Architecture Portfolio 2022

CHRISTINE YING LU

Universitat Internacional de Catalunya (UIC Barcelona) | Barcelona, Spain Oct 2021– Sep 2022.

Master of International Cooperation Sustainable Emergency Architecture Thesis | URBAN ACUPUNCTURE: A Wide Shared Sustainable Urban Transformation Model. Barcelona and Taipei as compared case studies

Taipei, Taiwan Sep 2013– Jan 2016.

Center for Public Interest Design (Research center at PSU) | Portland , USA Jun 2022–Aug 2022.

Intern

• Asset-Based Community Development Project 社區資源盤點,地圖報告製作

• Arleta Triangle Plaza Project 參與式廣場公共座椅設計發展

境碩設計有限公司 | Taipei, Taiwan Jun 2021–Sep 2021. 建築景觀設計師

【設計方案發展及報告書製作】

• 桃園大圳幹線沿岸景觀工程(第一期)委託設計監造案

• 花蓮規劃串聯全縣寺廟教會堂硬體景觀計畫

張正昀建築師事務所 | Taipei, Taiwan Jul 2019–May 2021. 建築設計師

【設計方案發展,專案執行】

• 芝山岩展示館修復工程委託規劃設計監造技術服務

• 臺北數位藝術中心開放空間鋪面暨木棧步道改善工程委託設計監造 【專案執行】 • 國軍花蓮總醫院男女單身宿舍整修工程委託規畫設計及監造技術服務

• 國立臺灣師範大學樸307書法教室天花板及屋頂修繕工程委託設計監造

• 國立臺灣師範大學美術系館德群畫廊及各樓層走廊整修工程委託設計監造

• 國立臺灣師範大學營養科學學士及碩士學位學程之辦公空間與教師研究室 整建工程委託設計監造

• 新北市立板橋高級中學預備教室多功能教學空間活化工程委託設計監造

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN

Section BB'

原日星鑄字行保留成 為鑄字工廠，並作 為工作空間主要出入 口。 民眾參觀出入口位於 新舊建築的交界處。

Third floor plan

生產過程也是展示的 一部分，看展覽同時 也能伴隨著鑄字的運 作聲。

建築外部空間釋放， 供居民使用，保留與 居民生活結合的自然 感受。

提供居民活版印刷教 學、書法練習等課 程，成立推廣教育機 構。

活版印刷體驗坊可獨 立對外營業。

8. 9. 10. 11.

Second floor plan

First floor plan

6. 7.

3. 5.

13. 14. 12. 2. 4.

Ground floor plan

1.

Basement plan

1.活字印刷體驗坊 2.原日星鑄字行 3.入口大廳 4.展覽空間 5.講堂 6.展覽空間 7.戶外平台 8.詩社 9.學徒工作空間 10.戶外廊道 11.推廣中心 12.辦公空間 13.展覽空間 14.書店

PRACTICAL PROJECT

URBAN DEVELOPMENT AND COMMUNITY DESIGN PROGRAM

Asset-Based Community Development

Center for Public Interest Design (U.S.A)

Jun 2022–Aug 2022.| Intern

• Asset mapping in Hood river

• Participating in interviews

• Assisting the smooth progress of the design workshop

• Integrating all the contents into a report

Asset-based Community Development (ABCD) is a newer model of development that challenges the top-down approach of the typical needs-based development, where outside organizations step in on ‘behalf’ of the community. The ABCD process, instead, offers a sustainable model of development, one that prioritizes a grassroots, bottom-up approach of empowerment, inclusion, and transformative change to communities. The traditional, needs-based model of community development, specifically in the context of affordable housing, has perpetuated a narrative of “criminality” that is problematic in identity-making for individuals who rely on the affordable housing system. Not only does this model present a problematic view of affordable housing and ts residents, it future disenfranchises those who already live on the fringes of society. Rather than seeking to empower these communities, the needs-based development model relies on outsiders to come in and solve these issues, creating a client-neighborhood where lower income neighborhoods now think their well-being is dependent on being a ‘client’. Essentially residents become dependents rather than being empowered to create a collective identity and work together within their communities.

ABCD is, by contrast, a capacity-focused model that creates communities based on its capacities, skillsets and assets. The ABCD approach seeks to identify the already-existing skills, services, and assets that exist at the local level, and mobilize them to better serve the community as a whole. The process involves taking inventory by physically mapping out these assets and opportunities, and interviewing key stakeholders to identify individuals and organizations already doing the work to serve and mobilize the community at large. This model stimulates the local economy and empowers marginalized community-members by transforming the ‘client-recipient’ into a contributor. ABCD emphasized relationship-building, which is the key to increasing social capital within the community and generating linkages between the micro with the macro, to create a more cohesive and thriving community, where these developments are being built.

PROJECT MEMBERS

Sergio Palleroni, Director, CPID Hannah Lopez, CPID Sean Silverstein, CPID Aline Van Driessche, CPID Christine Ying Lu, CPID

PARTNERS

Community Development Partners (CDP) Columbia Cascade Housing Corporation (CCHC) Mid-Columbia Housing Authority (MCHA) HOLST Architecture PLACE, la.

Executive Summary

The Rand Road Development, a development partnership between Community Development Partners (CDP), Columbia Cascade Housing Corporation (CCHC), and Mid-Columbia Housing Authority (MCHA), will address the community’s need for high-quality, affordable housing. The project aspires to support an intergenerational community for all ages (CFAA0) and an intercultural community. This development will be a hub for residents and the broader Hood River community by providing a large community center with robust on-site programming. The protection of the wetlands on-site, provision of community green spaces and outdoor play areas, echo a focus on sustainability, while providing a park-like environment to be enjoyed by residents and surrounding neighbors.

As an initiative of the Center for Public Interest Design (CPID), this reports aims to support and inform the development of this intergenerational, affordable housing community. The role of the CPID is to identify community assets using an ABCD model, conduct community outreach and engagement, and provide design and programming feedback based on this outreach process. The desired outcome of this work is to encourage a more

robust community-building strategy and provide a more sustainable, community-oriented approach to design and programming while leveraging the already-existing infrastructure and services in the Hood River community.

The Process

Employing the ABCD approach to community development, the CPID was able to identify various organizations, amenities, and service providers in the city and county. Community resources related to food, health, arts and education were of particular interest, in addition to support systems and equity recommendations for BIPOC (Black, Indigenous, and People of Color) communities in the county. Once these assets were identified, they were then mapped in relation to the site in terms of transportation and accessibility. Alternative transportation options such as walking, biking, and public transit routes were also taken into consideration and mapped. Organizations were then contacted by the CPID for further information, with the intention to understand available services and amenities, and to identify potential collaboration opportunities to bring these services directly on-site to serve residents.

OTHER SKILLS