8 minute read

CRYSTAL PEOPLES- STOKES

Next Article
FIRST READ

FIRST READ

“That’s pure and simple racism”

A Q&A with Assembly Majority Leader Crystal PeoplesStokes on how Buffalo recovers from a horrific mass shooting.

Advertisement

By Justin Sondel

Several people have described the Jefferson Avenue Tops as a safe place in the neighborhood that offered a sense of community. What do you feel it will mean for the neighborhood and the rest of the East Side going forward that this space has been taken from them, at least temporarily, and will certainly never be the same?

It’s a community gathering spot. Some people go there every day, not because they want to buy something, but because they know they’re going to see somebody that they know and they get to chitchat. It’s a community gathering spot that’s needed for dialogue to go back and forth in the community. Everybody doesn’t go to the barbershop. Everybody doesn’t go to the hair salon. This store actually served as a similar respite, like hair salons and barbershops, where you could go and catch up on all the latest information in the community and around the state, with the federal, national government. People talk about these issues. I just think that it’s going to take some time. We do know it’s still a crime scene. But at some point, it’s my priority that Tops pulls us back together and they continue to do business there. Now, does that mean that there should not be an additional opportunity for fresh fruit and vegetables in and around this neighborhood? No, it doesn’t

Assembly Majority Leader Crystal Peoples-Stokes, left, comforts a resident near the Tops supermarket where a mass shooter killed 10 people on May 14.

mean that. It means that maybe there should be something else as well. I won’t discard that as an opportunity for additional growth in this community because it is needed. But that Tops is needed as well.

Do you think people will want to return to shop at that location?

I’ve talked to some people who have said they will never go in there again. Then I’ve talked to a lot of people like myself, who will be the first one to walk in there on the first day, because you are not going to frighten me out of my community with your ignorant, racist actions. I’m angry about that. I’m disappointed in how America allows racism to continue. But you are not going to scare me away from my community.

“This store actually served as a similar respite, like hair salons and barbershops, where you could go and catch up on all the latest information in the community and around the state.”

– Assembly Majority Leader Crystal Peoples-Stokes

The alleged killer described scoping out potential targets across the state in online posts. He chose this Tops because of the high concentration of Black people in the area. What do you think that says about the high levels of segregation in Buffalo?

He decided that he wanted to kill Black people because he’s been radicalized on social media or he’s been raised that way by his family or his community. I love the way people try to say it’s all because of segregation. No, some of it is because your grandmother lived on the street, you live down the street and now you live down the street. It’s about

generational neighborhoods. It’s not just about segregation. Granted, this country actually developed its housing strategy on a racist proposition. It just did. It started out that way. But people could leave. They don’t have to stay. They chose to stay.

Many researchers and academics over the years have documented the deep segregation that exists in Buffalo and the discriminatory practices – redlining, unequal access to education, employment discrimination, unequal access to quality food – that are exacerbated by those conditions. Is it particularly painful that the systemic discrimination that has led to more hurdles and fewer opportunities for people of color in Buffalo made the city a target for this attack?

No. It’s just painful that he would go after Black people, period. The fact that he came to my town makes it even more painful. But I would be hurting if he went to Rochester or Syracuse or if he stayed in Binghamton and did the same thing. I can’t buy into the narrative that this place was chosen just because of segregation. No, it wasn’t chosen because of segregation. It was chosen because there are more Black people here who chose to be here. I wouldn’t disagree that there are some people who would want to move somewhere else but can’t afford to. But I would offer to you that most people who live in the 14208 (Editor’s note: The ZIP code where Tops is located.) live here because they want to be here. It’s not like this is all because of segregation. This is all because of racism.

Does this attack highlight the need to address some of the underlying issues at the root of Buffalo’s segregation? What can be done from a legislative perspective to address those issues?

Those are problems. But they’re problems in 14215 (Editor’s note: The ZIP code for an area of Buffalo northeast of the shooting location.) too. They’re problems in Binghamton. And those are the same problems they have in Syracuse and the same ones they have in Rochester. It’s racism that’s the problem. It’s racist policies that the government sets up. It’s racist policies the businesses set up. And it’s racist policies that the citizen base, who support that, helps to perpetuate. This attack underlines the most important issue that America needs to confront before it implodes on itself, and that’s racism. That’s pure and simple racism. You cannot keep judging people because they are different than you. You cannot keep having policies that are set up that people get treated different because people are different than you.

Where do we go from here?

Every time we have these incidents in America everybody says we need to have more communication. We need to start talking about this. A couple months later, no one is talking about it anymore. Because people are uncomfortable in acknowledging that they’re actually racist too. And I’ve said this to some of my white colleagues, “Listen, I don’t like you. But I do have to love you. So I’m not going to treat you like you treat me.” But if other people don’t get to that, then we’re not going to solve this. I don’t care how long we talk about it. I don’t care how many laws we pass. I don’t care who we elect. If we don’t get to that, that you must treat me the way I treat you – it’s the golden rule. If you can’t get to that, then this society is going to implode on itself.

Our Perspective

Protect New York’s Warehouse Workers Now!

By Stuart Appelbaum, President, Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union, RWDSU, UFCW Twitter: @sappelbaum

Warehouse workers are the backbone of the modern ecommerce economy, yet regulations protecting workers and communities affected by this new industry have lagged far behind its rapid growth. When New York’s warehouse and distribution center workers leave for work every day, they face a job that sees them three times more likely than the average private industry worker to suffer an injury or illness. That’s why New York needs to pass the Warehouse Worker Protection Act (WWPA – A10020/S8922), which helps protect workers from inhumane quotas at companies such as Amazon. A Dangerous Job

New York’s warehouse industry has alarmingly high injury rates, and nowhere is this more apparent than when reviewing the data at Amazon, which has opened over 70 new facilities in New York State since 2018. Amazon workers are injured at a rate of six per 100, which is five times the average in New York. While all warehouse work is dangerous, Amazon warehouse workers are 54 percent more likely than others in the industry to get sick or hurt on the job.

Research shows that many of these injuries and illnesses are preventable and are the result of management philosophies at these facilities that prioritize speed over workers’ safety. Unsafe work speeds, unreasonable work quotas, dangerous work, and insufficient breaks all contribute to the skyrocketing rate of injuries in the industry. Amazon workers have told RWDSU representatives that their productivity is monitored so closely that they are afraid to take bathroom breaks.

While Amazon is the highest-profile offender, workers throughout the industry suffer from higher-than-average injury rates, and many of the same dangerous policies and lack of protection. Addressing the Warehouse Industry Injury Epidemic

The WWPA, modeled after similar legislation signed into law in California last year and targeting large facilities and employers, would create important guardrails to protect warehouse industry workers from the brutal line speeds and quotas that are driving injuries and sickness at New York’s warehouses. These inhumane and abusive quotas, and the fear of being disciplined for not making them (even though workers aren’t told and don’t know exactly what they are), pressures workers into denying their basic needs and over-exerting themselves to the point of injury or illness.

The WWPA creates transparency for the often arbitrary and ever-changing quotas that many workers at large warehouses are subjected to. The law would inform workers on what their quotas are, and prevents workers from being disciplined if they fail to meet these quota requirements because they need to exercise basic human rights such as going to the bathroom when they need to.

New York’s warehouse workers are getting injured because there is no reason for unscrupulous employers to respect their basic humanity. The WWPA would change that, and these workers deserve passage of this important legislation that forces large employers like Amazon to reform the way it treats employees.

This article is from: