inside linebackers could determine the volume of snaps Matthews plays on the edge. Yet even with those factors in mind, the Packers lack any real leverage to force a pay cut from Matthews. Any organization asking for a discount must also accept that the

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

request could result in a release, something Green Bay cannot afford at this time. The team does not have any obvious inhouse candidates to replicate his contributions, and the free-agent market offers few viable replacements. The latter compounds the problem, as the pass rusher and his agent undoubtedly understand that the dearth at the position on the open market could allow Matthews to find a lucrative deal elsewhere if released. And for whatever Matthews has lost as a pass rusher, he remains one of the players most knowledgeable in Dom Capers' 3-4, two-gap defensive scheme. Even if the team brings in new pass rushers through the draft, those players would likely endure a steep learning curve before matching Matthews' present-day impact. Still, whether this offseason or in subsequent years, the Packers need to plan for life without Matthews. The end of a star's prime never comes at a convenient time, and no team can simply expect to find another one regardless of resources. However, the 2017 NFL Draft offers an embarrassment of promising edge rushers, many of which should interest Green Bay. Super prospects like Texas A&M's Myles Garrett and Stanford's Solomon Thomas are expected to come off the board well before the Packers' first selection (No. 29 overall), but other intriguing options should remain. T.J. Watt, younger brother of three-time Defensive Player of the Year J.J. Watt, posted impressive workout numbers at the NFL Scouting Combine and could sneak into the first round. UCLA's Takkarist McKinley possesses premier speed, albeit more of the straight-line variety. If Thompson compromises on size requirements, perhaps an elite-athlete such as Temple's Haason Riddick could appeal to him. A player like Alabama's Tim Williams could also make sense if the team feels comfortable with his off-the-field red flags. Given Thompson's draft history, the odds of the Packers selecting a front-seven player in the first round appear sky high. The GM has used over half of his 11 first-round picks on such players (the team traded out of the opening round in 2008), including three times over the past five years. Thompson understands that locating quality line-ofscrimmage defenders becomes extremely difficult later on in the draft, and he conducts his war room accordingly. And yet, even if the Packers land one of this year's top passrush prospects, they cannot simply expect him to become their next superstar. Uncovering a player of Matthews' caliber is extremely difficult, and replacing him presents an even greater challenge.

WHY TED IS ALWAYS GOING TO TED: LOOKING BEHIND THE CURTAIN C.D. Angeli

You could almost hear the rumbling starting, as the Green Bay Packers entered the second quarter of the NFC Championship game against the Atlanta Falcons. As the scoreless Packers fell behind by 17 points, then 24 points, the rumbles turned into all-out calls for Ted Thompson’s job. By the end of the game, as the Falcons celebrated an easy win on their way to the Super Bowl, the Packers limped back to their locker room. Meanwhile, armchair GM’s across Cheesehead Nation audited Thompson’s lack of success in repeating the magic of the 2010 Super Bowl championship team. Thompson would soon be excoriated not only by fans, but by respected members of the media, from Bob McGinn to Tom Oates, who decried Thompson consistent lack of venturing into the free agent market as the reason the team just can’t run on all cylinders at the same time. Indeed, as the season went on, more and more pressure fell on the shoulders of Aaron Rodgers, as the decimated back 7 of the defense spent more time plugging leaks in the dam than stopping opposing offenses. Thompson should have signed a prime linebacker last offseason. He KNEW we needed one! And what about cornerbacks? Without injured Sam Shields, shouldn’t have Thompson addressed the glaring holes in the secondary, rather than trusting unproven draft choices to make a deep playoff run? And to top it all off, Thompson hasn’t hit very well or often in the draft in the past few years. Several first rounders have been busts or struggled to find the playing field, much less make a first-round level impact: Derrick Sherrod, Nick Perry, and Datone Jones. But perhaps the biggest criticism was leveled at last year’s two top picks, Damarious Randall and Quinton Rollins, the two cornerbacks who were tapped to step up in their sophomore season when injuries struck. So, the Fire Thompson crew was back in full force. But, are their criticisms valid?

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

Like the Soup Nazi in Seinfeld, criticism of Thompson’s reluctance to play in the unrestricted free agent market, season after season, often feels like he now intentionally withholds free agent play purely out of spite. Fans and media types alike rehash the same conversations every season, wondering why Thompson won’t spend off his monumental cap space. Andrew Brandt, former Green Bay Packers front office VP and present-day ESPN Business of Football analyst, sums up the response to Thompson’s critics succinctly: “Why don't the Packers do more in free agency? What part of Ted Thompson don't you understand?” Having worked with Thompson for several years, Brandt understands the philosophy Thompson brings, and there’s a reason why the Packers have made the playoffs in each of the last eight seasons, That level of sustained success come from committing to a philosophy of drafting and developing. “Ted believes in having a pipeline of talent, and the pipeline is developed through the infrastructure of the draft,” said Brandt. “So, that's why more is better than less. When you have 10-12 picks, you are building this infrastructure. These guys aren't going to be your starters, but in 2-3 years they will.” In the perfect “Thompson Approach” scenario, the pipeline of talent would always be looking three years ahead, giving time for the mid- and late-round talent to develop. One example might have been trading back to take wide receiver Jordy Nelson in the second round in 2008. The selection raised eyebrows, as the Packers still had Donald Driver, James Jones, and Greg Jennings on their roster. With other areas on the team deemed far higher needs for upgrades, Nelson was a luxury pick. But as Nelson developed, then blossomed in the Super Bowl in 2010 season, the Packers had flexibility at the position. Donald Driver had a sharp decline that season, and James Jones was given the flexibility to explore free agency. While

WHY TED IS ALWAYS GOING TO TED CONTINUED...

he ended up re-signing with the Packers, the team was able to project Nelson into Driver’s role in the passing game with no disruption for quarterback Aaron Rodgers. In the same draft, Josh Sitton was selected in the fifth round, despite entrenched starters Daryn Colledge and Jason Spitz on the roster. Perhaps earlier than expected, Spitz was demoted in 2009 and Sitton took over. In other words, in a perfect Thomson-esque scenario, you’re always drafting ahead, because you’ve always struck that perfect balance of veteran talent worth extending past their rookie deal, and enough guys playing under their rookie contract to keep the team under the cap. A message to the cries for free agents at every position that needs an upgrade: you can’t do it financially. And every team that had tried to do it has failed. “Coming from a financial cap management background, the key to me was having a good number of players on your team in rookie contracts, so you could balance the elite contracts,” said Brandt. “If we're paying Brett and Charles Woodson and Chad Clifton top market for their position, we knew that has to be balanced. You can't do that in 10-12 positions. If you're paying a quarterback $20 million, you can build a team, but you need to have good drafting, because you need to have a lot of players contributing on rookie contracts.” In other words, a perfect drafter should never have to dip into free agency. But let’s be honest: as good of a drafter as Thompson is, he isn’t perfect. Just looking at the wasted picks of Bryan Brohm and Patrick Lee immediately following Nelson in the 2008 draft. Brohm was supposed to fill the role of backup to newly-minted starter Aaron Rodgers, but was a second-round bust. Luckily, Thompson covered that with the selection of Matt Flynn in the seventh round of the same draft, and he held the backup role through the 2011 season. But Lee was a second-round pick that was hopefully going to be the heir apparent for an aging Charles Woodson and Al Harris. When Harris tore up his knee in 2009, that would have been the perfect time for a player like Lee to have stepped

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

in. But, because he was a draft bust, the Packers had to look elsewhere. Luckily, the Packers had a undrafted free agent on their roster since 2006 named Tramon Williams, who stepped in and surprised everyone with his excellent play. Both Flynn and Williams went on to play critical roles in the road to the Super Bowl in 2010, but they weren’t just serendipitous accidents. Thompson signed Williams as a developmental player, and three years later, he developed into an emergency starter. Thompson drafted both Brohm and Flynn in the same draft, hoping one of them would assume the mantle. But the problem with being 100% draft-dependent is when injuries or draft busts without a Plan B or C disrupt your plan. A prime example might be Nick Collins, the safety who anchored the miracle defense of the 2010 Super Bowl team, and signed a lucrative three-year extension, just before a neck injury forced his retirement. Thompson had put all his eggs in the Collins basket, as not a single safety was taken in the 2011 draft. An assortment of placeholder fill-ins, from Charlie Peprah to MD Jennings, started alongside Morgan Burnett until 2014, when Thompson finally drafted safety Ha-Ha Clinton-Dix in the first round. Each offseason, Packer fans clamored for a free agent to be signed, but Thompson didn’t waver. Waiting until 2014 to draft Clinton-Dix, right at the end of what would have been Collins’ three-year contract, you almost believe that he wasn’t going to break from his plan, no matter what. But that’s not the way it necessarily has to be, and Thompson has broken with his self-imposed avoidance of free agency before. “Free agency is often the price you pay for not drafting well. Take a look at us in 2006, the year we signed Charles Woodson,” said Brandt. “We went after Charles because we failed in the draft. We had drafted two corners two years before in Ahmad Carroll and Joey Thomas, and they didn't work. So we overpaid in free agency because we didn't draft well.” And certainly, Thompson has dipped into the free agency pool, not only with Woodsen, but with Ryan Pickett (after a steady diet of defensive line draft pick busts under thenGM Mike Sherman), Julius Peppers (a street free agent,

WHY TED IS ALWAYS GOING TO TED CONTINUED...

following the then-failures of Nick Perry and Jerel Worthy), Jeff Saturday (replacing departed Scott Wells) and Jared Cook (replacing every tight end that failed to replace Jermichael Finley). Perhaps Ted Thompson has not gone the free agency route as often as many Packer fans would like. But fans don’t make the decisions. Matt Bowen, a former defensive back in Green Bay and Washington, states, “When we talk about criticism, that’s coming from the fan base. That’s not coming from the coaching staff, it's not coming from the locker room, it's coming from the people on the outside.” Not only is the Packers staff on board with the Thompson approach, NFL teams have been copying the approach since 2011, when the Packers won the Super Bowl with a squad of depth players substituting for injured players. As free agency ends up being a far less successful methodology for teams to improve and get a return on their investment, Thompson’s strategy is becoming the rule more so than the exception. “I think the Packers are wrongly singled out with the homegrown approach,” says Brandt. “Look at free agency the past couple years, where you have half the league sitting out, at least the early portions of it. The Packers may have the most draft-and-develop philosophy of any teams, but there's a lot of them doing the same thing out there.” Indeed, the first few days of free agency may have the sexy signings, but they also carry the overpriced players, all of whom tend to have some baggage. Occasionally, a team that manages its cap poorly may not be able to re-sign a talented player, but for the most part, a player sitting out there in UFA isn’t a Aaron Rodgers or Jordy Nelson or Mike Daniels. They are players that the teams know is getting older, has locker room issues, or that they have no worries upgrading from. “In Washington, we were Day One spenders, you’re going to overpay, as it becomes a bidding war,” said Bowen. “The second thing you have to ask yourself immediately, is why is this guy on the market? Why didn’t their own teams re-sign them for the same amount you’re going to pay them, like the Packers have done?” The Packers have lost several of their own free agents this year, including TJ Lang, Jared Cook, Julius Peppers, and Micah Hyde. In each case, the Packers have a reason for

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

letting them go, some more compelling than others. Lang’s deal will be close to a $10M a season hit, and as previously discussed, the Packers can’t have that many blockbuster deals on the roster at the same time. Furthermore, the Packers survived the departure of guard Josh Sitton last year with line play that was hailed as one of the best in the league. Cook’s monster catch against the Cowboys in the playoffs aside, his injury record was spotty, and the Packers had a better option waiting in the wings. Peppers, despite his veteran leadership, dropped off this past season and at age 37, can’t be considered a long-term solution worthy of a sizable contract. And while Hyde is a tremendous role player on both defense and special teams, five years at $30M with $14 in guaranteed money is a lot to spend for a guy who hasn’t proven himself to be a consistent shutdown cornerback. So, the Bills will roll the dice on Hyde as a full-time starter. And the Packers will roll the dice on finding players who can fill in, if not stand as a upgrade over what we could have expected from each of those other players this season.And thusly, Ted Thompson is sticking to his guns, counting on the underperforming Randall and Rollins to blossom in their junior year. After all, that’s why he drafted them, and if they pan out, the loss of Hyde becomes much easier to swallow. In addition, Thompson reached out to sign an unrestricted free agent, the Patriots TE Martellus Bennett, his first signing since 2012. It’s evidence that, despite the clamoring from the fan base, Thompson had a plan in place when he balked on signing Cook immediately, despite the vote of confidence from his future-Hall of Fame quarterback. Both Brandt and Bowen, despite their belief in the Thompson Way, both agree that the occasional dip into the free agent pool is a necessary part of the road to building a team. “Theoretically, if you draft well, you can fill out all these positions, said Brandt. “But, you do have an ability to sprinkle in some veteran free agents in with your homegrown, and I think the Packers have done that. Maybe not as much as some people want, but Charles, Jared Cook, Jullius Peppers, all someone not in high demand coming out of the box, but able to get a good deal on.”

WHY TED IS ALWAYS GOING TO TED CONTINUED...

Ted Thompson does not bite on big-name free agents, and once the bell sounds, you may as well start a countdown clock for at least three days before you’d even have a chance for Thompson to be considering a free agent, such as Bennett. Remember, free agency is a course correction in Thompson’s book, not a lottery ticket. When you are building a team for the long haul, to make the playoffs and have a shot at the Super Bowl every year, you don’t look to cripple yourself by overinvesting in one guy. The days of Reggie White’s free agency miracle are over. We tend to forget the number of players that Thompson extends, usually for a greater bargain than those players would have gotten on the open market. This, in essence, is Thompson’s free agency game: re-signing from within and creating more salary cap space for other players. “What you want to do is find a balance, and I think that is what Green Bay fans would like to see,” said Bowen. “What Ted Thompson does in the draft, everyone would love to have that—to hit on draft picks. To develop your own talent. To re-sign your own talent, and that’s the next step in the progression. Draft, develop, and re-sign. So, when it comes to that second contract, they’re staying in town, and you’re signing them early, not even letting them get to free agency.” One of the most important aspects about convincing players to stay in Green Bay, or even to come to Green Bay as a free agent, is having a culture that they would be willing to take a little less money to be part of a winning environment. And that might be even more important than finding a player who fits a scheme or a role on the team. Culture is going to trump scheme every time, said Bowen. “It’s more important than any playbook, anything Mike McCarthy draws up. That’s secondary. It is. It’s how you do things. That’s how you win. The scheme is a part of it, but a

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

good fit for a scheme isn’t as important as a fit into the team culture, and how Ted Thompson designs this team.” In fact, Martellus Bennett, the new Packer UFA tight end, said as much in an interview with Packers.com. “I wanted another chance to make a run at it,” Bennett said. “I want to be in a situation where I could win again right now. I have that victory taste in my mouth and I want to taste it again.” In the end, the Packers cannot afford an all-in approach, a Florida Marlins one-year spending spree to try and win it all in one year, only to break it all up the next. The Green Bay community relies on the continued success of the Packers, and winning always creates a positive culture. So, perhaps Thompson will sign a free agent one year. The next three, he won’t. But don’t doubt that he always has a plan in place, and while those plans can go awry with careerending injuries or a guy not developing into the player he was projected to be, free agency will never be anything more than a course correction. In Thompson’s World, it’s about winning over the long haul, and making the playoffs for eight consecutive seasons is a standard few teams can match. The good thing about the Packers is the sustained success,” said Brandt. “When I was there, we only missed the playoffs once in my nine years, and it's been there since. That's a marvel. New England is in that category, maybe Pittsburgh. But not many others.” So, if the Bennett signing made you take a breath and feel like Thompson did something to make you feel better, rest assured, it had nothing to do with you. In the end, Ted’s gonna Ted. And the Green Bay Packers are better off because of it.

TEAM NEEDS NFC NORTH Michelle Bruton

GREEN BAY PACKERS RECORD: 10–6 2016 RECAP The Packers’ 2016 season was proof in action of how general manager Ted Thompson’s draft-and-develop philosophy can hinder the team if the young players he selects don’t contribute at the required level when push comes to shove. No one could have expected that veteran cornerback Sam Shields would play just one game for the Packers in 2016—and would be gone by the offseason—but it’s Thompson’s job to make sure that the team is at least prepared for that situation. Theoretically, that preparation came in the form of 2015 first-round draft pick Damarious Randall, who had a year to develop and should have been ready, should injuries dictate, to take the lead manning the boundary. But Randall, too, missed games to injury—six total—and when he did get on the field, he came up short. His nine passes defensed and three interceptions looked nice on the stat sheet. But Randall’s fundamentals and coverage got so spotty at times that late in the season, he was benched even when he was available to play. All the corners on the Packers’ roster are 24 years old. Presumably, it’s Randall and Quinten Rollins who will anchor the secondary for the team in 2017. But from what we saw last season, the Packers desperately missed a veteran presence to set the tone in the defensive backfield and take on such targets as the Bears’ Alshon Jeffery, the Vikings’ Stefon Diggs, the Giants’ Odell Beckham Jr., and the Falcons’ Julio Jones. The Packers allowed 269.3 passing yards per game in the regular season—the secondmost in the league. The pass defense was, arguably, their single-biggest failure in 2016. However, Thompson made some savvy moves, which helped lessen the load of his shortcomings. One of the shining moments of the 2016 season was the redemption of veteran tight end Jared Cook, whom the Packers inked to a one-year, $2.75-million deal in March 2016. Cook’s season got off to a slow start as he battled through a high-ankle sprain, but later in the year he proved an invaluable weapon to quarterback Aaron Rodgers as he helped move the chains and keep drives alive. The Packers will need to address both the tight end and cornerback positions in the offseason and find some help for Ty Montgomery in the backfield. They also need to target an edge-rusher and figure out how to keep their offensive line playing at a high level, especially if they lose right guard T.J. Lang in free agency.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

TEAM NEEDS CONTINUED...

GREEN BAY PACKERS RECORD: 10–6 2017 DRAFT NEEDS Cornerback: There’s a reason nearly every mock draft you’ll find has the Packers targeting a cornerback with the 29th selection in the NFL draft. The duo of Randall and Rollins patrolling the perimeter scares very few. There are plenty of options from which they can select, as the position is one of this year’s deepest. No one knows how Thompson and his scouts have ranked their Big Board, but it’s hard to imagine that if the Packers decide to select a corner early they would be hard-pressed to find one at No. 29. Ohio State’s Gareon Conley could provide some height to the secondary, while Washington playmaker Sidney Jones would be a no-brainer were he to fall. Florida’s Teez Tabor is another player to keep an eye on. Edge-Rusher: A true 3-4 outside linebacker or a pass-rushing defensive end could get the job done here, but either way, the Packers need to put a premium on pressuring the quarterback in 2017. The plethora of their impending free agents at the position makes matters more pressing. This past season, Green Bay struggled to be disruptive up front. Sure, the Packers tied for sixth in sacks, but anyone who watched the film knows that the unit made mediocre quarterbacks seem elusive. In Round 1, the dream would be UCLA’s Takkarist McKinley, who would continue the Packers’ tradition of selecting pass-rushers from southern California programs.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

Running Back: Some analysts this draft season have advocated for Stanford rusher Christian McCaffrey to the Packers in Round 1, and even though a backfield composed of Montgomery and McCaffrey sounds incredible, it’s hardly a typical Thompson move. But there’s no question that Green Bay will likely target a running back in the top half of the draft. Eddie Lacy has sign a one year incentive heavy (pun intended) free agent contract with the Seahawks and as of this writing, there appears to be little interest by the Packers (or anyone else) to sign James Starks. Offensive Line: The Packers were unwilling to pay the hefty price needed to retain TJ Lang, and Lane Taylor ideally shouldn’t be starting. Thompson likes to convert college left tackles to NFL guards, and there are at least seven the Packers could target with their selections in the second or third rounds. Pitt’s Adam Bisnowaty, who projects best as a right tackle or guard in the NFL, could catch Green Bay’s eye on Day 2. Tight End: Even with the Packers' signings of Martellus Bennett and Lance Kendricks, they could still turn their attention to finding a young tight end of the future, because it’s become clear that Richard Rodgers is not it. It’s not Thompson’s M.O. to target pass-catchers in the first round, and both Miami’s David Njoku and Alabama’s O.J. Howard will likely be gone by No. 29. But there are plenty of weapons projected in the mid-rounds this year.

TEAM NEEDS CONTINUED...

DETROIT LIONS RECORD: 9–7 2016 RECAP The 2016 Lions had everything at their fingertips—but they couldn’t hold on. A four-win spurt after their bye week saw them sitting at 9-4 and in prime position to win the NFC North, but they dropped their final three games of the season to the New York Giants, Dallas Cowboys, and Green Bay Packers. Gone was Matthew Stafford’s comeback magic—and, to make matters worse, the Lions proved in the Wild Card Round that they didn’t belong, losing 26-6 to the Seattle Seahawks, failing to even score a touchdown in the process. Detroit doesn’t have a glaring need in the 2017 draft, but they could use upgrades at nearly every position—mock drafts have them targeting a tight end, cornerback, offensive tackle, running back, defensive tackle, and/or defensive end.

2017 DRAFT NEEDS Pass-Rusher: Like their 3-4 defense counterparts in the NFC North, the Lions too need some help getting after the passer, in the form of either a defensive end or a penetrating defensive tackle. Detroit finished tied for 30th with the Cleveland Browns in terms of total sacks last season, mustering just 26. Tennessee’s Derek Barnett is an obvious choice for them at No. 21, often leading the Vols in sacks and tackle for loss in his collegiate career. Linebacker: To put it simply, Detroit needs to add a threedown linebacker to help shore up its front seven, especially given that the Lions seem to have moved on from DeAndre Levy and his injury concerns. This is a need Bob Quinn could look to address in free agency, but there is enough talent in the early rounds of the draft to catch his eye. Running Back: The Lions got some late-season production out of Zach Zenner, while Ameer Abdullah and Theo Riddick haven’t proved that they can handle a featured role. A backfield this crowded could mean eyebrows will raise if Bob Quinn selects a rusher such as Dalvin Cook in the first round, but Detroit’s offense would benefit nonetheless.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

TEAM NEEDS CONTINUED...

MINNESOTA VIKINGS RECORD: 8–8 2016 RECAP The Vikings’ 2016 campaign was a study in inconsistency. After establishing itself as a force to be reckoned with in the NFC by winning five straight to open the season, Minnesota returned from its bye week and proceeded to drop four in a row. The Vikings found themselves finishing third place in the division, at 8-8, behind the Packers and the Lions. It was the result most might have expected when they lost quarterback Teddy Bridgewater in August, but surprisingly, Sam Bradford was more than productive as a replacement. Instead, additional injuries were the main culprit, as starters Matt Kalil, Andre Smith, and Jake Long all landed on injured reserve, and Sharrif Floyd never got on the field. Adrian Peterson also missed 13 games. The Vikings’ bright spot was the unexpected explosion of wide receiver Adam Thielen, who destroyed the Packers in Week 16, but it was too little, too late.

2017 DRAFT NEEDS Offensive Tackle: Injuries helped expose the already glaring deficits on Minnesota’s offensive line. The Vikings lost OT Mat Kalil to free agency but quickly replaced him by signing free ggents Reilly Reiff and Mike Remmers, good news since T.J. Clemmings—who was a disaster in 2016—should not be starting. The problem for Minnesota is that it has no first-round pick in 2017, so the starting-caliber tackles available in Rounds 2 and beyond are already members of a dwindling group. Offensive Guard: Whether they’re starting Bridgewater or Bradford, the Vikings have to upgrade the offensive guard position, as well. Right guard Brandon Fusco was released this offseason after a poor season during which he also suffered two concussions. Again, by the time they get to Round 2 or 3, the Vikings might have trouble finding an instant upgrade. Pittsburgh’s Dorian Johnson could be an option in Round 3. Running Back: If Adrian Peterson is going to stick around in Minnesota, he needs to help the Vikings help themselves and reduce his $18 million cap hit. Either way, Peterson’s time with the Vikings is coming to a close, and Minnesota needs to prepare for the future. Boise State’s Jeremy McNichols is highly productive and could be up for grabs in Round 4.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

TEAM NEEDS CONTINUED...

CHICAGO BEARS RECORD: 3–13 2016 RECAP Under the leadership of general manager Ryan Pace and head coach John Fox, the Bears were supposed to take a step toward relevance in 2016. Instead, they put up their worst record in modern franchise history. Chicago has a chance to improve with the third overall selection in the draft, but the question for Pace is which position warrants the investment? Does Chicago address its glaring need at quarterback as it prepares to move on from the Jay Cutler era, or give defensive coordinator Vic Fangio another piece for his chess board?

2017 DRAFT NEEDS Quarterback: Even with Chicago signing Mike Glennon to replace Cutler, Fox needs to develop his own quarterback. If they stay put at No. 3, the Bears could potentially have their pick of any passer in this class or, at the very least, anyone except for North Carolina’s Mitch Trubisky, should the San Francisco 49ers nab him at No. 2. But the Bears’ silver lining of a top-three draft pick isn’t so shiny this year once you consider the mediocrity available among college quarterbacks. Edge-Rusher: If the Bears want their new 3-4 defense to strike fear into the likes of Aaron Rodgers and Matthew Stafford, they’ll need to increase its speed off the edge. A no-brainer selection for Chicago should Pace eschew a QB in Round 1 is Alabama defensive end Jonathan Allen. Defensive Back: The Bears need some speed in the secondary if they’re going to have any hope tussling with Jordy Nelson, Randall Cobb, Stefon Diggs, Golden Tate, and Marvin Jones— to name their divisional opponents alone. If the Niners don’t get to him first, Ohio State’s Marshon Lattimore would be a solid choice.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

HE REMINDS ME OF... "Pigskin" Paul Guillemette

When comparing rookie prospects to NFL players—both past & present—it’s important to remember that each player is his own man once the pads go on. Therefore, the comparisons should be taken as a general guideline, not a cloning of football talent and skills. But given that a great deal of talent evaluation is trying to gauge how skills and attributes will translate from the college to pro levels, this exercise can be a small but useful piece of the bigger prospect puzzle. With that, here are some prospect comparisons—some quite obvious, others a bit more obscure.

JAMAL ADAMS REMINDS ME OF…

KEANU NEAL

EVAN ENGRAM REMINDS ME OF…

JORDAN REED

REUBEN FOSTER REMINDS ME OF…

C.J. MOSELY

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

Jamal Adams (S, LSU) is generally regarded as the top overall safety prospect of this draft. The son of a former first round Giants running, back, Adams has strong football genes and the athleticism to perform at the highest level of competition. While he built a rep in college as a heat-seeking missile out of the secondary, he played with discipline, control, and was assignment sure. His play and physical appearance is reminiscent of Keanu Neal, a top prospect in 2016, who started as a Rookie for the Falcons this past season during their Super Bowl run. With the evolution of the modern NFL offense, powered primarily by the passing attack, a new weapon has emerged—the hybrid TE/WR, who lines up anywhere from inline to the slot to the perimeter alongside actual wideouts. Such players are a nightmare for a LB or S, who are forced into man coverage. One of the elite players of this ilk is Jordan Reed of the Redskins. Reed is listed at 6'2” and 236 lbs, but might win a footrace with his speedy teammate, Pierre Garcon (WR). Just ask QB Kirk Cousins the difference Reed’s presence makes on the team’s scoring potential. Evan Engram (TE, Ole Miss) is a 2017 draft prospect that has the potential to fit into this elite role in the pro game. Engram has comparable size to Reed (6'3, 236 lbs) and may even be more athletic. Look for Engram to be a top-100 draft selection and help an NFL offense stretch defenses to the breaking point. The talented crop emerging each year from Alabama is mind-boggling. So, it’s often easy to find a former 'Bama guy to compare with the next man in line for a pro job. Reuben Foster (ILB) became his team's defensive leader as a senior with a whopping 115 tackles (a huge number when you consider how many talented players are sharing a limited number of snaps in Nick Saban's defense). Foster dropped his weight down to around 230 lbs to enable him to be more effective in coverage. His all-over-the-field playing style and ability to penetrate the backfields (13 TFL) remind 'Bama faithful of C.J. Mosley, who has started and starred for the Ravens since being drafted three years ago. Look for Foster to follow in Mosley’s footsteps and play right away, and at a high level.

HE REMINDS ME OF CONTINUED...

LEONARD FOURNETTE REMINDS ME OF…

HERSCHEL WALKER

MYLES GARRETT REMINDS ME OF…

VON MILLER

ZANE GONZALEZ REMINDS ME OF…

STEVE GOSTKOWSKI

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

Coming out of high school, Leonard Fournette (RB, LSU) looked like football's version of NBA super star LeBron James. Of course, Fournette faced a minimum three-year apprenticeship in college before he could ply his wares in the pro game. Despite being slowed in 2016 by chronic ankle/lower leg issues, his dominance in college ensures he will enter the 2017 draft as a sure-fire first round prospect. Fournette’s best comparison may be Herschel Walker. Both played at about 6'1” and 230 lbs, with a style that left defenders strewn all over the turf. Both show excellent straight-line speed once they hit the second level of a defense. Most secondary members show no desire to try to take on either man in the open field, moving like a runaway freight train. But this style of back—playing out of the FB slot ala Jim Brown, Jim Taylor, etc.—is not as valued now as it was back in their day. It is also a reality that nether Walker then, nor Fournette now, is considered to be much of a receiving threat. So, while Fournette looks to be a physical clone of Walker, he will likely not have the impact, touches or yardage that Herschel did.

Myles Garrett (DE/OLB, Texas A&M) is still considered to be a strong possibility as the No.1 overall selection in the 2017 NFL Draft, despite playing hurt (knee/ shoulder) most of the 2016 season. Given the significance of edge rushers in today's NFL, it is conceivable that the best player comparison for Garrett lies right in the recent history of fellow Aggie, Von Miller. The Denver Broncos standout is a pass rusher deluxe, and was named Super Bowl MVP one year ago. Garrett has the length, balance, quickness and all-around skills to play standing up in a 3-4 base scheme just as Miller has done so effectively. It should also be noted that Garrett, like Miller, is a free thinker whose interests and imagination roam far beyond the football field. But do not confuse that with a lack of dedication to football. These two Aggies may be like peas in a pod, and what NFL defensive coordinator wouldn't like the next Von Miller added to their roster come April?

It appears that one of the better placekicking prospects to come along in this decade may be Zane Gonzalez of Arizona State. Gonzalez looks to have a smooth, repeatable kicking motion. A reliable weapon for the Sun Devils his entire career, Gonzalez may have turned to a new chapter with his work in 2016. Going into last season he had never connected on a 50-yard field goal. In 2016 he made 5 of 7 from 50-yards and beyond, while connecting for an overall rate of 83%. Somewhere in his off-season work he found another 5-10 yards in that right leg of his. More than a few folks agreed that his work in Mobile at the 2017 Senior Bowl, might have been the most impressive kicking exhibition since the likes of Steve Gostkowski. Gostkowski got a lot of attention in Mobile over a decade ago with his booming and accurate kicks. Gonzalez did the same this year.

HE REMINDS ME OF CONTINUED...

O.J. HOWARD REMINDS ME OF…

GREG OLSEN

DESMOND KING REMINDS ME OF…

ERIC WEDDLE

COOPER KUPP REMINDS ME OF…

KEENAN ALLEN

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

This incoming TE class could be the strongest and deepest group in a decade, with Alabama’s O. J. Howard representing the cream of the position crop. He spent a good deal of time blocking in the ‘Bama offense, which will be highly valued in NFL circles. But, given the chance to act as a receiver, he displayed mobility, reliable and large (10") hands and the straight-line speed to get past defenders and stretch the field. You can’t ask much more of a TE in the pro game. You most likely have heard this comparison already, but it is such a good fit that it deserves to be repeated. Howard looks to have all the skills and tools to mirror the NFL career of Carolina’s Greg Olson—and that will certainly put him in position to be an early first round selection.

Desmond King (DB, Iowa) was a do-everything player for the Hawkeyes from his CB position, as well as a return specialist. Many were surprised when he returned to Iowa for his senior season, after collecting 8 INT during the 2015 season. As often happens, that level of success could not be repeated in 2016, but King did record 3 INT and 7 PBU. He's also a hard nosed, effective tackler. If you took a consensus of NFL scouts, the majority would likely project him as a safety in the NFL due to major concerns with his hip turning and lack of blazing speed. Some have already begun comparing him to former Hawkeye Bob Sanders (Colts), but it might be more appropriate to compare him to Baltimore’s Eric Weddle. King shares Weddle’s “energizer bunny” motor as well as his high football I.Q.

There seems to have been a resurgence in the number of smaller school players joining prospect lists in recent years. Whether it be FCS, D-2 or even D-3, it appears that no matter where good athletes play their college ball, pro scouts will find them. The premier small school prospect this year is Cooper Kupp (WR, Eastern Washington). Coming from an NFL lineage that includes his father and grandfather, Kupp was a record-setting receiver during his FCS career with 428 career receptions and 73 touchdowns. He participated in the Senior Bowl this year and excelled, showing great route running skills and footwork, faking out numerous top-notch defenders in Mobile. However, whether or not Kupp possesses the overall speed to be a #1 NFL receiver is in question, and his 4.62 40 yd time in the Combine did little to make pro scouts feel more comfortable. Having sad that, his play reminds of Keenan Allen of the Chargers, who gets by not on pure speed, but rather with quick moves, excellent route running and reliable hands. Kupp looks to have that same skill set. Even though Allen has battled injuries in his 4-year NFL career, it should be noted that he hauled in 67 receptions in 2015, when he stayed healthy for the most part. Kupp is top 100 and may be flirting with a second round selection come April.

HE REMINDS ME OF CONTINUED...

FORREST LAMP REMINDS ME OF…

ZACH MARTIN

DESHAUN WATSON REMINDS ME OF…

ROBERT GRIFFEN III

MIKE WILLIAMS REMINDS ME OF…

ALLEN ROBINSON

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

Forrest Lamp (OT, Western Kentucky) is one of the most experienced and athletic tackles in this year's draft. He expertly protected the QB blind side in a pass-heavy offense for the Hilltoppers. If you watched the WKU Bowl Game, you saw Lamp line-up as an eligible receiver to catch and run for a red zone TD. A slight injury derailed his chance to shine at the Senior Bowl, while his official weigh-in may have ended consideration of him as the top LT prospect in this year’s draft. His height (6’4”) would make him the shortest LT in the NFL. Even more damaging, his 31 1/8" arm length seems more in line with a top OG prospect. Before you feel too sorry for Lamp, remember that a similar situation forced the same position switch for Cowboys OG Zach Martin, now a Pro Bowl lineman. This comparison is already making its way around scouting circles, and deservedly so.

Clemson got a second chance to beat Alabama in the FBS Championship Game in January. Behind their All-American QB, and top pro prospect DeShaun Watson, the Tigers prevailed. Watson—a three-year starter for Clemson— declared for the draft following that victory. Though an imperfect prospect, he has intriguing talent and athleticism. Despite some concerns about his throwing accuracy, it should be noted that his completion rate for the 2016 season was an admirable 67%. He was also responsible for 50 total TD in 2016 (41 passing, 9 rushing). His one glaring negative stat was his 17 INT. While that is concerning, it cannot be forgotten that behind a young offensive line, a major burden fell on his shoulders to get the ball downfield. The best comparison that comes to mind is Robert Griffin III. Watson possesses RG3's athletic ability, and most importantly his leadership qualities. There is no way to predict if he will fall victim to the same plague of injuries as RG3, but their other similarities make Watson an appealing prospect to say the least.

Watson’s favorite target was Mike Williams (WR, Clemson), who came back for a monster season after missing 2015 with a neck injury. He is a jumbo sized deep threat with length and a sculpted body. He is by far the prospect most likely to emerge quickly as a true No. 1 wideout in the NFL. He has good hands and wins most battles for the ball with defenders. He has the size, physicality and nastiness to dominate the league ala Allen Robinson (Jaguars), the best WR nobody’s talking about. If a comparison to a receiver on the hapless Jags leaves you scratching your head, just think Dez Bryant without the mouth.

TOP 100: #1—#50 "Pigskin" Paul Guillemette

1) Myles Garrett (DE/OLB, TEXAS A&M) 2) Jamal Adams (S, LSU) 3) Jonathan Allen (DL, ALABAMA) 4) Solomon Thomas (DE, STANFORD) 5) Leonard Fournette (RB, LSU) 6) Dalvin Cook (RB, FLORIDA STATE) 7) Malik Hooker (S, OHIO STATE) 8) Mike Williams (WR, CLEMSON) 9) O.J. Howard (TE, ALABAMA) 10) Reuben Foster (ILB, ALABAMA) 11) Corey Davis (WR, W. MICHIGAN) 12) David Njoku (TE, MIAMI) 13) Garett Bolles (OT, UTAH) 14) John Ross (WR, WASHINGTON) 15) Forrest Lamp (OG, W. KENTUCKY) 16) Marshon Lattimore (CB, OHIO STATE) 17) Jabrill Peppers (S, MICHIGAN) 18) Chris McCaffrey (RB, STANFORD) 19) Derrck Barnett (DE, TENNESSEE) 20) Ryan Ramczyk (OT, WISCONSIN) 21) Curtis Samuel (WR, OHIO STATE) 22) Obi Melifonwu (S, UCONN) 23) Mitchell Trubisky (QB, UNC) 24) Joe Mixon (RB, OKLAHOMA) 25) Dan Feeney (OG, INDIANA)

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

26) Alvin Kamara (RB, TENNESSEE) 27) Haason Reddick (LB, TEMPLE) 28) T.J. Watt (OLB, WISCONSIN) 29) Adoree’ Jackson (CB, USCL) 30) Cam Robinson (OT, ALABAMA) 31) Jordan Willis (DE, KANSAS STATE) 32) Deshaun Watson (QB,CLEMSON) 33) Charles Harris (ER/OLB, MISSOURI) 34) Tre’davious White (CB, LSU) 35) Evan Engram (TE, OLE MISS) 36) Tak Mckinley (OLB, UCLA) 37) Deshone Kizer (QB, NOTRE DAME) 38) Zay Jones (WR, EAST CAROLINA) 39) Caleb Brantley (DT, FLORIDA) 40) Malik Mcdowell (DL, MICHIGAN STATE) 41) Patrick Mahomes (QB, TEXAS TECH) 42) Taco Charlton (DE, MICHIGAN STATE) 43) Raekwon Mcmillan (ILB, OHIO STATE) 44) Budda Baker (S, WASHINGTON) 45) Marlon Humphrey (DB, ALABAMA) 46) Josh Jones (SS, NC STATE) 47) Tim Williams (ER/LB, ALABAMA) 48) Quincy Wilson (CB, FLORIDA) 49) Zach Cunningham (LB, VANDERBILT) 50) Gareon Conley (CB, OHIO STATE)

TOP 100: #51—#100 51) Dion Dawkins (OG, TEMPLE) 52) Teez Tabor (CB, FLORIDA) 53) Desmond King (S, IOWA) 54) Cooper Kupp (WR, E. WASHINGTON) 55) Jake Butt (TE, MICHIGAN) 56) Marcus Maye (S, FLORIDA) 57) Chris Godwin (WR, PENN STATE) 58) Bucky Hodges (TE, VIRGINIA TECH) 59) Marcus Williams (FS, UTAH) 60) Juju Smith-Schuster (WR, USC) 61) Gerald Everett (TE, SOUTH ALABAMA) 62) Carlos Henderson (WR, LOUISIANA TECH) 63) Dorian Johnson (OG, PITT) 64) Fabian Moreau (CB, UCLA) 65) Tarell Basham (DE, OHIO) 66) Jarrad Davis (LB, FLORIDA) 67) Antonio Garcia (OT, TROY) 68) D’Onta Foreman (RB, TEXAS) 69) Davis Webb (QB, CAL) 70) Taylor Moton (OG, W. MICHIGAN) 71) Marlon Mack (RB, SOUTH FLORIDA) 72) Carl Lawson (ER/LB, AUBURN) 73) Anthony Walker (LB, NORTHWESTERN) 74) Kevin King (CB, WASHINGTON) 75) Roderick Johnson (OT, FLORIDA STATE)

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

76) Demarcus Walker (DL, FLORIDA STATE) 77) Cordrea Tankersley (CB, CLEMSON) 78) Amara Darboh (WR, MICHIGAN) 79) Brad Kaaya (QB, MIAMI) 80) Jaleel Johnson (DT, IOWA) 81) Ryan Anderson (ER/LB, ALABAMA) 82) John Johnson (FS, BOSTON COLLEGE) 83) Montravius Adams (DT, AUBURN) 84) Carlos Watkins (DT, CLEMSON) 85) Chris Wormley (DE, MICHIGAN) 86) Alex Anzalone (LB, FLORIDA) 87) Chidobe Awuzie (DB, COLORADO) 88) K.D. Cannon (WR, BAYLOR) 89) Larry Ogunjobi (DT, CHARLOTTE) 90) Rasul Douglas (CB, WEST VIRGINIA) 91) Pat Elflein (C, OHIO STATE) 92) Ethan Pocic (C, LSU) 93) Tanoh Kpassagnon (DE, VILLANOVA) 94) Josh Reynolds (WR, TEXAS A&M) 95) Kareem Hunt (RB, TOLEDO) 96) Jeremy Sprinkle (TE, ARKANSAS) 97) Sidney Jones (CB, WASHINGTON) 98) Tyus Bowser (OLB, HOUSTON) 99) Nathan Peterman (QB, PITT) 100) Josh Malone (WR, TENNESSEE)

NFL Mock Draft Andrew Garda

1. CLEVELAND BROWNS

MYLES GARRETT | DE, TEXAS A&M Is there anyone who thinks this won’t be the pick? Garrett is, without a doubt, the best pass rusher in the draft and the Browns need, well, everything. Defensively, Garrett can do anything they want and do it well. The Browns shouldn’t think twice.

2. SAN FRANCISCO 49ERS

SOLOMON THOMAS | DE, STANFORD There are so many ways the 49ers could go here. While they have been showing interest in quarterbacks, the latest buzz has head coach Kyle Shanahan shopping their pick and banking on Kirk Cousins’ availability next year. If they stay, Thomas is a rabid pass rusher who will bring pressure from the very first snap of the year.

3. CHICAGO BEARS

JAMAL ADAMS | S, LSU The Bears could go quarterback, but with Mike Glennon in place and a ton of need on the other side of the ball—especially in the secondary—Adams is the pick. It may be earlier than usual to draft a safety, but Adams is worth it for his ability to both cover and defend the run.

4. JACKSONVILLE JAGUARS

JONATHAN ALLEN | DE, ALABAMA There’s a lot of smoke around this pick, both because Jacksonville can go in multiple directions and because they are a bit of a mystery this year with a new coaching staff. Tom Coughlin is there though, and he has always favored stockpiling defensive linemen. Even with recent investment in the defensive line, a guy who can play in any scheme, inside or out, is a worthy pick.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

MOCK DRAFT CONTINUED...

5. TENNESSEE TITANS (FROM LA RAMS)

MARSHON LATTIMORE | CB, OSU Personally, I would not have signed Logan Ryan to his contract, but even so, this is a team which needs an upgrade at corner. Lattimore is a bit inexperienced, but is also an athletic freak who can make plays, which Tennessee needs in the secondary.

6. NEW YORK JETS

MALIK HOOKER | S, OHIO STATE Like the 49ers, the Jets are kicking the tires on a lot of quarterbacks. But they are more than likely shopping the pick. Could they grab a quarterback? Sure, but after Christian Hackenberg last season, it’d be a bad sign. Hooker is recovering from surgery, but the secondary need is real and his skills are excellent when healthy.

7. LOS ANGELES CHARGERS

MIKE WILLIAMS | WR, CLEMSON We keep seeing quarterback as a potential pick here, but it seems high for a team that still has Philip Rivers. If Rivers is your guy, why not give him another big weapon? Keenan Allen is a tremendous talent, but he’s frequently hurt and nobody else in the receiving corps scares anyone. Williams is a big, aggressive receiver and potential red zone target.

8. CAROLINA PANTHERS

LEONARD FOURNETTE | RB, LSU While there are a lot of ways to go for Carolina off a season most think is an aberration, Jonathan Stewart isn’t really getting the job done. This offense needs a run game. Fournette thrives in power-run situations and is a big, bruising back who would buy Cam Newton some breathing room.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

MOCK DRAFT CONTINUED...

9. CINCINNATI BENGALS

RYAN RAMCZYK | OT, WISCONSIN The Bengals are such a mess right now, and a wide receiver would make as much sense here, but they allowed their offensive line to leave this offseason. While this is far from a great OL class, if they don’t grab Ramczyk now, they won’t get a shot at a better guy. Ramczyk is a solid LT prospect.

10. BUFFALO BILLS

COREY DAVIS | WR, WESTERN MICHIGAN The Bills need someone not named Sammy Watkins for Tyrod Taylor to throw to. Someone who can take advantage of the attention Watson gets. This will no longer be a run-first offense and the team needs people to throw to. Davis is another aggressive “my ball” receiver who would help bail Taylor out and create some big plays.

11. NEW ORLEANS SAINTS

DEREK BARNETT | DE, TENNESSEE It doesn’t seem likely that the Saints pick their next quarterback here, and it’s easy to think they will find a way to make the trade for Malcolm Butler and improve their cornerback issues that way. They desperately need more pass-rush help, which Barnett would provide in spades.

12. CLEVELAND BROWNS (FROM PHI EAGLES)

DESHAUN WATSON | QB, CLEMSON Maybe it’s a bit of a stretch, but you have to wonder how intrigued Hue Jackson was by Robert Griffen III’s mobility. Watson isn’t RG3, but he is a mobile quarterback who can throw the ball and knows how to win. This feels right, and as long as Brock Osweiler is there, Watson has the time to polish his game.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

MOCK DRAFT CONTINUED...

13. ARIZONA CARDINALS

MITCHELL TRUBISKY | QB, UNC Arizona may be set this year with Carson Palmer, but that’s not a sustainable long term solution. Trubisky has a lot to like about him, with mobility, a solid arm and good instincts, but he’s inexperienced and needs to work on pocket awareness. A year behind Palmer would be plenty of time to get that straightened out.

14. PHILADELPHIA EAGLES (FROM MINN VIKINGS)

GAREON CONLEY | CB, OHIO STATE The Eagles need some help in the secondary, and Conley did a lot for his value with an outstanding Combine performance. He has some rough edges to his game, but his athleticism will make a team drool and defensive coordinator Jim Schwartz could make good use of him.

15. INDIANAPOLIS COLTS

REUBEN FOSTER | ILB, ALABAMA The Colts should go defense or offensive line—there’s really no other choice. If this was a better offensive line class, it’d be a real no-brainer. Foster could go even higher than this, if more teams are willing to ignore his off-field issues. He should be a great 3-down linebacker who will improve the middle of a bad defense.

16. BALTIMORE RAVENS

JOHN ROSS | WR, WASHINGTON With Steve Smith gone, Joe Flacco needs some help at wide receiver. Trusting Mike Wallace is playing Russian Roulette, so adding Ross—he of the new 40 yard dash record—is the smart play. He’ll need to work out his routes for shorter plays but his speed will make him dangerous deep.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

MOCK DRAFT CONTINUED...

17. WASHINGTON REDSKINS

DALVIN COOK | RB, FLORIDA STATE Washington might look at receivers, but a healthy Josh Doctson and Terrelle Pryor may be enough for them. Rob Kelley really disappointed last year, and Chris Thompson is a bit limited. That makes running back a real possibility and Cook is a playmaker in the waiting.

18. TENNESSEE TITANS

CHRIS GODWIN | WR, PENN STATE The Titans have Tajae Sharpe, who could develop into a great weapon for Marcus Mariota, and Rishard Matthews is solid, but Godwin is a receiver who can rip a ball from a defensive back and make a tough catch. He’d be a great release valve for Mariota.

19. TAMPA BAY BUCCANEERS

JARRAD DAVIS | LB, FLORIDA The Buccaneers might look at running backs or offensive line, but defense continues to be their biggest need. Davis is a linebacker who can line up all over and will deliver a big hit when the defense needs it.

20. DENVER BRONCOS

GARETT BOLLES | OT, UTAH The Broncos poor offensive line prevented them from making another title run last season. Bolles is a bit raw, and started just one year at Utah, but he’s a true left tackle. Keeping whatever quarterback is under center upright will be big key.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

MOCK DRAFT CONTINUED...

21. DETROIT LIONS

CHARLES HARRIS | DE, MISSOURI The Lions have Ziggy Ansah, but we saw last year that it wasn’t enough. Harris is a force off the edge and could play either defensive end or outside linebacker. There’s still upside for him as well, and he really seems like a guy who will flourish in a year or so.

22. MIAMI DOLPHINS

FORREST LAMP | OG, WESTERN KENTUCKY If Julius Thomas hadn’t arrived, tight end might have made more sense. But his acquisition, paired with consistent offensive line woes, makes this pick the one to make. Laremy Tunsil has kicked over to left tackle, leaving a bit of a hole at left guard. Lamp is the best fit there in the draft, bar none.

23. NEW YORK GIANTS

O.J. HOWARD | TE, ALABAMA It would have been interesting to see what happened if Lamp was here, given their issues on offensive line. However, with no really great OL option, the Giants look to add another weapon for Eli Manning. This team has looked for a great tight end for the better part of a decade—they can’t pass up Howard.

24. OAKLAND RAIDERS

CHRISTIAN MCCAFFREY | RB, STANFORD Latavius Murray is gone, which leaves a hole in the backfield. McCaffrey is a versatile back with good speed and quickness who can also catch the ball. The Raiders might go defense as well, since the front seven needs some help.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

MOCK DRAFT CONTINUED...

25. HOUSTON TEXANS

MARLON HUMPHREY | CB, ALABAMA What? No quarterback? Given how this team has drafted historically, it shouldn’t come as a shock. They need help at defensive back across from Jonathan Joseph, and they tend to keep loading up the defense anyway. Humphrey has good speed and length, and is a guy who can step in and play on day one.

26. SEATTLE SEAHAWKS

CAM ROBINSON | OT, ALABAMA This is tilting at windmills, but some day this team has to give Tom Cable something to work with, right? Robinson could stay at tackle or move to guard—both of which are huge needs. Or they can pick another defender and hope Russell Wilson’s legs keep him alive.

27. KANSAS CITY CHIEFS

COOPER KUPP | WR, EASTERN WASHINGTON The Chiefs need another option beyond Tyreek Hill and Travis Kelce. Kupp was very productive in college and has great hands. He’d be a reliable option for Alex Smith, and should be able to feast as attention is directed elsewhere.

28. DALLAS COWBOYS

JABRILL PEPPERS | S, MICHIGAN Peppers is a curious prospect, as he is a bit of a tweener and fits oddly in a lot of defenses. Teams are eyeing him as a safety, but he could also step in as a linebacker or even a running back if need be. He’s dynamic though, and we know Jerry Jones loves that. Peppers is enough of a physical freak to imagine Jones snagging him.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

MOCK DRAFT CONTINUED...

29. GREEN BAY PACKERS

CORDREA TANKERSLEY | CB, CLEMSON The Packers could start to reload their offensive line, since TJ Lang and JC Tretter are gone, but the class just isn’t very exciting. Another need is cornerback, and you need to have more than a few. The Packers could go any number of ways, but Tankersley’s size, ball-skills and athleticism are very intriguing.

30. PITTSBURGH STEELERS

TAKKARIST MCKINLEY | DE/OLB, UCLA The Steelers continue to build their defense up again, and McKinley is an explosive player off the edge. James Harrison came back this year but he’s not going to get younger, and while he might have another good season in him, the team has to plan for the future.

31. ATLANTA FALCONS

TACO CHARLTON | DE, MICHIGAN Aside from the best name in the first round, Charlton is good both against the pass and the run. He’s still a bit raw, but we saw improvement from him over the last year. The Falcons need to get more consistent on defense and bring more pressure. That lack of pressure is what eventually doomed them in the Super Bowl, and Charlton will help that.

32. NEW ORLEANS SAINTS (FROM NE PATRIOTS)

HAASON REDDICK | OLB, TEMPLE If the Saints don’t trade this pick back to the Patriots for Malcolm Butler, or to a quarterback needy team, Reddick would be a great snag here. He has a lot to offer. He is athletic, quick and consistent in his pressure. Between Derek Barnett and Reddick, the Saints would have a great first round haul.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

Andrew Garda

1) Mitchell Trubisky (NORTH CAROLINA) 2) DeShaun Watson (CLEMSON) 3) DeShone Kizer (NOTRE DAME) 4) Patrick Mahomes (TEXAS TECH) 5) Brad Kaaya (MIAMI) 6) Nathan Peterman (PITT) 7) Davis Webb (CAL) 8) Jerod Evans (VIRGINIA TECH) 9) Chad Kelly (OLE MISS) 10) Joshua Dobbs (TENNESSEE) 11) Bart Houston (WISCONSIN) 12) Seth Russell (BAYLOR) 13) Sefo Liufau (COLORADO) 14) CJ Beathard (IOWA) 15) Cooper Rush (CENTRAL MICHIGAN) 16) Alek Torgersen (PENN) 17) Zach Terrell (WESTERN MICHIGAN) 18) Mitch Leidner (MINNESOTA) 19) Ryan Higgins (LOUISIANA TECH) 20) Brady Gustafson (MONTANA)

ADDITIONAL PLAYERS / NOT FEATURED

21) Gunner Kiel (CINCINNATI) 22) Wes Lunt (ILLINOIS) 23) Garrett Fugate (CENTRAL MISSOURI STATE) 24) Austin Appleby (FLORIDA) 25) Tommy Armstrong (NEBRASKA)

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

MITCHELL TRUBISKY | QB1 NORTH CAROLINA (JR) Measurables: Height: 6’3” | Weight: 220 lbs. | 40-yard dash: 4.67 | Hands: 9 ½”

IN A NUT SHELL: Trubisky has exactly the type of build you look for in an NFL quarterback prospect. He delivers a crisp ball but is also mobile, possessing the ability to be dangerous with his legs. He can make a throw to anywhere on the field—with good velocity—from any angle. The problem is experience, or lack thereof. Trubisky only started one year and took most of his snaps from the shotgun. While he can read the field well, he isn’t quick to react to blitzing defenses and doesn’t show great pocket awareness. Despite good velocity on his passes, Trubisky hasn’t had to throw into tight windows.

BEST GAME (VS. PITT): Trubisky had a monster day, going 35 of 46 for 453 yards and five touchdowns, including the game winner. He led a 17 play, 63-yard drive that included three fourth-down conversions (he had four on the day). Late in the game, the Tar Heels found themselves with a first-and-goal, 31 seconds left and no timeouts. Trubisky missed on his first throw into the end zone, but he was able to connect for the score two plays later with less than 10 seconds on the clock. Trubisky showed tremendous poise and calm throughout the game. FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Trubisky would benefit greatly from Mike McCarthy’s famous “QB Camp,” and his mobility makes him a natural fit behind Aaron Rodgers. His inexperience under center makes him more of a project, but sitting behind Marquise Williams for a few seasons showed that Trubisky is patient and willing to sit while he learns.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

DESHAUN WATSON | QB2 CLEMSON (JR) Measurables: Height: 6’2” | Weight: 215 lbs. | 40-yard dash: 4.67 | Hands: 9 ¾”

IN A NUT SHELL: Watson has the athleticism, height, production and leadership in the huddle that most NFL teams look for in a quarterback prospect, but he’s a bit thin for his height and showed some inconsistencies in his field vision and decision making. The question teams will have to ask themselves is whether he can improve enough in those last two areas to warrant a first round pick. He improved over his time at Clemson, and with the right guidance, there seems little reason to think he couldn’t learn to read the field better and avoid mistakes. Watson’s general mobility and ability to avoid sacks are big positives, and anyone who saw him play in the last two National Title games knows he can step up in big moments and lead his team when they need it most.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

BEST GAME (VS. ALABAMA): For the second year in a row, Watson found himself facing Alabama in the National Championship game, and like in the previous tilt, he was successful against one of the most loaded defenses in college football. While he threw for one less touchdown this year, he avoided any interceptions. Trailing until the final touchdown, the Tigers were kept in the game in part due to Watson’s cool head and leadership ability, as he sealed the win with a short touchdown pass to Hunter Renfro with just one second left on the clock. FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Given his mobility, calm presence and throwing ability, Watson would be a pretty good fit with the Packers. Of course, he’d be sitting behind Aaron Rodgers for a long time. Nonetheless, he could learn an awful lot from the current starter. His experience in big games would also come in handy on a team which competes every year.

DESHONE KIZER | QB3 NOTRE DAME (rSO) Measurables: Height: 6’4” | Weight: 230 lbs. | 40-yard dash: 4.83 | Hands: 9 ⅞”

IN A NUT SHELL: Kizer took over for Malik Zaire, who suffered a broken ankle in 2015, and never gave the job back, completing 63 percent of his passes for 2,884 yards and 21 touchdowns that year. Head coach Brian Kelly kept him in the starting job the following year, but Kizer struggled in the middle of 2016 and was benched several times for Zaire. Kizer is a big quarterback with a nice arm who isn’t afraid to attack the secondary with deep throws. He locks onto his first read too often and, while he has good arm strength, he can be too reliant on it and has a tendency to bail out of the pocket when he should stand pat. Kizer has nice mobility for his size (6’4”, 230 lbs.), but is too inconsistent to be an instant starter.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

BEST GAME (VS. SYRACUSE): On a day when the Irish’s defense struggled, Kizer logged one of this better games, throwing for a career best 471 yards and completing 23 of 35 pass attempts. He did hit a rough patch with a bad sack and an interception near the end of the first half and appeared to be forcing too many throws. But Kizer settled down in the second half and torched Syracuse’s defense. Despite the lull in production at the end of the second quarter, Kizer showed good overall patience and decision-making in what ended up being one his most consistent games. FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Kizer’s rawness and skittishness mean he needs a fair amount of help. As a developmental prospect, he could turn into a solid player—but it would take patience. His biggest shortcoming is lack of consistency. Coach Kelly echoed this by swapping Kizer for Zaire often wheneven the former became a liability.

PATRICK MAHOMES | QB4

BRAD KAAYA | QB5

TEXAS TECH (JR)

MIAMI (JR)

Measurables: Height: 6’3” | Weight: 215 lbs. | 40-yard dash: 4.8

Measurables: Height: 6’4” | Weight: 215 lbs. | 40-yard dash: DNP

IN A NUT SHELL: Mahomes has confidence and the arm to back it up, with the accuracy to make big throws downfield. When he needs to fit a ball into a tight window, he has no issue adding a little extra zip on the ball as well. If anything, Mahomes’ problem may actually be overconfidence. He takes chances he shouldn’t and is prone to freelancing and going off script. His mechanics are sketchy as well—he’s wildly inconsistent at times. He’s a high ceiling/deep floor prospect.

IN A NUT SHELL: Kaaya won the job as a true freshman and kept it throughout his career with the Hurricanes. He can play under center or in the shotgun, and is a solid pro-style passer. Unfortunately, his accuracy gets wild and his ball placement could be much better. He doesn’t have great arm strength and his balls tend to hang in the air a bit as a result. Kaaya is very savvy and smart, but at times thinks too much and doesn’t make a quick decision. He probably should have taken another year in college to develop, though that likely wouldn’t have helped his arm strength.

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: His gunslinger mentality and wonky mechanics remind one of Brett Favre. But while has high upside—and the Packers love a mobile quarterback who can extend the play—his tendency to do his own thing would drive the coaching staff nuts. He’d be tough to tame, though the Packers have the staff to do it.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: His football intellect and work ethic make him a seemingly good fit for a Packers team which values those things, but his accuracy and decision making are an issue. The tools are there, though, and there would be no rush to get him on the field. This would be a beneficial fit for all parties.

NATHAN PETERMAN | QB6

DAVIS WEBB | QB7

PITT (SR)

CAL (SR)

Measurables: Height: 6’3” | Weight: 225 lbs. | 40-yard dash: 4.82

Measurables: Height: 6’5” | Weight: 225 lbs. | 40-yard dash: 4.79

IN A NUT SHELL: Peterman started his college career at Tennessee, but lost the starting job after an injury during his sophomore year. He transferred to Pitt and found success as a starter there. Peterman has pro-style experience, and shows good accuracy and anticipation. He is a bit inconsistent in his delivery, though, which results in some sloppy passes. Despite all that, his tape mostly looks good. If a team is willing to work on those mechanics with him and get him to settle down a bit, Peterman has some nice upside.

IN A NUT SHELL: Originally a starter at Texas Tech, Webb lost his job to Pat Mahomes in 2015 and decided to transfer to Berkley to replace Jared Goff. Webb has a nice release and can drive the ball downfield, but doesn’t adjust to defenses—the ball goes where it’s supposed to go on paper, and damn the consequences. Between his slow delivery and his inability to look off corners, many of his balls are contested. Many of his throws were less than 10 yards and anything beyond that suffered from inaccuracy. Webb has upside but has a lot of work to do.

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Peterman could be one of those late-round gems. His base skillset seems like a good fit for the Packers, even if he’s a bit less mobile than they like. They can certainly help with his mechanics while he sits behind Rodgers and down the road, Peterman could develop into a tradeable prospect.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Webb has been through multiple offenses and shown he can handle them. He’s got a lot of work to do, but could be a nice developmental prospect. The Packers would have to do something about his issues reading defenses, though, before he had the ability to step in should something happen to Rodgers.

JEROD EVANS | QB8

CHAD KELLY | QB9

VIRGINA TECH (JR)

OLE MISS (SR)

Measurables: Height: 6’4” | Weight: 230 lbs. | 40-yard dash: 4.80

Measurables: Height: 6’2” | Weight: 224 lbs. | 40-yard dash: DNP

IN A NUT SHELL: Evans is a big, strong quarterback with a quick release and a strong arm who reads defenses well. He seems to lack patience though, tucking and running when his first read isn’t open. Staring down his target also negates his ability to read defense by tipping off the secondary. His receivers also bailed him out too often. While he was productive in college, his offense was very simple and helped to inflate his numbers. Evans has talent for sure, but the question is whether he will be able to get enough time on the practice field as a backup to really improve.

IN A NUT SHELL: Kelly wasn’t invited to the Combine due to a new policy barring players who had been convicted of certain crimes. Kelly pleaded guilty to disorderly conduct in 2014 and has had multiple run-ins with coaches as well—which was part of the reason he left Clemson. On the field, he has a great arm, shows good anticipation but can predetermine his throws. He is said to be a hard worker, and he certainly has a lot of physical tools and mental toughness. If he can make better choices off and on the field, his upside is high.

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: The Packers do have receivers who can bail a quarterback out on a poor throw, but this otherwise seems like a bad fit. Evans is the sort of player who needs to be on the field to improve and he wouldn’t be with the Packers. Which means they couldn’t trust him in a game if Rodgers got hurt.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: The Packers have given some troublemakers second chances before, so it’s not out of the question, and his overall skills on the field could interest Green Bay. He’d have time to mature as a backup, and given the chance to showcase his skills in relief duty, could garner some trade value down the road.

JOSHUA DOBBS | QB10

BART HOUSTON | QB11

TENNESSEE (SR)

WISCONSIN (SR)

Measurables: Height: 6’3” | Weight: 216 lbs. | 40-yard dash: 4.64

Measurables: Height: 6’3” | Weight: 235 lbs. | 40-yard dash: DNP

IN A NUT SHELL: An aerospace engineering major, Dobbs has a high football IQ and is a well-respected leader on and off the field. Unfortunately, his execution, ball placement and accuracy leave a bit to be desired. While he shows good deep pass accuracy (47.7 per NFL.com), he sometimes floats balls on out routes, giving defenders time to adjust. His decision making can be poor at times, and he turned the ball over a career high 12 times last year, though he also threw for a career best 27 touchdowns.

IN A NUT SHELL: Houston started just one year for the Badgers, and lost his job in the middle of the season. He missed games against top-level opponents like Michigan State, Michigan and Ohio State, and it would have been nice to see how he fared against them. While reportedly initially despondent, Houston showed mental toughness in working hard and eventually earned the starting job back in time for the Big Ten Championship game. He played well in that game, though the Badgers leaned heavily on the run.

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Dobbs would certainly benefit from a few years behind Aaron Rodgers. His size, arm and overall skillset are there and he’s smart enough to overcome his decision-making issues with some guidance. Given how far back in the draft he will go, his value is as a backup with high upside.

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: It’s hard to see a ton here to attract the Packers. Houston has at times sounded a little too accepting of his role as a backup, and while he showed he won’t let himself be discouraged, even a backup should want a shot to start. Inconsistency early in the season and a relatively limited skillset also make him a mediocre fit for Green Bay.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

SETH RUSSELL | QB12 BAYLOR (SR) Measurables: Height: 6’3” | Weight: 203 lbs. | 40-yard dash: DNP

IN A NUT SHELL: Injuries are the story when it comes to Russell. He has a nice arm and attractive athleticism, but never displayed enough of it due to nagging injuries. Despite missing the end of 2015 with a neck injury, he was named Honorable Mention All Big Ten and looked poised for a great 2016 before sustaining an ankle injury. The film is promising, and Russell absolutely has talent, but he also seems to be injury prone. His slight build doesn’t help his case as an NFL prospect. FIT WITH THE PACKERS: He certainly has talent to offer, but Russell wouldn’t be more than a late round flier for the Packers. As a backup, he would have time to add some mass to his body and hopefully correct whatever may be contributing to his frequent injuries. Russell is not a ‘must have’ player for Green Bay.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

SEFO LIUFAU | QB13

CJ BEATHARD | QB14

COLORADO (SR)

IOWA (SR)

Measurables: Height: 6’3” | Weight: 232 lbs. | 40-yard dash: 5.09

Measurables: Height: 6’3” | Weight: 219 lbs. | 40-yard dash: DNP

IN A NUT SHELL: A big-bodied athlete with four years of starting experience, Liufau has a lot of intangibles. However, his poor mechanics led to timing and accuracy issues in college, and put a lower ceiling on his touchdown totals

IN A NUT SHELL: Beathard played in a pro-style offense both under center and in the shotgun. He regressed a bit in 2016, and negatives like a lack of pocket awareness, lack of decisiveness and poor vertical accuracy seemed to get worse as the season progressed.

COOPER RUSH | QB15

ALEK TORGERSEN | QB16

CENTRAL MICHIGAN (SR)

PENN (SR)

Measurables: Height: 6’3” | Weight: 230 lbs. | 40-yard dash: 4.93

Measurables: Height: 6’2” | Weight: 229 lbs. | 40-yard dash: DNP

IN A NUT SHELL: Smart and experienced, Rush shouldn’t have any issues in interviews or the film room. It’s getting on the field where things go south, as he has little arm strength and won’t be able to handle much beyond timing passes. He must improve his velocity and strength to stick in the NFL.

IN A NUT SHELL: Torgensen steadily improved each year at Penn, and he has the sort of arm strength that wows scouts. He mostly ran the option, but understands pro schemes as well. Of course, he played against a relatively low level of talent, so his NFL value is hard to project.

ZACH TERRELL | QB17

MITCH LEIDNER | QB18

WESTERN MICHIGAN (SR)

MINNESOTA (SR)

Measurables: Height: 6’1” | Weight: 215 lbs. | 40-yard dash: DNP

Measurables: Height: 6’3” | Weight: 226 lbs. | 40-yard dash: 4.93

IN A NUT SHELL: Receivers Daniel Braverman and Corey Davis overshadowed Terrell, but the Western Michigan QB was a big part of their success. He has physical limitations in terms of size, athleticism and arm strength, but he’s careful with the ball and runs the offense efficiently.

IN A NUT SHELL: Leidner wasn’t very productive in college, but he has a nice combination of size and arm strength, which should get teams to kick the tires on him. He has accuracy issues, worked almost exclusively out of the shotgun and stares his receivers down. His mechanics are problematic.

RYAN HIGGINS | QB19

BRADY GUSTAFSON | QB20

LOUISIANA TECH (SR)

MONTANA (SR)

Measurables: Height: 6’0” | Weight: 209 lbs. | 40-yard dash: DNP

Measurables: Height: 6’5” | Weight: 239 lbs. | 40-yard dash: n/a

IN A NUT SHELL: Higgins is shorter than most teams look for in a quarterback, but without the mobility and savvy that similarly sized guys like Drew Brees and Russell Wilson display. On the plus side, reads the field very well, is quick with his release and is very accurate in the short passing game.

IN A NUT SHELL: Gustafson is all upside—with a big arm and impressive size— but he is inexperienced and has injury concerns. He also faced a low level of competition during his two years as a starter at Montana. He does have a nice delivery, but will need to speed it up to succeed in the NFL.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

RB Dan Dahlke

1) Leonard Fournette (LSU) 2) Dalvin Cook (FLORIDA STATE) 3) Christian McCaffrey (STANFORD) 4) D’Onta Foreman (TEXAS) 5) Jamaal Williams (BYU) 6) Alvin Kamara (TENNESSEE) 7) Marlon Mack (SOUTH FLORIDA) 8) Jeremy McNichols (BOISE STATE) 9) Kareem Hunt (TOLEDO) 10) Wayne Gallman (CLEMSON) 11) Samaje Perine (OKLAHOMA) 12) Matt Dayes (NC STATE) 13) Brian Hill (WYOMING) 14) Corey Clement (WISCONSIN) 15) Joe Mixon (OKLAHOMA) 16) James Conner (PITTSBURG) 17) Elijah McGuire (LOUISIANA-LAFAYETTE) 18) Joe Williams (UTAH) 19) Donnel Pumphrey (SAN DIEGO ST.) 20) T.J. Logan (NORTH CAROLINA)

ADDITIONAL PLAYERS / NOT FEATURED

21) Aaron Jones (UTEP) 22) De’Veon Smith (MICHIGAN) 23) Elijah Hood (NORTH CAROLINA) 24) Justin Davis (USC) 25) Dare Ogunbowale (WISCONSIN)

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

IN A NUT SHELL: By his own standards Fournette had a down year in 2016, missing five games either due to injury (ankle) or by the coach’s decision to rest him. The dynamic LSU product may have had fewer bites of the apple his junior year, but he still made the most of his opportunities when he was on the field, showcasing the same dynamic playmaking ability as in his outstanding freshman and sophomore seasons. At 240 pounds, Fournette explodes through the line, showing excellent acceleration and speed to barrel down on defenders and break the game open with long downfield runs. Fournette runs with incredible power and he doesn’t shy away from contact. He’ll punish defenders who try to square him up, but he also has the quick feet and change of direction ability to sidestep tackles or cutback when necessary. Overall, Fournette’s vision is adequate, but could still use some improvement. Too frequently, he gets caught up behind his lineman and then taken down for a loss because he’s not able to square his shoulders up and break through the line. Fournette could also make more gains in the passing game as a receiver. However, he has come a long way in this area of his game since his freshman season.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

BEST GAME (VS. OLE MISS): Fournette has had plenty of jaw-dropping moments in his collegiate career, but his game against Ole Miss this past season was certainly a dominant performance, to say the least. On only 16 carries, he rushed for 284 yards and three touchdowns for a career-high 17.75 yards per carry. All of this production came against an eight-man box and an SEC opponent dead set on stopping him. It was a fine example of how easily Fournette can take over a game and break open big runs with just a little bit of daylight. FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Fournette’s physical downhill running style doesn’t necessarily lend itself to spread offenses or schemes that heavily favor shotgun formations. He’s best running out of I-Formation or single-back sets with the quarterback under center. However, Fournette is a special enough athlete that he can adapt to new systems. Plus, his game-breaking running ability and overall physical playing style immediately upgrades any offense that selects him.

IN A NUT SHELL: Cook is one of the most physically gifted halfbacks in the draft class. His short area burst and ability to suddenly change direction separate him from the rest of the class. He’s not only elusive out in space, but he also has the ability to hit the hole and then jumpcut to shake defenders at the contact point. His incredible wiggle in space and quick acceleration make him a special halfback. He also runs with the toughness and lower body strength to work through contact. He can pick up the tough yards inside the tackle box or turn the corner and break a big run to the outside. In the passing game, Cook shows adequate hands. He’s effective in the screen game and a decent checkdown option for quarterbacks. He does struggle in pass protection and can have issues with ball security. However, the biggest concerns with Cook’s game come off the field. Not only has Cook suffered several significant injuries, including a shoulder injury in 2016 and ankle and hamstring issues in 2015, the former FSU tailback has also had some run-ins with the law. He was taken to court in 2015 for domestic assault, and he was also cited in 2014 for animal

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

neglect. The injury and off-field red flags could ultimately cause him to drop in the draft despite the incredible talent and playmaking ability. 2016 ORANGE BOWL: While many of his contemporaries chose to sit out their school’s bowl game to avoid injury prior to the draft, Cook played in the 2016 Orange Bowl and was a key part in helping Florida State pull off a 33-32 upset against Michigan. Against the nation’s top-ranked defense, Cook ran for 145 yards on 20 carries (7.25 avg) and caught three receptions for 62 yards. His big plays came at crucial points in the game, and he showed the nation that he’s a true competitor who shows up in clutch moments. FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Cook’s electric running style would bring a whole new flavor to the Packers offense. He would give them a true playmaker in the backfield and help alleviate some of the pressure off Aaron Rodgers to always have to make plays with his arm. Cook’s game is also versatile enough that it would complement whoever else is in Green Bay’s backfield at the start of the 2017 season.

IN A NUT SHELL: McCaffrey solidified his draft stock by showcasing his excellent athletic traits with an outstanding combine performance. He finished among the top at his position in the 40-yard dash (4.48), vertical (37.5”), three-cone (6.57), and short shuttle (4.22). McCaffrey’s elite agility and elusiveness in space clearly show up on tape. His ability to set up defenders in space and separate from contact with speed and burst make him a special player in this class. While McCaffrey’s game lacks power and explosion, the Colorado native is built for the modern NFL. He excels playing out in space, and his ability to line up as a slot receiver as well in the backfield make him a great fit for spread offenses at the next level. McCaffrey can also make an impact as a returner, which will give him an immediate role in the NFL as a rookie as he works to break into the running back rotation. McCaffrey’s vision and cutback ability are also excellent, which lead to big-play potential downfield. His ability to slip through creases in the line make him a productive runner between the tackles despite lacking size. However, McCaffrey’s lack of size could make it difficult for him to take the physical pounding of a full NFL season if he’s asked to be the featured back.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

2016 ROSE BOWL: On the national stage in his first year as a starter, McCaffrey played an integral part in Stanford’s 45-16 victory over Iowa in the 2016 Rose Bowl. It was an important game for the former Stanford Cardinal because he was able to showcase every aspect of his game that makes him a dynamic playmaker. Not only did he run for 172 yards on 18 carries for an average of 9.56 yards per carry against a good Iowa defense, but he also recorded four receptions for 105 yards, including one for a touchdown, and returned a 63-yard punt for a score. FIT WITH THE PACKERS: The Packers tendency to run the hurry-up offense and play out of shotgun fit really well with McCaffrey’s skill set. Green Bay could utilize the former Stanford back in a variety of ways on offense, including splitting out wide or in the slot as well as a change-of-pace back and elusive returner. McCaffrey could serve in the Packers system in a similar fashion as Ty Montgomery, who excelled in a halfback-receiver hybrid role on offense.

D’ONTA FOREMAN | RB4

JAMAAL WILLIAMS | RB5

TEXAS (JR)

BYU (SR)

Measurables: Height: 6’0” | Weight: 233 lbs. | Arms: 31 ⅜” | Bench: 18 | 40-yard dash: DNP

Measurables: Height: 6’0” | Weight: 212 lbs. | Arms: 31 ¼” | Bench: DNP | 40-yard dash: 4.59

2016 Stats: 323 carries, 2028 yards (6.28 ypc), 15 TDs; 7 receptions, 75 yards

2016 Stats: 3234 carries, 1375 yards (5.88 ypc), 12 TDs; 7 receptions, 80 yards

IN A NUT SHELL: Unfortunately, Foreman did not work out at the NFL Combine because the medical examinations revealed a stress fracture in his foot. Durability could be a concern given Foreman’s physical running style. Despite these concerns, the former Texas halfback is a powerful downhill runner who moves light on his feet and shows excellent quickness for his size. His straight line speed is also evident in his ability to break through the line and pull away from defenders downfield. Although he’s an explosive game-breaking runner, Foreman still needs to develop in the passing game. Currently, he’s limited as a receiver.

IN A NUT SHELL: Williams is a physical one-cut runner who runs with good pad level and punishes defenders who challenge him head on. He keeps his legs turning through contact and runs with a tenacity that allows him to push piles and stiff arm defenders for extra yardage. Williams also has the burst and quick acceleration to break off big runs. Ultimately, Williams’ injury history will cause him to drop down draft boards. Not only did he miss the entire 2015 season because of a torn ACL, but Williams also missed three games in 2016 with an ankle injury. Despite this, Williams is a true tone setter on offense, and his physical running style and big-play potential make him a potential feature back in the NFL.

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Immediately, Foreman would give Green Bay a physical halfback to be the cornerstone of their running game, but he would offer very little on third downs or in passing situations initially. He had one breakout season at Texas, and despite being highly talented, his game remains raw. Foreman would need further development before he could be a true three-down back in the Packers offense.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Green Bay could potentially use a true three-down back and Williams would fit well in their offense. He has experience running out of shotgun, single-back sets, and I-Formation. His versatility in a variety of offensive looks matches well with what the Packers like to do on the field. Williams is also excellent in blitz pickup and can service well as a receiver on third downs.

ALVIN KAMARA | RB6

MARLON MACK | RB7

TENNESSEE (rJR)

SOUTH FLORIDA (JR)

Measurables: Height: 5’10” | Weight: 214 lbs. | Arms: 32 ¾” | Bench: 15 | 40-yard dash: 4.56

Measurables: Height: 5’11” | Weight: 213 lbs. | Arms: 32” | Bench: 15 | 40-yard dash: 4.50

2016 Stats: 103 carries, 596 yards (5.79 ypc), 9 TDs; 40 receptions, 392 yards, 4 TDs

2016 Stats: 174 carries, 1187 yards (6.82 ypc), 15 TDs; 28 receptions, 227 yards

IN A NUT SHELL: While only experiencing minimal production in college, Kamara demonstrates many of the elite athletic traits that make a good halfback in the NFL. The Tennessee product is an explosive runner, and Kamara’s combine numbers bear this out. He led all running backs in the vertical (39.5”) and broad jump (131”), showing incredible lower body explosion. Kamara is a dangerous playmaker in space and his ability to quickly stop-and-start are matched by few in this draft class. However, despite incredible short-area burst and balance, Kamara lacks top-end speed. He also primarily reprised a part-time role in Tennessee’s offense. Kamara flashed dynamic playmaking ability, but he may just be a really good third-down halfback at the next level.

