Public Comments March 23 through May 12, 2023 Combined by City of Boise

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

Tara Brandenburg-Weeks <brandenburg.tara@gmail.com> Thursday, March 30, 2023 7:35 PM ZoningRewrite [External] In support of zoning rewrite

Hi, My name is Tara Brandenburg‐Weeks. I read the Idaho's Statesmen article about the Zoning Rewrite and I just wanted to write that I enthusiastically support it! As a homeowner in Boise's SE Boise Village, I hear a lot of noise from my "Not in my backyard" neighbors. I disagree with them. I believe Boise should be a place where young families can afford to live, where native Idahoans don't get priced out, and where public transportation is easy. The only way that can happen is through this coding rewrite. Thank you for the work you're doing! Sincerely, Tara Brandenburg‐Weeks

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

Therrie Butz <therriepuckett@yahoo.com> Thursday, March 23, 2023 6:22 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Upzone

It’s rediculous to upzone any more than you already have our neighborhoods are being ruined with traffic, and dead ends are no longer safe streets as there’s so many people coming in that the kids are in jeopardy with all that traffic and speeding that goes on in 20 and 25 mph zones and up zoning‘s only gonna make it worse and and you’re just ruining a town that used to be neighborhood friendly I am totally against of zoning. I think you have already done enough of that and have ruined what we had and why we love Boise safe neighborhoods are now having to put in cameras and the elderly have to fear for their safety. All this for the almighty dollar of all the developers that are willing to stuff their pockets and ruin the life we had. Shame on you for your greediness Sent from my iPhone

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

sonya.crum@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Sonya Crum <sonya.crum@everyactioncustom.com> Friday, March 24, 2023 6:46 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Vote Yes on the Zoning Code Rewrite

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

Nicki Hellenkamp Thursday, March 30, 2023 1:31 PM ZoningRewrite Comment from Lori Dicaire

Hello, I received this comment from Lori Dicaire and wanted to make sure it was captured: “I am pleased that the city heeded Planning Commissioner Blanchards call to action to protect tenants against another Arbor Village purging of our most vulnerable community members for profiteering redevelopment and decided to include something in the proposed zoning code. However, the draft has some major flaws by... 1) limiting the action to requiring a conditional use permit for covered projects instead of guaranteeing mitigation for any displaced tenants in the form of mandated tenant relocation assistance, and 2) limiting this provision to only mixed-use zoning codes when there are 12 total zones where residential housing could exist not to mention that the vast majority of the mobile home parks (MHP) are in residential zoning.

Of the fifteen MHP’s in Boise city limits, every one has a residential zoning designation for their residential neighborhood – except for 2 in commercial designation, and of course Blue Valley that was inexplicably given an industrial zoning. I have not analyzed assisted living or income restricted housing but I suspect the results would be the same.” Nicki Olivier Hellenkamp (she/her) Mayor’s Housing Advisor Office of the Mayor Office: 208-972-8523 nhellenkamp@cityofboise.org cityofboise.org

Creating a city for everyone.

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Tuesday, March 28, 2023 4:07 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name William Donovan Email bonovan68@gmail.com Address 2089 White Pine Lane Comment Four years ago I moved to Boise from St Louis in part because Boise was a town I could ride my bicycle safely to almost anywhere in town. I hope you will not allow wonderful Boise to become a high density unsafe metropolis like St Louis. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Wednesday, March 29, 2023 5:50 AM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Darcy Elgin Email elgin.darcy@gmail.com Address 813 N 22nd St, Boise, ID 83702 Comment Historic Overlay District Expansion?? ‐ My house (813 N. 22nd St.) is presently zoned R‐2. It borders but is not a part of the Historic Overlay District. The new conversion map, however, states “Current and Proposed Overlay: Historic District.” Many neighboring properties that are not presently part of the historic district appear to have this new classification, as well. I do not understand why my house would now be incorporated into the historic district with these zoning changes. I am flagging this in case it is in error. If it is not an error, I write to strongly oppose this. These houses have never been part of the Historic District, and I have seen no justification for a change in status. This change will only serve to complicate rather than promote efficient growth, the supposed purpose of these zoning changes. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Thursday, March 30, 2023 8:58 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Colten Elkin Email colten.e.michael@gmail.com Address 3360 N Lakeharbor Lane, Q 206 Comment I'd love to see more Hyde Park‐style neighborhood eateries and more housing opportunities in all of Boise's neighborhoods. I strongly support property rights and believe that owners should have much more latitude in how they build on and use their land. I fully support this plan as written. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

Samantha Flaim <samflaim75@gmail.com> Wednesday, March 29, 2023 4:43 PM Mayor McLean; CityCouncil; Timothy Keane; zoninginfo; ZoningRewrite [External] Zoning Code Rewrite Public Comment for ZOA23-00001 & CPA23-00001

Dear Mayor, City Council, and Planning and Zoning Commission: The public has not been given adequate time to read, analyze, and comment meaningfully on the 611 page Zoning Code Rewrite, which are an almost complete replacement of the laws that, for the last half century, have established Boise as a highly desirable place to call home. The City of Boise is allowing only three weeks to submit comments by the March 22 deadline – the date that must be met for public testimony to be included in the Project Report. The Project Report will contain the staff analysis, and be provided to the Planning and Zoning Commission for their review well‐ahead of the later public hearings. In an incredibly complex rule‐change, it is imperative that the public is able to have their comments included in the Zoning Code Rewrite Project Report. After all, the City only released its final version of its Zoning Code Rewrite on February 28, 2023 – a document that does not show the numerous changes from the last draft released in October of 2022. This timeline has even put citizens that have carefully followed the process at an extraordinary disadvantage. Federal guidelines call for up to 180 days of public comment for rule changes that may have a large impact. The proposed changes to the Zoning Code Rewrite may lead to the most significant impacts many Boise residents will ever experience near their homes – rules that range from new allowances for alcohol serving commercial establishments within residential zoning districts, for tall apartment buildings next to single family homes, and even landfills within city limits. Given the enormity of the decision coming before the Planning and Zoning Commission on the week of April 23, it is essential that these volunteer public servants are able to consider written testimony for more than a few days over the weekend. Nonetheless, that is all the time they will have for those public comments that simply cannot be meaningfully submitted by the extremely short deadline of March 22. Please extend the timeline for public comment by at least 90 days. Sincerely, Samantha Flaim Boise, ID 83703

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Tuesday, March 28, 2023 12:31 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Susan Gemperle‐Abdo Email susangabdo@gmail.com Address 801 E Crestline Dr Comment The city code concerning ADU's 11‐03‐03 . In this section "(6) At the time of application for an accessory unit, the applicant shall provide proof of owner occupancy of the premises." This should be changed so a nonowner‐ occupied house can have long‐term housing as an ADU added to the premise.. With the housing shortage, it seems like it would be very beneficial for a rental home to be able to add an ADU for additional housing. Code can be added to ensure nonowner occupied housing that adds an ADU can only be used for Long Term rental which will help the housing shortage issue and create more affordable and smaller sqft housing. This change would also prevent nonowners‐occupied housing to turn an ADU into a short‐term/air BNB rental. I realize that much of the concern form folks was air BNB rentals. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

rngravesid@gmail.com Thursday, March 23, 2023 7:13 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Zoning Code Rewrite

What are you people thinking? I am concerned about the density and upzoning that is proposed in the rewrite of the current zoning ordinance. The increased density and the loss our current design standards are going to ruin our Boise neighborhoods just as the mostly non‐descript development that has been allowed to occur in downtown. We had the opportunity to do it right, we could have beautiful building instead of these unsightly apartments that have been allowed to be built by out of state developers. These people are going to rip down our charming buildings and neighborhoods, build ugly buildings, sell the buildings to an out of state investment group, take the money out of Boise and do the same thing in the next “hot” market. These developers, for the most part, are not helping to improve the quality of life in Ada County or Idaho, they just want to make a buck and move on. You don’t see any of them supporting any of the local non‐profits or educational institutions. I am also concerned about the loss of the opportunity to receive notice of these developments and the opportunity to comment on density and design review. We are losing what Boise is, we don’t need to provide housing for everyone who wants to live here, if we do, we are going to look like the paved areas of Los Angeles. Don’t change Idaho or Boise, let Boise and Idaho change you! Ron Graves

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Thursday, March 23, 2023 8:43 AM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name john hale Email jahale02@gmail.com Address 1805 n tenth Comment I am in support of rewriting the Zoning Code to reflect the contemporary and future needs of Boiseans. However, as drafted today, the Code still favors the automobile too heavily, and encourages low density sprawl. I strongly advocate for the following additional changes: 1) Affordable housing – do more to incent development of affordable housing by allowing zero‐parked housing, especially in R3 zones close to public transit options or the downtown. The current draft falls well short. 2) Mass transit and Boise core housing – promote higher density with no onsite parking requirements for residential housing along transit corridors and close to activity centers. Three blocks surrounding these critical pathways and community centers should be zoned R‐3 with no or minimal parking requirements to support affordable housing and alternative transit options (bike, walk, scoot, bus). 3) Approval Process ‐ Please consider further streamlining the process by disallowing or shortening objections to projects that fully comply with code. Developers make investment decisions based on risk. The “risk” that a fully compliant project could be denied based on community input presents an undue and uncontrollable risk. 4) Neighborhood Associations ‐ Neighborhood input is critical to the development of quality housing. However, the City of Boise currently gives an imbalanced power position to Neighborhood Associations. • The associations are allowed to make unsupported statements in testimony, with no burden of proof on assertions • The associations receive non‐public input opportunities to council members that are not disclose, and are not made available to developers • The associations are given more testimony time than the developers in public meetings, and are given the last word without opportunity for rebuttal by the developer These Associations quite often do not represent the best interests of their constituents: • The boards are not required to poll their constituents to inform the board’s position on projects. 5‐10 board members, many of whom are elderly and have served for many years, can stake a position that affects all of their constituents without ever asking for input. • The City does not require sufficient governance guidance to the associations. • The City does not audit compliance with current association practices and/or compliance with existing by laws. 5) ADUs – This housing product is the fastest solution to ease the affordable housing crisis. These should be 1

allowed non‐owner occupied applicants. There should be no onsite parking requirement, as this is a “back door” method for neighborhood associations to oppose ADUs. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

wingbeats <wingbeats@mailbox.org> Friday, March 24, 2023 3:30 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Thoughts on zoning code rewrite

Good Afternoon, My name is Diego Hilleary, I am 33 years old, and I've lived and rented all around Boise for 7 years. I work in IT at Idaho Housing and Finance Association, and I've experienced the housing struggles of Boise both firsthand and witnessed it among low‐income folks my organization is trying to help. I'm writing in to urge the Planning and Zoning Commission to vote for the zoning code rewrite. I feel Boise is restrained by the old zoning code that was created in a different era, and I want to remind everyone that Boise is a city. Cities are meant to grow and change as vibrant centers of diverse human art and culture, and that can't happen if we're only allowed to build miles and miles of high‐income suburbs that all look the same. I feel for those who liked Boise small, but we must look at reality. Young people like me want to come and work and pour money into Boise's economy, but we're hamstrung by a lack of housing. The only way to help us is to build denser, build higher, and build with intelligence. Idaho isn't wanting for rural and agricultural land ‐ we're utterly surrounded by in in the rest of the state. But I think Boise is an opportunity to be a vibrant oasis, where folks can come and land a great job and support their families ‐ all we're lacking is the starter housing to support us. We need the flexibility. We need more housing. And we can't let those fearing change hold us back. I am one of those young people dreaming of owning a home, but the huge suburbs being built with huge square footage are not made for me. I don't want to vacuum that huge house, let alone drive all the way to one, even if I could afford it. I want to walk and bike to work, I want to walk to a coffee shop or bike to lunch at a cafe. I don't want to be stuck sitting in traffic for two hours a day. One of my favorite parts of the code rewrite, aside from the greater density and housing type diversity, is the removal of lawn buffers. Turf takes so much water and is a terrible anti‐ecological monoculture, so I highly welcome the city maintaining less of it. Growth in Boise is happening. There is no stopping it. Thus, a zoning code rewrite that allows for greater density and height, with a focus on affordability and future sustainability, will be the smartest way to handle said growth. Cities are the most alive when they're allowed to grow and evolve. Keep Boise vibrant, keep Boise flexible, and keep Boise affordable! Thank you for your time in reading all this. I wish the Commission the best of luck and the most polite and kind of comments from everyone else. Please let me know if there are any questions or if I was unclear. Cheers, Diego Hilleary EDM Administrator at Idaho Housing and Finance 970‐379‐7437 Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

J Hull <katamanto@gmail.com> Thursday, March 23, 2023 4:59 AM Mayor McLean; CityCouncil; Timothy Keane; zoninginfo; ZoningRewrite [External] Zoning Code Rewrite Public Comment for ZOA23-00001 & CPA23-00001

March 22, 2023 Dear Mayor, City Council, and Planning and Zoning Commission: The public has not been given adequate time to read, analyze, and comment meaningfully on the 611 page Zoning Code Rewrite, which are an almost complete replacement of the laws that, for the last half century, have established Boise as a highly desirable place to call home. The City of Boise is allowing only three weeks to submit comments by the March 22 deadline–the date that must be met for public testimony to be included in the Project Report. The Project Report will contain the staff analysis, and be provided to the Planning and Zoning Commission for their review well-ahead of the later public hearings. In an incredibly complex rule-change, it is imperative that the public is able to have their comments included in the Zoning Code Rewrite Project Report. After all, the City only released its final version of its Zoning Code Rewrite on February 28, 2023–a document that does not show the numerous changes from the last draft released in October of 2022. This timeline has even put citizens that have carefully followed the process at an extraordinary disadvantage. Federal guidelines call for up to 180 days of public comment for rule changes that may have a large impact. The proposed changes to the Zoning Code Rewrite may lead to the most significant impacts many Boise residents will ever experience near their homes– rules that range from new allowances for alcohol serving commercial establishments within residential zoning districts, to tall apartment buildings next to single family homes, and even landfills within city limits. Given the enormity of the decision coming before the Planning and Zoning Commission on the week of April 23, it is essential that these volunteer public servants are able to consider written testimony for more than a few days over the weekend. Nonetheless, that is all the time they will have for those public comments that simply cannot be meaningfully submitted by the extremely short deadline of March 22. Please extend the timeline so that the public has at least 90 days to read, analyze, and write comments that will be included in the Zoning Code Rewrite Project Report. 1

Sincerely, Jody Hull 7916 W Queen Ct Boise ID 83704

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

craig hurst <craigmhurst@gmail.com> Friday, March 24, 2023 3:29 PM Mayor McLean; CityCouncil; Timothy Keane; zoninginfo; ZoningRewrite [External] Zoning overreach!!! Public Comment for ZOA23-00001 & CPA23-00001

Dear Mayor, City Council, and Planning and Zoning Commission: I was unaware of these proposed zoning changes. The short amount of time and lack of public input shows ridiculous overreach of this council, and to allow little public comment because it doesn't follow your own personal or public agenda is unacceptable. Do not allow this to proceed without more public input and do not write policies that create a blanket change for so many different zoning and multi use areas!!!!! There is plenty of space in this beautiful valley for additional projects Lets keep Boise different and keep Boise amazing. Use your political power for Boise area success. The public has not been given adequate time to read, analyze, and comment meaningfully on the 611 page Zoning Code Rewrite, which are an almost complete replacement of the laws that, for the last half century, have established Boise as a highly desirable place to call home. The City of Boise is allowing only three weeks to submit comments by the March 22 deadline – the date that must be met for public testimony to be included in the Project Report. The Project Report will contain the staff analysis, and be provided to the Planning and Zoning Commission for their review well‐ahead of the later public hearings. In an incredibly complex rule‐change, it is imperative that the public is able to have their comments included in the Zoning Code Rewrite Project Report. After all, the City only released its final version of its Zoning Code Rewrite on February 28, 2023 – a document that does not show the numerous changes from the last draft released in October of 2022. This timeline has even put citizens that have carefully followed the process at an extraordinary disadvantage. Federal guidelines call for up to 180 days of public comment for rule changes that may have a large impact. The proposed changes to the Zoning Code Rewrite may lead to the most significant impacts many Boise residents will ever experience near their homes – rules that range from new allowances for alcohol serving commercial establishments within residential zoning districts, for tall apartment buildings next to single family homes, and even landfills within city limits. Given the enormity of the decision coming before the Planning and Zoning Commission on the week of April 23, it is essential that these volunteer public servants are able to consider written testimony for more than a few days over the weekend. Nonetheless, that is all the time they will have for those public comments that simply cannot be meaningfully submitted by the extremely short deadline of March 22. Please extend the timeline for public comment by at least 90 days. Sincerely, Craig Hurst 214 S Pond Street 1

Boise Idaho 83705

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

Dave Kangas <davekangas@msn.com> Tuesday, March 28, 2023 10:30 AM ZoningRewrite; Andrea Tuning [External] Impessionns/ Housing Needs Analysis/ Lot splits/targeted impacts- comment for the ZCR

When I first read through and understood the ramifications of the revised Modules 1 and 2, I felt it was all about production. Production to produce as many units as possible, as quickly as possible, without regard to the people living in the areas most affected by its proposals. I could see even then that "Strategic Infill" (now under incentives) was specifically targeting areas on the Bench and West Boise with the lot widths over 55 feet rule. When the "Neighborhood Collector" criteria was combined with the MX3 incentive extending into neighborhood ¼ mile from any MX3 lot, it effectively covered the entirety of the Bench, West Boise with a blanket of incentivized redevelopment (more on this later). It is quite a rude awakening to realize that your home and neighborhood are viewed only as land to generate production. It is not a lifelong home, or a neighborhood of people- tenants and home owners of all incomes and demographics but a commodity in which to maximize profit. The Housing Needs Analysis confirms the intent. Boise's "Modern Zoning Code" marketing efforts have packaged it in a way to sooth the masses and sell a product. Throughout this discussion, note I will refrain from the over active use of labels, racial and economic segregation, but instead focus on the issue, the details, the facts not the hyperbole or justification the purported "professionals" use to sooth their egos as they push people from their homes and forever change the neighborhoods in which they are living. I am confident enough in my arguments, data and view point to stick with the issue. Housing Needs Analysis From day one after this was released, I felt this was about gaining a higher percentage of the Ada County building permit pool. The "need" for 27,000 housing in the next ten years exceeded that of the previous 20 years. A simple sold search on the MLS showed 20,134 residential new construction sales since 1/1/2000 and an additional 4192 residential income sales for 24,626 ttl new construction sales since 1/1/2000. COMPASS uses building permits vs sales and their data does not go back past 2010 that I could see. However, a quick calculation using COMPASS's 2021 Development Report data shows a total of 11968 building permits since 2014 for an average of 1496 annually. I started with 2014 since that is when post-recession production really started to pick up. 1496 units a year is significant difference from 2773 the Needs Analysis states but does not prove. The Needs Analysis never actually shows how it reached that number, it just states it time and again to convince you it is true. At one point it states Ada County exceeded demand by 768 units while Boise underperformed by 4146 units, which made zero sense to me. When looking at percentages I could see that from 2014 on Boise averaged about 26% of the Ada County building permits, while Meridian averaged 39% which has always been a sore spot for Boise leaders. The stated division in the Needs Analysis between Boise and Meridian is 41.4% for Boise, which for me shows the intent to gain a higher market share. Draw your own conclusions, but I can see no proof as to what the Needs Analysis asserts. Furthermore, from my understanding of Boise development patterns, home sales and ages I knew that the average needed density increase of 26% across all neighborhood would be targeted toward a specific area- The Bench and West Boise for sure and probably SE Boise too. Some Data- I always felt the 55 wide lot rule was meant to target car centric built homes of the 50's, 60's and 70's. These homes were developed at a time when land was plentiful, the car was coming on strong and attached garages vs alley loads the norm. Home designs were largely ranch style single level homes, split entry or tri-levels with a lower level partially below ground. I want to emphasize this trend of lower built heights throughout this time period, which I'll refer to later. I also felt and believe that lot size up to the 1950 or so tended to be platted on 50-foot-wide lots 100-125 ft deep with alleys, which would exclude a significant portion of them from the 55-foot-wide incentive. 1

I ran a couple sold searches to highlight lots eligible for lot splits- closed since 1/1/2014, .16 acres to .50 acres (excludes r1a,r1b large lots) no CC&R's or Historic Districts. Frankly I was surprised at the numbers, but it reinforced my feelings about targeting. The first one included homes built before 1950. The second for homes built from 1951 to 1980. I felt the homes built after 1980 were newer and more expensive to exclude from potential redevelopment and many would be in subdivisions with HOA's and CCR's. These two reports indicate what areas we can expect lot splits or subdividing to take place based on past sales. It also shows how we are targeting the lowest median sales price areas for redevelopment to achieve "affordability" which makes no sense to me. I have yet to see new construction to come in less expensive than those units being replaced. Not to mention the displacement of those current residents who will have few options locally and mostly be forced to leave Boise.

In these next 2 reports I pulled out sales of single level, single level with below ground and single w/bonus rooms. I wanted to see these numbers to address the compatibility and height transistion issues associated with the new code annd its incentives‐ 40 feet high, up to three stories.

From these 2 reports you can see that 82% of the homes sold since 2014 built before 1950 that qualify for subdividing or lot splits are single levels. And 79% of the build built from 1951 to 1980 are single levels. This is important when considerinng transitions and how new development relates to the "built environment", "protects stable enighborhoods", "predictable developmennt patterns". I am certainn there those who shout how these home needs to be replaced with more units, but not if there is ZERO connsideration given to those currently living there and are forced to live with Frankenstein developments that just don't blend in or transition to neighboring homes. While the current code does allow for transitions for lots under 3500 sq ft, we have not found any for lots splits created over 3500 sq ft. Nor any for incentives. 6

Incentives I have yet to find annyone living in an affected area who supports the idea that up to 12 units per lot, 40 ft high, up to 3 stories is good idea or welcome. This incentive began as only within 300 ft of a Neighborhood Collector on lots over 55 ft wide in R1c. It has now expanded to all collectors and arterials in ALL ZONES. Thank you for listening Boise. MX3 ‐ When I questioned the need to expand the above inceentive ¼ from any MX3 lot I was told we needed to support transit. What transit? Everone I have talked to about transit, loves the idea, but hates the execution, the time, the inconvenience. From what I read, if you want to build transit, you have to build the service FIRST. I am sure there are those that will disagree. People don't ride transit because they don't want to walk ¼ mile, they don't ride beacause the service sucks. We also live in state that will never fund transit, to the degree necessary to promote better service levels. In fact, with the new legislature, they are already attacking simple funding for bicycle annd pedestrian paths. Targeting surrounding neighborhoods for redevelopment before we have redevleped our corridors or before we have a source of consistent funding is putting the cart before the horse, a long ways before the horse, a horse that is just an idea. Renting vs home ownership I am surprised, greatly disheartened that an argument over the benfits of home ownership over renting needs to be made. Home ownership has never been easy. It is about choices, long term goals, building for the future. The first home purchase is as dauntinng today as it has ever been. The Upzone is designed to massively increase production of rental units across a specifc, targeted landscape and people surprised that there is resistance? Of course the area, that these units will be placed are largely outside of protected overlays annd subdivisions. I and many others question the long term viability of a large Boise relegated to rental properties. Certainly they look great now, but over time, is that really the path Boise wants to take? Too bad there aren't incentives built in to the ZCR to promote single family homes, townnhomes, even condominiums, but they are soley focused on rental units. This is also problematic given the current aggressive corporate property management techniques being employed today. Why would we promote, subjegate more people to those issues. Last time I checked close to 75% of Jessie Tree's budget was for emergency rental assistance caused by excessive property management fees annd rent increases. Tell me agin the virtue of renting over buying? Displacement We see this issue come up time and again. Apartments, assisted living, trailer courts, multi family residences being remodeled or demolished annd replaced with market rate housing. The ZCR does not provide for adequeate protections to address these issues. Why would allow large scale dispalcment without requirements a to replace current low incomes at the same numbers? I have an issue with the City of Boise prmoting large scale displacment, some or many who will end up on City low income rolls, subsidzied by the taxpayers. The devlopers make a killing. Low income families and seniors are pushed into turmoil. The taxpayer gets to pick up the tab, which in Boise is getting quite expensive. While I fully support Boise's efforts to develop low inncome housing, I do question the inntenisty and size of some projects. I question just how much are Boise taxpayers responnsible for when no other city in the region is helping. Just how high do Boise residents want their property taxes to go? Summary From the beginning of this process I have voiced my opinion that the Code should be rewritten passed as a simple rewrite. That would be a victory and all the money, time and effort would bne rewarded. THEN, take on all the land use issues by priority and currennt economic and development trends. Using data from a report generated at the height of the Covid pandemic is not sound policy. Trying to create and pass an aggressive land use upzone that does not address localized neighborhood development trends, will just build resistance and opposition. Recently, I reviewed a number of websites from ann RFP for 12 Missing Middle/rewrite consultants. Inn reviewing a number of those websites, I do not see one promoting 40 ft 3 story 7

buildings next to single levels. Instead the majority of their websites shows compatible designs across the landscape. I also saw in more than one of those websites comments on not being too aggressive as it will build opposition. This rewriteis supposed to guide Boise for the next 50 years, not just into the next 5‐10 years. The Urban environment I am consitently frustrated with the idea that people think we can build ourselves into affordability. Boise is onnnnne of the most popular places ini the country and one of the fastest. It has always been more expensive than surrounding areas‐ always. Instead, we should recognize that housing in our large, populat cities is always going to be expesnive‐ always. Urban land is expensive, adding entitlements makes it more expensive. No large, growing popular city can claim affordability unless it subsidized. Patrick Condon and planner from Vancouver, BC who once promoted density as the path to affordability has had to change course. Vancouver apparently has increased density six‐fold and is now the most expensive city in Canada. Is that what Boise is striving for? it seems so to me and growing number of others. Dave Kangas 1715 W Canal St

Boise, ID 83705 208‐841‐0580 davekangas@msn.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

Dave Kangas <davekangas@msn.com> Wednesday, March 29, 2023 3:30 PM ZoningRewrite; Andrea Tuning [External] Re: Impessionns/ Housing Needs Analysis/ Lot splits/targeted impacts- comment for the ZCR

This comment below, was not meant or directed at anyonne associated with the City of Boise planning staff or other. It was to be included in an online post, where at lot of "labels" are being used. Please accept my apologies for including it in this communication. It should not have been there. "Throughout this discussion, note I will refrain from the over active use of labels, racial and economic segregation, but instead focus on the issue, the details, the facts not the hyperbole or justification the purported "professionals" use to sooth their egos as they push people from their homes and forever change the neighborhoods in which they are living. I am confident enough in my arguments, data and view point to stick with the issue."

Dave Kangas ‐ Realtor 208.841‐0580 | dave@callisongroup.com Callison Group Real Estate Dave.Callisonhomes.com For personal communications, not related to real estate:

davekangas@msn.com

From: Dave Kangas Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2023 10:30 AM To: City of Boise Planning Department <zoningrewrite@cityofboise.org>; Andrea Tuning <atuning@cityofboise.org> Subject: Impessionns/ Housing Needs Analysis/ Lot splits/targeted impacts‐ comment for the ZCR When I first read through and understood the ramifications of the revised Modules 1 and 2, I felt it was all about production. Production to produce as many units as possible, as quickly as possible, without regard to the people living in the areas most affected by its proposals. I could see even then that "Strategic Infill" (now under incentives) was specifically targeting areas on the Bench and West Boise with the lot widths over 55 feet rule. When the "Neighborhood Collector" criteria was combined with the MX3 incentive extending into neighborhood ¼ mile from any MX3 lot, it effectively covered the entirety of the Bench, West Boise with a blanket of incentivized redevelopment (more on this later). It is quite a rude awakening to realize that your home and neighborhood are viewed only as land to generate production. It is not a lifelong home, or a neighborhood of people- tenants and home owners of all incomes and demographics but a commodity in which to maximize profit. The Housing Needs Analysis confirms the intent. Boise's "Modern Zoning Code" marketing efforts have packaged it in a way to sooth the masses and sell a product. Throughout this discussion, note I will refrain from the over active use of labels, racial and economic segregation, but instead focus on the issue, the details, the facts not the hyperbole or justification the purported "professionals" use to sooth their egos as they push people from their homes and forever 1

change the neighborhoods in which they are living. I am confident enough in my arguments, data and view point to stick with the issue. Housing Needs Analysis From day one after this was released, I felt this was about gaining a higher percentage of the Ada County building permit pool. The "need" for 27,000 housing in the next ten years exceeded that of the previous 20 years. A simple sold search on the MLS showed 20,134 residential new construction sales since 1/1/2000 and an additional 4192 residential income sales for 24,626 ttl new construction sales since 1/1/2000. COMPASS uses building permits vs sales and their data does not go back past 2010 that I could see. However, a quick calculation using COMPASS's 2021 Development Report data shows a total of 11968 building permits since 2014 for an average of 1496 annually. I started with 2014 since that is when post-recession production really started to pick up. 1496 units a year is significant difference from 2773 the Needs Analysis states but does not prove. The Needs Analysis never actually shows how it reached that number, it just states it time and again to convince you it is true. At one point it states Ada County exceeded demand by 768 units while Boise underperformed by 4146 units, which made zero sense to me. When looking at percentages I could see that from 2014 on Boise averaged about 26% of the Ada County building permits, while Meridian averaged 39% which has always been a sore spot for Boise leaders. The stated division in the Needs Analysis between Boise and Meridian is 41.4% for Boise, which for me shows the intent to gain a higher market share. Draw your own conclusions, but I can see no proof as to what the Needs Analysis asserts. Furthermore, from my understanding of Boise development patterns, home sales and ages I knew that the average needed density increase of 26% across all neighborhood would be targeted toward a specific area- The Bench and West Boise for sure and probably SE Boise too. Some Data- I always felt the 55 wide lot rule was meant to target car centric built homes of the 50's, 60's and 70's. These homes were developed at a time when land was plentiful, the car was coming on strong and attached garages vs alley loads the norm. Home designs were largely ranch style single level homes, split entry or tri-levels with a lower level partially below ground. I want to emphasize this trend of lower built heights throughout this time period, which I'll refer to later. I also felt and believe that lot size up to the 1950 or so tended to be platted on 50-foot-wide lots 100-125 ft deep with alleys, which would exclude a significant portion of them from the 55-foot-wide incentive. I ran a couple sold searches to highlight lots eligible for lot splits- closed since 1/1/2014, .16 acres to .50 acres (excludes r1a,r1b large lots) no CC&R's or Historic Districts. Frankly I was surprised at the numbers, but it reinforced my feelings about targeting. The first one included homes built before 1950. The second for homes built from 1951 to 1980. I felt the homes built after 1980 were newer and more expensive to exclude from potential redevelopment and many would be in subdivisions with HOA's and CCR's. These two reports indicate what areas we can expect lot splits or subdividing to take place based on past sales. It also shows how we are targeting the lowest median sales price areas for redevelopment to achieve "affordability" which makes no sense to me. I have yet to see new construction to come in less expensive than those units being replaced. Not to mention the displacement of those current residents who will have few options locally and mostly be forced to leave Boise.

Boise, ID 83705 208‐841‐0580 davekangas@msn.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

djkreiner2@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of dennis kreiner <djkreiner2 @everyactioncustom.com> Friday, March 24, 2023 3:55 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Vote Yes on the Zoning Code Rewrite

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Monday, March 27, 2023 11:29 AM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Ethan Mansfield Email mansfield.ethan@gmail.com Address 4409 W Albion St. Boise, ID 83705 Comment Dear Staff, Commissioners, and Council members, I've written several other letters, so I will keep this one brief. In short, I support the implementation of the new zoning code. I would like to see parking minimums and maximus abolished and I would like to remove the table of allowed uses and replace it with dimensional requirements and design guidelines, which (let's be honest with ourselves) are really what create a community's flavor and vibe in the first place. If anything, liberalizing the allowed land uses will only create more interesting, vibrant communities. That's what we are shooting for with "mixed‐use" in the first place. We used to have mixed‐use communities organically. We outlawed it and are now forcing the mixed‐use idea back into land‐use planning. But why can't we just let it happen naturally? Why are we so afraid of letting Cities grow up like they used to ‐‐ if prices (which express demand) are any indication, places that developed before the implementation of the zoning code are extremely valuable. Why a) did we outlaw them in the first place, and b) now try to control the specific uses and amount of parking allowed in them? It is precisely because we tried to plan uses from the top down that we have created communities that are not walkable, do not have services, etc. etc. Instead of merely changing the regulatory environment slightly, let's examine the conditions that created the organic development of cities and their dynamism, and shoot for that instead. Then, we can regulate specific impacts instead of preventing dynamic growth all together. Cheers, Ethan If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Tuesday, March 28, 2023 12:09 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Ethan Mansfield Email mansfield.ethan@gmail.com Address 4409 W Albion Street Comment Hi, it's me again. I think that City objectives could be achieved equally well if single‐family homes WITH ADUs were allowed in the R‐3 zone. Let's face it ‐ there is no functional difference between ADUs and duplex dwellings other than the forms. Both provide an additional unit of housing. In the name of "preserving neighborhood character", we've placed size and owner occupancy requirements on ADUs, but it really should not matter whether the units are attached or detached, renter or owner occupied. If that statement "people are people and units are units" is true, then the inclusion of required ADUs should not impact the development of R‐3 neighborhoods at all ‐ it's functionally the same as a duplex. There are plenty of neighborhoods that should be R‐3 that are not, and plenty of neighborhoods that are not ready to be 100% NOT single‐family homes that are zoned R‐3. Again, we wouldn't have this conundrum if we just let places grow organically, but here we are! :) Cheers, Ethan If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject:

Kristie McCaleb <kristieamccaleb@yahoo.com> Monday, March 27, 2023 9:07 AM ZoningRewrite Kristie McCaleb; Mickey McCaleb [External] Zoning Re-Write

Dear City of Boise, We are NOT IN FAVOR of the Zoning Re‐write for Boise. Michael & Kristie McCaleb 4297 N Chatterton Ave Boise, ID 83713 Kristie McCaleb 208-906-6810

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

Nannette Nelson <nannettemnelson@gmail.com> Friday, March 24, 2023 4:24 PM Mayor McLean; ZoningRewrite; Timothy Keane; CityCouncil [External] Zoning Code Rewrite

Greetings, I am writing to ask you to please re-consider the impact that high density infill in Boise's peripheral neighborhoods will have on the neighborhoods between outlying neighborhoods and the areas of commerce and employment opportunities. I am a huge fan of walkable/bikeable communities. I choose to live in one. However, doubling the number of housing in the areas on the edge of town in every direction will NOT create 15 minute communities! Especially in neighborhoods in the foothills where commuting to downtown and the connector by bike and walking is in no way realistic. As much as I would love to encourage more bike and pedestrian commuting, we must be realistic about expecting people to do such if they live in the hills, especially with the extreme heat and cold weather Boise has, not to mention the lack of infrastructure to support it. 1. The things that create 15 minute cities are having shopping, schools, and jobs within a 15 minute bike or walk. That is, and will be, impossible with more housing so far from those amenities. 2. All those new residents will be driving to and from commerce and work a 20+ minute drive away. The hope that adding mixed use in peripheral neighborhoods is nice but unrealistic in areas like the foothills and will not keep residents shopping and working in their neighborhoods. 3. The roads through neighborhoods that feed the foothills and neighborhoods on all edges of town will become extremely high traffic such as happened to 15th St and Harrison Blvd. and those neighborhood roads are not wide enough or designed for that much car traffic. 4. The 15 minute city works where it is already that- an urban setting, where there is a market, pharmacy, school, barber, bar, bike shop, restaurants, baker, park etc. within 15 minutes. 5. Do you think any of the new residents on Crestline, Table Rock, Overland and Maple Grove are going to have 15 minute walk/bike commutes? No, they will still have to drive everywhere. I don't see any new bus routes planned for Shenandoah or Shaw Mtn Rd. anytime soon. The quiet east end will suffer greatly with the doubling+ of vehicles headed to Warm Springs Ave, Parkcenter and Broadway Ave. 6. High density/mixed use infill needs to be allowed where new housing is close to commerce and employment opportunities. 7. HIgh density infill in peripheral neighborhoods turns quiet neighborhoods into thoroughfares. I recently had to sell my home, which I LOVED, on 15th St because the traffic had increased by thousands of car/truck/trailer trips per day in the last 15 years and I literally could no longer sleep at night because of the traffic noise. When I moved I made a point to find a street in the east end that had no chance of increased development in the foothills. I thought I knew what I was buying as far as traffic concerns. The new proposals will double the number of vehicles driving on my street daily. All the new residents in the foothills will drive, not bike or walk, to Broadway and Warm Springs Ave to get to their commerce and employment destinations. The stop signs and speed bumps in our neighborhood do nothing but cause the drivers to gun their engines and bang their trailers every other block. The increase of traffic on these streets will dramatically change our neighborhood as well as all other neighborhoods sandwiched between infill and commerce. Again, adding hundreds of units in the foothills and edges of town will only double the traffic through all the neighborhoods between them and places of commerce and employment. What does that do to the air quality and noise levels in those neighborhoods? Let's not be delusional. 15 minute cities are wonderful where they were built hundreds of years ago and we can do it again but they have to be planned before the development happens to really create them. I live in the East End and I would welcome high density infill here as it supports the ideal of a 15 minute city/neighborhood. It is generally flat, has wide sidewalks and close proximity to the greenbelt, enabling nonvehicle commuting to the commerce and employment downtown, Parkcenter and Hyde Park/State St areas. 1

There are other areas of Boise such as Parkcenter and Downtown that have great bike and pedestrian commute infrastructure, terrain that is bike/pedestrian friendly and close to commerce and employment centers. The damage to neighborhoods is rarely a result of high density residents, it is the vehicle traffic that creates the damage to quality living, not the people. Please reconsider the upzoning of Boise's peripheral neighborhoods and the damaging impact of being sandwiched between more car commuting neighborhoods and commerce/employment destinations would have on our "in-between" neighborhoods. Thank you for your work to manage the growth of our city. I appreciate the intent to grow better and healthier. All the best,

Nannette Nelson 425 N Locust St Boise, ID 83712 208‐859‐1972 ~Live well~

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Monday, March 27, 2023 11:57 AM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Rebecca J Oparnico Email RebeccaO.realestate@gmail.com Address 4959 S Umatilla Ave Boise ID 83709 Comment Please DO NOT upzone Boise! Upzoning will increase cost of living and destroy the unique character of our community. I have lived in Boise for 30 years, raised my children, built my business and have created an incredible community of family and friends. Boise struggles currently to keep up with infrastructure based on the growth in the past 30 years. Exponentially growing the population and building more apartments, high rise buildings, etc. will cause irreversible harm to our community & infrastructure. I have yet to see affordable housing being built so I don't see how Boise residents (homeowners & renters) will benefit from this plan. Property values have continued to rise over the past years leaving many Boiseans having to consider moving out of Boise just to afford housing costs. Upzoning will continue to rise property values & property taxes. Other than this benefitting the City of Boise financially, I don't see how this benefits the citizens of Boise. Please reject the upzone Boise plan! If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

l Pennisi <lppennisi@yahoo.com> Wednesday, March 29, 2023 4:31 PM ZoningRewrite [External] ZOA23-00001, CPA23-00001

This zoning code rewrite is nothing more than a way to destroy the American Dream of single-family homeownership, all in the name of climate change, equity, and affordability. The proposed changes are so legally complicated that the residents will most likely be unable to fight the radical transformation that this code permits. The housing bonus ordinance was a warmup for what is proposed in this ZCR. I participated in several of the ZCR community sessions and have testified at P&Z hearings in the past so I have been involved in the process. I know how difficult it was to bring arguments before P&Z because residents could only base their comments on legal challenges. This rewrite would compound the public's ability to participate in the process because if a person cannot understand the legalese then how can that person challenge it? This ZCR seeks to remove the public from the process and solidify the relationship between the City and developers all to accelerate development, but the taxpayers pay and suffer the consequences of unmanaged growth. Change is not always necessary and not all change is good. Lauren Pennisi 2411 W Pleasanton Ave

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

Linda P <lindapeterson83706@gmail.com> Sunday, March 26, 2023 9:38 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Proposed Zoning Code

As a Boise resident I vehemently oppose the proposed Boise upzoning/code rewrite. This change to current zoning regulations will greatly and permanently damage the integrity, consistency and livability of Boise neighborhoods. The only beneficiaries to this disaster will be developers, who will be allowed to rampage unbridled in their pursuit of profit throughout our city with no meaningful controls. I cannot understand why the mayor and her city council would inflict this monster upon the residents of our city. She evidently wants to radically increase density to gain more federal dollars for her purposes, clearly not to improve the livability of Boise neighborhoods. This new code is not in the best interest of the citizens of Boise and the residents of its diverse neighborhoods. Negative impacts of the proposed zoning code: 1. Allows intrusive and incompatible uses such as apartments, boarding houses, retail sales, bars, cafes, and bed and breakfasts in the middle of residential neighborhoods. Eliminates requirements and opportunities for public hearings. 2. Increased demand from investors and developers will drive up property and home values, raising taxes and further challenging home affordability. 3. New code will encourage demolishing existing homes with taller, bigger, denser construction with less required parking. Trees and private open space will be lost. 4. By making higher density housing an allowed use by right, the code shuts out neighbors from the proceedings and from being meaningfully heard, circumvents the normal planning and zoning process, and reverses the city's decades-long commitment to its neighborhoods. 5. My neighborhood was recently able to drive a crime-ridden wide-open crack house from our area through use and enforcement of Boise's existing zoning codes. With this new code we would not have that tool available to us to improve the safety and livability of our neighborhood. We would still have the crack house and the mayor would have her "density" goals. This is unacceptable. 6. Infrastructure such as schools, fire, police would become overburdened and require higher taxes from all of us to subsidize the demand. I reject this code as it is currently proposed. The mayor has tried to ram it through. This new code is bad for Boise and all who love our city. Thank you, Linda Peterson 2195 S. White Pine Pl. Boise, ID 83706

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

bella.pratt@ymail.com Tuesday, March 28, 2023 7:16 AM Mayor McLean; CityCouncil; Timothy Keane; zoninginfo; ZoningRewrite [External] Extend Timeline for Upzoning

3/28/23 To: mayormclean@cityofboise.org, citycouncil@cityofboise.org, tkeane@cityofboise.org, zoninginfo@cityofboise.org, zoningr ewrite@cityofboise.org Re: Zoning Code Rewrite Public Comment for ZOA23‐00001 & CPA23‐00001 Dear Mayor, City Council, and Planning and Zoning Commission: The public has not been given adequate time to read, analyze, and comment meaningfully on the 611 page Zoning Code Rewrite, which are an almost complete replacement of the laws that, for the last half century, have established Boise as a highly desirable place to call home. The City of Boise is allowing only three weeks to submit comments by the March 22 deadline – the date that must be met for public testimony to be included in the Project Report. The Project Report will contain the staff analysis, and be provided to the Planning and Zoning Commission for their review well‐ahead of the later public hearings. In an incredibly complex rule‐ change, it is imperative that the public is able to have their comments included in the Zoning Code Rewrite Project Report. After all, the City only released its final version of its Zoning Code Rewrite on February 28, 2023 – a document that does not show the numerous changes from the last draft released in October of 2022. This timeline has even put citizens that have carefully followed the process at an extraordinary disadvantage. Federal guidelines call for up to 180 days of public comment for rule changes that may have a large impact. The proposed changes to the Zoning Code Rewrite may lead to the most significant impacts many Boise residents will ever experience near their homes – rules that range from new allowances for alcohol serving commercial establishments within residential zoning districts, for tall apartment buildings next to single family homes, and even landfills within city limits. Given the enormity of the decision coming before the Planning and Zoning Commission on the week of April 23, it is essential that these volunteer public servants are able to consider written testimony for more than a few days over the weekend. Nonetheless, that is all the time they will have for those public comments that simply cannot be meaningfully submitted by the extremely short deadline of March 22. Please extend the timeline for public comment by at least 90 days. Sincerely, Bella Pratt 2577 S. Oak Leaf Ln

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Tuesday, March 28, 2023 10:33 AM CityCouncil Contact Form Submitted to City Council

Follow Up Flag: Flag Status:

Follow up Flagged

CREATING A CITY FOR EVERYONE

CONTACT FORM SUBMITTED TO CITY COUNCIL From Matthew Silva matthewrubensilva@gmail.com Phone Number: 2082506437 After seeing a lot of vocal presence for the "don't upzone boise" crowd at treefort, I just wanted to weigh in and say that they are not representative of my, and many of my friend's views. Updating the ancient zoning codes to deprioritize single family residences and car centric infrastructure is desperately needed. Density, walk ability, mixed use and for the love of God more bike paths, are all things I, as a resident of the bench where some streets by my house still don't have sidewalks, would love to see happen. Obviously things are complicated, and affordability for current residents, outside commercial investment meddling in the housing market, and fears over getting priced out of your own neighborhood are valid and need to be addressed. But these things do not need to conflict with an agenda that seeks to make Boise a nicer place to live and limit urban sprawl. Thank you for your time Matt Contact Form Submitted On: https://www.cityofboise.org/CityWideContactForm?contactId=1890

208-608-7000 info@cityofboise.org 150 North Capitol Boulevard, Boise, ID 83702

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Thursday, March 30, 2023 10:43 AM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Erin Sorensen Email erin@ethosdesignremodel.com Address Boise, ID 83703 Comment Overall I am supportive of the code rewrite and believe it is long overdue. Particularly as it relates to areas where we can bolster alternative transportation and make bus routes have more frequency in stops. Over the last 9 months, I have had the opportunity to live along State Street at the intersection of Bloom and State Street. When we moved from the Bench neighborhood our family's bus riding quadrupled because of how easy it is to hop on bus #9 along State Street. Bus #9 runs every 15 minutes from the early hours of the day until about 9 pm. Just yesterday I rode the bus home after working out at the downtown YMCA, it was awesome, after my workout, I grabbed a coffee at a nearby cafe, and then on the way home, I got caught up on emails. My two teenage sons use this route sometimes 8+ times a day (they are in sports and band) and it saves my husband and me from doing a lot of car trips. I believe placing opportunities for density along great bus lines is just smart planning and something that folks will get used to once they have the opportunity to experience positive impacts on quality of life such as my family has since moving. I am particularly concerned about placing restrictions on purchases for naturally affordable rental houses. In my experience, many of the naturally affordable rental homes (and just lower‐cost homes in general) that come on the market for sale are such because they are at the end of their usable life and are often needing critical repairs which cost ten's thousand's to implement. As a principal at Ethos Deisgn+Remodel and Ethos Developments where we specialize in building ADUs and affordable homes for folks 120% and blow AMI, our company specializes in the preservation and rehabilitation of existing structures for our clients and for holdings. A common misunderstanding of remodeling projects is that folks think remodeling is easier than new construction. The reality is that it's much more difficult to implement. Many of the homes we rehab are not up to code, requiring new electrical systems, wired‐in smoke, and carbon detectors, new plumbing systems, and new ventilation and heating systems. To do that work we have to remove drywall which exposes exterior walls, and often other issues too‐‐we don't have x‐ray vision that's perfect to identify every concealed condition sadly. These units then need to be insulated and brought up to the current building code standards. Often requiring us to furr out walls to add extra room for the thicker insulation‐‐which we believe is the #1 item that should be done to most remodels to keep our future energy consumption as small as possible. In addition to this, we have to create as‐built building plans showing current conditions, then building plans showing the proposed remodel up to jurisdictional standards which is submitted to the City of Boise to obtain Building permits (before all the work above mentioned even starts). We frequently have to hire other professionals such as licensed structural engineers, and energy modelers to retrofit new systems into existing structures and make sure that we are compliant and meet safety criteria. All of this represents our work and it's important because the embodied energy in these older homes needing repair is significant and should not be wasted. Building materials are too precious of a resource to be thrown into the landfill. Instead of placing restrictions on these types of units that may deter folks from wanting to purchase them, I'd like to see more incentives in place for preserving the number of affordable units within the purchaser's total building portfolio within city limits. Sometimes it just won't pencil to rehab a unit and keep it 1

under 80% or even 120% AMI. We might need to blend market with affordable units. The City should not make it harder for individuals and groups to purchase these older units that may have significant maintenance differed and no reserves to do critical repairs to keep them safe. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Saturday, April 1, 2023 9:58 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Andrew Bennett Email bennett.andrew1234@gmail.com Address 4020 N Delmonte Dr Comment Dear Mayor, I Sincerely ask for a longer period of time to review the news only laws, because the new 611 page document takes me a long time to read after many hours of work during the day. I ask for more time to read over the document and the proposed changes to the zoning because this will affect my community and my neighborhood. Thank you for extending the period of time to review these important documents. Sincerely, Andrew Bennett If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

George E. Bernick <jgbernick@gmail.com> Monday, April 3, 2023 7:47 AM ZoningRewrite [External] Tim Keane

What did Tim Mean actually accomplish in Atlanta and why did Atlanta decide it was time for him to go? Important questions to be made public before his plan to increase population density in Boise is put into effect.

