Water Supply Master Plan by City of Cranbrook

WATER SUPPLY MASTER PLAN

304 - 1353 Ellis Street, Kelowna, BC V1Y 1Z9 | T: 250.762.2517 CONTACT: Jeremy Clowes, P.Eng. E: jclowes@urbansystems.ca January 11, 2022

Page | 1

PREPARED FOR: The City of Cranbrook 40-10th Avenue South Cranbrook, BC V1C 2M8 304 - 1353 Ellis Street, Kelowna, BC V1Y 1Z9 | T: 250.762.2517 File: 0956.0050.01

This report is prepared for the sole use of The City of Cranbrook. No representations of any kind are made by Urban Systems Ltd. or its employees to any party with whom Urban Systems Ltd. does not have a contract. No representations of any kind are made by Urban Systems Ltd. or its employees to any party with whom Urban Systems Ltd. does not have a contract. © 2022 URBANSYSTEMS®.

THE CITY OF CRANBROOK WATER SUPPLY MASTER PLAN

January 11, 2022

File: 0956.0050.01

The City of Cranbrook 40-10th Avenue South Cranbrook, BC V1C 2M8

Attention: RE:

Mike Matejka, AScT – Manager of Infrastructure Planning and Delivery

Final Water Supply Master Plan

We are pleased to submit a FINAL copy of the Water Supply Master Plan. The report satisfies the objectives as outlined in the City’s RFP and we trust that it provides a clear path forward for addressing key risks and planning for future upgrades to accommodate growth over a 50 year planning horizon. Thank you for the opportunity to work with the City on this important project.

Sincerely, URBAN SYSTEMS LTD.

Jeremy Clowes, P.Eng. Principal, Water and Wastewater Engineer

Steve Brubacher, P.Eng. Principal, Project Leader

THE CITY OF CRANBROOK WATER SUPPLY MASTER PLAN

CONTENTS 1.

INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1.

Background and Scope of Study................................................................................................................................... 1

1.2.

Existing System Description ..................................................................................................................................... 2

1.3.

Document Organization ............................................................................................................................................. 3

DESIGN CRITERIA .......................................................................................................................................... 3 2.1.

Population Projections................................................................................................................................................. 3

2.2.

Per Capita Flows .............................................................................................................................................................4

2.3.

Design Flows..................................................................................................................................................................... 5

2.4.

Treatment .......................................................................................................................................................................... 5

2.5.

Storage ................................................................................................................................................................................ 6

2.6.

Levels of Service .............................................................................................................................................................. 6

WATER SOURCES ......................................................................................................................................... 7 3.1. 3.1.1.

License Summary.......................................................................................................................................................................... 7

3.1.2.

Quality................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7

3.1.3.

Source Protection Plan ..............................................................................................................................................................8

3.2.

Surface Water................................................................................................................................................................... 7

Ground Water................................................................................................................................................................. 10

3.2.1.

License Summary........................................................................................................................................................................ 10

3.2.2.

3.2.3.

Source Protection Plan ............................................................................................................................................................. 11

WATER TREATMENT..................................................................................................................................... 14 4.1.

Filtration Exemption ................................................................................................................................................... 14

4.2.

UV and Chlorine Disinfection ................................................................................................................................. 14

WATER STORAGE ......................................................................................................................................... 15

DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM ASSET MANAGEMENT AND PLANNING .................................................................. 16 6.1.

Capital Prioritization and Levels of Service ...................................................................................................... 16

6.1.1.

Capital Prioritization Methodology .................................................................................................................................. 17

6.1.2.

Results................................................................................................................................................................................................. 18

6.1.3.

Levels of Service, Risk, and Cost: Results ...................................................................................................................... 18

PROPOSED UPGRADES ................................................................................................................................ 21

IMPLEMENTATION PLAN ............................................................................................................................. 24

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................................... 27

Page | i

THE CITY OF CRANBROOK WATER SUPPLY MASTER PLAN

APPENDICES A. Growth Forecast B. Water Source and Storage Options C. Groundwater Source Protection Plan and PW Pumping Test D. Joseph Creek and Gold Creek Source Protection Plan E. Filtration Exemption Application F. Chlorine Disinfection Options G. Phillips Reservoir Bypass H. Gold Creek Dam I. Distribution System Risk Assessment J. Supply Solution Set K. Alternate Zone 3 Reservoir L. Water Conservation Plan Update M. UV Treatment Review

TABLES Table 2-1: Growth Population Equivalents ............................................................................................................................................... 3 Table 2-2: Water Use Projections ................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Table 2-3: Reservoir Storage Needs.............................................................................................................................................................. 6 Table 3-1: Surface License Summary ........................................................................................................................................................... 7 Table 3-2: Surface Water Quality.................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Table 3-3: Surface Water - Hazard and Risk Summary ................................................................................................................... 8 Table 3-4: Surface Water - Response Plan Summary ...................................................................................................................... 9 Table 3-5: Well License Summary ............................................................................................................................................................... 10 Table 3-6: Groundwater Quality..................................................................................................................................................................... 11 Table 3-7: Groundwater - Hazard and Risk Summary .................................................................................................................... 11 Table 3-8: Groundwater - Response Plan Summary ...................................................................................................................... 13 Table 6-1: Capital Prioritization Results of Pipe Assets .................................................................................................................. 18 Table 7-1: Risk Characterization..................................................................................................................................................................... 21 Table 7-2: Risk Scoring ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 21 Table 7-3: Proposed Upgrades, Risk Scores and Prioritization ............................................................................................... 22 Table 8-1: Funding Options Scenario ....................................................................................................................................................... 24

Page | ii

THE CITY OF CRANBROOK WATER SUPPLY MASTER PLAN

FIGURES Figure 1-1: Water Quality and Supply Master Plan Scope of Work........................................................................................... 1 Figure 1-2: Existing Water System................................................................................................................................................................. 2 Figure 6-1: Water Priority 1 and 2 - North................................................................................................................................................ 19 Figure 6-2: Water Priority 1 and 2 - South ............................................................................................................................................. 20 Figure 6-3: Proposed New Water Mains ................................................................................................................................................ 20 Figure 8-1: Base Original Schedule ............................................................................................................................................................ 25 Figure 8-2: Base Extended Schedule ....................................................................................................................................................... 25 Figure 8-3: Grants Original Schedule ....................................................................................................................................................... 26 Figure 8-4: Grants Extended Schedule .................................................................................................................................................. 26

Page | iii

THE CITY OF CRANBROOK WATER SUPPLY MASTER PLAN

1. INTRODUCTION 1.1.

Background and Scope of Study

Urban Systems Ltd. (Urban) was retained by the City of Cranbrook (City) to collaboratively develop a Water Quality and Supply Master Plan. The overall objective of the City’s Water Quality and Supply Master Plan is to combine four strategic aspects of service: long term supply management, source protection, treatment, and asset management. By integrating the strategic objectives for both the natural and built assets of the City, a holistic plan has been developed that will ensure the long-term vibrancy of the City’s potable drinking water supply. The figure below outlines the scope of work that was completed as part of the Water Quality and Supply Master Plan. Groundwater speciality input was provided to the plan by Kala Groundwater and Surface Water speciality input was provided by Dobson Engineering and Austin Engineering. Figure 1-1: Water Quality and Supply Master Plan Scope of Work

Page | 1

THE CITY OF CRANBROOK WATER SUPPLY MASTER PLAN

1.2. Existing System Description The City’s water supply comes from Gold Creek, Joseph Creek and three active groundwater production wells (PW3, PW4 and PW5). There are two production wells PW 1 and PW 2 that are currently not used due to water quality concerns. Gold Creek and Joseph Creek are the primary sources for the City and are conveyed to a diversion structure upstream of the Phillips Reservoir. The City has the ability to send one or both sources to the Phillips Reservoir or to a bypass channel. The Phillips Reservoir can provide up to 2270 ML of raw water storage. The Gold Creek source has a 70 ML impoundment that feeds into a 450 mm HDPE DR21 raw water supply line that has capacity of 45.8 MLD (530 L/s). It is estimated that approximately 40 ML of the impoundment area has been lost due to sediment accumulation. The Gold Creek raw water supply line extends approx. 9 km from the impoundment area to the Phillips Reservoir diversion structure. Joseph Creek flows as a natural stream up to the diversion structure. From the Phillips reservoir, water is conveyed to a chlorination facility located near the base of the Phillips Reservoir dam. The water is disinfected with gas chlorine and then flows by gravity to the City’s distribution system via a 750 mm concrete watermain. The three production wells have a combined capacity of 11.1 MLD, are located in the south side of the City and pump directly into the City’s distribution (i.e., pressure zone 3). The wells are all disinfected with sodium hypochlorite. Refer to Figure 1-2 for an overview of the City’s existing water system. Figure 1-2: Existing Water System

Page | 2

THE CITY OF CRANBROOK WATER SUPPLY MASTER PLAN

1.3. Document Organization This report provides an executive level summary of the work completed for the Water Quality and Supply Master Plan. Detailed information for each subject area (i.e., long-term supply management, source protection, treatment and assessment management) is appended to this report and referenced throughout the body. This report is subdivided into the following sections: · ·

· · · · ·

Section 2 – Design Criteria – Summarizes key criteria used to evaluate the City’s long term water supply, treatment and distribution needs. Section 3 – Water Source Evaluation and Protection – Reviews the City’s available water supply and quality, treatment requirements and presents the findings from the well head and surface water protection plans. Section 4 – Water Treatment – Summarizes the City’s filtration exemption application to Interior Health and outlines a plan for the City to comply with BCs Drinking Water Treatment Objectives for Surface Water Supplies Section 5 – Water Storage – Reviews raw and treated water storage requirements for the City under existing and future conditions Section 6 – Distribution System – Summarizes risk and asset management planning work Section 7 – Proposed Upgrades – Presents a list of proposed improvements to help ensure the City’s is able to meet long term drinking water supply needs Section 8 – Prioritization and Implementation Plan – Outlines the prioritization schedule and funding requirements in order to implement this Master Plan Section 9 – Conclusions and Recommendations – provides a brief summary of the findings and recommended next steps

2. DESIGN CRITERIA The key design criteria used to evaluate long term water supply and treatment needs are summarized in this section and include population projections, per capita flows, design flows, source water treatment requirements, and desired levels of service that City will provide.

2.1. Population Projections Growth was reviewed for a 20-year and 50-year planning horizon. The total equivalent population for the existing and growth scenarios are summarized in Table 2.1. Population projections align with City’s 2010 Growth Management Study and included allowances for growth in the North-West end of the City (e.g., Shadow Mountain). Refer to Appendix A for additional information regarding the growth projections. Table 2-1: Growth Population Equivalents

LAND USE CATEGORY Residential

EXISTING (2016)

2036

2070

19,259

+3,552

+30,741

Commercial

N/A

+83

+720

Industrial

N/A

+358

+3,096

Institutional

N/A

+81

+702

Total Increase

N/A

+4,074

+35,259

19,259

23,333

58,592

Total Equivalent Population

Page | 3

THE CITY OF CRANBROOK WATER SUPPLY MASTER PLAN Notes: 1. Existing population based on 2016 estimate 2. Growth rate of 0.85% assumed for the first twenty years 3. 50-year population estimate allows for City boundary expansions to occur (or servicing outside of the City boundary if desired)

2.2. Per Capita Flows Past water consumption data and the City’s Subdivision and Development Servicing Bylaw (Bylaw) were considered when per capita flows were established. The City’s bylaw identifies average day demand of 700 L/d/c. The past three years’ worth of data (2017 to 2019) shows the City’s actual per capita demand decreased from 745 L/d/c to 645 L/d/c. These per capita flows incorporate institutional/commercial/industrial (ICI) demands. A recent update was completed to the City’s Water Conservation Plan (See Appendix L). As noted, the City has made considerable progress through the use of Water Audits to reduce the unaccounted for water use from 33% in 2009 to 18% in 2018. The City considered embarking on a universal water meter program in 2011 however, a referendum was held and this was defeated. As such, the City has been focusing on metering institutional, commercial and industrial customers and conducting water audits where high flows were detected. The City has had success in reducing the winter base demand but has not had much success in reducing the summer irrigation demands. The recommendations from the Water Conservation are: · · · · ·

Implement a universal metering program and develop a consumption-based water rate system that promotes conservation; Complete annual leak detection monitoring and repair deficiencies; Update the City’s water use bylaw as required to ensure it remains effective at reducing water consumption; Continue to complete annual water audits; and, Continue to monitor water supply and consumption data.

Given the resistance in the past to universal metering, we recommend that a metering strategy be developed in order to evaluate pathways towards increased water metering and see which pathways is most acceptable to the City. This could consider metering all new construction, continued focus on metering all ICI customers, and considering zone metering to supplement the source metering in place. Based on the above and discussions with the City, an average day demand of 691 L/d/c was applied to growth. This value reflects the average of the last three years data for average day demand. The City records daily demands for their water system and ratio of 2.4 MDD: 1 ADD was used based on available data and aligns with the City’s bylaw ratio of 2.43 MDD: 1 ADD. Peak hour demands are not recorded so the City’s bylaw ratio of 1.5 PHD: 1 MDD ratio was used. As the City continues to invest in water conservation measures, it may entirely be possible that demands will continue to decline and allow the timing for capital projects to in some cases, be postponed. As such, it is critical the regular monitoring of water use characteristics be continued and that updates to the plan be completed at least once every 5 years.

Page | 4

THE CITY OF CRANBROOK WATER SUPPLY MASTER PLAN

2.3. Design Flows Table 2.2 summarizes the average day demand (ADD), maximum day demand (MDD) and peak hour demand for each scenario. Refer to Appendix B for detailed summary of the water use projections. Table 2-2: Water Use Projections

AVERAGE DAY DEMAND WATER USE

MAXIMUM DAY DEMAND WATER USE

PEAK HOUR DEMAND WATER USE (ESTIMATED)

2017 – Actual

15 ML/day

2018 – Actual

13 ML/day

Existing (2019) – Actual

13 ML/day

2036 – Forecast

16 ML/day

2070 – Forecast

37 ML/day

36 ML/day (2.4 MDD:1 ADD) 30 ML/day (2.3 MDD:1 ADD) 27 ML/day (2.1 MDD:1 ADD) 38 ML/day (2.4 MDD:1 ADD) 89 ML/day (2.4 MDD:1 ADD)

2.3 ML/hr (1.5 PHD:1 MDD) 1.9 ML/hr (1.5 PHD:1 MDD) 1.7 ML/hr (1.5 PHD:1 MDD) 2.4 ML/hr (1.5 PHD:1 MDD) 5.6 ML/hr (1.5 PHD:1 MDD)

2.4. Treatment The City’s surface and groundwater sources require different levels of treatment. Gold and Joseph Creek require treatment to comply with BCs Drinking Water Treatment Objectives for Surface Water. The BC objectives identify the 4-3-2-1-0 rule: · · · · · ·

4-log reduction or inactivation of viruses. 3-log reduction or inactivation of Giardia and Cryptosporidium. Two treatment processes for surface water Less than or equal to (≤) one nephelometric turbidity unit (NTU) of turbidity. No detectable E. Coli, fecal coliform and total coliform. Normally a filtration barrier is required in order to meet these objectives however, the province has a Filtration Exemption process that adds in the following requirements to be granted: Overall inactivation is met using a minimum of two disinfections, providing 4-log reduction of viruses and 3-log reduction of Cryptosporidium and Giardia. The number of E. coli in raw water does not exceed 20/100 mL (or if E. coli data are not available less than 100/100 mL of total coliform) in at least 90% of the weekly samples from the previous six months Treatment target for all water systems is to contain no detectable E. coli or fecal coliform per 100 ml. Total coliform objectives are also zero based on one sample in a 30-day period. For more than one sample in a 30-day period, at least 90% of the samples should have no detectable total coliform bacteria per 100 ml and no sample should have more than 10 total coliform bacteria per 100 ml. 3. Average daily turbidity levels measured at equal intervals (at least every four hours) immediately before the disinfectant is applied are around 1 NTU, but do not exceed 5 NTU for more than two days in a 12-month period. A watershed control program is maintained that minimizes the potential for fecal contamination in the source water. (Health Canada, 2012b)

One of the key activities within this Master Plan is to apply for and receive a filtration exemption approval from the Province. This is discussed in further detail in Section 4. The three active production wells have all been confirmed to not be Groundwater at Risk of Containing Pathogens (non-GARP) using the provincial GARP screening tool.

Page | 5

THE CITY OF CRANBROOK WATER SUPPLY MASTER PLAN

2.5. Storage Within a water supply and distribution system, storage is provided for four key functions: 1.

To buffer withdrawal rates against variability in surface water supply changes both under todays climate as well as under future climatic conditions – determination for this storage volume requires numerical modelling based on local climatic predictions. In the previously completed Growth Management Study (Stantec, 2010), a minimum reservoir level of 50% was considered as the desired design criteria.

To provide balancing for peak hour demands since sources are typically designed to provide maximum day rates – this is typically assessed at 25% of maximum day demands.

To provide storage for fire flows - the highest fire flow for the City outlined in the Asset Management Infrastructure Plan (AMIP) is 225 l/s for 2.9 hours (Industrial land use).

To provide emergency storage in the event a short duration unexpected pipe or equipment failure occurs - this typically is set at 25% of balancing and fire flow storage.

Emergency storage may be reduced or eliminated based on the reliability of supply. Table 2.3 summarizes storage requirements for criteria 2-4 for the two scenarios that were evaluated. Table 2-3: Reservoir Storage Needs

Existing (m3)

2070 (m3)

Peak Hour Balancing

6,750

22,250

Fire Storage

2,349

Emergency Storage

2,275

6,150

11,374

30,749

Total

2.6. Levels of Service Expected levels of service were reviewed with the City to determine how to prioritize proposed system upgrades. Urban worked collaboratively with the City to prioritize the proposed upgrades based on a risk scoring and available funding assessment. This is discussed in further detail in Section 6 and Section 8.

Page | 6

THE CITY OF CRANBROOK WATER SUPPLY MASTER PLAN

3. WATER SOURCES This section summarizes the City’s water licensed water capacity, water quality characteristics and findings from the source protection plans for each source. Two surface water protection plans were prepared—one for surface water and the other for groundwater. Both source protection plans followed the Comprehensive Drinking Water Source-to-Tap Assessment Guideline and included completing the following modules: · · · ·

Module 1 – Delineate and Characterize the Drinking Water Source; Module 2 – Conduct a Contaminate Source Inventory; Module 7 – Characterize Risks from Source to Tap; and, Module 8 – Recommend Actions to Improve Drinking Water Protection.

A copy of the surface water and well head protection plans can be found in Appendix C and D.

3.1. Surface Water 3.1.1.

License Summary Table 3-1: Surface License Summary

Source Name

Number of Licenses

Max Annual Withdrawal (ML/yr)

Max Daily Withdrawal (MLD)

Gold Creek

13,402

461

15,607

Total

29,009

Joseph Creek Notes: 1.

Max daily withdrawal limit is not specified for Gold Creek and is limited by the capacity of the Gold Creek pipeline of 46 MLD.

3.1.2. Quality The water quality downstream of the Phillips reservoir is considered good. Table 3.2 provides an overview of source water quality. All parameters that were tested were below the limits identified in the Guidelines for Canadian Drinking Water Quality, except for manganese which on average exceeds the aesthetic objective of 0.02 mg/L and had four samples that exceeded the health based maximum acceptable concentration of 0.1 mg/L. Table 3-2: Surface Water Quality

Phillips Raw Water (blend of Joseph and Gold Creeks)

pH Turbidity (NTU)

TOC Total (mg/L) Hardness (mg/L)

UVT (%)

Iron Manganese (mg/L) (mg/L)

Minimum

6.9

0.08

0.03

28.1

82.5

0.03

Maximum

8.4

1.87

8.73

148

94.9

0.85

0.61

Average

7.6

0.77

2.2

104

91.4

0.14

0.05

Page | 7

THE CITY OF CRANBROOK WATER SUPPLY MASTER PLAN

3.1.3. Source Protection Plan Table 3.3 provides a summary of the surface water hazards and risks. Table 3.4 outlines the response plan to address the identified risks. Table 3-3: Surface Water - Hazard and Risk Summary

Drinking Water Hazard

Risk

Description

Low to Moderate

The Equivalent Areas (ECAs) corresponding to current forest harvesting levels represents a low hazard for Gold Creek and a moderate hazard for Joseph Creek.

Sediment from forest development activities. Peak flow hazards from forest development.

Sedimentation and hydrology effects associated with wildfires. Potential loss of control/access or damage at the intake due to wildfire.

Sedimentation due to natural processes. Sediment delivery and water quality impacts (chemical) due to public transportation network. Sediment delivery and water quality impacts (chemical) due to public access/recreation. Sediment delivery and water quality impacts (biological) due to range use. Sediment delivery and peak flow impacts due to climate change effects.

Moderate

High to Very High

High to Very High Low

High to Very High

High road densities in both watersheds represents a higher peak flow hazard. Stream crossings were generally found to be low risk. The risk of wildfire is increasing with changing climate and due to declining forest health. Loss of forest can result in changes to watershed hydrology (higher peak flows, lowers summer flows) and sedimentation due to windfall. Wildfire fighting that includes the construction of access roads and/or fire breaks may cause sedimentation to streams in the watershed. Wildfire mitigation measures in the City of Cranbrook interface zone are addressed in the Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP). Sedimentation from soil erosion was identified along slopes above Phillips Reservoir. There is potential for ditch line erosion to creek and cut slope disturbance along Gold Creek Road. Ditch line connectivity to stream increases the risk of impact due to spills. Unrestricted access t intake pond at Gold Creek Diversion site increases risk of water quality impacts. Stream disturbance by livestock limited to few sites in watershed. Climate impacts on hydrology are associated with precipitation changes (rainfall intensity and proportion as snow). This may affect sediment delivery and peak flow.

Page | 8

THE CITY OF CRANBROOK WATER SUPPLY MASTER PLAN Table 3-4: Surface Water - Response Plan Summary

Stakeholder

Risk

Response Summary 1. 2.

City of Cranbrook

Recreation 3.

City of Cranbrook

Climate Change

1. 2. 3. City of Cranbrook

Other

5. 1.

2. City of Cranbrook

Public Transportation

Communicate with recreation users through local media, signage or verbally on responsible conduct in community watersheds. Report unauthorized and potentially damaging activity using the Natural Resource Compliance and Enforcement Tool, or the RAPP line (Report All Poachers and Polluters). Consider preparing an Access Management Plan to review options to restrict access to sensitive areas in the watersheds (FLNRORD/Galloway/City of Cranbrook). Collect and monitor raw water turbidity from both Joseph Creek and Gold Creek at the Joseph Creek flow control structure to identify trends in water quality on both Joseph Creek and Gold Creek at the control structure. Monitoring water quality and quantity is an essential component of the Source Protection Plan. Review the current Drought Policy for the City. Ensure that the policy includes detailed climate change assessment of impacts to water supply and that the Policy includes measures for water conservation to reduce water demand during low flow summer months. Locate fuel containment/spill kits at the intake diversion sites. Develop and implement an Emergency Response Plan in the event of a catastrophic fuel spill. Ensure that all diversion sites and reservoirs are fenced, securely locked, with posted signage to deter public access and vandalism. The Source Protection Plan should be reviewed annually by the City, IHA, and all stakeholders to develop annual action plans to address moderate and high risks to source water quality. The City is encouraged to establish a permanent Watershed Steward position. Address potential sources of sediment to Joseph Creek at the Joseph Bridge and along the Gold Creek Road. These include road surface, ditch line, and cut slope sources of sediment. Ensure that those transporting Dangerous Goods along the Gold Creek Road have the appropriate permits. Recommend that the roads maintenance contractor is aware of the risks associated with spills along roads within the Community Watersheds and to have spill response materials on hand if needed. A Spill Response kit could be placed at the Joseph Bridge to mitigate incidental spills at the bridge site (consider collaboration with the City to house the kit within the Diversion Building).

Page | 9

THE CITY OF CRANBROOK WATER SUPPLY MASTER PLAN

3.2. Ground Water 3.2.1. License Summary Table 3-5: Well License Summary

Well ID

Dia (mm)

Depth (m)

Capacity (MLD)

BC Groundwater License Applications1 (m3/d)

PW3 (WIN20355)

406

85.3

3.3

1.4

PW4 (WIN20356)

406

101.5

4.0

1.7

PW5 (WIN20357)

406

94.4

3.8

1.6

Total

11.1

4.7

Notes: 1.

License applications were submitted in 2017 and are still under review by the Province of BC. Wells are intended to augment water supply if Phillips Reservoir level becomes too low and they are not used for daily water supply. As such, extraction rates included in the applications have been purposefully left low but can be increased if well use changes.

Kala Geosciences Ltd. completed a pumping test on PW5 to better understand potential impacts to nearby surface water bodies and domestic wells. A report summarizing the testing can be found in Appendix C. As result, Kala recommended that the Environmental Assessment Certificate (EAC) W04-05 be updated to allow PW3, PW4 and PW5 to be operated 24 hours day and that the amended EAC include the following condition to ensure that there is no detrimental impact to surrounding domestic wells: “WIN20352 must be monitored weekly during PW5 operation for a period of three (3) years. If the groundwater level at WIN20352 is below 21.1 meters below top of casing (mbtoc), then monitoring must be conducted on a daily basis. If the water level at WIN20352 is below 21.1 mbtoc for three (3) days in a row and low water level compliant is received from local residents, then PW5 pumping must be ceased until the water level recovered to 21.1 mbtoc or shallower.”

Page | 10

THE CITY OF CRANBROOK WATER SUPPLY MASTER PLAN

3.2.2. Quality As noted earlier, all wells have been determined to be non-GARP using the Provincial screening tool. All parameters that were tested for each well were below the limits identified in the Guidelines for Canadian Drinking Water Quality with the exception of the manganese level in PW4 which exceeded the aesthetic objective of 0.02 mg/L but is still well below the health-based limit. Table 3-6: Groundwater Quality

Well

Turbidity (NTU)2

Total Hardness (mg/L)

Total Alkalinity (mg/L)

Total Iron (mg/L)

Total Manganese (mg/L)

TDS (mg/L)

Nitrate Nitrogen (mg/L)

PW3

7.7

0.18

334

354

0.18

0.002

394

1.2

PW4

7.9

0.29

324

394

<0.1

0.034

377

0.39

PW5

8.0

0.12

299

347

<0.1

0.003

337

0.68

Notes: 1.

Above values are the average from three samples taken for PW3 and PW4. Values for PW5 are the average of four samples take. Refer to Appendix D for complete results.

Initial turbidity values taken after well development of PW3 and PW5 exceeded 1 NTU and are excluded from above. These higher turbidity values are attributed to insufficient well development at the time of testing.

3.2.3. Source Protection Plan Table 3.7 provides a summary of the groundwater hazards and risks. Table 3.8 outlines the response plan to address the identified risks. Table 3-7: Groundwater - Hazard and Risk Summary

Hazard No.

Hazard Type and Description

Likelihood Level

Impact Level

Risk Level

Comments

PW3 1

Golf Course

Low

Residential Area

Low

Potential contaminants are unlikely to enter deep aquifer due to protection from confining layer Water supply pipes are above groundwater with pressure so wastewater will not enter water supply pipes even if sewer pipe leaking occurs

PW4/PW5 3

Baseball Field

Low

Transportation Corridor

Moderate

Residential / Commercial Area

Low

Page | 11

THE CITY OF CRANBROOK WATER SUPPLY MASTER PLAN

Hazard No.

Hazard Type and Description

Likelihood Level

Impact Level

Risk Level

Site 2727

Low

Site 7810 / Site 17402

Moderate

Site 7817

Low

Site 11732

Low

Site 17494

Low

Comments Wastewater will not enter water supply pipes even if sewer pipe leaking occurs Potential contaminants are unlikely to enter deep aquifer due to protection from shallow aquifer and confining layer Potential contaminants are unlikely to enter deep aquifer due to protection from shallow aquifer and confining layer Potential contaminants are unlikely to enter deep aquifer due to protection from shallow aquifer and confining layer Potential contaminants are unlikely to enter deep aquifer due to protection from shallow aquifer and confining layer Hydraulic connections between the deep aquifer and Jim Smith Cr. will not be strengthened with pumping

PW5 11

Individual Septic Fields

Low

Site 1639

Low

Site 1735

Low

Site 3481

Low

Site 4894

Low

Site 5117 / Site 23404

Moderate

Site 11796

Low

Potential contaminants are unlikely to enter deep aquifer due to protection from shallow aquifer and confining layer Potential contaminants are unlikely to enter deep aquifer due to protection from shallow aquifer and confining layer Potential contaminants are unlikely to enter deep aquifer due to protection from shallow aquifer and confining layer Potential contaminants are unlikely to enter deep aquifer due to protection from shallow aquifer and confining layer Potential contaminants are unlikely to enter deep aquifer due to protection from shallow aquifer and confining layer Potential contaminants are unlikely to enter deep aquifer due to protection from shallow aquifer and confining layer Potential contaminants are unlikely to enter deep aquifer due to protection from shallow aquifer and confining layer

Page | 12

THE CITY OF CRANBROOK WATER SUPPLY MASTER PLAN Table 3-8: Groundwater - Response Plan Summary

Hazard No.

Hazard Type and Description

Risk Level

Existing Management

Comments

PW3 1

Golf Course

Low

Maintained by trained person

Residential Area

Low

Community wastewater system

Educate the employee with BMP, including water conservation and pollution prevention Continue encouraging property owners for water conservation; Educate owners with lawn care BMP

PW4/PW5 Maintained by trained person

Baseball Field

Low

Transportation Corridor

Moderate

Residential / Commercial Area

Low

Community wastewater system BMP on auto maintenance

None

Site 2727

Low

Site 7810 / Site 17402

Moderate

Buffer and setbacks

Site 7817

Low

Buffer and setbacks

Site 11732

Low

BMP on auto maintenance

Site 17494

Low

None

Individual Septic Fields

Educate the employee with BMP, including water conservation and pollution prevention Add signage to alert residents and visitors that they are entering a groundwater protection zone Continue encouraging property owners for water conservation; Educate owners with lawn care BMP Continue using BMP Buffer and setbacks Education Buffer and setbacks Visually inspect the AST monthly Continue using BMP Garbage pickup annually along the Jim Smith Creek between Elizabeth Lake and Hwy 95

PW5 Low

Site 1639

Low

Site 1735

Low

Site 3481

Low

Site 4894

Low

Site 5117 / Site 23404

Moderate

Site 11796

Low

Pump out every 3 year Environment friendly practice such as, Scrap metals are picked up regularly by a recycling company BMP on LTL and TL carrier None BMP on equipment maintenance Buffer and setbacks BMP on truck maintenance

Pump out every 3-year Inspect the OWDS regularly Continue the environment friendly practice

Continue the BMP None (site is vacant) Continue the BMP Buffer and setbacks Education Continue using BMP

Page | 13

THE CITY OF CRANBROOK WATER SUPPLY MASTER PLAN

4. WATER TREATMENT 4.1. Filtration Exemption The final filtration exemption application can be found in Appendix E. This application was submitted to Interior Health in December 2021 and is currently under review. It is expected that City will be able to obtain filtration exemption, provided that UV disinfection is added at the Phillips Reservoir to satisfy the need for a dual treatment barrier. The City, Urban Systems Ltd. and Interior Health met in November 2020 to discuss the then draft filtration exemption application and gather feedback. Turbidity and total coliforms levels were two key items that were discussed at the meeting. Cranbrook’s turbidity leaving Phillips Reservoir is normally below 1 NTU, but has been recorded as high as 1.9 NTU. UV disinfection systems undergo validation testing to verify doses that are required to inactivate cryptosporidium and giardia. The validation testing is done with water that has turbidity of less 1 NTU and total suspended solids of less than 10 mg/L. Interior Health requested confirmation that the future UV system can achieve disinfection targets when turbidity exceeds 1 NTU. UV manufacturers that were consulted were not able to provide such confirmation and noted that no standard methodology is available to test water with elevated turbidity levels for drinking water. As such, the City will focus their efforts on controlling inflow to Phillips Reservoir at the upstream diversion structure by directing turbid water to the bypass channel as opposed to pursuing specialized UV testing. Raw water total coliforms levels exceeded the Provincial criteria for filtration exemption but Interior Health noted that this would not cause the City’s application to be rejected and no further action is anticipated regarding this. Note that as part of the filtration exemption application, the City must prepare a conceptual layout for a filtration plant that can be added if water quality changes and it becomes necessary to filter the water. The intent would be to locate a treatment facility at the base of the Phillips Reservoir if this becomes necessary in the future. The conceptual site layout for filtration plant can be found in Appendix E.

4.2. UV and Chlorine Disinfection The City currently disinfects their surface water supply with chlorine gas at a facility that it is located immediately downstream of the Phillips Reservoir. This existing facility will be replaced with a proposed disinfection facility that will include UV disinfection, followed by chlorine disinfection utilizing an onsite sodium hypochlorite generation system. The proposed facility will be located near the existing gas chlorine building. A conceptual layout for the proposed facility can be found in Appendix M. UV disinfection must be added to satisfy Provincial conditions to obtain a filtration exemption. Switching to liquid sodium hypochlorite is being considered to eliminate safety concerns with transporting and handling of gas chlorine. A request-for-proposals (RFP) was issued to select a UV disinfection system. The RFP, proposals and evaluation can be found in Appendix M. The Wedeco system scored the highest and was utilized to the develop the conceptual layout for the disinfection facility. The UV system must be sized to treat MDD plus fire flow or for a total flow of up to 665 L/s based on the 2036 design horizon. A design UVT of 70% was used to size the system which is lower than the minimum value expected from the Phillips Reservoir and was purposefully selected to allow for flexibility when operating the proposed Phillips Reservoir bypass pipe which will convey Gold Creek water directly to the treatment facility. Refer to Appendix G for additional details regarding the Phillips Reservoir Bypass pipe. In preliminary design, we recommend considering using larger UV reactors to decrease the required footprint for the disinfection facility. When the UV RFP was issued, it was anticipated that distribution storage would be added in the near future—meaning that the UV system would have only had to treat MDD flows and

Page | 14

THE CITY OF CRANBROOK WATER SUPPLY MASTER PLAN not included the City’s fire flow allowance of 225 L/s. The proposed system upgrades have been prioritized now and the UV disinfection system is a priority 1 upgrade which is to be completed between 2021 and 2036 versus the distribution storage which is a priority 3 upgrade and to be completed by 2048. As such, the UV system will be required to convey fire flow for up 27 years and it may be beneficial to use a larger reactor. Options for converting from chlorine gas to bulk sodium hypochlorite and onsite generation of sodium hypochlorite were considered. The detailed review of chlorine disinfection options can be found in Appendix F. The life cycle costs for each option were very similar and the City can choose either option in the preliminary design stage for the proposed disinfection facility. The conceptual facility layout was developed based on installing a 450 Ibs/day onsite generation equipment which requires a larger footprint than a bulk sodium hypochlorite system. We recommend planning for a filtration plant when the design of the proposed disinfection facility is completed. The disinfection facility design should allow for incorporating filtration at a later date should filtration become necessary.

5. WATER STORAGE The City currently has 2,270,000 m3 of raw water storage at the Phillips reservoir and 70,000 m3 at the Gold Creek impoundment. The Phillips reservoir presently does not have a bypass and as such cannot be taken off line for removal of sediment and if any repairs are required to the dam. The Gold Creek impoundment was recently assessed to be at high risk of a dam failure and as such requires replacement as soon as practical. Background on these two source facilities can be found in Appendix G and H. Upgrades to the water source facilities are considered a high priority. The Growth Management Plan (Stantec, 2010) evaluated the adequacy of the Phillips reservoir for source adequacy storage under the existing climatic and flow conditions and concluded that if the per capita water demands were able to be reduced to 670 l/c/day (which is slightly less than the 691 l/capita/day used in this master plan) then adequate storage would exist at a minimum of 50% depth with a service population of just over 44,000 people and 37 weeks of groundwater supplementation at 100 l/s. As such, it is recommended that an updated raw water storage capacity analysis be completed that also considers climate change projections in order to confirm adequate source capacity storage and in conjunction with upgrades to the Gold Creek intake. Many communities are moving towards storing fire, peak hour, and emergency balancing storage within their distribution systems since it puts less demand on the treatment infrastructure, as well as the transmission mains. Further, it provides a level of protection should the transmission main have to be taken offline for a short period of time. For the City, there is considerable value for looking at adding storage within the distribution system including: · · · · · ·

Inadequate storage at Phillips to meet the ultimate needs of the City Inadequate transmission main capacity to convey ultimate peak hour or maximum day + fire flows Ability to reduce treatment plant sizing Ability to reduce distribution system upgrades Ability to reduce risk associated with transmission main or storage reservoir failure Ability to use the groundwater wells to replenish storage volumes in the event of longer term surface water capacity reduction

Page | 15

THE CITY OF CRANBROOK WATER SUPPLY MASTER PLAN We have presented one distribution storage option which includes both a new Zone 1 and Zone 3 reservoir. We have also considered a modified configuration to evaluate the impact of locating the Zone 3 reservoir on the opposite side of town. This is reviewed and discussed in Appendix K. As shown, both reservoir configurations are possible and should be reviewed in further detail as part of preliminary design. For the purposes of this master plan, we have included the original configuration.

6. DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM ASSET MANAGEMENT AND PLANNING In 2016, the City’s Integrated Infrastructure Capital Plan (IICP) equipped the City with a prioritized list of water system projects. In the last 5 years, the City has tackled many of the Priority 1 projects and is ready to look at Priority 2. In terms of efficiencies and timing, it made sense to reevaluate the priority water distribution projects as part of the overall Master Plan. This work was focused on updating the water system risk assessment from the 2016 IICP. In addition to incorporating new infrastructure, and refining the water model, the City was also looking for a finer breakdown of the Priority 2 water main projects. For the City to address the Priority 2 projects from the original IICP it would require more than twice the investment of the previously funded Priority 1 projects ($13.5MM for P1 vs $28.7MM for P2). The City required more granularity in the Priority 2 water mains to help close the funding jump. Consequently, this work is not only an update of the 2016 IICP, but a refinement of the methodology to help the City break the Priority 2 projects out into smaller clusters, allowing for a more realistic funding strategy moving forward. It should also provide a mechanism to raise the profile of some of the local watermains that are failing due to condition, but do not have the high consequence of failure ratings that other trunk mains might have. The following tasks were undertaken to achieve this goal: · ·

· ·

GIS database update to incorporate recent water system additions and improvements completed by City of Cranbrook staff Hydraulic water model update – results were used to determine capacity risk scores. The model was also used to inform the overall Master Plan. For more information on the model build and calibration, refer to Technical Memo (TM) 5 in Appendix I. Risk parameter revision – methodology for determining Priority 2 projects (Capacity OR Condition flags) was refined to create Priority 2A and Priority 2B categories. Watermain break history was analyzed and used to refine the Condition scores. For more information refer to TM 1, 2, and 3 in Appendix I Unit rate update – unit rates were updated from 2016 to 2020 values. Rates can be seen in TM 4 in Appendix I Risk model update – the GIS-based risk assessment model was updated and run using the latest information and methodology. The results are described below.

6.1. Capital Prioritization and Levels of Service The following section is an update of Section 4.6 and 4.7 from the 2016 IICP. The risk analysis was applied to each pipe asset in the City’s water system. The result was a database of 1,828 linear assets (over 160km), with their own unique classification, including 667 assets (70km) with a combined risk score of 4 or 5 for either condition or capacity, or both. To prioritize the inventory of risks into a strategic list of assets, in sequence of importance, a three-step merging process was completed to yield a hierarchy of upgrades based on risk scores. This hierarchy relates directly to levels of service. This section describes the methodology; Section 6.1.3 translates level of service into tangible capital projects and associated costs.

Page | 16

THE CITY OF CRANBROOK WATER SUPPLY MASTER PLAN

6.1.1.

Capital Prioritization Methodology

Step 1: Level of Service 1: Apply triple-bottom-line analyses to determine risk scores based on considerations for social (population/land use), economic (cost implications) and environment (water resources). This step combines multiple facets of risk, including conditions and capacity, likelihood, and consequence of failure, and existing or future scenarios. The projects triggered here are considered Priority 1 (highest priority) because they are classified comprehensively. Scores range from a low of 1 to a high of 5, for likelihood, consequence, and overall risk scores.

Step 2: Level of Service 2: Determine which assets had a combined risk score of 4 or greater for either condition or capacity (still based on both likelihood and consequence of failure, existing or future scenarios). Although this step does still incorporate the triple-bottom-line analyses of the previous step, it triggers projects that demonstrate sufficient risk for either condition or capacity. These projects are considered Priority 2 (moderate priority). Level of Service 2 has been refined in the 2020 methodology by breaking out projects into two groups; 1.

Priority 2A: High priority projects where condition is the driver

Priority 2B: High priority projects where capacity is the driver

Step 3: Level of Service 3: Determine which assets scored a 4 or greater under likelihood of failure for either condition or capacity, under existing or future scenarios. Therefore, projects arising from Step 3 are triggered by their probability of failure, but not by the impact of that failure. These projects are considered Priority 3 (low priority). This methodology results in a four-tiered prioritization of projects, which was used to create a list of capital priorities.

Page | 17

THE CITY OF CRANBROOK WATER SUPPLY MASTER PLAN

6.1.2. Results The results of the capital prioritization of pipe assets are summarized in Table 6.1. There are 714 pipes totaling approximately 73km selected as Priority 1, Priority 2A/B, and Priority 3 assets for replacement. The table also summarizes the brand-new mains recommended from the capacity analysis. Table 6-1: Capital Prioritization Results of Pipe Assets

# of Pipes

Length of Pipe (km)

Priority 2A

Capital Scheduling (km of pipe)

Asset Replacement Value ($)

0-10 Years

10-20 Years

7.53

7.06

0.05

$6,288,000

475

48.96

16.40

32.56

$40,347,000

Priority 2B

139

13.02

10.44

2.58

$10,756,000

Priority 3

3.10

$3,008,000

Sub Total

714

72.62

33.90

38.72

$60,399,000

2.1

$2,053,000

723

74.73

36.01

38.72

$62,452,000

Priority 1

New Mains Total

6.1.3. Levels of Service, Risk, and Cost: Results The benefit of the Risk Assessment is the connection between levels of service, risk, and priorities. This section advances the methodology described above to define which types of projects will be funded based on the priority level. Priority 1 – Level of Service 1 a) Risk Level: Capital projects are selected when assets exhibit both condition and capacity risk scores greater than or equal to 4. b) What this means: We will ensure that all pipes are maintained to a condition and capacity risk score of 3 or less. To do this, we will fund and construct projects that are of high risk (4 or 5) for both condition and capacity failures. Note that for the purpose of this assessment, we have categorized the recommended new pipes under Level of Service 1. c)

Cost Implications: $8,341,000 over 20 years.

Priority 2A – Level of Service 2A a) Risk Level: Capital projects are selected when assets exhibit risk scores greater than or equal to 4 for condition. b) What this means: We will ensure that all pipes are maintained to a condition risk score of 3 or less. To do this, we will fund and construct projects that are of high risk (4 or 5) for condition failures. c)

Cost Implications: $48,688,000 over 20 years.

Page | 18

THE CITY OF CRANBROOK WATER SUPPLY MASTER PLAN Priority 2B – Level of Service 2B a) Risk Level: Capital projects are selected when assets exhibit risk scores greater than or equal to 4 for capacity. b) What this means: We will ensure that all pipes are maintained to a capacity risk score of 3 or less. To do this, we will fund and construct projects that are of high risk (4 or 5) for capacity failures. c)

Cost Implications: $19,097,000 over 20 years.

A full funding of the consolidated Priority 2 Level of Service (A + B) would be $59,444,000. Priority 3 – Level of Service 3 Selecting this risk level where assets scored a 4 or greater under likelihood of failure for either condition or capacity would trigger all priority 1, 2, and 3 assets which has a cost implication of $62,452,000 over 20 years. Selecting the preferred level of service to provide often comes down to community preferences and affordability. Following the 2016 IICP, the City chose to focus on Priority 1 and Priority 2 pipes. Updated maps showing Priority 1 and 2 infrastructure can be seen on Figures 6-1, 6-2 and 6-3. Based on conversations with City staff, it is understood that the focus will be: · · ·

•Priority 1 – continue to be funded and implemented as quickly as possible •Priority 2A (condition driven) – to be funded and implemented as quickly as possible •Priority 2B (capacity driver) – to gradually increase revenues over the 20-year time frame so that this level of service is achieved by 2040.

It is worth noting that the concrete cylinder transmission main upstream of Reservoir 1 is addressed in the Supply Projects and not in the list above. Figure 6-1: Water Priority 1 and 2 - North

Page | 19

THE CITY OF CRANBROOK WATER SUPPLY MASTER PLAN Figure 6-2: Water Priority 1 and 2 - South

Figure 6-3: Proposed New Water Mains

Page | 20

THE CITY OF CRANBROOK WATER SUPPLY MASTER PLAN

7. PROPOSED UPGRADES A detailed summary of the proposed water supply capital system upgrades is outlined in Appendix J. These are in addition to the distribution system upgrades presented in Section 6. Proposed upgrades were evaluated against the identified risks in Table 7.1 and broader capacity and condition risks. Projects were then assigned a risk scoring based on the Table 7.2. Table 7-1: Risk Characterization

Risk

Description

Phillips Reservoir

Water Quality Degradation

Inadequate Capacity

Condition Failure

Joseph Creek

Water Quality Degradation

Water Capacity Degradation

Gold Creek

Water Quality Degradation

Water Capacity Degradation

Water Transmission Main: Condition Failure

Groundwater Wells

Water Quality Degradation

Mechanical Failure

Power Failure

Table 7-2: Risk Scoring

Page | 21

THE CITY OF CRANBROOK WATER SUPPLY MASTER PLAN The following Table 7.3 summarizes all of the proposed upgrades and their associated risk scores and prioritization. Table 7-3: Proposed Upgrades, Risk Scores and Prioritization

Project

Overall Risk Score Existing/Future

Order of Magnitude Cost

Priority/Timing

Sequence for Completing Projects**

Rational

Repair existing condition issues and consider expanded impoundment area Required to complete repairs to Phillips Reservoir and provide increased resiliency Complete existing deficiency repairs (requires bypass to be constructed) IHA Filtration Deferral Compliance Address aging infrastructure with no current redundancy and future capacity limit Removes dependency on Phillips Reservoir and supply main for fire storage and peak hour balancing and allows groundwater to be supplied to entire City

Gold Creek Dam

5/5

~$6M

Priority 1 2021-2036

Phillips Bypass

5/5

~$6.5M

Priority 1 2021-2036 (complete at same time as 4b)

Phillips Upgrades

5/5

~$1.5M

Priority 1 2021-2036 (complete at same time as 4a)

Disinfection

5/5

~$11M

Priority 1 2021-2036

Transmission Main

4/4

~$7M

Priority 2 2037-2041

Zone 1 Reservoir

5/5

Priority 3 2042-2048

Zone 3 Reservoir (includes pump station, connection to trunkmain and connection to zone 3) Moir Pit Well

5/5

~$5.5M$6.5M* (2036) ~$8M$10M* (2070) ~$9.8M $11.3M* (2036) ~$7.3M $8.3M* (2070)

Priority 3 2042-2048

~$1M

Priority 4 2047-2049

3/4

Increases availability of groundwater supply and allows the City to supply average day demands with

Page | 22

THE CITY OF CRANBROOK WATER SUPPLY MASTER PLAN

Project

Overall Risk Score Existing/Future

Well Generators

4/4

Order of Magnitude Cost

~$1M

Priority/Timing

Priority 4 2047-2049

Sequence for Completing Projects**

Rational

groundwater only to ~2035 Increases availability of groundwater and allows for increased fire flows and lower dependence on distribution system

*Lower end of range excludes emergency storage. 2070 cost estimate range is based on expanding a reservoir that was constructed for 2036 demands.

The City has expressed concerns in regards to the condition of the concrete cylinder transmission main and as such, given the timing for 2037-2041, the City may wish to complete a condition assessment in order to verify the remaining life. These techniques can vary from exterior visual inspection at select locations through to a much more elaborate steel pipe leak detection and wall thickness testing using a remote operated inspection system. The exterior visual inspection only provides information for the location being tested and doesn’t report on leaks that aren’t present at the location while the inspection system provides a summary of the entire pipeline and provides both leaks and remaining wall thickness information. In order to deploy and recover the inspection equipment it requires a 300mm or larger full access port. The cost for the leak detection system is approximately $125,000$150,000 and to complete the remaining wall thickness inspection is a further $350,000-$400,000. In addition to these capital upgrades, the following projects are also recommended to be incorporated into the long term planning for the City: · · · · · · · ·

Complete a Water Rates Review and Financial Plan Update - $50k Update the Development Cost Charges Bylaw (underway) Phillips Reservoir Storage Capacity Modeling with Climate Change and Water Shortage Response Plan Development - $50-$100k Transmission Main Condition Inspection - $125k-$550k Develop a water metering strategy for the City - $50k Water Master Plan Updating (every 5 years) - $100k Annual Water Audits and Leak Detection as Needed – Completed with City staff Review and implement the recommendations contained in the Surface Water and Groundwater Protection Plans

Page | 23

THE CITY OF CRANBROOK WATER SUPPLY MASTER PLAN

8. IMPLEMENTATION PLAN The City is looking to prioritize water system projects that are attainable within the available $1M plus approximately $0.3M from DCCs in annual funding. Based on our review, this funding level will be insufficient to obtain the objectives and projects in this plan. This full amount of funding with a 1.3% annual increase, plus inflation and interest per year is needed to solely cover the supply capital projects. If 66% grant funding can be realized for the supply capital projects and if the distribution upgrades (Priority 1, 2A and 2B) can be stretched out further over 40 years instead of 20 years then the annual increase needed is projected to be 2.8% plus inflation and interest. Without grants, the annual funding needs to increase by 4.3%per year plus inflation and interest. To reach this target, the following implementation plan is recommended: · ·

Develop budgets for Priority 1 asset renewal projects, as listed in Appendix I tables and shown on Figures 6-1 and 6-2. There are a significant amount of Priority 2A projects. Begin developing budgets for the most critical 2A projects, starting with the ordered table in Appendix I. This table uses break history as a driver in the sorting. By tackling pipes with higher numbers of breaks, the City should save cost and effort on maintenance. Focus on pipes in the 0-10 year range, as highlighted on Figures 6-1 and 6-2.. Fund and construct the new pipes as identified through the water modeling in order to improve capacity of the system. Pipes are shown on Figure 6-3.

It is worth noting that while sufficient funding will be available over the 40 year time frame, there are points in the program where borrowing is required. The City may wish to review and consider alternative cost recovery mechanisms such as, a parcel tax in order to reduce the increase on the water utility rate. The following table and graphs illustrate both the revenue, forecasted expenditures, and project deficits by year which will require reserves or borrowing contribution. Note that that deficit numbers can be dramatically impacted by using a larger rate increase initially. For example, in the Base Extended Schedule + Grants by using a 5% increase for the first 10 years the cumulative deficit is reduced to $9 Million. Table 8-1: Funding Options Scenario

Scenario Base (Figure 8.1) Base Extended Schedule (Figure 8.2) Base + Grants (Figure 8.3) Base Extended Schedule + Grants (Figure 8.4)

Source Grants

Distribution System Upgrading Schedule

Annual Funding Increase*

Maximum Cumulative Deficit*

0% 0%

20 Years 40 Years

4.3% 4.3%

$68 Million $32 Million

66% 66%

20 Years 40 Years

2.8% 2.8%

$53 Million $15 Million

*Excluding inflation and interest

Page | 24

THE CITY OF CRANBROOK WATER SUPPLY MASTER PLAN Figure 8-1: Base Original Schedule

Figure 8-2: Base Extended Schedule

Page | 25

THE CITY OF CRANBROOK WATER SUPPLY MASTER PLAN Figure 8-3: Grants Original Schedule

Figure 8-4: Grants Extended Schedule

Page | 26

THE CITY OF CRANBROOK WATER SUPPLY MASTER PLAN

9. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The overall objective of the City’s Water Quality and Supply Master Plan is to combine four strategic aspects of service: long term supply management, source protection, treatment, and asset management. By integrating the strategic objectives for both the natural and built assets of the City, a holistic plan has been developed that will ensure the long-term vibrancy of the City’s potable drinking water supply. The following overarching conclusions have been reached in this Master Plan: ·

· ·

The City has adequate surface water capacity to meet the anticipated growth in demands to 2070 and the groundwater supplies can continue to be used to supplement and provide redundancy in the event of a loss of capacity from the surface water sources. Both the surface water and ground water are reliable long-term sources for the City but, there are risks that can be mitigated as outlined in the protection plans. The surface water source requires both a filtration exemption to be granted by Interior Health, and the addition of UV Disinfection in order to comply with Interior Health Authority requirements – these are both expected to be able to be achieved as outlined in this plan The groundwater source has one well (PW4) with elevated manganese levels that exceed the aesthetic objectives in the GCDWQ. An RFP was issued to select a suitable UV disinfection system. The Wedeco system utilizing LBX 1500 reactors scored the highest and is recommended. A larger reactor model can be considered when the proposed disinfection facility advances to pre-design to reduce the building footprint. Onsite sodium hypochlorite generation or a bulk sodium hypochlorite system are suitable for replacing the City’s existing gas chlorination facility and will have similar life cycle costs. A proposed disinfection facility can be constructed downstream of the Phillips Reservoir that includes UV and chlorine disinfection. The system has been sized for the 2036 design flow (MDD + fire flow) of 665 L/s. Refer to Appendix M for a conceptual layout of the proposed disinfection facility that allows for the Wedeco UV system and a 450 Ibs/day onsite sodium hypochlorite generation system. The disinfection facility should be designed in a manner that allows for adding filtration in the future in case water quality deteriorates over time and additional treatment becomes necessary. By adding in both a Zone 1 and Zone 3 distribution system reservoir, the City can significantly improve the resiliency of the water distribution system, optimize the sizing of future treatment equipment and transmission main sizing, and provide operational flexibility to address any interruptions to source capacity. An integrated risk-based assessment of both the source and distribution system outlines a recommended capital program. However, in order to be able to afford this plan sustained increases in funding to the water utility are critical.

The associated recommendations for moving forward include both non-capital and capital priority projects. Proceed with the following non-capital priority projects: · · · · · · ·

Complete a Water Rates Review and Financial Plan Update Update the Development Cost Charges Bylaw (underway) Phillips Reservoir Storage Capacity Modeling with Climate Change and Water Shortage Response Plan Development Transmission Main Condition Inspection Develop a water metering strategy for the City Water Master Plan updating (every 5 years) Annual Water Audits and Leak Detection as Needed – Completed with City staff

Page | 27

THE CITY OF CRANBROOK WATER SUPPLY MASTER PLAN ·

Review and implement the recommendations contained in the Surface Water and Groundwater Protection Plans and the PW5 pumping test report

Implement the capital priority projects as follows: · ·

Schedule the source upgrade projects in the sequence outlined in this plan and continue to pursue grants for all priority source upgrade projects For the distribution system upgrades: o Develop budgets for Priority 1 asset renewal projects. o Begin developing budgets for the most critical 2A projects. By tackling pipes with higher numbers of breaks, the City should save cost and effort on maintenance. Focus on pipes in the 0-10 year range. o Fund and construct the new pipes as identified through the water modeling in order to improve capacity of the system – ideally to align with development servicing.

Page | 28

KALA GEOSCIENCES LTD - TERMS AND CONDITIONS

Page 1

Standard of Care This study and report has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted hydrogeological and environmental practices. Where possible and applicable Kala has referenced and undertaken authorized commissions in accordance with governing regulatory guidelines. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is provided. Reporting This report has been prepared for the specific site, design objective, development and purpose that was described to Kala by the Client and summarized in the report of findings. The applicability and reliability of any of the findings, recommendations, suggestions, or opinions expressed in the report are only valid to the extent that there has been no material alteration to or variation from any of the said descriptions provided to Kala, unless Kala was specifically requested by the Client to review and revise the report in light of such alteration or variation. Recommendations from Kala to the Client pertinent to additional and follow up site inspections are mandatory. Preliminary Site Investigations & Environmental Site Assessments This section pertains to the completion of Kala reports pertinent to Preliminary Site Investigations (PSIs), Detailed Site Investigations (DSIs), and Environmental Site Assessments (ESAs) as defined by the BC Ministry of Environmental Contaminated Sites Regulation, and Environmental Site Assessments (ESA) as defined by CSA Standard Z768-01 (R2016) - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment This report authorizes the use of this Kala report by the Client as named herein, its solicitors, lenders, engineers and consultants to the same extent as the Client, and confirms that the Client can rely on this report for financial purposes. This report may be relied upon by the supporting financial institutions and related solicitors, lenders, engineers and consultants to the same extent as the original Client. Reporting is confidential and intended to provide the Client with a baseline assessment of environmental conditions within and adjacent to the subject property as previously defined. Reporting is based on data, information and materials collected during the performance of a (PSI)/(ESA). A PSI or ESA is based solely on site conditions of the subject property during the time of the site visits as described in this report. In evaluating a site, Kala relies in good faith on historical information provided by individuals and agencies noted within the report. Kala does not warranty any property, explicitly or implicitly. Although every effort is made to verify the authenticity of pertinent information, Kala assumes no responsibility for any deficiency, misstatement or inaccuracy contained within a report as a result of omissions, misrepresentation or fraudulent acts of the individuals or parties interviewed. Kala generally deems a Stage 1 or 2 PSI, or a Phase 1 or 2 ESA to be valid for a particular site for no more than 5 years from the published date of issue. Unless specifically stated otherwise, the applicability and reliability of the findings, recommendations, suggestions or opinions expressed in the report are only valid to the extent that there has been no material alteration to or variation from any of the information provided to Kala. If new information about the environmental conditions at the site is found, the information should be provided to Kala so that it can be reviewed and revisions to the conclusions and/or recommendations can be made, if warranted. KALA GEOSCIENCES LTD.

KALA GEOSCIENCES LTD - TERMS AND CONDITIONS

Page 2

The conclusions presented in this report were based, in part, on visual observations of the site and structures. Our conclusions cannot be and are not extended to include those portions of the site or structures which were not reasona The environmental conditions at the site were assessed within the limitations set forth here within. A review of compliance by past owners or occupants of the site with any applicable local, provincial or federal by-laws, orders-in-council, legislative enactments and regulations was not performed. Where testing was performed, it was carried out in accordance with the terms of our contract providing for testing. Other substances or different quantities of substances tested for, may be present on site and may be revealed to be different if other testing not provided for in our contract is completed. Because of the limitations referred to above, different environmental conditions from those stated in rt may exist. Should such different conditions be encountered, Kala must be notified in order that it may determine if modifications to the conclusions in the report are necessary. Provided that the report is still reliable, and less than 12 months old, Kala will issue a third-party reliance letter to such parties the Client identifies in writing, upon payment of the current fee for such letters. by such reliance agree to be bound by our standard reliance letter indicates that in no event shall Kala be liable for any damages, howsoever arising, relating to third-party use of Groundwater Potential Evaluations and Proof of Sufficient Water Investigations Groundwater potential evaluations are based on a review of maps, databases and published documents available at the time of the assessment, and a site reconnaissance. The conclusions provided by Kala do not preclude the existence of other aquifers from those identified. A groundwater supply investigation involving test wells and evaluation techniques is required to verify the presence or absence of suspected aquifers. If additional information or assessment findings arise which may alter the conclusions and/or recommendations of this report Kala would be pleased to review and append our report where required. Proof of water assessments are based on pumping test information provided by others and interpreted by Kala unless otherwise noted. Groundwater sourced from fractured bedrock aquifers is dependent on the density and aperture of randomly and structurally oriented fractures and joints. Kala cannot warranty the long term viability of domestic water wells completed within fractured bedrock. Water well maintenance is required on a regular basis to sustain long term yields. Kala proof of water evaluations are valid for the time of year and site conditions noted. The impacts of neighboring water wells on the pumping well or the later alteration of site conditions to include additional water wells has not been determined. While every effort is made to establish a recommended pumping rate for a subject water well based on the data provided, the Client or well owner is responsible for monitoring long term well water to verify an aquifers response to pumping and maintain the well such that well bore deterioration does not impact well performance.

KALA GEOSCIENCES LTD.

KALA GEOSCIENCES LTD - TERMS AND CONDITIONS

Page 3

Kala recommends the construction, development and use of drilled wells over and above excavated wells where ever possible. Dug wells generally comprise shallow culvert style excavations which are directly under the influence of surface water owing to depth and proximity to surface water recharge. Dug wells, unlike deeper drilled wells, are more sensitive to fluctuations in total available drawdown which impacts the quantity of water available. Seasonal fluctuations in water level especially during drought periods can have pronounced impact on dug wells. Dug wells are not developed to a silt and sand free condition as deeper drilled wells completed in unconsolidated formations are; rather, dug wells rely on the filtering capacity of the surrounding envelope of drain rock to improve water quality. Both the quality and quantity of water sourced from dug wells is more sensitive to surface and local watershed changes. Report Use The information and opinions expressed in the report, or any document forming part of the report, are for the sole benefit of the Client. The Client and approved users or agents may not give, lend, sell or otherwise make available the report or any portion thereof, or any copy of the report or portion thereof, to any other party without the permission of Kala. No other party may use or rely upon the report in whole or in part without the written consent of Kala. Any use of the report, or any portion of the report, by a third party are the sole responsibility of such third party. Kala is not responsible for damages suffered by any third party resulting from unauthorized use of the report. Third Party Report Use The information provided within this report is for the exclusive use of the Client/owner and their authorized users and agents. Third party use of this report or any reliance or decisions made on the subject information herein, is at the sole risk of the third party. Kala has no obligation, contractual or otherwise to any third persons or parties, using or relying on this information for any reason and therefore accepts no responsibility for damages incurred by a third party as a result of actions taken or decisions made on the basis of the subject information. Complete Report The report is not intended to stand alone without reference to the instructions given to Kala by the Client, communications between Kala and the Client, and to any other reports prepared by Kala for the Client relative to the specific site described in the report. In order to properly understand the suggestions, recommendations and opinions expressed in the report, reference must be made to the whole of the report. Kala cannot be responsible for use by any party of portions of the report without reference to the whole report.

KALA GEOSCIENCES LTD.

KALA GEOSCIENCES LTD - TERMS AND CONDITIONS

Page 4

Interpretation of the Report (a) Nature and Exactness of Soil Description: Classification and identification of soils, rocks and geologic units have been based upon commonly accepted methods employed in professional geotechnical practice. This report contains descriptions of the systems and methods used. Where deviations from these systems have been used, they are specifically mentioned. Classification and identification of the type and condition of soils, rocks and geologic units are judgmental in nature. Accordingly, Kala cannot warrant or guarantee the exactness of the description of insitu ground conditions set forth in the report. (b) Logs of Test Holes, Pits, Trenches etc.: The test hole logs are a record of information obtained from field observations and laboratory testing of selected samples as well as an interpretation of the likely subsurface stratigraphy at the test hole sites. In some instances normal sampling procedures do not recover a complete sample. Soil, rock or geologic zones have been interpreted from the available data. The change from one zone to another, indicated on the logs as a distinct line, may be transitional. The same limitations apply to test pit and other logs. (c) Stratigraphic and Geologic Sections: The stratigraphic and geologic sections indicated on drawings contained in this report are interpreted from logs of test holes, test pits or other available information. Stratigraphy is inferred only at the locations of the test holes or pits to the extent indicated by items (a) and (b) above. The actual geology and stratigraphy, particularly between these locations, may vary considerably from that shown on the drawings. Since natural variations in geologic conditions are inherent and a function of the historic site environment, Kala does not represent or warrant that the conditions illustrated are exact and the user of the report should recognize that variations may exist. (d) Groundwater Conditions: Groundwater conditions shown on logs of test holes and test pits, and/or given within the text of this report, record the observed conditions at the time of their measurement. Groundwater conditions may vary between test hole and test pit locations and can be affected by annual, seasonal and special meteorological conditions, or by tidal conditions for sites near the seas. Groundwater conditions can also be altered by construction activities. These types of variations need to be considered in design and construction. Samples Kala normally disposes of all unused soil, rock, and sediment or water samples after 90 days of completing the testing program for which the samples were obtained. Further storage or transfer

KALA GEOSCIENCES LTD.

KALA GEOSCIENCES LTD - TERMS AND CONDITIONS

Page 5

Alternate Report Format When Kala submits both electronic file and hard copies of reports, drawings and other documents and deliverables, the Client agrees that only the signed and sealed hard copy versions shall be considered final and legally binding. The hard copy versions submitted by Kala shall be the original documents for record and working purposes, and, in the event of a dispute or discrepancy, the hard copy versions shall govern over the electronic versions. Furthermore, the Client agrees and waives all future right of dispute that the original hard copy signed version archived by Kala shall be deemed to be the overall original for the project. The Client agrees that both electronic file and hard copy versions shall not, under any circumstances, no matter who owns or uses them, be altered by any party except Kala. The Client warrants that Kala report will be used only and exactly as submitted by Kala. The Client recognizes and agrees that electronic files submitted by Kala have been prepared and submitted using specific software and hardware systems. Kala makes no representation about the compatibility of these files with the C

KALA GEOSCIENCES LTD.

Definition of Terms and Abbreviations Analytical Methods: the use of easily understood mathematical equations and calculations to define groundwater movement and contaminant transport. Aquiclude: A geological formation, group of formations or part of a formation through which virtually no water moves. Aquifer: a water-bearing unit that will yield water in a useable quantity to a well or spring. Aquifer Model: a computerized mathematical description of the aquifer system, used to understand its physical behaviour. Aquifer System: a general term used to define all areas pertaining to the aquifer that contribute, remove or store groundwater. Aquitard: A saturated, but poorly permeable bed, formation, or group of formations that does not yield water freely to a well or spring. However, an aquitard may transmit water to or from adjacent aquifers. Available Drawdown: A volume of water measured from static water level to top of riser above screens. Bedrock: a general term for consolidated material, such as sandstone and shale, that underlies soils or other unconsolidated material. Capture Zone: the entire area recharging or contributing water to a well or well field. Casing Stickup: Well casing distance above ground surface. Conductivity: A measure of the ability of a material to permit the passage of water. Gravel has high conductivity; clay has a very low conductivity. Cone of Depression: the depression in the water table or potentiometric surface around a well caused by the withdrawal of water. It defines the area of influence of a well. Confined Aquifer: an aquifer completely saturated with water and bounded above and below by units, such as clay, which have a distinctly lower permeability than the aquifer itself. In a confined aquifer the groundwater is under pressure, and when a well is drilled into a confined aquifer, the water rises above the level of the aquifer. Contaminant: an undesirable substance not normally present in the water or soil. Contamination: the degradation of natural water quality as a result of man's activities. The degree of permissible contamination depends upon the intended end use, or uses, of the water. Contingency Plan: a plan that prepares for the unforeseen or an accidental occurrence. Drift deposits: a general term for unconsolidated material transported by glaciers and deposited directly on land or in the sea. Drawdown: the decline in groundwater level at a point caused by the withdrawal of water from an aquifer.

Evapotranspiration (ET): the process where water absorbed by plants, usually through the roots, is evaporated into the atmosphere from the plant surface. Flow Lines: lines indicating the direction followed by groundwater toward points of discharge. Flow lines are perpendicular to water table contours. Flow Path: subsurface course a water molecule or solute would follow. Flowing Artesian Well: A well in which the water overflows at ground surface. Groundwater: subsurface water contained in openings and pore spaces below the water table in an unconfined aquifer or located in a confined aquifer. Groundwater Divide: a ridge in the water table from which groundwater moves away in both directions. Hydraulic Gradient: the slope of the water table or potentiometric surface; that is, the change in water level per unit distance along the direction of maximum head decrease. Determined by measuring the water level in several wells. Hydrogeologic: factors that deal with subsurface waters and related geologic aspects of surface waters. Hydrologic Cycle: the exchange of water between the Earth and the atmosphere through evaporation and precipitation. Infiltration: the downward entry of water into soil or rock. Interference: the condition occurring when the cone of depression of a well comes into contact or overlaps that of a neighbouring well. At a given location, the total well interference is the sum of the drawdowns due to each individual well. IGPM: Imperial Gallons Per Minute L/s: Litres Per Second Leaching: removal of materials in solution from rock, soil, or waste; separation or dissolving out of soluble constituents from a porous medium by percolation of water. Long Term Well Capacity: Maximum recommended long term well capacity based on well equilibrium estimations. Non-point Source: a dispersed source that discharges contaminants into the environment. Observation Well: a non-pumping well used to observe the water table elevation or potentiometric surface. Permeability: the measure of a material's ability to allow the passage of a fluid. Potentiometric Surface: the potential level to which water will rise above the water level in an aquifer in a well than penetrates a confined aquifer, if the potential level is high than the land surface, the well will overflow.

Point Source: a specific site from which contaminants are or may be discharged into the environment. Porosity: the ratio of the total volume of voids available for fluid transmission to the total volume of a porous medium. Potable Water: suitable for human consumption as drinking water. Production Well (PW): Well producing water for consumption. Pumping Rate (Q): Constant or step pumping rate; typically in L/s or USgpm. Pumping Level (PL): Water level to pumping groundwater depth as measured below ground surface. Recharge: the addition of water to the zone of saturation; also the amount of water added. Can be expressed as a rate (i.e. mm/yr) or a volume. Recharge Area: area in which water reaches the zone of saturation by surface infiltration. Reservoir: a natural or artificial place where water is collected and stored for use, especially water for supplying a community, irrigating land etc. Residual Drawdown: the difference between the non-pumping water level and the water level at a given time (t ) after the pumping was stopped. Runoff: that part of the precipitation, snow melt, or irrigation water that appears in uncontrolled surface streams, rivers, drains or sewers. Run-off may be classified according to speed of appearance after rainfall or melting snow as direct run-off or base run-off, and according to source as surface run-off, storm interflow or groundwater run-off. Saturated Zone: the portion of the subsurface environment where the void spaces are filled with water. Specific Capacity (Q/s): Well discharge expressed as rate of yield per unit of drawdown (i.e. USgpm/ft, L/s/m). Spring: place where groundwater flows naturally from rock or soil onto the land surface or into a surface water body. Static Water Level (SWL): The level of water in a well that is not being affected by withdrawal of groundwater (pre-pumping) Storage Coefficient: volume of water released from aquifer storage over a unit decline in head. Storativity (S):The volume of water that the aquifer releases from storage per unit surface area of aquifer per unit loss in the component of hydraulic head normal to that surface. Surface Water: water on the surface of land such as in a river, lake, creek, wetland etc. Test Well (TW): Well used for exploratory purposes to determine if a water bearing zone is present.

Till: Compact mixture of clay, sand and stones often called hardpan or boulder clay. Till is deposited by glaciers. Time of Travel (TOT): the time required for a contaminant to move in the saturated zone from a specific point to a well. Transmissivity: rate of movement of groundwater through a unit wide vertical strip of saturated portion of an aquifer under a hydraulic gradient of 1. Unconfined Aquifer: an aquifer where the water table is exposed to the atmosphere through openings in the overlying material. Wastewater: any water that has been affected by human use.

Typically discharged from

homes, commercial establishments, farms, municipalities and industries. Water Table: level below which the ground is saturated with water. Watercourse: a natural or artificial channel through which water flows. Watershed: an area or ridge of land that separates waters flowing to different rivers, basins or oceans. Well Yield: The volume of water discharged from a well in gallons per minute or cubic meters per day.

B1 - CITY OF CRANBROOK, BC SUMMARY OF TEST DATA AT PW5 DURING PW5 TEST (November 13-15, 2019) ELAPSED TIME

PUMPING TIME

RECOVERY TIME

ELAPSED TIME RECOVERY TIME

[min]

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 12 15 18 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 60 70 80 90 100 120 148 160 180 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2500 2885 2886 2887 2888 2889 2890 2891 2892 2893 2894 2895 2897 2899 2901

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 12 15 18 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 60 70 80 90 100 120 148 160 180 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2500 2885

[days]

[min]

DRAWDOWN

10.51 36.71 48.22 52.51 55.51 58.01 59.63 61.22 63.26 64.21 65.20 66.88 68.60 70.22 71.85 73.24 74.73 74.92 75.66 76.00 76.41 76.70 76.93 77.16 77.38 77.81 78.47 78.62 78.79 78.95 79.22 79.42 79.85 79.95 80.28 80.45 80.78 81.00 81.21 81.36 81.50 81.63 81.84 82.03 82.11 82.18 82.20 82.46 82.59 41.27 28.46 21.38 17.69 15.81 14.69 14.47 14.21 14.10 14.02 13.88 13.76 13.66

0.00 26.20 37.71 42.00 45.00 47.50 49.12 50.71 52.75 53.70 54.69 56.37 58.09 59.71 61.34 62.73 64.22 64.41 65.15 65.49 65.90 66.19 66.42 66.65 66.87 67.30 67.96 68.11 68.28 68.44 68.71 68.91 69.34 69.44 69.77 69.94 70.27 70.49 70.70 70.85 70.99 71.12 71.33 71.52 71.60 71.67 71.69 71.95 72.08 30.76 17.95 10.87 7.18 5.30 4.18 3.96 3.70 3.59 3.51 3.37 3.25 3.15

[-]

0.0007 0.0014 0.0021 0.0028 0.0035 0.0042 0.0049 0.0056 0.0063 0.0069 0.0083 0.0104 0.0125 0.0139 0.0174 0.0208 0.0243 0.0278 0.0313 0.0347 0.0417 0.0486 0.0556 0.0625 0.0694 0.0833 0.1028 0.1111 0.1250 0.1389 0.1736 0.2083 0.2431 0.2778 0.3125 0.3472 0.4167 0.4861 0.5556 0.6250 0.6944 0.8333 0.9722 1.1111 1.2500 1.3889 1.7361 2.0035 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 12 14 16

WATER LEVEL [mbtoc]

2886.0000 1443.5000 962.6667 722.2500 578.0000 481.8333 413.1429 361.6250 321.5556 289.5000 241.4167 207.0714 181.3125

DISCHARGING RATE (L/s)

COMMENTS

[m]

Static Water Level 50.40 50.40 50.40 50.40 50.40 50.40 50.40 50.40 50.40 50.40 50.40 50.40 50.40 50.40 50.40 50.40 50.40 50.40 50.40 50.40 50.40 50.40 50.40 50.40 50.40 50.40 50.40 50.40 50.40 50.40 50.40 50.40 50.40 50.40 50.40 50.40 50.40 50.40 50.40 50.40 50.40 50.40 50.40 50.40 50.40 50.40 50.40 50.40

Pump Off Recovery

2903 2905 2910 2915 2920 2925 2930 2935 2945 2955 2965 2975 2985 3005 3025 3045 3065 3085 3135 3185 3235 3285 3335 3385 3485 3585 3685 3785 3885 4085

18 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 60 70 80 90 100 120 140 160 180 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1200

NOTES 1. mbtoc = meters below top of casing.

161.2778 145.2500 116.4000 97.1667 83.4286 73.1250 65.1111 58.7000 49.0833 42.2143 37.0625 33.0556 29.8500 25.0417 21.6071 19.0313 17.0278 15.4250 12.5400 10.6167 9.2429 8.2125 7.4111 6.7700 5.8083 5.1214 4.6063 4.2056 3.8850 3.4042

13.56 13.44 13.29 13.15 13.04 12.93 12.84 12.77 12.65 12.56 12.45 12.40 12.32 12.04 12.17 12.11 12.03 11.99 11.88 11.80 11.73 11.66 11.61 11.57 11.51 11.46 11.42 11.38 11.35 11.29

3.05 2.93 2.78 2.64 2.53 2.42 2.33 2.26 2.14 2.05 1.94 1.89 1.81 1.53 1.66 1.60 1.52 1.48 1.37 1.29 1.22 1.15 1.10 1.06 1.00 0.95 0.91 0.87 0.84 0.78

B2 - PUMPING TEST - PW5, City of Cranbrook, BC (50.4 L/s, November 13,-15, 2019) Time (min)

100

1000

10000

0 98% Recovery at ti = 120 min.

10 Static Water Level : 10.51 mbtoc

Drawdown (m)

Pump Off at t = 2,885 min

B3 - CITY OF CRANBROOK, BC MEASUREMENTS AT MONITORING WELLS DURING PW5 TEST (NOV 13-15, 2019) Dowling (Well 16, r = 590 m) ELAPSED TIME

Bains (Well 24, r = 330 Doran (Well 28, r = 812 m) m)

Colburn (Well 41, r = 326 m)

PUMPING TIME

[min]

[days]

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 60 70 80 90 100 120 140 160 180 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2160 2400 2640 2885 2890 2895 2900 2905 2910 2915 2920 2925 2930 2935 2945 2955 2965 2975 2985 3005 3025 3045

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 60 70 80 90 100 120 140 160 180 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2160 2400 2640 2885

0.0035 0.0069 0.0104 0.0139 0.0174 0.0208 0.0243 0.0278 0.0313 0.0347 0.0417 0.0486 0.0556 0.0625 0.0694 0.0833 0.0972 0.1111 0.1250 0.1389 0.1736 0.2083 0.2431 0.2778 0.3125 0.3472 0.4167 0.4861 0.5556 0.6250 0.6944 0.8333 0.9722 1.1111 1.2500 1.3889 1.5000 1.6667 1.8333 2.00347

WATER LEVEL [mbtoc]

DRAWDOWN [m]

WATER LEVEL [mbtoc]

DRAWDOWN [m]

WATER LEVEL [mbtoc]

DRAWDOWN [m]

WATER LEVEL [mbtoc]

DRAWDOWN [m]

15.26 15.56 15.55 15.55 15.55 15.55 15.54 15.54 15.54 15.54 15.54 15.53 15.53 15.53 15.53 15.53 15.53 15.52 15.53 15.52 15.52 15.52 15.55 15.54 15.53 15.53 15.53 15.53 15.52 15.51 15.50 15.47 15.41 15.41 15.39 15.40 15.41 15.41 15.39 15.39 16.49 15.67 15.46 15.41 15.39 15.80 15.45 15.41 15.40 15.38 15.38 15.37 15.36 15.35 15.35 15.35 15.34 15.34 15.33

0.00 0.30 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.26 0.27 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.29 0.28 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.26 0.25 0.24 0.21 0.15 0.14 0.13 0.14 0.15 0.15 0.13 0.13 1.23 0.41 0.20 0.15 0.13 0.54 0.19 0.15 0.14 0.12 0.12 0.11 0.10 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.07

24.98 26.20 26.26 26.82 26.92 26.64 26.55 26.54 26.55 26.57 26.60 26.65 26.70 26.99 26.75 26.79 26.85 27.60 26.99 27.01 27.06 27.15 27.23 27.41 27.37 27.42 27.47 27.56 27.63 27.69 27.75 28.56 27.91 27.99 28.05 28.11 28.30 28.21 28.27 28.40 28.46 27.02 26.96 26.91 26.87 26.82 27.78 27.19 26.90 26.77 26.69 26.62 26.56 26.52 27.54 26.62 26.40 26.34 26.29

0.00 1.22 1.28 1.84 1.94 1.66 1.57 1.56 1.57 1.59 1.62 1.67 1.72 2.01 1.77 1.81 1.87 2.62 2.01 2.03 2.08 2.17 2.25 2.43 2.39 2.44 2.49 2.58 2.65 2.71 2.77 3.58 2.93 3.01 3.07 3.13 3.32 3.23 3.29 3.42 3.48 2.04 1.98 1.93 1.89 1.84 2.80 2.21 1.92 1.79 1.71 1.64 1.58 1.54 2.56 1.64 1.42 1.36 1.31

14.92 14.96 14.94 14.92 15.24 15.16 15.11 15.07 16.28 16.04 15.87 15.65 15.49 15.62 15.52 15.44 15.77 15.67 15.42 15.52 15.31 15.15 15.09 26.88 20.19 18.11 17.02 16.21 19.94 19.08 16.61 16.02 15.82 16.10 16.43 15.78 16.56 15.97 16.55 16.80 16.99 16.50 16.38 16.29 16.21 16.13 16.07 16.02 15.96 15.91 15.87 16.07 15.94 15.83 15.75 15.69 15.83 15.66 15.85

0.00 0.04 0.02 0.00 0.32 0.24 0.19 0.15 1.36 1.12 0.95 0.73 0.57 0.70 0.60 0.52 0.85 0.75 0.50 0.60 0.39 0.23 0.16 11.96 5.27 3.19 2.10 1.29 5.02 4.16 1.69 1.10 0.90 1.18 1.51 0.86 1.64 1.05 1.63 1.88 2.07 1.58 1.46 1.37 1.29 1.21 1.15 1.10 1.04 0.99 0.95 1.15 1.02 0.91 0.83 0.77 0.91 0.74 0.93

29.82 29.84 29.84 29.84 29.84 29.84 29.84 29.84 29.84 29.84 29.84 29.84 29.84 29.84 29.82 29.82 29.82 29.82 29.82 29.82 29.82 29.83 29.83 29.84 29.84 29.84 29.85 29.85 29.86 29.87 29.88 29.89 29.91 29.95 29.93 29.97 30.02 30.05 30.10 30.16 30.13 30.13 30.13 30.13 30.13 30.13 30.13 30.13 30.14 30.13 30.13 30.13 30.14 30.14 30.14 30.14 30.14 30.14 30.15

0.00 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.09 0.13 0.11 0.15 0.19 0.23 0.28 0.34 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.32 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32

COMMENTS

Static Water Level

Pump Off Start of Recovery

3065 15.33 3085 15.33 3135 15.34 3185 15.33 3235 15.33 3285 15.32 3335 15.32 3385 15.32 3485 15.31 3585 15.29 3685 15.28 3785 15.26 3885 15.27 3980 15.28 4025 15.26 4060 15.47 4080 NOTES 1. mbtoc = meters below top of casing.

0.07 0.07 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.03 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.00 0.21

26.42 26.22 26.13 26.06 26.00 25.97 25.91 25.87 25.79 25.73 25.68 25.63 25.77

1.44 1.24 1.15 1.08 1.02 0.99 0.93 0.89 0.81 0.75 0.70 0.65 0.79 #N/A #N/A #N/A

15.92 16.28 16.40 16.08 15.58 16.02 15.70 15.83 15.56 15.58 15.23 15.24 16.93 15.71 15.54 15.62 15.62

1.00 1.36 1.48 1.16 0.65 1.10 0.78 0.90 0.64 0.66 0.31 0.32 2.01 0.78 0.62 0.70 0.70

30.15 30.15 30.15 30.15 30.15 30.16 30.16 30.16 30.16 30.16 30.15 30.16 30.16 30.15

0.32 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.33 0.34 0.33 0.33

B4 - CITY OF CRANBROOK, BC MEASUREMENTS AT MONITORING WELLS DURING PW5 TEST (NOV 13-15, 2019) TH11 (r = 8.3 m) ELAPSED TIME

Krane Logging (Well 32, r = 370 m)

PUMPING TIME

[min]

[days]

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 60 70 80 90 100 120 140 160 180 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2160 2400 2640 2885 2886 2887 2888 2889 2890 2891 2892 2893 2894 2895 2897 2899 2901 2903 2906 2910 2915 2920

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 60 70 80 90 100 120 140 160 180 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2160 2400 2640 2885

WATER LEVEL [mbtoc]

DRAW-DOWN [m]

10.09 12.74 14.01 14.81 14.98 15.19 15.42 15.52 15.65 15.75 15.81 15.97 16.02 16.10 16.17 16.24 16.36 16.45 16.50 16.57 16.64 16.76 16.86 16.99 17.06 17.13 17.19 17.30 17.38 17.45 17.52 17.56 17.63 17.69 17.76 17.81 17.86 17.90 17.93 17.97 17.99 15.76 14.87 14.42 14.14 14.00 13.88 13.78 13.69 13.61 13.54 13.40 13.29 13.19 13.10 12.98 12.84 12.70 12.59

0.00 2.65 3.92 4.72 4.89 5.10 5.33 5.43 5.56 5.66 5.72 5.87 5.93 6.01 6.08 6.15 6.27 6.36 6.41 6.48 6.55 6.67 6.77 6.89 6.97 7.04 7.10 7.20 7.29 7.36 7.43 7.47 7.54 7.60 7.67 7.72 7.77 7.81 7.84 7.88 7.90 5.67 4.78 4.33 4.05 3.91 3.79 3.69 3.60 3.52 3.45 3.31 3.20 3.10 3.01 2.89 2.75 2.61 2.50

COMMENTS

WATER LEVEL [mbtoc]

DRAW-DOWN [m]

12.76 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 13.04 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 12.81 #N/A #N/A #N/A 12.83 #N/A 12.87 12.88 12.81 12.80 12.79 12.78 12.78 12.80 12.77 12.77 12.76 12.81 12.80 12.77 13.28 13.01 13.00 12.90 12.88 12.97 13.44

0.00 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 0.28 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 0.05 #N/A #N/A #N/A 0.07 #N/A 0.11 0.12 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.04 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.05 0.04 0.01 0.52 0.25 0.24 0.14 0.12 0.21 0.68

13.49

0.73

#N/A

#N/A #N/A

13.76 #N/A #N/A

#N/A #N/A

Static Water Level

Pump Off Start of Recovery

2925 12.49 2930 12.40 2935 12.33 2945 12.21 2955 12.12 2968 12.02 2975 11.97 2988 11.89 3005 11.61 3025 11.74 3045 11.68 3065 11.60 3085 11.56 3135 11.45 3185 11.37 3235 11.30 3285 11.24 3335 11.19 3385 11.15 3485 11.08 3585 11.02 3685 10.97 3785 10.92 3885 10.88 4130 10.79 NOTES 1. mbtoc = meters below top of casing.