IN A NUT SHELL: The South Florida product is an explosive, speedy back built for the modern NFL. Playing primarily in the spread offense or pistol, Mack runs well out of shotgun and plays well in space. He has quick feet and is shifty in space, but he also possesses the quick acceleration to explode through the line and create separation from defenders. Mack is an elite athlete at the position and can even line up at times as a slot receiver because he moves so well in the open field. While Mack didn’t run frequently between the tackles, he does possess the power and balance to run through initial contact. He’s a late draft riser and likely Day 2 draft pick.

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Kamara’s ability to excel in the passing game would immediately give the Packers a dynamic playmaker out of the backfield in the passing game. The former Tennessee halfback can take a short swing pass or checkdown and turn it into a big gain by making defenders miss in the open field. Kamara’s ability to gain yards after contact make him a potentially special player.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Mack’s slashing running style and electric playmaking ability would add a new dynamic to the Packers offense. He is a complete back and should not have to leave the field on third downs. Regardless of how Green Bay’s backfield takes shape this season, Mack would immediately compete for a starting role on the Packers roster.

JEREMY MCNICHOLS | RB8

KAREEM HUNT | RB9

BOISE STATE (JR)

TOLEDO (SR)

Measurables: Height: 5’9” | Weight: 214 lbs. | Arms: 31 ½” | Bench: DNP | 40-yard dash: 4.49

Measurables: Height: 5’10” | Weight: 216 lbs. | Arms: 31 ⅜” | Bench: 18 | 40-yard dash: 4.62

2016 Stats: 314 carries, 1709 yards (5.44 ypc), 23 TDs; 37 receptions, 474 yards, 4 TDs

2016 Stats: 262 carries, 1475 yards (5.63 ypc), 10 TDs; 41 receptions, 403 yards, 1 TD

IN A NUT SHELL: There may have not been a more productive back in college football outside of Christian McCaffrey and Dalvin Cook over the past two years than McNichols. Quietly, the former Broncos halfback amassed 3,046 rushing yards, 934 receiving yards, and 53 total touchdowns as a two-year starter in college. McNichols’ immense productivity is a result of his excellent athletic traits and vision in the backfield. Despite lacking explosive plays, McNichols possesses quick feet and tremendous balance, while also showing good change of direction ability. This allows him to be an efficient runner and fit through small spaces. McNichols does need to shore up his ball security issues. He’s fumbled nine times over the past two seasons.

IN A NUT SHELL: Hunt is an explosive, physical runner with excellent balance and lower body strength. While he lacks breakaway speed, Hunt still possesses excellent short-area burst. He finished among the top running backs in the vertical (36.5”) at the NFL Combine, demonstrating his lower body explosion. His ability to get his pads low and bounce off tacklers make him effective between the tackles, but he also has the wiggle and stop-start quickness to make defenders miss in space. Hunt has also made tremendous gains in the passing game, and his excellent ball security is an underrated attribute of his game. Incredibly, he only fumbled once in 855 touches in college.

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: McNichols’ ability to be both a runner and receiver would complement well what Green Bay does on offense. The former Boise State halfback has all of the tools to be a legitimate three-down back in the NFL, and outside of the ball security issues, doesn’t have any one glaring deficiency in his game. He’d bring speed, elusiveness, and balance to the Packers running back position.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Coach McCarthy will certainly love Hunt’s ability to protect the ball. Over the years, players in Green Bay have quickly seen the bench if they fumbled. Hunt brings a balanced game to an offense and his aggressive high-energy running style would help breath some life back into the Packers ground game. Some of the character concerns might be red flags for the Packers, so the pre-draft interviews will go a long way in determining if he remains on their board.

WAYNE GALLMAN | RB10

SAMAJE PERINE | RB11

CLEMSON (rJR)

OKLAHOMA (JR)

Measurables: Height: 6’0” | Weight: 215 lbs. | Arms: 32 ⅝” | Bench: 21 | 40-yard dash: 4.60

Measurables: Height: 5’11” | Weight: 233 lbs. | Arms: 30 ⅜” | Bench: 30 | 40-yard dash: 4.65

2016 Stats: 232 carries, 1133 yards (4.88 ypc), 17 TDs; 20 receptions, 132 yards

2016 Stats: 196 carries, 1060 yards (5.41 ypc), 12 TDs; 10 receptions, 106 yards, 1 TD

IN A NUT SHELL: Over the past two seasons Clemson was 17-0 when Gallman eclipsed the 100-yard rushing mark in a game. The Georgia native played an integral part to the Tigers National Championship run this past season. While there isn’t any one aspect of Gallman’s game that stands out, he does everything well at the position and is a reliable option at halfback. He’s a smooth one-cut runner with good short-area burst and quickness in the open field. He’s economic with his choices, not wasting steps dancing at the line of scrimmage, but instead, he quickly turns upfield and makes the most of each opportunity. He also runs hard, keeping his legs turning through contact.

IN A NUT SHELL: Perine is a powerful runner who isn’t afraid to lay the hammer and punish defenders who meet him in the hole. There may not be a stronger back in this class. However, it would be a mistake to solely define Perine’s game by his strength and size. Playing at Oklahoma, Perine ran primarily out of the shotgun and looked comfortable playing in a spread offense. He possesses smooth feet and change of direction ability for a back his size, and he runs with good balance, making him a natural athlete out in space. He scored at least 13 touchdowns in each of his three seasons in college and averaged around 6-yards per carry.

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Gallman would give the Packers an early-down back to feature in their offense, as well as a moldable offensive weapon. He can carry the ball 20 times a game or just be a complementary piece in their hurry-up offense. Playing at Clemson, Gallman is comfortable running out of the shotgun, but he can also stay on the field on third downs because he’s reliable in pass protection. He would immediately compete for a starting role.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Green Bay runs a lot of multi-receiver, single-back sets on offense, and given Perine’s experience in the spread offense, this should be a system he’d be comfortable in. While Perine excels in a single-back offense, the 233-pound halfback would bring a physical presence to the Packers ground game and give them another big back to use to punish defenses.

IN A NUT SHELL: While not the fastest, biggest, or most dynamic halfback, Dayes possesses excellent vision and elusiveness in space. He has the wiggle to make defenders miss in the open field, while also showing the toughness to lower his shoulder and run through contact. He also has a knack for finding cutback lanes and he can make defenders pay for over pursuing their run fits. The former NC State standout is also a very solid receiver out of the backfield—a skill that was widely underutilized in college but something he showcased for scouts at the Senior Bowl. FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Dayes would immediately find a role in the Packers offense as a change-of-pace back and reliable third-down option. He picks up the blitz well, while also possessing the hands and awareness to be a reliable checkdown receiver for Aaron Rodgers. Dayes can also be effective in the screen game, as well as provide Green Bay’s ground game with an elusive scatback to pair with a more physical runner.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

BRIAN HILL | RB13

COREY CLEMENT | RB14

WYOMING (JR)

WISCONSIN (SR)

IN A NUT SHELL: Hill is a physical downhill runner who plays with good pad level and packs a punch when meeting defenders in the hole. Possessing only adequate speed and athleticism, Hill wins with good vision, toughness, and quick cutback ability. He amassed 1860 yards and 22 touchdowns on the ground in 2016.

IN A NUT SHELL: The former Wisconsin halfback is a smooth runner with natural change of direction ability. While Clement doesn’t stand out in any one area at the position, he does possess adequate power, vision, and footwork. Clement lacks top-end speed, and he’s not a guy that can create yardage on his own. He was a very productive college halfback that benefited from playing behind an outstanding Wisconsin offensive line.

*JOE MIXON | RB15

JAMES CONNER | RB16

OKLAHOMA (rSO)

PITTSBURGH (rJR)

IN A NUT SHELL: In 2016, Mixon emerged as one of the most dynamic running backs in college football, recording 1812 total yards and 15 touchdowns on offense, despite sharing backfield duties with Samaje Perine. Mixon is one of the most physically gifted backs in the draft class, but was hit with a misdemeanor charge for punching a female student in 2014, leading to a one-year suspension. Because of the incident, Mixon could fall to Day 3 of the draft or even go undrafted.

IN A NUT SHELL: After overcoming cancer and a season-ending knee injury in 2015, Conner rebounded in 2016 with solid production (1092 rushing yards, 16 TDs). The Pittsburgh graduate is a powerful, downhill runner who is a load for defenders to bring down at 6-foot-1 and 233 pounds. Conner lacks speed and athleticism, but he’s still a sure-footed back who makes his hay between the tackles.

ELIJAH MCGUIRE | RB17

JOE WILLIAMS | RB18

LOUISIANA-LAFAYETTE (SR)

UTAH (SR)

IN A NUT SHELL: McGuire exceeded the 1,000-yard rushing mark in three straight seasons in college, while also recording 42-career rushing touchdowns. The former Cajun halfback is a patient runner with good vision and toughness at the contact point. Having recorded 130 receptions in college, he’s also a reliable receiver in the passing game.

IN A NUT SHELL: Williams is a speedy back with big-play potential. As a senior, the former Utah halfback averaged 6.7 yards per carry on his way to recording 1407 yards on the ground to go along with 10 touchdowns. Surprisingly, for a guy many will project as a third-down back, Williams struggled in the passing game. He’s more of a straight-line speed athlete than a tailback who’s elusive in space.

DONNEL PUMPHREY | RB19

T.J. LOGAN | RB20

SAN DIEGO STATE (SR)

NORTH CAROLINA (SR)

IN A NUT SHELL: The former San Diego State scatback became the all-time FBS career rushing leader when he finished his senior season with 2133 yards on the ground. Ultimately, Pumphrey’s lack of size (5-8, 176) will limit him to a specialized role at the next level. Despite this, he’s a still an elusive offensive weapon out in space.

IN A NUT SHELL: Logan is an electric runner with 4.37 speed and shiftiness in space. However, the 5-foot-9, 214-pound halfback only had moderate production in college because he played a part-time role in the Tar Heels offense. Regardless, Logan still has the athletic traits to be a good third-down back and dynamic returner in the NFL.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

Erik Fretland

1) Sam Rogers (VIRGINIA TECH) 2) Freddie Stevenson (FLORIDA STATE) 3) Prescott Line (MICHIGAN STATE) 4) Bobby Wolford (BOSTON COLLEGE) 5) Emmanuel Holder (TOWSON) 6) Nate Iese (UCLA) 7) Michael Zunica (KANSAS) 8) Dakota Ball (ALABAMA) 9) Marquez Williams (MIAMI) 10) Trent Cowan (IDAHO) 11) Algernon Brown (BYU) 12) Dan Mastromatteo (NORTH CAROLINA)

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

SAM ROGERS | FB1 VIRGINIA TECH (SR) Measurables: Height: 5’10” | Weight: 231 lbs. | 40-yard dash: 4.93 | Bench: 19 reps 2016 Stats: 67 rushes (4.2 avg), 2 TDs, 24 catches (12.5 avg), 4 TDs, 1/1 passing, 13 yds, 1 TD

IN A NUT SHELL: Calling an offensive skill player a “gadget player” or “Swiss Army knife” conjures up images of a small, speedy receiver or running back— one that can be used as the primary rusher/ receiver on a play, or as a decoy. Sam Rogers is neither small nor speedy, but the versatility he provides an offense is extremely valuable. He was used in a variety of ways, including pass blocking and leading on toss plays from the wing spot, lining up at running back and either taking a handoff or lead blocking for sweeps and QB runs, lining up in the slot and either running routes or cracking a linebacker on an outside run— he was even the target of designed screen passes on occasion. He performs all of these duties well. He clearly enjoys blocking, as he consistently delivers a pop on impact and keeps his feet driving to continue the block through the whistle. He has good footwork and good functional strength, and is effective in the pass game both as a blocker and as a receiver.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

BEST GAME (VS. VIRGINIA): Sam Rogers’ best game of 2016— both in terms of his individual performance and the overall success of the team’s rushing attack—came against in-state rival UVA. Virginia Tech had 51 carries for 289 yards (5.7 average) and 3 touchdowns, of which 15 carries, 105 yards, and 2 touchdowns were Rogers’. On top of his rushing totals and work as a blocker, he also added 29 receiving yards on two catches. FIT WITH THE PACKERS: If the Packers didn’t have a better-than-average fullback on the roster already, Sam Rogers could carve out a nice role for himself as a run-blocker and potentially as a passblocker on third down. His vision as a runner is better than Ripkowski’s and his hands are better, but he is less powerful as a blocker and is just a little undersized. If he were to end up with the Packers, he would need to play special teams to have a role, and it would spell the end of Joe Kerridge’s tenure in Green Bay.

FREDDIE STEVENSON | FB2 FLORIDA STATE (SR) Measurables: Height: 6’0” | Weight: 234 lbs. | 40-yard dash: 4.75 | Bench: 24 reps 2016 Stats: 13 rushes (6.9 yd avg.), 4 TDs, 1 rec (6 yds), 1 TD

IN A NUT SHELL: Stevenson is an extremely well rounded fullback prospect, and often functioned more like an H-back, lining up as a wing tight end and frequently motioning before the snap. He is an above-average receiving back with soft hands and a large catch radius, as well as the ability to transition quickly from receiver to runner. The 234-pound former Seminole is capable of performing every duty required by fullbacks in the run game, whether that’s getting up to DBs when leading for outside runs, sealing backside defensive ends, or winning leverage battles and redirecting against linebackers coming downhill. Although he could afford to bulk up and gain functional strength, his understanding of leverage allows him to be effective when blocking defenders who are bigger than him. One potential area for concern is his limited experience in pass blocking, as he often came off the field on third downs.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

BEST GAME (VS. FLORIDA): As a run-blocking fullback, Stevenson’s best game should be determined by the overall performance of FSU’s run game, as opposed to his best individual stat line. But, as it happens, both of these occurred in the same game against Florida late in the season. Not only did Stevenson average 15 yards on two carries with one touchdown, the FSU backfield collectively was good for 249 rushing yards on 40 carries with 3 rushing touchdowns and 10 rushing first downs in only 66 plays. FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Unfortunately, with Ripkowski and Kerridge already on the roster, Stevenson would not add enough as a receiver to make up for the fact that he isn’t as good a pass blocker as Ripkowski. For the Packers, that skill is of paramount importance. However, he could be an effective between-the-tackles grinder if the Packers do not add a running back larger than Montgomery.

PRESCOTT LINE | FB3 MICHIGAN STATE (GRAD STUDENT) Measurables: Height: 6’0” | Weight: 253 lbs. | 40-yard dash: n/a | Bench: n/a 2016 Stats: 5 rushes (2.4 yd avg.), 0 TDs, 3 catches (6 yd avg.), 0 TDs

IN A NUT SHELL: One can only hope that Prescott Line knew what to expect when he transferred from SMU to Michigan State upon his graduation, because his role changed significantly from one year to the next. In his three seasons at SMU, it was not uncommon for him to receive 8 or 10 carries in a game, while at Michigan State, he only received 5 carries all season. This is unfortunate, as Line runs with power and decisiveness, often breaking one or two tackles and almost always falling forward. However, he is also a skilled run blocker, keeping his feet moving to maintain blocks and packing a wallop when squaring up a defender. He is also good at winning the leverage battle to open up a wider running lane. There is room to improve as a pass blocker, as he is occasionally slow to react to blitzers coming from unexpected directions.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

BEST GAME(S): Because Line functioned more as a true run-blocking fullback than either of the two fullbacks listed above, he didn’t have a single game with more than one touch in 2016. However, the best individual game of his career came in the final game of 2014 when he played for SMU, rushing 20 times for 90 yards with 2 touchdowns, adding one catch for 6 yards. In 2016, the most productive rushing game for MSU was against Maryland, where Line helped pave the way for 270 rushing yards on 44 carries (6.1 average) with two touchdowns. FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Line would fill the same role for the Packers that Aaron Ripkowski currently holds. They are both powerful blockers and powerful runners, with moderately good skills as receivers. However, since Ripkowski holds the edge in his pass-blocking, Line would have difficulty making the Green Bay roster and would most likely be a wasted draft pick, although he is talented enough to win a fullback job elsewhere in the league.

BOBBY WOLFORD | FB4

EMMANUEL HOLDER | FB5

BOSTON COLLEGE (rSR)

TOWSON (rSR)

Measurables: Height: 6’2” | Weight: 248 lbs. | 40-yard dash: n/a | Bench: n/a

Measurables: Height: 5’11” | Weight: 255 lbs. | 40-yard dash: n/a | Bench: n/a

2016 Stats: 1 catch, 1 yd, 1 TD. Career Stats: 25 catches (9.0 yd avg.), 4 TDs, 2 carries, 0 yards

2016 Stats: 35 catches (10.8 yd avg.), 8 TDs

IN A NUT SHELL: A run-blocker in the truest sense of the word, Wolford packs a punch when he can get a defender lined up in his sights and can get a straight shot at him. He is adept at stonewalling and driving linebackers backwards, and can easily clear out a safety trying to set the edge and contain the play. When he combines his block with an offensive lineman, defensive linemen usually end up on their backs. Unfortunately, in BC’s run-based offense, he didn’t get a chance to show if he has a more extensive skillset, and most of his pass-blocking snaps came on play action passes.

IN A NUT SHELL: Despite his sub-6-foot stature, there is nothing small about the way that Emmanuel Holder plays. His low, thick frame allows him to win leverage battles and win his blocks from the first instant of contact. He demonstrates good leg drive and lower body power when stonewalling linebackers, and is capable of kicking out all but the biggest defensive ends. He also possesses good run blocking vision, as he has a knack for knowing when to come off a block to move to a more immediate threat. He is a plus pass blocker as well, letting the blitzer come to him and then stopping him cold.

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Wolford’s talents match up better with a power run game than the Packers’ multiple offense. He could add a limited amount of value on power runs out of heavy sets, but this added value is offset by his narrow skillset and lack of versatility.

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: If the Packers didn’t already have Ripkowski on the roster, Emmanuel Holder would fit into that role very nicely. While Holder is not as well-rounded a pass catcher or special teams player, he may be a slightly more powerful run blocker than Ripkowski, and has the potential to be an almost equally good pass blocker. He is most comfortable lined up in the I formation with his hand in the dirt, which is another reason he is not likely to wind up in Green Bay.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

NATE IESE | FB6

MICHAEL ZUNICA | FB7

UCLA (rSR)

KANSAS (SR)

Measurables: Height: 6'3” | Weight: 241 lbs. | 40-yard dash: n/a | Bench: n/a

Measurables: Height: 5’11” | Weight: 211 lbs. | 40-yard dash: n/a | Bench: n/a

2016 Stats: 25 catches (11.7 yd avg.), 4 TDs, 0 carries

2016 Stats: 5 rec (17.0 yd avg.), 1 TD

IN A NUT SHELL: Nate Iese’s versatility is one of his strongest assets, as he has experience at fullback, tight end and even linebacker. At the NFL level, he projects to be more of an H-back or “move” tight end, rather than a true fullback. His diverse skillset makes him more attractive to special teams, as it’s likely he’ll be able to contribute on both coverage and blocking units. He’s more of a receiving threat than some of the other names on this list, although he’ll be limited to a possession, chain-moving role rather than a field-stretching presence up the seam. He has the agility to reach-block contain players and to lock onto defensive backs in the open field, but has question marks around his functional strength and effort on a play-by-play basis.

IN A NUT SHELL: Despite being undersized for the fullback position, Zunica effectively uses leverage and momentum to take on larger defenders, often using the defender’s own momentum against him. He aggressively goes after defenders to bring the hit to them. Once a defender starts to shed his block, he will frequently fall in the defender’s path, tripping him up and creating as much “trash” as possible. As a receiver, he has natural hands and can track the ball in the air well. He was not used much as a receiver by KU, but he flashed potential on his few targets. As might be expected from his smaller size, he is one of the faster, more athletic fullbacks in this draft class.

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: The Packers don’t currently have an H-back on the roster. But this doesn’t figure to be an issue in 2017, as both Martellus Bennett and Lance Kendricks are capable of lining up at both tight end and wing, and Ripkowski can handle the blocking from the backfield. His versatility, especially on special teams, could be useful, but it would be difficult to justify drafting him unless he could carve out a role on offense.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Zunica plays with the effort and athleticism on special teams that Green Bay’s coaches look for, but would be a less powerful offensive presence than Aaron Ripkowski. There’s no doubt he could gain weight and strength in the NFL, but with a roster crowded with tight ends and fullbacks, Zunica doesn’t fill a need for the Packers.

DAKOTA BALL | FB8

MARQUEZ WILLIAMS | FB9

ALABAMA (rSR)

MIAMI (rSR)

Measurables: Height: 6'3” | Weight: 268 lbs. | 40-yard dash: n/a | Bench: n/a

Measurables: Height: 6’1” | Weight: 280 lbs. | 40-yard dash: n/a | Bench: n/a

2016 Stats: 0 catches, 13 tackles, 1 TFL, 0.5 sacks *(played as a rotational DL)

2016 Stats: 2 catches (9.5 yd avg.), 1 TD

IN A NUT SHELL: Ball’s versatility is an asset just like Michael Zunica’s. But while Zunica is small and speedy for the fullback position, Ball projects to more of a blocker on special teams or a power run fullback. He came out of high school as a highly ranked defensive line prospect, but played fullback at Alabama for his first three years before getting a chance to rotate in at defensive line in 2016. Some teams may see him as a developmental DT or DE prospect, but he could easily win a part-time role for an NFL team with his consistent, powerful blocking and positional versatility on special teams.

IN A NUT SHELL: A very good mover for his size, Williams possesses the raw power to knock linebackers out of running lanes and to seal off backside defensive ends. He also possesses the sneaky athleticism to leak out of the backfield into the flats on play actions and turn the corner to get yards after the catch. Although his receiving opportunities were very limited in 2016, his touchdown catch displayed his athleticism as he adjusted to catch a difficult pass, then transitioned smoothly to a runner and dove for the goal line as the defender tried to tackle him low. On his other catch in 2016, he caught the pass in the flats and then beat the linebacker to the corner to get upfield for 15 yards.

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Ball is an intriguing prospect for the Packers, more so because of his potential to develop as a defensive lineman than for his contribution as a fullback. If he were to be drafted by the Packers, it would be intriguing to see him gain 20-30 pounds, then see if he could crack the DL rotation, while also serving as a situational fullback in short yardage and heavy sets while being a staple on special teams blocking units.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Marquez Williams is a bit of an anomaly in terms of how to project him at the NFL level. Most fullbacks weigh significantly less than Williams does, but he isn’t tall enough to attempt a conversion to offensive line and there’s no guarantee he would have the footwork or mobility. He should be seen as more of a big-body prospect rather than a prospect for any specific position, although his size will certainly allow him to play a role on special teams.

TRENT COWAN | FB8

ALGERNON BROWN | FB9

IDAHO (SR)

BYU (SR)

Measurables: Height: 6'3” | Weight: 230 lbs. | 40-yard dash: n/a | Bench: n/a

Measurables: Height: 6’1” | Weight: 250 lbs. | 40-yard dash: n/a | Bench: n/a

2016 Stats: 48 catches (11.4 yd avg.), 6 TDs

2016 Stats: 16 rushes (2.7 yd. avg.), 0 TDs, 6 catches (11.2 yd avg.), 0 TDs

IN A NUT SHELL: One of the best receiving H-backs in this year’s draft class, Cowan led the 2016 Vandals in both receptions and receiving touchdowns from the H-back/tight end spot. His solid routerunning and reliable hands allowed him to be a safety blanket for QB Matt Linehan. And while his 11.4 yards per catch average implies he’s not a vertical threat, he does have the speed to threaten the seam from the wing spot or even inline as a tight end. His pass blocking footwork is more refined than most others on this list. He does not possess elite strength for a blocking back, and he wins in the run game more through effort and footwork than pure power.

IN A NUT SHELL: As might be expected from his history as a running back, Brown’s primary weapon in his arsenal of fullback skills is his comfort with the ball in his hands. Earlier in his career when he was a primary ball carrier, he played at a significantly lighter weight, but was still more than a handful for defenders to tackle, seeking out contact and dishing out punishment while rarely going down on first contact. While Brown certainly lost some of his burst by putting on 20-30 pounds to switch to fullback, he is definitely not any easier to tackle and can be effective on short yardage plays whether blocking or carrying the ball.

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Cowan has the potential to be a movable chess piece on offense, functioning as a receiver out of the backfield, an extra pass blocker when linemen need help, and a reliable presence in the middle of the field to move the chains. However, for whatever Cowan would bring in the pass game, his run-blocking is at a level far enough below Ripkowski’s and Bennett’s that it wouldn’t make sense to take snaps from either of them to give to Cowan.

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: As difficult as it would be for Brown to cut 20 pounds, his best role with the Packers would be as a 230-ish pound running back who handles clock-killing and early-down duties. Watching film from Brown’s career as a running back made it clear that defenders got sick of him after a couple tackle attempts. Having him as a grinder in the backfield could wear a defense down very early in the game.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

DAN MASTROMATTEO | FB12 NORTH CAROLINA (SR) Measurables: Height: 6’2” | Weight: 235 lbs. | 40-yard dash: n/a | Bench: n/a 2016 Stats: *(on defense) 12 tackles, 0.5 TFL

IN A NUT SHELL: Mastromatteo is a raw fullback prospect and would unquestionably be a project to convert into a well-rounded fullback. According to Sports Reference, he did not have a single offensive touch in his career, functioning as a rotational run-blocker as well as a rotational linebacker for UNC. He only had the one job on offense, but he did it well. He is capable of tracking defenders on the move, and can be trusted to secure the backside of run plays or even seal out a defensive end on occasion. FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Mastromatteo’s role in a run-heavy offense makes him a philosophical mismatch for the Packers. His only hope at an NFL career is to show his worth on special teams, which he should be able to do on both blocking and coverage units.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

WR Andrew Garda

1) Mike Williams (CLEMSON) 2) Corey Davis (WESTERN MICHIGAN) 3) John Ross (WASHINGTON) 4) Chris Godwin (PENN STATE) 5) Curtis Samuel (OHIO STATE) 6) Cooper Kupp (EASTERN WASHINGTON) 7) JuJu Smith-Schuster (USC) 8) Zay Jones (EAST CAROLINA) 9) ArDarius Stewart (ALABAMA) 10) Carlos Henderson (LOUISIANA TECH) 11) Taywan Taylor (WESTERN KENTUCKY) 12) Chad Hansen (CAL) 13) Isaiah Ford (VIRGINIA TECH) 14) Amara Darboh (MICHIGAN) 15) Malachi Dupre (LSU) 16) Kenny Golladay (NORTHERN ILLINOIS) 17) Noah Brown (OHIO STATE) 18) Shelton Gibson (WEST VIRGINIA) 19) DeDe Westbrook (OKLAHOMA) 20) Artavis Scott (CLEMSON)

ADDITIONAL PLAYERS / NOT FEATURED

21) Stacy Coley (MIAMI) 22) Josh Reynolds (TEXAS A&M) 23) Isaiah McKenzie (GEORGIA) 24) Ryan Switzer (NORTH CAROLINA) 25) KD Cannon (BAYLOR)

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

MIKE WILLIAMS | WR1 CLEMSON (JR) Measurables: Height: 6’4” | Weight: 218 lbs. | 40-yard dash: 4.49 2016 Stats: 98 receptions, 1361 yards (13.9 YPC), 11 touchdowns

IN A NUT SHELL: Overcoming the bad history of guys named Mike Williams (see: Williams, Mike from USC and Williams, Mike from Syracuse), the Clemson wideout has a tremendous work ethic, a tough-nosed attitude on the field and excellent ball tracking. Williams has excellent body control and is equally effective digging the ball off the turf as he is snatching it out of the air. A natural hands-catcher, Williams is also able to use his arms to ward off defenders and create separation. Though at his size, he should be more physical. Williams bailed DeShaun Watson out on some bad passes and seems like someone who would be a good security blanket for a quarterback. He did miss all of 2015 with a neck injury, but has appeared healthy this year, avoiding any red flags. He can work all three levels of the field, and his size will make him a real pain to cover in the end zone.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

BEST GAME (VS. PITT): Williams was pretty close to unstoppable even in a losing effort against Pitt. Quarterback DeShaun Watson was locked onto him, and Williams accounted for about a third of Watson’s 52 completions that day. Pitt’s defense struggled with Williams’ size and strength, and his 15-yard touchdown reception showed off both his hands and his physical ability. Unfortunately, Pitt clamped down on the entire offense in the fourth quarter while still showing the ability to move the ball on Clemson’s defense. Williams was still able to catch five balls for 36 yards, though the Panthers mostly limited him to short receptions. FIT WITH THE PACKERS: We know Aaron Rodgers loves a receiver who can adjust to the ball and make tough catches, but we are also well aware that he hates when guys can’t run crisp routes. We think the former outweighs the latter in terms of value for the Packers, so Williams would be fine once they got him in camp. If he could sharpen up, he’d be a perfect fit for this offense.

COREY DAVIS | WR2 WESTERN MICHIGAN (SR) Measurables: Height: 6’3” | Weight: 209 lbs. | 40-yard dash: n/a 2016 Stats: 97 receptions, 1500 yards (15.5 YPC), 19 touchdowns

IN A NUT SHELL: Davis has been an incredibly productive player in his four years at Western Michigan, displaying a ‘my-ball’ mentality. He wants the ball early, often and in big moments. Of course, Western Michigan and the MAC aren’t the SEC, so he wasn’t facing the Alabamas of the NCAA. He completely outclasses his competition, though, and he played like he was a man among boys. Davis does a great job tracking and high-pointing the ball, and will juke a defender out of his socks with some of his breaks. That said, he’s sometimes a bit lackadaisical on his vertical routes and while he is great on some breaks, his underneath routes aren’t as sharp. According to NFL. com, he had 16 drops this past year. He didn’t do much blocking and saw very little press at the line. He missed both the Combine and his Pro Day with an ankle injury, which raises some red flags about his durability.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

BEST GAME (VS. BALL STATE): Davis stepped up on the national stage, catching a dozen passes for a MAC record 272 yards in the Broncos’ 52-20 decimation of the Ball State Cardinals. While he was at it, his three touchdowns tied the conference mark for career touchdown receptions (47) and the win was their 11th in a row, a school record. He would break the touchdown record two weeks later against Buffalo. This game showed everything Davis could do well, and the Cardinals had no answer for his quickness and aggressive play. FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Will the lingering injury drag into training camp and the season? That might be a huge turnoff for the Packers, even if it drops him to their end of the first round. If healthy, Davis is a solid fit, as he is aggressive and will fight for the ball. Aaron Rodgers would be able to rely on him to get the job done.

JOHN ROSS | WR3 WASHINGTON (JR) Measurables: Height: 5’11” | Weight: 188 lbs. | 40-yard dash: 4.22 2016 Stats: 81 receptions, 1150 yards (14.2 YPC), 17 touchdowns

IN A NUT SHELL: Lucky for Ross, the NFL loves short receivers, especially ones as fast as he is. He ran 4.22 at the Combine—and that’s after missing 2015 with a torn ACL. His speed will take the top off a defense on a vertical route, and that creates opportunities for him underneath as well. Given his small size, he might be overwhelmed by big, physical corners at the NFL level. He already struggled at times with contested catches in college. His route running on shorter routes needs to be impeccable, and it isn’t. You can see his passion on the field, which is both good and bad. It’s good when he fires himself and his teammates up, but bad when he appears to lose control and become mistake prone. Ross is a home run threat, but he has a little ways to go before he’s more than that. The potential is there.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

CFP SEMIFINAL (VS. ALABAMA): Ross’ performance here is probably the clearest indication of what he can do and what he will struggle with. He made a few nice plays in this game but the Alabama defensive backs were just too physical and too relentless in their coverage. Despite being targeted on routes he should have had success on, Ross struggled. The low point came early when he was stripped of the ball on a screen pass. You could see flashes of the player he has the potential to be, but if defenses match the intensity Alabama’s defenders had—and they will—Ross is going to have to sharpen his game very quickly. FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Packers fans will notice Ross has a combination of Jordy Nelson’s vertical ability and Randall Cobbs’ size and shortroute potential, but with much more speed. If he can sharpen his routes and get more physical, he could be a great fit for the Packers offense, as Aaron Rodgers has the arm to use Ross’ vertical game, and is always on the lookout for speed on shorter routes.

CHRIS GODWIN | WR4

CURTIS SAMUEL | WR5

PENN STATE (JR)

OHIO STATE (JR)

Measurables: Height: 6’1” | Weight: 209 lbs. | 40-yard dash: 4.42

Measurables: Height: 5’11” | Weight: 196 lbs. | 40-yard dash: 4.31

2016 Stats: 59 receptions, 982 yards (16.6 YPC), 11 touchdowns

2016 Stats: 97 receptions, 771 yards (7.9 YPC), 8 touchdowns

IN A NUT SHELL: Godwin doesn’t have the overall talent the top three players on this list do, but he is unparalleled in catching contested balls. According to Matt Harmon of NFL.com, Godwin converts contested catches at an 87.5-percent rate. That means if you throw the ball near him, he’s more than likely to come down with it. Godwin is able to do that in part because he knows how to use his body. He can box defenders out and has great leaping ability and strong hands to pry away the ball. He can be a little inconsistent with easier passes and needs to improve his blocking.

IN A NUT SHELL: Samuel is a great athlete and an intriguing second-round option, but he is an unpolished player. Used as an H-Back with the Buckeyes, Samuel’s best production came on screens and sweeps. He can do a little of everything but doesn’t do anything exceedingly well. Samuel catches with his body too much and needs to stop fighting the ball. He uses his quick twitch ability and speed to lose defenders, but a physical corner can knock him off his route.

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: An aggressive receiver who will highpoint the ball and tear it away from a defender? How could he not fit with the Packers? His likely second round value also makes him a potential option, as he could still be available for Green Bay’s second pick. Godwin can also run routes on any portion of the field and is especially dangerous on downfield routes.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Frankly, the body-catching and rough edges would likely give the team pause, though the versatility would be something Mike McCarthy would be attracted to. The problem is whether the team would use him properly. Ty Montgomery has the same basic (albeit far more polished) skillset and it doesn’t seem like the team maximizes him.

COOPER KUPP | WR6

JUJU SMITH-SCHUSTER | WR7

EASTERN WASHINGTON (SR)

USC (JR)

Measurables: Height: 6’2” | Weight: 204 lbs. | 40-yard dash: 4.62

Measurables: Height: 6’1” | Weight: 215 lbs. | Arms: 32” | Bench: 15 | 40-yard dash: 4.54

2016 Stats: 117 receptions, 1700 yards (14.5 YPC) 17 touchdowns

2016 Stats: 70 receptions, 914 yards, (13.1 YPC), 10 touchdowns

IN A NUT SHELL: Kupp was an incredibly productive college receiver, and set FSC career records for total receptions (428), receiving yards (6,464) and receiving touchdowns (73). He is a natural pass catcher, never fighting the ball. Kupp definitely has a “my ball” mentality and supreme confidence that he will outfight defenders on any given pass. He does struggle on underneath routes, where he often fails to get separation, which will give NFL quarterbacks smaller than desired windows. Kupp isn’t very quick and has a bit of a slow acceleration off the line, allowing defensive backs time to adjust and keep a cushion on him.

IN A NUT SHELL: A highly competitive, big-bodied target who is not afraid to go across the middle of the field, Smith-Schuster is an aggressive receiver. He needs to clean up his breaks during route running, and doesn’t accelerate well out of his cuts, leading to too many contested balls. While he thrives on those instances, it could hamper him at the pro level. He doesn’t have much vertical speed so he won’t get much cushion to work with. The lack of speed and quickness could be tough to overcome.

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Kupp lacks top end speed and the ability get open quickly. He struggles to get separation on underneath routes and is inexperience anywhere but in the slot. All of this makes him an initially limited player. But he can grow, and Green Bay has shown a willingness to be patient with receivers in the past.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: His size and aggressive ball-catching prowess make him a great fit for the Packers, but his lack of speed could make it hard for him to get separation, a problem for Green Bay receivers in recent years. That said, the Packers could take advantage of his size in the red zone—throw the ball up and let him get it.

ZAY JONES | WR8

ARDARIUS STEWART | WR9

EAST CAROLINA (SR)

ALABAMA (JR)

Measurables: Height: 6’2” | Weight: 201 lbs. | 4.45

Measurables: Height: 5’11” | Weight: 204 lbs. | 40-yard dash: 4.49

2016 Stats: 158 receptions, 1746 yards (11.1 YPC), 8 touchdowns

2016 Stats: 2015 Stats: 54 receptions, 864 yards (16 YPC), 8 touchdowns

IN A NUT SHELL: Jones’ father and uncle both played in the NFL, so he understands the game on a deep level and knows what it takes to succeed. Jones does a good job catching the ball away from his body, but also shows the savvy to bring it in and protect it from defenders. Both traits make Jones very effective in traffic and he’s not shy about taking a hit to make a catch. Jones does lack quality speed, and doesn’t have the ability to separate downfield consistently. Tight coverage is a problem for him, and a lot of his record-setting production came due to scheme.

IN A NUT SHELL: Stewart looked good last year despite Alabama’s freshman quarterback not being able to generate much passing attack. The Crimson Tide receiver missed two games due to an injury though, and one due to a suspension by coach Nick Saban. The year before, he started every game and was a big factor in the ‘Bama’s National Championship run. He’s ultimately an average player in terms of measurables, but has shown a propensity for big plays and a lot of heart. He creates some explosive plays on tape, making the most out of what he has to work with.

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: The high football IQ and character are attractive, as is the willingness to get in traffic and fight for the ball. If he can’t separate though, he’s going to struggle in this offense. While Aaron Rodgers will throw the ball into traffic, Jones may get swallowed up by NFL defenders.

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: The biggest question is whether he can replicate some of his big plays—which weren’t always consistent—against NFL defenses. Not having to jump right in and start would give him time to develop, and an experienced quarterback like Rodgers would put him in a position to succeed.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

CARLOS HENDERSON | WR10

TAYWAN TAYLOR | WR11

LOUISIANA TECH (JR)

WESTERN KENTUCKY (SR)

Measurables: Height: 5’11” | Weight: 199 lbs. | 40-yard dash: 4.46

Measurables: Height: 5’11” | Weight: 203 lbs. | 40-yard dash: 4.50

2016 Stats: 82 receptions, 1535 yards (18.7 YPC), 19 touchdowns

2016 Stats: 98 receptions, 1730 yards (17.7 YPC), 17 touchdowns

IN A NUT SHELL: Henderson is hoping to capitalize on a huge junior season, but probably should have gone back for another year. He runs good routes and can juke defenders, and has a nice extra gear on deeper routes. On the downside, he had no competition on a wide receiver-needy team and the offense didn’t challenge him to do more than basic route combinations. He rarely comes back for the ball and doesn’t track it well, either. His lack of size will also be an issue.

IN A NUT SHELL: Taylor played exclusively out of the slot, but was impressive doing so. He clearly has a great deal of athleticism and succeeded against both press coverage and off-man coverage. He feasted on a lot of screens as well as a few big plays, which skew his overall numbers a bit. He’s great along the sideline, showing focus and nice footwork to stay in bounds, but catches with his body too often and will lose focus, resulting in drops. Taylor also didn’t face high-level corners very often and sometimes seems hesitant to expose himself to safeties across the middle.

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: The inexperience with more complex route trees is a huge negative for a Packers prospect. The coaching staff would have to determine if Henderson could run—and understand— them. Was his limited route tree in college a function of the offensive scheme, or an indication of his limitations?

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: The slot attributes might make him attractive to Green Bay. He was very productive even against teams like Alabama, who he dropped 121 yards on last season. The big questions are whether he could improve his timing routes and if he can play tough across the middle—both critical for a Green Bay slot receiver.

CHAD HANSEN | WR12 CAL (JR) Measurables: Height: 6’2” | Weight: 202 lbs. | 40-yard dash: 4.53 2016 Stats: 2015 Stats: 92 receptions, 1249 yards (13.6 YPC), 11 touchdowns

IN A NUT SHELL: Hansen has a nice combination of size and speed, which could make him attractive for a team looking for an outside weapon. He runs his routes a little too upright, and can be a bit slow heading into his breaks. Hansen also struggles against physical press coverage. He does drive well off the line, and while he can struggle early on routes against press coverage, he effectively fights off grabby defenders at the top of his routes. Hansen shows great sideline awareness and does a nice job staying in bounds. FIT WITH THE PACKERS: He does have a fair amount to offer and we know Aaron Rodgers likes guys who can make plays along the sideline. If he was better off the line against press coverage, he might be more attractive, but his competitiveness for the ball would be a good fit. He’d be a bit of a project, but has upside.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

ISAIAH FORD | WR13

AMARA DARBOH | WR14

VIRGINIA TECH (JR)

MICHIGAN (SR)

IN A NUT SHELL: Ford is a really good athlete, but he’s a bit thin and could do with some added muscle to help him fend off defenders. He gets by on quickness and speed, but his route running needs to be refined.

IN A NUT SHELL: Darboh’s size and speed excites scouts. He’s not terribly sudden off the line, though, and builds to speed rather than exploding off the line. He catches the ball with his body too much.

MALACHI DUPRE | WR15

KENNY GOLLADAY | WR16

LSU (JR)

NORTHERN ILLINOIS (SR)

IN A NUT SHELL: Dupre is a tall, athletic receiver who could stand to add some more muscle and mass. But he’s a very versatile prospect who can play all over the offense.

IN A NUT SHELL: Golladay can go vertical effectively, but the rest of his route running skills are severely lacking. He can get up some good speed if he has a clear lane to run in, so press coverage at the pro level will be an issue. He is very raw, but has a lot of potential.

NOAH BROWN | WR17

SHELTON GIBSON | WR18

OHIO STATE (rSO)

WEST VIRGINIA (JR)

IN A NUT SHELL: Brown has immense size and knows how to use it, but lost 2015 to a broken leg. Couple that with just one game played in 2014 and we’re looking at a guy with just 14 games under his belt. If a team can be patient he could be a beast, but he has a lot to learn.

IN A NUT SHELL: Gibson can stretch the field with some heavy speed and can get under a ball when a quarterback goes too long. He can be inconsistent with his hands and sometimes gets gun-shy when going across the middle.

DEDE WESTBROOK | WR19

ARTAVIS SCOTT | WR20

OKLAHOMA (SR)

CLEMSON (JR)

IN A NUT SHELL: With his speed, Westbrook seems like a natural outside fit. But his thin frame is a huge concern. It’s hard to imagine him fighting off any corner who decides to get physical.

IN A NUT SHELL: Scott does a nice job using his body to shield the ball from defenders, but he’s simply too small, and he doesn’t have the speed or quickness to overcome it. He can play special teams, which could keep him on a roster.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

Ralph Mancini

1) O.J. Howard (ALABAMA) 2) Evan Engram (OLE MISS) 3) David Njoku (MIAMI) 4) “Bucky” Hodges (VIRGINIA TECH) 5) Jordan Leggett (CLEMSON) 6) Jake Butt (MICHIGAN) 7) Jeremy Sprinkle (ARKANSAS) 8) Gerald Everett (SOUTH ALABAMA) 9) Adam Shaheen (ASHLAND) 10) Michael Roberts (TOLEDO) 11) Cole Hikutini (LOUISVILLE) 12) Jonnu Smith (FLORIDA INT'L) 13) Blake Jarwin (OKLAHOMA STATE) 14) Josiah Price (MICHIGAN STATE) 15) Cethan Carter (NEBRASKA) 16) Hayden Plinke (UTEP) 17) Antony Auclair (L'UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL) 18) Eric Saubert (DRAKE) 19) George Kittle (IOWA) 20) Sean Culkin (MISSOURI)

ADDITIONAL PLAYERS / NOT FEATURED

21) Scott Orndoff (PITT) 22) Darrell Daniels (WASHINGTON) 23) Pharaoh Brown (OREGON) 24) Billy Freeman (SAN JOSÉ STATE) 25) Taylor McNamara (USC)

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

IN A NUT SHELL: Howard’s natural running and receiving skills make him the top prospect in this year’s draft class by a comfortable margin. His soft 10-inch hands allow him to make contested catches, as well as executing long plays in stride. The former five-star recruit is a smooth route runner that doesn’t need to gather himself when he tries to tack on yards after the catch. In fact, Howard has the ability to generate remarkable speed with every downfield stride, which gives him a breakaway quality that’s uncommon among bigger tight ends. An added bonus from this SEC product is his competitiveness. Howard rarely goes down at first contact; he would much rather throw his shoulder at a defender and bang out a few more yards instead of running out of bounds. During his four years in Tuscaloosa, the Alabama native was effective both in-line and in the backfield, where he would occasionally be on the receiving end of shovel passes. As a ball carrier, Howard ran low and hard just as a fullback would. This future first-round pick has improved appreciably as a blocker by properly using his hands to get inside his man. His big hands, long arms and wide base are all qualities that make him the type of player that should be able to handle

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

his share of defensive ends in one-on-one battles. Howard’s numbers at the collegiate level weren’t indicative of his overall elite skill set. His lack of production as a Crimson Tide is widely thought to be due to poor coaching on the part of the offensive coaching staff. VS. TOP OPPONENT: For a second consecutive year, Howard lit up Clemson’s defense in the National Championship rematch. He blew by Van Smith on a well-executed play, in which he drew in the safety by pretending to block for Calvin Ridley, walking in with a 68-yard touchdown. No. 88 also pulverized a Tiger defender on Bo Scarborough’s first touchdown run. Howard finished the night with 106 yards on four receptions. FIT WITH THE PACKERS: The 22-year-old tight end has all the tools to contribute as a three-down tight end, although he would need to bide his time behind the recently acquired duo of Martellus Bennett and Lance Kendricks. If Howard ends up being Green Bay’s pick in the first round, it would spell the end for the plodding Richard Rodgers.

IN A NUT SHELL: Ole Miss’ all-time receptions leader at the tight end position runs and moves like a receiver. His burst after the catch makes him a threat to explode for big plays on short screens, as well as on intermediate and deep passes. There might be a handful of linebackers at the next level that could handle Engram’s ability to fluidly transition in and out of his breaks— but not many. His deep speed exposes defenses, splitting the safeties down the middle. The three-year starter is blessed with the type of leaping ability ideal for 50/50 balls and one-on-one fades in the end zone. Engram’s body control and quick hands are tools he uses to contort his frame and come down with difficult receptions. While the Georgia-born prospect can line up outside, in the slot or in the backfield, he is not an in-line tight end. He may be a willing blocker, but that doesn’t mean he’s able to take on most down linemen or outside linebackers, who will likely outweigh him by at least 15 pounds at the next level. His lack of bulk also prevents him from being the type of tight end that can body-up a defender on shallow routes. He will certainly benefit from an NFL strength and conditioning program. Along with his acceleration and downfield speed, this NFL hopeful’s route-

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

running prowess and route-recognition skills give him the potential to be a featured part of any offense. The Jordan Reed comparisons aren’t merely hype. BACKGROUND: The 22-year-old was a three-star recruit out of Hillgrove in Powder Springs, GA. Engram was ranked as the 27th tight end in the country by ESPN before committing to Ole Miss. He has packed on about 25 pounds since his Hillgrove days, where he played wide receiver. FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Unable to line up in the “Y” position versus bigger, stronger players, Engram will start out in a specialized role as a rookie. Look for Green Bay to work him in four-receiver packages either outside or in the slot where they will try to match him up against a linebacker or box safety. Putting Engram and Martellus Bennett on the field simultaneously would present a myriad of problems to an undermanned defense. Look for Mike McCarthy to bring him along slowly as the third tight end while the young buck fills out.

IN A NUT SHELL: Njoku can be deadly lined up in the slot, where his size, speed and aggressiveness make him hard to defend on inbreaking routes. The Undeclared Arts & Sciences major is masterful in reeling in throws in tight spaces, which makes him a go-to target on fade patterns in the end zone. The two-year starter is lean and very capable of making acrobatic plays, but has the wide frame to pack on a few more pounds of muscle. No. 86’s broad shoulders do allow him to excel in the post-up game. Njoku was frequently targeted on shallow hitch routes over the past two seasons and demonstrated remarkable balance, staying on his feet while running through contact after the catch. He will drop his share of catchable passes due to a lack of focus. Njoku’s concentration lapses will sometimes occur when he lets the presence of an oncoming defender distract him. The former Hurricane takes his blocking assignments seriously and exhibits adequate footwork, but he lacks the upper-body strength to be dominant in the trenches. Njoku

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

looks more like a useful help blocker in the pro game rather than a tight end that can handle an edge defender on his own. The New Jersey native only has nine starts under his belt, making him a raw specimen. This is particularly evident in his route running, as he tends to round out his cuts instead of executing sudden and sharp movements. BACKGROUND: This high school track-and-field athlete was a champion high jumper at the New Balance Nationals Outdoor in 2014. He played wide receiver at the New Jersey-based Cedar Grove High School. FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Njoku’s lack of experience makes him a project. Lance Kendricks will be safe in his role as the TE2 in 2017, while the ACC import learns blocking schemes and refines his ability to run patterns against NFL defenders, who will not be overwhelmed by the future rookie’s size and athletic tools.

TEMUCHIN “BUCKY” HODGES | TE4

JORDAN LEGGETT | TE5

VIRGINIA TECH (rJR)

CLEMSON (SR)

Measurables: Height: 6’6” | Weight: 257 lbs. | Arms: 33” | Bench: 18 | 40-yard dash: 4.57

Measurables: Height: 6’5 ½” | Weight: 258 lbs. | Arms: 33 ½” | Bench: 18 | 40-yard dash: n/a

2016 Stats: 48 receptions, 691 yards (14.4 YPC), 7 touchdowns

2016 Stats: 46 receptions, 736 yards (16.0 YPC), 7 touchdowns

IN A NUT SHELL:

The converted high school quarterback is a long and agile passcatching weapon that can overwhelm defenders with his size and straight-line speed. In addition, Hodges utilizes his strength to fight off defenders in contested situations and he effectively shields his opponents with his enormous frame. The three-time All-ACC performer’s long strides allow him to be a target on deep throws, where he can engulf defensive backs with his size. Hodges’ footwork along the sidelines is just as impressive, as he will often find a way to keep his feet in bounds. As a pure pass catcher, Hodges will need to be coached on how to make adjustments in his routes. He’ll need to learn when it’s best to break his route off instead of relying on his brute force to take on defenders. He also needs to show more consistent hands, as he has a tendency to trap passes against his frame. From a blocking perspective, Hodges is a higheffort player who does a fine job redirecting in space. But he doesn’t always shoot out his hands quickly enough to strike the defender, which leads to missed assignments.

One thing that immediately pops out when watching Leggett is his ability to cleanly secure the football inside his big, soft hands. The former Tiger is a smooth, flexible pass catcher that can routinely adjust to off-target throws. The John Mackey Award finalist is a master at running straight into the teeth of zone coverage and turning back to find a favorable hole to sit in for his quarterback. Leggett regularly beat linebackers and box defenders on short in-breaking routes by using his lateral quickness to gain separation. On the flip side, Leggett is self-admittedly the type of player that can get “lazy.” He will need to work on becoming more sudden out of his breaks by using his lower body to change directions. The Florida-born prospect can also be a bit lackadaisical in the way secures the ball after the catch. Leggett shows potential as a blocker when he quickly shoots his hands out and gets them inside the chest of his opponent, but he’ll need to exhibit more knee bend at the next level. The 22-year-old aspiring pro doesn’t always seem to give it his all as a run blocker. He’ll stand and watch players go by him instead of getting on his horse to catch up to the oncoming defender.

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Hodges is a raw, but extremely talented prospect that needs to be developed. Green Bay would be an ideal spot for the young man to watch and learn from two quality veterans, such as Martellus Bennett and Lance Kendricks.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Leggett has tremendous potential to blossom into a reliable security blanket in the mold of Jason Witten—if he learns how to work. If not, he’ll be out of the league in three or four years. He’d have every opportunity to flourish behind Martellus Bennett and Lance Kendricks.

JAKE BUTT | TE6

JEREMY SPRINKLE | TE7

MICHIGAN (SR)

ARKANSAS (SR)

Measurables: Height: 6’5 ½” | Weight: 246 lbs. | Arms: 32” | Bench: n/a | 40-yard dash: n/a

Measurables: Height: 6’5” | Weight: 252 lbs. | Arms: 34 ½” | Bench: n/a | 40-yard dash: 4.69

2016 Stats: 46 receptions, 546 yards (11.9 YPC), 4 touchdowns

2016 Stats: 43 receptions, 698 yards (16.2 YPC), 8 touchdowns

IN A NUT SHELL:

There are flashier tight ends out there, but not many that could match Butt’s production during his time in Ann Arbor. The Big Ten product doesn’t win with breakaway speed or elusiveness; he makes plays by using great technique in getting off the line of scrimmage with subtle push-offs and shoulder fakes to gain separation. The other thing that Butt does better than most is catch the football. He secures everything that’s thrown his way, displaying an ability to extend and adjust for balls that are slightly outside his immediate vicinity. The two-time Big Ten Conference Tight End of the Year gained quite a few of his yards on shallow crosses versus zone coverage, where he would use his strength to drag defenders past the first down marker.

Sprinkle is a traditional in-line tight end, but he also contributes to the passing game. He can establish position on post-up routes over the middle, and is quite adept at making contested catches. His monstrous 10 ¾” hands and vine-like arms afford him quite an advantage over many defenders when fighting for the football. This well-rounded short-to-intermediate pass-catching weapon is a long-strider that may not have the instant acceleration of Evan Engram, but generates impressive speed the deeper he gets into his patterns. Moreover, Sprinkle demonstrates above-average agility in the way he can hit the deck for low passes. The area in which the converted high school offensive lineman struggles most is securing the catch. To that end, Sprinkle needs to curb his tendency to trap the ball to his body and try to become more of a hands catcher. The former Razorback is a fine blocker that can line up at fullback or at the line of scrimmage, and handle both outside linebackers and blitzing inside linebackers. Sprinkle has all the physical traits to eventually be able to take on bigger lineman one-on-one as long as he adds bulk to his upper body in an NFL strength and conditioning program.

The former Wolverine also has a knack for identifying small creases to run through, as well as exhibiting the savviness to take good angles. But while Butt did line up as a traditional “Y” in Jim Harbaugh’s pro-style attack, he’s not the dominant blocker you would imagine him to be. He struggles sustaining blocks against skilled and athletic defenders. The sure-handed prospect is currently recovering from a torn ACL, which factored into his sixth-place ranking.

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Butt is a multi-faceted tight end that will have no pressure to produce immediately, giving him time to recover from his torn ACL. In fact, it wouldn’t be surprising to see him land on IR in his rookie campaign. The promising draft pick would compete with Lance Kendricks for the TE2 role in his second year.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

As a rookie, Sprinkle can be inserted in three-tight-end formations or even occasionally as a fullback in short yardage and goal line plays. He’ll need to refine his route running and pass catching to excel at the NFL level.

GERALD EVERETT | TE8

ADAM SHAHEEN | TE9

SOUTH ALABAMA (SR)

ASHLAND (rJR)

Measurables: Height: 6’3” | Weight: 239 lbs. | Arms: 33” | Bench: 22 | 40-yard dash: 4.62

Measurables: Height: 6’6 ½” | Weight: 278 lbs. | Arms: 33 ½” | Bench: 24 | 40-yard dash: n/a

2016 Stats: 49 receptions, 717 yards (14.6 YPC), 4 touchdowns

2016 Stats: 48 receptions, 691 yards (14.4 YPC), 7 touchdowns

IN A NUT SHELL:

This fleet-footed senior is not only built like a receiver, he very much plays like one, possessing the speed to stretch the field and make plays at all three levels. Everett’s smooth release off the line and instant acceleration into his routes make him the type of player that always has to be accounted for. The former high school basketball player’s quick hands and considerable catch radius make him a quarterback’s best friend in the red zone, particularly on slants and fades versus tight coverage. Everett did not benefit from the luxury of playing with highly skilled passers, but managed to make the most of his opportunities. While the Jaguars’ top receiving tight end was never the biggest at his position, he proved capable of sitting in between defenders and coming down with completions in highly congested quarters. Everett also exhibits superior balance, elusiveness in the open field and the tenacity to fight for extra yardage. The small school product’s hands are comparatively small (8 ½”), but they’ve never impeded his ability to secure the ball. His route running is underdeveloped, though, and will need to be improved as a pro. Everett is an aggressive, but unskilled blocker that needs to polish the basics of taking on defenders, including establishing a wide base, getting hands into the defender’s breast plate and maintaining proper knee bend.

Sheehan is a monstrous performer, both in terms of sheer size and the dominance he consistently achieved at the Division II level. He often looked like a man among boys, shedding would-be tacklers with ease. But Sheehan is not a big, plodding colossus. Rather, the Ohio native is agile and explosive, allowing him to gain separation and bust loose for chunk plays. He is a natural runner that can make sharp cuts and possesses the athletic ability to extend and dive for balls thrown outside his reach. One can’t help but think of Rob Gronkowski when watching this unique prospect in action. His efforts as a blocker are indicative of a heady competitor that can anticipate blitz schemes, twists and stunts. Unfortunately for Sheehan, his lesser Division II competition raises questions from some scouts about his ability to replicate his success at the sport’s highest level.

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: If Shaheen is even close to being as physically overpowering during training camp and preseason as he was in college, he could see immediately reps in Green Bay’s offense. Though, he’ll probably require at least half a season to truly get comfortable with NFL blocking schemes and more elaborate route concepts.

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Everett’s presence in the lineup would be like having an extra receiver on the field and could be utilized in four and five-receiver packages. His 240-pound frame and movement skills would most likely make him better suited for an H-back role, requiring him to block similarly-sized inside linebackers rather than lining up over larger edge players.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

MICHAEL ROBERTS | TE10

COLE HIKUTINI | TE11

TOLEDO (SR)

LOUISVILLE (SR)

Measurables: Height: 6’4” | Weight: 270 lbs. | Arms: 33 ¼” | Bench: n/a | 40-yard dash: 4.86

Measurables: Height: 6’4” | Weight: 247 lbs. | Arms: 32 ¾” | Bench: 20 | 40-yard dash: n/a

2016 Stats: 45 receptions, 533 yards (11.8 YPC), 16 touchdowns

2016 Stats: 50 receptions, 668 yards (13.4 YPC), 8 touchdowns

IN A NUT SHELL: As a big, wide tight end that can block out the sun against smaller linebacker and defensive backs, Roberts is at his best on short-to-intermediate routes that put him in a postup position. His 11 ½” hands make him an inviting target that has the body control to extend outside his frame and tuck away off-target throws. Roberts uses his large frame to run through would-be tacklers for yards after the catch. But the Mid-American Conference standout is not a fluid runner. He’ll often gear down and gather himself in his breaks. He has little-to-no explosiveness and won’t run away from people, let alone make them miss. Roberts shows the potential to be a tremendous in-line run blocker when he properly bends and squares up his man. He has all the traits of a traditional in-line blocker, but his form, technique and balance will need to be improved by NFL coaching.

IN A NUT SHELL: The JUCO transfer was a downfield weapon in Bobby Petrino’s offense, beating defensive backs with his length and linebackers with his second-level speed. Hikutini tracks the ball well over his shoulder, exhibiting great focus in looking the ball into his hands. He often gains separation from quick motion out of his breaks, which makes him a quarterback’s best friend on safe throws across the middle. But while Hikutini runs out his patterns with precision, his route tree at Louisville was very limited. The pride of Sacramento, CA is very proficient at using his frame to body up defensive backs to come down with jump balls.

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Roberts’ combination of hands and size could see him blossom as a Bubba Franks type, particularly near the goal line. He would have TE2 upside as a Green Bay Packer, but would probably be used as an additional offensive lineman in run-heavy formations in the early going.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

No. 18 is a high-effort blocker and is willing to dive in order to create space for his running back, but he’ll rarely overpower people. For the most part, Hikutini will get in the way and do just enough to delay the defender from making contact with the ball carrier. Hikutini is raw, playing just one year of high school football. FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Hikutini has NFL pass-catching skills, but he will probably never be an in-line tight end. Any team, including the Packers, would need to develop him on the practice squad in hopes of making him a second or third-string move tight end. The former Cardinal’s lack of special-teams experience may retard his emergence as a mainstay on the active roster.

IN A NUT SHELL: Smith is an impressive physical specimen that beats defenders with his remarkable burst, as well as making people miss with fluid hips. His lateral agility allows him to gain a step on defenders. All that said, the four-year starter lacks the ability to cleanly haul in passes on a consistent basis. Jones waits too long for the ball to enter his frame instead of plucking it in mid-air. This deficiency will get him eaten alive by pro defensive backs who are more aggressive in undercutting routes. As a blocker, the former high school weightlifter look very much like a receiver trying to play tight end. His effort and movement skills help him get in the way of defenders, but don’t expect Smith to move anyone off the ball. FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Smith is a developmental player at the next level that will need to hone his craft on the practice squad. The FIU product has the athletic traits to be a contributor on offense and special teams, but there are too many holes in his game to project him as a future TE1.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

BLAKE JARWIN | TE13

JOSIAH PRICE | TE14

OKLAHOMA STATE (rSR)

MICHIGAN STATE (SR)

IN A NUT SHELL: Jarwin is a blue-collar tight end with soft hands and wide catch radius. He makes plays in traffic and along the sidelines. He’s a better pass protector than run blocker.

IN A NUT SHELL: Price is a versatile tight end that quickly gets into his routes and employs effective head and shoulder fakes to get open. He can lead block as a fullback.

CETHAN CARTER | TE15

HAYDEN PLINKE | TE16

NEBRASKA (SR)

UTEP (SR)

IN A NUT SHELL: Carter is sudden player that employs stutter moves to get into his routes. He makes plays using burst and body control, but lacks lower-body strength and doesn’t sustain blocks.

IN A NUT SHELL: Plinke is a large-framed, physical blocker at that point of attack who plays to the whistle. He’s far from a seam stretcher, but he adjusts well to off-target throws. He’s very flexible for a big man.

ANTONY AUCLAIR | TE17

ERIC SAUBERT | TE18

L'UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL | QUEBEC, CA (SR)

DRAKE (SR)

IN A NUT SHELL: Auclair can take on bigger defenders as a blocker and even dominate them when he uses proper technique. He’s not fast, but he’s a smooth, decisive and aggressive athlete that uses his size to his advantage.

IN A NUT SHELL: One of the top route runners in this class, Saubert is effective on both sideline plays and back-shoulder throws, and can high point the ball in traffic—though he’s prone to drops. Saubert is a very poor blocker.

GEORGE KITTLE | TE19

SEAN CULKIN | TE20

IOWA (SR)

MISSOURI (SR)

IN A NUT SHELL: Kittle is a strong pro-style run blocker that can steer defenders out of the play. He gets out on the edge and blocks on the move. He has reliable hands, but lacks burst and struggles to gain separation.

IN A NUT SHELL: Culkin is a big, boxy performer with sure hands that can hold his own as a run blocker and pass protector. He’s not an exciting prospect, but could be useful.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

"Jersey Al" Bracco

1) Cam Robinson (ALABAMA) 2) Garett Bolles (UTAH) 3) Ryan Ramczyk (WISCONSIN) 4) Antonio Garcia (TROY) 5) Roderick Johnson (FLORIDA STATE) 6) David Sharpe (FLORIDA) 7) Zach Banner (USC) 8) Will Holden (VANDERBILT) 9) Adam Bisnowaty (PITT) 10) Julieâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;n Davenport (BUCKNELL) 11) Chad Wheeler (USC) 12) Justin Senior (MISSISSIPPI STATE) 13) Erik Magnuson (MICHIGAN) 14) Conor McDermott (UCLA) 15) Dan Skipper (ARKANSAS) 16) Jerry Ugokwe (WILLIAM AND MARY) 17) Javarius Leamon (S. CAROLINA ST.) 18) Victor Salako (OKLAHOMA STATE) 19) Storm Norton (TOLEDO) 20) Sam Tevi (UTAH)

ADDITIONAL PLAYERS / NOT FEATURED

21) Danial Brunskill (SAN DIEGO STATE) 22) Cole Croston (IOWA) 23) Joseph Dieugot (FLORIDA INT'L) 24) Eric Smith (VIRGINIA) 25) Jon Heck (NORTH CAROLINA)

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

IN A NUT SHELL: A starter from the first day he walked onto campus, Robinson anchored the Tide’s left tackle spot for the last three seasons and was named the Outland Trophy Award-winner for the 2016 season. Robinson’s run blocking approach is to try to bury the defender, which he does effectively if allowed a few steps to pick up steam. He was asked to be on the move quite a bit—surprising for a tackle of his size—from zone blocking schemes to inside trap blocks to pulling outside on screens. He performed it all with grace for his size. As a pass blocker, he has slightly above-average feet. While not light footed, his technique is precise and he is able to mirror effectively. He tends to take an aggressive approach to pass blocking, looking to land an early punch to disrupt his opponent’s momentum. This sometimes results in him lunging a bit, which could lead to balance issues. However, he uses his hands extremely well and recovers well. The competition for the top spot in these rankings was closer than it has been in several years. Robinson gets the nod for being battletested, playing three years in the SEC.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

VS. TOP OPPONENT: Cam Robinson faced a litany of top pass rushers during the 2016 season, but none presented more of a challenge than Texas A&M’s Myles Garrett—the likely #1 overall pick in this year’s draft. Robinson was up to the task, neutralizing the speedy and hard-charging Garrett, giving up no sacks and limiting him to a single QB hurry. While Garrett did have seven tackles in A&M’s 33-14 loss to the Tide, none came when matched against Robinson. Robinson moved way up on many NFL Scouts’ rankings after that performance. FIT WITH THE PACKERS: With David Bakhtiari under contract through the 2020 season, Robinson would be battling with Jason Spriggs in an attempt to push Bryan Bulaga out the door at right tackle (think cap savings). Right tackle could very well prove to be the perfect position for Robinson anyway, with a move inside to guard also a possibility.

IN A NUT SHELL: Bolles is an unusual mix at offensive tackle. In one sense, he’s a finesse tackle with great feet and mobility. On the other hand—though not a powerful blocker—he has a lot of nastiness and clearly revels in embarrassing opponents whenever possible. Bolles can handle speed rushers easily in pass protection, as he proved when he took on UCLA’s Takkarist McKinley (see video). He moves fluidly from side to side, mirroring well and comfortably handling stunts and inside moves. He does need to develop a better punch, and he can get knocked off balance by a power rusher. In run blocking, Bolles doesn’t have a powerful leg drive and tends to play too upright. But he’s very effective at reach blocks and walling off defenders. Utah had him pulling quite a bit— and with good reason; he leads the back through the hole like a fullback. When he has a defender blocked, regardless of where the ball is, he doesn’t stop until he’s laying on top of him or the whistle blows—Nasty. Bolles showed off his athleticism among the offensive line group at the Combine with the best time in the three-cone drill, second best 20yard shuttle, third best 40-yard dash, and second best 10-

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

yard split. The only things keeping Bolles from being #1 in these rankings are his relative lack of experience against top competition and his age. BACKGROUND: Bolles is an older prospect (he will turn 25 in May), the result of some troubled teenage years that interrupted his football career. To his credit, after being out of school and football for two years, he got his life in order and enrolled in Utah’s Snow College, a top JUCO program. After two years there, he was recruited by top FBS schools, ultimately choosing to stay in his home state. FIT WITH THE PACKERS: The presence of Bolles on this Packers team would create a logjam of offensive tackle talent sitting on the bench and would surely hasten a move to guard for either Kyle Murphy or Jason Spriggs. If not for the long-term commitment the Packers made to David Bakhtiari, Bolles would be a threat to take over the left tackle spot in year one or two.

IN A NUT SHELL: Ramczyk is a Division III transfer who was a quick “one and done” with the Badgers, manning the left tackle spot for the 2016 season. Ramczyk displays good technique and footwork in pass protection. He rarely loses control and mirrors well. The Badger lineman does seem susceptible to spin moves and tends to give up too much ground in pass protection, taking deep drops to compensate for a “just adequate” kick-slide. As a run blocker, Ramczyk is fast off the snap, with an explosive first few steps to win the line of scrimmage. He maintains good pad level and shows a powerful leg drive while executing a variety of blocks. He easily gets downfield to the second level, showing good agility. One concern with Ramczyk is an inconsistent level of effort. He tends to release from blocks too soon, rather than playing to the whistle and doesn’t seem to possess a mean streak. If he can find that extra motivation, Ramczyk will be a long-time starter in the NFL.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

COLLEGE EXPERIENCE: After high school, Ramczyk signed with Division II Winona State, but never attended the school. Instead, he spent a year at a technical college with no football team before enrolling at UW – Stevens Point. After two years there, he decided to follow his dream to play for the Badgers. After sitting out the required one season in 2015 he spent the 2016 season as the Badgers’ starting left tackle. FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Ramczyk would best be viewed as a potential replacement for Bryan Bulaga at right tackle. With only one year at the FBS level, it would be best for him to spend a year or two in the weight room and get coached up.

ANTONIO GARCIA | OT4

RODERICK JOHNSON | OT5

TROY (rSR)

FLORIDA STATE (JR)

Measurables: Height: 6’6” | Weight: 293 lbs. | Arms: 32 ½" | Bench: 24 40-yard dash: 5.15 | 10-yard split: 1.81

Measurables: Height: 6’7” | Weight: 298 lbs. | Arms: 36" | Bench: DNP 40-yard dash: DNP | 10-yard split: n/a

IN A NUT SHELL: A former basketball player, Garcia looks the part out in space. He displays outstanding footwork and mirrors edge rushers as well as any tackle in this draft. When he latches on to someone, he is looking for a way to take him to the ground. Garcia plays with nastiness to the whistle and has mastered the skill of holding and letting go just in time to avoid a penalty. He doesn’t yet possess a powerful lower body and has played in the range of 280-290 lbs. He will require some work in the weight room to bulk up his core and legs, but he has all the skills you want from a modern day left tackle.

IN A NUT SHELL: Johnson has the physical dimensions and traits offensive line coaches drool over, but lacks refinement in his footwork and technique. He’s a confirmed waist-bender who always seems to be reaching for the defender, satisfied to use his long wingspan rather than move his feet. Johnson possesses a strong punch and powerful upper body that he uses to control defenders. He can get to the next level with ease, moving surprisingly well for a man his size. Only 21, he could stand to absorb a few years of solid coaching to help him reach his enormous potential.

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Garcia would bring a good dose of needed attitude to the Packers offensive line, especially with TJ Lang leaving the team. He would likely battle Jason Spriggs for the role of primary backup tackle in year one. Alternatively, with his short arms and nasty attitude, the Packers could use him as Lang’s replacement at guard.

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Johnson’s key to earning a roster spot would be the ability to back up multiple positions on the offensive line, supplanting the Packers’ resident jack-of-all-trades, Don Barclay. As an offensive tackle, Johnson likely fits best on the right side for the Packers, and would have to beat out Kyle Murphy to earn that backup spot.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

DAVID SHARPE | OT6

ZACH BANNER | OT7

FLORIDA (JR)

USC (rSR)

Measurables: Height: 6’6” | Weight: 343 lbs. | Arms: 35 ⅜" | Bench: 19 40-yard dash: 5.44 | 10-yard split: 1.90

Measurables: Height: 6’8” | Weight: 353 lbs. | Arms: 34 ⅞" | Bench: 22 40-yard dash: 5.58 | 10-yard split: 1.92

IN A NUT SHELL: A two-year starter for the Gators, Sharpe faced some of the best pass rushers in the country. He proved formidable as a run blocker, handling the likes of Alabama’s Jonathan Allen rather comfortably. Struggles surfaced when faced with pure speed on the edge. Still, the former basketball player has movement skills you just don’t see in guys his size (348 lbs.). Many project him as a guard, but with some proper coaching on technique, Sharpe could be the sleeper in an uninspiring tackle class.

IN A NUT SHELL: Despite being in the 90th percentile as far as size goes for offensive tackles, Banner is not the plodder you might expect. He can pull effectively and get downfield when asked. If there’s a lineman you want to run behind on the goal line, Banner is your guy. He is a true people mover, even though he’s not the fastest out of the blocks—as his 1.94 10-yard split in the 40 at the Combine confirms. Pass rushers with multiple moves will give him issues, as he’s prone to losing his balance. Banner is an old school prototype right tackle that could easily move inside to guard.

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Sharpe would be a bit of a departure for the type of offensive tackle the Packers normally draft. Although he dropped some weight for the Combine, they would likely ask him to get down to the 330 lb range to help him better fit their zone blocking scheme. Sharpe is strictly a right tackle or guard prospect for the Packers.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: With the Packers in need of a replacement for TJ Lang, Banner could be an interesting “out of the norm” option. He would surely help solve some of the short yardage woes the Packers seem to have had the last few years. His pass protection would improve not having to be out in space, but as a 6’8” interior lineman, he would need to play with consistent pad level to avoid impacting Rodgers’ vision downfield.

WILL HOLDEN | OT8

ADAM BISNOWATY | OT9

VANDERBILT (rSR)

PITT (rSR)

Measurables: Height: 6’7” | Weight: 311 lbs. | Arms: 33 ¼" | Bench: 23 40-yard dash: 5.47 | 10-yard split: 1.83

Measurables: Height: 6’5” | Weight: 305 lbs. | Arms: 33 ⅞" | Bench: 23 40-yard dash: 5.23 | 10-yard split: 1.83

IN A NUT SHELL: Holden is a strong, physical player who does his best work in the run game. He is effective using a combination of physicality and good technique, but athleticism is not his forte. Despite his good 10-yard split time in the 40 at the Combine (1.83), he doesn’t display that speed on tape. In pass protection, his feet are not left-tackle worthy. He has balance issues and adjusts poorly to spin moves. He compensates with physicality, but it’s not always enough.

IN A NUT SHELL: The former high school wrestler was a two-time First Team All-ACC selection for the Panthers. His best work is done in the running game, when he is attacking with aggression. He was on the move a lot in the Panthers’ offense, but that’s not to say he was particularly good at it. He is often late finding his target and whiffs too frequently when blocking downfield. In pass protection, he struggles with speed rushers, displaying a very short and choppy kick-slide. His best work in pass protection is when he attacks the rusher with pre-emptive strikes. It is worth noting that his 11 3/8” hands were a full half inch longer than any other offensive line prospect at the Combine.

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: At first glance, Holden may remind you of TJ Lang’s college days, but it’s unlikely that Holden could step right in to Lang’s old spot. Still, a move inside to guard would likely be best for him, and at worst, he could challenge Don Barclay for the interior line multi-purpose backup spot.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Bisnowaty was very successful manning the left side for the Panthers in their run-heavy offense. In the pass-happy NFL, his skills won’t translate so smoothly. The Packers would be unlikely to entrust him with protecting Aaron Rodgers. Ted Thompson doesn’t draft guards; he drafts college tackles and moves them inside. That would be the likely path for Bisnowaty.

JULIE’N DAVENPORT | OT10

CHAD WHEELER | OT11

BUCKNELL (SR)

USC (rSR)

Measurables: Height: 6’7” | Weight: 318 lbs. | Arms: 36 ½" | Bench: 18 40-yard dash: 5.45 | 10-yard split: 1.88

Measurables: Height: 6’7” | Weight: 306 lbs. | Arms: 33 ⅛" | Bench: 15 40-yard dash: 5.48 | 10-yard split: 1.89

IN A NUT SHELL: If looks were everything, Davenport would be a future AllPro left tackle by NFL standards. The former basketball player has the physical traits and athleticism, but does he have the heart and the desire? Davenport is very efficient in pass protection, using this 36 ½" arms to control pass rushers. He does not show much power, however, and generally plays too high, making him very susceptible to getting knocked off balance. If he can get stronger and show some more toughness, Davenport could be a very worthwhile development prospect. He looked very fluid in the field drills at the Combine.

IN A NUT SHELL: Wheeler is a fluid athlete and an efficient move blocker. He gets downfield easily and shows a high football IQ. His footwork in pass protection is slightly above average, but he lacks an effective punch to keep rushers from getting into his body. That can be a problem as he doesn’t display much core strength and is susceptible to the bull rush, sometimes getting tossed aside by power rushers. Some question his hustle, and he has a worrisome injury history.

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: As a tackle-only prospect, there would seem to be little room for Davenport in the Packers’ offensive line group. Could they afford to keep him on the roster for two years or so and get him stronger? That would likely only occur if any of their backup tackles get moved to guard.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: While Wheeler’s best fit will be with a zone blocking team, he would have a difficult time breaking onto the current Packers offensive line group. His best opportunity could be at guard, but his lack of strength would be a major concern. Wheeler doesn’t appear to have a high ceiling in the NFL.

IN A NUT SHELL: Senior has right tackle written all over him (a position he manned for the last 3 seasons for the Bulldogs). He’s not particularly agile, but moves well enough for a zone blocking system. He plays with aggression and is mostly successful at imposing his will when needed. Senior has adequate feet, but shows excellent use of his hands. He keeps his arms inside and lands multiple punches to disrupt the rusher, allowing him to mirror effectively. FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Senior doesn’t have the feet to play left tackle, so he would likely find a spot as a Don Barclay type—albeit with more upside. He has just enough athleticism and is a battler. This could be another of the Packers’ classic tackle-to-guard conversions waiting to happen.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

ERIK MAGNUSON | OT13

CONOR MCDERMOTT | OT14

MICHIGAN (rSR)

UCLA (rSR)

IN A NUT SHELL: It’s a bit of a mystery why the First-Team Big-10 selection was not invited to the NFL Combine. Magnuson started 36 games for the Wolverines, including 23 at right tackle and seven at guard.

IN A NUT SHELL: A highly regarded hoopster in high school, McDermott is a lanky 6’8” with better straight-line athleticism than agility. He manned the left tackle spot for the Bruins, but still appears to be an underpowered basketball player that can be manhandled.

DAN SKIPPER | OT15

JERRY UGOKWE | OT16

ARKANSAS (SR)

WILLIAM AND MARY (SR)

IN A NUT SHELL: Skipper is a plodding sort when in motion, but gets points for being a grind-it-out type of guy who plays to the whistle and is not interested in being nice on the field. He’s likely an all-purpose backup in the NFL.

IN A NUT SHELL: After coming to W&M as a walk-on, Ugokwe went on to become a 4-year starter after a red-shirt season. Still relatively new to the game, the 6-foot-7, 321-pound Ugokwe has shown improvement every year, and his impressive frame earned him a Combine invite from curious scouts looking to take a closer look.

JAVARIUS LEAMON | OT17

VICTOR SALAKO | OT18

S. CAROLINA ST. (rSR)

OKLAHOMA STATE (rSR)

IN A NUT SHELL: Leamon is an athletic specimen at 6-foot-7 and 331 pounds, but he will need a year or two of work on his technique and bulk up. Like a longshot at the racetrack, Leamon might pay off big, but it’s more likely he won’t.

IN A NUT SHELL: Salako was a Second-Team All Big-12 selection in 2016. He was evaluated at the Shrine game at both tackle positions and is a potential convert to guard, as well.