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

wblair4318@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of William Blair <wblair4318 @everyactioncustom.com> Thursday, April 6, 2023 4:50 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Vote Yes on the Zoning Code Rewrite

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Wednesday, April 5, 2023 12:02 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Stephen Cox Email stephenscox@yahoo.com Address 5190 N EDENBURGH WAY, Boise 83714 Comment The proposed code changes to the R‐1C Zone are unacceptable. We purchased our home in 2002 because of the neighborhood characteristics of single‐family homes on moderate‐sized lots (generally 7,000 to 10,000 square feet. The new code would allow these homes to be redeveloped into multi‐family, multi‐story units jammed onto lots 1/2 the size of existing lots and without requiring any P&Z Commission review and therefore no public comment. Multiple new uses would also be permitted without any public comment or review. Although the proposed code retains the R‐1C zoning for our area (Coventry Manor Sub., our proximity to State Street, the existing "apartmentalization" east of Pierce Park, and the proposed high‐density development on the former Plantation golf course across State Street would place our neighborhood at risk of invasion by new development that would destroy the very characteristics that we have enjoyed for over 20 years. I do not know who served on the "citizen advisory committee" for the rezone process, but they did not do a good job of protecting long‐standing neighborhoods across Boise. They seem to have been selected for their support of a Mayor and Council‐driven agenda rather than providing a true community perspective. Also, it appears that Planning staff have been directed, either overly or covertly, to provide a new code that enhances the power of the planning bureaucracy at the expense of citizen review by removing the P&Z Commission from many of the decisions that will drastically affect our neighborhoods. This new code should not receive consideration until after City Council elections by districts have been held and a new Council seated. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

dahlinsm@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Samuel Dahlin <dahlinsm@everyactioncustom.com> Thursday, April 6, 2023 1:23 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Vote Yes on the Zoning Code Rewrite

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

jvandinter@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of James Van Dinter <jvandinter@everyactioncustom.com> Thursday, April 6, 2023 2:32 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Vote Yes on the Zoning Code Rewrite

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

Slobodanka Hodzic <shodzic@jannus.org> Wednesday, April 5, 2023 1:02 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Support for the update of local zoning code

Hello, I would like to express support for the update of Boise zoning code. It has been long overdue, and we are really in need of more inclusive housing opportuni es. As somebody who arrived as a refugee and has been working with new Americans for the last twenty years, I have seen huge changes in housing availability and affordability. Also, as a parent of young adults who are looking to buy their first home, I have seen how much younger genera ons and lower income families have been struggling to find affordable housing opportuni es. Housing is a building block for safety, security, and prosperity. Without secure housing all other plans and services are impossible to achieve. Changing the zoning code to allow more affordable and inclusive housing is the only way to address the need to increase housing opportuni es. We cannot close our eyes and pretend that Boise is growing. Addressing the growth in strategical way is the right way to work on this issue. Thank you,

Slobodanka Hodzic (pronouns: she, her Why pronouns are important! Program Director Agency for New Americans 1614 W. Jefferson St. Boise, ID 83702 shodzic@jannus.org I http://www.anaidaho.org/ 208.955.0160

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments:

Dave Kangas <davekangas@msn.com> Friday, March 31, 2023 5:35 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Fw: Zoned out March 30 event results 20230331_153135.jpg; processed-673c6705-90fd-40ec-bd85-e60dc96d46d3_UVwQYVbc.jpeg; processed-e5905f7a-02b6-4848-b916-47444902bab4_tkSNBUVP.jpeg; QUESTIONNAIRE MARCH 30 ZONED OUT EVENT.docx

On March 30 Boise Working Together/RejectBoiseUpzone held an event at Hillcrest library where we watch the ZonedOut video from Austin, TX. The video was followed up with an open q and a with members of the RBU effort. This event was attended by 52 attenndees, 25 of whom filled out a questionnaire we put together at the last minute. Here are the results of that questionaire and some follow up comments that were added. The questionnaire numerical order was not proof read before printing, I left it alone for forwarding. I think the result speak for themselves. A couple of the questions could be clearer. I believe there is a distinct difference in support for ZCR based on age group. Since the majority of our attendees are seniors I can't speak for the other age groups though. If you need copies of the individual filled out forms to be included in the record, let me know. We did not ask for names, etc on these forms, just on the check in registration forms. Dave Kangas President Boise Working Together 208-841-0580 davekangas@msn.com

From: Dave Kangas Sent: Friday, March 31, 2023 4:18 PM To: davekangas@msn.com <davekangas@msn.com> Subject: Zoned out March 30 event results

Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone Get Outlook for Android

QUESTIONAIRE 25 responses from 50+ Zoned Out screening event- Hillcrest Library 1- From the video do you think Austin compares to Boise? 20 YES, 1 NO, 4 NA 2- Do you think Boise should wait for final approval until a City Council is elected and seated representing all 6 districts? 24 YES, 1 NO 3- Do you support funding and building infrastructure for transit? 9 YES, 14 NO 4- Do you support increasing density on main corridors for transit? 6 YES, 19 NO 5- Do you support increasing density with multifamily homes and small apartments in neighborhoods to support transit? 2 YES, 22 NO, 1 NA 6- Do you think the state legislature should fund transit? 11 YES, 12 NO 1 NA 7- Do you think the state legislature will ever fund transit? 3 YES, 20 NO, 2 NA 8- Do you support new multifamily up to 4 units in neighborhoods?0 Y, 22 N,3 NA 9- Do you support remodeling current single-family homes in neighborhoods into multfamily homes or small apartments of up to 12 units? 0 YES, 25 NO 10- Do you support the idea of new developments in single family homes neighborhoods being up to 40 ft high and 3 stories? 0 YES, 24 NO, 1 NA 11- Do you support increasing height limits in r-2 (45 feet) and r-3 (55 ft)medium density and high-density zones? 1 YES, 23 NO, 1 NA 12- Do you feel the city is doing well in educating you on the zoning code rewrite? 1 YES, 24 NO 13- Do you support the idea of increasing density, height and allowed uses to promote more growth in Boise? 0 YES, 23 NO, 2 NA 14- How did you find out about the zoning code rewrite? the City-5 local news-1 yard signs-7 Reject Boise Upzone- 16 NestDoor- 2 16- Have you submitted comments on the zoning code rewrite? 11-Y, 13 N, 1 NA 17- Do you support the zoning code rewrite as currently written? 1-Y, 23-N,1-NA

18- Do you support required parking reductions for new multifamily and apartment projects? 0 YES, 20-NO, 5- NA 19- Would support higher density if code required affordable units? 2-YES, 15-NO ,8 NA 20- Do you support what RejectBoiseUpzone is trying to do?19-YES, 2- NO, 4 NA 21- Do you own a car or truck? 24-YES, 1 NO 22- How many registered vehicles(cars/atvs/boats) does your household have? 53 ttl from 22 responses= 2.4 vehicle avg 1- excluded with 11 vehicles. 23- How old are you? (20-30)-O (30-40)-2 (40-50)-1 (50-60)-1 (60+)-18 24- Employment- empoyed?-5 self employed -0 retired-20 25- Do you consider yourself- low/med income- 2 middle income- 22 upper income- 1 26- What concerns you the most about the zoning code rewrite? choose all that apply Lack of education by the city of Boise- 13 Change - 5

New construction changing your neighborhood- 18

More traffic- -21

Higher housing costs-19

More people-18

More crime-17

Higher taxes-18

Loss of privacy (higher buildings)-18

28- Do you think the impacts of the zoning code rewrite will be spread across the city equally? 0- YES, 24- NO, 1- NA 29 Where do you live? Bench-8 West Boise-6 SW-0 NW-2 North end-1 NE Boise- 1 SE- 5 27- Would support density for requiring home ownership? 1 YES, 12 NO, 12 NA (question not written well) 28- Final thoughts? 11 had \additional written comments see attached photos.

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

Dave Kangas <davekangas@msn.com> Tuesday, April 4, 2023 10:06 AM ZoningRewrite [External] Minimum lot width R1C and R2

The issue of minimum lot width has already been proven by trial and error through the substandard lot ordinance. Back in the early 2000's a builder/developer- Chuck Storey obtained 12 contiguous substandard lots on Lemhi, just west of Vista. at that time, PDS wanted him to create a drive and alley behind is properties, incurring a great expense, a lot of time and losing two buildable lots. Instead, he just decided to build what current allowed, 12 homes with front load garages. This style had already been across the street on Lemhi 2-3 times. In the ensuing years 2-4 more were also built across the street. The issues came about dues to lack of on-street parking in front of these residences, due to 25' widths and driveways. Other residences on Lemhi had issues with garbage collection, mail delivery, blocked driveways. The fix was to require a minimum lot width of 37.5 feet when a property did not have alleys at the rear of the property. 37.5 feet was half the width of 3 contiguous substandard lots. I believe this lot width criteria has been removed. I do not think it wise to repeat past mistakes when proven solutions have been created and successfully implemented. reducing the minimum lot size to 3500 sq ft and 2500 sq ft in r2 with minimum lot widths of 25' will duplicate this past issue. Please put the 37.5 ft wide minimum lot width for properties without alleys back in. It just makes sense and it works.

Dave Kangas ‐ Realtor 208.841‐0580 | dave@callisongroup.com Callison Group Real Estate Dave.Callisonhomes.com For personal communications, not related to real estate:

davekangas@msn.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

Dave Kangas <davekangas@msn.com> Friday, March 31, 2023 5:21 PM ZoningRewrite; Andrea Tuning; Timothy Keane [External] implementation date/ approved rezonnes reapplying/ displacment zones

A concern came up, about developers with projects already approved for rezones with DA's, not starting construction until the rewrite is approved and then re submitting applications based on the revised new zoning laws. For example, the development on Palouse, coming back with their original application for 47 units, 3 stories tall, etc. which would be okay in r2 zoning. Any thoughts? I also feel that R2 and R3 willl nneeds some displacement protections/conditions for trailer courts. The VNA has four significant ones in these zones.

Dave Kangas ‐ Realtor 208.841‐0580 | dave@callisongroup.com Callison Group Real Estate Dave.Callisonhomes.com For personal communications, not related to real estate:

davekangas@msn.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

dkemper398@gmail.com Thursday, April 6, 2023 10:31 AM ZoningRewrite [External] Comment on the Zoning Rewrite

The zoning rewrite is absolutely needed to posi on Boise for a livable future. Things I like the most:  Smaller lot sizes (less impact on the coming water crises)  More walkable and bikeable solu ons for daily life  Less focus on cars and less space wasted on parking.  More affordable op ons for teachers, police, firefighters, librarians and others on limited public salaries.  More density around corridors that will promote public transporta on and eventually reduce traffic jams. Stay the course. These changes are what we need to keep Boise the great place to live that it has always been. Don Kemper 1821 Edgecliff Terrace 83702

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

Michelle Larson <mmmlarson@gmail.com> Monday, April 3, 2023 10:05 AM ZoningRewrite [External] Support of New Zoning

I am a 40 year resident of Boise city and have watched the tremendous growth we have experienced at various times, especially in the last 10 years. I am in full support of the new zoning rewrite you have worked on so diligently for the past few years. I work with people who have come as refugees to the Treasure Valley and I also support Leap Charities to support low income housing in the Treasure Valley. Thank you for your hard work and please add me to any additional mailing lists to help support this work. All the best, Michelle M Larson 4658 N Zimri Place Boise, ID. 83713

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

donnalooze@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Donna Looze <donnalooze@everyactioncustom.com> Thursday, April 6, 2023 4:16 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Vote Yes on the Zoning Code Rewrite

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

barbara_mark50@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Barbara Mark <barbara_mark50 @everyactioncustom.com> Thursday, April 6, 2023 2:53 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Vote Yes on the Zoning Code Rewrite

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Tuesday, April 4, 2023 4:31 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Martha Email marthastu@gmail.com Address 263o E Starcrest Dr Boise 83712 Comment I have lived at this address for 46 years. At 2642 there have been low income renters for past 18 years. It has been unbelievably horrible. They trash the place by destroying the inside and outside of the home which used to be a show place . Our neighborhood has had the police , hill protection services up here more times than I can count . Plus the city advertises for people to call to get help when they can not pay their rent. Thus prolonging the misery of the neighborhood And Now the city wants to put low income housing units into already established neighborhoods along with cafes and Commerical buildings have you all gone mad? As for riding transport buses in the city‐ crazy. No one wants to ride a bus or a trolly to get anywhere in the city of Boise. What should have been done years ago, is to have highways built that circle the city like Phoenix and Salt Lake. But no , you did not and now we are in a mess . No long term thinking in that area. Back to the city rewrite if the code ‐ please do not do this! I do not want a cafe next to my home with cars coming and going at all hours or my neighbor deciding their lot is so big they can build another small home or duplex. With parking being allowed all over the street. I am against the city code rewrite Do not vote for it ! No!No! No! If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments:

Deanna Dupuy Monday, April 3, 2023 4:32 PM ZoningRewrite FW: [External] Meeting on Rezone options 1112171235a.jpg

Comments for the record. ‐‐‐‐‐Original Message‐‐‐‐‐ From: Brent Mathieu <bmathieuboise@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, March 31, 2023 11:30 AM To: Deanna Dupuy <ddupuy@cityofboise.org> Subject: [External] Meeting on Rezone options Hi Deanna, Here is my email again. Thank you for our meeting. A summary: 1) Provide incentives for affordable housing, especially rentals, by agreement not to own/park a vehicle onsite. Benefits: Less parking pavement, less traffic. This might be combined with public transportation, mixed use for work onsite (decreased commutes) or fleets of alternative vehicles such as electric vehicles, e‐ bikes or scooters for short term use. 2) Balance loss of topsoil to buildings/pavement with roof top gardens, green houses, hydroponics, and trees (edible forests too) and pollinator landscapes. 3) Promote and model solar with microgrids for a building complex, or neighborhood such as State and Arthur. 4) Provide alternatives and diversity for development, affordable housing and infill. Such as ADUs, and above. 5) Take a tour of my urban homestead, ole MacMathieu Boise farm. 4130 W Plum street. Google earth for satellite or come visit. Attached photo of solar powered greenhouse hydroponics. Thanks again, Brent ‐‐ Brent B Mathieu Boise, Idaho 1

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

Molly Lynn <mollynn78@yahoo.com> Tuesday, April 4, 2023 3:57 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Collister area concerns

I live in a neighborhood just off Collister Street and I disagree with the new zoning code rewrite. I am not interested in our neighborhood becoming higher density. Our neighborhood is quaint and special and a great place for families. We need to preserve what we cherish about our neighborhood. Some people do like higher density housing, such as some newer communities in east Boise, and it is great for people to have that option. I just do not believe that established neighborhoods should have their zoning codes rewritten in such a drastic and radical fashion. Please listen to the citizens of Boise and do not force a code rewrite that it unwanted. Sincerely, Molly McMillan

4-3-2023: ZCR Commentary: Duplex, Triplex, & Fourplex in the R1-C Zone The following questions need to be answered for the Duplex, Triplex, & Fourplex in the R1-C zone: 1) Do we want to have lot coverage? I have attached some site models for the duplex, triplex and fourplex on a 60 ft. X 120 ft. lot with an alley in the East End. Without lot coverage, a duplex with unit sizes over 4,400 sf. can be constructed. Obviously, they do not have to be that large. The market and construction costs will drive what size units will be constructed. Current zoning has a 55% lot coverage requirement. Based on my site modeling, I am recommending the following: Duplexes: 55% (Allows 2 – 1,980 sf. units on a 60 ft. X 120 ft. lot) Triplexes: 65% (Allows 3 – 1,560 sf. units on a 60 ft. X 120 ft. lot) Fourplexes: 75% (Allows 4- 1,350 sf. units on a 60 ft. X 120 ft. lot)

My personal take on it is if you are going to remove the lot coverage, then you need to use a “Form-Based” code that will limit the size of the units to the ones needed to meet the city’s goals.

Information and Commentary provided by Gregg Ostrow, AIA

208-866-3168

2) Do we want to keep the proposed 40 ft. – 3-story maximum height limit? Adding 5 ft. to the current maximum height does not increase density and creates taller ceilings. If you look at the attached models, you will see that a 3-story unit can be constructed in 35 ft. with 12 ft. floor to floor heights on the first 2 floors and 11”-0 floor to top of roof on the 3rd floor. Most apartment units are constructed with 10 ft. floor to floor heights. Having the maximum height for pitched roofs and flat roofs will encourage flat roof boxes. You can see that with a lot of the new “boxes” being built around the city. My recommendation is to have a maximum height limit of 35 ft. for flat roofs and 40 ft. to the top of a pitched roof. A roof needs to be above 3 in 12 to qualify as a pitched roof.

3) Should balconies and sun decks be allowed to qualify as open space? Currently, duplexes, triplexes, and fourplexes are limited to open space on grade level. This is very restrictive for constructing stacked units. But I will caution you, if you allow all the open space to be above grade, you will have buildings built to the setbacks. Personally, I think this is bad “Form-Based” code. The Adoption Draft of the rewrite allows for 5 ft. setbacks for all floors for townhomes is not being constructed next to a single-story structure. As planners, you must make the decision if you want 40 ft. tall boxes constructed 10 ft. apart. Once again, I think this is bad “Form-Based” code. 3) 375 sf. open space or 200 sf open space?

Current zoning has the open space has the 375-sf. open space requirement with a 15 ft. minimum dimension on one side. 375/15 = 25 ft. means a 15 ft. X 25 ft. minimum open space requirement. The Adoption Draft changed this to 200 sf. and “usable” space with no minimum dimensions. Lowering the open space requirement will not increase density but will increase unit size. I feel you should at least have a minimum dimension with the 200-sf. requirement. Townhomes should have the same side yard step backs as duplexes, triplexes, and fourplexes. In addition, do we want buildings constructed from setback line to setback line?

89% LOT COVERAGE SHOWN

89%

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

gregg.servheen@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Gregg Servheen <gregg.servheen@everyactioncustom.com> Tuesday, April 4, 2023 3:33 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Vote Yes on the Zoning Code Rewrite

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Saturday, April 1, 2023 12:25 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Amy Steckel Email amysteckel@msn.com Address 718 W Ranch Rd, Boise, ID 83702 Comment I support new zoning rules that prioritize affordable housing and improving public transportation as well as encouraging walking/biking. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Friday, March 31, 2023 7:57 AM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Brandi Venable Email brandijvenable@gmail.com Address 1910 W Salem Ct, Boise, 83705 Comment The construction on the corner lot of Vista and Targee has already caused considerable congestion on a street regularly used by the public for school dropoffs/pickups and access to the Vista corridor. This congestion will continue after the construction has continued due to an increase in street parking, the amount of residents moving into the corner multi‐dwelling complex, and visitors to that building. Changing the zoning code to mix use will not address the housing shortage or cost of living crisis in Boise ‐ it will, instead, continue to drive out residents who live and work in the city and who will increasingly find it unaffordable as developers build housing that drives up property taxes, public taxes and is still for the native Boisean and/or longtime Idaho resident, quite out of the range of affordability. This code benefits developers and those residents or future residents whose income is already well above the local median income range. My neighbors are primarily older, retired folks who cannot afford the continual increases in taxes and who will, as they age, need to rely on public services for emergencies. Crowded streets that don't allow the timely passage of emergency vehicles and a strained infrastructure that cannot serve the growing population will negatively impact our most vulnerable residents. I would like the city leaders to show data that proves that upzoning makes housing more affordable and is the best path forward for current residents. How is Seattle, with its high‐rise multi‐dwelling buildings affordable? New York? I am staunchly opposed to the rewriting of the zoning code in its current proposal state, especially without further publicity that informs the residents, more opportunities for public input and feedback, etc. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

randialbrechtsen <randi.albrechtsen@gmail.com> Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:32 PM Mayor McLean; Timothy Keane; ZoningRewrite; zoninginfo; CityCouncil [External] delay zoning code rewrite vote

Dear Mayor, City Council and P and Z, I am requesting that the vote on the zoning rewrite be delayed until the next City Council is elected and seated by geographic district in november 2023. 2 of the 6 members of the current council were not elected by public vote. The effects of these proposed zoning changes will be significant and permanent. More time for public input is crucial. Upzoning isn not right for Boise and I reject the code as currently proposed. Respectfully, Randi Beth Albrechtsen 1209 E Washington St, Boise, ID 83712 East End Historic District homeowner for 15 years.

COMMENTS & ADDITIONS – from Boise Heights Neighborhood Board To Planning & Zoning Commission ADOPTION DRAFT, BOISE CITY ZONING CODE REWRITE - April 13, 2023

Dear Staﬀ and Commissioners: We know the moderniza�on of our City Code is a monumental undertaking. A number of us atended the workshops and appreciate the �me and detailed process of this undertaking. We support the general direc�on and most of the revised or new standards that allow Boise to grow as a viable and dynamic City. We ask you to consider adop�ng the following sugges�ons to make the modern code the best it can be. Thank you.

Chapter 11-02 ZONING DISTRICTS – Overlay Districts On page 106, under 11-02-07.3, Sensi�ve Lands Overlay Districts, (e) “Performance Monitoring” Suggested Addi�on - as a rewrite: (e) The Applicant shall monitor the performance of constructed enhancements for a minimum period of 18 months a�er road and infrastructure construc�on is completed on the project’s ﬁnal phase. Unless otherwise ﬁxed by the Planning and Zoning Commission. i.

If a Subdivision, CUP or PUD project involves a mul�-year buildout, enhancement performance evalua�ons shall be performed 18 months a�er each plat sec�on is submited as Final; or, 18 months a�er an enhancement’s construc�on is complete.

ii.

On sensi�ve lands permited on slopes greater than 15 percent, enhancements shall be monitored for two (2) calendar years.

Acceptable performance shall be judged by comparing measured values to standards that were previously agreed upon. Intent: there are mul� year or mul�-decade projects approved requiring with a buildout horizon of 10, 20 or more years. CUPs, PUDs or subdivisions on subject sensi�ve lands that require mul�ple plats or sequen�al phasing require review of enhancements such as drainage ponds, drain tunnels, open space enhancements, connec�ng trails or walkways, and retaining wall for suitability and successful implementa�on. HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS-O: Hillside Development Overlay Ques�on on Procedures for Hillside Developments:

Boise Heights Neighborhood Assn, Dra� Zoning Code Ordinance

On page 117, under 11-02-07, “Hillside Development Permits” G. (3) under (C), “Category 3 Permits” in which PUDS, Preliminary Plats or grading involving modiﬁca�on of approved topography beyond that allowed under Categories 1 and 2,” While we understand the steps and procedures for Pre-Project and Concept reviews outlined under 1105-04, “Common Procedures,” as written on page 359 the draft states:: Decisions (1) Purpose 1.

The purpose of Type 3 procedures is to process applications for conditional uses, allowed uses with alternative forms, and other complex applications that require interpretation and the exercise of discretion in making a decision by an appointed body.

(2) General Procedure Unless modified by another provision of this Code, Type 3 applications are reviewed and decisions made by an appointed City Official or Commission and require public notice and hearing as described in more detail in Section 11-05-05.3

What BHNA board members do not understand in reading both above sections is the use of the word “or” in Type 3 decisions, on page 359: “Unless modified by another provision of this Code, Type 3 applica�ons are reviewed and decisions made by an appointed City Official or Commission.” Does this mean that an official, such as the Public Works Director or a Planning and Development Services Director, can issue a Category 3 Hillside Permit without the involvement of Planning and Zoning Commissioners. We don’t believe the dra� intends to streamline hillside permits that are mul�ple lot on hillside topography. This also appears to conflict with the Chapter 11-05 administsra�on and decision procedures matrix Table, pages 326-327. Our understanding is that Planning and Zoning Commission always is a required decision maker in Category 3 permits. On page 118, under sec�on 11-02-07.3.G(5) (“Hillside Development Standards”), the following should be inserted as new subsec�ons A. and B. under Subsec�on (5)(a)(ix), which mandates “pedestrian access to and through the project”: A. Each subdivision plat shall specify the loca�on and alignment within the project of pedestrian access to and through the project, public pedestrian and/or bicycle trails, and the access corridors to these from public streets or other trail systems. Within six months a�er construc�on is commenced to install any street, sidewalk, sewer or water infrastructure for any project subject to these condi�ons, pedestrian access to and through the project, and public access to trails, and trails themselves, shall be constructed. These trails and connec�ons shall be secured through dedica�on, easement or other binding and permanent mechanism. B. It is the intent of this condi�on 5(a)(ix)(A) and (B) that all purchasers of lots, dwellings, or other property interests within the project shall have no�ce, by means of the relevant recorded plat, easement or similar instrument, and by means of their physical existence, of

Boise Heights Neighborhood Assn, Dra� Zoning Code Ordinance

the pedestrian access, trails, pathways, and/or public easements within and connec�ng to the project. Trailheads and access corridors from any public street shall be clearly marked and suﬃciently wide to make the access way obvious to pedestrians and to allow their contained pathways to be reasonably separated from any dwelling or other structure on adjacent plated lots. Suggested addi�on 2: On page 230, under sec�on 11-04-05.6(5)(b) (“Standards for Trails”), the following should be inserted as new subsec�ons 11-04-05.6(5)(b)(v) and (vi): v.

Each subdivision plat shall specify the loca�on and alignment within the project of pedestrian access to and through the project, public pedestrian and/or bicycle trails, and the access corridors to these from public streets or other trail systems. Within six months a�er construc�on is commenced to install any street, sidewalk, sewer or water infrastructure for any project subject to these condi�ons, pedestrian access to and through the project, and public access to trails, and trails themselves, shall be constructed. These trails and connec�ons shall be secured through dedica�on, easement or other binding and permanent mechanism.

vi.

It is the intent of this condi�on 5(b) that all purchasers of lots, dwellings, or other property interests within the project shall have no�ce, by means of the relevant recorded plat, easement or similar instrument, and by means of their physical existence, of the pedestrian access, trails, pathways, and/or public easements within and connec�ng to the project. Trailheads and access corridors from any public street shall be clearly marked and suﬃciently wide to make the access way obvious to pedestrians and to allow their contained pathways to be reasonably separated from any dwelling or other structure on adjacent plated lots.

On page 118 and page 123 under Hillside Development Standards, concerning bond and surety agreements, sec�on (5) x. Suggested Addi�on. Insert, a�er ﬁrst sentence now ending with … “is required to enable restora�on of the site if the project is not completed as approved.”: Per (C), Revegeta�on and Erosion Control Standards, the surety performance bond on a Hillside project shall not be released and returned to applicant for hillside revegeta�on performance un�l two years, including two spring-autumn cycles, a�er any plan�ng or revegeta�on eﬀort. [This intent of this sec�on is to recognize that a minimum of two growing seasons are needed in steep and dry foothills environments to evaluate if a revegeta�on plan succeeds and meets the 80% coverage standard.] Alternative note, the above language on release of paid performance bonds instead might be inserted on page 122-123 under (h) Inspec�on and Enforcement as a separate sentence referencing revegeta�on.

Boise Heights Neighborhood Assn, Dra� Zoning Code Ordinance

3.H WUI-O Wildland Urban Interface Overlay page. 127 Overall, Boise Heights supports adding the Wildland Urban Interface Fire code into the City of Boise building code rewrite. Boise Heights has been a Firewise Cer�fied Neighborhood Since 2018. Our neighborhood has avidly par�cipated in the Boise Chipper program and has removed tons of flammable vegeta�on from our neighborhood. The new building code as writen will ensure that all new homes or major remodels will be built and landscaped with Firewise principles thus making the exis�ng neighborhood more fire safe. However, here are two areas in the WUI overlay code that could use some improvement/clarifica�on/addi�ons concerning fencing and street ligh�ng. WUI Code Dra� Areas Needing Clarifica�on Fencing page 127 This sec�on on fencing needs some clarifica�on. We do not think the purpose of this is for areas like Boise Heights or Quail Ridge, that have undeveloped open space, to be required to have 6 � tall fences in backyards. Most homes in both Boise Heights and the adjacent Sommerset neighborhoods do not have backyard fences, or they have short wrought iron type metal fences with wide spacing for open views. These types of fences do not seem to interfere with deer and wildlife habitat in our neighborhoods. Dra� Code needs clarifica�on. page 127 This section of code, as written, sounds like 6 foot fences are required: (11) Fencing (a) Solid fencing at least six feet in height shall be installed along all rear and side property boundaries that abut undeveloped property to provide visual barriers to deer and elk. Flammable Fencing – a standard? page 127 – the language or intent may be unclear. Having participated in Firewise Activities, we are familiar with cedar-sided fences or wood rail and other flammable fencing (plus railroad tie walls) turning into a ‘ladder of fire‘ that can rapidly bring destructive wildfire uphill to structures. Some of us have helped fight fires near and under wood fences and railroad tie rear yard walls. It would be wise to prohibit flammable fencing in the WUI. We note that in proposed Blue Print Boise, there is this commendable goal/standard: “Goal SHCC1: Minimize the degree of risk to life and property from wildfire.

SHCC1.1 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Implement development standards such as a mi�ga�on measures matrix, access standards, noncombus�ble roofs, sprinklers, clear space, and other measures in areas prone to wildﬁre.” [highlight added.]

Boise Heights Neighborhood Assn, Dra� Zoning Code Ordinance

We concur with this development standard. We suggest that the words “non-ﬂammable fencing materials” be inserted here and in the Zoning Ordinance so that there is agreement that such fencing becomes a required and suitable ‘other measure’ in the City’s risk areas. (We’re mindful that a Paradise, California type disaster could occur across the Boise front or along Amity Road – high desert WUI area.) Street Lighting in the WUI - please add a section in the code on Street lighting in the WUI There should be an additional section on the Wildland Urban Interface Overlay that address proper street lighting for this sensitive area. It is important to have proper streetlights that do not disturb wildlife and that do not cause light trespass to uphill neighbors. In the past, Historic type streetlights were installed in the adjacent Somerset neighborhood and in Somerset Village. For many years they were a problem for neighbors and wildlife until they were changed out. Putting this in code will ensure that problem lights will never get installed in the first place.

11-04 Development and Design Standards, starting on page194 11-04-011 Exterior lighting, page 298 Background: Overall, Boise Heights supports the exterior lighting code included in the Draft Boise City Code Rewrite. Dark Sky Compliant lighting as described in the draft code ensures the health of the wildlife that share our foothills neighborhood as well as preserving the somewhat Dark Sky character that we currently have. Although much of Boise’s dark sky character has been lost in the last 20 years, the draft code will assist in Dark Sky preservation in the future. The Commission and the public should understand that some portions of the Boise foothills are important night flyways (routes) for bird flocks/species that migrate at night. On p. 298, we suggest one change to section 11-04-01: We suggest changing watt language to lumens because wattage is a measure of energy use, not luminary brightness. A 100-watt LED bulb would be very bright. Please adopt the suggestion below:

2. Applicability A. All outdoor lighting in all zoning districts shall comply with the standards in this Section 11-04-011 unless exempted by Subsection B below or by another provision of this Code. B. The following are exempt from this Section 11-04-011: (1) Luminaires with lamps of 100 watts 1,600 lumens or less in Residential zoning districts;

Boise Heights Neighborhood Assn, Dra� Zoning Code Ordinance

11-05-07 VIOLATIONS, ENFORCEMENT and PENALTIES: Code Enforcement – When and How? Minimum suggested by Boise Heights NA Background: Boise Heights residents and other foothills neighborhoods have years of experience with Code Compliance regarding un-cut high grasses, invasive weed growth and unmaintained drains in WUI overlay lands. We’re aware of and support the other zoning provisions requiring developments and their successor owners to maintain and repair retaining walls and subdivision drainage features, especially for stormwater runoﬀ. Under Deﬁni�ons (page 492) regarding untended vegeta�on, the proposed code states: Weeds, grasses, or other vegetation which (1) cover 50 percent or more of any lot or yard; (2) average 12 inches or more in height; and (3) could become a fire hazard;

Our representa�ves have reviewed the related 11-05-07 Sec�on, from pages 435 to 439, concerning Viola�ons, Enforcement and Penal�es. Specifically, we are concerned about the �melines in this sec�on -- and for future provision for enforcement and penal�es on uncut, high vegeta�ve growth that pose a fire hazard to exis�ng residences and to the City in general. And in our experience, ponds and drains that have not been maintained near us and in other neighborhoods backed up, and became extremely weedy. This high, overgrown vegeta�on later dries out and poses a fire hazard, Under exis�ng city code, we’ve experienced that the past City viola�on prac�ces have been: a. Complaint is received or a viola�on is discovered. b. Subject area is inspected; if a viola�on is found, then the hazard viola�on is writen up, a sign is posted at the site and the landowner by is no�fied via Cer�fied Mail. c. Landowner had two calendar weeks to remove/abate the nuisance/hazardous grass and weed growth. d. If the landowner failed to abate, the City would hire a service to cut down the weeds and grasses and bill the landowner for the cost of the service. This prac�ce effec�vely meant there was no meaningful financial incen�ve to comply with the law in a �mely manner during summer, dry seasons and properly reduce hazards. The City would get the work done but only a�er significant non-compliance, and then simply bill the landowner who was in viola�on. There is currently no penalty for each day past the date given to comply. (Other municipal jurisdic�ons in the U.S. levy significant fines per day for each day of failure to comply.) On some occasions, a landowner claimed a service was coming to do the abatement but was delayed, thus stretching the en�re abatement solu�on out several weeks. The compliance officer believed the landowner and had no method of enforcement. Commissioners: The current proposed language for penal�es (page 438) is: “4 A. General Penalties,

Boise Heights Neighborhood Assn, Dra� Zoning Code Ordinance

(3) Any person who violates any provision of this Code shall be punished by a fine of not more than $1,000.” • •

•

The current proposed language is not clear as to whether each day of sequen�al lack of compliance is a separate viola�on. Addi�onally, the language of a fine of “not more than” allows for discre�on by the City official. We instead suggest minimums be adopted for uncut vegeta�ve fire hazards and other properly no�ced viola�ons in the WUI (or, city-wide). A sugges�on is: at least $300 per day of viola�on, at a minimum.

Zoning Code Compliance Officers – Direc�on, Management, Exper�se needed Boise Heights NA understands that Code Compliance func�ons were streamlined and moved to the City’s Department of Finance some �me ago. We are unsure this structure had the desired results. We see that there’s many types of needed code compliance or oversight in Boise-- ranging from downtown noise levels, or day care standards, to stacking of wood pallets on a business property to the sensi�ve foothills /WUI for unabated high weeds or unmaintained drainage ponds and culverts. We suggest that the City hire more zoning code compliance officers and that a logical division (subset) of them should be based in the Planning Department. These officers would have per�nent subject mater experience, such as plant or soil science knowledge, fire preven�on, planning and zoning or development exper�se. These subject mater specialists could beter inves�gate and enforce code compliance ques�ons. [Other city code officers would have exper�se in health and welfare regula�on for issues such as day care facility licensing.]

Foothills and River/Riparian Exper�se in Public Works and Planning Departments Similarly, we hope you and the City Council concur that subject mater experts are needed - professionals with backgrounds in foothills development, river system-riparian treatments and soils engineering . These plannerss or engineering staff should be available in both the Planning and Development Services and in the Public Works Departments to review proposed developments. And work with the new interdepartmental mee�ngs that will take place on major applica�ons. Long term (decades long in some cases) and phased developments such as Harris Ranch, Syringa or Somerset Ridge I - II also would benefit from having this kind of staffing in-house.

We appreciate the chance to participate and recommend improvements to this vital update process for Blueprint Boise and for the Zoning Code Rewrite. Sincerely, Boise Heights Neighborhood Associa�on Board of Directors

Boise Heights Neighborhood Assn, Dra� Zoning Code Ordinance

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Thursday, April 13, 2023 8:03 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Lorraine Byerly Email pokyandgumbi@msn.com Address Boise ID 83703 Comment Regardless of which side you are on for how we need to fix Boise’s housing crisis, or otherwise suit the needs of the future, the proposed zoning regulations, take away the right, completely, of individuals to have a voice and say in all future zoning issues. Additionally, building low income high‐rise apartments next to bus stations and homeless shelters is exactly what was the make up of ghettos that people have spent the last 60 years undoing. There are a lot of people moving to Boise, who need places to live but nothing should give them the right to replace the people who have been here and paid taxes for a lifetime. There is nothing wrong with those people moving to more outlying places to live, except it dries up the tax base that Boise wants to up to use for other projects that have nothing to do with zoning homes or homelessness. The proposed change in zoning will make it like the places of Seattle and Portland, because that ideology followed in rezoning Boise came from those places. The rezoning plan gets my resounding no vote because it benefits no one, but the city of Boise government and out‐of‐state developers. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

cecollins@q.com Tuesday, April 11, 2023 2:48 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Boise Upzone

This would ruin alot of our quality of life.

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

hollie.kathleen@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Hollie Conde <hollie.kathleen@everyactioncustom.com> Monday, April 10, 2023 10:26 AM ZoningRewrite [External] Vote Yes on the Zoning Code Rewrite

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Thursday, April 13, 2023 11:35 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Steve Cozine Email Cosine222@gmail.com Address Boise, ID 83704 Comment Please leave our R1‐C neighborhoods alone. People moved here because Boise was a nice liveable city with beautiful friendly neighborhoods. Not the crowded mess that this code will bring. Do not change the front setback to 20ft. A 30ft setback allows people to park front of their house and not block the sidewalk. 20ft will force cars on the streets. It is a horribly shortsighted to plan for a future that does not include cars. Think to your own experiences of the stress of coming home late and trying to find a parkspot everyday. That is not a lifestyle we should strive to create. Covid showed us the future is not biking to work but investing in your home that you work from. Many citizens recreate outside of city limits there will never be a bus route to support the life style that Idaho offers. The R1‐C rewrite will destroy neighborhoods, irreversibly hamper Boise in future, and benefit only those willing to sell and move onto the next property and eventually city. Not the families investing in a place to raise their family. How can anyone invest in their property when tomorrow they can be flanked on all sides by 4 rentals per lot. We need predictably. These areas are zoned single family dueling for a reason. People need space to breath, relax, and grow roots. I ask again please leave the single family neighborhoods alone. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Tuesday, April 11, 2023 5:55 AM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Samuel Dahlin Email dahlinsm@gmail.com Address Boise, ID 83703 Comment I want to express my support for this zoning code rewrite. I think it is important to add density, where appropriate, to our community, to accommodate the additional demand of housing in the area and help keep housing varied and affordable for all. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

East End Boise <eastendboise@gmail.com> Monday, April 10, 2023 9:08 AM ZoningRewrite [External] Zoning Code Rewrite Letter from EENA

East End Neighborhood Association Mayor Lauren McLean; Boise City Council; Boise Planning and Zoning Commission 150 North Capital Blvd. Boise, Idaho 83702 Subject: Zoning Code Rewrite: Adoption Draft Dear Mayor McLean, Council Members, and Commissioners: During our monthly meeting on March 28, 2023, the East End Neighborhood Association (EENA) board approved a motion to request additional time and information necessary for reviewing the Boise Zoning Code Rewrite: Adoption Draft. The board appreciates the time and energy necessary to present the Draft and lay the groundwork for exceptional progress within our city. However, due to both its substantial length and significant changes from previous drafts, we have the following requests in accordance with the adopted East End Neighborhood Plan and the inclusionary nature of its Neighborhood Planning Principle: 1. Additional Draft - given the significant changes between the October 2022 and February 2023 Drafts, the lack of clear effects - if any - to the city’s Historical Preservation Guidelines and the adopted East End Neighborhood Plan, and the omission of changes to the Review and Decision Procedure, the board requests that the city provides an additional Zoning Code Rewrite Draft for public review that provides increased clarity to these areas of concern. a. Draft Changes - all drafts and changes to them require additional documentation. i. Change Log - as is customary, the board requests that these changes be highlighted and summarized between all drafts. ii. Versioning - likewise, the board requests that all drafts include their publication date and version number on each page. 2. 180-Day Review Period - having only just been able to perform Step 2. Neighborhood Meeting due to a lack of accordance with the Boise Code of Ordinances: TITLE 11 DEVELOPMENT CODE - 11-03-04: SPECIFIC PROCEDURES - 11-03.3 Rezone Procedure on 3/29/2023 and given the length of the prospective Draft, the board requests a period of 180 days in order to sufficiently review a document of such magnitude. This time is necessary to allow adequate public participation at the neighborhood level. . Planning and Zoning Commission Hearing Postponement - a sufficient public Review Period requires rescheduling the Commission’s hearing. 3. Additional Materials - in an effort to increase transparency in the development process, the board requests the documentation of comments on previous drafts - from public and private entities alike - and how the Planning and Zoning Commission has and will include changes to address these concerns in subsequent drafts. The board thanks you for these considerations as we strive to create a more inclusive rezoning process and, thereby, a more inclusive city. We are encouraged by Council’s vision for responsible development, and EENA will work tirelessly to uphold our responsibilities - both to represent our neighbors and facilitate growth alongside our elected officials. Sincerely,

Sheila Grisham, President East End Neighborhood Association

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

Paula Forney <pbforney@gmail.com> Thursday, April 13, 2023 3:34 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Zoning rewrite

I am concerned with many aspects of the zoning rewrite. It seems to me it will not protect existing neighborhoods, it will give priority to new development over the housing that has been in place for years. I am not in favor of limiting notice to nearby neighbors and not allowing for public review and comments. In my experience, often times public input allows new and different ideas to be considered and often times it make the proposed project better for everyone involved. I spoke with Timothy Keane and he assured me the Lake Harbor Planned Unit Development will not be impacted by the proposed zoning changes along State Street near our home. However, the ZCR conversion maps show MX‐3 and MX‐4 zoning is being proposed for areas close to our neighborhood. I would request that all PUD’s throughout the city be clearly identified and show they will be honored and new zoning will not be implemented. I think proper verbiage should also clearly state this in the proposal. I think this could eliminate confusion and would be much more transparent. Thank you for your consideration. Paula Forney

Sent from Mail for Windows

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

Andy Hoffman <cody2dog@yahoo.com> Tuesday, April 11, 2023 4:09 PM ZoningRewrite; Mayor McLean; Holli Woodings; Patrick Bageant; Jimmy Hallyburton; Luci Willits; Latonia Haney Keith; Colin Nash [External] Upzoning

Hello all, Please do not upzone my neighborhood! I see absolutely NO benefit to the potential 'upzoning' plan, other than to make developers wealthier, and it would certainly destroy the quality of life of residents near the affected areas. It's been done in many other cities, and there is never a resulting increase in housing affordability, although it does hurt existing property values. In my neighborhood, exceptions were granted in past years to allow splitting of residential lots for the addition of 'skinny' houses, built to replace older homes. I'm sure there was some economic benefit to the original owners of these lots, but it has caused problems with parking and driving the narrow streets in this area. I don't see anyone walking to the bus stop to get transportation around town, it's getting harder to drive to my house because of on-street parking, and I don't see why anyone should suffer to make developers richer. I bought my house on Liberty Street with the expectation that I'd be able to move my vehicles, boat and camper, in and out of my property, but I now have to coordinate with my neighbor to park in my driveway, and have him move his vehicles and trailers. The owners of houses on narrow lots find they have inadequate space in the small houses for their possessions, so they fill their garages with stuff, which means they have to park on the street. Since the narrow lots only have very limited curb space, they're cluttering up the curbs in front of standard lots, which has a negative impact on quality of life for the owners of the standard lots, and frequently impacts access to mailboxes and driveways.

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Thursday, April 13, 2023 2:46 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name LeAnn Hume Email leann.hume@cushwake.com Address 422 Bacon Dr., Boise, Idaho 83712 Comment I have been in commercial retail tenant representation for 25 years and my team represents many retailers who require a drive thru. My team is VERY concerned that the requirements outlined in the proposed code for drive thrus will fatally effect the retail drive thru interest in our city from national retailers. We have countless examples of drive thrus that are severely flawed that contain only a few of the current proposed requirements. Chick Fil A on Broadway and Starbucks on Vista to name two. I don't believe a practical example of a functional and affordable drive thru can be produced using the requirements you have set forth. I believe retail drive thrus would nearly cease to be developed in Boise if this were to pass as it currently is written. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

zoninginfo Wednesday, April 12, 2023 8:04 AM ZoningRewrite FW: [External] Written Testimony for Zoning Code Rewrite

Jeff Lowe, AICP, CFM

Senior Planner Planning and Development Services Office: (208)608-7075 jtlowe@cityofboise.org cityofboise.org

Creating a city for everyone.

From: Austin Hurd <austin.wade.hurd@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2023 5:36 PM To: zoninginfo <zoninginfo@cityofboise.org> Subject: [External] Written Testimony for Zoning Code Rewrite I am submitting the following for written testimony for the Modern Zoning Code (ZOA23-00001 & CPA2300001) meeting. Austin Hurd austin.wade.hurd@gmail.com 7195 Bluebird Dr, Boise, ID 83714 208‐553‐3428

I am in support of the new residential standards, including increasing height maximums, increasing densities, reducing minimum lot sizes, reducing minimum parking, and reducing setback minimums. I think it will help increase the supply of both housing and affordable housing and not destabilize neighborhoods. The additional setback for the 3rd story for R‐1C was a great move. I would prefer no parking requirement, as it both increases affordability and increases safety, but I am happy with the parking reduction. I am in support of neighborhood cafes and retail as they greatly enhance the walkability and livability of neighborhoods. Kudos for limiting the potential negative neighborhood impacts of cafes and retail by limiting their service hours. I also have no concerns about bed and breakfasts. I am in support of the affordability and sustainability incentives and strategic infill. I think it does a great job balancing a need for affordability, using already in‐place infrastructure, and not causing too much change to neighborhoods. Special kudos for the strategic infill requirements that eliminate the risk of non‐dilapidated places just being demolished for the strategic infill incentives. I live by State Street and Gary and am in support of the new mixed use zoning and neighborhood transitions. I look forward to having more access to services while still having a zoning transition to my residential neighborhood. 1

I am in support of the new/updated Open Land, Wildland Urban Interface, Boise River System Overlay, and annexation policies. I have access to both the Greenbelt and the Foothills and look forward to these new tools helping to maintain these great natural beauties and limit sprawl. I am in support of updating the zoning code process and procedures. While community input is important, it can also be used to veto any and all development for the benefit of a few and the long term detriment of the community. The ZCR balances community input and development. Thank you for also being flexible with the conditional use permits, doing so will help innovative buildings come about. Thank you for establishing the Citywide Advisory Committee, hosting many open houses, and having tables at other events to ensure there was widespread public input and that the ZCR was not a top‐down effort. I would like to convey that doing nothing will just increase the affordability crisis and sprawl. Austin Texas didn’t pass their ZCR and their affordability crisis and sprawl got worse. Vancouver still has loads of Single Family Zoning and too much community input which has made it so the only dense developments that get through are on industrial zoned land, so Vancouver still has an affordability crisis and much less industrial zoned land which had better middle class income jobs than commercial zoned land.

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

Vicki Masterson <nd75vicki@gmail.com> Tuesday, April 11, 2023 4:48 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Zoning code rewrite

I do not agree with many of the aspects of the zoning code rewrite. I request that you delay the vote on the zoning code rewrite until the next city council is elected and seated by geographic district. Thank you

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Monday, April 10, 2023 9:04 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Allen McLeod Email ad.mcleod@yahoo.com Address 4613 W Castlebar Dr. Boise, ID Comment I would like to voice my support for the zoning code rewrite. I would like more mixed‐use walkable neighborhoods in Boise with higher density. Please build more pedestrian and cycling infrastructure to encourage multi‐modal transportation. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

annaquinnperry@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Anna Quinn Perry <annaquinnperry@everyactioncustom.com> Thursday, April 13, 2023 4:51 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Vote Yes on the Zoning Code Rewrite

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Wednesday, April 12, 2023 4:08 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Shawn Petsch Email shawn.petsch@gmail.com Address 13221 W Dahlia Dr, Boise, ID 83713 Comment As another commenter noted, having "a walkable neighborhood requires somewhere to walk to." Please consider adding the following uses to R‐1A and R‐1B as a conditional use: Neighborhood Cafe, Sidewalk Cafe, Small Retail. If, as the city claims, a goal is to reduce the amount of driven miles within city limits, allowing small cafes, grocers, and appropriate small retailers to locate within residential blocks is essential. Because traffic relies so heavily on the grid system, and that system is overburdened, traffic along any corridor is crowded and fast moving. As a result, getting anywhere by foot or bike is stressful, hostile, and requires a vehicle to cover even small distances safely and comfortably. Allowing small establishments as conditional uses, and especially on interior lots, would allow residents, both adults and children, to reach desirable locations by bike, foot, or radio flyer, and in a peaceful and safe manner. It would reduce city‐wide traffic, expenditures on gas, and the time cost of reaching basic amenities. To prevent any "destruction of the neighborhood", restrictions such as limits on operating hours, requirements that the establishment share the architectural features with surrounding residential properties, restrictions on the sale of alcohol, and other restrictions imposed by a neighborhood HOA can ensure the establishment adheres to the expectation of the neighborhood residents. Thank you! If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Thursday, April 13, 2023 7:15 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Christine Powell Email cpowell38@gmail.com Address Boise. ID 83705 Comment I am NOT in support of the proposed zoning changes. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

April 5, 2023 Boise Planning & Zoning Commission Via email zoningrewrite@cityofboise.org Attn: Chairperson Bob Schafer Attn: Co-Chair Chris Danley Attn: Commissioner Meredith Stead Attn: Commissioner Chris Blanchard Attn: Commissioner Janelle Finfrock Attn: Commissioner Milt Gillespie Attn: Commissioner Jennifer Mohr Attn: Commissioner John Mooney Attn: Commissioner Ashley Squyres RE: City of Boise Zoning Code Re-Write – Mixed Use Zones Commissioners, As a member of the Citizen Advisory Committee for the last 3 years, I would like to offer my thoughts on the proposed Mixed Use zones. The City has articulated a very clear vision for its desired development of our commercial zones: dense, multi-story development, containing a mix of uses, with active ground floors, limited parking, limited automotive uses, pedestrian friendly scale and access, and integrated open spaces. I think the proposed code offers improvements to the existing code by allowing for the desired type of dense, mixed use development to occur as Boise grows, when the prior code may have restricted it. However, I believe there are a few sections of the proposed code that go too far by requiring more density and mixed use than what may be financially viable, which could result in stagnation and/or a heavy volume of applications seeking departures from the code. Areas of Support •

More Neighborhood Retail – The proposed code adds more commercial opportunities in and near our neighborhoods through an expanded use table for MX1, as well as allowing limited neighborhood retail and cafes in R1-C, R-2, R-3. The prior L-O zone was too restrictive.

•

A Mix of Uses Within Zones – The proposed code allows a mix of commercial, residential, and office development within the new MX zones, which allows developers greater flexibility to meet the market’s demands. 350 N. 9th Street, Ste 200, Boise ID 83702

P. (208) 345-7030

F. (208) 345-7210

www.rmcos.com

•

Opportunity for More Density – Increased height limits create the opportunity for more density along our commercial corridors, especially along our best-in-class transit lines. This improves our chances of a viable mass transit system.

•

Expanded MX5 - I support the expansion of the MX5 zone into the Downtown Planning Areas that were not previously zoned C5.

Concerns / Opportunities for Improvement •

“Allowed Use/Alternative Form” (p. 235 and 385) o This provision establishes a minimum building height of 4 stories in MX3, MX4, and MX5 for most common commercial uses (as well as a minimum height of 2 stories in MX1, or a minimum of two different uses). o This provision also caps the number of allowed parking stalls in MX3 to the minimum number of allowed stalls for that use.  Background Note: The predominant commercial zone in the current code, C-2, has been split into a more-traditional MX2 zone and a more-intense MX3 zone. The amount of land zoned MX3 has grown in size throughout the re-write process. MX3 was originally mapped only to strategic intersections identified in Blueprint Boise as “Activity Centers”. However, later updates added all properties along Fairview, State Street, Vista, and parts of Parkcenter and Federal Way as MX3, due to their location along transit lines or pathways. MX3 now covers much of the proposed commercial zoning conversion map. o There are many, many properties in the proposed MX3 zones that are not physically and/or financially viable for 4-story, mixed use development with minimal parking. o A large percentage of these MX3 properties will eventually wind up in front of P&Z seeking a parking increase and/or height reduction through what is called an “Allowed Use, Alternative Form” departure (a process similar to a Conditional Use Permit). These applications will clog the system. o The criteria for an “Alternative Form” approval at P&Z are very subjective, so the process will result unpredictable outcomes over time. o Recommendation: I believe this set of height and parking requirements should be removed from the code, but particularly from the MX3 zone. There are other changes throughout the proposed code that will already allow for our corridors to develop with the desired intensity when it is supported by the market. These minimum height requirements and parking maximums go too far by requiring intensity immediately regardless of viability. o Alternative Recommendation: An alternative compromise would be to apply the height minimums to only the MX3 properties that were originally designated as “Activity Centers” in Blueprint Boise.

•

Complexity, Scope, and Staffing: o Recommendation: While the new illustrations are helpful, the proposed code remains very long and complicated. I recommend a short form “Citizen’s Guide/Commercial Guide/Owner’s Manual” as a helpful addition to the rollout process.

350 N. 9th Street, Ste 200, Boise ID 83702

P. (208) 345-7030

F. (208) 345-7210

www.rmcos.com

Recommendation: The proposed code includes major expansions of Planning staff’s scope and responsibilities throughout the review process. Staff could fall behind quickly if they are not properly supported. This will come at the same time as the adoption of a new building code in the Building Department. I would like to see the Planning Department establish objective turnaround times for processing applications, and publicly track performance against these goals. I would like to see the Mayor’s Office and City Council support the Planning Department to by “staffing to” these public turnaround goals.

I would like to commend Mr. Tim Keane, Ms. Andrea Tuning, and the rest of the City staff for their efforts on the Zoning Code Re-Write. Thank you for the opportunity to participate in this process and for your consideration of my feedback. Sincerely,

Ben Zamzow Chief Operating Officer 208 859 5938 bmz@rmcos.com cc.

Tim Keane (via email keane@cityofboise.org) Andrea Tuning (via email ATuning@cityofboise.org) Attn: Mayor Lauren McLean (via email LMcLean@cityofboise.org) Attn: Council President Pro Tem Holli Woodings (hwoodings@cityofboise.org) Attn: Council Member Patrick Bageant (pbageant@cityofboise.org) Attn: Council Member Jimmy Hallyburton (jhallyburton@cityofboise.org) Attn: Council Member Luci Willits (lwillits@cityofboise.org)

350 N. 9th Street, Ste 200, Boise ID 83702

P. (208) 345-7030

F. (208) 345-7210

www.rmcos.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

LindaRytt@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Linda Rytterager <LindaRytt@everyactioncustom.com> Monday, April 10, 2023 10:46 AM ZoningRewrite [External] Vote Yes on the Zoning Code Rewrite

Dear Planning and Zoning Commission, I am writing to express my support for the Zoning Code Rewrite. My husband and I have lived on the Boise Bench since 1993 and chose to settle here especially because of the green spaces, tree canopy, and walking/biking opportunities. When the Bench began to see an increase in infill projects, we were worried about the problems that come with density: more traffic, cars parked along the street, loss of canopy, and more rental units being poorly managed by absentee landlords. To be honest, it was tough when our block changed from 11 single‐family homes, adding 10 new two‐story skinny homes to create a mixed neighborhood of twenty housing units. Our block almost doubled in population and lost over seven large old trees. We had very little say in the big changes to our block because the codes in place then did little to promote sensible development. After initially opposing the changes, we have reluctantly adjusted. The new construction has been an improvement in most cases from the original single‐family homes (built in the 1940s) that they replaced. And, for the most part, the newer members of the community have been good and thoughtful neighbors. The sustainability, affordability, and open space protections included in the new zoning code rewrite are exactly what Boise needs to plan for and address our rapid growth. Growth is inevitable, and we need a modern zoning code to ensure we are following the best practices to grow sustainably and responsibly. Boise City Staff have put in the effort to make an inclusive and extensive community input process to develop the zoning code our city needs and deserves. Specifically, we appreciate that the proposed zoning code incentivizes energy and water efficiency, allows for smart and targeted density, and prioritizes walkability and bikeability. We recognize that sustainability is vital to ensure a livable future for Boise, and welcome the provisions that include clean energy sources, energy efficiency, and water efficiency. And we strongly support policies that improve Boise's tree canopy, to lower summer energy costs and combat the urban heat island effect: these include the requirement to increase the diversity of tree species for newly developing sites; new mitigation policies to protect the existing tree canopy; and enhanced requirements for the protection of trees during construction We know there is always room for growth and tweaks within the code, but we strongly encourage the Planning and Zoning Commission to support this zoning code rewrite that staff and residents have spent so much time and effort to shape. Sincerely, 1

Ms. Linda Rytterager 2006 S Gourley St Boise, ID 83705‐3305 LindaRytt@gmail.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments:

Erika Schofield <potatopancake@hotmail.com> Tuesday, April 11, 2023 3:54 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Fw: Zoning rewrite & Chapter 11 ordinances Ch. 11 - Ordinances.pdf

The following information for Section 11–05–03 of the proposed rewrite was submitted to Mr. Tim Keane on February 13, 2023. Some corrections were made to this recent draft, but problems still exist that need to be corrected for compliance with Idaho Code and other Boise Code. Please include the attached document with the written comments below, which show the edits for each issue directly on the text in the document submitted in February. Sincerely, Erika Schofield Ordinance For Hearing Examiner 

The draft document does not show the separate ordinance adopted to have a Hearing Examiner as required by Idaho’s enabling legislation, i.e., LLUPA (I.C. 67–6520).