2.40 2.31 2.24 2.12 2.03 1.93 1.88 1.80 1.52 1.65 1.59 1.51 1.47 1.36 1.28 1.21 1.15 1.10 1.06 0.99 0.93 0.88 0.83 0.79 0.70

#N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 12.98 #N/A #N/A 12.91 #N/A #N/A 12.92 12.95 12.93 12.87 12.86 12.93 12.86 12.84 12.83 12.82 12.85 12.96 12.81

#N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 0.16 0.19 0.17 0.11 0.10 0.17 0.10 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.09 0.20 0.05

B5 - CITY OF CRANBROOK, BC MEASUREMENTS AT MONITORING WELLS DURING PW5 TEST (NOV 13-15, 2019) TH6 (r = 560 m) ELAPSED TIME

[min]

Rick Belland (Well 23, r Clause Jenson (Well 25, r = 158 m) = 178 m)

PUMPING TIME WATER LEVEL [mbtoc] [min]

DRAWDOWN [m]

WATER LEVEL [mbtoc]

DRAWDOWN [m]

16.31 16.53 16.53 #N/A 16.51 #N/A 16.52 #N/A #N/A 16.50 #N/A #N/A #N/A 16.50 #N/A #N/A 16.40 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 16.63

0.00 0.22 0.22 #N/A 0.20 #N/A 0.21 #N/A #N/A 0.19 #N/A #N/A #N/A 0.19 #N/A #N/A 0.09 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 0.32

WATER LEVEL [mbtoc]

DRAWDOWN [m]

12.90 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 12.92 #N/A 14.47 14.69 #N/A #N/A 14.06 14.62 #N/A #N/A 14.84 #N/A 15.10 15.75 #N/A 12.30 #N/A 11.41

1.49 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 1.51 #N/A 3.06 3.28 #N/A #N/A 2.65 3.21 #N/A #N/A 3.43 #N/A 3.69 4.34 #N/A 0.89 #N/A 0.00

COMMENTS

[days]

0 0 11.05 70 70 0.0486 #N/A 125 125 0.0868 #N/A 189 189 0.1313 12.55 215 215 0.1493 #N/A 225 225 0.1563 #N/A 1085 1085 0.7535 #N/A 1103 1103 0.7660 #N/A 1450 1450 1.0069 #N/A 1454 1454 1.0097 #N/A 1517 1517 1.0535 14.35 1892 1892 1.3139 #N/A 2592 2592 1.8000 #N/A 2600 2600 1.8056 #N/A 2609 2609 1.8118 14.63 2824 2824 1.9611 #N/A 2840 2840 1.97222 #N/A 3079 #N/A 3122 #N/A 3199 12.77 3219 0.00 3912 11.99 3970 4046 NOTES 1. mbtoc = meters below top of casing.

0.00 #N/A #N/A 1.50 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 3.30 #N/A #N/A #N/A 3.58 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 1.72 #N/A 0.94

Static Water Level

Pump Off Start of Recovery

B6 - CITY OF CRANBROOK, BC MEASUREMENTS AT MONITORING WELLS DURING PW5 TEST (NOV 13-15, 2019) WIN20351 (r = 310 m) ELAPSED TIME

WIN20352 (r = 310 m)

PUMPING TIME WATER LEVEL [mbtoc]

[min]

[days]

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 120 140 160 180 200 230 277 300 360 397 420 500 600 637 720 840 960 1200 1310 1450 1600 1800 2000 2160 2400 2640 2885 2889 2893 2897 2901 2905 2909 2917 2921 2925 2929 2937 2945 2957 2965 2977 2985 3005 3025 3045 3065 3085

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 120 140 160 180 200 230 277 300 360 397 420 500 600 637 720 840 960 1200 1310 1450 1600 1800 2000 2160 2400 2640 2885

0.0069 0.0139 0.0208 0.0278 0.0347 0.0417 0.0486 0.0556 0.0625 0.0694 0.0833 0.0972 0.1111 0.1250 0.1389 0.1597 0.1924 0.2083 0.2500 0.2757 0.2917 0.3472 0.4167 0.4424 0.5000 0.5833 0.6667 0.8333 0.9097 1.0069 1.1111 1.2500 1.3889 1.5000 1.6667 1.8333 2.00347

9.36 9.43

9.38

9.37 #N/A 9.36 #N/A 9.36 9.36 #N/A 9.35 9.36 9.36 9.36 9.37 9.39 9.39 9.41 9.43 9.44 9.46 9.49 9.53

9.57

DRAW-DOWN [m]

0.00 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 0.02 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 0.01 #N/A #N/A 0.00 #N/A #N/A 0.00 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 0.01 0.03 0.03 0.05 0.07 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 0.21

COMMENTS

WATER LEVEL [mbtoc]

DRAW-DOWN [m]

19.41 #N/A #N/A #N/A 19.53 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 20.80 #N/A #N/A #N/A 21.05 #N/A #N/A 21.20 #N/A 21.30 #N/A 21.40 21.45 21.50 21.58 21.63 21.65 21.77 21.78 21.87 21.87 21.93 21.99 22.02 22.08 22.07 21.95 21.81 21.69 21.58 21.49 21.35 21.29 21.24 21.19 21.12 21.06 20.99 20.95 20.90 20.87 20.81 20.76 20.72 20.68 20.65

0.00 #N/A #N/A #N/A 0.12 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 1.39 #N/A #N/A #N/A 1.64 #N/A #N/A 1.79 #N/A 1.89 #N/A 1.99 2.04 2.09 2.17 2.22 2.24 2.36 2.37 2.46 2.46 2.52 2.58 2.61 2.67 2.66 2.54 2.40 2.28 2.17 2.08 1.94 1.88 1.83 1.78 1.71 1.65 1.58 1.54 1.49 1.46 1.40 1.35 1.31 1.27 1.24

Static Water Level

Pump Off Start of Recovery

3133 9.58 3185 3233 9.59 3285 3333 3385 9.59 3485 9.58 3585 9.58 3685 9.57 3785 3789 3885 9.56 NOTES 1. mbtoc = meters below top of casing.

0.22 #N/A 0.23 #N/A 0.23 0.22 0.22 0.21 #N/A #N/A 0.20

20.58 20.52 20.56 20.52 20.49 20.45 20.40 20.35 20.30 20.27 20.27 20.24

1.17 1.11 1.15 1.11 1.08 1.04 0.99 0.94 0.89 0.86 0.86 0.83

B7 - CITY OF CRANBROOK, BC MEASUREMENTS AT JIM SMITH CREEK DURING PW5 TEST (NOV 13-15, 2019) Stick 1 (r = 710 m) ELAPSED TIME

Stick 2 (r = 400 m)

PUMPING TIME

[min]

[days]

0 180 185 1020 1028 1230 1240 1530 1535 2455 2460 2670 2680

0.1250 0.1285 0.7083 0.7139 0.8542 0.8611 1.0625 1.0660 1.7049 1.7083 1.8542 1.8611

WATER LEVEL [mbtoc]

DRAW-DOWN [m]

0.18 0.18 #N/A 0.18 #N/A 0.18

0.00 0.00 #N/A 0.00 #N/A 0.00 -0.18 0.00 -0.18 0.00 -0.18 0.00 -0.18

0.18 0.18 0.18

WATER LEVEL DRAW-DOWN [m] [mbtoc]

0.19

0.00 -11.41 0.00 -0.19 0.00 -0.19 0.00 #N/A 0.00 -0.19 0.00

0.19

0.00

0.19 0.19 0.19 #N/A 0.19

COMMENTS

Static Water Level

B8 - PUMPING TEST - Drawdown Interference at Neighbouring Wells during PW5 Test City of Cranbrook, BC (November 13-15, 2019) Time (min) 1

100

0.0

2.0

4.0

Drawdown (m)

Distance to Well 24: 330 m to Well 28: 812 m 6.0

8.0 Well depth: Well 24 - 38.1 m Well 28 - 100.6 m

10.0

12.0

14.0

Well 24

Well 28

1000

10000

B9 - PUMPING TEST - Drawdown Interference at Neighbouring Wells during PW5 Test City of Cranbrook, BC (November 13-15, 2019) Time (min) 1

100

1000

0.0

0.2

Drawdown (m)

0.4

0.6

Distance to Well 16: 590 m to Well 41: 326 m

0.8 Well depth: Well 16 - 45.7 m Well 41 - 121.9 m

1.0

1.2

1.4

Well 16

Well 41

10000

B10 - PUMPING TEST - Drawdown Interference at Neighbouring Wells during PW5 Test City of Cranbrook, BC (November 13-15, 2019) Time (min) 1

100

0.0

1.0

2.0

Drawdown (m)

3.0 TH6

4.0

TH11

5.0 Distance to TH6:560 m to TH11: 8.3 m 6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

Well depth: TH6 - 101.5 m TH11 - 102.4 m

1000

10000

B11 - PUMPING TEST - Drawdown Interference at Neighbouring Wells during PW5 Test City of Cranbrook, BC (November 13-15, 2019) Time (min) 1

100

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

Drawdown (m)

2.0

Distance to Well 23: 178 m to Well 25: 158 m to Well 32: 370 m

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

5.0

Well depth: Well 23 - 26.3 m Well 25 - 77.1 m Well 32 - 15.2 m

Well 23 Well 25 Well 32

1000

10000

B12 - PUMPING TEST - Drawdown Interference at Neighbouring Wells during PW5 Test City of Cranbrook, BC (November 13-15, 2019) Time (min) 1

100

1000

0.0

0.5

Drawdown (m)

1.0 Distance to WIN20351/WIN20352: 310 m 1.5

2.0 Well depth: WIN20351 - 24.2 m WIN20352 - 68.2 m

2.5 WIN20351

3.0

WIN20352

10000

B13 - CITY OF CRANBROOK, BC PUMPING TEST ANALYSIS - PW5 (Nov 2019) DRAWDOWN FORECAST

PUMPING TIME [days]

0.001 0

0.01

0.1

100

SPECIFIC CAPACITY CALCULATIONS

SC 4hr =

Q s4

50.40 67.02

L/s = m

0.75 L/s/m

Q = s100

50.40 76.50

L/s = m

0.66 L/s/m

DRAWDOWN [m]

SC100 day =

40 50

Where: 60 70

Q= sn =

Flowrate Drawdown forecast at time n

SCn =

Specific capacity forecast at time n

RESIDUAL DRAWDOWN FORECAST

ELAPSED / RECOVERY TIME [-]

100

1000

10000

RECOVERY CALCULATIONS

RESIDUAL DRAWDOWN [m]

Recovery at End of Test

71.30 72.08

Projected Ultimate Recovery

m m

99%

DATA SUGGESTS ULTIMATE RECOVERY EQUAL INITIAL STATIC WATER LEVEL

metres residual drawdown

B14 - CITY OF CRANBROOK, BC CALCULATION OF RECOMMENDED PUMPING RATE - PW5 (Nov 2019)

DESCRIPTION

STATIC WATER LEVEL (SWL) Depth to SWL at time of well completion Depth to SWL at time of pumping test Design value for calculations

4 HOUR FORECAST

UNITS

100 DAY FORECAST

mbtoc mbtoc mbtoc

10.4 10.5 10.5

Not Artesian Not Artesian See Note 1

10.4 10.5 10.5

Not Artesian Not Artesian See Note 1

0.0

Conservative

0.0

Conservative

PUMPING INFRASTRUCTURE Depth to K-Packer Minimum distance from K-packer to base of motor Motor length Lowest allowable pump intake set-point Length of pump Recommended minimum pump water cover Lowest Allowable Dynamic Water Level (DWL)

mbtoc m m mbtoc m m mbtoc

89.7 0.0 0.0 89.7 0.0 0.0 89.7

Estimated Min. Recommended Estimated

89.7 0.0 0.0 89.7 0.0 0.0 89.7

Estimated Min. Recommended Estimated

SPECIFIC CAPACITY (SC) Forecast SC trend (assuming continuous drawdown) Derated SC (from screen incrustation and biofouling)

L/s/m L/s/m

0.75 0.75

See Table 3b 100% (Short-Term)

0.66 0.66

See Table 3b 100% (Long-Term)

AVAILABLE WATER COLUMN Forecast of lowest expected SWL Top of aqufier Maximum Water Column (MWC) Estimated Drawdown Interference (DI) Allowance for incomplete recovery Maximum Available Drawdown (MAD)

mbtoc mbtoc m m m m

10.5 90.4 79.9 0.0 0.0 79.9

DRAWDOWN INTERFERENCE (DI) Maximum Estimated Drawdown Interference

100%

m mbtoc

79.9 90.4

L/s L/min L/day Usgpm %

60.0 3603 5,188,177 952 119%

52.6 3156 4,545,250 834 104%

L/s

74.2

81%

71%

Safety Factor Safe Available Drawdown Operational Water Level (OWL)

Estimated Min. Recommended

THEORETICAL WELL YIELD Theoretical maximum % of 50.4 L/s testing rate

WELL SCREEN LIMITATIONS Maximum recommended flow rate through screen Theoretical Yield as % of limitation Is theoretical well yield limited by screens?

WELL CASING LIMITATIONS Maximum recommended flow rate based upon casing diameter (limits maximum pump diameter) Theoretical Yield as % of limitation

113.4

53%

46%

59.50 944.4

50.40 800.0

Notes 1. Design SWL includes 0 m seasonal adjustment for this well. 2. mbtoc = meters below top of casing.

L/s GPM

406 mm Diameter

74.2

L/s

Is theoretical well yield limited by casing diameter?

RECOMMENDED PUMPING RATE

9.5 ft x 100 slot 5.5 ft x 150 slot

113.4

9.5 ft x 100 slot 5.5 ft x 150 slot

406 mm Diameter

B15 - CITY OF CRANBROOK, BC WATER CHEMISTRY SCREENING - PW5 PARAMETER

RESULTS- Nov 26, 2019

Physical Tests Colour Conductivity Total Dissolved Solids Hardness pH Turbidity Dissolved Anions Alkalinity - Total Alkalinity - Bicarbonate Chloride Fluoride Sulphate Nutrients Nitrate Nitrogen Nitrite Nitrogen Cyanides Total Cyanide

<5 629 372 326 7.99 0.1

Bateriological Tests E.coli Fecal Coliform Total Coliform Heterotrophic Plate Count (CFU/mL)

15 TCU

500 mg/L 2 7.0 - 10.5 2 0.3/11/0.1 NTU

305 305 22 below detection limit 8.8

250 mg/L 2 1.5 mg/L 3 500 mg/L 2

0.989 below detection limit

10 mg/L 3 1 mg/L 3

below detection limit

0.2 mg/L 3

<1 <1 <1 <5

Total Metals Aluminum Antimony Arsenic Barium Beryllium Boron Cadmium Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Mercury Nickel Phosphorus Potassium Selenium Silver Sodium Uranium Zinc

below detection limit below detection limit 0.00075 0.154 below detection limit 0.0407 below detection limit 62 0.00077 below detection limit 0.00157 below detection limit below detection limit 42.8 below detection limit below detection limit below detection limit 0.146 2.78 below detection limit below detection limit 14.1 0.00721 below detection limit

Dissolved Metals Calcium Iron Magnesium Manganese Sodium

62 below detection limit 41.5 below detection limit 13.6

NOTES 1. Generally accepted values. 2. AO = Aesthetic Objective

CANADIAN DRINKING WATER STANDARDS -

0 CFU/100 mL 3 0 CFU/100 mL 3

0.1 mg/L 1 0.006 mg/L 3 0.01 mg/L 3 1.0 mg/L 3 5 mg/L 3 0.005 mg/L 3 0.05 mg/L 3 2.0 mg/L 2 0.3 mg/L 2 0.005 mg/L 3 0.12 mg/L 3 0.02 mg/L 2 0.001 mg/L 3

0.05 mg/L 3 200 mg/L 2 0.02 mg/L 3 5.0 mg/L2

3. MAC = Maximum Acceptable Concentration

Page 1 of 16

Page 2 of 16

Page 3 of 16

Page 4 of 16

Page 5 of 16

Page 6 of 16

Page 7 of 16

Page 8 of 16

Page 9 of 16

Page 10 of 16

Page 11 of 16

Page 12 of 16

Page 13 of 16

Page 14 of 16

Page 15 of 16

Page 16 of 16

Page 1 of 18

Page 2 of 18

Page 3 of 18

Page 4 of 18

Page 5 of 18

Page 6 of 18

Page 7 of 18

Page 8 of 18

Page 9 of 18

Page 10 of 18

Page 11 of 18

Page 12 of 18

Page 13 of 18

Page 14 of 18

Page 15 of 18

Page 16 of 18

Page 17 of 18

Page 18 of 18

KALA GEOSCIENCES LTD - TERMS AND CONDITIONS

Page 1

KALA GEOSCIENCES LTD - TERMS AND CONDITIONS

Page 2

KALA GEOSCIENCES LTD.

KALA GEOSCIENCES LTD - TERMS AND CONDITIONS

Page 3

KALA GEOSCIENCES LTD.

KALA GEOSCIENCES LTD - TERMS AND CONDITIONS

Page 4

KALA GEOSCIENCES LTD.

KALA GEOSCIENCES LTD - TERMS AND CONDITIONS

Page 5

KALA GEOSCIENCES LTD.

YIELD TEST - PW3, City of Cranbrook, BC (June 25-26, 2014)

Time (min) 1

100

1000

10000

-5.00 Static Water Level - 43.61 mbtoc 100% recovery at ti = 30 min.

0.00

14.43 L/s

Drawdown (m)

5.00

10.00 26.15 L/s

15.00

37.17 L/s

20.00

38.75 L/s 25.00

100-day Specific Capacity: 38.75 L/s / 24.5 m = 1.58 L/s/m Pump Off at t = 1,200 min

30.00

CITY OF CRANBROOK, BC SUMMARY OF TEST DATA AT PW3 DURING PW3 TEST(June 25-26, 2014) ELAPSED TIME

PUMPING TIME

RECOVERY TIME

ELAPSED TIME RECOVERY TIME

[min]

0 1 2 3 5 6 7 8 9 10 12 14 17 18 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 60 65 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 12 14 16 18 20 25 30 35 42 47 50 60 65 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 12 14 16 20 25 30

0 1 2 3 5 6 7 8 9 10 12 14 17 18 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 60 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 77 79 81 83 85 90 95 100 107 112 115 125 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 142 144 146 150 155 160

[days]

0.0007 0.0014 0.0021 0.0035 0.0042 0.0049 0.0056 0.0063 0.0069 0.0083 0.0097 0.0118 0.0125 0.0139 0.0174 0.0208 0.0243 0.0278 0.0313 0.0347 0.0417 0.0451 0.0458 0.0465 0.0472 0.0479 0.0486 0.0493 0.0500 0.0507 0.0514 0.0521 0.0535 0.0549 0.0563 0.0576 0.0590 0.0625 0.0660 0.0694 0.0743 0.0778 0.0799 0.0868 0.0903 0.0910 0.0917 0.0924 0.0931 0.0938 0.0944 0.0951 0.0958 0.0965 0.0972 0.0986 0.1000 0.1014 0.1042 0.1076 0.1111

[min]

WATER LEVEL [mbtoc]

DRAWDOWN

43.61 50.82 50.54 50.53 50.46 50.42 50.42 50.40 50.39 50.37 50.39 50.34 50.37 50.36 50.35 50.34 50.34 50.33 50.35 50.36 50.34 50.36 50.37 55.67 56.06 56.28 56.49 56.65 56.73 56.80 56.87 56.91 56.95 57.00 57.03 57.06 57.07 57.09 57.11 57.11 57.12 57.12 57.12 57.11 57.11 57.11 63.68 64.00 64.24 64.40 64.53 64.62 64.69 64.74 64.79 64.83 64.88 64.92 64.94 64.97 64.99 65.03

0.00 7.21 6.93 6.92 6.85 6.81 6.81 6.79 6.78 6.76 6.78 6.73 6.76 6.75 6.74 6.73 6.73 6.72 6.74 6.75 6.73 6.75 6.76 12.06 12.45 12.67 12.88 13.04 13.12 13.19 13.26 13.30 13.34 13.39 13.42 13.45 13.46 13.48 13.50 13.50 13.51 13.51 13.51 13.50 13.50 13.50 20.07 20.39 20.63 20.79 20.92 21.01 21.08 21.13 21.18 21.22 21.27 21.31 21.33 21.36 21.38 21.42

[-]

Discharging Rate [L/s]

COMMENTS

[m]

Static Water Level 14.43 14.43 14.43 14.43 14.43 14.43 14.43 14.43 14.43 14.43 14.43 14.43 14.43 14.43 14.43 14.43 14.43 14.43 14.43 14.43 14.43 14.43 26.15 26.15 26.15 26.15 26.15 26.15 26.15 26.15 26.15 26.15 26.15 26.15 26.15 26.15 26.15 26.15 26.15 26.15 26.15 26.15 26.15 26.15 26.15 37.17 37.17 37.17 37.17 37.17 37.17 37.17 37.17 37.17 37.17 37.17 37.17 37.17 37.17 37.17 37.17

35 165 0.1146 40 170 0.1181 45 175 0.1215 50 180 0.1250 60 190 0.1319 65 195 0.1354 1 196 0.1361 3 198 0.1375 4 199 0.1382 5 200 0.1389 6 201 0.1396 8 203 0.1410 9 204 0.1417 10 205 0.1424 12 207 0.1438 14 209 0.1451 16 211 0.1465 18 213 0.1479 20 215 0.1493 25 220 0.1528 30 225 0.1563 35 230 0.1597 40 235 0.1632 45 240 0.1667 50 245 0.1701 60 255 0.1771 70 265 0.1840 84 279 0.1938 90 285 0.1979 100 295 0.2049 120 315 0.2188 140 335 0.2326 160 355 0.2465 180 375 0.2604 202 397 0.2757 250 445 0.3090 300 495 0.3438 350 545 0.3785 400 595 0.4132 450 645 0.4479 500 695 0.4826 550 745 0.5174 600 795 0.5521 650 845 0.5868 700 895 0.6215 750 945 0.6563 800 995 0.6910 900 1095 0.7604 975 1170 0.8125 1005 1200 0.8333 1201 1201 1 1201.0000 1202 1202 2 601.0000 1203 1203 3 401.0000 1204 1204 4 301.0000 1205 1205 5 241.0000 1206 1206 6 201.0000 1207 1207 7 172.4286 1208 1208 8 151.0000 1209 1209 9 134.3333 1210 1210 10 121.0000 1212 1212 12 101.0000 1214 1214 14 86.7143 1216 1216 16 76.0000 1218 1218 18 67.6667 1220 1220 20 61.0000 1225 1225 25 49.0000 1230 1230 30 41.0000 NOTES 1. mbtoc = meters below top of casing.

65.04 65.06 65.06 65.05 65.05 65.06 67.32 67.33 67.33 67.33 67.34 67.34 67.35 67.35 67.35 67.36 67.36 67.36 67.37 67.37 67.37 67.38 67.38 67.39 67.40 67.41 67.42 67.43 67.44 67.44 67.44 67.45 67.46 67.46 67.45 67.48 67.50 67.50 67.55 67.55 67.55 67.55 67.55 67.57 67.58 67.59 67.61 67.61 67.62 67.62 54.98 49.75 48.52 47.39 46.54 45.90 45.46 45.11 44.84 44.63 44.32 44.11 43.96 43.87 43.78 43.66 43.60

21.43 21.45 21.45 21.44 21.44 21.45 23.71 23.72 23.72 23.72 23.73 23.73 23.74 23.74 23.74 23.75 23.75 23.75 23.76 23.76 23.76 23.77 23.77 23.78 23.79 23.80 23.81 23.82 23.83 23.83 23.83 23.84 23.85 23.85 23.84 23.87 23.89 23.89 23.94 23.94 23.94 23.94 23.94 23.96 23.97 23.98 24.00 24.00 24.01 24.01 11.37 6.14 4.91 3.78 2.93 2.29 1.85 1.50 1.23 1.02 0.71 0.50 0.35 0.26 0.17 0.05 -0.01

37.17 37.17 37.17 37.17 37.17 37.17 38.75 38.75 38.75 38.75 38.75 38.75 38.75 38.75 38.75 38.75 38.75 38.75 38.75 38.75 38.75 38.75 38.75 38.75 38.75 38.75 38.75 38.75 38.75 38.75 38.75 38.75 38.75 38.75 38.75 38.75 38.75 38.75 38.75 38.75 38.75 38.75 38.75 38.75 38.75 38.75 38.75 38.75 38.75 38.75

Pump Off Recovery

End of Data Collection

YIELD TEST - Drawdown Interference at Testwell TH9b and Golf Course Main Well during PW3 Test, City of Cranbrook, BC (June 25-26, 2014) Time (min) 1

-5.00

0.00

Drawdown (m)

5.00

10.00 TH9b Golf Course Main

15.00

20.00

100

1000

10000

CITY OF CRANBROOK, BC DRAWDOWN AT MONITORING WELLS DURING PW3 TEST (Jun 25-26, 2014) ELAPSED TIME

TH9B (r = 7.91 m)

Golf Course Main (r = 683 m)

PUMPING TIME

[min]

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 340 360 380 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1205 1225

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 340 360 380 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1100 1120

WATER LEVEL [mbtoc]

DRAW-DOWN [m]

WATER LEVEL [mbtoc]

42.59 48.56 48.58 48.57 53.06 53.94 53.94 53.94 59.62 59.66 59.68 59.68 61.25 61.25 61.25 61.25 61.25 61.25 61.29 61.29 61.29 61.32 61.33 61.32 61.32 61.33 61.34 61.35 61.37 43.05 42.60

0.00 5.97 5.99 5.98 10.47 11.35 11.35 11.35 17.03 17.07 17.09 17.09 18.66 18.66 18.66 18.66 18.66 18.66 18.70 18.70 18.70 18.73 18.74 18.73 18.73 18.74 18.75 18.76 18.78 0.46 0.01

66.10

DRAW-DOWN [m]

COMMENTS

[days]

0.0139 0.0278 0.0417 0.0556 0.0694 0.0833 0.0972 0.1111 0.1250 0.1389 0.1528 0.1667 0.1806 0.1944 0.2083 0.2222 0.2361 0.2500 0.2639 0.2778 0.3472 0.4167 0.4861 0.5556 0.6250 0.6944 0.7639 0.83333

NOTES 1. mbtoc = meters below top of casing.

Static Water Level

66.09

-0.01

66.09

-0.01

67.89 66.09

1.79 -0.01

Sprinkler's running Pump Off Start of Recovery

CITY OF CRANBROOK, BC PUMPING TEST ANALYSIS - PW3 (Jun 2014) DRAWDOWN FORECAST

PUMPING TIME [days] 0.001 0.0

0.01

0.1

100

SPECIFIC CAPACITY CALCULATIONS

5.0

SC 4hr =

Q s4

38.75 23.87

L/s = m

1.62 L/s/m

Q = s100

38.75 24.50

L/s = m

1.58 L/s/m

DRAWDOWN [m]

10.0

SC100 day =

15.0

20.0

Where: 25.0

30.0

Q= sn =

Flowrate Drawdown forecast at time n

SCn =

Specific capacity forecast at time n

35.0

RESIDUAL DRAWDOWN FORECAST

ELAPSED / RECOVERY TIME [-] 1

100

1000

10000

RECOVERY CALCULATIONS

0.00

RESIDUAL DRAWDOWN [m]

2.00

4.00

6.00

8.00

10.00

12.00

DATA SUGGESTS ULTIMATE RECOVERY ABOVE INITIAL STATIC WATER LEVEL

Recovery at End of Test

24.02 24.01

Projected Ultimate Recovery

m m

= 100%

metres residual drawdown

CITY OF CRANBROOK, BC CALCULATION OF RECOMMENDED PUMPING RATE - PW3 (Jun 2014)

DESCRIPTION

STATIC WATER LEVEL (SWL) Depth to SWL at time of well completion Depth to SWL at time of pumping test Design value for calculations

4 HOUR FORECAST

UNITS

100 DAY FORECAST

mbtoc mbtoc mbtoc

42.5 43.6 43.6

Not Artesian Not Artesian See Note 1

42.5 43.6 43.6

Not Artesian Not Artesian See Note 1

0.0

Conservative

0.0

Conservative

mbtoc m m mbtoc m m mbtoc

79.4 0.0 0.0 79.4 0.0 0.0 79.4

Estimated Min. Recommended Estimated

79.4 0.0 0.0 79.4 0.0 0.0 79.4

Estimated Min. Recommended Estimated

SPECIFIC CAPACITY (SC) Forecast SC trend (assuming continuous drawdown) Derated SC (from screen incrustation and biofouling)

L/s/m L/s/m

1.62 1.62

See Table 3b 100% (Short-Term)

1.58 1.58

See Table 3b 100% (Long-Term)

AVAILABLE WATER COLUMN Forecast of lowest expected SWL Lowest Allowable DWL Maximum Water Column (MWC) Estimated Drawdown Interference (DI) Allowance for incomplete recovery Maximum Available Drawdown (MAD)

mbtoc mbtoc m m m m

43.6 79.4 35.8 0.0 0.0 35.8

DRAWDOWN INTERFERENCE (DI) Maximum Estimated Drawdown Interference

Safety Factor Total Allowable Drawdown (TAD) Operational Water Level (OWL)

Estimated Min. Recommended

100%

70%

m mbtoc

35.8 79.4

25.1 68.7

L/s L/min L/day Usgpm %

58.1 3486 5,019,896 921 150%

39.6 2377 3,423,569 628 102%

L/s %

146.6 40%

Estimated Min. Recommended

THEORETICAL WELL YIELD Theoretical maximum % of 38.75 L/s testing rate

WELL SCREEN LIMITATIONS Maximum recommended flow rate through screen Theoretical Yield as % of limitation

Is theoretical well yield limited by screens?

WELL CASING LIMITATIONS Maximum recommended flow rate based upon casing diameter (limits maximum pump diameter) Theoretical Yield as % of limitation

Notes 1. Design SWL includes 0 m seasonal adjustment for this well. 2. mbtoc = meters below top of casing.

146.6 27%

113.4

51%

35%

58.10 922.2

38.75 615.1

L/s GPM

23 ft x 150 slot

L/s

Is theoretical well yield limited by casing diameter?

RECOMMENDED PUMPING RATE

23 ft x 150 slot

406 mm Diameter

113.4

406 mm Diameter

CITY OF CRANBROOK, BC PW3 CHEM STRY SCREENING PARAMETER

Unit

RESULTS - June 26, 2014

TCU

GUIDELINES

Physical Tests Colour Conductivity Total Dissolved Solids Hardness pH Turbidity

mg/L mg/L pH unit NTU

<5 756 442 390 7.72 0.2

Dissolved Anions Alkalinity - Total Alkalinity - Bicarbonate Chloride Fluoride Sulphate

mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L

344 344 24.1 0.1 31

250 mg/L 1.5 mg/L 3 2 500 mg/L

Nutrients Nitrate Nitrogen Nitrite Nitrogen

mg/L mg/L

1.5 below detection limit

10 mg/L 3.2 mg/L 3

Cyanides Total Cyanide

mg/L

below detection limit

0.2 mg/L 3

CFU/100 mL CFU/100 mL CFU/100 mL CFU/mL

below detection limit below detection limit below detection limit below detection limit

0 CFU/100 mL 3

mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L

0.07 below detection limit below detection limit 0.14 below detection limit below detection limit below detection limit 73.4 below detection limit below detection limit 0.011 0.18 0.001 50.2 0.004 below detection limit below detection limit below detection limit 3.5 below detection limit below detection limit 24.7 0.0065 0.04

0.1/0.2 mg/L 0.006 mg/L 3 3 0.01 mg/L 3 1.0 mg/L

Dissolved Metals Calcium Iron Magnesium Manganese Sodium

mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L

72.6 below detection limit 49.8 below detection limit 24.7

Bateriological Tests E.coli Fecal Coliform Total Coliform Heterotrophic Plate Count

NOTES 1. Generally accepted values. 2. AO = Aesthetic Objective

S/cm

15 TCU 2 500 mg/L

6.5 - 8.5 2 1 0.3/1 /0.1 NTU

0 CFU/100 mL 3

5 mg/L 3 3 0.005 mg/L 0.05 mg/L

1.0 mg/L 0.3 mg/L 2 3 0.01 mg/L 2

0.05 mg/L 0.001 mg/L 3

0.01 mg/L 3 200 mg/L 2 3 0.02 mg/L 2 5.0 mg/L

0.3 mg/L

0.05 mg/L 200 mg/L 2

3. MAC = Maximum Acceptable Concentration

YIELD TEST - PW4, City of Cranbrook, BC (46.62 L/s, November 21-22, 2014)

Time (min) 1

100

1000

10000

0 Static Water Level - 10.04 mbtoc 5

Tansmissivity: 184.3 m2/d using Copper and Jacob method and pumping data.

90% Recovery at ti = 325 min.

Drawdown (m)

100-day Specific Capacity: 46.62 L/s / 35 m = 1.33 L/s/m

Pump Off at t = 1,490 min

CITY OF CRANBROOK, BC SUMMARY OF TEST DATA AT PW4 DURING PW4 TEST(NOV 21-22, 2014) ELAPSED TIME

PUMPING TIME

[min]

0 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 12 14 16 18 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 60 70 83 90 100 127 147 160 180 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1200 1400 1490 1491 1492 1493 1494 1495 1496 1497 1498 1499 1500 1502 1504 1506 1508 1510 1515 1520

0 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 12 14 16 18 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 60 70 83 90 100 127 147 160 180 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1200 1400 1490

[days]

RECOVERY TIME [min]

WATER LEVEL RECOVERY TIME [mbtoc] [-]

DRAWDOWN

10.04 17.65 18.16 18.40 18.51 18.63 18.72 18.78 18.84 18.89 18.98 19.05 19.12 19.17 19.22 19.35 19.42 22.30 28.48 29.13 29.41 30.50 30.82 31.08 31.20 31.40 31.80 32.04 32.85 33.10 33.30 33.72 34.05 34.34 34.58 34.79 34.99 35.31 35.55 35.74 35.94 36.06 36.30 36.49 36.53 20.87 18.86 18.13 17.72 17.42 17.18 17.03 16.88 16.75 16.63 16.44 16.29 16.15 16.04 15.93 15.71 15.52

0.00 7.61 8.12 8.36 8.47 8.59 8.68 8.74 8.80 8.85 8.94 9.01 9.08 9.13 9.18 9.31 9.38 12.26 18.44 19.09 19.37 20.46 20.78 21.04 21.16 21.36 21.76 22.00 22.81 23.06 23.26 23.68 24.01 24.30 24.54 24.75 24.95 25.27 25.51 25.70 25.90 26.02 26.26 26.45 26.49

ELAPSED TIME

0.0014 0.0021 0.0028 0.0035 0.0042 0.0049 0.0056 0.0063 0.0069 0.0083 0.0097 0.0111 0.0125 0.0139 0.0174 0.0208 0.0243 0.0278 0.0313 0.0347 0.0417 0.0486 0.0576 0.0625 0.0694 0.0882 0.1021 0.1111 0.1250 0.1389 0.1736 0.2083 0.2431 0.2778 0.3125 0.3472 0.4167 0.4861 0.5556 0.6250 0.6944 0.8333 0.9722 1.0347 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 12 14 16 18 20 25 30

1491.0000 746.0000 497.6667 373.5000 299.0000 249.3333 213.8571 187.2500 166.5556 150.0000 125.1667 107.4286 94.1250 83.7778 75.5000 60.6000 50.6667

RESIDUAL DRAWDOWN

[m]

PUMPING RATE (L/s)

COMMENTS

[m]

Static Water Level

26.49 10.83 8.82 8.09 7.68 7.38 7.14 6.99 6.84 6.71 6.59 6.40 6.25 6.11 6.00 5.89 5.67 5.48

27.72 27.72 27.72 27.72 27.72 27.72 27.72 27.72 27.72 27.72 27.72 27.72 27.72 27.72 27.72 27.72 46.75 46.75 46.75 46.75 46.75 46.75 46.75 46.75 46.75 46.75 46.75 47.25 47.25 47.25 47.25 47.25 47.25 47.25 47.25 46.62 46.62 46.62 46.62 46.62 46.62 46.62 46.62 46.62

Pump Off Start of Recovery

1525 1530 1535 1540 1550 1560 1570 1580 1590 1610 1630 1650 1670 1690 1740 1815

1766

35 40 45 50 60 70 80 90 100 120 140 160 180 200 250 325

NOTES 1. mbtoc = meters below top of casing.

43.5714 38.2500 34.1111 30.8000 25.8333 22.2857 19.6250 17.5556 15.9000 13.4167 11.6429 10.3125 9.2778 8.4500 6.9600 5.5846

15.36 15.22 15.09 14.98 14.78 14.57 14.44 14.29 14.16 13.92 13.70 13.51 13.34 13.18 12.84 12.69

5.32 5.18 5.05 4.94 4.74 4.53 4.40 4.25 4.12 3.88 3.66 3.47 3.30 3.14 2.80 2.65

End of Data Collection

YIELD TEST - Drawdown Iat Monitoring Wells During PW4 test, City of Cranbrook, BC (November 21-22, 2014) Time (min) 1

100

Drawdown (m)

Distance to TH6:17.9 m to TH11: 550 m to Well 25: 600 m

TH6 Well 25

TH11

Well depth: TH6 - 100.3 m TH11 - 102.4 m Well 25 - 77.08 m

1000

10000

YIELD TEST - Drawdown Iat Monitoring Wells During PW4 test, City of Cranbrook, BC (November 21-22, 2014) Time (min) 1

100

-0.2

0.0

0.2 Distance to WIN20351:890 m to WIN20352: 890 m

Drawdown (m)

0.4

0.6 WIN20351

WIN20352

0.8

1.0

1.2

Well depth: WIN20351 - 15.2 m WIN20352 - 68.2 m

1000

10000

CITY OF CRANBROOK, BC DRAWDOWN AT MONITORING WELLS DURING PW4 TEST(NOV 21-22, 2014) ELAPSED TIME

TH6 (r = 17.9 m)

[min]

WATER LEVEL [mbtoc]

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 250 260 270 280 290 300 310 320 330 340 350 360 370 380 390 400 410 420 430 440 450 460 470 480 490 500 510 600 700 800 900 1000 1200 1260 1320 1470 1480

9.32 9.36 9.37 10.81 11.14 11.35 12.29 12.94 13.31 13.57 13.76 13.94 14.10 14.24 14.37 14.49 14.60 14.71 14.88 15.00 15.10 15.19 15.28 15.37 15.45 15.52 15.60 15.66 15.73 15.80 15.87 15.93 15.99 16.05 16.10 16.16 16.21 16.27 16.32 16.69 16.40 16.45 16.50 16.54 16.59 16.63 16.67 16.71 16.75 16.79 16.83 16.87 17.17 17.45 17.68 17.86 18.01 18.23 18.29 18.33 18.33 18.34

TH11 (r = 550 m)

DRAWDOWN [m]

WATER LEVEL [mbtoc]

0.00 0.03 0.05 1.49 1.82 2.03 2.97 3.62 3.99 4.25 4.44 4.62 4.77 4.91 5.05 5.17 5.28 5.38 5.56 5.67 5.78 5.87 5.96 6.05 6.13 6.20 6.28 6.34 6.41 6.48 6.55 6.61 6.67 6.73 6.78 6.84 6.89 6.95 7.00 7.37 7.08 7.13 7.18 7.22 7.27 7.31 7.35 7.39 7.43 7.47 7.51 7.55 7.85 8.13 8.35 8.54 8.69 8.91 8.97 9.01 9.01 9.01

8.29 8.30 8.30 8.33 8.39 8.45 8.51 8.58 8.66 8.73 8.81 8.87 8.93 8.98 9.03 9.08 9.14 9.19 9.23 9.27 9.31 9.34 9.38 9.41 9.45 9.48 9.50 9.53 9.56 9.59 9.62 9.64 9.66 9.69 9.71 9.74 9.76 9.79 9.77 9.79 9.81 9.83 9.85 9.87 9.89 9.91 9.93 9.95 9.97 9.98 9.95 9.97 10.10 10.23 10.34 10.44 10.51 10.63 10.66 10.69 10.74 10.74

TH25 (r = 600 m)

DRAWDOWN [m]

WATER LEVEL [mbtoc]

DRAWDOWN [m]

0.00 0.00 0.01 0.03 0.09 0.15 0.21 0.28 0.36 0.44 0.51 0.58 0.63 0.69 0.74 0.79 0.85 0.89 0.93 0.97 1.01 1.05 1.08 1.12 1.15 1.18 1.21 1.23 1.26 1.29 1.32 1.34 1.37 1.39 1.42 1.44 1.47 1.49 1.47 1.49 1.52 1.54 1.56 1.58 1.60 1.61 1.63 1.66 1.67 1.69 1.65 1.67 1.81 1.94 2.05 2.14 2.22 2.34 2.37 2.40 2.45 2.44

8.78 9.35 9.15 9.01 9.73 9.31 9.14 9.55 9.40 9.23 9.11 9.03 8.99 8.96 9.75 9.56 9.45 9.09 9.03 9.65 9.49 9.37 9.30 9.26 9.23 9.27 9.27 9.28 10.19 9.99 9.87 9.78 9.72 9.68 9.66 9.65 9.65 9.66 9.68 9.74 9.76 9.78 9.81 9.84 9.87 9.89 9.92 9.95 10.74 10.60 10.49 10.36 10.28 10.45 10.63 10.77 10.89 11.06 11.11 11.14 12.05 11.84

0.00 0.57 0.37 0.23 0.96 0.54 0.36 0.78 0.62 0.45 0.33 0.26 0.21 0.19 0.98 0.79 0.67 0.31 0.26 0.87 0.71 0.60 0.53 0.48 0.46 0.49 0.49 0.50 1.41 1.22 1.09 1.00 0.94 0.90 0.88 0.87 0.88 0.88 0.90 0.96 0.98 1.01 1.03 1.06 1.09 1.11 1.14 1.17 1.96 1.82 1.72 1.58 1.50 1.68 1.85 1.99 2.11 2.28 2.33 2.37 3.28 3.07

COMMENTS

Static Water Level

1490 1500 1510 1520 1530 1540 1550 1560 1570 1580 1590 1600 1610 1620 1630 1640 1650 1660 1670 1680 1690 1700 1710 1720 1730 1740 1750 1760 1780

18.33 15.48 14.96 14.60 14.33 14.11 13.92 13.71 13.59 13.45 13.32 13.21 13.09 12.99 12.89 12.80 12.70 12.62 12.53 12.46 12.38 12.31 12.24 12.17 12.11 12.05 11.99 11.93 11.91

9.01 6.16 5.64 5.28 5.01 4.79 4.60 4.39 4.27 4.13 4.00 3.89 3.77 3.67 3.57 3.48 3.38 3.30 3.21 3.14 3.06 2.99 2.92 2.85 2.79 2.73 2.67 2.61 2.59

NOTES 1. mbtoc = meters below top of casing.

10.74 10.73 10.67 10.58 10.49 10.42 10.35 10.28 10.23 10.17 10.12 #N/A 10.03 #N/A 9.95 #N/A 9.87 #N/A 9.80 #N/A 9.74 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 9.60 #N/A #N/A 9.51

2.45 2.44 2.37 2.28 2.20 2.13 2.05 1.99 1.93 1.88 1.83 #N/A 1.73 #N/A 1.65 #N/A 1.58 #N/A 1.51 #N/A 1.45 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 1.31 #N/A #N/A 1.21

11.72 11.61 11.53 11.46 11.41 11.36 11.32 11.28 11.23 11.19 11.14 #N/A 11.58 #N/A 11.25 #N/A 11.03 #N/A 10.86 #N/A 10.73 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 10.47 #N/A #N/A 10.30

2.94 2.83 2.75 2.69 2.63 2.59 2.54 2.50 2.46 2.41 2.37 #N/A 2.80 #N/A 2.48 #N/A 2.25 #N/A 2.09 #N/A 1.95 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 1.69 #N/A #N/A 1.53

Pump Off Recovery

End of Data Collection

CITY OF CRANBROOK, BC DRAWDOWN AT MONITORING WELLS DURING PW4 TEST(NOV 21-22, 2014) ELAPSED TIME

WIN20351 (r = 890 m) WATER LEVEL [mbtoc]

WIN20352 (r = 890 m)

DRAW-DOWN [m]

WATER LEVEL [mbtoc]

DRAW-DOWN [m]

0.00 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A -0.04 #N/A #N/A #N/A -0.05 #N/A -0.06 #N/A -0.07 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A -0.12 -0.11 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A -0.09

17.76 17.76 17.76 17.77 17.77 17.79 17.81 17.83 17.86 17.89 17.92 17.97 18.01 18.06 18.10 18.14 18.28 18.30 18.33 18.39 18.45 18.53 18.61 18.66 18.75 18.79 18.83 18.84 18.84 18.84 18.83 18.80 18.78 18.75 18.73 18.71 18.68 18.66 18.63 18.59 18.56 18.53 18.50 18.44 18.40

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.03 0.05 0.07 0.10 0.13 0.16 0.21 0.25 0.30 0.34 0.38 0.52 0.54 0.57 0.63 0.69 0.77 0.85 0.90 0.99 1.03 1.07 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.07 1.04 1.02 0.99 0.97 0.95 0.92 0.90 0.87 0.83 0.80 0.77 0.74 0.68 0.64

COMMENTS

[min]

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 120 140 160 180 240 300 360 420 480 600 720 840 960 1200 1320 1440 1490 1500 1510 1520 1530 1540 1550 1560 1570 1580 1590 1610 1630 1650 1670 1690 1740 1780

9.13

9.09

9.08 9.07 9.06

9.01 9.02

9.04

NOTES 1. mbtoc = meters below top of casing.

Static Water Level

Pump Off Recovery

End of Data Collection

CITY OF CRANBROOK, BC PUMPING TEST ANALYSIS - PW4 (Nov 2014) DRAWDOWN FORECAST

PUMPING TIME [days] 0.001 0

0.01

0.1

100

SPECIFIC CAPACITY CALCULATIONS

SC 4hr =

Q s4

47.25 23.6

L/s = m

2.00 L/s/m

Q = s100

46.62 35.00

L/s = m

1.33 L/s/m

DRAWDOWN [m]

15 20

SC100 day =

25 30

Where:

35 40 45

Q= sn =

Flowrate Drawdown forecast at time n

SCn =

Specific capacity forecast at time n

RESIDUAL DRAWDOWN FORECAST

ELAPSED / RECOVERY TIME [-] 1

100

1000

10000

RECOVERY CALCULATIONS

RESIDUAL DRAWDOWN [m]

DATA SUGGESTS ULTIMATE RECOVERY EQUAL TO INITIAL STATIC WATER LEVEL

Recovery at End of Test

23.84 26.49

Projected Ultimate Recovery

m m

90%

metres residual drawdown

CITY OF CRANBROOK, BC CALCULATION OF RECOMMENDED PUMPING RATE - PW4 (Nov 2014)

DESCRIPTION

STATIC WATER LEVEL (SWL) Depth to SWL at time of well completion Depth to SWL at time of pumping test Design value for calculations

4 HOUR FORECAST

UNITS

100 DAY FORECAST

mbtoc mbtoc mbtoc

10.5 10.0 10.0

Not Artesian Not Artesian See Note 1

10.5 10.0 10.0

Not Artesian Not Artesian See Note 1

0.0

Conservative

0.0

Conservative

mbtoc m m mbtoc m m mbtoc

79.5 0.0 0.0 79.5 0.0 0.0 79.5

Estimated Min. Recommended Estimated

79.5 0.0 1.0 79.5 0.0 0.0 79.5

Estimated Min. Recommended Estimated

SPECIFIC CAPACITY (SC) Forecast SC trend (assuming continuous drawdown) Derated SC (from screen incrustation and biofouling)

L/s/m L/s/m

2.00 2.00

See Table 3b 100% (Short-Term)

1.33 1.33

See Table 3b 100% (Long-Term)

mbtoc mbtoc m m m m

10.0 79.5 69.5 0.0 0.0 69.5

100%

70%

m mbtoc

69.5 79.5

48.6 58.7

L/s L/min L/day Usgpm %

139.1 8344 12,015,403 2,204 294%

64.8 3886 5,595,653 1,027 137%

L/s

125.0

111%

52%

DRAWDOWN INTERFERENCE (DI) Maximum Estimated Drawdown Interference

Safety Factor Total Allowable Drawdown (TAD) Operational Water Level (OWL)

Estimated Min. Recommended

THEORETICAL WELL YIELD Theoretical maximum % of 46.62 L/s testing rate

WELL SCREEN LIMITATIONS Maximum recommended flow rate through screen Theoretical Yield as % of limitation Is theoretical well yield limited by screens?

WELL CASING LIMITATIONS Maximum recommended flow rate based upon casing diameter (limits maximum pump diameter) Theoretical Yield as % of limitation

113.4

123%

57%

YES

113.40 1,800.0

46.62 740.0

Notes 1. Design SWL includes 0 m seasonal adjustment for this well. 2. mbtoc = meters below top of casing.

L/s GPM

406 mm Diameter

125.0

L/s

Is theoretical well yield limited by casing diameter?

RECOMMENDED PUMPING RATE

20 ft x 150 slot & 25.6 ft x 250 slot

113.4

20 ft x 150 slot & 25.6 ft x 250 slot

406 mm Diameter

YIELD TEST - PW5, City of Cranbrook, BC (43.47 L/s, November 23-25, 2014)

Time (min) 1

100

1000

10000

0 Static Water Level - 9.36 mbtoc 97% Recovery at ti = 180 min. 10

Tansmissivity: 414.6 m2/d using pumping data collected at 100 and 1,000 min.

Drawdown (m)

100-day Specific Capacity: 43.47 L/s / 45 m = 0.97 L/s/m Pump Off at t = 2,920 min

CITY OF CRANBROOK, BC SUMMARY OF TEST DATA AT PW5 DURING PW5 TEST (November 23-25, 2014) ELAPSED TIME

PUMPING TIME

[min]

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 12 14 16 18 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 60 70 80 90 100 120 148 160 180 200 258 300 350 400 450 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1200 1400 1440 1600 1800 2000 2500 2880 2920 2921 2922 2923 2924 2925 2926 2927 2928 2929 2930

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 12 14 16 18 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 60 70 80 90 100 120 148 160 180 200 258 300 350 400 450 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1200 1400 1440 1600 1800 2000 2500 2880 2920

[days]

RECOVERY TIME [min]

WATER LEVEL RECOVERY TIME [mbtoc] [-]

DRAWDOWN

9.36 20.95 22.55 23.13 23.35 23.44 23.51 23.53 23.56 23.60 23.62 35.62 40.75 44.05 45.15 45.50 45.82 46.05 46.23 46.36 47.51 47.64 47.83 47.99 48.11 48.21 48.30 48.41 48.58 48.61 48.70 48.78 48.94 49.07 49.17 49.26 49.35 49.45 49.57 49.69 49.80 49.84 49.97 50.12 50.25 50.28 50.37 50.46 50.54 50.66 50.81 50.82 27.21 17.70 13.59 12.92 12.69 12.56 12.46 12.37 12.30 12.24

0.00 11.59 13.19 13.77 13.99 14.08 14.15 14.17 14.20 14.24 14.26 26.26 31.39 34.69 35.79 36.14 36.46 36.69 36.87 37.00 38.15 38.28 38.47 38.63 38.75 38.85 38.94 39.05 39.22 39.25 39.34 39.42 39.58 39.71 39.81 39.90 39.99 40.09 40.21 40.33 40.44 40.48 40.61 40.76 40.89 40.92 41.01 41.10 41.18 41.30 41.45 41.46 17.85 8.34 4.23 3.56 3.33 3.20 3.10 3.01 2.94 2.88

ELAPSED TIME

0.0007 0.0014 0.0021 0.0028 0.0035 0.0042 0.0049 0.0056 0.0063 0.0069 0.0083 0.0097 0.0111 0.0125 0.0139 0.0174 0.0208 0.0243 0.0278 0.0313 0.0347 0.0417 0.0486 0.0556 0.0625 0.0694 0.0833 0.1028 0.1111 0.1250 0.1389 0.1792 0.2083 0.2431 0.2778 0.3125 0.3472 0.4167 0.4861 0.5556 0.6250 0.6944 0.8333 0.9722 1.0000 1.1111 1.2500 1.3889 1.7361 2.0000 2.0278 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

2921.0000 1461.0000 974.3333 731.0000 585.0000 487.6667 418.1429 366.0000 325.4444 293.0000

RESIDUAL DRAWDOWN

[m]

DISCHARGING RATE (L/s)

COMMENTS

[m]

Static Water Level

41.46 17.85 8.34 4.23 3.56 3.33 3.20 3.10 3.01 2.94 2.88

21.74 21.74 21.74 21.74 21.74 21.74 21.74 21.74 21.74 21.74 39.19 41.58 43.47 43.47 43.03 43.03 43.03 43.03 44.10 44.10 44.10 44.10 44.10 44.10 43.79 43.79 43.79 43.79 43.79 43.79 43.79 43.79 43.79 43.79 43.79 43.79 43.79 43.79 43.79 43.79 43.79 43.79 43.47 43.47 43.47 43.47 43.47 43.47 43.47 43.47 43.47

Pump Off Recovery

2932 2934 2936 2938 2940 2945 2950 2955 2960 2965 2970 2980 3015 3020 3040 3060 3080 3100

12 14 16 18 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 60 95 100 120 140 160 180

NOTES 1. mbtoc = meters below top of casing.

244.3333 209.5714 183.5000 163.2222 147.0000 117.8000 98.3333 84.4286 74.0000 65.8889 59.4000 49.6667 31.7368 30.2000 25.3333 21.8571 19.2500 17.2222

12.11 12.02 11.91 11.83 11.76 11.62 11.49 11.40 11.30 11.23 11.16 11.06 10.82 10.79 10.71 10.64 10.57 10.52

2.75 2.66 2.55 2.47 2.40 2.26 2.13 2.04 1.94 1.87 1.80 1.70 1.46 1.43 1.35 1.28 1.21 1.16

YIELD TEST - Drawdown Interference at Neighbouring Wells during PW5 Test City of Cranbrook, BC (November 23-25, 2014) Time (min) 1

100

1000

-0.5

0.0

Drawdown (m)

0.5

Distance to Well 16: 590 m to Well 22: 365 m to Well 32: 310 m to Well 47: 640 m

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

Well depth: Well 16 - 45.7 m Well 22 - 25.5 m Well 32 - 15.2 m Well 47 - 61.0 m

Well 16

Well 22

Well 32

Well 47

10000

YIELD TEST - Drawdown Interference at Neighbouring Wells during PW5 Test City of Cranbrook, BC (November 23-25, 2014) Time (min) 1

100

-0.5

0.0

0.5

1.0

Distance to Well 24: 330 m to Well 25: 280 m to WIN20351: 310 m to WIN20352: 310 m

Drawdown (m)

1.5

2.0

Well 24

Well 25

WIN20351

WIN20352

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

Well depth: Well 24 - 38.1 m Well 25 - 77.08 m WIN20351 - 24.2 m WIN20352 - 68.2 m

1000

10000

YIELD TEST - Drawdown Interference at Neighbouring Wells during PW5 Test City of Cranbrook, BC (November 23-25, 2014) Time (min) 1

100

1000

-1.0

0.0

1.0

Drawdown (m)

2.0

3.0

Distance to TH11: 8.3 m to TH6: 550 m

TH11

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

Well depth: TH11 - 102.4 m TH6 - 100.3 m

TH6

10000

CITY OF CRANBROOK, BC MEASUREMENTS AT MONITORING WELLS DURING PW5 TEST (NOV 23-25, 2014)

ELAPSED TIME

Dowling (Well 16, r = 590 m)

Turner (Well 22, r = 365 m)

Crane Logging (Well 32, r = 310 m)

WATER LEVEL [mbtoc]

DRAWDOWN [m]

WATER LEVEL [mbtoc]

DRAWDOWN [m]

WATER LEVEL [mbtoc]

DRAWDOWN [m]

14.28 14.28 14.28 14.28 14.28 14.28 14.28 14.28 14.28 14.28 14.28 14.28 14.28 14.52 14.33 14.31 14.30 14.30 14.30 14.30 14.30 14.30 14.25 14.25 14.25 14.25 14.25 14.25 14.37 14.29 14.27 14.25 14.25 14.24 14.24 14.24 14.24 14.24 14.24 14.24 14.24 14.23 14.23 14.23 14.23 14.23 14.23 14.23 14.23 14.23 14.23 14.23 14.23 14.23 14.23 14.23 14.23 14.22 14.22

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.05 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 -0.03 -0.03 -0.03 -0.03 -0.03 -0.03 0.09 0.01 -0.01 -0.03 -0.04 -0.04 -0.04 -0.04 -0.04 -0.04 -0.04 -0.04 -0.05 -0.05 -0.05 -0.05 -0.05 -0.05 -0.05 -0.05 -0.05 -0.05 -0.05 -0.05 -0.05 -0.05 -0.05 -0.05 -0.05 -0.06 -0.06

0.00 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 0.35 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 0.52 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 0.60 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 0.73 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

11.77 11.77 11.77 11.96 11.82 11.80 11.79 12.45 11.88 11.83 11.81 11.80 11.88 11.81 11.79 11.78 11.78 11.78 12.13 11.85 11.80 11.80 11.90 11.80 11.80 12.00 11.84 11.79 11.79 11.90 11.82 11.79 11.96 11.85 11.82 12.00 11.87 11.84 12.00 11.86 11.83 11.82 11.81 12.76 12.36 12.05 11.96 11.91 11.89 12.01 11.91 11.88 11.86 11.84 12.50 11.90 11.85 11.77 11.77

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.05 0.02 0.01 0.67 0.11 0.05 0.03 0.02 0.10 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.36 0.07 0.03 0.02 0.13 0.03 0.02 0.22 0.06 0.02 0.02 0.13 0.05 0.01 0.18 0.07 0.05 0.22 0.09 0.06 0.23 0.09 0.06 0.05 0.03 0.98 0.59 0.27 0.19 0.14 0.11 0.23 0.14 0.10 0.08 0.07 0.73 0.12 0.08 0.00 0.00

Pro Chute (Well 47, r = 640 m)

PUMPING TIME

[min]

[days]

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 140 160 180 200 210 220 230 250 260 270 300 310 340 350 380 390 400 410 450 460 470 480 490 500 510 520 530 540 550 560 570 580 590 600 610 620 630 640 650 660 670 680 690 700 850 870

0.0069 0.0139 0.0208 0.0278 0.0347 0.0417 0.0486 0.0556 0.0625 0.0694 0.0764 0.0833 0.0972 0.1111 0.1250 0.1389 0.1458 0.1528 0.1597 0.1736 0.1806 0.1875 0.2083 0.2153 0.2361 0.2431 0.2639 0.2708 0.2778 0.2847 0.3125 0.3194 0.3264 0.3333 0.3403 0.3472 0.3542 0.3611 0.3681 0.3750 0.3819 0.3889 0.3958 0.4028 0.4097 0.4167 0.4236 0.4306 0.4375 0.4444 0.4514 0.4583 0.4653 0.4722 0.4792 0.4861 0.5903 0.6042

23.36

23.71

23.88

23.96

24.09

WATER LEVEL [mbtoc]

DRAWDOWN [m]

24.30

0.00

24.32

0.02

24.32

0.02

24.34

0.04

24.35

0.05

COMMENTS

Static Water Level

880 890 940 950 1000 1090 1100 1130 1200 1210 1220 1230 1240 1250 1260 1270 1280 1290 1300 1310 1320 1330 1340 1350 1360 1370 1380 1390 1400 1410 1420 1430 1440 1450 1460 1470 1480 1490 1500 1510 1520 1530 1540 1550 1560 1570 1580 1590 1600 1610 1620 1630 1640 1650 1660 1670 1680 1690 1700 1710 1720 1730 1740 1750 1760 1770 1780 1790

0.6111 0.6181 0.6528 0.6597 0.6944 0.7569 0.7639 0.7847 0.8333 0.8403 0.8472 0.8542 0.8611 0.8681 0.8750 0.8819 0.8889 0.8958 0.9028 0.9097 0.9167 0.9236 0.9306 0.9375 0.9444 0.9514 0.9583 0.9653 0.9722 0.9792 0.9861 0.9931 1.0000 1.0069 1.0139 1.0208 1.0278 1.0347 1.0417 1.0486 1.0556 1.0625 1.0694 1.0764 1.0833 1.0903 1.0972 1.1042 1.1111 1.1181 1.1250 1.1319 1.1389 1.1458 1.1528 1.1597 1.1667 1.1736 1.1806 1.1875 1.1944 1.2014 1.2083 1.2153 1.2222 1.2292 1.2361 1.2431

14.22 14.22 14.22 14.21 14.21 14.19 14.38 14.22 14.19 14.19 14.18 14.18 14.18 14.18 14.18 14.17 14.17 14.17 14.17 14.16 14.16 14.16 14.16 14.16 14.16 14.16 14.16 14.15 14.15 14.29 14.21 14.19 14.18 14.17 15.05 15.18 15.54 14.44 16.31 14.57 14.59 15.45 14.63 14.50 14.45 14.42 14.39 14.38 14.36 14.35 14.35 14.34 14.33 14.32 14.32 14.31 14.31 14.30 14.30 14.29 14.29 14.29 14.28 14.28 14.28 14.28 14.27 14.27

-0.06 -0.06 -0.07 -0.07 -0.07 -0.09 0.10 -0.06 -0.09 -0.09 -0.10 -0.10 -0.10 -0.10 -0.11 -0.11 -0.11 -0.11 -0.11 -0.12 -0.12 -0.12 -0.12 -0.12 -0.12 -0.12 -0.12 -0.13 -0.13 0.01 -0.07 -0.09 -0.10 -0.11 0.77 0.90 1.26 0.16 2.03 0.28 0.31 1.17 0.35 0.22 0.17 0.14 0.11 0.10 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -0.01 -0.01

24.47

24.50

24.56

24.57

#N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 1.11 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 1.14 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 1.20 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 1.21 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

12.21 11.83 11.78 11.93 11.77 11.75 11.75 11.94 11.76 12.27 12.39 12.05 11.90 11.85 11.83 11.90 11.84 13.13 12.06 12.84 12.26 13.03 12.78 12.15 13.46 12.55 13.19 12.42 13.71 12.44 13.41 12.43 13.37 12.48 13.13 12.83 13.07 12.61 13.00 12.66 13.00 12.49 12.26 13.38 12.40 13.71 12.39 12.48 12.21 12.13 12.07 12.03 12.00 11.98 12.26 12.01 11.97 11.94 11.92 11.91 12.04 11.96 11.91 11.89 11.88 11.87 11.86 11.85

0.44 0.06 0.00 0.15 0.00 -0.02 -0.02 0.17 -0.02 0.49 0.61 0.27 0.13 0.08 0.05 0.13 0.06 1.35 0.28 1.07 0.49 1.26 1.01 0.38 1.69 0.77 1.41 0.65 1.94 0.66 1.63 0.65 1.60 0.70 1.36 1.06 1.29 0.84 1.23 0.89 1.23 0.72 0.48 1.60 0.63 1.94 0.61 0.71 0.44 0.35 0.30 0.26 0.23 0.20 0.48 0.24 0.19 0.17 0.15 0.13 0.27 0.19 0.14 0.12 0.11 0.09 0.09 0.08

24.51

0.21

24.54

0.24

24.53

0.23

24.55

0.25

1800 1810 1820 1830 1840 1850 1860 1870 1880 1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2060 2070 2080 2090 2100 2250 2260 2270 2280 2360 2370 2380 2420 2430 2440 2540 2550 2560 2570 2630 2640 2650 2660 2670 2680 2690 2700 2710 2720 2730 2740 2750 2760 2770 2780 2790 2800 2810 2820 2830 2840 2850 2860 2870 2880 2890 2900 2910

1.2500 1.2569 1.2639 1.2708 1.2778 1.2847 1.2917 1.2986 1.3056 1.3125 1.3194 1.3264 1.3333 1.3403 1.3472 1.3542 1.3611 1.3681 1.3750 1.3819 1.4306 1.4375 1.4444 1.4514 1.4583 1.5625 1.5694 1.5764 1.5833 1.6389 1.6458 1.6528 1.6806 1.6875 1.6944 1.7639 1.7708 1.7778 1.7847 1.8264 1.8333 1.8403 1.8472 1.8542 1.8611 1.8681 1.8750 1.8819 1.8889 1.8958 1.9028 1.9097 1.9167 1.9236 1.9306 1.9375 1.9444 1.9514 1.9583 1.9653 1.9722 1.9792 1.9861 1.9931 2.0000 2.0069 2.0139 2.0208

14.27 14.27 14.26 14.26 14.26 14.26 14.26 14.26 14.26 14.26 14.25 14.25 14.25 14.25 14.25 14.25 14.25 14.25 14.25 14.25 14.25 14.25 14.25 14.25 14.25 14.26 14.42 14.31 14.29 14.28 14.27 14.27 14.27 14.27 14.27 14.25 14.25 14.25 14.25 14.24 14.24 14.23 14.23 14.23 14.23 14.23 14.23 15.06 14.30 14.26 14.25 14.70 14.31 14.28 14.26 14.26 14.25 14.24 14.24 14.24 14.24 14.23 14.23 14.23 14.22 14.22 14.22 14.22

-0.01 -0.01 -0.02 -0.02 -0.02 -0.02 -0.02 -0.02 -0.02 -0.03 -0.03 -0.03 -0.03 -0.03 -0.03 -0.03 -0.03 -0.03 -0.03 -0.04 -0.03 -0.03 -0.03 -0.03 -0.03 -0.02 0.14 0.03 0.01 -0.01 -0.01 -0.01 -0.01 -0.01 -0.01 -0.03 -0.03 -0.03 -0.03 -0.04 -0.04 -0.05 -0.05 -0.05 -0.05 -0.05 -0.05 0.78 0.02 -0.02 -0.03 0.42 0.03 0.00 -0.02 -0.03 -0.03 -0.04 -0.04 -0.04 -0.05 -0.05 -0.05 -0.05 -0.06 -0.06 -0.06 -0.06

24.58

25.24

24.58

24.68

#N/A #N/A 1.22 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 1.88 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 1.22 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 1.32

11.94 11.88 11.86 11.86 11.85 12.54 11.91 11.96 11.90 11.87 11.86 11.85 11.84 12.53 11.92 11.87 11.86 11.84 12.06 11.89 11.82 12.38 12.44 11.95 11.89 11.81 12.27 11.90 11.86 11.81 11.94 11.86 11.82 11.94 11.86 11.80 12.53 11.88 11.84 11.80 12.22 12.67 12.10 12.03 12.12 11.97 11.92 11.89 11.87 12.22 11.92 11.88 11.85 11.84 11.83 11.82 11.91 11.86 11.84 11.83 11.82 11.81 12.36 11.87 11.84 11.82 11.81 11.81

0.16 0.11 0.09 0.08 0.07 0.76 0.14 0.18 0.12 0.10 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.75 0.15 0.10 0.08 0.07 0.29 0.12 0.05 0.61 0.66 0.18 0.12 0.03 0.50 0.12 0.08 0.04 0.16 0.08 0.04 0.17 0.08 0.02 0.75 0.11 0.07 0.02 0.45 0.89 0.33 0.25 0.35 0.19 0.14 0.11 0.10 0.45 0.14 0.10 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.14 0.08 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.59 0.10 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.03

24.53

0.23

24.52

0.22

24.54

0.24

24.55

0.25

2920 2930 2940 2950 2960 2970 2980 2990 3000 3090 3100 3110 3130 3140

2920

2.02778

14.22 14.31 14.25 14.24 14.23 14.22 14.22 14.21 14.21 14.20 14.20 14.20 14.19 14.19

NOTES 1. mbtoc = meters below top of casing.

-0.07 0.03 -0.03 -0.04 -0.05 -0.06 -0.06 -0.07 -0.07 -0.08 -0.08 -0.08 -0.09 -0.09

24.56

24.34

#N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 1.20 #N/A #N/A #N/A 0.98

11.80 11.93 11.84 11.82 11.81 11.80 11.80 12.07 11.85 11.78 12.23 11.87 11.81

0.03 0.16 0.07 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.29 0.07 0.01 0.46 0.09 0.04

Pump Off Start of Recovery

24.55

0.25

24.55

0.25

CITY OF CRANBROOK, BC MEASUREMENTS AT MONITORING WELLS DURING PW5 TEST (NOV 23-25, 2014) Bains (Well 24, r = 330 m) ELAPSED TIME

Jenson (Well 25, r = 280 m)

PUMPING TIME

[min]

[days]

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 120 140 160 170 180 190 200 250 300 360 390 400 410 500 510 520 600 640 650 690 700 710 720 730 850 990 1000 1010 1200 1210 1220 1230 1240 1250 1260 1270 1280 1290 1300 1310 1320 1330 1340 1350 1360 1370 1380 1390

0.0069 0.0139 0.0208 0.0278 0.0347 0.0417 0.0486 0.0556 0.0625 0.0694 0.0833 0.0972 0.1111 0.1181 0.1250 0.1319 0.1389 0.1736 0.2083 0.2500 0.2708 0.2778 0.2847 0.3472 0.3542 0.3611 0.4167 0.4444 0.4514 0.4792 0.4861 0.4931 0.5000 0.5069 0.5903 0.6875 0.6944 0.7014 0.8333 0.8403 0.8472 0.8542 0.8611 0.8681 0.8750 0.8819 0.8889 0.8958 0.9028 0.9097 0.9167 0.9236 0.9306 0.9375 0.9444 0.9514 0.9583 0.9653

COMMENTS

WATER LEVEL [mbtoc]

DRAW-DOWN [m]

WATER LEVEL [mbtoc]

DRAW-DOWN [m]

23.78 23.64 23.73 23.95 24.21 24.41 24.56 24.68 24.78 24.85 24.92 25.01 25.09 26.10 25.34 25.81 25.34 25.28 25.37 25.44 25.52 25.53 26.12 25.65 25.63 26.08 25.73 25.99 26.85 25.94 25.78 26.94 27.13 26.92 26.00 25.84 25.89 26.19 25.95 25.96 25.96 25.96 25.96 25.96 25.97 25.97 25.97 25.97 25.98 25.98 25.98 25.98 26.44 26.07 26.01 26.00 26.00 27.59 26.25

0.00 -0.14 -0.05 0.17 0.43 0.63 0.78 0.90 1.00 1.07 1.14 1.23 1.31 2.32 1.56 2.03 1.56 1.50 1.59 1.66 1.74 1.75 2.34 1.87 1.85 2.30 1.95 2.21 3.07 2.16 2.00 3.16 3.35 3.14 2.22 2.06 2.11 2.41 2.17 2.18 2.18 2.18 2.18 2.18 2.19 2.19 2.19 2.19 2.20 2.20 2.20 2.20 2.66 2.29 2.23 2.22 2.22 3.81 2.47

9.26 9.26 9.26 9.28 9.33 9.39 9.47 9.56 9.65 9.74 9.84 10.00 10.19 10.33 10.40 10.46 10.53 10.58 10.80 10.96 11.12 11.18 11.20 11.22 11.36 11.36 11.39 11.48 11.52 11.53 11.57 11.58 11.59 11.60 11.60 11.69 11.77 11.78 11.78 11.86 12.68 12.48 12.34 12.24 12.16 12.10 12.05 12.66 12.47 12.33 12.23 12.15 12.09 12.05 12.02 11.99 11.98 11.96 11.96

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.06 0.13 0.21 0.29 0.39 0.48 0.58 0.74 0.92 1.07 1.14 1.20 1.26 1.32 1.53 1.70 1.86 1.92 1.94 1.96 2.10 2.10 2.12 2.22 2.26 2.27 2.31 2.32 2.33 2.33 2.34 2.43 2.51 2.52 2.52 2.60 3.42 3.22 3.08 2.98 2.90 2.84 2.79 3.39 3.21 3.07 2.97 2.89 2.83 2.79 2.75 2.73 2.71 2.70 2.69

Static Water Level

1400 1410 1420 1430 1440 1450 1460 1470 1480 1490 1500 1510 1520 1530 1540 1550 1560 1570 1580 1590 1600 1610 1620 1630 1640 1650 1660 1670 1680 1690 1700 1710 1720 1730 1740 1750 1760 1770 1780 1790 1800 1810 1820 1830 1840 1850 1860 1870 1880 1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070

0.9722 0.9792 0.9861 0.9931 1.0000 1.0069 1.0139 1.0208 1.0278 1.0347 1.0417 1.0486 1.0556 1.0625 1.0694 1.0764 1.0833 1.0903 1.0972 1.1042 1.1111 1.1181 1.1250 1.1319 1.1389 1.1458 1.1528 1.1597 1.1667 1.1736 1.1806 1.1875 1.1944 1.2014 1.2083 1.2153 1.2222 1.2292 1.2361 1.2431 1.2500 1.2569 1.2639 1.2708 1.2778 1.2847 1.2917 1.2986 1.3056 1.3125 1.3194 1.3264 1.3333 1.3403 1.3472 1.3542 1.3611 1.3681 1.3750 1.3819 1.3889 1.3958 1.4028 1.4097 1.4167 1.4236 1.4306 1.4375

26.06 26.03 26.02 26.02 26.02 26.02 26.02 26.03 26.62 26.13 26.06 26.05 26.05 26.05 26.05 26.05 26.05 26.05 26.06 26.32 26.11 26.08 26.07 26.07 26.07 26.08 26.08 26.08 26.08 26.08 26.09 26.09 26.09 26.10 26.09 26.10 26.10 26.10 26.10 26.11 26.11 26.11 26.12 26.37 26.17 26.14 26.13 26.13 26.13 26.13 26.14 26.14 26.16 26.16 26.16 26.16 26.16 27.53 26.37 26.21 26.19 26.18 26.54 26.25 26.21 26.20 26.19 26.20

2.28 2.25 2.24 2.24 2.24 2.24 2.24 2.25 2.84 2.35 2.28 2.27 2.27 2.27 2.27 2.27 2.27 2.27 2.28 2.54 2.33 2.30 2.29 2.29 2.29 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.31 2.31 2.31 2.32 2.31 2.32 2.32 2.32 2.32 2.33 2.33 2.33 2.34 2.59 2.39 2.36 2.35 2.35 2.35 2.35 2.36 2.36 2.38 2.38 2.38 2.38 2.38 3.75 2.59 2.43 2.41 2.40 2.76 2.47 2.43 2.42 2.41 2.42

11.95 12.76 12.55 12.41 12.30 12.22 12.16 12.10 12.07 12.04 12.03 12.01 12.74 12.55 12.42 12.32 12.24 12.93 12.65 12.50 13.03 12.70 12.54 12.41 12.32 12.25 12.19 12.15 12.12 12.10 12.09 12.07 12.06 12.06 12.05 12.05 12.05 12.80 12.62 12.49 12.39 12.32 12.26 12.22 12.92 12.70 12.55 12.44 12.36 12.30 12.25 12.22 12.19 12.17 12.16 12.15 12.14 12.14 12.14 13.08 12.80 12.64 12.53 13.15 13.22 12.86 12.68 13.36

2.69 3.49 3.29 3.14 3.04 2.96 2.89 2.84 2.81 2.78 2.76 2.75 3.48 3.29 3.16 3.06 2.98 3.67 3.39 3.24 3.77 3.44 3.27 3.15 3.06 2.99 2.93 2.89 2.86 2.84 2.82 2.81 2.80 2.79 2.79 2.79 2.79 3.54 3.36 3.23 3.13 3.06 3.00 2.96 3.66 3.43 3.29 3.18 3.10 3.04 2.99 2.95 2.93 2.91 2.90 2.89 2.88 2.88 2.87 3.82 3.54 3.38 3.26 3.89 3.96 3.59 3.41 4.10

2080 2090 2220 2230 2240 2420 2430 2440 2560 2570 2580 2590 2600 2610 2620 2730 2740 2750 2760 2770 2780 2790 2800 2810 2820 2830 2840 2850 2860 2870 2880 2890 2900 2910 2920 2930 2940 2950 2960 2970 2980 2990 3000 3010 3020 3030 3040 3050 3060 3070 3080 3090 3100 3110 3120 3130 3140 3150 3160 3170 3180

2080 2090 2220 2230 2240 2420 2430 2440 2560 2570 2580 2590 2600 2610 2620 2730 2740 2750 2760 2770 2780 2790 2800 2810 2820 2830 2840 2850 2860 2870 2880 2890 2900 2910 2920

1.4444 1.4514 1.5417 1.5486 1.5556 1.6806 1.6875 1.6944 1.7778 1.7847 1.7917 1.7986 1.8056 1.8125 1.8194 1.8958 1.9028 1.9097 1.9167 1.9236 1.9306 1.9375 1.9444 1.9514 1.9583 1.9653 1.9722 1.9792 1.9861 1.9931 2.0000 2.0069 2.0139 2.0208 2.02778

26.20 26.20 26.23 26.49 26.28 26.27 27.34 26.48 26.28 26.28 26.28 26.29 26.29 26.29 26.29 26.30 26.30 26.31 26.30 26.31 26.29 26.29 27.53 26.47 26.33 26.31 26.30 26.30 26.30 26.98 26.42 26.33 26.31 26.31 26.31 26.31 26.10 25.78 25.53 25.35 25.22 25.11 25.03 24.97 24.91 24.87 24.83 24.79 24.75 24.72 24.69 24.67 24.64 24.62 24.71

NOTES 1. mbtoc = meters below top of casing.

2.42 2.42 2.45 2.71 2.50 2.49 3.56 2.70 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.51 2.51 2.51 2.51 2.52 2.52 2.53 2.52 2.53 2.51 2.51 3.75 2.69 2.55 2.53 2.52 2.52 2.52 3.20 2.64 2.55 2.53 2.53 2.52 2.53 2.32 2.00 1.75 1.57 1.44 1.33 1.25 1.19 1.13 1.09 1.05 1.01 0.97 0.94 0.91 0.89 0.86 0.84 0.93

12.91 12.70 12.20 12.20 12.20 12.23 12.23 12.24 12.24 12.97 12.79 12.66 12.56 12.49 12.43 12.26 12.95 12.78 12.66 12.56 12.49 12.43 13.28 12.94 12.77 12.65 12.55 12.48 12.43 12.38 12.35 12.33 12.31 12.30 12.91 12.76 12.64 12.53 12.41 12.28 12.92 12.38 12.11 11.93 11.78 11.64 11.52 11.41 11.32 11.23 11.14 11.64 11.41 11.24 11.11 11.00 10.91 10.83 11.55 11.21 11.03

3.65 3.44 2.94 2.94 2.94 2.97 2.97 2.97 2.97 3.71 3.53 3.40 3.30 3.23 3.17 3.00 3.69 3.52 3.39 3.30 3.23 3.17 4.02 3.68 3.51 3.39 3.29 3.22 3.16 3.12 3.09 3.07 3.05 3.03 3.65 3.50 3.38 3.27 3.15 3.02 3.66 3.12 2.85 2.67 2.52 2.38 2.26 2.15 2.05 1.96 1.88 2.38 2.15 1.98 1.85 1.74 1.65 1.57 2.29 1.95 1.77

Pump Off Start of Recovery

CITY OF CRANBROOK, BC MEASUREMENTS AT MONITORING WELLS DURING PW5 TEST (NOV 23-25, 2014) TH11 (r = 8.3 m) ELAPSED TIME

TH6 (r = 550 m)

PUMPING TIME

[min]

[days]

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 130 160 200 240 300 350 400 490 600 700 800 900 1000 1200 1320 1440 1560 1690 1800 2040 2280 2520 2760 2880 2920 2930 2940 2950 2960 2970 2980 2990 3000 3010 3020 3040 3060 3080 3100 3120 3150 3170

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 130 160 200 240 300 350 400 490 600 700 800 900 1000 1200 1320 1440 1560 1690 1800 2040 2280 2520 2760 2880 2920

0.0069 0.0139 0.0208 0.0278 0.0347 0.0417 0.0486 0.0556 0.0625 0.0694 0.0903 0.1111 0.1389 0.1667 0.2083 0.2431 0.2778 0.3403 0.4167 0.4861 0.5556 0.6250 0.6944 0.8333 0.9167 1.0000 1.0833 1.1736 1.2500 1.4167 1.5833 1.7500 1.9167 2.0000 2.02778

WATER LEVEL [mbtoc]

DRAW-DOWN [m]

8.81 10.13 11.73 12.82 13.10 13.36 13.53 13.64 13.72 13.79 13.85 13.95 14.06 14.16 14.25 14.36 14.42 14.46 14.56 14.64 14.70 14.75 14.79 14.83 14.88 14.91 14.95 15.03 15.06 15.08 15.12 15.18 15.20 15.21 15.23 15.23 12.84 11.78 11.39 11.15 10.98 10.85 10.32 10.24 10.18 10.12 10.03 9.96 9.89 9.84 9.78 9.72 9.68

0.00 1.33 2.92 4.01 4.30 4.55 4.72 4.83 4.91 4.99 5.04 5.14 5.25 5.35 5.44 5.55 5.62 5.65 5.75 5.83 5.89 5.94 5.98 6.02 6.07 6.10 6.14 6.22 6.25 6.27 6.31 6.37 6.40 6.41 6.42 6.42 4.03 2.97 2.58 2.34 2.17 2.05 1.51 1.44 1.37 1.32 1.22 1.15 1.08 1.03 0.98 0.91 0.87

NOTES 1. mbtoc = meters below top of casing.

COMMENTS

WATER LEVEL [mbtoc]

DRAW-DOWN [m]

9.92 9.92 9.98 10.09 10.21 10.31 10.40 10.49 10.56 10.62 10.68 10.84 10.99 11.14 11.26 11.42 11.53 11.59 11.70 11.85 11.95 12.03 12.10 12.15 12.22 12.26 12.25 12.39 12.44 12.47 12.51 12.52 12.54 12.54 12.47 12.39 12.39 12.28 12.14 12.01 11.90 11.81 11.73 11.66 11.60 11.52 11.42 11.32 11.24 11.16 11.09 11.00

0.00 0.00 0.05 0.17 0.29 0.39 0.48 0.56 0.63 0.70 0.76 0.92 1.07 1.21 1.34 1.50 1.61 1.67 1.78 1.93 2.03 2.11 2.18 2.23 2.30 2.34 2.33 2.47 2.52 2.55 2.59 2.59 2.62 2.62 2.54 2.47 2.47 2.36 2.21 2.09 1.98 1.89 1.81 1.74 1.67 1.60 1.49 1.40 1.32 1.24 1.17 1.08

Static Water Level

Pump Off Start of Recovery

CITY OF CRANBROOK, BC MEASUREMENTS AT MONITORING WELLS DURING PW5 TEST (NOV 23-25, 2014) WIN20351 (r = 310 m) ELAPSED TIME

WIN20352 (r = 310 m)

PUMPING TIME WATER LEVEL [mbtoc]

[min]

[days]

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 120 140 160 180 200 230 300 360 420 500 600 720 840 960 1200 1310 1450 1560 1690 1790 1920 2160 2400 2620 2760 2890 2920 2930 2940 2950 2960 2970 2980 2990 3000 3010 3020 3040 3060 3080 3100 3180

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 120 140 160 180 200 230 300 360 420 500 600 720 840 960 1200 1310 1450 1560 1690 1790 1920 2160 2400 2620 2760 2890 2920

0.0069 0.0139 0.0208 0.0278 0.0347 0.0417 0.0486 0.0556 0.0625 0.0694 0.0833 0.0972 0.1111 0.1250 0.1389 0.1597 0.2083 0.2500 0.2917 0.3472 0.4167 0.5000 0.5833 0.6667 0.8333 0.9097 1.0069 1.0833 1.1736 1.2431 1.3333 1.5000 1.6667 1.8194 1.9167 2.0069 2.02778

9.10

9.07

9.06 9.05 9.04

9.08 9.08 9.09 9.10 9.10 9.11

9.15 9.16

9.19

9.23

NOTES 1. mbtoc = meters below top of casing.