STORM NORTON | OT19

SAM TEVI | OT20

TOLEDO (rSR)

UTAH (SR)

IN A NUT SHELL: Norton was named First Team All-Mac Conference (coaches’ poll) at left tackle each of the last two seasons. He needs to improve strength and play with more knee bend.

IN A NUT SHELL: Tevi converted from defensive line to tackle while at Utah, starting the last two seasons at both tackle spots. He’s still learning the finer points of the position, so some time on a practice squad would be best for him.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

Jacob Westendorf

1) Forrest Lamp (WESTERN KENTUCKY) 2) Pat Elflein (OHIO STATE) 3) Dan Feeney (INDIANA) 4) Ethan Pocic (LSU) 5) Dorian Johnson (PITT) 6) Dion Dawkins (TEMPLE) 7) Taylor Moton (WESTERN MICHIGAN) 8) Nico Siragusa (SAN DIEGO STATE) 9) Isaac Asiata (UTAH) 10) Damien Mama (USC) 11) Greg Pyke (GEORGIA) 12) Danny Isidora (MIAMI) 13) Tyler Orlosky (WEST VIRGINIA) 14) Avery Gennesy (TEXAS A&M) 15) Jon Toth (KENTUCKY) 16) Kyle Kalis (MICHIGAN) 17) Alex Kozan (AUBURN) 18) Zack Johnson (NORTH DAKOTA STATE) 19) Erik Austell (CHARLESTON SOUTHERN) 20) Corey Levin (TENNESSEE-CHATTANOOGA)

ADDITIONAL PLAYERS / NOT FEATURED

21) Aviante Collins (TCU) 22) Gavin Andrews (OREGON STATE) 23) Ben Braden (MICHIGAN) 24) JJ Dielman (UTAH) 25) Ethan Cooper (INDIANA | PA)

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

IN A NUT SHELL: Lamp was a four-year starter as a tackle at Western Kentucky, proving to be a technically sound and physical blocker. He’s a mauler in the run game with a strong core that allows him to move defenders at the point of attack. That strong core gives him a good base to hold his ground as a pass blocker. Singled out by likely first-round pick Johnathan Allen as one of the best blockers that he faced, Lamp shows no profound weaknesses in any facet of his game. He’s also durable, at one point starting 42 consecutive games. His versatile skill set will be attractive to NFL teams, though he ultimately projects as a guard or center in the NFL, partly due to his short arms (32 ¼”).

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

VS. TOP OPPONENT: Johnathan Allen (DT, Alabama) is going to be one of the first names called on draft day. He gave most SEC offensive linemen fits, but Allen specifically named Forrest Lamp as one of the best blockers he faced throughout his college career. Allen finished his day against Lamp with three tackles and one sack—a very quiet day by his standards. Lamp performed well against his conference foes, but his performance against Alabama will be the one that scouts will most often point to when discussing his long term potential. FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Lamp could provide an early starter or early depth at a position of need. The Packers like to move young linemen all over the line, and Lamp could be an instant backup at every position, save for left tackle.

IN A NUT SHELL: Elflein is one of the few Ohio State Buckeyes to return for his senior season, delaying his entry into the NFL. A consensus All-American and Rimington Trophy winner, he is certainly one of the more decorated prospects entering the draft. Though he initially emerged as a left guard for the Buckeyes in 2013, he projects more as a center in the pros. He has thick legs and a quick first step to stop opposing defenders in their tracks, while good hand placement allows him to move defenders at the point of attack. The 303 lb. Elfein displays quickness off the snap, and shows good awareness in picking up blitzes from even complex defensive schemes. He plays aggressively and can be prone to penalties as a result.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

RIVALRY GAME: Pundits and writers refer to the annual matchup of Ohio State and Michigan—one of the oldest rivalries in college football—as “the Game.” In Elflein’s junior season, Jim Harbaugh’s Wolverines hosted the Buckeyes, and had upset on their minds. With Elflein anchoring the offensive line, Ezekiel Elliot gashed Michigan’s highly ranked run defense for 214 yards on their way to a 42-13 victory. The thrashing was a season-ending highlight for departing seniors, as well a career day for Elflein. FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Elflein is an aggressive offensive lineman with the ability to play multiple interior positions. He could play an interior “swing” role not unlike a young Evan Dietrich-Smith, though he ultimately projects as a better player than EDS.

IN A NUT SHELL: Feeney was a four-year starter at right guard, blocking for some standout Hoosier running backs in Tevin Coleman and Jordan Howard. Indiana runs a college-friendly spread attack, so it remains to be seen if Feeney can handle the transition to a pro scheme. But there is little question about his athleticism. He has good initial quickness and lateral movement, which bodes well for teams that like to use reach blocks and pull their guards down the line of scrimmage. Feeney’s mean streak should endear him to both his coaches and fans. His biggest question mark is durability. He missed four games in 2016 with a concussion, and the entire 2013 season with a Lisfranc injury.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

COLLEGE EXPERIENCE: While linemen typically take a year or two to get their body ready to play at the college level, Feeney is one of those rare players who was able to contribute immediately after stepping on campus, battling through injuries to remain a starter throughout his entire career. He allowed just one sack in his 39 starts, which spanned more than 2,600 snaps in an uptempo offense. His athleticism and experience will interest teams looking to add a smart, plug-and-play lineman. FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Having played only on the right side, Feeney does not offer the same versatility as other prospects. But he is an extremely athletic lineman, which could work well in the Packers nohuddle offense.

ETHAN POCIC | IL4

DORIAN JOHNSON | IL5

LSU (JR)

PITT (SR)

Measurables: Height: 6’6” | Weight: 310 lbs. | Arms: 33 ⅛" 40-yard dash: 5.15 | 10-yard split: 1.82

Measurables: Height: 6’5” | Weight: 300 lbs. | Arms: 35 ¼" 40-yard dash: 5.27 | 10-yard split: 1.80

IN A NUT SHELL: Pocic was the anchor of an offensive line that paved the way for Leonard Fournette. More of a technician than he is a bruiser, the former LSU lineman a smart player that can play all three interior line positions. He’s a reliable pass protector that occasionally struggles in the run game. What he lacks in strength he makes up for in tenacity, with an old school mentality and playing through the echo of the whistle. Pocic is a heady player that was in charge of protection schemes along the LSU offensive line.

IN A NUT SHELL: Johnson missed just one game in his career, and has started since midway through his freshman year. He’s an athletic prospect with good lateral agility, which shows up when fighting off stunts and complex blitz schemes. He’s adept at getting to the second level. Prone to inconsistent pad level and lapses in his fundamentals, the Panther lineman tends to lose more battles than he should against inferior players. He does a good job at recovering once he is beaten, but simply focusing more on fundamentals would make his job much easier.

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Pocic would give the Packers depth along the interior. He is a good pass blocker, which fits the Packers pass-heavy playbook. Pocic is a good fit in a zone blocking scheme.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Johnson would give the Packers athleticism and experience along the offensive line. His ability to get to the second level would be helpful against the complex blitz schemes of NFC North defensive coordinators like Mike Zimmer and Vic Fangio.

DION DAWKINS | IL6

TAYLOR MOTON | IL7

TEMPLE (SR)

WESTERN MICHIGAN (rSR)

Measurables: Height: 6’4” | Weight: 314 lbs. | Arms: 35" 40-yard dash: 5.11 | 10-yard split: 1.80

Measurables: Height: 6’5” | Weight: 318 lbs. | Arms: 34 ⅛" 40-yard dash: 5.18 | 10-yard split: 1.84

IN A NUT SHELL: Dawkins is a massive man that took an odd route to the NFL Draft. After finishing high school, he spent a year in a military academy before taking the field for Temple. Dawkins uses his massive frame to make defenders disappear at the point of attack. He’s a bruiser who plays with a street-fight mentality, and he enjoys beating his opponents and putting them on the ground. He’s quick off the ball and uses his strength to frustrate opponents, many of which seem to simply give up by the fourth quarter.

IN A NUT SHELL: Moton played both tackle and guard for the high-powered Broncos offense. He has elite strength and a massive frame that allows him to move defensive tackles at the point of attack. The former Bronco is an excellent run blocker but needs to improve his pass blocking, as his strength cannot always overcome his poor footwork. He has a tendency to duck his head, lose patience and lunge at pass rushers instead of using his hands.

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Dawkins would provide instant help to a Packers line that struggles in short yardage situations. His brawler mentality is a perfect fit for the team’s jumbo package. He’s best suited as a run blocker on the right side line of the line.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Moton would add size strength to the Packers front. He offers versatility, with experience at both guard and tackle. He’s an intriguing prospect that could potentially learn to play center to add to his overall versatility.

NICO SIRAGUSA | IL8

ISAAC ASIATA | IL9

SAN DIEGO STATE (SR)

UTAH (SR)

Measurables: Height: 6’4” | Weight: 319 lbs. | Arms: 33 ½" 40-yard dash: 5.35 | 10-yard split: 1.83

Measurables: Height: 6’3” | Weight: 323 lbs. | Arms: 33 ¼" 40-yard dash: 5.34 | 10-yard split: 1.85

IN A NUT SHELL: With a thick frame and wide body, Siragusa looks the part of an old-school NFL guard. But despite his imposing frame, he’s surprisingly light on his feet. The former Aztec Warrior does a good job getting to the second level, moves well laterally, and has vice grips for hands in both run and pass sets. His biggest weakness lies in getting off the ball, and he occasionally struggles to recover from being beaten by a defender. Perhaps lacking trust in his body, he sometimes lunges at defenders.

IN A NUT SHELL: Asiata’s greatest strength is his burst and ability to get off the ball, which is how he wins the majority of his snaps. More often than not, he moves his opponent with the initial contact that he makes. He’s a smart player that sees the whole field. As a pass blocker, he shows good anticipation and the ability to shadow defenders. Occasionally he gets too far ahead of himself when getting to the second level, which can cause him to lunge at defenders.

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: The Packers tend to favor blockers that are good with their hands, and Siragusa fits that mold. Within Green Bay’s zone blocking scheme, he’d be a big-bodied guard who could get to the second level with ease, thanks to his light footwork.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Asiata would give the Packers versatility, as he’s experienced at all three interior positions. In a pinch, he may also have the athleticism to play right tackle. He’s a smart player that sees stunts and blitz schemes well. He’s a polished passblocker, which is something the Packers prioritize on the offensive line.

100

DAMIEN MAMA | IL10

GREG PYKE | IL11

USC (JR)

GEORGIA (JR)

Measurables: Height: 6’3” | Weight: 334 lbs. | Arms: n/a 40-yard dash: 5.84 | 10-yard split: 1.95

Measurables: Height: 6’6” | Weight: 325 lbs. | Arms: n/a 40-yard dash: DNP | 10-yard split: DNP

IN A NUT SHELL: Mama has a powerful lower body that allows him to toss defenders aside (think Mike Daniels on the offensive line). The former Trojan played both left and right guard, starting 29 games. He uses his strong hands to stop would-be rushers in their tracks. Mama does a good job of finding work with constant hustle and a desire to be engaged with a defender. He can occasionally be caught too high in his pass sets and struggles with ducking his head and lunging at defenders.

IN A NUT SHELL: Pyke entered the 2014 season with zero career starts, but eventually won the starting guard spot, earning the distinction of the team’s most improved offensive player. Pyke understands how to play with leverage and is adept with using the cut block. He has a good initial punch in pass protection, winning early often and frustrating opponents. He struggles with agility and getting to the second level. He can be caught too high and can get grabby if he gets beaten, which can lead to holding penalties.

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Mama would give the Packers depth at guard and someone to compete with Kyle Murphy along the interior. Eventually he is someone that could develop into a starting caliber player at either guard spot. He offers little versatility, though.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Pyke can offer positional versatility, which the Packers value. His ability to cut defenders would be valuable in their zone blocking scheme. Pyke could be a backup at both guard spots and potentially the center position if Corey Linsley were to continue to struggle with injuries.

101

DANNY ISIDORA | IL12 MIAMI (SR) Measurables: Height: 6â&#x20AC;&#x2122;3â&#x20AC;? | Weight: 306 lbs. | Arms: 33 40-yard dash: 5.03 | 10-yard split: 1.73

IN A NUT SHELL: Isidora has fantastic lower body strength, which he uses to stonewall defenders. His strength strength helps him move defenders in the run game, and at least come to a stalemate in pass protection. He has good initial quickness to help get him to the second level when he is uncovered, but he has a tendency to be indecisive when facing blitzes. FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Isidora is experienced enough to fill both guard spots. He has the lower body strength to help their run game immediately, but he requires some grooming in pass protection. His quickness off the ball makes him an intriguing prospect that they could possibly try at center.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

102

TYLER ORLOSKY | IL13

AVERY GENNESY | IL14

WEST VIRGINIA (SR)

TEXAS A&M (SR)

IN A NUT SHELL: Orlosky has a quick first step and is adept at snapping out of the shotgun. He has violent hands that latch onto defenders and help open up run lanes. He needs to bulk up.

IN A NUT SHELL: Gennsey started two seasons at the JUCO level before transferring to Texas A&M. He has good lateral movement and quick feet in pass protection.

JON TOTH | IL15

KYLE KALIS | IL16

KENTUCKY (SR)

MICHIGAN (rSR)

IN A NUT SHELL: Toth is a technician on the interior. He is fundamentally sound with his footwork and hand placement. His length makes him appealing as both a guard and center.

IN A NUT SHELL: Kalis is a mauler in the run game that’s adequate as a pass protector. He’s aggressive, which can lead to some penalties. He projects as a late round project player.

ALEX KOZAN | IL17

ZACK JOHNSON | IL18

AUBURN (SR)

NORTH DAKOTA STATE (SR)

IN A NUT SHELL: Kozan has violent hands at the point of attack with enough quickness to get to the second level. A durable athlete, he played in 40 consecutive games.

IN A NUT SHELL: Johnson is a powerful run blocker and an adequate pass blocker. He may be overlooked due to the lower level of competition he faced. He projects as a guard in the NFL.

ERIK AUSTELL | IL19

COREY LEVIN | IL20

CHARLESTON SOUTHERN (SR)

TENNESSEE-CHATTANOOGA (SR)

IN A NUT SHELL: Austell is an athletic prospect that plays with great lateral quickness. He needs to add some bulk and strength in an NFL weight room.

IN A NUT SHELL: Levin has good hands that allow him to turn defenders, but he lacks speed and strength. He has the tools to be crosstrained at any offensive line position.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

103

dl Ross Uglem

1) Jonathan Allen (ALABAMA) 2) Malik McDowell (MICHIGAN STATE) 3) Caleb Brantley (FLORIDA) 4) Jaleel Johnson (IOWA) 5) Eddie Vanderdoes (UCLA) 6) Nazair Jones (NORTH CAROLINA) 7) Ryan Glasgow (MICHIGAN) 8) Elijah Qualls (WASHINGTON) 9) Charles Walker (OKLAHOMA) 10) Dalvin Tomlinson (ALABAMA) 11) Montravius Adams (AUBURN) 12) Davon Godchaux (LSU) 13) Jarron Jones (NOTRE DAME) 14) Carlos Watkins (CLEMSON) 15) Larry Ogunjobii (CHARLOTTE) 16) Tanoh Kpassagnon (VILLANOVA) 17) Vincent Taylor (OKLAHOMA STATE) 18) Treyvon Hester (TOLEDO) 19) DeAngelo Brown (LOUISVILLE) 20) Stevie Tuâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;ikolovatu (USC)

ADDITIONAL PLAYERS / NOT FEATURED

21) Adam Butler (VANDERBILT) 22) Nik D'Avanzo (NEW MEXICO) 23) Chunky Clements (ILLINOIS) 24) Daylon Mack (TEXAS A&M) 25) Derrick Nnadi (FLORIDA STATE)

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

104

IN A NUT SHELL: It’ll be difficult to find a no. 1 prospect in a position group that is further ahead of his “classmates” than Allen. The Alabama defender is a wonderful player who will provide tremendous value anywhere in the top five picks. He’s consistently disruptive, scheme versatile and a legitimate threat against the pass. Allen is an elite hand-fighter and doesn’t stay engaged with his blocker any longer than it takes to dominate them. He played as part of a rotation, so his statistics are not at all inflated. Arriving at Alabama as an outside linebacker, his athleticism is elite for a man of his size. Allen can play anywhere along the line and projects instantly as one of the best four or five 3-technique players in the league.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

CFP SEMIFINAL (VS. WASHINGTON): Allen was a monster against Washington in the Peach Bowl. In fact, Pro Football Focus graded him as Alabama’s top player in the contest. Washington had no answers for Allen, who looked unblockable. All told, Allen finished with 3 hurries and 1 sack, but his constant pressure on the quarterback had to have been demoralizing for the Huskies. FIT WITH THE PACKERS: While it is a pipe dream to think Allen would be available to the Packers at 29, he’s everything that Dom Capers could ever want. Allen could play any position across the defensive line, occasionally handle the edge on run downs and even kick inside against the pass. He would immediately transform the defense; giving Mike Daniels the pass rushing partner he’s never had.

105

IN A NUT SHELL: McDowell is a high-upside player that an NFL team will take based on potential. It’s all there physically. At 6-foot-6 and 295-pounds, he has an exceptional NFL frame. He’s a raw player, but his strength, explosiveness and the way he uses his length is very impressive. There are certainly tools to work with, but the production is not yet there. His junior statistics don’t exactly jump off of the page: just 7 tackles for a loss and 1.5 sacks. McDowell doesn’t project as an edge defender and is taller than you’d want at either the 1- or 3-technique. His ideal fit is as a 5-tech in a 3-4 scheme, likely on the strong side.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

RIVALRY GAME: McDowell performs well in shorts and a compression shirt. His 4.85 40-yard dash was very good for an interior defender and his 4.53 short shuttle was also above average. His 23 reps on the bench isn’t going to shatter any records, but it’s fine for an athlete of McDowell’s length. It may seem insane that a player with 1.5 sacks would get a first round grade, but someone may look at these Combine numbers and pull the trigger. FIT WITH THE PACKERS: McDowell could finally bring Green Bay the true 5 technique that they’ve been looking for—their Calais Campbell. McDowell could be groomed by Mike Trgovac and Dom Capers to fill that role. The Packers would, like every other team, be taking McDowell for his potential.

106

IN A NUT SHELL: Brantley is the first in a long line of incomplete defensive line prospects in this draft. The former Gator has the kind of compact frame that’s ideal for a 4-3 defense and occasionally flashes the disruption of a first round defensive lineman. He has explosive tendencies, showing glimpses of a potentially effective pass rusher, but he must develop a move besides the bull rush to counter opponents.

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Brantley’s squatty build projects more to a 1 technique or a nose tackle. With the likely emergence of Kenny Clark as a starter—and with Letroy Guion still in the fold—there isn’t a need at the position. Brantley and the Packers seem an unlikely fit, both because of the position he plays and the round he’ll likely be taken in.

POSTSEASON GAME: When the Gators met the Hawkeyes in the Outback Bowl, Brantley led his defensive line mates to a dominant performance against Iowa’s physical front, allowing just three points. Florida was just as dominant against the pass as they were the run. Brantley tallied three tackles and a sack of Iowa QB CJ Beathard.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

107

JALEEL JOHNSON | DL4

EDDIE VANDERDOES | DL5

IOWA (rSR)

UCLA (rJR)

Measurables: Height: 6’3” | Weight: 316 lbs. | Arms: 33 ¼" | Bench: 19 | 40-yard dash: 5.38

Measurables: Height: 6’3” | Weight: 305 lbs. | Arms: 33 ⅛" | Bench: 28 | 40-yard dash: 4.99

2016 Stats: 55 tackles, 10 TFL, 7.5 SK, 5 QBH, 2 PBU

2016 Stats: 27 tackles, 1.5 TFL, 1.5 SK

IN A NUT SHELL: Despite being listed at “just” 6-foot-3, Jaleel Johnson has the long look of a player that could excel at defensive end in a 3-4 system. Johnson, as with many prospects in this defensive line class, runs a bit hot and cold. But the Iowa defender shows the kind anticipation and timing that can’t be taught, providing at least one elite skill to build on as he looks to contribute regularly to an NFL pass rush. Johnson had a very productive senior season on the interior (10 TFL, 7.5 sacks) and his work in Iowa’s upset win over Michigan was a revelation.

IN A NUT SHELL: With an injury affecting his draft stock, Vanderdoes is a possible value pick. He was exceptional as a true freshman and sophomore before tearing his ACL during the first game of his junior year. He was an honorable mention All Pac-12 performer in 2016, but didn’t quite make it back to his preinjury level of play. Vanderdoes has the ability to fight and split double teams instead of just occupying the two blockers. He’s as strong as an ox, but the team that drafts him will be hoping he can make a jump in his second year removed from the ACL injury (a la Jake Ryan).

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Johnson would be a nice fit in the base defense for Green Bay and could be an eventual replacement for Letroy Guion, albeit with more pass rush upside. He has the length to play the 5-tech in the base and could eventually be versatile enough to play all three downs. The Packers have had success dipping into the Iowa program before.

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: A Vanderdoes selection would mark the third time since 2013 that the Packers selected a UCLA defender. Vanderdoes shows the ability to two-gap and could be a part of Green Bay’s base defense. If Vanderdoes can recapture the trajectory his career was on before the knee injur,y he can play in Green Bay’s two down linemen sets as well.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

108

NAZAIR JONES | DL6

RYAN GLASGOW | DL7

NORTH CAROLINA (rJR)

MICHIGAN (rSR)

Measurables: Height: 6’5” | Weight: 305 lbs. | Arms: 34 ⅝" | Bench: n/a | 40-yard dash: 5.11

Measurables: Height: 6’3” | Weight: 302 lbs. | Arms: 33 ⅜" | Bench: 20 | 40-yard dash: 5.13

2016 Stats: 70 tackles, 9.5 TFL, 2.5 SK, 1 QBH, 1 FF, 3 PBU

2016 Stats: 43 tackles, 9.5 TFL, 4 SK, 3 QBH, 1 FF, 1 PBU

IN A NUT SHELL: The story on Jones is his length. It allows him to keep blockers away from his body after his initial punch. At 6’5” and 305 pounds, Jones screams 5-tech, and he should be an instant starter in run fits on a 3-4 defense at the next level.

IN A NUT SHELL: Glasgow was a key part of head coach Jim Harbaugh’s revitalization of Michigan’s program. With his brother Graham playing for the Detroit Lions, Glasgow is part of a football family. The former Wolverine was Second Team All Big Ten as a Senior and, while he isn’t an elite athlete, he plays with a great motor—his effort is something you can’t teach.

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Jones would potentially be a one trick pony, but one worth a roster spot. With the departure of Datone Jones, Green Bay could use a long defensive end to pair with Dean Lowry and Kenny Clark on obvious running plays. Jones may never develop a ton of pass rush but his presence on early downs could keep the interior pass rushers fresh.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Glasgow would offer depth as a run defender until and unless he develops a pass rush game that can be effective against NFL interior offensive linemen. His consistent effort level would endear him to fans and the coaching staff and his experience playing outside in the Big Ten make for an easy transition to Green Bay.

109

ELIJAH QUALLS | DL8

CHARLES WALKER | DL9

WASHINGTON (rJR)

OKLAHOMA (rJR)

Measurables: Height: 6’1” | Weight: 313 lbs. | Arms: 30 ⅝" | Bench: 33 | 40-yard dash: 5.13

Measurables: Height: 6’2” | Weight: 310 lbs. | Arms: 33 ¾" | Bench: 25 | 40-yard dash: 4.96

2016 Stats: 38 tackles, 5 TFL, 3.0 SK, 3 QBH

2016 Stats: 7 tackles, 2 TFL, 4 PBU, 2 QBH (4 games)

IN A NUT SHELL: Qualls is a short, refrigerator-type body who looks to be the latest in a long line of UW defenders selected in the first few rounds of the draft. He’s a little bit short, and has short arms, but he’s an instinctive player that drew a lot of double teams playing on a talented Huskie defense. Qualls was selected as a First Team All Pac-12 defender. He’s a very unique athlete. Considering his build, his position-best 33 reps on the bench shouldn’t be a surprise.

IN A NUT SHELL: After suffering a concussion midway through his final season, Walker left Oklahoma to prepare for the NFL draft—a decision that didn’t exactly make him a fan favorite in Norman. Walker was a monster as a sophomore, and his production that season gives evaluators hope that there can be “sizzle” in his game. He has athletic upside, but character concerns have to be taken into account when projecting his draft position.

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Unless you believe Qualls can be the same kind of short pass rusher that Mike Daniels is, it’s difficult to see him fitting in Green Bay. He’d likely play nose tackle, and would have to add strength and size. Qualls might be better suited for a 4-3 defense.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Walker’s size is perfect for a defensive tackle in a 4-3 scheme. Walker doesn’t have the length to play the 5-tech, nor does he have the girth to contribute at nose. If Walker is able to recapture that disruptive magic of his sophomore season, he could fit in Green Bay’s “attacking” two down linemen looks. It will be interesting to see if Walker shows up on Thompson’s board at all as someone who might fit in as “Packer people”.

110

DALVIN TOMLINSON | DL10

MONTRAVIUS ADAMS | DL11

ALABAMA (rSR)

AUBURN (SR)

Measurables: Height: 6’3” | Weight: 310 lbs. | Arms: 33 ½" | Bench: n/a | 40-yard dash: 5.19

Measurables: Height: 6’4” | Weight: 304 lbs. | Arms: 32 ¾" | Bench: 22 | 40-yard dash: 4.87

2016 Stats: 62 tackles, 5.5 TFL, 3.0 SK, 7 QBH, 1 FF, 4 PBU

2016 Stats: 44 tackles, 8.5 TFL, 4.5 SK, 15 QBH, 1 FF, 2 PBU, 1 INT, 1 FR

IN A NUT SHELL: Watching on film, you might be tempted to say that the other stars on the Alabama defense are overshadowing Tomlinson— he feels underrated. But the reality is that he spent much of his time being single-teamed. Offensive protection units focused on Jonathan Allen and Tim Williams long before they worried about Tomlinson. Despite those one-on-one matchups, Tomlinson never flashed much in the box score. His 5.5 tackles-for-loss and 3 sacks aren’t awful, but they aren’t great, either. One thing Tomlinson does flash, though, is effort—constant effort.

IN A NUT SHELL: Adams has upside and potential. He has length (6’4”, 32 ¾” arms) and his sub-4.9 forty time is nothing to sneeze at for a guy his size (304 lbs.). The former Tiger is an explosive athlete with above average “get-off.” His junior season was highly forgettable, and his film shows inconsistent effort levels. Adams should be paired with a good defensive line coach in the NFL. While he consistently brings the fight to his opponent, he needs to improve his two-gapping and his pass rush skills.

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Tomlinson would be a quick addition to Green Bay’s defensive rotation, albeit with limited upside. Alabama plays both a 3-4 base defense and a nickel package with a 2-4-5 look. Tomlinson’s 6-foot-three, 310-pound frame is the basic look of a 3-4 base end. He’d be able to play sooner rather than later, but would likely never become a star.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Adams has the length to play in a 3-4 defense and the long term talent to at least intrigue Ted Thompson. Adams is a project at the next level, but Green Bay has a worthwhile defensive line rotation with Daniels, Clark, Guion, Lowry, Ringo and maybe even Brian Price. Adams could bide his time and contribute in 2018 or 2019.

111

IN A NUT SHELL: Godchaux has a chance to rush the passer at the next level. Strength and overall athleticism are his major concerns. The former Tiger played plenty of 5-technique at LSU, consistently showing good hand placement and the ability to maintain space between himself and his blocker. According to Pro Football Focus, Godchaux created a combined 74 pressures over his last two years in Baton Rouge. Despite that, he does not get off the ball as quickly or explosively as you’d like. Won’t likely be a key contributor against the run at the next level. FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Unless the strength and conditioning staff can improve his power, Godchaux might be a one trick pony in Green Bay. But if the Packers feel comfortable with their foundational pieces on defense, a specialist like Godchaux could be worth a mid round selection.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

112

JARRON JONES | DL13

CARLOS WATKINS | DL14

NOTRE DAME (rSR)

CLEMSON (rSR)

IN A NUT SHELL: Jones is a big, strong kid that has dealt with injuries throughout his career at Notre Dame. He is the ideal body fit for a 3-4 defense.

IN A NUT SHELL: Watkins was a big part of Clemson’s national championship defense. He is a bit of a project, as his production doesn’t yet meet his talent.

LARRY OGUNJOBII | DL15

TANOH KPASSAGNON | DL16

CHARLOTTE (rSR)

VILLANOVA (rSR)

IN A NUT SHELL: Ogunjobi is a late riser in the pre draft process. He played for both Louisville and Charlotte.

IN A NUT SHELL: Kpassognon was a combine star. It’s hard to see him as linebacker. If drafted to a 3-4 team, he might have to fit into the Calais Campbell role.

VINCENT TAYLOR | DL17

TREYVON HESTER | DL18

OKLAHOMA STATE (rJR)

TOLEDO (JR)

IN A NUT SHELL: Taylor is a likely 4-3 fit that might have shown enough wiggle in his pass rush to sneak into the middle rounds.

IN A NUT SHELL: Hester is a future 3-technique with a MAC background. He can develop into a rotation player for a 40 front team.

DEANGELO BROWN | DL19

STEVIE TU’IKOLOVATU | DL20

LOUISVILLE (SR)

USC (rSR)

IN A NUT SHELL: Brown is a short, squatty player with a little juice. He was a versatile player for Louisville.

IN A NUT SHELL: At 6-foot-1, Tu’ikolovatu has a wide, powerful body. 28 reps on the bench is near the top of the class.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

113

edge Ross Uglem

1) Myles Garrett (TEXAS A&M)

2) Solomon Thomas (STANFORD) 3) Derek Barnett (TENNESSEE) 4) Takkarist McKinley (UCLA) 5) TJ Watt (WISCONSIN) 6) Tim Williams (ALABAMA) 7) Taco Charlton (MICHIGAN) 8) Carl Lawson (AUBURN)

9) DeMarcus Walker (FLORIDA STATE) 10) Charles Harris (MIZZOU) 11) Devonte Fields (LOUISVILLE) 12) Vince Biegel (WISCONSIN) 13) Ryan Anderson (ALABAMA) 14) Dawuane Smoot (ILLINOIS) 15) Jordan Willis (KANSAS STATE) 16) Hunter Dimick (UTAH) 17) Deatrich Wise (ARKANSAS) 18) Chris Wormley (MICHIGAN) 19) Derek Rivers (YOUNGSTOWN STATE) 20) Tanoh Kpassagnon (VILLANOVA)

ADDITIONAL PLAYERS / NOT FEATURED

21) Ejuan Price (PITT) 22) Trey Hendrickson (FLORIDA ATLANTIC) 23) Garrett Sickels (PENN STATE) 24) Avery Moss (YOUNGSTOWN STATE) 25) Al-Quadin Muhammad (MIAMI)

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

114

IN A NUT SHELL: Garrett is the consensus best player in this draft. With no clear no. 1 quarterback, the Browns seem likely to select Garrett first overall, covering their top pass rusher position for the next decade. Garrett was an exceptional player at Texas A&M and his athletic testing numbers indicate that he’s quite possibly just scratching the surface of his potential. At his size, Garrett is scheme versatile, so whether a team plays a 4-3 or a 3-4 won’t much matter. He’ll make an immediate impact. NFL COMBINE: Garrett was the unquestioned star of the NFL combine. The players around him literally referred to him as “the freak.” Garrett, who weighs in at 272 pounds, ran an impressive sub 4.7 forty-yard dash. His 41” vertical jump led all athletes over

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

250 pounds and his 128” broad jump checked in second. Garrett also managed 33 reps on the bench. Athleticism and strength will not be an issue for this prospect—his “tool box” is quite full. FIT WITH THE PACKERS: My lord. Just the thought makes me misty eyed. It would be like turning back the clock on Julius Peppers. While he doesn’t have Peppers’ length, he’s a generational athletic freak. He could play both OLB in a traditional 3-4 as well as in an elephant role in a 4-3. Frankly, Garrett would revolutionize the Packers defense. He would command attention from defenses, allowing Clay Matthews some freedom to move around. It wouldn’t be a stretch to imagine Garrett becoming Green Bay’s best defender. Garrett is a pipe dream—but what a dream.

115

IN A NUT SHELL: Thomas was a very disruptive player in Stanford’s top-notch defense. His size and experience all over the field makes him a “tweener” for NFL teams that don’t run a traditional 4-3 defense. Thomas led Stanford in tackles with 62, impressive for a defensive lineman facing the spread offenses of the Pac 12. Thomas projects as a player who can handle himself on the edge, as well as kick inside to rush from the interior. He’s able to be disruptive all along the defensive line, from the 1 gap to the 9. Draft Solomon Thomas and play him anywhere you want on the line of scrimmage, in any scheme you want. BOWL GAME: If you want to see Solomon Thomas at his best, throw on his film against North Carolina in the Sun Bowl. Thomas’ statistics speak for themselves, though they don’t tell the whole story. He had seven tackles, with two for loss and one sack. He also pressured likely first round pick Mitchel Trubisky all

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

game long. North Carolina was a high flying offense in 2016, but with 6:57 left in the third quarter Thomas and the Cardinal had those Tar Heels stuck at 7 points. A versatile player, Thomas lined up everywhere against the balanced Tar Heels offense (38 passes, 37 runs), but none of North Carolina’s NFL-caliber offensive linemen could block him. FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Thomas, who looks like a perfect 5-technique in Green Bay’s scheme on film, probably doesn’t have the requisite length. If by some miracle Thomas ended up in Green Bay, he projects as a rich man’s Datone Jones. Jones had more length than Thomas but Thomas is a better prospect. The addition of Thomas to the roster would allow the Packers to pretty seamlessly play a 4-3 defense if they ever wanted to. Thomas and Nick Perry both fit in that scheme. Like Garrett, Thomas would improve the play of the secondary just by creating more pressure in the backfield.

116

IN A NUT SHELL: NFL teams may find themselves overthinking about Derek Barnett, but they should trust the tape. Barnett is a polished player with a relentless motor. Most pass rushers take two or three years to have a serious impact (see Nick Perry), but Barnett is going to be as good as advertised from the moment he steps on an NFL field. No, Barnett did not test extremely well at the combine. No, Barnett is not 6’5”. No, he will not be the best athlete on the field. But, despite all that, the fact remains: Derek Barnett is very good at football. He had 33 sacks in college, breaking Reggie White’s school record. That’s quite the company to keep. Barnett is a playmaker.

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Barnett’s physical makeup reminds a lot of people of Nick Perry. They have a similarly thick frame, and both played defensive end in college. I think at this point in their careers Perry was the better athlete and Barnett is the better football player. He’s extremely skilled and polished. Barnett could play the outside linebacker or elephant position for the Packers. You wouldn't want to see him in coverage but he’d still be a welcome addition to Green Bay, and he’d make a more immediate impact that quite a few pass rushers in this class. Barnett should be gone by the time the Packers are on the clock—but maybe he won’t be. Packers fans should be ecstatic if he ends up in Green Bay.

VS. TOP OPPONENT: While Barnett turned a lot of heads with his bowl performance against Nebraska, his snaps against Cam Robinson of Alabama were even more impressive. Barnett dominated all game long and consistently beat Robinson with the same elite get-off and basic bend move around the corner. You can’t test bend and balance in compression shorts at the Combine. Barnett has plenty of both, and they were on display against the Crimson Tide.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

117

TAKKARIST MCKINLEY | EDGE4

TJ WATT | EDGE5

UCLA (JR)

WISCONSIN (rJR)

Measurables: Height: 6’2” | Weight: 250 lbs. | Arms: 34 ¾" | Bench: 24 | 40-yard dash: 4.59

Measurables: Height: 6’4” | Weight: 252 lbs. | Arms: 33 ⅛" | Bench: 21 | 40-yard dash: 4.69

2016 Stats: 61 tackles, 18 TFL, 10 SK, 3 QBH, 6 PBU, 3 FF

2016 Stats: 63 tackles, 15.5 TFL, 11.5 SK, 13 QBH, 2 FF, 4 PBU, 1 INT

IN A NUT SHELL: McKinley is as good a run defender as you will find on the edge. While his pass rush production is not where you want it to be for a first round pick, the potential is there. His sub4.6 40 and impressive 10 yard split show adequate explosiveness. What’s most impressive about McKinley, though, is his relentlessness. If you like “high motor” players, McKinley is your guy. He may be a top 10 pick in a class with a weaker group of edge rushers. McKinley has a shoulder issue that could cause him to miss training camp, but he’ll like be ready for the start of the regular season.

IN A NUT SHELL: It certainly seems like Watt’s manifest destiny is to end up with the Packers. He’s from Wisconsin, he played for Wisconsin, his brother is a Badger legend and he looks to be a carbon copy of a young Clay Matthews. But Watt does have his detractors. Many say that his value is inflated because of his brother, or that Packers writers have a soft spot for him because of his Wisconsin roots. The reality is that the tape is good, the combine numbers are good, and Watt, frankly, is good. He is just learning to play defense and could be just scratching the surface of his potential.

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: McKinley would form a fearsome Pac 12 edge-defending unit against the run. Nick Perry is one of the very finest run defending 3-4 outside linebackers in football and McKinley shuts down his edge as well. His smaller size would lead him to play solely at outside linebacker in Green Bay’s system, staying away from the Elephant role. His presence would alleviate some of the stress on Clay Matthews.

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: It’s fine to go with the Matthews comparison. Watt would provide relief for Matthews—and may ultimately replace him. Watt, Matthews, Fackrell and Elliot could provide an interesting pass rush group when Green Bay isn’t using run defenders like Nick Perry on the edges. Watt could potentially rush from the inside a la Matthews as well. He loves Wisconsin and Wisconsin loves him—it would be a great fit.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

118

TIM WILLIAMS | EDGE6

TACO CHARLTON | EDGE7

ALABAMA (SR)

MICHIGAN (SR)

Measurables: Height: 6’3” | Weight: 244 lbs. | Arms: 32 ¾" | Bench: DNP | 40-yard dash: 4.68

Measurables: Height: 6’6” | Weight: 277 lbs. | Arms: 34 ¼" | Bench: 25 | 40-yard dash: 4.92

2016 Stats: 31 tackles, 16 TFL, 9 SK, 12 QBH, 2 FF, 2 PBU, 1 FR

2016 Stats: 42 tackles, 13.5 TFL, 10 SK, 8 QBH, 2 PBU

IN A NUT SHELL: Williams is a prototype outside linebacker in a 3-4 scheme, having played in Alabama’s pro style defense in college. He was effective against SEC competition and certainly the most successful pass rusher the Crimson Tide had on the edge. Williams has two or three pass rush moves (including an effective spin) and that’s about it, but they’re all pretty good moves. His get-off is tremendous. He’s potentially a pass rush-only player in the NFL and he carries some character issues. He didn’t test well at the combine, but his tape is very impressive against very good competition.

IN A NUT SHELL: One of the great things about this class is depth at the top. Charlton, the 7th ranked edge defender, is being mocked in the top 10 overall by national pundits. Charlton has the frame and athleticism to make teams salivate, but with just 13 TFL in a 13 game Wolverines season, the eye popping numbers aren’t quite there. The big question for Charlton will be whether a defensive line or outside linebackers coach can help him realize his potential, or if his physique will trick a GM. Charlton might best fit as a defensive end in a 4-3 scheme.

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: If Williams is as good at his pass rush tricks as he appears, it might be good enough for him to be a one-trick pony in the pros. Williams would play outside linebacker in Green Bay and his limitations against the run could easily be offset by the Packers using better run defenders on early downs. It’s a passing league anyway, right? Williams’ character issues would be less of a concern in Green Bay’s metro area (and locker room) than they would be anywhere else.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Charlton might fit in Green Bay as an elephant rusher, but may not be the freak that can drop in a zone blitz—see Julius Peppers. Not everyone who is 6’6” or 6’7” works in a 3-4 defense like Peppers did. Charlton may seem like a readymade Peppers replacement, but the Lord didn’t put many guys like that on this earth. Charlton and the Packers might not be a perfect marriage.

119

CARL LAWSON | EDGE8

DEMARCUS WALKER | EDGE9

AUBRUN (rJR)

FLORIDA STATE (SR)

Measurables: Height: 6’2” | Weight: 261 lbs. | Arms: 31 ½" | Bench: 35 | 40-yard dash: 4.67

Measurables: Height: 6’4” | Weight: 280 lbs. | Arms: 33" | Bench: 18 | 40-yard dash: DNP

2016 Stats: 30 tackles, 13.5 TFL, 9 SK, 24 QBH, 1 FF

2016 Stats: 68 tackles, 21.5 TFL, 16 SK, 1 FR, 3 FF, 2 PBU, 4 QBH

IN A NUT SHELL: Lawson is yet another edge defender in this class with a lot of “ranking volatility.” Plenty of national mocks have Lawson in the first round, and plenty of them have the Auburn pass rusher available at the tail end of the second round. He’s very well built, but more of a compact pass rusher than teams looking for length may want. His impressive 35 reps at 225 may be a little misleading as well—the bench press is an easier lift for shorter armed athletes. Lawson has struggled to stay healthy during the balance of his career at Auburn.

IN A NUT SHELL: Like his Florida State predecessor Mario Edwards, Walker is an underrated prospect who brings a lot to the table. Walker has a big frame and good tape. His 25 sacks over the course of the last two seasons is certainly notable. He also does an excellent job getting his hands into passing lanes. Walker is more than capable of contributing to run defense as a rookie and carries little or no durability concerns. He might be best suited as a 4-3 defensive end.

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Lawson is the ideal size for an outside linebacker in Green Bay’s system. However, the Packers have recently shown a desire to get longer and more athletic, so Lawson may not be the perfect prospect for them. With that said, there is nothing wrong with a 4.19-second short shuttle and a nine sack performance in the SEC.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Walker could bring a lot of the same things to the table that Nick Perry did in the first part of his career. Florida State doesn’t have a problem standing their pass rushers up, so his transition to Green Bay’s system wouldn’t be difficult. The pass rush production is there, even if the athletic testing numbers aren’t.

120

CHARLES HARRIS | EDGE10

DEVONTE FIELDS | EDGE11

MIZZOU (rJR)

LOUISVILLE (rSR)

Measurables: Height: 6’3” | Weight: 253 lbs. | Arms: 32 ⅜" | Bench: 21 | 40-yard dash: 4.82

Measurables: Height: 6’2” | Weight: 236 lbs. | Arms: 32 ⅜" | Bench: DNP | 40-yard dash: 4.72

2016 Stats: 61 tackles, 12 TFL, 9 SK, 10 QBH, 2 PBU, 2 FF, 1 FR

2016 Stats: 45 tackles, 9 TFL, 6 SK, 10 QBH, 3 PBU, 1 INT

IN A NUT SHELL: Harris is the latest in a line of Mizzou pass rushers that will likely be selected in the first two rounds of the draft. He is a late riser, though his performance at the combine certainly doesn’t have anything to do with that. He didn’t run, jump or cut particularly well in Indianapolis, which adds to concerns that he was much better as a sophomore than he was as a junior. He does have a good first step, and his football skills seem to make up for his perceived lack of athleticism.

IN A NUT SHELL: Fields had a very interesting college career, having been the Big 12 defensive freshman of the year before finally ending up rushing the passer for the Louisville Cardinals of the ACC. Fields is not very big or athlete, especially for the defensive end position. He struggled a lot with consistency both in effort and results. His quickness and agility paint the picture of a player with tremendous upside.

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Harris is a popular option to end up in Green Bay. His size is very similar to Clay Matthews. Harris’ run defense leaves a bit to be desired, so it’s worth wondering if he’s athletic enough to be a pass rush specialist in the pros.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Fields would play the traditional outside linebacker role in Green Bay. He stood up plenty at Louisville and isn’t being seriously considered as a defensive end in a 4-3. If the coaching staff in Green Bay could get him to play with more competitive fire, he could be an early-to-mid round steal.

121

IN A NUT SHELL: Biegel is the forgotten Badger edge rusher for two reasons: He’s not a projected first round pick and his last name isn’t Watt. With that said, he made himself quite a bit of money at the scouting combine. There’s nothing wrong with a 4.67 40 time. There’s nothing wrong with a 4.3 short shuttle. And there’s certainly nothing wrong with a 6.92 three cone. Biegel will be an excellent player in a phone booth for a 3-4 team, and an instant impact player on special teams. FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Biegel would immediately upgrade the special teams unit in Green Bay and work himself into the outside linebacker rotation, playing the same position he played at Wisconsin. Biegel was a team captain at Wisconsin and would immediately be a Cheesehead favorite.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

122

EDGE CONTINUED...

RYAN ANDERSON | EDGE13

DAWUANE SMOOT | EDGE14

ALABAMA (rSR)

ILLINOIS (SR)

IN A NUT SHELL: Anderson lacks elite athleticism and gives off the vibe that he might be one of the "product-of-the-system Alabama disappointments" in the pros. Anderson makes up for what he lacks in size, strength and combine numbers with excellent technique. Whether or not that works at the next level is a big question mark.

IN A NUT SHELL: Smoot is a good, not great athlete with good build for a 3-4 outside linebacker. He was an elite hurdler in high school.

JORDAN WILLIS | EDGE15

HUNTER DIMICK | EDGE16

KANSAS STATE (SR)

UTAH (rSR)

IN A NUT SHELL: Willis is a late riser. He’s a good edge player that reminds a few of Nick Perry.

IN A NUT SHELL: Dimick was a high motor player for the Utes. He almost assuredly fits better in a 4-3 defense.

DEATRICH WISE | EDGE17

CHRIS WORMLEY | EDGE18

ARKANSAS (rSR)

MICHIGAN (SR)

IN A NUT SHELL: Five year player in the SEC. Wise has the size (6’5” 274) to add length to a front seven.

IN A NUT SHELL: Wormley is a good player, but often gets forgotten by scouts paying attention to Charlton and Glasgow.

DEREK RIVERS | EDGE19

TANOH KPASSAGNON | EDGE20

YOUNGSTOWN STATE (SR)

VILLANOVA (SR)

IN A NUT SHELL: Don’t let the FCS background fool you—Rivers is a stud as a mid-to-late round steal.

IN A NUT SHELL: Kpassagnon is an athletic freak with every tool you would ever want to work with. He is a project.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

123

ILB Dan Dahlke

1) Reuben Foster (ALABAMA) 2) Haason Reddick (TEMPLE) 3) Zach Cunningham (VANDERBILT) 4) Jarrad Davis (FLORIDA) 5) Raekwon McMillan (OHIO STATE) 6) Duke Riley (LSU) 7) Anthony Walker Jr. (NORTHWESTERN) 8) Alex Anzalone (FLORIDA) 9) Kendell Beckwith (LSU) 10) Elijah Lee (KANSAS STATE) 11) Blair Brown (OHIO) 12) Marquel Lee (WAKE FOREST) 13) Harvey Lan (BYU) 14) Jayon Brown (UCLA) 15) Ben Gedeon (MICHIGAN) 16) Paul Magloire Jr. (ARIZONA) 17) Tanner Vallejo (BOISE STATE) 18) James Onwualu (NOTRE DAME) 19) Matt Milano (BOSTON COLLEGE) 20) Calvin Munson (SAN DIEGO STATE)

ADDITIONAL PLAYERS / NOT FEATURED

21) Connor Harris (LINDENWOOD) 22) Jalen Reeves-Maybin (TENNESSEE) 23) Brooks Ellis (ARKANSAS) 24) Ben Boulware (CLEMSON) 25) Steven Taylor (HOUSTON) 26) Hardy Nickerson (ILLINOIS) 27) Riley Bullough (MICHIGAN STATE) 28) Keith Kelsey (HOUSTON) CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

124

IN A NUT SHELL: Foster is one of the most physically gifted players in the draft, regardless of position. His ability to read and react to an offense and then quickly close in on the ball is unmatched among this year’s linebacker group. The former All-American shows an excellent ability to anticipate run progressions, while also not showing any hesitation in his play when crashing downhill to meet the halfback at the line of scrimmage. However, Foster is more than just an aggressive, physical linebacker. While he is a tone setter against the run, he’s also a tremendous athlete with the straight-line speed and smooth change of direction to excel in space. Foster does a nice job flowing to the ball, and he’s excellent at breaking down in the open field to square up the ball carrier. The former Alabama standout’s sound technique and awareness also extend to the passing game. He rarely loses his man in coverage, staying step-for-step with tight ends and slot receivers down the seam or across the middle of the field. He also defends checkdowns well. Foster is as complete of a linebacker prospect as there is in the draft.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

2016 NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP GAME: While it was only Foster’s first season starting, he played an integral part in Alabama’s 2016 Championship win over Clemson. At the time, the junior linebacker played second fiddle to Reggie Ragland, one of the top linebacker prospects in the 2016 Draft. However, it was Foster and not Ragland that truly affected the outcome of the Crimson Tide’s 45-40 win over the Tigers. In a way it was Foster’s breakout performance. As Alabama’s most active defender that day, he hustled all over the field, delivering big hits and making several key stops in the game. He finished the night with nine tackles, and set the stage to becoming Alabama defensive captain the following season. FIT WITH THE PACKERS: If the Packers were fortunate enough to select Foster in the draft, they’d get a true leader and gritty playmaker in the middle of their defense. Despite some injury concerns and his dismissal at the NFL Combine for getting into an altercation with a hospital worker, Foster’s talent and ability to make plays trumps any minor concerns about his character or medical history. He’s a complete inside linebacker prospect with very few flaws in his game and would instantly upgrade the Packers front seven.

125

IN A NUT SHELL: By Reddick’s senior season at Temple, he established himself as the top pass rusher in the American Athletic Conference, and one of the more unique athletes in all of college football. While he made plays in college as an undersized defensive end, the New Jersey native will make the transition to inside linebacker in the NFL, a position he excelled at in the Senior Bowl back in January. Given Reddick’s unique athleticism and speed, playing off the ball and in space should be a smooth transition for him. He began his career at Temple as a defensive back before adding weight and putting his hand in the dirt as an edge rusher. Reddick’s flexible hips, quick footwork and fluid change of direction definitely show up on film. When dropping into space, the former Temple defender looks like a natural athlete. He’s also incredibly explosive, showing tremendous upfield burst and quick acceleration in pursuit. These rare athletic traits, combined with his high motor and strong punch off the line, allow him to shed blocks and get after ball carriers.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

NFL COMBINE PERFORMANCE: After generating a lot of draft buzz in the media and scouting community with an impressive Senior Bowl performance, Reddick furthered his cause with tremendous workout numbers at the NFL Combine. After running a blazing 4.52 40-yard dash, which was the fastest time among all frontseven defenders, the former Temple standout also had the day’s top broad jump at 11’1’’. This was five inches farther than Myles Garrett’s jump, demonstrating Reddick’s incredible lower body explosiveness. Reddick also finished with 24 reps on the bench press, and a 36.5-inch vertical, which were both top-five marks among the linebacker group. His quick 7.01 three-cone time capped off one of the most impressive overall performances in Indianapolis. FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Reddick’s rare athleticism and power for a player at his size would give Green Bay a unique talent to feature in the middle of their defense. With his strong hands and solid base, he could play the strong inside linebacker position. But he’s also athletic enough to play as a run-and-chase weak side linebacker. Dom Capers could also utilize Reddick in a variety of ways on passing downs. He can drop in coverage, or he could line up on the edge and generate pressure as a blitzer.

126

IN A NUT SHELL:

BEST GAME (VS. GEOGIA):

Cunningham is a rare blend of athleticism, length and speed at the inside linebacker position. With 34.5-inch arms on a 6-foot3 frame, the former Vanderbilt linebacker uses his length to disengage from blocks and keep clean in order to swarm to the ball and make stops. He shows the explosiveness to burst through the line, shooting the gap and bringing down the halfback behind the line of scrimmage. He also works well in space and shows good lateral movement, sliding over the top of the line while working his way to the ball. Cunningham takes good angles to the ball carrier, and his quick read-and-react ability allows him to get in position to make plays. The Alabama native is very active against the run, but he’s also excellent dropping into coverage. His athleticism and length allow him to match up well against tight ends, but he can also play out in space and hold his own aginst slot receivers. Cunningham is prone to over-pursuit in run fits and needs learn to keep his pad level lower when he engages in contact. Too frequently, he whiffs on tackles because he wraps up too high. Despite these few shortcomings, Cunningham is a special athlete with impressive range as an off-ball linebacker.

There are few games in college where a linebacker has a true eye-popping performance, but Cunningham had such a game midway through the 2016 season when Vanderbilt went on the road to play Georgia. On his way to recording 19 tackles, including 2.5 for a loss, Cunningham almost single-handedly kept Georgia’s prolific running game in check. While the Bulldogs only mustered 75 yards on the ground in their 16-17 loss to Vanderbilt, it was Cunningham’s incredible 4th-and-1 stop late in the fourth quarter that stole the show. Lined up over the A-gap on a fourth-and-one play at the Vanderbilt 40-yard line, with Georgia down by one point, Cunningham displayed a Herculean effort to hustle to the sidelines at the snap and chase down the ball carrier just inches short of the first down. The play sealed the win for the Commodores, and it also demonstrated the kind of impact Cunningham can have in a game.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Cunningham’s ability to make big plays at clutch moments would be a tremendous asset to the Packers defense. Simply put, Green Bay needs more young playmakers on the defensive side of the ball. Despite his sloppy play at times, Cunningham is a highly active, aggressive player who finds ways to impact games. Hiss excellent coverage ability would also make him an instant three-down linebacker in their system.

127

JARRAD DAVIS | ILB4

RAEKWON MCMILLAN | ILB5

FLORIDA (SR)

OHIO STATE (JR)

Measurables: Height: 6’1” | Weight: 238 lbs. | Arms: 33 ½" | Bench: DNP | 40-yard dash: DNP

Measurables: Height: 6’2” | Weight: 240 lbs. | Arms: 33" | Bench: 23 | 40-yard dash: 4.61

2016 Stats: 60 tackles, 6 TFL, 2 sacks, 4 PBU

2016 Stats: 102 tackles, 7 TFL, 2 sacks, 2 FF, 4 PBU

IN A NUT SHELL: Davis has the athleticism and burst to run down ball carriers outside the tackle box. He plays with good anchor to hold his ground in the box, meeting halfbacks head-on in the hole. The former Gator’s combination of speed and power allows him to crash downhill and punish ball carriers. He’s probably the hardest hitting linebacker in the class. He’s also excellent at dropping into coverage, thanks to his athleticism and fluidly in space. He stays step-for-step with tight ends across the field, and he excels at dropping into zone coverage and breaking on the ball when it’s thrown in his vicinity. He can also bring pressure as a blitzer. However, Davis does need to demonstrate more body control. He can get a bit reckless at times, which causes him to over-pursue or miss open-field tackles.

IN A NUT SHELL: Outside of Foster, McMillan is this year’s top run defender between the tackles. He has the size and functional strength to hold the point of attack and take on blocks. He doesn’t get hung up in the trash and does a good job filling his run fits. McMillan is a smart player with good on-field awareness and natural leadership skills. He’s also an adequate pass defender, especially when dropping into zone coverage. At the NFL Combine, McMillan tested out well athletically, showing speed and agility in drills. However, these athletic attributes don’t always show up on film. At times, McMillan’s lateral movement and change of direction look sluggish, minimizing his ability to make plays in pursuit. He also lacks explosiveness. A majority of his stops against the run came a few yards beyond the line of scrimmage.

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Davis makes plenty of splash plays on the field, and Green Bay could use a playmaker like that at inside linebacker. His lateral speed and overall athleticism would greatly benefit both their run and pass defense. Davis is a true tone setter against the run, and the fact the Packers wouldn’t have to take him off the field on third downs would be an added benefit.

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: While McMillan is a very solid linebacker prospect, he’s not necessarily an impact player. He would give the Packers a reliable, tough inside backer, who can also develop into a field general. However, the lack of big plays and explosiveness could limit his role. He certainly could compete for a starting spot, but he may not be the difference-maker the Packers need at the position.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

128

DUKE RILEY | ILB6

ANTHONY WALKER JR. | ILB7

LSU (SR)

NORTHWESTERN (rJR)

Measurables: Height: 6’0” | Weight: 232 lbs. | Arms: 32 ⅞" | Bench: 18 | 40-yard dash: 4.58

Measurables: Height: 6’1” | Weight: 238 lbs. | Arms: 30 ⅜" | Bench: 23 | 40-yard dash: 4.65

2016 Stats: 93 tackles, 9 TFL, 1.5 sacks, 1 INT, 1 PBU

2016 Stats: 105 tackles, 10 TFL, 2 sacks, 4 FF, 1 INT, 1 FR, 5 PBU

IN A NUT SHELL: At the start of the 2016 season, Duke Riley’s counterpart, Kendell Beckwith, garnered more national attention. But the 6-foot, 232-pound Riley is now arguably the better pro prospect. He’s an elite athlete at the position. His 4.58 speed shows up on film—whether he’s trailing a tight end down the seam or tracking a halfback down—and his ability to smoothly change direction aids him when dropping into coverage or swarming to the ball. While Riley may not have ideal size as an inside backer, he does play with good functional strength, utilizing good leverage and explosion in his lower body. Physical attributes aside, Riley’s best attribute may be his tenacity against the run.

IN A NUT SHELL: Walker is a difficult player to project at the next level. In 2015, he played at around 230 pounds and looked quick, nimble, and explosive. Coupled with his good football instincts, Walker made plays all over the field as a run-and-chase linebacker. But in 2016, Walker bulked up to 245 pounds, which greatly improved his ability to hold up between the tackles—but it did cost him some speed and agility. Walker’s junior film is a bit underwhelming. He looked sluggish at times and a step slow in coverage, despite still showing good assertiveness against the run. Walker checked in at 238 pounds at the NFL Combine and tested out moderately well athletically. It’s still unclear at this point which version of this player teams will be getting.

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: The Packers lack a true athletic presence in the middle of their defense, and Riley would certainly fill that void. He’s one of the top coverage linebackers in the draft, and like his former teammate, Deion Jones, Riley brings great top-end speed. Green Bay needs a linebacker who can hold his own in coverage, and who also possesses the sideline-to-sideline speed to make plays in pursuit.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: If Walker shows his sophomore speed and agility, then he could compete for a starting role in the Packers nickel defense. Now playing back down under 240 pounds, Walker could return to his old form, which would make him an athletic, explosive player better suited for the modern NFL. Green Bay could use the coverage linebacker seen in Walker’s 2015 film.

129

ALEX ANZALONE | ILB8

KENDELL BECKWITH | ILB9

FLORIDA (rJR)

LSU (SR)

Measurables: Height: 6’3” | Weight: 241 lbs. | Arms: 32 ⅛" | Bench: 16 | 40-yard dash: 4.63

Measurables: Height: 6’3” | Weight: 243 lbs. | Arms: 33" | Bench: 20 | 40-yard dash: DNP

2016 Stats: 30 tackles, 13.5 TFL, 9 SK, 24 QBH, 1 FF

2016 Stats: 91 tackles, 6 TFL, 1 sack, 4 PBU

IN A NUT SHELL: Anzalone shows very good athleticism and instincts on film. He has all the makings of a true three-down linebacker in the NFL. The former Gator flows well to the ball, showing an impressive knack for reading and reacting to plays. He takes sharp angles to the ball carrier, allowing him to quickly cover a lot of ground. He also looks effortless in his backpedal, dropping fluidly into coverage. Anzalone would be an earlyround prospect if it wasn’t for his injury history. He missed almost the entire 2015 season with a shoulder injury, and then in 2016 as his first year as a starter, he sat out the last five games with a broken arm.

IN A NUT SHELL: Although a bit stiff as an athlete, Beckwith is a tough, physical downhill linebacker who excels as an inside run defender. He’s a true enforcer in the middle of the field, and his ability to lay the hammer is a major asset to his game. He’s one of the better linebackers in the class at holding the point of attack and shedding blocks to make a play on the ball. His strength and size allow him to anchor well, but he does have limitations in space. He’s not the best athlete, and his lack of straight-line speed does hinder his ability to make plays outside the tackle box. He could also fall in the draft because he’s still recovering from a torn ACL he suffered in November.

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Anzalone could be the three-down starter the Packers have needed at inside linebacker for some time now. He has the athleticism and speed to hold up well in coverage, but he also has the size and functional strength to be an effective interior run defender. There are very few linebackers of his breed left in college football. However, given the injuries that have plagued Green Bay’s defense the past few seasons, they may be wary of a player with Anzalone’s medical record.

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Even with his fair share of struggles in coverage, Beckwith would still be a nice addition to the Packers roster. He would immediately bring a physical presence to the middle of their front seven. There aren’t many defenders in this draft class who can lay the wood like Beckwith. While the former LSU linebacker may not answer the Packers coverage issues at the position, he would give them a reliable early-down run defender.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

130

ELIJAH LEE | ILB10

BLAIR BROWN | ILB11

KANSAS STATE (JR)

OHIO (rSR)

Measurables: Height: 6’3” | Weight: 229 lbs. | Arms: n/a" | Bench: 18 | 40-yard dash: 4.65

Measurables: Height: 5’11” | Weight: 238 lbs. | Arms: 31 ¼" | Bench: DNP | 40-yard dash: 4.65

2016 Stats: 110 tackles, 6.5 TFL, 1.5 sacks, 1 FF, 2 INT, 3 PBU

2016 Stats: 128 tackles, 15 TFL, 4.5 sacks, 1 FF

IN A NUT SHELL: Lee primarily played in nickel at Kansas State. Being in the Big 12, he frequently faced spread offenses, shotgun formations and multiple receiver sets. Lee got used to defending slot receivers or split-out tight ends in the passing game. In fact, his ability to hold up well in coverage is the primary strength of his game. He moves smoothly in space, showing good hip flexibility and overall agility. He also has the speed to cover ground outside the tackle box, or he can turn and run down the seam to defend a streaking tight end. Lee is undersized and occasionally struggles to hold the point of attack against run-heavy offenses. However, he’s an active, athletic linebacker built for the modern NFL.

IN A NUT SHELL: Some may question the level of competition Brown played against as an Ohio linebacker, but the 5-foot-11, 238-pound backer brings consistent play and strong athletic traits to the position. He led the Bobcats in tackles (128) and tied for the team-lead in tackles for loss with 15. His on-field awareness stands out, as he shows an ability to quickly read and react to plays and flow to the ball. He also possesses good straightline speed and takes good angles to the ball carrier, making him an effective run stopper in pursuit. The Ohio product also possesses the balance and strength to take on blocks and hold the point of attack. He does have the athleticism and change-of-direction ability to serve well in coverage, but he didn’t show a lot of ability to make plays as a pass defender.

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Built similarly to Joe Thomas, Lee would make a strong case for one of the nickel linebacker spots in the Packers defense. His athleticism and speed are real assets to his game, and his ability to cover on passing downs would help fill a need on Green Bay’s roster. Lee would likely play in the weak side inside linebacker spot, alongside either Jake Ryan or Blake Martinez.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: At the very least, Brown would be a very good early-down run defender in the Packers defense. He’s a tough interior run defender with some run-and-chase ability. He’s a good enough athlete to stay in on third downs, but his coverage skills still need some development before he can be depended on as a nickel linebacker in passing situations. His awareness on passing downs could also use improvement.

131

IN A NUT SHELL: Lee is an underrated athlete with good strength and size for the position. He moves fluidly in space, showing smooth change-of-direction ability. He also plays with quick lateral movement and short-area quickness, which allows him to be active against the run and make stops outside the tackle box. While he moves well in the open field, Lee’s good upfield burst leads to a lot of explosive plays. In 2016, Lee recorded 20 tackles for loss, 7.5 sacks, and three forced fumbles. He could be a great Day 3 find for teams looking for an athletic linebacker prospect to develop. FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Lee would bring length, speed, and athleticism to the Packers inside linebacker group. He could contribute immediately on special teams, while working to develop his game and eventually break into the starting rotation. Lee’s ability to move well in space and hold up in coverage would make him a nice fit in the Packers nickel package. He could also stay in on third downs because he has a knack for getting home as a blitzer.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

132

HARVEY LANGI | ILB13

JAYON BROWN | ILB14

BYU (rSR)

UCLA (SR)

IN A NUT SHELL: Langi is a raw athlete with good explosive traits, including good upfield burst and short-area speed off the edge. As a former college defensive end, Langi will work to make the transition as an off-ball linebacker in the NFL. He certainly has the size (6-2, 251), strength, and athleticism to develop into a decent inside linebacker.

IN A NUT SHELL: Brown is a short, squatty build (6-0, 231), with a strong lower body that allows him to anchor and play with good functional strength for his size. He also moves fluidly in space and is a very active run defender. He led the Bruins in tackles as a senior with 120 stops, but he also showed a knack for making plays in coverage (3 INTs, 6 pass breakups).

BEN GEDEON | ILB15

PAUL MAGLOIRE JR | ILB16

MICHIGAN (SR)

ARIZONA (rSR)

IN A NUT SHELL: Gedeon was really productive in his one year as the Wolverines starting middle linebacker. He led the team in tackles (100) and tackles for loss (15), while also recording 4.5 sacks and two pass breakups. The 6-foot-2, 244-pound linebacker also tested really well at the NFL Combine, showing he possesses good explosiveness and agility for the position.

IN A NUT SHELL: While undersized, Magloire is an aggressive run-and-chase linebacker who moves well in space and has the speed to make plays outside the tackle box. He primarily played linebacker in a nickel defense, so he’s comfortable dropping into coverage and playing off the line. He needs to get stronger.

TANNER VALLEJO | ILB17

JAMES ONWUALU | ILB18

BOISE STATE (SR)

NOTRE DAME (SR)

IN A NUT SHELL: Vallejo is an undersized, athletic linebacker who excels in space. At 6-foot-1 and 228 pounds, the former Boise State Bronco struggles to get off blocks and can get hung up in the trash. Despite this, he does hold up well in coverage and could make a good nickel linebacker in the NFL.

IN A NUT SHELL: Onwualu quietly had three solid seasons at Notre Dame as their starting outside linebacker. After playing receiver his freshman year, Onwualu added weight and made the transition to linebacker. He’s an intriguing developmental prospect with high athletic upside.

MATT MILANO | ILB19

CALVIN MUNSON | ILB20

BOSTON COLLEGE (SR)

SAN DIEGO STATE (rSR)

IN A NUT SHELL: As a two-year starter in the Eagles defense, Milano recorded 118 stops, while finishing second on the team in tackles for loss with 24. At 6-0, 223 pounds, Milano can get lost in the trash and pushed around by opposing offensive linemen. This makes him a liability in the tackle box. However, he excels playing out in space where he can swarm to the ball and use his 4.67 speed to run and chase down ball carriers.

IN A NUT SHELL: Munson is a high-motor player with limited athleticism and speed. He was San Diego State’s leading tackler for the past two seasons, while also registering 18 sacks, 36.5 tackles for loss, and seven interceptions over his three year career. Munson could be a valuable role player and special teams contributor at the next level.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

133

Ralph Mancini

1) Treâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;Davious White (LSU) 2) Marshon Lattimore (OHIO STATE) 3) Marlon Humphrey (ALABAMA) 4) Teez Tabor (FLORIDA) 5) Gareon Conley (OHIO STATE) 6) Quincy Wilson (FLORIDA) 7) Fabian Moreau (UCLA) 8) Corn Elder (MIAMI) 9) Sidney Jones (WASHINGTON) 10) Rasul Douglas (WEST VIRGINIA) 11) Marquez White (FLORIDA STATE) 12) Ahkello Witherspoon (COLORADO) 13) Adoree Jackson (USC) 14) Cameron Sutton (TENNESSEE) 15) Damontae Kazee (SAN DIEGO STATE) 16) Jourdan Lewis (MICHIGAN) 17) Chidobe Awuzie (COLORADO) 18) Cordrea Tankersley (CLEMSON) 19) Jeremy Cutrer (MID. TENNESSEE ST.) 20) Desmond King (IOWA) 21) Kevin King (WASHINGTON) 22) Howard Wilson (HOUSTON) 23) Jalen Myrick (MINNESOTA) 24) Des Lawrence (NORTH CAROLINA) 25) Brendan Langley (LAMAR)

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

134

IN A NUT SHELL: This four-year starter comes off a superb senior campaign that saw him ranked as the top-rated cornerback by Pro Football Focus (90.5). White is a versatile cover man that can play both press-man and off-coverage, as well as line up against shifty receivers in the slot. His combination of long arms, quick feet and fluid hips makes him a special corner. He consistently makes great reads off the quarterback, often resulting in deflected balls or interceptions. White ranks third all-time in passes defensed in the SEC. The former Bayou Bengal puts his instincts to good use by quickly diagnosing fakes and misdirection in the running game, along with leaving his man in pass coverage to cut off a nearby opponent with the ball in his hands.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

VS. TOP OPPONENT: White did a marvelous job of shadowing Calvin Ridley, running step-for-step with Alabama’s top receiving weapon and not allowing any real separation. Ridley failed to record a single catch versus No. 18. White was also a factor against the run, notching 3 tackles, including 1.5 for a loss. White also recorded a sack in the third quarter. FIT WITH THE PACKERS: The vacancy left by Sam Shields leaves the door wide open for White to step in and earn a starting role. The current roster lacks anything resembling a lockdown corner, which would allow the LSU product to step in immediately and defend the opposition’s primary receiver. Should he struggle in assuming the role of the No. 1 cornerback in the preseason, White has the reactive quickness and natural cover skills to play the slot.

135

IN A NUT SHELL: Lattimore is a master at bodying up his man, mimicking the receiver’s route while showcasing his loose hips through change-of-direction. He combines these outstanding skills with top-notch timing and instincts, sensing when his opponent is slowing down while also tracking downfield throws and anticipating the ball’s arrival. The redshirt sophomore makes up for his lack of experience with the desired physical strength to steer adversaries toward the sideline. He can also fight off blocks to get to the ball carrier in run support. The former Buckeye is arguably the most complete corner in the draft.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

VS. TOP OPPONENT: Though the Buckeyes suffered a 31-0 shutout to Clemson, the defense did its part in limiting the damage. Lattimore faced off against receiver Mike Williams, and did a nearly perfect job of keeping the tall playmaker in front of him in one-on-one situations. Lattimore only gave up one reception to Wiliams—an insignificant 1-yard gain FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Lattimore is a physical, scheme-versatile corner who isn’t shy about getting (and staying) in an opponent’s face. This former Big-Ten standout has the ability to erase an opponent’s top receiver. He may need to adopt more off-man technique versus speedy receivers, though, as he struggled to prevent big plays from speed merchants like Alabama’s Dede Westbrook.

136

IN A NUT SHELL: Humphrey’s height, weight, length and speed are all valuable tools. He’s also an intimidating presence in off-man coverage, taking great pleasure in attacking screens and hammering his opponents. The underclassman flashes great recovery speed with the ball in the air, but is still deficient in his overall technique. In particular, he tends to jump the gun in engaging his man in press coverage, leaving him vulnerable to conceding inside leverage.

VS. TOP OPPONENT: Humphrey was an integral part of Alabama totally shutting down and annihilating LSU’s offense during their Nov. 5 matchup. Tigers’ quarterback Randy Etling was held to only 92 yards passing with the aggressive underclassman playing press-man coverage throughout the contest, as the opponent couldn’t muster much of attack in the air and on the ground. Humphrey

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

was also an active participant in supporting the run, as he totaled 8 tackles in the 10-0 shutout. The one time where it seemed as if No. 26 was in danger of being beat was on an Etling underthrow in which the receiver D.J. Chark did a tremendous job of not shooting up his hands up for the oncoming ball until the very last instant. In either case, Humphrey had successfully established good position on the play in question.

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: The upside is tremendous, but the Packers may need to exert patience with Humphrey early on. Expecting him to immediately emerge as the No. 1 cornerback is probably unrealistic given his inexperience—he still lacks route recognition and patience. His fluid movement skills and competitive streak are two primary traits that can help him become a top-5 cornerback with proper coaching.

137

JALEN “TEEZ” TABOR | CB4

GAREON CONLEY | CB5

FLORIDA (JR)

OHIO STATE (JR)

Measurables: Height: 6’0” | Weight: 199 lbs. | Arms: 32" | Bench: 9 | 40-yard dash: 4.62

Measurables: Height: 6’0” | Weight: 195 lbs. | Arms: 33" | Bench: 11 | 40-yard dash: 4.44

2016 Stats: 33 tackles, 2 TFL, 4 INT, 6 PBU, 1 sack

2016 Stats: 26 tackles, 0 TFL, 4 INT, 8 PBU, 0 sac

IN A NUT SHELL: This SEC underclassman is a tough customer that doesn’t back down or concede much to receivers in man coverage. In addition to his ability to quickly cover lots of ground in off-coverage, Tabor exhibits extraordinary instincts, reading the eyes of the quarterback to undercut routes. He is extremely confident and very much aware of his support and what’s taking place around him. That doesn’t make him immune to mistakes. He will sometimes lose sight of the ball on downfield throws or occasionally get duped by double moves. The former Gator tips the scales at over 200 pounds and, depending on a ball carrier’s physical dimensions, picks and chooses how hard to attack in run support.

IN A NUT SHELL: Conley’s combination of length and coverage technique will make him a prospect in high demand. Unlike many corners that tend to get grabby when their opponent gains a step on them, the Big-Ten product compensates by using his burst and long arms to close in on the ball. His efforts to avoid pass interference can at times make him hesitant, surrendering completions on back-shoulder fades as a result. But overall, the Ohio-born cover man does a fine job of playing the ball instead of the man and has the instincts to recognize routes and sniff out screens. Conley does fall prey to being overpowered by big receivers on slant plays, and he struggles to disengage from blockers in run support. In fact, the former Buckeye can be a bit of a “pile inspector” on run plays.

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: While Tabor is athletic and skilled enough to be scheme versatile, he projects as more as an off-coverage defender. He has struggled against bigger pass catchers that can body him up on in-breaking patterns. In a perfect world, “Teez” would be a better fit as Green Bay’s No. 2 corner, where he would be less likely to match up against some of the bigger and more physically dominant playmakers in the league.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Conley has the skill set to earn a starting role in his rookie campaign, but his transition to the pros won’t be without growing pains. He’s susceptible to double moves and inside routes. His deficiencies as a run defender also need to be addressed. Elevating Conley to the starting lineup will only work if he’s paired with a free-agent veteran that the Packers may have already signed by the time the draft kicks off in late April.

138

QUINCY WILSON | CB6

FABIAN MOREAU | CB7

FLORIDA (JR)

UCLA (SR)

Measurables: Height: 6’1” | Weight: 211 lbs. | Arms: 32 ¼" | Bench: 14 | 40-yard dash: 4.54

Measurables: Height: 6’0” | Weight: 206 lbs. | Arms: 31 ⅜" | Bench: n/a | 40-yard dash: 4.35

2016 Stats: 33 tackles, 3.5 TFL, 3 INT, 6 PBU, 1 sack

2016 Stats: 31 tackles, 1 TFL, 2 INT, 9 PBU, 0 sacks

IN A NUT SHELL: Wilson is a highly competitive defender who gets in his opponent’s face to jam and reroute them while establishing leverage. His long arms and superior read-and-react skills help him to get his hands on balls outside his frame. But while he shows awareness by getting his head around on fade routes, more complex route combinations can just as easily confuse him. This second-team All-SEC selection is also prone to some sloppiness in his backpedal, which allows his adversary to benefit from excessive cushion. The Florida native may be better suited to play free safety in the NFL.

IN A NUT SHELL: This converted running back combines toughness to jam and reroute receivers off the line with excellent instincts to make great reads and avoid being baited by play fakes. In fact, it’s Moreau that often does most of the baiting. He has an ability to lure passers into a false sense of security by playing soft at first, but can recover in time to make a play on the ball. The sturdy prospect plays with loads of confidence and likes to gamble by jumping routes. While he’s known as more of a press-man player, he showed the skills to excel in off-coverage at the East-West Shrine game. Moreau is prone to committing pass-interference on extended pass plays and suffered a Lis-Franc injury in 2015.

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: One can see shades of former Packer Al Harris in the way Wilson thrives in bump-and-run coverage. The young enforcer is just as physical in playing the run and would probably be asked to play in nickel and dime coverage if he remains at his corner position. Moving him to safety, though, would allow the Packers to match him against tight ends instead of quicker and more agile receivers on the outside. If the coaching staff decides to go that route, Wilson could be the heir apparent to Morgan Burnett.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: If Moreau eases concerns about potential issues from his Lis-Franc ailment, the Pac-12 phenom has the tools and experience to start from day one. Along with exhibiting scheme-versatile traits, the Pac-12 import should be a force in run support due to his aggressive nature and sure tackling.

139

CORN ELDER | CB8

*SIDNEY JONES |CB9

MIAMI (SR)

WASHINGTON (JR)

Measurables: Height: 5’9 ¾” | Weight: 183 lbs. | Arms: 31 ¼" | Bench: n/a | 40-yard dash: 4.55

Measurables: Height: 6’0” | Weight: 186 lbs. | Arms: 31 ½" | Bench: n/a | 40-yard dash: 4.47

2016 Stats: 76 tackles, 4.5 TFL, 1 INT, 12 PBU, 3 sacks

2016 Stats: 39 tackles, 2.5 TFL, 2 INT, 6 PBU, 0 sacks

IN A NUT SHELL: The former Hurricane is a human Swiss Army knife. He flashes the speed to run down plays, the patience and discipline to play press-man, the quick-twitch instincts to swat away balls and the toughness to square up and drive ball carriers into the ground. And if that weren’t enough, Elder was a headhunter on special teams as well. He does lack elite size, though. The one-time high school running back measured in at 5’10” at the combine.

IN A NUT SHELL: Jones is a confident corner who jams guys hard off the line and aggressively puts himself between the ball and the intended target. The long-armed defender not only possesses the ball skills of a receiver, but he can also use his leaping ability to deny the ball from opponents who have four or five inches on him. The three-year starter’s flexibility allows him to extend for balls outside of his frame. In addition to being physical in coverage, Jones makes great reads in run support and doesn’t give up the edge to oncoming ball carriers. He is also an effective blitzer who is capable of disguising his intentions.

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Elder’s varied skill set will allow him to see the field early on as a nickel or dime corner or even at the safety position. The Packers could easily feature his agility and quickness by lining him up as a slot defender. Look for the Tennessee native to play a key role on special teams.