The definition for a Hearing Examiner does not comply with the Idaho Code.

“A City employee, or a person or firm on contract with the City, who reviews specific types of applications under authority delegated by a City decision‐making body and/or makes decisions on some or all of those types of decisions pursuant to criteria established by City Council.” Idaho Code states the following: I.C. 67-6520. HEARING EXAMINERS. (1) Hearing examiners include professionally trained or licensed staff planners, attorneys, engineers, or architects. If authorized by local ordinance adopted, amended, or repealed in accordance with the notice and hearing procedures provided in section 67-6509, Idaho Code, hearing examiners may be appointed by a governing board or zoning or planning and zoning commission for hearing applications for subdivisions, special use permits, variances and requests for rezoning which are in accordance with the plan. “a person or firm on contract with the City” is not equivalent to, or can serve as a substitute for, a “staff” member as mandated by Idaho Code. The legislature has made it simple and very clear in its statutory provision as to who may fulfill the role of a Hearing Examiner by including only four (4) professions and starting this specific list with the term “staff” to indicate that any of these professionally trained or licensed persons are to be part of a city or county’s staff.

There are no provisions in Idaho’s enabling legislation that would authorize a governing board, or its Planning and Zoning Commission, the ability to outsource the requirement of exercising the powers conferred in its land use law to an external entity. I firmly believe a city cannot legally do that. Furthermore, the ability to ensure compliance with Idaho Code Section 67–6506 prohibiting conflict of interest, and the ability to honor the Code of Ethics in Chapter 1–8 of the Boise City Code, would be impossible if the role of Hearing Examiner was fulfilled by an external “person or firm on contract with the City” because Idaho has no laws requiring a person or private business to publicly release their client lists. The language used in an ordinance for a Hearing Examiner needs to closely adhere to the language used in Idaho Code, and be the same language included in the proposed zoning code rewrite. The ordinance number should be visibly included in Chapter 11 in order for interested residents and permit applicants to know the City is compliant with Idaho Code, and to be able to request the ordinance by its identifier if needed. Adopt Ordinance For Design Review Commission The Design Review Committee has been a sub–committee of the Planning and Zoning Commission, which does not require a separate ordinance per Idaho Code 67–6504(b). The proposed zoning code rewrite shows this entity becoming a commission which will continue to function as a permanent role in the administration of the Boise City Code, therefore an ordinance is required per the following codes: The responsibilities, duties and authority granted permanent boards or commissions, shall be enumerated by ordinance. (Idaho Code § 50–210) Any activities, duties or responsibilities delegated by permanent boards or commissions shall be by ordinance and not otherwise. (Boise City Code § 2–1–4) The language in the current description of the Design Review Committee is being carried over to the proposed zoning code rewrite, but it is in need of additional clarity, consistency, and corrections, therefore the ordinance language should be drafted and set forth for adoption, then include the same language in the proposed zoning code rewrite. Please visibly include the ordinance number within the first section of the language that will be adopted into Title 2 of the Boise City Code in order for interested residents and permit applicants to know the City is compliant with Idaho Code, and to be able to request the ordinance by its identifier if needed. Locate Ordinance For Historic Preservation Commission Title 2 of the Boise City Code does not include the Historic Preservation Commission and Chapter 11 does not specify if this commission has been adopted by ordinance, as required by Idaho Code § 50–210, but there are references to ordinance numbers pertaining to this commission in older versions of Boise Code Chapter 11, such as Supplement 46. The ordinance for this commission needs to be located and added to Title 2 of the Boise City Code, including its ordinance number in order for interested residents and permit applicants to know the City is compliant with Idaho Code. In closing, to reduce opportunity for conflicting language in the Definitions section of the proposed rewrite, the various governing bodies and City staff positions responsible for the administration of the Code should be listed by name and indicate “see Section 11–05–03 of this Code”, rather than unnecessarily repeat the lengthy definitions or risk using language different from the ordinances and Section 11–05–03. Amend Title 2 – Boise City Code: Planning & Zoning Commission

Section 2–4–3 of the Boise City Code for the Planning and Zoning Commission is not in compliance with three (3) items in Idaho Code Sections 67–6504(a) and (b). The attached document identifies the issues to be amended and some additional minor clarifications. In the amending process, please visibly include the ordinance number in Section 2-4-1 of Boise City Code in order for interested residents and permit applicants to know the City is compliant with Idaho Code, and to be able to request the ordinance by its identifier if needed. Once amended, Section 2–4–3 needs to be included in the proposed zoning code rewrite. In addition, the duties of this commission shown in Section 2–4–6 need to be included in Chapter 11. These officially adopted duties are what alleviates the Council of the burden of exercising many of the requirements in Idaho’s land use law, and including these duties in Chapter 11 will improve the public’s understanding of the commission’s activities and overall scope of responsibility.

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

Erika Schofield <potatopancake@hotmail.com> Tuesday, April 11, 2023 4:00 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Fw: ZCR - Safety Facility – under Temporary Uses

The following comments were submitted to the City in February but the problems remain in this recent draft .

From: Erika Schofield Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2023 10:14 PM To: Andrea Tuning <atuning@cityofboise.org>; ZoningRewrite <zoningrewrite@cityofboise.org>; Deanna Dupuy <ddupuy@cityofboise.org> Cc: tkeane@cityofboise.org <tkeane@cityofboise.org> Subject: ZCR ‐ Safety Facility – under Temporary Uses

The July 2022 draft added the new term “Safety Facility” as a temporary use in the Table of Allowed Uses, with a definition combining annexation, natural disaster, emergency circumstances, and homeless services. This definition is not reasonable, cannot be justified, and is not feasible. A definition such as this cannot be founded upon sound reason when the Code does not scramble together other similar but dissimilar uses into one name and use. For example – all types of uses that involve consumption of items by drinking and eating are not placed under one broad name of “Eating & Drinking Facility” with the expectation that this should suffice for the unique differences that can occur between variations of this use. The definition’s inclusion of protecting public safety on a temporary basis following annexation of land cannot be justified and is not feasible based on the following reasons: 

The Table of Allowed Uses shows “Safety Facility” in the MX–2 through MX–5 zoning districts, which are not anywhere near the remaining lands in Boise’s Area of City Impact (AOCI) that would be considered for annexation.



Areas to be annexed in the AOCI are far from the city center which means they would most likely be classified as residential zoning, and the Table of Allowed Uses shows all “R” zoning districts as a conditional use for a Fire, Police, or Public Safety Facility. The current and proposed Code indicate that uses requiring Planning and Zoning Commission approval if they are a principal or accessory use in a district “shall not be considered for temporary approval’, which would make this type of use – a temporary use certificate for a fire, police or public safety facility – prohibited per the Code.



It is impossible to build a fire station, police station, or ambulance facility to provide these types of required services to an annexed area in the timeframe specified for a temporary use certificate, which “shall not exceed 180 consecutive days.”



Annexation is to occur only if Boise can provide urban level services that are in “substantial compliance with the level‐of‐service standards identified in Table 3” of the Boise City Comprehensive Plan, as 1

indicated in public policy PDP3.2. The City is well aware of Idaho’s annexation laws and that the Level of Service standard for fire response in Table 3 is from two documents adopted into the comprehensive plan; ordinance 5517 (Boise Fire Department Master Siting Plan) and the impact fee study, which uses the adopted level of service standard in the methodology for calculating and collecting fire impact fees. 

Tax–and–(impact) fee funded public safety services are not to be provided from a temporary facility because fire and police impact fees use a methodology for calculating these fees based on long–term assets (10+ years), not temporary facilities.



Annexation without the ability to provide public safety services at the required Level of Service standard from permanent facilities could appear to be annexing solely for more tax revenue, which the Supreme Court ruled against long ago (Forbes et al. v. Mayor, etc. of City of Meridian, Supreme Court of Mississippi, (1905), and as discussed in Boise City v. Boise City Development Company, Supreme Court of Idaho, (1925)).

Emergency/Disaster Facility The designation of a facility or an area to provide temporary protection and safety in a natural disaster or emergency circumstance is reasonable and justifiable, but should have a clear and specific name such as “Emergency/Disaster Facility”. This type of temporary use also needs to be allowed in all zoning districts since it is an unpredictable use. A definition for this type of temporary use could be stated as: A facility or an area of land that is designated for providing protection and safety to the public on a temporary basis in times of natural disaster or emergency circumstances, which may include areas for the staging and use of fire protection and police protection equipment, or facilities to provide overnight accommodations to people and animals displaced by a natural disaster or emergency, or to provide services related to the administration or management of such temporary provisions. Warming/Cooling Day Shelter When citizens asked Mr. Keane about this new term, he explained that “Safety Facility” was added to address the warming and cooling shelters the City has set up for those experiencing homelessness. If that is the case, why hide behind a convoluted definition? The City needs to be transparent with the public, especially in light of the ongoing Interfaith Sanctuary Shelter issue, and to demonstrate that Mayor McLean’s campaign message to improve transparency is supported by the City’s actions, rather than made worse by them. 

Name this type of use what it is, “Warming/Cooling Day Shelter”.



Locate this use to be in the MX–5 zoning district to be in accordance with the comprehensive plan’s policies for location of social services to be downtown Boise.



Include specific standards for operation, which should be easy to determine since the City has chosen to provide this type of temporary use for many years.

Without specific standards for this type of seasonal use, the opportunity to abuse the Code can occur, where a temporary approval becomes an ongoing overnight shelter, as has occurred with the Interfaith Sanctuary Shelter on River Street; the record shows a conditional use permit was never applied for or approved. 2

The two different circumstances that justify a temporary facility for public safety–related issues need to have separate names with clear, objective definitions, and each needs to be added to the list in the Table of Contents and the relevant sections of this Code; Table of Allowed Uses, Use–Specific Standards, Parking, and Definitions.

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

Erika Schofield <potatopancake@hotmail.com> Tuesday, April 11, 2023 4:07 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Public Comments - Table of Allowed Uses

Resubmitting comments for the record that were provided on February 2, 2023 for this rewrite. From: Erika Schofield Sent: Thursday, February 2, 2023 5:13 PM To: Andrea Tuning <ATuning@cityofboise.org>; ZoningRewrite <ZoningRewrite@cityofboise.org> Cc: ddupuy@cityofboise.org <ddupuy@cityofboise.org> Subject: Public Comments ‐ Draft Module 3 ‐ Table of Allowed Uses A quick reply to this email to confirm you received this will be greatly appreciated. Public Comments For Zoning Code Rewrite: Consolidated Draft (October 2022) / Section 11–03.1: Table of Allowed Uses Hello Zoning Rewrite Team, Please accept another public comment submission for this draft, as it is taking a great amount of time for a citizen to read and comprehend what is being proposed in a technical 562-page document, while comparing it to the current version of the code and other municipal codes. I chose not to submit detailed comments such as this earlier in this process, because the document was constantly morphing, which discourages putting forth time and effort on the front end. But it is crucially important that language used in a governing body’s zoning ordinance be specific to its comprehensive plan because a zoning ordinance has a nexus to the policies in the comprehensive plan (I.C. § 67–6511(1), and serves as a principal regulation for the implementation of the comprehensive plan. My intention it to provide meaningful input using thoughtful analysis and constructive suggestions from the viewpoint of an average citizen. I hope the City’s request for citizen input continues to be welcomed, as it is not uncommon for those deeply involved in a project to fall prey to believing accurate language has been used, and not recognize that may not be the case, when having read a document dozens or even hundreds of times. As the code is drafted so far, there remains room for clarity and improvement. Sincerely, Erika

The following written comments apply to the general Use Categories and specific Use Types in the Table of Allowed Uses. They are also attached as a Word document. GENERAL USE CATEGORIES Current code — Public/Institutional Uses This classification name has been given the new name of Public, Institutional and Civic Uses, which is not consistent with the language used in the Boise City Comprehensive Plan, herein referred to as the Plan. The Plan does not 1

include the term “civic” in conjunction with public and institutional land use as shown in Chapter 3 Community Structure and Design: Public/Institutional Areas (p. 3–37) Three types of Public/Institutional Areas are identified on the Land Use Map: Public/Quasi-Public, Airport, and Education. Public/Institutional Land Use Categories (p. 3–38) The common definition for civic is “of a city, citizens, or citizenship.” In the Plan, the term civic is primarily used when referring to the desired outcome for downtown Boise; to be the civic, cultural, and employment center. By inserting the term civic into this general land use classification name, this presents as the City assuming all of the uses listed in this section would be downtown. The Plan also indicates something as a civic use or civic space, which is often just a fancy way of saying a “municipal space” or “public use” to make it appear more educated or enlightened. And the Plan uses “civic” to describe actions related to other things. For example, on page 2–60 a policy indicates ongoing civic support related to arts and culture, which equates to saying have the city support arts and culture. Or the policy on page 2–65 indicating make schools available for civic functions, which equates to saying allow school property for the use of city or citizen events. The three terms that are now in this proposed name are referring to similar things, which make for redundancy in this classification name. For the term “Institution”, a Thesaurus will suggest community, shared, municipal, communal, unrestricted, free, or open, which are all similar to the term “Public”. The current name of Public/Institutional Uses serves the classification purpose without the need to add “civic” and essentially duplicate the other two terms. REQUESTED ACTION: Please retain the current name Public/Institutional Uses in order to ensure consistency between Public/Institutional Land Use referred to in the Plan and its nexus to land use in the Zoning Ordinance; and to eliminate redundancy. SPECIFIC USE TYPES Current code — Community Service This classification name has been given the new name of Community and Cultural Facilities, containing a large and unrelated mix of uses, which combines publicly funded services with privately funded entities. An average or reasonable person’s understanding of a Community Service generally means a public benefit provided through the taxes and fees paid (e.g. property taxes, impact fees, income taxes, etc.). Many of the uses listed in this section would not be considered a community service by an average citizen, and the inclusion of “cultural facility” as a classification name is overreach when only one use within the eleven line items would legitimately be considered a cultural facility; a museum. Please see additional explanation under #4 related to cultural facility. 1. REQUESTED ACTION: Please retain the current name but in its plural form, Community Services, to provide a distinct separation for publicly funded land uses that provide a direct resident benefit. 2. REQUESTED ACTION: Cemetery, Mausoleum, and Mortuary are end of life services that are not publicly funded, which creates a conflict with the functional characteristics and type of activities generally understood to be a publicly funded Community Service. Please relocate these three uses to Commercial Uses or consider a new way of listing as Health Care and End of Life Services. The following reasons support this request: 2

Cemetery — This type of use is most commonly a private enterprise that imposes fees for a plot and pays property taxes at the commercial rate. Although our Boise City property levy/tax pays for the Parks and Recreation Department to maintain the grounds of Boise’s three publicly–owned cemeteries, the two that have available plot and mausoleum space are not free. Fees for burial service and interment are involved, making this land use transactional and not a direct resident benefit. The City’s record acknowledges that expanding the three cemeteries or adding new cemeteries is not in its best interest, therefore there is no longer a need for Cemetery to be proposed as a conditional use in the O– 2 zoning district (municipal uses), or the O–3 zoning district (managed open space). Furthermore, the possibility of publicly owned land within Boise’s Area of City Impact being selected for a future government owned cemetery is highly unlikely, thus the need for Cemetery in the Community Service section of the Table has become outdated and no longer relevant in a growing urban environment. These factors limit this use to a private landowner in the R-1A and O–1 zoning districts. Mausoleum — This type of use is a structure for burial chambers or interment space that is primarily privately owned, charges a large fee, and is taxed at the commercial rate. The mausoleum facilities at the two publicly owned cemeteries are not free or a direct resident benefit, and the City’s record indicates additional cemeteries with this type of use will not be pursued. Mortuary — This type of use is also known as a Funeral Home, which charges fees to care for and prepare a body for burial or cremation, making this a profit-based commercial business. The City of Boise’s website does not show it owns or operates any mortuaries for a direct resident benefit. 3. REQUESTED ACTION: Please separate the classification of Art Gallery and Museum from Library and relocate Library back to its legally appropriate section Education; and relocate Art Gallery and Museum to be with the performing arts cultural venues of Auditorium and Theater, plus revise the name under Commercial Uses to be Culture, Entertainment, and Recreation. The following reasons support this request: First and foremost, Library has been consistently listed under the use classification of Education because Education is the section of Idaho Code that authorizes a city to establish a tax–supported library with the stated purpose to be the provision of public education for all ages (I.C. 33–26): 33-2601. POLICY. It is hereby declared to be the policy of the state of Idaho, as a part of the provisions for public education, to promote the establishment and development of free library service for all the people in Idaho. It is the purpose of this act to assure an informed electorate by enabling the provision of free local library service, in the present and in the future, to children in their formative years and to adults for their continuing education. 33-2603. CITIES MAY ESTABLISH TAX SUPPORTED LIBRARIES. The city council of every city shall have power to establish a public library, and for such purpose may annually levy and cause to be collected a tax up to but not exceeding one-tenth percent (.10%) of market value for assessment purposes or fund a library out of allocations from the city's general fund. All such moneys shall be kept by the city treasurer separate and apart from other moneys of the city and be used exclusively for library purposes ... The City keeps the operations of the Library as its own department of the City, rather than combined with its Arts & History Department, to be in compliance with Section 33–2603. The City is not statutorily required to provide art galleries or museums, as that would be competition with the private sector, therefore it is not appropriate to include these uses under the classification of Community Service. 3

The City has chosen to support arts, history, and culture as indicated by policies in the Comprehensive Plan, but these policies direct the City to provide leadership, promotion, supplemental funding, etc. and do not indicate outright ownership and/or operation of an “art gallery” or “museum”. An example: The Boise Art Museum (BAM) located on the grounds of Julia Davis Park is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization that leases the building from the City for its operations and the artwork is owned by BAM. Up until recently, the lease was for $1.00 a year but the City has finally standardized the leasing of its public property and has moved toward market rate rents. There is not, and never has been, a direct resident benefit to compensate for subsidizing this museum with taxpayer funds. An Art Gallery is a place that sells art, making it a transactional activity that belongs under Commercial Uses. Culture, Entertainment, and Recreation are the three promotional themes used for attracting visitors and business interests to Boise; list them together for consistency in use. 4. REQUESTED ACTION: Please add Government Building/Facility, cultural under Community Services to have a provision for future acquisitions similar to the Boise Depot, James Castle House, and Erma Hayman House. These are cultural facilities, not art galleries or museums, and each provides a direct resident benefit (free admission). The following reasons support this request: The statutory requirement of comprehensive planning includes the component of Special Areas or Sites, which encompasses structures of historical, archeological, or architectural significance (I.C. 67–6508(k) and the City is authorized to spend its revenue on the use and conservation of historic property under Idaho Code 67–46. The operation of such sites as cultural facilities is granted per Section 50–303 of state code, therefore the specific term “cultural” for the use of a government owned building or facility is necessary to align with state law when determining specific types of land and building uses. This use classification will correctly align with policy CEA3.5 in the Plan, which addresses public cultural facilities, and will provide a clear distinction between a building or facility that provides a direct resident benefit, from a building or facility that does not. 5. REQUESTED ACTION: Please add back in the use of a Government Building/Facility, non-industrial under Community Service. Ada County might seek to expand the courthouse facilities using nearby parking lots, or there may be a need for a post office or other political subdivision building(s) as Boise annexes its Area of City Impact. 6. REQUESTED ACTION: Please add Government Building/Facility, industrial to be prepared for the City’s plans to relocate several of its operations from the downtown area out near the airport. 7. REQUESTED ACTION: Please remove Religious Institution under Community Service and combine with education as explained below. 8. REQUESTED ACTION: Please remove Food Kitchen and Shelter Home under Community Service and relocate these uses to the correct classification of being Social Services. Additional explanation for this request is provided below. Current code — Education Current code — Health Care These two classification names have been given the combined new name of Education and Health, which is not appropriate as they are not land uses grouped together in the Plan. Education is grouped with culture, arts and 4

history, while health care is grouped with medical, mental health and social services. In addition, this combination does not come up when researching other cities naming classifications for land uses. REQUESTED ACTION: Please combine Education and Religion, which is a more appropriate combination considering some religious institutions also have schools. With the exception of one proposed zoning district (MX–U), these both have the same allowed and conditional designations. REQUESTED ACTION: Please retain the current, separate name Health Care and add Government Medical Facility for uses such as facilities at the V.A. Medical Center Complex. Also see #2 above suggesting a name of Health Care and End of Life Services to include cemetery, mausoleum, and mortuary. Current code — Social Care This classification name has been eliminated, which is problematic for several reasons. Social services are a long–standing land use policy in decades of Boise’s Comprehensive Plans, with these types of services stated in public policies going back at least as far as 1963 in the Comprehensive General Plan produced by Atkinson Associates. The Plans land use policies have consistently indicated a condition of social services to be located in downtown Boise, as that provides the means to maximize resources that receive public funding, and the current goals and policies indicate the same (Goal SHCC15 [which should be 14], and policies SHCC14.3, DT–CCN 1.3, DT–NC 3.2). Policies in a comprehensive plan are to have a nexus to zoning districts as required by Section 67–6511(1) of the Idaho code: The zoning districts shall be in accordance with the policies set forth in the adopted comprehensive plan. Idaho’s land use law expressly makes the adoption of a comprehensive plan a condition precedent to the validity of a zoning ordinance (I.C. §§ 67–6507 through –6511) and courts have made it clear that the comprehensive plan is the essence of zoning. The policies in a comprehensive plan describe the anticipated land uses for different areas of a city, which determine the types of zoning districts, followed by prescribing regulations for the use of land, buildings, and structures within the districts. The City uses the Table of Allowed Uses as the instrument to illustrate its compliance with the legislative requirement to establish standards to regulate and restrict . . . the location and use of building and structures (I.C. § 67–6511(1)(a). The resolution adopting the Boise City Comprehensive Plan declares policies to be used as a guide by public officials in the adoption of pertinent laws and ordinances (RES. No. 21500), but the policies are not “just guides” for the zoning ordinance when state law provides a clear directive that zoning districts “shall” be in accordance with the policies; in other words, they are to be grounded upon the adopted policies in the comprehensive plan. To ensure this outcome, the terminology used in the Table of Allowed Uses should accord with the language in the policies of the Plan. Although social services are not a statutory requirement for Idaho cities, Boise has stated its intention in its Plan to recognize and support the need for providers of these types of services that address social issues. The City demonstrates its commitment to social service providers through many quasi–public arrangements involving public funding for operations and the provision of support services, which has created and expanded a strong social service network in the downtown Boise area. The common understanding of the functional characteristics, type of activities, and the type of customers served by such quasi–public entities is known by the general public to be social services and are referred to as such. Social Services are not the same as Community Services. They are not something the majority of the population hopes to use regardless of any public funding, they are not intended (or allowed?) for use of an employed person who has secure housing but just wants to give it a try, and most importantly, pertaining to land use regulations, they are specifically called Social Services in the policies of the Plan and should be consistently referred to in the same way in the zoning ordinance. 5

By eliminating this classification name, the City creates a major disconnect between its land use policies in its Plan and the naming classification for uses in the zoning districts. 1. REQUESTED ACTION: Please add the descriptive name Social Services as used in the Boise City Comprehensive Plan for consistent terminology; to ensure the zoning districts and the legislated use classifications conform to language in the land use policies of the Plan; and to minimize confusion, misinterpretation, and misrepresentation between governing documents when permit applications come forth. 2. REQUESTED ACTION: Please relocate Food Kitchen and Shelter Facility (see name explanation below) to be under Social Services for correct alignment to the related policies in the Plan. Homeless Shelter & Shelter Home The term “Homeless Shelter” is in the definitions section of the Plan, while the term “Shelter Home” is used in Chapter 11 of the City’s code. The use of two different terms needs to be corrected otherwise we will continue to have confusion and misunderstanding with the public, as well as mismatched language when referencing governing documents, and instances where the applicant misinterprets this use. REQUESTED ACTION: Please seriously consider replacing both Homeless Shelter and Shelter Home with the plain term Shelter Facility in the City’s governing documents. This change would remove the stigma of a derogatory label and correct the misinterpretation and misrepresentation of this type of facility serving as “a home”. Removing the word “home” is appropriate because this word is commonly understood to be a residential use and permanent occupancy, whereas this type of shelter is not intended to be a permanent place to reside. Furthermore, a facility for those experiencing homelessness is not regulated under Residential Uses in the code. HERE IS WHAT RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THIS SECTION OF THE TABLE WOULD LOOK LIKE — since government buildings serve many functions, but the functions may not be suitable for all zoning districts, there is a need for individual listings.

Public & Institutional Uses Adult or Child Day Care Not generally a free or publicly funded service, should be under Commercial Uses, unless they receive public funding, making them a Quasi–Public Use? Community Services Government, non–industrial Government, industrial Government, public safety Government, cultural Municipal Community/Recreation Center Park, Playground, or Sports Field Forest Reserve or Recreation Area Jail or Detention Facility Education & Religion School, including Trade or Vocational College or University Library Place of Religious or Faith–Based Assembly Health Care & End of Life Services Medical or Mental Health Hospital 6

Government Medical Facility Mortuary or Funeral Home Mausoleum Cemetery Social Services Food Kitchen or Pantry Shelter Facility I have far fewer comments for the other General Use categories in this draft.

COMMERCIAL USES

Agricultural and Animal Uses— no need to indicate “uses” again Current code — Visitor Accommodations This classification name has been given the new name of Lodging while including the land use of a Recreation Vehicle Park. A “Recreation Vehicle Park” is not “Lodging”. A Recreation Vehicle Park is intended to accommodate recreational vehicles, and it is the vehicle that provides the lodging. REQUESTED ACTION: Please retain the current name Visitor Accommodations. Culture, Entertainment & Recreation Art Gallery or Museum Auditorium or Theater, Indoor Auditorium or Theater, Outdoor — need to add this use? Firing Range, Indoor Firing Range, Outdoor — need to add this use? Sexually Oriented Business — does not need a classification name and use type that are redundant, and should be the last line item in the Culture, Entertainment, and Recreation classification because many consider this to be just another form of entertainment. Why put the spotlight on it by giving it its own section?

INDUSTRIAL USES

Utility Uses – no need to indicate “uses” again In closing, there are many other terms and language in the rewrite of Chapter 11 that cross–over and affect terms used in the Boise City Comprehensive Plan that will need to be updated and revised. This will be necessary to minimize conflicting information, misinterpretation, and misrepresentation between these governing documents.

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Tuesday, April 11, 2023 3:46 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Erika Schofield Email Address Comment The definitions section of this rewrite still needs a lot of work to comply with the recommendation in the Clarion Diagnostic Report of, “While often an afterthought, a good definitions chapter is key to the transparency, efficiency, and predictability of any development code.” Specific problems include: "Regulatory text should be taken out of the use definitions and instead listed in zone district, development, or design standards." As written, some standards are embedded in the definitions while not being in the body text of this document. “All definitions in the Code should appear in Chapter 11‐02.” The phrase Permanent Supportive Housing does not show up anywhere in this document except in the middle of the definition for Dwelling, Multifamily Housing. This type of use is very specific and needs its own definition, as well as inclusion in the standards of the body of the code. In addition, this type of use is often funded through federal HUD monies and should match the definition used by the federal government. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Wednesday, April 12, 2023 11:48 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name George H Solverson Email lcesfire@yahoo.com Address Boise, Id 83704 Comment As long as federal, state, and city government policies promote unsustainable growth there will be housing concerns. Blueprint Boise focus on increased density is simply repeating the unsuccessful strategy of many other growing cities in decline. The main goal needs to be to protect and maintain the quality of living for current residents and provide for measured, sustainable growth. To be responsive to the desires of Boiseans, sustainable neighborhoods and quality of living for those who call Boise their home must be the priority for proposed zoning code changes. A modern building code should reflect lessons learn from the contemporary failures of modern density city planning. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

Phil Toomey <patoomey@gmail.com> Thursday, April 13, 2023 11:09 AM ZoningRewrite [External] Zoning code rewrite

I do not wish to see any more high rise apartments near existing houses. Phil Toomey 351 S. Pierce Pl. Boise, Idaho 83712

WHITE-LEASURE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY

March 9, 2023 Mr. Tim Keane Planning Director City of Boise Via email to tkeane@cityofboise.org RE: City of Boise Zoning Code Rewrite version February 2023 Dear Tim, Thank you for taking the time to meet with me along with the other members of the ACHD Developer Advisory Committee on January 12, 2023. I appreciate the immense amount time and energy that you and your staff have committed to the Zoning Code Rewrite. This is quite the colossal task. I have had the opportunity during my career to develop mainly retail oriented projects throughout the communities in Idaho and throughout the northwest, Montana, Oregon, Washington, and California. From large greenfield, 30 acre shopping centers, down to single tenant infill developments. So, I have seen a wide variety of city codes, from simple and intuitive to complex, tedious and confusing. Having grown up here in Boise, it is exciting to see where this community can go while appreciating the progress from busted up downtown sidewalks and downtown railyard that were here when I was a kid. Knowing full well that you are getting input from every angle, I feel it is best to stay in my lane and focus mainly on the commercial/retail/mixed use area. I am concerned that the Zoning code rewrite has a bit of a one size fits all feel to it as it relates to the “MX” zoning conversion from our current “C” zones. My main concerns relate to parking, setbacks, mandatory multi-story buildings and drive throughs as seen through the eyes of a retail user; having dealt with many of them over the years. Reflecting on the struggles that we all faced during the pandemic, I believe we should take a bit of a pause on adding too many boxes to check in the rubric of how detailed the various specifics of site and building designs should be. I think we could simplify a lot of the requirements into guidelines and allow the architects, builders, and engineers to be creative with their site and building layouts. I believe the requirement of multistory development for new projects in MX zones is a serious mistake that will hamper growth in the near term. Allowing for higher density is great for the future of our city but it should not be a requirement in the here and now. The market will evolve to allow for more density in different areas and at different times. The rewrite should allow for this not mandate it. We simply don’t know what we don’t know about the future and allowing for development to occur to support future needs and demands should be at the root of this rewrite. One theme of the rewrite that I would like to comment on is the push for affordability. I don’t believe that anything in the rewrite will help affordability based upon the increase in requirements of sites and buildings, sidewalks, bicycle racks, windows and accompanying bird safety devices, etc. And not to mention the additional staff that the city will need to hire to keep up with applications, variations, and conditional uses. Please consider simplifying the code to allow for more autonomy for the public to develop and use their properties the way they see fit and minimize the amount of input needed from city staff. The following are my comments to specific portions of the rewrite, I decided to use two columns in order to fit the snipped portions of the code I am referring to for ease of reference.

If it is unlawful to be out of compliance with the code and there is no allowance for nuisances, who then decides what is attractive and public nuisance?

Not inconsistent seems like a double negative, may need to be looked at. This seems like the code could be undermined by bureaucratic policies being adopted without public debate or input.

Consider giving more time for compliance given the time and expense it takes formulating a concept and preparation to get to the submittal point and the time it takes to get through the permitting process.

Please remove all maximum setbacks this is very impractical for development. Look around at all the properties that this will be overlayed upon and see how many would be in compliance with a maximum 20’ setback, it is staggeringly low. Why are we trying to buck the way that properties have been developed since the beginning of time. Allowing for denser growth should be the goal but not inhibiting the current way in which properties are used today and in the near future.

This should be removed; it is a security risk placing parking behind the buildings where the parking can’t be seen by passing law enforcement or concerned citizen, as well as the inconvenience of not have the parking at the storefront which faces the street.

Please remove maximum setbacks this is very impractical for development. Look around at all the properties that this will be overlayed upon and see how many would be in compliance with a maximum 20’ setback, it is staggeringly low. Why are we trying to buck the way that properties have been developed since the beginning of time. Allowing for denser growth should be the goal but not inhibiting the current way in which properties are used today and in the near future.

Please remove maximum setbacks this is very impractical for development. Look around at all of the properties that this will be overlayed upon and see how many would be in compliance with a maximum 20’ setback, it is staggeringly low. That being said why are we trying to buck the way that properties have been developed since the beginning of time. Allowing for denser growth should be the goal but not inhibiting the current way in which properties are used today and in the near future.

Shouldn’t we be trying to simplify the code to allow for properties to be developed with less box checking by the planners? This seems like an over reach to try and figure out how to check all of the boxes when simply having properties connect pedestrians to right of ways should be the goal and let the owners figure out how to get there rather than wasting planners time checking all the fine details that try to apply

ideas in text to real world applications. 10” sidewalks seem to be a bit more than necessary and an undue expense for that much extra material.

This should be removed; it is a security risk placing parking behind the buildings where the parking can’t be seen by by passing law enforcement or concerned citizen, as well as the inconvenience of and also inconvenient to not have the parking at the storefront which faces the street.

Please remove this, allow for development as the owner sees fit to allow them to place the building where they want, with an entrance that fits their building. What if people inside the building don’t want their activities viewed? Allow for the desired density but make it available for transition from now until then.

I have seen the intermodal type zoning in other municipalities that are much more advanced in their density cycle and I understand the need for it but wonder if there is a less heavy handed way to go about this that allows for current development but reserves the ability into the future. I also think automotive uses make sense in these areas as the personal vehicle may be a part of overall solution, ie carpooling. Is this even legal to outlaw private property from competing with public property for parking? Screening parking is a security risk as people using the parking stalls at night cannot be seen by passing traffic that may be able to react if a crime is being committed.

It seems to me that given most of the intense commercial properties are being converted from C-2 to MX-3 most of the intensive vehicle uses should be allowed in MX-3. Considering EV charging is allowed everywhere I think we need to allow for the chance that people continue to drive internal combustion engines for a while into the future and allow for them to be refueled and repaired and the inevitable evolution of the service station.

Consider removing the hours of operation, or possibly a closing time if noise is the concern, or at a minimum, an earlier operating time of maybe 5am to allow the businesses to accommodate early customers.

Placing the drive through lanes and windows behind the building is very poor design and unsafe. It is far more efficient and safe to have the drive through aisle go around the building leaving parking and pedestrian traffic to the interior side of the building separating the two. Five feet in a planting strip does not seem like much but in infill sites every inch matters at times. The Drive through lanes generally have a curb around them so the safety concern should be minimized as an inattentive fast food goer would run up against the curb first. Below are two examples showing the difference between the two Chick-Fil-A’s on Broadway and on Franklin

Please remove the restrictions as they relate to residential use, residential zoning is fine but the use could overstep the entitlement of the commercial zoning and put undo burdens on the businesses.

These are very different parcels to begin with, one rather square the other a long rectangle. But we can see with the Broadway location that there is a conflict where the pedestrians walking from their parked cars have to walk through the drive through aisle. Additionally the drive through aisle conflicts with parking stalls and drive aisles at all times whereas the Franklin location would only see parking and drive aisle conflict only when extremely busy in the drive through and less than half of its stalls at those times. I don’t understand why the city is trying to discourage and limit drive through businesses from existing. Look at the number of restaurants that closed during the madness of the pandemic and then look at how many of those that closed had drive throughs. Very few drive through restaurants closed during this time and in fact, actually thrived due to the fact that dining rooms were forced to close. Restaurants with drive throughs employ more people as they do more business than standard restaurants. Many fast food restaurants are young people’s first jobs and teach hard work, scheduling, and accountability, why are we doing away with them? The City should not be allowed to limit the hours of operation! The businesses need to be open when the customer demand is there.

Please don’t limit the number of pumps, the business can make up its own business decision regarding the demand of the market, the dispensers are not cheap and will not be installed unless there is a market for it. Placing everything behind buildings is anit business; the pumps need to be seen from the public streets to indicate to the consumer that there is fuel for sale there. Besides the security and safety standpoint that a police officer driving by cannot see into the business to see if there is a crime being committed.

There should be no maximum building setback. Every site is unique and needs to be able to be developed to fit the needs and desires of the community, business, and owner.

and is substantially more expensive and does not take into account whether or not the specific market will support this type of development. This will also take away the opportunity to own and develop real estate for the vast majority of people given the complexity and cost. We will end up with only large conglomerats owning all of the commercial real estate in town. Also once again mandating no parking in the front of the building is overeaching for planning and should be removed.

I personally don’t care about gated communities but I believe this should be up to the market to determine if they want gates or not; considering elderly folks may want the extra sense of security.

I believe I understand this, all new developments and redevelopments in the MX zones are to have a multi story height requirement. Allowing for and encouraging multistory development is great but to require it is absolutely uneconomic. This should be drafted to allow or encourage future density but not jumping through hoops for variances to build single story buildings. This will actually stifle development as multistory development requires more land area

Regarding alley access for MX zoning this should not be applicable as alleys are far too narrow for two way traffic and would cause more congestion gettting in and out of the property. Regarding circular driveways, why is the city getting this deep into the weeds on people’s private properties. Assuming this is a residential application it generally shouldn’t matter if there are dual curb cuts on a residential street.

on neighboring parcels that get their parking poached due to the limited number of stalls. Office, Multi Family, and Retail all suffer from not being able to park and access the real estate. Allow the person investing in the building to decide what their future needs will be.

And to add insult to injury to the parking undersupply, 20% of the spaces need to go towards EV cars, which according to the Energy department (https://afdc.energy.gov/data/10962) There were 3,500 EVs in June of 2022 in the entire state of Idaho. This is an overreach and should be removed altogether. 10% of the total project cost is a ridiculously high number as it relates to a project and has zero return for it. If the city wants to add some incentive for EV stations go ahead but there is no reason this should be a green subsidy forced onto a private land owner. The talk throughout the Code Rewrite about making things more affordable, this is far from it.

Parking maximums should be removed altogether, has anyone on staff interviewed any end user of retail and restaurant type users on their parking needs. The cap on dental clinic probably doesn’t even cover the number of employees. This is irresponsible to limit a businesses ability to serve customers because they have nowhere to park. This can also put undo burden

An additional 10% doesn’t even come close to helping the debacle that is being proposed.

The number of bicycle parking requirements are far overreaching to begin with, but, asking to accommodate cargo bikes and trailer bikes is an overeach.

Can this be limited and exempt up to a threshold so that IDWR, Veolia Water, and planners are not inundated with approval letters for every new project on undeveloped land?

I believe more thought should be put into the formula for calculating how much signage is allowed for larger shopping centers to allow for more area and more than 1 EMD if it’s a larger cetner. Also 20 seconds is much too long for multiple users on a site, it should be much shorter but not so short that it is distracting to vehicular transporters. Surely there is some science on this subject.

Things like this do not make anything more affordable, and has anyone talked to Idaho Power about how they feel about landscaping growing close to their transformers?

I think the distance from predominantly single family is very subjective and should be removed, if the property is zoned it needs to have a clear direction of entitlement of allowed use. I think the distance from predominantly single family is very subjective and should be removed, if the property is zoned it needs to have a clear direction of entitlement of allowed use. Here in the definitions of drive through facility it states the issue I previously talked about with the Chick-Fil-A aerials with having the parking and drive through aisle on the same side of the building, it is poor design and not safe. Remove the requirement to not have any paved surfaces on the frontage of MX lots.

Shouldn’t materials be stored in yards that are required?

Thank you for taking the time to consider my concerns for the future of Boise. I would enjoy the opportunity to get together again with you and your team to discuss possible solutions. Best regards,

Jason White Cc

Boise City Council (via email) Attn: Mayor Mclean lmclean@cityofboise.org Attn: Council Member Woodings hwoodings@cityofboise.org Attn: Council Member Bageant pbageant@cityofboise.org Attn: Council Member Hallyburton jhallyburton@cityofboise.org Attn: Council Member Willits lwillits@cityofboise.org

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:10 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. April Beck ctrbeck@msn.com 5222 W Ellens Ferry ct Boise, ID 83703 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Thursday, April 20, 2023 4:30 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Angie Marianthi Email angie.marianthi@gmail.com Address 3720 W Vaughn Street, Boise, ID 83705 Comment As a lifetime Idaho resident, I'm highly in favor of the zoning rewrite. It would improve my community to have more walkable neighborhoods and affordable housing. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Deanna Dupuy From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Wednesday, April 19, 2023 7:33 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Andrew Moore Email moore.andrew09@gmail.com Address 412 S 13th St Apt 213 Boise, ID 83702 Comment To the Boise City Council: I am writing to express my support for the proposed zoning code modernization. I have been a resident of Boise for the majority of my life, having attended Kindergarten through High School in the Treasure Valley, and now living as a resident in my 30s. As someone who grew up in the city and returned to it, it is deeply important to me that my hometown is welcoming and affordable for those who choose to move here. It is painful to see friends and family struggle with finding housing that is affordable and close to where they work, learn, and socialize. The demand for housing is high, and our zoning code should incentivize both greater density and sustainable development. Additionally, it is unwise to ignore the challenges and dangers posed by climate change; ensuring that we're making best use of our resources in terms of space and water is critical. Seeing the expansion of sprawl around the Treasure Valley has been one of the most dismaying aspects of returning to the area. Being able to walk to get groceries, drink coffee with companions, and enjoy green spaces are sources of immense joy in my daily life. I would hope that my city's zoning code would encourage and anticipate greater access to public transit and reduce our dependence on cars. Updating the zoning code to align with the city's comprehensive plan is an important goal, and pushes us towards meeting the values and aspirations I've mentioned. This is especially true given the scale of change and growth that the Treasure Valley has experienced over the past decade. If adopted, I believe the city will be better prepared to adjust and benefit from future economic and population growth in the region. Sincerely, Andrew Moore If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 4:24 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Miss Angela Thiel thielgto@hotmail.com 11034 W Edgehill Dr Boise, ID 83709 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

Michael Aberg <pilotaberg@gmail.com> Thursday, April 20, 2023 2:58 PM ZoningRewrite [External] ZCR Written Testimony

I am writing in support of the new Zoning Code Rewrite. One of my favorite phrases of the last few years has been, “don’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good”. While there are areas of the ZCR that could use some work, it is still a drastically needed update to Boise’s current outdated and frankly harmful zoning standard. Imagine a world where the current zoning plan was strictly enforced; where all of the non‐conforming buildings and uses were condemned and torn down, replaced with buildings and uses that meet the written standard. Would Boise be a better place in this world? Without many of our treasured neighborhoods like the North End, East End, and Southeast Boise? Areas full of non‐conforming buildings who have managed to not destroy or disrupt their current environments? Places where these things like fourplexes, cottage court apartments, duplexes, and townhomes mingle so uniformly and seamlessly with their environment that it’s nearly impossible to tell them apart? Boise has a strong history of being a welcoming, inclusive, kind, and forward thinking city. Preserving the open space along the Boise river in the form of the Greenbelt in 1969, an era of “urban renewal” that could have easily seen the area paved over. Finding space in our communities for refugees from around the globe. Establishing the Foothills plan and levy to ensure that we can always find a place to relax in the foothills and look down on the Statehouse. The ZCR is definitely in line with those values. We can’t control the desire of people to move to our wonderful city, but we can control our reaction to these outside forces. Instead of forcing these new residents to either displace current residents or move to our exurbs like Meridian, Eagle, Caldwell, or Nampa, we can make space within our city by densifying and focusing on public transit. This has the added benefit of cutting back on car traffic along our highways and major arteries! As an airline pilot and someone who has been lucky enough to travel both around our country and the world, I frequently find myself without a car in cities that I’m visiting. Part of my barometer for the health of a city is how safe or isolated I feel trying to navigate these places without a car. I still think about when I first moved here in 2017, and the joy of exploring the area near my affordable rental near BSU on my bike. These trips took me all over the city and along the Greenbelt, and during those trips I was able to meet and interact with so many kind members of the community. The unexpected pleasure of discovering Camel’s Back Park and being able to dine in the community along 13th St all while being able to bike to and from was a major part of what made me decide to make Boise my home. That same rental, with no improvements, now rents for 41% higher than it did when I moved out. This is the natural consequence of artificially constricting how much housing can be in an area by mandating low‐density through zoning codes. While densifying won’t immediately solve the affordability issue, it can definitely have a positive impact in decreasing the meteoric rise in housing prices. For the sake of longtime Boise residents, BSU students, BSU graduates whose talents we want to retain, fellow Idaho residents moving to our valley, and out of state future residents who are attracted to our beautiful nature and values, let’s make some space in our city for them, and toss out the outdated car‐centric low density values of our old zoning code. Please pass the new zoning code! Sincerely, Michael Aberg 1

Boise Resident

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Friday, April 14, 2023 5:24 AM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Luci Willits, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Sylvia H Adams geasja21@gmail.com 11292 W Woodhaven Ct Boise, ID 83713 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Thursday, April 20, 2023 5:00 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Daniel Adams Email Address Comment As a public health professional, I’m in favor of the new zoning code ordinance. Its necessary for us to be able to create the infrastructure for a more walkable/bikeable community. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 8:47 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Vaughn Adamson fixnboise@gmail.com 3220 w Taft st Boise, ID 83703 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:49 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Michael Alb cadyranch@aol.com 172 S Cromwell Place Boise, ID 83709 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 4:43 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Ms. Kathleen Aldenbrook kathy@nym.hush.com 967 E Parkcenter Blvd 336 Boise, ID 83706 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments:

Stacey Alexander <stacey.spaulding@gmail.com> Thursday, April 20, 2023 10:18 AM ZoningRewrite [External] Support of zoning code update PXL_20230420_004503793.jpg

To Whom it May Concern, I, along with my daughter (see attached for her written testimony) are writing in support of the zoning code rewrite. In order to adapt and become a City for everyone, we must modify our existing code to allow more density and various uses. If you are looking for any modifications to the code, I would recommend the following: De‐couple affordable incentives from sustainability incentives to better incentivize both. Currently the incentive is a package deal and, arguably, decreases the “value” of both incentives making them harder to utilize. Large daycares are not an allowable use in many zones, perhaps revising the definition of large daycare from 25 kids to 50 is reasonable. Best, Stacey Alexander 1519 W Fort St Boise, ID 83702

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

algerdustin@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Dustin Alger <algerdustin@everyactioncustom.com> Thursday, April 20, 2023 4:40 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Zoning Code Rewrite

Dear Planning and Zoning Commission, I am writing to express my support for the Zoning Code Rewrite because plat lines make no sense. It would be great to be able to split a property that makes sense and meets the needs of the neighborhood. Sincerely, Dustin Alger 2218 W Breneman St Boise, ID 83702‐0539 algerdustin@yahoo.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

eallen@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Emily Allen <eallen@everyactioncustom.com> Thursday, April 20, 2023 4:56 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Support the Zoning Code Rewrite!!

Dear Planning and Zoning Commission, I am writing to express my support for the Zoning Code Rewrite. The rewrite seeks to preserve the high quality of life in Boise and expand those benefits to everyone so we can grow healthfully and thoughtfully. The sustainability, affordability, and open space protections included in the new zoning code rewrite are exactly what Boise needs to plan for and address our rapid growth. Growth is inevitable, and we need a modern zoning code to ensure we are following the best practices to grow sustainably and responsibly. Boise has become increasingly unaffordable for everyone, especially for new home buyers, renters, students, low‐ income residents, refugee families, and elderly folks on fixed incomes. This code helps address those issues and it matters to me we consider the needs of these populations. I specifically appreciate that this zoning code protects our green spaces, improves our tree canopy and makes our communities more walkable and bikeable. I strongly encourage the Boise Planning and Zoning Commission to support this zoning code rewrite that staff and residents have spent so much time and effort to shape. Sincerely, Emily Allen 700 W Victory Rd Boise, ID 83706‐4766 eallen@jannus.org

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:50 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Ms. Michelle Allison mallison180@gmail.com 5603 West Targee Street Boise, ID 83705 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

zoninginfo Monday, April 17, 2023 4:23 PM ZoningRewrite FW: Contact Form Submitted to Planning

From: noreply@cityofboise.org <noreply@cityofboise.org> Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2023 9:21 PM To: zoninginfo <zoninginfo@cityofboise.org> Subject: Contact Form Submitted to Planning

To help protect y our priv acy , Microsoft Office prev ented automatic download of this picture from the Internet. City of Boise

CREATING A CITY FOR EVERYONE

CONTACT FORM SUBMITTED TO PLANNING From Jacob Allred Jacob.b.allred@gmail.com Phone Number: 801‐979‐0037 I want to voice my support for the new zoning codes. This modern zoning code seems like a real push to try and save the city from the same sprawling development pattern that cities across America are suffering from. There is a real movement especially among young people to build a different way. As someone in there late 20s trying to put down roots in Boise I am so refreshed to se a push like this being made. I don't want to live somewhere where the city's biggest interest is in protecting parking lots and extra lanes. Boise is undergoing huge growing pains and left unchecked all that money is going to go to new developments on the outside of town. These new developments are expensive to maintain and isolating to live in. There is real support for a safe, urban, walkable city and this zoning code is one of the most important steps that needs to be taken. Don't let the NIMBY's stop this! You have our support, fingers crossed, good luck.