COMMENTS

DRAW-DOWN [m]

WATER LEVEL [mbtoc]

DRAW-DOWN [m]

0.00 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A -0.03 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A -0.04 #N/A -0.05 #N/A -0.06 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A -0.02 -0.02 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 #N/A #N/A #N/A 0.05 0.06 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 0.09 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 0.13

18.11 18.10 18.20 18.39 18.60 18.74 18.84 18.92 18.99 19.04 19.08 19.15 19.20 19.25 19.29 19.32 19.37 19.45 19.50 19.55 19.64 19.66 19.71 19.85 19.89 19.95 19.97 20.01 20.03 20.06 20.08 20.08 20.07 20.11 20.14 20.15 20.22 20.22 20.23 20.06 19.79 19.62 19.49 19.29 19.22 19.17 19.12 19.09 19.03 18.98 18.93 18.90 18.89

0.00 -0.01 0.09 0.28 0.49 0.63 0.73 0.81 0.87 0.92 0.97 1.03 1.09 1.13 1.17 1.21 1.25 1.33 1.39 1.43 1.53 1.54 1.60 1.74 1.78 1.83 1.86 1.89 1.92 1.95 1.97 1.97 1.96 2.00 2.02 2.04 2.11 2.11 2.11 1.95 1.68 1.50 1.38 1.17 1.11 1.05 1.01 0.97 0.91 0.86 0.82 0.79 0.77

Static Water Level

Pump Off Start of Recovery

CITY OF CRANBROOK, BC PUMPING TEST ANALYSIS - PW5 (Nov 2014) DRAWDOWN FORECAST

PUMPING TIME [days] 0.001 0

0.01

0.1

100

SPECIFIC CAPACITY CALCULATIONS

SC 4hr =

Q s4

43.79 39.56

L/s = m

1.11 L/s/m

Q = s100

43.47 45.00

L/s = m

0.97 L/s/m

DRAWDOWN [m]

SC100 day = 30

Where: 40

Q= sn =

Flowrate Drawdown forecast at time n

SCn =

Specific capacity forecast at time n

RESIDUAL DRAWDOWN FORECAST

ELAPSED / RECOVERY TIME [-] 1

100

1000

10000

RECOVERY CALCULATIONS

0 2

Recovery at End of Test

40.30 41.46

Projected Ultimate Recovery

m m

97%

RESIDUAL DRAWDOWN [m]

4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20

DATA SUGGESTS ULTIMATE RECOVERY ABOVE INITIAL STATIC WATER LEVEL

metres residual drawdown

CITY OF CRANBROOK, BC CALCULATION OF RECOMMENDED PUMPING RATE - PW5 (Nov 2014)

DESCRIPTION

STATIC WATER LEVEL (SWL) Depth to SWL at time of well completion Depth to SWL at time of pumping test Design value for calculations

4 HOUR FORECAST

UNITS

100 DAY FORECAST

mbtoc mbtoc mbtoc

10.4 9.4 9.4

Not Artesian Not Artesian See Note 1

10.4 9.4 9.4

Not Artesian Not Artesian See Note 1

0.5

Conservative

0.5

Conservative

mbtoc m m mbtoc m m mbtoc

90.7 0.0 0.0 90.7 0.0 0.0 90.7

Estimated Min. Recommended Estimated

90.7 0.0 0.0 90.7 0.0 0.0 90.7

Estimated Min. Recommended Estimated

SPECIFIC CAPACITY (SC) Forecast SC trend (assuming continuous drawdown) Derated SC (from screen incrustation and biofouling)

L/s/m L/s/m

1.11 1.11

See Table 3b 100% (Short-Term)

0.97 0.97

See Table 3b 100% (Long-Term)

mbtoc mbtoc m m m m

9.4 90.7 81.3 0.5 0.0 80.8

100%

70%

m mbtoc

80.8 90.7

56.6 66.4

L/s L/min L/day Usgpm %

89.5 5369 7,731,410 1,418 204%

54.7 3280 4,722,970 866 125%

L/s

83.5

107%

65%

YES

DRAWDOWN INTERFERENCE (DI) Maximum Estimated Drawdown Interference

Safety Factor Total Allowable Drawdown (TAD) Operational Water Level (OWL)

Estimated Min. Recommended

THEORETICAL WELL YIELD Theoretical maximum % of 43.47 L/s testing rate

WELL SCREEN LIMITATIONS Maximum recommended flow rate through screen Theoretical Yield as % of limitation Is theoretical well yield limited by screens?

WELL CASING LIMITATIONS Maximum recommended flow rate based upon casing diameter (limits maximum pump diameter) Theoretical Yield as % of limitation

113.4

79%

48%

81.90 1,300.0

43.47 690.0

Notes 1. Design SWL includes 0 m seasonal adjustment for this well. 2. mbtoc = meters below top of casing.

L/s GPM

406 mm Diameter

83.5

L/s

Is theoretical well yield limited by casing diameter?

RECOMMENDED PUMPING RATE

9.5 ft x 100 slot 5.5 ft x 150 slot

113.4

9.5 ft x 100 slot 5.5 ft x 150 slot

406 mm Diameter

Project Property:

Project No: Report Type: Order No: Requested by: Date Completed:

Cranbrook - SWPP BC-3 Cranbrook BC 19139-100 BC Site Registry Report 20200520096 Kala Geosciences Ltd. May 22, 2020

h-Table Contents Table of of Contents

Table of Contents...........................................................................................2 Executive Summary........................................................................................3 Executive Summary: Report Summary.......................................................................................................................4 Executive Summary: Site Report Summary - Project Property...................................................................................6 Executive Summary: Site Report Summary - Surrounding Properties........................................................................7 Executive Summary: Summary By Data Source.........................................................................................................9

Map...............................................................................................................11 Aerial.............................................................................................................12 Topographic Map..........................................................................................13 Detail Report.................................................................................................14 Unplottable Summary...................................................................................80 Unplottable Report........................................................................................81 Appendix: Database Descriptions.................................................................82 Definitions.....................................................................................................89 Notice: IMPORTANT LIMITATIONS and YOUR LIABILITY Reliance on information in Report: This report DOES NOT replace a full Phase I Environmental Site Assessment but is solely intended to be used as a database review of environmental records. License for use of information in Report: No page of this report can be used without this cover page, this notice and the project property identifier. The information in Report(s) may not be modified or re-sold. Your Liability for misuse: Using this Service and/or its reports in a manner contrary to this Notice or your agreement will be in breach of copyright and contract and ERIS may obtain damages for such mis-use, including damages caused to third parties, and gives ERIS the right to terminate your account, rescind your license to any previous reports and to bar you from future use of the Service. No warranty of Accuracy or Liability for ERIS: The information contained in this report has been produced by ERIS Information Limited Partnership ("ERIS") using various sources of information, including information provided by Federal and Provincial government departments. The report applies only to the address and up to the date specified on the cover of this report, and any alterations or deviation from this description will require a new report. This report and the data contained herein does not purport to be and does not constitute a guarantee of the accuracy of the information contained herein and does not constitute a legal opinion nor medical advice. Although ERIS has endeavored to present you with information that is accurate, ERIS disclaims, any and all liability for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in such information and data, whether attributable to inadvertence, negligence or otherwise, and for any consequences arising therefrom. Liability on the part of ERIS is limited to the monetary value paid for this report. Trademark and Copyright: You may not use the ERIS trademarks or attribute any work to ERIS other than as outlined above. This Service and Report (s) are protected by copyright owned by ERIS Information Limited Partnership. Copyright in data used in the Service or Report(s) (the "Data") is owned by ERIS or its licensors. The Service, Report(s) and Data may not be copied or reproduced in whole or in any substantial part without prior written consent of ERIS.

erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services

Order No: 20200520096

h-Executive Summary Executive Summary Property Information:

Project Property:

Cranbrook - SWPP BC-3 Cranbrook BC

Project No:

19139-100

Coordinates: Latitude: Longitude: UTM Northing: UTM Easting: UTM Zone:

49.5054696 -115.7878418 5,484,354.91 587,758.64 11U 3,046 FT 928.40 M

Elevation:

Order Information: Order No: Date Requested: Requested by: Report Type:

20200520096 May 20, 2020 Kala Geosciences Ltd. BC Site Registry Report

Historical/Products:

erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services

Order No: 20200520096

h-Executive Summary: Report Summary Executive Summary: Report Summary Database rr-AMS-aa

AMS

Name Authorization Management System (formerly WASTE)

rr-ARIS-aa

ARIS

rr-AUWR-aa

AUWR

rr-BOGW-aa

BOGW

rr-CDRY-aa

CDRY

rr-CHEM-aa

CHEM

rr-CNG-aa

CNG

rr-COAL-aa

COAL

rr-CONV-aa

CONV

rr-DIS-aa

DIS

rr-EEM-aa

EEM

rr-EHS-aa

EHS

rr-EIIS-aa

EIIS

rr-EM-aa

rr-FCON-aa

FCON

rr-FCS-aa

FCS

rr-FISH-aa

FISH

rr-FOFT -aa

FOFT

rr-FRST -aa

FRST

rr-GEN-aa

GEN

rr-GEN2-aa

GEN2

rr-GHG-aa

GHG

rr-HWF-aa

HWF

rr-IAFT-aa

IAFT

rr-LUM-aa

LUM

rr-MINE-aa

MINE

rr-MNR-aa

MNR

rr-NATE-aa

NATE

rr-NCPL-aa

NCPL

rr-NDFT-aa

NDFT

rr-NDSP-aa

NDSP

rr-NDWD-aa

NDWD

rr-NEBI-aa

NEBI

rr-NEBP-aa

NEBP

rr-NEES-aa

NEES

rr-NPCB-aa

NPCB

Searched

Project Property

Within 0.50 km -

Total -

Assessment Report Indexing System

Automobile Wrecking & Supplies

BC Oil and Gas Wells

Dry Cleaning Facilities

Chemical Register

Compressed Natural Gas Stations

Coal Tar Sites

Compliance and Enforcement Summary

Wastewater Discharge Inventory

Environmental Effects Monitoring

ERIS Historical Searches

Environmental Issues Inventory System

Environmental Monitoring Locations

Federal Convictions

Contaminated Sites on Federal Land

Commercial Fisheries

Fisheries & Oceans Fuel Tanks

Federal Identification Registry for Storage Tank Systems (FIRSTS) Waste Generators Summary

Generators - Special Waste Information System (SWIS)

Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Large Facilities

Hazardous Waste Facilities

Indian & Northern Affairs Fuel Tanks

Lumber Mills

Canadian Mine Locations

Minerals Deposits Database

National Analysis of Trends in Emergencies System (NATES) Non-Compliance Reports

National Defense & Canadian Forces Fuel Tanks

National Defense & Canadian Forces Spills

National Defence & Canadian Forces Waste Disposal Sites National Energy Board Pipeline Incidents

National Energy Board Wells

National Environmental Emergencies System (NEES)

National PCB Inventory

erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services

Order No: 20200520096

Database rr-NPRI-aa

NPRI

rr-OG INCIDENTS-aa

OG INCIDENTS

rr-OGWW-aa

OGWW

rr-PAP-aa

PAP

rr-PCB-aa

PCB

rr-PCFT -aa

PCFT

rr-PES-aa

PES

rr-PRAI-aa

PRAI

rr-PUAI-aa

PUAI

rr-REC-aa

REC

rr-REC2-aa

REC2

rr-RST-aa

RST

rr-SCT-aa

SCT

rr-SREG-aa

SREG

rr-STNK-aa

STNK

rr-TCFT-aa

TCFT

rr-VTNK-aa

VTNK

rr-WDS-aa

WDS

rr-WWIS-aa

WWIS

Name

Searched

Project Property

Within 0.50 km

Total

National Pollutant Release Inventory

BC Oil and Gas Commission Incidents

Oil and Gas Wells

Canadian Pulp and Paper

Inventory of PCB Storage Sites

Parks Canada Fuel Storage Tanks

Pesticide Register

Private Aggregate Inventory

Public Aggregate Inventory

Waste Receivers Summary

Receivers - Special Waste Information System (SWIS)

Retail Fuel Storage Tanks

Scott's Manufacturing Directory

Site Registry

Surrey Tank Construction Permits

Transport Canada Fuel Storage Tanks

Vancouver Heating Oil Underground Storage Tanks

Waste Disposal Site Inventory

Water Well Information System

Total:

erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services

Order No: 20200520096

h-Executive Summary: Site Report Summary - Project Property Executive Summary: Site Report Summary - Project Property Map Key

Company/Site Name

Address

Dir/Dist (m)

Elev diff (m)

Page Number

No records found in the selected databases for the project property.

erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services

Order No: 20200520096

h-Executive Summary: Site Report Summary - Surrounding Properties Executive Summary: Site Report Summary - Surrounding Properties Map Key

dd-SREG-2005436-aa

m1d 1

SREG

Company/Site Name

Address

Dir/Dist (m)

Elev Diff (m)

Page Number

Motorways Terminal (Former) Cranbrook

1201 W COBHAM AVENUE No Entry CRANBROOK BC

NNE/111.0

-1.23

p-14-2005436-x

SE/175.9

-3.05

p-16-2006222-x

SSE/218.2

-3.13

p-31-803364429-x

SW/220.0

1.53

p-34-802878034-x

E/234.8

-4.88

p-35-2003481-x

NE/265.0

-2.61

p-38-803364484-x

SSW/328.7

-1.11

p-42-801657556-x

SSW/328.7

-1.11

p-55-822538650-x

N/342.0

2.49

p-57-2005341-x

S/356.6

-5.18

p-60-822538756-x

E/449.5

-4.62

p-60-2003660-x

E/449.5

-4.62

p-65-882101471-x

Site ID | Updated: 1735 | 26-Jun-2002 dd-SREG-2006222-aa

m2d 2

SREG

Turbo Station (Former) Van Horne Street

444 VAN HORNE STREET No Entry CRANBROOK BC

Site ID | Updated: 2727 | 25-Jun-2009 dd-SREG-803364429-aa

m3d 3

SREG

460 Van Horne Street South, Cranbrook

460 VAN HORNE STREET SOUTH No Entry CRANBROOK BC

Site ID | Updated: 11732 | 18-Sep-2009 dd-SREG-802878034-aa

m4d 4

SREG

Petrocanada Former W/S Keylock Facility

1412 W COBHAM AVENUE No Entry CRANBROOK BC

Site ID | Updated: 7817 | 22-Mar-2004 dd-SREG-2003481-aa

m5d 5

SREG

Joseph'S Prairie Grocery Property

367 VAN HORNE STREET SOUTH No Entry CRANBROOK BC

Site ID | Updated: 4894 | 24-May-2006 dd-SREG-803364484-aa

m6d 6

SREG

1125 Cobham Avenue West, Cranbrook

1125 COBHAM AVENUE WEST No Entry CRANBROOK BC

Site ID | Updated: 11796 | 23-Oct-2009 dd-SREG-801657556-aa

m7d 7

SREG

Former Chevron Cardlock Cranbrook

498 VAN HORNE STREET AND 145 WATTSVILLE ROAD SOUTH No Entry CRANBROOK BC

Site ID | Updated: 7810 | 23-Aug-2019 dd-SREG-822538650-aa

m7d 7

SREG

Wattsville Rd Adjt To 498 Van Horne

WATTSVILLE ROAD ADJACENT TO 498 VAN HORNE STREET No Entry CRANBROOK BC

Site ID | Updated: 17402 | 11-Dec-2015 dd-SREG-2005341-aa

m8d 8

SREG

Bri-Lin Develop Ltd - Cranbrook

550 LAURIER STREET No Entry CRANBROOK BC

Site ID | Updated: 1639 | 19-Sep-2005 dd-SREG-822538756-aa

m9d 9

SREG

Jim Smith Creek, Cranbrook

JIM SMITH CREEK No Entry CRANBROOK BC

Site ID | Updated: 17494 |

m10d 10

dd-SREG-2003660-aa

SREG

Fas Gas

323 VAN HORNE STREET No Entry CRANBROOK BC

Site ID | Updated: 5117 | 07-Jan-2014

m10d 10

dd-SREG-882101471-aa

SREG

323 VAN HORNE STREET SOUTH, CRANBROOK BC

erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services

Order No: 20200520096

Map Key

Company/Site Name

Address

Dir/Dist (m)

Elev Diff (m)

Page Number

E/487.8

-4.05

p-66-2002454-x

Site ID | Updated: 23404 |

m11d 11

dd-SREG-2002454-aa

SREG

Interlink Freight Depot

310 SOUTH VAN HORNE STREET No Entry CRANBROOK BC Site ID | Updated: 3481 | 24-Mar-2011

erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services

Order No: 20200520096

h-Executive Summary: Summary ByBy Data Source Executive Summary: Summary Data Source SREG - Site Registry A search of the SREG database, dated Mar 31, 2020 has found that there are 13 SREG site(s) within approximately 0.50 kilometers of the project property. Equal/Higher Elevation

Address

Direction

Distance (m)

Map Key

Petrocanada Former W/S Keylock Facility

1412 W COBHAM AVENUE No Entry CRANBROOK BC

219.96

m-4-802878034-a 4

342.01

m-8-2005341-a 8

Site ID | Updated: 7817 | 22-Mar-2004

Bri-Lin Develop Ltd - Cranbrook

550 LAURIER STREET No Entry CRANBROOK BC Site ID | Updated: 1639 | 19-Sep-2005

Lower Elevation

Address

Direction

Distance (m)

Map Key

Motorways Terminal (Former) Cranbrook

1201 W COBHAM AVENUE No Entry CRANBROOK BC

NNE

111.03

m-1-2005436-a 1

175.90

m-2-2006222-a 2

SSE

218.24

m-3-803364429-a 3

234.85

m-5-2003481-a 5

264.97

m-6-803364484-a 6

SSW

328.70

m-7-822538650-a 7

SSW

328.70

m-7-801657556-a 7

Site ID | Updated: 1735 | 26-Jun-2002

Turbo Station (Former) Van Horne Street

444 VAN HORNE STREET No Entry CRANBROOK BC Site ID | Updated: 2727 | 25-Jun-2009

460 Van Horne Street South, Cranbrook

460 VAN HORNE STREET SOUTH No Entry CRANBROOK BC Site ID | Updated: 11732 | 18-Sep-2009

Joseph'S Prairie Grocery Property

367 VAN HORNE STREET SOUTH No Entry CRANBROOK BC Site ID | Updated: 4894 | 24-May-2006

1125 Cobham Avenue West, Cranbrook

1125 COBHAM AVENUE WEST No Entry CRANBROOK BC Site ID | Updated: 11796 | 23-Oct-2009

Wattsville Rd Adjt To 498 Van Horne

WATTSVILLE ROAD ADJACENT TO 498 VAN HORNE STREET No Entry CRANBROOK BC Site ID | Updated: 17402 | 11-Dec-2015

Former Chevron Cardlock Cranbrook

498 VAN HORNE STREET AND 145 WATTSVILLE ROAD SOUTH No Entry CRANBROOK BC

erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services

Order No: 20200520096

Site ID | Updated: 7810 | 23-Aug-2019

Jim Smith Creek, Cranbrook

JIM SMITH CREEK No Entry CRANBROOK BC

356.56

m-9-822538756-a 9

449.49

m-10-2003660-a 10

449.49

m-10-882101471-a 10

487.81

m-11-2002454-a 11

Site ID | Updated: 17494 |

Fas Gas

323 VAN HORNE STREET No Entry CRANBROOK BC Site ID | Updated: 5117 | 07-Jan-2014

323 VAN HORNE STREET SOUTH, CRANBROOK BC Site ID | Updated: 23404 |

Interlink Freight Depot

310 SOUTH VAN HORNE STREET No Entry CRANBROOK BC Site ID | Updated: 3481 | 24-Mar-2011

erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services

Order No: 20200520096

10 (2) 1 11

4 3

(2)

10 (2) 1 11

4 3

(2)

h-Detail Report Detail Report Map Key

m-1-2005436-b

Number of Records 1 of 1

Direction/ Distance (m) NNE/111.0

Elev/Diff (m) 927.2 / -1.23

Site

Motorways Terminal (Former) - Cranbrook 1201 W COBHAM AVENUE No Entry CRANBROOK BC

dd-SREG-2005436-bb p-2005436-y

SREG

09-Oct-1997 Registered: 26-Jun-2002 Updated: 13-Jun-2002 Detail Removed: 26250-20/1735 Common Name: No Entry Postal Code: NOT ASSIGNED 49d 30m 23.0s Latitude DMS: March 2020 115d 47m 12.1s Longitude DMS: 49.506381 Latitude: Large Site, Simple Contamination 115.786706 Longitude: SW INTERSECTION OF COBHAM AVE & LAURIER ST (AKA 420/500 LAURIER ST). LAT/LONG DERIVED BY BCE REFERENCING THE TRANSPORTATION CENTERLINE NETWORK (TRIM 1:20K), NAD 83. 1201 W COBHAM AVENUE, CRANBROOK Addr (BC Data Catalogue): There are no Associated Sites for this site. Site Note: Site ID: Victoria File No: Env Rmd ID: Regional File No: Region: Record Status: Status as of: Cleanup Status: Category: Location Desc:

1735 No File

Registry Notations Event ID: Notation Type and Act: Initiated Date: Approved Date: Region: Ministry Contact: Notation Notes:

Required Actions: Requirement Due Date: Requirement Received Date:

6149 SITE INVESTIGATION REPORT SUBMITTED. Administrative 06-Mar-1995 06-Mar-1995 Cranbrook, Kootenay JENSEN, JIM Site Investigation Of Two Abandonded Diesel Fuel Ust'S. Tanks Appeared To Be In Good Condition With No Evidence Of Significant Leakage. Limited Data Indicates That Soils In Tank Nest Area Are Within Commercial Standards. Consultant Recommended That Stained Surface Soils Be Removed Before Future Sale Of The Property.

Participant:

Landmark Consulting (Cranbrook)

Role:

SUBMITTED BY

Participant:

Jensen, Jim

Role:

RECEIVED BY

Markuson, Les EMP

Start Date: End Date:

Jan-27-1996 Mar-31-1997

Start Date: End Date:

Mar-06-1995 Mar-31-2004

Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes: Participants Role:

Alternate Ministry Contact

Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes: Participants Role:

Jensen, Jim EMP

Main Ministry Contact

erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services

Order No: 20200520096

Map Key

Number of Records

Direction/ Distance (m)

Elev/Diff (m)

Site

Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes:

Toronto Dominion Bank (Head Office For Bc) ORG

Start Date: End Date:

Jun-04-1997

Notice Recipient(Wmaa20.21(3))-Dont Flag

Participants Role: Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes:

Landmark Consulting (Cranbrook) ORG

Start Date: End Date:

Mar-06-1995

Start Date: End Date:

Feb-26-1996 Sep-26-1996

Start Date:

Mar-17-1988

Environmental Consultant/Contractor

Participants Role: Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes:

Fraser, Stirling EMP

Alternate Ministry Contact

Participants Role: Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes:

Direct Transportation System Limited (Winnipeg, Man) ORG

End Date:

Participants Role:

Former Operator

Participants Role:

Property Owner

Participants Role:

Notice Recipient(Wmaa20.21(3))-Dont Flag

Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes:

Fil Realty Corporation Ltd. (Toronto, Ontario) ORG

Start Date: End Date:

Participants Role:

Developer/Associated Company

Participants Role:

Notice Recipient(Wmaa20.21(3))-Dont Flag

Mar-06-1995

Documents on File Document or Report Title: Authored Date: Submitted Date:

Environmental Assessment Of The Fuel Storage And Dispenser Area Of The Motorways Terminal 420 Laurier St. Cranbrook, B.C. 06-Mar-1995 06-Mar-1995

Document Entry Notes: Site Investigation Of Abandonded Diesel Fuel Tanks.

Participant and Role:

Fil Realty Corporation Ltd. (Toronto, Ontario) - Commissioner

Participant and Role:

Jensen, Jim - Recipient

erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services

Order No: 20200520096

Map Key

Number of Records

Direction/ Distance (m)

Elev/Diff (m)

Site

Landmark Consulting (Cranbrook) - Author

Participant and Role: Suspected Land Use - Notes

Petro. Prod., /Produce Water Strg Abvegrnd/Undergrnd Tank Fuel Used Only For The Company Trucks, No Retail Sales; 2 Diesel Fuel Ust'S

Land Use Description: Notes: Parcel Descriptions Date Added: LTO PID(s): Land Description: m-2-2006222-b

7/29/1997 Crown Land PIN#: 015-989-402 Crown Land File#: LOT 93 DISTRICT LOT 30 KOOTENAY DISTRICT PLAN 887

1 of 1

SE/175.9

925.3 / -3.05

Turbo Station (Former) Van Horne Street 444 VAN HORNE STREET No Entry CRANBROOK BC

dd-SREG-2006222-bb p-2006222-y

SREG

08-Oct-1997 Registered: 25-Jun-2009 Updated: 24-Jun-2009 Detail Removed: 26250-20/2727 Common Name: V1C 4W7 Postal Code: NOT ASSIGNED 49d 30m 15.5s Latitude DMS: March 2020 115d 47m 08.2s Longitude DMS: 49.504314 Latitude: Unranked 115.785614 Longitude: S OF FLAMINGO MOTEL & TRAILER PARK, BETWEEN JIM SMITH CREEK & HWY 3. LAT/LONG DERIVED BY BCE REFERENCING (TRIM 1:20K), NAD 83, TRANSPORTATION CENTERLINE NETWORK . 444 VAN HORNE STREET, CRANBROOK Addr (BC Data Catalogue): There are no Associated Sites for this site. Site Note: Site ID: Victoria File No: Env Rmd ID: Regional File No: Region: Record Status: Status as of: Cleanup Status: Category: Location Desc:

2727 No File

Registry Notations Event ID: Notation Type and Act: Initiated Date: Approved Date: Region: Ministry Contact: Notation Notes: Required Actions: Requirement Due Date: Requirement Received Date:

10347 LETTER OF COMFORT ISSUED. Administrative 26-May-1994 26-May-1994 Cranbrook, Kootenay JENSEN, JIM No Notes Entered No Actions Entered

Participant:

Canadian Turbo (1993) Inc (Calgary)

Role:

RECEIVED BY

Participant:

Jensen, Jim

Role:

ISSUED BY

Registry Notations Event ID: Notation Type and Act: Initiated Date: Approved Date: Region: Ministry Contact: Notation Notes: Required Actions: Requirement Due Date: Requirement Received Date:

22867 CONCENTRATION CRITERIA APPROACH USED. Administrative 26-May-1994 26-May-1994 Cranbrook, Kootenay JENSEN, JIM No Actions Entered

erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services

Order No: 20200520096

Map Key

Number of Records

Direction/ Distance (m)

Elev/Diff (m)

Site

Registry Notations Event ID: Notation Type and Act: Initiated Date: Approved Date: Region: Ministry Contact: Notation Notes: Required Actions: Requirement Due Date: Requirement Received Date:

10348 REMEDIATED TO COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL LEVELS (DRAFT CMCS 21/11/89). Administrative 26-May-1994 26-May-1994 Cranbrook, Kootenay JENSEN, JIM No Notes Entered No Actions Entered

Participant:

Jensen, Jim

Role:

ISSUED BY

Participant:

Canadian Turbo (1993) Inc (Calgary)

Role:

RECEIVED BY

Registry Notations Event ID: Notation Type and Act: Initiated Date: Approved Date: Region: Ministry Contact: Notation Notes: Required Actions: Requirement Due Date: Requirement Received Date:

10345 MONITORING REPORT SUBMITTED. Administrative 09-May-1994 09-May-1994 Cranbrook, Kootenay JENSEN, JIM No Notes Entered No Actions Entered

Participant:

Hbt Agra Limited (Lethbridge)

Role:

SUBMITTED BY

Participant:

Canadian Turbo (1993) Inc (Calgary)

Role:

REQUESTED BY

Registry Notations Event ID: Notation Type and Act: Initiated Date: Approved Date: Region: Ministry Contact: Notation Notes: Required Actions: Requirement Due Date: Requirement Received Date:

10346 REMEDIATION COMPLETION REPORT SUBMITTED. Administrative 04-May-1994 09-May-1994 Cranbrook, Kootenay JENSEN, JIM No Notes Entered No Actions Entered

Participant:

Hbt Agra Limited (Lethbridge)

Role:

SUBMITTED BY

Participant:

Canadian Turbo Inc (Calgary)

Role:

REQUESTED BY

Registry Notations Event ID: Notation Type and Act: Initiated Date: Approved Date: Region: Ministry Contact: Notation Notes: Required Actions: Requirement Due Date:

18015 MONITORING REPORT SUBMITTED. Administrative 28-Apr-1994 28-Apr-1994 Cranbrook, Kootenay JENSEN, JIM Hydrocarbon Contamination Assessment No Actions Entered

erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services

Order No: 20200520096

Map Key

Number of Records

Direction/ Distance (m)

Elev/Diff (m)

Site

Requirement Received Date: Hbt Agra Limited (Lethbridge)

Participant:

Role:

ISSUED BY

Registry Notations Event ID: Notation Type and Act: Initiated Date: Approved Date: Region: Ministry Contact: Notation Notes: Required Actions: Requirement Due Date: Requirement Received Date:

18014 CASE MANAGEMENT ITEM. Administrative 16-Feb-1994 16-Feb-1994 Cranbrook, Kootenay JENSEN, JIM Sale Of Property Located At 444 Van Horne Street South, Cranbrook, Bc. No Actions Entered

Canadian Turbo (1993) Inc (Calgary)

Participant:

Role:

ISSUED BY

Registry Notations Event ID: Notation Type and Act: Initiated Date: Approved Date: Region: Ministry Contact: Notation Notes: Required Actions: Requirement Due Date: Requirement Received Date:

18012 CASE MANAGEMENT ITEM. Administrative 10-Nov-1993 26-Jan-1994 Cranbrook, Kootenay JENSEN, JIM Sampling Proposal 1994-01-26 - Sampling Program Modifications Sent By Jim Jensen

Participant:

Canadian Turbo Inc (Calgary)

Role:

ISSUED BY

Participant:

Jensen, Jim

Role:

RECEIVED BY

Registry Notations 18590 MONITORING REPORT DUE. Administrative 04-Nov-1993 04-Nov-1993 Cranbrook, Kootenay JENSEN, JIM Response To Monitoring Results - Further Monitoring Requested. Further Monitoring. 1993-11-04 - Sent Copy Of Waste Management Act To Turbo.

Event ID: Notation Type and Act: Initiated Date: Approved Date: Region: Ministry Contact: Notation Notes: Required Actions: Requirement Due Date: Requirement Received Date: Participant:

Jensen, Jim

Role:

ISSUED BY

Participant:

Canadian Turbo Inc (Calgary)

Role:

RECEIVED BY

Registry Notations Event ID: Notation Type and Act: Initiated Date: Approved Date: Region: Ministry Contact:

10344 MONITORING REPORT SUBMITTED. Administrative 02-Nov-1993 02-Nov-1993 Cranbrook, Kootenay JENSEN, JIM

erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services

Order No: 20200520096

Map Key

Number of Records

Notation Notes: Required Actions: Requirement Due Date: Requirement Received Date:

Direction/ Distance (m)

Elev/Diff (m)

Site

No Notes Entered No Actions Entered

Participant:

Jensen, Jim

Role:

RECEIVED BY

Participant:

Canadian Turbo Inc (Calgary)

Role:

SUBMITTED BY

Registry Notations 18618 CASE MANAGEMENT ITEM. Administrative 27-Oct-1993 01-Nov-1993 Cranbrook, Kootenay JENSEN, JIM Letter From Lawyer Requesting Results Of Remediation For Potential Buyer. 1993-10-29 - Permission From Canadian Turbo To Release Ministry Information On Subject Property For Resale Purposes. 1993-11-01 - Request From Steidl Kambeitz For Information Regarding Remediation Of Site.

Event ID: Notation Type and Act: Initiated Date: Approved Date: Region: Ministry Contact: Notation Notes: Required Actions:

Requirement Due Date: Requirement Received Date: Participant:

Canadian Turbo Inc (Calgary)

Role:

ISSUED BY

Participant:

Steidl Kambeitz (Cranbrook, B.C.)

Role:

SUBMITTED BY

Registry Notations Event ID: Notation Type and Act: Initiated Date: Approved Date: Region: Ministry Contact: Notation Notes: Required Actions: Requirement Due Date: Requirement Received Date:

10341 MONITORING REPORT SUBMITTED. Administrative 20-Sep-1993 02-Nov-1993 Cranbrook, Kootenay JENSEN, JIM Decommissioned Kootenay Valley Turbo- Monitoring Report And Request For Release No Actions Entered

Participant:

Canadian Turbo Inc (Calgary)

Role:

REQUESTED BY

Participant:

Hbt Agra Limited (Kamloops)

Role:

SUBMITTED BY

Registry Notations Event ID: Notation Type and Act: Initiated Date: Approved Date: Region: Ministry Contact: Notation Notes: Required Actions: Requirement Due Date: Requirement Received Date:

18010 MONITORING REPORT DUE. Administrative 02-Dec-1992 02-Dec-1992 Cranbrook, Kootenay JENSEN, JIM Request For Monitoring Program No Actions Entered

Participant:

Canadian Turbo Inc (Calgary)

Role:

RECEIVED BY

Participant:

Jensen, Jim

Role:

ISSUED BY

erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services

Order No: 20200520096

Map Key

Number of Records

Direction/ Distance (m)

Elev/Diff (m)

Site

Registry Notations Event ID: Notation Type and Act: Initiated Date: Approved Date: Region: Ministry Contact: Notation Notes: Required Actions: Requirement Due Date: Requirement Received Date:

18008 MONITORING REPORT SUBMITTED. Administrative 09-Nov-1992 09-Nov-1992 Cranbrook, Kootenay JENSEN, JIM Site Monitoring And Recommendations No Actions Entered

Participant:

Hbt Agra Limited (Kamloops)

Role:

ISSUED BY

Participant:

Canadian Turbo Inc (Calgary)

Role:

SUBMITTED BY

Registry Notations Event ID: Notation Type and Act: Initiated Date: Approved Date: Region: Ministry Contact: Notation Notes: Required Actions: Requirement Due Date: Requirement Received Date:

18007 MONITORING REPORT SUBMITTED. Administrative 29-Sep-1992 05-Oct-1992 Cranbrook, Kootenay JENSEN, JIM Ground Water Sampling No Actions Entered

Participant:

Canadian Turbo Inc (Calgary)

Role:

SUBMITTED BY

Participant:

Hbt Agra Limited (Kamloops)

Role:

ISSUED BY

Registry Notations Event ID: Notation Type and Act: Initiated Date: Approved Date: Region: Ministry Contact: Notation Notes: Required Actions: Requirement Due Date: Requirement Received Date:

10349 CONCENTRATION CRITERIA APPROACH USED. Administrative 14-Jan-1992 14-Jan-1992 Cranbrook, Kootenay JENSEN, JIM No Notes Entered No Actions Entered

Registry Notations Event ID: Notation Type and Act: Initiated Date: Approved Date: Region: Ministry Contact: Notation Notes: Required Actions: Requirement Due Date: Requirement Received Date: Participant:

10342 MONITORING REPORT SUBMITTED. Administrative 14-Jan-1992 14-Jan-1992 Cranbrook, Kootenay JENSEN, JIM No Notes Entered No Actions Entered

Canadian Turbo Inc (Calgary)

erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services

Role:

SUBMITTED BY

Order No: 20200520096

Map Key

Number of Records

Direction/ Distance (m)

Elev/Diff (m)

Site

Registry Notations Event ID: Notation Type and Act: Initiated Date: Approved Date: Region: Ministry Contact: Notation Notes: Required Actions: Requirement Due Date: Requirement Received Date:

10343 REMEDIATION PLAN REPORT SUBMITTED. Administrative 11-Jan-1992 14-Jan-1992 Cranbrook, Kootenay JENSEN, JIM No Notes Entered No Actions Entered

Participant:

Hbt Agra Limited (Kamloops)

Role:

ISSUED BY

Participant:

Canadian Turbo Inc (Calgary)

Role:

SUBMITTED BY

Registry Notations Event ID: Notation Type and Act: Initiated Date: Approved Date: Region: Ministry Contact: Notation Notes: Required Actions: Requirement Due Date: Requirement Received Date:

18009 MONITORING REPORT SUBMITTED. Administrative 01-Jan-1992 01-Jan-1992 Cranbrook, Kootenay JENSEN, JIM Corrective Action Report No Actions Entered

Hbt Agra Limited (Kamloops)

Participant:

Role:

ISSUED BY

Registry Notations Event ID: Notation Type and Act: Initiated Date: Approved Date: Region: Ministry Contact: Notation Notes: Required Actions: Requirement Due Date: Requirement Received Date:

18000 MONITORING REPORT SUBMITTED. Administrative 25-Oct-1991 31-Oct-1991 Cranbrook, Kootenay JENSEN, JIM Program Status No Actions Entered

Canadian Turbo Inc (Calgary)

Participant:

Role:

SUBMITTED BY

Registry Notations Event ID: Notation Type and Act: Initiated Date: Approved Date: Region: Ministry Contact: Notation Notes: Required Actions: Requirement Due Date: Requirement Received Date:

10339 MONITORING REPORT SUBMITTED. Administrative 16-Jul-1991 16-Jul-1991 Cranbrook, Kootenay JENSEN, JIM No Notes Entered No Actions Entered

Participant:

Hbt Agra Limited (Kamloops)

Role:

SUBMITTED BY

Participant:

Canadian Turbo Inc (Calgary)

Role:

REQUESTED BY

erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services

Order No: 20200520096

Map Key

Number of Records

Direction/ Distance (m)

Elev/Diff (m)

Site

Registry Notations Event ID: Notation Type and Act: Initiated Date: Approved Date: Region: Ministry Contact: Notation Notes: Required Actions: Requirement Due Date: Requirement Received Date:

17996 SITE INVESTIGATION REPORT SUBMITTED. Administrative 01-Jul-1991 01-Jul-1991 Cranbrook, Kootenay JENSEN, JIM Preliminary Assessment No Actions Entered

Participant:

Hbt Agra Limited (Kamloops)

Role:

ISSUED BY

Participant:

Canadian Turbo Inc (Calgary)

Role:

SUBMITTED BY

Registry Notations Event ID: Notation Type and Act: Initiated Date: Approved Date: Region: Ministry Contact: Notation Notes: Required Actions: Requirement Due Date: Requirement Received Date:

17994 SITE INVESTIGATION REPORT SUBMITTED. Administrative 21-Jun-1991 24-Jun-1991 Cranbrook, Kootenay JENSEN, JIM Preliminary Site Assessment-Action Plan No Actions Entered

Participant:

Canadian Turbo Inc (Kamloops)

Role:

SUBMITTED BY

Participant:

Hardy Bbt Limited (Kamloops)

Role:

ISSUED BY

Registry Notations Event ID: Notation Type and Act: Initiated Date: Approved Date: Region: Ministry Contact: Notation Notes: Required Actions: Requirement Due Date: Requirement Received Date:

17993 CASE MANAGEMENT ITEM. Administrative 13-Jun-1991 13-Jun-1991 Cranbrook, Kootenay JENSEN, JIM Request To Identify The Magnitude Of Contamination No Actions Entered

Jensen, Jim

Participant:

Role:

REQUESTED BY

Registry Notations Event ID: Notation Type and Act: Initiated Date: Approved Date: Region: Ministry Contact: Notation Notes: Required Actions: Requirement Due Date: Requirement Received Date:

10336 SITE INVESTIGATION REQUESTED. Administrative 11-Jun-1991 11-Jun-1991 Cranbrook, Kootenay JENSEN, JIM No Notes Entered No Actions Entered

erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services

Order No: 20200520096

Map Key

Number of Records

Direction/ Distance (m)

Elev/Diff (m)

Site

Participant:

Canadian Turbo Inc (Kamloops)

Role:

RECEIVED BY

Participant:

Jensen, Jim

Role:

REQUESTED BY

Start Date: End Date:

Jul-01-1991

Start Date: End Date:

Jun-29-1994

Registry Notations Event ID: Notation Type and Act: Initiated Date: Approved Date: Region: Ministry Contact: Notation Notes: Required Actions: Requirement Due Date: Requirement Received Date:

10338 SPILL REPORTED. Administrative 11-Jun-1991 11-Jun-1991 Cranbrook, Kootenay JENSEN, JIM No Notes Entered No Actions Entered

Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes: Participants Role:

Hbt Agra Limited (Kamloops) ORG KEVIN BENNETT Environmental Consultant/Contractor

Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes:

Ludwig, Karla E. PER

Participants Role:

Property Owner

Participants Role:

Notice Recipient(Wmaa20.21(3))-Dont Flag

Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes: Participants Role:

Steidl Kambeitz (Cranbrook, B.C.) ORG GERALD KAMBEITZ

Start Date: End Date:

Oct-27-1993

Start Date: End Date:

Oct-03-1983

Lawyer/Solicitor

Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes: Participants Role:

City Of Cranbrook (Cranbrook) ORG

Notice Recipient(Wmaa20.21(3))-Dont Flag

Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes: Participants Role:

Turbo Resources Ltd. (Now Canadian Turbo Inc.) (Dissolved) ORG

Start Date:

Jun-11-1991

End Date:

Operator

erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services

Order No: 20200520096

Map Key

Number of Records

Participants Role:

Direction/ Distance (m)

Elev/Diff (m)

Site

Notice Recipient(Wmaa20.21(3))-Dont Flag

Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes: Participants Role:

Bc Gas Inc (Head Office) ORG

Start Date: End Date:

Dec-04-1973

Notice Recipient(Wmaa20.21(3))-Dont Flag

Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes: Participants Role:

Hardy Bbt Limited (Kamloops) ORG PAUL BLACKETT

Start Date: End Date:

Jun-24-1991 Jul-16-1991

Start Date: End Date:

Oct-23-1992

Start Date: End Date:

Feb-16-1994 Jun-28-1994

Environmental Consultant/Contractor

Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes: Participants Role:

Scanlands Vacuum Tankers (Cranbrook, B.C.) ORG GROUNDWATER DISPOSAL Fill Recipient

Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes:

Canadian Turbo (1993) Inc (Calgary) ORG

Participants Role:

Former Property Owner

Participants Role:

Operator

Participants Role:

Notice Recipient(Wmaa20.21(3))-Dont Flag

Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes:

Canadian Turbo Inc (Kamloops) ORG

Start Date: End Date:

Participants Role:

Notice Recipient(Wmaa20.21(3))-Dont Flag

Participants Role:

Former Property Owner

Participants Role:

Former Operator

Jun-21-1991 Feb-15-1994

Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes: Participants Role:

Jensen, Jim EMP

Start Date: End Date:

Jun-11-1991 Mar-31-2004

Main Ministry Contact

Site Participants

erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services

Order No: 20200520096

Map Key

Number of Records

Participant: Participation Type: Notes: Participants Role:

Direction/ Distance (m)

Elev/Diff (m)

Beck Drilling And Environmental Services Incorporated (Richmond) ORG

Site Start Date:

DB Jun-24-1991

End Date:

Environmental Consultant/Contractor

Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes:

Canadian Turbo Inc (Calgary) ORG

Participants Role:

Operator

Participants Role:

Former Property Owner

Participants Role:

Notice Recipient(Wmaa20.21(3))-Dont Flag

Start Date: End Date:

Oct-25-1991 Jun-28-1994

Site Participants

Participation Type: Notes:

Analytical Service Laboratories Ltd (Vancouver) ORG JOANNE PATRICK

Participants Role:

Analytical Lab

Participant:

Start Date:

Jun-27-1991

End Date:

Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes: Participants Role:

Markuson, Les EMP

Start Date: End Date:

Jan-28-1997 Mar-31-1997

Start Date: End Date:

Jun-11-1991 Jun-28-1994

Alternate Ministry Contact

Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes:

Canadian Turbo Inc (Calgary) ORG

Participants Role:

Operator

Participants Role:

Notice Recipient(Wmaa20.21(3))-Dont Flag

Participants Role:

Property Owner

Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes: Participants Role:

Provincial Emergency Program ORG JIM JENSEN

Start Date: End Date:

Jun-11-1991

Associated Provincial Government Contact

Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes:

Hbt Agra Limited (Lethbridge) ORG LETHBRIDGE

erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services

Start Date: End Date:

Apr-28-1994

Order No: 20200520096

Map Key

Number of Records

Direction/ Distance (m)

Elev/Diff (m)

Site

Environmental Consultant/Contractor

Participants Role: Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes:

Ludwig, Werner PER

Participants Role:

Start Date: End Date:

Oct-29-1993

Prospective Purchaser

Documents on File Document or Report Title: Authored Date: Submitted Date:

Corrective Action Report 01-Jan-1992 01-Jan-1992

Document Entry Notes: Nothing Noted

Participant and Role:

Hbt Agra Limited (Kamloops) - Author

Documents on File Document or Report Title: Authored Date: Submitted Date:

Permission To Release Information On Subject Property 29-Oct-1993 29-Oct-1993

Document Entry Notes: Nothing Noted

Participant and Role:

Jensen, Jim - Recipient

Documents on File Document or Report Title: Authored Date: Submitted Date:

Remediated To Commercial Levels (Draft Cmcs 21/11/89) 26-May-1994 26-May-1994

Document Entry Notes: Nothing Noted

Participant and Role:

Jensen, Jim - Reviewer

Documents on File Document or Report Title: Authored Date: Submitted Date:

Spill Reported And Site Investigation Requested 11-Jun-1991 11-Jun-1991

Document Entry Notes: Nothing Noted

Participant and Role:

Jensen, Jim - Author

erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services

Order No: 20200520096

Map Key

Number of Records

Direction/ Distance (m)

Elev/Diff (m)

Site

Documents on File Document or Report Title: Authored Date: Submitted Date:

Preliminary Site Assessment -Action Plan 21-Jun-1991 24-Jun-1991

Document Entry Notes: Nothing Noted

Participant and Role:

Hardy Bbt Limited (Kamloops) - Author

Documents on File Document or Report Title: Authored Date: Submitted Date:

Monitoring Report 16-Jul-1991 16-Jul-1991

Document Entry Notes: Nothing Noted

Participant and Role:

Hbt Agra Limited (Kamloops) - Author

Documents on File Document or Report Title: Authored Date: Submitted Date:

Monitoring Report 14-Jan-1992 14-Jan-1992

Document Entry Notes: Nothing Noted

Participant and Role:

Hbt Agra Limited (Kamloops) - Author

Documents on File Document or Report Title: Authored Date: Submitted Date:

Monitoring Report 02-Nov-1993 02-Nov-1993

Document Entry Notes: Nothing Noted

Participant and Role:

Canadian Turbo Inc (Calgary) - Commissioner

Participant and Role:

Hbt Agra Limited (Kamloops) - Author

Documents on File Document or Report Title: Authored Date: Submitted Date:

Sale Of Property 16-Feb-1994 16-Feb-1994

Document Entry Notes:

erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services

Order No: 20200520096

Map Key

Number of Records

Direction/ Distance (m)

Elev/Diff (m)

Site

Nothing Noted

Participant and Role:

Canadian Turbo (1993) Inc (Calgary) - Author

Documents on File Document or Report Title: Authored Date: Submitted Date:

Environmental Engineering Services Program Status Fro Vernon Cranbrook And Creston Service Stations 25-Oct-1991 31-Oct-1991

Document Entry Notes: Nothing Noted

Participant and Role:

Hardy Bbt Limited (Kamloops) - Author

Participant and Role:

Jensen, Jim - Reviewer

Participant and Role:

Canadian Turbo Inc (Calgary) - Commissioner

Documents on File Document or Report Title: Authored Date: Submitted Date:

Site Monitoring And Recommendations Decommissioned Kootenay Valley Turbo Service Station Cranbrook Bc 09-Nov-1992 14-Jan-1993

Document Entry Notes: Nothing Noted

Participant and Role:

Jensen, Jim - Reviewer

Participant and Role:

Canadian Turbo Inc (Kamloops) - Commissioner

Participant and Role:

Hbt Agra Limited (Kamloops) - Author

Documents on File Document or Report Title: Authored Date: Submitted Date:

Monitoring Report 29-Sep-1992 05-Oct-1992

Document Entry Notes: Nothing Noted

Participant and Role:

Jensen, Jim - Reviewer

Participant and Role:

Hbt Agra Limited (Kamloops) - Author

Documents on File Document or Report Title: Authored Date: Submitted Date:

Sampling Proposal 10-Nov-1993 10-Nov-1993

Document Entry Notes:

erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services

Order No: 20200520096

Map Key

Number of Records

Direction/ Distance (m)

Elev/Diff (m)

Site

Nothing Noted

Participant and Role:

Canadian Turbo Inc (Calgary) - Commissioner

Participant and Role:

Jensen, Jim - Recipient

Documents on File Document or Report Title: Authored Date: Submitted Date:

Hydrocarbon Contamination Assessment Kootenay Turbo Service Station Cranbrook Bc 28-Apr-1994 28-Apr-1994

Document Entry Notes: Nothing Noted

Participant and Role:

Canadian Turbo Inc (Kamloops) - Commissioner

Participant and Role:

Hbt Agra Limited (Kamloops) - Author

Participant and Role:

Jensen, Jim - Reviewer

Documents on File Document or Report Title: Authored Date: Submitted Date:

Request For Monitoring Program 02-Dec-1992 02-Dec-1992

Document Entry Notes: Nothing Noted

Participant and Role:

Jensen, Jim - Author

Documents on File Document or Report Title: Authored Date: Submitted Date:

Letter Of Comfort Issued 26-May-1994 26-May-1994

Document Entry Notes: Nothing Noted

Participant and Role:

Jensen, Jim - Author

Documents on File Document or Report Title: Authored Date: Submitted Date:

Letter Requesting Release Of Results From Remediation 27-Oct-1993 27-Oct-1993

Document Entry Notes: Nothing Noted

Participant and Role:

Jensen, Jim - Recipient

erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services

Order No: 20200520096

Map Key

Number of Records

Participant and Role:

Direction/ Distance (m)

Elev/Diff (m)

Site

Steidl Kambeitz (Cranbrook, B.C.) - Author

Documents on File Document or Report Title: Authored Date: Submitted Date:

Remediation Completion And Monitoring Report09-May-1994 09-May-1994

Document Entry Notes: Nothing Noted

Participant and Role:

Hbt Agra Limited (Lethbridge) - Author

Documents on File Document or Report Title: Authored Date: Submitted Date:

Draft Canadian Turbo Incorporated Kootenay Turbo Station Carnbrook Bc Canada Corrective Action Report 01-Jan-1992 01-Jan-1992

Document Entry Notes: Nothing Noted

Participant and Role:

Hbt Agra Limited (Kamloops) - Author

Participant and Role:

Canadian Turbo Inc (Kamloops) - Commissioner

Participant and Role:

Jensen, Jim - Reviewer

Documents on File Document or Report Title: Authored Date: Submitted Date:

Groundwater Sampling And Site Monitoring - Factual Report Decommissioned Kootenay Valley Turbo Service Station Cranbrook Bc 29-Sep-1993 02-Nov-1993

Document Entry Notes: Nothing Noted

Participant and Role:

Jensen, Jim - Reviewer

Participant and Role:

Hbt Agra Limited (Kamloops) - Author

Participant and Role:

Canadian Turbo Inc (Calgary) - Commissioner

Documents on File Document or Report Title: Authored Date: Submitted Date:

Permit Waste Management 09-Nov-1992 09-Nov-1992

Document Entry Notes: Nothing Noted

Participant and Role:

Jensen, Jim - Author

erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services

Order No: 20200520096

Map Key

Number of Records

Direction/ Distance (m)

Elev/Diff (m)

Site

Documents on File Document or Report Title: Authored Date: Submitted Date:

Sampling Program Modifications 26-Jan-1994 26-Jan-1994

Document Entry Notes: Nothing Noted

Jensen, Jim - Author

Participant and Role: Documents on File Document or Report Title: Authored Date: Submitted Date:

Preliminary Environmental Assessment Of Kootenay Turbo Service Station Cranbrook Bc 01-Jul-1991 01-Jul-1991

Document Entry Notes: Nothing Noted

Participant and Role:

Canadian Turbo Inc (Calgary) - Commissioner

Participant and Role:

Hbt Agra Limited (Kamloops) - Author

Participant and Role:

Jensen, Jim - Reviewer

Suspected Land Use - Notes Petro. Prod., /Produce Water Strg Abvegrnd/Undergrnd Tank No Entry

Land Use Description: Notes: Suspected Land Use - Notes

Petro. Prod., Dispense Facility, Inc. Serv Sta./Cardlot Decommissioned

Land Use Description: Notes: Suspected Land Use - Notes

Waste Oil, Reprocessing, Recycling Or Bulk Storage No Entry

Land Use Description: Notes: Parcel Descriptions Date Added: LTO PID(s): Land Description: m-3-803364429-b

1 of 1

Site ID: Victoria File No: Env Rmd ID: Regional File No: Region:

8/9/1996 Crown Land PIN#: 012-123-331 Crown Land File#: LOT 1 DISTRICT LOT 30 KOOTENAY DISTRICT PLAN 4338

SSE/218.2

925.3 / -3.13

11732 26250-20/11732 No File

erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services

460 Van Horne Street South, Cranbrook 460 VAN HORNE STREET SOUTH No Entry CRANBROOK BC Registered: Updated: Detail Removed: Common Name: Postal Code:

dd-SREG-803364429-bb p-803364429-y

SREG

10-Aug-2009 18-Sep-2009 16-Sep-2009 V1C 4W7

Order No: 20200520096

Map Key

Number of Records

Direction/ Distance (m)

Elev/Diff (m)

Site

49d 30m 12.8s Latitude DMS: 115d 47m 15.2s Longitude DMS: 49.503556 Latitude: Not Applicable 115.787556 Longitude: SITE CREATED BY SITE PROFILE, ENTERED 2009-07-31. LAT/LONG VERIFIED USING GOOGLE EARTH 2009-07-31. 460 VAN HORNE STREET SOUTH, CRANBROOK Addr (BC Data Catalogue): There are no Associated Sites for this site. Site Note: Record Status: Status as of: Cleanup Status: Category: Location Desc:

NOT ASSIGNED March 2020

Registry Notations Event ID: Notation Type and Act: Initiated Date: Approved Date: Region: Ministry Contact: Notation Notes: Required Actions: Requirement Due Date: Requirement Received Date:

55254 SITE PROFILE REVIEWED - FURTHER INVESTIGATION REQUIRED BY THE MINISTRY. Environmental Management Act: General 31-Jul-2009 No Entry Cranbrook, Kootenay HANEMAYER, VINCENT (SURREY) C Auto Inserted From Site Profile Preliminary Site Investigation Required.

54999 SITE PROFILE RECEIVED. Environmental Management Act: General 27-Jul-2009 No Entry Cranbrook, Kootenay HANEMAYER, VINCENT (SURREY) C Notation Generated In Site Profile On 2009-07-31 By Tyogrady No Actions Entered

Js Environmental Consulting Inc

Role:

SITE PROFILE SUBMITTED BY

Js Environmental Consulting Inc ORG

Start Date: End Date:

Jul-27-2009

Start Date: End Date:

Jul-27-2009

Start Date: End Date:

Jul-27-2009

Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes: Participants Role:

Site Profile Contact

Participants Role:

Site Profile Completor

Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes: Participants Role:

Onyx Holdings Ltd ORG

Property Owner

Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes:

O'Grady, Tyler EMP

erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services

Order No: 20200520096

Map Key

Number of Records

Direction/ Distance (m)

Elev/Diff (m)

Site

Alternate Ministry Contact

Participants Role: Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes:

Hanemayer, Vincent (Surrey) C EMP

Start Date: End Date:

Jul-27-2009

Main Ministry Contact

Participants Role: Suspected Land Use - Notes

Auto/Truck/Bus/Subway/Other Vehicle Repair/Salvage/Wrecking Inserted For Site Profile Dated 2009-07-20

Land Use Description: Notes: Parcel Descriptions Date Added: LTO PID(s): Land Description:

7/20/2009 Crown Land PIN#: 015-020-517 Crown Land File#: LOT 2 DISTRICT LOT 30 KOOTENAY DISTRICT PLAN 2985

Current Site Profile Information Date Entered: Date Completed: Decision Date: Date Received: Date Registrar Recorded: Date Answer Completed: Reg Date Entered: Investigation?: Local Authority: Local Authority Date Recorded: Site Profile Comments:

Jul-31-2009 Jul-20-2009 Jul-31-2009 Jul-27-2009 Jul-20-2009 Yes City Of Cranbrook Jul-22-2009 No Comment

Site Profile Note All Questions

Important Note: SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING SITE PROFILE QUESTIONS In the bulk data provided by the Ministry of the Environment, the Current Site Profile information for any given site ONLY INCLUDES QUESTIONS TO WHICH THE ANSWER IS YES. Here, for informational purposes only, we provide the list of ALL current site profile questions.

erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services

Order No: 20200520096

Map Key

Number of Records

Direction/ Distance (m)

Elev/Diff (m)

Site

- Materials Such As Household Garbage, Mixed Municipal Refuse, Or Demolition Debris? - Waste Or Byproducts Such As Tank Bottoms, Residues, Sludge, Or Flocculation Precipitates From Industrial Processes Or Wastewater Treatment? - Waste Products From Smelting Or Mining Activities, Such As Smelter Slag, Mine Tailings, Or Cull Materials From Coal Processing? - Waste Products From Natural Gas And Oil Well Drilling Activities, Such As Drilling Fluids And Muds? - Waste Products From Photographic Developing Or Finishing Laboratories; Asphalt Tar Manufacturing; Boilers, Incinerators Or Other Thermal Facilities (Eg. Ash); Appliance, Small Equipment Or Engine Repair Or Salvage; Dry Cleaning Operations (Eg. Solvents); For From The Cleaning Or Repair Of Parts Of Boats, Ships, Barges, Automobiles Or Trucks, Including Sandblasting Grit Or Paint Scrapings? *[1] *[1] Note prior to 2009, question 5 was worded as follows: "Waste Products From Photographic Developing Or Finishing Laboratories; Asphalt Tar Manufacturing; Boilers, Incinerators Or Other Thermal Facilities (Eg. Ash); Appliance, Small Equipment Or Engine Repair Or Salvage; Dry Cleaning Operations (Eg. Solvents); Or Automobile And Truck Parts Cleaning Or Repair?" TANKS OR CONTAINERS USED OR STORED, OTHER THAN TANKS USED FOR RESIDENTIAL HEATING FUEL*[2] - Underground Fuel Or Chemical Storage Tanks Other Than Storage Tanks For Compressed Gases? *[2A] - Above Ground Fuel Or Chemical Storage Tanks Other Than Storage Tanks For Compressed Gases? *[2B] *[2] Note prior to 2009, this section was referred to "Tanks Or Containers Used Or Stored". *[2A] Note prior to 2009, question 1 was worded as follows: "Underground Fuel Or Chemical Storage Tanks?" *[2B] Note prior to 2009, question 2 was worded as follows: "Above Ground Fuel Or Chemical Storage Tanks? " HAZARDOUS WASTES OR HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES *[3] - Pcb-Containing Electrical Transformers Or Capacitors Either At Grade, Attached Above Ground To Poles, Located Within Buildings, Or Stored? - Waste Asbestos Or Asbestos Containing Materials Such As Pipe Wrapping, Blown-In Insulation Or Panelling Buried? - Paints, Solvents, Mineral Spirits Or Waste Pest Control Products Or Pest Control Product Containers Stored In Volumes Greater Than 205 Litres? *[3] Note, prior to 2009, this section was referred to "Special (Hazardous) Wastes Or Substances". LEGAL OR REGULATORY ACTIONS OR CONSTRAINTS - Government Orders Or Other Notifications Pertaining To Environmental Conditions Or Quality Of Soil, Water, Groundwater Or Other Environmental Media? - Liens To Recover Costs, Restrictive Covenants On Land Use, Or Other Charges Or Encumbrances, Stemming From Contaminants Or Wastes Remaining Onsite Or From Other Environmental Conditions? - Government Notifications Relating To Past Or Recurring Environmental Violations At The Site Or Any Facility Located On The Site?

Site Profile Note - Questions Category Precursor: Category and Question:

m-4-802878034-b

1 of 1

Is there currently or to the best of your knowledge has there previously been on the site any landfilling, deposit, spillage or dumping of the following materials: Waste Disposal (Questions As Of January 1 2009) - Waste Products From Photographic Developing Or Finishing Laboratories; Asphalt Tar Manufacturing; Boilers, Incinerators Or Other Thermal Facilities (Eg. Ash); Appliance, Small Equipment Or Engine Repair Or Salvage; Dry Cleaning Operations (Eg. Solvents); For From The Cleaning Or Repair Of Parts Of Boats, Ships, Barges, Automobiles Or Trucks, Including Sandblasting Grit Or Paint Scrapings? Yes

SW/220.0

929.9 / 1.53

Petrocanada Former W/S Keylock Facility 1412 W COBHAM AVENUE No Entry CRANBROOK BC

dd-SREG-802878034-bb p-802878034-y

SREG

7817 29-May-2002 Site ID: Registered: No File 22-Mar-2004 Victoria File No: Updated: 12-Mar-2004 Env Rmd ID: Detail Removed: 26250-20/7817 Regional File No: Common Name: V1C 4H3 Region: Postal Code: NOT ASSIGNED 49d 30m 14.4s Record Status: Latitude DMS: March 2020 115d 47m 19.8s Status as of: Longitude DMS: 49.504008 Cleanup Status: Latitude: Unranked 115.788839 Category: Longitude: LAT/LONG CONFIRMED USING GOAT BY MINISTRY STAFF (APPROXIMATE) Location Desc: 1412 W COBHAM AVENUE, CRANBROOK Addr (BC Data Catalogue): There are no Associated Sites for this site. Site Note:

erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services

Order No: 20200520096

Map Key

Number of Records

Direction/ Distance (m)

Elev/Diff (m)

Site

41225 CASE MANAGEMENT ITEM. Administrative 23-May-2002 23-May-2002 Cranbrook, Kootenay JENSEN, JIM Petrocanada Former W/S Keylock Facility. No Actions Entered

Petro-Canada Exploration Inc (Calgary)

Role:

RECEIVED BY

Jensen, Jim EMP

Start Date: End Date:

May-23-2002 Mar-31-2004

Start Date: End Date:

May-23-2002

Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes: Participants Role:

Main Ministry Contact

Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes:

Petro-Canada Exploration Inc (Calgary) ORG

Participants Role:

Responsible Person

Parcel Descriptions Date Added: LTO PID(s): Land Description: m-5-2003481-b

1 of 1

11/29/2002 Crown Land PIN#: 012-861-871 Crown Land File#: LOT 3 DISTRICT LOT 30 KOOTENAY DISTRICT PLAN 10904EXCEPT PART INCLUDED IN PLAN 14393

E/234.8

923.5 / -4.88

Joseph'S Prairie Grocery Property 367 VAN HORNE STREET SOUTH No Entry CRANBROOK BC

dd-SREG-2003481-bb p-2003481-y

SREG

21-May-1998 Registered: 24-May-2006 Updated: 19-May-2006 Detail Removed: 26250-20/4894 Common Name: No Entry Postal Code: NOT ASSIGNED 49d 30m 20.5s Latitude DMS: March 2020 115d 47m 03.4s Longitude DMS: 49.505683 Latitude: Small Site, Simple Contamination 115.784278 Longitude: 2 SEPARATE ADJACENT PROPERTIES ON THE W SIDE OF VAN HORNE ST S. LAT/LONG DERIVED FROM NAD 83. 367 VAN HORNE STREET SOUTH, CRANBROOK Addr (BC Data Catalogue): There are no Associated Sites for this site. Site Note: Site ID: Victoria File No: Env Rmd ID: Regional File No: Region: Record Status: Status as of: Cleanup Status: Category: Location Desc:

4894 26250-20/4894

Registry Notations Event ID: Notation Type and Act: Initiated Date: Approved Date: Region:

42549 MONITORING REPORT SUBMITTED. Administrative 01-Nov-2002 01-Nov-2002 Cranbrook, Kootenay

erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services

Order No: 20200520096

Map Key

Number of Records

Ministry Contact: Notation Notes: Required Actions: Requirement Due Date: Requirement Received Date:

Direction/ Distance (m)

Elev/Diff (m)

Site

JENSEN, JIM Environmental Assessment & Remediation 592 Celia Road, Cranbrook, Bc V1c 6v9. Interim Report Of The Environmental Remediation Of The Joseph'S Prairie Grocery Property 367 Van Horne St S, Cranbrook, Bc No Actions Entered

Participant:

Landmark Consulting (Cranbrook)

Role:

ISSUED BY

Participant:

Niagara Holdings Ltd (Calgary)

Role:

REQUESTED BY

Participant:

Jensen, Jim

Role:

REVIEWED BY

Registry Notations Event ID: Notation Type and Act: Initiated Date: Approved Date: Region: Ministry Contact: Notation Notes: Required Actions: Requirement Due Date: Requirement Received Date:

39643 SITE INVESTIGATION REQUESTED. Administrative 20-Aug-2001 20-Aug-2001 Cranbrook, Kootenay JENSEN, JIM Letter From Bc Environment Requesting Follow-Up Report. No Actions Entered

Participant:

Niagara Holdings Ltd (Calgary)

Role:

RECEIVED BY

Participant:

Murdoch, Wendy R (Cranbrook)

Role:

ISSUED BY

Registry Notations Event ID: Notation Type and Act: Initiated Date: Approved Date: Region: Ministry Contact: Notation Notes: Required Actions: Requirement Due Date: Requirement Received Date:

27250 PRELIMINARY SITE INVESTIGATION REPORT: INTERNAL REVIEW REQUESTED. Waste Management Act: Contaminated Sites Notations 01-Sep-1996 25-Sep-1997 Cranbrook, Kootenay JENSEN, JIM Environmental Site Assessment Of The Joseph'S Prairie Grocery Property, 367 Van Horne Street South, Cranbrook, Bc. No Actions Entered

Participant:

Niagara Holdings Ltd (Calgary)

Role:

REQUESTED BY

Participant:

Landmark Consulting (Cranbrook)

Role:

ISSUED BY

Participant:

Jensen, Jim

Role:

REVIEWED BY

Jensen, Jim EMP

Start Date: End Date:

Sep-01-1996 Mar-31-2004

Start Date: End Date:

Sep-01-1996

Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes: Participants Role:

Main Ministry Contact

Site Participants Participant: Participation Type:

Landmark Consulting (Cranbrook) ORG

erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services

Order No: 20200520096

Map Key

Number of Records

Direction/ Distance (m)

Elev/Diff (m)

Notes:

NORM DAKIN

Participants Role:

Environmental Consultant/Contractor

Site

Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes:

Niagara Holdings Ltd (Calgary) ORG

Start Date: End Date:

Sep-01-1996

Start Date: End Date:

Sep-01-1996

Start Date:

Oct-10-1996

Property Owner

Participants Role: Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes:

Joseph'S Prairie Grocery (Cranbrook) ORG

Operator

Participants Role: Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes:

Asl Analytical Services Laboratories Ltd. (Vancouver) ORG

End Date:

Analytical Lab

Participants Role: Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes:

Murdoch, Wendy R (Cranbrook) EMP

Participants Role:

Start Date: End Date:

Aug-20-2001

Alternate Ministry Contact

Documents on File Document or Report Title: Authored Date: Submitted Date:

Interim Report Of The Environmental Remediation Of The Joseph'S Prairie Grocery Property 367 Van Horne St. South Cranbrook, Bc 01-Nov-2002 01-Nov-2002

Document Entry Notes: Nothing Noted

Participant and Role:

Jensen, Jim - Reviewer

Participant and Role:

Landmark Consulting (Cranbrook) - Author

Participant and Role:

Niagara Holdings Ltd (Calgary) - Commissioner

Documents on File Document or Report Title: Authored Date: Submitted Date:

Environmental Site Assessment Of The Joseph'S Prairie Grocery Property 25-Sep-1997 26-Nov-1997

erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services

Order No: 20200520096

Map Key

Number of Records

Direction/ Distance (m)

Elev/Diff (m)

Site

Document Entry Notes: Nothing Noted

Participant and Role:

Landmark Consulting (Cranbrook) - Author

Participant and Role:

Jensen, Jim - Reviewer

Participant and Role:

Niagara Holdings Ltd (Calgary) - Commissioner

Suspected Land Use - Notes Petro. Prod., /Produce Water Strg Abvegrnd/Undergrnd Tank No Entry

Land Use Description: Notes: Suspected Land Use - Notes

Petro. Prod., Dispense Facility, Inc. Serv Sta./Cardlot No Entry

Land Use Description: Notes: Parcel Descriptions Date Added: LTO PID(s): Land Description:

m-6-803364484-b

3/2/1998 Crown Land PIN#: 008-158-789 Crown Land File#: PARCEL 2 (REFERENCE PLAN 18588I) LOT 208 DISTRICT LOT 30 KOOTENAY DISTRICTPLAN 887 EXCEPT (1) PARCEL A (EXPLANATORY PLAN 34536I) OF PARCEL B AND(2) PART INCLUDED IN PLAN 18141

1 of 1

NE/265.0

925.8 / -2.61

1125 Cobham Avenue West, Cranbrook 1125 COBHAM AVENUE WEST No Entry CRANBROOK BC

dd-SREG-803364484-bb p-803364484-y

SREG

28-Aug-2009 Registered: 23-Oct-2009 Updated: 19-Oct-2009 Detail Removed: No File Common Name: V1C 6T3 Postal Code: NOT ASSIGNED 49d 30m 25.0s Latitude DMS: March 2020 115d 47m 09.0s Longitude DMS: 49.506944 Latitude: Not Applicable 115.785833 Longitude: SITE CREATED BY SITE PROFILE, ENTERED 2009-08-26. LAT/LONG VERIFIED USING GOOGLE EARTH 2009-08-26. 1125 COBHAM AVENUE WEST, CRANBROOK Addr (BC Data Catalogue): There are no Associated Sites for this site. Site Note: Site ID: Victoria File No: Env Rmd ID: Regional File No: Region: Record Status: Status as of: Cleanup Status: Category: Location Desc:

11796 26250-20/11796

55472 SITE INVESTIGATION REPORT SUBMITTED. Administrative 15-Sep-2009 15-Sep-2009 Cranbrook, Kootenay O'GRADY, TYLER Investigation Report Submitted In Support Of Development Permit Release No Actions Entered

Snc-Lavalin Environment Inc. (Cranbrook)

erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services

Role:

SUBMITTED BY

Order No: 20200520096

Map Key

Number of Records

Direction/ Distance (m)

Elev/Diff (m)

Site

Registry Notations Event ID: Notation Type and Act: Initiated Date: Approved Date: Region: Ministry Contact: Notation Notes: Required Actions: Requirement Due Date: Requirement Received Date:

55267 SITE PROFILE REVIEWED - FURTHER INVESTIGATION REQUIRED BY THE MINISTRY. Environmental Management Act: General 26-Aug-2009 No Entry Cranbrook, Kootenay HANEMAYER, VINCENT (SURREY) C 2009-10-15: Release Of The Development Permit Granted Because In The Opinion Of The Director The Site Does Not Pose A Significant Risk. Preliminary Site Investigation Required.

55151 SITE PROFILE RECEIVED. Environmental Management Act: General 20-Aug-2009 No Entry Cranbrook, Kootenay HANEMAYER, VINCENT (SURREY) C Notation Generated In Site Profile On 2009-08-26 By Tyogrady No Actions Entered

Rocky Mountain Diesel Ltd

Role:

SITE PROFILE SUBMITTED BY

Hanemayer, Vincent (Surrey) C EMP

Start Date: End Date:

Aug-20-2009

Start Date: End Date:

Aug-20-2009

Start Date: End Date:

Dec-10-2008

Start Date: End Date:

Dec-10-2008

Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes: Participants Role:

Main Ministry Contact

Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes: Participants Role:

O'Grady, Tyler EMP

Alternate Ministry Contact

Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes:

Rocky Mountain Diesel Ltd ORG

Participants Role:

Property Owner

Participants Role:

Site Profile Completor

Participants Role:

Site Profile Contact

Site Participants Participant: Participation Type:

Snc-Lavalin Environment Inc. (Cranbrook) ORG

erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services

Order No: 20200520096

Map Key

Number of Records

Direction/ Distance (m)

Elev/Diff (m)

Site

Notes: Environmental Consultant/Contractor

Participants Role: Documents on File Document or Report Title: Authored Date: Submitted Date:

Phase One And Two Environmental Site Assessment - 1125 Cobham Avenue West, Cranbrook, Bc 10-Dec-2008 15-Sep-2009

Document Entry Notes: Site Investigation Report Submitted In Support Of A Release Of A Pending Development Permit In 2009.

Participant and Role:

Rocky Mountain Diesel Ltd - Commissioner

Participant and Role:

Snc-Lavalin Environment Inc. (Cranbrook) - Author

Documents on File Document or Report Title: Authored Date: Submitted Date:

Limited Soil Assessment During Building Footprint Investigation - 1125 Cobham Avenue West, Cranbrook, Bc 07-Oct-2009 08-Oct-2009

Document Entry Notes: Investigation Report Submitted To Supplement Previous Report For Development Permit Release.

Participant and Role:

Rocky Mountain Diesel Ltd - Commissioner

Participant and Role:

Snc-Lavalin Environment Inc. (Cranbrook) - Author

Suspected Land Use - Notes Auto/Truck/Bus/Subway/Other Vehicle Repair/Salvage/Wrecking Inserted For Site Profile Dated 2009-08-05

Land Use Description: Notes: Parcel Descriptions Date Added: LTO PID(s): Land Description:

8/5/2009 Crown Land PIN#: 019-208-961 Crown Land File#: LOT 1 DISTRICT LOT 30 KOOTENAY DISTRICT PLAN NEP22174

Aug-26-2009 Aug-05-2009 Aug-26-2009 Aug-20-2009 Aug-05-2009 Yes City Of Cranbrook Aug-15-2009 No Comment

Site Profile Note All Questions

erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services

Order No: 20200520096

Map Key

Number of Records

Direction/ Distance (m)

Elev/Diff (m)

Site

All Questions: AREAS OF POTENTIAL CONCERN - Petroleum, Solvent Or Other Polluting Substance Spills To The Environment Greater Than 100 Litres? - Residue Left After Removal Of Piled Materials Such As Chemicals, Coal, Ore, Smelter Slag, Air Quality Control System Baghouse Dust? - Discarded Barrels, Drums Or Tanks? - Contamination Resulting From Migration Of Substances From Other Properties? FILL MATERIALS - Fill Dirt, Soil, Gravel, Sand Or Like Materials From A Contaminated Site Or From A Source Used For Any Of The Activities Listed Under Schedule 2? - Discarded Or Waste Granular Materials Such As Sand Blasting Grit, Asphalt Paving Or Roofing Material, Spent Foundry Casting Sands, Mine Ore, Waste Rock Or Float? - Dredged Sediments, Or Sediments And Debris Materials Originating From Locations Adjacent To Foreshore Industrial Activities, Or Municipal Sanitary Or Stormwater Discharges? WASTE DISPOSAL - Materials Such As Household Garbage, Mixed Municipal Refuse, Or Demolition Debris? - Waste Or Byproducts Such As Tank Bottoms, Residues, Sludge, Or Flocculation Precipitates From Industrial Processes Or Wastewater Treatment? - Waste Products From Smelting Or Mining Activities, Such As Smelter Slag, Mine Tailings, Or Cull Materials From Coal Processing? - Waste Products From Natural Gas And Oil Well Drilling Activities, Such As Drilling Fluids And Muds? - Waste Products From Photographic Developing Or Finishing Laboratories; Asphalt Tar Manufacturing; Boilers, Incinerators Or Other Thermal Facilities (Eg. Ash); Appliance, Small Equipment Or Engine Repair Or Salvage; Dry Cleaning Operations (Eg. Solvents); For From The Cleaning Or Repair Of Parts Of Boats, Ships, Barges, Automobiles Or Trucks, Including Sandblasting Grit Or Paint Scrapings? *[1] *[1] Note prior to 2009, question 5 was worded as follows: "Waste Products From Photographic Developing Or Finishing Laboratories; Asphalt Tar Manufacturing; Boilers, Incinerators Or Other Thermal Facilities (Eg. Ash); Appliance, Small Equipment Or Engine Repair Or Salvage; Dry Cleaning Operations (Eg. Solvents); Or Automobile And Truck Parts Cleaning Or Repair?" TANKS OR CONTAINERS USED OR STORED, OTHER THAN TANKS USED FOR RESIDENTIAL HEATING FUEL*[2] - Underground Fuel Or Chemical Storage Tanks Other Than Storage Tanks For Compressed Gases? *[2A] - Above Ground Fuel Or Chemical Storage Tanks Other Than Storage Tanks For Compressed Gases? *[2B] *[2] Note prior to 2009, this section was referred to "Tanks Or Containers Used Or Stored". *[2A] Note prior to 2009, question 1 was worded as follows: "Underground Fuel Or Chemical Storage Tanks?" *[2B] Note prior to 2009, question 2 was worded as follows: "Above Ground Fuel Or Chemical Storage Tanks? " HAZARDOUS WASTES OR HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES *[3] - Pcb-Containing Electrical Transformers Or Capacitors Either At Grade, Attached Above Ground To Poles, Located Within Buildings, Or Stored? - Waste Asbestos Or Asbestos Containing Materials Such As Pipe Wrapping, Blown-In Insulation Or Panelling Buried? - Paints, Solvents, Mineral Spirits Or Waste Pest Control Products Or Pest Control Product Containers Stored In Volumes Greater Than 205 Litres? *[3] Note, prior to 2009, this section was referred to "Special (Hazardous) Wastes Or Substances". LEGAL OR REGULATORY ACTIONS OR CONSTRAINTS - Government Orders Or Other Notifications Pertaining To Environmental Conditions Or Quality Of Soil, Water, Groundwater Or Other Environmental Media? - Liens To Recover Costs, Restrictive Covenants On Land Use, Or Other Charges Or Encumbrances, Stemming From Contaminants Or Wastes Remaining Onsite Or From Other Environmental Conditions? - Government Notifications Relating To Past Or Recurring Environmental Violations At The Site Or Any Facility Located On The Site?

Site Profile Note - Questions Category Precursor:

Are there currently or to the best of your knowledge have there been previously on the site any:

erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services

Order No: 20200520096

Map Key

Number of Records

Elev/Diff (m)

Site

Tanks Or Containers Used Or Stored, Other Than Tanks Used For Residential Heating Fuel - Above Ground Fuel Or Chemical Storage Tanks Other Than Storage Tanks For Compressed Gases? Yes

Category and Question:

m-7-801657556-b

Direction/ Distance (m)

1 of 2

SSW/328.7

927.3 / -1.11

Former Chevron Cardlock Cranbrook 498 VAN HORNE STREET AND 145 WATTSVILLE ROAD SOUTH No Entry CRANBROOK BC

dd-SREG-801657556-bb p-801657556-y

SREG

7810 29-May-2002 Site ID: Registered: 26250-20/7810 23-Aug-2019 Victoria File No: Updated: 23-Aug-2019 Env Rmd ID: Detail Removed: 26250-20/7810 Regional File No: Common Name: No Entry Region: Postal Code: NOT ASSIGNED 49d 30m 09.0s Record Status: Latitude DMS: March 2020 115d 47m 20.3s Status as of: Longitude DMS: 49.502500 Cleanup Status: Latitude: Unranked 115.788972 Category: Longitude: LOCATION CONFIRMED USING GOOGLE MAPS ON 13 FEBRUARY, 2019 Location Desc: 498 VAN HORNE STREET AND 145 WATTSVILLE ROAD SOUTH, CRANBROOK Addr (BC Data Catalogue): Site Note: Registry Notations Event ID: Notation Type and Act: Initiated Date: Approved Date: Region: Ministry Contact: Notation Notes: Required Actions: Requirement Due Date: Requirement Received Date:

94976 NOTICE OF INDEPENDENT REMEDIATION INITIATION SUBMITTED. Environmental Management Act: General 21-Aug-2019 21-Aug-2019 Cranbrook, Kootenay FREDERICK, PABLO Start: 2019-09-23 Commercial: Neighbouring Source No Actions Entered

Slr Consulting (Canad) Ltd.

Participant:

Role:

SUBMITTED BY

Registry Notations Event ID: Notation Type and Act: Initiated Date: Approved Date: Region: Ministry Contact: Notation Notes: Required Actions: Requirement Due Date: Requirement Received Date:

94762 SITE PROFILE REVIEWED - FURTHER INVESTIGATION REQUIRED BY THE MINISTRY. Environmental Management Act: General 06-Aug-2019 06-Aug-2019 Cranbrook, Kootenay HANEMAYER, VINCENT (SURREY) C 2019-08-23 Development Permit Application Released Under Scenario 2. Site Investigation Must Be Completed Following The Development Permit Application (Required For Remedial Excavations). Detailed Site Investigation

Registry Notations Event ID: Notation Type and Act: Initiated Date: Approved Date: Region: Ministry Contact: Notation Notes: Required Actions: Requirement Due Date:

94761 SITE PROFILE RECEIVED. Environmental Management Act: General 25-Jul-2019 No Entry Cranbrook, Kootenay HANEMAYER, VINCENT (SURREY) C Notation Generated In Site Profile On 2019-08-01 By Cdelaney No Actions Entered

erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services

Order No: 20200520096

Map Key

Number of Records

Direction/ Distance (m)

Elev/Diff (m)

Site

Requirement Received Date: Slr Consulting (Canada) Ltd.

Participant:

Role:

SITE PROFILE SUBMITTED BY

Registry Notations Event ID: Notation Type and Act: Initiated Date: Approved Date: Region: Ministry Contact: Notation Notes: Required Actions: Requirement Due Date: Requirement Received Date:

92492 SITE RISK CLASSIFIED - AFFECTED SITE IS HIGH RISK. Environmental Management Act: General 14-Feb-2019 14-Feb-2019 Cranbrook, Kootenay SORENSEN, INGRID Site Risk Classification Report Submitted With Monitoring Report. No Actions Entered

Participant:

Dankevy, Stephen (Surrey) Neil

Role:

RECEIVED BY

Participant:

Sorensen, Ingrid

Role:

REVIEWED BY

Participant:

Slr Consulting (Canad) Ltd.

Role:

SUBMITTED BY

Registry Notations Event ID: Notation Type and Act: Initiated Date: Approved Date: Region: Ministry Contact: Notation Notes:

Required Actions: Requirement Due Date: Requirement Received Date:

93858 MONITORING REPORT SUBMITTED. Administrative 19-Dec-2018 19-Dec-2018 Cranbrook, Kootenay SORENSEN, INGRID 2017 - 2018 Upland Groundwater And Jim Smith Creek Porewater & Surface Water Sampling Results, 498 Van Horne Street And 145 Wattsville Road, Cranbrook, Bc Env Victoria File: 26250-20 / 7810 Pid: 018-495-923 No Actions Entered

Participant:

Slr Consulting (Canad) Ltd.

Role:

SUBMITTED BY

Participant:

Sorensen, Ingrid

Role:

REVIEWED BY

Registry Notations Event ID: Notation Type and Act: Initiated Date: Approved Date: Region: Ministry Contact: Notation Notes:

Required Actions: Requirement Due Date: Requirement Received Date:

92490 REQUIREMENT(S) IMPOSED UNDER EMA SECTION 54(3)(D). Environmental Management Act: General 08-May-2017 08-May-2017 Cranbrook, Kootenay SORENSEN, INGRID Monitoring Report In Response To Env Letters Of February, April And May Of 2017 Identifying Data Gap: Report Jim Smith Creek Remediation Plan, 145 Wattsville Road South, Cranbrook, Bc Env Victoria File: 26250-20 / 7810 Pid: 018-495-923 No Actions Entered

Participant:

Parkland Refining (Bc) Ltd.

Role:

RECEIVED BY

Participant:

Slr Consulting (Canada) Limited

Role:

SUBMITTED BY

erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services

Order No: 20200520096

Map Key

Number of Records

Direction/ Distance (m)

Elev/Diff (m)

Site

Participant:

Sorensen, Ingrid

Role:

REVIEWED BY

Participant:

Dankevy, Stephen (Surrey) Neil

Role:

RECEIVED BY

Registry Notations Event ID: Notation Type and Act: Initiated Date: Approved Date: Region: Ministry Contact: Notation Notes: Required Actions: Requirement Due Date: Requirement Received Date:

93488 REQUIREMENT(S) IMPOSED UNDER EMA SECTION 54(3)(D). Environmental Management Act: General 09-Dec-2015 09-Dec-2015 Cranbrook, Kootenay DANKEVY, STEPHEN (SURREY) NEIL Site Acquired By Parkland Refining (Bc) In October 2017. Hhera Submitted To Env April 29, 2016 No Actions Entered

Participant:

Dankevy, Stephen (Surrey) Neil

Role:

REVIEWED BY

Participant:

Parkland Refining (Bc) Ltd.

Role:

RECEIVED BY

Participant:

Slr Consulting (Canad) Ltd.