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: This ball hawk can be the same type of lockdown corner Sam Shields was, but with more size, physicality and superior ball skills. Jones may not have the straight-line speed of the former Packer, but his keen anticipation often puts him one step ahead of the receiver. His biggest flaw might be his aggressive, grabby play, which invites pass-interference calls. *Originally 3rd in the rankings, Jones was dropped down after rupturing his Achilles tendon at his Pro Day.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

140

RASUL DOUGLAS | CB10

MARQUEZ WHITE | CB11

WEST VIRGINIA (SR)

FLORIDA STATE (SR)

Measurables: Height: 6’1 ½” | Weight: 209 lbs. | Arms: 32 ⅜" | Bench: 16 | 40-yard dash: 4.59

Measurables: Height: 6’0” | Weight: 1948 lbs. | Arms: 32 ⅛" | Bench: n/a | 40-yard dash: 4.59

2016 Stats: 70 tackles, 3.5 TFL, 8 INT, 8 PBU, 1 sack

2016 Stats: 25 tackles, 2 TFL, 2 INT, 4 PBU, 1 sacks

IN A NUT SHELL: Douglas is primarily a bail-technique defender that specializes in reading the quarterback’s movements and breaking on slants as well as sideline routes. His ball skills are secondto-none in that he not only gets his hands on a lot of throws, but he tucks them away for interceptions and had eight of them in his senior year in Morgantown. The New Jersey native’s length and aggressive nature allow him to defend jump balls. The former Mountaineer’s technique in press-man could use a lot of improvement.

IN A NUT SHELL: A real student of the game with intense study habits, White seldom falls prey to double moves. A former high school basketball star, the Seminole was the definition of a lockdown corner in both press-man and off-coverage in Tallahassee. He allowed just one touchdown in his last two seasons. White effectively uses his 10” hands to immediately strike and reroute his man off the line, but needs to get stronger and improve his tackling.

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: This big corner has all the traits to serve as a significant upgrade over the speed-deficient Ladarius Gunter. While Douglas may not be Green Bay’s No. 1 corner off the bat, he could develop into the type of defender that could erase some of the league’s bigger downfield threats, such as Julio Jones and Mike Evans, with his read-and-react skills.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Both in abilities and character, White projects as a great fit with the Packers. He’s constantly putting in extra time to improve different aspects of his game. Once he refines his reaction skills in press-man, he should be ready to handle a starting role. His propensity to miss tackles remains the biggest concern.

141

ADOREE JACKSON | CB13 USC (SR) IN A NUT SHELL: Jackson has tremendous recovery speed, which makes him superb in off-coverage. However, he is lacking in technique and recognition.

CAMERON SUTTON | CB14 TENNESEE (SR) IN A NUT SHELL: Sutton is physical and instinctive as a corner, and with great range as a safety. His injury history is a concern.

IN A NUT SHELL: One of the taller and longer prospects at his position, Witherspoon is a technician that recognizes routes and generally keeps his opponent in front of him. His long arms and longer strides make him hard to separate from. In addition, the California-born defender possesses fluid hips and quick feet. He puts himself in great position to undercut routes. His tackling, however, is sub-par in both technique and timing. Getting stronger is a must. FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Witherspoon’s lanky frame may require him to start off as a nickel or dime corner, where he will be expected to cover big veteran receivers that outweigh him by 10-to-15 pounds. The all-time single-season record holder in pass breakups at the University of Colorado could develop into a Richard Sherman type.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

DAMONTAE KAZEE | CB15 SAN DIEGO STATE (SR) IN A NUT SHELL: Kazee brings instincts and great ball skills, and he can deliver the wood in run support. He projects as a slot corner.

JOURDAN LEWIS | CB16 MICHIGAN (SR) IN A NUT SHELL: Lewis has remarkable speed and lateral agility in man coverage, but makes poor reads and struggles versus size on the outside.

CHIDOBE AWUZIE | CB17 COLORADO (rSR) IN A NUT SHELL: Munson is a high-motor player with limited athleticism and Awuzie can jam receivers off the line in man coverage. He anticipates plays, but his overall effort is inconsistent and he can get overpowered. While he is versatile, he gets hung up on blocks versus the run. His 40-time can be deceiving.

142

CORDREA TANKERSLEY | CB18

JEREMY CUTRER | CB19

CLEMSON (SR)

MIDDLE TENNESSEE STATE (SR)

IN A NUT SHELL: The word on Tankersley is that he’s overrated and plays stiff. He struggles tracking deep passes. His ball skills and length are his best assets.

IN A NUT SHELL: Cutrer is a long zone corner with superior awareness. He hits like a linebacker.

DESMOND KING | CB20

KEVIN KING | CB21

IOWA (SR)

WASHINGTON (SR)

IN A NUT SHELL: A physical ball hawk, King struggles with bad technique in man coverage. He likely projects as a safety in the NFL.

IN A NUT SHELL: Kevin King has the agility, ball skills and body control to make plays, but he isn’t very physical. He struggles to jam opponents that gain inside leverage on him.

HOWARD WILSON | CB22

JALEN MYRICK | CB23

HOUSTON (rSO)

MINNESOTA (SR)

IN A NUT SHELL: Wilson is a zone coverage defender with great recovery speed. He faced a limited route tree and suffered a knee injury in 2015.

IN A NUT SHELL: Myrick is a better athlete than he is a technician. He’s susceptible to double moves and gets overpowered in run support.

DES LAWRENCE | CB24

BRENDAN LANGLEY | CB25

NORTH CAROLINA STATE (SR)

LAMAR (SR)

IN A NUT SHELL: Lawrence is a zone scheme corner that gives up excessive cushion and exhibits poor form as a tackler.

IN A NUT SHELL: Langley is a tough cover man with speed and leaping ability. He struggled mightily in Senior Bowl practices. He is strictly an off-coverage corner.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

143

Erik Fretland

1) Malik Hooker (OHIO STATE) 2) Jamal Adams (LSU) 3a) Marcus Williams (UTAH) 3b) Budda Baker (WASHINGTON) 5) Desmond King (IOWA) 6) Obi Melifonwu (UCONN) 7) Jabrill Peppers (MICHIGAN) 8) Marcus Maye (FLORIDA) 9) Eddie Jackson (ALABAMA) 10) Justin Evans (TEXAS A&M) 11) Josh Jones (NC STATE) 12) Josh Harvey-Clemons (LOUISVILLE) 13) Rayshawn Jenkins (MIAMI) 14) Delano Hill (MICHIGAN) 15) Nate Gerry (NEBRASKA) 16) Xavier Woods (LOUISIANA TECH) 17) Fish Smithson (KANSAS) 18) Leon McQuay III (UCLA) 19) Dante Barnett (KANSAS STATE) 20) Nate Andrews (FLORIDA STATE)

ADDITIONAL PLAYERS / NOT FEATURED

21) Jadar Johnson (CLEMSON) 22) Tony Conner (OLE MISS) 23) Max Redfield (NOTRE DAME) 24) Tedric Thompson (COLORADO) 25) Jamal Carter (MIAMI)

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

144

MALIK HOOKER | S1 OHIO STATE (rSO) Measurables: Height: 6’1” | Weight: 206 lbs. | 40-yard dash: n/a | Vertical: n/a 2016 Stats: 74 tackles, 5.5 TFL, 0.5 sacks, 7 INT (3 TDs), 4 PD

IN A NUT SHELL: Hooker is an extremely skilled player in coverage. While his tape shows his obvious athleticism, what really stands out is his footwork and technique. He is extremely comfortable defending slot receivers man to man, running their routes with them and changing direction smoothly. He transitions well from backpedaling in off-man to driving on receivers’ cuts, and he has more than enough speed to hang with fast receivers if he is tested deep in man. In deep zones, he is also quite comfortable, although his technique and reaction time isn’t quite as perfect as it is when he is in man-to-man. What he lacks in quick recognition (at least when in a deep zone) he makes up for with ground-covering athleticism and good fundamentals when the ball is in the air. He isn’t as aggressive as some in short zones, and doesn’t close especially quickly on shorter passes. Against the run, Hooker is one of the more consistent of the top safeties in this class. He typically (but not always) takes good angles from depth, and is a solid tackler. He can often

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

be found arriving late to a pile, but this is because he plays under more control than most other safeties, and thus is still in position to chase a tailback down if he somehow slips free. Although Hooker isn’t a big hitter, he’s an effective tackler who finds ways to bring down larger backs. BEST GAME(S): Hooker’s 2-interception game to start the season against BGSU might qualify for his best game of the season, although his 14-tackle game against Northwestern and his 7-tackle, 1-pick six game against Michigan might also contend for that spot. FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Hooker being drafted by the Packers (assuming a trade up, or a precipitous fall by Hooker) would imply that the Packers do not plan on extending Morgan Burnett after this season. Although they don’t play the same position, it might set the stage for Haha Clinton-Dix to move into the box safety/ILB role while Hooker takes over the free safety role.

145

JAMAL ADAMS | S2 LSU (JR) Measurables: Height: 6’0” | Weight: 214 lbs. | 40-yard dash: 4.56 | Vertical: 31.5 2016 Stats: 76 tackles, 7.5 TFL, 1 sack, 1 INT, 4 PD, 1 FF

IN A NUT SHELL: Adams is a physical, rangy safety whose only playing speed is a hundred miles an hour. He fits more into a role as either a Cover-2 safety or a box/hook zone defender, as his skillset emphasizes making instant decisions and flying to a spot rather than ranging sideline to sideline in a single-high scheme. When looking at Adams’ combine stats, it would be easy to make the mistake of thinking that he is a good football player because of his size and athleticism. While these factors do contribute, Adams’ best attribute is his incredibly high football IQ and great football instincts. There were several instances on tape in just the few games used for this analysis where Adams’ instincts kicked in as a play developed and his athleticism allowed him to get to where he needed to be to shut the play down, especially on 3rd down passes to the flats. He moves fluidly, but can be exposed in man coverage or in the deep middle zone. Adams is very good at reading, reacting to, and closing on short passes, although sometimes he misses tackles because he comes in out of control. This issue with tackling also arises occasionally when defending the run, especially when he aggressively overpursues runs away from his side. He usually has good run fits when in the box, but can whiff when coming down in run

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

support from deep. Despite his physicality, he often struggles getting off blocks that he should be able to shed with relative ease. He doesn’t usually go for big hits on backs, which contributes to his reliability in the box. BEST GAME(S): Adams had two games where he had double-digit tackles, including one against Southern Mississippi where he had 11 tackles, 1.5 tackles for loss, in addition to forcing and recovering a fumble. In their rivalry game with Alabama, Adams had 6 tackles, 1 tackle for loss, and an interception on Alabama’s first drive. FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Adding Adams would add an aggressive, playmaking presence to the secondary that has been missing since Charles Woodson’s prime. He profiles more closely to serve as Morgan Burnett’s replacement if he isn’t resigned, as he can play in the box and would be an upgrade in the slot and in 2-deep zone coverages. In the meantime, he would most likely fill the hole left by Micah Hyde’s departure, and can also play a variety of roles on special teams.

146

MARCUS WILLIAMS | S3a UTAH (JR) Measurables: Height: 6’1” | Weight: 202 lbs. | 40-yard dash: 4.56 | Vertical: 43.5 2016 Stats: 64 tackles, 1 TFL, 5 INTs, 3 PD, 2 FF

IN A NUT SHELL:

BEST GAME(S):

Williams fits the mold of a true centerfield free safety, playing a majority of his college snaps in the deep middle of the field. Unlike some of the other top safety prospects in this class, Williams’ role in college was less varied, but also unlike some of the other top safety prospects, Williams stands out in that one role. He possesses the range to go sideline to sideline against deep go routes, and when responsible for the deep half in Cover-2, has the speed and technique, as well as the jumping ability, to defend deep passes when in one-on-one coverage. He isn’t afraid to punish receivers on post routes and crossers thrown into the deep middle zone, and reads and breaks on intermediate routes well. Williams is limited in man coverage and in shorter zones.

In Utah’s game against Arizona State, Williams had his most productive day, with 9 solo tackles on top of an interception and a pass deflection. Just a week later, he had 12 total tackles and a forced fumble at home against Oregon.

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Although Ted Thompson likely thought he was drafting his free safety for the next ten years when he pulled the trigger on Clinton-Dix in 2014, drafting Williams would upgrade two positions, by slotting Williams into Clinton-Dix’s role at free safety and bumping Clinton-Dix down to the box safety role, where he would be an improvement in coverage over Burnett. Burnett would then move to the bench on base downs, but would see a high number of snaps in subpackages as a linebacker.

Against the run, Williams is exactly what teams look for in a “last line of defense”. He is an extremely reliable tackler, capable of pursuing and dragging down ballcarriers in the open field, while consistently filling the proper gaps when closer to the line of scrimmage and against screen passes. He is not a powerful hitter, but he doesn’t need to be.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

147

BUDDA BAKER | S3b WASHINGTON (JR) Measurables: Height: 5’10” | Weight: 195 lbs. | 40-yard dash: 4.45 | Vertical: 32.5 2016 Stats: 70 tackles, 9.5 TFL, 3 sacks, 2 INT, 5 PD, 1 FF

IN A NUT SHELL: If Baker was two inches taller, it’s not out of the question that he’d be in the discussion as a top-20 pick in the NFL draft. As it is, Baker plays larger than his size, locking down slot receivers, punishing runningbacks in the box, and blowing up blockers on screen passes and outside run plays. Most of Baker’s experience came primarily in the slot, with the bulk of the rest coming as a box defender or even as an outside linebacker on the line of scrimmage. In coverage, Baker possesses route recognition good enough to run most routes for the receiver, the footwork and agility to stay in position through any variety of cuts, and the speed to close when the ball is in the air and also to recover if he gets beat on a double move. He likes to undercut routes but is quick enough to get back into good position if the route happens to be a double move. On short throws, the way he closes on the ball is reminiscent of a shark smelling blood in the water. Against the run, Baker hits like a linebacker, and can be devastating when coming unblocked off the edge on run downs. Even when accounted for in blocking schemes, has a knack for slipping around blockers to shut down running lanes. Although

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

he does not frequently square runners up one on one, he does a good job of figuring out the best angle to take down the oncoming back, and is overall a very effective run game player.

BEST GAME(S): Baker’s best game was early on in the season against Idaho, where he had 6 total tackles, including 1.5 TFLs and a half sack in addition to a forced fumble. He also had 9 solo tackles in a game against Arizona, and had 8 tackles, 2 TFLs and an interception against in-state rival Washington State.

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Baker would bring a level of intensity to the Packers defense that it sorely needs. Baker would come in and immediately be the best slot cover man on the roster. Although his experience in deep zone coverage is limited, he would be an upgrade over Micah Hyde in both the slot and blitzing off the edge on run downs. Unfortunately, it seems unlikely that the Packers would draft Baker because he does not meet the size thresholds that Ted Thompson usually looks for in defensive backs.

148

DESMOND KING | S5

OBI MELIFONWU | S6

IOWA (SR)

UCONN (SR)

Measurables: Height: 5’10” | Weight: 201 lbs. | 40-yard dash: n/a | Vertical: 34

Measurables: Height: 6’4” | Weight: 224 lbs. | 40-yard dash: 4.40 | Vertical: 44

2016 Stats: 58 tackles, 3.5 TFL, 3 INTs (1 TD), 7 PD, 1 FF

2016 Stats: 118 total tackles, 2.5 TFL, 4 INTs, 3 PD

IN A NUT SHELL: Although the majority of King’s college snaps came at boundary corner, many NFL teams consider him a safety prospect due to speed questions (and he didn’t run a 40 at the combine due to an abdominal strain). He possesses the technical skills in press man, off man and zone to cover from any position on the field, and on tape did not demonstrate a speed deficiency. He has a natural feel for where he needs to be in zone to defend various route combinations and is a disciplined player. He’s a physical player but due to his lack of reps at safety in college, there are questions about how well he can play against the run. His best role at the next level may be as a slot corner/ safety hybrid where he can smother slot receivers and tight ends with his tight man coverage.

IN A NUT SHELL: Obi Melifonwu is the type of player who can shore up a weak run defense while also holding his own in coverage. Melifonwu was used too frequently by UConn as a slot corner, and while he didn’t perform terribly there, his best coverage occurred when he was playing as a deep half or centerfield safety, where he demonstrated the awareness and range to be effective if not a game-changing coverage player. Against the run, Melifonwu sifts through traffic and finds the running lane easily, and closes on the ball carrier without hesitation. He comes in under control and rarely misses tackles, and usually packs enough of a wallop to stop forward progress immediately. He has the burst to make tackles for loss when coming unblocked off the backside on run plays.

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: A team as cornerback-needy as the Packers would be foolish not to give King a chance to compete for an outside cornerback spot. While he isn’t as fast as the ideal cornerback prospect, he is significantly faster than Ladarius Gunter and is much more skilled in man coverage than any of Gunter, Randall or Rollins. Should the Packers not want to try this, King will at the very least serve as a high level slot corner and depth at outside corner, and can move to safety when Morgan Burnett is in at linebacker.

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Although Melifonwu was not used as a blitzer much by UConn, Dom Capers would have a field day using him in the role Woodson played in the latter part of his career, lining him up in the slot and on the line of scrimmage and frequently sending him as part of zone blitz packages where he can use his speed to full effect when getting unblocked runs at the quarterback. His speed, size and agility combination might even allow Capers to use him in some “psycho” packages with him, Burnett and Joe Thomas as the coverage linebackers.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

149

JABRILL PEPPERS | S7

MARCUS MAYE | S8

MICHIGAN (JR)

FLORIDA (rSR)

Measurables: Height: 5’11” | Weight: 213 lbs. | 40-yard dash: 4.46 | Vertical: 35.5

Measurables: Height: 6’0” | Weight: 210 lbs. | 40-yard dash: n/a | Vertical: n/a

2016 Stats: 66 tackles, 13 TFL, 3 sacks, 1 INT, 1 PD

2016 Stats: 50 tackles, 1.5 TFL, 1 sack, 1 INT, 5 PD

IN A NUT SHELL: On defense, Peppers is more valuable for the variety of roles that he can play rather than how well he can play them. On any given play, he can line up in the slot, in a two point stance on the line of scrimmage, as an off-ball linebacker, or a deep center field safety. While he isn’t bad in any of those roles, he also isn’t a difference maker, as he struggles to hang with good route runners in both off-man and press-man. In zone, he is a very disciplined player and recognizes route concepts well, but doesn’t have elite closing speed on routes in front of him. Against the run, he sorts through traffic well when lined up in the box, but can over-pursue at times and will get stood up by big backs when trying to square them up.

IN A NUT SHELL: A physical player who projects to be able to play in the box or to defend the deep half in a Cover-2 scheme, Maye stands out on tape in a Florida defense filled with playmakers. When he lines up in the box, he has an almost uncanny sense for where the running back is headed and slips easily through traffic to get there and make the stop. He is a strong tackler both in the box and in the open field. In coverage, Maye can do a lot of things well, including breaking on routes going into his deep half and playing tight man coverage in the red zone. He is capable of playing center field but does not excel there.

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Drafting Peppers would give Dom Capers a movable chess piece to play around with in a variety of pressure packages, while also using him more conventionally in a big slot role similar to what Micah Hyde played. Peppers’ 13 TFLs and 3 sacks in 2016 show that he can be an effective blitzer, and is also able to man up on tight ends and shore up the Packers’ coverage in the middle of the field.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Marcus Maye would be a valuable and versatile backup to a team with established starters throughout the secondary but not a lot of depth, due to his ability to play multiple positions and hold his own in coverage. Although the Packers have both starting safety jobs locked down, Maye would compete with Brice to be the 3rd safety and could take over Morgan Burnett’s role if he is not resigned.

150

EDDIE JACKSON | S9

JUSTIN EVANS | S10

ALABAMA (SR)

TEXAS A&M (SR)

Measurables: Height: 6’0” | Weight: 201 lbs. | 40-yard dash: n/a | Vertical: n/a

Measurables: Height: 6’0” | Weight: 199 lbs. | 40-yard dash: n/a | Vertical: n/a

2016 Stats: 24 tackles, 2.5 TFL, 1 INT (1 TD), 2 PD

2016 Stats: 87 tackles, 5 TFLs, 4 INTs, 8 PDs

IN A NUT SHELL: As a former cornerback, Jackson has the athleticism and coverage ability to line up all over the defense, including occasionally in the deep middle of the field. When he comes down to cover the slot, his technique in man coverage is very good, although he doesn’t have the suddenness to stay with the quickest receivers. When playing the deep half of the field, Jackson is more than capable of breaking on corner routes to the sideline, and has decent range when playing center field. He is a willing and relatively consistent tackler against the run. His biggest question mark is how well he’s recovered from a broken leg suffered partway through the 2016 season.

IN A NUT SHELL:

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Like Desmond King, it would be surprising if the Packers didn’t give Jackson a shot to compete for a cornerback job. If he were to perform well, Ladarius Gunter’s roster spot would be in jeopardy, and Randall and Rollins would be put on notice as well. Either way, he could contribute immediately on special teams as a punt returner and in the slot.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

A versatile cover safety, Evans has neither unique strengths nor glaring weaknesses. Overall, he is a well rounded prospect, but lacks one particular thing that sets him apart. He is comfortable in a variety of coverage roles, from deep zones to short zones to man, and has solid athleticism to match up with most non-perimeter targets. He recognizes route combinations pretty well, and closes well on short passes. When in man or short zone coverage, he is extremely aggressive, which can be taken advantage of with double moves. Evans grades poorly as a run defender for several reasons. His angles taken were questionable, and he is a poor tackler. He also struggles to get off blocks, even from smaller players. When lined up in the box, he had difficulty sorting through trash to cut off the running lane.

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: The more defensive backs who can cover, the better. Although Evans wouldn’t have a clear cut path to starting in year one, this is probably for the best because he needs to develop his coverage technique as well as clean up some mental errors. In his rookie year, he provides valuable depth to a safety group that lost Micah Hyde and Chris Banjo, and going forward he could easily move into the 3rd safety slot in the event that Kentrell Brice doesn’t develop.

151

JOSH JONES | S11

JOSH HARVEY-CLEMONS | S12

NC STATE (rJR)

LOUISVILLE (SR)

Measurables: Height: 6’1” | Weight: 220 lbs. | 40-yard dash: 4.41 | Vertical: 37.5

Measurables: Height: 6’4” | Weight:217 lbs. | 40-yard dash: n/a | Vertical: 31.5

2016 Stats: 109 tackles, 4.0 TFLs, 1 sack, 3 INTs, 8 PDs, 1 FF

2016 Stats: 60 tackles, 3 TFL, 1 sack, 2 PD

IN A NUT SHELL: Josh Jones is a player whose best position at the next level may be as a slot defender, for two reasons. He is extremely comfortable in man coverage, and while he isn’t great at breaking on shorter routes in front of him, he can smoothly turn and run with slot receivers down the field and stay in phase the whole time. Secondly, he is an explosive blitzer, and keeping him close to the line of scrimmage will allow him to utilize that skillset. He can be slow to react to routes and throws when in deep zones. He is also a solid tackler and can help in run support.

IN A NUT SHELL: While NFL teams love big defensive backs, Josh HarveyClemons may be a candidate for a position switch to inside linebacker at the next level, or at the very least to play a role similar to Morgan Burnett for the Packers or Deone Bucannon for the Cardinals. He is at his best when lined up off the ball as a linebacker, able to thump running backs and blockers from the weak side linebacker position but without being exposed in coverage. He is better in zone coverage than man, and is an outright liability against speedy receivers and tight ends.

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: In recent years, when the Packers have struggled to defend the pass, a large reason has been the lack of a dominant pass rush. Since it doesn’t look like the Packers will have an elite pair of outside linebackers, the other way they can get pressure is by blitzing effectively. Jones would take over Micah Hyde’s role, providing an upgrade over Hyde in blitzing and in run defense, although he isn’t quite as good in zone coverage as Hyde.

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Because the Packers have a history of having difficulty covering tight ends and slot receivers, a player like Josh Harvey-Clemons would make sense for the Packers to draft in the middle rounds. If he gains 15 or so pounds, he would be able to get on the field as a coverage linebacker for a good number of snaps. Between Ryan, Martinez, Thomas and Harvey-Clemons, the Packers would have a linebacker rotation versatile enough to handle almost any offense.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

152

RAYSHAWN JENKINS | S13

DELANO HILL | S14

MIAMI (rSR)

MICHIGAN (SR)

IN A NUT SHELL: Jenkins was used as both in the box and in a Cover-2 alignment by Miami. He is a powerful hitter and a good tackler when in the box, but takes poor angles against the run when lined up as a deep safety. When deep, he shows good route recognition and the athleticism to break on routes both in front of him and going to the sideline.

IN A NUT SHELL: A poor man’s Malik Hooker, Hill is a centerfield safety with the skills to match up to slot receivers or even play boundary corner against motions to 5-wide sets. He is also a consistent tackler both in the box and in space.

NATE GERRY | S15

XAVIER WOODS | S16

NEBRASKA (SR)

LOUISIANA TECH (SR)

IN A NUT SHELL: A solid tackler with good football instincts, Gerry has a feel for what the offense is trying to do and where the receivers will be even when he is underneath routes. He is athletic enough and versatile enough to play deep centerfield on one snap and in the box the next.

IN A NUT SHELL: Woods has a natural feel for man coverage, giving him the flexibility to switch from safety to slot player on any given snap. Although smaller than ideal, he is not afraid to take on bigger running backs head on and is a reliable tackler.

FISH SMITHSON | S17

LEON MCQUAY III | S18

KANSAS (SR)

USC (SR)

IN A NUT SHELL: Alternating between playing deep and in the slot, Smithson has the versatility that NFL teams look for, but is athletically limited and doesn’t have the range to play a true centerfield role in a Cover 1 or Cover 3 scheme, although he can be an asset as a backup safety and special teams player.

IN A NUT SHELL: A scrappy, tenacious player, McQuay flies to the ball like he’s fired out of a cannon, and usually finds a way to bring the ball carrier to the ground. Although not especially talented in coverage, he is disciplined and often finds himself in position to make a play on either the ball or the receiver.

DANTE BARNETT | S19

NATE ANDREWS | S20

KANSAS STATE (SR)

FLORIDA STATE (SR)

IN A NUT SHELL: Barnett’s trademarks as a player are awareness, play recognition, and reliability. He is especially effective in the run game, setting the edge and coming down from deep to stop outside run plays for no gain. Can match up with tight ends and some slot receivers.

IN A NUT SHELL: Andrews is a physical player who has very good technique in man and zone coverage when matched up against tight ends and slot receivers. Although not a great athlete, his football intelligence and instincts get him to the right place at the right time.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

153

Erik Fretland

1) Zane Gonzalez (ARIZONA STATE) 2) Jake Elliott (MEMPHIS) 3) Austin Rehkow (IDAHO) 4) Andy Phillip (UTAH) 5) Rigoberto Sanchez (HAWAII) 6) Conrad Ukropina (STANFORD) 7) Eric Medina (TEXAS SOUTHERN) 8) Adam Griffith (ALABAMA) 9) Matt Davis (UNC-PEMBROKE) 10) YoungHoe Koo (GEORGIA SOUTHERN)

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

154

ZANE GONZALEZ | K1 ARIZONA STATE (SR) Measurables: Height: 6’1” | Weight: 190 lbs. 2016 Stats: 23/25 FG (92%), 13/15 40+, 7/9 50+, 39/40 XPM | Career Stats: 96/116 FG (83%), 204/209 XPM

IN A NUT SHELL: It should come as no surprise to find Arizona State’s Zane Gonzalez at the top of the kicker rankings. Not only does the Texas native end his college career as the all-time FBS leader in both made field goals and points by a kicker, his senior season was just as strong as the rest of his career. He led the nation in accuracy among kickers with more than 20 made field goals, making 23 of his 25 attempts for an FBS-best 92%. He also had the longest field goal of the season, from 59 yards out. Even more impressive than his cumulative field goal statistics are his numbers from distance. He made 13 of 15 (87%) from 40 yards or longer, and 7 of 9 (78%) from 50 yards or longer. He also handled kickoffs for Arizona State, forcing touchbacks on 76% of his kickoffs. The 2016 Lou Groza award winner leads our kicker rankings for his consistently strong performance throughout his career, as well as his elite performance this season, especially from distances where NFL kickers make their money.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

BEST GAME(S): You could make the case for several games from the 2016 season as Gonzalez’ best. ASU’s early-season match against Texas Tech was a high scoring affair, leading to nine opportunities to kick extra points and one chance at a 43 yard field goal. Gonzalez made all ten kicks. He was again perfect two weeks later, making three field goals and six extra points against Cal. Later in the season, versus Colorado, he showcased his powerful, accurate leg, going 3/3 on kicks of 51, 50, and an FBS season-long 59 yards, tacking on an extra point for good measure.

155

JAKE ELLIOTT | K2 MEMPHIS (SR) Measurables: Height: 5’10” | Weight: 169 lbs. 2016 Stats: 2016: 21/26 FG (81%%), 12/15 40+, 2/3 50+, 58/58 XPM | Career Stats: 81/104 FG (78%), 202/202 XPM

IN A NUT SHELL: Easily the most notable achievement of Elliott’s young career is his impeccable record on extra points. Since 2013, he has connected on 202 consecutive extra point attempts. While this may reflect on his his long snapper, holder, and blockers as much as it does on him, the results can only help build up his confidence, which is just as important as any physical trait for a kicker. On field goals, he also performed very well. His 80% accuracy mark from beyond 40 yards is extremely solid, although his inconsistency on shorter kicks leaves a little to be desired. He has a career record of 10 for 15 from beyond 50 yards, demonstrating a powerful leg and consistent long-range accuracy. On kickoffs, he was able to force touchbacks 68% of the time in 2016. Nine career kickoffs out of bounds may be a potential red flag, though. He also demonstrated respectable athleticism, running a 4.79 40yard dash at the NFL combine.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

BEST GAME(S): Elliott’s season was marked by consistency throughout. He accounted for double digit points in eight out of Memphis’ thirteen games in 2016, and scored 7 or more points in all but three games. He didn’t get the opportunity to try any field goals during Memphis’ 77-3 destruction of Bowling Green, but he did hit all 11 of his extra points. Versus Tulane, he was a perfect 3/3 on field goals, including one from over 50 yards, converting his lone extra point attempt as well. When Memphis faced off against SMU, he again made 3 field goals, and added 6 extra points on 6 attempts to complete the 51-3 rout. In the final game of the regular season, Elliott again answered the call, scoring on both field goal attempts and all 6 extra point attempts in Memphis’ 48-44 win over Houston.

156

AUSTIN REHKOW | K3 IDAHO (SR) Measurables: Height: 6’3” | Weight: 208 lbs. 2016 Stats: 26/29 FG (90%), 8/10 40+, 1/1 50+, 42/44 XPM | Career Stats: 70/92 FG (76%), 135/140 XPM

IN A NUT SHELL:

BEST GAME(S):

The story of Austin Rehkow’s college career is one of constant improvement. NFL scouts will take note of his jump from 58% made field goals in his first two years, to 88% in his final two. As his opportunities increased, his performance improved. Whether his uptick can be attributed to a change in technique, an increase in confidence, or simply more reps, Rehkow may be worth the gamble if NFL teams think he can sustain or even improve his current level of performance. His remarkable consistency from all distances drives his high ranking, although his limited work from 50+ yards leaves some room for questions. Another question mark is his kickoff ability. Not only did he force touchbacks on just 25 of 80 kickoffs (31%) in 2016, he has kicked 14 kickoffs out of bounds over the course of his career. However, Rehkow’s versatility may give him a competitive advantage—he doubled as Idaho’s primary punter for all four years, averaging a very good 45.8-yards per punt for his career.

Rehkow made all 7 of his extra point attempts and both of his field goals in Idaho’s game against New Mexico State. He also went a perfect 4 for 4 on field goals in two separate games in 2016. The first came against Louisiana-Monroe (where he also added two extra points) and the second came against Appalachian State (where he scored 13 of his team’s 19 points and made a 46-yarder). Rehkow hit a season high 50-yarder against the University of Louisiana-Lafayette, a game in which he was a perfect 3 for 3 with two extra points.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

157

ANDY PHILLIPS | K4

RIGOBERTO SANCHEZ | K5

UTAH (rSR)

HAWAII (SR)

Measurables: Height: 5’10” | Weight: 210 lbs.

Measurables: Height: 6’1” | Weight: 190 lbs.

2016 Stats: 21/25 (84%), 7/10 40+, 0/0 50+, 43/43 XPM Career Stats: 84/100 (84%), 195/196 XPM

2016 Stats: 13/13 FG (100%%), 2/2 40+, 1/1 50+, 49/50 XPM Career Stats: (2 years) 21/24 FG (88%), 72/74 XPM

IN A NUT SHELL: In a statistical feat nearly as impressive as Jake Elliott’s 100% on extra points, Andy Phillips set a school record for consecutive extra points made with 97—his only career miss coming as a sophomore. However, his solid body of work kicking field goals is what gives him a shot at an NFL roster spot. Demonstrating remarkable consistency throughout his career (84% career field goal percentage), the only major question mark is whether he has the leg for kicks longer than 50 yards. He has only attempted four 50+ kicks in his career, though he did make all four.

IN A NUT SHELL: The versatile special teamer from Hawaii comes in at number five on the list due primarily to his excellent work on field goals in the 2016 season. Despite a small sample size, he was perfect on all field goal attempts (13 for 13) and only missed one extra point (49 of 50) all year. However, the field goal attempts were mostly of the shorter variety, with only two coming from 40 or more yards out. The versatile kicker also handled punting duties both at Hawaii and at Butte College, performing well enough to be named to the Ray Guy watch-list before his first year at Hawaii.

BEST GAME(S): Phillips’ best game of 2016 came in Utah’s 26-24 win over the Indiana Hoosiers in the Foster Farms Bowl. He went a perfect 4 for 4 on field goals, including three in the second half, finishing with the go-ahead field goal with a minute and a half left in the game.

BEST GAME(S): In Hawaii’s brutal loss to Michigan early in the season, Sanchez scored UH’s only points on a 55-yard field goal. Later on in the season, he was perfect on three field goal attempts and an extra point in Hawaii’s loss to Boise State.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

158

CONRAD UKROPINA | K6

ERIC MEDINA | K7

STANFORD (rSR)

TEXAS SOUTHERN (SR)

Measurables: Height: 6’1” | Weight: 185 lbs.

Measurables: Height: 5’11” | Weight: 195 lbs.

2016 Stats: 22/27 FG (82%), 10/15 40+, 2/2 50+, 34/34 XPM Career Stats: (2 years) 42/51 FG (82%), 72/74 XPM

2016 Stats: 15/16 FG (93%), 6/6 40+, 1/1 50+, 27/28 XPM Career Stats: 38/50 FG (76%), 82/88 XPM

IN A NUT SHELL: Ukropina exemplified reliability in both the 2015 and 2016 seasons, which is a trait that NFL coaches and general managers desire above almost all else from the kicker position. Over his two full years as the starting kicker for Stanford, he connected on 40 of 47 field goals (85%) and did not miss an extra point. Additionally, he possesses the ability to handle punting duties. Although he hasn’t been a team’s primary punter since high school, he did average almost 44-yards per punt as a senior in high school. One major question mark is his weak leg on kickoffs. In 2015, he forced touchbacks on a meager 23% of kickoffs.

IN A NUT SHELL: Medina was a special teams jack-of-all-trades for Texas Southern in 2016, handling not only placekicking duties, but also punts and kickoffs as well. He performed very well on field goals in 2016, converting on 93% of his attempts, though the sample size was limited to just 16 overall tries. While he did perform well from over 40 yards (a perfect 6 for 6), he missed his lone attempt from over 50 yards, leaving questions about leg strength.

BEST GAME (VS. NORTH CAROLINA): Ukropina saved his best for last in 2016, going 4 for 5 (including 2 from over 40 yards) in Stanford’s bowl win over North Carolina.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

BEST GAME (VS. ALCORN STATE): Medina’s best game in 2016 came against Alcorn State, where he made two field goals (long of 48 yards), averaged 48 yards on 5 punts and forced 3 touchbacks on 5 kickoffs.

159

ADAM GRIFFITH | K8

MATT DAVIS | K9

ALABAMA (SR)

UNC-PEMBROKE (rSR)

Measurables: Height: 5’10” | Weight: 191 lbs.

Measurables: Height: 6’1” | Weight: 190 lbs.

2016 Stats: 21/28 FG (75%), 3/9 40+, 0/0 50+, 66/67 XPM Career Stats: 57/82 FG (70%), 72/74 XPM

2016 Stats: 27/32 FG (84%), long of 58, 38/39 XPM Career Stats: 37/44 FG (84%), 68/70 XPM

IN A NUT SHELL: Alabama head coach Nick Saban is a well-known perfectionist, so he must have been frustrated by his special teams unit not living up to the standard of excellence set by the rest of the team. Griffith’s 75% field goal conversion rate is lower than most other highly rated kickers, and his poor performance from beyond 40 yards is a bad sign for his NFL future. However, a silver lining is the fact that his field goal percentage has improved each year since his freshman year.

IN A NUT SHELL: Matt Davis had an interesting career at UNC-Pembroke, only seeing the field during three of his four years. He redshirted his first year, and then handled kickoffs during his redshirt freshman season. His third year of college, he briefly transferred to NC State before returning to take over primary placekicking duties, a job he held on to through his senior year. In addition to placekicking, he has both punting and kickoff experience.

BEST GAME(S): In a 51-3 demolition of Mississippi State, Griffith converted all three of his field goal opportunities and added five extra points on five attempts. Later on, in Alabama’s rivalry game against Auburn, he converted on all three of his field goal tries and added three extra points.

BEST GAME(S): Early on in 2016, against Fayetteville State, Davis connected on all five of his field goal attempts, with a long of 38 yards. Against West Virginia State, Davis was a perfect 2 for 2 on field goals including an impressive 58-yarder, while also averaging 47.4 yards per punt on 5 punts.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

160

YOUNGHOE KOO | K10 GEORGIA SOUTHERN (SR) Measurables: Height: 5’10” | Weight: 190 lbs. 2016 Stats: 19/20 FG (95%), 5/6 40+, 1/2 5+ , 28/29 XPM Career Stats: 31/35 FG (89%), 87/92 XPM

IN A NUT SHELL: Koo’s consistently great performance kicking the ball in 2016 led him to be named a Lou Groza Award finalist, although he ultimately lost out to Zane Gonzalez. Koo started off as a kickoff specialist and situational kicker, before adding in spot duty on extra points as a sophomore. He took over placekicking duties during his junior year and never looked back. His 95% conversion rate on field goals is a Georgia Southern record. BEST GAME (VS. ARKANSAS): Koo saved his best performance for Georgia Southern’s narrow defeat at the hands of Arkansas State. Although his team lost 26-27, he did what he could, connecting on all four field goal attempts (53-yard long) and adding two extra points.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

161

Erik Fretland

1) Austin Rehkow (IDAHO)) 2) Justin Vogel (MIAMI) 3) Cameron Johnston (OHIO STATE) 4) Toby Baker (ARKANSAS) 5) Kenny Allen (MICHIGAN) 6) Hayden Hunt (COLORADO STATE) 7) Eric Keena (NORTH TEXAS) 8) Alex Boy (NEVADA) 9) Jonny Linehan (BYU) 10) Dalton Parks (TULSA)

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

162

AUSTIN REHKOW | P1 IDAHO (SR) Measurables: Height: 6’3” | Weight: 213 lbs. 2016 Stats: 55 punts (41.7 yard avg.), long of 60, 3 touchbacks, 20 fair catches, 26 inside 20

IN A NUT SHELL: On both the Lou Groza and Ray Guy Award watchlists at the beginning of his senior season, the Idaho punter-kicker lived up to the preseason hype, especially with his kicking performance. His skills and abilities, combined with his entire body of punting work, are what lead to his position as our top-rated punter. In his freshman and sophomore campaigns, he averaged 47.8 yards per punt, dipping slightly to 45.7 in his junior season, and dropping significantly to 41.6 during the 2016 season. However, this lower average is not necessarily a reflection of a decline in performance, as Idaho frequently asked Rehkow to pin the opponent deep with shorter, accurate punts, or to neutralize a returner through sacrificing distance for hangtime. Rehkow’s strengths as a punter are his ability to get either distance or hang time, without sacrificing much accuracy. He is also a willing tackler with good size. In addition to being a very good punter, Rehkow is a good enough kicker that an NFL team could feasibly consider eliminating a roster spot by having him carry out duties for both positions.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

BEST GAME(S): Rehkow’s best game of his career came in his junior year against Appalachian State, where he punted 6 times and averaged 51.7 yards per punt. For his senior season, his best game came against Washington, where he averaged 47.4 yards per punt on 5 punts.