Contact Form Submitted On: https://www.cityofboise.org/departments/planning‐and‐development‐ services/planning‐and‐zoning/zoning‐code‐rewrite/project‐milestones/

To help protect y our priv acy , Microsoft Office prev ented automatic download of this picture from the Internet. City of Boise Logo

208-608-7000 info@cityofboise.org 150 North Capitol Boulevard, Boise, ID 83702

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 7:39 AM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. William Amalu daylong‐sludge0d@icloud.com 6332 N Buckley Pl Boise, ID 83713 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 4:46 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mike Amschel mpamschel@yahoo.com 4848 N. Cresthaven circle Boise, ID 83704 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

ZoningRewrite From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:27 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Holli Woodings, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Dr. Jennifer Anderson shultzanderson@gmail.com 472 N Morningside Way Boise, ID 83712 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:05 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Brett Anderson brettaa@centurylink.net 2211 West Sunrise Rim Road Boise, ID 83705 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

312courtney@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Courtney Anderson <312courtney@everyactioncustom.com> Thursday, April 20, 2023 3:58 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Support Growth

Dear Planning and Zoning Commission, I support the Zoning Code Rewrite because Boise needs to continue to support the growth. Sincerely, Courtney Anderson 2039 N Blaine Way Boise, ID 83702‐0513 312courtney@gmail.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Wednesday, April 19, 2023 9:42 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Heidi A Andrade Email heidiajandrade@gmail.com Address Garden City ID 83714‐1575 Comment I was born, raised, educated, worked and retired in Boise, but now I cannot afford to live there! If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Wednesday, April 19, 2023 6:38 AM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Anthony Email oopsyoopsy123@gmail.com Address 930 n Mercer st, Boise, Idaho, 83703 Comment Please do what's best for capitalism. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Thursday, April 20, 2023 11:41 AM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Lisa Applebee Email lapplebee@hotmail.com Address Boise, Idaho 83703 Comment I support the zoning rewrite. I like the new mixed‐use categories especially along transit corridors. All categories attempt to reduce personal vehicle dependence and promote multi‐modal options by reducing parking requirements. Reduced parking requirements may make developing projects easier and less costly. I support making it easier and less costly to develop in‐fill projects. Reduced sprawl and car dependence is good for Boiseans health, wealth, and happiness. I support robust efforts to create more affordable housing that generates wealth for underrepresented and underserved populations. People experiencing homelessness need clean, safe shelter options. I support Interfaith Sanctuary on State Street because it has transit available, people would have easy access to jobs, recreation, shopping, services, and schools. I support other shelter options such as cooling and warming shelters. Proactive solutions are better than homeless camps. There may need to be more public participation but allowing NIMBYs to stop projects is not the answer. We need solutions, not people saying no! Great work, City of Boise. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Thursday, April 20, 2023 1:59 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Holly Apsley Email Address Comment I am writing to you today in support of the new zoning code ordinance (ZOA23‐0001 & CPA23‐0001). We need this re‐write to provide housing for all! Please count this as support in the affirmative for the new ordinance. Thank you. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:42 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Justin armstrong masterndn@gmail.com 2480 South virginia St. BOISE, ID 83705 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 4:39 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Colonel Stephen Arnt stevearnt@aol.com 2200 South Crosscreek Lane Boise, ID 83706 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Wednesday, April 19, 2023 9:47 AM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Christopher Ash Email AshChristopher757@gmail.com Address 1321 N liberty st Comment Leaving idaho tommorow. Would love not to if the rent wasnt so unlivabley high. A real shame what the prices have done to my home state If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 9:36 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Linda Austin ctr1linda@gmail.com 9204 Harbourview Dr Boise, ID 83703 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Deanna Dupuy From: Sent: To: Subject:

sunrisecox@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Sunrise Ayers <sunrisecox@everyactioncustom.com> Wednesday, April 19, 2023 3:43 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Vote Yes on the Zoning Code Rewrite

Dear Planning and Zoning Commission, I am writing to express my support for the Zoning Code Rewrite. The sustainability, affordability, and open space protections included in the new zoning code rewrite are exactly what Boise needs to plan for and address our rapid growth. Idaho and Boise have an affordable housing crisis and this proposed zoning code update will help us house Idaho families who are at risk of homelessness without much needed housing stock. Growth is inevitable, and we need a modern zoning code to ensure we are following the best practices to grow sustainably and responsibly. It has been clear that Boise City Staff have put in the effort to make an inclusive and extensive community input process to develop the zoning code our city needs and deserves. Boise has become increasingly unaffordable for everyone, especially for new home buyers, renters, students, low‐ income residents, refugee families, and elderly folks on fixed incomes. This code helps address those issues. And, critically, this will allow for building housing close to where jobs are located, which will decrease traffic congestion and make Boise more live‐able for all of us! I specifically appreciate that this zoning code protects our green spaces, improves our tree canopy, incentivizes energy and water efficiency that saves money over the lifetime of a home, allows for smart and targeted density, increases opportunities for multi‐family homes like duplexes, removes unnecessary parking space minimums, protects pollinators, and makes our communities more walkable and bikeable. I strongly encourage the Boise Planning and Zoning Commission to support this zoning code rewrite that staff and residents have spent so much time and effort to shape. Sincerely, Mrs. Sunrise Ayers 5590 S Anaura Pl Boise, ID 83709‐5287 sunrisecox@yahoo.com

Deanna Dupuy From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Wednesday, April 19, 2023 4:05 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Brad Hyland Email Bradley.r.hyland@gmail.com Address 4520 West Kootenai Street Comment Hello! I am writing to express my support for the City’s efforts to update our zoning code to advance housing affordability and to help diversify the great city of Boise. As an individual who has loved their time in Boise due to the thriving outdoor culture, I want to ensure that the city is able to offer these type of amenities to more individuals with a diverse background...many of which are currently priced out of the Boise area due to extreme housing costs. Since moving to Boise, it has been a dream to purchase a house of our own. However, after several years of trying, we have come to the conclusion that it is likely that we will not be able to afford a house that fits our needs and will need to continue renting at high costs as well. When moving to Boise, we were hopeful to be able to find a house that we would be able to purchase and grow into on our tech industry and Boise State post‐doctoral salaries, however, that was not the case. I hope you pass this zoning code to help individuals like ourselves and the many others that want to enjoy Boise and the beautiful state of Idaho. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Deanna Dupuy From: Sent: To: Subject:

bevrosam@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Beverly Mitchell <bevrosam@everyactioncustom.com> Wednesday, April 19, 2023 4:36 PM ZoningRewrite [External] I Support the Zoning Code Rewrite

Dear Planning and Zoning Commission, I am writing to express my support for the Zoning Code Rewrite. The sustainability, affordability, and open space protections included in the new zoning code rewrite are exactly what Boise needs to plan for and address our rapid growth. Growth is inevitable, and we need a modern zoning code to ensure we are following the best practices to grow sustainably and responsibly. It has been clear that Boise City Staff have put in the effort to make an inclusive and extensive community input process to develop the zoning code our city needs and deserves. Boise has become increasingly unaffordable for everyone, especially for new home buyers, renters, students, low‐ income residents, refugee families, and elderly folks on fixed incomes. This code helps address those issues. I specifically appreciate that this zoning code protects our green spaces, improves our tree canopy, incentivizes energy and water efficiency that saves money over the lifetime of a home, allows for smart and targeted density, increases opportunities for multi‐family homes like duplexes, removes unnecessary parking space minimums, protects pollinators, and makes our communities more walkable and bikeable. I strongly encourage the Boise Planning and Zoning Commission to support this zoning code rewrite that staff and residents have spent so much time and effort to shape. Sincerely, Ms. Beverly Mitchell 1812 S Watersilk Pl Boise, ID 83709‐2500 bevrosam@aol.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 11:03 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Kenneth Bacus bacusken@hotmail.com 9517 W Birmingham Dr Boise, ID 83704 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

sylviabadasci@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Sylvia Badasci <sylviabadasci@everyactioncustom.com> Thursday, April 20, 2023 10:28 AM ZoningRewrite [External] I Support the Zoning Code Rewrite

Dear Planning and Zoning Commission, I'm writing to you because I support the zoning code rewrite. Once we encroach into our beautiful foothills, we can't reverse it. Sincerely, Ms. Sylvia Badasci 1516 N 23rd St Boise, ID 83702‐0408 sylviabadasci@yahoo.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 6:54 AM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Ms. Elizabeth Bader elizabader@gmail.com 4569 N Settlers Ridge Place Boise, ID 83703 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Deanna Dupuy From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Wednesday, April 19, 2023 6:25 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Amber Baker Email Amberbaker783@gmail.com Address 3672 S Daisy Way Comment Please add more affordable housing in downtown Boise. An average income is not enough to survive on with these housing prices. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

mohrcrystal@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Crystal Banka <mohrcrystal@everyactioncustom.com> Thursday, April 20, 2023 3:34 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Support the Zoning Code Rewrite

Dear Planning and Zoning Commission, I support the Zoning Code Rewrite because I'm for density and preserving our foothills and farm land. Sincerely, Crystal Banka 2312 W Heron St Boise, ID 83702‐2438 mohrcrystal@hotmail.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Wednesday, April 19, 2023 6:32 AM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Logan Barclay Email loganbarclay@protonmail.com Address 3000 West Stewart Avenue Comment I full support the zoning rewrite, and I think it is desperately needed. Don't listen to the NIMBYs! If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 5:27 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Ms. Kimberley Barger sculptress1@sbcglobal.net 2127 N Currant Place Boise, ID 83704 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 4:16 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Holli Woodings, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Lisa Barnes lisabarnes1@comcast.net 1420 E Warm Springs Ave Boise, ID 83712 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 7:31 AM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Luci Willits, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Nancy Barnes nlbarnes46@gmail.com 3781 N Lancer Way Boise, ID 83713 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Friday, April 14, 2023 10:41 AM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Shawn Barnes sbcable@comcast.net 1420 East Warm Springs Ave Boise, ID 83712 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:05 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Jennifer Barnett spiffyniffer@gmail.com 1951 S. Abbs St. Boise, ID 83705 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Thursday, April 20, 2023 2:51 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Lauren Barraza Email laurenlucas92@gmail.com Address 419 Purdue St. Boise, ID 83706 Comment Dear Planning and Zoning Staff, I write today in support of Boise's new zoning code. As a young professional living in Boise, I am fortunate enough to have been able to buy a home a few years ago. Those like me looking for homes, however, have not been so lucky, because Boise is becoming increasingly unaffordable. This is due in large part to the inflexible zoning code we have today, which produces a serious lack of housing diversity, density, and availability. This zoning code is a big step in the right direction, and one that will allow young people to go to school here, and stay and create families here, instead of having to search elsewhere for housing. It will also help protect the open space I enjoy by putting more homes where homes belong, instead of allowing continued sprawl. Additionally, I support the new zoning code's focus on allowing more mixed use development. As a resident of the Bench, I have enjoyed the vitality of the newest additions to the Alpine and Latah corridor in Push and Pour, Wyld Child, and The Stil. This walkable activity center is something the rest of Boise should experience, and one that can be achieved with a more flexible and modern zoning code like this one. Thank you for taking the time to read my comments, and please vote in favor of the new zoning code. Sincerely, Lauren If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 4:28 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Lloyd Barron idpounder@gmail.com 3816 N Erick LN Boise, ID 83704 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 7:07 AM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Karen Barrow karens.creations21@yahoo.com 1508 S Riverstone Ln Apt 303 Boise, ID 83706 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 10:52 AM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Gary Barton gbarton55@outlook.com 6519 Randolph Boise, ID 83709 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 6:00 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Chris Basaites chris_basaites@hotmail.com 1304 S Euclid Av Boise, ID 83706 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 9:44 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. John Bassetti johnbassetti@gmail.com 2120 N 15th St Boise, ID 83702 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Thursday, April 20, 2023 3:15 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name William, F Basham Email billbasham21@gmail.com Address 2701 N. 26th, St. Comment No decision should be made until the new council has been seated after the November elections; on‐street parking will become an even greater problem than it already is; ADU's should only be legal as long as property owner remains in the main dwelling; 40+ building height has a negative impact on surrounding single family homes. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Friday, April 14, 2023 8:42 AM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Ms. Lois Bastida loisbastida@yahoo.com 2696 S Moultrie Ave Boise, ID 83709 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Monday, April 17, 2023 3:14 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Kevin Bayhouse kevinbayhouse@gmail.com 706 Opal St. Boise, ID 83705 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Deanna Dupuy From: Sent: To: Subject:

christinalouisebaylis@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Christina Baylis <christinalouisebaylis@everyactioncustom.com> Wednesday, April 19, 2023 8:47 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Please Vote Yes on the ZCR

Dear Planning and Zoning Commission, I am writing to express my support for the Zoning Code Rewrite. The sustainability, affordability, and open space protections included in the new zoning code rewrite are exactly what Boise needs to plan for and address our rapid growth. What has happened to our sweet city in the past 5 years is too much too fast. It's clear Boise is headed in the wrong direction. Boise has become noisy, crowed,and congested with traffic. We must support the zoning code rewrite so that for those of us who have lived here and cherish our sweet city know that something is in place to try to retain some of the charm it once had. Walking communities should be a must for all new development. We must invest in the tree canopy and green spaces. A wise approach would have all new development stop until a cohesive plan is in place for the sustainablilty of what has been built. Growth is inevitable, and we need a modern zoning code to ensure we are following the best practices to grow sustainably and responsibly. It has been clear that Boise City Staff have put in the effort to make an inclusive and extensive community input process to develop the zoning code our city needs and deserves. Boise has become increasingly unaffordable for everyone, especially for new home buyers, renters, students, low‐ income residents, refugee families, and elderly folks on fixed incomes. This code helps address those issues. I specifically appreciate that this zoning code protects our green spaces, improves our tree canopy, incentivizes energy and water efficiency that saves money over the lifetime of a home, allows for smart and targeted density, increases opportunities for multi‐family homes like duplexes, removes unnecessary parking space minimums, protects pollinators, and makes our communities more walkable and bikeable. I strongly encourage the Boise Planning and Zoning Commission to support this zoning code rewrite that staff and residents have spent so much time and effort to shape. Sincerely, Ms. Christina Baylis 1508 N 9th St Boise, ID 83702‐3613 christinalouisebaylis@gmail.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 5:29 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Tom Bean thomas.bean8@gmail.com 5617 E Gateway Dr Boise, ID 83716 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Thursday, April 20, 2023 12:51 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Rebecca Beasley‐Cockroft Email r.beasleycockroft@gmail.com Address Boise, ID 83706 Comment Dear Planning and Zoning Staff, I write today in support of Boise's new zoning code. As a professional living in Boise, I am fortunate enough to have been able to buy a home a few years ago. Those like me looking for homes, however, have not been so lucky, because Boise is becoming increasingly unaffordable. This is due in large part to the inflexible zoning code we have today, which produces a serious lack of housing diversity, density, and availability. This zoning code is a big step in the right direction, and one that will allow young people to go to school here, and stay and create families here, instead of having to search elsewhere for housing. It will also help protect the open space I enjoy by putting more homes where homes belong, instead of allowing continued sprawl. I also am in support actions that improve our diversity of housing. At different stages of my life I expect to have different housing needs. Today Boise primarily has single family housing and updating the zoning code so that there are other housing options available is something I support. Additionally, I support the new zoning code's focus on allowing more mixed use development. As a resident of the Bench, I have enjoyed the vitality of the newest additions to the Alpine and Latah corridor in Push and Pour, Wyld Child, and The Stil. This walkable activity center is something the rest of Boise should experience, and one that can be achieved with a more flexible and modern zoning code like this one. Thank you for taking the time to read my comments, and please vote in favor of the new zoning code. Sincerely, Rebecca Beasley‐Cockroft If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Thursday, April 20, 2023 4:14 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Becca Email ramathias@live.com Address 3342 E Trifecta Lane Comment I am writing to you today in support of the new zoning code ordinance (ZOA23‐0001 & CPA23‐0001). Boise is desperately in need of the code rewrite to stay in line with current zoning and housing needs. Please count this as support in the affirmative for the new ordinance. Thank you. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

Jbechler2@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Jacob Bechler <Jbechler2 @everyactioncustom.com> Thursday, April 20, 2023 4:47 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Please Support the Zoning Code Rewrite

Dear Planning and Zoning Commission, The current code is out of date and as someone looking to buy a house in the next few years, affordable housing is extremely important to me. Sincerely, Jacob Bechler 2505 W Pendleton St Boise, ID 83705‐2539 Jbechler2@gmail.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:14 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Luci Willits, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Veronica Beck veronica.k.beck1@gmail.com 2461 n Tyra Ave Boise, ID 83713 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 9:30 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Jochen Becker mail@saranbecker.com 8565 W Winchester Dr Boise, ID 83704 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Deanna Dupuy From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Wednesday, April 19, 2023 5:06 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name scott beecham Email scott.beecham@gmail.com Address 2105 West Irene Street Comment I am writing in support of the updated, modern zoning code. As a longtime Boise resident as well as a former city planner and developer who now works in the production of affordable housing I can fairly say that the current zoning ordinance doesn’t work well for anyone. It has long been outdated as evidenced by the confusing patchwork of “fixes” that have occurred over the years as well as the disconnect with the long term vision documents. The new code offers both clarity and alignment. A modern zoning ordinance that honors the place we call home while at the same time allowing for responsible and sustainable growth is exactly what is needed to maintain our quality of life. It will increase housing options and affordability, it will improve access to essential services and amenities and it will ensure a financially viable future for the infrastructure we all depend on. Economic studies have shown that the pattern of development that we have seen in Boise and the greater Treasure Valley under post war codes are not sustainable. It is long past time to acknowledge the growth and direct it in a productive way that enhances our community. Boise should continue to lead by example while setting a sustainable pattern of growth for neighboring communities to follow. Thank you for the thoughtful leadership and hard work by the entire City team. You should all be proud of the effort and the product. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 4:29 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Nancy F Behrens foxbehr@msn.com 2079 S Scyene Way Boise, ID 83712 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 5:10 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, John Beidleman johnbeidleman@hotmail.com 2803 N. 32nd St. Boise, ID 83703 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

ZoningRewrite From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:29 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. John F Bell jfranklinbell@gmail.com 4315 W Pasadena Dr Boise, ID 83705 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:25 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Holli Woodings, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. John Benelli johnbenelli@me.com 625 N BACON DRIVE Boise, ID 83712‐8212 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:12 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Emilio Bengoa ebengoa2022@gmail.com 5610s Basalt Ave Boise, ID 83716 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

sdbenner1@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Steven Benner <sdbenner1 @everyactioncustom.com> Wednesday, April 19, 2023 9:01 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Please Vote Yes on the ZCR

Dear Planning and Zoning Commission, I am writing to express my support for the Zoning Code Rewrite. The sustainability, affordability, and open space protections included in the new zoning code rewrite are exactly what Boise needs to plan for and address our rapid growth. Growth is inevitable, and we need a modern zoning code to ensure we are following the best practices to grow sustainably and responsibly. It has been clear that Boise City Staff have put in the effort to make an inclusive and extensive community input process to develop the zoning code our city needs and deserves. Boise has become increasingly unaffordable for everyone, especially for new home buyers, renters, students, low‐ income residents, refugee families, and elderly folks on fixed incomes. This code helps address those issues. I specifically appreciate that this zoning code protects our green spaces, improves our tree canopy, incentivizes energy and water efficiency that saves money over the lifetime of a home, allows for smart and targeted density, increases opportunities for multi‐family homes like duplexes, removes unnecessary parking space minimums, protects pollinators, and makes our communities more walkable and bikeable. I strongly encourage the Boise Planning and Zoning Commission to support this zoning code rewrite that staff and residents have spent so much time and effort to shape. I believe those who oppose the zoning code update are misinformed about the effects of this code. The old code will just perpetuate the development patterns we have. We need these changes to our zoning code to support better development patterns that incentivize affordable and sustainable housing. Sincerely, Mr Steven Benner 2808 S Colorado Ave Boise, ID 83706‐4730 sdbenner1@gmail.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

tbchico7@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Tristan Bennett <tbchico7@everyactioncustom.com> Thursday, April 20, 2023 9:17 AM ZoningRewrite [External] Please Vote Yes on the Zoning Code Rewrite

Dear Planning and Zoning Commission, I am writing in support of the zoning code rewrite. I live in a small historic home in downtown Boise, and I really appreciate the walkability this neighborhood has. Increasing density across the city would allow me to walk other places. I'm a big fan of the zoning in the Hyde Park neighborhood and I'd like to see more mixed‐use zoning around the city. Sincerely, Miss Tristan Bennett 912 W Fort St Boise, ID 83702‐5425 tbchico7@gmail.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Thursday, April 20, 2023 8:26 AM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Paula Benson Email paulainboise@gmail.com Address 1564 E Lenz Lane Comment How is it possibly correct that two new council members, appointed by the Mayor rather than elected by citizens, can vote on this important issue? This is a clear conflict of interest and should not be acceptable in a democracy. The City of Boise, and the rest of the City Council members, need to stop this process until elections for those seats are complete. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 5:19 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Eileen Benton 17corky@gmail.com 4830 N Burlington Dr Boise, ID 83704 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 9:20 AM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. David Benton nisboise@gmail.com 4830 N Burlington Drive Boise, ID 83704 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Wednesday, April 19, 2023 8:32 AM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Katie Berry Email kasnyaberry@gmail.com Address Boise, ID, 83709 Comment Boise and Ada County sold out to REIT and other investors and now regular locals are priced out of our HOME. Young people can’t buy, can’t upgrade for families because there are incentives for greedy investors and nothing to protect renters or regular home buyers. Sense multi‐family is NOT the answer either. Extra tax liabilities for greed buying and exploitative renting is the key. Homes are for living and should NOT be Wall Street casino poker chips as it has become. How much does American Homes for Rent own? How about other good old boy groups buying neighborhoods to rent for California prices?? If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:40 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Kathleen Beynun kbeynun@hotmail.com 4041 N Edelweiss St Boise, ID 83713 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Tuesday, April 18, 2023 8:38 AM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Heidi Bice Email heidiandkelton@yahoo.com Address 2021 S Pacific Street, Boise, ID 83705 Comment 4/18/23 To: mayormclean@cityofboise.org, citycouncil@cityofboise.org, tkeane@cityofboise.org, zoninginfo@cityofboise.org, zoningrewrite@cityofboise.org

Re: Zoning Code Rewrite Public Comment for ZOA23‐00001 & CPA23‐00001

Dear Mayor, City Council, and Planning and Zoning Commission:

The public has not been given adequate time to read, analyze, and comment meaningfully on the 611 page Zoning Code Rewrite, which are an almost complete replacement of the laws that, for the last half century, have established Boise as a highly desirable place to call home.

The City of Boise is allowing only three weeks to submit comments by the March 22 deadline – the date that must be met for public testimony to be included in the Project Report. The Project Report will contain the staff analysis, and be provided to the Planning and Zoning Commission for their review well‐ahead of the later public hearings. In an incredibly complex rule‐change, it is imperative that the public is able to have their comments included in the Zoning Code Rewrite Project Report.

After all, the City only released its final version of its Zoning Code Rewrite on February 28, 2023 – a document that does not show the numerous changes from the last draft released in October of 2022. This timeline has even put citizens that have carefully followed the process at an extraordinary disadvantage.

Federal guidelines call for up to 180 days of public comment for rule changes that may have a large impact. The proposed changes to the Zoning Code Rewrite may lead to the most significant impacts many Boise residents will ever experience near their homes – rules that range from new allowances for alcohol serving commercial establishments within residential zoning districts, for tall apartment buildings next to single family homes, and even landfills within city limits.

Given the enormity of the decision coming before the Planning and Zoning Commission on the week of April 23, it is essential that these volunteer public servants are able to consider written testimony for more than a few days over the weekend. Nonetheless, that is all the time they will have for those public comments that simply cannot be meaningfully submitted by the extremely short deadline of March 22.

Please extend the timeline for public comment by at least 90 days.

Sincerely, Heidi Bice 2021 S Pacific Street Boise, ID 83705 If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 4:07 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Holli Woodings, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Glenn Bickel busybs55@gmail.com 214 N Hot Springs Dr Boise, ID 83712 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:24 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Kathleen Biggers gigglesb@icloud.com 3873 w magnolia lane Boise, ID 83703 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Thursday, April 20, 2023 4:00 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Bayley Bingham Email bayleybingham@gmail.com Address Boise, Idaho 83702 Comment I am in favor of the new zoning proposal! We need more affordable housing in Boise, or else many members of our workforce will be squeezed out of town. We don't want that. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 8:53 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Miss Carolyn Bjorner madambutterfly658@live.com 2321 N Siesta Way Boise, ID 83704 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:49 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Marianne Blomstom mablomstrom@msn.com 4184 N WESTVIEW WAY BOISE, ID 83704 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 11:23 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Anjanette Bodily anjbodily@gmail.com 12724 w Edna Ct Boise, ID 83713 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

ZoningRewrite From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Tuesday, April 18, 2023 9:20 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Patrick Boel Email patrickboel01@gmail.com Address 4083 Shakespeare Way, Boise, ID 83716 Comment As a native Boisean I am in full support of a new zoning code ordinance. Boise has the opportunity to lead the nation in sustainability, innovation, and quality of life. Without a modern zoning code I believe Boise is at risk of making the same mistakes most other places have already made and will become a sprawling City with traffic and low quality of life. Planning for growth does not cause extra growth, it enables us to manage growth the smartest way we can. The answer is not to pull the ladder up so only those who got here first can enjoy this wonderful City. That will, inevitably, backfire. Please pass this rewrite. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

sgawboehner@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Susan boehner <sgawboehner@everyactioncustom.com> Wednesday, April 19, 2023 2:26 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Vote Yes on the Zoning Code Rewrite

Dear Planning and Zoning Commission, I am writing to express my support for the Zoning Code Rewrite. The sustainability, affordability, and open space protections included in the new zoning code rewrite are exactly what Boise needs to plan for and address our rapid growth. Growth is inevitable, and we need a modern zoning code to ensure we are following the best practices to grow sustainably and responsibly. It has been clear that Boise City Staff have put in the effort to make an inclusive and extensive community input process to develop the zoning code our city needs and deserves. Boise has become increasingly unaffordable for everyone, especially for new home buyers, renters, students, low‐ income residents, refugee families, and elderly folks on fixed incomes. This code helps address those issues. I specifically appreciate that this zoning code protects our green spaces, improves our tree canopy, incentivizes energy and water efficiency that saves money over the lifetime of a home, allows for smart and targeted density, increases opportunities for multi‐family homes like duplexes, removes unnecessary parking space minimums, protects pollinators, and makes our communities more walkable and bikeable. I strongly encourage the Boise Planning and Zoning Commission to support this zoning code rewrite that staff and residents have spent so much time and effort to shape. Sincerely, Ms. Susan boehner 2219 N Heights Dr Boise, ID 83702‐2831 sgawboehner@gmail.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:14 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Morgan Boren mb@1791.com 4265 N Sorrel Place, Boise, ID Boise, ID 83703 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Thursday, April 20, 2023 4:08 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Sophia Borgias, PhD Email sophiaborgias@gmail.com Address 6015 Poplar Drive, Boise, ID 83704 Comment I strongly support the City’s proposed zoning code update as part of its broader efforts in regard to both equity and sustainability. It is a crucial step toward housing affordability, carbon neutrality, habitat conservation, and farmland preservation. I believe all of these benefits far outweigh the concerns about aesthetics and neighborhood character. The broader character of Boise —including its diversity and livability, and its close access to undeveloped and agricultural landscapes— is what is really at risk if we continue with the status quo. The move toward more affordable and high‐density development is long overdue. Thank you for helping to foster a more equitable and sustainable city! If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 10:39 AM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Robert J Borgna superitalian1@hotmail.com 2881 N LAKEHARBOR LN BOISE, ID 83703 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 5:24 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Susan Borsch kimbersb26@gmail.com 1355 N. Etheridge Lane Boise, ID 83704 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:53 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Kathy Borthwick kb3run@gmail.com 3370 E Exacta Lane Boise, ID 83716 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 10:14 AM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Dean Borup dmborup48@gmail.com 11300 Chickadee Dr Boise, ID 83709 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

Nancy Bowman <nancykatbowman@gmail.com> Tuesday, April 18, 2023 10:09 AM ZoningRewrite [External] Zoning

When we bought our home in the already dense North/Northwest Boise, we certainly did not expect much could change. I do not live on a corner lot, but if I was on either side of one, I would be appalled. People will be parking up and down the street. Seriously, just the people working there will be a parking issue. In addition, try to enjoy your front or back yard in the mornings or until 8pm, with outside access and the cars. Density does not make affordability. Look at downtown. Most expensive rents, with most increase in density. The affordable housing in Boise is older, not new. With these changes, developers will build new, and it will be expensive. Another HUGE concern for me is the environmental impact this zoning has. When you are able to build this densely and cover the lot/s, there are NO TREES. With the current zoning regulations, I have already seen this happen on many lots, with mature trees removed. I can’t imagine how bad it will be with the new zoning proposal. Nancy Bowman

Deanna Dupuy From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Wednesday, April 19, 2023 8:33 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Robert William Boyne Email robertwboyne@gmail.com Address Boise, ID, 83709 Comment I strongly support a rewrite to enable upzoning, and denser housing. This will help sustain Boise's finances, with less roadfront per dwelling, more desirable and walkable neighborhoods, proximity to parks and recreational trails and better climate sustainability. Failing to upzone would mean more urban sprawl, time stuck in traffic, and lack of affordability. Denser, more walkable neighborhoods enable mass transit, financial sustainability and better tax revenues, and will make Boise a better place. To the extent Idaho law allows, zoning should also promote smaller, more affordable housing intermixed with more expensive housing, to avoid segregating and concentrating areas of lower income residents, which will improve educational outcomes, reduce inequality and reduce crime. We can't have zoning written only for the rich to isolate and banish anyone else from part of the city, using excuses of "neighborhood characters" and yes, zoning changes can hurt home values. You can't make housing more affordable without lowering the price of housing. It's the literal requirement for that. Please implement a denser, more equal, more sustainable, more financially sounds and more reasonable zoning policy. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:21 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Ms. Lynn Bradescu lynn@boiserealtygroup.com 919 N 21st St Boise, ID 83702 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 1:06 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Patti Brady pbradyh@msn.com 3070 W Hillcrest Ln Boise, ID 83705 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Wednesday, April 19, 2023 1:02 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Rebecca Bratsman Email r.bratsman@gmail.com Address 2435 N. Tyra Ave Comment I think that healthy growth for the city means that apartments are mixed in with single‐family houses so that socio‐economic groups can be mixed. If low‐income housing is segregated in the city, that will lead to entire neighborhoods being considered "bad". One of the best ways to ensure that everyone gets a chance at a better life is by creating mixed‐use neighborhoods. I am also a huge fan of neighborhoods where children can safely walk to school. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:38 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. J. Wallis Bratt wallebratt2@gmail.com 10734 W. Excalibusr Boise, ID 83713 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 6:52 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Ms. Brenda Breidinger breidingerb@yahoo.com 1966 S. Teal Lane Boise, ID 83706 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Deanna Dupuy From: Sent: To: Subject:

sdbenner1@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Steven Benner <sdbenner1 @everyactioncustom.com> Wednesday, April 19, 2023 9:01 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Please Vote Yes on the ZCR

Dear Planning and Zoning Commission, I am writing to express my support for the Zoning Code Rewrite. The sustainability, affordability, and open space protections included in the new zoning code rewrite are exactly what Boise needs to plan for and address our rapid growth. Growth is inevitable, and we need a modern zoning code to ensure we are following the best practices to grow sustainably and responsibly. It has been clear that Boise City Staff have put in the effort to make an inclusive and extensive community input process to develop the zoning code our city needs and deserves. Boise has become increasingly unaffordable for everyone, especially for new home buyers, renters, students, low‐ income residents, refugee families, and elderly folks on fixed incomes. This code helps address those issues. I specifically appreciate that this zoning code protects our green spaces, improves our tree canopy, incentivizes energy and water efficiency that saves money over the lifetime of a home, allows for smart and targeted density, increases opportunities for multi‐family homes like duplexes, removes unnecessary parking space minimums, protects pollinators, and makes our communities more walkable and bikeable. I strongly encourage the Boise Planning and Zoning Commission to support this zoning code rewrite that staff and residents have spent so much time and effort to shape. I believe those who oppose the zoning code update are misinformed about the effects of this code. The old code will just perpetuate the development patterns we have. We need these changes to our zoning code to support better development patterns that incentivize affordable and sustainable housing. Sincerely, Mr Steven Benner 2808 S Colorado Ave Boise, ID 83706‐4730 sdbenner1@gmail.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

H B <h.brodt1993@gmail.com> Monday, April 17, 2023 10:59 AM ZoningRewrite [External] Support for Rewrite

Hello ‐ I just wanted to email my support for the rewrite. My name is Hunter Brodt and my address is 2240 S Sumac St. Boise, ID 83706

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

brostfran@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Fran Brost <brostfran@everyactioncustom.com> Thursday, April 20, 2023 3:30 PM ZoningRewrite [External] I am in support of the Zoning Code Rewrite

Dear Planning and Zoning Commission, I support the city of Boise's new Zoning Code Rewrite. Sincerely, Fran Brost 2317 W Heron St Boise, ID 83702‐2439 brostfran@gmail.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 4:17 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Justin Brown justinidaho@hotmail.com 4900 n contour way boise, ID 83703 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 12:55 AM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Monica Brown m_1brown@yahoo.com 2918 W Malad St., BOISE, ID 83705 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

L Brusseau <lbrusseau@q.com> Saturday, April 15, 2023 8:25 AM ZoningRewrite [External] Zoning

Are you kidding me? There are so many apartments near my residence that I cannot even get out onto the street. I live by Maple Grove & Franklin. My friend’s mom went to the hospital and they didn’t have any rooms. The infrastructure is not here for all of these people to be so condensed. Why are people moving into the area and not being charged impact fees? Theu need to support the impact they are causing. For people who have lived here all of their life their property taxes are becoming unaffordable. Boise is becoming less of a beautiful place. Who is in charge? Sent from my iPhone

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:10 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Michael Buch mbmo2@q.com 13492 W Waldemar St Boise, ID 83713 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Wednesday, April 19, 2023 9:56 AM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Dave Buck Email dbuck@rndhouse.com Address 1100 W Idaho Street 83702 Comment My wife and I feel fortunate to have moved from Los Angeles to Boise for many reasons ‐ the people, culture, access to outdoors, great schools, infrastructure, affordability, and lack of social issues to name a few. Boise's vibrant and growing downtown offers great amenities and entertainment, and with relatively limited traffic, it is easy to access from where we live (near Hidden Springs). Of course, as we all know growth can be a powerful driver of opportunity for residents, businesses and other local stakeholders, but if not managed properly, it can lead to the cascading issues we see neighboring states battling including suburban sprawl, traffic, and lack of housing affordability. The zoning code rewrite does an effective job of protecting and modernizing the code to address the reality that Boise will continue to experience elevated growth for decades. The City of Boise has been thorough and diligent in advancing this initiative, collecting feedback and addressing concerns along the way. I believe the rewrite strikes the balance between preserving the character of existing neighborhoods while also being intentional about future growth. This is an important milestone in effectively managing Boise's growth and avoiding the pitfalls that other cities have fallen into. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

cherie@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Cheri Buckner Webb <cherie@everyactioncustom.com> Thursday, April 20, 2023 3:22 PM ZoningRewrite [External] In Support of the Zoning Code Rewrite

Dear Planning and Zoning Commission, I am in unilateral support of all the items protected in the Zoning Code Rewrite and support it. Sincerely, Cheri Buckner Webb 2304 W Bella St Boise, ID 83702‐0422 cherie@sojournercoaching.com

ZoningRewrite From: Sent: To: Subject:

Caleb Bujak <cbuja20111@gmail.com> Tuesday, April 18, 2023 9:48 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Very excited about zoning rewrite

I’m very happy with the new proposed zoning rewrite. It is something that needs to be done to combat sprawl and to bring Boise to a hopefully new modern standard of city planning. I fear that the rewrite will be stopped in its tracks by people who hate to see Boise change for the better and are more interested in retaining their “neighborhood character” aka excluding people to maintain their property values, than to see Boise become a welcoming city for all.

ZoningRewrite From: Sent: To: Subject:

Ben Burnham <ben.burnham11@gmail.com> Thursday, April 20, 2023 4:49 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Public Comment for ZOA23-0001 & CPA23-0001 - Zoning Code Rewrite

Hello, I am testifying today as a mid 30’s, thankful homeowner, who got in right before the market exploded, from the Central Bench who serves on my Neighborhood Association (NA) and works in the public sector (all comments are from me as a private citizen). I note my NA participation and job because they are both very influential in why I am strongly supportive of the modern zoning code proposal. I am a bullet list person and here are my primary reasons as to why I support this well put together document: Earlier Neighborhood Participation and Faster Project Approval: As a NA board member, it is wonderful that the City is pushing for earlier feedback, so that impacted neighbors can weigh in before the project is essentially in its perceived final stage. This creates an environment where the neighborhood meetings are ineffective and typically toxic. The neighbors feel as though the project is too late to change and the developers have to navigate a hostile crowd that is usually against the proposed development. By moving the meetings to earlier in the process, neighbors will be a part of the development process, rather than weighing in at the perceived end, and thus creating more buy-in from their future neighbors. This code proposal also lessens the requirement for some neighborhood meetings in a way that I think are very reasonable. Currently, nearly every proposal is treated like a battle against change and it is not productive for either side of the issue. With this, we can get more housing more quickly and remove the government from getting involved when it does not need to be involved. Low Wage Workers and Housing: As a public employee in Idaho, this issue is of particular interest and impact to my life. While the benefits to public sector employment tend to be great, the wages tend to be below market rate. It is not possible to pay rent or a mortgage based on benefits. As the state capital and home to the largest public four-year university in the state, we are a city full of folks who have agreed to work for a bit less, for the public good. Those folks, and all lower wage workers, deserve the opportunity to live close to their work in respectable housing. With the state limitations on city/state supported housing, this rewrite is the next best strategy in bringing more units online. My Housing Journey: As noted above, I am fortunate to be a homeowner. I was lucky enough to purchase a house in the Central Bench in the Fall of 2020, which was a time when home values were going up quickly, but not out of this world which happened a few months later. For one, I would not be able to purchase my very small home today. Secondly, my goal in housing was to purchase a townhome/condo and not a house. I had no desire to live the suburban dream of single family home ownership but the overly regulated market dictated otherwise. There were no affordable townhome/condo options within a safe bikeable distance from my work and the core of the city. This zoning code proposal would once again allow for housing diversity and smaller scale developers in the city. The “coolest” neighborhoods in Boise are those that were built before our current zoning code. Every citizen deserves a “cool” neighborhood, with a coffee shop in walking distance, and that features a variety of different housing types for a very diverse set of interests and needs. The Next 30 Years, Not the Last 30 Years: Technology will be driving change and the need to be adaptable more quickly every passing year. Change is coming, and is here now, whether the community likes it or not. Wouldn’t it be great to be able to guide change in a positive manner rather than via a code that was written in the 1960’s? I say yes. 1

Support Sustainable Neighborhoods: As a Central Bench resident, the idea of easier to obtain, infill development is an incredibly exciting prospect. I live near the Orchard corridor which has been passed over time and time again by the city, ACHD, and private development. While this has created an affordable ecosystem which has allowed for the most diverse and incredible block of business in the city, it could be so much more. These amazing businesses deserve more customers who can walk and bike to their locations since the Orchard corridor is one of the least safe to navigate at this time. Strategic infill development is the best tool the city has to achieve its climate action plan goals, reduce vehicle traffic congestion, and create safer, more walkable and bikeable neighborhoods. The entire city should be able to enjoy the immense pleasure and connection that I get to enjoy when walking or biking to the Push and Pour development on Latah and Alpine. Let’s welcome people to our existing infrastructure and neighborhoods and stop the development from expanding further into the desert expanses. Lastly, as you all maneuver through this process, I would like to leave you with two very telling graphics.

Ben Burnham

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 4:06 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Holli Woodings, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Michael Burns msbboise@gmail.com 2815 W Jefferson St Boise, ID 83702 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Wednesday, April 19, 2023 1:17 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Tim Burr Email tim.r.burr@gmail.com Address 3301 W TAFT ST Comment Boise needs more housing at every price point. I would like to see more, denser housing in walkable neighborhoods with good transit. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Wednesday, April 19, 2023 1:14 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Joe Burton Email josephburton@u.boisestate.edu Address Meridian, Idaho 83646 Comment Greetings, As a Boise native, I have watched my dream of homeownership quickly slip away. I attended Boise and West Ada schools, graduated from Boise State University and now teach in the Boise public school system. Over the last several years I have been faced with the reality that I will either have to leave the state of Idaho or accept that fact that I will never own a home. The cost of rent has made it impossible to save money for a down payment on a house and the prices of houses have made it impossible to afford a mortgage even if I did have the down payment. The cost of housing has increased at such a staggering rate that income has not had a chance to keep up with the cost of living. When I graduated from college in 2018, I was splitting rent on a 2 bedroom townhouse on the Bench for a total of $800/month. Now you can barely find anything for less than $1,200/mo for a tiny one bedroom apartment or studio. Something needs to be done about the cost of housing in the City of Boise and the Treasure Valley in general. Zoning codes need to be rewritten to allow for more housing to be developed. Thank you for your time, Joe If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 6:33 AM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Holli Woodings, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Ms. Jane Buser jbuser@boisestate.edu 3413 Kootenai St. Boise, ID 83705 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 4:44 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Sally butler tlbutl2009@hotmail.com 3533 n ambergina lane Boise, ID 83703 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 11:06 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Kim Bybee bybeekim@gmail.com 2315 West Woodlawn Ave Boise, ID 83702 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 10:38 AM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Luci Willits, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Colleen Fedorchuk scfedorchuk@gmail.com 11206 W Excalibur St Boise, ID 83713 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Deanna Dupuy From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Wednesday, April 19, 2023 6:56 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Corbin Hall Email Corbin_Priorityelectric@yahoo.com Address 2467 North Keystone Place, Comment End Corporate ownership of housing. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 7:19 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Christopher Mackenzie mackenziechrisrobert@yahoo.com 4558 N Tattenham Way Boise, ID 83713 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Deanna Dupuy From: Sent: To: Subject:

willandmurph75@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Cayla Morgan <willandmurph75 @everyactioncustom.com> Wednesday, April 19, 2023 6:07 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Please Vote Yes on the ZCR

Dear Planning and Zoning Commission, I am writing to express my support for the Zoning Code Rewrite. The sustainability, affordability, and open space protections included in the new zoning code rewrite are exactly what Boise needs to plan for and address our rapid growth. Growth is inevitable, and we need a modern zoning code to ensure we are following the best practices to grow sustainably and responsibly. It has been clear that Boise City Staff have put in the effort to make an inclusive and extensive community input process to develop the zoning code our city needs and deserves. Boise has become increasingly unaffordable for everyone, especially for new home buyers, renters, students, low‐ income residents, refugee families, and elderly folks on fixed incomes. This code helps address those issues. I specifically appreciate that this zoning code protects our green spaces, improves our tree canopy, incentivizes energy and water efficiency that saves money over the lifetime of a home, allows for smart and targeted density, increases opportunities for multi‐family homes like duplexes, removes unnecessary parking space minimums, protects pollinators, and makes our communities more walkable and bikeable. I strongly encourage the Boise Planning and Zoning Commission to support this zoning code rewrite that staff and residents have spent so much time and effort to shape. Sincerely, Ms. Cayla Morgan 3614 S Brookshore Pl Boise, ID 83706‐5582 willandmurph75@gmail.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:12 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Lisa Cafferty snlcafferty@yahoo.com 4819 Roberts rd Boise, ID 83705 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:04 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Brenda Caine brendacaine@gmail.com 13626 W Baldcypress St, Ste 121 Boise, ID 83713 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Wednesday, April 19, 2023 9:37 AM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Michael Caldwell Email mcaldwell@rndhouse.com Address Boise, ID 83716 Comment We cannot allow Boise to become a victim of its own success in the face of continued pressures from in‐ migration. The modern zoning code rewrite currently underway is essential for Boise to improve housing access and maintain its quality of life. It proposes more dense zoning in the urban core, where new housing stock can be constructed closer to public infrastructure while reducing traffic demands. It proposes to fill the “missing middle” of medium density housing (e.g. attached townhomes), which Boise sorely lacks and which will promote more housing ownership opportunities. It includes inclusionary zoning provisions, which dictate income affordability requirements for developers seeking to provide the greater housing densities offered in the new code. It encourages mixed‐used environments, which will locate small‐scale retail services closer to housing. This will reduce long‐term traffic demands and enliven neighborhoods. Without these changes, housing costs will skyrocket over the long term, and traffic and congestion will increase as more housing development is pushed further afield. Public infrastructure like roads and utilities will be spread across a greater footprint, which will increase the costs to service and maintain it over the long term. We have the benefit of having observed this in Phoenix, Dallas and other sprawling cities where you spend the bulk of your life in a car. The zoning rewrite process undertaken by the City of Boise has been as thorough and inclusive as I have seen in any jurisdiction. The City has incorporated extensive stakeholder engagement, community feedback, input from planning experts, and the leadership of Tim Keane, the City’s new Planning Director, who has seen this rodeo go the wrong way in Atlanta. We should all support this so that our children and grandchildren can access housing in Boise. Planning for growth does not cause extra growth, it enables us to manage growth the smartest way we can. The answer is not to pull the ladder up so only those who got here first can enjoy our wonderful City. That will, inevitably, backfire. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:08 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Monika Caltagirone monika.caltagirone11@gmail.com 1886 W Silver Crest dr Boise, ID 83703 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Friday, April 14, 2023 9:43 AM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Craig Campbell craigc0716@protonmail.com 14349 W Elmsprings St Boise, ID 83713 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:46 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. John R Cantrell johntamcantrell@msn.com 2642 North Peregrine Place Boise, ID 83702 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 6:43 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Brad Capener cotswolds78@gmail.com 4980 n Maplewood dr Boise, ID 83703 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 9:36 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Chris carcia carsh@me.com 1501 e rimrock crt Boise, ID 83712 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Friday, April 14, 2023 5:02 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Normajean Cardoza njcardoza@gmail.com 4910 N. Contour Way Boise, ID 83703 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Thursday, April 20, 2023 4:27 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Charlene Cariou Email charlenemcariou@gmail.com Address Boise, ID 83709 Comment I support the zoning code rewrite because we need to: • Reduce urban sprawl and increase connectivity to public transit, city/neighborhood centers, existing public services, etc. • Increase the types of housing allowable in the city (ex. 8‐plexes) • Ensure better protections for affordable housing for all If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:08 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Deneen Carleton deneenrc@centurylink.net 5908 Robertson dr Boise, ID 83709 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Boise City Planning & Zoning Commission Boise City Hall 150 Nth Capitol Blvd. Boise, ID 83702 Subject: Modern Zoning Code April 12, 2023 Dear Commissioner: I am writing in support of the proposed Modern Zoning Code. My family has participated in the development of Boise City since 1863 when C.W. Moore arrived. C.W. developed the first geothermal system in Boise and co-founded the Idaho First National Bank. Since then, Joan Carley established the Old Boise Historic District and led the effort to preserve historic buildings in downtown Boise. I now manage Old Boise and have worked to add mixed-use projects which bring added vitality and character to downtown. As the past Chair of the Downtown Boise Association and the Idaho District Council of the Urban Land Institute I have dedicated 20 years studying cities across the United States. After visiting over 30 cities in America I can attest that Boise is in the very unique position of being able to see the future and take immediate actions to create a better future than those cities I have visited. The fact that Boise will continue to grow is undeniable. Where these new residents will live, work, and play must be determined by us today. For the past 100 years Boise has grown with little attention to becoming a metropolitan region with over 1 million residents. Yet here we are facing 1 million residents in the next 15 years. The zoning codes in Boise city must be modernized to meet this certain growth and mitigate the decades of sprawl that have occurred. Continuing the trend of low-density development will curse Boise to become another victim of lack of foresight and courage to change the course of development to a more compact and communityoriented place. While the proposed zoning changes are complex and sure to create unintended consequences, this effort is very thoughtful and comprehensive. It is certain to be modified as time goes on. But the direction and intent are the right thing to do. Please support this effort. Best Regards, Clay Carley General Manager Old Boise LLC

106 N 6th M2 Boise, Idaho 83702 ph (208) 345-7852 fax (208) 379-1477

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:16 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Ms. Janet carr jancarr115@gmail.com 3405 n Collister Drive Boise, ID 83703 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 4:01 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Ms. Jess carter carter.idaho@gmail.com 2430 W State St Boise, ID 83702 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

Denise C <dcaruzzi@gmail.com> Thursday, April 20, 2023 4:28 PM ZoningRewrite [External] ENDORSE Updated Zoning Code

Date: 20 April 2023 To:

City of Boise Planning & Zoning Commission

From: Denise Caruzzi Re:

Endorsement of the new UPDATED Zoning Code

Dear Commission members, This letter urges you to accept the revised zoning code for the City of Boise, but begins with a thank you for two things: 1—the efforts you have made to provide information/education about zoning codes, the issues, and the process. Kudos to staff, their talents and the priority/time/resources allocated to this effort. I truly believe you are investing a great deal today for the potential of a vibrant/ sustainable community of tomorrow. 2—the choice to begin the process with identified goals for our future. While some of the details and the necessary complexity of the code make it difficult to absorb, the vision, direction, and objectives are those that will enable a thriving future for Boise, while dealing with the current chaos of our growth. Here is what I appreciate and endorse in those goals and the code that supports them: Abundant housing—laying a pathway for MORE housing, with the necessary greater densities in central areas and transit corridors; balancing supply and demand, and ensuring affordable options in all areas of the City; protecting naturally occurring affordable housing and the tenants who occupy those spaces. (I continue to hope for limitations‐‐or at least, disincentives‐‐to the proliferation of short‐term rentals, which continues to deplete the housing supply without any of the usual business constraints applied.) Diverse/Inclusive housing options—providing the flexibility of housing type (from ADUs, multi‐plex, single family) and of housing ratios and mixes (greater diversity in all neighborhoods); housing for all of us who comprise the city (including students, seniors, artists, those with limited abilities, first‐time buyers, young and multi‐generational families, home‐owners AND renters—who are 40% of our population), and allowing more landowner control to add/alter property to accommodate additional living space. It is important to note that the predominance of detached single‐family housing is, and has always been, exclusive. Livable/Accessible housing—walkable, bikeable housing, near community activities, gathering spaces and services; small business opportunities in the neighborhoods they serve; social interaction among residents for greater neighborhood stability and for our health and well‐being. 1

Sustainable/Environmentally responsible—alternate focus on transportation; encouraging pedestrian and biking access, and enabling mass transit; discouraging single person auto‐occupancy; enabling more “green” space and public spaces for nature and play; using density for greater efficiencies in how we support and maintain housing growth. I am lucky to live in an area that developed before the current restrictive housing codes. We benefit already from many of the recommended changes. In addition to single family homes, there are duplexes, 4‐plexes, and small multi‐plexes. There are restaurants and small businesses. The neighborhood has weathered the fluctuations of the real‐estate market better than most other areas in town, which I consider an endorsement of the concept. It is curious to me that many of the voices who oppose this rewrite, come to this neighborhood to play, shop, and celebrate…with some wishing to live closer? Again, an endorsement of denser, mixed‐use neighborhoods. Your work is never easy, choices are difficult, and opposition is always loud. Thank you for fulfilling this rezoning opportunity, for prioritizing a sustainable/living community for future generations (our children and grandchildren) and for leaving this legacy to the City.