Role:

SUBMITTED BY

Registry Notations Event ID: Notation Type and Act: Initiated Date: Approved Date: Region: Ministry Contact: Notation Notes: Required Actions: Requirement Due Date: Requirement Received Date:

79909 REQUIREMENT(S) IMPOSED UNDER EMA SECTION 54(3)(D). Environmental Management Act: General 09-Dec-2015 09-Dec-2015 Cranbrook, Kootenay DANKEVY, STEPHEN (SURREY) NEIL Hhera Submitted In April 2016, Update Report With Results Of The 2016 Porewater And Groundwater Sampling Results Submitted In November 2016 Submission Of Remediation Plan Report With Detailed Risk Assessment

Registry Notations Event ID: Notation Type and Act: Initiated Date: Approved Date: Region: Ministry Contact: Notation Notes: Required Actions:

76794 REQUIREMENT(S) IMPOSED UNDER EMA SECTION 54(3)(D). Environmental Management Act: General 24-Mar-2015 24-Mar-2015 Cranbrook, Kootenay DANKEVY, STEPHEN (SURREY) NEIL No Notes Entered If The Rationale For Completing Tasks 4 And 6 According To The Schedule Contained In Table 1 In The Above Referenced Slr Report Is Found To Be Acceptable, Then These Tasks Should Be Undertaken As Planned. Furthermore, An Interpretation Of Current And Cumulative Results From The Site Investigation Program, Including Groundwater, Surface Water, Soil, Sediment, Vapour, Ecological And Habitat Assessments, Etc., Should Be Submitted Along With A Final Remediation Plan In A Report By November 1st, 2015;

Requirement Due Date: Requirement Received Date: Registry Notations Event ID: Notation Type and Act: Initiated Date: Approved Date: Region: Ministry Contact: Notation Notes:

76793 REQUIREMENT(S) IMPOSED UNDER EMA SECTION 54(3)(D). Environmental Management Act: General 24-Mar-2015 24-Mar-2015 Cranbrook, Kootenay DANKEVY, STEPHEN (SURREY) NEIL No Notes Entered

erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services

Order No: 20200520096

Map Key

Number of Records

Direction/ Distance (m)

Elev/Diff (m)

Site

Submit A Report Signed By An Approved Professional To The Director For Review By July 31st, 2015. The Report Shall Include The Following:

Required Actions:

A. A Summary Of Investigation Of Groundwater/Sediment Activities Completed To Delineate The Contamination Identified And Assessment Resulting From Completion Of Tasks 1, 2, 3 And 5 Specified In Table 1 Of The Above Referenced Slr Report; B. Assessment Of Overall Investigation Findings And Remediation Progress; C. Supporting Documentation (E.G. Analytical Reports, Tables And Figures, Records Of Inspection, Maintenance Of Treatment Works, Etc.); And D. If Tasks 4 And 6 Are Required To Be Completed Concurrently With The Other Tasks Then The Findings Of These Investigations And A Final Remediation Plan Shall Be Included In The July 31, 2015 Report Submitted To The Ministry. Requirement Due Date: Requirement Received Date: Registry Notations 76791 REQUIREMENT(S) IMPOSED UNDER EMA SECTION 54(3)(D). Environmental Management Act: General 24-Mar-2015 24-Mar-2015 Cranbrook, Kootenay DANKEVY, STEPHEN (SURREY) NEIL No Notes Entered Provide Rationale For Delaying Implementation Of Tasks 4 And 6 To The Summer And Fall As Specified In Table 1 Of The Above Referenced Slr Report. This Rationale Must Be Provided By April 15th, 2015;

Event ID: Notation Type and Act: Initiated Date: Approved Date: Region: Ministry Contact: Notation Notes: Required Actions: Requirement Due Date: Requirement Received Date: Registry Notations Event ID: Notation Type and Act: Initiated Date: Approved Date: Region: Ministry Contact: Notation Notes: Required Actions: Requirement Due Date: Requirement Received Date:

75683 NOTIFICATION RECEIVED ABOUT LIKELY OR ACTUAL SUBSTANCE MIGRATION TO NEIGHBOURING SITE. Environmental Management Act: General 18-Dec-2014 18-Dec-2014 Cranbrook, Kootenay O'GRADY, TYLER Affected Parcel Is Jim Smith Creek (Owned By The Crown). Site 17494. No Actions Entered

Participant:

Ministry Of Forests, Lands And Natural Resource Operations

Role:

RECEIVED BY

Participant:

Slr Consulting (Canada) Ltd

Role:

SUBMITTED BY

75681 SITE RISK CLASSIFIED - SITE IS HIGH RISK. Environmental Management Act: General 18-Dec-2014 18-Dec-2014 Cranbrook, Kootenay O'GRADY, TYLER Site Risk Classification Is For A Portion Of The Site. High Risk Area Of The Site Is The Former Water Park Parcel Located At 145 Wattsville Road South (Pid: 018-495-923). No Actions Entered

Slr Consulting (Canada) Ltd

erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services

Role:

SUBMITTED BY

Order No: 20200520096

Map Key

Number of Records

Direction/ Distance (m)

Elev/Diff (m)

Site

Registry Notations Event ID: Notation Type and Act: Initiated Date: Approved Date: Region: Ministry Contact: Notation Notes: Required Actions: Requirement Due Date: Requirement Received Date:

75682 SITE RISK CLASSIFIED - AFFECTED SITE IS HIGH RISK. Environmental Management Act: General 18-Dec-2014 18-Dec-2014 Cranbrook, Kootenay O'GRADY, TYLER Affected Parcel Is Jim Smith Creek (Owned By The Crown). Site 17494. No Actions Entered

Slr Consulting (Canada) Ltd

Participant:

Role:

SUBMITTED BY

Registry Notations Event ID: Notation Type and Act: Initiated Date: Approved Date: Region: Ministry Contact: Notation Notes: Required Actions: Requirement Due Date: Requirement Received Date:

75312 NOTIFICATION RECEIVED ABOUT LIKELY OR ACTUAL SUBSTANCE MIGRATION TO NEIGHBOURING SITE. Environmental Management Act: General 24-Nov-2014 24-Nov-2014 Cranbrook, Kootenay SAMWAYS, JENNIFER Affected Roadway Is A Portion Of Wattsville Road Adjacent To 498 Van Horne Street, Cranbrook. Site 17402. No Actions Entered

Slr Consulting (Canada) Ltd

Participant:

Role:

SUBMITTED BY

Registry Notations Event ID: Notation Type and Act: Initiated Date: Approved Date: Region: Ministry Contact: Notation Notes: Required Actions: Requirement Due Date: Requirement Received Date:

75429 SITE RISK CLASSIFIED - SITE IS NON-HIGH RISK. Environmental Management Act: General 19-Nov-2014 19-Nov-2014 Cranbrook, Kootenay O'GRADY, TYLER Site Risk Classification Is For A Portion Of The Site. Non-High Risk Area Is The Chevron Cardlock Parcel Located At 498 Van Horne Street (Pid: 013-221-311). No Actions Entered

Slr Consulting (Canada) Ltd

Participant:

Role:

SUBMITTED BY

75430 SITE RISK CLASSIFIED - AFFECTED SITE IS NON-HIGH RISK. Environmental Management Act: General 19-Nov-2014 19-Nov-2014 Cranbrook, Kootenay O'GRADY, TYLER Affected Roadway Is A Portion Of Wattsville Road Adjacent To 498 Van Horne Street, Cranbrook. Site 17402. No Actions Entered

Slr Consulting (Canada) Ltd

erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services

Role:

SUBMITTED BY

Order No: 20200520096

Map Key

Number of Records

Direction/ Distance (m)

Elev/Diff (m)

Site

Registry Notations Event ID: Notation Type and Act: Initiated Date: Approved Date: Region: Ministry Contact: Notation Notes: Required Actions: Requirement Due Date: Requirement Received Date:

46443 CASE MANAGEMENT ITEM. Administrative 09-Sep-2004 09-Sep-2004 Cranbrook, Kootenay MURDOCH, WENDY R (CRANBROOK) Request For Update On Site Investigation And Remediation Sent By Kerri Dundas. Followed Up By Wendy Murdoch No Actions Entered

Dundas, Kerri (Surrey) L

Participant:

Role:

ISSUED BY

Registry Notations Event ID: Notation Type and Act: Initiated Date: Approved Date: Region: Ministry Contact: Notation Notes: Required Actions: Requirement Due Date: Requirement Received Date:

41340 SITE PROFILE - NO FURTHER INVESTIGATION REQUIRED BY THE MINISTRY. Waste Management Act: Contaminated Sites Notations 28-May-2002 No Entry Cranbrook, Kootenay JENSEN, JIM Auto Inserted From Site Profile No Actions Entered

Registry Notations Event ID: Notation Type and Act: Initiated Date: Approved Date: Region: Ministry Contact: Notation Notes: Required Actions: Requirement Due Date: Requirement Received Date:

41200 SITE PROFILE RECEIVED. Waste Management Act: Contaminated Sites Notations 16-May-2002 No Entry Cranbrook, Kootenay JENSEN, JIM Notation Generated In Site Profile On 2002-05-17 By Lhagel No Actions Entered

Chevron Canada Limited (Vancouver)

Participant:

Role:

SITE PROFILE SUBMITTED BY

Registry Notations Event ID: Notation Type and Act: Initiated Date: Approved Date: Region: Ministry Contact: Notation Notes: Required Actions: Requirement Due Date: Requirement Received Date:

41341 NOTICE OF INDEPENDENT REMEDIATION INITIATION SUBMITTED (WMA 28(2)). Waste Management Act: Contaminated Sites Notations 30-Apr-2002 01-May-2002 Cranbrook, Kootenay JENSEN, JIM No Notes Entered The Degree And Extent Of Remediation To Be Completed At The Site Is Unknown To The Ministry.

Participant:

Chevron Canada Limited (Vancouver)

Role:

ISSUED BY

Participant:

Jensen, Jim

Role:

RECEIVED BY

erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services

Order No: 20200520096

Map Key

Number of Records

Direction/ Distance (m)

Elev/Diff (m)

Site

Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes: Participants Role:

Murdoch, Wendy R (Cranbrook) EMP

Start Date: End Date:

Jul-10-2003

Start Date: End Date:

Apr-30-2002

Start Date: End Date:

Mar-24-2015

Start Date: End Date:

Jul-25-2019

Start Date: End Date:

Apr-30-2002 Mar-31-2004

Start Date: End Date:

Apr-04-2003

Start Date: End Date:

Nov-19-2014

Main Ministry Contact

Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes:

Chevron Canada Limited (Vancouver) ORG

Participants Role:

Property Owner

Participants Role:

Site Profile Completor

Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes: Participants Role:

Dankevy, Stephen (Surrey) Neil EMP

Ministry Contact

Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes: Participants Role:

Parkland Refining (Bc) Ltd ORG

Property Owner

Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes: Participants Role:

Jensen, Jim EMP

Alternate Ministry Contact

Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes: Participants Role:

Chevron Canada Limited (Head Office For Bc) ORG

Property Owner

Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes: Participants Role:

O'Grady, Tyler EMP

Ministry Contact

Site Participants

erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services

Order No: 20200520096

Map Key

Number of Records

Participant: Participation Type: Notes: Participants Role:

Direction/ Distance (m)

Elev/Diff (m)

Linke, Jeff PER

Site

Start Date: End Date:

May-16-2002

Start Date:

Apr-04-2003

Site Profile Contact

Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes: Participants Role:

Seacor Environmental Engineering Inc (Calgary) ORG

End Date:

Environmental Consultant/Contractor

Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes: Participants Role:

Dundas, Kerri (Surrey) L EMP

Start Date: End Date:

Sep-09-2004

Start Date: End Date:

Nov-24-2014

Start Date: End Date:

Jul-25-2019

Start Date: End Date:

May-21-2019

Start Date:

Dec-18-2014

Alternate Ministry Contact

Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes: Participants Role:

Site Information Advisor EMP

Ministry Contact

Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes: Participants Role:

Hanemayer, Vincent (Surrey) C EMP

Ministry Contact

Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes: Participants Role:

Ministry Of Environment ORG

Document Participant (Do Not Use)

Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes: Participants Role:

Ministry Of Forests, Lands And Natural Resource Operations ORG

End Date:

Alternate Ministry Contact

Site Participants Participant: Participation Type:

Slr Consulting (Canada) Limited ORG

erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services

Start Date: End Date:

Jan-23-2019

Order No: 20200520096

Map Key

Number of Records

Direction/ Distance (m)

Elev/Diff (m)

Site

Notes: Participants Role:

Notation Participant (Do Not Use)

Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes: Participants Role:

Slr Consulting (Canada) Ltd ORG

Start Date: End Date:

Nov-19-2014

Start Date: End Date:

May-21-2019

Start Date: End Date:

Jul-25-2019

Start Date: End Date:

Aug-21-2019

Start Date: End Date:

Nov-30-2016

Start Date: End Date:

May-08-2017

Start Date: End Date:

Jul-25-2019

Environmental Consultant/Contractor

Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes: Participants Role:

Yan, Peter EMP

Notation Participant (Do Not Use)

Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes:

Slr Consulting (Canada) Ltd. ORG

Participants Role:

Site Profile Contact

Participants Role:

Site Profile Completor

Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes: Participants Role:

Frederick, Pablo EMP

Ministry Contact

Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes: Participants Role:

Slr Consulting (Canada) Ltd. ORG

Environmental Consultant/Contractor

Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes: Participants Role:

Sorensen, Ingrid EMP

Notation Participant (Do Not Use)

Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes:

Delaney, Colleen EMP

erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services

Order No: 20200520096

Map Key

Number of Records

Direction/ Distance (m)

Elev/Diff (m)

Site

Alternate Ministry Contact

Participants Role: Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes:

Hagel, Lynn (Cranbrook) J EMP

Start Date: End Date:

May-16-2002 Feb-28-2003

Start Date: End Date:

Dec-09-2015

Start Date: End Date:

May-08-2017

Start Date: End Date:

Dec-09-2015

Alternate Ministry Contact

Participants Role: Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes:

Slr Consulting (Canad) Ltd. ORG

Document Participant (Do Not Use)

Participants Role: Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes:

Fortin, Patricia EMP

Document Participant (Do Not Use)

Participants Role: Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes:

Parkland Refining (Bc) Ltd. ORG

Participants Role:

Notation Participant (Do Not Use)

Documents on File Document or Report Title: Authored Date: Submitted Date:

2017-2018 Upland Groundwater And Jim Smith Creek Porewater And Surface Water Sampling Results Monitoring Report, 498 Van Horne Street And 145 Wattsv 19-Dec-2018 23-Jan-2019

Document Entry Notes: Monitoring Report - Groundwater, Porewater And Surface Water Sampling Results 2017-2018. 2 Volumes - Second Volume = Appendices A To D

Participant and Role:

Dankevy, Stephen (Surrey) Neil - Reviewer

Participant and Role:

Sorensen, Ingrid - Reviewer

Participant and Role:

Slr Consulting (Canad) Ltd. - Author

Documents on File Document or Report Title: Authored Date: Submitted Date:

Re: High Risk Site Conditions - Reporting Requirements 21-May-2019 22-Aug-2019

Document Entry Notes: Nothing Noted

erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services

Order No: 20200520096

Map Key

Number of Records

Participant and Role:

Direction/ Distance (m)

Elev/Diff (m)

Site

Ministry Of Environment - Author

Documents on File Document or Report Title: Authored Date: Submitted Date:

Data Submission And Work Plan Chevron Canada Limited Cardlock 220, 498 Van Horne Street, Cranbrook, Bc 04-Apr-2003 01-May-2003

Document Entry Notes: Nothing Noted

Participant and Role:

Jensen, Jim - Recipient

Participant and Role:

Chevron Canada Limited (Head Office For Bc) - Commissioner

Participant and Role:

Seacor Environmental Engineering Inc (Calgary) - Author

Documents on File Document or Report Title: Authored Date: Submitted Date:

Groundwater Modelling Program, Chevron Cardlock Cl#220, Cranbrook Bc 10-Jul-2003 25-Jul-2003

Document Entry Notes: Nothing Noted

Participant and Role:

Seacor Environmental Engineering Inc (Calgary) - Author

Participant and Role:

Murdoch, Wendy R (Cranbrook) - Recipient

Participant and Role:

Chevron Canada Limited (Head Office For Bc) - Commissioner

Documents on File Document or Report Title: Authored Date: Submitted Date:

Preliminary And Detailed Site Investigation Chevron Canada Limited Cardlock 220, 498 Van Horne Street, Cranbrook, Bc 27-Oct-2003 18-Nov-2003

Document Entry Notes: Nothing Noted

Participant and Role:

Chevron Canada Limited (Head Office For Bc) - Commissioner

Participant and Role:

Seacor Environmental Engineering Inc (Calgary) - Author

Participant and Role:

Jensen, Jim - Recipient

Documents on File Document or Report Title: Authored Date: Submitted Date:

Jim Smith Creek Remediation Plan, 145 Wattsville Road South, Cranbrook, Bc. 02-Apr-2019 04-Apr-2019

Document Entry Notes:

erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services

Order No: 20200520096

Map Key

Number of Records

Direction/ Distance (m)

Elev/Diff (m)

Site

Application # 7810 In Cats

Participant and Role:

Slr Consulting (Canad) Ltd. - Author

Participant and Role:

Sorensen, Ingrid - Reviewer

Participant and Role:

Dankevy, Stephen (Surrey) Neil - Publishing Company

Documents on File Document or Report Title: Authored Date: Submitted Date:

2004 Environmental Site Works Chevron Cardlock No 220, 498 Van Horne Street, Cranbrook, Bc 02-Nov-2004 02-Nov-2004

Document Entry Notes: Nothing Noted

Participant and Role:

Dundas, Kerri (Surrey) L - Recipient

Participant and Role:

Chevron Canada Limited (Head Office For Bc) - Author

Documents on File Document or Report Title: Authored Date: Submitted Date:

2016 Porewater And Groundwater Sampling Results, 145 Wattsiville Road, Cranbrook, Bc, Moe Victoria File: 26250-20/7810 30-Nov-2016 06-Dec-2016

Document Entry Notes: Nothing Noted

Slr Consulting (Canada) Ltd. - Author

Participant and Role: Associated Sites Associated Site ID: Notes:

17402

Effective Date:

11/25/2014

Effective Date:

12/18/2014

SOURCE PARCEL 7810 AFFECTED PARCEL 17402

Associated Sites Associated Site ID: Notes:

17494 SOURCE PARCEL 7810 AFFECTED PARCEL 17494

Suspected Land Use - Notes Land Use Description: Notes:

Sites Which Have Possible Contamination From Other Property Inserted For Site Profile Dated 2019-07-25

Suspected Land Use - Notes Land Use Description: Notes:

Petro. Prod., Dispense Facility, Inc. Serv Sta./Cardlot Inserted For Site Profile Dated 2002-04-30

erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services

Order No: 20200520096

Map Key

Number of Records

Direction/ Distance (m)

Elev/Diff (m)

Site

Parcel Descriptions Date Added: LTO PID(s): Land Description:

12/18/2014 Crown Land PIN#: 018-495-923 Crown Land File#: LOT A DISTRICT LOT 30 KOOTENAY DISTRICT PLAN NEP20861

Parcel Descriptions Date Added: LTO PID(s): Land Description:

4/30/2002 Crown Land PIN#: 013-221-311 Crown Land File#: PARCEL A (SEE 127880I) OF LOT 3 DISTRICT LOT 30 KOOTENAY DISTRICT PLAN 2985EXCEPT PART INCLUDED IN SRW PLAN 18254

May-17-2002 Jul-25-2019 Aug-01-2019 Jul-25-2019 Jul-25-2019 Jul-25-2019 Aug-01-2019 Yes City Of Cranbrook Jul-25-2019 No Comment

Site Profile Note All Questions

erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services

Order No: 20200520096

Map Key

Number of Records

Direction/ Distance (m)

Elev/Diff (m)

Site

*[1] Note prior to 2009, question 5 was worded as follows: "Waste Products From Photographic Developing Or Finishing Laboratories; Asphalt Tar Manufacturing; Boilers, Incinerators Or Other Thermal Facilities (Eg. Ash); Appliance, Small Equipment Or Engine Repair Or Salvage; Dry Cleaning Operations (Eg. Solvents); Or Automobile And Truck Parts Cleaning Or Repair?" TANKS OR CONTAINERS USED OR STORED, OTHER THAN TANKS USED FOR RESIDENTIAL HEATING FUEL*[2] - Underground Fuel Or Chemical Storage Tanks Other Than Storage Tanks For Compressed Gases? *[2A] - Above Ground Fuel Or Chemical Storage Tanks Other Than Storage Tanks For Compressed Gases? *[2B] *[2] Note prior to 2009, this section was referred to "Tanks Or Containers Used Or Stored". *[2A] Note prior to 2009, question 1 was worded as follows: "Underground Fuel Or Chemical Storage Tanks?" *[2B] Note prior to 2009, question 2 was worded as follows: "Above Ground Fuel Or Chemical Storage Tanks? " HAZARDOUS WASTES OR HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES *[3] - Pcb-Containing Electrical Transformers Or Capacitors Either At Grade, Attached Above Ground To Poles, Located Within Buildings, Or Stored? - Waste Asbestos Or Asbestos Containing Materials Such As Pipe Wrapping, Blown-In Insulation Or Panelling Buried? - Paints, Solvents, Mineral Spirits Or Waste Pest Control Products Or Pest Control Product Containers Stored In Volumes Greater Than 205 Litres? *[3] Note, prior to 2009, this section was referred to "Special (Hazardous) Wastes Or Substances". LEGAL OR REGULATORY ACTIONS OR CONSTRAINTS - Government Orders Or Other Notifications Pertaining To Environmental Conditions Or Quality Of Soil, Water, Groundwater Or Other Environmental Media? - Liens To Recover Costs, Restrictive Covenants On Land Use, Or Other Charges Or Encumbrances, Stemming From Contaminants Or Wastes Remaining Onsite Or From Other Environmental Conditions? - Government Notifications Relating To Past Or Recurring Environmental Violations At The Site Or Any Facility Located On The Site?

Site Profile Note - Questions Category Precursor: Category and Question:

Is there currently or to the best of your knowledge has there previously been on the site any: Areas Of Potential Concern - Contamination Resulting From Migration Of Substances From Other Properties? Yes

Site Profile Note - Questions Category Precursor: Category and Question:

m-7-822538650-b

2 of 2

To the best of your knowledge are there currently any of the following pertaining to the site: Legal Or Regulatory Actions Or Constraints - Government Orders Or Other Notifications Pertaining To Environmental Conditions Or Quality Of Soil, Water, Groundwater Or Other Environmental Media? Yes

SSW/328.7

927.3 / -1.11

Wattsville Rd Adjt To 498 Van Horne WATTSVILLE ROAD ADJACENT TO 498 VAN HORNE STREET No Entry CRANBROOK BC

dd-SREG-822538650-bb p-822538650-y

SREG

17402 01-Dec-2014 Site ID: Registered: 26250-20/17402 11-Dec-2015 Victoria File No: Updated: 09-Dec-2015 Env Rmd ID: Detail Removed: No File Regional File No: Common Name: N/A Region: Postal Code: NOT ASSIGNED 49d 30m 07.9s Record Status: Latitude DMS: March 2020 115d 47m 20.9s Status as of: Longitude DMS: 49.502200 Cleanup Status: Latitude: 115.789139 Category: Longitude: LATS/LONGS PROVIDED BY CONSULTANT Location Desc: WATTSVILLE ROAD ADJACENT TO 498 VAN HORNE STREET, CRANBROOK Addr (BC Data Catalogue): There are no PIDs for this site. Site Note: Registry Notations Event ID: Notation Type and Act:

79910 SITE RISK CLASSIFIED - SITE IS HIGH RISK. Environmental Management Act: General

erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services

Order No: 20200520096

Map Key

Number of Records

Initiated Date: Approved Date: Region: Ministry Contact: Notation Notes: Required Actions: Requirement Due Date: Requirement Received Date:

Direction/ Distance (m)

Elev/Diff (m)

Site

09-Dec-2015 09-Dec-2015 Cranbrook, Kootenay DANKEVY, STEPHEN (SURREY) NEIL Based On New Information The Site Has Been Classified As High Risk. Refer To Site 7810 For High Risk Site Notations No Actions Entered

Registry Notations Event ID: Notation Type and Act: Initiated Date: Approved Date: Region: Ministry Contact: Notation Notes: Required Actions: Requirement Due Date: Requirement Received Date:

75311 NOTIFICATION RECEIVED ABOUT LIKELY OR ACTUAL SUBSTANCE MIGRATION FROM NEIGHBOURING SITE. Environmental Management Act: General 24-Nov-2014 24-Nov-2014 Cranbrook, Kootenay SAMWAYS, JENNIFER Source Parcel Is 498 Van Horne Street, Cranbrook. Site 7810. No Actions Entered

Slr Consulting (Canada) Ltd

Participant:

Role:

SUBMITTED BY

75431 SITE RISK CLASSIFIED - SITE IS NON-HIGH RISK. Environmental Management Act: General 19-Nov-2014 19-Nov-2014 Cranbrook, Kootenay O'GRADY, TYLER No Notes Entered No Actions Entered

Slr Consulting (Canada) Ltd

Role:

SUBMITTED BY

Slr Consulting (Canada) Ltd ORG

Start Date: End Date:

Nov-19-2014

Start Date: End Date:

Nov-24-2014

Start Date: End Date:

Nov-19-2014

Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes: Participants Role:

Environmental Consultant/Contractor

Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes: Participants Role:

City Of Cranbrook ORG

Property Owner

Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes:

O'Grady, Tyler EMP

erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services

Order No: 20200520096

Map Key

Number of Records

Direction/ Distance (m)

Elev/Diff (m)

Site

Ministry Contact

Participants Role: Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes:

Site Information Advisor EMP

Start Date: End Date:

Nov-24-2014

Start Date: End Date:

Dec-09-2015

Effective Date:

11/25/2014

Ministry Contact

Participants Role: Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes:

Dankevy, Stephen (Surrey) Neil EMP

Ministry Contact

Participants Role: Associated Sites Associated Site ID: Notes:

m-8-2005341-b

7810 SOURCE PARCEL 7810 AFFECTED PARCEL 17402

1 of 1

N/342.0

930.9 / 2.49

dd-SREG-2005341-bb p-2005341-y

Bri-Lin Develop Ltd - Cranbrook 550 LAURIER STREET No Entry CRANBROOK BC

SREG

09-Oct-1997 Registered: 19-Sep-2005 Updated: 14-Sep-2005 Detail Removed: 26250-20/1639 Common Name: No Entry Postal Code: NOT ASSIGNED 49d 30m 30.7s Latitude DMS: March 2020 115d 47m 15.3s Longitude DMS: 49.508525 Latitude: Large Site, Simple Contamination 115.787572 Longitude: ALSO KNOWN AS 549 & 525 LAURIER ST. LAT/LONG DERIVED BY BC ENVIRONMENT REFERENCING THE TRANSPORTATION CENTERLINE NETWORK (TRIM 1:20K), NAD 83. 550 LAURIER STREET, CRANBROOK Addr (BC Data Catalogue): There are no Associated Sites for this site. Site Note: Site ID: Victoria File No: Env Rmd ID: Regional File No: Region: Record Status: Status as of: Cleanup Status: Category: Location Desc:

1639 No File

Registry Notations Event ID: Notation Type and Act: Initiated Date: Approved Date: Region: Ministry Contact: Notation Notes:

Required Actions: Requirement Due Date: Requirement Received Date:

5524 SITE INVESTIGATION REPORT SUBMITTED. Administrative 28-Oct-1994 28-Oct-1994 Cranbrook, Kootenay JENSEN, JIM Environmental Site Investigation Of Waste Oil Spill. Consultant Concluded That Initial Response Seems To Have Limited The Contamination Problem Substantially. No Contamination Was Evident In The Diesel Underground Storage Tank Area. Stockpiled Soils May Still Remain On Site. No Actions Entered

Participant:

Jensen, Jim

Role:

RECEIVED BY

Participant:

Bri-Lin Developments Ltd. (Cranbrook)

Role:

REQUESTED BY

erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services

Order No: 20200520096

Map Key

Number of Records

Direction/ Distance (m)

Elev/Diff (m)

Landmark Consulting (Cranbrook)

Participant:

Site Role:

DB SUBMITTED BY

Registry Notations 19056 SPILL REPORTED. Administrative 24-May-1994 24-May-1994 Cranbrook, Kootenay JENSEN, JIM Bri-Lin Developments Reported A 200-300 Litre Waste Oil Spill From A Concrete Tank That Broke During Excavation. A 2000 Gallon Steel Underground Storage Tank Was Also Being Excavated. Bc Environment Inspection Recommended Contaminated Soil Be Removed Onto A Poly Liner And Soil Analysis Be Done.

Event ID: Notation Type and Act: Initiated Date: Approved Date: Region: Ministry Contact: Notation Notes: Required Actions: Requirement Due Date: Requirement Received Date: Participant:

Bri-Lin Developments Ltd. (Cranbrook)

Role:

SUBMITTED BY

Participant:

Jensen, Jim

Role:

RECEIVED BY

City Of Cranbrook (Cranbrook) ORG

Start Date: End Date:

Jun-03-1997

Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes: Participants Role:

Notice Recipient(Wmaa20.21(3))-Dont Flag

Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes: Participants Role:

Landmark Consulting (Cranbrook) ORG

Start Date: End Date:

Jun-02-1994

Start Date: End Date:

Nov-01-1995

Environmental Consultant/Contractor

Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes:

Niagara Holdings Ltd (Calgary, Ab) ORG

Participants Role:

Property Owner

Participants Role:

Notice Recipient(Wmaa20.21(3))-Dont Flag

Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes: Participants Role:

Jensen, Jim EMP

Start Date: End Date:

May-24-1994 Mar-31-2004

Start Date:

Jun-03-1997

Main Ministry Contact

Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes:

Business Development Bank Of Canada (Head Office For Bc) ORG

erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services

End Date:

Order No: 20200520096

Map Key

Number of Records

Direction/ Distance (m)

Elev/Diff (m)

Site

Notice Recipient(Wmaa20.21(3))-Dont Flag

Participants Role: Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes:

Bri-Lin Developments Ltd. (Cranbrook) ORG

Start Date: End Date:

Participants Role:

Notice Recipient(Wmaa20.21(3))-Dont Flag

Participants Role:

Former Operator

Participants Role:

Former Property Owner

May-24-1994

Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes:

Markuson, Les EMP

Start Date: End Date:

Nov-27-1996 Mar-31-1997

Start Date: End Date:

Jun-06-1997 Jul-25-1997

Alternate Ministry Contact

Participants Role: Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes:

Ord, Roger Scott EMP

Participants Role:

Alternate Ministry Contact

Documents on File Document or Report Title: Authored Date: Submitted Date:

Environmental Site Investigation Of 525 Laurier St. Cranbrook, B.C. Bri-Lin Devopments Ltd 02-Jun-1994 28-Oct-1994

Document Entry Notes: Site Investigation Of Waste Oil Spill During Waste Oil Underground Storage Tanke (Ust) And Diesel Fuel Ust Excavation.

Participant and Role:

Bri-Lin Developments Ltd. (Cranbrook) - Commissioner

Participant and Role:

Landmark Consulting (Cranbrook) - Author

Participant and Role:

Jensen, Jim - Recipient

Suspected Land Use - Notes Land Use Description: Notes:

Petro. Prod., /Produce Water Strg Abvegrnd/Undergrnd Tank 1 2000 Gallon Steel Diesel Fuel Ust Removed May 1994.

Suspected Land Use - Notes Land Use Description: Notes:

Waste Oil, Reprocessing, Recycling Or Bulk Storage 1 Concrete Waste Oil Ust Removed May 1994

Parcel Descriptions

erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services

Order No: 20200520096

Map Key

Number of Records

Date Added: LTO PID(s): Land Description: m-9-822538756-b

1 of 1

Direction/ Distance (m)

Elev/Diff (m)

Site

11/2/1995 Crown Land PIN#: 015-999-173 Crown Land File#: LOT 105 DISTRICT LOT 30 KOOTENAY DISTRICT PLAN 887, EXCEPT PART INCLUDED INPLAN 13537

S/356.6

923.2 / -5.18

Jim Smith Creek, Cranbrook JIM SMITH CREEK No Entry CRANBROOK BC

17494 Site ID: Registered: 26250-20/17494 Victoria File No: Updated: Env Rmd ID: Detail Removed: No File Regional File No: Common Name: Region: Postal Code: NOT ASSIGNED Record Status: Latitude DMS: March 2020 Status as of: Longitude DMS: Cleanup Status: Latitude: Category: Longitude: LAT/LONG CONFIRMED USING GOOGLE EARTH 2014-12-18. Location Desc: JIM SMITH CREEK, CRANBROOK Addr (BC Data Catalogue): There are no PIDs nor Associated Sites for this site. Site Note:

dd-SREG-822538756-bb p-822538756-y

SREG

18-Dec-2014

No Entry 49d 30m 08.2s 115d 47m 14.5s 49.502278 115.787361

Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes: Participants Role:

Ministry Of Forests, Lands And Natural Resource Operations ORG

Start Date:

Dec-18-2014

End Date:

Property Owner

Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes: Participants Role:

O'Grady, Tyler EMP

Start Date: End Date:

Dec-18-2014

Start Date: End Date:

Dec-18-2014

Ministry Contact

Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes: Participants Role: m-10-2003660-b

1 of 2

Slr Consulting (Canada) Ltd ORG

Environmental Consultant/Contractor

E/449.5

923.8 / -4.62

Fas Gas 323 VAN HORNE STREET No Entry CRANBROOK BC

dd-SREG-2003660-bb p-2003660-y

SREG

17-Aug-1998 Registered: 07-Jan-2014 Updated: 31-Dec-2013 Detail Removed: 26250-20/5117/4B Common Name: V1C 1Z6 Postal Code: NOT ASSIGNED 49d 30m 21.4s Latitude DMS: March 2020 115d 46m 52.3s Longitude DMS: 49.505933 Latitude: Unranked 115.781181 Longitude: SITE CREATED BY SITE PROFILE, ENTERED 1998-05-27. LAT/LONG ESTIMATED USING BC ENVIRONMENT TRIM (1:20,000) DATA AND SHOULD BE UPDATED WITH NEW INFORMATION 323 VAN HORNE STREET, CRANBROOK Addr (BC Data Catalogue): Site ID: Victoria File No: Env Rmd ID: Regional File No: Region: Record Status: Status as of: Cleanup Status: Category: Location Desc:

5117 26250-20/5117

erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services

Order No: 20200520096

Map Key

Number of Records

Direction/ Distance (m)

Elev/Diff (m)

Site

There are no Associated Sites for this site.

Site Note: Registry Notations Event ID: Notation Type and Act: Initiated Date: Approved Date: Region: Ministry Contact: Notation Notes: Required Actions: Requirement Due Date: Requirement Received Date:

59946 NOTICE OF INDEPENDENT REMEDIATION COMPLETION SUBMITTED. Environmental Management Act: General 06-May-2011 06-May-2011 Cranbrook, Kootenay SAMWAYS, JENNIFER Completed: 2011-05-03 No Actions Entered

Stantec Consulting Ltd

Participant:

Role:

SUBMITTED BY

Registry Notations Event ID: Notation Type and Act: Initiated Date: Approved Date: Region: Ministry Contact: Notation Notes: Required Actions: Requirement Due Date: Requirement Received Date:

58441 SITE RISK CLASSIFIED - SITE IS NON-HIGH RISK. Environmental Management Act: General 29-Nov-2010 29-Nov-2010 Cranbrook, Kootenay O'GRADY, TYLER No Notes Entered No Actions Entered

Stantec

Participant:

Role:

SUBMITTED BY

Registry Notations Event ID: Notation Type and Act: Initiated Date: Approved Date: Region: Ministry Contact: Notation Notes: Required Actions: Requirement Due Date: Requirement Received Date:

58198 NOTICE OF INDEPENDENT REMEDIATION INITIATION SUBMITTED. Environmental Management Act: General 05-Nov-2010 05-Nov-2010 Cranbrook, Kootenay SAMWAYS, JENNIFER Start: 2010-11-03 No Actions Entered

Stantec

Participant:

Role:

SUBMITTED BY

Registry Notations Event ID: Notation Type and Act: Initiated Date: Approved Date: Region: Ministry Contact: Notation Notes: Required Actions: Requirement Due Date: Requirement Received Date:

57779 RELEASE OF APPROVING AUTHORITY UNDER ACCEPTANCE OF INDEPENDENT REMEDIATION ISSUED. Environmental Management Act: General 21-Sep-2010 21-Sep-2010 Cranbrook, Kootenay LARSEN, KELLI Release Of Development Permit Under Scenario 4 - Site Upgrade No Actions Entered

erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services

Order No: 20200520096

Map Key

Number of Records

Direction/ Distance (m)

Elev/Diff (m)

Larsen, Kelli

Participant:

Site Role:

DB ISSUED BY

Registry Notations 57780 REQUIREMENT(S) IMPOSED UNDER EMA SECTION 54(3)(D). Environmental Management Act: General 21-Sep-2010 21-Sep-2010 Cranbrook, Kootenay LARSEN, KELLI Notice Of Independent Remediation Completion Notice Submitted. Remediation Shall Be Completed Within Five Years Of The 2010-09-21 Release Letter. Remediation Shall Be Confirmed According To Applicable Legislation And Ministry Guidance. Within 90 Days Of Completing Remediation, A Report Summarizing Confirmation Of Remediation Shall Be Submitted To The Director.

Event ID: Notation Type and Act: Initiated Date: Approved Date: Region: Ministry Contact: Notation Notes: Required Actions:

Requirement Due Date: Requirement Received Date: Registry Notations Event ID: Notation Type and Act: Initiated Date: Approved Date: Region: Ministry Contact: Notation Notes: Required Actions: Requirement Due Date: Requirement Received Date:

57511 SITE PROFILE REVIEWED - FURTHER INVESTIGATION REQUIRED BY THE MINISTRY. Environmental Management Act: General 13-Aug-2010 No Entry Cranbrook, Kootenay LARSEN, KELLI No Notes Entered Detailed Site Investigation.

Registry Notations Event ID: Notation Type and Act: Initiated Date: Approved Date: Region: Ministry Contact: Notation Notes: Required Actions: Requirement Due Date: Requirement Received Date:

29227 SITE PROFILE - NO FURTHER INVESTIGATION REQUIRED BY THE MINISTRY. Waste Management Act: Contaminated Sites Notations 11-Jun-1998 No Entry Cranbrook, Kootenay JENSEN, JIM Auto Inserted From Site Profile No Actions Entered

Registry Notations Event ID: Notation Type and Act: Initiated Date: Approved Date: Region: Ministry Contact: Notation Notes: Required Actions: Requirement Due Date: Requirement Received Date:

29355 SITE PROFILE RECEIVED. Waste Management Act: Contaminated Sites Notations 01-Jun-1998 01-Jun-1998 Cranbrook, Kootenay JENSEN, JIM No Notes Entered No Actions Entered

Participant:

Koopmans, Sim

Role:

SUBMITTED BY

Participant:

Jensen, Jim

Role:

RECEIVED BY

erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services

Order No: 20200520096

Map Key

Number of Records

Direction/ Distance (m)

Elev/Diff (m)

Site

Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes:

Bridge, Gwen EMP

Start Date: End Date:

Jun-01-1998 Aug-31-1998

Start Date: End Date:

Nov-05-2010

Start Date: End Date:

Aug-13-2010

Start Date: End Date:

Jun-01-1998

Start Date: End Date:

Nov-29-2010

Start Date: End Date:

May-06-2011

Start Date: End Date:

Nov-05-2010

Alternate Ministry Contact

Participants Role: Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes:

Parkland Industries Lp ORG

Property Owner

Participants Role: Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes: Participants Role:

Stantec ORG

Environmental Consultant/Contractor

Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes:

Koopmans, Sim PER FAS GAS CONTACT IN RED DEER

Participants Role:

Site Profile Completor

Participants Role:

Site Profile Contact

Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes: Participants Role:

O'Grady, Tyler EMP

Ministry Contact

Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes: Participants Role:

Stantec Consulting Ltd ORG

Notation Participant (Do Not Use)

Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes: Participants Role:

Site Information Advisor EMP

Alternate Ministry Contact

Site Participants

erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services

Order No: 20200520096

Map Key

Number of Records

Participant: Participation Type: Notes:

Direction/ Distance (m)

Elev/Diff (m)

Fas Gas Realty Ltd Inc 28745 (Vancouver) ORG

Site

Start Date: End Date:

Jun-01-1998

Start Date: End Date:

Aug-13-2010

Start Date: End Date:

May-27-1998 Mar-31-2004

Property Owner

Participants Role: Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes:

Larsen, Kelli EMP

Ministry Contact

Participants Role: Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes:

Jensen, Jim EMP

Alternate Ministry Contact

Participants Role: Suspected Land Use - Notes

Petro. Prod., Dispense Facility, Inc. Serv Sta./Cardlot No Entry

Land Use Description: Notes: Suspected Land Use - Notes

Petro. Prod., /Produce Water Strg Abvegrnd/Undergrnd Tank Inserted For Site Profile Dated 1998-06-01

Land Use Description: Notes: Parcel Descriptions Date Added: LTO PID(s): Land Description:

6/2/1998 Crown Land PIN#: 010-119-710 Crown Land File#: LOT 1 DISTRICT LOT 30 KOOTENAY DISTRICT PLAN 4350 EXCEPT PART INCLUDEDIN PLAN 13083

Jun-02-1998 Jun-01-1998 Aug-13-2010 Jun-01-1998 Jun-01-1998 Jun-01-1998 Jun-02-1998 Yes City Of Cranbrook Jun-01-1998 No Comment

Site Profile Note All Questions

erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services

Order No: 20200520096

Map Key

Number of Records

Direction/ Distance (m)

Elev/Diff (m)

Site

WHICH THE ANSWER IS YES. Here, for informational purposes only, we provide the list of ALL current site profile questions.

Site Profile Note - Questions Category Precursor: Category and Question: m-10-882101471-b

2 of 2

Are there currently or to the best of your knowledge have there been previously on the site any: Tanks Or Containers Used Or Stored - Underground Fuel Or Chemical Storage Tanks? Yes

E/449.5

923.8 / -4.62

erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services

323 VAN HORNE STREET SOUTH, CRANBROOK

dd-SREG-882101471-bb p-882101471-y

SREG

Order No: 20200520096

Map Key

Number of Records

Direction/ Distance (m)

Elev/Diff (m)

Site

BC Site ID: Victoria File No: Env Rmd ID: Regional File No:

23404 26250-20/23404 46379293

Registered: Updated: Detail Removed: Common Name:

Region: Record Status: Status as of: Cleanup Status: Category: Location Desc:

Postal Code: Latitude DMS: March 2020 Longitude DMS: Latitude: Longitude: LOCATION CONFIRMED USING GOOGLE EARTH/LTSA DGIR# 183802 323 VAN HORNE STREET SOUTH, CRANBROOK Addr (BC Data Catalogue): There are no PIDs nor Associated Sites for this site. Site Note: m-11-2002454-b

1 of 1

E/487.8

924.4 / -4.05

323 VAN HORNE STREET SOUTH, CRANBROOK 49d 30m 23.0s 115d 46m 55.0s 49.50638900027282 -115.78194400025781

Interlink Freight Depot 310 SOUTH VAN HORNE STREET No Entry CRANBROOK BC

dd-SREG-2002454-bb p-2002454-y

SREG

27-Oct-1997 Registered: 24-Mar-2011 Updated: 22-Mar-2011 Detail Removed: 26250-20/3481 Common Name: V1C 1Z5 Postal Code: NOT ASSIGNED 49d 30m 26.2s Latitude DMS: March 2020 115d 46m 46.8s Longitude DMS: 49.507286 Latitude: Medium Site, Complex Contamination 115.779669 Longitude: LAT/LONG DERIVED BY BC ENVIRONMENT REFERENCING THE TRANSPORTATION CENTERLINE NETWORK (TRIM 1:20K),NAD 83. KOOTENAY LAND DISTRICT, CPR LEASE SITE IN THE CRANBROOK YARD, REF FOLIO 18001.000. 310 SOUTH VAN HORNE STREET, CRANBROOK Addr (BC Data Catalogue): There are no Associated Sites for this site. Site Note: Site ID: Victoria File No: Env Rmd ID: Regional File No: Region: Record Status: Status as of: Cleanup Status: Category: Location Desc:

3481 26250-20/3481

Registry Notations Event ID: Notation Type and Act: Initiated Date: Approved Date: Region: Ministry Contact: Notation Notes: Required Actions: Requirement Due Date: Requirement Received Date:

30269 APPROVAL IN PRINCIPLE ISSUED. Waste Management Act: Contaminated Sites Notations 04-Sep-1998 04-Sep-1998 Cranbrook, Kootenay JENSEN, JIM No Notes Entered No Actions Entered

Registry Notations Event ID: Notation Type and Act: Initiated Date: Approved Date: Region: Ministry Contact: Notation Notes: Required Actions: Requirement Due Date: Requirement Received Date:

30186 APPROVAL IN PRINCIPLE REQUESTED. Waste Management Act: Contaminated Sites Notations 28-Aug-1998 31-Aug-1998 Cranbrook, Kootenay JENSEN, JIM Approval In Principle And Review Of Remediation Plan. Former Interlink Facility At 310 Van Horne Street, Cranbrook, Bc. No Actions Entered

erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services

Order No: 20200520096

Map Key

Number of Records

Direction/ Distance (m)

Elev/Diff (m)

Site

Participant:

Canadian Pacific Railway Company (Vancouver)

Role:

REQUESTED BY

Participant:

Jensen, Jim

Role:

RECEIVED BY

Registry Notations Event ID: Notation Type and Act: Initiated Date: Approved Date: Region: Ministry Contact: Notation Notes: Required Actions: Requirement Due Date: Requirement Received Date:

30172 CASE MANAGEMENT ITEM. Administrative 26-Aug-1998 26-Aug-1998 Cranbrook, Kootenay JENSEN, JIM Information About The Injection Protocol To Be Used During The Bioremediation Of The Former Cpr Interlink Terminal Located At 310 Van Horne Street, Cranbrook, Bc. No Actions Entered

Participant:

Jensen, Jim

Role:

REVIEWED BY

Participant:

Enviro Fx Inc. (Calgary)

Role:

ISSUED BY

Registry Notations Event ID: Notation Type and Act: Initiated Date: Approved Date: Region: Ministry Contact: Notation Notes: Required Actions: Requirement Due Date: Requirement Received Date:

30171 MONITORING REPORT SUBMITTED. Administrative 13-Aug-1998 13-Aug-1998 Cranbrook, Kootenay JENSEN, JIM Soil And Groundwater Sampling Results For Off-Site Monitoring. No Actions Entered

Participant:

Enviro Fx Inc. (Calgary)

Role:

SUBMITTED BY

Participant:

Jensen, Jim

Role:

REVIEWED BY

Participant:

Norwest Labs

Role:

ISSUED BY

Registry Notations Event ID: Notation Type and Act: Initiated Date: Approved Date: Region: Ministry Contact: Notation Notes: Required Actions: Requirement Due Date: Requirement Received Date:

30175 CASE MANAGEMENT ITEM. Administrative 06-Aug-1998 27-Aug-1998 Cranbrook, Kootenay JENSEN, JIM Final Approval Given By Environment Canada For Use Of Bacteria For Remediation Of Soil. No Actions Entered

Participant:

Enviro Fx Inc. (Calgary)

Role:

SUBMITTED BY

Participant:

Jensen, Jim

Role:

REVIEWED BY

Participant:

Environment Canada (General)

Role:

ISSUED BY

Registry Notations

erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services

Order No: 20200520096

Map Key

Number of Records

Event ID: Notation Type and Act: Initiated Date: Approved Date: Region: Ministry Contact: Notation Notes: Required Actions: Requirement Due Date: Requirement Received Date:

Direction/ Distance (m)

Elev/Diff (m)

Site

30174 CASE MANAGEMENT ITEM. Administrative 22-Jul-1998 22-Jul-1998 Cranbrook, Kootenay JENSEN, JIM Preliminary Approval From Environment Canada For Use Of Bacteria In Soil Remediation. No Actions Entered

Participant:

Jensen, Jim

Role:

REVIEWED BY

Participant:

Enviro Fx Inc. (Calgary)

Role:

SUBMITTED BY

Registry Notations Event ID: Notation Type and Act: Initiated Date: Approved Date: Region: Ministry Contact: Notation Notes:

Required Actions: Requirement Due Date: Requirement Received Date:

30194 REMEDIAL PLAN SUBMITTED WITHOUT RISK ASSESSMENT: INTERNAL REVIEW REQUESTED. Waste Management Act: Contaminated Sites Notations 16-Jul-1998 28-Aug-1998 Cranbrook, Kootenay JENSEN, JIM This Is An Application For A Remediation Plan Review - Document Is "Revised Proposal To Remediate Hydrocarbon Contaminated Soils And Groundwater Using An In-Situ Bio-Sparge System ...At The Interlink Terminal No. 800, Etc." Fees Are Attached As Well As Fees For 2nd Approval In Principal. No Actions Entered

Participant:

Jensen, Jim

Role:

REVIEWED BY

Participant:

Canadian Pacific Railway Company (Vancouver)

Role:

ISSUED BY

Registry Notations Event ID: Notation Type and Act: Initiated Date: Approved Date: Region: Ministry Contact: Notation Notes: Required Actions: Requirement Due Date: Requirement Received Date:

30170 CASE MANAGEMENT ITEM. Administrative 16-Jul-1998 16-Jul-1998 Cranbrook, Kootenay JENSEN, JIM Additional Information Regarding The Bio-Sparge Unit In Cranbrook. No Actions Entered

Participant:

Enviro Fx Inc. (Calgary)

Role:

ISSUED BY

Participant:

Jensen, Jim

Role:

REVIEWED BY

Registry Notations Event ID: Notation Type and Act: Initiated Date: Approved Date: Region: Ministry Contact: Notation Notes:

30169 CASE MANAGEMENT ITEM. Administrative 29-Jun-1998 29-Jun-1998 Cranbrook, Kootenay JENSEN, JIM Project Information, 310 Van Horne Street, Cranbrook, Bc.

erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services

Order No: 20200520096

Map Key

Number of Records

Required Actions: Requirement Due Date: Requirement Received Date:

Direction/ Distance (m)

Elev/Diff (m)

Site

No Actions Entered

Participant:

Enviro Fx Inc. (Calgary)

Role:

ISSUED BY

Participant:

Jensen, Jim

Role:

REVIEWED BY

Registry Notations Event ID: Notation Type and Act: Initiated Date: Approved Date: Region: Ministry Contact: Notation Notes: Required Actions: Requirement Due Date: Requirement Received Date:

30177 CASE MANAGEMENT ITEM. Administrative 11-Jun-1998 14-Jul-1998 Cranbrook, Kootenay JENSEN, JIM Technical Review & Draft Approval In Principal. No Actions Entered

Participant:

Canadian Pacific Railway Company (Vancouver)

Role:

RECEIVED BY

Participant:

Crozier, Rick

Role:

ISSUED BY

Registry Notations Event ID: Notation Type and Act: Initiated Date: Approved Date: Region: Ministry Contact: Notation Notes:

Required Actions: Requirement Due Date: Requirement Received Date:

30104 APPROVAL IN PRINCIPLE REQUESTED. Waste Management Act: Contaminated Sites Notations 11-Jun-1998 12-Jun-1998 Cranbrook, Kootenay JENSEN, JIM This Is The Second Approval In Principle That The Company Has Requested On This Property. It Is Based On The Document "Revised Proposal To Remediate Hydrocarbon Contaminated Soil And Groundwater Using An In-Situ Bio-Sparge System At The Interlink Terminal No. 800, 310 Van Horne Street, Cranbrook, Bc" (Enviro Fx). No Actions Entered

Participant:

Enviro Fx Inc. (Calgary)

Role:

ISSUED BY

Participant:

Canadian Pacific Railway Company (Vancouver)

Role:

REQUESTED BY

Participant:

Jensen, Jim

Role:

REVIEWED BY

30167 CASE MANAGEMENT ITEM. Administrative 11-Jun-1998 11-Jun-1998 Cranbrook, Kootenay JENSEN, JIM Site Specific Environmental Information Concerning The Enviro Fx Inc. Bio-Sparge Technology On The Former Interlink Terminal Located At 310 Van Horne Street, Cranbrook, Bc. No Actions Entered

Jensen, Jim

erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services

Role:

REVIEWED BY

Order No: 20200520096

Map Key

Number of Records

Direction/ Distance (m)

Elev/Diff (m)

Enviro Fx Inc. (Calgary)

Participant:

Site

Role:

ISSUED BY

Registry Notations Event ID: Notation Type and Act: Initiated Date: Approved Date: Region: Ministry Contact: Notation Notes: Required Actions: Requirement Due Date: Requirement Received Date:

30093 REMEDIAL PLAN SUBMITTED WITHOUT RISK ASSESSMENT: INTERNAL REVIEW REQUESTED. Waste Management Act: Contaminated Sites Notations 28-Apr-1998 28-Apr-1998 Cranbrook, Kootenay JENSEN, JIM Revised Proposal To Remediate Hydrocarbon Contaminated Soil And Groundwater Using An In-Situ Bio-Sparge System At The Interlink Terminal No. 800, 310 Van Horne Street, Cranbrook, Bc (Enviro Fx Inc.) No Actions Entered

Participant:

Canadian Pacific Railway (Government And Public Affairs)

Role:

REQUESTED BY

Participant:

Jensen, Jim

Role:

REVIEWED BY

Registry Notations Event ID: Notation Type and Act: Initiated Date: Approved Date: Region: Ministry Contact: Notation Notes: Required Actions: Requirement Due Date: Requirement Received Date:

30173 REMEDIAL PLAN SUBMITTED WITHOUT RISK ASSESSMENT: INTERNAL REVIEW REQUESTED. Waste Management Act: Contaminated Sites Notations 06-Mar-1998 09-Mar-1998 Cranbrook, Kootenay JENSEN, JIM Site Remedial Activities - Former Interlink Terminal No. 800, 310 Van Horne Street, Cranbrook, Bc No Actions Entered

Participant:

Jacques Whitford Environment Limited (Calgary)

Role:

ISSUED BY

Participant:

Jensen, Jim

Role:

REVIEWED BY

Registry Notations Event ID: Notation Type and Act: Initiated Date: Approved Date: Region: Ministry Contact: Notation Notes: Required Actions: Requirement Due Date: Requirement Received Date:

26445 APPROVAL IN PRINCIPLE ISSUED. Waste Management Act: Contaminated Sites Notations 07-Jan-1998 07-Jan-1998 Cranbrook, Kootenay JENSEN, JIM No Notes Entered No Actions Entered

Participant:

Jacques Whitford Environment Limited (Calgary)

Role:

REQUESTED BY

Participant:

Crozier, Rick

Role:

ISSUED BY

Participant:

Interlink Freight Systems Inc (Cranbrook, B.C.)

Role:

RECEIVED BY

Registry Notations

erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services

Order No: 20200520096

Map Key

Number of Records

Event ID: Notation Type and Act: Initiated Date: Approved Date: Region: Ministry Contact: Notation Notes: Required Actions: Requirement Due Date: Requirement Received Date:

Direction/ Distance (m)

Elev/Diff (m)

Site

30165 CASE MANAGEMENT ITEM. Administrative 24-Sep-1997 30-Sep-1997 Cranbrook, Kootenay JENSEN, JIM Letter Of Clarification Regarding Remediation Proposal Details For Cell Liners, Excavation Dewatering And Confirmation Sampling. No Actions Entered

Participant:

Jensen, Jim

Role:

REVIEWED BY

Participant:

Jacques Whitford Environment Limited (Calgary)

Role:

ISSUED BY

Registry Notations Event ID: Notation Type and Act: Initiated Date: Approved Date: Region: Ministry Contact: Notation Notes: Required Actions: Requirement Due Date: Requirement Received Date:

22773 APPROVAL IN PRINCIPLE REQUESTED. Waste Management Act: Contaminated Sites Notations 29-May-1997 03-Jun-1997 Cranbrook, Kootenay JENSEN, JIM Application Form And Fees Sent Out For Approval In Principal. Fees Are Based On A Simple Medium Site. No Actions Entered

Participant:

Jacques Whitford Environment Limited (Calgary)

Role:

RECEIVED BY

Participant:

Jensen, Jim

Role:

ISSUED BY

Registry Notations Event ID: Notation Type and Act: Initiated Date: Approved Date: Region: Ministry Contact: Notation Notes: Required Actions: Requirement Due Date: Requirement Received Date:

22774 SITE INVESTIGATION REPORT SUBMITTED. Administrative 19-Mar-1997 04-Apr-1997 Cranbrook, Kootenay JENSEN, JIM Service Request For Approval To Proceed With Site Remediation No Actions Entered

Participant:

Interlink Freight Systems Inc (Cranbrook, B.C.)

Role:

REQUESTED BY

Participant:

Jensen, Jim

Role:

REVIEWED BY

Participant:

Jacques Whitford Environment Limited (Calgary)

Role:

ISSUED BY

Registry Notations Event ID: Notation Type and Act: Initiated Date: Approved Date: Region:

14868 SITE INVESTIGATION REPORT SUBMITTED. Administrative 23-Apr-1996 31-Oct-1996 Cranbrook, Kootenay

erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services

Order No: 20200520096

Map Key

Number of Records

Ministry Contact: Notation Notes: Required Actions: Requirement Due Date: Requirement Received Date:

Direction/ Distance (m)

Elev/Diff (m)

Site

JENSEN, JIM Preliminary Report Received (Draft) No Actions Entered

Participant:

Interlink Freight Systems Inc (Cranbrook, B.C.)

Role:

REQUESTED BY

Participant:

Jacques Whitford Environment Limited (Calgary)

Role:

SUBMITTED BY

Participant:

Jensen, Jim

Role:

RECEIVED BY

Interlink Freight Systems Inc (Cranbrook, B.C.) ORG

Start Date: End Date:

Apr-11-1996

Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes: Participants Role:

Operator

Participants Role:

Leasee/Renter/Tenant

Participants Role:

Notice Recipient(Wmaa20.21(3))-Dont Flag

Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes: Participants Role:

Crozier, Rick EMP

Start Date: End Date:

Jan-07-1998 Feb-01-2002

Start Date:

Apr-11-1996

Alternate Ministry Contact

Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes: Participants Role:

Tory Tory Deslauriers & Binnington (Calgary, Alberta) ORG

End Date:

Lawyer/Solicitor

Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes:

Canadian Pacific Railway Company (Vancouver) ORG

Start Date:

Jun-11-1998

End Date:

Participants Role:

Notice Recipient(Wmaa20.21(3))-Dont Flag

Participants Role:

Property Owner

Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes:

Interlink Freight Systems Inc. (Vancouver) ORG

Participants Role:

Leasee/Renter/Tenant

erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services

Start Date: End Date:

Jan-07-1998

Order No: 20200520096

Map Key

Number of Records

Direction/ Distance (m)

Elev/Diff (m)

Site

Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes: Participants Role:

Jacques Whitford Environment Limited (Calgary) ORG

Start Date:

Apr-11-1996

End Date:

Environmental Consultant/Contractor

Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes: Participants Role:

Canadian Pacific Railway (Government And Public Affairs) ORG

Start Date:

Apr-28-1998

End Date:

Property Owner

Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes: Participants Role:

Norwest Labs ORG

Start Date: End Date:

Aug-13-1998

Start Date: End Date:

Apr-28-1998

Start Date: End Date:

Sep-04-1998

Start Date: End Date:

Sep-01-1994

Analytical Lab

Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes: Participants Role:

Enviro Fx Inc. (Calgary) ORG

Environmental Consultant/Contractor

Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes: Participants Role:

Johnson, Carl EMP

Alternate Ministry Contact

Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes:

Interlink Freight Systems (North York, Ontario) ORG

Participants Role:

Leasee/Renter/Tenant

Participants Role:

Notice Recipient(Wmaa20.21(3))-Dont Flag

Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes: Participants Role:

Environment Canada (General) ORG

Start Date: End Date:

Jul-22-1998

Associated Federal Government Contact

erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services

Order No: 20200520096

Map Key

Number of Records

Direction/ Distance (m)

Elev/Diff (m)

Site

Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes:

Jensen, Jim EMP

Start Date: End Date:

Apr-23-1996 Mar-31-2004

Start Date: End Date:

Sep-24-1987

Main Ministry Contact

Participants Role: Site Participants Participant: Participation Type: Notes:

Canadian Pacific Ltd (Vancouver) ORG

Participants Role:

Notice Recipient(Wmaa20.21(3))-Dont Flag

Participants Role:

Property Owner

Documents on File Document or Report Title: Authored Date: Submitted Date:

Draft - Environmental Site Assessment Interlink Terminal No.800 Cranbrook, B.C. 23-Apr-1996 31-Oct-1996

Document Entry Notes: Nothing Noted

Participant and Role:

Interlink Freight Systems Inc (Cranbrook, B.C.) - Commissioner

Participant and Role:

Jacques Whitford Environment Limited (Calgary) - Author

Participant and Role:

Jensen, Jim - Reviewer

Documents on File Document or Report Title: Authored Date: Submitted Date:

Approval In Principle 11-Jun-1998 14-Jul-1998

Document Entry Notes: Nothing Noted

Participant and Role:

Canadian Pacific Railway Company (Vancouver) - Recipient

Participant and Role:

Jensen, Jim - Co-Author

Participant and Role:

Crozier, Rick - Author

Documents on File Document or Report Title: Authored Date: Submitted Date:

Letter Report Re: Monitoring Data For Interlink Terminal Located At 301 Van Horne Street, Cranbrook, Bc 28-Oct-1998 29-Oct-1998

Document Entry Notes: Nothing Noted

erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services

Order No: 20200520096

Map Key

Number of Records

Participant and Role:

Direction/ Distance (m)

Elev/Diff (m)

Site

Enviro Fx Inc. (Calgary) - Author

Documents on File Document or Report Title: Authored Date: Submitted Date:

Site Remedial Activities - Former Interlink Terminal No. 800, 310 Van Horne Street, Cranbrook, Bc 06-Mar-1998 09-Mar-1998

Document Entry Notes: Nothing Noted

Participant and Role:

Jensen, Jim - Reviewer

Participant and Role:

Jacques Whitford Environment Limited (Calgary) - Author

Participant and Role:

Interlink Freight Systems Inc. (Vancouver) - Commissioner

Documents on File Document or Report Title: Authored Date: Submitted Date:

Additional Information Regarding The Bio-Sparge Unit In Cranbrook 16-Jul-1998 16-Jul-1998

Document Entry Notes: Nothing Noted

Participant and Role:

Jensen, Jim - Reviewer

Participant and Role:

Enviro Fx Inc. (Calgary) - Author

Documents on File Document or Report Title: Authored Date: Submitted Date:

New Substance Notification, Nsn # 7741 (Secondary ) 06-Aug-1998 27-Aug-1998

Document Entry Notes: Nothing Noted

Participant and Role:

Environment Canada (General) - Author

Participant and Role:

Jensen, Jim - Reviewer

Documents on File Document or Report Title: Authored Date: Submitted Date:

Approval In Principle 04-Sep-1998 04-Sep-1998

Document Entry Notes: Nothing Noted

Participant and Role:

Johnson, Carl - Author

Participant and Role:

Canadian Pacific Railway Company (Vancouver) - Recipient

erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services

Order No: 20200520096

Map Key

Number of Records

Participant and Role:

Direction/ Distance (m)

Elev/Diff (m)

Site

Jensen, Jim - Co-Author

Documents on File Document or Report Title: Authored Date: Submitted Date:

Environmental Site Assessment Interlink Terminal No. 800, Cranbrook, Bc 19-Mar-1997 04-Apr-1997

Document Entry Notes: Nothing Noted

Participant and Role:

Jacques Whitford Environment Limited (Calgary) - Author

Participant and Role:

Jensen, Jim - Reviewer

Participant and Role:

Interlink Freight Systems Inc (Cranbrook, B.C.) - Commissioner

Documents on File Document or Report Title: Authored Date: Submitted Date:

Aip Request Faxed From Enviro Fx Inc. (No Title, Just A Cover Page And Lab. Results) 13-Aug-1998 13-Aug-1998

Document Entry Notes: Nothing Noted

Participant and Role:

Canadian Pacific Railway Company (Vancouver) - Commissioner

Participant and Role:

Jensen, Jim - Reviewer

Participant and Role:

Enviro Fx Inc. (Calgary) - Author

Documents on File Document or Report Title: Authored Date: Submitted Date:

Groundwater Monitoring Data 13-Aug-1998 13-Aug-1998

Document Entry Notes: Nothing Noted

Participant and Role:

Norwest Labs - Author

Participant and Role:

Jensen, Jim - Reviewer

Participant and Role:

Enviro Fx Inc. (Calgary) - Co-Author

Documents on File Document or Report Title: Authored Date: Submitted Date:

Statement Of Qualifications - Enviro Fx Inc. 01-Jun-1998 01-Jun-1998

Document Entry Notes: Nothing Noted

erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services

Order No: 20200520096

Map Key

Number of Records

Direction/ Distance (m)

Elev/Diff (m)

Participant and Role:

Jensen, Jim - Recipient

Participant and Role:

Enviro Fx Inc. (Calgary) - Author

Site

Documents on File Document or Report Title: Authored Date: Submitted Date:

Project Information, 310 Van Horne Street, Cranbrook, Bc 29-Jun-1998 29-Jun-1998

Document Entry Notes: Nothing Noted

Participant and Role:

Enviro Fx Inc. (Calgary) - Author

Participant and Role:

Jensen, Jim - Reviewer

Documents on File Document or Report Title: Authored Date: Submitted Date:

Information About The Injection Protocol To Be Used During The Bioremediation Of The Former Cpr Interlink Terminal Located At 310 Van Horne Street, Cr 26-Aug-1998 26-Aug-1998

Document Entry Notes: Nothing Noted

Participant and Role:

Enviro Fx Inc. (Calgary) - Author

Participant and Role:

Jensen, Jim - Reviewer

Documents on File Document or Report Title: Authored Date: Submitted Date:

Interlink Terminal No. 800, 310 Van Horne Street, Cranbrook, Bc 24-Sep-1997 30-Sep-1997

Document Entry Notes: Nothing Noted

Participant and Role:

Jacques Whitford Environment Limited (Calgary) - Author

Participant and Role:

Jensen, Jim - Reviewer

Documents on File Document or Report Title: Authored Date: Submitted Date:

Approval In Principle - Interlink Freight Systems Inc., 310 Van Horne Street, Cranbrook, Bc 07-Jan-1998 07-Jan-1998

Document Entry Notes: Nothing Noted

erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services

Order No: 20200520096

Map Key

Number of Records

Direction/ Distance (m)

Elev/Diff (m)

Site

Participant and Role:

Interlink Freight Systems Inc. (Vancouver) - Recipient

Participant and Role:

Jensen, Jim - Co-Author

Participant and Role:

Crozier, Rick - Author

Documents on File Document or Report Title: Authored Date: Submitted Date:

Estimate Of On-Site Remediation Costs 20-Mar-1997 04-Apr-1997

Document Entry Notes: Nothing Noted

Participant and Role:

Jacques Whitford Environment Limited (Calgary) - Author

Participant and Role:

Interlink Freight Systems (North York, Ontario) - Recipient

Documents on File Document or Report Title: Authored Date: Submitted Date:

Revised Proposal To Remediate Hydrocarbon Contaminated Soil And Groundwater Using An In-Situ Bio-Sparge System At The Interlink Terminal No, 800, 310 28-Apr-1998 17-Jul-1998

Document Entry Notes: Nothing Noted

Participant and Role:

Canadian Pacific Railway (Government And Public Affairs) - Commissioner

Participant and Role:

Jensen, Jim - Reviewer

Participant and Role:

Enviro Fx Inc. (Calgary) - Author

Documents on File Document or Report Title: Authored Date: Submitted Date:

Site Specific Environmental Information Concerning The Enviro Fx Inc. Bio-Sparge Technology On The Former Interlink Terminal Located At 310 Van Horne 11-Jun-1998 11-Jun-1998

Document Entry Notes: Nothing Noted

Participant and Role:

Jensen, Jim - Reviewer

Participant and Role:

Enviro Fx Inc. (Calgary) - Author

Documents on File Document or Report Title: Authored Date: Submitted Date:

New Substance Notification (Preliminary) Micrococcus Roseus; Bacillus Megaterium And Bacillus Pumilus 22-Jul-1998 22-Jul-1998

Document Entry Notes:

erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services

Order No: 20200520096

Map Key

Number of Records

Direction/ Distance (m)

Elev/Diff (m)

Site

Nothing Noted

Participant and Role:

Jensen, Jim - Reviewer

Participant and Role:

Environment Canada (General) - Author

Suspected Land Use - Notes Petro. Prod., /Produce Water Strg Abvegrnd/Undergrnd Tank No Entry

Land Use Description: Notes: Suspected Land Use - Notes Land Use Description: Notes:

Bulk Commodity Storage Or Shipping (Eg. Coal) No Entry

Parcel Descriptions Date Added: LTO PID(s): Land Description:

8/12/1997 Crown Land PIN#: 008-462-640 Crown Land File#: THAT PART OF DISTRICT LOT 30 INCLUDED IN PLAN DD1403 KOOTENAY DISTRICT EXCEPT(1) PARCEL 1 (EXPLANATORY PLAN 34207I) AND (2) PART INCLUDED IN PLAN 10269

erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services

Order No: 20200520096

h-Unplottable Summary Unplottable Summary Total: 0 Unplottable sites

Company Name/Site Name

Address

erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services

City

Postal

Order No: 20200520096

h-Unplottable Report Unplottable Report No unplottable records were found that may be relevant for the search criteria.

erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services

Order No: 20200520096

h-Appendix: Database Descriptions Appendix: Database Descriptions Environmental Risk Information Services (ERIS) can search the following databases. The extent of historical information varies with each database and current information is determined by what is publicly available to ERIS at the time of update. Note: Databases denoted with " * " indicates that the database will no longer be updated. See the individual database description for more information. Authorization Management System (formerly WASTE):

Provincial

rr-AMS-bb

Provincial

rr-ARIS-bb

AMS AMS is the Ministry of Environment's waste permit administration system. It maintains data related to the administration of permits issued under the Environmental Management Act and registrations under various regulations where the regulation requires a discharger to register. It will include information such as companies or individuals permitted to discharge waste; type of business and locations at which waste disposal is permitted; the types, amounts and frequency of waste products that are permitted to be discharged at given locations; issue date and more. This was previously referred to as the "WASTE" database. Government Publication Date: 1957-Jul 31, 2019

Assessment Report Indexing System:

ARIS Within British Columbia, the "Mineral Tenure Act Regulation", requires that results of mineral exploration and development programs be submitted to the British Columbia Ministry of Employment and Investment, where they are then maintained and housed by the Geological Survey Branch. The assessment reports provided by the Geological Survey Branch contain summary information for reports approved to November 1998; on geology, geophysics, geochemistry, drilling, prospecting and physical work. Government Publication Date: Mar 31, 2019 rr-AUWR-bb

Private Automobile Wrecking & Supplies: AUWR This database provides an inventory of known locations that are involved in the scrap metal, automobile wrecking/recycling, and automobile parts & supplies industry. Information is provided on the company name, location and business type. Government Publication Date: 1999-Jan 31, 2020

BC Oil and Gas Wells:

Provincial

rr-BOGW-bb

BOGW The BC Oil and Gas Wells database was collected from the BC Oil and Gas Commission and is a comprehensive database that includes information regarding well number, well name, operator name, location, depth, status, as well as drill date and type. Please note that this database will not be updated, information on wells drilled after January 2006 can be found in the Oil and Gas Wells (OGW) database under the 'Private Source Database' section. Government Publication Date: 1918-Jan 2006*

Dry Cleaning Facilities:

Federal

rr-CDRY-bb

CDRY

List of dry cleaning facilities made available by Environment and Climate Change Canada. Environment and Climate Change Canada's Tetrachloroethylene (Use in Dry Cleaning and Reporting Requirements) Regulations (SOR/2003-79) are intended to reduce releases of tetrachloroethylene to the environment from dry cleaning facilities. Government Publication Date: Jan 2004-Dec 2017

Chemical Register:

Private

rr-CHEM-bb

Private

rr-CNG-bb

Provincial

rr-COAL-bb

CHEM This database includes a listing of locations of facilities within the Province or Territory that either manufacture and/or distributes chemicals. Government Publication Date: 1999-Jan 31, 2020

Compressed Natural Gas Stations:

CNG Canada has a network of public access compressed natural gas (CNG) refuelling stations. These stations dispense natural gas in compressed form at 3,000 pounds per square inch (psi), the pressure which is allowed within the current Canadian codes and standards. The majority of natural gas refuelling is located at existing retail gasoline that have a separate refuelling island for natural gas. This list of stations is made available by the Canadian Natural Gas Vehicle Alliance. Government Publication Date: Dec 2012 - Feb 2020

Coal Tar Sites:

COAL This one-time study is an inventory of all known and historical coal tar sites, identifying sites that produced coal tar and other related tars during the mid 1800's to the mid 1900's. Government Publication Date: 1992*

erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services

Order No: 20200520096

Compliance and Enforcement Summary:

Provincial

rr-CONV-bb

Provincial

rr-DIS-bb

Federal

rr-EEM-bb

Private

rr-EHS-bb

Federal

rr-EIIS-bb

Provincial

rr-EM-bb

Federal

rr-FCON-bb

CONV This database summarizes orders, tickets and convictions issued by the Ministry of the Environment under applicable ministry and federal legislation. Orders are issued when action is required to prevent or stop actual or potential impact to the environment. Tickets apply to all tickets paid, deemed guilty by non-payment or expiry, or contested in court and found guilty by a judge. Convictions apply to all court convictions of ministry legislation as well as federal legislation where the ministry has taken action. This reporting summary began in January 2006, replacing Non-Compliance Reports by the former Ministry of Water, Land & Air Protection. See the Non-Compliance Reports (NCPL) database below for more information. This database is part of a larger COORS (Conservation Officer On-Line Reporting System) database controlled by the Ministry of Environment in BC. Government Publication Date: 1990-Dec 31, 2019

Wastewater Discharge Inventory:

DIS This inventory contains information regarding direct dischargers of toxic pollutants for the following operations: Industrial; Commercial; Agricultural; Mining; Municipal; Urban; Aquaculture; and Pulp & Paper, operating under provincial permits. Please note that this program was discontinued and therefore the database will not be updated. Government Publication Date: 1957-1995*

Environmental Effects Monitoring:

EEM The Environmental Effects Monitoring program assesses the effects of effluent from industrial or other sources on fish, fish habitat and human usage of fisheries resources. Since 1992, pulp and paper mills have been required to conduct EEM studies under the Pulp and Paper Effluent Regulations. This database provides information on the mill name, geographical location and sub-lethal toxicity data. Government Publication Date: 1992-2007*

ERIS Historical Searches:

EHS ERIS has compiled a database of all environmental risk reports completed since March 1999. Available fields for this database include: site location, date of report, type of report, and search radius. As per all other databases, the ERIS database can be referenced on both the map and "Statistical Profile" page. Government Publication Date: 1999-Jan 31, 2020

Environmental Issues Inventory System:

EIIS The Environmental Issues Inventory System was developed through the implementation of the Environmental Issues and Remediation Plan. This plan was established to determine the location and severity of contaminated sites on inhabited First Nation reserves, and where necessary, to remediate those that posed a risk to health and safety; and to prevent future environmental problems. The EIIS provides information on the reserve under investigation, inventory number, name of site, environmental issue, site action (Remediation, Site Assessment), and date investigation completed. Government Publication Date: 1992-2001*

Environmental Monitoring Locations:

EM List of environmental monitoring locations included in the Environmental Monitoring System (EMS) maintained by BC's Ministry of the Environment. EMS is the ministry's primary monitoring data repository. The system was designed to capture data covering physical/chemical and biological analyses performed on water, air, solid waste discharges and ambient monitoring sites throughout the province. Government Publication Date: Mar 2011-Nov 30, 2019

Federal Convictions:

FCON Environment Canada maintains a database referred to as the "Environmental Registry" that details prosecutions under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act (CEPA) and the Fisheries Act (FA). Information is provided on the company name, location, charge date, offence and penalty. Government Publication Date: 1988-Jun 2007* rr-FCS-bb

Federal Contaminated Sites on Federal Land: FCS The Federal Contaminated Sites Inventory includes information on known federal contaminated sites under the custodianship of departments, agencies and consolidated Crown corporations as well as those that are being or have been investigated to determine whether they have contamination arising from past use that could pose a risk to human health or the environment. The inventory also includes non-federal contaminated sites for which the Government of Canada has accepted some or all financial responsibility. It does not include sites where contamination has been caused by, and which are under the control of, enterprise Crown corporations, private individuals, firms or other levels of government. Includes fire training sites and sites at which Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) are a concern. Government Publication Date: Jun 2000-Nov 2019

Commercial Fisheries:

Provincial

rr-FISH-bb

FISH The Fisheries, Aquaculture & Commercial Fisheries Branch of the Ministry of Water, Land & Air Protection maintains a database of fish processing plant approvals, licenses and activities. Each year, licenses need to be renewed. Government Publication Date: 1993-2019

erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services

Order No: 20200520096

Fisheries & Oceans Fuel Tanks:

Federal

rr-FOFT-bb

Federal

rr-FRST-bb

FOFT Fisheries & Oceans Canada maintains an inventory of aboveground & underground fuel storage tanks located on Fisheries & Oceans property or controlled by DFO. Our inventory provides information on the site name, location, tank owner, tank operator, facility type, storage tank location, tank contents & capacity, and date of tank installation. Government Publication Date: 1964-Sep 2019

Federal Identification Registry for Storage Tank Systems (FIRSTS):

FRST A list of federally regulated Storage tanks from the Federal Identification Registry for Storage Tank Systems (FIRSTS). FIRSTS is Environment and Climate Change Canada's database of storage tank systems subject to the Storage Tank for Petroleum Products and Allied Petroleum Products Regulations. The main objective of the Regulations is to prevent soil and groundwater contamination from storage tank systems located on federal and aboriginal lands. Storage tank systems that do not have a valid identification number displayed in a readily visible location on or near the storage tank system may be refused product delivery. Government Publication Date: May 31, 2018 rr-GEN-bb

Provincial Waste Generators Summary: GEN Within British Columbia, the Special Waste Regulation defines a waste generator as any site, equipment and/or operation involved in the production, collection, handling and/or storage of regulated wastes. A generator of regulated waste is required to register the waste generation site and each waste produced, collected, handled, or stored at the site. This database contains the registration number (BCG#), company name and address of registered generators; including the types of hazardous wastes generated and the form of treatment used in the handling of the waste. Some of "Waste Generators Summary" addresses may represent mailing addresses rather than waste/hazardous sites. This information is a summary of all years from June 1993 to September 2010. Please note that a British Columbia Generator number (BCG#) are not unique to a company. This database is part of a larger SWIS (Special Waste Information System) database controlled by the Ministry of Environment in BC. Waste Generators Summary data are historic and no longer being updated. Government Publication Date: 1993-Jan 31, 2019

Generators - Special Waste Information System (SWIS):

Provincial

rr-GEN2-bb

GEN2 The Special Waste Information System (SWIS) maintained by the BC Ministry of Environment holds information related to the generation and transportation of hazardous waste under the Hazardous Waste Regulation. This is a list of waste shipper sites (waste generators) included in hazardous waste transport manifests from 2011 - 2014, accompanied by manifest details. Government Publication Date: Jan 2011-Dec 2014 rr-GHG-bb

Federal Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Large Facilities: GHG List of greenhouse gas emissions from large facilities made available by Environment Canada. Greenhouse gas emissions in kilotonnes of carbon dioxide equivalents (kt CO2 eq). Government Publication Date: 2013-Dec 2017

Hazardous Waste Facilities:

Provincial

rr-HWF-bb

Federal

rr-IAFT-bb

HWF A list of Hazardous Waste Facilities in British Columbia made available by the Ministry of Jobs, Trade and Technology in the BC Data Catalogue. Government Publication Date: Apr 30, 2019

Indian & Northern Affairs Fuel Tanks:

IAFT The Department of Indian & Northern Affairs Canada (INAC) maintains an inventory of aboveground & underground fuel storage tanks located on both federal and crown land. Our inventory provides information on the reserve name, location, facility type, site/facility name, tank type, material & ID number, tank contents & capacity, and date of tank installation. Government Publication Date: 1950-Aug 2003* rr-LUM-bb

Provincial Lumber Mills: LUM This database provides information regarding the general location and estimated annual output capacity of major timber processing facilities within the province of British Columbia. Government Publication Date: 1997-2017

Canadian Mine Locations:

Private

rr-MINE-bb

MINE This information is collected from the Canadian & American Mines Handbook. The Mines database is a national database that provides over 290 listings on mines (listed as public companies) dealing primarily with precious metals and hard rocks. Listed are mines that are currently in operation, closed, suspended, or are still being developed (advanced projects). Their locations are provided as geographic coordinates (x, y and/or longitude, latitude). As of 2002, data pertaining to Canadian smelters and refineries has been appended to this database. Government Publication Date: 1998-2009*

erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services

Order No: 20200520096

Minerals Deposits Database:

Provincial

rr-MNR-bb

Federal

rr-NATE-bb

MNR The Ministry of Energy and Mines maintains a database of more than 12,000 metallic mineral, industrial mineral and coal deposits and occurrences within British Columbia. Information within our report pertains to primary name, elevation, mining division, commodities, and status. Please note that as of January 27, 1999, information included within this database was divided into 2 categories: released and unreleased areas. Records for unreleased areas may contain incomplete, unedited, and/or inaccurate data. Government Publication Date: Apr 30, 2019

National Analysis of Trends in Emergencies System (NATES):

NATE In 1974 Environment Canada established the National Analysis of Trends in Emergencies System (NATES) database, for the voluntary reporting of significant spill incidents. The data was to be used to assist in directing the work of the emergencies program. NATES ran from 1974 to 1994. Extensive information is available within this database including company names, place where the spill occurred, date of spill, cause, reason and source of spill, damage incurred, and amount, concentration, and volume of materials released. Government Publication Date: 1974-1994* rr-NCPL-bb

Provincial Non-Compliance Reports: NCPL From 1990 to March 2001 the Ministry of Water, Land & Air Protection maintained a reporting system that identified any reported concern that pertained to compliance with authorized waste management permits or plans, approvals, orders, operational certificates and regulations, or any other activity under the Waste Management Act. This reporting system was discontinued in April of 2001; therefore there will be no updates to this database. However, beginning in January 2006 the Ministry of the Environment began publishing Compliance and Enforcement Summaries. See the Compliance and Enforcement Summary (CPL) database above for more information. Government Publication Date: 1990-Mar 2001*

National Defense & Canadian Forces Fuel Tanks:

Federal

rr-NDFT-bb

Federal

rr-NDSP-bb

NDFT The Department of National Defense and the Canadian Forces maintains an inventory of all aboveground & underground fuel storage tanks located on DND lands. Our inventory provides information on the base name, location, tank type & capacity, tank contents, tank class, date of tank installation, date tank last used, and status of tank as of May 2001. This database will no longer be updated due to the new National Security protocols which have prohibited any release of this database. Government Publication Date: Up to May 2001*

National Defense & Canadian Forces Spills:

NDSP The Department of National Defense and the Canadian Forces maintains an inventory of spills to land and water. All spill sites have been classified under the "Transportation of Dangerous Goods Act - 1992". Our inventory provides information on the facility name, location, spill ID #, spill date, type of spill, as well as the quantity of substance spilled & recovered. Government Publication Date: Mar 1999-Apr 2018 rr-NDWD-bb

Federal National Defence & Canadian Forces Waste Disposal Sites: NDWD The Department of National Defence and the Canadian Forces maintains an inventory of waste disposal sites located on DND lands. Where available, our inventory provides information on the base name, location, type of waste received, area of site, depth of site, year site opened/closed and status. Government Publication Date: 2001-Apr 2007*

National Energy Board Pipeline Incidents:

Federal

rr-NEBI-bb

Federal

rr-NEBP-bb

NEBI Locations of pipeline incidents from 2008 to present, made available by the Canada Energy Regulator (CER) - previously the National Energy Board (NEB). Includes incidents reported under the Onshore Pipeline Regulations and the Processing Plant Regulations related to pipelines under federal jurisdiction, does not include incident data related to pipelines under provincial or territorial jurisdiction. Government Publication Date: 2008-Mar 31, 2020

National Energy Board Wells:

NEBP The NEBW database contains information on onshore & offshore oil and gas wells that are outside provincial jurisdiction(s) and are thereby regulated by the National Energy Board. Data is provided regarding the operator, well name, well ID No./UWI, status, classification, well depth, spud and release date. Government Publication Date: 1920-Feb 2003*

erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services

Order No: 20200520096

National Environmental Emergencies System (NEES):

Federal

rr-NEES-bb

NEES In 2000, the Emergencies program implemented NEES, a reporting system for spills of hazardous substances. For the most part, this system only captured data from the Atlantic Provinces, some from Quebec and Ontario and a portion from British Columbia. Data for Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba and the Territories was not captured. However, NEES is also a repository for previous Environment Canada spill datasets. NEES is composed of the historic datasets ' or Trends ' which dates from approximately 1974 to present. NEES Trends is a compilation of historic databases, which were merged and includes data from NATES (National Analysis of Trends in Emergencies System), ARTS (Atlantic Regional Trends System), and NEES. In 2001, the Emergencies Program determined that variations in reporting regimes and requirements between federal and provincial agencies made national spill reporting and trend analysis difficult to achieve. As a consequence, the department has focused efforts on capturing data on spills of substances which fall under its legislative authority only (CEPA and FA). As such, the NEES database will be decommissioned in December 2004. Government Publication Date: 1974-2003* rr-NPCB-bb

Federal National PCB Inventory: NPCB Environment Canada's National PCB inventory includes information on in-use PCB containing equipment in Canada including federal, provincial and private facilities. Federal out-of-service PCB containing equipment and PCB waste owned by the federal government or by federally regulated industries such as airlines, railway companies, broadcasting companies, telephone and telecommunications companies, pipeline companies, etc. are also listed. Although it is not Environment Canada's mandate to collect data on non-federal PCB waste, the National PCB inventory includes some information on provincial and private PCB waste and storage sites. Some addresses provided may be Head Office addresses and are not necessarily the location of where the waste is being used or stored. Government Publication Date: 1988-2008*

National Pollutant Release Inventory:

Federal

rr-NPRI-bb

NPRI

Environment Canada has defined the National Pollutant Release Inventory ("NPRI") as a federal government initiative designed to collect comprehensive national data regarding releases to air, water, or land, and waste transfers for recycling for more than 300 listed substances. Government Publication Date: 1993-May 2017

BC Oil and Gas Commission Incidents:

Provincial

rr-OG INCIDENTS-bb

OG INCIDENTS A list of oil and gas pipeline incidents in British Columbia made available by BC Oil and Gas Commission. An incident is defined as a present or imminent event or circumstance, resulting from oil and gas activity that is outside the scope of normal operations which may or may not be an emergency. Includes pipeline spills, releases, and damage to active and discontinued pipelines; does not include incidents that did not result in damage to the pipeline or a release of contents. Government Publication Date: Nov 30, 2019 rr-OGWW-bb

Private Oil and Gas Wells: OGWW The Nickle's Energy Group (publisher of the Daily Oil Bulletin) collects information on drilling activity including operator and well statistics. The well information database includes name, location, class, status and depth. The main Nickle's database is updated on a daily basis, however, this database is updated on a monthly basis. More information is available at www.nickles.com. Government Publication Date: 1988-Feb 29, 2020 rr-PAP-bb

Private Canadian Pulp and Paper: PAP This information is part of the Pulp and Paper Canada Directory. The Directory provides a comprehensive listing of the locations of pulp and paper mills and the products that they produce. Government Publication Date: 1999, 2002, 2004, 2005, 2009-2014

Inventory of PCB Storage Sites:

Provincial

rr-PCB-bb

Federal

rr-PCFT-bb

Provincial

rr-PES-bb

PCB The Ministry of Water, Land & Air Protection maintains a database of all active Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB) waste storage sites within the Special Waste Information System. Please note that there is no requirement to maintain an accurate listing of all inactive PCB waste storage equipment and/or disposal sites. The records within this database provide information regarding site name, location, an inventory of stored wastes and quantities, and status date (when site first active/inactive). Previous to May 1993, data was collected from a different source and is only available for 1989. Inventory of PCB Storage Sites data are historic and no longer being updated. Government Publication Date: 1989, May 1993-2010*

Parks Canada Fuel Storage Tanks:

PCFT Canadian Heritage maintains an inventory of known fuel storage tanks operated by Parks Canada, in both National Parks and at National Historic Sites. The database details information on site name, location, tank install/removal date, capacity, fuel type, facility type, tank design and owner/operator. Government Publication Date: 1920-Jan 2005*

Pesticide Register:

PES This is a database of individuals who apply for a service or vendor license for the use of registered pesticides. A service license is denoted by an "S" in the license number, likewise, a vendor license by a "V" in the license number. Government Publication Date: 1989-Mar 2020

erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services

Order No: 20200520096

Private Aggregate Inventory:

Provincial

rr-PRAI-bb

PRAI Within British Columbia, aggregate pits are designated as mines; and as such, the Ministry of Energy and Mines is responsible for their planning, management and regulation, including permitting, health, safety and reclamation. Owners or operators of all private aggregate pits must file Notices of Work as part of the permitting and reclamation process. In 1994, the Geological Survey Branch initiated the Aggregate Program, in order to establish an inventory of natural and crushed aggregate pits. Information about each pit in the database file includes its location, NTS map sheet number, Notice of Work file number and status (active/inactive) and the type of landform hosting the pit. This database was a one-time inventory and will not be updated. Government Publication Date: 1975-1996* rr-PUAI-bb

Provincial Public Aggregate Inventory: PUAI Information about public aggregate pits in British Columbia is collected and managed by the Ministry of Transportation and Highways. Data has been gathered on more than 2000 pits, in respect to pit name, type and geographical location. Government Publication Date: 1960-2001*

Waste Receivers Summary:

Provincial

rr-REC-bb

Provincial

rr-REC2-bb

Private

rr-RST-bb

Private

rr-SCT-bb

Provincial

rr-SREG-bb

Provincial

rr-STNK-bb

Federal

rr-TCFT-bb

REC The Special Waste Regulation defines the disposal of regulated waste through an operating waste management system or a waste disposal site operated or used pursuant to the terms and conditions of a Certificate of Approval or a Provisional Certificate of Approval. A waste receiving location is any site or facility to which waste is transferred through a waste carrier. A receiver of regulated waste is required to register the waste receiving facility. This database represents registered receivers of regulated wastes, identified by registration number, company name and address. Some of "Waste Receivers Summary" addresses may represent mailing addresses rather than waste/hazardous sites. This database is part of a larger SWIS (Special Waste Information System) database controlled by the Ministry of Environment in BC. Waste Receivers Summary data are historic and no longer being updated. Government Publication Date: 1992-2010*

Receivers - Special Waste Information System (SWIS):

REC2 The Special Waste Information System (SWIS) maintained by the BC Ministry of Environment holds information related to the generation and transportation of hazardous waste under the Hazardous Waste Regulation. This is a list of waste receiver sites included in hazardous waste transport manifests from 2011 - 2014, accompanied by manifest details. Government Publication Date: Jan 2011-Dec 2014

Retail Fuel Storage Tanks:

RST This database includes an inventory of retail fuel outlet locations (including marinas) that have on their property gasoline, oil, waste oil, natural gas and / or propane storage tanks. Government Publication Date: 1999-Jan 31, 2020

Scott's Manufacturing Directory:

SCT Scott's Directories is a data bank containing information on over 200,000 manufacturers across Canada. Even though Scott's listings are voluntary, it is the most comprehensive database of Canadian manufacturers available. Information concerning a company's address, plant size, and main products are included in this database. Government Publication Date: 1992-Mar 2011*

Site Registry:

SREG This information is collected from the Ministry of Environment's Site Registry. It is not a registry of contaminated sites, although some sites on the registry are contaminated. Most sites have already been investigated and require minor remediation, or have already been cleaned up to government requirements. The Registry also stores environmentally relevant historic information about sites including: names of participants, legal and administrative notations, references to pertinent documents submitted to the ministry, associations with other sites, and much more. 1. Please note the information provided in the Detail Reports have been updated to the best of our ability as provided by the source, BC Government. For more information, please contact your ERIS sales representative. Government Publication Date: Mar 31, 2020

Surrey Tank Construction Permits:

STNK A list of building permits issued for the removal, construction, and decommissioning of storage tanks in the City of Surrey. This list is made available by the City of Surrey Building Division of the Department of Planning and Development. Government Publication Date: Mar 31, 2020

Transport Canada Fuel Storage Tanks:

TCFT List of fuel storage tanks currently or previously owned or operated by Transport Canada. This inventory also includes tanks on The Pickering Lands, which refers to 7,530 hectares (18,600 acres) of land in Pickering, Markham, and Uxbridge owned by the Government of Canada since 1972; properties on this land has been leased by the government since 1975, and falls under the Site Management Policy of Transport Canada, but is administered by Public Works and Government Services Canada. This inventory provides information on the site name, location, tank age, capacity and fuel type. Government Publication Date: 1970-Aug 2018

erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services

Order No: 20200520096

Vancouver Heating Oil Underground Storage Tanks:

Provincial

rr-VTNK-bb

Provincial

rr-WDS-bb

Provincial

rr-WWIS-bb

VTNK A list of heating oil Underground Storage Tanks made available by the City of Vancouver. The City of Vancouver maintains records of UST removals, abandonments, and installations for heating oil storage tanks. Government Publication Date: Jun 1995 - Feb 2020

Waste Disposal Site Inventory:

WDS This inventory pertains to active, regulated waste disposal sites within the province of British Columbia. Registered companies may hold a permit or certificate for release of the following waste types: Effluent, Refuse, Air and Special Waste Storage. Information on Waste Disposal Sites after 1998 is contained within the Authorizations (AUTH) database. Government Publication Date: 1980-1998*

Water Well Information System:

WWIS This database was collected from the Groundwater Information Center of the Ministry of Water, Land & Air Protection and contains over 90,000 records. Comprehensive information is available for each well including: well location (address/site area), latitude/longitude, legal description (section, lot, plan, district lot, range, township), BCGS Mapsheet No., depth of well, construction dates, well status and lithology. The accuracy of well locations is also provided, as well as the reference source for obtaining geographic coordinates. Government Publication Date: Mar 31, 2020

erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services

Order No: 20200520096

h-Definitions Definitions Database Descriptions: This section provides a detailed explanation for each database including: source, information available, time coverage, and acronyms used. They are listed in alphabetic order. Detail Report: This is the section of the report which provides the most detail for each individual record. Records are summarized by location, starting with the project property followed by records in closest proximity. Distance: The distance value is the distance between plotted points, not necessarily the distance between the sites' boundaries. All values are an approximation. Direction: The direction value is the compass direction of the site in respect to the project property and/or center point of the report. Elevation: The elevation value is taken from the location at which the records for the site address have been plotted. All values are an approximation. Source: Google Elevation API. Executive Summary: This portion of the report is divided into 3 sections: 'Report Summary'- Displays a chart indicating how many records fall on the project property and, within the report search radii. 'Site Report Summary'-Project Property'- This section lists all the records which fall on the project property. For more details, see the 'Detail Report' section. 'Site Report Summary-Surrounding Properties'- This section summarizes all records on adjacent properties, listing them in order of proximity from the project property. For more details, see the 'Detail Report' section. Map Key: The map key number is assigned according to closest proximity from the project property. Map Key numbers always start at #1. The project property will always have a map key of '1' if records are available. If there is a number in brackets beside the main number, this will indicate the number of records on that specific property. If there is no number in brackets, there is only one record for that property. The symbol and colour used indicates 'elevation': the red inverted triangle will dictate 'ERIS Sites with Lower Elevation', the yellow triangle will dictate 'ERIS Sites with Higher Elevation' and the orange square will dictate 'ERIS Sites with Same Elevation.' Unplottables: These are records that could not be mapped due to various reasons, including limited geographic information. These records may or may not be in your study area, and are included as reference.

erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services

Order No: 20200520096

..........................................................................................................................