163

N/A

JUSTIN VOGEL | P2 MIAMI (rSR) Measurables: Height: 6’4” | Weight: 215 lbs. 2016 Stats: 64 punts (43.8 yd avg.), long of 63 yds, 25 inside 20 yard line

IN A NUT SHELL: Vogel’s best punting season as a Miami Hurricane came in his final season. A well-rounded punter prospect, Vogel handled punting duties for the Hurricanes from 2014-2016, in addition to handling kickoff duties in 2014. Prior to 2014, Vogel was a backup at Florida, but redshirted and then transferred. One of his strongest attributes is his consistency, as he averaged over 40 yards per punt in all but two games in 2016, and only had one game where he averaged less than 39 yards per punt. He finished the 2016 season averaging 43.8 yards per punt, the best season mark of his career. He possesses great size for an NFL special teams coach to work with, and is athletic enough to not be a liability as a tackler on punt or kickoff coverage, in addition to being a run threat on fake punts.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

BEST GAME(S): Vogel had a two game stretch early in the 2015 season, against Cincinnati and Nebraska, where he averaged 52 yards per punt on ten punts. He also had one game in the 2014 season where he averaged 50.4 yards per punt. In Miami’s 2016 matchup with North Carolina, Vogel came to play, averaging 47.8 yards per punt on 5 punts with a long of 57 yards.

164

N/A

CAMERON JOHNSTON | P3 OHIO STATE (GRAD STUDENT) Measurables: Height: 5’11” | Weight: 198 lbs. 2016 Stats: 56 punts (46.7 yd avg.), long of 70, 8/11 games averaging 45+ yards per punt

IN A NUT SHELL:

BEST GAME(S):

Cameron Johnston was the key cog in an Ohio State special teams unit that led the Big Ten in punting average each of the last three years. His career average of 44.3 yards per punt ranks third in OSU history, and he holds school records for most punts inside the 20 for both a career and a season. The Australian punter’s main strength is his incredible accuracy and touch with ball placement, combined with the strong leg to keep the ball in the air longer than most punters. Many returners deemed it more prudent to call for a fair catch than risk taking a hit from the coverage team, thanks to Johnston’s hangtime and placement. He also gets his punts off very quickly, and can adjust the kick point by rugby punting, both of which make his punts difficult to block. Johnston is athletic enough to get what’s blocked on fake punts, although his one fake in 2016 (against Michigan) was stopped for a turnover on downs.

The best game of Johnston’s career was in his freshman season against Illinois, where he crushed 6 punts for an average of 57 yards per punt, an OSU single game record. His best game in 2016 was against Wisconsin, punting 4 times for an average of 53.8 yards per punt.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

165

TOBY BAKER | P4

KENNY ALLEN | P5

ARKANSAS (SR)

MICHIGAN (rSR)

Measurables: Height: 6’3” | Weight: 215 lbs.

Measurables: Height: 6’4” | Weight: 222 lbs.

2016 Stats: 57 punts (44.4 yd avg.), long of 60, 3 touchbacks, 24 fair catches, 22 inside the 20

2016 Stats: 54 punts (43.7 yd avg.), long of 67, 7 touchbacks, 11 fair catches, 24 inside the 20

IN A NUT SHELL: The Arkansas punter turned in a stellar senior season, marked both by consistently strong performance throughout the season as well as flashes of great performance. Over the course of two games, he had 7 punts in a row travel further than 50 yards, and had at least one 50+ yarder in 10 of 11 games in 2016. Baker won the Crip Hall Award, given annually by the media to Arkansas’ most outstanding senior in their homecoming game. The high school quarterback also gives NFL special teams coaches the ability to try both running and passing punt fakes.

IN A NUT SHELL: Nowhere was the importance of having a top-level punter illustrated more clearly than in Michigan’s defensive struggle with rival Ohio State in 2016. In a low-scoring affair, both punters played well, but Allen put on a clinic, completely negating dangerous Buckeye returner Curtis Samuel. He demonstrates both the accuracy to pin returners against the sideline as well as the touch to get the ball to stop just short of the goal line. He also flashed a powerful leg, flipping field position multiple times in that game. He is comfortable punting with defenders and blockers around his feet. His only real question mark is the small sample size of his work, as he only held the punting job for Michigan for the 2016 season.

BEST GAME(S): Baker had two games in 2016 where he averaged above 50 yards per punt, and only had one game all season where he did not average at least 40 yards per punt (39.3, against Texas A&M). Against TCU, Baker punted 6 times for 304 yards (50.7 avg.) and added a special teams tackle. Against Alabama, Baker had his highest average of the season, punting 4 times for an average of 52.8 yards.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

BEST GAME(S): Allen’s second best game of 2016 came against the Buckeyes, where he averaged 47.4 yards per punt on 7 punts and also made two field goals. He capped the season off with his strongest performance, also averaging 47.4 yards per punt (but on one more punt) and making three field goals.

166

HAYDEN HUNT | P6

ERIC KEENA | P7

COLORADO STATE (rSR)

NORTH TEXAS (SR)

Measurables: Height: 6’0” | Weight: 220 lbs.

Measurables: Height: 6’2” | Weight: 175 lbs.

2016 Stats: 56 punts (44.1 yd avg.), long of 66, 4 touchbacks, 19 fair catches, 26 inside the 20

2016 Stats: 72 punts (43.7 yd avg.), long of 68, 21 inside the 20, 21 punts of 50+

IN A NUT SHELL: The Ray Guy semifinalist’s versatility will be a key factor in his appeal to NFL teams. Besides averaging 44.1 yards per punt in 2016, he also has the ability to be a weapon on punt fakes, as he converted two fakes in 2016 (one passing and one rushing). In addition to his punting prowess, he had one game in 2016 (against Boise State) where he converted two onside kicks, despite not handling regular kickoff duties.

IN A NUT SHELL: Keena had plenty of opportunities to showcase his skillset over the course of his career playing for an offensively challenged North Texas team. He performed well enough in the 2015 season to make the 2016 Ray Guy preseason watchlist, and although his average dropped slightly in 2016, his increased number of punts inside the 20 and punts of 50+ imply that his lower average was a reflection of being asked to do more directional punting.

BEST GAME(S): Hunt’s best game in 2016 came in the middle of the season against Utah State. Not only did he punt 7 times for a 45.7 yard average, he also converted a fake punt for a first down with a 6 yard rush. The best punting game of his career came in 2014, when he averaged 54.5 yards per punt in the first game of the season in a win against Colorado.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

BEST GAME(S): Keena’s best punting game in 2016 was against Middle Tennessee State, where he punted 8 times and averaged 51.6 yards per punt. In a win against Marshall, Keena averaged 42.5 yards per punt and also converted a 4th down on an 18 yard fake punt run.

167

ALEX BOY | P8

JONNY LINEHAN | P9

NEVADA (SR)

BYU (JR)

Measurables: Height: 6’3” | Weight: 200 lbs.

Measurables: Height: 6’0” | Weight: 203 lbs.

2016 Stats: 51 punts (43.7 yd avg.), long of 71, 7 touchbacks, 17 fair catches, 17 inside the 20

2016 Stats: 57 punts (42.5 yd avg.), long of 62, 5 touchbacks, 14 fair catches, 30 inside the 20

IN A NUT SHELL: Like many of the other punters on this list, Boy started the season on the Ray Guy watchlist. His 2016 average of 43.7 yards per punt is the 6th best for a season in Nevada history. Boy was named Nevada’s best special teamer as a result of his consistent performance, as he had a 50+ yard punt in all but 3 games and forced the opposing team to either fair catch the ball or start inside their 20 on 67% of his punts.

IN A NUT SHELL: The New Zealand-born punter has only two years of starts under his belt, but the relatively small sample size was more than enough to show off his ability. Although his leg is not as strong as some of the other punters in this class, his accuracy and placement is evident in the fact that 83 of his 119 career punts (70%) have either been downed inside the 20 or fair caught. His rugby background makes him a willing tackler as the last line of defense.

BEST GAME(S): Boy’s best game of the season came against Wyoming, when he averaged 52.3 yards per punt on three punts. The best game of his career came in 2015 against Arizona, as he averaged 47 yards per punt on a whopping 8 punts.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

BEST GAME(S): Although Linehan only averaged 40 yards per punt against Boise State in 2016, 5 of his 7 punts were downed inside the 20, while the other two were fair caught. He also averaged 47.7 yards per punt on 6 punts the week previously against Mississippi State.

168

DALTON PARKS | P10 TULSA (JR) Measurables: Height: 6â&#x20AC;&#x2122;3â&#x20AC;? | Weight: 209 lbs. 2016 Stats: 64 punts (41.8 yd avg.)

IN A NUT SHELL: Dalton Parks has handled the punting duties for Tulsa since his freshman season, although he only earned a scholarship in the spring before his sophomore year. He brings consistency and athleticism to the table, as he never averaged below 37.8 yards per punt in 2016 and his background as a wide receiver and quarterback in high school give him the flexibility to be used on fake punts. BEST GAME(S): The best game of his career came in the opening week of 2015 against Florida Atlantic, when he averaged 50.3 yards per punt on 4 punts. His best two games in 2016 came against San Jose St. (6 punts, 45.2 avg.) and against UCF (8 punts, 43.5 avg.).

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

169

KR/PR Erik Fretland

1) Adoreeâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; Jackson (USC)

2) Jabrill Peppers (MICHIGAN) 3) TJ Logan (NORTH CAROLINA)

4) Carlos Henderson (LOUISIANA TECH) 5) Justin Evans (TEXAS A&M) 6) Eddie Jackson (ALABAMA) 7) Jojo Natson, Jr. (AKRON) 8) Dede Westbrook (OKLAHOMA) 9) Desmond King (IOWA) 10) Jesus Wilson (FLORIDA STATE)

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

170

ADOREE’ JACKSON | KR/PR1 USC (JR) Measurables: Height: 5’10” | Weight: 186 lbs. | 40-yard dash: 4.42 | Vertical: 36 Specialty: KR/PR | Defensive Contributor 2016 Stats: 26 KR (29.5 avg), 2 TDs, 20 PR (15.8 avg), 2 TDs, 55 tackles, 5 INT, 11 PD IN A NUT SHELL: Adoree’ Jackson was always one of the best athletes on the field. This fact will not change in the NFL. Not only did Jackson showcase his athleticism on the football field, he also lettered in track for USC, winning the Pac-12 broad jump event in both 2015 and 2016. Although his good-not-great Combine measurables don’t perfectly illustrate it, Jackson is a threat to take the ball to the house from anywhere on the field. His coaches at USC were well aware of this fact, and they lined him up on offense to get the ball in his hands more frequently than just on returns. No play better illustrates the respect Jackson received from return coverage units, as well as from his own teammates, than on one particular kickoff return against Notre Dame in 2015. Notre Dame kicked off away from Jackson, Juju Smith-Schuster caught it, started to return it, and then decided to risk pitching it backwards to Jackson, who then gained fifteen more yards than SmithSchuster would have.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

BEST GAME (VS. NOTRE DAME): Jackson’s best game as a returner in 2016 unquestionably came against Notre Dame. His 4 kickoff returns were good for 161 yards (40.3 average) and a touchdown, while his 3 punt returns averaged 22 yards each with another touchdown. To complete the trifecta, Jackson scored a third time on a 52-yard reception. FIT WITH THE PACKERS: It’s no secret that cornerback is one of the Packers’ biggest roster needs. Almost as important is the need to replace Micah Hyde on returns. Adoree’ Jackson would give the Packers an immediate spark on special teams, much like Cordarrelle Patterson did for the Vikings when they drafted him, and would give CBs coach Joe Whitt a raw but athletically gifted prospect to coach up. Jackson is not ready to be a full-time starter at cornerback, but the impact he would make on special teams would be immense.

171

JABRILL PEPPERS | KR/PR2 MICHIGAN (JR) Measurables: Height: 5’11” | Weight: 213 lbs. | 40-yard dash: 4.46 | Vertical: 35.5 Specialty: PR | Offensive & Defensive Contributor 2016 Stats: 10 KR (26.0 avg), 0 TD, 21 PR (14.8 avg), 1 TD, 46 tackles, 3 sacks, 1 INT, 1 PD IN A NUT SHELL: It’s not unusual for a college football team’s primary return specialist to have a role elsewhere on the team, whether on offense or defense. Jabrill Peppers takes this to an entirely new level, as he alternated between lining up at linebacker, slot corner, and safety on defense, as well as at quarterback and at running back on offense. The reason for his heavy usage is simple: Peppers has game-breaking athleticism. Although his 40 time doesn’t show it, Peppers won the New Jersey high school state championship 100- and 200-meter dash two years in a row. His straight-line breakaway speed makes him lethal in the open field, and he’s more than capable of making the first man miss in order to create a seam for himself.

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: In the wake of Micah Hyde’s departure for Buffalo, Jabrill Peppers would be able to slide perfectly into his role. Peppers has experience playing both deep and in the box as a safety, inside the tackles and blitzing off the edge as a linebacker, and playing over the slot as a cornerback. While Micah Hyde is more technically proficient and has better coverage instincts, Peppers would be more than capable of covering tight ends and backs, and would match up better with speedier slot receivers. As a returner, Peppers would be an upgrade over Hyde, adding explosiveness and balance in addition to having great vision. In the absence of a bell cow running back for the Packers, Peppers might even get some carries a la Ty Montgomery in early 2016.

BEST GAME (VS. COLORADO): Peppers’ best game as a returner in 2016 came against Colorado, where he got 8 total chances to touch the ball. His 2 kickoff returns averaged 40.5 yards apiece, and his 4 punt returns yielded 99 total yards and a touchdown. As icing on the cake, he converted two carries into 24 yards from scrimmage, and on defense, he finished with 9 total tackles, 3.5 tackles for loss, and a sack.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

172

TJ LOGAN | KR/PR3 NORTH CAROLINA (SR) Measurables: Height: 5’9” | Weight: 196 lbs. | 40-yard dash: 4.37 | Vertical: n/a Specialty: KR | Offensive Contributor (change of pace back) 2016 Stats: 21 KR (32.9 avg), 2 TDs, 120 rushes (5.4 avg), 7 TDs, 24 rec (8.4 avg), 3 TDs IN A NUT SHELL:

FIT WITH THE PACKERS:

TJ Logan had 4 games in 2016 where he averaged 34 or more yards per kickoff return, so there were several candidates for his best game as a returner. However, his most productive game was UNC’s first game of the season against Georgia. Logan returned 5 kicks for a total of 170 yards and a touchdown, and was also a strong contributor on offense with 6 carries for 80 yards and another touchdown.

Logan would be a welcome addition to the Packers’ depleted running back stable, although he would not be able to fill the 4-minute offense/grinder role that is now missing with Eddie Lacy’s absence. His straight-line speed would be an effective complement to Ty Montgomery’s elusiveness. He would also give the Packers kickoff return unit a true return specialist, but would unfortunately not be able to immediately fill the hole left on punt returns due to his limited experience there.

BEST GAME (VS. GEORGIA): TJ Logan had 4 games in 2016 where he averaged 34 or more yards per kickoff return, so there were several candidates for his best game as a returner. However, his most productive game was UNC’s first game of the season against Georgia. Logan returned 5 kicks for a total of 170 yards and a touchdown, and was also a strong contributor on offense with 6 carries for 80 yards and another touchdown.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

173

CARLOS HENDERSON | KR/PR4

JUSTIN EVANS | KR/PR4

LOUISIANA TECH (rJR)

TEXAS A&M (JR)

Measurables: Height: 5’11” | Weight: 199 lbs. | 40-yard dash: 4.46 | Vertical: 36 Specialty: KR | Offensive Contributor

Measurables: Height: 6’0” | Weight: 199 lbs. | 40-yard dash: n/a | Vertical: n/a Specialty: KR | Defensive Contributor

2016 Stats: 25 KR (32.2 avg), 2 TDs, 82 rec (18.7 avg), 19 TDs, 14 carries (9.5 avg), 2 TDs

2016 Stats: 15 KR (28.5 avg), 0 TDs, 87 tackles, 5 TFL, 4 INT, 8 PD

IN A NUT SHELL: Henderson is a different style of returner than those above him on this list. While players like Adoree’ Jackson and TJ Logan depend on their straight line speed to hit creases in the coverage units, Henderson also possesses elite tacklebreaking ability and great vision with the ball in his hands. This is also apparent when he is on the field on offense, as his 18.7 yards per reception in 2016 has just as much to do with him breaking screen passes for long gains as it does with his catching deep passes.

IN A NUT SHELL: The junior college transfer served as a versatile, ball-hawking defender for the Aggies in 2016, in addition to being an impact player on special teams. He averaged better than 20 yard-per-return on six of the eight games in which he had at least one kickoff return. On defense, his four interceptions came against UCLA, Alabama, and Tennessee, while also deflecting three other passes in those games. Evans is not as well-rounded a returner as others on this list, and he does not possess the same experience, as he has only one full season of handling return duties under his belt.

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Drafting Carlos Henderson would be a problem for the Packers… and that problem would be which of Nelson, Cobb or Adams would lose playing time to him. His skill as a returner is equaled or surpassed by his skill as a receiver, meaning that he could be competing for a starting job from Day 1. Although he was primarily used on kick returns, his elusiveness could easily translate to him being a lethal punt returner.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Evans would join a crowded safety room with the Packers, fitting into the depth chart behind Burnett, Clinton-Dix, and Kentrell Brice. However, his coverage skills would be an upgrade over Micah Hyde’s, and if he can play the slot, it may be possible to use him similarly to Hyde.

174

EDDIE JACKSON | KR/PR6

JOJO NATSON, JR. | KR/PR7

ALABAMA (SR)

AKRON (rSR)

Measurables: Height: 6’0” | Weight: 201 lbs. | 40-yard dash: n/a | Vertical: n/a Specialty: PR | Defensive Contributor

Measurables: Height: 5’8” | Weight: 151 lbs. | 40-yard dash: n/a | Vertical: n/a Specialty: PR | Offensive Contributor (gadget player)

2016 Stats: 11 PR (23.0 avg), 2 TDs, 24 tackles, 2.5 TFL, 1 INT, 2 PD (in only 8 games)

2016 Stats: 4 KR (15.5 avg), 0 TDs, 16 PR (16.3 avg), 2 TDs, 59 catches (14.2 avg), 10 TDs

IN A NUT SHELL: Jackson is a prospect with as many on-field red flags as he has reasons to be excited about him. The talented, athletic safety/former cornerback is coming off a broken leg suffered late in the 2016 season, which prevented him from running at the Combine. In 2014, he suffered a torn ACL during a spring practice, but recovered in time to play in 11 games that season. Lastly, his sample size of collegiate punt returns is tiny (only 11 returns), but those 11 returns yielded a 23.0 yard average and 2 touchdowns. Overall, if healthy, he can be a major contributor on both defense and special teams.

IN A NUT SHELL: The diminutive speedster spent his redshirt senior year at Akron after spending the first three seasons of his college career at Utah State. In his one year at Akron, he led the team in total touchdowns (12) and was second on the team in receiving yards. His stature will certainly limit the opportunities that he’ll get on offense, but after an offseason in an NFL weight room, it won’t be out of the question for him to be used as a gadget player in addition to his return duties.

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Jackson’s specialty (punt returns) is the biggest special teams hole that the Packers need to fill. However, on top of special teams, Jackson’s background at cornerback as a freshman and sophomore at Alabama could earn him some looks in training camp. That would be an easier path to playing time than safety, where the Packers have a lot of depth.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Although his specialty of returning punts aligns with what the Packers need, there are two major question marks regarding his fit with the team. First, Ted Thompson has certain size thresholds for the receiver position, and Natson at 5-foot-8 and 151-pounds, does not meet that standard. Secondly, Natson was kicked off the Utah State team for a violation of team rules, which may be a character red flag that the Packers are not willing to overlook.

175

DEDE WESTBROOK | KR/PR8

DESMOND KING | KR/PR9

OKLAHOMA (rSR)

IOWA (SR)

Measurables: Height: 6’0” | Weight: 176 lbs. | 40-yard dash: 4.34 | Vertical: n/a Specialty: KR/PR | Offensive Contributor

Measurables: Height: 5’10” | Weight: 201 lbs. | 40-yard dash: n/a | Vertical: 34 Specialty: KR | Defensive Contributor

2016 Stats: 9 KR (27.1 avg), 0 TD, 5 PR (16.2 avg), 1 TD, 80 catches (19.1 avg), 17 TDs

2016 Stats: 27 KR (27.8 avg), 0 TDs, 26 PR (10.2 avg), 0 TDs, 58 tackles, 3.5 TFL, 3 INT, 7 PD

IN A NUT SHELL: An extremely productive player and the focus of the Oklahoma passing offense in his redshirt senior season, Westbrook is capable of doing it all. Although his experience as a returner is limited, the straight-line speed, acceleration, vision and tackle-breaking ability that is evident in his offensive snaps certainly carries over to his work on special teams. Two question marks are his slender frame and questions in his past about domestic violence concerns, although charges were not pressed.

IN A NUT SHELL:

FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Dede Westbrook has the ability to make an impact on both special teams and offense for the Packers, but it’s no secret that the Green Bay front office steers clear of players with the character concerns that Westbrook has exhibited. If he were somehow to be selected by the Packers, he would step into the punt returner role with the chance to compete with Davis and Janis for the deep threat role.

FIT WITH THE PACKERS:

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

A safety prospect with the athleticism and background to play cornerback, King specializes in returning kickoffs, with a healthy average of 27.8 yards per return. King is solidly built, making it difficult for tacklers to bring him down once he’s up to full speed in the open field. After four respectable seasons as Iowa’s cornerback, he is now being viewed as a safety prospect by NFL teams, but the height concerns that would prevent him from being an effective cornerback at the NFL level will not prevent him from being an effective NFL kick returner.

Stop me if you’ve heard this one before: A versatile Iowa defensive back with the ability to play both cornerback and safety. All joking aside, King would not be the perfect replacement for Micah Hyde on punt returns, but he would be an upgrade over the Packers current kick returners. However, on defense, he would fit well into Hyde’s role as a defensive Swiss Army knife, with the added bonus of more experience playing as an outside cornerback.

176

IN A NUT SHELL: Over the course of his career at Florida State, Wilson was alternately used as a punt returner, kick returner, and wide receiver. In a redshirt senior season cut short by a foot injury with 5 games to play, Wilson ended up 3rd on the team in receptions and was in the top 10 in punt return average at the time of his injury. His punt return numbers in 2016 were inflated by an 89 yard return touchdown, but it also demonstrates that he is capable of explosive plays. His career average of 11.7 yards-per-catch indicates that he would be no more than a possession receiver if he gets snaps on offense at the next level. FIT WITH THE PACKERS: Wilson would have difficulty making the team in a crowded receiver group, and he is not consistently explosive enough on punt returns to justify a roster spot solely as a punt returner. He would most likely land on the Packers practice squad in his first year, or at least until he could prove that he’d be a reliable target on offense while also being trusted to make plays and make good decisions as a returner.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

177

PACKERS Mock Draft "Jersey Al" Bracco

ROUND 1

TJ WATT | OLB, WISCONSIN OK Badgers/Packers fans, I give in. All draft season I’ve resisted getting on the TJ Watt bandwagon. It’s just too easy, and might even look lazy on my part. So I tried to like other players more, I really did. But alas, of the players likely to be there at pick #29 (Charles Harris is my real favorite), none would fit the Packers better than TJ Watt. And none would be prouder to wear the Green and Gold. As Watt himself has said, he’s just scratching the surface of what he could be. Alternate Choices: Charles Harris, Takkarist McKinley ROUND 2

QUINCY WILSON | CB, FLORIDA Regardless of the name, Edge Rusher was going to be the Round 1 position choice (mainly because the remaining CBs will be a better value in Round 2). Grabbing Wilson this far back in Rd 2 might be some wishful thinking, but if Ted really likes him, a Spriggs-like second round trade-up is very possible. Wilson is a physical corner with plus football smarts. A comparison to a young Ike Taylor could be made. Alternate Choices: Chidobe Awuzie, Fabian Moreau ROUND 3

NICO SIRAGUSA | OG, SAN DIEGO STATE Everyone knows Ted never drafts guards, he drafts college tackles and lets the staff develop them as guards. Well, Ted has never let two Pro Bowl-level guards leave in the space of eight months before, either. If there was ever a year to break out of that pattern and looks for instant help at guard, this is it. Siragusa is the athletic type the Packers prefer–a top performer in several Combine drills. Alternate Choices: Isaac Asiata, Taylor Moton ROUND 4

KENNY GOLLADAY | WR, N. ILLINOIS With Jordy Nelson turning 32 years old this May, it would be classic Ted to start looking for his eventual replacement (despite having started last season with 7 WR on the roster). If you need a replacement for Nelson, why not draft a guy whose skill set seems similar? Golladay stands at 6’4” and like Nelson, is faster than he looks when running, ran a 4.5 at the combine, has a large catching radius, and is a solid red zone target. Alternate Choices: Chad Hansen, Amara Darboh

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

178

PACKERS MOCK DRAFT CONTINUED...

ROUND 5

BRIAN HILL | RB, WYOMING Mike McCarthy loves himself a workhorse running back he can lean on in December and the playoffs. Hill carried the ball 349 times in 2016 for 1,860 yards (5.3 ypc avg.) and scored 22 touchdowns. And just as important to being a running back in Green Bay, he is secure with the ball and is a good blocker.

Alternate Choices: James Conner, Jamal Williams, ROUND 5 (COMPENSATORY)

BRENDAN LANGLEY | CB, LAMAR Here you have a speedy, raw, athletic cornerback that has also played wide receiver and will need coaching up on technique. Sound familiar? (cough… Sam…cough…Shields… cough). Langley could be the next pet project for CB coach Joe Whitt Jr., who seems to do his best work with the players who need the most help.

Alternate Choices: Nate Hairston, Shaquill Griffin ROUND 6

JALEN REEVES-MAYBIN | LB/S, TENNESSEE When you get to this point in the draft, you start looking for players who have a logical reason for being available here (other than they’re just not going to be very good). ReevesMaybin is an undersized LB/S hybrid type coming off a lost year due to a bad shoulder injury. If the medicals look acceptable, he can be a core special teams contributor from the get go while spending a year or two getting stronger and coached up. Alternate Choices: Jayon Brown, Paul Magliore ROUND 7

ISAAC ROCHELL | DE, NOTRE DAME A three-year starter for the Irish, Rochell was a productive tackler who shows the ability to take on double teams and hold the edge as a base 3-4 end. While he's not very dynamic as far as getting to the quarterback, he will eat up blockers and make it easier for better pass rushers to break through.

Alternate Choices: Derek Rivers, Vincent Taylor

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

179

Positional analysis PACKERS Ross Uglem

QUARTERBACKS: The position, as do the Packers, begins and ends with Aaron Rodgers. Rodgers, the NFL’s all-time leader in passer rating, is coming off of a borderline MVP season. He scraped through a continuation of his struggles at the end of 2015 to finish on a historic tear. After a loss to Washington dropped the Packers to 4-6, Rodgers proclaimed to the media that he felt Green Bay could “run the table”. The national media scoffed, and Rodgers responded by completing 68% of his passes at 8.1-yards per attempt with a vicious 24-2 TD to INT ratio. The team won their last six regular season games and played in three playoff contests. Rodgers remains one of the best passers of all time. Backup QB Brett Hundley has played admirably in preseason but has seen little game action. Like many seemingly talented backup QBs sitting behind stars, Hundley has been the source of trade rumors. His athleticism certainly alludes to a high ceiling, and after this season Hundley will enter the last year of his contract. That might be the season to shop him. Until then, Hundley will supply the Packers with a QB who can (probably?) win games during a Rodgers absence. Third string QB and preseason favorite Joe Callahan has made his way back to Green Bay. The Packers will almost assuredly bring in an arm to compete with Callahan via the late rounds of the draft or through free agency. RUNNING BACKS: Green Bay’s running back position is in a bit of flux. Eddie Lacy has signed with the Seattle Seahawks. Lacy’s tenure with the Packers was quite the roller coaster ride. There were certainly highs (Offensive Rookie of the Year) and lows (conditioning and injury issues).

will get an offseason in the running backs room and a full camp as the Packers #1 runner. He has all the physical characteristics of a running back and is more than capable of handling the role. Ted Thompson is also bringing back Christine Michael. Michael is a physical specimen. At 5’10” 220, Michael still checks in at the 89th percentile or better for running backs in bench press, short shuttle, 3 cone, broad jump and vertical jump drill. If Green Bay can get him to play “smarter”, Michael is a weapon. If not, he is a liability. Green Bay also has Don Jackson on the roster, whose short stint with the team in 2016 was ended by a broken hand against the Bears. Aaron Ripkowski is sliding right into John Kuhn’s role as both a lead blocker and a pass blocker. Joe Kerridge will also return to the team. WIDE RECEIVERS: Jordy Nelson, Aaron Rodgers’ top target returned in 2016. Nelson was particularly effective as he distanced himself further and further from his ACL injury. He was able to maintain a high level of production in the red zone early and then re-establish his presence downfield as time went on. 2017 could go one of two ways for Nelson. Either his physical abilities will return him to dominance another year removed from his injury or his age (32 by the time training camp starts) will move him into a hybrid perimeter/slot role.

The Packers have also moved on from 2010 hero James Starks. Starks hit the wrong side of age 30 and his production dipped mightily last season.

Davante Adams did an excellent job of silencing his critics of a season ago. Adams fought an ankle injury for much of 2015 and was very ineffective. He improved mightily in his third year. Adams finished 17th overall in Football Outsiders’ Defense-Adjusted Yards Above Replacement stat. Considering there are basically 96 starting wide receivers in the NFL, 17th is pretty great. The traditional stats weren’t bad either. Adams fell 3 yards short of 1,000 and tied for second in the entire league in receiving touchdowns with 12.

The Packers lead running back will almost assuredly be Ty Montgomery. Though Montgomery will reportedly refuse to change his number to a running back number (20-49), he

Randall Cobb had an ok season statistically, but was constantly open. Often times Rodgers just chose to go elsewhere with the football. Pro Football Focus ranked Cobb 23rd overall at

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

180

POSITIONAL ANALYSIS CONTINUED...

receiver. PFF is a film-based group that gives receivers credit for beating a corner regardless of where the ball went. Cobb can still win.

catcher when the offensive line you’re blocking with is bad and the QB throwing you the ball is even worse. Kendricks is a closer comp to last year’s Cook signing than Bennett is.

Green Bay also has a few young, talented options at the position. Geronimo Allison showed quite a bit as an undrafted free agent, Trevor Davis is a speedy option and Max McCaffrey was an effective college receiver with a great pedigree. Jeff Janis appears relegated to a special teams role

Richard Rodgers certainly has his limitations, but as a third tight end there aren’t many teams in the league that can boast a better player, certainly not one with Rodgers’ resume. Rodgers will almost always be the lowest priority for the defense so he’s going to be open a lot.

TIGHT ENDS: The tight end position was about as exciting this offseason as any position group has been during the Ted Thompson era. Jared Cook, who revitalized the position to its highest point since Jermichael Finley, got in a financial disagreement with the Packers and ended up in Oakland.

DEFENSIVE LINE: The Packers bring back most of a young and talented defensive line in 2017. It would appear that the base defense is set. Second year players Dean Lowry and Kenny Clark will man the strong side five technique and nose tackle positions, respectively. Both are ideal body types for those positions and showed flashes at the end of last season, especially Clark, who has a chance to be a star.

All is most certainly not lost. The Packers signed a pair of tight ends in the first 72 hours of free agency. First was the immediate answer to Cook leaving, eccentric tight end Martellus Bennett. Bennett was not brought back by the Patriots, but had one of the best seasons of any tight end last season, ranking 3rd in DYAR (even ahead of Gronk). His switch from TE2 with New England to the focal point of that position with Green Bay could lead to big, big production. Former Badger Lance Kendricks then joined Bennett in Green Bay. Kendricks has toiled away with awful quarterbacks during his entire Rams career. He did not play great last season individually, but it is easy to check out as a pass

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

Mike Daniels, possibly the best player on the Packers defense, will pitch in both on the weak side of the base defense and in all of Green Bay’s nickel packages. Daniels is a high motor player who dominates the offensive line against both run and pass. Green Bay also added a player during free agency who has long been tied to the Packers over the years. Ricky JeanFrancois is a versatile defensive lineman, though he doesn’t provide much pass rush. He is one of the best 30 or 40 run defenders in football, though and that kind of production not only helps on early downs but it keeps guys like Daniels

181

POSITIONAL ANALYSIS CONTINUED...

and Clark from having to play 60 snaps a game. Jean-Francois also provides veteran leadership to a defense that is usually very, very young. The Packers have lost Mike Pennel to the New York Jets and Letroy Guion to another suspension. Without Guion for the first few games, Green Bay will lean on Jean-Francois and could ultimately decide to move on from the twicesuspended lineman. Just before this guide went to press, the Packers claimed former second round pick Ego Furguson on waivers from the Bears. OLB / EDGE: Thompson’s first order of business during the new league year was to re-sign Nick Perry. Perry had a very good season in 2016 and started to show the promise that made him a first round pick. Perry was considered by many to be the top edge defender in the free agent market, so his return was important. That’s about all Thompson retained. Datone Jones joined the Vikings and Julius Peppers returned to Carolina. The Packers will be replacing a lot of edge snaps in 2017. Clay Matthews will continue to play outside linebacker and lead the defense. Matthews has never been quite the player that he was during his sophomore season. Matthews is a terror when he’s fully healthy, but he rarely is. If Green Bay could keep him on more of a pitch count, he’d almost certainly be more effective. If the Packers wish to reduce Matthews’ snaps and replace Jones and Peppers, those reps are going

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

to have to come from somewhere. Jayrone Elliott is a prime candidate for more snaps. Elliott has consistently made plays during his career when his number was called. The former Toledo Rocket is one of the Packers' most important special teams players, but his impact on the defense might be coming soon to a stadium near you. Kyler Fackrell, a 26-year old second year player from Utah State, will need to step up as well. Fackrell, who plays well in space, was Green Bay’s third round selection a year ago. Reggie Gilbert is a young talent to pay attention to. Green Bay always seems to be developing undrafted pass rush talent. ILB: The Packers have addressed their inside linebacker position twice in the last two years during the fourth round of the NFL Draft. Green Bay’s 2015 selection, Jake Ryan, made one of the bigger jumps from a rookie into his second year in the league. Ryan was an above average starter after improving his ability in coverage and against the run. He became yet another year removed from an ACL injury at Michigan, and was dominant in Green Bay’s playoff win against the Giants. After a strong showing in camp, Blake Martinez’s rookie season was derailed by injury. Martinez was supposed to be Green Bay’s coverage linebacker, but he lost those snaps to players like Joe Thomas, Micah Hyde and Morgan Burnett. There’s no reason to think Martinez can’t get healthy and make an impact in year two.

182

POSITIONAL ANALYSIS CONTINUED...

The aforementioned Thomas appears to be a nice undrafted find, filling in at dime linebacker admirably. When pressed into duty in the base defense, Thomas showed his weaknesses in the run game. Thomas is a nice chess piece, but the Packers would be in a better spot if they added a “beef” linebacker in the middle or use more of Matthews and Fackrell in that spot. Morgan Burnett will almost assuredly be a part of the linebacker group as well, at least part time. Derrick Matthews and Jordan Tripp are young prospects that will look to contribute on special teams early—especially Tripp. CORNERBACKS: No position group took as much heat as the Packers’ cornerbacks did a season ago. Green Bay had lost Davon House and Tramon Williams in recent years and went into the season with a thin group. That group got even thinner when Sam Shields was lost for the season with a concussion the first week of the season. Shields was the team’s no. 1 option at the position, and his loss created a domino effect. Damarious Randall was forced into the lead role after an excellent game against Jacksonville. The rest of the season did not go excellently. Randall was torched by Stefon Diggs in week two and things went downhill from there. He struggled repeatedly and was obviously hampered by injury. His second season was much, much worse than his rookie year. Randall will look to bounce back…

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

…So will Quentin Rollins. Rollins struggled all season long as well, and also had a groin injury. He is either looking for his Davante Adams season or an eventual move to safety. Rollins could potentially fit in the Packers defense in the way that Micah Hyde did, pitching in everywhere. Many pre draft evaluators had him as a safety. LaDarius Gunter struggled down the stretch, but proved his worth as a capable defensive back in a dime setting. He’s a keeper. His athletic limitations will keep him out of the no. 1 role, but his work outside is important, especially against big, physical receivers. Green Bay brought back Davon House in free agency. House has returned on a one-year deal for very little money. With that said, he is a physical cornerback with a lot of gifts that helped the Packers have a much better pass defense during his final season in Green Bay. Josh Hawkins is a very interesting prospect and reminds many of Sam Shields athletically. SAFETIES: The safety position has a chance to be the strongest group on the defense. They are led by rising superstar HaHa ClintonDix. Clinton-Dix is not only a playmaker, but is consistently assignment sure. He also has the ability to play the run. Clinton-Dix is very soon going to be eligible for an extension,

183

POSITIONAL ANALYSIS CONTINUED...

and thus far appears to be worth every coming penny. HHCD stabilized a group that has long been a sore spot for the Packers. The former Crimson Tide is still an excellent blitzer, the end of the Colts game notwithstanding. Morgan Burnett is now one of the veteran leaders of the defense, as insane as that may sound. Burnett may take a different role in 2017 with the departure of Micah Hyde. Green Bay had already been using Burnett close to the line of scrimmage with Clinton-Dix and Kentrell Brice covering the back end. Burnett is an excellent strong safety, but might be more of a Deone Buchanon linebacker in 2016. That’s because of Kentrell Brice. What Brice may lack in coverage (right now) and awareness he more than makes up for with the desire to bring pain. Brice is as big of a hitter as I can remember in Green Bay, especially with the league’s new player safety rules. His impact on the game in year two is an underrated story line.

CHEESEHEADTV.COM 2017 PRO FOOTBALL DRAFT GUIDE

Marwin Evans and Jermaine Whitehead are young prospects that might contribute on special teams next season. SPECIALISTS: Mason Crosby has certainly solidified himself as a great kicker after the debacle that was 2012. It’s 2017 now and Packers fans have gotten to the point that they trust Crosby. His heroic performance against Dallas certainly didn’t hurt matters. Cheeseheads should never, ever forget those two field goals. Crosby is as good as it gets at his position. Jake Schum was certainly a player that got better as the season went on. He has been brought back for 2017. It’s unclear at this time whether or not Green Bay wants to bring in some real competition for Schum. At this time, Green Bay has not re-signed Brett Goode. Taybor Pepper of Michigan State is currently on the roster.

184

LEONARD FOURNETTE RB | LSU ORIGINAL PHOTO COURTESY OF

LSU Communications