Respectfully, Denise Caruzzi m: +1‐208‐340‐7449 dcaruzzi@gmail.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:24 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Connie Cash cash.connie@yahoo.com 8335 W Westchester Ave Boise, ID 83704 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Monday, April 17, 2023 4:14 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Joseph Castrigno Email jcastrigno@gmail.com Address Boise, ID 83702 Comment There must be more housing to accommodate Boise's growth. Rejecting this is to deny reality. Whether we like it or not, Boise is growing. We can't be a city of only land owners and skilled laborers. Who will wait on your tables? Who will clean the toilets at your office building? People who perform menial labor jobs must have access to quality, affordable housing or they won't want to work here. To accommodate growth, more housing must be built. Of course, trusting the market to magically solve these problems is also to deny reality. Developers and speculators are out to make as much money as they can. They don't care if we have homeless on the streets. They are not benevolent do‐gooders coming to our rescue. It is the city government's role to tell them what they can and cannot do. Boise has built and continues to build affordable housing apartments downtown. This trend must continue if we are to have a diverse, beautiful, city full of the art, culture, and amenities we have come to enjoy. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 10:34 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Mary Catama jmcatama@aol.com 13981 W Rochester Dr Boise, ID 83713 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 8:08 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Ms. Charmaine Cates czcates@gmail.com 7364 W Saxton Dr. H404 Boise, ID 83714 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Friday, April 14, 2023 12:32 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Celeste Email celestehyde@hotmail.com Address Boise, ID 83702 Comment I would so love to support this but I am incredibly disappointed in the implementation thus far. I operate a salon located in Sola on 12th & Main. It may not out last this construction. We feel like our pleas for help and parking resolutions have fallen on deaf ears. How does taking away free Saturday parking and sending meter maids every 5 minutes help our customers right now with so little parking available? I know you want this dynamic downtown but what if you run out half the small businesses in the process? Do you care? Will you just bring in chains? I’m a lifelong Idaho resident and I have worked downtown for 15 years. I don’t want to leave. I’m not against change and growth but the way this is all happening at once feels like poor planning or greed. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:08 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Ms. Luisa Cervantes manuelito547@icloud.com 6472 W Douglas St Boise, ID 83704 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Wednesday, April 19, 2023 8:45 AM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Nicolas Cesare Email ncesare@gmail.com Address Eagle, ID 83616 Comment The updated zoning code is a necessity for sustainable development. The city must adopt it or fall deeper into suburban hell in the coming decades. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

Michelle Chan <michelle.chan.dvm@gmail.com> Wednesday, April 19, 2023 10:25 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Comments on the Zoning Rewrite

To whom it may concern; The changes to Boise’s zoning code reflect the growing need for varied housing, alternative modes of transport, and preservation of Idaho’s open space while maintaining the small town character of the area. Growth is inevitable, and in recent years, the influx to the region is undeniable. The Treasure Valley’s natural beauty and temperate climate are certainly quite the draw for many out-of-state migrants, and for many locals, the reason why they stay. Furthermore, much of the migration to the area may have been prompted by the then-affordable cost of living and housing prices. In order to preserve the small town charm of the area, the changes to the zoning code do need to reflect the growing need for housing and amenities for both the out-ofstate migrants and locals. The new zoning code rewrite falls in line with the New Urbanist approach to city planning, which involves mixed use land developments, varied housing options, and promotion of alternative modes of transportation other than the use of the personal automobile. As an Arizona native, I watched the Phoenix metropolitan area explode both in population and in sprawl, stretching the road infrastructure quite tight over nearly a 20 year period of time. Due to the Euclidean organization of the city structure, as the population increased, the city expanded further and further outward, increasing the dependence on the car to get to the central services, such as the grocery store, library, park, doctor’s office, school, and other amenities. Due to the physically expansive nature of the growth, alternatives to travel other than the car were not practical. Furthermore, large swaths of the beautiful desert land were consumed by housing, roadways, and parking infrastructure. Traffic became time consuming, expensive, and cumbersome (and over 20 years, the hours spent on the road and costs of transportation sure do add up). While some may enjoy the freedoms offered by the automobile, the lack of alternative transportation options made mobility challenging for those of low income who could not afford their own car, younger teenagers, and senior citizens who were no longer able to drive. One caveat to the mobility issue that may be challenging to overcome is in regards to the short term deficits in public transit and parking - I recognize that this may be a bit of a chicken-and-egg situation - It may be hard for Boise to support a public transit system before there is a demand. By reducing the parking requirement for the new developments, both commercial and residential, demand will increase, but likely before there is a proper transit alternative in place. Growing pains may be predicted as the changing needs of Boise evolve, hopefully in tandem with a novel housing development pattern. By strategically increasing the housing density either through smaller lot/house sizes or promoting multifamily units in mixed development areas, I hope that some of the demand in this area will be alleviated, thus resulting in more affordable options, especially for lower income people or young families who may be looking for starter homes. Building densely in amenity rich areas helps minimize sprawl which preserves the open space for farmland, rural development for those who want more land, and for recreation. One aspect mentioned in the zoning rewrite addresses housing density specifically in regards to rent control. If I understand correctly, if a developer were to exceed the maximum density for a lot - for example, building a quadplex where normally a duplex would be allowed - two of those units will be required to be for people making 80 percent of AMI. Although this may decrease investor activity, I suspect that it may be more likely that developers may just decide to build in a manner that does not exceed the maximum density limit, thus depressing the amount of housing that could be built. 1

This approach is a bit more novel than capping the rent, which can sometimes promote peripheral gentrification, but I’m not sure how much of an impact it will have in increasing the availability of affordable housing. It seems to me that increasing the housing density will play the biggest role in helping meet the demand in a more sustainable fashion. Overall, I am happy that Boise is finally updating their zoning laws to accommodate smart growth in a more sustainable fashion. By creating more dense, mixed use walkable neighborhoods, I hope that Boise will keep its personality, small businesses, and foster its much loved community feel. I hope that there will be future opportunities to modify the plan as the city grows and as we find new needs to be addressed. Best, Michelle Chan

ZoningRewrite From: Sent: To: Subject:

Jane Chandler <jane.eb.chandler@gmail.com> Tuesday, April 18, 2023 4:11 PM ZoningRewrite [External] New zoning proposal

Hi, I wanted to write and say I think the city has done a great job with the new zoning proposal. I am a huge fan of the mixed use zoning (as an east end resident I love the Roosevelt market and am exited that there could be additional spots around the city of this nature). Additionally, anything we can do to increase bike lanes (specifically separated bike lanes like the ones near city hall and St. Luke’s) and public transport really improves the quality of life if Boise residents. If there is a way in the future to bring back the trolley cars I believe it would be a significant benefit to Boiseans and add to the charm of the city. Thank you for all of your hard work, Jane Chandler Sent from my iPhone

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

Kyrsten Chaplin <kyrstenbrooke@yahoo.com> Thursday, April 20, 2023 4:45 PM Mayor McLean; ZoningRewrite; Holli Woodings; Patrick Bageant; Jimmy Hallyburton; Luci Willits; Latonia Haney Keith; Colin Nash [External] Bench Zoning

I oppose the proposed code as currently written. I support public planning that protects homeowner, the integrity and stability of our neighborhoods, and Boise’s unique environment and quality of life. I seek a community-led zoning code that protects neighborhoods while accommodating compatible growth not mass change. New development must not overburden infrastructure. Zoning should accommodate the feel of existing neighborhoods benefitting its residents, not just developers. The Bench is a beautiful place full of single family homes. I've lived in my home since 1995. If I wanted my neighborhood full of mass box apartments - I would move to Portland. That 'thing' being built on the corner of Targee and Vista is exactly what we do not want in our neighborhood. I want to live right where I live. Just as it is. Streets full of single-family homes and neighborhood pride. We know our neighbors & we help our neighbors + vise versa. Everything we need is within walking distance. Our homes are all similar in size and have nice yard space - which is a desired checklist item for many Idahoans. Mass upzoning will NOT bring "affordable" housing. Anyone who thinks so hasn't worked in Boise real estate for over 20 years as I have. The only people who benefit from upzoning are the developers. We do not want multi-units, or towering units in our backyards or next door - it's simply not part of The Bench neighborhood. Keep our neighborhood "The Bench." Kyrsten B Chaplin 2208 W. Canal St., 873705

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 3:37 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Lynn E Christensen lynn.christensen.83713@gmail.com 11069 W Arch St Boise, ID 83713 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 9:30 AM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Virgel Clark bobc012001@yahoo.com 2259 S White Pine Place, Boise, ID 83706 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Wednesday, April 19, 2023 7:52 AM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Ben Clark Email Address 83702 Comment I live in the North End. I think that the "don't upzone" movement is hypocritical. I am in favor of higher‐density and mixed‐use development and policy with corresponding infrastructure investments that will allow more people to live in the most desirable parts of Boise and make the areas immediately surrounding downtown more walkable and metropolitan. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Deanna Dupuy From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Wednesday, April 19, 2023 4:59 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Erin Claxton Email erinpink88@gmail.com Address 9911 W Lupine St Comment As a citizen of Boise I would like to voice my opinion for the rezoning and say that I am absolutely for the rezoning. Boise already has such a huge problem with housing currently and changing the zoning would be a huge opportunity for Boise and the surrounding area to handle the influx of people try hat are coming. Please vote this through. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 7:46 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Ms. Jeanine Cleary jjcboise@yahoo.com 2024 E. Mortimer Drive Boise, ID 83712 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 11:02 AM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Ms. Jennifer Clegg village22@yahoo.com 7773 Duncan Lane Boise, ID 83714 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Saturday, April 15, 2023 9:27 AM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Daniel Clegg jr. danielcleggjr@yahoo.com 917 North Clover Drive Boise, ID 83703 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

nclements73@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Nathan Clements <nclements73 @everyactioncustom.com> Thursday, April 20, 2023 4:03 PM ZoningRewrite [External] In Support of the Zoning Code Rewrite

Dear Planning and Zoning Commission, I am writing to express my support for the Zoning Code Rewrite because I want more walking paths, biking paths, parks, and I support smart growth. Sincerely, Nathan Clements 2013 N 20th St Boise, ID 83702‐0720 nclements73@gmail.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Saturday, April 15, 2023 4:02 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Eve Clougherty eveclougherty@gmail.com 2884 S Grebe Pl 83716 Boise, ID 83716 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:05 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Steven C Clyne coreyclyne@yahoo.com 7077 ustick rd Boise, ID 83704 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:32 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Tara Coffland tara.coffland@gmail.com 3227 E Rivernest Ln Boise, ID 83706 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

ZoningRewrite From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:28 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Holli Woodings, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. John Coggins in2you4fun@yahoo.com 4904 W DOUGLAS LN Boise, ID 83706‐6090 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

grantandmary@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Grant Cogswell <grantandmary@everyactioncustom.com> Thursday, April 20, 2023 3:27 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Trust in the City Planners

Dear Planning and Zoning Commission, I am in support of the city of Boise's proposed zoning code rewrite, because I trust my city planners to do what's best. Sincerely, Grant Cogswell 2316 W Lemp St Boise, ID 83702‐2446 grantandmary@yahoo.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Friday, April 14, 2023 5:16 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. JoyAnn Collett joyann.collett@gmail.com 12553 W. Goldenrod Ave. BOISE, ID 83713 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

heather.colwell.hc@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Heather Colwell <heather.colwell.hc@everyactioncustom.com> Wednesday, April 19, 2023 2:03 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Vote Yes on the Zoning Code Rewrite

Dear Planning and Zoning Commission, I am writing to express my support for the Zoning Code Rewrite. The sustainability, affordability, and open space protections included in the new zoning code rewrite are exactly what Boise needs to plan for and address our rapid growth. Growth is inevitable, and we need a modern zoning code to ensure we are following the best practices to grow sustainably and responsibly. It has been clear that Boise City Staff have put in the effort to make an inclusive and extensive community input process to develop the zoning code our city needs and deserves. Boise has become increasingly unaffordable for everyone, especially for new home buyers, renters, students, low‐ income residents, refugee families, and elderly folks on fixed incomes. This code helps address those issues. I specifically appreciate that this zoning code protects our green spaces, improves our tree canopy, incentivizes energy and water efficiency that saves money over the lifetime of a home, allows for smart and targeted density, increases opportunities for multi‐family homes like duplexes, removes unnecessary parking space minimums, protects pollinators, and makes our communities more walkable and bikeable. I strongly encourage the Boise Planning and Zoning Commission to support this zoning code rewrite that staff and residents have spent so much time and effort to shape. Sincerely, Ms. Heather Colwell 201 S Dot St Boise, ID 83705‐1617 heather.colwell.hc@gmail.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Thursday, April 20, 2023 2:58 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Heather Colwell Email heather.colwell.hc@gmail.com Address Boise, Idaho 83705 Comment I support this rewrite. Boise needs to modernize its zoning code so we can grow in a smart and appropriate way to accommodate the needs of our city. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 8:53 AM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Scott compton wh2h3c@aol.com 9934 w java court Boise, ID 83704 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 9:43 AM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Holli Woodings, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Claude Connelly cclly@msn.com 615 San Juan Way Boise, ID 83712 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:55 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Lesly Cook lesly_cook@hotmail.com 6568 s federal way 242 Boise, ID 83716 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Monday, April 17, 2023 6:54 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Patty Cook pacook@control‐engineers.com 4252 N Nines Ridge Boise, ID 83702 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 10:46 AM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Edwin C. Cooper coopinid@gmail.com 4220 Bodenheimer Boise, ID 83703 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 1:13 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Ms. Corinna Soleil dolphinlove1@earthlink.net 3706 north stone creek way, boise boise, ID 83703 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 9:06 AM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Morgan Cornwall betterbirthboise@gmail.com 6924 w Petrie st Boise, ID 83704 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:06 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Holli Woodings, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Kathryn Costa katyc3131@gmail.com 1019 S. Abbey ln Boise, ID 83705 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 5:00 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Ms. Theresa Cotner theresacotner@gmail.com 3670 Sweetwater Drive Boise, ID 83716 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 5:18 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. norm e couper couperpainting@gmail.com 7300 W Maxwell Dr Boise, ID 83704‐8542 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 4:19 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Ms. Susan Courtial music.suze83@gmail.com 5951 W Elmer St Boise, ID 83703 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 8:03 AM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Luci Willits, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Ms. Sheryl Coward sherrylc60@hotmail.com 4350 N Lusitano Avenue Boise, ID 83713 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 4:57 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Ms. Carrie Cowgill cowgillc@slhs.org 4810 N. Tredwell Way Boise, ID 83703 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 10:37 AM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Jeff Craig jcraig@fishwindowcleaning.com 6712 W. Fairview Boise, ID 83704 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 6:55 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Tyson Cranney tyson.since86@gmail.com 5985 West Grandview Drive Boise, ID 83709 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 8:40 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Ms. Jacqueline Crist jc@jcrist.com 5052 E Woodcutter Dr Boise, ID 83716 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:37 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Rob Cronin robcronin@rixonandcronin.com 412 S 13th Street # 408 Boise, ID 83702 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 7:36 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Kathy Crowley katlcrowley@yahoo.com 3670 W Quail Hollow Ct Boise, ID 83703 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 11:11 AM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Ms. Audrie b cudahy audriebcudahy86@gmail.com 4221 e barber station way Boise, ID 83716 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 7:31 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Lisa Curtis lpinto@me.com 3590 N Ambergina Lane Boise, ID 83703 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

donlcurtisjr@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Donald Curtis <donlcurtisjr@everyactioncustom.com> Thursday, April 20, 2023 4:24 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Please Support the Zoning Code Rewrite

Dear Planning and Zoning Commission, I support the Zoning Code Rewrite because prefer higher density building preserving open space. I also support walkability and not developing open foothills space. Sincerely, Donald Curtis 2419 N 24th St Boise, ID 83702‐0212 donlcurtisjr@gmail.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:37 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Tiffany Cushing tiffanycushing@hotmail.com 4818 W Willow Ln Boise, ID 83703 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 7:13 AM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Amanda Cutter amandacutter208@gmail.com 321 E. Highland View Dr. Boise, ID 83702 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 11:31 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Daniel Day ssnattacksub@yahoo.com 2472 South Heritage Pl Boise, ID 83709 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 7:36 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. David Overcash refund@mac.com 6826 E Les Bois St Boise, ID 83716 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 5:46 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Deanna Shurtleff mychickbella@gmail.com 8834 W Northview Street Boise, ID 83704 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:18 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Jeffrey Dahl jeffdahl74@gmail.com 3834 N Sawgrass Place Boise, ID 83704 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Monday, April 17, 2023 11:30 AM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Ms. Geraldine Dake idwajer@gmail.com 3223 N. 36th Street Boise, ID 83703 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 6:53 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Karen Daley karendaley3108@gmail.com 3108 N. 24th Street Boise, ID 83702 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 5:35 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Ms. Karen Daniels kbelgum@icloud.com 7976 S Snow Bird Ave Boise, ID 83716 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 11:07 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Ms. Mary lynn D'Aubin mldaubin@gmail.com 11023 w ramrod6 dr Boise, ID 83713 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 5:00 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Larry Davenport lddavenport1728@gmail.com 1637 S Coronado Ave Boise, ID 83709 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 12:45 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Garry Davis archer352@gmail.com 2928 Bellomy Ln Boise, ID 83703 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

Jamie L Davis <moralityxdictates@gmail.com> Wednesday, April 19, 2023 11:06 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Zoning

Boise is not a small town anymore and shouldn’t be treated as such. Neighborhood markets and coffee shops, etc are great for many reasons. They’re great for the community, great for walkability, great people who don’t always want to have to go downtown to grab a cup of coffee. People want to be able to walk a couple blocks and grab some coffee, a pastry, some food. Rewriting the zoning codes will give Boise the opportunity to expand outside of the downtown core. It will eventually, more so than it already is, become oversaturated with cafe after cafe after cafe, market after market after market. It’s hard for these places to stand out on their own when just a block away is another shop. Eventually Boise is going to have to start focusing their efforts outside of downtown and forming more of their own unique neighborhoods that offer walkable amenities for people. Take Portland for example ( not all of the bad and the headache of Portland ) they have many distinct neighborhoods with their own flare that offer all of the amenities that anyone could need. All of these things just make for a more vibrant city that will ultimately benefit the residents. I know this is rather poorly worded and I could do a better job, but I think it’s just important to acknowledge that Boise is steadily growing and will continue to do so. With the projected population growth over the next decade or more, downtown is going to be an absolutely madhouse if it continues to be the main focus for growth. I hope this all makes sense. Writing these types of things is not my strong suit. Thank you.

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:47 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Carrol Day carrolmday@gmail.com 8221 W Donnybrook Boise, ID 83709 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 5:13 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Chris Dayhoff cdayhoff2@hotmail.com 1836 W Panama St Boise, ID 83705 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 6:25 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Richard De Stasio malathon41@yahoo.com 2108 W Cataldo Dr Boise, ID 83705 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:53 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Steven Deeds dukie6060@gmail.com 6315 W Arlington Dr Boise, ID 83709 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 4:59 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, David DeHaas coachidaho@gmail.com 1116 s vista Boise, ID 83705 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

NANCY DENNISTON <FISHER1224@msn.com> Monday, April 17, 2023 2:16 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Rezoning questions on impact to our neighborhoo

Wondering if rezoning would address such issues as we see in Southeast Boise We are in a quiet, well‐kept neighborhood East Meadow Park and do not want anything to change about it However! I would like to see a few additions/ changes, again to not our neighborhood, but the areas around us which impact our neighborhood. Would rezoning involve at all: 1. Providing bike lanes on Bergeson, Holcomb, Boise Ave. We are lucky to have a neighborhood of bike riders, including school children, which can be scary for parents due to the fact that vehicles on Bergeson can be speeding. 2. Adding a crossing light for people crxossing Boise Avenue at Holcomb? 3. Install speed bumps on Holcomb (25 mph speed limit)and Bergeson (30 mph speed limit)between Law and Holcomb as the homes adjacent to both streets are having to put up with speeding and loud vehicles at all hours. 4. Since the plan to use Holcomb and Amity as a corridor for Harris Ranch traffic to get on the Interstate failed years ago the people living on Boise Ave, Holcomb, and Bergeson have to put up with bumper to bumper traffic with people coming and going to work or to pickup kids from school. Those streets were not designed to carry that much traffic and should not be widened in order to do so. Nancy Denniston East Meadow park homeowner

Sent from Mail for Windows

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 8:04 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Ms. Kathryn Denton kdenton1492@gmail.com 1709 S. Euclid Ave Boise, ID 83706 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Sunday, April 16, 2023 10:13 AM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Holli Woodings, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Carrie Despot carrie.despot@gmail.com 833 S Capitola Way Boise, ID 83712 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:10 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Dr. Eric Deutsch ericdeu@gmail.com 1815 N. 10th Street, Boise, ID 83702 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 4:00 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Cathy DeVand cathynospam@outlook.com 5140 E Sawmill Boise, ID 83716 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:07 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Ms. Laurel dezan theonlylivwire@hotmail.com 415 w ivywild street Boise, ID 83706 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 12:20 AM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Jo Anne Dick k‐j‐dick@hotmail.com 8645 W. Shellie Ln. Boise, ID 83704 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:21 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Rebecca Dieteman bdieteman@yahoo.com 7905 W Westover Drive Boise, ID 83704 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:58 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Patrick Doolittle pjdoolittle@hotmail.com 6916 W. Folk Drive Boise, ID 83704 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 6:24 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Fin Dorough fdorough@gmail.com 13312 W. Pinyon Street Boise, ID 83713 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Saturday, April 15, 2023 10:30 AM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Wade Dorrell Email wade@dorrells.org Address 6533 W Kangaroo Ct, Boise, ID 83714 Comment As a long‐time homeowner living in a large single‐family‐zoned area along the State St corridor, I've reviewed and fully support the updated zoning code ordinance. Allowing duplexes (and more dense residential), smaller lots, and additional uses of private property are all appealing to me and I hope my neighbors are able to take advantage of this. I expect with additional living units in my area, we'll see better opportunity for businesses that serve the more immediate area, and employment opportunities within a 1 mile radius, and/or within reach on the transit corridor, as well, which are definitely positive things for this sprawled part of Boise. Please also work to encourage reduction/elimination of parking minimums, so that businesses can provide better service to people in the immediate area, so property owners can use more of their valuable land for people not cars. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:05 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Drew Dorsch drewdorsch@gmail.com 2920 W Teton st Boise, ID 83705 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:11 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Dallas Doty ddoty31161@gmail.com 4900 W Edson St Boise, ID 83705 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Saturday, April 15, 2023 8:17 AM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name David Doyle Email doyledavid89@yahoo.com Address 3121 W. Barr St. Comment Stop the insidious crusade to up zone Boise. Profit over people is just plain wrong. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Sunday, April 16, 2023 9:47 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Dell Drake dell.drake@yahoo.com 9270 W Teakwood Dr Boise, ID 83709 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 6:06 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Ms. Karla A Draper kster2013@gmail.com 1640 E Seaport Ct Boise, ID 83706 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Wednesday, April 19, 2023 6:45 AM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Sarah Drinka Email sdrinka@gmail.com Address 3808 Hawthorne Dr Comment I love the city of Boise. But I think housing affordability is a huge issue. I am really excited about the new zoning code and hope that it allows people to continue working AND living in Boise. I think that if people are able to find housing that is affordable they are able to give back to their communities. Our city will only become a more diverse and lovely place if we make more room at the table. I'm also really excited about the prospect of having more walkable communities. I think these communal spaces will foster community since neighbors can hang out close to home. Thank you for all your hard work in this rewrite. I believe it is the next step in the growth of Boise. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:10 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Joseph Ducato joscato@protonmail.com 9734 W Sunflower Lane Boise, ID 83704 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:59 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Ms. Cathy Duchek cachem5@yahoo.com 5606 South Alyssum Place Boise, ID 83716 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

davidandmarydudley@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of David Dudley <davidandmarydudley@everyactioncustom.com> Thursday, April 20, 2023 4:37 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Please Support the Zoning Code Rewrite

Dear Planning and Zoning Commission, I am in support of the Zoning Code Rewrite because of the plan for wildlife and open space, and to keep density near existing infrastructure. Sincerely, David Dudley 2106 N 23rd St Boise, ID 83702‐0523 davidandmarydudley@gmail.com

Deanna Dupuy From: Sent: To: Subject:

kya.dudney@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Kya Dudney <kya.dudney@everyactioncustom.com> Wednesday, April 19, 2023 4:25 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Vote Yes on the Zoning Code Rewrite

Dear Planning and Zoning Commission, I am writing to express my support for the Zoning Code Rewrite. The sustainability, affordability, and open space protections included in the new zoning code rewrite are exactly what Boise needs to plan for and address our rapid growth. Growth is inevitable, and we need a modern zoning code to ensure we are following the best practices to grow sustainably and responsibly. It has been clear that Boise City Staff have put in the effort to make an inclusive and extensive community input process to develop the zoning code our city needs and deserves. Boise has become increasingly unaffordable for everyone, especially for new home buyers, renters, students, low‐ income residents, refugee families, and elderly folks on fixed incomes. This code helps address those issues. I specifically appreciate that this zoning code protects our green spaces, improves our tree canopy, incentivizes energy and water efficiency that saves money over the lifetime of a home, allows for smart and targeted density, increases opportunities for multi‐family homes like duplexes, removes unnecessary parking space minimums, protects pollinators, and makes our communities more walkable and bikeable. I strongly encourage the Boise Planning and Zoning Commission to support this zoning code rewrite that staff and residents have spent so much time and effort to shape. Sincerely, Ms. Kya Dudney 4080 S Federal Way Apt J104 Boise, ID 83716‐5255 kya.dudney@gmail.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

jdunbar1153@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Jane Dunbar <jdunbar1153 @everyactioncustom.com> Wednesday, April 19, 2023 1:43 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Vote Yes on the Zoning Code Rewrite

Dear Planning and Zoning Commission, I am writing to express my support for the Zoning Code Rewrite. The sustainability, affordability, and open space protections included in the new zoning code rewrite are exactly what Boise needs to plan for and address our rapid growth. Growth is inevitable, and we need a modern zoning code to ensure we are following the best practices to grow sustainably and responsibly. It has been clear that Boise City Staff have put in the effort to make an inclusive and extensive community input process to develop the zoning code our city needs and deserves. Boise has become increasingly unaffordable for everyone, especially for new home buyers, renters, students, low‐ income residents, refugee families, and elderly folks on fixed incomes. This code helps address those issues. I specifically appreciate that this zoning code protects our green spaces, improves our tree canopy, incentivizes energy and water efficiency that saves money over the lifetime of a home, allows for smart and targeted density, increases opportunities for multi‐family homes like duplexes, removes unnecessary parking space minimums, protects pollinators, and makes our communities more walkable and bikeable. I strongly encourage the Boise Planning and Zoning Commission to support this zoning code rewrite that staff and residents have spent so much time and effort to shape. Sincerely, Ms. Jane Dunbar 1153 E Kimberley Ln Boise, ID 83712‐7718 jdunbar1153@gmail.com

ZoningRewrite From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Saturday, April 15, 2023 7:56 AM CityCouncil Contact Form Submitted to City Council

CREATING A CITY FOR EVERYONE

CONTACT FORM SUBMITTED TO CITY COUNCIL From Steve Dunlap sd060126@hotmail.com Phone Number: 2089212578 Dear Councilwoman Haney Kieth The Boise city offices of Mayor and all city council seats are on the ballot this November. I suggest that any final vote or decision regarding adoption of the Boise City Zoning Code Rewrite be postponed until after the duly elected mayor and council persons are settled and have had time to review this proposed change with concerned constituents. That will allow all Boise residents to be represented by the council person elected by their district, rather than by an appointed or at‐large councilor. Sincerely, Steve Dunlap 2342 E Independence Dr Boise, ID 83706 (208) 921‐2578 Contact Form Submitted On: https://www.cityofboise.org/departments/city‐ council/council‐district‐3/

208-608-7000

info@cityofboise.org 150 North Capitol Boulevard, Boise, ID 83702

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

Steve Dunlap <sd060126@hotmail.com> Thursday, April 20, 2023 9:27 AM ZoningRewrite; Mayor McLean; Holli Woodings; Patrick Bageant; Jimmy Hallyburton; Luci Willits; Latonia Haney Keith; Colin Nash [External] Boise Zoning Code Rewrite

Dear Mayor McLean and Boise City Council Members,

In June or later this year a vote will be taken regarding the Boise City Zoning Code Rewrite. Whether it be in a few weeks or a few months, when the vote is taken, I strongly recommend that we NOT accept the Zoning Code Rewrite. Here are brief descriptions of my main concerns: 1. Reading about cities such as Seattle, Portland and Austin that have “modernized” their land use codes, there are no reports celebrating the now-flush supply of affordable housing. These changes seem to universally fail to deliver the number one touted benefit. 2. Making R-1C properties available to higher density housing will create a “land rush” that will drive up prices, taxes and will drive people out of their homes. Searching in Zillow and the county GIS system it’s easy to find cases like 1704 Kinney Ave in Austin where a lot-filling $1.6 million condo was plunked down in the middle of a neighborhood much like our Colonial Estates. As a result the 2 bedroom homes on either side are now valued at $934k and $1 million. I’ll bet further investigation would reveal that those owners were forced to relocate. This neighborhood is being destroyed. 3. In my own personal case, our modest home is in long-established East Meadow Park. That neighborhood will be protected by the ZCR respect for existing covenants. But our property is on the north perimeter, adjacent to a large and underutilized lot zoned R-1C. This lot will be a prime candidate for development that may well result in one or more 3-story, forty foot tall multi-family buildings placed 15 feet away from our back fence. Our views of the foothills, trees and the birds that visit our back yard will be obliterated, along with the privacy and enjoyment our back yard. The “land grab” effect will probably drive up our taxes and we will be forced to leave our “age-in-place” home. I thank you for your interest and concern, and I ask you to represent my interests and those of my neighborhood and our city by voting “NO” on the Boise Zoning Code rewrite. Sincerely, Steve Dunlap 208 921 2578 2342 E Independence Dr Boise, ID 83706

ZoningRewrite From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Saturday, April 15, 2023 7:57 AM CityCouncil Contact Form Submitted to City Council

CREATING A CITY FOR EVERYONE

CONTACT FORM SUBMITTED TO CITY COUNCIL From Steve Dunlap sd060126@hotmail.com Phone Number: 2089212578 Dear Councilman Nash, The Boise city offices of Mayor and all city council seats are on the ballot this November. I suggest that any final vote or decision regarding adoption of the Boise City Zoning Code Rewrite be postponed until after the duly elected mayor and council persons are settled and have had time to review this proposed change with concerned constituents. That will allow all Boise residents to be represented by the council person elected by their district, rather than by an appointed or at‐large councilor. Sincerely, Steve Dunlap 2342 E Independence Dr Boise, ID 83706 (208) 921‐2578 Contact Form Submitted On: https://www.cityofboise.org/departments/city‐ council/council‐district‐3/

208-608-7000

info@cityofboise.org 150 North Capitol Boulevard, Boise, ID 83702

ZoningRewrite From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:25 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Jennifer Dunn calljencall@yahoo.com 9581 West Old Mill Drive Boise, ID 83709 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Thursday, April 20, 2023 9:52 AM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Creston Dupree Email crestonmd@gmail.com Address Boise, ID 83705 Comment I am in favor of the zoning code rewrite. The best places I've ever visited or lived have been mixed‐use, walkable areas. Since Boise has a hard time securing state funding for public transportation, it is all the more important that we make areas walkable to reduce car‐dependency as we grow. Please move forward with the rewrite (and even more impactful changes in the future). If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Thursday, April 20, 2023 9:50 AM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Dylan M. Email Address Boise, ID 83703 Comment I am in favor of the zoning code rewrite to prevent excessive sprawl, increase public accessibility, and increase housing affordability. Increasing housing density and overlap of residential and commercial uses will help move Boise into the urban environment needed to sustain the city's growth. If growth only continues at the fringes of the City in suburban style housing developments, it will require not just significant investments in vehicle‐based transportation such as highways, but also negatively impact the quality of life of residents who are forced to deal with the traffic of a sprawled city. By increasing the overlap of commercial and residential development projects, the public will have a greater accessibility to local businesses, public services, and recreational options, which will enhance the living experience within Boise. While I am a new resident of Boise, it is already obvious that the low wages in the area cannot begin to support the inflated housing market. The lowered housing cost due to increased supply will help residents avoid the stress of paying rents and montages which are consuming the vast majority of their income. It is simple to see that if the City does not invest in higher density housing solutions, the continued population expansion will reach a tipping point where expansion will stall because people cannot afford to move here, hurting the city's economy and potentially forcing economic downturn for the local business. If Boise wants to see continued economic growth, it needs to change how it goes about housing and commercial development. I would also like to add that if the density of the city increases, Boise needs to invest in increased public transportation solutions, it is not an option. It seems like lots of people don't want to acknowledge that Boise is turning into a bigger city, but they need to face the reality of the situation. If not, it will only result in further economic hardship for those that call the city home. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 9:02 AM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Emily Alb cadyranch@msn.com 172 S Cromwell Pl Boise, ID 83709 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 9:13 AM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Edward McElroy mcelroymac53@gmail.com 2678 E. Parkriver Dr. Boise, ID 83706 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Friday, April 14, 2023 4:38 AM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Kevin Earl kevinearl79@ymail.com Wilshire Dr Boise, ID 83704 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 10:52 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Kim Ebersole idahoebersole6@gmail.com 2084091024 3735 N Bryson Way Boise, ID 83713 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 5:51 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. nancy j eddy nancy.jo.eddy@gmail.com 1111West Highland View Drive Boise, ID 83702 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 5:30 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Julio eiguren julioeiguren@msn.com 3976 n. Mint ave Boise, ID 83703 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

ZoningRewrite From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Tuesday, April 18, 2023 9:07 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Robert Elliott Email relliott249@gmail.com Address 1037 West Hale Street Comment Hi, I have been a resident in Boise for the last decade, and a homeowner here for the last 5 years. I think the current zoning regulations make it extremely difficult for other people to buy homes, and because of that I am in favor of the proposed zoning rewrite. I believe that this will enable Boise to grow in a more responsible and sustainable manner and I think it will help provide the very necessary relief we need for housing in Boise. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Thursday, April 20, 2023 9:28 AM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name megan ellis Email megan.maryland@gmail.com Address 2713 S Inverness Way; boise, ID 83705 Comment To whom it may concern, I am writing in favor of a new zoning code in Boise that will allow for more affordable housing for all. As Boise residents for the past 6 years, we have seen first hand the challenges to first time home buyers and were fortunate enough to find our home after years of searching. My parents would now like to move out to be with their grandchild and are having to look at options hours away from Boise due to limited houses and affordability. Please consider the new zoning code to help keep Boise "kind" for all. Sincerely, Megan Ellis If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

Daniel Ellis <daniel.s.ellis1@gmail.com> Tuesday, April 18, 2023 9:26 AM ZoningRewrite [External] Neighborhood Cafes Improve Neighborhoods

Hi, I recently read an article on Boisedev.com regarding the proposed zoning changes that would allow cafes in residential neighborhoods, which we are fully in support of. For me and my family (wife and 7‐month‐old), we see these as a big benefit, making neighborhoods more walkable/bike‐able, allowing families to have options to go get a bite to eat or a coffee without getting in a car. We used to live in West Downtown (before Alchemist and the new bagel shop opened), and we were always wishing there was a coffee shop a bit closer to us. Of course, we could walk to Whitewater Park and go to Push and Pour or other restaurants along the Greenbelt (which we did!), but the ability to go somewhere within your own neighborhood, similar to Roosevelt Market or the shops in Hyde Park is hugely attractive and makes neighborhoods more desirable. Especially after our son was born, we were constantly trying to go on walks (it was the only way to guarantee a nap!), so having neighborhood spots to go to would have been fantastic. We now live around 26th and Sunset, so we certainly have the ability to walk to a few different places, which we love, but if the Sunset neighborhood had a few neighborhood cafes, I really believe that would be a benefit to the neighborhood, and I know it’s something that my family would utilize regularly. In summary, having neighborhood cafes provides walkable and bike‐able options for families, providing destinations to eat and drink without the need to load kids into a vehicle, thereby also reducing road traffic. They also provide an opportunity to diversify neighborhoods, allowing each to have its own unique spots, culture, and feel, which can increase the attractiveness of other neighborhoods, potentially reducing the extremely high demand for homes in areas that already have these sorts of options available (e.g. Hyde Park). This may even serve to ease some of the housing challenges in Boise by making these other neighborhoods more livable than they already are. Finally, I believe it’s an opportunity for new businesses to get a start. By serving new communities that previously had to drive to their favorite restaurant or coffee shop, small businesses have a built in customer base that could allow them to get off the ground without the need to compete with long‐standing favorites in existing neighborhoods, and that could allow for some new, exciting places to be born. I hope you’ll consider this as you evaluate the zoning changes, and I would be happy to provide additional thoughts if helpful. Thanks! Daniel Ellis (Sunset Neighborhood resident, former West Downtown resident, Boise resident since 2010).

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

kenziemac32@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Mackenzie Engel <kenziemac32 @everyactioncustom.com> Thursday, April 20, 2023 2:42 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Please Support the Zoning Code Rewrite

ZoningRewrite From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Tuesday, April 18, 2023 8:36 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Andrew Erstad Email acerstad@erstadarchitects.com Address Boise, Idaho 83702 Comment I am in support of adopting the Modern Zoning Ordinance / Code. It is time to update our outdated Zoning Ordinance. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Deanna Dupuy From: Sent: To: Subject:

Ce.carolee@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Carolee Eslinger <Ce.carolee@everyactioncustom.com> Wednesday, April 19, 2023 4:51 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Vote Yes on the Zoning Code Rewrite

Dear Planning and Zoning Commission, I love Boise! As an Idaho native and 32 year Boise resident, I have seen huge changes and dramatic development. I am very interested and invested in how our beautiful city grows! I am in full support of the new Zoning Code Rewrite. Thoughtful input from multiple stakeholders over a three year process has resulted in a modern and powerful Code that can guide our development in a positive direction for many years to come. I appreciate the sustainability, affordability, and open space protections included in the rewrite. Boise needs this Code to plan for and address our rapid growth! Housing in Boise has become ridiculously expensive. This code helps address those issues by providing more density, smaller starter home options, and encouraging other more affordable choices for housing. It does all this while encouraging wise use of our limited natural resources, and protections for our green spaces and pollinators. This code will help keep Boise a walkable, bikeable, liveable city. With its adoption, our city will grow in a healthy direction allowing current and future residents to love this space and be proud to call it home. I strongly encourage the Boise Planning and Zoning Commission to support this zoning code rewrite! Thank you for the opportunity to give input. Sincerely, M Carolee Eslinger 1415 E Hays St Boise, ID 83712‐7419 Ce.carolee@gmail.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:08 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Bev Evans bevevans50@yahoo.com 9756 W Woodland Lane Boise, ID 83704 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 4:02 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Holli Woodings, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. TAMA and Mike Everett tamaeverett7@gmail.com 2270 East Table Rock Road Boise, ID 83712 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

ZoningRewrite From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Tuesday, April 18, 2023 4:35 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Frank Brady frankfudd@gmail.com 5678 N Becliffe Ct Boise, ID 83704 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 4:33 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Luci Willits, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. James Falk j.h.falk@icloud.com 13210 Bluebonnet Ct Boise, ID 83713 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:08 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Jacob Farris jacobfarris@yahoo.com 11217 W Barden Tower Dr Boise, ID 83709 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 7:36 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, George Farrow geofarrow@yahoo.com 301 s. Pierce Place Boise, ID 83712 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Boise Zoning Code Rewrite Comments for Planning and Zoning April 2023 Thank you Commissioners for hearing these comments. My name is Joanie Fauci, 2944 N Hillway Dr Boise ID 83702.

I have been following the Zoning Code Rewrite since the beginning. I have attended meetings and commented at each phase. I’m not totally opposed to the Rewrite but I do have some concerns. Ever since I became engaged in Boise development & preservation issues I have learned a lot. But I still don’t understand a lot. I think I have been involved and aware of issues since the late 1980’s when Hull’s Gulch first started being protected. Since then I have moved from the North End to the Central Foothills where I have held several roles in our Neighborhood Association over the years. I am speaking tonight as representing the Board of the Central Foothills Neighborhood Association. I have done my share of testifying and writing letters. But I still have to scratch my head a lot. Most development proposals are not cut & dry. There always seems to be exceptions and deals made. Within this rewrite this still appears to be the case. It seems part of the intent of the new code is to streamline development options which would allow proposals to go through with little oversight. We don’t agree with this but we also see the need for streamlining as the city grows. The City can’t continue to have hearings on every development. But, within this draft new code there are places that mention “waivers”. So, still, nothing will be cut & dry. The developers will continue to have the option to push through whatever they want. We don’t know what will or will not be grandfathered in (non-conforming houses/lots, etc). How will an individual or a Neighborhood Association question a project that only goes through the single hearing examiner or fair hearing? Does Blueprint Boise or any Neighborhood Plan still have any value? There are many areas that are still vague. This rewrite is not finished. And there are issues that have not been addressed, for instance, anti-displacement language and anti-demolition language. And there are items that should be included, for instance, how much green space a lot is required to maintain (since Boise wants to maintain recognition as ‘The City of Trees’ and plant x amount of trees in x amount of years). We need more code compliance officers and enforcement to go with it. We, in foothills areas, are especially interested in outside lighting and vegetation violations. We also think some of the items need to be adjusted. Affordable housing incentives should be “mandated” not just suggested. And “affordable housing” should not be a number above 100% area median income (AMI) but something less than 100%, say 80% AMI. The rules for parking should have a minimum requirement of one parking spot per bedroom. All apartment buildings, going forward, should have covered, secure bicycle parking and electric vehicle charging stations. Over the years, as I’ve listened in at meetings/hearings, I was always appalled at projects that got approved mainly because the City was afraid of being sued by the developer, because the “code” allowed the developer or owner the opportunity to build what they were proposing. Even if the P&Z Commissioners and City Council were opposed to a project, they felt forced to approve the projects if code allowed it. Here is our opportunity to change that! There should be mention in several places within this new code that says something to the effect of “A real estate

investment is not a guaranteed money maker, just like the stock market is not. No developer has the ‘right’ to develop land and make as much money as possible. The City reserves the right to deny any project.” All references to “by right” within this new code should be removed! There are other things we do like in the draft rewrite. We like the wildfire resistant vegetation requirements for the WUI overlay. We like all the bicycle and pedestrian allowances. We hope for more mass transit. Energy efficiency and water quality and water quantity are also nicely represented. So, as I stated at the beginning, we’re not opposed to all of the rewrite. We also want to thank the staff for all the outreach and meetings they’ve had, even through a pandemic. Recently the news group BoiseDev surveyed Neighborhood Associations for their comments on this. Hopefully the Commissioners have seen the article. We would like to express our support of most of the points made by the Centennial, Collister, North End, West End, and West Valley Neighborhood Associations.

Lastly, we know this will delay approval of the new code but we think we should hold off on approval until we have a City Council elected by district. It will take them some time to get up to speed on this, but it’s the right thing to do. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, the Board of the Central Foothills Neighborhood Association.

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Saturday, April 15, 2023 10:02 AM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Holli Woodings, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, susan feallock sfeallock1@yahoo.com 790 n. riviera dr. #21 boise, ID 83703 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:52 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Emily Featherstone efeathy@gmail.com 5984 w drawbridge dr Boise, ID 83703 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 10:42 AM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Sergei Fedorchuk safedorchuk@gmail.com 11206 W Excalibur St Boise, ID 83713 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

Mary Feeny <feenymary@gmail.com> Thursday, April 20, 2023 2:05 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Zoning Concerns

Thank you for this opportunity to share my concerns. Individuals who have worked so hard for so long to address the issue of affordable housing in Boise deserve credit; however, there are those who are overzealous in their desire to change zoning codes without considering the downsides of certain changes. Consider: Short term rentals in Boise will break the bonds of community in established neighborhoods, and the frequent turnover in occupancy means more vehicles in a limited space resulting in traffic congestion. Who will be responsible for regulating short term rentals? Anyone? Another likelihood resulting in diminished parking spaces and an increase in traffic congestion is the carving up of existing established single family homes on certain lots in an effort to accommodate tiny homes, skinny homes, neighborhood coffee shops and the like. Again, there will be a loss of a known community of neighbors. Mary Feeny

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Thursday, April 20, 2023 11:07 AM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Roshaharra Daniel Fell Email roshaharra@yahoo.com Address 4427 W Alpine Street, Boise, ID 83705 Comment The City is planning to change residential zoning to allow 4‐plexes in any residential zone. You are also planning to allow 12 unit developments in residential areas that the Idaho Statesman is describing as "near mixed use" or on "busier residential streets". This change will erase Boise as an owner‐occupied city. Yet the financial incentives for maintaining non‐owner‐occupied properties are very different from the finances of maintaining owner‐occupied properties. This zoning change will turn most of Boise into non‐owner occupied, rental‐housing neighborhoods. In the long run it will turn much of Boise into a big slum as in time only rental properties in the most expensive neighborhoods will be profitable to maintain. In my own neighborhood, Central Bench, Latah Village is an illustrative example. The proposals to allow ADUs in residential neighborhoods is working out well, because the primary homes remain mostly owner‐occupied. Tiny homes that are owner‐occupied will likely work out well in residential neighborhoods. Boise has acre upon acre of blighted and underused commercial, industrial, warehouse, and office real estate that would make a great place to build apartment buildings, with some nice landscaping perhaps. Please consider returning to the zoning revision as originally proposed, the one that was presented as I recall about two years ago. The current plan is poison to this City. You and I won't be here to see it's eventual and worst consequences. That is, however, not a good reason to go ahead with it in its current form. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:08 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Patrick Feller pfeller@vivaldi.net 11102 W Sandhurst Dr Boise, ID 83709‐0175 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 8:55 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Thomas Felter tcfelter@gmail.com 219 S. Ruby Street Boise, ID 83705 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 6:13 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Ms. Pamela Ferarese pamelaferarese@gmail.com 2916 W Gavin St Boise, ID 83703 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:25 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Pence Ferry casazabala@yahoo.com 1112 S Owyhee St Boise, ID 83705 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 5:59 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mitch Fiderlick mitchel.fiderlick@gmail.com 4096 N Chatterton Ave Boise, ID 83713 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:58 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Luci Willits, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Jacob Fiksdal ironeagle94@comcast.net 11161 W Hickory Bark Dr Boise, ID 83646 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Thursday, April 20, 2023 4:11 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Jeff Fillmore Email jkicker125@gmail.com Address 7784 W Bayhill St Comment Hello. I don't envy the task of rewriting a zoning code that's nearly as old as I am. I've often joked that Boise employed the anti Field of Dreams theory that is "If you don't build it they won't come". We all know our secret of this town is out and they are coming in droves. Unfortunately we are ill‐equipped to deal with the explosive growth as this town was predicated on the single‐family dwelling concept of the post World War II years in the western US. I grew up here in the 60's when an apartment was a rarity, homes were cheap and affordability was high. Fast forward to today when home ownership is far past the hopes of many who live here. Yet we have not adapted to a denser well thought out solution. Central neighborhoods, with mixed use and walkability are being pushed aside by sprawl, traffic congestion and a rush to infill on every available lot. We need to seize the moment with the code rewrite that is long overdue. And yes, I know the nativists are banging the drum of "don't change anything and keep the out‐of‐staters out". That rhetoric and its like are what have gotten us into this predicament in the first place. To wit, I never thought I'd see the day when one of my sons in northern California chooses not to move back because of high cost of housing, traffic issues and westward sprawl. Let's start wrestling with this bear before it becomes too big to tame. Move forward, make the changes and continue to adapt. Waiting until "everyone is in agreement" to make the necessary changes is the same thinking that got us here in the first place. And please, don't let the volume of those who would have us do nothing override the sense of those who know we must change. Thanks for listening to and old Boisean who loves his town and knows progress is hard but necessary. Best of luck with the planning and zoning changes and thank you for your efforts of fighting the good fight. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 4:22 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. scott fischer scottfischer@att.net 1618 N. 17th Street Boise, ID 83702 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Friday, April 14, 2023 8:53 AM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Miss Brittney Fischer brittney@meltorganic.com 780 East Riverpark Lane Boise, ID 83706 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 9:46 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Paula Flacker paulaflacker@hotmail.com 747 E. Curling Dr. Boise, ID 83702 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 5:36 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Douglas C Fleenor dcfrrr@gmail.com 6704 W Fernwood dr Boise, ID 83709 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

K Fletcher <kljfletch@gmail.com> Friday, April 14, 2023 9:25 AM ZoningRewrite [External]

I am writing with major concerns about the zoning rewrite. It calls for increasing density in spite of the fact that our infrastructure across the board would not be able to meet the needs of such growth. It also does not prioritize open space, it does not honor the existing aesthetics of neighborhoods that have been here for decades, nor did it properly seek input from Boiseans. It is clearly a pro‐growth, pro‐development plan, and as a whole, it is not in Boise’s best interest, and I believe, would definitely lessen the quality of life that makes Boise great. In addition, I did take the survey asking for input before it was published, and the survey was vastly skewed in favor of this pro‐development, pro‐growth mentality. There were no options or choices to indicate a difference of opinion, instead we were only asked to weigh in in ways that supported the plan. We need to go back to the drawing board. Thank you, Kenya Fletcher

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 4:22 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. David Forbes davidjamesforbes@4bz.org 3937 N Elgin Way Boise, ID 83713 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 8:18 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Jason Forst j2forst@gmail.com 4298 N Forest Meadow Ave Boise, ID 83704 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

April 20, 2023

Boise Planning and Zoning Commission Re: City of Boise Zoning Code Re-Write,

Commissioners, I am writing this letter in support of the new zoning code. Boise has been growing for the past 150 years with little consideration for retaining open space, affordable housing, or transportation planning to accommodate growth like we are experiencing. The Boise City zoning code has not been addressed appropriately for over fifty years. If this trend continues Boise will end up looking like Phoenix, Los Angeles or another US city that didn’t properly manage their growth. Compared to other North America Cities, Boise is in a unique position to address the oncoming growth and intentionally and methodically decide where this growth should best be directed and what open spaces need to be preserved, and how to contemplate a variety of housing choices for all ages and income levels. The current rezone proposed by city staff is comprehensive, thoughtful and deserves your support. Putting it simply, Boise cannot continue to grow as it has in the past. Higher density is absolutely necessary to slow the past practice of sprawling communities that require new infrastructure investment. Boise needs to grow more where this infrastructure is already in place. The proposed new zoning code provides for thoughtful design and putting the higher density where it belongs and allowing existing neighborhoods to retain their unique character and appeal. Thank you for considering my feedback and please approve this important code re-write. Sincerely, Barbara Fountain 1662 S. Loggers Pond Place #22 Boise, ID 83706

Deanna Dupuy From: Sent: To: Subject:

foxcroftisme@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Bill Foxcroft <foxcroftisme@everyactioncustom.com> Wednesday, April 19, 2023 3:38 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Vote Yes on the Zoning Code Rewrite

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 11:24 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Sher Francis 4raejae@live.com 718 N 20th St Boise, ID 83702 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

Robert Frazier <robertcfrazier@gmail.com> Wednesday, April 19, 2023 11:22 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Zoning Rewrite Public Comment

The Zoning Rewrite in Boise Is All About Freedom For those of you who live in Boise city limits, you’ve probably been limited by zoning laws. Where you can build, what kind of house, how many square feet, the layout, the setbacks, the types of materials in your house or in your driveway. Zoning laws are strict arbitrary rules written to limit our private property rights and keep us from using our most valuable asset in ways that we desire. Not only are you limited by law, but if you want to even do what you are entitled to by law, you have to go through a draconian process to get the city to acknowledge your rights and ‘permit’ you to do what you want with your property. The Boise City zoning code was written over 60 years ago by city planners that had no interest in creating desirable, walkable neighborhoods but rather built a code to exclude people who are marginalized from homeownership and accessing affordable housing options that are dense and built for public transit, walking or bicycle commuting. We should all support the zoning code rewrite as a way to lower the bureaucratic red-tape that holds back our use of our own homes. We should support the rewrite to see more diverse types of housing, mixed use developments, neighborhood cafes, walkable neighborhood centers and less parking lots sitting empty across the city utilizing valuable space that would make our city more liveable. We should all support the zoning code rewrite because we believe that personal freedoms should be preserved to utilize our homes in the ways we see fit that preserve our ways of life and promote affordable options driven by the market rather than philosophically incomprehensible zoning rules written in a different century. As a faith leader in our community, I want to speak to fellow followers of Jesus. The center of our faith is the cosmic hospitality of God, to create space in His household for humanity by disadvantaging Himself so we might find our home in Him. This should be the same with us. We look at our community and find ways to live hospitably, to make space for our guests and new arrivals. We support the marginalized by taking our privilege as insiders and build systems that do not hinder making a life among us. We take our homes, our land, our assets and even our own lives and make space for foreigners, refugees, travelers and vagabonds who wonder into our city. My children are 5th generation Boiseans, and 4th generation West Bench natives. My grand-parents bought a house in Winstead Park for $25,000 in 1952. My parents bought a house at Maple Grove and Ustick for $50,000 in 1982. I bought our house off Mountain View in 2016 for $242,000, and it is now worth $550,000. At this rate by the time my oldest daughter turns 30, a house in the West bench will cost $6,430,000. The only way to combat that increase in value over time is to build higher density housing with affordability mechanisms in existing neighborhoods. Otherwise my children will be driving from Malheur county to visit their parents rather than staying in their hometown. Please take some time and write a note to support the zoning rewrite to Planning and Zoning here: zoningrewrite@cityofboise.org

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 1:22 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Erwin Frech erwin@frechs.com 5301 E Warm Springs Ave F409 Boise, ID 83716 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Thursday, April 20, 2023 2:28 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name April Frederick Email april_frederick_2000@yahoo.com Address 1416 N 8th St Comment I support the Boise zoning rewrite. I like the emphasis on affordable housing, diverse neighborhoods, walkable communities, and local neighborhood amenities. Please approve the rewrite. Thank you. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:58 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Patti Freeman pfreeman4@hotmail.com 12432 W Sitka Dr Boise, ID 83713 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 3:29 AM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Randy Freeman fishonrandy@hotmail.com 12432 W Sitka Dr Boise, ID 83713 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Fred and Carolyn Fritchman 1321 Denver Avenue Boise, Idaho 83706 April 20, 2023 Boise Planning and Zoning Commission 150 North Capitol Boulevard Boise, Idaho 83702 Members of the Planning and Zoning Commission, Concerning ZOA23-00001 and CPA23-00001, I ask that you not recommend this Code rewrite to the City Council. It is not only a failure of policy, which will result in numerous negative effects to Boise neighborhoods, but it is also a failure of process. Sweeping changes to our city have been brought forward by leadership and planning staff with little front-end input from citizens. Furthermore, the lack of time given the public to digest and comment on hundreds of pages of arcane, technical code before public hearing is disrespectful of our fellow citizens. In America, they are supposed to be in charge. They deserve the time and complete information required to make informed decisions. What will the Code Rewrite’s impact be on our neighborhoods? I am a lifelong Boise resident and have followed zoning in the southeast area for over twenty years. Two questions worth asking to evaluate whether zoning changes are good for our residents are 1) Do the changes contribute to neighborhood stability? Neighbors should not have to live in fear about what may be built next to them in established neighborhoods and 2) Will changes incentivize rental housing over owner-occupied in established neighborhoods? The new code fails these important tests. Drastic changes in allowed uses, parking reductions, lot coverage, and building heights will destabilize our neighborhoods. Further, these increased entitlements will inflate property values, shutting out new homeowners and giving well-funded investors the upper hand in the market. Changes to the Boise City Zoning Code should be written to protect neighbors rather than to destabilize their neighborhoods. And they should not put the American Dream of home ownership even farther out of reach than they already are for many. The hundreds of pages of comments you have received from citizens cover many valid issues with the proposed new code. Following are some specific concerns I have with it. Our established R-2 neighborhoods have effectively been rezoned to R-3. Of particular concern to me are the drastic changes made to standards of the R-2 zone. I live south of Boise State University in an R-2 zone. Such zoning is found throughout our city. These areas contain houses, duplexes, and small apartments. In my neighborhood, the built density of many blocks runs from 10 to 16 dwelling units per acre, much more than the 4 dwelling units per acre found in many suburbs. The density is achieved at a neighborhood scale of one and two-story structures. Now come the new standards which establish a limit of 45 feet and four stories. This is not at all compatible with the scale of our built neighborhoods. I served on numerous City of Boisesponsored committees to develop standards for compatible duplexes and infill houses in these neighborhoods, which have been largely successful.

The proposed new standards completely undermine the work that we did to preserve our established neighborhoods. They are more in line with the current R-3 standards. This breaks faith with the expectations neighbors had when they bought their property. These neighborhoods have changed and become more dense in the past 20 years under our current code. A key concept of “Missing Middle” housing as espoused by architect Daniel Parolek, is that additional denser housing types can be accommodated into existing neighborhoods by respecting the scale of those areas in height and building mass. 45 feet provides for no transition. I am attaching two pages of photos illustrating the variety found in Boise’s R-2 neighborhoods. These neighborhoods “pull their weight” in providing much housing at a livable scale. Their built character and future livability deserve our respect. The proposed MX-U standards allow a height of 70 feet at university boundaries like Beacon, Broadway, and Boise Avenue. The current allowed U-zone height of 45 feet within 50 feet of those boundaries is appropriate and consistent with the more intense use of the university. It allows for a transition to the neighborhoods beyond. This well-considered height standard dates back to BSU master plans of the 1990s. Taller buildings make sense internal to the campus. To my knowledge, no internal height exceptions Boise State has asked for have been opposed by the SouthEast Neighborhood Association. 70 feet at the edge does not transition to smaller scale adjacent neighborhoods. It is not too much to ask that Boise State concentrate its building height internally and transition that height to 45 feet within 50 feet of the boundary. They need to be good neighbors. The new code lacks objective concrete standards to protect residential neighborhoods. For example: • Industrial uses in the I-1 district “should” be buffered from adjacent residential, rather than “must.” • Standards for live-work units say “The work activities shall not create adverse noise or operational impacts on adjacent residential properties.” Yet no measurable standards are included to ensure compliance. • In the R-1B, R-1C, R-2, R-3, MX-1, and MX-2 zones, the standards for multifamily buildings state: “Building and site design shall provide for adequate transition into the surrounding neighborhood to ensure compatibility between the development and the context around it. Factors to be considered are setbacks, building height, building materials, bulk, roof design, parking area locations, and landscaped area locations.” The code should provide objective standards to ensure functional transitions. The findings for conditional use permits are entirely subjective and have been loosened, to the detriment of neighbors. The current standards read: “The proposed use, if it complies with all conditions imposed, will not adversely affect other property of the vicinity.” The proposed language says, ”The proposed use will not create any material negative impacts to uses in the surrounding area, or any material negative impacts will be mitigated to the maximum extent practicable, or the public benefits of the proposed use outweighs any material negative impacts of the proposed use that cannot be mitigated;” (Italics added). Who decides whether the public benefits outweigh the negative impacts? Many times at P and Z hearings, I have heard testifying citizens refer to sections of Blueprint Boise to support their arguments. Commissioners often replied that Blueprint Boise offers only planning

goals, not the actual rules the Commission must follow in their decisions; those are supplied by the Zoning Code. These proposed code changes do not offer certainty to neighbors; in fact they inject even more subjectivity into decision-making, and in my opinion load the process in the direction of the developers. I have read hundreds of comments from citizens opposed to these changes, including some pointed and technical analyses from Gregg Ostrow, a professional architect, Gary Zimmerman, and Richard Llewellyn. These comments demonstrate clearly that these code changes not only do not reflect the vision large numbers of Boiseans have of their community, but are not well crafted nor completely thought out. Clearly, these code changes are “not ready for prime time” and should be paused while citizens are given sufficient time to analyze them. Sincerely,

Fred Fritchman

Historic East End, north of Warm Springs, west of Coston. Homes and duplexes are a mix of one and two stories

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Thursday, April 20, 2023 12:29 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Courtney Frost Email courtneyleighfc@gmail.com Address 4845 N Anchor Ave Comment I am writing in support of the proposed new zoning code. I think it would positively impact housing, transportation and businesses. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Wednesday, April 19, 2023 11:17 AM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name JD Fuller Email jdfuller@live.com Address 1683 W Woodington St, Meridian ID 83642 Comment Investment buyers have flooded the US market, and we’re likely a few years out from a pre‐pandemic stabilization. That having been said, controlling the market such that Investor buyers no longer have the ability to drive prices up would be nice. Sell to Idaho individuals, for long term Idaho living. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Thursday, April 20, 2023 12:12 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Margaret Anne Fullerton Email fullerton.maggie@gmail.com Address 1611 N 7th Street Comment I am writing in support of the new zoning code. Boise needs more housing, of all kinds. Not every household needs to be in a single family home. There should be a mix of housing sizes at more levels of affordability, and there should be opportunities for retail so more people can walk to shops in their neighborhood. Boise should grow in a smart way where infrastructure already exists, rather than sprawl into the hills and desert. I live in the North End and I would welcome more neighbors; with more density and more economic vitality, more transit options might be put in place which would benefit everyone. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:13 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Grady Beck grady.beck44@gmail.com 10334 W Mesquite St Boise, ID 83704 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 11:14 AM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Gail Borup theborupbunch@msn.com 11300 W Chickadee Dr Boise, ID 83709 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

April 19, 2023

Boise Planning and Zoning Commission Re: City of Boise Zoning Code Re-Write,

Commissioners, I am a 21 year old who works as a hostess at a downtown restaurant. I am writing this letter in support of the new zoning code. Boise has been growing for the past 150 years with little consideration for retaining open space, affordable housing, or transportation planning to accommodate growth like we are experiencing. The Boise City zoning code has not been addressed appropriately for over fifty years. If this trend continues Boise will end up looking like Phoenix, Los Angeles or another US city that didn’t properly manage their growth. Compared to other North America Cities, Boise is in a unique position to address the oncoming growth and intentionally and methodically decide where this growth should best be directed and what open spaces need to be preserved, and how to contemplate a variety of housing choices for all ages and income levels. The current rezone proposed by city staff is comprehensive, thoughtful and deserves your support. Putting it simply, Boise cannot continue to grow as it has in the past. Higher density is absolutely necessary to slow the past practice of sprawling communities that require new infrastructure investment. Boise needs to grow more where this infrastructure is already in place. The proposed new zoning code provides for thoughtful design and putting the higher density where it belongs and allowing existing neighborhoods to retain their unique character and appeal. Thank you for considering my feedback and please approve this important code rewrite. Sincerely, Grace Schoenherr 255 S. Capitol Blvd., Suite 1606 Boise, ID 83702

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 10:30 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. George H Solverson lcesfire@yahoo.com 9890 W JAVA CT BOISE, ID 83704 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 5:18 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Ms. Melissa Gaffrey meligaff@yahoo.com 5974 S Tallowtree Way Boise, ID 83716 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

Got To Sail <crgains@msn.com> Friday, April 14, 2023 5:23 PM ZoningRewrite [External] ZOA23-0001 & CPA23-0001 Proposed R1C Rezone is incomplete, problematic, and misses Boise City goals.

I have lived in Boise for 49 years. I am not woke, nor a Qanon theorist, nor a believer in Critical Race Theory. Yet, I do believe in true Idahoans,the people living here! They know the growth issues and how to address them. Local people could come up with a better, more thorough, comprehensive, relevant, weighted, and flexible P&Z solution. The UpZone Rezone Code (ZOA23-0001 & CPA230001) appears to be a work-product of Boise P&Z staff but it is really a work product of Clarion and Associates, Denver, CO. Yes, we cannot deny growth, we cannot deny the inevitable consequences and impacts of growth to public services and facilities like transportation, roads, sewers, pollution, education, fire, parks, etc. So, these common denominators, always found to affect code development, need to be integrated into the City's comprehensive long-term plans and goals developed by the local P&Z staff. Mr. Keane says: “As we make decisions – if we don’t make different decisions – we’re really in trouble.” What Mr. Keane should say is: "As we make decisions - if we don't thoroughly consider and include new systems, social and environmental impacts, relevancy, costs, taxes, staff capabilities, new departmental administrations, new code enforcement roles, the work of previous commissions, the people and property affected, and historical accomplishments that have already made Boise City so attractive - in addition to the common denominator factors of conventional planning - then we're really in trouble." The conclusion is clear: This 611-page document, written more in "legalese" than common sense and practical/proven solutions, is NOT the document to provide satisfactory growth solutions to Boiseans. "We're really in trouble." My objections below, by no means a comprehensive list, concern R1C neighborhoods: 1. Boise Development writes that changing the code in existing R1C neighborhoods is not consistent with the previous long-term plans of community commissions - I agree. 2. The proposed code does not run realistic or probabilistic models showing what the neighborhoods would look like in 5, 10, and 15 years. 3. The proposed code does not use Boise-specific economic data and demographics to model the residential areas. 4. The proposed code adoption does not look at impacts to Boise City that would have to manage and enforce its new codes and the people affected by the code, e.g., buyers, sellers, lawsuits, enforcement, records, inspections, surveys, catalog and track income data, etc. 5. The proposed code adoption gives absolutely zero information about possible or necessary changes to the code in order for it to accomplish the stated outcomes. 6. Much less, the proposed code does little or nothing to show how the code efficacy will be monitored, measured, and establish progress towards the outcomes. 7. The proposed code does not gather data, research, or reference measured successes or failures in other communities with similar demographics as Boise. 8. The proposal does not provide FAC sections backed up by references including proof of answers. 1

9. The proposal does not provide "What if" sections and alternate scenario solutions. E.g., What if this code promotes "flipping" in R1C neighborhoods? 10. The proposed code does not provide adequate and simple cost-effective appeals and modifications that clearly and specifically automatically rise to easy resolution of disputes. E.g. if 80% of the homeowners in a neighborhood object to a "split" the property owner application requesting a split shall be denied. Please reject proposed P&Z UPzone codes ZOA23‐0001 & CPA23‐0001 Sincerely, Charles Gains Boise, Idaho

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

nagallaher@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Nicole Gallaher <nagallaher@everyactioncustom.com> Wednesday, April 19, 2023 1:46 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Vote Yes on the Zoning Code Rewrite

Dear Planning and Zoning Commission, I am writing to express my support for the Zoning Code Rewrite. The sustainability, affordability, and open space protections included in the new zoning code rewrite are exactly what Boise needs to plan for and address our rapid growth. Growth is inevitable, and we need a modern zoning code to ensure we are following the best practices to grow sustainably and responsibly. It has been clear that Boise City Staff have put in the effort to make an inclusive and extensive community input process to develop the zoning code our city needs and deserves. Boise has become increasingly unaffordable for everyone, especially for new home buyers, renters, students, low‐ income residents, refugee families, and elderly folks on fixed incomes. This code helps address those issues. I specifically appreciate that this zoning code protects our green spaces, improves our tree canopy, incentivizes energy and water efficiency that saves money over the lifetime of a home, allows for smart and targeted density, increases opportunities for multi‐family homes like duplexes, removes unnecessary parking space minimums, protects pollinators, and makes our communities more walkable and bikeable. I strongly encourage the Boise Planning and Zoning Commission to support this zoning code rewrite that staff and residents have spent so much time and effort to shape. Sincerely, Ms. Nicole Gallaher 3920 S Yorktown Way Boise, ID 83706‐6034 nagallaher@gmail.com

April 20, 2023

Boise Planning and Zoning Commission Re: City of Boise Zoning Code Re-Write,

Commissioners, I am writing in support of the new City of Boise Zoning Code re-write. As you know, we currently operate under a zoning code, first adopted in 1966. This code was specifically designed to prohibit small, multi-family housing types within single family zones. This restricts access for many people to find affordable, accessible housing. The new proposed code offers substantial improvements to the existing code by allowing for the desired type of dense, mixed-use development to occur as Boise grows. This type of development is critical to ensuring Boise works for all its citizens. The city has articulated a clear vision for its desired development of our commercial zones, including: dense multi-story development, containing a mix of uses, with active ground floors, limited parking, limited automotive uses, pedestrian friendly scale and access, and integrated open spaces. We support this vision and believe it is the proper way to save Boise from becoming a sprawling auto-dependent metropolis like so many other American cities. Sprawl is expensive and drives up both costs and property taxes. Attainable housing will continue to be a challenge in an area growing at Boise’s rate. The new code allows for more flexible options providing both short and long-term solutions to bring back a state of abundant housing for everyone in our city. We are behind on the number of homes for essential people who make our community run. Removing unnecessary red tape and administrative process will help us catch up on badly needed housing inventory. Complete cities are accessible, useful and vibrant places to live and our new zoning code directs mixed-use development in strategic places that will support walkability, transit, and local economic opportunities. The new Zoning code incentivizes efficient and sustainable growth, right where we need it, near existing streets and pathways and future transit. I commend Tim Keane, Andrea Tuning and the rest of the committee and City staff for their work on this effort. Thank you for considering my feedback and please approve this important code re-write. Sincerely, Annika Galliani 11221 W. Allerton St. Boise, ID 83709

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:46 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Jennifer Garcia ja669903@gmail.com 3307 North Tamarack Drive Boise, ID 83703 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 6:20 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Ms. Bobbie Gardner bobbie_gardner@msn.com 8150 W Mcmullen St BOISE, ID 83709 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Friday, April 14, 2023 11:29 AM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Benton Garrett Email stablewormhole@pm.me Address Boise, ID 83703 Comment I support the zoning code rewrite. Providing a pathway to solving the housing crisis is more important than the tiny risk of landowners (of which I am one) losing a bit of value. The rewrite provides that path. Like most things, those opposed to action are typically the loudest, so I urge the council to take the nays with a grain of salt. Go forward boldly and with the tacit approval of community members who see how the lack of affordability is a tangible issue where actual people are hurt on a daily basis due to no fault of their own. No zoning code can solve this issue, but the proposal is a big step in the right direction. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 7:01 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Sandra Gauss sjgauss@gmail.com 3701 Crescent Rim Dr. Apt.201 Boise, ID 83706 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:04 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Nancy R Geissler ngeiss@yahoo.com 1300 E Franklin Street Boise, ID 83712 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Thursday, April 20, 2023 3:05 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Lindsey Gentry Email gentry11235@gmail.com Address Boise Idaho 83705 Comment I am in favor of the zoning update. With the current code being written in the 1960's we need a zoning code that reflects our current housing climate and addresses some of the lessons we have learned about sprawl, placemaking and the environmental and human impacts of car‐centric communities. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 4:15 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Joel glaisyer jgmmf@yahoo.com 1313 Michigan ave Boise, ID 83706 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

dino glascock <dinoglascock@gmail.com> Tuesday, April 18, 2023 2:55 AM Mayor McLean; Timothy Keane; ZoningRewrite; zoninginfo; CityCouncil [External] Boise Zone Code Rewritre

Elected Officials of Boise: I would like a delay in the vote on the Boise City Code Rewrite. As it stands, only two of the six positions on the city council were elected by the voters. It would make sense that this action is delayed until November, when all positions within the new districts would be elected by voters of the city of Boise. These positions represent us, the concerned citizens of Boise. I have been a home owner in Boise since 1993, and I'm totally against this proposed code. Don't Upzone Boise! Semper Fidelis! Monty D. Glascock 2873 S. Triumph Place Boise, ID 83705.

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 4:34 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Cheryl Gmirkin cgmirkin@hotmail.com 4993 East Sawmill Way Boise, ID 83716 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Friday, April 14, 2023 4:36 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Forrest R Goodrum forrestgoodrum@yahoo.com 7321 W. Kettering Ave. Boise, ID, ID 83704 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject:

Barbara <bawarfield@aol.com> Wednesday, April 19, 2023 11:01 PM ZoningRewrite Mayor McLean; citycounil@cityofboise.org [External] lack of citizen representation

The West Bench Planning Area, where I live, will see a major portion of the changes in the zoning rewrite but we are not yet fairly represented on the Boise City Council and won’t be until after the upcoming November election. Because of this, the zoning rewrite should be heard by Boise City Council until next year, after the election. It is well publicized and documented that the citizens have a distrust in local Boise city government. It does not help that it seems that the current city government had the majority of opportunity for public input during COVID when opportunities were limited and now, they seem to be rushing it through before the upcoming election. Rather than using the zoning code rewrite as an opportunity to rebuild trust, it has done the opposite. Regarding my input on the final draft of the rewrite, I do not believe that it supports the following principles listed in the Blueprint Boise Plan: Blueprint Boise Page 3‐16 Principle IDP‐MU.2: Relationship to Surrounding Neighborhoods Use the following techniques to promote compatibility between redevelopment within existing activity centers and the surrounding neighborhood: (a) Concentrate tallest buildings at the center of the site or along primary street frontages; (b) Provide gradual decreases in building height and mass so that new structures have a comparable scale as adjacent homes along the shared lot line or street frontage; (c) Respect existing block patterns by carrying street connections to and through the activity center; or (d) Incorporate lower‐intensity housing types (e.g., townhomes, duplexes, etc.) along a shared street frontage. WB‐CCN 2.1: SUBURBAN NEIGHBORHOODS Suburban neighborhoods in the West Bench, as identified on the Future Land Use map are anticipated to remain largely single‐family in character, with the exception of areas between Fairmont Park and Ustick, between Winstead Park and Fairview and south of Fairview, which are anticipated to see some infill and redevelopment. Should infill and redevelopment occur in these or other locations, it should be consistent with the design principles contained in this Comprehensive Plan to ensure compatibility with the single‐family character of surrounding homes and adjacent neighborhoods. Considerations specific to the West Bench should include limits on overall lot coverage for infill development to protect the more open character provided by the area’s larger lot sizes.

In addition, the rewrite zoning code in too many cases eliminates the need for developers to ask for variances and the opportunity for the neighborhoods and/or city to negotiate a development agreement. More projects will slide through without giving notice to neighbors, requiring signs to be posted or holding neighborhood meetings which once again denies citizens who will be affected the most to share their knowledge of their existing neighborhood in relationship to infill and development projects. Thank you for reading this written testimony, Barbara Gordon 7750 W. Preece Dr. Boise, Idaho 83704

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 4:44 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Michael Graham motox40@msn.com 2875 S Mayflower Way Boise, ID 83709 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

ZoningRewrite From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Tuesday, April 18, 2023 11:21 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Molly Graham Email mollygraham877@yahoo.com Address 1037 W Hale St, Boise ID 83706 Comment I’ve lived in Boise my whole life and have watched the prices of rent skyrocket. I went back to school as an adult, and even working full time managing a restaurant, it was nearly impossible to find housing that was within my budget. I was able to move into an ADU for part of the time I was back in school, and the lower rent for a small space allowed me to minimize the student loans I had to take. Boise is not going to stop growing, and we have to take steps to allow for creative development on the land that already exists. I’ve graduated now and even though I can afford to live in a bigger space, I still live in a small ADU and I absolutely love it because of the low price for how close it is to downtown. Basic economic principals tell us that scarcity drives up prices, so allowing people to develop their properties to increase the number living spaces just makes sense. Relying on sprawl for more housing units is a terrible solution, and it turns more neighborhoods in Boise into places that only the very wealthy can afford. In addition to reducing prices, density helps with our increasingly frustrating traffic issues. Pushing affordable housing further from town creates more commuters and breaks down the sense of community that everyone on both sides of this is afraid of losing. I am in support of the revised zoning code. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

Got To Sail <crgains@msn.com> Friday, April 14, 2023 5:23 PM ZoningRewrite [External] ZOA23-0001 & CPA23-0001 Proposed R1C Rezone is incomplete, problematic, and misses Boise City goals.

Deanna Dupuy From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Wednesday, April 19, 2023 7:06 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Sidney Graves Email idahobusiness2000@yahoo.com Address 3112 W Stewart Ave, Boise ID 83702 Comment The city needs as much density as possible in neighborhoods in order to reduce the overall cost of housing. Please increase density to allow for apartment buildings. In addition, the city needs to eliminate parking requirements in our neighborhood. Parking spaces can cost as much as $45,000 and are often unnecessary near transit (bus lines). Thank you, Sidney If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:36 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Richard Gray grayrich1954@gmail.com 4213 Grover Boise, ID 83705 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 5:04 AM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Stephen Gray stevegray1956@yahoo.com 1507 W. Garfield Street Boise, ID 83706 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 2:47 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. David Green dgreen2010@yahoo.com 1779 S Pebbleside Way Bosie, ID 83709 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Wednesday, April 19, 2023 9:42 AM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Garrett Greene Email garrett.greene@outlook.com Address Boise, ID 83702 Comment As a Boise resident, I am pleased to express my support for the ongoing zoning code rewrite. We cannot ignore the continued pressures of in‐migration and risk Boise becoming a victim of its own success. The proposed changes are critical for Boise to improve housing access and maintain its quality of life. One of the key proposals is to increase zoning density in the urban core, which will allow for the construction of new housing closer to public infrastructure while reducing traffic demands. Additionally, the new code seeks to fill the "missing middle" of medium‐density housing such as attached townhomes, which will promote more housing ownership opportunities in Boise. I am also encouraged by the inclusionary zoning provisions in the new code, which require developers to meet income affordability requirements when providing greater housing densities. Furthermore, the mixed‐use environment encouraged by the rewrite will enable small‐scale retail services to be located closer to housing, reducing traffic demands and enlivening neighborhoods. Without these changes, housing costs will continue to soar, traffic congestion will increase, and public infrastructure will be spread over a larger area, increasing the long‐term costs to service and maintain it. As seen in sprawling cities like Phoenix and Dallas, this is not a desirable outcome. The City of Boise has undertaken a thorough and inclusive process in the zoning code rewrite, incorporating extensive stakeholder engagement, community feedback, and input from planning experts, including the leadership of Planning Director Tim Keane, who has seen the negative impact of poor planning decisions in Atlanta. It is important to support this initiative so that future generations can enjoy access to housing in Boise. Planning for growth is not the cause of growth but enables us to manage it intelligently. Pulling the ladder up for the benefit of only those who arrived first will backfire eventually, and we must not let that happen to our wonderful city. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 9:22 AM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Miss kristina grimes krisbiz@digitalstations.org 10191 w countryman dr boise, ID 83709 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Sunday, April 16, 2023 1:24 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Don Grimes dongrimes126@mac.com 1797 S Rustic Mill Place Boise, ID 83709 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 5:08 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. GAVIN HAGEN gandshagen@msn.com 1742 S Canonero Way Boise, ID 83709 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 4:35 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Trent Hall thallsyntek@gmail.com 1799 N Yonkers Ave Boise, ID 83704 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Friday, April 14, 2023 8:10 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Sandy Hall sandy@tkhmicro.com 12065 W. Tidewater Dr. Boise, ID 83713 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 5:18 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Miss Shelley Hallum yogartini@gmail.com 2654 S SHADYWOOD WAY BOISE, ID 83716 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:13 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Terry Hancock chevygirl1776@gmail.com 6368 N Heathrow Ct Boise, ID 83713 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Wednesday, April 19, 2023 8:36 AM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Gary Hanes Email ghanes1965@gmail.com Address 992 E Riverpark Ln, ID 83706 Comment This addends my earlier comments. 1) Gregg Colburn, co‐author of "Homelessness is a Housing Problem", made the case in Boise that housing supply is a key factor in homelessness. The book's research demonstrated that a low supply of housing combined with low vacancy rates exacerbates and increases homelessness. Boise's new zoning code is aimed at increasing the production of housing by removing regulatory barriers. It also adds affordability requirements. While I don't believe this is a complete solution to housing affordability or homelessness, it puts the City on course to better address these issues. If the city pairs its affordability requirements with infusion of federal, state, and city monies, it is possible to increase the impact of these investments while reducing the amounts that must be invested to make units affordable to households with incomes below 80% of the area median income. 2) As a designated 'entitlement community', Boise is qualified to receive HUD's Community Development Block Grant funding as well as other HUD funding for housing and homelessness. As a condition of this funding Boise must develop a Consolidated Plan. This ConPlan must identify barriers to affordable housing and measures to address them. Boise's 2021‐2025 ConPlan identifies its zoning as a barrier. Page 87 of ConPlan: "Zoning code and land‐use map provide limited acreage by right for multi‐family units: "Recently, the City has embarked on making significant changes to the zoning ordinance. The changes will allow increased building densities in more locations than historically permitted. For the past several decades, the number of parcels allowed on a given plot has been limited, impacting the availability of more affordable units generally derived from an increased number of residences and reduced material costs. Any developer proposing to build such housing needed conditional use permissions or rezoning to accommodate their project, which poses additional obstacles absent from conventional, single‐family market rate housing." The proposed rezone addresses the barriers to housing production and affordability identified in the ConPlan. 3) As part of the Consolidated Planning process the city must evaluate impediments to Fair Housing and accessibility to housing by members of certain protected classes. Restrictive zoning is shown to suppress the production of housing and has a disproportionate adverse impact on these protected classes. 1

4) Finally, I live in SE Boise (SENA). The Southeast Neighborhood Association has provided comments on the timing for City Council consideration of the proposed rezoning. I also expect SENA to submit testimony in opposition to the rezoning. As a past Board member of SENA, I wish to separate myself from it and its position on the proposed rezoning. SENA, while it 'represents' southeast Boise, it is not REPRESENTATIVE of those of us who live in southeast Boise. For instance, there are more than 20,000 students at BSU. BSU is in Area 1 of SENA's jurisdiction. THERE IS NOT ONE SINGLE BSU STUDENT ON SENA! Boldly, there is even stated opposition to participation by BSU students. Students also have problems accessing affordable housing and BSU has recognized this as a problem in recruiting students. Thanks for considering my comments. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 9:17 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Monte Hansen mgh11868@gmail.com 2135 Fairmeadow Drive Boise, ID 83704 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Thursday, April 20, 2023 3:18 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Jim Hansen Email democracyjim@gmail.com Address 610 W Warren St Comment I strongly support the modernizing of Boise's zoning code. It is decades overdue. The outreach was extensive and the analysis comprehensive. It will help neighborhoods become more vibrant and encourage people to remain in their neighborhood as they age and their families transitions. It will encourage reinvestment in small, incremental ways that help make neighborhoods more livable by permitting modest mixed uses we can walk and bike to. We are healthier when we have the freedom to choose the way they get to our destinations. Public infrastructure such as streets and sidewalks are a long term investment and need to facilitate good growth. The existing code does not facilitate the improved use of existing infrastructure but tends to force taxpayers to take on the burden of maintaining more infrastructure. The approach in the proposed new code can do that better and can help people stay in their neighborhoods and reinvest in their own homes if they choose. Without nearby mixed uses, public infrastructure is underused but still must be paid for. In fact, as neighborhoods participate in bringing vibrant mixed uses to their neighborhood, we should make sure the missing or neglected pieces of infrastructure (like sidewalks, curb extensions, crosswalks, etc...) in those neighborhoods are prioritized. Adding more sprawling single‐family subdivisions further and further out in the desert and farmland adds more to the cost of maintaining public infrastructure than it returns in taxes. People starting out their careers and people retiring from their careers too often are forced to move further away from family, work, school and other community amenities. Residents of all ages and incomes deserve choices so that not all of their daily trips have to be by car. These fellow Boiseans are often the least able to afford the added cost that car‐dependency imposes. While I like the vibrancy of downtown, Boise will be stronger and healthier as each neighborhood also has its own small town centers, where we gather just as often as we might go to downtown Boise. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Thursday, April 20, 2023 4:39 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Chelsea Harada Email chelseanharada@gmail.com Address Boise, Idaho, 83709 Comment I'm writing in support of the zoning modernization. Updating our zoning is one step we can take to address our housing crisis, and the proposed zoning modernization has added benefits that will contribute to the character and accessibility of our community. I've been dismayed by the deluge of mis/disinformation from groups that have formed in opposition, and while they may have a vocal and coordinated campaign, I hope that does not curtail this important work. Please help preserve the character of this city we love by updating the zoning code so we can avoid the pitfalls that sprawl has created in other parts of the country. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

sebhargrove@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Sebastian Hargrove <sebhargrove@everyactioncustom.com> Thursday, April 20, 2023 9:25 AM ZoningRewrite [External] Please Vote Yes on the Zoning Code Rewrite

Dear Planning and Zoning Commission, I am writing to express my support for the Zoning Code Rewrite. I've lived in Boise's North End since 1975. Although I'm not an expert in city planning, I appreciate the thoughtfulness and hard work that has gone into the new code. I also appreciate the diversity of voices on the Advisory Committee and the public input process. The sustainability, affordability, and open space protections included in the new zoning code rewrite are exactly what Boise needs to plan for and address our rapid growth. Growth is inevitable, and we need a modern zoning code to ensure we are following the best practices to grow sustainably and responsibly. It has been clear that Boise City Staff have put in the effort to make an inclusive and extensive community input process to develop the zoning code our city needs and deserves. Boise has become increasingly unaffordable for everyone, especially for new home buyers, renters, students, low‐ income residents, refugee families, and elderly folks on fixed incomes. This code helps address those issues. I specifically appreciate that this zoning code protects our green spaces, improves our tree canopy, incentivizes energy and water efficiency that saves money over the lifetime of a home, allows for smart and targeted density, increases opportunities for multi‐family homes like duplexes, removes unnecessary parking space minimums, protects pollinators, and makes our communities more walkable and bikeable. I strongly encourage the Boise Planning and Zoning Commission to support this zoning code rewrite that staff and residents have spent so much time and effort to shape. Sincerely, Mr. Sebastian Hargrove 1512 N 5th St Boise, ID 83702‐3703 sebhargrove@gmail.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:53 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Holli Woodings, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Jeffrey Harlow jeffrey.harlow@outlook.com 447 W. Thatcher St Boise, ID 83702 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 5:56 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Luci Willits, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Clint Harmon clint.harmon@gmail.com 12546 W Edna Dr Boise, ID 83713 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 4:33 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Ms. Carol Harris carolsueh1946@gmail.com 418 S Pond St Boise, ID 83705 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

lukehayhurst@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Luke Hayhurst <lukehayhurst@everyactioncustom.com> Thursday, April 20, 2023 1:50 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Please Support the Zoning Code Rewrite

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

hedrick.ars@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Andrew Hedrick <hedrick.ars@everyactioncustom.com> Thursday, April 20, 2023 1:09 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Please Support the Zoning Code Rewrite

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Friday, April 14, 2023 11:05 AM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Troy Heninger tk_buys@yahoo.com 2274 S Georgetown Way Boise, ID 83709 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 5:29 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Daniel henley dhenley8@yahoo.com 8751 w Oakmont dr Boise, ID 83704 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:31 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Richard Henning dickmargo@aol.com 3717 S. Ticonderoga Way Boise, ID 83706 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Thursday, April 20, 2023 3:05 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Richard Henry Email henryrt@gmail.com Address 7893 w gillis rd Comment Creating higher density housing will be great for walkability and traffic. I love the walkability of a city that does not require a car to enjoy. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Wednesday, April 19, 2023 11:38 AM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name John K Hergenrather Email john@mzfits.com Address Boise, ID 83706 Comment We need housing options that match with the salaries offered here in Boise. Even with remote work ‐ too many look at Boise as cheap labor. With the housing market going crazy around here ‐ wages have not even closely kept up. I can't afford to stay here much longer. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

antonhernang@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Antonio Hernandez <antonhernang@everyactioncustom.com> Saturday, April 15, 2023 3:36 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Vote Yes on the Zoning Code Rewrite

Dear Planning and Zoning Commission, I recently read about the Zoning Code Rewrite and I'm absolutely excited to voice my support for the rewrite. The effort the City of Boise leadership and staff have taken to create sustainability, affordability, and open space protections included in the new zoning code rewrite are exactly what Boise needs to plan for and address our rapid growth. Growth is inevitable, and we need a modern zoning code to ensure we are following the best practices to grow sustainably and responsibly. It has been clear that Boise City Staff have put in the effort to make an inclusive and extensive community input process to develop the zoning code our city needs and deserves. Specifically, I appreciate that this zoning code focuses on making future housing affordable, protects our green spaces, improves our tree canopy, incentivizes energy and water efficiency, allows for smart and targeted density, removes unnecessary parking space minimums, protects pollinators, and makes our communities more walkable and bikeable. I think there is always room for growth and tweaks within the code, but I strongly encourage the Planning and Zoning Commission to support this zoning code rewrite that staff and residents have spent so much time and effort to shape. Sincerely, Mr. Antonio Hernandez 369 S Walnut St Boise, ID 83712‐8336 antonhernang@gmail.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Thursday, April 20, 2023 10:35 AM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Andrew Herndon Email ahherndon@gmail.com Address Boise, ID 83702 Comment Thank you for your work on this proposal and for reviewing this public testimony. I live downtown in a rental apartment with my partner. We moved to Boise after my partner (who was born and raised here) finished his medical training in Portland and joined a practice here, and be closer to family. When we were looking for places to rent ahead of our move we found our options pretty limited. Prices seemed high for the units available, and the units themselves were in pretty short supply. Surprisingly, two leasing agents in different buildings even told us that they thought the prices their own buildings were charging were too high, and suggested we'd get a better value in Meridian. With all due respect to our neighbors to the west, neither of us want to live in Meridian. Ultimately, we found an apartment that is acceptable, and we live there now, though we are perhaps paying more than we should. We are lucky that we are able to afford it, but it's clear that there is real housing scarcity, and expecting people to just move to Meridian, or Nampa, or Eagle, and forcing those people to commute to work in town, is not a solution that will work ‐ at some point, families looking to put down roots or stay close with family that is already here will have to simply look to other parts of the state, or the country. Boise will miss out on the skills and community that those families could provide, and that is a true shame. I support the modernization of Boise's zoning code. I think that the solutions that are in the new zoning codes are thoughtfully crafted and make sense for this city, rather than simply copy‐pasting from another city with different circumstances. I think there was careful compromise put into place to prevent runaway gentrification and displacement, which is also important when considering how to manage the development of the city I do have concerns about deed restricting 3rd and 4th unit housing into permanent affordability. I think that such restrictions should be time limited, so that we don't accidentally create a permanent two tier system. I would ask for an amendment to limit deed restrictions to a number of years, perhaps between 7 and ten (these numbers are arbitrary, would require more careful analysis), before they expire, so that affordable housing is still created, but the free market is allowed to exist to a greater extent. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 10:09 AM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Ilawna Hessing lawna@hessinggroup.com 5705 N Lilybrook Way Boise, ID 83737 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Friday, April 14, 2023 9:34 AM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Mary Joan Hoene Email maryjoanhoene@gmail.com Address Boise, Idaho 83706 Comment We have a home in Depot Bench. My family moved to Boise in 1965, specifically for the quality of life that is now being threatened by rampant growth along with the political and lifestyle goals of the current mayor and her administration. These goals are assumed as predicates and justifications for the proposed zoning code, which can be implemented by the City Council, excluding voters, which is not fair to residents and their city. The rewrite of the code is massive yet the city has not provided an executive summary. Rather, the city is "selling" the rewrite at every opportunity, on its website and in other communications and meetings. In effect, people are being coerced to support the rewrite by the city's saying changes are necessary to have a clean, livable, affordable city for all. Of course we all want that. Most of us are here because of the quality of life ‐ don't insult us by implying that Boise is unequitable, unfair, dirty, or intolerant. While prices of housing along with cost of living are up, driving massive change by rezoning is not the solution. Specifically, many of the city's neighborhood associations and residents have not had time to digest the proposed changes and their potential impact; the comment period must be extended to allow for more comment. Automatic upzoning for four units on single family lots with controls on rents for two units is a mistake. In general, cramming more coverage on lots on an "as right" basis will eliminate trees and open space on residential properties. More density makes sense in many areas, but this should only be done via special applications for variances and special uses, without pricing restrictions on the property owners. The same point pertains to cafes and businesses in residential zones. The pop up cafes we have seen generate more cars, by the way, not walker and bikers. Parking should not be restricted, rather, adequate provision for public parking is essential. The city should not be in the subsidized or affordable housing business. Affordable housing is essential; we fully support having more in Boise. However this can be achieved through appropriate zoning and incentives for redevelopment along with new projects. Boise is digesting an enormous amount of new development as well as adjusting to the recent high inflation and post‐Covid environment. There is a lot of property within Boise proper that will gradually become redeveloped in the normal course. Ancillary living space will be created too. Boise was historically undervalued and people could live here easily on the margins. This has changed and affected many if not most families, including ours. Adjustments are wrenching but it is best to allow market forces to play out within less expansive changes, as is occurring now under the current code. The zoning rewrite and other agendas from City Hall translate to much bigger government, increased taxpayer burdens, massive impact on our neighborhoods with loss of control by residents. The Mayor just appointed two new City Council members, who will now owe her their support. The proposed Zoning Code should be sent back for a rewrite in light of the many substantive comments and only voted upon after the next City election. Thank you for your consideration of these thoughts. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot 1

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

jakehoffman15@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Jake Hoffman <jakehoffman15 @everyactioncustom.com> Thursday, April 20, 2023 10:33 AM ZoningRewrite [External] Support for the Zoning Code Rewrite

Dear Planning and Zoning Commission, I support the Boise Zoning Code Rewrite because we have a large lot and it's prime to be divided. We want to keep livable houses from being demolished and keep the feel of the neighborhood, and have my neighborhood part of the historic district. Sincerely, Mr. Jake Hoffman 2007 N 24th St Boise, ID 83702‐0206 jakehoffman15@gmail.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

chiligirl07@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Kris Hoffman <chiligirl07@everyactioncustom.com> Thursday, April 20, 2023 10:30 AM ZoningRewrite [External] In Favor of Boise's Zoning Code Rewrite

Dear Planning and Zoning Commission, I'm reaching out to express my support the new Boise Zoning Code. I'm an avid hiker and want the foothills to remain available. Please protect them and vote yes on this code! Sincerely, Ms. Kris Hoffman 2007 N 24th St Boise, ID 83702‐0206 chiligirl07@gmail.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Wednesday, April 19, 2023 12:35 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Joseph Hoisington Email josephhoisington@gmail.com Address 106 W Colby Lane Boise, ID 83706 Comment I support this zoning reform. I envision a future where not just people who live downtown can live car free. Boise needs more housing and transit options. Small business owners and developers need access to new opportunities and this zoning rewrite aids them. We need safer and more walkable and billable neighborhoods with easier access to diverse transport. Let’s begin to rebuild what car based infrastructures destroyed! If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 8:37 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Sarah Holland mandsfamily1@gmail.com 2943 E Nahuatl Boise, ID 83716 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Deanna Dupuy From: Sent: To: Subject:

donotreply@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Isabella Holt <donotreply@everyactioncustom.com> Wednesday, April 19, 2023 9:01 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Please Vote Yes on the ZCR

Dear Planning and Zoning Commission, I want to protect our open space! Please support the Zoning Code rewrite to help with that goal. Sincerely, Ms. Isabella Holt 1519 N 23rd St Boise, ID 83702‐0409 donotreply@noemail.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

bholt43@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Thomas Holt <bholt43@everyactioncustom.com> Thursday, April 20, 2023 3:36 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Support the Zoning Code Rewrite/Save the Foothills

Dear Planning and Zoning Commission, I am writing in favor of the Zoning Code Rewrite, because I want you to save the wonderful foothills! Sincerely, Thomas Holt 2312 W Bella St Boise, ID 83702‐0422 bholt43@aol.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 5:02 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Zachery Horrocks zachhorrocks32@gmail.com 7595 S. Wagons West Ave. Boise, ID 83716 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:47 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Fredrick Houtman houtmanfred@gmail.com 5075 w. Alamosa St. Boise, ID 83703 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

ZoningRewrite From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:28 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Eddie Howell ehowell1967@gmail.com 8568 N Silver Tree Way Boise, ID 83714 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

ZoningRewrite From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:28 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Cade Hulbert caderade19@msn.com 9758 W. Toni St. Boise, ID 83704 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 4:58 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Ms. Elaine Hulderman elaine.hulderman@gmail.com 5631 E Bay Trail Ct Boise, ID 83716 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Deanna Dupuy From: Sent: To: Subject:

julie hulvey <jhulvey@hotmail.com> Wednesday, April 19, 2023 3:08 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Written testimony zoning code rewrite

April 18, 2023 Dear Boise City Planning and Zoning Commissioners and Boise City Council, RE: ZOA23‐00001, beginning hearings April 24, 2023, as new business:

What an effort to produce a 611‐page document covering all the Boise Zoning Codes! I see much of it was copied and pasted from the previous code. I hope important things were not omitted! I also see ambiguities, conflicts, repeats, and omissions in the new parts of the draft. It would have been helpful, as is done in State of Idaho legislation, for you to redline out what is being omitted or changed, with the replacement text following the strikeouts. My first wish is that this is done and provided to the citizens before the attempt to approve the proposed Zoning Code Update is even voted on. My general criticism is that your attempts to rewrite the code seem to be an aggression on certain parts of the city. You completely remove the opportunity to attend a hearing and offer input in the early stages of the approval process in many cases with a proposed by‐right zoning code. How dare you I say! I see one of the largest responsibilities of the city is to plan, manage, and control the process of building and construction in the community. There is a way to review zoning and building applications so that there is no harm done because of oversight, misinterpretation, haste or neglect. That would be to employ more planners to do the work and only seat commissioners who want to do the job. Perhaps commission terms should be shorter, with no repeats. Perhaps neighborhood representatives should be appointed. Like any responsibility it is easy to become bored with the process and overlook real problems that have been presented by neighbors, neighborhood associations and nearby property owners. Don't remove the public input from the process by attempting to transition to by‐right approvals or applications that avoid hearings. It is undemocratic, and it is a fool's choice to tell us that there is an appeal process available. At whose expense? The community’s, that's whose! It should not be regarded as an excess cost to developers. That is a political ruse. You are attempting to allow a lot of discretion in the planning process by the director and the planners, and that is undemocratic and imbalanced in favor of the builder of developer. I am certain that the director and the planners are not always fully informed, nor correct in their application of the codes to the point that ignoring input is recommended. Next, I see some tricky inconsistencies between the Zoning Code Rewrite Adoption Draft (February 2023) and the proposed updates of Blueprint Boise. Your statement in the legal notice states that the zoning 1

code and map and the comprehensive plan need to match. I have heard statements that I decode to be misrepresentations and I attribute those statements to avoiding the recognition of the mismatch of the zoning map and the comprehensive plan. I heard Planning and Zoning Director Keane say things like, "We want to have density along the main corridors," but omits that there is a trick involved with how far the dense area is from a main arterial or collector (300 feet, a quarter mile?), to then be allowed to just build more. Do you want to increase traffic in residential areas? I hope not. It appears that you're set to be moving the big boxes of apartment buildings into residential neighborhoods beside homes no matter how you are representing the process. By the way, the Zoning Code Rewrite Adoption Draft (February 2023) does not have a definition of "local" street. There are such things, you know, and I suspect that this just continues the blame game between the city and Ada County Highway District (ACHD). Therin is the danger of saying that you can create density based on street designations. Who decides that? It is a fluid designation that further undermines predictability instead of direction that creates predictability. The conversion map on your online presentation creates a lot of questions. Using your conversion map, my own residence that is now R1C shows up as R1C‐compact. But inside your Blueprint Boise, there is no R1‐C compact. It moves directly to R2‐compact, with extreme increases in density. Where is my R1C? That is taking away my residential neighborhood where I and others bought homes and paid mortgages, and gifting property zoning upzones to developers. That is defiant of predictable development. Predictable development does apply to homeowners in current residential neighborhoods in law. Your proposal is a prejudicial and undemocratic way of managing property through the police powers granted to the city by the state. It needs to be fair and uniform. The new attempted rewrite of the zoning code discriminates against some neighborhoods in favor of others. Lower income neighborhoods are targeted for infill which diminishes the residential character that has existed for decades. Why are upscale neighborhoods saved from lot splits and density as infill? l (Because they're upscale, and the city needs monied interests on the side of the city?) Indeed, why are other areas such as the foothills and the Collister area saved? That brings the legality of this proposed rewrite into question in my mind. You are picking some neighborhoods to take the density hit, and not picking others. It creates a perfect storm where some neighbors will agree and remain silent, and others will disagree and must protest. If infill is that good, it is good in all neighborhoods. It pits neighborhood against neighborhood. I am also opposed to the encouragement of lot splits of R1C lots into 25' parcels that then allow density and height that exceeds the current code limits. If this is good in the Bench and/or East Boise residential neighborhoods it should be good in every single neighborhood throughout the city. You might not have to stuff them in so densely if the proposed changes were democratic, and for all neighborhoods. The idea that you can upzone and destroy some residential neighborhoods in the name of the bus is a bad idea and you (the city) have been conflating those ideas. Why not build 12‐plexes in the foothills, and send a bus up for commuting? The continued emphasis on lot splits forces traffic into the alley. In my case, I now look out my kitchen window at a parking lot of vehicles, behind their garages, behind skinny homes. And this has occurred because of a by‐right part of the code, and the discretion of a planner. I am one person, the planner is another, and the interpretation of what it says in the code, including the regulations provided by ACHD for alleys behind homes differ, with absolute deference to the planner. But we read the same codes! The planner allowed changes after the PZ hearing, during the design review (but I had to point out the builder had made a switch), and it was done despite objections from neighbors. These are the experiences we are all trying to avoid. Is it too much to ask for the PZ Commission to be active, involved, fair, and available to manage the built environment in Boise? I think not. This type of plan didn't go over well in other cities. Look and learn. Listen to your community and learn. We do not want bars and cafes in our traditional residential areas. I have a few tips as to why. They create noise, traffic, odors, and trash. Even rats come to these places. Not to mention, when someone is 2

overserved and becomes a drunk driver or pedestrian it is a safety issue. One such assumed pedestrian recently used my backyard as a toilet and my garage as a place to smoke and sleep (police informed). Restaurants fail at an amazing rate because they are expensive to operate and need a lot of daily turnovers. You seriously want to put that next to somebody's home? How dare you! That sounds like commerce, not residential. The city should vet the proposed plan and the city needs the neighborhood associations to be involved. It is no secret that the current planning director or the assistant director may not appreciate nor be in favor of neighborhood associations having input, but the community does think it is important. I really wish you could view this as an analysis versus just a rant. But on the same foot, the city did not give us a product that we could easily use as a comparison mechanism. All we see, hear, and feel is that your desire is to tip power to the developer. Should we fear such an outsized move? Of course, we should, and you should respond to the citizens’ needs for a better process, more input, more logic in the plan. Nothing in planning literature and study tells us that more big apartments, more density, and less respect for single‐family neighborhoods are improvements in a city that seeks quality of life and affordability. The streets become crowded with vehicles. (Think vandalism and hit‐and‐run.) You will hear these points over and over with variation in emphasis. If the plans were good the repeats of testimony would not be necessary. Don’t ignore the public. Sincerely, Julie G. Hulvey 3707 Nez Perce Boise, ID 83705

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

Stephen Hundt <hundtstephen@gmail.com> Wednesday, April 19, 2023 9:54 AM ZoningRewrite [External] Letter of support for zoning reform

Dear planning commission and Boise City counselors, I would like to express my ENTHUSIASTIC SUPPORT for the proposed Boise zoning reform. The plan appears to be a well‐ considered attempt to balance our need for more housing, a desire for more diverse land use patterns and alternative transportation opportunities, and current homeowners’ desire for stability in their neighborhoods. I would like to encourage you to be strong and not cave to the pressure of the vocal minority that will be opposing this change during the public testimony. In particular, please remember a few things: 1. The public testimony will given by a small subset of residents that are not fully representative of all the people you are trying to serve with this zoning rewrite. This group will likely include almost no renters, no future residents, no children, and few others who may one day find themselves struggling to find an affordable place to live in a vibrant neighborhood. 2. The opposition is implying that with the proposed code the city is forcing neighborhoods to look a certain way. In almost all cases that I have seen, this code is offering more choices for what can be allowed on lots. Providing more choices is the opposite of what forcing anything. 3. The opposition is presenting an argument that this zoning code will change neighborhoods that would otherwise remain stable. This is a fallacy. As an example, I live in a small home on Sycamore Avenue and there are currently two lots on my (very short street) where excavators are finishing their demolition of former homes. This is the continuation of a pattern in my neighborhood in which modest homes owned by families of modest means have been purchased by wealthier newcomers, demolished, and replaced by mansions. These lots will now forever be out of reach of the type of residents who formerly lived in the neighborhood. This is a dramatic change in both the visual and demographic character of the neighborhood. An alternate path, envisioned by this zoning code, is for these lots to include a few more affordable houses. This would increase the density of number of homes and people on the lots but would preserve the level of affordability (and possibly not change the resulting square footage of housing on the lots). This is a physical change that would better preserve the demographic character of the neighborhood (I personally don't need either form of stability, just want to point out that nothing we do or don't do will halt all change).

I hope that you approve this zoning code reform without much revision. Also, please don’t believe any accusation that you have not been open with the public about the process. I am not in any way involved in development, city politics, or planning and I have been aware of this zoning rewrite for YEARS now. Thank you for your work. Sincerely, Stephen Hundt

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 6:02 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Jeanne Hunter jkhunter81@gmail.com 1643 Robert St. Boise, ID 83705 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Friday, April 14, 2023 8:01 AM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Linda Fowler Hurley lmfhurley@gmail.com 13476 annabrook dr Boise, ID 83713 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:44 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Holli Woodings, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Jill Hutchinson jillinhiswill@gmail.com 889 N. 30th St. Boise, ID 83702 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Wednesday, April 19, 2023 10:25 AM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Carly Hyland Email carlyhyland@boisestate.edu Address 4520 W Kootenai St Comment I am in strong favor of the proposed rezoning of Boise. I am a postdoctoral research scholar at Boise State University and will soon be starting as an Assistant Professor here and have been unable to afford to buy a house. I think that the proposed zoning rules will increase the supply of housing, which will help bring down costs. Boise desperately needs more low‐ and mixed‐income housing options as home ownership is currently unattainable for many working professionals. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 6:40 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Miss Zoey Ingram zoeysfabulouscreations@gmail.com 3910 N Buckingham Pl Boise, ID 83704 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 7:15 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, ‐ Maureen Ingram ingrammaureen46@gmail.com 7705 W. Mooserun Ct. Boise, ID 83704 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 9:03 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Christy Isla gmomisla@gmail.com 903 N Imperial Way Boise, ID 83704 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 5:10 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mary Jane Dahl jeff.mary.1972@gmail.com 3834 N Sawgrass Pl Boise, ID 83704 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 11:29 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Jennifer day molding_paw_0y@icloud.com 2472 S Heritage Pl Boise, ID 83709 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 9:16 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Jeff e Morris jemorris52@msn.com 412 Pueblo, pueblo Boise, ID 83702 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Deanna Dupuy From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Wednesday, April 19, 2023 6:32 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Jon wagner Email jwagner162@hotmail.com Address 1019 N 30th st. Boise ID 83602 Comment I fully support the zoning code rewrite. Please also consider reducing off street parking requirements to 0. It would be nice to see a city shaped for the future. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Wednesday, April 19, 2023 9:54 AM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Timothy Jan Email tj.jan@outlook.com Address Boise, ID 83705 Comment The ongoing zoning code rewrite in Boise is critical for improving housing access and maintaining the city's quality of life amidst in‐migration pressures. By increasing zoning density in the urban core, new housing can be constructed closer to public infrastructure, reducing traffic demands. The code also aims to fill the "missing middle" of medium‐density housing, providing more housing ownership opportunities. A mixed‐use environment will reduce traffic demands and enliven neighborhoods. We must support this initiative to manage growth intelligently and prevent housing costs from skyrocketing. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

ZoningRewrite From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:26 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Luci Willits, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Tim Jaszkowiak tjasz@zekeseng.com 2229 N Cribbens St Boise, ID 83713 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 11:08 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Mark Jaszkowski jaszkowski@gmail.com 2643 S Mayflower Way Boise, ID 83709 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 4:12 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Joshua Jeffrey jeffreycatering@gmail.com 2800 North Eldorado St Boise, ID 83704 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 8:55 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Jennifer C. tinymouse512@gmail.com 4146 wisteria way Boise, ID 83713 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

davidcjensen@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of David Jensen <davidcjensen@everyactioncustom.com> Thursday, April 20, 2023 11:18 AM ZoningRewrite [External] Please Support the Zoning Code Rewrite

Dear Planning and Zoning Commission, I support the zoning code rewrite because I'm concerned about building codes and building to more than minimum standards. Sincerely, Mr. David Jensen 2103 N 24th St Boise, ID 83702‐0208 davidcjensen@gmail.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

Louis Jochems <lwjochems@gmail.com> Thursday, April 20, 2023 1:11 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Support for Zoning Code Rewrite

I am writing to express my strong support for the City’s updated zoning code and its efforts to increase housing choice and environmental sustainability for the reasons below.  Housing in the right places: The proposed code directs the most dense housing to areas where housing density is helpful: downtown, our transit corridors and activity centers.  Housing for all Boise income levels: The proposed code provides modest increases in density only if the project provides income-restricted units to our neighbors who earn 80% of the AMI and it also encourages different types of housing that naturally may become more affordable over time.  Housing that adds to the character of our neighborhoods: Neighborhoods of exclusively singlefamily homes are not stable. A stable neighborhood is one in which people have the choice to stay in as their lives, circumstances, and needs change. Consider my parents, empty-nesters who raised our family in a large single-family home but would like to age in place and downsize – they are faced with what seems like an impossible decision: stay in a large home they cannot maintain or move out of their beloved neighborhood to an area that offers smaller footprint homes. The character of a neighborhood is not defined by the architecture but instead by the people who live there. The character of a neighborhood is at stake if we cannot allow our neighborhoods of the past to meet the needs of people today and into the future.  Acknowledges the need to avoid making the same bad decisions of every other Western city regarding housing affordability, environmental impact and sprawl: If we allow the current trajectory of our city’s growth, we will suffer the same fate as other sprawling Western cities. I have spent most of my life in the Inter-Mountain West, and I do not want Boise to end up like Phoenix or Salt Lake City. I support the efforts to increase strategic density in the rewrite and I have not yet heard of any feasible alternative from those who oppose it. Let’s not be on the wrong side of history and at least try something to increase the potential for housing development within city limits NOW.  Reducing dependence on cars, fossil fuels, and expensive/inefficient road building: The modern zoning code promotes a variety of environmental benefits. Strategic density along transit corridors, as an alternative to sprawling single-family housing, will lead to fewer vehicle miles traveled thereby lowering emissions. Moreover, mixed-used development in city limits encourages less sprawl into the sagebrush steppe ecosystem, foothills, and farmlands. We need to preserve these ecosystems to ensure long-term sustainability and well-being for our residents.  Critics of the code are those who have benefited the most from our current system of exclusion: Think about those who are opposing this rewrite. They have mobilized likely because they have more time on their hands either due to being long-term homeowners with normal working hours or are retirees. They use scare tactics and misinformation to garner support. I can say from personal experience that the board of my neighborhood association does not represent myself or the views of much of my community in Boise. This neighborhood board primarily consists of older homeowners who have an affordable mortgage, most of which have come out publicly against the zoning code and continue to spread misinformation. People like this have taken up more space with their personal desire to maintain their status quo or “go back to the drawing board” just to obstruct progress and crowd out other voices that may want a different future for our city.

I ask that you consider the makeup of the voices at the hearings this week and more importantly, think about those who are not here: o Those working long hours or multiple jobs just to afford their housing o Those who are caretakers to aging parents or loved ones o Those enjoying the first week of 70-degree weather with their young kids o Or those who are at The Olympic simply choosing to enjoy a weeknight concert because this city is great and they don’t want to battle with a bunch of old people over the fundamental fact that a healthy, happy, and resilient city evolves over time! The one thing for certain is that if we do nothing to proactively work with this inevitable change, we will have fewer tools to adapt to these changes. We will end up making the mistakes other Western cities have made and lose what makes Boise special: the people and our environment. Please don’t let the voices of a selfish few prevent intelligent and reasonable solutions to be tried. Therefore, I strongly support the zoning code update and urge you to do the same. Sincerely, Louis Jochems, Ph.D., M.S.

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 4:57 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Curt Johanson cgjo1124@gmail.com 13125 W Paint Dr Boise, ID 83713 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Friday, April 14, 2023 11:17 AM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Brenda Johnson brendadmssr4@yahoo.com 6597 N Glencrest Way Boise, ID 83714 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Friday, April 14, 2023 11:17 AM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Brenda Johnson brendadmssr4@yahoo.com 6597 N Glencrest Way Boise, ID 83714 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 10:39 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Tracy Johnston tracy.cmlglass@gmail.com 5455 N Cloverdale rD Boise, ID 83713‐1712 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 4:44 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Teresa Jones heyteresahey@yahoo.com 3409 Kelly Way Boise, ID 83704 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 1:24 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Steven Jones idjones1@msn.com 5516 N. Five Mile Rd Boise, ID 83713 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 12:27 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Ms. Betty Jordan betty44jordan@gmail.com 3306 W Hillcrest Ln Boise, ID 83705 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 3:19 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. james a joy jimandruthjoy@gmail.com 3110 n crane creek rd Boise, ID 83702 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:22 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Holli Woodings, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. KIP L DAVIS kelum400@gmail.com 3275 W Edson St Boise, ID 83705 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 10:55 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Luci Willits, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Kevin Ebersole ke‐art@live.com 3735 N Bryson Way Boise, ID 83713 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 6:54 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Kristine Shannon krishannon52@gmail.com 2060 S Creekside Lane Boise, ID 83706 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Thursday, April 20, 2023 8:05 AM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name William Kaage Email lakaage@q.com Address Boise, ID 83706 Comment Thanks for the draft update to our zoning code. Really needed. Well thought out code that I support. Appreciate the effort to create diversified avenues of mixed use that encourage multimodal transportation choices and also the effort to diversify the current philosophy of single family home development in large chunks without other types of living. Good stuff. A step in the right direction for Boise’s future. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:10 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Nabil Kaali squardius@gmail.com 3815 W Glendale St, Boise, ID 83703 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Cc:

Subject:

Dave Kangas <davekangas@msn.com> Thursday, April 20, 2023 9:28 AM ZoningRewrite; Timothy Keane; Mayor McLean; Holli Woodings; Jimmy Hallyburton; Luci Willits; Patrick Bageant Molly O'; 'Anthony Sanchez (Pierce Park NA)'; Ashley (Hillcrest NA); 'Barber Valley NA Board'; Brittney Scigliano; Bryan Passmore (Central Rim NA); 'Carolyn Punt (Central Foothills NA)'; 'Cathy Sherman (Sunset NA)'; Central Bench Neighborhood Association; 'Dave Krick'; 'Depot Bench NA'; Collister President; 'Eric Berg (SENA)'; 'Eric Willadsen (Veterans NA)'; 'Ethan Mansfield (West DNA)'; Hillcrest NA; Winstead Park; 'Shawn Shelton (Pierce Park NA)'; 'Sheila Grisham (EENA)'; 'Vererans Park NA'; vistanaboise@gmail.com; 'Wade Dorrell (Pierce Park NA)'; 'West End Boise NA'; Jeanette Ross (Winstead Park NA); 'Jennifer Hensley (DBA)'; 'John Mooney (Barber Valley NA)'; Jonathon Melby (West Bench NA); 'Karen Jonnard (Central Bench NA)'; Kate Lovan; katiebeth4694@gmail.com; 'Katy Decker (VPNA)'; 'Kelley Tagg (West Downtown NA)'; 'Lauren Pennisi (West End NA)'; Laurynda Williams; Marika Panagiotou (Lusk NA); mkeithboise@gmail.com; 'Marnie Mesplay (SBVNA)'; 'Matt Ciranni (VPNA'; 'Michelle Doane (Sunset NA)'; 'Morris Hill NA (Lynn Lockhart)'; 'NENA Board'; 'Rob Mason (Sunset NA)'; 'Ronnie Marler (WBNA)'; Roy Tweedle (BVNA); Don Essig (BHNA); Ashley Hammond (Borah NA); centennialnaboise@gmail.com; centralfoothillsna@gmail.com; eastendboise@gmail.com; aaronhaskell75@gmail.com; bighitterjb@icloud.com; Libertyparkna@gmail.com; ldnaboise@gmail.com; nwneighborhoodassociation@gmail.com; Richard Llewellyn; pierceparkneighborhood@gmail.com; sbvnaboise@gmail.com; gbhardey@q.com; lrpooch@sonic.net; marksmisc@hotmail.com; swadacounty@gmail.com; 'Michelle Doane (Sunset NA)'; tommy2x4@gmail.com; warmspringsmesana@gmail.com; wbnaboise@hotmail.com; cchriskcockrell@gmail.com; wdnaboise@gmail.com; westvalleyna@gmail.com; jordanssong@gmail.com; Ed McLuskie; estee.lafrenz lafrenzfamily.com; Karen Danley [External] please increase neighborhood association time to testify on Zoning Code Rewrite

Mayor McLean, Council President Woodings, Council Pro Tem Hallyburton, Planning Director Keane: On behalf of the Board of Directors of Boise Working Together, We respectfully ask that the time for neighborhood association testimony be increased. It is our understanding that the City plans to allow only 5 minutes of testimony for each Neighborhood Association who may choose to comment on the Zoning Code changes at the upcoming Planning & Zoning meeting. The proposed Code changes are very complex and sweeping in nature. They will profoundly impact the character of Boise neighborhoods, homeowners' investment in property, and the quality of life of Boiseans. We request that Neighborhood Associations be allowed 15 minutes (at a minimum) to articulate concerns about how the changes will impact neighborhoods in this upcoming public forum. Respectfully, Dave Kangas President 1

Boise Working Together 208-841-0580 davekangas@msn.com 1715 W Canal St. Boise ID 83705

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Wednesday, April 19, 2023 7:13 AM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Lindsay Kaster Email lindzblack@hotmail.com Address 11578 W Bowmont Ave, Boise, ID. 83713 Comment I am strongly in favor of a newer, modern zoning code for Boise. Our ability to continue to grow depends on our having affordable and sustainable zoning that will allow for efficient, flexible growth. Thank you for moving us forward! If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 4:32 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Mike Kauspedas mike@mindaugas.us 3436 North Duane Way Boise, ID 83713 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Friday, April 14, 2023 7:03 AM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Beth Ann Kavanagh bethann.kavanagh@gmail.com 4528 S Axiom Ave Boise, ID 83716 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Friday, April 14, 2023 10:44 AM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Elizabeth Keeler Email liz.k.keeler@gmail.com Address 4500 W Kootenai St Comment Boise is growing exceptionally fast, and I want to ensure that growth keeps a diverse population in the city and accommodates all means. I support a fair, modern code to have thriving neighborhoods, affordability, and sustainable, responsible growth. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 4:58 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Jack L Keen lamontkeen@hotmail.com 481 N Strata Via Way Boise, ID 83712 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

Ed Keener <edmakeener@gmail.com> Monday, April 17, 2023 3:12 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Support Rezoning Boise

Hello, I support rezoning. It is important that we have a variety of housing in all our neighborhoods including rental, single family, tiny homes, and apartments. It is also important that citizens begin learning that R 1a zoning was created as a response by white racism to keep people of color away from white home owners; that fears by whites that poor people and people of color will degrade a neighborhood are not grounded in fact; that creating more housing in the city reduces pollution and global warming, encourages alternative types of transportation, is more efficient; and, yes, we will need to get used to closer neighbors just like other cities. Thank you, Ed Keener, 3423 N. 39th St, Boise, 83703 Collister Neighborhood

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Wednesday, April 19, 2023 9:55 AM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Kristine Email kristinekelly96@gmail.com Address 505 W Broad St #412 Comment Boise must address continued in‐migration pressures through the ongoing zoning code rewrite. Increasing zoning density in the urban core will allow for the construction of new housing closer to public infrastructure, reducing traffic demands. The code also aims to fill the "missing middle" of medium‐density housing, providing more housing ownership opportunities. A mixed‐use environment will reduce traffic demands and enliven neighborhoods. It is critical to support this initiative to maintain the city's quality of life and prevent housing costs from spiraling out of control. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

benkemperstoryteller@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Benjamin Kemper <benkemperstoryteller@everyactioncustom.com> Thursday, April 20, 2023 3:22 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Please Support the Zoning Code Rewrite

Dear Planning and Zoning Commission, I am writing to express my support for the Zoning Code Rewrite. The sustainability, affordability, and open space protections included in the new zoning code rewrite are exactly what Boise needs to plan for and address our rapid growth. Growth is inevitable, and we need a modern zoning code to ensure we are following the best practices to grow sustainably and responsibly. It has been clear that Boise City Staff have put in the effort to make an inclusive and extensive community input process to develop the zoning code our city needs and deserves. Boise has become increasingly unaffordable for everyone, especially for new home buyers, renters, students, low‐ income residents, refugee families, and elderly folks on fixed incomes. This code helps address those issues. I specifically appreciate that this zoning code protects our green spaces, improves our tree canopy, incentivizes energy and water efficiency that saves money over the lifetime of a home, allows for smart and targeted density, increases opportunities for multi‐family homes like duplexes, removes unnecessary parking space minimums, protects pollinators, and makes our communities more walkable and bikeable. I strongly encourage the Boise Planning and Zoning Commission to support this zoning code rewrite that staff and residents have spent so much time and effort to shape. Sincerely, Benjamin Kemper 415 W Thatcher St Boise, ID 83702‐4447 benkemperstoryteller@gmail.com

ZoningRewrite From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Tuesday, April 18, 2023 5:37 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Samantha Kenney Email skenneyj@gmail.com Address 4510 W. Irving St. Boise, Idaho Comment I am writing in support of the zoning re‐write as presented. I believe city planning staff have done their due diligence in re‐writing a code that allows for Boise to grow more gracefully into the larger, urban center it seems destined to be. Being born and raised in the Treasure Valley, and at 45 years old, I have come to terms with the growth and feel the new code and zoning re‐write will do wonders to keep the best parts of Boise alive while managing growth. Density in housing and mixed use options, with fewer parking requirements, while encouraging multi‐modal transportation will keep communities tighter and healthier from my perspective. Continuing to grow the way we have, sprawling to the outer limits of the city into divided single family home subdivisions with five lane roads between homes and services is not sustainable, and is a detriment to the lifestyle I have grown up appreciating about Boise ‐ i.e. parks, bikes, neighborhoods with local restaurants and services available within a safe 10‐15 minute walk or slow drive. The zoning rewrite, as I see it, ensures those tight connected neighborhoods at the same time as it considers the inevitable, and seemingly unending growth Boise experiences. I feel many people have moved here in the last 5‐10 years with a notion that things would remain just as the day they moved in and don't see a need or have a desire to support the changes presented in this re‐write. For those of us that are from here, we recognize change is a constant and feel it about time that the code keep up. This re‐write is long overdue and, as I see it, will help to maintain the community closeness I grew up with while allowing the city to grow into the future. Thank you for considering my comments. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 6:14 AM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Kristi Kimball kristiakimball@yahoo.com 12033 W. Mesquite Dr. Boise, ID 83713 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Wednesday, April 19, 2023 9:47 AM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Tomas Kinalski Email Address Comment As a college grad working in corporate, I feel like I will never have enough money to afford a house in my future, at least not by the same time my parents did. Rent right now is holding up my savings and houses are only going to get more expensive. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 8:50 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Ms. Kelly Kirkland kellyann38_2000@yahoo.com 312 N Hillview Dr Boise, ID 83712‐8114 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 4:45 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Gail Kirklin gkirklin@fiberpipe.net 10433 W Arnold Road Boise, ID 83714 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

klabokids@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Colleen Klabo <klabokids@everyactioncustom.com> Thursday, April 20, 2023 3:14 PM ZoningRewrite [External] In favor of the Zoning Code Rewrite

Dear Planning and Zoning Commission, I am writing in support of the Zoning Code Rewrite because the new provisions will protect our foothills and create more affordable living near urban jobs. Sincerely, Colleen Klabo 2308 W Bella St Boise, ID 83702‐0422 klabokids@gmail.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

kimkleaveland@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Kim Kleaveland <kimkleaveland@everyactioncustom.com> Thursday, April 20, 2023 4:33 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Please Support the Zoning Code Rewrite

Dear Planning and Zoning Commission, I am writing to express my support for the Zoning Code Rewrite because of the electric vehicle provisions! Sincerely, Kim Kleaveland 2111 N 24th St Boise, ID 83702‐0208 kimkleaveland@gmail.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:07 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Michael Knickerbocker knickerbocker.usa@gmail.com 2704 s wise way BOISE, ID 83716 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 8:17 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Ms. Carrie Knighton cbknighton@gmail.com 2567 S Georgetown Pl Boise, ID 83709‐8000 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Monday, April 17, 2023 10:54 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Larry Knopp lrkarch@gmail.com 2520 E Boise Ave Boise, ID 83706 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

andrew.kowalewski@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Andrew Kowalewsk <andrew.kowalewski@everyactioncustom.com> Thursday, April 20, 2023 5:00 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Please Support the Zoning Code Rewrite

Dear Planning and Zoning Commission, I am writing to express my support for the Zoning Code Rewrite. We are not accommodating the growth we've seen in the last few years. There needs to be rethinking at every level of every approach to sustainability, affordability, design and density, and transit. We need to stop building outwards and continue building around existing infrastructure. This is a problem that can't be ignored and the public input process that we've seen with the ZCR is the approach to take, not just to this foundational problem, but to other issues as well. Hopefully the success here can serve as a model. But this is a priority and we need to start taking this seriously. Thank you, Sincerely, Andrew Kowalewsk 3915 N Ten Mile Rd Meridian, ID 83646‐5409 andrew.kowalewski@cvidaho.org

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

petekozi@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Peter Kozisek <petekozi@everyactioncustom.com> Thursday, April 20, 2023 2:18 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Please Support the Zoning Code Rewrite

Deanna Dupuy From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Wednesday, April 19, 2023 6:59 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Daniel Krafft Email Address Comment Housing prices must come down; my friends are all moving away because of how expensive it is If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 9:08 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Luci Willits, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Natalie Kravtsov natakrav4991@gmail.com 13720 W. Rochester St. Boise, ID 83713 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

donotreply@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Carolyn Kuhr <donotreply@everyactioncustom.com> Thursday, April 20, 2023 10:39 AM ZoningRewrite [External] Please Support the Zoning Code Rewrite

Dear Planning and Zoning Commission, I support the Zoning Code Rewrite because we need to be mindful of our environment. I really want to protect our water resources. Sincerely, Ms. Carolyn Kuhr 2409 W Irene St Boise, ID 83702‐0435 donotreply@noemail.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 4:23 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Laura Watts omawatts@msn.com 8780 W Pembrook Dr Boise, ID 83704 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 9:09 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. JoAnn LaFramboise windsongjml@protonmail.com 4730 N. Bruxelles Dr. Boise, ID 83704 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 4:39 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, William Land amigafanrafl@hotmail.com 5144 W Blaser Ln Boise, ID 83705 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Deanna Dupuy From: Sent: To: Subject:

michaelalanza79@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Michael Lanza <michaelalanza79 @everyactioncustom.com> Wednesday, April 19, 2023 6:01 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Please Vote Yes on the ZCR

Dear Planning and Zoning Commission, I am writing to express my support for the Zoning Code Rewrite. The sustainability, affordability, and open space protections included in the new zoning code rewrite are exactly what Boise needs as we grow. We need a modernized zoning code to grow sustainably and responsibly and affress issues like Boise's unaffordability many, especially for new home buyers, renters, students, low‐income residents, refugee families, and elderly folks on fixed incomes. I specifically appreciate that this zoning code protects our green spaces, improves our tree canopy, incentivizes energy and water efficiency that saves money over the lifetime of a home, allows for smart and targeted density, increases opportunities for multi‐family homes like duplexes, removes unnecessary parking space minimums, protects pollinators‐ ‐and especially that it makes our communities more walkable and bikeable. I strongly encourage the Boise Planning and Zoning Commission to support this zoning code update. Sincerely, Mr. Michael Lanza 921 W Resseguie St Boise, ID 83702‐4252 michaelalanza79@gmail.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 10:39 AM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Melody Lattie mlattie1@gmail.com 2963 S Helen Ave Boise, ID 83705 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

ZoningRewrite From: Sent: To: Subject:

Lavin, Mark <mark.lavin@wincofoods.com> Tuesday, April 18, 2023 4:03 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Comments to Section 11-04-08 Parking and Loading

Dear PDS Director Tim Keane and Senior Urban and Regional Planner Andrea Tuning, First things first – congratulations on getting Boise’s new zoning code into draft form. I know that this is a significant effort for both of you, your colleagues at the city, your advisory groups, and Clarion Consulting. As a Boise resident, I appreciate your collective efforts. We have reviewed the draft code and one have significant concern in Table 11‐04.9: Off‐Street Parking Requirements. For “Retail Sales > 60,000 sf,” the minimum parking required would be 2 stalls per 1000 sf of ground floor area (GFA). The proposed maximum parking allowed would be 125% of the minimum or 2.5 stalls per 1000 sf. On behalf of WinCo Foods, I would like to propose a maximum of 215% of the minimum or 4.3 stalls per 1000 sf of GFA based on the following:   



Our two existing stores in the City of Boise have approximately 4.3 stalls per 1000 sf. Our building size is generally between 85,000 sf and 95,000 sf. We have dealt with maximum parking requirements in other cities, but none have gone as low as 2.5 stalls per 1000 sf. o Bozeman, MT allowed us to park at 3.6 stalls per 1000 sf and utilize parking adjacent to our store parcel, which effectively put us closer to 5 stalls per 1000 sf. o Medford, OR allows up to 5.0 stalls per 1000 sf for the maximum number of parking space permitted. Their minimum is 3.7 spaces per 1000 sf. We are different than a traditional supermarket. o While we do have walk‐in customers and cyclists that shop our store, we are primarily a stock‐up shopping trip and most of our customers drive to our store so they can transport their large quantities of goods back to their home. Many of our stores now have electric vehicle charging stations. Electric vehicles also need a place to park. In addition, the charging equipment takes up extra space in our parking lots.

Thank you for your consideration of this matter. Sincerely, Mark Lavin Senior Director, Real Estate WinCo Foods, LLC 208.672.2013

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

m.lawford@lawfordmedia.com Thursday, April 20, 2023 4:13 PM Mayor McLean; ZoningRewrite; Holli Woodings; Patrick Bageant; Jimmy Hallyburton; Luci Willits; Latonia Haney Keith; Colin Nash [External] Proposed Rezone of Boise

Good Afternoon, We are writing to all of you to inform you that we are opposed to the Rewrite as it now stands. The idea that multi family units should be allowed in virtually ALL zones is something that will end up destroying the character of many neighborhoods. For example, in areas where people live on half acre or acre lots, they choose that environment because of it's semi rural feel. From past experience in other cities, we have learned that if people move into an area like this, the first thing they do is complain about the "animals" chickens, horses, etc. They also often do not appreciate the quietness of semi rural areas as the residents do and engage in the normal activities of people living in high density housing.... because they prefer that lifestyle ... which often includes noise. Most people choose their neighborhoods for certain amenities and/or conditions of living. Some people love living in high energy, dense areas of population and others don't. It's human nature to like different things and it's important that we respect each other in the living conditions that they choose. This plan does not respect those who wish to live in semi rural, low density areas. We are also opposed to the idea that this plan could be approved by people not elected to serve particular areas ... leaving some neighborhoods totally unrepresented. It is also possible that we could have a different Mayor. For that reason , we believe that the choice should not be made until after the November election for council seats and mayor. Another portion of the plan that is really abhorrent is the idea that there will be virtually no neighborhood notification or hearings for projects that are different in nature to the neighborhoods. I believe you call it "streamlining".... we call it throwing the citizens of Boise out of the equation in determining the future of their neighborhood. We believe this plan was engineered by a small group of "urbanists" who have a particular ideology in their beliefs about what a city should be, an ideology that is not in conformance with most of the people of Boise. We do not live in Idaho to live in high rise, high density neighborhoods ... if we wanted that we would live in NYC. Which is a perfect example of what high density does to neighborhoods. We hope that the powers that be, understand that this plan is not what Boise wants or needs .... and while some changes could be made ... these are not the changes we want. Regards, Mary Ann & Jack Lawford

ZoningRewrite From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:28 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Connie Leavitt connleav2110@gmail.com 9170 W. Donnybrook Ct Boise, ID 83709 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:36 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Jennifer Lee robindixiesoap@aol.com 5010 W. Catalpa Dr. Boise, ID 83703 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 6:35 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Mike Leonard mike@aurorapower.net 3412 N36th Boise, ID 83703 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Wednesday, April 19, 2023 8:48 AM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Leslie Email kaetalyne@gmail.com Address Boise, ID 83709 Comment Boise is in desperate need of affordable options for housing and this rewrite will help make that possible. Please support this effort! If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

roblesserid@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Rob Lesser <roblesserid@everyactioncustom.com> Thursday, April 20, 2023 11:13 AM ZoningRewrite [External] I Support the Zoning Code Rewrite

Dear Planning and Zoning Commission, I'm writing to express my support for the Zoning Code Rewrite. I support it because I would like to see more neighborhood grocery stores, as in the 50's. Sincerely, Ms. Rob Lesser 1812 N 21st St Boise, ID 83702‐0733 roblesserid@gmail.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

JaimeIsrael.Lima@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Jaime Lima <JaimeIsrael.Lima@everyactioncustom.com> Thursday, April 20, 2023 3:39 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Please Protect Boise

Dear Planning and Zoning Commission, I am writing to express my support for the Zoning Code Rewrite, because I want the city to protect all the things :) Sincerely, Jaime Lima 1810 N Harrison Blvd Boise, ID 83702‐1016 JaimeIsrael.Lima@gmail.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 9:14 AM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Sarah Lindstrom sarahlindstrom@msn.com 2300 N Bryson Rd Boise, ID 83713 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Thursday, April 20, 2023 1:46 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Kallie Linse Email kallielinse@gmail.com Address 2601 W Boise Ave, #12 Boise ID 83706 Comment I am writing to you today in support of the new zoning code ordinance (ZOA23‐0001 & CPA23‐0001). Boise is desperately in need of the code rewrite to stay in line with current zoning and housing needs. Please count this as support in the affirmative for the new ordinance. Thank you. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Thursday, April 20, 2023 1:15 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Michael “Kent” Lipple Email lipple511@hotmail.com Address 773 S Gray Eagle Way, Boise Idaho 83712 Comment I have lived in Boise my entire life. I completely support the zoning code rewrite. The misinformation and drama surrounding this rewrite is expected. Progress and change frighten people . Keep up the good work . If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

lizfire@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Elizabeth Littman <lizfire@everyactioncustom.com> Thursday, April 20, 2023 10:19 AM ZoningRewrite [External] Please Vote Yes on the Zoning Code Rewrite

Dear Planning and Zoning Commission, I am writing to express my support for the Zoning Code Rewrite. The sustainability, affordability, and open space protections included in the new zoning code rewrite are exactly what Boise needs to plan for and address our rapid growth. Growth is inevitable, and we need a modern zoning code to ensure we are following the best practices to grow sustainably and responsibly. It has been clear that Boise City Staff have put in the effort to make an inclusive and extensive community input process to develop the zoning code our city needs and deserves. Having grown up in Boise, I appreciate the way that it has historically been easy to get around town either by car, by bike or in walkable areas. I believe it is important to make sure Boise maintains the community feel we've had for ages, while planning for smart and sustainable growth in the future. I specifically appreciate that this zoning code protects our green spaces, improves our tree canopy, incentivizes energy and water efficiency that saves money over the lifetime of a home, allows for smart and targeted density, increases opportunities for multi‐family homes like duplexes, protects pollinators, and ensures that our communities are walkable and bikeable. I strongly encourage the Boise Planning and Zoning Commission to support this zoning code rewrite that staff and residents have spent so much time and effort to shape. Sincerely, Ms. Elizabeth Littman 3019 W Breneman St Boise, ID 83703‐5636 lizfire@gmail.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 10:08 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Ms. Vivian Lockary vivian2211@msn.com 2211 N. 19th St. Boise, ID 83702 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Deanna Dupuy From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject:

John Lodman <johnlodman@gmail.com> Wednesday, April 19, 2023 4:27 PM ZoningRewrite Jeff Lowe [External] Fwd: Accessory Dwelling Unit Deed Restriction

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Forwarded message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ From: John Lodman <johnlodman@gmail.com> Date: Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 10:53 AM Subject: Accessory Dwelling Unit Deed Restriction To: <jszelag@cityofboise.org> Cc: Jason Jones <jason.fizzixguy.jones@gmail.com>, Zeb Moers <zeb@leaphousing.org>, Margaret Carmel <margaret@boisedev.com>

Good morning, I was referred to you by the Mayor's office. I am writing to comment directly on the ADU occupancy deed restriction. I've spoken with staff and have commented similarly on the new zoning code comment page, all to no effect. The ADU occupancy deed restriction, 11‐03‐03.2.B.8 (page 150), states:

Similar language is found in the current code. This deed restriction requirement is functionally unworkable, probably illegal, and is likely slowing ADU development dramatically: 1. The code creates two classes of property owner‐ the owner occupant and the owner investor. The code creates value for the owner occupant while diminishing the property value for the owner investor. Once recorded, the deed restriction effectively limits the resale market of the property to only owner occupants. Nowhere else in the code are development rights dictated by owner occupancy. Sooner or later this discrimination will be tested and I suspect the City will lose. 2. The code effectively prohibits owner investors from developing ADUs. Based on a recent conversation with Drew Alexander at BSU, BSU has over 30 residential properties which it considers underutilized. They have a historic deficit of employee and faculty housing near the campus. ADUs could be one way to improve utilization. Under the code they are prohibited. I know local investors, some with 20+ houses in Boise corporate, who can't consider ADU development because of this provision. 3. What would/could BSU and other institutions (a church for example) do with a deed restricted property they'd purchased or received as a donation? Leave the ADU unoccupied? 1

4. The potential problems created in estate transfer of an ADU property are obvious. For example, imagine you receive an ADU property in settlement of an estate, and you don't want to live in the ADU or the main residence. Are your only options to either ignore the deed restriction or sell the property? 5. As written, only an "owner" can satisfy the owner occupancy requirement. Grown children, mothers, fathers, in‐ laws, and etc. do not meet this requirement. I reject that the City can decide who is and who is not eligible. Owners are found on the deed. 6. Regardless of comment 5, I understand that ADUs are often developed to satisfy a family housing requirement‐ a widowed mother, a struggling son. Plans change. What does the City expect the owner to do when Mom moves on to assisted living, or the son wants to move on‐ leave the ADU empty? Who would do that? Is that what the City really wants? 7. Creation of a temporary owner is a solution I've considered. Consider that a property owned by an LLC can simply add the tenant as a Member of the LLC under the terms of a lease, and remove the member on termination of the lease. This concept is not theoretical, and is fairly simple to implement though there may be some minor tax filing implications. My arguments might seem hypothetical. Over the course of the years to come, properties with ownership occupancy deed restrictions will still exist with the original owners long gone to time. Successor owners will be left to either ignore the restriction or seek removal. Deed restrictions with the City require an act of city council to vacate. Does the council really want to deal with this minutiae? This provision in the planning code is bad public policy. The intent of preserving neighborhoods could more easily be served by a deed restriction on short term rentals (STR). Such a provision would be legal, and easily monitored and enforced. The STR threat to neighborhood peace and cohesion is legitimate and documented. There is no such threat from long term rental of properties which are better utilized by the addition of an ADU. I hope you will consider removing the owner occupancy section 11‐03‐03.2.B.8 from the new zoning code. Thank you, John Lodman 208.867.4584

Deanna Dupuy From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Wednesday, April 19, 2023 5:39 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Brett Lofgren Email brettlofgren@gmail.com Address 2607 S. Augusta St. Comment I desperately want Boise to be more dense with better transportation, walkable streets and bike lanes. I live on the bench and we need these things. The popularity of Hyde park and Downton Boise are our nearest examples of good density and multi‐purpose zoning, but go to many major cities and you'll find the economy is centered around density and people want to live there. Me and many of my neighbors, coworkers, friends and family want to be able to walk to a cafe, bike to a grocery store and live in a vibrant city. Rezoning and increasing our density is the best way to do this. Thank you! If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 5:40 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Deanna Lokker lokkerd316@yahoo.com 12041 Edna St Boise, ID 83713 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

jean_lovelace@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Jean Lovelace <jean_lovelace@everyactioncustom.com> Thursday, April 20, 2023 10:37 AM ZoningRewrite [External] Support the Zoning Code Rewrite

Dear Planning and Zoning Commission, I'm writing today to share my strong support of Boise's new zoning code. I support it because I want to preserve the foothills! Sincerely, Ms. Jean Lovelace 1755 N 24th St Boise, ID 83702‐0419 jean_lovelace@hotmail.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

prlowenthal@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Patrick Lowenthal <prlowenthal@everyactioncustom.com> Thursday, April 20, 2023 2:39 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Please Support the Zoning Code Rewrite

Dear Planning and Zoning Commission, I am writing to express my support for the Zoning Code Rewrite. The sustainability, affordability, and open space protections included in the new zoning code rewrite are exactly what Boise needs to plan for and address our rapid growth. Growth is inevitable, and we need a modern zoning code to ensure we are following the best practices to grow sustainably and responsibly. It has been clear that Boise City Staff have put in the effort to make an inclusive and extensive community input process to develop the zoning code our city needs and deserves. Boise has become increasingly unaffordable for everyone, especially for new home buyers, renters, students, low‐income residents, refugee families, and elderly folks on fixed incomes. This code helps address those issues. I specifically appreciate that this zoning code protects our green spaces, improves our tree canopy, incentivizes energy and water efficiency that saves money over the lifetime of a home, allows for smart and targeted density, increases opportunities for multi‐family homes like duplexes, removes unnecessary parking space minimums, protects pollinators, and makes our communities more walkable and bikeable. I strongly encourage the Boise Planning and Zoning Commission to support this zoning code rewrite that staff and residents have spent so much time and effort to shape. Sincerely, Patrick Lowenthal 434 W Thatcher St Boise, ID 83702‐4446 prlowenthal@gmail.com

Deanna Dupuy From: Sent: To: Subject:

marinalundy@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Marina Lundy <marinalundy@everyactioncustom.com> Wednesday, April 19, 2023 4:27 PM ZoningRewrite [External] I Support the Zoning Code Rewrite

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Wednesday, April 19, 2023 9:29 AM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Casey Lynch Email casey@rndhouse.com Address 1100 W Idaho Street. Boise ID 83702 Comment Boise, ID is one of the great cities in the Western U.S. and only stands to gain in appeal relative to its peers. Its long history of civic engagement, per capita philanthropic investment, diversified economy and effective leadership have set it up for continued success. Boise’s walkable downtown, access to nature, charming housing stock and friendly citizens set it apart in ways big and small. We cannot allow Boise to become a victim of its own success in the face of continued pressures from in‐ migration. The modern zoning code rewrite currently underway is essential for Boise to improve housing access and maintain its quality of life. It proposes more dense zoning in the urban core, where new housing stock can be constructed closer to public infrastructure while reducing traffic demands. It proposes to fill the “missing middle” of medium density housing (e.g. attached townhomes), which Boise sorely lacks and which will promote more housing ownership opportunities. It includes inclusionary zoning provisions, which dictate income affordability requirements for developers seeking to provide the greater housing densities offered in the new code. It encourages mixed‐used environments, which will locate small‐scale retail services closer to housing. This will reduce long‐term traffic demands and enliven neighborhoods. Without these changes, housing costs will skyrocket over the long term, and traffic and congestion will increase as more housing development is pushed further afield. Public infrastructure like roads and utilities will be spread across a greater footprint, which will increase the costs to service and maintain it over the long term. We have the benefit of having observed this in Phoenix, Dallas and other sprawling cities where you spend the bulk of your life in a car. The zoning rewrite process undertaken by the City of Boise has been as thorough and inclusive as I have seen in any jurisdiction. The City has incorporated extensive stakeholder engagement, community feedback, input from planning experts, and the leadership of Tim Keane, the City’s new Planning Director, who has seen this rodeo go the wrong way in Atlanta. We should all support this so that our children and grandchildren can access housing in Boise. Planning for growth does not cause extra growth, it enables us to manage growth the smartest way we can. The answer is not to pull the ladder up so only those who got here first can enjoy our wonderful City. That will, inevitably, backfire. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:14 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Kathie Lyon klyon4619@gmail.com 7227 W Cascade Dr Boise, ID 83704 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 3:07 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Dr. Mary Davis marydavis.boise@gmail.com 3296 N Mountain Lane Boise, ID 83702 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 6:10 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Michael Schrader mschrader0@protonmail.com 11949 W Silverking Dr Boise, ID 83709 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Friday, April 14, 2023 6:03 AM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Marc Searl searl3092@gmail.com 3503 E Tallow Ln Boise, ID 83716 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 6:52 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Elizabeth Mackenzie elizmack78@gmail.com 4558 N Tattenham Way Boise, ID 83713 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 8:05 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Ms. Gayle Mackey addyroluv@yahoo.com 2440 N Birchgrove Ln Boise, ID 83703 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Deanna Dupuy From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Wednesday, April 19, 2023 6:39 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Cienna Madrid Email ciennam@gmail.com Address 1019 n 30th Street, Boise ID 83702 Comment Thanks for this thoughtful update to the zoning code. We should be building up more, and infilling, not creating more sprawl. This is a good step in the right direction. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

tlmadrid718@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Theresa Madrid <tlmadrid718 @everyactioncustom.com> Thursday, April 20, 2023 3:51 PM ZoningRewrite [External] In support of the Zoning Code Rewrite

Dear Planning and Zoning Commission, I am in the support of the Zoning Code Rewrite because I want safer streets, to protect the foothills, clean water and air, and a more walkable community! =) Sincerely, Theresa Madrid 1602 N Harrison Blvd Boise, ID 83702‐2555 tlmadrid718@gmail.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 2:47 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Dennis Magee dennisjosephmagee@gmail.com 4656 N Arrow Villa Way Boise, ID 83703‐7017 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Sunday, April 16, 2023 9:56 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Linda Mahler linda.mccauley20@gmail.com 2511 N 31st St Boise, ID 83703 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Thursday, April 20, 2023 12:48 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Cara Mahler Email caramahler@gmail.com Address Boise, ID 83705 Comment Dear Planning and Zoning Staff, I write today in support of Boise's new zoning code. As a young professional living in Boise, I am fortunate enough to have been able to buy a home a few years ago. Those like me looking for homes, however, have not been so lucky, because Boise is becoming increasingly unaffordable. This is due in large part to the inflexible zoning code we have today, which produces a serious lack of housing diversity, density, and availability. This zoning code is a big step in the right direction, and one that will allow young people to go to school here, and stay and create families here, instead of having to search elsewhere for housing. It will also help protect the open space I enjoy by putting more homes where homes belong, instead of allowing continued sprawl. Additionally, I support the new zoning code's focus on allowing more mixed use development. As a resident of the Bench, I have enjoyed the vitality of the newest additions to the Alpine and Latah corridor in Push and Pour, Wyld Child, and The Stil. This walkable activity center is something the rest of Boise should experience, and one that can be achieved with a more flexible and modern zoning code like this one. Thank you for taking the time to read my comments, and please vote in favor of the new zoning code. Sincerely, Cara Mahler If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Wednesday, April 19, 2023 9:55 AM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Alex Main Email Address Comment Growth is happening whether we want it or not. The only way to handle it is to increase housing density and walk ability. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Monday, April 17, 2023 11:18 AM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Daniel Malarkey Email daniel.j.malarkey@gmail.com Address 3416 Meadow Drive, Boise, ID, 83706 Comment I write to testify in favor of the modern zoning code as it is a clear improvement on the existing zoning code. I served on the Citizen's Advisory Committee and understand the zoning rewrite represents a political compromise between pro‐housing and NIMBY (Not In My Backyard) factions in the city. As a result, while the new code is a big improvement over the status quo, it contains features that pro‐housing experts, including my colleagues at the Sightline Institute, would recommend changing. Potential improvements to the code include: 1. Allow people who own and rent SF homes to add ADUs without setting income limits on the renters. The current zoning code requires owners to occupy the main home in order to add ADUs to their SF homes. The new code is an improvement because it allows landlords to add and rent ADUs on single‐family properties if they meet affordability and green criteria. ADUs are by their nature affordable because they are small. If our code allows enough of them to be built the laws of supply and demand will drive rents down to a level that covers their cost and modest profit. The new code creates barriers to building ADUs by regulating the movement of people in and out of their dwellings and creating new encumbrances on properties. We have over 210,000 single‐family homes in Boise. If 1% of them added ADUs every year, that would be 2,100 new ADUS per year. We had fewer than 100 new ADUs built the first year after the ADU law in Boise changed in 2019. We are not close to reaching our capacity to add these small and affordable units. The new zoning code city should remove all barriers to building ADUs, not create complicated new rules and regulations. 2. Remove affordability requirements for 4‐plexes in residential zones. The arguments against regulating who can and can’t build and rent ADUs also apply to allowing 3 and 4‐plexes. The new code allows them if they are green and affordable. As evidence that much more pro‐housing policy is being implemented elsewhere, Washington state is poised to pass a bill that legalizes 4‐plexes without income requirements across the entire state, pre‐empting local zoning control. See https://www.sightline.org/2023/01/03/washingtons‐2023‐middle‐ housing‐bill‐explained/

3. Remove all parking requirements on new housing. The market will sort out how much parking is needed. Developers know how many spaces they need to attract buyers and tenants. All parking requirements do is drive up costs. The city can issue a limited number of parking permits to existing residents if street parking becomes too scarce. See https://www.sightline.org/costs‐of‐parking‐mandates/ 4. Allow all parcels to be subdivided and reduce the minimum lot size further. Boise’s zoning rewrite reduces the minimum lot size from 5,000 to 3,500 square feet. In 1998, Houston dropped the minimum lot size for single‐ family homes from 5,000 to as low as 1,400 square feet spurring a boom of in‐city development. 1

https://www.mercatus.org/research/policy‐briefs/learning‐houstons‐townhouse‐reforms Again, I support the new zoning code because it’s an improvement over what we have and my hope is that over time we can continue to improve it to spur more housing construction within the city. Daniel Malarkey Senior Fellow, Sightline Institute Member, Citizen's Advisory Committee If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Monday, April 17, 2023 10:35 AM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Deida Malinowski d_dayton@hotmail.com 6056 E Gateway Dr Boise, ID 83716 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

Ethan Mansfield <mansfield.ethan@gmail.com> Wednesday, April 19, 2023 1:51 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Letter of Support

I support the new zoning code. TO make it even better, I would like to see a very simplified table of allowed uses. It can be done, see Japan: Why Japan Looks the Way it Does: Zoning YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wfm2xCKOCNk&t=2s Cheers, Ethan ‐‐

Ethan Mansfield 208-921-4686

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Thursday, April 20, 2023 4:22 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Marcus Marianthi Email the.marianthis@gmail.com Address 3720 Vaughn st Comment I am in favor of the upzone. We run a small family business out of our house, enjoy mixed use development in our neighborhood, and enjoy our neighbors being able to provide more housing for friends/family within their existing property. Thank you. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:37 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Geron Marks geron.marks@gmail.com 10373 W. Treeline Street Boise, ID 83704 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Sunday, April 16, 2023 1:42 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Cale Marthens calemarthens@yahoo.com 4079 S Mill Site Ave Boise, ID 83716 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Deanna Dupuy From: Sent: To: Subject:

markmasarik@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Mark Masarik <markmasarik@everyactioncustom.com> Wednesday, April 19, 2023 8:32 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Please Vote Yes on the ZCR

Dear Planning and Zoning Commission, I write to express my enthusiastic support for the proposed Boise City Zoning Code Rewrite. I have been a member of Drawdown Treasure Valley for about four years. We inform people about the existing practical solutions to reverse global warming and how they can "up their game" in taking action. The Zoning Code Rewrite contains numerous components that will directly and indirectly foster a more sustainable and climate‐friendly Boise City. I mention just a few of the Drawdown solutions that will be enhanced with the Code Rewrite: Walkable communities, electric vehicles support, bicycle friendly routes, higher density housing, protecting our local food systems, energy efficient buildings, and waste diversion policies. It is imperative that the Zoning Code Rewrite be adopted as soon as possible to give us the best chance of success to remain a viable and healthy community. Thank you for all you do with your service to the City of Boise residents. With appreciation and respect, Mark Masarik

Sincerely, Mr. Mark Masarik 2802 N Norman Dr Boise, ID 83704‐6140 markmasarik@gmail.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Wednesday, April 19, 2023 4:53 AM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Bruce Mastorovich Email b.mastorovich@gmail.com Address 450 W Grove St, Apt 213, Boise, ID 83702 Comment I am in support of the Zoning Code Rewrite. Boise needs more homes for the people that want to live here. I want to see these new homes close to the places people work, learn, and play. Our existing car‐centric design is wasteful, isolating, and dangerous. When we push people out of the city towards exurbs, we might not increase the density of people in Boise, but we greatly increase the density of car trips here. With our pathways program, a new zoning code, and the thriving e‐bike industry; we can reduce the number of car trips and collisions in Boise. I think we will build a happier, healthier community if people get out of their metal boxes to see each other face‐to‐face. I am very excited about the opportunity to build a Fourplex. I live in an apartment downtown and I like it. However, there aren't very many 3BR units. I would like to build a Fourplex of 3BR units and live in one of them. Right now, I am investing heavily in my 401k, which is good for retirement. I hate that saving for retirement means putting all of my savings into index funds which support companies like Exxon, Apple, and Berkshire Hathaway. I would much rather invest in my own community. Let's legalize missing middle housing so that people like me can do that. Finally, there are a lot of people who want to live in Boise that don't get to make public comments in this process because they can't afford a Boise address. They have been priced out to Nampa, Caldwell, or Mountain Home. Please consider that a few hundred voices at these public hearings are not a fair representation of our much larger community. People want homes and options. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Thursday, April 20, 2023 3:14 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Joe Matranga Email Address 3508 S Ticonderoga Way Comment Allow more multi‐family and mixed‐use housing developments, having a walkable little bodega in your neighborhood will reduce traffic big time. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Planning and Zoning Commission Planning and Development Services |City of Boise 150 N Capital Blvd 83702 April 19 ,2023 RE: Our Path Home Written Testimony

Dear Planning & Zoning Commissioners,

Thank you for the opportunity to provide written support in relation to the City of Boise’s Zoning Code Rewrite. Our Path Home is the public-private partnership that manages homelessness response for Ada County. Our Path Home’s mission is to ensure the experience of homelessness in our community is rare, brief, and non-reoccurring. Our Path Home, based on the collective expertise of our homelessness response and funding partners, is writing to urge the Planning and Zoning Commission to support adoption of the proposed Zoning Code. The adoption and implementation of a Modern Zoning Code for the City of Boise is essential within the strategic process of ending homelessness. We need a code that includes policies and strategies that are reflective of the change that has, and will continue, to mold our city. Over the last the sixty years the City of Boise has changed significantly, with a notable accelerated pace of development and influx of residents over the last few years. Although this type of community change can provoke discomfort, it is inevitable. In the face of widespread change, Boise’s current zoning code is no longer effectively meeting the needs of our community. Boise’s outdated land use policies, which don’t stop our community from dramatically changing, have not supported and certainly have negatively impacted the development of housing necessary to respond to the needs of our community. This is especially true of the incredibly scarce housing types most often needed to solve homelessness. Under the current code, housing most closely associated with the homelessness crisis face challenges related to public opposition that can stall or effectively stop development from moving forward entirely. We need a code that will produce more units and housing diversity. Despite best public and private efforts, we will not be able to meaningfully address homelessness in Boise without the modification of outdated zoning codes and land use policies. The solution to homelessness is housing and our city desperately needs more housing. The Zoning Code’s allowance and expectation of dense development where it makes the most sense inclusive of alterations to residential land usage create the opportunity for an increase in available housing units and housing diversity produced by the market. While new construction alone does not necessarily address the deficit of housing affordability we see in our community, we recognize that public subsidy conversations must continue alongside a Zoning Code that ushers in smarter, needed development of housing. We need a code that prioritizes growth based on access to resource rich corridors and amenities. Community integration and support often prove to be key components of sustained housing stability. Expanding housing inventory around transit corridors bridges residents to resources, allowing for

equitable access to community amenities. The Zoning Code’s thoughtful approach to infill that will mean people’s homes are in places that enable more members of our community access our more valuable, connective resources. When layered with affordable housing strategies, that means more units for every household types, including those exiting homelessness, are included in every neighborhood. Our Path Home supports and is encouraged by the reformation of Boise’s zoning and land use policies. We urge your support.