...........................................................................................

.....................................................................................

......................................................................................................

........

.......................................................................................................................................... .......................................................................................................................................

....................................................................................................................................

........................................................................

2.1

Watershed Characteristics

]

)

Subject: Meeting Date: Time: Location: File #:

City of Cranbrook Source Protection Plan – Technical Committee Meeting #2 July 15, 2020 9:00 am – 10:00 pm MST via teleconference 0953.0050.01

July 15, 2020 Present:

Urban Systems – Anthony Comazzetto, Steve Brubacher, Don Dobson, Jennifer Clarke City of Cranbrook – Mike Matejka, Jason Perrault Interior Health Authority – Rob Birtles (for Dan Byron) MFLRNORD – Scott Hicks (Forestry) MOTI – Lindsay McKinnon Galloway Lumber Co. – Randy Byford, Geoff Byford Ktunaxa Nation – Heather McMahon

Regrets:

MFNRORD – Shawna Larade (Range), Lisa Cox (Recreation), Jennifer Andrews (Water Stewardship), Yong Wang (Water Resource Authorizations) MOTI – Hilary Barnett Rancher – Jordy Thibeault RDEK – Kevin Paterson, Paul Kerckhoff a am – Sonja Seher, John Brace MB Labs – Wendy Riggs

1. Participants Confirmed individuals on the call and who they represent. 2. Introduction to Meeting and Review Agenda Don outlined that the purpose and objective of the meeting was to: a) Summarize Results of Phase 1 Source Assessment draft report; b) Solicit feedback and questions from Technical Committee members regarding the Phase 1 Source Assessment draft report, specifically the hazard summary and recommendations; and, c) Outline Next Steps in the Source Protection Plan process. 3. Phase 1 Source Assessment Results (Hazard Summary and Recommendations) Don went through Table 4.1 Summary of Hazards, found on page 23 of the draft report. For each section, feedback was solicited. FOREST DEVELOPMENT HAZARDS – overall high risk assigned to “roads” at a landscape-level based on watershed observations. o Randy Byford (Galloway) indicated that previous research showed that sediment inputs from forest roads in the watershed to be “negligible” and they have not found this to be a problem.

Suite 204 - 625 Front Street, Nelson, BC V1L 4B6 | T: 250.352.9774

MINUTES Subject:

City of Cranbrook Source Protection Plan – Technical Committee Meeting #2

Meeting Date:

July 15, 2020

Time:

9:00 am – 10:00 pm MST

Location:

via teleconference

File:

0953.0050.01

Page:

2 of 3

Action: Project Team will follow up with Randy to share our findings and to ask that the research findings be made available to incorporate into the assessment. o

Randy Byford (Galloway) indicated that the pine forest monoculture (single-age, single-species) is a greater hazard to water quality in the watershed.

Action: Information on forest health will be updated where possible. We would ask for reference documentation if available. o

Steve Brubacher asked why “Site J1 – harvesting within 30 m of stream” was rated low risk? Don answered that the field assessment determined there to be adequate forested buffer, low connectivity to the stream, and no disturbance to stream banks. Randy informed us that stream order is bumped up one class in Community Watersheds as a precaution.

WILDFIRE HAZARDS – overall moderate risk assigned to wildfire risk in the watersheds. NATURAL PROCESS HAZARDS – assigned a low to moderate risk. PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION NETWORK HAZARDS – assigned a high to very high risk due to potential for sediment delivery and chemical contamination at the Joseph Creek bridge on Gold Creek Road. Recommendations are to address potential for sediment delivery from road surface, ditchline and cutslope sources, ensure that permits are in place for the Transportation of Dangerous Goods, and that a spill response kit be placed at the bridge to mitigate incidental spills at the bridge site. Action: Project Team will follow up with MOTI and City of Cranbrook on this risk during development of the Response Plan. RECREATION AND RANGE HAZARDS – range use by cattle was determined to be low risk but unauthorized recreation use at the Gold Creek diversion site was determined to be high to very high risk. The City of Cranbrook is currently undergoing maintenance and upgrades at the Gold Creek diversion site so there is an opportunity to include security and access controls in the new designs. o Randy Byford (Galloway) indicated that there is a mountain pine beetle infestation near the Gold Creek diversion site and is currently being assessed. Action: Galloway should share details of proposed havresting near the intake with the City of Cranbrook and with the Project Team to review potential risks to water quality and quantity. o

Rob Birtles (Interior Health) pointed out that the City of Cranbrook experienced a cryptospiridium outbreak in 1996 and that is was determined to be associated with turning out of calves in the watershed. Rob wondered what changes may have occurred since this time to reuce this risk?

Action: Project Team will follow up with Range Licensee and Range Officer to further characterize range use practices in the watershed.

MINUTES Subject:

City of Cranbrook Source Protection Plan – Technical Committee Meeting #2

Meeting Date:

July 15, 2020

Time:

9:00 am – 10:00 pm MST

Location:

via teleconference

File:

0953.0050.01

Page:

3 of 3

CLIMATE CHANGE HAZARDS – potential for sediment delivery and changes in hydrology attributed to predicted climate change are assigned a high to very high risk. On-going raw water quality monitoring by the City of Cranbrook is recommended. o Scott Hicks (Forestry) asked whether we looked at culvert sizing in the watershed to determine whether they are able to handle changed flows and whether there are specific risks identified by the assessment? Randy Byford indicated that Galloway oversizes culvert to account for hydrologic change. Don replied that there is a process in dealing with culvert size upgrades. Priorities are given to culverts closer to the intake. He noted that there is a buffered section of upper Gold Creek (low gradient, wetlands) that can mitigate events and that there were no concerns with crossings on the Joseph Creek mainstem channel. The City of Cranbrook is able to mitigate sediment effects at the flow control structure and divert supply if necessary. o Jason Perrault (City of Cranbrook) indicated that there is on-going water quality monitoring above the Gold Creek intake pond. Monitoring is currently done manually but the City plans to upgrade monitoring with the installation of sensors automatically transmitted in real-time. 4. Next Steps and Project Timeline We will distributed minutes to the Technical Committee and provide additional time for comments, edits, question. Feedback should be sent to us by July 24, 2020. We expect to finalize the Phase 1 report, including the recommendations (Module 8) by the end of July, provided that we have received all the comments on the draft report by that date. The Phase 2 Reponse Plan addresses only the high and very high risks identified in the Phase 1 report. We epxect to complete the Response Plan by the end of August and circulate for comment and review. A final report, combines Phase 1 Source Assessment and Phase 2 Response Plan, will be forwarded to Interior Health upon completion at the end of August 2020. 5. Wrap Up Meeting adjourned at 10:00 am.

Minutes recorded by: Jennifer Clarke

MEMORANDUM Date: To: cc: From: File: Subject:

December 13, 2021 Interior Health Authority Mike Matejka – City of Cranbrook Jeremy Clowes, P.Eng. 0956.0050.01 City of Cranbrook - Filtration Exemption Application_Final_rev.A

1.0 INTRODUCTION Urban Systems Ltd. (Urban) is applying for Filtration Exemption from the Interior Health Authority (IH) on behalf of the City of Cranbrook (City) for their surface water supply. This application report summarizes British Columbia’s criteria for filtration exemption and the City’s level of compliance.

2.0 BACKGROUND The City’s primary water sources are Joseph Creek and Gold Creek. The City also utilizes three groundwater wells to supplement their water supply. Surface water from both creeks is directed to the Phillips reservoir by a common diversion structure located approximately 1 km upstream of the reservoir. Raw water from the Phillips Reservoir is currently treated by chlorine gas and then conveyed by gravity to the City’s distribution system. The City is planning to convert from the existing gas chlorination system to a bulk liquid or onsite generation system to improve safety. In addition, a plan is in place to install a UV disinfection system as a secondary disinfection process. The City initiated a comprehensive Pathogen Monitoring Program in 2014. Through this Program, water samples are collected from the Phillips Reservoir. Raw water and potable water samples are collected at the Phillips Reservoir chlorination facility. In addition, the City samples water from 4 locations on Gold Creek, 2 locations on Joseph Creek, and at a location upstream of the Phillips Reservoir, where water is a mixture of Gold and Joseph Creek sources. Water samples are collected weekly from the Phillips reservoir sampling sites and every two weeks from the Gold and Joseph Creek sampling sites. These samples are submitted to an independent lab for analysis. In addition to the sample collection for lab analysis, various field parameters including turbidity are regularly tested by City Operators and/or online analyzers. Through their intensive Water Quality Monitoring Program, the City has collected the water quality data required for the completion of the filtration exemption application, as outlined by Section 4.3 of the “Drinking Water Treatment Objectives (Microbiological) for Surface Water Supplies in British Columbia” (Government of BC, 2012). As indicated by the Objectives, the criteria listed in the table below must be met to satisfy the requirements of a filtration exemption.

304 - 1353 Ellis Street, Kelowna, BC V1Y 1Z9 | T: 250.762.2517

MEMORANDUM Date: December 13, 2021 File: 0956.0050.01 Subject: IH Filtration Deferral Application Page: 2 of 8

Table 2.0 – BC Criteria for Filtration Exemption Parameter

BC Criteria for Filtration Exemption

Watershed Control Program

Designed with the express purpose of minimizing fecal contamination in the source water.

Viruses

4 log reduction

Cryptosporidium and Giardia

3 log reduction Baseline levels are established

E.coli

10% of Source/raw water does not exceed 20/100 mL in any 6-month period Non-detectable in treated water

Total Coliform

10% of Source/raw water does not exceed 100/100 mL in any 6-month period (evaluated if E.Coli data is not available) Non-detectable in treated water

Turbidity

Average daily turbidity levels measured at equal intervals (at least every 4 hours) are around 1 NTU Turbidity does not exceed 5 NTU for more than 2 days in a 1-year period.

Trihalomethanes (THMs) 1

Furthest location in distribution system from the treatment facility will not exceed 0.1 mg/L (annual average)

Notes: 1.

There are no conditions for THMs that must be met for filtration exemption; however, it has been included because THMs are a key indicator of water quality. The Guidelines for Canadian Drinking Water Quality recommend a maximum acceptable concentration of 0.1 mg/L for THMs, expressed as locational running annual average of quarterly samples.

At a past meeting between IH, the City, and Urban Systems, IH indicated that turbidity grab samples are not acceptable for reviewing a filtration exemption application. The City has since provided Urban Systems with online analyzer turbidity data for two periods: January 2018-January 2019, May 2020 – November 2020. Based on this data, compliance with turbidity requirements for filtration exemption were re-analyzed and are presented in Section 8.0. The following sections outline the City’s level of compliance with the filtration exemption criteria.

3.0 WATERSHED CONTROL PROGRAM Dobson Engineering Ltd. has prepared a Source Protection Plan that meets the objectives outlined by IH. This report has been submitted to Interior Health previously but please let us know if you require a copy.

304 - 1353 Ellis Street, Kelowna, BC V1Y 1Z9 | T: 250.762.2517

MEMORANDUM Date: December 13, 2021 File: 0956.0050.01 Subject: IH Filtration Deferral Application Page: 3 of 8

4.0 REDUCTION OF VIRUSES, CRYPTOSPORIDIUM AND GIARDIA The filtration exemption criteria require that the City can achieve 4-log reduction of viruses and 3-log reduction of cryptosporidium and giardia using a minimum of 2 disinfection processes. As discussed, the City’s current level of water treatment includes chlorination and there is a plan in place to install a UV disinfection system. The chlorine contact time that is achieved in the existing supply trunkmain from the point of chlorine injection to the first user is summarized in the table below for existing conditions and 2036 growth scenario. Table 4.0 - Chlorine Contact Time Scenario

Max Day Demand + Fire Flow (L/s)

Distance to First User (m)

Pipe Size (mm)

Travel Time (mins)

Chlorine Residual (mg/L)

CT Achieved (mg*min/L)

Minimum CT Required (mg*min/L) 1

Existing

538

5900

600

51.7

0.5

25.9

2036

665

5900

600

41.8

0.5

20.9

1. Based on a temperature of 0.5 degrees Celsius and a maximum pH of 9 The planned UV system will be rated to achieve 4-log reduction of Giardia and Cryptosporidium at a conservative design UV transmittance (UVT) of 71% to allow for some fluctuations in water quality without compromising the safety of the water supply. Table 4.1 provides the minimum, maximum and average UVT values from the data. Table 4.1 - UVT Measurement Source Data for Design UVT Selection UVT Measurement Source Phillips Reservoir Raw Water Intake

Min UVT (%)

Max UVT (%)

Average UVT (%)

82.5

94.9

91.4

The BC Drinking Water Officers’ Guide notes that a minimum of 3 log reduction in Cryptosporidium and Giardia must be provided and that “a higher level of reduction may be required if the situation justifies it”. Both the EPA and Alberta Government have standards in place to determine when higher levels of treatment are recommended for Cryptosporidium and Giardia which are discussed below. The US EPA Ultraviolet Disinfection Guidance Manual for the Final Long Term 2 Enhance Surface Water Treatment Rule identifies disinfection targets for cryptosporidium which governs UV system sizing as noted in the table below. Treatment requirements are determined based on the level of treatment provided upstream of the UV system and the average baseline levels of cryptosporidium.

304 - 1353 Ellis Street, Kelowna, BC V1Y 1Z9 | T: 250.762.2517

MEMORANDUM Date: December 13, 2021 File: 0956.0050.01 Subject: IH Filtration Deferral Application Page: 4 of 8

Table 4.2 – Cryptosporidium Required Log Reduction Treatment

EPA Cryptosporidium Log Reduction Range for UV Systems

Phillips Reservoir Average Cryptosporidium Level

EPA Required Cryptosporidium Log Reduction for Cranbrook UV System

Filtered System

0 to 2.5

0.011 oocysts/L

n/a

Unfiltered System

2 to 3

0.011 oocysts/L

The concentration of Giardia was also considered in selecting the design log reduction requirement for UV reactors. The average measured Giardia concentration at the Phillips reservoir raw water intake is 1.3 counts/100L. The Alberta Standards and Guidelines for Municipal Waterworks, Wastewater and Storm Drainage Systems manual (Part 1), requires 4-log reduction where raw water Giardia levels are >1 counts/100L. Comparing the EPA and Alberta Giardia reduction requirements, the Alberta requirement for Giardia is most stringent and was therefore used to specify a 4-log Giardia reduction.

5.0 BASELINE CRYPTOSPORIDIUM AND GIARDIA The Filtration Exemption requires that background baseline levels of Cryptosporidium and Giardia, adequate to establish trends, have been established. As discussed in Section 4.0, the baseline levels of Cryptosporidium and Giardia are used to establish treatment requirements. The Phillips reservoir samples noted below were collected at the raw water intake between October 2014 and August 2019. Table 5.0 shows that the maximum Giardia concentration measured is 7.5 counts/100L (sample collected on September 27 th, 2016). The maximum Cryptosporidium measured is 4.3 counts/100L (sample collected on January 13, 2016). Table 5.0 - Summary of Giardia and Cryptosporidium Measurement Data

Parameter Giardia Cryptosporidium

Phillips Reservoir Sampling Site

# Samples Collected

Min Count (counts/ 100L)

Max Count (counts/ 100L)

Average Count (counts/ 100L)

0.0

7.5

1.3

0.0

4.3

1.1

Phillips Reservoir Raw Water Intake Phillips Reservoir Raw Water Intake

6.0 E. COLI The BC requirement is that not more than 10% of source/raw water samples exceed 20 counts/100mL in any 6-month period. The maximum E. Coli count determined by the lab was 2 counts/100mL, therefore all Phillips Reservoir raw water intake samples meet the E. Coli requirement for filtration exemption.

7.0 TOTAL COLIFORM Total coliform can be evaluated in lieu of E.Coli if data is not available to determine source water eligibility for filtration exemption. For Cranbrook’s application, E.Coli and Total Coliform data were available and reviewed.

304 - 1353 Ellis Street, Kelowna, BC V1Y 1Z9 | T: 250.762.2517

MEMORANDUM Date: December 13, 2021 File: 0956.0050.01 Subject: IH Filtration Deferral Application Page: 5 of 8

BC requires that less than 10% of source/raw water samples exceed 100 count/100 mL in any 6-month period. The tabulated data indicates that the BC requirement for filtration exemption was not met for the Phillips Reservoir raw water intake source between 2016 and 2019. Refer to Table A.1 included in Appendix A. Through discussions with IH, the City and Urban understand that an exceedance of the Total Coliform raw water limit is acceptable provided that source complies with E.Coli criteria and that both E.Coli and Total Coliform are non-detectable in treated water.

8.0 TURBDITIY - 1 NTU REQUIREMENT The BC filtration exemption requirement is that “average daily turbidity levels measured at equal intervals (at least every four hours) immediately before the disinfectant is applied are around 1 NTU, but do not exceed 5 NTU for more than 2 days in a 1-year period” (Government of BC, 2012). The first draft filtration exemption application was based on Turbidity data obtained from grab samples. As noted, IH indicated that grab samples are not sufficient for reviewing filtration exemption applications. The City provided Urban Systems with turbidity data from their online analyzer for two periods (Jan 2018-Jan 2019 & May-Nov 2020). Note that the City’s online analyzer records turbidity levels every four hours as required by BCs Filtration Exemption criteria. IH expressed concern with regards to the proposed UV system being effective at maximum turbidity level of 1.9 NTU. The proposed UV system (Wedeco) is designed to be capable of operating with total suspended solids (TSS) of up to 10 mg/L but Wedeco was unable to verify that the system is suitable for operating at a turbidity of 1.9 NTU as no standard testing methodology is available to demonstrate this. The City is going to focus their efforts on controlling the inflow to the Phillips Reservoir to prevent the turbidity from exceeding 1 NTU so that the turbidity concern can be addressed without pursuing specialized UV testing. The turbidity measurements recorded by the online analyzer meet filtration exemption requirements. Figures 1 and 2 of Appendix A show the measured turbidity values from Jan 2018-Jan 2019, and May 2020-Nov2020, respectively. The summary tables also provided in Appendix A (Tables A.2 and A.3) show that there were 6 exceedances (>1 NTU) between Jan 2018-Jan2019 and 10 exceedances between May 2020-Nov 2020. The average daily values on the dates which these exceedances coincided with are also included in Tables A.2 an A.3. The results indicate that in all cases, the average daily turbidity level measured was around 1 NTU (max 1.1 NTU average on June 7, 2020). The maximum instantaneous measured turbidity was 1.85 NTU; hence, no measurements exceeded 5 NTU. There was not sufficient data available to establish a relationship between TSS and turbidity in the source water to confirm that TSS remains below 10 mg/L at the peak turbidity levels that are experienced. To help ensure turbidity levels remain below the allowable limit of 1 NTU required for filtration exemption, and below a TSS of 10 mg/L as required by the UV system supplier, it is recommended that City complete the following: Implement Source Protection Plan recommendations to reduce sediment transport to the creeks and Phillips Reservoir. Improve monitoring of turbidity in each creek upstream of the Phillips Reservoir through the use of online analyzers. Direct creeks to the diversion channel, that flows around Phillips Reservoir, during periods of elevated turbidity. Consider automating valving at the diversion structure upstream of Phillips Reservoir to allow for improved control of source water being directed to Phillips Reservoir.

304 - 1353 Ellis Street, Kelowna, BC V1Y 1Z9 | T: 250.762.2517

MEMORANDUM Date: December 13, 2021 File: 0956.0050.01 Subject: IH Filtration Deferral Application Page: 6 of 8

Remove sediment that has accumulated in Phillips Reservoir to increase hydraulic retention time which may improve turbidity levels.

9.0 TURBIDITY - 5 NTU REQUIREMENT BC requires that peak turbidity not exceed 5 NTU for more than 2 days in a one-year period. No online turbidity meter measurements exceeded 2 NTU. The maximum NTU value recorded was 1.84 NTU (July 13, 2018).

10.0 TRIHALOMETHANES (THM) The filtration exemption criteria require that the average Trihalomethanes (THM) concentration not exceed 0.1 mg/L which is identified as a Maximum Acceptable Concentration (MAC) in the Canadian Guidelines for Drinking Water Quality. It is noted that the Canadian Guidelines express the measured THM level as an annual average of quarterly samples. The City samples for disinfection by-products, including Trihalomethanes (THM) and halo acidic acids (HAA). Samples are collected during the colder winter months on a quarterly basis, and monthly during the hot summer months. Areas targeted for sampling include the beginning, middle and end of the system. THM data is available from October 2014 to September 2019. Out of 128 samples collected, one sample exceeded the THM maximum acceptable concentration (MAC) of 0.1 mg/L (sample collected May 11, 2015 at the Gyro Park sampling tap) but the annual average THM level was below the MAC. Refer to Table A.4 in Appendix A. THMs are not considered to be a concern as there was only one exceedance in the review period and organic levels are low in the source water. It is expected that THM levels can be maintained below the MAC through regularly flushing problematic areas in the distribution system with extended residence times and minimizing the chlorine residual that is maintained in the system.

11.0 WATER TREATMENT PROCESS As noted, the City plans to construct a new UV and Chlorine disinfection facility. This facility will be located downstream of the Phillips Reservoir, next to the existing chlorination facility. Urban has reviewed footprint requirements for a filtration plant in case this is required in the future. The filtration plant can be located on the same site as the proposed disinfection facility. Refer to a conceptual figure that shows the estimated footprint requirements in Appendix B. The proposed disinfection facility will be designed in a manner that allows for accepting flows from the existing trunkmain from Phillips Reservoir or a future filtration plant.

304 - 1353 Ellis Street, Kelowna, BC V1Y 1Z9 | T: 250.762.2517

MEMORANDUM Date: December 13, 2021 File: 0956.0050.01 Subject: IH Filtration Deferral Application Page: 7 of 8

12.0 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS Table 12.0 summarizes the City’s ability to comply with BCs Filtration Exemption Criteria. Table 12.0 – Summary of the City’s Ability to Comply With the Filtration Exemption Criteria Parameter

BC Criteria for Filtration Exemption

City of Cranbrook Status

Watershed Control Program

Designed with the express purpose of minimizing fecal contamination in the source water.

Complies

Viruses

4 log reduction

Complies

Cryptosporidium and Giardia

3 log reduction

Will comply when UV Disinfection System is Added

Baseline levels are established

Established

E.coli

10% of Source/raw water does not exceed 20/100 mL in any 6-month period

Complies

Total Coliform

10% of Source/raw water does not exceed 100/100 mL in any 6-month period

Does not comply

Turbidity

Average daily turbidity levels measured at equal intervals (at least every 4 hours) are around 1 NTU, but do not exceed 5 NTU for more than 2 days in a 1-year period.

Complies

Trihalomethanes (THMs)

Furthest location in distribution system from the treatment facility will not exceed 0.1 mg/L

Complies. Annual average well below the 0.1 mg/L MAC.

*Acceptable as non-detect in treated water supply and system complies with E.Coli criteria

There are three key areas for the City to focus on with respect to reaching compliance with the filtration exemption criteria as noted below. UV Disinfection System – A UV Disinfection System must be added to comply with the filtration exemption criteria. Turbidity - Turbidity exceedances are limited in duration and the maximum values detected. Turbidity is normally below 1.0 NTU and the maximum level detected was 1.84 NTU which satisfies the filtration exemption criteria. The following can be considered to improve turbidity levels: Implement Source Protection Plan recommendations to decrease sediment entering the creeks and reservoir. Direct creek water to the diversion channel that flows around Phillips Reservoir when source turbidity exceeds 1 NTU. Consider adding online turbidity analyzers at the diversion structure (for each source) upstream of Phillips Reservoir (also recommended in the Source Protection

304 - 1353 Ellis Street, Kelowna, BC V1Y 1Z9 | T: 250.762.2517

MEMORANDUM Date: December 13, 2021 File: 0956.0050.01 Subject: IH Filtration Deferral Application Page: 8 of 8

Plan) and automated valving to allow for improved control of source water entering the Phillips Reservoir. Remove accumulated sediment from the Phillips reservoir to increase hydraulic retention time (may improve turbidity levels). Further planning is required to determine regulatory implications and methodology to complete this work while minimizing impacts to the water system and environment. THMs – There was only one exceedance of the THM MAC in the data provided but it recommended that the City continue to effectively maintain THM levels below the MAC through the following measures: Regularly flush areas in the distribution system with extended residence times. Minimize the chlorine residual level that is maintained. It is expected that the City will be able to deliver safe water to customers with the implementation of the above noted items. The City must continue to monitor source water quality to verify compliance and if water quality deteriorates, filtration is recommended.

13.0 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS ON WATER QUALITY The City’s “2020 Phillips Reservoir (inorganic)” water quality report identifies an elevated level nitratenitrogen of 15.1 mg/L, from a Phillips Raw water sample, which exceeds the Guidelines for Canadian Drinking Water Quality MAC of 10 mg/L. City staff confirmed this result was an anomaly and levels are normally well below the MAC—sampling from June 8, 2021 found nitrate-nitrogen to be non-detect in the Phillips reservoir. As such, no further action is proposed to address this issue aside from ongoing water quality monitoring which is regularly completed by the City.

14.0 CLOSURE We trust this provides IH with sufficient information to make an informed decision regarding the City’s application for filtration exemption. Please contact the undersigned if you have any questions or require additional information.

Sincerely, URBAN SYSTEMS LTD.

Jeremy Clowes, P.Eng. Principal cc: Mike Matejka – City of Cranbrook Attachments: Appendix A – Water Quality Data Appendix B – WTP Footprint Figure /ac U:\Projects_KEL\0956\0050\01\R-Reports-Studies-Documents\R1-Reports\4. Water Quality and Treatment\1. City of Cranbrook Filtration Exemption Application\2021-06-02_City of Cranbrook Filtration Exemption Application_Final_Rev.A.docx

304 - 1353 Ellis Street, Kelowna, BC V1Y 1Z9 | T: 250.762.2517

15.0 REFERENCES Government of BC. Part B: Drinking Water Treatment Objectives (Microbiological for Surface Water Supplies in British Columbia. 2012. Available at: https://www2.gov.bc.ca/assets/gov/environment/airland-water/water/waterquality/how-drinking-water-is-protected-in-bc/part_b__5_surface_water_treatment_objectives.pdf

304 - 1353 Ellis Street, Kelowna, BC V1Y 1Z9 | T: 250.762.2517

Appendix A Water Quality Data

304 - 1353 Ellis Street, Kelowna, BC V1Y 1Z9 | T: 250.762.2517

Table A.1 - Total Coliform Tabulated Results for Phillips Reservoir Raw Water Intake

Result Exceeding 100 CFU/100mL

Sample Collection Date (month/day/year)

# Samples Exceeding 100 Counts/100mL in 6-month Period

# Samples in any 6-month Period

% of samples exceeding in 6month Period

200 400 200 200 400 400 600 600 100 600 102 196 600 1800 2200 1200 1000 147 233 800 172 108 400 140 2800 110 104 400 133 1000 400 1800 200 1000 1800 1800 1000 400 120 1000 400

10/06/2014 10/15/2014 10/21/2014 04/27/2015 09/28/2015 10/05/2015 08/29/2016 09/06/2016 10/31/2016 11/14/2016 11/21/2016 01/16/2017 07/24/2017 07/31/2017 08/08/2017 08/21/2017 08/28/2017 10/10/2017 10/23/2017 12/11/2017 01/22/2018 03/26/2018 05/07/2018 08/27/2018 09/04/2018 09/17/2018 10/01/2018 12/10/2018 01/02/2019 05/21/2019 05/27/2019 06/03/2019 06/17/2019 07/15/2019 08/06/2019 08/12/2019 08/19/2019 08/26/2019 09/16/2019 09/23/2019 09/30/2019

3 3 3 3 3 3 6 6 6 6 6 6 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 7 5 5 6 6 6 6 6 6 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12

37 37 37 31 31 31 27 27 27 27 27 27 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 27 25 24 24 24 24 24 24 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27

8.1% 8.1% 8.1% 9.7% 9.7% 9.7% 22.2% 22.2% 22.2% 22.2% 22.2% 22.2% 30.8% 30.8% 30.8% 30.8% 30.8% 30.8% 30.8% 30.8% 26.9% 18.5% 20.0% 25.0% 25.0% 25.0% 25.0% 25.0% 25.0% 44.4% 44.4% 44.4% 44.4% 44.4% 44.4% 44.4% 44.4% 44.4% 44.4% 44.4% 44.4%

Criterion noncompliance indicated in red

304 - 1353 Ellis Street, Kelowna, BC V1Y 1Z9 | T: 250.762.2517

2 1.8 1.6

Turbidity (NTU)

1.4 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0

Measured Turbidity Data

1 NTU

Figure 1: January 2018 - Jan 2019 Turbidity (NTU)

Table A.2 Turbidity Data Summary: Data collection date range Jan 1, 2018-Jan 1, 2019 Total data points 2,189 No. Exceeding 1 NTU 6 No. Exceeding 2 NTU 0 No. Exceeding 5 NTU 0 Average daily turbidity for day with samples greater than 1 NTU: Date Average NTU 2018-01-09 0.77 2018-05-03 0.91 2018-05-04 0.94 2018-05-06 0.94 2018-07-13 0.79

304 - 1353 Ellis Street, Kelowna, BC V1Y 1Z9 | T: 250.762.2517

1.8 1.6

Turbidity (NTU)

1.4 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0

Measured Turbidity Data

1 NTU

Figure 2: May-November 2020 Turbidity (NTU)

Table A.3: Turbidity Data Summary: Data collection date range May 23, 2020-Nov 19, 2020 Total data points 1,080 No. Exceeding 1 NTU 10 No. Exceeding 2 NTU 0 No. Exceeding 5 NTU 0 Average daily turbidity for day with samples greater than 1 NTU: Date Average NTU 2020-06-07 1.10 2020-06-08 0.82 2020-10-21 0.60

304 - 1353 Ellis Street, Kelowna, BC V1Y 1Z9 | T: 250.762.2517

Table A.4 – THM Test Results Date, time of Sample Collection 10/06/2014 11:20 01/19/2015 11:15 04/27/2015 11:30 07/07/2015 13:10 08/04/2015 11:45 09/14/2015 13:05 10/05/2015 12:30 01/04/2016 11:45 05/16/2016 09:55 07/04/2016 13:25 08/22/2016 14:00 10/03/2016 13:20 11/21/2016 13:55 01/09/2017 08:55 05/11/2017 09:05 06/26/2017 13:30 09/26/2017 14:15 11/06/2017 15:05 02/05/2018 09:55 08/13/2018 12:40 09/24/2018 13:40 10/31/2018 12:40 02/05/2019 11:30 07/02/2019 10:15 08/06/2019 11:00 09/11/2019 11:50

Sampling Point City Works Yard-Janitors Room City Works Yard-Janitors Room City Works Yard-Janitors Room City Works Yard-Janitors Room City Works Yard-Janitors Room City Works Yard-Janitors Room City Works Yard-Janitors Room City Works Yard-Janitors Room City Works Yard-Janitors Room City Works Yard-Janitors Room City Works Yard-Janitors Room City Works Yard-Janitors Room City Works Yard-Janitors Room City Works Yard-Janitors Room City Works Yard-Janitors Room City Works Yard-Janitors Room City Works Yard-Janitors Room City Works Yard-Janitors Room City Works Yard-Janitors Room City Works Yard-Janitors Room City Works Yard-Janitors Room City Works Yard-Janitors Room City Works Yard-Janitors Room City Works Yard-Janitors Room City Works Yard-Janitors Room City Works Yard-Janitors Room

304 - 1353 Ellis Street, Kelowna, BC V1Y 1Z9 | T: 250.762.2517

Trihalomethanes Concentration (mg/L)

Exceedance

0.0627

0.02961

0.07659

0.05853

0.04155

0.03789

0.0602

0.06212

0.05375

0.00923

0.007628

0.07426

0.06383

0.033998

0.09846

0.005527

0.0487

0.022536

0.03397

0.03986

0.04543

0.07839

0.00525

0.08839

Date, time of Sample Collection

Sampling Point

Trihalomethanes Concentration (mg/L)

Exceedance

01/19/2015 11:55

Gyro Park- Sampling Tap

0.02475

04/27/2015 09:00

Gyro Park- Sampling Tap

0.03558

10/05/2015 09:15

Gyro Park- Sampling Tap

0.0554

01/04/2016 09:30

Gyro Park- Sampling Tap

0.04908

05/16/2016 08:25

Gyro Park- Sampling Tap

0.03847

11/21/2016 10:30

Gyro Park- Sampling Tap

0.061417

01/09/2017 14:20

Gyro Park- Sampling Tap

0.03065

05/11/2017 09:25

Gyro Park- Sampling Tap

0.15929

yes

11/06/2017 11:35

Gyro Park- Sampling Tap

0.046632

02/05/2018 09:15

Gyro Park- Sampling Tap

0.02083

05/01/2018 12:50

Gyro Park- Sampling Tap

0.03672

07/03/2018 12:50

Gyro Park- Sampling Tap

10/31/2018 13:00

Gyro Park- Sampling Tap

0.04585

02/05/2019 11:00

Gyro Park- Sampling Tap

0.03507

04/01/2019 10:30

Gyro Park- Sampling Tap

0.02923

07/02/2019 10:35

Gyro Park- Sampling Tap

0.04673

10/07/2019 10:40

Gyro Park- Sampling Tap

0.04041

01/19/2015 10:55

PR 1 Sampling Tap - PRIORITY

0.02371

04/27/2015 08:30

PR 1 Sampling Tap - PRIORITY

0.0301

10/05/2015 10:45

PR 1 Sampling Tap - PRIORITY

0.04645

01/04/2016 09:00

PR 1 Sampling Tap - PRIORITY

0.04541

05/16/2016 10:45

PR 1 Sampling Tap - PRIORITY

0.028992

11/21/2016 10:45

PR 1 Sampling Tap - PRIORITY

0.055833

01/09/2017 09:20

PR 1 Sampling Tap - PRIORITY

0.02189

05/10/2017 11:25

PR 1 Sampling Tap - PRIORITY

0.0511

11/06/2017 11:00

PR 1 Sampling Tap - PRIORITY

0.0265

02/05/2018 11:15

PR 1 Sampling Tap - PRIORITY

0.016611

05/01/2018 13:15

PR 1 Sampling Tap - PRIORITY

0.03548

07/03/2018 10:40

PR 1 Sampling Tap - PRIORITY

0.02523

10/31/2018 13:20

PR 1 Sampling Tap - PRIORITY

0.032776

02/05/2019 10:30

PR 1 Sampling Tap - PRIORITY

0.02189

04/01/2019 09:55

PR 1 Sampling Tap - PRIORITY

0.02557

07/02/2019 09:50

PR 1 Sampling Tap - PRIORITY

0.04551

10/07/2019 09:30

PR 1 Sampling Tap - PRIORITY

0.03623

01/19/2015 13:15

PR 8 - Sampling Tap

0.0219

04/27/2015 10:15

PR 8 - Sampling Tap

0.0345

10/05/2015 11:25

PR 8 - Sampling Tap

0.05423

01/04/2016 09:30

PR 8 - Sampling Tap

0.05205

05/16/2016 14:05

PR 8 - Sampling Tap

0.032836

08/22/2016 11:35

PR 8 - Sampling Tap

0.05876

11/21/2016 13:25

PR 8 - Sampling Tap

0.06694

01/09/2017 09:50

PR 8 - Sampling Tap

0.03132

01/09/2017 13:40

PR 8 - Sampling Tap

0.03961

304 - 1353 Ellis Street, Kelowna, BC V1Y 1Z9 | T: 250.762.2517

Date, time of Sample Collection

Sampling Point

Trihalomethanes Concentration (mg/L)

Exceedance

05/11/2017 08:10

PR 8 - Sampling Tap

0.07513

11/06/2017 09:40

PR 8 - Sampling Tap

0.039222

02/05/2018 10:35

PR 8 - Sampling Tap

0.015923

02/05/2018 13:55

PR 8 - Sampling Tap

0.024554

05/01/2018 13:45

PR 8 - Sampling Tap

0.03577

07/03/2018 13:20

PR 8 - Sampling Tap

0.024857

10/31/2018 14:40

PR 8 - Sampling Tap

0.043036

02/05/2019 13:00

PR 8 - Sampling Tap

0.03154

04/02/2019 11:00

PR 8 - Sampling Tap

0.03557

07/02/2019 09:30

PR 8 - Sampling Tap

0.065

10/07/2019 12:50

PR 8 - Sampling Tap

0.033966

01/19/2015 13:00

Well 2- Sampling Tap

0.018868

04/27/2015 09:40

Well 2- Sampling Tap

0.04814

07/07/2015 13:35

Well 2- Sampling Tap

0.065

08/04/2015 11:05

Well 2- Sampling Tap

0.05075

09/14/2015 11:20

Well 2- Sampling Tap

0.02251

10/05/2015 11:00

Well 2- Sampling Tap

0.05589

01/04/2016 10:10

Well 2- Sampling Tap

0.0337

05/16/2016 13:45

Well 2- Sampling Tap

0.02794

07/04/2016 10:20

Well 2- Sampling Tap

0.04396

08/22/2016 09:30

Well 2- Sampling Tap

0.04926

10/03/2016 13:50

Well 2- Sampling Tap

0.05004

11/21/2016 08:32

Well 2- Sampling Tap

0.06215

01/09/2017 09:26

Well 2- Sampling Tap

0.04795

05/11/2017 08:50

Well 2- Sampling Tap

0.07179

06/26/2017 10:35

Well 2- Sampling Tap

0.044741

08/17/2017 08:45

Well 2- Sampling Tap

0.0412

09/26/2017 14:20

Well 2- Sampling Tap

0.03591

11/06/2017 13:40

Well 2- Sampling Tap

0.036999

02/05/2018 11:40

Well 2- Sampling Tap

0.02656

08/13/2018 11:45

Well 2- Sampling Tap

0.05543

09/24/2018 13:25

Well 2- Sampling Tap

0.04862

10/31/2018 13:45

Well 2- Sampling Tap

0.0434

02/05/2019 12:45

Well 2- Sampling Tap

0.0297

07/02/2019 10:50

Well 2- Sampling Tap

0.0663

08/06/2019 11:15

Well 2- Sampling Tap

0.0746

09/11/2019 11:05

Well 2- Sampling Tap

0.03443

01/19/2015 13:50

Wildstone Trunk Line

0.018923

04/27/2015 14:00

Wildstone Trunk Line

0.04733

07/07/2015 14:20

Wildstone Trunk Line

0.05841

08/04/2015 13:50

Wildstone Trunk Line

0.05149

10/05/2015 13:43

Wildstone Trunk Line

0.07247

01/04/2016 11:20

Wildstone Trunk Line

0.05296

304 - 1353 Ellis Street, Kelowna, BC V1Y 1Z9 | T: 250.762.2517

Date, time of Sample Collection

Sampling Point

Trihalomethanes Concentration (mg/L)

Exceedance

05/16/2016 14:40

Wildstone Trunk Line

0.04863

07/04/2016 14:00

Wildstone Trunk Line

0.07323

10/03/2016 14:50

Wildstone Trunk Line

0.07037

11/21/2016 11:30

Wildstone Trunk Line

0.08447

05/11/2017 10:40

Wildstone Trunk Line

0.0853

06/26/2017

Wildstone Trunk Line

0.06529

08/17/2017 10:35

Wildstone Trunk Line

0.05342

09/26/2017 13:45

Wildstone Trunk Line

0.05081

11/06/2017 14:45

Wildstone Trunk Line

0.05448

08/13/2018 14:30

Wildstone Trunk Line

0.06598

09/24/2018 14:20

Wildstone Trunk Line

0.06617

10/31/2018 14:10

Wildstone Trunk Line

0.05934

02/05/2019 13:40

Wildstone Trunk Line

0.04821

07/02/2019 09:10

Wildstone Trunk Line

0.08446

08/06/2019 13:45

Wildstone Trunk Line

0.09167

09/11/2019 13:15

Wildstone Trunk Line

0.09235

304 - 1353 Ellis Street, Kelowna, BC V1Y 1Z9 | T: 250.762.2517

Appendix B WTP Footprint Figure

304 - 1353 Ellis Street, Kelowna, BC V1Y 1Z9 | T: 250.762.2517

City of Cranbrook Water Treatment Facility

10m

Client/Project

City of Cranbrook Filtration Deferral Application Scale AS SHOWN

0956.0050.01

Revision Date

2020-06-25

Figure

1 of 1 Title

Treatment Plant Footprint Requirements

Appendix C Source Protection Plan (refer to Appendix D of the Water Supply Master Plan)

304 - 1353 Ellis Street, Kelowna, BC V1Y 1Z9 | T: 250.762.2517

MEMORANDUM Date: To: cc: From: File: Subject:

January 30, 2021 Mike Matejka – City of Cranbrook Jason Perrault, Anthony Comazzetto, Steve Brubacher Jeremy Clowes, P.Eng. 0956.0050.01 Chlorine Disinfection Options_Final

Introduction The City of Cranbrook intends to convert from a gas chlorine disinfection system to a safer liquid system that utilizes sodium hypochlorite. Two sodium hypochlorite disinfection options are reviewed in this memorandum including an onsite generation system and bulk delivery. It has been assumed that a new disinfection building will be constructed downstream of the Phillips Reservoir that will house a proposed UV disinfection system along with a sodium hypochlorite disinfection system. Sodium hypochlorite will be injected downstream of the proposed UV system. The two sodium hypochlorite options were evaluated based on the design criteria listed in the table below. The system will need to be sized to supply both maximum day demand and fire flows initially. The system will only need to disinfect flows up to the maximum day demand after the proposed Zone 1 Reservoir is constructed. It was assumed that the electrical service to the existing chlorine building is sufficiently sized and can be extended to the proposed disinfection facility. A minor allowance for modifying the existing service was included in the estimated costs.

Table 1 – Design Criteria for Sodium Hypochlorite Systems Item

Design Criteria

Design Flow Existing ADD* 2036 MDD + Fire Flow

13 MLD (used for evaluating annual costs) 38 MLD (MDD) + 19 MLD (Fire Flow) = 57 MLD (660 L/s) (used for sizing components)

Chlorine Dosage Range

0.5 mg/L to 3 mg/L

Average Chlorine Dosage

2.6 mg/L (used for evaluating annual costs).

304 - 1353 Ellis Street, Kelowna, BC V1Y 1Z9 | T: 250.762.2517

MEMORANDUM Date: January 30, 2021 File: 0956.0050.01 Subject: Chlorine Disinfection Options Page: 2 of 4

Item

Design Criteria

Redundancy

Liquid System – Redundant metering pumps Onsite Generation – Per Alberta Standards and Guidelines for Municipal Waterworks – Part 1 Redundant metering pumps and exhaust air fans for hydrogen by-product, Brine tank sized for 3 days minimum storage at max day chlorine demand Salt storage for at least 30 days at max day chlorine demand Sodium hypochlorite storage for at least two days at max day chlorine demand with ability to fill tank with bulk delivery

*Note: Minimal increase in average day demand is expected from existing to 2036 demand scenario (increases from 13 MLD to 16 MLD) Option 1 - Onsite Generation System On-site generation system provides the safest option for operators, as the sodium hypochlorite produced does not exceed a concentration of 0.8%, therefore many risks associated with handling the chlorine can be averted. This method passes electrical current through a salt brine solution to produce sodium hypochlorite. The main components of the onsite generation system include: A salt storage and feed system, Brine tank and pumps, Electrolytic cell with a rectifier for DC power supply, Acid cleaning system for the electrolytic cell, Sodium hypochlorite storage tank and metering pumps, and, A control panel. The onsite generation system also requires a potable water supply that has a supply pressure of at least 40 psi, is maintained above 18 degrees Celsius and is softened to have a total hardness of less than 10 mg/L. It is assumed that this water supply will be pumped for the Cranbrook application. Residuals from the process include water softener re-generation waste and acid residual waste from periodic cleaning of the electrolytic cell. Hydrogen is also created as by-product during the electrolysis process and must be safely vented from the facility. A septic system will likely be required to handle the water softener re-generation waste. The regeneration volume will need to be confirmed in design but may be in the order of 1 m 3/day. The acid waste must be neutralized and then may be sent to a holding tank to be trucked away for disposal or sent to the septic system. We have assumed that adequate ground conditions exist at the site for disposal to ground.

304 - 1353 Ellis Street, Kelowna, BC V1Y 1Z9 | T: 250.762.2517

MEMORANDUM Date: January 30, 2021 File: 0956.0050.01 Subject: Chlorine Disinfection Options Page: 3 of 4

Historically there have been three main manufacturers of onsite generation systems including: DeNora (formerly Clortec), MIOX and Evoqua. From our experience, DeNora has the strongest presence and reputation in BC for onsite generation systems. DeNora also purchased MIOX within the last couple years, leaving two main suppliers. We contacted DeNora to provide a budgetary proposal for the Cranbrook system. Refer to Appendix A for a copy of this. The capital cost for an onsite generation system is estimated to be $1.83M including a 40% allowance for engineering and contingency but excluding GST. This estimate includes allowances for the following: Complete onsite generation system as noted in Appendix A; 8 m x 5 m Masonry Block or Pre-Cast Concrete Building; A septic system and associated piping for the water softener re-generation waste; Duplex pumps to supply water to the onsite generation system; Emergency shower; A custom fabricated salt hopper system; and, Electrical service, electrical equipment, and programming.

For salt, it is assumed that a 3,000 kg bulk bag will be delivered every 30 days (based on an average chlorine dosage of 2.6 mg/L and ADD of 13 MLD). The anticipated annual operating cost for the salt deliveries, energy consumption and maintenance are $60,000. The electrolytic cells are the most expensive component that will require replacement. It is expected that the two electrolytic cells on the proposed system will be replaced every 12 years at a total cost of $30,000. Given the above, the net present value was determined to be $3.1M (based on 25-year service life and 2% interest rate).

Option 2 - Bulk Delivery Bulk delivery of 12% sodium hypochlorite is much less complex than the onsite generation option but the trade off is handling higher strength sodium hypochlorite. The main components for this option include a storage tank that is sized to hold up to 90 days of sodium hypochlorite at the average day demand and metering pump skid that has a redundant pump. The capital cost for the 12% sodium hypochlorite is estimated to be $0.6M excluding GST. This estimate includes allowances for the following: 6 m x 6 m Masonry Block or Pre-Cast Concrete Building; Storage tank; Metering pump skid; Chemical piping; Emergency shower; and, Electrical service, electrical equipment, and programming.

304 - 1353 Ellis Street, Kelowna, BC V1Y 1Z9 | T: 250.762.2517

MEMORANDUM Date: January 30, 2021 File: 0956.0050.01 Subject: Chlorine Disinfection Options Page: 4 of 4

Based on an average day demand of 13 MLD and an average chlorine dosage of 2.6 mg/L, the anticipated annual operating cost is $114,000. This cost is attributed to the bulk deliveries of 12% sodium hypochlorite that occur every 90 days. Given the above capital cost and annual recurring cost, the net present value was determined to be $2.9M (based on 25-year service life and 2% interest rate).

Summary and Recommendations Our findings are summarized in the table below. Table 2 – Option Comparison Option 1 – Onsite Generation System

Option 2 – Bulk Delivery

$1.83M

$0.6M

$3.1M

$2.9M

25 Year Total Investment

$3.45M

$3.49M

Operational Complexity

More Complex

Base Case

Required Building Size

40 sq.m

36 sq.m

Capital Cost* Net Present Value

*Note: Detailed Cost Estimates are included in Appendix B

Based on the above, the City can proceed with either option for similar costs. Urban will size the proposed disinfection facility to allow for either bulk delivery or onsite generation so the City has flexibility for choosing a preferred technology at later date.

Closure Please contact the undersigned if you have any questions or concerns.

Sincerely, URBAN SYSTEMS LTD.

Jeremy Clowes, P.Eng. Principal cc: /jc \\usl.urban-systems.com\projects\Projects_KEL\0956\0050\01\R-Reports-Studies-Documents\R1-Reports\4. Water Quality and Treatment\2. Chlorine Disinfection Options Review\2020-0723 Chlorine Disinfection Options Memo.docx

304 - 1353 Ellis Street, Kelowna, BC V1Y 1Z9 | T: 250.762.2517

Appendix A Onsite Generation System Budget Proposal

304 - 1353 Ellis Street, Kelowna, BC V1Y 1Z9 | T: 250.762.2517

Appendix B Cost Estimates

304 - 1353 Ellis Street, Kelowna, BC V1Y 1Z9 | T: 250.762.2517

Cranbrook Water System - Cost Estimate - Class D Option 1 - Onsite Generation System

Job No: Date:

0956.0050.01 30-Jan-21

Prepared by: J.Clowes Checked by: S.Brubacher ITEM

DESCRIPTION General Mobilization/Demobilization Insurance and Bonding

QTY

UNIT

$/UNIT

1 1

LS LS

65,000 10,000

1 1

LS LS

30,000 10,000

1 1

LS LS

10,000 50,000

1 40 1 1 1 1

LS sq.m LS LS LS LS

720,000 3,000 40,000 10,000 10,000 25,000

Removals n/a Site Works Septic system Water service - 100 mm c/w hot tap Watermain tie-in (Part of UV Scope) Gravel access and site restoration Yard Piping (sanitary, drainage) Building Supply and install onsite generation equipment (450 Ibs/day) Masonry block building Water supply pumps and piping Chemical piping Emergency shower system Salt feed system Electrical Electrical Service, Electrical and SCADA Generator Programming

100,000 75,000 30,000 Subtotal Engineering and Contingency (40%) Total Rounded Total 1 1 1

ls ls ls

EXTENDED $65,000.00 $10,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $30,000.00 $10,000.00 $0.00 $10,000.00 $50,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $720,000.00 $120,000.00 $40,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $25,000.00 $0.00 $100,000.00 $75,000.00 $30,000.00 $1,305,000 $522,000 $1,827,000 $1,830,000

Cranbrook Water System - Cost Estimate - Class D Option 2 - Bulk Delivery Job No: Date:

0956.0050.01 2-Sep-20

Prepared by: J.Clowes Checked by: S.Brubacher ITEM

DESCRIPTION General Mobilization/Demobilization Insurance and Bonding

QTY

UNIT

$/UNIT

1 1

LS LS

15,000 3,000

Site Works Watermain tie-in (Part of UV Scope) Gravel access and site restoration Holding tank for emergency shower c/w high level float

1 1

LS LS

10,000 15,000

Building Metering pump skid Masonry block building Storage tank (dual wall) Emergency shower system Chemical piping

1 36 1 1 1

LS sq.m LS LS LS

60,000 3,000 7,500 10,000 10,000

Removals n/a

Electrical Electrical Service, Electrical and SCADA Generator Programming

75,000 50,000 15,000 Subtotal Engineering and Contingency (40%) Total Rounded Total 1 1 1

ls ls ls

EXTENDED $15,000.00 $3,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $10,000.00 $15,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $60,000.00 $108,000.00 $7,500.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $75,000.00 $50,000.00 $15,000.00 $378,500 $151,400 $529,900 $530,000

Date: To: cc: From: File: Subject:

January 30, 2020 Mike Matejka, Manager of Infrastructure Planning & Delivery, City of Cranbrook Jason Perrault, Public Works Manager, City of Cranbrook Jeremy Clowes, P. Eng., Water and Wastewater Engineer 0956.0050.01 City of Cranbrook – Phillips Reservoir Bypass Pipe _rev.2

1. INTRODUCTION Urban Systems Ltd. (Urban) has been retained by the City of Cranbrook (City) to develop a conceptual design for a piped bypass around the Phillips Reservoir.

2. BACKGROUND The City’s main water supply comes from Joseph and Gold Creeks. Water from these two sources flows to a common diversion structure that is located approximately 1 km upstream of the Phillips Reservoir. Note that the Gold Creek source is piped directly to the diversion structure through a 450 mm DR21 pipe. The diversion structure can divert one or both sources to the Phillips Reservoir or to a diversion channel that flows around the reservoir. The creek flows are directed to the diversion channel during periods of elevated turbidity. Water levels in Phillips Reservoir are maintained by an earthen dam located on the north side of the reservoir. The City’s water distribution system is fed from an intake in Phillips reservoir that connects to a 750 mm supply trunkmain. Water is disinfected with chlorine gas immediately downstream of the Phillips Reservoir before being conveyed to the City’s distribution network. The proposed bypass pipe will allow the Phillips reservoir to be taken offline for maintenance, while maintaining water supply to the City. Critical maintenance must be completed on the earthen dam which requires Phillips reservoir to be taken offline and at least partially drained. Required maintenance work was identified in a December 2019 Dam Safety Review report that was prepared by Austin Engineering. In addition, taking the Phillips reservoir offline will allow sediment to be removed from the reservoir which has been accumulating since the reservoir’s construction in the early 1970s. This memorandum identifies the bypass pipe’s design criteria, conceptual design, environmental and regulatory considerations and estimated capital costs.

29 - 10th Avenue South, Cranbrook, BC V1C 2M9 | T: 778.517.0981

MEMORANDUM Date:

January 30, 2020

File:

0956.0050.01

Subject:

City of Cranbrook – Phillips Reservoir Bypass Pipe _rev.2

Page:

2 of 7

3. DESIGN CRITERIA The table below summarizes key criteria used to develop the conceptual design of the bypass system.

Table 1 – Design Criteria Item

Design Criteria

Comments

Flow

530 L/s

Capacity limited by existing Gold Creek raw water pipeline that connects to the diversion structure.

Isolation Valve Type

Gate or butterfly

To be direct bury valve that is equipped with standard 50 mm square nut, 150 mm PVC riser pipe, operator extension, rock guard and valve box.

Isolation Valve Spacing

500 m

500 mm proposed. Typical standards for distribution systems vary from 200 to 250 m but given that this is a raw water supply main with no services or connections, a longer valve spacing is recommended.

Air Valves

Direct bury style

Air valves where required will be direct bury style to avoid creating a confined space with valve chambers.

Pipe Material

PVC or HDPE

PVC AWWA C900 or HDPE AWWA C906 pipe can be utilized to construct the bypass pipe.

C Value

120

Hazen Williams Friction Factor used to size pipes

Minimum Cover

1.8 m

Minimum bury depth for frost protection

4. CONCEPTUAL BYPASS PIPE The bypass system will be a 750 mm pipe that is approximately 2.5 km in length. Drawing C02, which is included in Appendix A, provides an overview of the bypass pipe. The bypass pipe will have manually operated valves to allow or stop flow. At the upstream end, the bypass pipe will connect to an existing 450 mm pipe at the diversion structure. There is an existing valve that can be used to isolate flow at the upstream tie-in point. The proposed tie-in location is shown in Appendix A. The proposed bypass pipe will only convey flows from Gold Creek. The existing Gold Creek pipeline has a capacity of 530 L/s. The City’s existing and future MDD is 363 L/s and 445 L/s, respectively. As such the bypass pipe will have adequate capacity to convey the existing MDD of 363 L/s and a fire flow of 167 L/s.

MEMORANDUM Date:

January 30, 2020

File:

0956.0050.01

Subject:

City of Cranbrook – Phillips Reservoir Bypass Pipe _rev.2

Page:

3 of 7

In the future, the bypass pipeline will be able to supply the future MDD of 445 L/s and a fire flow of 85 L/s. To supply a higher fire flow, storage would need to be constructed. The City could consider adding storage in the future. If the incoming flow rate is higher than the City’s demands, water will be discharged at the diversion structure and directed to the diversion channel. The proposed bypass pipe will be 750 mm in size to match the existing trunkmain on the downstream side of Phillips Reservoir. This will ensure friction losses in the pipe and velocities are kept reasonably low which will ensure the pipe can operate by gravity and help reduce the potential for hydraulic surges in the pipeline. The maximum working pressure and surge pressure are estimated at 50 psi and 105 psi (50 psi working pressure + 55 psi surge pressure), respectively. It is recommended that a transient analysis be completed at the preliminary design stage to determine if any measures are required to mitigate the effects of water hammer. Water hammer can occur when there is a sudden change in flow conditions (e.g. if a valve is closed quickly). The supply Hydraulic Grade Line (HGL) will be limited to 1102 m in the proposed bypass pipe which equates to an approximate 13.6 m (19 PSI) increase to the existing supply HGL from the Phillips Reservoir. City staff have advised that the pressure will need to be reduced to match the Phillips Reservoir HGL when the bypass is in use. As such, the conceptual design allows for a Pressure Reducing Valve (PRV) Building near the bypass pipe’s down-stream tie-in point. Conceptual plan/profile drawings for the proposed bypass pipe are included in Appendix A. The bypass pipe will be supplied by gravity and as such, topography governs where the pipe can be routed (i.e., high points must be avoided to ensure flow can be maintained through the pipe). The bypass pipe will be routed along Gold Creek Road. The proposed alignment will cross a transmission pressure gas main and the diversion channel. It is assumed that the pipe will be installed by horizontal directional drilling at the channel crossing. Gas crossing requirements will need to be confirmed in preliminary design, but it is expected that the gas utility will require that they have an inspector present when the crossings are completed. At the downstream end, the bypass pipe will tie-in to the existing 750 mm trunkmain upstream of the chlorine injection point. There is an existing 750 mm steel pipe which runs through the existing “Y-Building” as noted on the drawings that the proposed bypass can be connected to. An existing valve will be used to isolate flow at the tie-in location. Once the above is completed, the City will have the ability to bypass Phillips Reservoir as required without interrupting water supply to the City’s water distribution network.

5. ENVIRONMENTAL and REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS The project area was reviewed to identify environmental constraints and considerations regarding the proposed bypass works. The project area comprises aquatic, riparian and terrestrial habitats of the Kootenay variant Dry Mild subzone of the Interior Douglas-fir biogeoclimatic region (IDFdm). The proposed bypass pipe runs along Gold Creek Road, from the existing diversion structure to the existing water treatment facility immediately downstream of the Phillips Reservoir. The bypass alignment was modified as part of the conceptual design mitigation to utilize mostly disturbed areas outside of the adjoining forested riparian habitat of Joseph Creek.

MEMORANDUM Date:

January 30, 2020

File:

0956.0050.01

Subject:

City of Cranbrook – Phillips Reservoir Bypass Pipe _rev.2

Page:

4 of 7

A preliminary review revealed several sensitive species and habitats within the vicinity of the project area. A sensitive species occurrence record for Painted Turtle – Intermountain – Rocky Mountain population is documented within the Phillips Reservoir. This species is BC Blue-listed (special concern) and listed as Special Concern on Schedule 1 of the Species at Risk Act (SARA). Joseph Creek, Gold Creek, Baker Creek and Philip’s Reservoir all have documented occurrences of Westslope cutthroat trout (O. clarki lewisi), which is BC Blue-listed and listed as Special Concern on Schedule 1 of the SARA. Westslope cutthroat trout have been recorded in Joseph Creek as recently as August 2019. In addition, Joseph Creek and Gold Creek support brook trout, bull trout, cutthroat trout (O. clarki), mountain whitefish and rainbow trout. Gold Creek is also documented as having burbot, kokanee and Dolly Varden. The project area appears to be situated within a “Delayed Instream Work Window Zone” for the Kootenay Region, therefore the least-risk work windows as noted Table 2 apply.

Table 2 – Least-Risk Work Windows Species

Least Risk Window for Instream Works

Bull Trout/Dolly Varden

June 1 – August 31

Rainbow Trout

August 20 – October 15

Cutthroat Trout

August 20 – October 15

Kokanee

June 16 – August 31

Mountain Whitefish

May 1 – September 30

Burbot

June 1 – October 31

Brook Trout

June 1 – August 31

The project area is overlain by an American badger sensitive occurrence record. The American Badger is BC Red-listed and listed as Endangered on Schedule 1 of the SARA. Badgers have been recorded in the general area as recently as 2010. The IDF biogeoclimatic zone can also support sensitive species such as tiger salamander, Great Basin spadefoot, Rocky Mountain elk, great blue heron, and yellow-headed blackbird in riparian areas.

5.1. Regulatory Requirements Based on a review of available reports and environmental information, the proposed project has the potential to trigger the following municipal, provincial and federal environmental approval processes: •

BC Water Sustainability Act - Water Licence Amendment and/or Section 11 Change Approval: A water licence amendment and/or a Section 11 Water Sustainability Act Change Approval application will be required for “changes in about a stream”. An environmental impact assessment study is required to satisfy the regulatory approval conditions. The study would evaluate the potential environmental effects of the project and provide mitigation measures to prevent adverse effects. The study would also specify habitat offsetting (if required) and environmental monitoring requirements.

MEMORANDUM

•

Date:

January 30, 2020

File:

0956.0050.01

Subject:

City of Cranbrook – Phillips Reservoir Bypass Pipe _rev.2

Page:

5 of 7

Fisheries and Oceans Canada Authorization: In the absence of appropriate mitigation, it is anticipated that a Fisheries Act Authorization would be required for the proposed project considering the presence of aquatic species at risk (Westslope Cutthroat Trout) and the potential for the project to cause serious harm to fish and/or fish habitat. An Authorization typically requires the implementation of a habitat off-setting plan. A Request for Project Review form must be submitted to Fisheries and Oceans Canada to determine if an Authorization is required. The decision for Authorization is based on the potential for residual effects to fish and fish habitat, after taking into consideration the proposed mitigation measures. The Riparian Areas Protection Regulation: The Riparian Areas Protection Act (2016) must be satisfied to ensure that the riparian features, functions and conditions that are vital to maintaining stream health and productivity are protected from the proposed project. Local Government Development Permit: Based on a review of the Regional District of East Kootenay’s Official Community Plans, the project appears to be within Environmentally Sensitive Development Permit Areas identified on Schedule 5 – Gold Creek of the Rockyview Official Community Plan, Bylaw No. 2255, 2010. Unless exempted, a development permit addressing applicable environmental guidelines must be approved prior to construction, addition, or alteration of a structure or alteration of land, including the removal of vegetation or site grading. Species at Risk Act: Several species at risk have been documented in the vicinity of the project area, including Painted Turtle – Intermountain – Rocky Mountain population, American badger and Westslope cutthroat trout. Critical habitat mapping was reviewed, and no critical habitat was identified within the project area. A Section 73 SARA permit is required for the damage and/or destruction of Schedule 1 listed aquatic and migratory bird species (endangered, threatened and extirpated) and their habitat wherever they occur. Prohibitions pertaining to all other SARA-listed species generally only apply on federal lands. BC Wildlife Act and the Migratory Birds Convention Act: If vegetation removal is to be undertaken during the regional nesting period between mid-April and mid-August, a qualified professional will need to undertake active nest surveys. If active nests are discovered that belong to species that are protected under the Migratory Birds Convention Act and/or the BC Wildlife Act, a no work zone would be established to ensure that the birds are not killed, captured, injured, taken, or disturbed or that their nests are not damaged, destroyed, removed or disturbed. Drinking Water Protection Act: A Waterworks Construction Permit must be obtained from Interior Health prior to construction. Interior Health may also require that the City’s Operating Permit be amended to account for the proposed works.

5.2. Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Recommendations Based on a review of the environmental constraints and conceptual design information, potential environmental impacts identified for the project include erosion and contamination of soils, disruption/alteration of wildlife habitat, introduction of invasive species, reduction in surface water quality, disruption/alteration of fish habitat, impacts to hydrology, and temporary reduction in air quality. The following recommendations are provided to satisfy regulatory requirements and mitigate potential environmental impacts: Prepare and submit all regulatory applications as soon as possible to avoid project delays; Conserve and protect aquatic and riparian areas as much as possible;

MEMORANDUM Date:

January 30, 2020

File:

0956.0050.01

Subject:

City of Cranbrook – Phillips Reservoir Bypass Pipe _rev.2

Page:

6 of 7

Utilize existing footprints of disturbed areas to minimize impacts to sensitive habitats; Schedule project activities for applicable least risk timing windows; Maintain environmental streamflow in Joseph Creek and tributary streams (Phillips Reservoir); Have a Qualified Professional undertake a detailed assessment of the project and prepare an Environmental Management Plan to be followed during construction; Ensure all instream works are isolated from flowing water; Salvage fish and other wildlife species from work areas prior to construction; Finalize the design and prepare a habitat off-setting plan based on estimated instream and riparian habitat loss; and, Have a Qualified Environmental Monitor on-site during all instream works.

6. CLASS D COST ESTIMATE The estimated capital cost for the complete bypass system is $6.13M (including a 35% contingency and 15% engineering allowance and excluding GST). Refer to Appendix B for a detailed breakdown of the cost estimate. This estimate does not include an allowance for: Completing Phillips dam repairs as identified in the December 2019 Dam Safety Review report that was prepared by Austin Engineering; or Removing sediment from the Phillips Reservoir.

7. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS This report confirms that it is feasible to construct a bypass system that will allow the City to divert flows around the Phillips Reservoir without interrupting water supply to the City’s distribution system. It is recommended that the City address the items below when the project is advanced: Complete environmental recommendations as noted in Section 5.2; Develop a plan for draining and isolating a work area in the Phillips Reservoir in parallel with environmental work. It is expected that the City will be required to maintain some amount of water in the reservoir when the bypass is activated. In addition, it may be necessary to maintain an environmental flow through the reservoir when the bypass is active which will require the use of temporary pumps; Develop an operating and maintenance plan for the proposed bypass pipe; Complete field investigations and identify if there are any items that will impact costs (e.g., unsuitable soils, dewatering, rock); Confirm gas main crossing requirements; and, Complete a transient analysis.

MEMORANDUM Date:

January 30, 2020

File:

0956.0050.01

Subject:

City of Cranbrook – Phillips Reservoir Bypass Pipe _rev.2

Page:

7 of 7

8. CLOSING Thank you for the opportunity to work on this important initiative. Please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned should you have any questions or comments.

Sincerely, URBAN SYSTEMS LTD.

Jeremy Clowes, P.Eng. Principal, Water and Wastewater Engineer /jc

Steve Brubacher, P.Eng. Principal, Senior Water Engineer

Enclosure

REFERENCES 1.

December 2019 Dam Safety Review, Austin Engineering

May 2016 Integrated Infrastructure Capital Plan (IICP) Prioritized Water System Capital Plan, Urban Systems Ltd.

cc:

Jason Perrault, Public Works Manager, City of Cranbrook

U:\Projects_KEL\0956\0050\01\R-Reports-Studies-Documents\R1-Reports\Phillips Reservoir Bypass\2020-01-30 Bypass Pipe Conceptual Report_rev.2.docx

Appendix A – Conceptual Drawings

PHILLIPS RESERVOIR BYPASS PIPING OR F D W E U V IE 2 0 2 0 S IS R E 30, RY A NU A J

Atlin Atlin

Stewart

Williston Williston New New Hazelton Hazelton

Dixon Dixon Entrance Entrance

Masset Masset Queen Queen Charlotte

Fort Fort Nelson Nelson

Terrace Terrace

Kitimat Kitimat

Haida Haida Gwaii

Smithers

Hope LL

Dawson Dawson Creek Creek

Mackenzie Mackenzie

Fort Fort Houston Houston St St James James Burns Burns Lake Fraser Lake Vanderhoof Prince Prince George George Quesnel Quesnel

PACIFIC PACIFIC OCEAN

Bella Bella Bella Bella Queen Queen Charlotte Sound Sound Port Port Hardy Hardy

Bella Bella Coola Coola

Fort Fort St St John

Williams Williams Lake Lake

Chetwynd Chetwynd Tumbler Tumbler Ridge Ridge

McBride Wells Wells Valemount Kinbasket Kinbasket LL 100 100 Mile Mile House House

Revelstoke Port McNeill Golden Golden Ashcroft Lillooet Campbell Campbell Kamloops Kamloops Salmon Salmon Arm Arm River River Powell Powell Vancouver Vancouver Island Island Invermere Invermere Vernon Vernon Merritt Whistler Whistler Nakusp River River Courtenay Okanagan Kelowna Elkford Squamish Okanagan Sechelt Sechelt Squamish Port Port Kimberley Kimberley L Alberni Penticton Nelson Nelson Hope Vancouver Vancouver Tofino Castlegar Castlegar Cranbrook Cranbrook Ucluelet Ucluelet Osoyoos Osoyoos Trail Abbotsford Abbotsford Creston Creston Trail Sidney Sidney Saanich Victoria Juan Juan de de Fuca Fuca Str Str

U:\Projects_KEL\0956\0050\01\D-Design\CAD\10_DES\DES-0956.0050.01.dwg, C00, 2020-01-30 03:20 pm bbriggs

Port Alice

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

Dease Lake Lake

CITY OF CRANBROOK / PHILLIPS RESERVOIR BYPASS PIPING / 0956.0050.01 / JANUARY 30, 2020

Atlin L

SANITARY EXISTING

GENERAL

PROPOSED

FUTURE

SHALLOW UTILITIES

Main

EXISTING

Main (in profile) Callout Label

Sheet Match Line

Limit of Proposed Construction

Detail Label

Force Main

Electrical Line (Underground)

Service

Overhead Utility Line

Manhole (arrow indicates incoming flow)

Conduits

FUTURE

PROPOSED

Gas Line

High Point Manhole

Telephone Line Clean Out Fibre Optic Line

Inspection Chamber Project Boundary

Section Indicator

Cable Line

Lift Station

Service Line

Manhole Vault

Manhole

Cap Section Label

Revision Identifier

Junction Box

Cross

Electrical Tower Footing

Tee Street Light

Reducer

ROADS EXISTING

Coupling

Utility Pole

Valve

Utility Pole with Light

FUTURE

PROPOSED

Road Centre Line

Signal Light (Single)

STORM

Edge of Gravel Road

EXISTING

Signal Light (Double)

PROPOSED

FUTURE Guy Anchor

Edge of Pavement Main

Edge of Road Shoulder

Kiosk

Main (in Profile)

Vault (Underground)

Curb and Gutter Service

Sign - Single Post

Gas Valve

Catch Basin Lead

Sign - Double Post

Cabinet

Ditch

Pedestal

Grass Swale Concrete/Asphalt Swale

Manhole (arrow indicates incoming flow)

PAVEMENT MARKINGS EXISTING

PROPOSED

STRUCTURES EXISTING

High Point Manhole

FUTURE

Catch Basin Manhole

Building Face

Paintline - Continuity

Catch Basin

Fence (Generic)

Paintline - Lane Marking

Inlet/Outlet Structure

Fence (Barbed Wire)

Paintline - Intersection Tracking

Cleanout

Fence (Chain Link)

Paintline - Solid Yellow/White

Vault

Fence (Wood Panel)

Universally Accessible Parking

Culvert

Fence (Post & Cable)

Informational Directional Arrows

Cap

Railway Centre Line

Painted Directional Arrows

Cross

Retaining Wall

Tee

Guardrail

Reducer

Mailbox

Coupling

Bollard

Bicycle Marker

FUTURE

PROPOSED

Valve

COMMON ABBREVIATIONS

EXISTING

LEGAL & SURVEY EXISTING

PROPOSED

Abandoned Alberta Survey Control Monument

FUTURE

PROPOSED

Main

FUTURE

Main (in Profile) Block Line

Service

Lot Line

Irrigation

Easement/Right-of-Way

Hydrant

Control Point

Air Valve

Survey Monument

Blow-Off

Survey Spike

U:\Projects_KEL\0956\0050\01\D-Design\CAD\10_DES\DES-0956.0050.01.dwg, C01, 2020-01-30 11:29 am bbriggs

Curb Stop

Survey Iron Bar

Manhole

Iron Pin

Meter

Test Pit/Bore Hole

Cap Cross Tee

EXISTING

PROPOSED

Coupling

FUTURE

Valve

LANDSCAPE & VEGETATION

Toe

EXISTING

Breakline Major Contour Interval

PROPOSED

FUTURE

Treeline

Minor Contour Interval Water Edge Center of Water Way

Deciduous Tree

Spot Elevation

Tree of Unspecified Type

WARNING

H Professional Seals

ATTENTION

ISSUED FOR REVIEW JANUARY 30, 2020

Concrete Control Corrugated Metal Pipe

North Northeast Northwest Not to Scale Number Offset Pathway

K #

L Date

Issue / Revision

Rollover Curb Rolled Face Sanitary Separate Walk

Station Storm Straight Face

Manhole Municipal Reserve

Swale Symbol Tangent Tangent to Spiral Telephone Temporary Test Manhole Top of Curb Top of Wall Typical Underground Utility Right-of-Way

Point of Intersection Point of Common Curve Point of Reverse Curve Point On Curve Point On Tangent Polyethylene Polyvinyl Chloride Pressure Reducing Valve Property Line Proposed Quantity

Valve Velocity Vertical Vertical Curve Vitrified Clay Tile Volume Water West Weeping Tile Drain Wheel Chair Ramp

Radius Railway Range Reducer Reverse/Reversed Right-of-Way

Service Sidewalk South Southeast Southwest Specification Spiral to Curve Spiral to Tangent Spiral to Reverse Spiral

Lift Station Light Rail Transit Lip of Gutter

Face of Curb Fibre Optic Flange

Shrub

Inlet Control Device Invert Length of Curve

Elevation End of Curve Environmental Reserve Existing

Slope Arrow

Cast Iron Catch Basin Catch Basin Manhole Centre Line Certificate of Title Clean Out Clearing & Grubbing Complete With

Ductile Iron East Edge of Gravel Edge of Pavement

Coniferous Tree

Daylight Line

Horizontal Curve Hub Hydrant

Delta Diameter Dimension Distance Drawing Dry Well

Top

Bench Mark Building Capacity

Culvert Curb and Gutter Curve to Spiral Degree

Reducer

TOPOGRAPHY & GRADING

Asbestos Cement Back of Walk Beginning of Curve

Force Main Future Gas (Natural Gas) High Density Polyethylene Highway

App

PHILLIPS RESERVOIR BYPASS PIPING

CITY OF CRANBROOK

CIVIL LEGEND Scale NOT TO SCALE 1 of 9

Sheet Number Quality Control by Designed by Drawn by

JC BB BB

Project Number

0956.0050.01

Drawing Number

Revision

C01

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

WATER

ATTENTION

WARNING

H Professional Seals

ISSUED FOR REVIEW JANUARY 30, 2020

K #

L Date

Issue / Revision

App

PHILLIPS RESERVOIR BYPASS PIPING

CITY OF CRANBROOK

KEY PLAN Scale

30m

90 2 of 9

Sheet Number Quality Control by Designed by Drawn by

JC BB BB

Project Number

0956.0050.01

Drawing Number

Revision

C02

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

U:\Projects_KEL\0956\0050\01\D-Design\CAD\10_DES\DES-0956.0050.01.dwg, C02, 2020-01-30 03:25 pm bbriggs

Proposed Alignment 1 -0+020 to 0+320 x5.0

U:\Projects_KEL\0956\0050\01\D-Design\CAD\10_DES\DES-0956.0050.01.dwg, 0+000 - 0+300, 2020-01-30 11:51 am bbriggs

ATTENTION

WARNING

H Professional Seals

ISSUED FOR REVIEW JANUARY 30, 2020

K #

L Date

Issue / Revision

App

PHILLIPS RESERVOIR BYPASS PIPING

CITY OF CRANBROOK

0+000 - 0+360 Scale

3 3 of 9

Sheet Number Quality Control by Designed by Drawn by

JC JC BB

Project Number

0956.0050.01

Drawing Number

Revision

C03

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

Proposed Alignment 1 0+300 to 0+680 x5.0

U:\Projects_KEL\0956\0050\01\D-Design\CAD\10_DES\DES-0956.0050.01.dwg, 0+300 - 0+680, 2020-01-30 11:16 am bbriggs

ATTENTION

WARNING

H Professional Seals

ISSUED FOR REVIEW JANUARY 30, 2020

K #

L Date

Issue / Revision

App

PHILLIPS RESERVOIR BYPASS PIPING

CITY OF CRANBROOK

0+300 - 0+680 Scale

3 4 of 9

Sheet Number Quality Control by Designed by Drawn by

JC JC BB

Project Number

0956.0050.01

Drawing Number

Revision

C04

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

Proposed Alignment 1 0+680 to 1+060 x5.0

U:\Projects_KEL\0956\0050\01\D-Design\CAD\10_DES\DES-0956.0050.01.dwg, 0+680 - 1+060, 2020-01-30 11:15 am bbriggs

ATTENTION

WARNING

H Professional Seals

ISSUED FOR REVIEW JANUARY 30, 2020

K #

L Date

Issue / Revision

App

PHILLIPS RESERVOIR BYPASS PIPING

CITY OF CRANBROOK

0+680 - 1+060 Scale

3 5 of 9

Sheet Number Quality Control by Designed by Drawn by

JC JC BB

Project Number

0956.0050.01

Drawing Number

Revision

C05

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

Proposed Alignment 1 1+060 to 1+440 x5.0

U:\Projects_KEL\0956\0050\01\D-Design\CAD\10_DES\DES-0956.0050.01.dwg, 1+060 - 1+440, 2020-01-30 11:14 am bbriggs

ATTENTION

WARNING

H Professional Seals

ISSUED FOR REVIEW JANUARY 30, 2020

K #

L Date

Issue / Revision

App

PHILLIPS RESERVOIR BYPASS PIPING

CITY OF CRANBROOK

1+060 - 1+440 Scale

3 6 of 9

Sheet Number Quality Control by Designed by Drawn by

JC JC BB

Project Number

0956.0050.01

Drawing Number

Revision

C06

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

Proposed Alignment 1 1+440 to 1+820 x5.0

U:\Projects_KEL\0956\0050\01\D-Design\CAD\10_DES\DES-0956.0050.01.dwg, 1+440 - 1+820, 2020-01-30 11:13 am bbriggs

ATTENTION

WARNING

H Professional Seals

ISSUED FOR REVIEW JANUARY 30, 2020

K #

L Date

Issue / Revision

App

PHILLIPS RESERVOIR BYPASS PIPING

CITY OF CRANBROOK

1+440 - 1+820 Scale

3 7 of 9

Sheet Number Quality Control by Designed by Drawn by

JC JC BB

Project Number

0956.0050.01

Drawing Number

Revision

C07

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

ATTENTION

WARNING

H Professional Seals

ISSUED FOR REVIEW JANUARY 30, 2020

K #

L Date

Issue / Revision

App

PHILLIPS RESERVOIR BYPASS PIPING

CITY OF CRANBROOK

1+820 - 2+120 Scale

3 8 of 9

Sheet Number Quality Control by Designed by Drawn by

JC JC BB

Project Number

0956.0050.01

Drawing Number

Revision

C08

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

U:\Projects_KEL\0956\0050\01\D-Design\CAD\10_DES\DES-0956.0050.01.dwg, 1+820 - 2+120, 2020-01-30 03:09 pm bbriggs

Proposed Alignment 1 2+120 to 2+500 x5.0

U:\Projects_KEL\0956\0050\01\D-Design\CAD\10_DES\DES-0956.0050.01.dwg, 2+120 - 2+500.594, 2020-01-30 03:14 pm bbriggs

ATTENTION

WARNING

H Professional Seals

ISSUED FOR REVIEW JANUARY 30, 2020

K #

L Date

Issue / Revision

App

PHILLIPS RESERVOIR BYPASS PIPING

CITY OF CRANBROOK

2+120 - 2+500.294 Scale

3 9 of 9

Sheet Number Quality Control by Designed by Drawn by

JC JC BB

Project Number

0956.0050.01

Drawing Number

Revision

C09

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

Appendix B – Cost Estimate

Cost Estimate - Class D - Phillips Reservoir Bypass Pipe Job No: Date:

0956.0050.01 26-Jan-20

Prepared by: J. Clowes Checked by: S. Brubacher ITEM

DESCRIPTION General Mobilization/demobilization Insurance Environmental approvals and inspection Gas utility supervision of pipe installation

QTY

UNIT

$/UNIT

EXTENDED

1 1 1 1

LS LS LS LS

$200,000 $75,000 $100,000 $6,000

Watermain 750 mm PVC C900 Pipe 750 mm Isolation Valve Direct bury air release valve Blow down assembly (hydrant style) PRV Station (pre-cast concrete building) Upstream tie-in at Diversion Structure Downstream tie-in at Y Building HDD Creek Crossing (fusible PVC or HDPE, includes pipe cost)

2150 5 1 1 1 1 1 375

lm lm ea ea LS LS LS Lm

$750 $25,000 $20,000 $20,000 $500,000 $25,000 $25,000 $2,000

$1,612,500 $125,000 $20,000 $20,000 $500,000 $25,000 $25,000 $750,000

Roadway Restoration 100 mm base course gravels 350 mm subbase course gravels utility conflict allowance trench dewatering (assumed length)

17200 17200 1 100

sq.m sq.m ls lm

$10 $15 $20,000 $90

$172,000 $258,000 $20,000 $9,000

Other Traffic Control

2150

$15

$32,250

Removals N/A

subtotal contingency (35%) engineering (15%) total rounded total

Notes: Watermain unit costs include an allowance for fittings. Estimates assume full road restoration (8m width). Estimates assume native backfill is used Estimates assume that dewatering is done with sumps and pumps (not well point) Cost estimate prepared without geotechnical information or survey. Complete field investigations to refine estimate. Trench assumptions: Open Cut Trench Size - 4 m deep, 1.4 m wide at base, 7.4 m wide at surface, side slope of 0.75H:1V

$3,949,750 $1,382,413 $799,824 $6,131,987 $6,130,000

City of Cranbrook Gold Creek Dam Options Legend UTM Gridlines (1:1,000) UTM_ZONE 7 Zone 8 Zone 9 Zone 10 Zone 11 Zone

Mapsheet Grid (1:2,500) PMBC Parcel Cadastre - First Nation PMBC Parcel Cadastre - Private PMBC Parcel Cadastre - Municipal bc_bc_xc1m_bcalb_1995_2004

Option 1

Option 4 Option 2

Option 3

0.10

0.2 km

1: 5,000.00 Copyright/Disclaimer The material contained in this web site is owned by the Government of British Columbia and protected by copyright law. It may not be reproduced or redistributed without the prior written permission of the Province of British Columbia. To request permission to reproduce all or part of the material on this web site please complete the Copyright Permission Request Form which can be accessed through the Copyright Information Page. CAUTION: Maps obtained using this site are not designed to assist in navigation. These maps may be generalized and may not reflect current conditions. Uncharted hazards may exist. DO NOT USE THESE MAPS FOR NAVIGATIONAL PURPOSES.

Datum:

NAD83

Projection: WGS_1984_Web_Mercator_Auxiliary_Spher e

Key Map of British Columbia

MEMORANDUM Date: To: cc: From: File: Subject:

April 16, 2021 Mike Matejka – City of Cranbrook Scott Shephard, Anthony Comazzetto, Jeremy Clowes – Urban Systems Steve Brubacher, P.Eng. 0956.0050.01 Cranbrook Water Supply Master Plan Supply Solution Set – FINAL_Rev.2

Introduction The purpose of this memo is to outline a supply solution set and prioritization of projects to address the long-term needs of the City in supplying water to a growing population. As outlined at the start of this project the measures of success for this master plan have been defined under the following categories: Compliance with regulations Sustainable long-term supply of water to the City Levels of service are defined and supported by Council Financial plan is sustainable and within the City’s capacity to pay Four technical memos have been prepared ahead of this memo and inform the solution set presented: Growth Forecast – projects the long-term needs of the City Water Source and Storage Options – provides a summary of the water supply and storage sources available to the City Levels of Service – provides an overview to the methodology for the level of service prioritization process Water System Risk Assessment Update – provides an update to the linear water transmission and distribution system risk assessment downstream of the proposed new Zone 1 reservoir Methodology As outlined in the previous Levels of Service and Water System Risk Assessment Update the risk assessment process for linear infrastructure is based on both an evaluation of hydraulic capacity and condition likelihood and consequence of failure. This same methodology is expanded as we consider the cumulative impacts of the multiple sources and the unique considerations due to the supply system configuration. Specific risks are outlined in this memo and project options are evaluated against these specific risks but also against the broader capacity and condition overall risks. With this risk assessment information, the proposed projects are prioritized and a solution set is presented for discussion.

29 - 10th Avenue South, Cranbrook, BC V1C 2M9 | T: 778.517.0981

MEMORANDUM Date: April 16, 2021 File: 0956.0050.01 Subject: Solution Set Page: 2 of 12

Risks were assigned a score based the consequence and likelihood of failure as shown in Table 1. Table 1 – Condition Risk Scoring

Risk Characterization The following major system risks have been considered in the project evaluation. There are numerous events that could result in the system risks materializing. For example, wildfires or a seismic event could trigger multiple system component failures occurring simultaneously. Risk

Description

Phillips Reservoir

Water Quality Degradation

Inadequate Capacity

Condition Failure

Joseph Creek

Water Quality Degradation

Water Capacity Degradation

Gold Creek

Water Quality Degradation

Water Capacity Degradation

Water Transmission Main: Condition Failure

Groundwater Wells

Water Quality Degradation

Mechanical Failure

Power Failure

29 - 10th Avenue South, Cranbrook, BC V1C 2M9 | T: 778.517.0981

MEMORANDUM Date: April 16, 2021 File: 0956.0050.01 Subject: Solution Set Page: 3 of 12

Project Options Nine supply projects have been identified for consideration. These projects are over and above the distribution system upgrade projects that have been outlined in the linear risk assessment update. Refer to Appendix A and Appendix B for figures that show the existing water system and future water system configurations. All nine projects that are listed below are shown in Appendix B.

Project 1. Disinfection Upgrades – UV + Chlorination at Phillips Reservoir Description Addition of ultraviolet light disinfection and conversion of the gas chlorination system to an on-site generation or bulk sodium hypochlorite system with generator backup. The addition of ultraviolet light disinfection is an Interior Health Authority requirement for filtration deferral and provides protection from cryptosporidium and giardia outbreaks as well as a secondary barrier for bacteriological risks.

The Disinfection Facility will initially need to be sized to treat the higher of MDD + fire flow or PHD. Constructing the reservoirs, as noted below under Project 6 and 7, will decrease demand on the Disinfection Facility as it will only need to treat up to MDD.

Risks Addressed

Directly: Phillips (1a, 1c), Joseph Creek (2a), Gold Creek (3a), Power Failure (6) Indirectly: Groundwater Wells (5a, 5b) by improving the reliability of the surface water source

Overall Existing Risk Likelihood of Failure

Overall Existing Risk Consequence of Failure

Overall Existing Risk Score

Overall 2036 Risk Likelihood of Failure

Overall 2036 Risk Consequence of Failure

Overall 2036 Risk Score

29 - 10th Avenue South, Cranbrook, BC V1C 2M9 | T: 778.517.0981

MEMORANDUM Date: April 16, 2021 File: 0956.0050.01 Subject: Solution Set Page: 4 of 12

Project 2. Filtration Plant at Phillips Reservoir Description Addition of a filtration plant at Phillips Reservoir if required by Interior Health Authority.

Risks Addressed

Directly: Phillips (1a, 1c), Joseph Creek (2a), Gold Creek (3a), Power Failure (6) Indirectly: Groundwater Wells (5a, 5b) by improving the reliability of the surface water source

Overall Existing Risk Likelihood of Failure

Overall Existing Risk Consequence of Failure

Overall Existing Risk Score

Overall 2036 Risk Likelihood of Failure

Overall 2036 Risk Consequence of Failure

Overall 2036 Risk Score

*Assumes that IHA approves the application for filtration deferral (increase to 5 if filtration deferral application is not approved)

Project 3. Gold Creek Dam Upgrades Description Construction of a new spillway and upgrading of the diversion pipeline through the berm. Armouring is required on the upstream face of the berm. Further, the berm is recommended to be upgraded to bring it into compliance with the dam safety regulations. With this work the impoundment area can also likely be increased.

Risks Addressed

Directly: Gold Creek (3a, 3b) Indirectly: Groundwater Wells (5a, 5b) by improving the reliability of the surface water source

Overall Existing Risk Likelihood of Failure

Overall Existing Risk Consequence of Failure

Overall Existing Risk Score

Overall 2036 Risk Likelihood of Failure

Overall 2036 Risk Consequence of Failure

Overall 2036 Risk Score

29 - 10th Avenue South, Cranbrook, BC V1C 2M9 | T: 778.517.0981

MEMORANDUM Date: April 16, 2021 File: 0956.0050.01 Subject: Solution Set Page: 5 of 12

Project 4a) Phillips Reservoir Bypass Description Add a bypass that diverts the Gold Creek flows around the Phillips Reservoir in the event that the Phillips Reservoir needs to be taken off-line. Bypass must be in place to complete project 4b.

Risks Addressed

Directly: Phillips (1a, 1c), Joseph Creek (2a) Indirectly: Groundwater Wells (5a, 5b) by improving the reliability of the surface water source

Overall Existing Risk Likelihood of Failure

Overall Existing Risk Consequence of Failure

Overall Existing Risk Score

Overall 2036 Risk Likelihood of Failure

Overall 2036 Risk Consequence of Failure

Overall 2036 Risk Score

Project 4b) Phillips Reservoir Upgrades Description Complete capital recommendations from the 2019 Dam Safety Review with a focus on installing a seepage weir and repairing the isolation valve on the main outlet pipe. Project 4a must be completed prior to upgrading the Phillips Reservoir.

Risks Addressed

Directly: Phillips (1c), Joseph Creek (2a, 2b), Gold Creek (3a, 3b) Indirectly: Groundwater Wells (5a, 5b) by improving the reliability of the surface water source

Overall Existing Risk Likelihood of Failure

Overall Existing Risk Consequence of Failure

Overall Existing Risk Score

Overall 2036 Risk Likelihood of Failure

Overall 2036 Risk Consequence of Failure

Overall 2036 Risk Score

29 - 10th Avenue South, Cranbrook, BC V1C 2M9 | T: 778.517.0981

MEMORANDUM Date: April 16, 2021 File: 0956.0050.01 Subject: Solution Set Page: 6 of 12

Project 6. Transmission Main Upgrade Description The existing transmission main is a concrete cylinder and steel main and is reaching the end of its life. In addition, this main is required to have increased capacity in order to convey the 2070 flows even with the Zone 1 and Zone 3 reservoirs constructed. To convey the 2070 MDD of 89 MLD from Phillips Reservoir to the Zone 1 Reservoir, the pipe will need to be twinned with a 750 mm pipe or replaced with 900 mm pipe. This allows for the future construction of a filtration plant and the associated supply HGL to drop to approximately 1065 m. Trunkmain and distribution upgrades downstream of the proposed Zone 1 Reservoir were considered in the distribution system analysis which is documented in a separate technical memo. Risks Addressed

Directly: Transmission Main (4) Indirectly: Groundwater Wells (5a, 5b) by improving the reliability of the surface water source

Overall Existing Risk Likelihood of Failure

Overall Existing Risk Consequence of Failure

Overall Existing Risk Score

Overall 2036 Risk Likelihood of Failure

Overall 2036 Risk Consequence of Failure

Overall 2036 Risk Score

29 - 10th Avenue South, Cranbrook, BC V1C 2M9 | T: 778.517.0981

MEMORANDUM Date: April 16, 2021 File: 0956.0050.01 Subject: Solution Set Page: 7 of 12

Project 7. Zone 1 Reservoir (Reservoir No.1) Description Addition of a covered reservoir at the top of Zone 1 in order to provide peak hour balancing to Zones 1, 2, 2a, 2b, 5 and 6 and fire flow to all zones. This together with the Zone 3 reservoir eliminates the requirement for the Phillips Reservoir and transmission main to provide balancing for peak hour and fire flows and also reduces the size of the disinfection facility. The fire flow and peak hour balancing storage needs are: 5.1 ML (2036), 13.2 ML (2070) If desired the emergency storage volume needs are an additional: 1.3 ML (2036), 3.3 ML (2070)

Note: Reservoir location and service area to be verified when the project advances to preliminary design. An alternate location was considered for Reservoir No.2 which if selected will impact Reservoir No.1 sizing and configuration. Refer to Appendix C for a technical memorandum documenting the review of the alternate location of Reservoir No.2 and potential impacts to Reservoir No.1.

Risks Addressed

Directly: Phillips (1a, 1b, 1c), Joseph Creek (2a, 2b), Gold Creek (3a, 3b), Transmission Main (4) Indirectly: none

Overall Existing Risk Likelihood of Failure

Overall Existing Risk Consequence of Failure

Overall Existing Risk Score

Overall 2036 Risk Likelihood of Failure

Overall 2036 Risk Consequence of Failure

Overall 2036 Risk Score

29 - 10th Avenue South, Cranbrook, BC V1C 2M9 | T: 778.517.0981

MEMORANDUM Date: April 16, 2021 File: 0956.0050.01 Subject: Solution Set Page: 8 of 12

Project 8. Zone 3 Reservoir (Reservoir No.2) Description Addition of a covered reservoir at the top of Zone 3 in order to provide peak hour balancing storage to Zones 3, 3a and 4. This together with the Zone 1 reservoir eliminates the requirement for the Phillips Reservoir and transmission main to provide balancing for peak hour and fire flows and also reduces the size of the disinfection facility. This reservoir is also proposed to include a pump station to transfer well water to the upper zones in the event of loss of surface water supply. The peak hour balancing storage needs are: 6.7 ML (2036), 11.4 ML (2070) If desired the emergency storage volume needs are an additional: 1.7 ML (2036), 2.9 ML (2070)

Note: Reservoir location and service area to be verified when the project advances to preliminary design. An alternate location was considered for Reservoir No.2 which will impact sizing, service area, and distribution system upgrades that are needed to accommodate the proposed reservoir. Refer to Appendix C for a technical memorandum documenting the review of the alternate location of Reservoir No.2 and potential impacts to Reservoir No.1.

Risks Addressed

Directly: Phillips (1a, 1b, 1c), Joseph Creek (2a, 2b), Gold Creek (3a, 3b), Transmission Main (4) Indirectly: none

Overall Existing Risk Likelihood of Failure

Overall Existing Risk Consequence of Failure

Overall Existing Risk Score

Overall 2036 Risk Likelihood of Failure

Overall 2036 Risk Consequence of Failure

Overall 2036 Risk Score

29 - 10th Avenue South, Cranbrook, BC V1C 2M9 | T: 778.517.0981

MEMORANDUM Date: April 16, 2021 File: 0956.0050.01 Subject: Solution Set Page: 9 of 12

Project 9. Moir Pit Well Description Construction of a new groundwater well in the range of 40-60 l/s to increase the capacity and reliability of the groundwater supply. With a generator this well will also be able to increase the availability of fire flows in the lower zone.

Risks Addressed

Directly: Groundwater Wells (5a, 5b) Indirectly: Phillips (1a, 1b, 1c), Joseph Creek (2a, 2b), Gold Creek (3a, 3b) and Transmission Main (4) by improving the reliability of the ground water source

Overall Existing Risk Likelihood of Failure

Overall Existing Risk Consequence of Failure

Overall Existing Risk Score

Overall 2036 Risk Likelihood of Failure

Overall 2036 Risk Consequence of Failure

Overall 2036 Risk Score

Project 10. Well Generators Description Addition of backup generators to the existing wells so that in a power failure the wells are able to operate and provide fire flows and water to meet customer demands.

Risks Addressed

Directly: Power Failure (6) Indirectly: Phillips (1a, 1b, 1c), Joseph Creek (2a, 2b), Gold Creek (3a, 3b) and Transmission Main (4) by improving the reliability of the ground water source

Overall Existing Risk Likelihood of Failure

Overall Existing Risk Consequence of Failure

Overall Existing Risk Score

Overall 2036 Risk Likelihood of Failure

Overall 2036 Risk Consequence of Failure

Overall 2036 Risk Score

29 - 10th Avenue South, Cranbrook, BC V1C 2M9 | T: 778.517.0981

MEMORANDUM Date: April 16, 2021 File: 0956.0050.01 Subject: Solution Set Page: 10 of 12

Project Timing and Prioritization In considering the projects identified above, we have developed an overall priority and timing sequence as outlined below. The following timing is based on the City’s target spending level of $1.0 Million/year plus DCCs which should contribute approximately $5 Million by 2036 – or a total average spending level of $1.3 Million per year plus an annual increase of 1.9% and inflation. This can be accelerated through the securing of grants or increased funding if the City determines the benefits outweigh the costs. The below costs include the transmission main to Reservoir 1 but do not include the distribution main upgrades which are outlined in a separate memo and will need to be considered for the total funding required and the timing identified. Project

Overall Risk Score Existing/Future

1. Disinfection

5/5

Order of Magnitude Cost

Priority/Timing

Sequence for Completing Projects**

Rational

~$11M

Priority 1

IHA Filtration Deferral Compliance

2021-2036 2. WTP

3/3

~$25-50M

TBD

If and when required by IHA

3. Gold Creek Dam

5/5

~$6M

Priority 1

Repair existing condition issues and consider expanded impoundment area

4a) Phillips Bypass

5/5

Required to complete repairs to Phillips Reservoir and provide increased resiliency

4b) Phillips Upgrades

5/5

Complete existing deficiency repairs (requires bypass to be constructed)

Addresses aging infrastructure with no current redundancy and future capacity limit

2021-2036

~$6.5M

Priority 1 2021-2036 (complete at same time as 4b)

~$1.5M

Priority 1 2021-2036 (complete at same time as 4a)

5. Transmission Main (To Reservoir No.1 only)

4/4 (Risk to be re-evaluated after condition assessment)

~$7M

Priority 2 2037-2041

29 - 10th Avenue South, Cranbrook, BC V1C 2M9 | T: 778.517.0981

MEMORANDUM Date: April 16, 2021 File: 0956.0050.01 Subject: Solution Set Page: 11 of 12

Project

Overall Risk Score Existing/Future

6. Zone 1 Reservoir

5/5

Order of Magnitude Cost

Priority/Timing

Sequence for Completing Projects**

~$5.5M$6.5M* (2036)

Priority 3

2042-2048

~$8M$10M* (2070) 7. Zone 3 Reservoir (includes pump station, connection to trunkmain and connection to zone 3)

5/5

9. Moir Pit Well

3/4

~$9.8M $11.3M* (2036)

Priority 3

2042-2048

~$7.3M $8.3M* (2070)

~$1M

Priority 4

4/4

~$1M

Priority 4 2047-2049

Removes dependency on Phillips Reservoir and supply main for fire storage and peak hour balancing and allows groundwater to be supplied to entire City

Increases availability of groundwater supply and allows the City to supply average day demands with groundwater only to ~2035

Increases availability of groundwater and allows for increased fire flows and lower dependence on distribution system

2047-2049

10. Well Generators

Rational

*Lower end of range excludes emergency storage. 2070 cost estimate range is based on expanding a reservoir that was constructed for 2036 demands.

29 - 10th Avenue South, Cranbrook, BC V1C 2M9 | T: 778.517.0981

MEMORANDUM Date: April 16, 2021 File: 0956.0050.01 Subject: Solution Set Page: 12 of 12

Closure Please contact the undersigned if you have any questions.

URBAN SYSTEMS LTD.

Steve Brubacher, P.Eng. Principal Attachments Appendix A – Existing and Future Water System Schematics Appendix B – Water System Upgrade Map Appendix C – Reservoir No.2 Alternate Location Review /sb U:\Projects_KEL\0956\0050\01\R-Reports-Studies-Documents\R1-Reports\2020-07-27 Supply Solution Set Memo.docx

29 - 10th Avenue South, Cranbrook, BC V1C 2M9 | T: 778.517.0981

Jeremy Clowes, P.Eng. Principal

Appendix A Existing and Future Water System Schematic

29 - 10th Avenue South, Cranbrook, BC V1C 2M9 | T: 778.517.0981

Phillips Reservoir EL. 1087.90m

LEGEND

Zone 1

Fed by Phillips Reservoir.

Zone 2

Zone 2 fed by PRV2. Zone 2a fed by PRV1. Zone 2b fed by PRV13.

Zone 3

Zone 3 split into 2 sub-zones. South fed by PRV3 and PRV4, North by PRV5 and PRV6.

Zone 4

Zone 4 fed by PRvs 11 and 12. PRVs 7 and 8a only open under fire and high demands

Zone 5

Controlled solely by PRV9.

Zone 6

Controlled solely by PRV8b.

EXISTING SYSTEM - 2020 PRV #1/1a EL. 999.28

PRV #2 EL. 982.93 PRV #3 EL. 970.09

200mm 55 psi HGL 1038m

PRV #13 EL. 981.50

250mm 52 psi HGL 1020m

PRV #4 EL. 967.65 200mm 44 psi HGL 1001m

PRV #6 EL. 962.34

200mm 49 psi HGL 1002m

200mm 93 psi HGL 1047m

200mm 51 psi HGL 1003m

200mm 49 psi HGL 997m

PRV #5 EL. 950.66 200mm 69 psi HGL 999m

PRV #12 EL. 923.82

PRV #8a/8b EL. 927.47 200mm 43/87 psi HGL 958m/984m

PRV #11 EL. 918.50

300mm 50 psi HGL 959m Well #5 El. 924.6 45.5 L/s 157.6m TDH

Well #4 El. 925.2 47.6 L/s 145.7m TDH

Well #3 El. 937.5 37.9 L/s 136.6m TDH

PRV #10 EL. 966.05

PRV #9 EL. 966.88

200mm 61 psi HGL 961m

PRV #7 EL. 898.41 200mm 87 psi HGL 960m

100mm inactive HGL 1084m

Phillips Reservoir EL. 1087.90m

LEGEND

Proposed Gold Creek Bypass Proposed Reservoir 1 Balancing/Emergency Storage Service Area = Zones 1, 2, 2a, 2b, 5 & 6 Fire Flow Area = Zones 1-6 EL.1055m

Proposed Treatment Facility EL.1065m

Zone 1

Fed by Reservoir 1.

Zone 2

Zone 2 fed by PRV2. Zone 2a fed by PRV1. Zone 2b fed by PRV13.

Zone 3

Zone 3 split into 2 sub-zones. South fed by PRV3 and PRV4 or Reservoir 2, North by PRV5 and PRV6 or Reservoir 2.

Zone 4

Zone 4 fed by PRvs 11 and 12. PRVs 7 and 8a only open under fire and high demands

Zone 5

Controlled solely by PRV9.

Zone 6

Controlled solely by PRV8b.

FUTURE SYSTEM Proposed Booster Pump (Supply well source water to upper zones) EL.1002m 200L/s TDH=52m

PRV #1/1a EL. 999.28

PRV #2 EL. 982.93 PRV #3 EL. 970.09

Proposed Reservoir 2 Service Area = Zones 3, 3a & 4 Balancing Storage for Zones 3, 3a & 4 EL.1004m

200mm 55 psi HGL 1038m

PRV #13 EL. 981.50

250mm 52 psi HGL 1020m

PRV #4 EL. 967.65 200mm 44 psi HGL 1001m

PRV #6 EL. 962.34

200mm 49 psi HGL 1002m

200mm 93 psi HGL 1047m

200mm 51 psi HGL 1003m

200mm 49 psi HGL 997m

PRV #5 EL. 950.66 200mm 69 psi HGL 999m

PRV #12 EL. 923.82

PRV #8a/8b EL. 927.47 200mm 43/87 psi HGL 958m/984m

PRV #11 EL. 918.50

300mm 50 psi HGL 959m Well #5 El. 924.6 45.5 L/s 157.6m TDH

Well #4 El. 925.2 47.6 L/s 145.7m TDH

Proposed Moir Pit Well (TW10) El.952m 44L/s 134 m TDH

Well #3 El. 937.5 37.9 L/s 136.6m TDH

PRV #10 EL. 966.05

PRV #9 EL. 966.88

200mm 61 psi HGL 961m

PRV #7 EL. 898.41 200mm 87 psi HGL 960m

100mm inactive HGL 1084m

Appendix B Water System Upgrade Map

29 - 10th Avenue South, Cranbrook, BC V1C 2M9 | T: 778.517.0981

Appendix C Reservoir No.2 Alternate Location Review (refer to Appendix K of the Water Supply Master Plan)

29 - 10th Avenue South, Cranbrook, BC V1C 2M9 | T: 778.517.0981

MEMORANDUM DATE

April 16, 2021

FROM

Jeremy Clowes, P.Eng.

Mike Matejka, AScT

FILE

0956.0050.01

Steve Brubacher, P.Eng.

SUBJECT Altern ante Zone 3 Reservoir_Final_rev.1

1.0 INTRODUCTION The purpose of this memo is to compare two locations for the Pressure Zone 3 reservoir. The primary considerations in selecting the Zone 3 reservoir location are: Maximize existing and growth areas that can be serviced; Minimize risk associated with a trunkmain failure; Maximize flexibility for using the ground water wells as an emergency backup water supply; and, Minimize Costs. The following Table 1.1 shows the maximum day demands of each pressure zone and their proportion to the City’s overall demand during the buildout phase (2070). Note that Zone 6 includes the Shadow Mountain and Rivers Crossing Developments. Table 1.1 Pressure Zone Distribution System Demands Zone

Maximum Day Demand (L/s) 2019

2036

2070

2070 MDD Percentage of Total Demand

7.8

26.2

175.6

17%

15.7

36.2

108.2

10%

15.3

17.5

0.1

0.01%

119.2

142.1

14%

9.4

17.3

113.9

149.9

370.0

36%

16.4

23.1

72.8

13.2

27.3

129.6

13%

Total

311.0

439.7

1033.2

29 - 10th Avenue South, Cranbrook, BC V1C 2M9 | T: 778.517.0981

DATE FILE SUBJ ECT

February 12, 2021 0956.0050. 01 Alternate Zone 3 Reser voir

PAGE

2 of 6

Appendix A includes a figure that shows the two proposed Reservoir 2 locations along with the required distribution system upgrades to accommodate a reservoir at each of the locations. These required upgrades are compared in the following Table 1.2 . Table 1.2 Infrastructure Upgrades Comparison for Reservoir 2 Locations Infrastructure Upgrades

Alternate Reservoir 2

Reservoir 2

Trunk Main Upgrades

Provide Fire Flow Storage

New Interconnect between PZ 3&5, PZ 3&4, and PZ 5&6

2.0 ORIGINAL RESERVOIR 2 The original Reservoir 2 location in the South-east quadrant of the City was proposed in the Cranbrook Water Supply Master Plan Supply Solution Set and can be described by the following Table 2.1. Table 2.1 Reservoir 1 & 2 Comparison Items

Reservoir 1

Reservoir 2

Supply Zones

1, 2, 2a, 2b, 5 & 6

3, 3a & 4

2036 MDD (l/s)

130

309

Fire Flow Storage Zones

1, 2, 2a, 2b, 3, 3a, 4, 5 & 6 (225 l/s fire flow)

Fire Flow Storage (m 3) Total Storage (m ) 3

N/A

2,300

6,400

8,400

Total Combined Storage (m ) 3

14,800

The order of magnitude cost estimate for the original 2036 Reservoir 2 location is approximately $10M, per the Supply Solution Set Memo dated July 27, 2020. The City perimeter Trunk Main services pressure zones on the east and north sides of the City. As all the City’s fire flow storage is contained in Reservoir 1, the Trunk Main requires the following approximately $7.7M upgrades to effectively convey these flows to Zones 4 and 5. 3,240 metres of 400 mm upsized to 500 mm; 3,460 metres of 400 mm upsized to 600 mm; and, 235 metres of 450 mm upsized to 600 mm.

29 - 10th Avenue South, Cranbrook, BC V1C 2M9 | T: 778.517.0981

DATE FILE SUBJ ECT

February 12, 2021 0956.0050. 01 Alternate Zone 3 Reser voir

PAGE

3 of 6

The main that connects the original reservoir 2 location to Zone 3 allows the wells to fill the reservoir overnight at approximately 79 L/s (with no supply from Reservoir 1 or Philips Reservoir).

3.0 ALTERNATE RESERVOIR 2 The Alternate Reservoir 2 location places the Zone 3 reservoir in the North-west quadrant of the City. A location was found to place the reservoir at the approximately the same HGL as the original Reservoir 2 – 1004 m. As such, this location will the reservoir to be filled by the wells but require a booster station to supply Zones 1 and 2 if Philips reservoir is offline. In this scenario, the wells can fill the Reservoir 2 overnight at approximately 66 L/s from Zone 3. Table 3.1 Reservoir 1 & 2 Comparison Items

Reservoir 1

Reservoir 2

Supply Zones

1, 2, 2a & 2b

3, 3a, 4, 5 & 6

2036 MDD (l/s)

360

1, 2, 2a & 2b (150 L/s fire

3, 3a, 4, 5 & 6 (225 L/s

flow)

fire flow)

1,100

2,300

3,500

12,700

Fire Flow Storage Zones Fire Flow Storage (m ) 3

Total Storage (m ) 3

Total Combined Storage (m ) 3

16,200

The water main connecting the Alternate Reservoir 2 to Pressure Zone 3 will have a direct connection to Pressure Zone 5 on 6 Street NW. Zones 3 & 5 operate at approximately the same HGL and can therefore operate as one pressure zone through this connection. Adjacent to this connection will be one of two required PRVs that connect the Zone 3 main to Pressure Zone 4. These PRVs will be required to ensure fire flow can be conveyed from the North-East sector to the extents of Zone 4. A third PRV will be installed to connect Zone 5 to Zone 6 just downstream of existing PRV-8b, so all Zone 6 demands can be serviced through Zone 5 and the alternate Reservoir 2 site. Currently, PRV-8b services Zone 6 from the Trunk Main. The set point of this existing PRV will be adjusted to ensure only fire flow will be conveyed from the Trunk Main to Zone 6 if there is a supply issue from Reservoir 2. With the connections mentioned above, the North-west location for Reservoir 2 will adequately service Zones 3, 3a, 4, 5 & 6.

29 - 10th Avenue South, Cranbrook, BC V1C 2M9 | T: 778.517.0981

DATE FILE SUBJ ECT

February 12, 2021 0956.0050. 01 Alternate Zone 3 Reser voir

PAGE

4 of 6

4.0 COST ESTIMATE Relocating Reservoir 2 to the North-west end of the city will change the respective volumes of both Reservoir 1 & 2 and increase the overall required storage. The total storage will be greater in the revised concept as both reservoirs will have to provide fire storage instead of Reservoir 1 providing all fire storage. Allowing for fire storage in each reservoir eliminates the need for upgrading the trunkmain downstream of Reservoir 1. The following table provides a cost comparison between the two concepts. Table 4.1 Cost Comparison Items

Original Concept

Revised Concept

Trunk Main Upgrades

$7.7M

N/A

Reservoir 1

$5.5M

$5M

$9.8M

$17.5M

N/A

$30K

N/A

$900K

$23M

$23.5M

Reservoir 2, booster pumps and connecting pipes Zone 3 to 5 interconnection 3 PRVs – Above Ground Kiosk or Chamber without SCADA Connection and Instrumentation Total Cost

*land acquisition and financing costs not included

5.0 SUMMARY The estimated capital costs are similar for each of the reviewed Reservoir 2 locations. It is recommended that the City confirm the preferred locations and service areas for Reservoir No.1 and No.2 when these projects are advanced to the preliminary design stage. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned.

29 - 10th Avenue South, Cranbrook, BC V1C 2M9 | T: 778.517.0981

DATE FILE SUBJ ECT

February 12, 2021 0956.0050. 01 Alternate Zone 3 Reser voir

PAGE

5 of 6

Sincerely, URBAN SYSTEMS LTD.

Jeremy Clowes, P.Eng. Principal, Water and Wastewater Engineer /sj & jc Enclosure cc:

Steve Brubacher, P.Eng.

\\usl.urban-systems.com\projects\Projects_KEL\0956\0050\01\R-Reports-Studies-Documents\R1-Reports\1. Reservoir\2021-02-03 Alternate Zone 3 Reservoir.docx

29 - 10th Avenue South, Cranbrook, BC V1C 2M9 | T: 778.517.0981

Long

Term

Water

Supply

Management\5.

Alternate

Zone

Appendix A

29 - 10th Avenue South, Cranbrook, BC V1C 2M9 | T: 778.517.0981

Date: To: cc: From: File: Subject:

January 27, 2020 Mike Matejka, Manager of Infrastructure Planning & Delivery, City of Cranbrook Jason Perrault, Public Works Manager, City of Cranbrook Jeremy Clowes, P.Eng., Water and Wastewater Engineer 0956.0050.01 City of Cranbrook Water Conservation Plan Update

INTRODUCTION The City of Cranbrook (City) requested that Urban Systems Ltd. (Urban) assess their water conservation efforts to date and identify areas where the City can continue to make reductions in their water use. BACKGROUND

During periods of peak demand, the City utilizes three groundwater wells to supplement water supply. The surface water supply is directed to Philips reservoir. Downstream of the reservoir, The City experiences seasonal fluctuations in water demand due to a temporary population, summer tourism, and high irrigation demands during the summer. population can be estimated from Canadian census data, as the difference between the number

permanently residing (Statistics Canada, 2016). in the last census was reported as 19,259 (2016), where people were counted based on their usual place of residence. Residential customers account for the greatest number of connections and water demand. which aimed to reduce water consumption throughout the Columbia River Basin. Additionally, the City promoted water conservation through a number of initiatives prior to joining the Water Smart Program. The following memorandum will provide an overview of City led water conservation initiatives, review the Water Smart Program objectives and results, review recent water consumption data and identify future actions that the City can take to further reduce water consumption.

CRANBROOK WATER CONSERVATION INITIATIVES Prior to the Water Smart Program, following:

efforts focused on the

1. Educating the public on how to reduce their water usage which included using a water 2. Utilizing bylaws to regulate water use habits including: waterless Wednesdays (outdoor

irrigation not permitted on Wednesdays), odd/even day watering and hourly watering restrictions, 3. Running a toilet exchange program, and, 4. Conducting leak detection and repairs.

WATER SMART ACTION PLAN In 2009, the Columbia Basin Trust initiated the Water Smart Program to achieve a basin-wide consumption reduction of 20% over seven years (2009-2015). The program provided financial and technical support to participating communities to reach this target. In 2010, the Columbia Basin Trust completed a Water Smart Action Plan (WSAP) tailored for the City of Cranbrook. The City committed to achieving a reduction of 20% from the 2009 annual total flow of 4,954 ML from the combined surface and groundwater sources. To help Cranbrook to reach their 20% reduction target, the WSAP outlined four objectives, associated recommended actions and expected reductions. The following will identify the four

Objective 1: To Develop a Comprehensive Leak Detection, Repair and Infrastructure Replacement Program that Addresses Leakage. The WSAP estimated that the system as of 2009 was losing 33.4% of its water supply to leakage. Since 2015, the City of Cranbrook has been using the AWWA water audit software to quantify balance tool that estimates system water losses. Between 2015 and 2018, water loss decreased from 847 ML/yr in 2015 down to 632 ML/yr in 2016. Following this decrease, the estimated water loss increased to 881 ML/yr in 2018. Although water losses marginally increased from 2015 to 2018, the 2018 loss of 881 ML/yr or 18% of the total water supply is still significantly lower than the 2009 baseline year losses of 33.4%.

Objective 2: To Develop an Operations Program to Read Available Metered Data and Integrate the Water Metered Data with a Leak Detection Program to Better Capture Unaccounted for Losses and To Better Understand ICI and Residential Water Uses. A referendum was held in 2011 to determine whether the community would pursue a universal water metering program. The proposed universal metering program referendum was defeated, and the matter has not been pursued further. Due to this, the City has not been able to analyze metered data and integrate it with a leak detection program. Objective 3: Implement Universal Metering on ICI Users and Identify High ICI Water Users and Conduct Water Audits. As of 2014, 172 commercial service connections were equipped with water meters. Additional ICI meters have not been installed since. Objective 4: Implement Proven Strategies for Reducing Residential Water Demands. In 2009, the second highest quantity of water consumption was for residential outdoor use (after leakage). The following identifies the actions taken by the City to reduce water demands throughout the community. The City hired a seasonal Water Smart Ambassador from 2014 to 2019. The Water Ambassador s role included educating the public on the importance of water stewardship and equipping residents with the skills and tools to successfully conserve water at home. Some of the programs carried out by the Water Smart Ambassador included: a. Water Wise Elementary Education Program provided an interactive lesson to children about the importance of using water wisely. b. Irrigation Assessments provided lawn and garden assessments to residents to help reduce irrigation demands; provided irrigation assessments to local public schools in 2016; and provided irrigation assessments of public parks. c. Information Booths educated the public about water stewardship and allowed the Water Ambassador to advertise and communicate water conservation programs to residents. d. Encouraging Compliance with City of Cranbrook Bylaws through Neighborhood Monitoring the Water Ambassador biked through the City to ensure residents were following the water use regulations. The City offered the low flow toilet rebate program from May 2010 to September 2014 in an effort to reduce indoor water use the program encouraged homeowners to replace high

volume toilets with more efficient low-flow toilets by providing a rebate ($50 rebate). A total of 1,000 rebates were issued.

can be quantified by removing the winter baseflow from summertime demands. The average baseflow can be determined from October to April demands, and irrigation demands during the summer can be estimated by subtracting the base demand from the total summer demand. Figure 1 shows that the City was not successful in significantly reducing outdoor demands over the course of the CBT Water Smart Program (2009-2014). Figure 1: Outdoor Irrigation Demands from 2009-2014.

The City of Cranbrook was successful in reducing average winter baseflow demands from 2009 to 2014 (Table 1). Table 1: Average Monthly Winter Baseflow from October to April Demand Average Winter Baseflow (ML/month)

2009

2010

309

277

2011 2012 2013 286

273

255

2014 253

Additional Comments Regarding the Water Smart Program In 2016, Dr. Hans Schreier of UBC prepared a report analyzing the results of the Water Smart Program on behalf of the Columbia Basin Trust. Consumption data over the program period was compared against the 2009 baseline data. The study also found that the City of Cranbrook was successful in reducing winter base demand (Figure 2), however despite reductions in base

demand, the City as of 2015 still had issues with high water consumption during the summer months (particularly in July). Figure 2: Changes in 2011-2015 water consumption in Cranbrook compared to 2009.

th ,

2016.

In addition to monthly consumption data, the report also investigated the change in total annual water consumption from 2009 baseline levels. Figure 3 shows the total annual water consumption percent reductions from 2011 to 2015 for communities located in the North and Southeast of the Columbia Basin. From 2009 to 2015, Cranbrook achieved a total annual demand reduction of five percent (5%). From 2009 baseline levels, the greatest decrease in annual water consumption occurred in 2014, followed by 2013. In 2015, the percent reduction from 2009 levels decreased, which can likely be attributed to high temperatures and dry conditions. In 2015, the City experienced the highest mean maximum summer temperatures. The City also experienced the lowest summer precipitation (May-September) between 2009 and 2015. The high temperatures and limited rainfall caused an increase in outdoor water usage throughout the City prior to the implementation of water use restrictions. Through water restrictions, the City was able to maintain water consumption levels comparable to those in the other years over the remaining summer months.

Figure 3: Comparison of Reduction in Annual Water Consumption for the North and Southeast Communities in the Columbia Basin from 2011-2015 Compared to 2009 Baseline Levels.

2009 to th,

2016.

ANAYLSIS OF RECENT WATER DATA Through the Water Smart Program, the City committed to a 20% reduction in annual water use. As of 2015, the City had reduced annual consumption by approximately 5% from 2009 levels (4,954 ML). To provide a more recent analysis of water conservation efforts, flow data from 2017 to 2019 was analyzed and compared to 2009 baseline levels. Data was available from a flow meter located at the Phillips reservoir , and from flow meters located at each of the three groundwater wells. A summary of the total monthly and annual flows from both sources (surface and groundwater) from 2017 to 2019 can be found in Table 2.

Table 2: Total Monthly and Annual flows from Surface and Groundwater Sources. Month January February March April May June July August September October November December Total

2009 Flow (ML/month) 340 302 329 320 493 632 579 577 508 316 275 284 4,954

2017 Flow (ML/month) 275 245 274 278 437 654 933 819 549 294 265 280 5,303

2018 Flow (ML/month) 288 241 260 281 515 566 701 721 435 283 257 264 4,814

2019 flow (ML/month) 266 253 294 294 451 512 535 665 454 308 284 294 4,609

Comparing the total monthly flow from 2009 to the flows in recent years, it is notable that, from 2009 to 2017, the total demand has been decreasing since 2017 (Figure 4). Winter baseflow has remained relatively constant in the last 10 years. Figure 4: Total Monthly and Annual Flows from Surface and Groundwater Sources

To , it is important to analyze per capita demands. Canadian census population data is available from 2006, 2011 and 2016. The census population statistics was used to estimate a fixed population growth rate, which was then used to estimate the population in each year of flow data. Between 2006-2011 and 2011-2016 the estimated population growth rates are 0.54% and 0.53%, respectively. A growth rate of 0.53% was applied to estimate the population of Cranbrook in 2017, 2018 and 2019. Table 3 provides an overview of the estimated population, total annual water consumption, per capita annual consumption, and changes from the 2009 baseline consumption. Table 3: Recent Change in per Capita Demand from the 2009 Baseline Level

Year

Population

Total Flow (ML/year)

Per Capita Flow (L/Capita/day)

% Change in Demand From 2009

2009 2017 2018 2019

18,562 19,360 19,462 19,564

4,954 5,303 4,814 4,609

731 750 678 645

2.6% -7.3% -11.7%

In 2019, the City had achieved a 11.7% reduction from the estimated 2009 per capita consumption. These improvements indicate that the City has been successful in conserving water through infrastructure improvements and reducing consumption. emporary population made up of seasonal workers and tourists. The Canadian census data quantifies population the place where a person is permanently residing. Considering the method in which population data is quantified, it possible that the actual population during some parts of the year could be greater than the number used census of non-permanent residences were estimated to be 368 and 254 in 2011 and 2016 respectively. This number of residences could result in a decrease in estimated per capita water demands. Leakage Analysis Annual water audits were completed from 2015 to 2018 using the AWWA Free Water Audit Software (v5.0). Water losses have remained relatively stable since 2015 and are much lower than the 2009 baseline year (Table 4).

Table 4: Water Losses

Year

Total Consumption (ML/yr)

Real Losses (ML/yr)

Real Losses Percent of Total Supply

2009 2015 2016 2017 2018

Not available 4,737 4,562 5,308 4,804

Not available 818.9 606.9 826.0 867.0

33.4% 17.3% 13.3% 15.6% 18.0%

The water audit software uses supply and consumption data to estimate the current leakage and provides recommendations to the City with regards to how leakage can be better mitigated. If the City is looking to continue to reduce leakage, it is recommended that leakage reviews be further improved upon, and that tools such as the AWWA water audit software continue to be used to support these efforts.

SUMMARY AND NEXT STEPS Through water conservation efforts, the City of Cranbrook has seen an overall reduction in annual water demand of 11.7% from 2009 to 2019. The decrease in demand can likely be in repairing leaks and reducing residential outdoor water consumption. Based on the above review and discussions with City staff, Urban recommends that the City complete the following: Implement a universal metering program and develop a consumption-based water rate system that promotes conservation; Complete annual leak detection monitoring and repair deficiencies; water consumption; Continue to complete annual water audits; and, Continue to monitor water supply and consumption data.

CLOSING Thank you for the opportunity to work on this important initiative. Please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned should you have any questions or comments. Sincerely, URBAN SYSTEMS LTD.

Aya Costa Water Engineering Co-op Student

Jeremy Clowes, P.Eng. Principal, Water and Wastewater Engineer

REFERENCES 1. Cranbrook Water Smart Action Plan 2. City of Cranbrook Water Quality Information Page. Available at: https://www.cranbrook.ca/residents/water-conservation/water-quality/ 3. City of Cranbrook Water Conservation Information Page. Available at: https://cranbrook.ca/residents/water-conservation/ 4. 2011 and 2016 Canadian Census data 5. 2014 and 2016 City of Cranbrook Water Smart Ambassador Final Reports 6. City of Cranbrook Water Audit Data (2015-2018) 7. Water System Optimization Priorities, January 2019

MEMORANDUM Date: To: cc: From: File: Subject:

January 30, 2021 Mike Matejka – City of Cranbrook Jason Perrault, Anthony Comazzetto, Steve Brubacher Jeremy Clowes, Water and Wastewater Engineer 0956.0050.06 City of Cranbrook Water Treatment Upgrade – UV System RFP Summary _rev.2

1.0 INTRODUCTION This memorandum summarizes the results from a request for proposal (RFP) that was issued for an ultraviolet (UV) disinfection system which will be added to the City of Cranbrook’s (City) water treatment process. Adding UV disinfection will allow the City to comply with British Columbia’s objectives for surface water treatment. The RFP was issued in June 2020 by Urban Systems Ltd. (Urban) to three reputable local suppliers including Wedeco, Trojan and Calgon Carbon. The intent of issuing the RFP was to pre-select a system that a design can be based on. The following sections outline the results of the submitted proposals and identify the recommended supplier.

2.0 ULTRA-VIOLET DISINFECTION (UV) SYSTEM RFP RESULTS Table 2.1 provides a summary of the UV Disinfection System RFP. The RFP allowed for suppliers to select medium-pressure or low-pressure high output (LPHO) UV systems. Medium pressure and LPHO refers to the type of lamp used in the UV Disinfection System. The are advantages and disadvantages to each type of system which is outlined in the table below. The UV System that will be used in Cranbrook will be treated high flow rates and on a gravity system. This makes energy cost and headloss important parameters for selecting a system. Table 2.0 – Medium Pressure vs. LPHO Comparison Medium Pressure UV System

LPHO UV System

Capital Cost

Base Case

Similar to Base Case

Energy Cost

Base Case

Lower

Required Space

Base Case

More Space Required than Base

Headloss thru System

Base Case

Lower

Allowable Starts Per Day

Typically, 20 to 25

Typically, 4

Lamp Life

5000 Hours

14,000 to 15,000 Hours

Lamp Sleeve Cleaning System

Mechanical Wipers and Acid Clean in Place Options Available

All three suppliers provided good proposals. Calgon Carbon submitted a medium pressure system which would perform well but the associated energy costs and headloss through the system are high. Trojan and Wedeco both submitted proposals for LPHO systems. Wedeco and Trojan proposals were ranked very close 83/100 points and 81/100 points, respectively. Wedeco had the lowest Net Present Value which helped them finish as the highest-ranking proposal overall. There are some items that need to be confirmed with the Wedeco submission which may impact the overall ranking as noted below.

304 - 1353 Ellis Street, Kelowna, BC V1Y 1Z9 | T: 250.762.2517

MEMORANDUM Date: January 30, 2021 File: 0956.0050.01 Subject: Cranbrook Water System – UV System RFP Page: 2 of 8

Table 2.1 – UV Disinfection System RFP Summary RFP Issue Date

June 24, 2020

RFP Closing Date

July 15, 2020

Number of Submissions

Three

Evaluation Criteria

Technical

50 Points

References (of those listed in proposal)

25 Points

Capital and O&M Costs

25 Points Total

Ranking of Submission*

100 Points

Supplier and Manufacturer (if different from supplier)

RFP Score (out of 100)

BOWRIO Water, Calgon Carbon

Ramtech, Trojan

Mequipco, Xylem/Wedeco

Technical and Cost Review

Refer to Appendix A for summary

Additional Reference Review for Wedeco (Highest Ranking)

2 references checked

*Refer to Appendices B to D for a copy of each proposal

2.1. PREFERRED SUPPLIER AND SYSTEM The recommended Supplier is Mequipco, Xylem/Wedeco as they had the highest scoring proposal. Concerns or Issues to Resolve with Preferred Supplier: Reference Check No.1 Comments: Ballast Card Issues – The first Wedeco reference had issues with their ballast cards failing soon after the system was put into service, and since then, they have continued to have some issues with ballast cards failing. They believe this may be due to variations in the power supply to the UV system. We followed up with Wedeco regarding this issue and they informed us of the following: Xylem/Wedeco replaced all failed ballast cards at the beginning, free of charge. Wedeco has in the past had issues with ballast and lamps. Better quality safeguards have been established to ensure their products perform as advertised. Reference Check No.2 Comments: Power Issue – The second reference reported that their system is susceptible to variations in power supply which can cause the operating reactor to shut off. In this case, the redundant reactor is then turned on, but requires 10 to 30minutes to “warm up”. This reference also mentioned that they have been unable to re-start the reactors remotely following these system shut-downs. We followed up with Wedeco regarding this issue and they informed us of the following:

304 - 1353 Ellis Street, Kelowna, BC V1Y 1Z9 | T: 250.762.2517

MEMORANDUM Date: January 30, 2021 File: 0956.0050.01 Subject: Cranbrook Water System – UV System RFP Page: 3 of 8

Xylem/Wedeco have found that sites that follow good grounding practices, along with their with panel’s installed surge protective devices (SPD) on the incoming power (480 and 120V), and a 24V UPS on the control power are reliable. Start up/warm up times can be shortened with a programmable logic controller (PLC). Remote start-up will be possible with a PLC (included in the quote for Cranbrook system). Turbidity – It is important to ensure the proposed reactor was validated with water that had a higher turbidity level than the max level expected for Cranbrook. This is key item for un-filtered sources that Interior Health will look for before issuing a Waterworks Construction Permit. The max recorded level at Phillips Raw Water sampling point was 1.9 NTU. We requested in the RFP that the units be validated up to at least 2.0 NTU. We followed up with Wedeco who noted that turbidity was not measured in the source water when the proposed reactors were validated. Wedeco noted that the proposed system is designed to work with an influent source that has a TSS of 10 mg/L which is expected to equate to a turbidity level above 2 NTU. Wedeco also noted that they can document this in a sealed technical memorandum and guarantee that the proposed system will provide a 4 log reduction credit for cryptosporidium with source water that has turbidity of 2 NTU. It is recommended that City begin collecting TSS data to verify that it remains below 10 mg/L under peak turbidity levels.

3.0 UV SYSTEM SUPPLY COST The quoted supply price for the Wedeco UV system is $845,297 plus GST for a system that includes: 4 - UV reactors (3 duty and 1 standby); 4 – Control cabinets (one dedicated to each reactor); Online UVT analyzer (used for dose pacing); Reference sensor (for calibrating UV intensity sensors on reactors); Delivery of equipment to Cranbrook, and, Startup assistance and training. Note that the quoted UV system has a capacity of up to 38 MLD (based on 2036 MDD). This must be increased to 57 MLD to allow for the MDD (38 MLD) plus a fire flow of 225 L/s (19 MLD) to be treated by the UV disinfection system. One additional reactor will be required to increase the capacity to 57 MLD (4 duty and 1 standby reactor). The estimated cost for the 5 reactor system is $1.1M plus GST. The UV equipment quote received to date is for supply only. Other items that will be required for the UV Upgrade include: New disinfection building; Process piping and valving; Yard piping including two tie-ins to the existing trunkmain; Electrical service, controls (may include a general plant PLC), flow and pressure instrumentation, SCADA integration;

304 - 1353 Ellis Street, Kelowna, BC V1Y 1Z9 | T: 250.762.2517

MEMORANDUM Date: January 30, 2021 File: 0956.0050.01 Subject: Cranbrook Water System – UV System RFP Page: 4 of 8

Standby generator; HVAC equipment; and, Other miscellaneous equipment. An overall Class C estimate and floor plan will be submitted separately for the City’s proposed disinfection facility that includes UV and onsite generation or bulk sodium hypochlorite disinfection systems. Please note that the proposed system can be expanded to suit the ultimate MDD of 89 MLD by adding an additional two reactors for a 6 duty and 1 standby configuration. Note that the future flow does not include an allowance for fire flows as it is assumed the Zone 1 Reservoir will be built prior to expanding the UV system.

4.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The Xylem/Wedeco UV system is recommended based on the proposal scoring. It is recommended that the City continue to monitor turbidity at the Phillips raw water source with their online analyzer and begin collecting TSS data at the same location to establish a relationship between the two parameters. It is recommended that the City at minimum collect TSS data monthly and more frequently (i.e., daily) during periods of elevated turbidity. If possible, installing an online TSS analyzer for the Phillips raw water source would be preferred. It will be critical to be able to demonstrate that the TSS remains below 10 mg/L (UV design limit) during peak turbidity levels when applying to Interior Health for a Waterworks Construction Permit. We trust that the above provides sufficient direction to move forward with the Cranbrook water treatment plant UV equipment selection.

URBAN SYSTEMS LTD.

Jeremy Clowes, P.Eng. Principal /jc U:\Projects_KEL\0956\0050\01\T - Tender Documents\RFP - UV System

304 - 1353 Ellis Street, Kelowna, BC V1Y 1Z9 | T: 250.762.2517

Appendix A Summary of Review

304 - 1353 Ellis Street, Kelowna, BC V1Y 1Z9 | T: 250.762.2517

UV System RFP - Submission Scores Calgon Carbon

Techincal Score (x of 50) Reference Score (x of 25) Capital and O&M Costs (x of 25) Total

25 20 15 60

Trojan

Techincal Score (x of 50) Reference Score (x of 25) Capital and O&M Costs (x of 25) Total

38 25 19 81

Wedeco

Techincal Score (x of 50) Reference Score (x of 25) Capital and O&M Costs (x of 25) Total

38 20 25 83

Cost Ranking Net Present Value Adjusted Total (Max 25 Points for Overall RFP Ranking)

Calgon Carbon $4,420,549.21 15

Trojan $3,606,461.73 19

Wedeco $2,675,865.21 25

Technical Ranking Design and O&M (x of 50)

Calgon Carbon 25 25

Trojan 37.5 37.5

Wedeco 37.5 37.5

Total

City of Cranbrook UV System RFP Proposal Reviews - Net Present Worth Comparison July 20, 2020 0956.0050.01

BowRio Calgon Carbon

Supplier Manufacturer Option Equipment Cost, Start-Up, Training, Reference Sensor, UVT Analyzer, Freight Total System Power Consumption (kW) at Design Flow (440 L/s) and UVT (71%) Total System Power Consumption (kW) at Design Flow (440 L/s) and Avg UVT (90%) Cost of Power for 1 year ($0.1240/kWh) No. of Reactors (Duty + Redundant) No. of Lamps per Reactor Lamp Life (hrs) Lamp Price Lamp Price per Year No. of Ballasts per Reactor Ballast Life (yrs) Ballast Price Ballast Price per Year No. of Sensors per Reactor Sensor Life (yrs) Sensor Price Sensor Calibration Price Sensor Price per Year No. of Sleeves per Reactor Sleeve Life (yrs) Sleeve Price Sleeve Price Per Year

Ramtech Environmental Trojan

Mequipco Wedeco

Preferred

Alternate

Preferred

Alternate 1

Alternate 2

Preferred

Alternate

$1,028,591

$1,048,600

$995,100

$1,099,960

$845,297

245.5

151.6

52.6

24.4

38.69

38.2 $79,023.96 4 9 5000 $812.13 $38,417.00

35.6 $59,670.78 4 9 5000 $812.13 $38,417.00

13 $16,076.05 3 48 15000 $880.00 $49,336.32 12 10 $1,337.50 $4,815.00 2 10 $1,824.35 $750.00 $1,544.61 48 10 $160.50 $2,311.20

13 $16,076.05 3 48 15000 $880.00 $49,336.32 12 10 $1,337.50 $4,815.00 2 10 $1,824.35 $802.50 $1,576.11 48 10 $160.50 $2,311.20

27.47 $31,697.57 4 60 14000 $201.16 $22,656.36 30 10 $516.81 $6,201.72 1 10 $1,017.57 $518.95 $614.61 60 20 $516.81 $6,201.72

9 10 $1,824.82 $416.66 $8,069.32 9 10 $536.71 $1,932.16

13.4 $21,417.58 3 64 15000 $880.00 $65,781.76 16 10 $1,337.50 $6,420.00 2 10 $1,824.35 $802.50 $1,576.11 64 10 $160.50 $3,081.60

Total Price Per Year

$141,624.52

$122,271.35

$98,277.05

$74,083.18

$74,114.68

$67,371.98

Single Payment Present Worth Factor (based on 25 years, 2%)

$626,957.97

$639,154.07

$606,544.17

$670,459.58

$515,234.49

$4,420,549.21

$4,042,708.32

$3,606,461.73

$3,048,004.00

$3,217,394.39

$2,675,865.21

Net Present Value (based on 25 years, 2% interest)

$7,784.04 $12,454.46

$4,319.04 $1,727.62

10 $4,319.04 $1,727.62

10 $7,784.04 $12,454.46

City of Cranbrook UV System RFP Proposal Reviews - Technical and Cost Comparison July 20, 2020 0956.0050.01

Supplier Manufacturer Option Validation Method Design Flow, L/s Design UVT, % Design Pressure, psi Cryptosporidium log-Inactivation No. Duty Reactors (-) Redundant Reactors (-) 1 Fouling Coefficient 2 End-of-Lamp Life (EOLL) Factor Dose (mJ/cm2) Model MP / LPHO Optimal Number of Upstream Pipe Diameters Clearance Optimal Number of Downstream Pipe Diameters Clearance Minimum Number of Upstream Pipe Diameters Clearance Required Minimum Number of Downstream Pipe Diameters Clearance Required Is Vertical Configuration Acceptable? (Y / N) No. Lamps / Reactor (-) No. Banks / Reactor (if applicable) (-) No. Sensors / Reactor (-) No. Ballasts / Reactor (-)

BowRio Calgon Carbon

Ramtech Environmental Trojan

Mequipco Wedeco

Preferred MS2 440 71 50 4 3 1

Alternate MS2 440 71 50 4 4 1

Preferred MS2 440 71 50 4 2 1

Alternate 1 T1 440 71 50 4 2 1

Alternate 2 T1 440 71 50 4 2 1

Preferred MS2 440 71 50 4 3 1

0.9

0.8

52.9 24" 9x10 kW Sentinel MP

53.5 24" 9x10kW Sentinel MP

53.38 Flex 100 LPHO

22 LBX 1500e LPHO

0.5

n/a

none

0.5

1x Y 9 5 9

0 Y 64 2 2

0 Y 48 2 2

none Y, horizontal preferred 60 n/a 1

165.8 98/reactor 105

52.6 125.7 336.18

24.4 88.8 336.18

38.69 84.77 51.1

30.8 MLD/reactor

38.53

23.9

11.92

43.3 MLD/reactor @ 70%T 46.3 MLD/reactor @ 71%T

51.66

37.6

15.03

105 MLD/reactor 150

336.18 60 (125 optional)

51.1 145

Total System Power Consumption (KW) at Design Flow and UVT 265 Installed Power Load (KW) 98/reactor Max Flow / Reactor (ML/d) 105 Max. Flow at 65% UVT & 4-log inactivation of Cryptosporidium (ML/d) 20.9 MLD (7MLD/reactor) Max. Flow at 70% UVT & 4-log inactivation of 35.7 (11.9/reactor)@70%T) Cryptosporidium (ML/d) 39.1 (13/reactor@71%T) Max. Flow at 95% UVT & 4-log inactivation of Cryptosporidium (ML/d) 315.5MLD(105MLD/reactor) Maximum Operating Pressure (psi) 150

Alternate T1

City of Cranbrook UV System RFP Proposal Reviews - Technical and Cost Comparison July 20, 2020 0956.0050.01

Supplier Manufacturer Option Minimum flow for cooling required (L/s) Max. Reactor Headloss (mm) Reactor Length (mm) Reactor Width (mm) Reactor Height (mm) Reactor Flange Diameter (mm) Control Panel Brand and Model Number

BowRio Calgon Carbon Preferred 9.4 1109 mm (at 106 MLD) 910 1350 910 610 Sentinel 24 Electrical Enclosure 2510 900 2160

Alternate 9.4 1109 mm (at 106 MLD) 910 1350 910 610 Sentinel 24 Electrical Enclosure 2510 900 2160

Control Panel Length (mm) Control Panel Width (mm) Control Panel Height (mm) Maximum Distance between Control Panel and Reactor (m) 150 150 Reference Sensors Provided (Y/N) Y Y Location Where Sensors are calibrated as required factory factory Reactor Validated (Y/N) Y Y Validation Range: - Flow Range 0.96 - 28.2 mgd 0.96 - 28.2 mgd - UVT Range 53.9-98.2 %T 53.9-98.2 %T -Turbidity Range n/a n/aat 53.9%T for 1.43MLD/reactor at 53.9%T 9.2 MLD/reactor Maximum Flow at min. UVT validated 4 log crypto for 4 84%T at 105MLD/reactor 4 log crypto 92%T atfor 105MLD/reactor for 4 Minimum UVT at max. Flow validated log crypto log crypto Configured to Allow Dose Pacing Based on UVT and Flow (Y/N) Y Y Total Equipment Cost (CAN$) $895,500 $895,500 Start-Up Assistance and Training (5 days; not including 3 travel Expenses) ( CAN$) $23,600 $23,600 Reference Sensor Costs (CAN$) $4,700 $4,700 On-Line UVT Analyzer Used for Dose Pacing (CAN$) $8,700 $8,700 Shop Drawings Delivery Time (weeks) Equipment Delivery Time (weeks) Freight (for three units) Total Cost (CAN$ - excluding GST)

3 weeks following acceptance 3 weeks following acceptance of PO of PO 18-20 weeks 18-20 weeks $28,800 $28,800 $1,028,591 $1,028,591

Ramtech Environmental Trojan Preferred 5 22.4 1718 1427 1639 914

Alternate 1 5 22.4 1718 1427 1639 914

Mequipco Wedeco Alternate 2 5 22.4 2323 1427 1639 914

Trojan Panel Flex 36SL Trojan Panel Flex 36SL Trojan Panel Flex 36SL 712 712 712 763 (Type 12) 1524 (Type 12) 1524 (Type 12) 2109 2109 2109

Preferred 0.21 214.5 2866.5 860 980 508 Allan Bradley CompactLogix PLC 1520 600 2100

20 Y London Ontario Y

20 Y Y

233.4 - 7004 m3/hr 45-98% < 5 NTU n/a 93%

89.23 - 591.41 L/s 20-98% see validation N/A for 4 log 98.4 for 4 log

Y $1,005,452

Y $951,952

Y $1,056,812

Y $814,890

$14,445 $3,558 $12,305

$3,634 $1,018 $10,038

4-6 28 - 32 $12,840 $1,048,600

4-6 28 - 32 $12,840 $995,100

4-6 28 - 32 $12,840 $1,099,960

8 18 $15,718 $845,297

Alternate

City of Cranbrook UV System RFP Proposal Reviews - O&M Comparison July 20, 2020 0956.0050.01

Option

LAMPS Lamp at 100% Power (KW) End of Life Ageing Factor (-) Lamp Life (h) Max. ON/OFF Cycles per Day (-) Replacement Cost (CAN$) Guaranteed Replacement Period (h) Prorata (-) Residual Value (CAN$) Failure Rate (%) Start-up Time (min)1 Cool-down Time Prior to Replacement (min) Cool-down Time Prior to Restart the Unit (min) Mercury Content (g/Lamp) Lamp exchange program (Yes/No) Lamp exchange cost per lamp ($CAD) SLEEVES Sleeve Life (yr) Fouling Factor (-) Clean Sleeve Transmittance (%) Cleaning Strategy (Wiper/Chemical/Combined) Cleaning Agent (Type / Name / Conc.) Cleaning Agent Disposal Method Cleaning Reagent Costs ($) Cleaning Cycle Duration (min) Replacement Cost (CAN$) Guaranteed Replacement Period (yr) Residual Value (CAN$) Failure Rate (%) Prorata (-) Sleeve Seals (CAN$/Sleeve) Sleeve Seals Guarantee (yr) BALLASTS Turndown Range (Min-% - Max-%) Ballast Life (yr) Ballast Efficiency (%) Ballast Type Heat Generated (KW/Ballast) Replacement Cost (CAN$) Guaranteed Replacement Period (yr)

Ramtech Environmental Trojan

BowRio Calgon Carbon

Supplier Manufacturer Preferred

Mequipco Wedeco

Alternate

Preferred

Alternate 1

Alternate 2

Preferred

Alternate

0.5

0.32

0.8

5000 alarm setpoint at 20 on/off cycles

5000

15000

14000

alarm setpoint at 20 on/off cycles

$812.13

$880.00

$201.16

5,000

15,000

14,000

after 2000

9,000

n/a

< 3%

1.5% estimated

n/a

2-4 2-4

5 0

10 4

0.7

0.045

n/a

yes, expired lamps can be returned to Calgon or recycled at locally accepted facilities

YES

$12

Shipping costs

$12 10

0.9

92%

89%

88%

wiper

n/a

n/a 2.5

n/a 4

once every few minutes to once per month once every few minutes to once per month $536.71

$536.71

$160.50

$516.81

n/a

< 1%

n/a

after 1 year

n/a

$5.28/o-ring

$54

$50

$25.68

1 yr

40 - 100%

30 - 100%

5 - 100%

92%

95%

91 - 93%

electromagnetic 0.8 1.6 $4,319.04 $7,784.04

electronic 0.053 $1,338

Ecoray TDS 30 C1 0.045 $516.81

City of Cranbrook UV System RFP Proposal Reviews - O&M Comparison July 20, 2020 0956.0050.01

BowRio Calgon Carbon

Supplier Manufacturer

Ramtech Environmental Trojan

Mequipco Wedeco

Option

Preferred

Alternate

Preferred

Alternate 1

Alternate 2

Preferred

Alternate

Prorata (-) SENSORS Sensor Life (yr) Sensor Type (wet or dry) Replacement Cost (CAN$) Guaranteed Replacement Period (yr) Prorata (-) Sensor Calibration (CAN$)

after 1 year

dry

$1,824.82

$1,824.35

$1,017.57

after 1 year

$416.66

$802.50

$750.00

$802.50

$518.95

Appendix B Wedeco Submission

304 - 1353 Ellis Street, Kelowna, BC V1Y 1Z9 | T: 250.762.2517

Bid Proposal City of Cranbrook

prepared for: Urban Systems Aya Costa July 15, 2020

Xylem Canada Company 93 Claireville Dr. Toronto, ON M9W 6K9 July 15, 2020 Urban Systems Aya Costa Project Name: City of Cranbrook Project Number: J20060637940 Revision Number: 1

Dear Aya Costa, We are pleased to submit the following proposal for the City of Cranbrook UV opportunity based on the information provided within your inquiry. The LBX series is a closed vessel system specifically designed for water and wastewater applications. We have highlighted below the major benefits of the LBX vessels that can improve the performance of the system and increase the lifespan of the equipment: Our system includes our latest low-pressure, high-intensity Ecoray lamps which have a guaranteed life of 14,000 hours and are a more efficient lamp with a lower power consumption requirement. In addition, from a maintenance standpoint, the Ecoray lamps are more robust and easy to remove and replace. Latest sensor technology – germicidal UV sensor of reference sensor quality (ÖNORM approved) providing the highest accuracy in UV system monitoring and control. Automatic wiping system that prevents fouling of the quartz sleeve with easy replacement of wipers. The WEDECO Remote Service Support, a combination of the PLC interface and a telephone modem, allows us to monitor and if necessary to adjust the LBX control unit from remote in the same way as directly on site. Therefore Remote Service Support improves the service quality of the LBX unit due to faster and even more cost effective technical support (e.g. maintenance, software updates or service diagnosis) through WEDECO service technicians. WEDECO’s established and proven TotalCare Program provides our customers with proactive services all designed to minimize the cost of ownership to operate and maintain a UV system. TotalCare services can provide our customers with system health checks, efficiency audits, training and preventative maintenance contracts.

Please refer to our local representative Devlin Wing of Mequipco, (604) 813-4445 or us if you have any questions. We look forward to working with you on this exciting project.

Sincerely,

Luigi Tiberi Regional Sales Manager (385) 227-9864

Ben Bryson Sales Engineer

Table of Content 1

Xylem Overview ..................................................................................................... 5

General Process Description ................................................................................ 7 2.1 2.2

Design ......................................................................................................................7 Process Description .................................................................................................7

Technical Description ........................................................................................... 8

Price & Scope of Supply ....................................................................................... 9 4.1 4.2 4.3

Wedeco Scope of Supply .........................................................................................9 Contractor Scope of Supply....................................................................................10 Price Summary.......................................................................................................12 Commercial Terms & Conditions ....................................................................... 13

5.1 Delivery schedule ...................................................................................................13 5.1.1 Delivery time ................................................................................................... 13 5.2 Terms and Conditions ............................................................................................13 6

Attachments ......................................................................................................... 14 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.5

Bid Tables and Pricing ...........................................................................................14 Validation ...............................................................................................................14 General Arrangement Drawings .............................................................................14 Warranty ................................................................................................................14 Installations ............................................................................................................14

Cranbrook, BC 4x LBX1500 Proposal 20.09.03 R1.Docx Revision no.: 1

Page 4 of 14

Date: September 3, 2020 Version no.: 3.5

1 Xylem Overview Xylem is a leading global water technology provider, enabling customers to transport, treat, test and efficiently use water in public utility, residential and commercial building services, industrial and agricultural settings. The company does business in more than 150 countries through a number of market-leading product brands, and its people bring broad applications expertise with a strong focus on finding local solutions to the world’s most challenging water and wastewater problems.

Xylem’s treatment business offers a portfolio of products and systems designed to effectively meet the demands and challenges of treating water and wastewater. From smarter aeration to advanced filtration to chemical-free disinfection, Xylem leverages its well-known Treatment brands, Flygt, Leopold, Sanitaire, and Wedeco, to offer hundreds of solutions backed by a comprehensive, integrated portfolio of services designed to ensure we can meet our customers’ needs in a number of different industries including municipal water and wastewater, aquaculture, biogas and agriculture, food and beverages, pharmaceuticals, and mining. Our scientists and engineers utilize their deep applications expertise and continually listen and learn from our customers’ situations to create solutions that not only use less energy and reduce life-cycle costs, but also promote the smarter use of water.

Wedeco has accepted the challenge of the 21st century. With the Wedeco brand for UV Disinfection, ozone oxidation & AOP solutions, we own the advanced technologies for chemical-free and environmentally friendly treatment of drinking water, wastewater and process water as well as further industrial treatment processes. We constantly invest a large portion of our energy in the development of high-tech components, systems and equipment, as well as in the study of new areas of application for UV, ozone & AOP. In doing so, we have always given special attention to the increase in energy efficiency of our Products equipped with our unique UV lamps and ozone electrodes.

Cranbrook, BC 4x LBX1500 Proposal 20.09.03 R1.Docx Revision no.: 1

Page 5 of 14

Date: September 3, 2020 Version no.: 3.5

The special characteristics of the Wedeco Ecoray UV lamp are its special doping and the unique long-life coating. Because of these features, a constantly high UV light yield is achieved with a substantially extended lamp service life at the same time. In addition, by using this technology it is not necessary to apply liquid mercury inside the lamp. Wedeco UV lamps cannot be surpassed in economic efficiency.

In relation to expenditure of energy, the High-Intensity/LowPressure Technology provides a light yield three times higher than comparable UV lamps of widely used Medium Pressure Technology. A higher light yield also means a lower heat generation at the same time. Thanks to this, Wedeco UV lamps become less susceptible to varying water temperatures. Even the formation of deposits on the quartz sleeves as well as lamp aging is considerably lower than with alternative UV lamp technologies in Herford and Essen.

WEDECO Ecoray UV lamp

Xylem's Wedeco ozone systems combine maximum flexibility and reliable operating characteristics for small to large ozone capacities. The ozone generator system and control unit can be combined and supplemented with option sets that allow for various application requirements. Effizon evo 2G ozone electrodes are the core of our technology and achieve an unmatched level of reliability and energy efficiency. The electrodes are manufactured completely from inert materials, without the need for fuses or coatings, making them highly resistant to corrosion. This means that the Wedeco ozone generators are practically maintenance free with no need for regular cleaning or replacement of the electrodes. We rely on consistently high-quality standards in all divisions of the company. Moreover, product quality and manufacturing operations are constantly monitored and optimized in continuous improvement processes. Established quality controls give Xylem and you the security of knowing that Wedeco UV, Ozone & AOP systems will always operate reliably. ®

WEDECO Effizon evo 2G Ozone electrode

For more information please visit us at http://www.xylem.com/treatment/

Cranbrook, BC 4x LBX1500 Proposal 20.09.03 R1.Docx Revision no.: 1

Page 6 of 14

Date: September 3, 2020 Version no.: 3.5

2 General Process Description 2.1 DESIGN Design Flow Rates - Design Flow - Future Design Flow

440 L/s 1030 L/s

Total Suspended Solids (Maximum)

10 mg/l

Allowable Effluent Temperature Range

5-30°C

UV Transmittance at 253.7 nm

71%, minimum

Effluent Disinfection Standard - Cryptosporidium

4 Log Removal

UV Dose - Minimum Design UV Dose (based on IUVA/UVDGM (MS2) bioassay)

22 mJ/cm²

2.2 PROCESS DESCRIPTION UV system designed to the parameters above given by RFQ. To expand to future flow 3 additional LBX 1500 reactors would be added. If minimum UVT was 85% a 2 duty, 1 standby system with 24 lamps per reactor could be used still meeting all other specification requirements.

Cranbrook, BC 4x LBX1500 Proposal 20.09.03 R1.Docx Revision no.: 1

Page 7 of 14

Date: September 3, 2020 Version no.: 3.5

3 Technical Description CONFIGURATION:

LBX 1500e

DESCRIPTION

UNITS

VALUE

Number of 316L SS vessels

3 duty, 1 standby

Number of lamps per vessel

Number of intensity sensors per vessel

1 240

Total number of lamps REACTOR DIMENSIONS:

See attached drawing

HEADLOSS PER VESSEL (at peak flow):

214.5

POWER CONSUMPTION:

Peak Flow (lamp and ballast only)

38.69

Total Connected System Power

84.77

Cranbrook, BC 4x LBX1500 Proposal 20.09.03 R1.Docx Revision no.: 1

Page 8 of 14

Date: September 3, 2020 Version no.: 3.5

4 Price & Scope of Supply 4.1 WEDECO SCOPE OF SUPPLY One (1) complete WEDECO LBX-Series™ ultraviolet disinfection system, including the following major equipment: 4.1.1

Four (4) 316L stainless steel LBX 1500e reactor(s) will be supplied completely assembled with all required UV lamps, quartz sleeves, lamp end/reactor mating flange assemblies and lamp connector with o-ring seal kits.

4.1.2

Two hundred forty (240) lamp-to-ballast cables of standard length (82 feet) will be supplied. Cabling between the UV lamps, sensors, and the control cabinet will be factory assembled. Field cabling and terminations of these cables are the responsibility of the installing CONTRACTOR.

4.1.3

One (1) reactor mounted calibrated UV intensity sensor per reactor

4.1.4

One (1) reactor mounted temperature switch per reactor

4.1.5

Two (2) stainless steel manual cleaning port isolation valves per reactor

4.1.6

One (1) control enclosure per reactor (containing control system, power supplies, and ballasts) Model & Make: Operator interface: Quantity: Rating, Cooling & Material: Dimensions:

Allen-Bradley CompactLogix PLC Allen-Bradley PanelView Plus 700 One (1) Type 4X, Air-conditioned, 304 Stainless Steel 62.5”W x 23.6”D x 86.6”H (Type 4X PLC)

4.1.7

One (1) automatic wiping system – electrically actuated per reactor

4.1.8

One (1) on-line transmittance monitor, per system shall be provided for continuous measurement of UV transmittance.

4.1.9

Spares parts and safety equipment: The following spare parts and safety equipment will be supplied with the UV system: 60 – UV Lamps 60 – Quartz Sleeve Assemblies (include Seals) 1 – Ballast Card

4.1.10 Field Services: WEDECO will provide the services of a qualified technician for the following: Five (5) days, Two (2) trip(s) for installation inspection, start-up, commissioning, and operator training. Additional days as required will be made available on a per diem rate plus travel.

Cranbrook, BC 4x LBX1500 Proposal 20.09.03 R1.Docx Revision no.: 1

Page 9 of 14

Date: September 3, 2020 Version no.: 3.5

4.2 CONTRACTOR SCOPE OF SUPPLY The customer will be responsible for providing all items that are necessary for the completion of the treatment process as described in the tender document, including the following items related to the equipment described in this proposal: 4.2.1

The CONTRACTOR is responsible for all field terminations and electrical conduits. The field terminations include the lamp cable to ballast terminations within the ballast enclosures. There are two hundred forty lamp cables, with four (4) terminations per lamp cables. Any additional terminations and conduits are also the responsibility of the contractor.

4.2.2

The CONTRACTOR is responsible for ballast card installation; there are a total of one hundred twenty ballasts (estimated 1-2 minutes per ballast card).

4.2.3

Supplying and installing an influent flow measurement to the UV system PLC (4 – 20 mA signal).

4.2.4

The CONTRACTOR is responsible for setting in place and anchoring the transformer(s) as indicated in the drawings. The CONTRACTOR shall also be responsible for the power feed to the transformers. 480 V, 3-phase, 3 wire plus ground (delta), 60 Hz

4.2.5

The CONTRACTOR is responsible for setting in place and anchoring the ICA as indicated in the drawings. The CONTRACTOR shall also be responsible for the power feed to the ICA. 120 V, 1-phase, 60 Hz All conduits and conductors are the responsibility of the CONTRACTOR.

4.2.6

Service water supply: sufficient quantity of clean service water for the cleaning system to fill and rinse the reactors during cleaning

4.2.7

Process piping and connections: all process piping, valves, connections, etc. to the UV reactors

4.2.8

Lightning protection and electrical ground connection.

4.2.9

Cleaning solution (e.g. food-grade phosphoric acid or citric acid) in order to periodically clean the UV reactors

4.2.10 Actuated valves for isolation of individual UV reactors to perform dose control and maintenance/cleaning 4.2.11 Overall PLC for pumps, valves and UV control and monitoring 4.2.12 Labor for unloading, installing and commissioning acc. to O&M manuals 4.2.13 Suitable sun/rain shield for the system electrical enclosures and ancillary equipment. 4.2.14 Design and supply of all applicable support structures for UV reactors supplied by WEDECO such as support framework or legs

Cranbrook, BC 4x LBX1500 Proposal 20.09.03 R1.Docx Revision no.: 1

Page 10 of 14

Date: September 3, 2020 Version no.: 3.5

4.2.15 Supplying and installing a suitable lifting device if required 4.2.16 Video taping of training if required. In addition, materials of construction should be capable of withstanding periodic exposure to cleaning solution.

Cranbrook, BC 4x LBX1500 Proposal 20.09.03 R1.Docx Revision no.: 1

Page 11 of 14

Date: September 3, 2020 Version no.: 3.5

4.3 PRICE SUMMARY DESCRIPTION

PRICE

UV System Model LBX as defined in scope of supply TOTAL:

Included $ TBA

NOTES: 1. CAD prices are FCA factory with full freight allowed to the job site. Offloading and arrangement of the equipment is not included. 2. Price quoted is firm and valid for 90 days. WEDECO reserves the right to adjust price after 90 days. 3. Price is based upon the following payment terms (net 30 days): a. 10% net 30 days upon initial submittal of mechanical/electrical drawings for approval b. 80% net 30 days from the date of the respective shipments of the product c. 5% installation of the Xylem equipment, NTE 150 days after shipment (whichever comes first) d. 5% start-up / training on the Xylem equipment, NTE 180 days after shipment (whichever comes first) 4. Please make purchase orders out to: Xylem Canada Company 93 Claireville Dr. Toronto, ON M9W 6K9 5. WEDECO does not provide for any process utility requirements including electrical power. 6. If not specifically requested, typical commissioning and training services have been included in firm proposal. 7. This firm proposal is based upon WEDECO’s General Terms of Business. 8. No taxes of any kind have been included in this firm proposal.

Cranbrook, BC 4x LBX1500 Proposal 20.09.03 R1.Docx Revision no.: 1

Page 12 of 14

Date: September 3, 2020 Version no.: 3.5

5 Commercial Terms & Conditions 5.1 DELIVERY SCHEDULE 5.1.1 Delivery time Submittals are available within 8 weeks after acceptance of purchase order. Equipment delivery is within 18 weeks after approved submittals. Delivery times are based upon an approval period of four (4) weeks, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld.

5.2 TERMS AND CONDITIONS This proposal is governed by and subject to Terms and Conditions of Sales-Xylem Americas effective on the date the order is accepted which terms are available at http://www.xyleminc.com/enus/Pages/terms-conditions-of-sale.aspx and incorporated herein by reference and made a part of the agreement between the parties.

Cranbrook, BC 4x LBX1500 Proposal 20.09.03 R1.Docx Revision no.: 1

Page 13 of 14

Date: September 3, 2020 Version no.: 3.5

6 Attachments 6.1 BID TABLES AND PRICING 6.2 VALIDATION 6.3 GENERAL ARRANGEMENT DRAWINGS 6.4 WARRANTY 6.5 INSTALLATIONS

Xylem, Inc. www.xylem.com/treatment

THE CITY OF CRANBROOK WATER TREATMENT PLANT | UV Disinfection System RFP

3 1

22.0 LBX 1500 LPHO 0.5 None 0.5 None

THE CITY OF CRANBROOK WATER TREATMENT PLANT | UV Disinfection System RFP

Yes, horizontal preffered 60 NA 1 30 38.69 84.77 51.10 11.92 15.03 51.10 145 .21 @Max Flow

3422.9 2866.5 860.0 980.0 508.0 Rittal SK3140.500 1520 600 2100 20 Y

Y L/s 89.23-591.41 20-98 see validation NA for 4 log 98.4 for 4 log Y 761,579.00 3,396.00 951.00

THE CITY OF CRANBROOK WATER TREATMENT PLANT | UV Disinfection System RFP

9,381.00 8 18 14,690.00

.32

14,000 4 188.00 14,000 9,000 NA NA 4 10 4 NA Yes Shipping 20

THE CITY OF CRANBROOK WATER TREATMENT PLANT | UV Disinfection System RFP

88 Wiper NA NA NA 4 483.00 20 NA

NA 5 24.00 2 50-100 10 91-93 Ecoray TDS 30 C1 .045 483.00 1 10

10 Dry 951.00 2 10 485.00

THE CITY OF CRANBROOK WATER TREATMENT PLANT | UV Disinfection System RFP

120

27.47

120

27.47

180

54.24

13.73

120

27.47

180

41.20

13.73

15.94

120

31.88

13.73

120

27.47

13.73

120

27.47

13.73

120

27.47

1 reactor @150 L/s 224.3mm headloss 1 reactor @220 L/s 480.5mm headloss 1 reactor @440 L/s 1907.8mm headloss

THE CITY OF CRANBROOK WATER TREATMENT PLANT | UV Disinfection System RFP

Xylem Canada Company

$789,997

93 Claireville Dr., Toronto, ON, M9W 6K9

luigi.tiberi@xyleminc.com

(385) 227-9864

UV Equipment Warranty

1. General Statement of UV Product Warranty Warranty and obligations of Xylem Water Solutions USA, Inc. (“Xylem”) for new UV equipment orders are set out in the Warranty Section of the General Terms of Business. Warranties for consumables such as lamps, ballasts, quartz sleeves, and UV sensors are provided below.

2. Lamp Warranty ECORAY Xylem warrants 14,000 hours operating time as measured by the controller for each lamp in a DURON, TAK, LBX, BX, Spektron, or K Series system under normal operating conditions. Normal operating conditions are defined as operation and maintenance according to the O&M Manual and include the following conditions: On/off cycles max. 4 per 24 operating hours, Lamps are controlled by WEDECO approved ballast operated within its specified limits Requires lamps to be operated submerged in water. In case of premature lamp failure, the customer is requested to send the lamp back prepaid to Xylem complete with UV unit serial number, lamp runtime hours, and lamp on/off cycles. Xylem then offers the following: Lamp failure before 9,000 hours: Xylem will send a replacement lamp free of charge, Lamp failure after 9,000 hours: Xylem will issue a credit proportional to the hours not used from the 14,000 hour lamp warranty toward the purchase of like replacement parts from Xylem. SPEKTROTHERM Xylem warrants 14,000 hours operating time as measured by the controller for each lamp in a TAK, LBX, BX, Spektron, or K Series system under normal operating conditions. Normal operating conditions are defined as operation and maintenance according to the O&M Manual and include the following conditions: On/off cycles max. 4 per 24 operating hours, Lamps are controlled by WEDECO approved ballast operated within its specified limits In case of premature lamp failure, the customer is requested to send the lamp back prepaid to Xylem complete with UV unit serial number, lamp runtime hours, and lamp on/off cycles. Xylem then offers the following: Lamp failure before 9,000 hours: Xylem will send a replacement lamp free of charge, Lamp failure after 9,000 hours: Xylem will issue a credit proportional to the hours not used from the 14,000 hour lamp warranty toward the purchase of like replacement parts from Xylem. ALL LAMPS The warranty is limited to 36 months after the date of delivery (maximum storage period), regardless of whether or not lamps have been operated. The lamps must be stored in their original WEDECO packaging. Within the 36 month period the individual lamp life guarantee will apply. As part of Xylem’s corporate commitment to the environment, used and failed but intact lamps returned to our Charlotte, NC facility will be properly recycled and safely disposed of at no charge to the client. For every new lamp purchased, Xylem will accept one back for disposal. A Return Goods Authorization (RGA) number must be requested from the Xylem Returns Department and written on the outside of the shipping container(s). Lamps should be shipped back prepaid in good packaging that avoids the possibility of breakage.

UV Equipment Warranty

3. Ballast Warranty Xylem warrants 10 years of ballast life after Startup Date for a DURON, TAK, Spektron, LBX, BX, Quadron, or K series system under normal operating conditions. Normal operating conditions are defined as operation and maintenance according to the O&M Manual and include the following conditions: On/off cycles max. 4 per 24 operating hours Ballasts operated within ballast data sheet specified limits Ballasts are operated with OEM Wedeco lamps This warranty is only valid with respect to a new Ballast that is purchased either as a component of a new UV system, or as a spare part shipped with a new UV system, or as a purchased replacement component of a new UV system. The warranty is only valid with a new Ballast that is properly stored, handled, and installed, as specified in the O&M manuals supplied with the system in which the Ballast is installed. In case of premature ballast failure, the customer is requested to send the ballast back prepaid to Xylem complete with UV unit serial number, ballast runtime hours, and ballast on/off cycles. A Return Goods Authorization (RGA) number must be requested from the Xylem Returns Department and written on the outside of the shipping container(s). Xylem then offers the following: Ballast failure before 1 year: Xylem will send a replacement ballast free of charge, Ballast failure after 1 year: Xylem will issue a credit proportional to the time not used from the 10 year warranty toward the purchase of like replacement parts from Xylem.

Ballasts operated with non-OEM Wedeco parts are not covered under warranty.

4. Quartz Sleeve Warranty Xylem warrants a 20-year lifetime from Startup Date for each quartz sleeve under normal operating conditions based upon operation and maintenance according to the O&M manual. In case of premature quartz sleeve failure, the customer is requested to send the quartz sleeve back prepaid to Xylem complete with UV unit serial number, bank runtime hours, and bank on/off cycles. A Return Goods Authorization (RGA) number must be requested from the Xylem Returns Department and written on the outside of the shipping container(s). Xylem then offers the following: Quartz sleeve failure before 5 years: Xylem will send a replacement quartz sleeve free of charge, Quartz sleeve failure after 5 years: Xylem will issue a credit proportional to the time not used from the 20 years warranty toward the purchase of like replacement parts from Xylem.

5. Sensor Warranty Xylem warrants a 10-year lifetime from Startup Date for each UV intensity sensor under normal operating conditions based upon operation and maintenance according to the O&M manuals. In case of premature sensor failure, the customer is requested to send the sensor back prepaid to Xylem complete with UV unit serial number, bank runtime hours, and bank on/off cycles. A Return Goods Authorization (RGA) number must be requested from the Xylem Returns Department and written on the outside of the shipping container(s). Xylem then offers the following: Sensor failure before 2 years: Xylem will send a replacement sensor free of charge, Sensor failure after 2 years: Xylem will issue a credit proportional to the time not used from the 10 years warranty toward the purchase of like replacement parts from Xylem.

6. Consumables This warranty does not cover items considered as consumables including gaskets, wear items, calibrations, or maintenance items.

7. Conditions Applicable to All Warranties

THE FOREGOING WARRANTIES ARE EXCLUSIVE AND IN LIEU OF ANY AND ALL OTHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, GUARANTEES, CONDITIONS OR TERMS OF WHATEVER NATURE RELATING TO THE EQUIPMENT PROVIDED HEREUNDER, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, WHICH ARE HEREBY EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMED AND EXCLUDED. BUYER’S EXCLUSIVE REMEDY AND SELLER’S AGGREGATE LIABILITY FOR BREACH OF ANY OF THE FOREGOING WARRANTIES IS LIMITED TO REPAIRING OR REPLACING THE PRODUCT AND SHALL IN ALL CASES BE LIMITED TO THE AMOUNT PAID BY THE BUYER HEREUNDER. IN NO EVENT IS SELLER LIABLE FOR ANY OTHER FORM OF DAMAGES, WHETHER DIRECT, INDIRECT, LIQUIDATED, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE, EXEMPLARY OR SPECIAL DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO LOSS OF PROFIT, LOSS OF ANTICIPATED SAVINGS OR REVENUE, LOSS OF INCOME, LOSS OF BUSINESS, LOSS OF PRODUCTION, LOSS OF OPPORTUNITY OR LOSS OF REPUTATION.

Rev 3

December 2011

LBA/LBX Series Customer

Type

Grand Targhee Ski Resort Grand Targhee, WY

(USA Installation List) Flow (MGD)

Date of Award

2 x LBA 20

0.29

09/1998

LDS Girls Camp Springville, UT

1 x LBA 30

0.1

05/2002

Oakley WWTP Oakley City, UT

2 x LBA 30

0.25

08/2002

Rehberg Ranch WWTP Billings, MT

1 x LBA 50

0.25

06/2003

Chino Valley WWTP Chino Valley, AZ

1 x LBA 110

1.0

06/2003

Alder WWTP Alder, MT

1 x LBA 20

0.1

08/2003

Rolling Hills WWTP Rolling Hills Casino, CA

1 x LBA 50

0.2

10/2003

Hyrum WRF Hyrum City, UT

2 x LBX550

3.0

12/2003

Everglades Water Reuse FL

2 x LBA50s, 2 x LBA20s

0.1

12/2003

Tempe Kyrene WRF Tempe, AZ

7 x LBX550x2

11.7

03/2004

Willow Creek WWTP (Crossland Construction), MT

1 x LBA 50

0.29

04/2004

Aerojet AOP Sacramento, CA

14 x LBX750 (LBX1000)

NDMA

04/2004

Ekalaka WWTP Ekalaka, MT

1 x LBA 15

0.05

07/2004

Ririe WWTP, ID

1 x LBX200

< 0.43

01/2005

Entrada Del Oro, AZ

2 x LBX200

< 0.47

09/2005

Stoutsville WWTP, OH

1 x LBX90

0.25

05/2006

Revised August 2019 LBX LBA Installation List 19.08.16.docx

LBA/LBX Series Customer

Type

King William WWTP, VA

(USA Installation List) Flow (MGD)

Date of Award

2 x LBX90

0.2

11/2006

Jerome WWTP, ID

2 x LBX750

5.0

01/2007

Concrete WWTP, WA

2 x LBX120

0.44

03/2007

Edgewood WWTP, NM

2 x LBX120

0.30

03/2007

South Fork Landing, ID

4 x LBX400

0.4

06/2007

Clovis WWTP, CA

8 x LBX1000

6.4

06/2007

San Felipe WWTP, NM

2 x LBX200

1.6

10/2007

Union Rome WWTP, OH

2 x LBX550

3.5

12/2007

Kuna WWTP, ID

2 x LBX550

7.4

12/2007

Alpine WWTP, WY

2 x LBX90

0.4

01/2008

Ennis WWTP, MT

1 x LBX120

0.324

02/2008

Goddard WWTP, KS

2 x LBX200

1.6

03/2008

Star WWTP, ID

1 x LBX550

2.5

07/2008

West End, Bermuda

2 x LBX90

0.37

10/2008

Cokeville WWTP, WY

2 x LBX90

0.375

10/2008

Cape May WWTP, NJ

1 x LBX90

0.3

11/2008

Modesto WRF, CA

3 x LBX1000

2.3

11/2008

Welch Allyn WWTP, NY

2 x LBX90

0.03

12/2008

1 x LBX90

0.05

05/2009

Revised August 2019 LBX LBA Installation List 19.08.16.docx

LBA/LBX Series Customer

Type

Hancock Co, MS

(USA Installation List) Flow (MGD)

Date of Award

4 x LBX1000

4.5

11/2009

Filer, ID

2 x LBX1000

0.9

04/2010

Citronelle, GA

2 x LBX200

1.2

05/2010

Malibu, CA (2 sites)

4 x LBX90 (2 x LBX90 per site)

0.1

06/2010

Santa Clara San Jose, CA

12 x LBX1000

01/2011

Monroe WWTP Monroe, WA

4 x LBX1000

02/2011

Kingman WWTP Kingman, AZ

2 x LBX1000

1.27

03/2011

Cathlamet, WA

2 x LBX200

2.1

01/2012

Potlatch, WA

2 x LBX90

0.09

05/2012

Soda Springs, CA

6 x LBX400

0.8

09/2012

Silverdale, WA

2 x LBX90

0.05

11/2012

Baker City, OR

3 x LBX1000e

02/2013

Maple Shade, NJ

1 x LBX400

1.15

05/2013

San Diego, CA

1 x LBX90e

0.09

06/2013

Fruitland, ID

2 x LBX550e

2.07

01/2014

Riverhead, NY

1 x LBX1500e

2.02

07/2014

Lolita, CA

2 x LBX200

0.09

02/2015

Revised August 2019 LBX LBA Installation List 19.08.16.docx

LBA/LBX Series Customer

Type

Victor Valley, CA (2 sites)

(USA Installation List) Flow (MGD)

Date of Award

6 x LBX850e (3 x LBX850e per site)

1.28

02/2015

Dead Horse WWTP North Slope, AK

2 x LBX90e

0.43

05/2015

Port Gamble, WA

2 x LBX90e

0.28

06/2015

Rowlett Creek, TX

3 x LBX1500e

06/2015

GTT Fish Hatchery Spooner, WI

2 x LBX1500e

1.37

10/2015

Delta Township, MI

3 x LBX 1500e

10.0

01/2016

Seeley, CA

LBX 90e

0.25

03/2016

Knoxville, TN

3 x LBX 1500e

08/2016

Cottonwood, AZ

2 x LBX 850e

0.4

12/2016

Savage, MT

1 x LBX 850e

0.18

02/2017

Waconia, MN

1 x LBX 850e

0.32

02/2017

Cascadia, WA

2 x LBX 850e

2.56

03/2017

Coeur D'Alene, ID

1 x LBX850e

1.0

03/2017

Rowlett Creek, TX

3 x LBX1500e

20.0

05/2017

San Francisco, CA (SFPUC)

2 x LBX850e

5.0

10/2017

Hi Desert, CA

2 x LBX150ee

1.63

12/2017

Port Alberni, BC

5 X LBX1500e

21.1

Revised August 2019 LBX LBA Installation List 19.08.16.docx

LBA/LBX Series Customer

Type

North Vancouver, BC

(USA Installation List) Flow (MGD)

Date of Award

6 x LBX1500e

5.8

07/2018

Cedar Creek, NY

1 x LBX1500e

0.86

12/2018

Clemson, SC

2 x LBX850e

3.6

01/2019

Gunnison, CO

3 x LBX1500e

3.35

04/2019

Cayucos, CA

2 x LBX1500e

1.2

06/2019

Devon, AB

2 x LBX850e

3.0

12/2016

(Canada) Customer

Type

Port Alberni, BC

5 X LBX1500e

21.1

06/2018

North Vancouver, BC

6 x LBX1500e

5.8

07/2018

Devon, AB

2 x LBX850e

3.0

12/2016

Revised August 2019 LBX LBA Installation List 19.08.16.docx

Flow (MGD)

Date of Award

Appendix C Trojan Submission

304 - 1353 Ellis Street, Kelowna, BC V1Y 1Z9 | T: 250.762.2517

Phillips Reservoir Water Treatment Plant, Cranbrook, BC UV Disinfection Submitted by Trojan Technologies July 15, 2020

Jordan Fournier, Trojan Technologies (519) 457-3400, jfournier@trojanuv.com www.trojanuv.com

TrojanUV - A Division of Trojan Technologies Group ULC 3020 Gore Road, London, Ontario, Canada N5V 4T7 T 519.457.3400

F 519.457.3030

www.trojanuv.com

TrojanUV - A Division of Trojan Technologies Group ULC 3020 Gore Road, London, Ontario, Canada N5V 4T7 T 519.457.3400

F 519.457.3030

www.trojanuv.com

TrojanUV - A Division of Trojan Technologies Group ULC 3020 Gore Road, London, Ontario, Canada N5V 4T7 T 519.457.3400

F 519.457.3030

www.trojanuv.com

THE CITY OF CRANBROOK WATER TREATMENT PLANT | UV Disinfection System RFP

71 per the addenda

4 log crypto Flex 100 LPHO 5 N/A 0 0

THE CITY OF CRANBROOK WATER TREATMENT PLANT | UV Disinfection System RFP

Y 96

64 2 2

52.6

24.4

125.7

88.8

336.18 38.53

23.9

51.66

37.6

336.18 60 (125 Optional) 5 22.4 1718

2323

1427 1639 914 Trojan

Flex 36SL

712 763 (Type 12)

1524 (Type 12)

2109 20 Y London Ontario Y

233.4 to 7004 m³/h 45 - 98% < 5 NTU n/a 93% Y

$13,50 $3,325

NOTE: Entries for alternate option are the same as Preferred option except as noted

94%

THE CITY OF CRANBROOK WATER TREATMENT PLANT | UV Disinfection System RFP

$11,500 4-6 28 to 32 $12,000 * included in TOTAL EQUIPMENT COST ON PRICE PAGE

0.5

15,000 4

15,000 9 000 0 1.5% estimated 5 5 0 .045 Yes 0

THE CITY OF CRANBROOK WATER TREATMENT PLANT | UV Disinfection System RFP

89 Wiper N/A N/A N/A

0 5 0 N/A N/A 50 1 30 -100 10 95 Electronic

.053 1,250 10 1

10 dry 1,705 5 1 750

THE CITY OF CRANBROOK WATER TREATMENT PLANT | UV Disinfection System RFP

24.2

34.3

128

68.5

20.1 2 .

128

52.1

15.7*

17.2

20.2*

21.3

128

40.4

26.6

9.1

12.0*

11.9

19.5*

19.8

8.2*

8.4

13.4*

13.4

12.2*

12.3

16.0*

17.2

6.2

* denotes minimum power at design condition. Alternatively system may operate to minimize No. of Lamps on. For these entries

THE CITY OF CRANBROOK WATER TREATMENT PLANT | UV Disinfection System RFP

48 2 .

2 1

12.

1 1

13.

THE CITY OF CRANBROOK WATER TREATMENT PLANT | UV Disinfection System RFP

Trojan Technologies

Canadian Consumer

3020 Gore Road London Ontario N5V 4T7

519-457-3400

jfournier@trojanuv.com

THE CITY OF CRANBROOK WATER TREATMENT PLANT | UV Disinfection System RFP

Trojan Technologies

Canadian Consumer

3020 Gore Road London Ontario N5V 4T7

519-457-3400

jfournier@trojanuv.com

THE CITY OF CRANBROOK WATER TREATMENT PLANT | UV Disinfection System RFP

Trojan Technologies

$1,

,000

Canadian Consumer

3020 Gore Road London Ontario N5V 4T7

519-457-3400

jfournier@trojanuv.com

For Alternate Option 2 the reactor will accommodate lamps to be added in the future. No additional reactors are required. As a result the layout will match the drawing provided, for both current and future flows, however the reactor will be one bank larger. The reactor proposed for Option 2 is as follows.

REFERENCES

Name of Water Treatment Plant

Coquitlam WTP, BC

Willyam Dragon 604-813-0448 Willyam.Dragon@metrovancouver.org Instantaneous Capacity (L/s): Daily Capacity (ML/d): Year Installed:

Name of Water Treatment Plant

13,888 600 2013

Powers Creek Sean Lefebvre 250-707-0141 Sean.Lefebvre@westkelownacity.ca

Instantaneous Capacity (L/s):

625

Daily Capacity (ML/d):

393

Year Installed:

Name of Water Treatment Plant

2008

Fort McMurray Tim McKenna 587-258-4726 Cell: 780-381-4475 Timothy.McKenna@rmwb.ca

Instantaneous Capacity (L/s):

602

Daily Capacity (ML/d): Year Installed:

2009

REFERENCES

Name of Water Treatment Plant

Salmon Arm Rick Webb 250-832-2780 Cell 250-804-9804

rwebb@salmonarm.ca Instantaneous Capacity (L/s):

347

Daily Capacity (ML/d): Year Installed: Name of Water Treatment Plant

2008 Red Deer Bert J. Miller 403-342-8248 bert.millerjr@reddeer.ca

Instantaneous Capacity (L/s): Daily Capacity (ML/d): Year Installed: Name of Water Treatment Plant

1736 868 2005 Comox Valley Regional District Steve Prunkle 250-334-6030 Cell 250-218-3207 sprunkle@comoxvalleyrd.ca

Instantaneous Capacity (L/s):

521

Daily Capacity (ML/d):

174

Year Installed:

2017

SCOPE OF SUPPLY FOR UV EQUIPMENT

Project Name:

Cranbrook, BC - Phillips Reservoir

Trojan Quote:

225451

Date:

July

Design Criteria:

TROJANUVFLEX

SYSTEM

Trojan UV Flex100 System

Peak Flow:

38 ML/d

UV Transmission:

71% Cryptosporidium

Disinfection Limit:

We are pleased to submit the following scope of equipment based on the above criteria. The equipment described herein is named as the basis for the design. The purchaser is responsible for reading all information contained in this Supply Contract. Trojan will not be held accountable for the supply of equipment not specifically detailed in this document. Supplemental Terms and Conditions are attached to this document. Detailed installation instructions are provided with the shop drawings and are available upon request. Changes to the attached Scope of Supply that affect selling price will be handled through a change order.

Arthur Ouyang Ramtech Environmental Products 2130 33 Ave SW Unit B, Calgary, AB T2T 1Z6 Tel: 403-221-8589 Cell: 403-891-9976 E-Mail: aouyang@ramtech.ca

This proposal has been respectfully submitted by, Trojan Technologies Jordan Fournier Regional Sales Manager Trojan Technologies jfournier@trojanuv.com

TrojanUVFlex TM System Scope of Supply

Page 2 of 6

ULTRAVIOLET CHAMBER

The ultraviolet chamber shall be supplied with all necessary internal equipment such as UV lamps, sleeve wiping system, quartz sleeves, intensity sensors, high temperature switch, air vent valves, and level sensor. The UV lamps and intensity sensors will be packaged separately and will be installed by a Trojan service representative upon start-up. Chamber Model: Total Number of Chambers: Chamber Configuration: Number of Banks per Chamber (Chamber Size): Number of Available Lamp Ports Per Chamber: Number of Supplied Lamps Per Chamber: Number of Supplied Sleeves Per Chamber: Material of Construction: Inlet/Outlet Connection: Maximum Operating Pressure: UV Intensity Sensors per Chamber:

100 3 2 Duty Train and 1 Redundant Train with 1 Chamber Per Train 2 64 64 (32 kW 2 Banks Populated) 68 2205 Duplex Stainless Steel 12" AWWA Class B 60 psi 4

The Installation Contractor shall be solely responsible for lifting, loading, placement, installation and support of the UV chambers into the building and onto the concrete equipment pad (final location) and any and all costs associated with installation including but not limited to any required temporary or permanent modifications and/or repairs to any new or existing building or structure including all material, labor, engineering and other required services. The Installation Contractor to be responsible for the supply, installation and connection of the following at each of the UV Chamber: 1. Two (2) 24VDC, M12 5 conductor shielded cables (provided by Trojan) from the CPP for the temperature and level switches 2. One (1) 24VDC, M8 5 conductor shielded cables (provided by Trojan) from the CPP for each UV intensity sensor per Bank 3. Thirty-Two (32), 4-conductor #14 AWG SO cables (provided by Trojan) from the CPP to the Chamber per Bank 4. One (1) #10 AWG from the CPP for bonding (by Trojan) Associated Equipment to be supplied and installed by others: Downstream and upstream isolation valves - as required All pipe spools, elbows, reducers, etc. Flow meter Drain valves - as required All bolts and gaskets as required for mounting and installation Cable wire tray and associated installation for all cables and hydraulic hoses.

July 13, 2020

TrojanUVFlex TM System Scope of Supply

Page 3 of 6

CONTROL POWER PANEL (CPP) The CPP houses both the lamp drivers required to power the lamps in a chamber as well as the interface and microcontroller to monitor and control each UV chamber.

Quantity of Single-Door CPPs: Controller Type: Operator Interface: Enclosure Material: Enclosure Rating: Lamp and I/O Cables:

Number of Banks per Chamber (Chamber Size): CPP Size : CPP Connected Power Supply : CPP Weight :

1 CPP Per Chamber Trojan Microcontroller Painted Mild Steel IP 54, Type 12 Trojan to supply all lamp cables, with connectors between the Chamber and CPP 2 (1,100 mm x 2,027 mm x 711 mm) 53 kVA 1000 lbs. (454 kg)

The Installation Contractor to be responsible for indoor installation of the CPP as indicated on the drawings. The CPP must be located within 65 ft (20 m) of the chamber. The Installation Contractor to be responsible for the supply, installation and connection of the following: 1. One (1) 480V, 3 phase, 4 wire + GND, 60 Hz electrical supply for one (1) CPP per chamber with the appropriate connected power supply as per table above. 2. 4-conductor #14 AWG SOLO Lamp cables (provided by Trojan, qty as per table above) from each UV chamber 3. Two (2) 24VDC, M12 5 conductor cables (provided by Trojan) from the CPP for the temperature and level switch 4. 24VDC, M8 5 conductor cables (provided by Trojan, qty as per table above) from the CPP for the UV intensity sensors 5. One (1) 4-20mA analog shielded twisted pair from the Train flowmeter 6. One (1) 4-20mA analog shielded twisted pair from the Train UVT monitor 7. One (1) Belden 3106A #22 AWG shielded twisted pair between CPP panel and HSC panel 8. One (1) #10 AWG from UV chamber for bonding at each CPP All conductors, conduit and local disconnects are the responsibility of the CONTRACTOR unless explicitly stated otherwise.

HYDRAULIC SYSTEM CENTER

The Hydraulic System Center (HSC) houses the equipment required to operate the quartz sleeve cleaning system. Quantity: Panel Size (W x H x D): Material of Construction: Rating: Panel Weight (approx.):

July 13, 2020

One (1) HSC Panel per Chamber mm) 304 Stainless Steel Type 4X, IP66 310 lbs. (141 kg)

TrojanUVFlex TM System Scope of Supply Hydraulic Fluid: Heater:

Page 4 of 6 Pure Drive Provided

chamber. The Installation Contractor shall be responsible for the supply, connection and installation of the following at each HSC: 1. 2. 3. 4.

One (1) 480V, 3 phase, 3 wire + GND, 60 Hz, 2.5 kVA electrical supply One (1) bond link to plant ground, in accordance with applicable codes and standards One (1) Belden 3106A #22 AWG shielded twisted pair between HSC panel and CPP panel Cut and crimp hydraulic hoses (coordination with Parker Store) (hoses and connections supplied by Trojan) 5. Connection of the hydraulic hoses, total of Two (2) per UV bank / chamber

ON-LINE UV TRANSMISSION UNIT MONITOR

Trojan Technologies will supply a UVT sensor/sampler to monitor influent transmission. Quantity: Enclosure Material: Enclosure Rating: Approximate Weight:

One (1) UVT monitor will be supplied Stainless Steel Type 4X, IP 66 65 lbs. (29.5 kg)

The Installation Contractor to be responsible for setting in place and wall mounting the enclosure indoors as per the layout drawings. The Installation Contractor shall also be responsible for the supply, installation and connection of the following: 1. One 120 Volt, 1 phase, 2 wire + ground, 15 amp power supply, 250 VA. 2. One (1) 4-20 mA DC Analog Output from the UVT monitor to the CPP. 3. All tubing/piping to monitor requires a pressurized source and the appropriate flow regulators/pressure reducers to maintain flow rates of 0.1 gpm (0.4 l/min) to 0.4 gpm (1.6 l/min) at a maximum inlet pressure of 30 psi (210 kPa). Shut off valve located within 3 ft. (1 m) of cabinet SPARE PARTS AS DETAILED BELOW

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.

One (1) complete set of spare lamps for one (1) reactor. One (1) complete set of quartz sleeves for one (1) reactor. One (1) complete set of o-rings, seals for one (1) reactor. One (1) spare lamp ballast One (1) complete set of wiper seals for one (1) reactor Two (2) UVI Reference sensors

EXCEPTIONS/CLARIFICATIONS TO SPECIFICATION Specifications Sections 46 00 00 paragraph 2.4. Specifications Sections 46 00 00 paragraph 2.8.2. Trojan wiping system is hydraulic, not motors or pneumatic

July 13, 2020

TrojanUVFlex TM System Scope of Supply

Page 5 of 6

Specifications Sections 46 00 00 paragraph 2.9.1.4. The UV Transmittance will need to be communicated to the CPP's of the UV System, or multiple UVT Analyzers would need to be provided. Specifications Sections 46 00 00 paragraph 2.9.1.4. & 2.9.1.5. Trojan does not provide the program. If absolutely necessary, a Non-Disclosure Agreement would have to be signed. Specifications Sections 46 00 00 paragraph 2.9.1.5. UV System will be equipped with a 7" Beijer Specifications Sections 46 00 00 paragraph 2.10.2.4. Trojan takes exception because UV Flex 100 does not have leak detection however the UV ballast can detect eakage . Specifications Sections 46 00 00 paragraph 2.10.2.6. Trojan takes exception because SCC is not requested and without an SCC, the plant will be required to handle the fault/redundancy switch overs. Specifications Sections 46 00 00 paragraph 2.10.3.6. Trojan did not provide a power meter, but we have provided a theoretical calculation in kW. Specifications Sections 46 00 00 paragraph 2.7.2. Trojan did not provide 2 handheld reference sensors but did provide 2 Trojan reference sensors.

DOCUMENTATION (SHOP DRAWINGS AND O&M MANUALS)

Trojan will supply the following documentation to the Contractor per the following schedule: Electronic copies of submittal shop drawings 4-6 weeks after receipt of written purchase order (applicable only to projects not ordered based on the standard approved submittal). Three (3) copies of Final O&M Manuals, at time of equipment delivery. DELIVERY, START-UP AND TRAINING Equipment shipped 28-32 weeks after approval of Shop Drawings Lead time and delivery date subject to factory loading.

The following services will be supplied by Trojan: 2 Trip 5 days (total) duration for Equipment Installation assistance, check-out and certification, startup, commissioning and operator training 1 Trips 1 day duration on-site visit after 30 days WARRANTY

Trojan Technologies will warrant the equipment and parts for 18 months from start-up or 24 months after equipment delivery to site. Please note that items considered consumable such as UV lamps and O-rings are not covered under this warranty. Labor is not included for those procedures deemed to be routine maintenance such as UV lamps, quartz sleeves, ballasts, and sensor replacement. The UV lamps are warranted for 15,000 hours of operation, prorated after 9,000 hours. The UV quartz sleeves are warranted for 1 year . The UV drivers are warranted for 10 years, of operation, prorated after 1 year. The UV intensity sensors are warranted for 5 years, of operation, prorated after 1 year.

July 13, 2020

TrojanUVFlex TM System Scope of Supply

PAYMENT TERMS 10% upon submittals 80% upon delivery of equipment to site 10% on equipment acceptance or 60 days after delivery to site Net 30 Days Selling price does not include any duties or taxes which may be applicable Freight paid to job site (In North America) Refer to attached Terms and Conditions for additional details. TERMS AND CONDITIONS

July 13, 2020

Page 6 of 6

Appendix D Calgon Submission

304 - 1353 Ellis Street, Kelowna, BC V1Y 1Z9 | T: 250.762.2517

Base Bid Proposal to the City of Cranbrook for a 24" Sentinel® UV Disinfection System for the City of Cranbrook Water Treatment Plant UV Disinfection System Reference No. 0655.0205.01 Cranbrook, BC

July 15, 2020 CCUVT Proposal No. 00002775

MAKING WATER AND AIR SAFER AND CLEANER

Cranbrook WTP Table of Contents Section 1

– Bid Form

Section 2

– CCUVT Proposal

Section 3

– Attachments

Section 1 – Bid Form 5.0 Submission Requirements

City of Cranbrook – UV Disinfection System Reference No. 0956.0050.01 CCUVT Proposal No. 00002775

5.0 Submission Requirements Table 2 summarizes the information required. Additional information is requested in Table3 (including parameters associated with O&M costs). Please fill in all the cells in the tables, for each UV system submitted for review. Amongst others, information to be provided includes the following: a) Budget equipment supply price; Refer to Table 2: UV Reactor Information. b) Power requirements; Input power supply of 600 VAC, 3 phase, 60 Hz Maximum full load per 24” 9x10kW Sentinel reactor is 120 FLA Full power requirement per reactor is 98 kW. c) Number of lamps per reactor; Nine (9) d) Max allowable starts per hour; Alarm setpoint is set at 20 on/off cycles per day. e) Max distance from reactor to control panel; 150 m f)

Estimated chemical cleaning frequency (if applicable); Not applicable.

g) Cost per lamp and frequency of replacement; $759 CDN/lamp and replaced minimum every 5000 hours of operation h) Cost per ballast and frequency of replacement; $4319.04 CDN/10 kW ballast and $7784.04 CDN/20 kW ballast. Ballasts have an expected life of 10-15 years. i)

General assembly drawings to indicate floor space and head room requirements; Refer to Equipment Layout drawing S900341.

Upstream and downstream pipe diameters required; 24 inch (310 mm) to accommodate UV reactors’ 316L SS, ASME B16.5, Class 150, Raised Face Flanges.

k) Number of straight pipe lengths required on inlet/outlet; In accordance with UVDGM, we would recommend 5 times pipe diameter straight pipe upstream (3048 mm) and one pipe diameter downstream (610 mm). If flowmeter (by other) is installed upstream please incorporate appropriate upstream straight pipe per manufacturer’s specification. l)

Completed quotation and information sheet (Appendix A); See attached 5.0 Submission Requirement Tables 2, 3, and 4.

City of Cranbrook – UV Disinfection System Reference No. 0956.0050.01 CCUVT Proposal No. 00002775

m) Unit features included; and Please refer to CCUVT Proposal Sections 1 & 2 along with the attached Sentinel® 24 Data Sheet. n) Delivery times for shop drawings and equipment. Shop Drawings – Three (3) weeks following acceptance of P.O. Equipment Delivery- Eighteen (18) to twenty (20) weeks after receipt of approved drawings (ARAD).

THE CITY OF CRANBROOK WATER TREATMENT PLANT | UV Disinfection System RFP

(71%T per Addendum No. 1) (replace with 3)

MS2 RED 52.9 mJ/cm2 24" 9x10kW Sentinel MP 5x 3x 5x 1x

THE CITY OF CRANBROOK WATER TREATMENT PLANT | UV Disinfection System RFP

Y 9 5 9 one(1)-10kW;four(4)-20kW 265 kW 98kW/reactor 105 MLD hydraulic max 20.9 MLD (7MLD/reactor) 35.7MLD(11.9MLD/reactor)@70%T) 39.1MLD (13MLD/reactor@71%T)

315.5MLD(105MLD/reactor) 150 psi 9.4 L/s 1109 mm w.c. at 106 MLD 910 mm 1350 mm 910 mm 610 mm Sentinel 24 Electrical Enclosure S103527 Power Supply; S103530 Control Panel

2510 mm 900 mm 2160 mm 150 m Y factory Y 0.96-28.2 mgd 53.9-98.2 %T n/a 1.43MLD/reactor at 53.9%T for 4 log crypto 92%T at 105MLD/reactor for 4 log crypto Y $895,500 CAN$ $23,600 CAN$ $4,700 CAN$

THE CITY OF CRANBROOK WATER TREATMENT PLANT | UV Disinfection System RFP

$8,700 CAN$ 3 weeks following acceptance of PO 18-20 weeks ARAD $28,800 CAN$

10 kW 5000 h alarm setpoint at 20 on/off cylces

$759 5000 h after 2000 h 0 <3% 3 mins 2-4 mins 2-4 mins 0.7 g/lamp Yes expired lamps can be returned to Calgon or recycled at locally accepted facilities

$11 CDN/lamp 10 yrs

THE CITY OF CRANBROOK WATER TREATMENT PLANT | UV Disinfection System RFP

92% Wiper N/A N/A N/A once every few minutes to once per month

$501.60 5 yrs 0 <1% after 1 year $5.28/o-ring 1 yr 40%-100% 15 92 electromagnetic 0.8kW/10kW ballast 1.6kW/20kW ballast $4319.04/10kW ballast $7784.04/20kW ballast

5 yrs after 1 year 10 yrs dry $ 1,705.44 5 yrs after 1 year $389.40

THE CITY OF CRANBROOK WATER TREATMENT PLANT | UV Disinfection System RFP

* * *

2 3

18 27

157.8 kW 232.5 kW

2 2

94.0 kW 140.7 kW

9 9 18

1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1

5 9 18 3 5 9 2 3 5

61.8 kW 84.1 kW 168.2 kW 39.0 kW 57.7 kW 115.5 kW 27.7 kW 35.1 kW 67.3 kW 16.2 kW 21.2 kW 38.2 kW

*If above 70%T was adjusted to 71%T per Addendum No. 1 the results would be as follows: 150 L/s, 71%T, 1 reactor, 9 lamps, 83.3 kW power required 220 L/s, 71%T, 2 reactors, 18 lamps, 129.8 kW power required 440 L/s, 71%T, 3 reactors, 27 lamps, 245.5 kW power required Note above operating conditions are based on higher 86% combined end of lamp life and sleeve fouling factor.

THE CITY OF CRANBROOK WATER TREATMENT PLANT | UV Disinfection System RFP

Calgon Carbon UV Technologies Canada Inc.

$961,300 CAN$

2% per year

38 Kappele Ave, Toronto, ON M4N 2Z1

Contact:

David DesRochers

Cell: 519-820-3547 Email: david.desrochers@kuraray.com

Section 2 – CCUVT Proposal CCUVT Proposal

Base Bid CCUVT Proposal to the City of Cranbrook for a 24" Sentinel® UV Disinfection System for the City of Cranbrook Water Treatment Plant UV Disinfection System Reference No. 0655.0205.01 Cranbrook, BC

July 15, 2020 CCUVT Proposal No. 00002775

MAKING WATER AND AIR SAFER AND CLEANER

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Calgon Carbon UV Technologies Canada Inc. (CCUVT) is pleased to submit this proposal for a Sentinel® UV Disinfection System to treat water in response to a request for proposal from the from the City of Cranbrook WTP, BC. The proposed Sentinel® System is designed to deliver a 4.0 log Cryptosporidium inactivation per the USEPA UV Disinfection Guidance Manual. A summary of the design basis and key features of the Sentinel® System follows: Three (3) 9x10 kW 24 inch diameter Sentinel® reactors are proposed for treating the water at a design flow rate of 440 L/s. One (1) 9x10 kW Sentinel® reactor is proposed for redundancy with a capacity for treating the water at a design flow rate of 440 L/s. The proposed system will meet the treatment objectives based on water with a transmittance of 71 %T at 254 nm. The proposed Sentinel® reactor meets the design requirements of the EPA’s UV Disinfection Guidance Manual Final 2006 (UVDGM). A full description of the proposed system is included in the attached proposal.

Page 1 MAKING WATER AND AIR SAFER AND CLEANER

Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................ 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................................................... 2 SECTION 1: SENTINEL® HIGHLIGHTS ............................................................................................. 3 SECTION 2: SYSTEM DESCRIPTION .................................................................................................. 5 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4

Process Description .................................................................................................... 5 Equipment Description ................................................................................................ 6 Process Control .......................................................................................................... 9 Clarifications and Exceptions .................................................................................... 10

SECTION 3: SYSTEM PERFORMANCE ............................................................................................ 12 3.1 3.2

Treatment Specification ............................................................................................ 12 Validation Testing ..................................................................................................... 12

SECTION 4: SYSTEM SUPPLY ............................................................................................................ 13 4.1 4.2 4.3

CCUVT Supply .......................................................................................................... 13 Supply by Others ...................................................................................................... 14 Manufacturer’s Warranty ........................................................................................... 15

SECTION 5: STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS ......................................................................... 17 5.1

Overview ................................................................................................................... 17

CONTACT INFORMATION .................................................................................................................. 19

Page 2 MAKING WATER AND AIR SAFER AND CLEANER

Section 1: Sentinel® Highlights Highlights of the Sentinel® system are as follows: The proposed reactor uses 10 kW medium pressure UV lamps positioned perpendicular to the liquid flow. The lamps are contained within quartz tubes mounted inside a flanged 316L stainless steel 609 mm (24”) diameter reactor. Sentinel® reactors incorporate germicidal selective sensors as required by the UVDGM. The proposed Sentinel® Reactor has been third party Validated per the UVDGM and is in full compliance with the requirements of the UVDGM. CCUVT provides third party certification of the hydraulic profiles and pressure drops of this reactor, in addition to the requirements of the UVDGM. Sentinel® reactors provide treatment in a very small footprint. The design of the reactor minimizes the amount and complexity of piping necessary to install the unit. The Sentinel® Quickwipe™ automatic cleaning technology is utilized to keep the quartz sleeves from fouling thus providing efficient system operation. The Quickwipe™ system consists of stainless brushes which are driven by an electric motor. The system is fully automatic and does not require system downtime to conduct the cleaning operation. The system automatically cleans the quartz sleeves and sensor windows while the UV reactors remain in operation, without adversely affecting the system’s ability to provide properly treated water. Ballasts for Sentinel® reactors are fully variable electromagnetic ballasts. The electromagnetic ballasts are highly tolerant of power line voltage fluctuations of -40 to +25 % which results in a more reliable system and maximum up-time. The ballast cabinets and control panels for Sentinel® reactors can be mounted up to 500 feet away from the reactors. This allows the ballast cabinets to be located where they are most convenient to other electrical equipment and where they fit most appropriately. Sentinel’s® simple electrical interconnecting wiring minimizes the size and number of electrical cable trays required for the interconnecting wiring of the reactors. Sentinel® reactors are operated on a Calculated Dose Approach control. This allows the system to provide the most efficient operation while providing the proper dose regardless of the flow rate or UV transmittance of the water. This control method and the algorithms that support this design approach were developed and verified during the reactor validation in accordance with the requirements of the UVDGM. Sentinel® reactors are provided with individual reactor PLCs. This provides maximum operational flexibility and reliability to the operational staff.

Page 3 MAKING WATER AND AIR SAFER AND CLEANER

The Calgon Carbon Difference: Proven Performance. With over 350 systems built and 25,000 kW of medium pressure lamps installed for treating a broad spectrum of contaminated groundwater, industrial wastewater, process water and drinking water, CCUVT has proven its capability to meet the most demanding performance requirements. Technology Leadership. As a result of its strong commitment to R&D, CCUVT has introduced a number of important features to the ultraviolet industry, including: Reliability. Field experience with the extensive installed base of treatment systems has shown CCUVT to be an industry leader in terms of performance and reliability. CCUVT has never had to remove an installed system for unsatisfactory performance. Safety. All CCUVT Sentinel® UV Systems are both UL508A and CSA certified. Both UL and CSA are recognized by the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) as an accredited Nationally Recognized Testing Laboratory (NRTL). Our facilities are inspected regularly to ensure that the high standards of both UL and CSA are maintained. System Quality. Calgon Carbon UV Technologies Canada Inc. is ISO 9001:2015 accredited. The certification of compliance with ISO 9001:2015 recognizes that the policies, practices, and procedures of our UVT Division ensure consistent quality in the products and services we provide to our customers. The certification applies to the management system for the design, development, manufacture, delivery, installation, warranty support, and aftermarket parts and service for ultraviolet (UV) water treatment systems. CCUVT’s quality assurance manufacturing program has also fully met the requirements of NASA, the U.S. DOD and the U.S. DOE.

Page 4 MAKING WATER AND AIR SAFER AND CLEANER

Section 2: System Description 2.1

PROCESS DESCRIPTION The proposed Sentinel® Disinfection System is designed to deliver a 4.0 log Cryptosporidium inactivation by exposing the water stream to high intensity UV light. The system is installed in a closed pipe connected to the new or existing piping using flanged end connections. The 24” Sentinel was validated with a 90-degree bend immediately upstream and downstream of the reactor. The 24” Sentinel® UV Disinfection reactor will include 10 kW high intensity medium pressure ultraviolet lamps. The lamps are powered by electromagnetic ballasts with continuously variable power output. This variability enables each lamp to be adjusted from 40% to 100% of maximum power resulting in excellent operating efficiencies over the operating range of the reactor. A separate lamp drive enclosure containing the ballasts and other lamp power supply components will be provided with each reactor. The lamp output can be regulated either manually by operator input or automatically by feedback from the flow signal and sensor reading. The power output is automatically regulated by maintaining a minimum irradiance set point, which is determined by the validation results and input by the operator. The Sentinel® system includes sensors (one per lamp) to continuously measure the absolute UV irradiance in the water to ensure an adequate UV dose is maintained. In the event that the UV dose drops below the minimum level required for treatment, an alarm will sound to alert the operator to this condition. Each UV lamp is protected from the effluent stream by a quartz sleeve. The quartz sleeves are kept clean automatically by a screw-driven wiper. The wiper system can be set with an adjustable cycle frequency. Each Sentinel® reactor is supplied with a System Control cabinet capable of controlling its associated reactor in stand alone mode. The system operates under the control of a fully programmed Programmable Logic Controller (PLC). The main functions of the PLC software are to control the UV disinfection process, monitor the system status and alert the operator to any fault conditions. The system is failsafe for operator and equipment safety. Also provided with each System Control cabinet will be a touch-screen operator interface on the control panel to allow the operator to continuously monitor the treatment system (flow rate, UV dose, %T, lamp power, lamp volts and amps) and adjust process set points. Alarm and status messages are displayed on the operator interface. One on-line UV Transmittance analyzer will be provided for %T monitoring. The measured %T will be displayed on the control panel and can be used in the PLC algorithm for the control logic.

Page 5 MAKING WATER AND AIR SAFER AND CLEANER

2.2

EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION UV System Configuration Based on the use of 10 kW lamps, the following configuration will be used: a. Number of UV reactors

4 (3 duty + 1 redundant trains)

b. Number of lamps per reactor

c. Power per lamp (kW)

d. Total nominal power (kW)

360

UV Reactor Each proposed Sentinel® reactor is described in detail below: Reactor Casing

: : : : : :

316L stainless steel Wetted parts: SS, EPDM, Teflon, 214A quartz All wetted parts conform to NSF 61 24 inch 316L SS flanges, ASME B16.5, Class 150, Raised Face Dimensions: 610 mm dia x 1340 mm L Abrasive Bead Blasted, Pickled & Passivated, inside & out

Lamps

: : : :

Enclosed in quartz sleeve Operated by electromagnetic ballasts Manual lamp selection on operator interface 10 kW medium pressure ultraviolet lamps

Quartz Sleeve Wipers

: : : :

Automatic action for cleaning quartz sleeves in service Electrically driven wipers Manual lamp selection on operator interface Adjustable cycle frequency via operator interface

Hydraulic System Design Flow/Future Flow per Reactor Maximum hydraulic flow per reactor Reactor Pressure Drop at 147 L/s System design pressure System test pressure

: : : : :

147 L/s 1227 L/s 30 mm WC 150 psi 195 psi

Note: All valves and/or other flow controlling devices downstream of the Sentinel® UV Reactor must be slow closing to prevent water hammer in the process line, which may damage the Sentinel® system.

Page 6 MAKING WATER AND AIR SAFER AND CLEANER

UV Irradiance Sensor

: : : :

DVGW Approved UV sensor Continuous on-line monitoring of UV intensity at biocidal wavelength One sensor per lamp Interfaced with Control System to provide feed back regarding UV dose requirement

Electrical System The electrical system components include a ballast power supply and a reactor control panel. These are supplied pre-wired together and mounted on a common skid. Ballast Power Supplies

: : : :

Ventilated NEMA 12 painted carbon steel cabinets 600 VAC, 3 ph, 3 wire Noise levels are minimal and below OSHA limits Power factor better than 0.92 at full power

Reactor Control Panel

: :

NEMA 12 painted carbon steel cabinet All control power derived from the ballast power supply 120 VAC control circuit Allen Bradley CompactLogix L32E PLC Allen Bradley Panel View Plus 1000 Color touch screen Emergency Stop Button Integral operator interface is used for displaying process status and changing process set points and testing components during servicing UL508A and CSA certifiable

: : : : :

Spare Parts and Accessories Nine (9), 10kW UV Lamps Nine (9), Quartz Sleeves One (1), 10 kW Ballast One (1), 20 kW Ballast Nine (9), Quartz Sleeve O-Ring Seals One (1), Motor Mount O-Ring Seal Ten (10), 2" Sanitary Gaskets One (1), Mercury Spill Kit Two (2), Torque Screwdrivers

Page 7 MAKING WATER AND AIR SAFER AND CLEANER

Transmittance (%T) Analyzer As the water quality typically fluctuates, the on-line %T analyzer provides a measure of the %T. The %T analyzer will be supplied with the following standard features: Simple Calibration Procedures Auto Ranging from 10-100 %T SPECIFICATIONS

Range- Auto Ranging Accuracy Resolution Units Path Length Sampling Time Flow Rate Calibration Cleaning Self Diagnostics Operator Interface Display Alarms

Humidity Control Outputs Wavelength Light Source Lamp Life Dimensions Enclosures Fluid Connections Electrical Storage Temp Operating Temp Weight Warranty Technology Options

10 – 100 % UVT, 0 - 1 UVA +/- 0.5% FS 0.1% Transmittance, 0.001 UVA Operator configurable: cm -1, m-1 10 mm 10 seconds 300 - 800 mL/min In-situ zeroing to any sample with known UVT. No further calibration required. In-situ cleaning makes cleaning quick and easy. Automatic chemical cleaning is optional. Detection and diagnosis of internal system faults. Five push buttons to control a comprehensive hierarchical menu system. - 4 line x 20 character backlit LCD and LED alarm indicator Dry-contact terminals allow operator configurable alarms for: high and low UVT/UVA set points, low lamp output, leak detected, system fault, etc. Humidity sensor with large regeneratable desiccant system Self-powered 4-20mA, RS232 serial for PC 253.7 nm Low-pressure mercury UV lamp 2 years 16" h x 14" w x 8" d NEMA 4X, wall mountable 1/4" tube compression in/out 24 VDC 40W power adapter (accepts 90-250 VAC 50/60 Hz) -20 to 60°C (-4 to 140°F) 0 to 45°C (32 to 113°F) 22 lbs 2 year limited warranty Ortho-Beam - Dual feed - Real Clean Automatic Chemical Cleaning System - Pump System with Real Clean

Page 8 MAKING WATER AND AIR SAFER AND CLEANER

2.3

PROCESS CONTROL The Sentinel® Control System operates under the control of a Programmable Logic Controller (PLC). The main functions of the PLC software are to control the process and monitor the system status, and to alert the operator to any fault conditions. The PLC will facilitate a UV demand feedback loop to ensure accurate water treatment at all times. The system is fail-safe for the operator's safety and equipment protection. Alarm and status messages are displayed on the operator interface station on the control panel. Control system specifications are as follows: Fail-safe Interlocks Lamp

: :

General

: :

Temperature

: : :

Alarm on hi/low lamp current, lamp failure and identification of failed lamp(s). Ground fault detection for each lamp circuit Power interlock on high voltage cabinet doors Power interlock on reactor access covers Alarm and shutdown on high water temperature Alarm and shutdown on high ballast temperature Alarm and shutdown on power supply overtemperature

Leak Detection

Alarm and shutdown if reactor leak detected

Quartz Cleaner

Alarm on failure to cycle

UV Intensity

Alarm on UV intensity out of range

Dose Pacing

The PLC continuously monitors the irradiance levels of the individual UV sensors and automatically adjusts the operating power of the lamps to insure the required dose is maintained for the flow rate based on validation-derived criteria. The PLC checks the measured irradiance against expected values calculated from lamp power, lamp age and % transmittance and alarms if the irradiance level is out of range, indicating a sensor re-calibration may be required. (An online sensor re-calibration routine can be accessed through the OIT screen.) The operator may disable automatic dose pacing and set lamp power manually, if desired.

Page 9 MAKING WATER AND AIR SAFER AND CLEANER

2.4

CLARIFICATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS

The City of Cranbrook Water Treatment Plant UV Disinfection System RFP 1.0

Clarification – The proposed Sentinel UV reactor has undergone third party validation by Carollo Engineers. The validation report is confidential and will be provided upon an Award of Contract or signed Non-Disclosure Agreement.

5.0 Table 2

Clarification – The proposed Sentinel UV system will have 3 duty and 1 redundant reactor trains.

Section 46 00 00 1.2.1 & 2.3.1.(1) Clarification - The proposed Sentinel UV system will have a total of 4 reactors arranged as 3 duty and 1 redundant reactor trains. 1.2.5

1.2.10

Clarification – An alternate proposal is provided with also four (4) total UV reactors. The alternate bid arrangement comprises of 1 duty and 1 redundant reactor trains each with 2 reactors in series. Future expansion for the Alternate layout will require one extra duty train for a system total of 6 UV reactors. This alternate layout will reduce over capital expense and building footprint with fewer number of trains, reduce piping, valves, flow meters, etc.

2.4.1

Exception - Standard flange on the Sentinel reactor is 24” CL. 150 Raised Face per ASME/ANSI B16.5.

2.4.7

Exception – Cleaning valves, solenoid valves, and sample valves to be supplied by other.

2.9.1.(1) 1st bullet Clarification – The control panel will be NEMA 4/12 and the ballast power supply panels are ventilated NEMA 12 painted carbon steel cabinets. 2.9.1.(2) 2nd bullet Clarification – Control Panel requires 600V feeder and includes a Control Transformer to provide 120V power for internal control circuits and to feed 24VDC Power Supply for instrumentation loop. 2.9.1.(4) 1st bullet Clarification – "ALL" information is not possible, but everything that is necessary to operate the system remotely from SCADA will be made available. 2.9.1.(4) 4th bullet Clarification - Communications between AB PLC and Moxa Modbus card is by Calgon, between Moxa Modbus card and Plant PLC is by others. Page 10 MAKING WATER AND AIR SAFER AND CLEANER

2.9.1.(5).1st bullet Clarification – Reactor control panel will be equipped with Allen Bradley Panelview 1000 Series 7 Performance Operator Interface Terminal. 2.9.1.(5).3rd bullet Clarification – Calgon will not provide a weatherproof cover since the AB Panelview 1000 is rated NEMA 4X and does not require it. 2.9.1.(5).5th bullet Clarification - Since the HMI is mounted on the local Control Panel we don't understand why there is a need for this communication cable to be installed by the General Contractor. This would only make sense if the HMI were mounted remotely. Please clarify.

Page 11 MAKING WATER AND AIR SAFER AND CLEANER

Section 3: System Performance The proposed Sentinel® UV Disinfection System will treat the water to the specified treatment level. The specific performance and the estimated operating requirements are as follows:

3.1

TREATMENT SPECIFICATION Design flow rate:

440 L/s (3 duty + 1 redundant reactor trains)

Future flow rate:

1030 L/s (7 duty + 1 redundant reactor trains)

Treatment Specification:

4 log Cryptosporidium inactivation MS2 surrogate

3.2

Design %T (@ 254 nm):

71%T (per cm)

Average %T (@ 254 nm):

90%T (per cm)

Input power factor:

0.92

Lamp life:

5,000 hrs

End of lamp life/fouling factor

72 %

VALIDATION TESTING The proposed Sentinel® reactor has undergone validation testing in accordance with the USEPA UV Disinfection Guidance Manual (2006). This validation procedure was completed on all of Calgon Carbon’s Sentinel® reactors by a third party engineering firm. The full report will be made available upon successful contract award. The third party validator is: Carollo Engineers 12592 West Explorer Drive Suite 200 Boise, ID 83713 Phone (208) 376-2288 Attn: Harold Wright All validation information presented is CONFIDENTIAL.

Page 12 MAKING WATER AND AIR SAFER AND CLEANER

Section 4: System Supply 4.1

CCUVT SUPPLY CCUVT proposes to supply the following equipment and to provide the following services. The standard equipment below will meet all of the functional requirements according to the Specifications Equipment: CCUVT Total System Price:

Refer to Table 2: UV Reactor Information

Four (4) 24 inch 9x10 kW Sentinel® UV Disinfection Systems, as described Three (3) Operating and Maintenance Manuals Two (2) Hand-Held Reference Sensors One (1) On-Line RealTech UV Transmittance Analyzer One (1) On-Line RealTech UV Transmittance Analyzer Cleaning Module Lot of Spare Parts and Accessories, as Indicated

Included Included Included Included Included Included

Services: Up to three (3) trips totaling up to six (6) days of on-site services will be supplied to provide start up, training assistances.

Included

*Additional days will be invoiced at the prevailing rates at the time of service. Travel and living expenses are billed at cost plus 15%.

Payment Terms:

Delivery: Taxes:

20% at approval of shop drawing 70% at equipment delivery 10% at start-up

Included D.A.P. Jobsite, City of Cranbrook WTP, Cranbrook, BC Not Included

Delivery Schedule:

Shop Drawings – Three (3) weeks following acceptance of P.O. Equipment Delivery- Eighteen (18) to twenty (20) weeks after receipt of approved drawings (ARAD).

This offer is valid 60 days from 7/15/2020.

Page 13 MAKING WATER AND AIR SAFER AND CLEANER

4.2

SUPPLY BY OTHERS The scope of CCUVT’s supply consists exclusively of the items of equipment and services listed above. Additional equipment and services required to render the proposed Sentinel® System operational are assumed to be supplied by others. The equipment and services to be provided by others include, but are not limited to, the following: Installation of the Equipment, including the following:

• • • • • • • • • •

indoor environment, 40oF – 120oF, < 95% R.H. non-corrosive supply and installation of all interconnecting piping, bypass piping, isolation valves, flow controllers and meters and associated controls, if required electrical hook-up, 600 VAC to power supply cabinet provision of flow meter installation of electrical and process connections for flow meter, if required all civil work including installation of UV reactor provision of all analytical services during startup, certification, and testing including pH, temperature, UV absorbance, etc., if required provision for continuous flow, flooded pipe at reactor inlet provision for slow closing valve(s) downstream of Sentinel® reactor to prevent water hammer in process line provision for pressure relief in process line, if required

Utilities The utilities required to operate the Sentinel® System are indicated below. Sentinel® System Maximum full load 9x10 kW

: :

600 VAC, 60 Hz, 3 Phase, protected supply 120 full load amps per reactor

Page 14 MAKING WATER AND AIR SAFER AND CLEANER

4.3

MANUFACTURER’S WARRANTY CCUVT warrants that the equipment sold hereunder shall be free from defects in materials and workmanship for a period of thirty (30) months from date of shipment or twenty-four (24) months from the date of start-up, whichever occurs first. This warranty excludes removal, reinstallation and freight and does not apply to problems associated with normal wear and tear, improper maintenance, negligence, misuse, abuse, or the failure to operate the equipment in strict accordance with the operating and maintenance plan provided. All other warranties, either express or implied, are hereby disclaimed including, but not limited to, the warranty of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose. The system as supplied by CCUVT, has been specifically designed to handle the design basis furnished by the customer. Any changes, modifications or additions to this system/controls (including modifications, disassembly, repair or tampering) or nonpayment of outstanding invoices, without written CCUVT approval, will result in a void of warranties and process guarantees. Lamp Warranty CCUVT warrants that useful lamp output is maintained for a minimum 5,000 hours of operation with up to 600 on/off cycles. Should lamp performance not be in accordance with above, cost of replacement lamps will be as follows: Lamp Hours

Lamp Cost

1-2000 hours 2001-5000 hours

Lamps replaced at no charge Lamp price prorated proportional to actual hours

Warranty will be invalid in cases of water damage, excess lamp power, fingerprints or dust on lamp surface, or other mechanical damage caused by abuse. Ballast Warranty CCUVT warrants the electromagnet ballast for a period of five (5) years for defects in materials or workmanship. The electromagnetic ballast replacement cost will be prorated after one (1) year. Warranty will be invalid in cases of exposure to abnormally corrosive environments, failure to maintain adequate ventilation, water damage, or mechanical damage caused by abuse. Quartz Sleeve Warranty CCUVT warrants the quartz sleeves for a period of five (5) years for defects in materials or workmanship. The Quartz sleeve replacement cost will be prorated after one (1) year.

Page 15 MAKING WATER AND AIR SAFER AND CLEANER

Warranty will be invalid in cases of water damage, or other mechanical damage caused by abuse. Irradiance Sensors Warranty CCUVT warrants the irradiance sensors for a period of five (5) years for defects in materials or workmanship. The irradiance sensor replacement cost will be prorated after one (1) year. Periodic off-site recalibration of sensors (estimated every 3 years) may be required which is not covered by this warrantee. On-site re-scaling is required approximately every 6 months. Warranty will be invalid in cases of water damage, or other mechanical damage caused by abuse. There are no representations, warranties or conditions express or implied statutory or otherwise with respect to Sentinel® or any part thereof except as expressly provided herein and in the immediately proceeding sections.

Page 16 MAKING WATER AND AIR SAFER AND CLEANER

Section 5: Statement of Qualifications 5.1

OVERVIEW Calgon Carbon UV Technologies Canada Inc. has over three hundred commercial UV installations throughout the world. CCUVT's corporate goal is to maintain its position of leadership through extraordinary commitment to research and development, excellence in design, quality-centered manufacturing, and customer-oriented service. Manufacturing CCUVT has a 40,000 square feet manufacturing facility located in Coraopolis, near Pittsburgh, PA. CCUVT has a full complement of equipment and tradesmen to manufacture and assemble all systems in-house. Quality plays a major role at CCUVT in the manufacturing cycle with a well-established Quality Assurance program. In addition, all systems undergo a detailed hydraulic and electrical function test prior to shipment. As a vital part of CCUVT’s manufacturing and assembly operation, high standards of quality are maintained by documented and thorough inspection procedures for critical purchased components such as power supplies and lamps, as well as for all machined parts. Systems are carefully assembled and thoroughly tested for up to 24 hours, using customer provided water if requested, before shipment. Overall quality control is the responsibility of the Manufacturing Manager. It should be noted that CCUVT’s quality assurance procedures have met the exacting standards of the U.S. Navy and NASA. Customer Service Each Calgon Carbon employee or representative is specially trained to offer phone support or on-site technical services to assist all our customers with regular parts replacement and any troubleshooting requirements they may have. Each field service employee is trained in the system components, system functionality, programming and troubleshooting techniques from both a mechanical and electrical standpoint. They also take part in annual refresher and skills upgrade training to ensure they have the most up-to-date information on our systems. We have personnel located in Elkin, North Carolina; Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Cincinnati, Ohio; Los Angeles, California; Morrisville, Pennsylvania; Vacaville, California; Houston, Texas; Edmonton, Alberta; Toronto, Ontario; and Uxbridge, Ontario, Canada. Calgon has over 20 support staff each with experience ranging from over ten years to three years with our specific equipment. The number of staff and cross-functional training coupled with nearby personnel offers Calgon Carbon a distinct advantage over our competitors for both routine and emergency support requirements. CCUVT's service capability far exceeds the minimum requirement of servicing Sentinel® systems through the warranty period. Optional Periodic Maintenance agreements provide for regular visits by CCUVT Service Personnel to provide scheduled preventative

Page 17 MAKING WATER AND AIR SAFER AND CLEANER

maintenance. Full-Service agreements provide all labor and materials for the complete operation of a system. Engineering CCUVT's process engineering group provides the practical expertise for designing and installing treatment systems. The process-engineering group becomes involved at the initial inquiry stage and follows a given project through process specification, materials selection, process control, quality control testing and installation. Individual responsibility is the key to ensuring project congruence and high quality. CCUVT's product engineering group includes electrical and mechanical engineering personnel as well as mechanical and electrical CAD designers. This group has many years of experience in designing and building UV/oxidation and UV disinfection systems. Project Management Once a contract has been awarded to CCUVT, the point of contact is transferred from the responsibility of the sales representative to the Project Manager. The Project Manager works with the Engineer or customer's representative to ensure that all of the contract requirements are satisfied in a timely and effective manner. This effort includes issue of drawings, coordinating drawings approval with the owner's representative, issuing Operating and Maintenance manuals, and coordinating CCUVT's training of the owner's operation and maintenance personnel as well as technical supervision during the commissioning of the Sentinel® system. Research and Development CCUVT's most valuable asset is its intellectual property. Even more valuable than its numerous process and product design patents and its non-patentable know-how are the expertise and experience of its staff. Continuing projects for CCUVT's R&D staff include extending the development of innovative processes, improving the commercial application and competitiveness of existing processes, and researching areas of new application.

Page 18 MAKING WATER AND AIR SAFER AND CLEANER

Contact Information David DesRochers Regional Sales Manager Cell: 519-820-3547 Email: david.desrochers@kuraray.com

www.calgoncarbon.com

Calgon Carbon Asia Calgon Carbon Asia Pte Ltd. 3 Harbour Front Place #05-01 Harbour Front Tower Two Singapore 099254 Phone: + 65 (0) 6221 3500 + 65 (0) 6221 3554

Calgon Carbon UV Technologies Canada Inc. 38 Kappele Avenue Toronto, Ontario Canada M4N 2Z1 Phone: 519-824-8318

European Headquarters Zoning Industriel C de Feluy B-7181 Feluy, Belgium Phone: +32 (0) 64 511 811

© This is the property of Calgon Carbon UV Technologies Canada Inc. and is not to be reproduced in whole or in part, nor employed for any purpose other than specifically permitted in writing by Calgon Carbon UV Technologies Canada Inc.

Page 19 MAKING WATER AND AIR SAFER AND CLEANER

Section 3 – Attachments Sentinel® 24 Data Sheet Sentinel® Installation List Sentinel® 24 Reference List Validation Report Cover and Table of Content 00002775 Cranbrook WTP, BC - Tools and Spare Parts Drawings: S900341 Equipment Layout S900904 Piping Layout S102974 Electrical External Wiring Diagram S500469 Process & Instrumentation Diagram S102859 Electrical Single Line Diagram CCUVT Terms and Conditions

Sentinel® 24 Reference List 1.

Name of Client or Water System: Bangor Water District Plant Name: Butler WTP Location: Bangor ME System: (2) 24 inch Sentinels Flow: 13 MGD Contact: Bob Burke Phone: 207-843-6472 Address: Pond Road Eddington ME 04428 Completion Date: July 2013

Name of Client or Water System: Illinois American Water Company Plant Name: Illinois River Station Improvement Location: Peoria, IL System: (3) 24 inch Sentinels Flow: 17.5 MGD Contact: Douglas Tennis Phone: 309-566-4164 Address: 100 Lorentz Avenue, Peoria IL 61614 Completion Date: November 2011

Name of Client or Water System: Veolia Water Indianapolis Plant Name: TW Moses WTP Location: Indianapolis, IN System: (3) 24 inch Sentinels Flow: 24 MGD Contact: Dan Moran Phone: 317-917-4652 Address: 5761 W 85th Street, Indianapolis IN 46278 Completion Date: January 2010

Name of Client or Water System: Auburn/Lewiston WTF Plant Name: Auburn Lewistown WTF Location: Auburn, ME System: (3) 24 inch Sentinels Flow: 16 MGD Contact: Dan Rodrigue Phone: 207-576-8860 Address: 167 Pump Station Road Auburn ME 04210 Completion Date: May 2011

Name of Client or Water System: City of Bremerton Plant Name: Bremerton WTP Location: Bremerton WA System: (3) 24 inch Sentinels Flow: 23 MGD B3bContact: Ned Lever Phone: 360-473-2398 Address: 8301 West Old Belfair Highway, Bremerton WA 98312 Completion Date: December 2010

Calgon Carbon Corporation 24-INCH SENTINEL REACTOR UV REACTOR VALIDATION AT THE PORTLAND, OR UV VALIDATION FACILITY

TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. SECTION 1 1.1 1.2 1.3

1.4 1.5

1.6

MONITORING ALGORITHMS .............................................................................. 1-3 VALIDATED RANGE .......................................................................................... 1-10 INACTIVATION CREDIT..................................................................................... 1-20 1.3.1 RED Bias................................................................................................. 1-20 1.3.1.1 Predicting MS2 or T1UV REDs ................................................. 1-21 1.3.1.2 Predicting Cryptosporidium, Giardia or virus REDs ................... 1-22 1.3.2 Polychromatic Bias .................................................................................. 1-22 1.3.2.1 Action Spectra .......................................................................... 1-22 1.3.2.2 Spectral Shifts ........................................................................... 1-23 1.3.2.3 UV Absorbance Spectra............................................................ 1-23 1.3.3 Uncertainty of Validation .......................................................................... 1-23 1.3.3.1 Uncertainty of Interpolation ....................................................... 1-24 1.3.3.2 Uncertainty of UV Sensors ........................................................ 1-25 1.3.3.3 Uncertainty of UV Dose Response ............................................ 1-25 VALIDATION FACTORS AND REQUIRED UV DOSES ..................................... 1-26 UV SYSTEM SIZING .......................................................................................... 1-27 1.5.1 UV System Sizing Based on MS2 Phage REDs ...................................... 1-27 1.5.2 UV System Sizing Based on T1UV Phage REDs .................................... 1-30 1.5.3 UV System Sizing Based on Cryptosporidium log reduction .................... 1-34 UVDGM COMPLIANCE ...................................................................................... 1-37

SECTION 2 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6

2-1

REACTOR ............................................................................................................ 2-1 LAMPS ............................................................................................................... 2-10 LAMP SLEEVES ................................................................................................. 2-11 DUTY UV SENSORS.......................................................................................... 2-13 REFERENCE UV INTENSITY SENSORS .......................................................... 2-16 SENSOR WINDOW ............................................................................................ 2-20

SECTION 3 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5

1-1

3-1

TEST TRAIN ......................................................................................................... 3-1 PRODUCTION OF CHALLENGE MICROORGANISMS ....................................... 3-4 ENUMERATION OF CHALLENGE MICROBES ................................................... 3-5 COLLIMATED BEAM APPARATUS...................................................................... 3-5 THIRD PARTY OVERSIGHT ................................................................................ 3-6

October 2013 CALGON CARBON CORPORATION

Confidential - Do not circulate ii

SECTION 4 4.1

4.2 4.3

4.4 4.5

WATER QUALITY MEASUREMENTS .................................................................. 4-1 4.1.1 UVT Measurements .................................................................................. 4-1 4.1.2 Total Chlorine ............................................................................................ 4-1 POWER CONSUMPTION ..................................................................................... 4-2 UV SENSOR PERFORMANCE ............................................................................ 4-2 4.3.1 Reference Sensor Checks ......................................................................... 4-2 4.3.2 Dependence of Measured UV Intensity on Ballast Power Setting and UVT .................................................................................................... 4-2 BIODOSIMETRY .................................................................................................. 4-3 QUALITY ASSURANCE AND QUALITY CONTROL............................................. 4-3 4.5.1 UV Spectrophotometer Calibration Check ................................................. 4-4 4.5.2 Flow Meter Accuracy ................................................................................. 4-5 4.5.3 Microbial QA/QC ....................................................................................... 4-5 4.5.4 Steady State Conditions ............................................................................ 4-5

SECTION 5 5.1

5.2 5.3 5.4

5.5

5.6 5.7

5-1

SOURCE WATER QUALITY ................................................................................ 5-1 5.1.1 Spectral UV Absorbance ........................................................................... 5-1 5.1.2 UVT Variability........................................................................................... 5-7 HEADLOSS .......................................................................................................... 5-7 TOTAL POWER CONSUMPTION ........................................................................ 5-8 UV SENSOR PERFORMANCE .......................................................................... 5-10 5.4.1 Reference UV Sensor Calibration ............................................................ 5-11 5.4.2 Scaling Factors........................................................................................ 5-12 5.4.3 Reference UV Sensors Checks ............................................................... 5-14 5.4.4 UV Sensor Readings as a Function of Ballast Power Setting and UVT ......................................................................................................... 5-15 5.4.5 UV Sensor Equation for UV Dose Monitoring .......................................... 5-35 5.4.6 Relative Lamp Output and UV Dose Monitoring ...................................... 5-35 5.4.7 CAF Index QA/QC ................................................................................... 5-37 BIODOSIMETRY ................................................................................................ 5-40 5.5.1 Challenge Microbe UV Dose-Response .................................................. 5-41 5.5.2 Biodosimetry Data Analysis ..................................................................... 5-56 5.5.3 Prediction of RED .................................................................................... 5-69 5.5.4 Validated Range ...................................................................................... 5-76 UV DOSE MONITORING.................................................................................... 5-91 UV SYSTEM SIZING .......................................................................................... 5-97 5.7.1 UV System Sizing Based on MS2 Phage REDs ...................................... 5-97 5.7.2 UV System Sizing Based on T1UV Phage REDs .................................... 5-97 5.7.3 UV System Sizing Based on Cryptosporidium log reduction .................. 5-103

SECTION 6 6.1 6.2

4-1

6-1

REQUIRED UV DOSE .......................................................................................... 6-1 VALIDATION FACTORS....................................................................................... 6-1 6.2.1 RED Bias................................................................................................... 6-2 6.2.1.1 Predicting MS2 or T1UV REDs ................................................... 6-2 6.2.1.2 Predicting Cryptosporidium, Giardia or adenovirus REDs ........... 6-5 6.2.2 Polychromatic Bias .................................................................................... 6-5 6.2.2.1 Action Spectra ............................................................................ 6-6

October 2013 CALGON CARBON CORPORATION

Confidential - Do not circulate iii

6.3

6.2.2.2 Lamp Aging and Fouling ............................................................. 6-8 6.2.2.3 UVT Spectra ............................................................................... 6-8 6.2.3 Uncertainty of Validation .......................................................................... 6-13 6.2.3.1 Uncertainty of Interpolation ....................................................... 6-13 6.2.3.2 Uncertainty of UV Sensors ........................................................ 6-14 6.2.3.3 Uncertainty of UV Dose Response ............................................ 6-14 VALIDATION FACTOR AND REQUIRED UV DOSES ........................................ 6-21 6.3.1 Validation Factor and Required UV Doses for MS2 and T1UV REDs ....................................................................................................... 6-21 6.3.2 Validation Factor and Required UV Doses for Cryptosporidium Giardia or adenovirus REDs .................................................................... 6-22 6.3.3 Example Calculation ................................................................................ 6-22

SECTION 7

7-1

Appendix A: Functional and Biodosimetric Test Data Appendix B: Spectral Output of a New Lamp Appendix C: UV Sensor Calibration Certificates Appendix D: Microbiological Analysis Methods and Certifications Appendix E: Collimated Beam Procedure and UV Radiometer Calibration Certificates Appendix F: Flow Meter, Power Meter, and Spectrophotometer Calibration Certificates Appendix G: Background to Biodosimetry Data Analysis Appendix H: Dose Response QA/QC Bounds Appendix I: Test Microbe Action Spectra Evaluation

October 2013 CALGON CARBON CORPORATION

Confidential - Do not circulate iv

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1.1 Table 1.2 Table 1.3 Table 1.4 Table 1.5 Table 1.6 Table 1.7 Table 1.8 Table 1.9 Table 2.1 Table 2.2 Table 2.3 Table 2.4 Table 2.5 Table 5.1 Table 5.2a Table 5.2b Table 5.2b Table 5.3 Table 5.4 Table 5.5 Table 5.6 Table 5.7 Table 5.8 Table 5.9 Table 5.10 Table 5.11 Table 5.12 Table 5.13 Table 5.14a Table 5.14b Table 5.15a Table 5.15b Table 5.16a Table 5.16b Table 5.17a

Summary of Equations Required for UV Dose Monitoring ......................... 1-5 Model Coefficients for Equation 1.1 ........................................................... 1-8 Model Coefficients for Equations 1.2 and 1.3 ............................................ 1-8 Model Coefficients for Equation 1.6 ........................................................... 1-9 Model Coefficients for Equation 1.8 ......................................................... 1-10 UV Dose Requirements for Pathogen Inactivation Credit as Defined by the LT2ESWTR .................................................................... 1-20 Relationship Between RED and UV Sensitivity for MS2 and T1UV Phage...................................................................................................... 1-21 Uncertainty of Interpolation for Equation 1.2 ............................................ 1-24 Equation 1.18 Coefficients for Predicting U DR for MS2 ,T1UV, and T7 Phage................................................................................................. 1-26 Mechanical Inspection Table ..................................................................... 2-4 Lamp Data Sheet (Source: CCC) ............................................................ 2-11 UV Transmittance of a 2.5±0.5mm thick Lamp Sleeve for a 90° of Incidence Angle and Air-Quartz Interfaces (Source: Measured by Carollo) ................................................................................................... 2-12 Properties of the UV Intensity Sensor ...................................................... 2-14 Properties of the Reference UV Sensor ................................................... 2-17 Lamp Operation with the Validation of the Sentinel Reactor ...................... 5-1 Spectral UV Absorbance Coefficient of Source Water Without LSA........... 5-4 Spectral UV Absorbance Coefficient of Source Water With LSA ............... 5-5 Spectral UV Absorbance Coefficient of Source Water With LSA ............... 5-6 Measured UVT of Sensor Port Windows, 18 April 2012 ........................... 5-10 Duty and Reference UV Sensor Information ............................................ 5-11 Scaling Factors Calculated for the 24-inch Sentinel’s PLC Software for the Validation Testing .......................................................... 5-13 Equation 5.6 Coefficients for Each UV Sensor with 9 Lamp Operation Determined Using Multivariate Linear Regression................... 5-22 Equation 5.6 Coefficients for Top and Bottom UV Sensors with 9 Lamp Operation Determined Using Multivariate Linear Regression ......... 5-26 Equation 5.8 Coefficients for the halo affect ............................................ 5-32 Results of MS2 Phage Dose-Response Regression Analysis.................. 5-44 Results of T1UV Phage Dose-Response Regression Analysis ................ 5-45 Results of T7 Phage Dose-Response Regression Analysis ..................... 5-45 Grubb’s Statistics and Standard Deviation of the Residuals with the Best Fit to Equation 5.15 ................................................................... 5-60 Biodosimetry Data Identified as Outliers or with Log Inactivation Greater than Dose-Response Range ...................................................... 5-61 Model Coefficients for Equation 5.15 Obtained Using Multivariate Non-Linear Regression............................................................................ 5-62 Model Coefficients for Equation 5.15 Obtained Using Multivariate Non-Linear Regression............................................................................ 5-63 Validation Envelope Bounds for Figure 5.22 ............................................ 5-85 Validation Envelope Bounds for Figure 5.22 ............................................ 5-86 Validation Envelope Bounds for Figure 5.23 ............................................ 5-86 Validation Envelope Bounds for Figure 5.23 ............................................ 5-86 Validation Envelope Bounds for Figure 5.24 ............................................ 5-87

October 2013 CALGON CARBON CORPORATION

Confidential - Do not circulate v

Table 5.17b Table 5.18 Table 5.19 Table 5.20 Table 5.21

Table 6.1 Table 6.2 Table 6.3 Table 6.4a Table 6.4b Table 6.4c Table 6.5 Table 6.6a Table 6.6b Table 6.7a Table 6.7b Table 6.8a Table 6.8b Table 6.9a Table 6.9b Table 6.10a Table 6.10b Table 6.11a Table 6.11b Table 6.12a Table 6.12b Table 6.13a Table 6.13b Table 6.14a

Validation Envelope Bounds for Figure 5.24 ............................................ 5-87 Coefficients for calculating the UV sensitivity of MS2, T1UV and T7 phage ................................................................................................. 5-91 Coefficients for Linear Interpolation of UV Sensitivity .............................. 5-92 Example 1 Calculations for Cryptosporidium ........................................... 5-95 Predicted Log Inactivation and RED of MS2, T1UV, T7 Phage and Cryptosporidium for Operation of three lamps at 12 mgd, 85% UVT and S/S 0 = 0.87 ............................................................................... 5-95 UV Dose Requirements for Pathogen Inactivation Credit as Defined by the LT2ESWTR ....................................................................... 6-1 Relationship Between RED and UV Sensitivity for MS2 and T1UV Phage........................................................................................................ 6-3 Uncertainty of Interpolation for Equations 5.18 ........................................ 6-14 Coefficients for predicting U DR for MS2 phage ......................................... 6-18 Coefficients for predicting U DR for T1UV phage ....................................... 6-19 Coefficients for predicting U DR for T7 phage ............................................ 6-20 Calculation of Cryptosporidium Credit with Example 2............................. 6-23 Minimum MS2 RED (mJ/cm2) Required for Crypto Log Inactivation Credits - 1 lamp ....................................................................................... 6-24 MS2 Validation Factors Required for Crypto Log Inactivation Credits – 1 lamp ...................................................................................... 6-25 Minimum MS2 RED (mJ/cm2) Required for Giardia Log Inactivation Credits - 1 lamp .................................................................... 6-26 MS2 Validation Factors Required for Giardia Log Inactivation Credits – 1 lamp ...................................................................................... 6-27 Minimum T1UV RED (mJ/cm2) Required for Crypto Log Inactivation Credits - 1 lamp .................................................................... 6-28 T1UV Validation Factors Required for Crypto Log Inactivation Credits – 1 lamp ...................................................................................... 6-29 Minimum T1UV RED (mJ/cm2) Required for Giardia Log Inactivation Credits - 1 lamp .................................................................... 6-30 T1UV Validation Factors Required for Giardia Log Inactivation Credits – 1 lamp ...................................................................................... 6-31 Minimum MS2 RED (mJ/cm2) Required for Crypto Log Inactivation Credits - 2 lamps ..................................................................................... 6-32 MS2 Validation Factors Required for Crypto Log Inactivation Credits – 2 lamps .................................................................................... 6-33 Minimum MS2 RED (mJ/cm2) Required for Giardia Log Inactivation Credits - 2 lamps .................................................................. 6-34 MS2 Validation Factors Required for Giardia Log Inactivation Credits – 2 lamps .................................................................................... 6-35 Minimum T1UV RED (mJ/cm2) Required for Crypto Log Inactivation Credits - 2 lamps .................................................................. 6-36 T1UV Validation Factors Required for Crypto Log Inactivation Credits – 2 lamps .................................................................................... 6-37 Minimum T1UV RED (mJ/cm2) Required for Giardia Log Inactivation Credits - 2 lamps .................................................................. 6-38 T1UV Validation Factors Required for Giardia Log Inactivation Credits – 2 lamps .................................................................................... 6-39 Minimum MS2 RED (mJ/cm2) Required for Crypto Log Inactivation Credits - 3 lamps ..................................................................................... 6-40

October 2013 CALGON CARBON CORPORATION

Confidential - Do not circulate vi

Table 6.14b Table 6.15a Table 6.15b Table 6.16a Table 6.16b Table 6.17a Table 6.17b Table 6.18a Table 6.18b Table 6.19a Table 6.19b Table 6.20a Table 6.20b Table 6.21a Table 6.21b Table 6.22a Table 6.22b Table 6.23a Table 6.23b Table 6.24a Table 6.24b Table 6.25a Table 6.25b Table 6.26a Table 6.26b

MS2 Validation Factors Required for Crypto Log Inactivation Credits – 3 lamps .................................................................................... 6-41 Minimum MS2 RED (mJ/cm2) Required for Giardia Log Inactivation Credits - 3 lamps .................................................................. 6-42 MS2 Validation Factors Required for Giardia Log Inactivation Credits – 3 lamps .................................................................................... 6-43 Minimum T1UV RED (mJ/cm2) Required for Crypto Log Inactivation Credits - 3 lamps .................................................................. 6-44 T1UV Validation Factors Required for Crypto Log Inactivation Credits – 3 lamps .................................................................................... 6-45 Minimum T1UV RED (mJ/cm2) Required for Giardia Log Inactivation Credits – 3 lamps.................................................................. 6-46 T1UV Validation Factors Required for Giardia Log Inactivation Credits – 3 lamps .................................................................................... 6-47 Minimum MS2 RED (mJ/cm2) Required for Crypto Log Inactivation Credits - 4 lamps ..................................................................................... 6-48 MS2 Validation Factors Required for Crypto Log Inactivation Credits – 4 lamps .................................................................................... 6-49 Minimum MS2 RED (mJ/cm2) Required for Giardia Log Inactivation Credits - 4 lamps .................................................................. 6-50 MS2 Validation Factors Required for Giardia Log Inactivation Credits – 4 lamps .................................................................................... 6-51 Minimum T1UV RED (mJ/cm2) Required for Crypto Log Inactivation Credits - 4 lamps .................................................................. 6-52 T1UV Validation Factors Required for Crypto Log Inactivation Credits – 4 lamps .................................................................................... 6-53 Minimum T1UV RED (mJ/cm2) Required for Giardia Log Inactivation Credits – 4 lamps.................................................................. 6-54 T1UV Validation Factors Required for Giardia Log Inactivation Credits – 4 lamps .................................................................................... 6-55 Minimum MS2 RED (mJ/cm2) Required for Crypto Log Inactivation Credits - 5 lamps ..................................................................................... 6-56 MS2 Validation Factors Required for Crypto Log Inactivation Credits – 5 lamps .................................................................................... 6-57 Minimum MS2 RED (mJ/cm2) Required for Giardia Log Inactivation Credits - 5 lamps .................................................................. 6-58 MS2 Validation Factors Required for Giardia Log Inactivation Credits – 5 lamps .................................................................................... 6-59 Minimum T1UV RED (mJ/cm2) Required for Crypto Log Inactivation Credits - 5 lamps .................................................................. 6-60 T1UV Validation Factors Required for Crypto Log Inactivation Credits – 5 lamps .................................................................................... 6-61 Minimum T1UV RED (mJ/cm2) Required for Giardia Log Inactivation Credits – 5 lamps.................................................................. 6-62 T1UV Validation Factors Required for Giardia Log Inactivation Credits – 5 lamps .................................................................................... 6-63 Minimum MS2 RED (mJ/cm2) Required for Crypto Log Inactivation Credits - 9 lamps ..................................................................................... 6-64 MS2 Validation Factors Required for Crypto Log Inactivation Credits – 9 lamps .................................................................................... 6-65

October 2013 CALGON CARBON CORPORATION

Confidential - Do not circulate vii

Table 6.27a Table 6.27b Table 6.28a Table 6.28b Table 6.29a Table 6.29b Table 6.30a

Table 6.30b Table 7.1 Table 7.2 Table 7.3 Table 7.4 Table 7.5

Minimum MS2 RED (mJ/cm2) Required for Giardia Log Inactivation Credits - 9 lamps .................................................................. 6-66 MS2 Validation Factors Required for Giardia Log Inactivation Credits – 9 lamps .................................................................................... 6-67 Minimum T1UV RED (mJ/cm2) Required for Crypto Log Inactivation Credits - 9 lamps .................................................................. 6-68 T1UV Validation Factors Required for Crypto Log Inactivation Credits – 9 lamps .................................................................................... 6-69 Minimum T1UV RED (mJ/cm2) Required for Giardia Log Inactivation Credits – 9 lamps.................................................................. 6-70 T1UV Validation Factors Required for Giardia Log Inactivation Credits – 9 lamps .................................................................................... 6-71 Minimum RED (mJ/cm2) Required for Cryptosporidium and Giardia (D L method) and Adenovirus (MS2 RED) Log Inactivation Credits..................................................................................................... 6-72 Validation Factors Required for Cryptosporidium and Giardia (D L method) and Adenovirus (MS2 RED) Log Inactivation Credits................. 6-73 Compliance to UVDGM Checklist 5.1: UV Reactor Documentation ........... 7-3 Compliance to UVDGM Checklist 5.2: Validation Test Plan ....................... 7-4 Compliance to UVDGM Checklist 5.3: Validation Report ........................... 7-5 Compliance to UVDGM Checklist 5.4: QA/QC ........................................... 7-6 Compliance to UVDGM Checklist 5.5: Validation Report Review .............. 7-8

October 2013 CALGON CARBON CORPORATION

Confidential - Do not circulate viii

LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1.1 Figure 1.2a Figure 1.2b Figure 1.3a Figure 1.3b Figure 1.3c Figure 1.3d Figure 1.3e Figure 1.3f Figure 1.4a Figure 1.4b Figure 1.4c Figure 1.4d Figure 1.4e Figure 1.4f Figure 1.5a Figure 1.5b Figure 1.5c Figure 1.5d Figure 1.5e Figure 1.5f Figure 1.6a Figure 1.6b Figure 1.6c Figure 1.6d Figure 1.6e Figure 1.6f Figure 1.7a

Isometric View of the Calgon Carbon Corporation 24-inch Sentinel UV Reactor. Source: (CCC)....................................................................... 1-1 Vertical Cross-Sectional View of the Calgon Carbon Corporation 24-inch Sentinel Reactor with 9 lamp configuration. Source: (CCC) .......... 1-2 Vertical Cross-Sectional View of the Calgon Carbon Corporation 24-inch Sentinel Reactor with 5 lamp configuration. Source: (CCC) .......... 1-2 Validated Range of UVT and Flow – 1 Lamp .......................................... 1-11 Validated Range of UVT and Flow – 2 Lamps ........................................ 1-11 Validated Range of UVT and Flow – 3 Lamps ........................................ 1-12 Validated Range of UVT and Flow – 4 Lamps ........................................ 1-12 Validated Range of UVT and Flow – 5 Lamps ........................................ 1-13 Validated Range of UVT and Flow – 9 Lamps ........................................ 1-13 Validated Range of Predicted and Measured Log Inactivation and Flow – 1 Lamp ........................................................................................ 1-14 Validated Range of Predicted and Measured Log Inactivation and Flow – 2 Lamps ...................................................................................... 1-14 Validated Range of Predicted and Measured Log Inactivation and Flow – 3 Lamps ...................................................................................... 1-15 Validated Range of Predicted and Measured Log Inactivation and Flow – 4 Lamps ...................................................................................... 1-15 Validated Range of Predicted and Measured Log Inactivation and Flow – 5 Lamps ...................................................................................... 1-16 Validated Range of Predicted and Measured Log Inactivation and Flow – 9 Lamps ...................................................................................... 1-16 Validated Range of Predicted and Measured Log Inactivation and UVT- 1 Lamp .......................................................................................... 1-17 Validated Range of Predicted and Measured Log Inactivation and UVT- 2 Lamps ........................................................................................ 1-17 Validated Range of Predicted and Measured Log Inactivation and UVT- 3 Lamps ........................................................................................ 1-18 Validated Range of Predicted and Measured Log Inactivation and UVT- 4 Lamps ........................................................................................ 1-18 Validated Range of Predicted and Measured Log Inactivation and UVT- 5 Lamps ........................................................................................ 1-19 Validated Range of Predicted and Measured Log Inactivation and UVT- 9 Lamps ........................................................................................ 1-19 MS2 RED as a function of flow and UVT for 1 lamp in operation and a combined lamp aging and fouling factor of 0.87 ............................ 1-27 MS2 RED as a function of flow and UVT for 2 lamps in operation and a combined lamp aging and fouling factor of 0.87 ............................ 1-28 MS2 RED as a function of flow and UVT for 3 lamps in operation and a combined lamp aging and fouling factor of 0.87 ............................ 1-28 MS2 RED as a function of flow and UVT for 4 lamps in operation and a combined lamp aging and fouling factor of 0.87 ............................ 1-29 MS2 RED as a function of flow and UVT for 5 lamps in operation and a combined lamp aging and fouling factor of 0.87 ............................ 1-29 MS2 RED as a function of flow and UVT for 9 lamps in operation and a combined lamp aging and fouling factor of 0.87 ............................ 1-30 T1UV RED as a function of flow and UVT for 1 Lamp in operation and a combined lamp aging and fouling factor of 0.87 ............................ 1-31

October 2013 CALGON CARBON CORPORATION

Confidential - Do not circulate ix

Figure 1.7b Figure 1.7c Figure 1.7d Figure 1.7e Figure 1.7f Figure 1.8a

Figure 1.8b

Figure 1.8c

Figure 1.8d

Figure 1.8e

Figure 1.8f

Figure 2.1 Figure 2.2 Figure 2.3a Figure 2.3b Figure 2.4 Figure 2.5a Figure 2.5b Figure 2.6 Figure 2.7 Figure 2.8

Figure 2.9 Figure 2.10

T1UV RED as a function of flow and UVT for 2 Lamps in operation and a combined lamp aging and fouling factor of 0.87 ............................ 1-31 T1UV RED as a function of flow and UVT for 3 Lamps in operation and a combined lamp aging and fouling factor of 0.87 ............................ 1-32 T1UV RED as a function of flow and UVT for 4 Lamps in operation and a combined lamp aging and fouling factor of 0.87 ............................ 1-32 T1UV RED as a function of flow and UVT for 5 Lamps in operation and a combined lamp aging and fouling factor of 0.87 ............................ 1-33 T1UV RED as a function of flow and UVT for 9 Lamps in operation and a combined lamp aging and fouling factor of 0.87 ............................ 1-33 Cryptosporidium log reduction as a function of flow and UVT for 1 lamp in operation and a combined lamp aging and fouling factor of 0.87 ......................................................................................................... 1-34 Cryptosporidium log reduction as a function of flow and UVT for 2 lamps in operation and a combined lamp aging and fouling factor of 0.87 ..................................................................................................... 1-35 Cryptosporidium log reduction as a function of flow and UVT for 3 lamps in operation and a combined lamp aging and fouling factor of 0.87 ..................................................................................................... 1-35 Cryptosporidium log reduction as a function of flow and UVT for 4 lamps in operation and a combined lamp aging and fouling factor of 0.87 ..................................................................................................... 1-36 Cryptosporidium log reduction as a function of flow and UVT for 5 lamps in operation and a combined lamp aging and fouling factor of 0.87 ..................................................................................................... 1-36 Cryptosporidium log reduction as a function of flow and UVT for 9 lamps in operation and a combined lamp aging and fouling factor of 0.87 ..................................................................................................... 1-37 Isometric View of the Calgon Carbon Corporation 24-inch Sentinel Reactor Source: (CCC) ............................................................................. 2-1 End View of the Calgon Carbon Corporation 24-inch Sentinel Reactor Source: (CCC) ............................................................................. 2-2 Vertical Cross-Sectional View of the Calgon Carbon Corporation 24-inch Sentinel Reactor with 9 lamp configuration. Source: (CCC) .......... 2-2 Vertical Cross-Sectional View of the Calgon Carbon Corporation 24-inch Sentinel Reactor with 5 lamp configuration. Source: (CCC) .......... 2-3 Lamp Placement within the Quartz Sleeve ................................................ 2-8 View of the Calgon Carbon Corporation 24-inch Sentinel Reactor Cleaning Brushes with 9 lamp configuration (Source: CCC) ...................... 2-8 View of the Calgon Carbon Corporation 24-inch Sentinel Reactor Cleaning Brushes with 5 lamp configuration (Source: CCC) ...................... 2-9 Horizontal Cross-Section Downward View of the Calgon Carbon Corporation 24-inch Sentinel Reactor Shell. Source: (CCC) .................... 2-10 Spectral Output of MP Lamp (Source: CCC) ........................................... 2-12 UV Transmittance of a 2.5 ± 0.5mm thick Lamp Sleeve for a 90° of Incidence Angle and Air-Quartz Interfaces (Source: Measured by Carollo) ................................................................................................... 2-13 Typical Spectral Response of the Sentinel’s Duty and Reference UV Sensors (Source: CCC) .................................................................... 2-14 Typical Angular Response of the Sentinel’s Duty and Reference UV Sensor (Source: CCC) ....................................................................... 2-15

October 2013 CALGON CARBON CORPORATION

Confidential - Do not circulate x

Figure 2.11

Dimensions (mm) of the Sentinel’s Duty UV Sensor (Source: DVGW 294) ............................................................................................. 2-15 Figure 2.12 Spectral Response of SUV 20 AN01 measured October 20, 2009 .......... 2-18 Figure 2.13 Angular Response of SUV 20 AN01 measured October 22, 2009 ........... 2-18 Figure 2.14 UV reactor used by IL Metronic Sensortechnik GmbH to calibrate duty and reference UV sensors .............................................................. 2-19 Figure 2.15 Nominal spectral output of the UVH 3519/28-2 MP UV lamp ................... 2-20 Figure 2.16 Nominal UV transmittance of the ilmasil PN quartz material .................... 2-20 Figure 3.1 Test Train Layout ...................................................................................... 3-3 Figure 5.1a Spectral Absorbance Coefficient of Source Water ..................................... 5-2 Figure 5.1b Spectral Absorbance Coefficient of Source Water with LSA for UVTs ranging from approximately 55% to 82%. ........................................ 5-2 Figure 5.1c Spectral Absorbance Coefficient of Source Water with LSA for UVTs ranging from approximately 88% to 97%. ........................................ 5-3 Figure 5.2 Standard Deviation of UVT Replicates as a Function of Testaveraged UVT ........................................................................................... 5-7 Figure 5.3 Headloss Testing for the 24-inch Sentinel UV reactor................................ 5-8 Figure 5.4a Measured Total Power as a Function of the Total Lamp Power ................. 5-9 Figure 5.4b Total Power Consumption as a Function of the Lamp Power................... 5-10 Figure 5.5a Relationship Between References and Duty UV Sensors Observed During Reactor Validation ....................................................... 5-14 Figure 5.5b Relative Difference Between Reference and Duty UV Sensor Measurements During Reactor Validation ............................................... 5-15 Figure 5.6a Top and Bottom UV Sensor Reading versus Ballast Power Setting at 54.9 0.07 % UVT ............................................................................. 5-16 Figure 5.6b Top and Bottom UV Sensor Reading versus Ballast Power Setting at 64.9 0.08 % UVT .............................................................................. 5-16 Figure 5.6c Top and Bottom UV Sensor Reading versus Ballast Power Setting at 75.0 0.07 % UVT .............................................................................. 5-17 Figure 5.6d Top and Bottom UV Sensor Reading versus Ballast Power Setting at 81.9 0.09 % UVT ............................................................................. 5-17 Figure 5.6e Top and Bottom UV Sensor Reading versus Ballast Power Setting at 88.4 0.18 % UVT .............................................................................. 5-18 Figure 5.6f Top and Bottom UV Sensor Reading versus Ballast Power Setting at 93.2 0.07 % UVT .............................................................................. 5-18 Figure 5.6g Top and Bottom UV Sensor Reading versus Ballast Power Setting at 97.8 0.05 % UVT .............................................................................. 5-19 Figure 5.7a Coefficient A versus UVT for the Top and Bottom UV Sensors................ 5-20 Figure 5.7b Coefficient B versus UVT for the Top and Bottom UV Sensors................ 5-20 Figure 5.8a Measured versus Predicted UV Intensities for UV Sensors 1-1, 21, 2-2 and 3-1 Using Fit Coefficients in Table 5.6 .................................. 5-23 Figure 5.8b Measured versus Predicted UV Intensities for UV Sensors 3-2, 41, 4-2, and 5-1 Using Fit Coefficients in Table 5.6 .............................. 5-24 Figure 5.9c Measured versus Predicted UV Intensities for UV Sensor 5-2 Using Fit Coefficients in Table 5.6 .......................................................... 5-25 Figure 5.9a Measured versus Predicted UV Intensities for the Top UV sensors ......... 5-26 Figure 5.9b Measured versus Predicted UV Intensities for the Bottom UV sensors ................................................................................................... 5-27 Figure 5.10a Prediction Residuals Versus Predicted UV Sensor Readings for the Top UV sensors ................................................................................ 5-27

October 2013 CALGON CARBON CORPORATION

Confidential - Do not circulate xi

Figure 5.10b Prediction Residuals Versus Predicted UV Sensor Readings for the Bottom UV sensors............................................................................ 5-28 Figure 5.11a Ratio of UV Sensor Readings with 5 Lamps to Those with 9 Lamps ..................................................................................................... 5-29 Figure 5.11b Ratio of UV Sensor Readings with 4 Lamps to Those with 5 Lamps ..................................................................................................... 5-29 Figure 5.11c Ratio of UV Sensor Readings with 3 Lamps to Those with 5 Lamps ..................................................................................................... 5-30 Figure 5.11d Ratio of UV Sensor Readings with 2 Lamps to Those with 4 Lamps ..................................................................................................... 5-30 Figure 5.11e Ratio of UV Sensor Readings with 1 Lamps to Those with 3 Lamps ..................................................................................................... 5-31 Figure 5.12a Halo Affect Ratios for 4 lamps relative to 9 lamps.................................... 5-33 Figure 5.12b Halo Affect Ratios for 3 lamps relative to 9 lamps.................................... 5-33 Figure 5.12c Halo Affect Ratios for 2 lamps relative to 9 lamps.................................... 5-34 Figure 5.12d Halo Affect Ratios for 1 lamp relative to 9 lamps ..................................... 5-34 Figure 5.13 Relative Lamp Output as a Function of Ballast Power Setting as Indicated by Top and Bottom UV sensors Predicted by Equation 5.9 ........................................................................................................... 5-36 Figure 5.14a CAF index during biodosimetric testing for UV sensors 1-1, 2-1, and 2-2 .................................................................................................... 5-37 Figure 5.14b CAF index during biodosimetric testing for UV sensors 3-1 and 32 .............................................................................................................. 5-38 Figure 5.14c CAF index during biodosimetric testing for UV sensors 4-1, 4-2, 5-1, and 5-2 ............................................................................................. 5-38 Figure 5.15a CAF index verses measured UV sensor intensity for UV sensors 1-1, 2-1, and 2-2 ...................................................................................... 5-39 Figure 5.15b CAF index verses measured UV sensor intensity for UV sensors 3-1 and 3-2 .............................................................................................. 5-39 Figure 5.15c CAF index verses measured UV sensor intensity for UV sensors 4-1, 4-2, 5-1, and 5-2 ............................................................................... 5-40 Figure 5.16a UV Dose-Response of MS2 Phage Measured on 20 June 2012 ............. 5-46 Figure 5.16b UV Dose-Response of MS2 Phage Measured on 18 September 2012 ........................................................................................................ 5-46 Figure 5.16c UV Dose-Response of MS2 Phage Measured on 1 October 2012 .......... 5-47 Figure 5.16d UV Dose-Response of MS2 Phage Measured on 2 October 2012 .......... 5-47 Figure 5.16e UV Dose-Response of MS2 Phage Measured on 5 October 2012 .......... 5-48 Figure 5.16f UV Dose-Response of MS2 Phage Measured on 9 October 2012 .......... 5-48 Figure 5.16g UV Dose-Response of MS2 Phage Measured on 10 October 2012......... 5-49 Figure 5.16h UV Dose-Response of MS2 Phage Measured on 1 November 2012 ........................................................................................................ 5-49 Figure 5.17a UV Dose-Response of T1UV Phage Measured on 20 June 2012 ............ 5-50 Figure 5.17b UV Dose-Response of T1UV Phage Measured on 21 June 2012 ............ 5-50 Figure 5.17c UV Dose-Response of T1UV Phage Measured on 12 September 2012 ........................................................................................................ 5-51 Figure 5.17d UV Dose-Response of T1UV Phage Measured on 13 September 2012 ........................................................................................................ 5-51 Figure 5.17e UV Dose-Response of T1UV Phage Measured on 17 September 2012 ........................................................................................................ 5-52 Figure 5.17f UV Dose-Response of T1UV Phage Measured on 18 September 2012 ........................................................................................................ 5-52 Figure 5.17g UV Dose-Response of T1UV Phage Measured on 5 October 2012 ......... 5-53 October 2013 CALGON CARBON CORPORATION

Confidential - Do not circulate xii

Figure 5.17h UV Dose-Response of T1UV Phage Measured on 9 October 2012 ......... 5-53 Figure 5.17i UV Dose-Response of T1UV Phage Measured on 10 October 2012 ........................................................................................................ 5-54 Figure 5.17j UV Dose-Response of T1UV Phage Measured on 1 November 2012 ........................................................................................................ 5-54 Figure 5.18a UV Dose-Response of T7 Phage Measured on 19 September 2012 ........................................................................................................ 5-55 Figure 5.18b UV Dose-Response of T7 Phage Measured on 20 September 2012 ........................................................................................................ 5-55 Figure 5.18c UV Dose-Response of T7 Phage Measured on 11 October 2012............ 5-56 Figure 5.19a Measured versus Predicted Log Removal using Equation 5.15 – 1 Lamp ....................................................................................................... 5-63 Figure 5.19b Measured versus Predicted Log Removal using Equation 5.15 – 2 Lamps ..................................................................................................... 5-64 Figure 5.19c Measured versus Predicted Log Removal using Equation 5.15 – 3 Lamps ..................................................................................................... 5-64 Figure 5.19d Measured versus Predicted Log Removal using Equation 5.15 – 4 Lamps ..................................................................................................... 5-65 Figure 5.19e Measured versus Predicted Log Removal using Equation 5.15 – 5 Lamps ..................................................................................................... 5-65 Figure 5.19f Measured versus Predicted Log Removal using Equation 5.15 – 9 Lamps ..................................................................................................... 5-66 Figure 5.20a Prediction Residuals versus Predicted Log Removal Using Equation 5.15 – 1 Lamp .......................................................................... 5-66 Figure 5.20b Prediction Residuals versus Predicted Log Removal Using Equation 5.15 – 2 Lamps......................................................................... 5-67 Figure 5.20c Prediction Residuals versus Predicted Log Removal Using Equation 5.15 – 3 Lamps......................................................................... 5-67 Figure 5.20d Prediction Residuals versus Predicted Log Removal Using Equation 5.15 – 4 Lamps ......................................................................... 5-68 Figure 5.20e Prediction Residuals versus Predicted Log Removal Using Equation 5.15 – 5 Lamps ......................................................................... 5-68 Figure 5.20f Prediction Residuals versus Predicted Log Removal Using Equation 5.15 – 9 Lamps......................................................................... 5-69 Figure 5.21a Measured Versus Predicted RED Obtained Using Equation 5.25 – 1 Lamp (above full RED range, below maximum REDs of 40 mJ/cm2) ................................................................................................... 5-70 Figure 5.21b Measured Versus Predicted RED Obtained Using Equation 5.25 – 2 Lamps (above full RED range, below maximum REDs up to 40 mJ/cm2) ................................................................................................... 5-71 Figure 5.21c Measured Versus Predicted RED Obtained Using Equation 5.25 – 3 Lamps (above full RED range, below maximum REDs up to 40 mJ/cm2) ................................................................................................... 5-72 Figure 5.21d Measured Versus Predicted RED Obtained Using Equation 5.25 – 4 Lamps (above full RED range, below maximum REDs up to 40 mJ/cm2) ................................................................................................... 5-73 Figure 5.21e Measured Versus Predicted RED Obtained Using Equation 5.25 – 5 Lamps (above full RED range, below maximum REDs up to 40 mJ/cm2) ................................................................................................... 5-74 Figure 5.21f Measured Versus Predicted RED Obtained Using Equation 5.25 – 9 Lamps (above full RED range, below maximum REDs up to 40 mJ/cm2) ................................................................................................... 5-75 October 2013 CALGON CARBON CORPORATION

Confidential - Do not circulate xiii

Figure 5.22a Figure 5.22b Figure 5.22c Figure 5.22d Figure 5.22e Figure 5.22f Figure 5.23a Figure 5.23b Figure 5.23c Figure 5.23d Figure 5.23e Figure 5.23f Figure 5.24a Figure 5.24b Figure 5.24c Figure 5.24d Figure 5.24e Figure 5.24f Figure 5.25a Figure 5.25b Figure 5.25c Figure 5.25d Figure 5.25e Figure 5.25f Figure 5.26 Figure 5.27

Figure 5.28a

Figure 5.28b

Figure 5.29a Figure 5.29b Figure 5.29c Figure 5.29d Figure 5.29e Figure 5.29f Figure 5.30a Figure 5.30b

Validated Range of UVT and Flow – 1 Lamp .......................................... 5-76 Validated Range of UVT and Flow – 2 Lamps ........................................ 5-77 Validated Range of UVT and Flow – 3 Lamps ........................................ 5-77 Validated Range of UVT and Flow – 4 Lamps ........................................ 5-78 Validated Range of UVT and Flow – 5 Lamps ........................................ 5-78 Validated Range of UVT and Flow – 9 Lamps ........................................ 5-79 Validated Range of Log Removal and Flow – 1 Lamp ............................. 5-79 Validated Range of Log Removal and Flow – 2 Lamps ........................... 5-80 Validated Range of Log Removal and Flow – 3 Lamps ........................... 5-80 Validated Range of Log Removal and Flow – 4 Lamps ........................... 5-81 Validated Range of Log Removal and Flow – 5 Lamps ........................... 5-81 Validated Range of Log Removal and Flow – 9 Lamps ........................... 5-82 Validated Range of Log Removal and UVT - 1 Lamp .............................. 5-82 Validated Range of Log Removal and UVT - 2 Lamps............................. 5-83 Validated Range of Log Removal and UVT - 3 Lamps............................. 5-83 Validated Range of Log Removal and UVT - 4 Lamps............................. 5-84 Validated Range of Log Removal and UVT - 5 Lamps............................. 5-84 Validated Range of Log Removal and UVT - 9 Lamps............................. 5-85 Measured Log inactivation as a function of S/S 0 /Q/D L – 1 lamp .............. 5-88 Measured Log inactivation as a function of S/S 0 /Q/D L – 2 lamps ............ 5-88 Measured Log inactivation as a function of S/S 0 /Q/D L – 3 lamps ............ 5-89 Measured Log inactivation as a function of S/S 0 /Q/D L – 4 lamps ............ 5-89 Measured Log inactivation as a function of S/S 0 /Q/D L – 5 lamps ............ 5-90 Measured Log inactivation as a function of S/S 0 /Q/D L – 9 lamps ............ 5-90 D L as a function of UV dose for Cryptosporidium, Giardia, and adenovirus............................................................................................... 5-93 Comparison of the UV sensitivity of MS2, T1UV and T7 phage to that of Cryptosporidium and Giardia as defined using LT2ESWTR UV dose requirements. ......................................................................... 5-94 Log Inactivation and RED of MS2, T1UV and T7 phage and Cryptosporidium, Giardia, and adenovirus as a function of UV sensitivity (linear scale). .......................................................................... 5-96 Log Inactivation and RED of MS2, T1UV and T7 phage and Cryptosporidium, Giardia, and adenovirus as a function of UV sensitivity (log scale). .............................................................................. 5-96 MS2 RED as a function of flow and UVT for 1 lamp in operation and a combined lamp aging and fouling factor of 0.87 ............................. 5-97 MS2 RED as a function of flow and UVT for 2 lamps in operation and a combined lamp aging and fouling factor of 0.87 ............................. 5-98 MS2 RED as a function of flow and UVT for 3 lamps in operation and a combined lamp aging and fouling factor of 0. 87 ............................ 5-98 MS2 RED as a function of flow and UVT for 4 lamps in operation and a combined lamp aging and fouling factor of 0. 87 ............................ 5-99 MS2 RED as a function of flow and UVT for 5 lamps in operation and a combined lamp aging and fouling factor of 0. 87 ............................ 5-99 MS2 RED as a function of flow and UVT for 9 lamps in operation and a combined lamp aging and fouling factor of 0. 87 .......................... 5-100 T1UV RED as a function of flow and UVT for 1 Lamp in operation and a combined lamp aging and fouling factor of 0.87 ........................... 5-100 T1UV RED as a function of flow and UVT for 2 Lamps in operation and a combined lamp aging and fouling factor of 0.87 ........................... 5-101

October 2013 CALGON CARBON CORPORATION

Confidential - Do not circulate xiv

Figure 5.30c T1UV RED as a function of flow and UVT for 3 Lamps in operation and a combined lamp aging and fouling factor of 0. 87 .......................... 5-101 Figure 5.30d T1UV RED as a function of flow and UVT for 4 Lamps in operation and a combined lamp aging and fouling factor of 0. 87 .......................... 5-102 Figure 5.30e T1UV RED as a function of flow and UVT for 5 Lamps in operation and a combined lamp aging and fouling factor of 0. 87 .......................... 5-102 Figure 5.30f T1UV RED as a function of flow and UVT for 9 Lamps in operation and a combined lamp aging and fouling factor of 0. 87 .......................... 5-103 Figure 5.31a Cryptosporidium log reduction as a function of flow and UVT for 1 lamp in operation and a combined lamp aging and fouling factor of 0.87 ....................................................................................................... 5-104 Figure 5.31b Cryptosporidium log reduction as a function of flow and UVT for 2 lamps in operation and a combined lamp aging and fouling factor of 0.87 ................................................................................................... 5-104 Figure 5.31c Cryptosporidium log reduction as a function of flow and UVT for 3 lamps in operation and a combined lamp aging and fouling factor of 0.87 ................................................................................................... 5-105 Figure 5.31d Cryptosporidium log reduction as a function of flow and UVT for 4 lamps in operation and a combined lamp aging and fouling factor of 0.87 ................................................................................................... 5-105 Figure 5.31e Cryptosporidium log reduction as a function of flow and UVT for 5 lamps in operation and a combined lamp aging and fouling factor of 0.87 ................................................................................................... 5-106 Figure 5.31f Cryptosporidium log reduction as a function of flow and UVT for 9 lamps in operation and a combined lamp aging and fouling factor of 0.87 ................................................................................................... 5-106 Figure 6.1a UV Sensitivity of MS2 Phage as a Function of RED .................................. 6-4 Figure 6.1b UV Sensitivity of T1UV Phage as a Function of RED................................. 6-4 Figure 6.1c UV Sensitivity of T7 Phage as a Function of RED ..................................... 6-5 Figure 6.2 Action Spectra of MS2 Phage and Cryptosporidium (USEPA 2003 UVDGM).................................................................................................... 6-7 Figure 6.3 Relationship Between MS2 RED and Measured UV Intensity Divided by Flowrate for Three Sensor Positions with a Hypothetical UV Reactor (Wright et al, 2002) ........................................... 6-9 Figure 6.4a Log inactivation as a function of S/Q/D L and UVT- 1 Lamp ..................... 6-10 Figure 6.4b Log inactivation as a function of S/Q/D L and UVT- 2 Lamps.................... 6-10 Figure 6.4c Log inactivation as a function of S/Q/D L and UVT- 3 Lamps.................... 6-11 Figure 6.4d Log inactivation as a function of S/Q/D L and UVT- 4 Lamps.................... 6-11 Figure 6.4e Log inactivation as a function of S/Q/D L and UVT- 5 Lamps.................... 6-12 Figure 6.4f Log inactivation as a function of S/Q/D L and UVT- 9 Lamps.................... 6-12 Figure 6.5a Uncertainty of the UV Dose-Response, U DR , of MS2 Phage as a Function of UV Dose .............................................................................. 6-16 Figure 6.5b Uncertainty of the UV Dose-Response, U DR , of T1UV Phage as a Function of UV Dose ............................................................................... 6-16 Figure 6.5c Uncertainty of the UV Dose-Response, U DR , of T7 Phage as a Function of UV Dose ............................................................................... 6-17

October 2013 CALGON CARBON CORPORATION

Confidential - Do not circulate xv

00002775 Cranbrook WTP, BC - Tools and Spare Parts 24" - 5x10kW Sentinel System Part No. R153780 R153781 R153782 R153783 R350407 S301640 R350222 R350331 1007278 1007447 S300994 S300980 S301016 S300807 S301048 R350307 R450385 R450635 350706

Description Transformer, ballast 10kW 480/600V Transformer, sat core used with 153780 Transformer, ballast 20kW 60HZ Transformer, sat core used with 153782 Seal o-ring quartz sleeve EPDM-NSF UV Sensor, 0-1000 W/m2 (size to be confirmed) Fan assembly for power cabinet Seal o-ring EPDM-NSF, motor mount seal Sanitary clamp Gasket, sanitary 2" Lamp assembly 10kW Quartz sleeve dome end, 33-3/8" long Lamp holder retaining assembly Wiper drive nut Wiper element assembly Reference Sensor Mercury Spill Kit RealTech Online UVT Analyzer Torque Screwdriver

Qty. 1 1 9

1 10 9 9

TOTAL COST

Sell CDN

Spare

Life

$4,319.04 Info. 10-15 years $2,626.80 Info. 10-15 years $7,784.04 Info. 10-15 years $4,563.24 Info. 10-15 years $5.28 Critical 1 year $1,705.44 Info. 5 years $508.20 Critical 1 year $2.64 Critical 1 year $31.68 Info. 5 years $3.96 Recommend. 1 year $759.00 Critical 5000 hours $681.12 Critical 5 years $40.92 Critical 5 years $168.96 Info. 5 years $501.60 Consume 5 years 2,712.60 Recommend. 5 years $229.68 Info. $10,045.20 Info. $921.77 Info. $25,153.92

CONDUIT #3

NOTES:

CONDUIT #2

CONDUIT #5 CONDUIT #1 CONDUIT #3

ALL EXTERNAL WIRING PROVIDED AND INSTALLED BY OTHERS. ALL CONDUCTORS ARE COPPER, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

ALL WIRING INSTALLED ACCORDING TO CANADIAN, LOCAL CODES, AND ANY AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION.

CONDUIT RUNS REQUIRE 10% SPARE WIRES.

FOR MINIMUM CLEARANCE ABOUT POWER SUPPLY CABINETS, SEE CANADIAN ELECTRICAL CODE PART 1, ARTICLE 2-308, 2-310, & 2-312.

CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL "EYS" TYPE SEALING FITTINGS AND POTTING IN CONDUITS #2 AND #4 AFTER INSTALLATION IS COMPLETE.

WIRE SIZES INDICATED ARE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS ONLY. NO CONSIDERATION IS GIVEN TO DERATING AS IT PERTAINS TO CONDUIT FILL, AMBIENT TEMPERATURE, NUMBER OF BENDS, OR LENGTH OF RUN. CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THESE FACTORS AS PER FIELD CONDITIONS AND MAKE NECESSARY ADJUSTMENTS.

MAXIMUM SEPARATION DISTANCE BETWEEN CONTROL PANEL/POWER SUPPLY AND REACTOR ASSEMBLY IS 500 FEET.

FOR CONNECTIONS TO CUSTOMER EQUIPMENT, PREFIX WIRE NUMBER WITH UV1 FOR SYSTEM 1100.

TERMINATION OF THE LAMP WIRES (GTO CABLE), AT THE REACTOR, SHALL BE NON-INSULATED RING TERMINALS, SUPPLIED BY OTHERS.

CONDUIT #4

CONDUIT #3A CONDUIT #3B SENSOR/PROX. SW BOX #1 & #2

CONDUIT #2 SEE NOTE 5

10. ONE (1) DISINFECTION SYSTEM IS SHOWN; ALL OTHERS ARE TYPICAL. REACTORS AND POWER/CONTROL PANELS ARE FACTORY TESTED & CALIBRATED AS MATCHED PAIRS, (REFERENCE NAMEPLATES). THIS RELATIONSHIP MUST BE PRESERVED DURING INSTALLATION & WIRING.

CONTROL PANEL (UV PLC PANEL) UV POWER SUPPLY #1

HIGH VOLTAGE LAMP ENCLOSURE

D C

UV POWER SUPPLY #2 CONDUIT #4 SEE NOTE 5

CONDUIT #4

ISSUED FOR PROPOSAL

REV

DESCRIPTION

DLY

10/10/13

CHG

APP

DATE

REVISIONS TOLERANCES (unless otherwise specified) ANGULAR FRACTIONAL DECIMAL (1 PLACE)

SENTINEL REACTOR ASSEMBLY

CONTROL PANEL AND POWER SUPPLY

DECIMAL (2 PLACES) DECIMAL (3 PLACES) DECIMAL (4 PLACES)

1/16" .15

THIS DRAWING AND DESIGN IS THE PROPERTY OF CALGON CARBON CORPORATION AND IS NOT TO BE REPRODUCED IN WHOLE OR IN PART NOR EMPLOYED FOR ANY PURPOSE OTHER THAN SPECIFICALLY

CLIENT

CSTMR NAME CSTMR LOCATION

PERMITTED IN WRITING BY CALGON CARBON CORPORATION. THIS DRAWING LOANED SUBJECT TO RETURN ON DEMAND.

NAME

DATE

DRAFTER

DLY

10/10/13

DESIGNER

JLB

10/10/13

CHECKER APPROVAL PROJECT No.

PROPOSAL

TITLE

ELECTRICAL EXTERNAL WIRING DIAGRAM DWG. Size DWG. No.

SHEET No.

1 OF 2

S102974

SCALE

NONE REV.

CONDUIT

FROM / TO

WIRE FUNCTION

CONDUIT #1

MAIN AC SUPPLY FROM CUSTOMER UPS 480V, 3P, 60Hz, 117 FULL LOAD AMPS PHASE A 86.3 AMPS TO MAIN DISCONNECT SWITCH PHASE B 117.2 AMPS LOCATED IN CONTROL PANEL PHASE C 104.2 AMPS

CONDUIT #2

FROM UV PLC PANEL TO REACTOR LAMP ENCLOSURE

CONDUIT #3A

ALL EXTERNAL WIRING PROVIDED AND INSTALLED BY OTHERS. ALL CONDUCTORS ARE COPPER, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

8-1/C #14AWG & GND

ALL WIRING INSTALLED ACCORDING TO CANADIAN, LOCAL CODES, AND ANY AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION.

CONDUIT RUNS REQUIRE 10% SPARE WIRES.

FOR MINIMUM CLEARANCE ABOUT POWER SUPPLY CABINETS, SEE CANADIAN ELECTRICAL CODE PART 1, ARTICLE 2-308, 2-310, & 2-312.

CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL "EYS" TYPE SEALING FITTINGS AND POTTING IN CONDUITS #2 AND #4 AFTER INSTALLATION IS COMPLETE.

MAXIMUM SEPARATION DISTANCE BETWEEN CONTROL PANEL/POWER SUPPLY AND REACTOR ASSEMBLY IS 500 FEET.

FOR CONNECTIONS TO CUSTOMER EQUIPMENT, PREFIX WIRE NUMBER WITH UV1 FOR SYSTEM 1100.

TERMINATION OF THE LAMP WIRES (GTO CABLE), AT THE REACTOR, SHALL BE NON-INSULATED RING TERMINALS, SUPPLIED BY OTHERS.

ZSR-1100

242-1

24V DC, 24V DC COMMON

FU132, 24COM, GND

WIPER DRIVE MOTOR #1

WD1-A1, WD1-A2

1EA 1-PR #14AWG SHLD BELDEN #9314 (OR EQUAL)

UVT1111+ UVT1121+ UVT1122+ UVT1131+ UVT1132+

1 EA 9-TW/PR #18AWG SHLD BELDEN #9559 (OR EQUAL) (FOLD BACK UNUSED CONDUCTORS)

FROM UV PLC PANEL UV SENSORS TO REACTOR SENSOR/PROX. SW BOX 2 UVT-1141 UVT-1142 UVT-1151 UVT-1152

FROM UV PLC PANEL TO CUSTOMER SCADA SYSTEM

PROXIMITY SWITCH (RETRACT)

ZSE-1100 LSL-1100

240-1 217-1 FU132, 24COM, GND

2-1/C #14AWG & GND

UVT1141+ UVT1142+ UVT1151+ UVT1152+

1 EA 4-TW/PR #18AWG SHLD BELDEN #9554 (OR EQUAL)

LP1B, LP2B, LP3B, LP4B, LP5B, GND

10-1/C #14AWG 15KV CABLE TYPE GTO (OR EQUAL) NO BREAKS

LAMP WIRES LAMP LAMP LAMP LAMP LAMP

CONDUIT #5

NOTES:

213-1 AS1100+, AS1100FU138, FU138-1

FROM UV PLC PANEL UV SENSORS TO REACTOR SENSOR/PROX. SW BOX 1 UVT-1111 UVT-1121 UVT-1122 UVT-1131 UVT-1132

FROM UV POWER SUPPLY CABINET TO REACTOR LAMP ENCLOSURE

3-1/C #1/0 AWG (THWN) & 1-1/C #1/0 AWG GND (THWN)

TSH-1100 AS-1100 ZS-1100

24V DC, 24V DC COMMON

CONDUIT #4

WIRE SIZE & QTY

F1, F2, F3 GND

REACTOR HIGH TEMP SW MOISTURE DETECTOR REACTOR COVER IN PLACE

PROXIMITY SWITCH (EXTEND) LEVEL SWITCH

CONDUIT #3B

WIRE NUMBERS

BANK BANK BANK BANK BANK

#1, #2, #3, #4, #5,

LAMPS LAMPS LAMPS LAMPS LAMPS

1-1 2-1, 2-2 3-1, 3-2 4-1, 4-2 5-1, 5-2

LP1C LP2C LP3C LP4C LP5C

D C B

1-1/C #12AWG GND

ETHERNET COMMUNICATION LINK

ISSUED FOR PROPOSAL

REV

CAT 5e UTP CABLE BELDEN #1583A

DESCRIPTION

DLY

10/10/13

CHG

APP

DATE

REVISIONS TOLERANCES (unless otherwise specified) ANGULAR FRACTIONAL DECIMAL (1 PLACE)

DECIMAL (2 PLACES) DECIMAL (3 PLACES) DECIMAL (4 PLACES)

1/16" .15

THIS DRAWING AND DESIGN IS THE PROPERTY OF CALGON CARBON CORPORATION AND IS NOT TO BE REPRODUCED IN WHOLE OR IN PART NOR EMPLOYED FOR ANY PURPOSE OTHER THAN SPECIFICALLY

CLIENT

CSTMR NAME CSTMR LOCATION

PERMITTED IN WRITING BY CALGON CARBON CORPORATION. THIS DRAWING LOANED SUBJECT TO RETURN ON DEMAND.

NAME

DATE

DRAFTER

DLY

10/10/13

DESIGNER

JLB

10/10/13

CHECKER APPROVAL PROJECT No.

PROPOSAL

TITLE

ELECTRICAL EXTERNAL WIRING DIAGRAM DWG. Size DWG. No.

SHEET No.

2 OF 2

S102974

SCALE

NONE REV.

Terms and Conditions for UV Equipment / System Purchase (the “Terms and Conditions”) 1) DEFINITIONS: (a) Seller: (b) Buyer: (c) Documentation:

Calgon Carbon UV Technologies Canada Inc., a Delaware limited liability company The buyer named in the Documentation The Proposal, Confirmation or Acknowledgement, as applicable, for the sale of the System/Products to which these Terms and Conditions are attached (d) System/Products: The system and/or equipment described in the Documentation (e) Agreement: The Documentation, these Terms and Conditions and any attachments referenced in the Documentation

2) GENERAL: Seller hereby offers for sale to Buyer the Products on the express condition that Buyer agrees to accept and be bound by the terms and conditions set forth herein. To the extent of a conflict between these Terms and Conditions and the express terms set forth in the Documentation, the terms set forth in the Documentation shall control. Any provisions contained in any document issued by Buyer are expressly rejected and if the terms and conditions set forth herein differ from the terms in any document issued by Buyer, this document shall be construed as a counter offer and shall not be effective as an acceptance of Buyer’s document. In ordering and delivery of the Products, the parties may employ their standard forms; provided, however, that nothing in those forms shall be construed to modify or amend the terms of this Agreement. In the event of a conflict between this Agreement and either party's standard forms, this Agreement shall govern. 3) PRICE AND PAYMENT: The price shall be as stated in the Documentation, subject to these Terms and Conditions and other terms and conditions as may be stated in the Documentation. Unless otherwise stated in the Documentation: (a) The price is exclusive of any taxes, tariff, and duties of any kind which either party may be required to pay with respect to the sale of goods described in the Documentation, and Buyer shall be responsible for the payment of all taxes, tariffs and duties related hereto, except for income taxes imposed on Seller; (b) Sales Tax will be added to the price based upon the Product destination unless tax exemption or direct pay documentation is provided; (c) Billing terms are (i) twenty percent (20%) when Seller submits design drawings to Buyer for review and approval, (ii) seventy percent (70%) when the System is ready for shipment, and (iii) ten percent (10%) when the System is delivered and installed (if applicable); (d) Payment terms shall be net thirty (30) days, or net forty-five (45) days if paid by Electronic Funds Transfer (EFT). A late payment fee of 1.25% per month, or the highest lawful rate, whichever is less, will apply to all amounts past due, and will be prorated per day. Retainage may only be applied on the final invoice. 4) PRICING CONDITIONS: (a) Pricing Limitations: Unless otherwise indicated within the Documentation, all pricing quoted in connection with the Documentation is valid for purchase for a sixty (60) day period beginning with the date of the Documentation. (b) Pricing Escalations: Buyer acknowledges that the price for raw materials may increase unexpectedly. Therefore, unless otherwise specified in the Documentation, in the event that fabrication of the System is delayed for a period beyond three (3) months from the date of the Documentation, Buyer agrees to pay all surcharges and price increases as they are incurred by Seller. Pricing escalations for raw materials will be based upon the percent change in the Producer Price Index for such raw materials from the date of the Documentation to the date fabrication has begun. In addition all prices are subject to adjustment on account of changes in specifications, quantities, shipment arrangements and other terms or conditions which are not part of Seller's original price quotation set forth in the Documentation. 5) SALE AND DELIVERY: Sale terms and pricing, unless otherwise specified in the Documentation, are Ex Works Seller’s point of shipment (INCOTERMS 2010). Seller will have the right, at its election, to make partial shipments of the Products and to invoice each shipment separately. Seller reserves the right to stop delivery of any Product in transit and to withhold shipments in whole or in part if Buyer fails to make any payment to Seller when due or otherwise fails to perform its obligations hereunder or under any other outstanding payment obligations of Buyer to Seller, whether related to the Documentation or otherwise.

Revised July 8, 2015

6) TITLE AND RISK OF LOSS. Notwithstanding the trade terms indicated above and subject to Seller's right to stop delivery of any Product in transit pursuant to Section 5 above, title to and risk of loss of the Products will pass to Buyer upon delivery of the Products by Seller to the carrier at Seller’s point of shipment; provided, however, that title to any software incorporated within or forming a part of the System shall at all times remain with Seller or the licensor(s) thereof, as the case may be. Notwithstanding the foregoing or the provisions of the UCC or INCOTERMS, title to the goods, and all accessions to or products of the goods, shall remain with Seller until the later of (a) payment in full of the purchase price and of other amounts owing by Buyer and (b) delivery to Buyer, if Buyer is located outside the United States. 7) AVAILABILITY: Shipment dates (and delivery and installation dates if included in the System/scope of work description in the Documentation) are not guaranteed, and Seller will not be liable for any loss or damage resulting from any delay in delivery or failure to deliver which is due to any cause beyond Seller's reasonable control. In the event of a delay due to any cause beyond Seller's reasonable control, Seller reserves the right to reschedule the shipment within a reasonable period of time, and Buyer will not be entitled to refuse delivery or otherwise be relieved of any obligations as the result of such delay. If any delivery is delayed for more than thirty (30) days beyond the originally scheduled delivery date and such delay is caused by Buyer, Buyer will be subject to storage charges from the scheduled shipment date of two percent (2%) of the sale price per month; and such storage charge shall be due monthly on the first day of each month. Storage by Seller shall be at Buyer's risk and expense. 8) ON-SITE SERVICES: All orders which include on-site services (including installation supervision, startup, training, testing, etc.) as stated in the Documentation (On-Site Services), will require the completion of the Pre-Visit Checklist and Service Request Form prior to scheduling the visit. If there are delays, cancellations, or failures by Buyer to meet service personnel at designated times, then fees will be assessed to the customer accordingly on a per hour rate of $160 per hour of delay per person. For domestic travel, additional on-site services not specified in the Documentation shall be provided at a per diem rate of $1,280 per person inclusive of all travel and living expenses per eight (8) hour day (or partial day not pro-rated), or as specified in the Documentation. For international travel, an additional fee will apply. Buyer shall make the premises, where On-Site Services are to be performed (the “Premises”), available to Seller at all reasonable times as Seller may request, such that Seller shall be able to perform the On-Site Services in a timely manner. Buyer shall bear all risk and liability associated with its inability to make the Premises available to Seller to perform the On-Site Services. Prior to the commencement of On-Site Services, Buyer shall insure that the Premises are in good repair and in safe condition for the performance of Seller’s On-Site Services, and shall, prior to the commencement of work, notify Seller of any dangerous, unsafe or hazardous conditions associated with the Premises, such that Seller can take the appropriate safeguards. Prior to the commencement of any work, Buyer shall notify Seller of any special workplace requirements, safety standards, operating procedures or other conditions imposed on persons performing work at the Premises. 9) PERMITS, LICENSES AND FEES: Buyer shall be responsible, at its sole expense, for all environmental permits, applications, regulatory approvals, and other permits or licenses that may be required for installation and/or operation of the System. 10) CHANGES: Any changes requested by Buyer after signing the Documentation will be separately designed and priced by Seller. No change will be made without receipt of a written change order accepted in writing by Seller.

Page 1 of 4

11) ACCELERATION: Buyer agrees that Seller, at its discretion, may accelerate and make due and payable all remaining payments if Buyer shall fail to perform any of its obligations hereunder or under the Documentation, including without limitation Buyer’s failure to pay any amount when due, subject to any applicable cure periods provided for herein. 12) CANCELLATION; TERMINATION: (a) In the event that Buyer cancels its order under the Documentation prior to approving the design drawings submitted by Seller, Buyer shall pay to Seller as liquidated damages ten percent (10%) of the total purchase price of the Products, in addition to any progress payments invoiced. Following the acceptance of the design drawings by Buyer, Buyer shall not be permitted to cancel its order without Seller's written consent, and then only upon payment of Seller's cancellation charges which shall be equal to Seller’s direct costs of goods sold, plus direct labor costs and fixed charges relating to the design and manufacturing of the Products, plus ten percent (10%) of the total purchase price as liquidated damages. (b) Seller may cancel this Agreement if any of the following occurs: (i) Buyer becomes insolvent; (ii) Buyer ceases to conduct its operations in the normal course of business; (iii) Buyer is unable to meet its obligations as they mature, or admit in writing such inability or fails to provide adequate assurances of its ability to perform its obligations hereunder; (iv) Buyer files a voluntary petition in bankruptcy; (v) Buyer suffers the filing of an involuntary petition in bankruptcy and the same is not dismissed within thirty (30) days after filing; (vi) a receiver, custodian or trustee is appointed for Buyer or for a substantial part of its property; (vii) Buyer fails to make payment on the terms and within the time specified in this Agreement, or breaches any other obligations under this Agreement; or (viii) Buyer executes an assignment for the benefit of its creditors. In the event of such cancellation, Seller shall have all rights and remedies set forth in the UCC of any applicable jurisdiction and all other remedies available at law or in equity. The following provisions shall survive termination or expiration of this Agreement: Sections 2 (General), 12 (Cancellation; Termination), 13 (Limited Warranties), 15 (Limitation of Liability), 17 (Export Controls), 18 (Confidentiality), 19 (Security Interest), 22 (Applicable Law and Jurisdiction), 23 (Miscellaneous) and 24 (Entire Agreement). 13) LIMITED WARRANTIES: Unless otherwise specifically provided for in the Documentation, Seller warrants that the (i) System shall be free from defects in material and workmanship, and shall be manufactured in accordance with the specifications agreed to in writing by the parties in the Documentation or any subsequent written change order, for a period of twelve (12) months from startup or eighteen (18) months from the date of shipment, whichever is earlier, and (ii) any On-Site Services provided for hereunder shall be performed in a workman-like manner, and in accordance with industry standards. Corrosion or other chemical action is specifically excluded as a defect covered hereunder. Seller agrees during the respective warranty periods specified above, (i) to repair or replace, at Seller's option, defective Products so as to cause the same to comply materially with the agreed to specifications, and (ii) to provide corrective On-Site Services so as to cause such On-Site Services to be performed in accordance with the terms hereof; provided that Buyer shall (a) promptly notify Seller in writing upon the discovery of any defect, which notice shall include the product model and serial number (if applicable) and details of the warranty claim; and (b) after Seller’s review, Seller will provide Buyer with service data and/or a Return Material Authorization (“RMA”), which may include biohazard decontamination procedures and other product-specific handling instructions. Then, if applicable, Buyer may return the defective Products to Seller with all costs prepaid by Buyer. Replacement parts may be new or refurbished, at the election of Seller. All replaced parts shall become the property of Seller. Shipment to Buyer of repaired or replacement Products shall be made in accordance with the delivery provisions of these Terms and Conditions, freight charged to Seller. In no event shall Seller have any obligation to make repairs, replacements or corrections required, in whole or in part, as the result of (i) normal wear and tear, (ii) accident, disaster or event of force majeure, (iii) misuse, fault or negligence of or by Buyer, (iv) use of the Products in a manner for which they were not designed, (v) external causes such as, but not limited to, power failure or electrical power surges, (vi) improper storage and handling of the Products or (vii) use of the Products in combination with equipment or software not supplied by Seller. If Seller determines that Products for which Buyer has requested warranty services are Revised July 8, 2015

not covered by the warranty hereunder, Buyer shall pay or reimburse Seller for all costs of investigating and responding to such request at Seller's then prevailing time and materials rates. If Seller provides repair services or replacement parts that are not covered by this warranty, Buyer shall pay Seller therefor at Seller's then prevailing time and materials rates. ANY INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE, REPAIR, SERVICE, RELOCATION OR ALTERATION TO OR OF, OR OTHER TAMPERING WITH, THE PRODUCTS PERFORMED BY ANY PERSON OR ENTITY OTHER THAN SELLER WITHOUT SELLER'S PRIOR WRITTEN APPROVAL, OR ANY USE OF REPLACEMENT PARTS NOT SUPPLIED BY SELLER, SHALL IMMEDIATELY VOID AND CANCEL ALL WARRANTIES WITH RESPECT TO THE AFFECTED PRODUCTS. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Products supplied by Seller that are obtained by Seller from an original manufacturer or third party supplier are not warranted by Seller, but Seller agrees to assign to Buyer any warranty rights in such Product that Seller may have from the original manufacturer or third party supplier, to the extent such assignment is allowed by such original manufacturer or third party supplier. THE OBLIGATIONS CREATED BY THIS WARRANTY STATEMENT TO REPAIR OR REPLACE A DEFECTIVE PRODUCT OR TO PROVIDE CORRECTIVE ON-SITE SERVICES SHALL BE THE SOLE REMEDY OF BUYER IN THE EVENT OF A DEFECTIVE PRODUCT OR ON-SITE SERVICES. THERE ARE NO WARRANTIES MADE WITH REGARD TO THE GOODS OR SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED PURSUANT TO THIS AGREEMENT OTHER THAN THOSE CONTAINED HEREIN. ALL OTHER WARRANTIES, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, ARE HEREBY DISCLAIMED, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND ALL WARRANTIES ARISING FROM COURSE OF DEALING OR USAGE OF TRADE. SELLER DOES NOT WARRANT THAT THE PRODUCTS ARE ERROR-FREE OR WILL ACCOMPLISH ANY PARTICULAR RESULT. ANY ADVICE OR ASSISTANCE FURNISHED BY SELLER IN RELATION TO THE PRODUCTS PROVIDED FOR HEREUNDER AND UNDER THE DOCUMENTATION SHALL NOT GIVE RISE TO ANY WARRANTY OR GUARANTEE OF ANY KIND, AND SHALL NOT CONSTITUTE A WAIVER BY SELLER OF ANY PROVISIONS OF THIS AGREEMENT, UNLESS OTHERWISE AGREED TO IN WRITING. This warranty does not cover any charges for replacement of parts, adjustments or repairs, or any other work unless such charges shall be assumed or authorized in advance in writing by the Seller. 14) SHORTAGE, LOSS, DAMAGES and NON-CONFORMITY: It is Buyer’s responsibility to notify the freight carrier of any shortages, losses, or damage. This notification must be noted on the Bill of Lading at time of delivery. Claims will be disallowed if not reported within fifteen (15) calendar days of receipt of the respective Products and the responsibility for repairs/replacement will be on Buyer. Without expanding the limited warranties set forth in Section 13, Buyer shall have (i) thirty (30) days after delivery to its destination of use to inspect and test the System for any apparent non-conformity, and (ii) fifteen (15) days after the performance of any On-Site Services to inspect and test such On-Site Services for any apparent non-conformity. Failure to so inspect and test, or to give notice to Seller of any claim during the respective periods above, shall constitute an irrevocable acceptance of the Products and/or On-Site Services, and a waiver of any defect or warranty claim that could have been discovered by inspecting and testing. Buyer shall have the right to reject, refuse acceptance and revoke acceptance of any non-conforming Products or On-Site Services during the respective periods. 15) LIMITATION OF LIABILITY: Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary herein, the parties hereto agree that in no event shall either party be liable to the other party for any indirect, special, consequential, incidental or punitive damages, or lost profits, as a result of a breach of any provision of this Agreement or for any other claim of any kind arising out of or relating to this Agreement, whether in contract, in tort or otherwise. Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary herein, for all losses, damages, liabilities or expenses (including attorney’s fees and costs), whether for indemnity or negligence, including errors, omissions or other acts, or willful misconduct, or based in contract, warranty (including any costs and fees for repairing, replacing or reperforming services or curing a breach hereof), or for any other cause of action (individually, a "Claim"; collectively, "Claims"), Seller’s liability, Page 2 of 4

including the liability of its insurers, employees, agents, directors, and officers and all other persons for whom Seller is legally responsible, shall not, to the maximum extent permitted by law, exceed in the cumulative aggregate with respect to all Claims arising out of or related to this Agreement, the lesser of (a) the total amount of compensation paid to Seller hereunder, and (b) One Million Dollars ($1,000,000). All Claims of whatsoever nature shall be deemed waived unless made in writing within ninety (90) days of the occurrence giving rise to the Claim. Moreover, any failure of Buyer to notify Seller of unsatisfactory operation or any improper or unauthorized installation, maintenance, use, repair, adjustment or attempts to operate the System outside of the design limits shall relieve Seller of any further responsibilities hereunder. 16) FORCE MAJEURE: Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary herein, Seller shall have no liability to Buyer or its affiliates, and shall have the right to suspend performance (including, without limitation, shipments) hereunder, in the event of war, riot, terrorism, accident, explosion, sabotage, flood, acts of God, fire, court order, strike, labor disturbance, work stoppage, national defense requirements, act of governmental authority, extraordinary failure of equipment or apparatus, inability to obtain electricity or other type of energy, raw material, labor, equipment or transportation, or other causes beyond Seller’s reasonable control. It is understood and agreed that settlement of strikes, lockouts and other labor disputes shall be entirely within the discretion of Seller and that nothing in this Agreement shall require the settlement of strikes, lockouts and labor disputes when such course is inadvisable in the sole discretion of Seller. 17) EXPORT CONTROLS: Buyer acknowledges that the Products and related technology are subject to U.S. export controls and economic sanctions, which may include the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR), the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) and regulations promulgated by the U.S. Department of the Treasury Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC). Buyer further acknowledges that the reexport of the Products and/or related technology to a third country or retransfer to an unapproved end user may require a license or other authorization from the Government of the United States. Such licenses or other authorizations may impose further restrictions on the reexport or retransfer of the Products and/or related technology. U.S. law also restricts the reexport or retransfer of U.S.-origin goods, technology, or services to countries or persons subject to U.S. sanctions or embargoes. Buyer represents and warrants that it is in compliance with and agrees to comply with all such applicable export control and economic sanctions laws and regulations. It is the sole responsibility of Buyer to apply for and obtain any necessary licenses or other authorizations prior to any reexport or retransfer of the Products and/or related technology. Seller makes no warranty that any such licenses or other authorizations will be granted, and shall have no liability for Buyer’s inability to obtain such licenses or other authorization or for any violation by Buyer of any applicable export control and/or economic sanctions laws and regulations. Buyer will indemnify Seller and hold it harmless from any liability resulting from Buyer’s violation of this provision or applicable export laws or regulations. Notwithstanding any other provision in this Agreement, Seller shall have the right to terminate this Agreement immediately upon the determination by Seller, in Seller’s sole discretion, that Buyer has breached, intends to breach, or insists upon breaching any of the provisions in the above clauses. 18) CONFIDENTIALITY: Other than in the performance of the terms of this Agreement, neither Buyer nor its agents, employees, or subcontractors shall use or disclose to any person or entity any confidential information of Seller (whether written, oral, electronic or other form) that is obtained or otherwise prepared or discovered in connection with this Agreement. Buyer agrees that all pricing, discounts, design drawings and technical information that Seller provides to Buyer are the confidential and proprietary information of Seller, whether or not otherwise identified as such. The obligations under this section continue perpetually and survive the termination or expiration of any underlying agreement between the parties. The provisions of this section relating to use and disclosure shall not apply to any information that: (a) is or becomes generally available to the public other than as a result of a disclosure by Buyer under this Agreement; (b) becomes available to Buyer from a source other than Seller without breach of any obligation of confidentiality; (c) was independently developed by Buyer without violation of Seller’s rights and without reference to the confidential information, as evidenced by written records, maintained in the ordinary course of business by Buyer; (d) is used or disclosed with the prior written approval of Seller; (e) is information previously known to Buyer as evidenced by written records maintained by Buyer in Revised July 8, 2015

the ordinary course of business, and not otherwise subject to any confidentiality restrictions; or (f) Buyer becomes legally compelled (by oral questions, interrogatories, requests for information or documents, subpoenas, investigative demands or similar process) to disclose. If Buyer becomes legally compelled (by oral questions, interrogatories, requests for information or documents, subpoenas, investigative demands or similar process) to disclose any of the confidential information, Buyer shall provide Seller with prompt written notice so that Seller may seek a protective order or other appropriate remedy or waive compliance with the provisions of this Agreement. If such protective order or other remedy is not obtained, or if Seller waives compliance with the provisions of this Agreement, Buyer shall furnish only that portion of the confidential information which Buyer is legally required to disclose and shall exercise its reasonable efforts to obtain reliable assurance that confidential treatment shall be accorded the confidential information. Buyer shall not undertake any qualitative or quantitative analysis, reverse engineering or replication of any of Seller’s products, samples or prototypes without Seller’s specific written authorization. 19) SECURITY INTEREST: Buyer hereby grants Seller a security interest in the System to secure the payment of the purchase price and shall not sell, lease, transfer or encumber the System and will keep it free from any and all liens and security interests until Seller has been paid in full. Buyer shall execute any and all documents reasonably requested by Seller to protect such security interests. 20) MODIFICATION OF PROVISIONS: This Agreement cannot be modified except by agreement in writing signed by Seller. 21) MANAGEMENT OF CHANGE: Seller is constantly striving to improve its products and capabilities and to provide the best product to its customers. Seller may from time to time develop product improvements or alterations with respect to the Products hereunder (the “Product Improvements”), and Seller may implement such Product Improvements without notice to Buyer so long as the performance of the Products will not be materially diminished, as determined in Seller’s sole discretion, and so long as Seller has not separately agreed in writing to provide such notification to Buyer. In the event that Seller has agreed in writing to provide notice of Product Improvements to Buyer (the “Notice”), then Seller shall provide such Notice in accordance with the terms set forth in the separate writing. 22) APPLICABLE LAW AND JURISDICTION: This Agreement shall be governed by, construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, without regard to its conflict of law principles. The UN Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods shall not apply to the transaction(s) represented hereby. The parties consent and submit to the exclusive jurisdiction and service of process of any state or federal court located in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania. 23) MISCELLANEOUS: (a) Neither party may assign this Agreement, including without limitation any of its rights or obligations hereunder, without the express written consent of the other party hereto; provided that Seller may, without Buyer’s consent (i) assign this Agreement, including without limitation any of its rights or obligations hereunder, to any of its parents, subsidiaries or affiliates or to any third party which merges with Seller or acquires all or substantially all of its business and assets or a substantial part of its assets or business relating to the Products and (ii) use subcontractors (for which Seller shall be responsible). (b) In the event of any legal proceeding between Seller and Buyer relating to this Agreement, neither party may claim the right to a trial by jury, and both parties waive any right they may have under applicable law or otherwise to a trial by jury. (c) In the event that any one or more provisions (or portions thereof) contained herein shall be held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any respect, the validity, legality and enforceability of the remaining provisions (or portions thereof) contained herein shall remain in full force and effect, unless the revision materially changes the bargain. (d) Seller's failure to enforce, or Seller's waiver of a breach of, any provision contained in this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other breach or of such provision.

Page 3 of 4

(e) Seller reserves the right to correct clerical, arithmetical, or stenographic errors or omissions in the Documentation, quotations, order acknowledgments, invoices or other documents. (f) Any notice or communication required or permitted hereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed received when personally delivered or three (3) business days after being sent by certified mail, postage prepaid, to a party at the address specified in this Agreement, or at such other address as either party may from time to time designate to the other. (g) Buyer agrees that it will not use Seller’s name(s), logo(s) or mark(s) in any public communication or press release, or for any other marketing or promotional purpose, without Seller’s prior written consent. (h) Terms used in this Agreement which are not defined herein and which are defined by the Uniform Commercial Code of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania shall have the meanings contained therein. 24) ENTIRE AGREEMENT: With respect to the subject matter hereof, this Agreement constitutes the complete and exclusive statement of the contract between Seller and Buyer. No waiver, consent, modification, amendment or change of the terms contained in this Agreement shall be binding unless made in writing and signed by Seller and Buyer. Seller's failure to object to terms contained in any subsequent communication from Buyer (whether in a purchase order or other communication) will not be a waiver or modification of the terms set forth herein.

Revised July 8, 2015

Page 4 of 4

Alternate Bid Proposal to the City of Cranbrook for a 24" Sentinel® UV Disinfection System for the City of Cranbrook Water Treatment Plant UV Disinfection System Reference No. 0655.0205.01 Cranbrook, BC

July 15, 2020 CCUVT Proposal No. 00002775

MAKING WATER AND AIR SAFER AND CLEANER

Cranbrook WTP Table of Contents Section 1

– Bid Form

Section 2

– CCUVT Proposal

Section 3

– Attachments

Section 1 – Bid Form 5.0 Submission Requirements

City of Cranbrook – UV Disinfection System Reference No. 0956.0050.01 CCUVT Proposal No. 00002775

Estimated chemical cleaning frequency (if applicable); Not applicable.

General assembly drawings to indicate floor space and head room requirements; Refer to Equipment Layout drawing S900341.

Upstream and downstream pipe diameters required; 24 inch (310 mm) to accommodate UV reactors’ 316L SS, ASME B16.5, Class 150, Raised Face Flanges.

Completed quotation and information sheet (Appendix A); See attached 5.0 Submission Requirement Tables 2, 3, and 4.

City of Cranbrook – UV Disinfection System Reference No. 0956.0050.01 CCUVT Proposal No. 00002775

THE CITY OF CRANBROOK WATER TREATMENT PLANT | UV Disinfection System RFP

(71%T per Addendum No. 1)

MS2 RED 53.5 mJ/cm2 24" 9x10kW Sentinel MP 5x 3x 5x 1x

THE CITY OF CRANBROOK WATER TREATMENT PLANT | UV Disinfection System RFP

Y 9 5 9 one(1)-10kW;four(4)-20kW 165.8 kW 98kW/reactor 105 MLD hydraulic max 30.8 MLD/reactor 43.3 MLD/reactor @ 70%T 46.3 MLD/reactor @ 71%T

105 MLD/reactor 150 psi 9.4 L/s 1109 mm w.c. at 106 MLD 910 mm 1350 mm 910 mm 610 mm Sentinel 24 Electrical Enclosure S103527 Power Supply; S103530 Control Panel

2510 mm 900 mm 2160 mm 150 m Y factory Y 0.96-28.2 mgd 53.9-98.2 %T n/a 9.2 MLD/reactor at 53.9%T for 4 log crypto 84%T at 105MLD/reactor for 4 log crypto Y $895,500 CAN$ $23,600 CAN$ $4,700 CAN$

THE CITY OF CRANBROOK WATER TREATMENT PLANT | UV Disinfection System RFP

$8,700 CAN$ 3 weeks following acceptance of PO 18-20 weeks ARAD $28,800 CAN$

10 kW 5000 h alarm setpoint at 20 on/off cylces

$759 5000 h after 2000 h 0 <3% 3 mins 2-4 mins 2-4 mins 0.7 g/lamp Yes expired lamps can be returned to Calgon or recycled at locally accepted

$11 CDN/lamp 10 yrs

THE CITY OF CRANBROOK WATER TREATMENT PLANT | UV Disinfection System RFP

92% Wiper N/A N/A N/A once every few minutes to once per month

$501.60 5 yrs 0 <1% after 1 year $5.28/o-ring 1 yr 40%-100% 15 92 electromagnetic 0.8kW/10kW ballast 1.6kW/20kW ballast $4319.04/10kW ballast $7784.04/20kW ballast

5 yrs after 1 year 10 yrs dry $ 1,705.44 5 yrs after 1 year $389.40

THE CITY OF CRANBROOK WATER TREATMENT PLANT | UV Disinfection System RFP

* * *

2 2

10 18

77.8 kW 113.8 kW

2 2 2 2

60.3 kW 82.6 kW 151.6 kW 48.0 kW 63.7 kW

2 2 1

10 18 10 10 18 5

1 2 1

9 10

1 2 1 1 2

5 10 2 3 4

116.0 kW 39.0 kW 57.7 kW 83.7 kW 27.7 kW 35.1 kW 59.1 kW 16.2 kW 21.2 kW 35.6 kW

*If above 70%T was adjusted to 71%T per Addendum No. 1 the results would be as follows: 150 L/s, 71%T, 2 reactors, 10 lamps, 57.3 kW power required 220 L/s, 71%T, 2 reactors, 10 lamps, 78.6 kW power required 440 L/s, 71%T, 2 reactors, 18 lamps, 143.8 kW power required Note above operating conditions are based on higher 86% combined end of lamp life and sleeve fouling factor.

THE CITY OF CRANBROOK WATER TREATMENT PLANT | UV Disinfection System RFP

Calgon Carbon UV Technologies Canada Inc.

$961,300 CAN$

2% per year

38 Kappele Ave, Toronto, ON M4N 2Z1

Contact:

David DesRochers

Cell: 519-820-3547 Email: david.desrochers@kuraray.com

Section 2 – CCUVT Proposal CCUVT Proposal

Alternate Bid CCUVT Proposal to the City of Cranbrook for a 24" Sentinel® UV Disinfection System for the City of Cranbrook Water Treatment Plant UV Disinfection System Reference No. 0655.0205.01 Cranbrook, BC

July 15, 2020 CCUVT Proposal No. 00002775

MAKING WATER AND AIR SAFER AND CLEANER

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Calgon Carbon UV Technologies Canada Inc. (CCUVT) is pleased to submit this proposal for a Sentinel® UV Disinfection System to treat water in response to a request for proposal from the from the City of Cranbrook WTP, BC. The proposed Sentinel® System is designed to deliver a 4.0 log Cryptosporidium inactivation per the USEPA UV Disinfection Guidance Manual. A summary of the design basis and key features of the Sentinel® System follows: Two (2) 9x10 kW 24 inch diameter Sentinel® reactors arranged in series are proposed for treating the water at a design flow rate of 440 L/s. Two (2) 9x10 kW Sentinel® reactor arranged in series are proposed for redundancy with a capacity for treating the water at a design flow rate of 440 L/s. The proposed system will meet the treatment objectives based on water with a transmittance of 71 %T at 254 nm. The proposed Sentinel® reactor meets the design requirements of the EPA’s UV Disinfection Guidance Manual Final 2006 (UVDGM). A full description of the proposed system is included in the attached proposal.

Page 1 MAKING WATER AND AIR SAFER AND CLEANER

SECTION 3: SYSTEM PERFORMANCE ............................................................................................ 12 3.1 3.2

SECTION 4: SYSTEM SUPPLY ............................................................................................................ 13 4.1 4.2 4.3

SECTION 5: STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS ......................................................................... 17 5.1

Overview ................................................................................................................... 17

CONTACT INFORMATION .................................................................................................................. 19

Page 2 MAKING WATER AND AIR SAFER AND CLEANER

Page 3 MAKING WATER AND AIR SAFER AND CLEANER

Page 4 MAKING WATER AND AIR SAFER AND CLEANER

Section 2: System Description 2.1

Page 5 MAKING WATER AND AIR SAFER AND CLEANER

2.2

EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION UV System Configuration Based on the use of 10 kW lamps, the following configuration will be used: a. Number of UV reactors

4 (1 duty + 1 redundant trains, each with 2 reactors in series)

b. Number of lamps per reactor

c. Power per lamp (kW)

d. Total nominal power (kW)

360

UV Reactor Each proposed Sentinel® reactor is described in detail below: Reactor Casing

: : : : : :

Lamps

: : : :

Enclosed in quartz sleeve Operated by electromagnetic ballasts Manual lamp selection on operator interface 10 kW medium pressure ultraviolet lamps

Quartz Sleeve Wipers

: : : :

Automatic action for cleaning quartz sleeves in service Electrically driven wipers Manual lamp selection on operator interface Adjustable cycle frequency via operator interface

Hydraulic System Design Flow per Reactor Future Flow per Reactor Maximum hydraulic flow per reactor Reactor Pressure Drop at 440 L/s Reactor Pressure Drop at 515 L/s System design pressure System test pressure

: : : : : : :

440 L/s 515 L/s 1227 L/s 306 mm WC 397 mm WC 150 psi 195 psi

UV Irradiance Sensor

: : : :

DVGW Approved UV sensor Continuous on-line monitoring of UV intensity at biocidal wavelength One sensor per lamp Interfaced with Control System to provide feed back regarding UV dose requirement

: : : :

Ventilated NEMA 12 painted carbon steel cabinets 600 VAC, 3 ph, 3 wire Noise levels are minimal and below OSHA limits Power factor better than 0.92 at full power

Reactor Control Panel

: :

: : : : :

Page 7 MAKING WATER AND AIR SAFER AND CLEANER

Range- Auto Ranging Accuracy Resolution Units Path Length Sampling Time Flow Rate Calibration Cleaning Self Diagnostics Operator Interface Display Alarms

Humidity Control Outputs Wavelength Light Source Lamp Life Dimensions Enclosures Fluid Connections Electrical Storage Temp Operating Temp Weight Warranty Technology Options

Page 8 MAKING WATER AND AIR SAFER AND CLEANER

2.3

: :

General

: :

Temperature

: : :

Leak Detection

Alarm and shutdown if reactor leak detected

Quartz Cleaner

Alarm on failure to cycle

UV Intensity

Alarm on UV intensity out of range

Dose Pacing

Page 9 MAKING WATER AND AIR SAFER AND CLEANER

2.4

CLARIFICATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS

The City of Cranbrook Water Treatment Plant UV Disinfection System RFP 1.0

5.0 Table 2

Clarification – The proposed Sentinel UV system will have 3 duty and 1 redundant reactor trains.

Section 46 00 00 1.2.1 & 2.3.1.(1) Clarification - The proposed Sentinel UV system will have a total of 4 reactors arranged as 3 duty and 1 redundant reactor trains. 1.2.5

2.4.1

Exception - Standard flange on the Sentinel reactor is 24” CL. 150 Raised Face per ASME/ANSI B16.5.

2.4.7

Exception – Cleaning valves, solenoid valves, and sample valves to be supplied by other.

2.9.1.(5).5th bullet Clarification - Since the HMI is mounted on the local Control Panel we don't understand why there is a need for this communication cable to be installed by the General Contractor. This would only make sense if the HMI were mounted remotely. Please clarify.

Page 11 MAKING WATER AND AIR SAFER AND CLEANER

3.1

TREATMENT SPECIFICATION Design flow rate:

440 L/s (1 duty + 1 redundant reactor trains, each with 2 reactors in series)

Future flow rate:

1030 L/s (2 duty + 1 redundant reactor trains, each with 2 reactors in series)

Treatment Specification:

4 log Cryptosporidium inactivation MS2 surrogate

3.2

Design %T (@ 254 nm):

71%T (per cm)

Average %T (@ 254 nm):

90%T (per cm)

Input power factor:

0.92

Lamp life:

5,000 hrs

End of lamp life/fouling factor

72 %

Page 12 MAKING WATER AND AIR SAFER AND CLEANER

Section 4: System Supply 4.1

Refer to Table 2: UV Reactor Information

Included Included Included Included Included Included

Services: Up to three (3) trips totaling up to six (6) days of on-site services will be supplied to provide start up, training assistances.

Included

*Additional days will be invoiced at the prevailing rates at the time of service. Travel and living expenses are billed at cost plus 15%.

Payment Terms:

Delivery: Taxes:

20% at approval of shop drawing 70% at equipment delivery 10% at start-up

Included D.A.P. Jobsite, City of Cranbrook WTP, Cranbrook, BC Not Included

Delivery Schedule:

Shop Drawings – Three (3) weeks following acceptance of P.O. Equipment Delivery- Eighteen (18) to twenty (20) weeks after receipt of approved drawings (ARAD).

This offer is valid 60 days from 7/15/2020.

Page 13 MAKING WATER AND AIR SAFER AND CLEANER

4.2

• • • • • • • • • •

Utilities The utilities required to operate the Sentinel® System are indicated below. Sentinel® System Maximum full load 9x10 kW

: :

600 VAC, 60 Hz, 3 Phase, protected supply 120 full load amps per reactor

Page 14 MAKING WATER AND AIR SAFER AND CLEANER

4.3

Lamp Cost

1-2000 hours 2001-5000 hours

Lamps replaced at no charge Lamp price prorated proportional to actual hours

Page 15 MAKING WATER AND AIR SAFER AND CLEANER

Page 16 MAKING WATER AND AIR SAFER AND CLEANER

Section 5: Statement of Qualifications 5.1

Page 17 MAKING WATER AND AIR SAFER AND CLEANER

Page 18 MAKING WATER AND AIR SAFER AND CLEANER

Contact Information David DesRochers Regional Sales Manager Cell: 519-820-3547 Email: david.desrochers@kuraray.com

www.calgoncarbon.com

Calgon Carbon Asia Calgon Carbon Asia Pte Ltd. 3 Harbour Front Place #05-01 Harbour Front Tower Two Singapore 099254 Phone: + 65 (0) 6221 3500 + 65 (0) 6221 3554

Calgon Carbon UV Technologies Canada Inc. 38 Kappele Avenue Toronto, Ontario Canada M4N 2Z1 Phone: 519-824-8318

European Headquarters Zoning Industriel C de Feluy B-7181 Feluy, Belgium Phone: +32 (0) 64 511 811

Page 19 MAKING WATER AND AIR SAFER AND CLEANER

Section 3 – Attachments Sentinel® 24 Data Sheet Sentinel® Installation List Sentinel® 24 Reference List Validation Report Cover and Table of Content 00002775 Cranbrook WTP, BC - Tools and Spare Parts Drawings: S900341 Equipment Layout S900905 Piping Layout S102974 Electrical External Wiring Diagram S500469 Process & Instrumentation Diagram S102859 Electrical Single Line Diagram CCUVT Terms and Conditions

Sentinel® 24 Reference List 1.

Calgon Carbon Corporation 24-INCH SENTINEL REACTOR UV REACTOR VALIDATION AT THE PORTLAND, OR UV VALIDATION FACILITY

TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. SECTION 1 1.1 1.2 1.3

1.4 1.5

1.6

SECTION 2 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6

2-1

SECTION 3 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5

1-1

3-1

October 2013 CALGON CARBON CORPORATION

Confidential - Do not circulate ii

SECTION 4 4.1

4.2 4.3

4.4 4.5

SECTION 5 5.1

5.2 5.3 5.4

5.5

5.6 5.7

5-1

SECTION 6 6.1 6.2

4-1

6-1

October 2013 CALGON CARBON CORPORATION

Confidential - Do not circulate iii

6.3

SECTION 7

7-1

October 2013 CALGON CARBON CORPORATION

Confidential - Do not circulate iv

LIST OF TABLES

October 2013 CALGON CARBON CORPORATION

Confidential - Do not circulate v

Table 5.17b Table 5.18 Table 5.19 Table 5.20 Table 5.21

October 2013 CALGON CARBON CORPORATION

Confidential - Do not circulate vi

October 2013 CALGON CARBON CORPORATION

Confidential - Do not circulate vii

Table 6.27a Table 6.27b Table 6.28a Table 6.28b Table 6.29a Table 6.29b Table 6.30a

Table 6.30b Table 7.1 Table 7.2 Table 7.3 Table 7.4 Table 7.5

October 2013 CALGON CARBON CORPORATION

Confidential - Do not circulate viii

October 2013 CALGON CARBON CORPORATION

Confidential - Do not circulate ix

Figure 1.7b Figure 1.7c Figure 1.7d Figure 1.7e Figure 1.7f Figure 1.8a

Figure 1.8b

Figure 1.8c

Figure 1.8d

Figure 1.8e

Figure 1.8f

Figure 2.1 Figure 2.2 Figure 2.3a Figure 2.3b Figure 2.4 Figure 2.5a Figure 2.5b Figure 2.6 Figure 2.7 Figure 2.8

Figure 2.9 Figure 2.10

October 2013 CALGON CARBON CORPORATION

Confidential - Do not circulate x

Figure 2.11

October 2013 CALGON CARBON CORPORATION

Confidential - Do not circulate xi

Confidential - Do not circulate xii

Confidential - Do not circulate xiii

Figure 5.28a

Figure 5.28b

Figure 5.29a Figure 5.29b Figure 5.29c Figure 5.29d Figure 5.29e Figure 5.29f Figure 5.30a Figure 5.30b

October 2013 CALGON CARBON CORPORATION

Confidential - Do not circulate xiv

October 2013 CALGON CARBON CORPORATION

Confidential - Do not circulate xv

Qty. 1 1 9

1 10 9 9

TOTAL COST

Sell CDN

Spare

Life

CONDUIT #3

NOTES:

CONDUIT #2

CONDUIT #5 CONDUIT #1 CONDUIT #3

ALL EXTERNAL WIRING PROVIDED AND INSTALLED BY OTHERS. ALL CONDUCTORS ARE COPPER, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

ALL WIRING INSTALLED ACCORDING TO CANADIAN, LOCAL CODES, AND ANY AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION.

CONDUIT RUNS REQUIRE 10% SPARE WIRES.

FOR MINIMUM CLEARANCE ABOUT POWER SUPPLY CABINETS, SEE CANADIAN ELECTRICAL CODE PART 1, ARTICLE 2-308, 2-310, & 2-312.

CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL "EYS" TYPE SEALING FITTINGS AND POTTING IN CONDUITS #2 AND #4 AFTER INSTALLATION IS COMPLETE.

MAXIMUM SEPARATION DISTANCE BETWEEN CONTROL PANEL/POWER SUPPLY AND REACTOR ASSEMBLY IS 500 FEET.

FOR CONNECTIONS TO CUSTOMER EQUIPMENT, PREFIX WIRE NUMBER WITH UV1 FOR SYSTEM 1100.

TERMINATION OF THE LAMP WIRES (GTO CABLE), AT THE REACTOR, SHALL BE NON-INSULATED RING TERMINALS, SUPPLIED BY OTHERS.

CONDUIT #4

CONDUIT #3A CONDUIT #3B SENSOR/PROX. SW BOX #1 & #2

CONDUIT #2 SEE NOTE 5

CONTROL PANEL (UV PLC PANEL) UV POWER SUPPLY #1

HIGH VOLTAGE LAMP ENCLOSURE

D C

UV POWER SUPPLY #2 CONDUIT #4 SEE NOTE 5

CONDUIT #4

ISSUED FOR PROPOSAL

REV

DESCRIPTION

DLY

10/10/13

CHG

APP

DATE

REVISIONS TOLERANCES (unless otherwise specified) ANGULAR FRACTIONAL DECIMAL (1 PLACE)

SENTINEL REACTOR ASSEMBLY

CONTROL PANEL AND POWER SUPPLY

DECIMAL (2 PLACES) DECIMAL (3 PLACES) DECIMAL (4 PLACES)

1/16" .15

THIS DRAWING AND DESIGN IS THE PROPERTY OF CALGON CARBON CORPORATION AND IS NOT TO BE REPRODUCED IN WHOLE OR IN PART NOR EMPLOYED FOR ANY PURPOSE OTHER THAN SPECIFICALLY

CLIENT

CSTMR NAME CSTMR LOCATION

PERMITTED IN WRITING BY CALGON CARBON CORPORATION. THIS DRAWING LOANED SUBJECT TO RETURN ON DEMAND.

NAME

DATE

DRAFTER

DLY

10/10/13

DESIGNER

JLB

10/10/13

CHECKER APPROVAL PROJECT No.

PROPOSAL

TITLE

ELECTRICAL EXTERNAL WIRING DIAGRAM DWG. Size DWG. No.

SHEET No.

1 OF 2

S102974

SCALE

NONE REV.

CONDUIT

FROM / TO

WIRE FUNCTION

CONDUIT #1

MAIN AC SUPPLY FROM CUSTOMER UPS 480V, 3P, 60Hz, 117 FULL LOAD AMPS PHASE A 86.3 AMPS TO MAIN DISCONNECT SWITCH PHASE B 117.2 AMPS LOCATED IN CONTROL PANEL PHASE C 104.2 AMPS

CONDUIT #2

FROM UV PLC PANEL TO REACTOR LAMP ENCLOSURE

CONDUIT #3A

ALL EXTERNAL WIRING PROVIDED AND INSTALLED BY OTHERS. ALL CONDUCTORS ARE COPPER, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

8-1/C #14AWG & GND

ALL WIRING INSTALLED ACCORDING TO CANADIAN, LOCAL CODES, AND ANY AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION.

CONDUIT RUNS REQUIRE 10% SPARE WIRES.

FOR MINIMUM CLEARANCE ABOUT POWER SUPPLY CABINETS, SEE CANADIAN ELECTRICAL CODE PART 1, ARTICLE 2-308, 2-310, & 2-312.

CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL "EYS" TYPE SEALING FITTINGS AND POTTING IN CONDUITS #2 AND #4 AFTER INSTALLATION IS COMPLETE.

MAXIMUM SEPARATION DISTANCE BETWEEN CONTROL PANEL/POWER SUPPLY AND REACTOR ASSEMBLY IS 500 FEET.

FOR CONNECTIONS TO CUSTOMER EQUIPMENT, PREFIX WIRE NUMBER WITH UV1 FOR SYSTEM 1100.

TERMINATION OF THE LAMP WIRES (GTO CABLE), AT THE REACTOR, SHALL BE NON-INSULATED RING TERMINALS, SUPPLIED BY OTHERS.

ZSR-1100

242-1

24V DC, 24V DC COMMON

FU132, 24COM, GND

WIPER DRIVE MOTOR #1

WD1-A1, WD1-A2

1EA 1-PR #14AWG SHLD BELDEN #9314 (OR EQUAL)

UVT1111+ UVT1121+ UVT1122+ UVT1131+ UVT1132+

1 EA 9-TW/PR #18AWG SHLD BELDEN #9559 (OR EQUAL) (FOLD BACK UNUSED CONDUCTORS)

FROM UV PLC PANEL UV SENSORS TO REACTOR SENSOR/PROX. SW BOX 2 UVT-1141 UVT-1142 UVT-1151 UVT-1152

FROM UV PLC PANEL TO CUSTOMER SCADA SYSTEM

PROXIMITY SWITCH (RETRACT)

ZSE-1100 LSL-1100

240-1 217-1 FU132, 24COM, GND

2-1/C #14AWG & GND

UVT1141+ UVT1142+ UVT1151+ UVT1152+

1 EA 4-TW/PR #18AWG SHLD BELDEN #9554 (OR EQUAL)

LP1B, LP2B, LP3B, LP4B, LP5B, GND

10-1/C #14AWG 15KV CABLE TYPE GTO (OR EQUAL) NO BREAKS

LAMP WIRES LAMP LAMP LAMP LAMP LAMP

CONDUIT #5

NOTES:

213-1 AS1100+, AS1100FU138, FU138-1

FROM UV PLC PANEL UV SENSORS TO REACTOR SENSOR/PROX. SW BOX 1 UVT-1111 UVT-1121 UVT-1122 UVT-1131 UVT-1132

FROM UV POWER SUPPLY CABINET TO REACTOR LAMP ENCLOSURE

3-1/C #1/0 AWG (THWN) & 1-1/C #1/0 AWG GND (THWN)

TSH-1100 AS-1100 ZS-1100

24V DC, 24V DC COMMON

CONDUIT #4

WIRE SIZE & QTY

F1, F2, F3 GND

REACTOR HIGH TEMP SW MOISTURE DETECTOR REACTOR COVER IN PLACE

PROXIMITY SWITCH (EXTEND) LEVEL SWITCH

CONDUIT #3B

WIRE NUMBERS

BANK BANK BANK BANK BANK

#1, #2, #3, #4, #5,

LAMPS LAMPS LAMPS LAMPS LAMPS

1-1 2-1, 2-2 3-1, 3-2 4-1, 4-2 5-1, 5-2

LP1C LP2C LP3C LP4C LP5C

D C B

1-1/C #12AWG GND

ETHERNET COMMUNICATION LINK

ISSUED FOR PROPOSAL

REV

CAT 5e UTP CABLE BELDEN #1583A

DESCRIPTION

DLY

10/10/13

CHG

APP

DATE

REVISIONS TOLERANCES (unless otherwise specified) ANGULAR FRACTIONAL DECIMAL (1 PLACE)

DECIMAL (2 PLACES) DECIMAL (3 PLACES) DECIMAL (4 PLACES)

1/16" .15

THIS DRAWING AND DESIGN IS THE PROPERTY OF CALGON CARBON CORPORATION AND IS NOT TO BE REPRODUCED IN WHOLE OR IN PART NOR EMPLOYED FOR ANY PURPOSE OTHER THAN SPECIFICALLY

CLIENT

CSTMR NAME CSTMR LOCATION

PERMITTED IN WRITING BY CALGON CARBON CORPORATION. THIS DRAWING LOANED SUBJECT TO RETURN ON DEMAND.

NAME

DATE

DRAFTER

DLY

10/10/13

DESIGNER

JLB

10/10/13

CHECKER APPROVAL PROJECT No.

PROPOSAL

TITLE

ELECTRICAL EXTERNAL WIRING DIAGRAM DWG. Size DWG. No.

SHEET No.

2 OF 2

S102974

SCALE

NONE REV.

Terms and Conditions for UV Equipment / System Purchase (the “Terms and Conditions”) 1) DEFINITIONS: (a) Seller: (b) Buyer: (c) Documentation:

Revised July 8, 2015

Page 1 of 4

Page 3 of 4

Revised July 8, 2015

Page 4 of 4