Sincerely,

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Wednesday, April 19, 2023 8:55 AM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Constantine Mavromichalis Email constantine.mavromichalis@gmail.com Address Boise, ID 83705 Comment Don’t upzone Boise! The code should promote true affordable housing and effective anti‐displacement programs. New development must not overburden infrastructure. Please don’t allow contractors to shove as many apartment complexes as they can among neighborhoods which do not have the infrastructure to support the residents as it is already. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 9:49 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Garold Maxfield garold43@gmail.com 1920 S MAYFLOWER WAY, Boise, ID 83709 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

Don May <don.may.email@gmail.com> Monday, April 17, 2023 12:26 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Zoning Input - Please Increase Density & Lower Parking Requirements to Zero

Hello, Please increase residential density and increase building height as much as possible along W Stewart Ave in West Boise. This street is right in front of the Esther Simplot Park, where many people wish to live. There is already a low income apartment complex on the corner of Whitewater Park Blvd and Stewart Ave, so density is already high for the apartments. Residents like me should be able to increase density and building heights on our lots as well. Boise is better when it's a walkable city, close to many amenities like bus transportation and city parks. Our location has both, as there are bus routes along Whitewater Park Blvd and Esther Simplot Park is directly across the street. Please do the right thing and increase density along W Stewart Ave to allow every lot to have at least 8 units. Please reduce parking requirements to zero in our neighborhood as well. When people have access to public transportation like they do along Whitewater Park Blvd, there is NO NEED for parking. Thank you for your time. Don May 3108 W Stewart Ave Boise ID 83702

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:13 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Taryn Mayer tandtmayer@yahoo.com 13110 w Satinleaf Dr Boise, ID 83713 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 4:26 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Karen McAdams‐Kunze kmmkunze@gmail.com 983 E Strawberry Ln Boise, ID 83712 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:36 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Ms. Barbara Chrisman McAlister bccm61@outlook.com 2943 S. Garden St. Boise, ID 83705 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 5:32 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. TIM McArthur tfmcarthur@outlook.com 720 S SCOTT ST Boise, ID 83705 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

macdan7@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Daniel McAuliffe <macdan7 @everyactioncustom.com> Thursday, April 20, 2023 3:53 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Please Support the Zoning Code Rewrite

Dear Planning and Zoning Commission, I am writing to express my support for the Zoning Code Rewrite. The sustainability, affordability, and open space protections included in the new zoning code rewrite are exactly what Boise needs to plan for and address our rapid growth. Growth is inevitable, and we need a modern zoning code to ensure we are following the best practices to grow sustainably and responsibly. It has been clear that Boise City Staff have put in the effort to make an inclusive and extensive community input process to develop the zoning code our city needs and deserves. Boise has become increasingly unaffordable for everyone, especially for new home buyers, renters, students, low‐income residents, refugee families, and elderly folks on fixed incomes. This code helps address those issues. I specifically appreciate that this zoning code protects our green spaces, improves our tree canopy, incentivizes energy and water efficiency that saves money over the lifetime of a home, allows for smart and targeted density, increases opportunities for multi‐family homes like duplexes, removes unnecessary parking space minimums, protects pollinators, and makes our communities more walkable and bikeable. As an avid bicyclist and somebody who enjoys walks and hikes around north boise, I fully support the goals this zoning rewrite plans to implement. I strongly encourage the Boise Planning and Zoning Commission to support this zoning code rewrite that staff and residents have spent so much time and effort to shape. Sincerely, Daniel McAuliffe 2012 N 26th St Boise, ID 83702‐0225 macdan7@hotmail.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 10:21 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Sue McCullough suesoasis@msn.com 11132 W Ashburton Dr Boise, ID 83709 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Thursday, April 20, 2023 8:42 AM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Charles B McConnell Email cbenmc@gmail.com Address 415 E. Curling Dr Comment https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?hl=en&shva=1#inbox/FMfcgzGsmDsbGDVFjDQVqgZVhTLGLHQV If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:51 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Ms. Alissa McCord alissa.mccord@gmail.com 8893 W Sloan St Boise, ID 83714 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Sunday, April 16, 2023 7:41 AM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Jeff McCray jefferson.d.mccray@gmail.com 2901 South Ladera Place Boise, ID 83705 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 7:17 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Claudette McDaniel ccmidwife@aol.com 3717 W Palouse Street Boise, ID 83705 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 11:32 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Rebecca McDonald rebecca.mcdonald3378@gmail.com 4880 e arrow junction dr Boise, ID 83716 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Deanna Dupuy From: Sent: To: Subject:

edwardmce@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of John e McEachern <edwardmce@everyactioncustom.com> Wednesday, April 19, 2023 5:40 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Please Vote Yes on the ZCR

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 8:52 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Ms. Tracy McElhinney tracymc59@msn.com 3405 S Centennial Way Boise, ID 83706 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 8:42 AM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Cheryl McElroy emce872714@aol.com 2678 E Parkriver Dr Boise, ID 83706 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

scottydm3@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Scot McGavin <scottydm3 @everyactioncustom.com> Thursday, April 20, 2023 7:44 AM ZoningRewrite [External] Please Vote Yes on the Zoning Code Rewrite

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 8:24 AM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Tim McGinnis froggutz@usa.com 2103 N. Beach St. Boise, ID 83706 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

denisemcgold2@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Denise McGoldrick <denisemcgold2 @everyactioncustom.com> Thursday, April 20, 2023 1:28 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Vote yes on the proposed Zoning Code

Dear Planning and Zoning Commission, I am writing to express my support for the Zoning Code Rewrite. The sustainability, affordability, and open space protections included in the new zoning code rewrite are exactly what Boise needs to plan for and address our rapid growth. Growth is inevitable, and we need a modern zoning code to ensure we are following the best practices to grow sustainably and responsibly. It has been clear that Boise City Staff have put in the effort to make an inclusive and extensive community input process to develop the zoning code our city needs and deserves. Boise has become increasingly unaffordable for everyone, especially for new home buyers, renters, students, low‐ income residents, refugee families, and elderly folks on fixed incomes. This code helps address those issues. I specifically appreciate that this zoning code protects our green spaces, improves our tree canopy, incentivizes energy and water efficiency that saves money over the lifetime of a home, allows for smart and targeted density, increases opportunities for multi‐family homes like duplexes, removes unnecessary parking space minimums, protects pollinators, and makes our communities more walkable and bikeable. I strongly encourage the Boise Planning and Zoning Commission to support this zoning code rewrite that staff and residents have spent so much time and effort to shape. Sincerely, Denise McGoldrick 440 E Provident Dr Boise, ID 83706‐6522 denisemcgold2@gmail.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Cc:

Ryan McGoldrick <ryan@cvidaho.org> Thursday, April 20, 2023 10:40 AM ZoningRewrite Lisa Young; Brad Heusinkveld; Stephanie Day; Lisa Reed; Nina Pienaar; Byron Folwell; Eric Willadsen; Mary Nutting [External] Joint Letter of Support for the Zoning Code Rewrite ZCR_Joint_Letter_of_Support.pdf

Subject: Attachments:

Good morning, Please accept the following joint letter of support for the Zoning Code Rewrite from Conservation Voters for Idaho, CATCH, Idaho Conservation League, Neighbors for Boise, Idaho Chapter Sierra Club, Boise Bicycle Project Board of Directors, Idaho Walk Bike Alliance, Golden Eagle Audubon Society, and the Canals Connect Community Coalition. Within the attachment, you will find our letter of support, the supporting organizations, and detailed comments about the specific provisions we support. In addition to our comments, I would like to thank the City of Boise staff for the extensive public outreach they conducted and incorporated to develop this proposed zoning code over the last three years. By our count, there were 29 community conversations across the city, 23 citywide Advisory Committee Meetings, five surveys with nearly 7k responses, dozens of stakeholder meetings, seven presentations to city council, 12 commission or committee meetings, and multiple rounds of mailers to residents. Thank you for your time and consideration, ‐Ryan ‐‐ Ryan McGoldrick (Pronouns: He/Him/His) Senior Program Manager Conservation Voters for Idaho & Conservation Voters for Idaho Education Fund Mobile: 503.871.7082 Mail: PO Box 2802, Boise, ID 83701 Website: cvidaho.orgEmail: ryan@cvidaho.org To help protect y ou r priv acy , Micro so ft Office prev ented au tomatic download of this pictu re from the Internet. facebo ok

To help protect y ou r priv acy , Micro so ft Office prev ented au tomatic download of this pictu re from the Internet. twitter

To help protect y ou r priv acy , Micro so ft Office prev ented au tomatic download of this pictu re from the Internet. instagram

April 20, 2023 City of Boise Planning and Zoning Commission 150 N Capitol Blvd, Boise, ID 83702 Re: Zoning Code Rewrite

Dear Planning and Zoning Commissioners, On behalf of the undersigned organizations, we strongly encourage the Planning and Zoning Commission to approve the affordability, sustainability, and open space provisions included in the City of Boise’s Zoning Code Rewrite. Boise is facing rapid and inevitable growth, and a modern zoning code is necessary to meet the needs of our community both today and into the future. This code meets those requirements and will help preserve the city we cherish while making it more livable for everyone. In addition to the critical updates to our zoning policies and procedures, this code includes the sustainability and affordability action that will continue to make our city a safe and welcoming city for all residents. The inextricable link between sustainability and affordability is clear within the detail of the proposed code. For example, by gently increasing density and creating more mixed-use zones, we will create less-expensive options for first-time buyers, renters, and young families while also decreasing car trips and increasing walkability. By implementing water and energy efficiency incentives, we can decrease the ownership costs over the lifetime of a home while protecting our critical infrastructure and resources. Additionally, we find fears that this will destroy homes or the character of our community to be completely unfounded. We strongly feel this code will instead preserve the look and feel of the neighborhoods that are cherished by residents of the City of Trees. This code protects the aspects we love while making this community safe, welcoming, affordable, sustainable, and livable for everyone. For detail on the specific sustainability, affordability, and open space provisions that we support, please refer to the following categories on pages 3-4: natural environment, consumption and waste, cars and electric vehicles, walkable communities, water, food systems, buildings, and energy and housing affordability. Thank you for your time and consideration,

Ryan McGoldrick Senior Program Manager Conservation Voters for Idaho

Stephanie Day Executive Director CATCH

Brad Heusinkveld Energy Associate Idaho Conservation League Housing Advocates Neighbors for Boise

Lisa Young Director Idaho Chapter Sierra Club

Board of Directors Boise Bicycle Project

Patrick Riceci President, Board of Directors Idaho Walk Bike Alliance Lisa Reed President Golden Eagle Audubon Society

Canals Connect Community Coalition

Natural environment: We support… ● The mapping overlay of the Wildland Urban Interface to guide decisions around areas where our built environment meets the natural environment. ● Improved mapping overlays of the Boise River and the Foothills to protect the sensitive areas we all treasure. ● The new requirement for Class III trees in many locations (for example, parking lots) to increase our community’s tree canopy, which will lower energy costs during the summer and combat the urban heat island effect. ● The new requirement to increase the diversity of tree species for newly-developing sites to create a healthier and more diverse canopy. ● New tree mitigation policies to protect the existing tree canopy, as well as enhanced and clarified requirements for the protection of trees during construction. Consumption and Waste: We support… ● New incentives to encourage the adaptive reuse of buildings and avoid materials going to the landfill. ● New requirements for multifamily developments to accommodate recycling and compost from homeowners by dedicating equal area to landfill diversion (recycling and compost) as trash. Cars and EVs: We support… ● Reduced parking requirements for single-family, duplex, triplex, and fourplex homes to align with improved public transit and bike/ped infrastructure and reduced need for independent vehicles (owners can still choose to have more spaces available). ● The increase in both electric vehicle charging stations and EV-ready infrastructure within new developments to significantly reduce future costs. Walkable Communities: We support… ● New connectivity standards to provide clear and efficient walkability for people to access places of interest such as public transit, open space, and goods and services. ● Improved pathway designs to safely and comfortably accommodate all modes of active transportation. ● New standards to allow for wider and detached sidewalks in mixed-use areas and along main arterial roadways to increase pedestrian safety and comfort, allow for more shade from trees along sidewalks, and encourage more active modes of transportation to cut down on traffic congestion. ● Improved bicycle parking standards based on expected use rather than on the number of required parking spaces. ● New standards for limited, small-scale retail and cafes in residential neighborhoods for walkability and convenience. Water: We support… ● The requirement for new developments to have a certificate of assured water supply. ● Limits on the amount of grass that can be provided on developments.

● ● ●

Encouragement for the use of non-potable water for landscape irrigation whenever possible. Allowed use for xeriscape landscape designs, as well as other plantings that consume less water. Policies to encourage new developments to be focused in areas where there is existing public investment in water supply to ensure we are using our water efficiently.

Food Systems: We support… ● Requirements for pollinators and other native species in green and open spaces. ● Revised guidelines for the annexation and rezones of land to protect the continued operation of farmlands and rangelands. Buildings and Energy: We support… ● Allowances for more density when developments meet affordable and sustainable requirements. The sustainability provisions include clean energy sources, energy efficiency, and water efficiency. ● Requirements on building designs and lighting to prevent bird fatalities. ● Incentives for density, height, and parking in the zones where it makes sense for our community. ● Requirements for buildings in the Mixed-Use areas to be a minimum of two stories and not exceed parking requirements to ensure density is focused in the locations with the infrastructure to support density. ● Requirements for certain buildings to be placed adjacent to the street to create pedestrian friendly environments where residents can easily walk between businesses. ● Expanded availability of attached housing styles, which increase the energy efficiency of buildings through shared walls, heat capture by upper floors in cold months, etc. Affordability: We support… ● Policies that allow for more infill, covering critical housing gaps, such as the need for small starter homes for first time home buyers. ● Incentives that allow for multi-family homes (including duplexes, triplexes, and fourplexes) that gently increase density and increase affordability without altering the look and feel of neighborhoods. ● Policies that target density in mixed-use neighborhoods that are close to services and transit.

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

stevemcgold@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Steve McGoldrick <stevemcgold@everyactioncustom.com> Thursday, April 20, 2023 1:37 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Vote Yes: Zoning Code Rewrite

Dear Planning and Zoning Commission, I am writing to express my support for the Zoning Code Rewrite. The sustainability, affordability, and open space protections included in the new zoning code rewrite are exactly what Boise needs to plan for and address our rapid growth. Growth is inevitable, and we need a modern zoning code to ensure we are following the best practices to grow sustainably and responsibly. It has been clear that Boise City Staff have put in the effort to make an inclusive and extensive community input process to develop the zoning code our city needs and deserves. Boise has become increasingly unaffordable for everyone, especially for new home buyers, renters, students, low‐ income residents, refugee families, and elderly folks on fixed incomes. This code helps address those issues. I specifically appreciate that this zoning code protects our green spaces, improves our tree canopy, incentivizes energy and water efficiency that saves money over the lifetime of a home, allows for smart and targeted density, increases opportunities for multi‐family homes like duplexes, removes unnecessary parking space minimums, protects pollinators, and makes our communities more walkable and bikeable. I strongly encourage the Boise Planning and Zoning Commission to support this zoning code rewrite that staff and residents have spent so much time and effort to shape. Sincerely, Steve McGoldrick 440 E Provident Dr Boise, ID 83706‐6522 stevemcgold@gmail.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 4:47 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Gary McGrath gmacmcgrath@hotmail.com 2736 McKinney street Boise, ID 83704 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 9:00 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Donna R McKay boisedonna1@gmail.com 6249 W Cohiba Ln Boise, ID 83703 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Wednesday, April 19, 2023 1:03 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Christian McKenna Email christian.a.mckenna@gmail.com Address Boise Idaho 83703 Comment I would love to see this zoning change occur. More density is needed to reduce the sprawling growth and having small neighborhood coffee shops and such is a great way to have more folks in a neighborhood meeting and get to know one another a little more. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:19 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Keith McKenney steamfitter32@gmail.com 5000 W Hadlock St Boise, ID 83703 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Wednesday, April 19, 2023 9:20 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name James McKenzie Email jammck@gmail.com Address Boise, Idaho 83703 Comment I live in Northwest Boise in the Sycamore Overlay district area. Many years ago, our neighborhood worked with the city to preserve the semi‐rural character and lifestyle of our neighborhood and ensure that future impacts by greedy developers would be thwarted. I am concerned that the Boise rezone does not do enough to not preserve that character and lifestyle. We feel that the city leaders desire is for the city to grow without regard for the expense of the citizens. I have several concerns about the rezone Boise plans with regard to the R1‐A Large Lot zones and the lack of consideration of density, setback, and sufficient parking regulations when incentives for Triplex and Fourplex are involved. Triplex and Fourplex units are not consistent with the character and lifestyle of the R1‐A large lots, and the residents in large lot zones should not have to attempt to convince the city officials at a later time of this fact when developers, flush with cash decide to take over a large lot neighborhood. In the Zoning Code Rewrite document, it states that Overlay districts are intended to maintain the unique character of specific areas. It further states that in a conflict between Zone code and Overlay district that the Overlay district takes precedent. Case in point: The Sycamore Neighborhood Overlay (SC‐O) Purpose states that the purpose of the SC‐O is to preserve and encourage land use and development that is consistent with the semi‐rural, agricultural character and lifestyle of the Sycamore neighborhood. Does the SC‐O trump the ability to build Duplex, Triplex and Fourplex units within the Sycamore Overlay district? If not, then the code needs to be modified to ensure that the agricultural characteristics of the neighborhood are not sacrificed for the desire to provide dense, low‐ income housing through the incentive program. Another concern is the proposal to reduce the amount of parking as an incentive for denser housing. Lack of parking is not going to keep families from having multiple vehicles and then parking on the streets. Don’t pad the developer’s pockets at the expense of the residents by reducing the parking space requirements. If you want to see the effect of that type of policy, go to the end of Maple Grove after 7:00 PM any evening and try to drive through the neighborhoods, or check out Silver Street just off of State Street in the Collister area. The duplexes with single parking spaces have forced many cars to line and congested the streets. Please slow down and fix the issues before proceeding with the rezone plans. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

augustmckernan@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of August Mckernan <augustmckernan@everyactioncustom.com> Thursday, April 20, 2023 1:35 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Support the Zoning Code Rewrite, You Silly Goose

Dear Planning and Zoning Commission, I am writing to express my support for the Zoning Code Rewrite. The sustainability, affordability, and open space protections included in the new zoning code rewrite are exactly what Boise needs to plan for and address our rapid growth. Growth is inevitable, and we need a modern zoning code to ensure we are following the best practices to grow sustainably and responsibly. It has been clear that Boise City Staff have put in the effort to make an inclusive and extensive community input process to develop the zoning code our city needs and deserves. Boise has become increasingly unaffordable for everyone, especially for new home buyers, renters, students, low‐ income residents, refugee families, and elderly folks on fixed incomes. This code helps address those issues. I specifically appreciate that this zoning code protects our green spaces, improves our tree canopy, incentivizes energy and water efficiency that saves money over the lifetime of a home, allows for smart and targeted density, increases opportunities for multi‐family homes like duplexes, removes unnecessary parking space minimums, protects pollinators, and makes our communities more walkable and bikeable. I strongly encourage the Boise Planning and Zoning Commission to support this zoning code rewrite that staff and residents have spent so much time and effort to shape. Sincerely, August Mckernan 2203 W Kootenai St Apt 2 Boise, ID 83705‐5980 augustmckernan@gmail.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 6:47 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Clyde Mclain mclaincm@gmail.com 1997 N Highwood Ave Boise, ID 83713 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 6:55 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mark McLaughlin lmsuntrust@comcast.net 4637 North Arrow Crest Way Boise, ID 83703 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

Briceland McLaughlin <bricelandmclaughlin@gmail.com> Wednesday, April 19, 2023 11:11 AM ZoningRewrite [External] Zoning ReWrite - Neighborhood Cafe Feedback

Hello! My name is Briceland McLaughlin and I live at 5206 N Sunderland Dr in Boise. I am writing in support of allowing neighborhood cafes. I am in support because having small cafe locations in neighborhoods like mine would bring a little life to the area and it would be a lovely destination I could get to without a car. Currently, I cannot go anywhere without getting in my car and I really hate that, especially after living in south Boise where it was much more bikeable. I like the idea of having small businesses that are service businesses near me. Cafe are great, tiny grocery stores would be awesome, a little bakery‐ anything I could walk or ride to or throw kids in a wagon and walk to would be wonderful and really increase my quality of life. I also have a lot of older neighbors that I believe could really benefit from having an easily accessible destination in the neighborhood to just get out for an hour here or there. Thank you for your time! Briceland McLaughlin

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Thursday, April 20, 2023 2:18 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Ian McLaughlin Email imclaughlin30@gmail.com Address 5206 N Sunderland Dr, Boise, ID 83704 Comment I am in support of the new zoning code ordinance. As a member of the CAC (Citizen's Advisory Committee) for the Zoning Code rewrite, I got to see and experience first hand the conversations that led to the development of this document. While I don't believe it is perfect, I do believe it is a great starting point to prepare Boise to be a city of the future while retaining and adding to the character which makes it special. Here are a handful of reasons I feel the proposed zoning code has the City headed in the right direction. The more housing choices allowed by the new ordinance creates more options for people from all backgrounds and incomes. Both short‐term and long‐term housing is needed to build up housing stock and make Boise a city for everyone. People need to be able to live near the neighborhoods they work in to be in order to feel invested in their communities as well as reduce commutes. The allowance for small businesses in and adjacent neighborhoods further contributes to walkable neighborhoods. Many of Boise’s most desirable neighborhoods feature easy access to markets, coffee shops, and other small businesses which create an amenity for these communities. The focus of the new code on affordability is key for preventing some of the housing crisis we are seeing in neighboring communities in Idaho and nationwide. Creating affordable options for the service workers, teachers, and healthcare professionals is important to keeping our City running smoothly. Responsible and sustainable new construction will help promote the City we want and set us up for the future. The new ordinance incentivizes efficient construction practices and growth in parts of the City with access to transit corridors. I view the new zoning code ordinance as essential to coping with the change this City is experiencing. We can prepare for a future we want or ignore the issues and deal with the consequences in the future. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 9:46 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Cherol McMonigle clfletch3@yahoo.com 2701 Table Rock Rd Boise, ID 83712 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Sunday, April 16, 2023 8:10 AM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Holli Woodings, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Pat McMonigle p_mcmonigle@yahoo.com 2701 E Table Rock Rd Boise, ID 83712 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

mitchellmcnees@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Mitch McNees <mitchellmcnees@everyactioncustom.com> Thursday, April 20, 2023 4:32 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Please Support the Zoning Code Rewrite

Dear Planning and Zoning Commission, I am writing to express my support for the Zoning Code Rewrite, because I am concerned over affordable housing and property tax increases. Sincerely, Mitch McNees 2117 N 26th St Boise, ID 83702‐0228 mitchellmcnees@hotmail.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

scheribim@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Judy McRobert <scheribim@everyactioncustom.com> Thursday, April 20, 2023 11:21 AM ZoningRewrite [External] Support for the Zoning Code Rewrite

Dear Planning and Zoning Commission, I support the zoning code rewrite because planning for growth and development is essential. Sincerely, Ms. Judy McRobert 2063 W Pandora Dr Boise, ID 83702‐0262 scheribim@gmail.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Wednesday, April 19, 2023 9:19 AM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Jake Melder Email melder.jacob@gmail.com Address 2611 S Marlow Way Comment I appreciate the effort that has gone into this zoning code rewrite and bringing Boise's code up to more modern standards. I support this rewrite. I believe the Council should support it as well. The outreach the city staff has done has been phenomenal. The robust engagement has created dialogue and refined the proposed code to be more feasible and accepted by Boiseans today and into the future. While the numbers of those commenting may favor no change, I hope that does not dissuade councilmembers from making what I believe is the right choice and approving the proposed code. Those who are established in Boise are more likely to have the time and resources to protect their current situation. I understand change can be challenging and it brings reasonable concern. However, I am convinced the proposed code rewrite will unleash the power of the market to create more dwellings while preserving the Boise way of life so many of us love ‐ I believe in many areas it will even improve upon the good foundation we have today. This code serves not only those who are here today, but those who may call Boise home in the future. I have lived in Boise for the last ten years, moving here right after college to start my career. I have worked local jobs and done my best to contribute to the betterment of our community. For the last three years, I've been trying to buy a home in Boise to further put down roots. Unfortunately, the availability of starter homes at a price point Boise workers can afford do not exist. In large part, the outdated code we currently operate under has contributed to this affordability scarcity. Many of my friends and peers find themselves in the same position of wanting to buy but finding nothing. Simply put, the market is there for affordable units to be purchased by young professionals, entrepreneurs, and families, but the exclusionary zoning of single family homes or large apartment complexes prevents such homes from being built. If we fail to address the home affordability issue, we will lose and entire generation of Boiseans who will be forced to leave the area to build a life. I believe the proposed code rewrite will begin to chip away at this issue and slowly relieve the crisis. Thank you to the many people who worked hard for several years on this issue. I implore your support in passing this rewrite. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 6:16 AM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Ms. Lisa mendieta lisamendieta@outlook.com 8870 w mapleview cove Boise, ID 83704 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Wednesday, April 19, 2023 10:34 AM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Jacob Merten Email jakemer10@gmail.com Address 900 N Riviera Dr, Boise, ID 83703 Comment This zoning change is essential to improving affordability and walkability within the city. Boise is rapidly growing and if we do not act early we will pay for it later. I live in the Veteran's Park neighborhood which is Zoned R2. I chose to buy in this neighborhood for that reason. Because of this, I am able to rent out the ADU mother in law suite attached to my house to help pay part of my mortgage and I have neighbors who are building an ADU above their new garage to do the same. Another example includes my next door neighbor whose mother in law in getting old enough to require more help. They are thinking about knocking down their garage and building an ADU so that she can live with them but still keep her independence. There are a lot of benefits to easing zoning restrictions and as Gen Z and Millenials etc attempt to buy and start families in this city, having more units or a chance to rent part of the unit you live in creates more inclusion and flexibility of choice for citizens. I am pro re‐ zoning. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 8:37 AM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Debra Messenger debramessenger@gmail.com 7641 W CAMBRIDGE DR Boise, ID 83704 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Friday, April 14, 2023 6:30 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Michael Email lipple511@hotmail.com Address 773 S. Grayeagle Way, Boise 83712 Comment I completely support The city’s Upzone initiative. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Thursday, April 20, 2023 8:10 AM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Stephen R. Miller Email millerstep@gmail.com Address 1506 N 23rd Street, Boise ID 83702 Comment I write to offer my support for the new Boise zoning code. As a former P&Z commissioner, I am perhaps aware more than most that the city we live in has very little to do with the existing code. Most major housing projects‐‐ and by that I mean projects of more than 5 residential units‐‐require a planned‐unit development (PUD) permit. When a code relies so heavily on PUDs‐‐the "release valve" of zoning‐‐it's clear to me that the existing code isn't doing its job. And even those that like the city as it is probably don't understand that the city we have is the result of ad hoc, one‐off decisions pieced together in a "let's make a deal" fashion. Planning shouldn't be like that, and any sort of broad‐based development planning necessitates a code that actually addresses what the community wants. That eliminates process, it makes investment easier, and the community gets the benefits it states it needs in the legislative process. There are, however, missed opportunities in this draft. The processes of the P&Z, the appeals process, and the relation of procedure and parliamentary process should simply be spelled out in the code instead of hidden bylaws. Not permitting written comments on the day of the hearing is the kind of anti‐democratic process that alienates people from government. The processes for deferring a hearing by the P&Z are, simply, bizarre. It seems little attention was given to that process. It should be revisited because clearer process‐‐not always more‐‐achieves a democratic necessity of clarity in decisonmaking, eve when we don't agree with it. I also want to note that the kind of housing strategies proposed in the new code are typical of what environmentalists used to propose as anti‐sprawl. I don't know why anti‐sprawl language has gone out of fashion. But those who are willing to take a regional view of the valley have to understand that preserving farmland and access to outdoor recreational opportunities means that we need to use our existing infrastructure better. It is important that the city bear in mind the new literature showing that changing zoning codes alone seldom has significant effect on housing production. To solve the housing crisis, the city will need to partner with developers and the finance community to make it happen. That is a kind of collaboration that many local governments have yet to take on, but which Boise might be able to excel at given its small and often usually collaborative development community. Finally, it is incumbent on the development community to accept the code as it is and not seek endless PUDs and other exceptions to the new code. The code presents new opportunities in line with community values. To maintain trust, the development community needs to take what has been given and work as a partner; it will lose trust, and build a strong anti‐growth movement, to the extent it seeks endless revisions and special exceptions even after the new code is in place. 1

If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:59 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mike Mitchell mikewmitchell52@gmail.com 9495 Appling Dr Boise, ID 83704 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

mitchellkelsy@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Kelsy Mitchell <mitchellkelsy@everyactioncustom.com> Thursday, April 20, 2023 1:44 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Please Support the Zoning Code Rewrite

Dear Planning and Zoning Commission, I am a nurse and my husband is a Physician Assistant. These are jobs that I thought would lead to a prosperous life in Boise where we could afford a house that we are proud of. That is sadly no longer the case. We love Boise but if something isn't done to improve cost of housing we won't be able to stay here. That is unfortunately the case for many health care providers in Idaho. Sincerely, Kelsy Mitchell 2906 S Inglewood Rd Boise, ID 83705‐4628 mitchellkelsy@gmail.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Thursday, April 20, 2023 2:16 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name David Miville Deschenes Email david.miville.deschenes@gmail.com Address 406 N. Atlantic St. Boise Idaho 83706 Comment I am writing in opposition to the rewrite of the zoning code as it is currently being proposed. The messaging coming from the City seems to promise the world, but offers no realistic path to achieving it. For one, it gives the option, but does not require, developers to build lower cost homes on an existing site. I cannot understand why someone in the business of making money would choose to make less money. Building up and creating larger buildings does not by necessity create affordable housing. In this case, it does the opposite by driving up property values and taxes for all residents in the pursuit of maximizing profit on investment. Second, it allows developers to build extensively on a given site, reducing green space and destroying the integrity and safety of existing neighborhoods with additional street parking by new residents. Visibility for pedestrians, bicyclists, and drivers will become limited as streets appear in effect more narrow. This puts children at an exceptional risk, who do not play in their neighborhoods with the same mindset of adult drivers. Third, I oppose the zoning code changes because they shut the public out from providing input and testimony now available to them through public hearings. Residents spend a lot of time in where they live and not only know best how changes would affect their area, but have to live with the consequences of these decisions. Shutting us out from this process is unacceptable. Boise promotes itself as having a high ‘quality of life’, but how can this be measured? When I look out my window from my home on the bench, I see children on bicycles riding down the roads, owls in the trees calling to each other, neighbors who walk the streets and visit with each other casually, and calm, relatively quiet sounds allowing us to relax and recharge in the personal outdoor spaces in and around our homes. This is how I would define quality of life and it is certain to be lost to the current changes proposed by the City. It is my opinion that we look at zoning issues in areas of need as they arise, instead of applying these proposed changes so broadly. We need more time for public input and I ask that this process be put on hiatus until the residents of Boise have elected their new officials in November. Thank you for your time. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Deanna Dupuy From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Wednesday, April 19, 2023 4:20 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Fatuma Mnongerwa Email fatumamnongerwa@gmail.com Address 5885 W Grandview Dr Boise, ID Comment I support the Zoning Code Rewrite because people need homes and options. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 4:47 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Pamela Modeen tahoe.retreatslt@gmail.com 4669 N Arrow Crest Way Boise, ID 83703 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

molteneric@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Eric Molten <molteneric@everyactioncustom.com> Thursday, April 20, 2023 2:39 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Please Support the Zoning Code Rewrite

Dear Planning and Zoning Commission, I am writing to express my support for the Zoning Code Rewrite. The sustainability, affordability, and open space protections included in the new zoning code rewrite are exactly what Boise needs to plan for and address our rapid growth. Growth is inevitable, and we need a modern zoning code to ensure we are following the best practices to grow sustainably and responsibly. It has been clear that Boise City Staff have put in the effort to make an inclusive and extensive community input process to develop the zoning code our city needs and deserves. Boise has become increasingly unaffordable for everyone, especially for new home buyers, renters, students, low‐income residents, refugee families, and elderly folks on fixed incomes. This code helps address those issues. I specifically appreciate that this zoning code protects our green spaces, improves our tree canopy, incentivizes energy and water efficiency that saves money over the lifetime of a home, allows for smart and targeted density, increases opportunities for multi‐family homes like duplexes, removes unnecessary parking space minimums, protects pollinators, and makes our communities more walkable and bikeable. I strongly encourage the Boise Planning and Zoning Commission to support this zoning code rewrite that staff and residents have spent so much time and effort to shape. Sincerely, Eric Molten 1573 S Riverstone Ln Apt 203 Boise, ID 83706‐4085 molteneric@gmail.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:45 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Richard Montgomery ramonty@me.com 14244 W Comisky Dr. Boise, ID 83713 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 5:10 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Cathie Moore mooreidaho43@gmail.com 337 W. Thornberry Dr. Boise, ID 83702 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

Mark Moore <markmoore235@gmail.com> Tuesday, April 18, 2023 11:38 AM ZoningRewrite [External] ***ZONING REWRITE FEEDBACK***

Hello City of Boise,

Polling suggests that a majority of Americans believe their kids will be worse off than they are. They will leave a world for their children and grandchildren that is poorer, presents greater challenges to daily happiness and that is less appealing. There are many factors contributing to this sentiment at different levels of society. Here locally, the push by the Boise city council and mayor to get rid of pre‐existing zoning standards and protocols, in order to dramatically increase the population density in Boise and surrounding metropolitan area (Upzoning) is a perfect example of a set of policies that do not have widespread support, that the people do not want, and that will predictably make this area less livable and appealing for future generations. The proposed zoning changes are a slap in the face to the property owners and landowners in Boise, many of whom have lived here for generations. These hard‐working people had the reasonable expectation that their single‐family neighborhood was a single‐family neighborhood. That their kids could walk across the street without having to wade through a line of cars. That a business never intended for the neighborhood would go up across the street obstructing their view. That a population‐dense structure would be built next‐door to strain neighborhood resources, create noise or other pollution or ruin the long‐standing aesthetics of the neighborhood. Their concerns about the appearance of their property, the value of their property and their quality of life while using their property are completely valid concerns. Anyone who thinks the current zoning change proposals are a good idea either does not own property, does not have a family, or does not know the history of these kinds of zoning changes in neighboring states. Or perhaps they think their own affluence and influence will shield them from the worst effects of these policy changes. I pose the following question to the mayor and city council members ‐‐ how would you react if a large multi‐dwelling structure towering over your house went up right against your property line without any warning or notice? Would you like that? If not, then why do you want this for everyone else in Boise?

The Upzoning proposal in question will increase the population density in Boise while allowing mostly out‐of‐state developers and private equity to profit from it. They will follow profits and in the process will carve up this city in any way they see fit. They don't live here and won't care about the consequences. Will Upzoning changes decrease homelessness? No. Will Upzoning decrease crime rates? No. Will Upzoning make your commute faster? No. Will Upzoning make quality of life here in Boise better? No. In fact, Upzoning will make all of these things worse.

In my hometown of Kirkland, Washington just outside of Seattle, where I was born and raised, similar zoning changes resulted in dramatic changes to the level of congestion. The city is almost unrecognizable from when I grew up there. None of these changes are for the better. There is more homelessness, more crime and less local control over the appearance and usage of neighborhoods. The elimination of any kind of protection for single‐family dwellings leads to a crowded, hodge‐podge mess of a city that is less livable. 1

There are many inequalities in the larger society and here in Boise. For those that want to alleviate these inequalities and move us in a better direction, I strongly suggest taking a balanced approach that is rational and empirical. We do not need an ideological approach. We need an approach that balances the needs of everyone in the community, including not just the poor or those with tenuous housing, but the middle class, upper class, commercial interests and others. I think the best way to accomplish this is not to force divisive and utopian zoning policies on this community. It is better to take time, consider all of the options, and have a multi‐faceted approach. Hopefully one that does not reward some and punish others, but instead respects everyone in the community. ‐Mark Moore

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:20 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Richard P Morgan richpmorgan@gmail.com 1105 E KIMBERLEY LN BOISE, ID 83712 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Thursday, April 20, 2023 1:08 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Richard P Morgan Email richpmorgan@gmail.com Address Boise, ID 83712 Comment Please do NOT "up zone" our existing, residential neighborhoods! And keep the existing height restrictions in place! No one is in favor of multi story complexes being built next to their single story homes! Thank You! If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Friday, April 14, 2023 12:36 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Ms. Cheryl Renee Morris cherflu.art@gmail.com 3224 w. Edgemoor st. Boise, ID 83703 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

Eric Morrison <eric@alley.homes> Thursday, April 20, 2023 1:18 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Testimony on Zoning Code Rewrite: Embracing ADUs for a Diverse and Thriving Boise

To the Planning and Zoning Commission, My name is Eric Morrison, a proud Boise resident for six years and founder of Alley Homes, a company committed to providing affordable Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs). As a citizen deeply invested in our community, I submit this testimony in support of the zoning code rewrite, and particularly in easing size limits and removing deed restrictions for ADUs. I’m a Highly Sensitive Person, or HSP. If you’re unaware, HSPs make up 20% of the population; we’re wired to be more in-tune with sounds, lights, smells, and our general surroundings. Being highly sensitive makes living in most apartment buildings unpleasant at best, and excruciating at worst, due to the inescapable noise and chaos. That means 1 in 5 of our fellow Boiseans who live in these complexes are suffering immensely, and feel like they have nowhere to go. These buildings are a result of the current zoning code. In 2012, shortly after finishing school at BSU, I took a job in New York City. I was fortunate to find a stand-alone garage converted into a studio apartment—my sanctuary in the busy city. My time there showed me that even highly sensitive individuals can thrive in urban environments if provided with adequate living spaces. This experience has reinforced my belief in the importance of diverse housing options like ADUs. While ADUs are currently allowed in our city's zoning code, the restrictions in place severely impede their potential to improve the lives of homeowners and renters and address our housing crisis. To further support ADU development, it is crucial to consider the experiences of cities that have successfully implemented ADUs, such as Portland. In a consultation with Kol Peterson, a foremost ADU expert who has worked with dozens of municipalities, he emphasized that deed restrictions and size limits for ADUs greatly hinder their development. By increasing the allowable size of ADUs, we can provide a more diverse range of housing options that accommodate different family sizes, lifestyles, and needs. There are a variety of needs in a growing population like Boise’s, and our housing should reflect that. As you know, ADUs offer many benefits to both renters and homeowners. They provide affordable housing options for families, young professionals, and the elderly. They can also generate supplemental income for homeowners, offsetting rising property taxes and living expenses. This financial benefit can help preserve our neighborhoods' unique character. It’s common for neighbors to be concerned about Airbnb rentals. A recent UC Berkeley study found that only 8% of ADUs built since 2016 are used as short-term rentals. This suggests that the vast majority are, in fact, being utilized for their intended purpose: providing long-term, affordable housing options for residents.

President Theodore Roosevelt's admiration for Boise serves as a reminder of the potential we have to create a lasting, positive impact. In a speech during his visit to Boise in May 1903, he said, "I wish it were possible to take the whole city around on exhibition as an example from which many much older cities could learn.” Today, Boise is making national headlines, but not for the reasons he’d hoped. We’re on display as one of the worst cases of housing affordability in the nation. I don’t want this to be Boise’s legacy. It is time to adapt our zoning code to embrace “missing middle” development, including ADUs, as a vital part of our housing landscape. Let's create housing options that cater to the diverse needs of our growing community, including those of us who are highly sensitive. And let’s make Boise a shining example once again. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Eric Morrison

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 9:41 AM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. John Mosby jdmosby@acm.org 1316 E Franklin St Boise, ID 83712 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Deanna Dupuy From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Wednesday, April 19, 2023 6:26 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Leanne Moselle Email leannemoselle@gmail.com Address Boise, Idaho 83705 Comment I do not consent to any further advancement of this plan. The speed and lack of transparency is very suspicious. I understand the need for growth and change, but it should be carefully considered and agreed upon by the citizens of Boise, first and foremost, in conjunction with city government in an organized civil process. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 6:27 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Michelle Motta idahomotta@gmail.com 2220 W Madison Ave Boise, ID 83702 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 6:42 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Debra Mulligan mulligan_dd@hotmail.com 4270 S. River Falls Avenue Boise, ID 83716 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Wednesday, April 19, 2023 12:38 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Austen Myers‐Flachson Email austenc.id@pm.me Address Boise, ID 83716 Comment Finding adorable housing in Boise is an extreme struggle, especially for those with disabilities. We need more places to live and we need protection from greedy landlords. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 4:44 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Nancy Graham nannie8556@msn.com 2875 S Mayflower Way Boise, ID 83709 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Thursday, April 20, 2023 City of Boise, Planning & Zoning 150 N Capitol Blvd. Boise, ID 83702 RE: Updated/New Boise Zoning Codes One of the forefront missions of NeighborWorks Boise ™ is to provide high quality, affordable, sustainable, and community-focused housing in the Treasure Valley. Our Pocket Neighborhoods ™ grew out of a desire by many to move closer to where they work and play. They offer an innovative solution to higher-density housing. Affordable housing should not mean substandard housing. The model includes mixed affordability-with some market rate and some subsidized with grants and down payment assistance. Beyond the affordability of the purchase price, monthly cost are minimized through various energy-efficient construction methods. These single-family homes allow buyers to obtain their “American Dream” in a more compact setting within existing neighborhoods. As a non-profit organization we rely on various committees to oversee and support best practices of the organization. Our NeighborWorks Boise ™ Real Estate Committee holds a particular interest in the New Boise Zoning Codes and has taken time to review them closely. As it aligns with the vision, mission and affordable housing model NeighborWorks Boise™ created over 7+ years ago, The NeighborWorks Boise ™ Real Estate Committee reviewed the subsequent proposed Boise Zoning Code update and fully support its implementation, confident it will be of value to the community in accomplishing a more efficient and diverse housing environment to include: • • •

Bringing efficient development that encourages affordable and fair housing, add diversity and inclusivity with a variety of housing choices Reduce urban sprawl by increasing density to preserve natural areas, reduce environmental impact of development and increase economic growth Achieve an integrated approach to land use that improves public transportation, reduction in commute time, enhanced walkability, increased social interaction and improved access to public services

Strategies that we believe will be effective in welcoming and integrating these goals: •

Tying density incentives with requirement for affordability and sustainable design

3380 W Americana Terrace, Suite 120 Boise, ID 83706 Page 1 of 2

• • • • •

Reduced parking requirements and increased height allowances with requirements for affordability and sustainability Identify key areas for redevelopment near transportation corridors where infrastructure exists to support higher density Reduction in the approval time through P & Z for proposed developments to be able to build and make affordable housing options accessible to fulfill the need Will create a cohesive community and resolve areas being designated as stigmatized or “undesirable”, thus reducing social and economic inequality More flexibility to allow for purchase and rehab of existing single-family/multi-family units that are naturally affordable but in need of significant repairs to become livable, to be able to sell or hold them without penalties

Policy approaches to persuade harsh critics of policy changes and increased density and diversity: •

•

Education and Awareness: One effective policy approach would be to educate and raise awareness about the benefits of increased housing density and diversity in the community. This would include explaining how exclusionary zoning harms communities by limiting housing options, exacerbating inequality, and driving up housing prices. Incentives and Subsidies: Another policy approach would be to offer incentives and subsidies for developers and builders to create more affordable housing units in areas where zoning changes are being implemented. This could include tax breaks, grants, or other financial incentives to encourage developers to build affordable housing units. Community Engagement: Engaging with local communities and residents is crucial in order to address their concerns and gain their support for zoning changes. This could involve community meetings, public forums, and other events to gather feedback and input from residents about how they would like to see their neighborhoods develop. Flexibility and Adaptability: Flexibility in zoning regulations can be a powerful tool in addressing the concerns of critics of increased housing density and diversity. Allowing for different housing types, such as accessory dwelling units (ADUs), or permitting mixed-use development, can create more diverse neighborhoods while still preserving the character of the community. Collaboration and Partnership: Partnering with stakeholders, such as local governments, community organizations, and housing advocates, can be an effective approach to gaining support for zoning changes. Collaboration can help to build trust and establish shared goals, and can help to create a sense of ownership and investment in the process among all parties involved.

We are excited to share in the opportunities that the new zoning codes will provide, as it supports the vision we’ve been striving towards to achieve a better, more diverse, inclusive community. Respectfully submitted, NeighborWorks Real Estate Committee

3380 W Americana Terrace, Suite 120 Boise, ID 83706 Page 2 of 2

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

danielle nestor <danimaltech@gmail.com> Wednesday, April 19, 2023 7:49 AM ZoningRewrite [External] Zoning for cafes

I am in favor of neighborhood cafes in Boise. Dani Nestor Sent from my iPhone

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 10:02 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. DENNIS NIELSEN rootdiggertwo@hotmail.com 4107 Normandie Drive Boise Idaho, ID 83705 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 10:57 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Kate Nihipali katenihipali@hotmail.com 1631 E Seaport Ct Boise, ID 83706 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 11:08 AM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Ms. Gloria Nordin gjnordin@yahoo.com 3962 N Tamarack Dr Boise, ID 83703 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Thursday, April 20, 2023 4:26 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Mary Beth Nutting Email yayasis@live.com Address Boise, Idaho 83703 Comment I support the Zoning Code Rewrite. There are many reasons that I support the Zoning Code Rewrite, but the things that I most appreciate are the changes that will allow for mixed‐use areas. With the increase of our population in the city and the Treasure Valley, it would be beneficial in a multitude of ways, if people could walk/roll or bicycle safely to areas in close proximity to where they live that would fulfill their daily needs ‐ markets, cafes/restaurants, stores, etc. I appreciate the allowance for higher density areas. Again, so that people can live closer to transit lines and to destination spots (work, entertainment, stores). Please vote in favor of the Zoning Code Rewrite. Thank you for your consideration. Mary Beth Nutting If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 9:23 AM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Edward O'Brien edobrien3@gmail.com 3164 S Shortleaf Ave Boise, ID 83716 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

lkoesch4@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Lorren Oesch <lkoesch4@everyactioncustom.com> Thursday, April 20, 2023 4:28 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Please Support the Zoning Code Rewrite

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:20 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Mike Ogas michael.ogas@gmail.com 9923 W Hollandale Dr Boise, ID 83709 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 5:16 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. David Ogden dogden4066@msn.com 3353 S Chickory Way Boise, ID 83706 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:24 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Katherine Olson kathyolson88@gmail.com 4270 S Trailridge Ave Boise, ID 83716 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

1cleverchick@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Tracy Olson <1cleverchick@everyactioncustom.com> Thursday, April 20, 2023 9:27 AM ZoningRewrite [External] Please Vote Yes on the Zoning Code Rewrite

Dear Planning and Zoning Commission, I am writing to express my support for the Zoning Code Rewrite. The sustainability, affordability, and open space protections included in the new zoning code rewrite are exactly what Boise needs to plan for and address our rapid growth. Growth is inevitable, and we need a modern zoning code to ensure we are following the best practices to grow sustainably and responsibly. It has been clear that Boise City Staff have put in the effort to make an inclusive and extensive community input process to develop the zoning code our city needs and deserves. Boise has become increasingly unaffordable for everyone, especially for new home buyers, renters, students, low‐ income residents, refugee families, and elderly folks on fixed incomes. This code helps address those issues. I specifically appreciate that this zoning code protects our green spaces, improves our tree canopy, incentivizes energy and water efficiency that saves money over the lifetime of a home, allows for smart and targeted density, increases opportunities for multi‐family homes like duplexes, removes unnecessary parking space minimums, protects pollinators, and makes our communities more walkable and bikeable. I strongly encourage the Boise Planning and Zoning Commission to support this zoning code rewrite that staff and residents have spent so much time and effort to shape. Sincerely, Mrs. Tracy Olson 1562 E Sendero Ln Boise, ID 83712‐6693 1cleverchick@gmail.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 12:31 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Meg ONeal megoneal55@gmail.com 5757 N Fenwick Ave boise, ID 83714 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 4:34 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. robert Onsgard usfs789@gmail.com 1951 S Springbrook Ln Boise, ID 83706 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Deanna Dupuy From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments:

lmosbo@gmail.com Wednesday, April 19, 2023 3:29 PM Mayor McLean; CityCouncil; Timothy Keane; zoninginfo; ZoningRewrite [External] Oppose Boise Upzone oppose upzone boise letter 4 19 23.docx

April 19, 2023

To: mayormclean@cityofboise.org, citycouncil@cityofboise.org, tkeane@cityofboise.org, zoninginfo@cityofboise.org, zoningrewrite@cityofboise.org Re: Zoning Code Rewrite Public Comment for ZOA23-00001 & CPA23-00001 Dear Mayor, City Council, and Planning and Zoning Commission:

The City of Boise will consider a significant change to the local zoning ordinance, creating “upzoning” that, among other actions, will effectively eliminate “R-1,” zoning otherwise known as single-family home zoning. The proposed ordinance would allow up to a 4-plex to be built on an R-1 lot. The upzoning plan was in response to some in the City and the Council who incorrectly maintain that eliminating single-family zoning will create affordable housing. Their plan would allow developers and land speculators to build 4-plexes on almost any single-family home lot, and allows building by right (without public hearing) if certain design criteria are met. This plan offers no guarantees that any of the new housing will be affordable. The plan does not: 

Adequately assess impacts to existing infrastructure, their costs, mitigations and who is responsible for mitigation costs. (I can speculate who will pay – the existing homeowners! This cost should be borne by developers)



Address the damage to the fabric of existing R-1 Neighborhoods caused by the reduction of open space and the intangible issues that arise long after the developer leaves with the profits and city tax increases have been implemented. These intangible issues include, but are not limited to, traffic increase, parking issues, crime increase, more dog poop, diminution of property values, noise, light pollution, decline in neighborhood quality of life to name a few. These costs are born by the existing

residents who will remain. These same residents chose to pay the price to live in the suburbs to avoid high density/multifamily development housing and its downsides. 

Benefit those existing residents who have paid property taxes year upon year to maintain the standard of living that they want and chose.



Present how is this fair and equitable to existing property owners. It is silent under what conditions and authority the city can promote upzoning by right in existing zones. This encroaches our taxpayer rights. It does not identify appropriate mitigation measures for existing neighborhood residents.

There is an affordable housing crisis, no doubt. However, single-family homes are not the cause. Housing experts and builders agree that under the upzoning scenario, developers who buy an R-1 lot will not chose to build affordable housing on that lot. They will build larger houses or up to 4-plexes that will rent for top dollar. It will be the beginning of the end of resident owned single-family neighborhoods. The City of Boise has done some outreach on this issue. The outreach to date has been inadequate to let residents know what might happen to their neighborhood. I recently attended a HOA meeting and less than 10 percent of those in attendance had not heard about this. This is not acceptable. Our council members made community involvement and transparency key tenets of their campaigns. Why then, are they not making sure that every property owner in the City of Boise is informed about this important issue that will significantly affect our entire city forever? Perhaps this is an issue for property owners to vote on. The time is not right for this action. I demand that the City Council takes no action to change R-1 zoning. In addition, before any further action affecting any zoning changes occur, Council and the City must provide all of the following: 

Representation by Council members selected by the voters within their respective districts so their constituents’ views are represented to insure community involvement and transparency from government. This will take place in November, and is needed as some council members have been reported in the press to state the proposed plan does not go far enough and more density is needed.



Adequate notice to all property owners in the City, including internet, television, and postcard campaign. 2



Schedule meetings, workshops, and listening sessions in neighborhoods and community centers to provide clear explanations and the ramifications of changes. These meetings need to show the negative aspects of the upzoning, in addition to the positive assertions, so that City residents clearly understand what upzoning will cost in terms of intangible impacts and cost of decline in neighborhood quality of life.



Fact-based proof that eliminating R-1 zoning will increase affordable housing, including evidence from other localities that have implemented such changes.



Verifiable calculations of the impact on city infrastructure of any suggested zoning changes including sewer, water, electricity, parking, schools, and traffic.

Solving our affordable housing crisis requires thoughtful, effective, and community-building solutions. Let’s preserve single-family homes and existing neighborhoods and create opportunity for affordable housing for all. Regards, Leonard Osborne 12330 W Muir Ridge Dr Boise, ID 83709

Zoning Code Rewrite By Gregg D. Ostrow, AIA April 15, 2023 Clarification on the existing Zoning Code As you are aware, I have spent hundreds of hours reviewing and modeling the R1C zone in the proposed City of Boise Modern Zoning Rewrite (ZCR). I have sent in numerous documents to the city starting back in July of 2022 when the first public draft came out. My comments and suggestions have been ignored. One item that has been bothering me is the city stating that we are working with a 60-year old outdated code. This appears to be “fake news” to me. Here’s why: The zoning code has gone through numerous amendments over the years. Today, with the current zoning code, I can split my single-story 1.600 sf into a duplex and add an ADU for a total of 3 units. I can also add an additional 2,360 sf. to my house and still conform to the 55% lot coverage requirement. I will need to stay under 25 ft. due to the current height transition requirement next to single story homes, and will need to supply 375 sf. of open space for each unit in the duplex. I can also demolish my house and garage and construct the same duplex and ADU. Currently, I can provide 3-units on my property with no affordability or sustainability requirements that are required through incentives with the new ZCR. The ZCR incentives will allow me to put 4-units on my property. Here is a quote from the PDS-ZCR Modern Zonings Tip Card that was recently made public: “Right now, too many people are priced out of homes in Boise – our kids, returning home from college to start their lives in the place they grew up: our aging parents who want to downsize and still be close to friends and families; our workforce who teach our kids, change their tires, make their coffee. We need a modern zoning code that makes more housing types possible, that adds to the character of our neighborhoods, that creates opportunities for Boiseans of all income types. With new housing, at price points Boiseans can afford in the places that make the most sense, we will get more of the things that help us enjoy our lives.

The Rewrite Adoption Draft removed lot coverage and height transition requirements for Duplexes, Triplexes, and Fourplexes. I can now demolish my house and accessory garage and construct a duplex with units above 4,000 sf. and 40 ft. tall next to single-story homes. Even larger if a basement is installed. I feel the current zoning codes meet the goals listed in the PDS-ZCR Modern Zoning Tip Card that I previously quoted by: 1) Providing smaller duplex units up to 2,000 sf. 2) Providing an ADU up to the proposed 900 sf. I do not think the removal of existing homes and the construction of large 40 ft. tall structures with limited open space meets the city’s expressed goals. The large changes in the Adoption Draft leads me to believe that the process is being rushed and proper analysis of the changes has not been completed. I hate the term “fake news”, but I have to use it in this context. Sincerely. Gregg D. Ostrow, AIA

Page 2 2

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments:

Gregg Ostrow <geo@greggostrow.com> Monday, April 17, 2023 4:51 PM ZoningRewrite Drew Alexander [External] Please attach the following comments 4-24-2023 P&Z Presentation.pdf

To the record. Thanks!!

Gregg D. Ostrow, AIA 208‐866‐3168

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments:

Gregg Ostrow <geo@greggostrow.com> Wednesday, April 19, 2023 6:32 AM ZoningRewrite Deanna Dupuy; Drew Alexander; Byron Folwell; Deanna Smith; Sheila Grisham [External] Height Limits in the R1-C Zone 4-19-2023 R1-C Height Limits.pdf

Please add the a ached to the P&Z record. 1) You do not need to cater to the developers 2) Yes, I am running out of steam on this topic. Thank you for the opportunity to comment.

Gregg D. Ostrow, AIA 208‐866‐3168

Using height limits for 4-units or less in the R1-C zone to meet the city's goal of affordability and sustainability (All dwelling types with 4 -units or less have the same Use Specific Standards

3-Story Structures require a 1/2 level basement. Height Limit for pitch roof = 28'-0" to the eave and 33'-6" to the midpoint of the pitched roof. Height Limit for flat roof = 33'-0"

2-Story Structures Height Limit for pitch roof = 22'-0" to the eave and 33'=0" to the peak of the pitched roof. Height Limit for flat roof = 25'-6"

The goal is to create affordable and sustainable dwellings. Encouraging basements is sustainable. Providing the basement as an incentive to go 3-stories should be more affordable by making 3 - stories more expensive thus encouraging 2-story structures. This will also help with height transition next to single-story homes. There was a reason that the height transition was put in the current code. Removing it does not increase your density. It does create diversity with large units. You can still get 79% lot coverage with a 2 story structure. See sheet 2. Yes, this is lower than today's limit! But the goal is to provide affordability and sustainability!!!

Prepared by Gregg D. Ostrow, AIA 208=866-3168

2-Story Duplex on a 60 ft. X 120 ft. R1-C lot with an alley. Left Unit Area = 2,898 sf. Right Unit Area = 2,710 sf. Lot Coverage = 79.3% Floor to Floor Height = 12’-0” Building Height to peak of pitched roof – 34’-3” Open Space = 375 sf. per unit

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Wednesday, April 19, 2023 12:52 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Jared Ostyn Email ostyn@live.com Address 4211 W Fairmont Street Comment I support the zoning code rewrite as Boise deserves a modern vision for encouraging sustainable, human‐centric, car‐optional development. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 4:50 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Holli Woodings, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Michael S. Oswald michael@msochartered.com 2412 W. Bannock St. BOISE, ID 83702 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

ZoningRewrite From: Sent: To: Subject:

Ben Ovard <benovard@gmail.com> Tuesday, April 18, 2023 8:12 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Zoning rewrite

Hi, I am writing to express my support for the zoning code rewrite. Allowing for denser development, mixed use zoning, and neighborhood businesses are all great improvements that will make our city more livable, more affordable, and more environmentally friendly. I am strongly in favor of all of these changes and the rest of the zoning code rewrite. It is time to modernize the way we build our city and move away from old ideas from the 60's and 70's. I would like to see the zoning code rewrite go even farther in increasing density, but I am still very pleased with the current plan. I hope the zoning committee and city council will approve these changes to make our city even better. Ben Ovard

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:22 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Elizabeth Overcash lizzieo@mac.com 6826 E. Les Bois Street Boise, ID 83716 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Thursday, April 20, 2023 12:27 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Mary Overstreet Email maryodesign@yahoo.com Address 6620 Hummel Drive, Boise, ID 83709 Comment I am writing you today in support of the new zoning code ordinance (ZOA23‐0001 & CPA23‐0001). Boise is desperately in need of the code rewrite to stay in line with current zoning and housing needs. Please count this as support in the affirmative for the new ordinance. Thank you. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 9:33 AM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Patricia O'Brien trishbartobrien@gmail.com 967 E Parkcenter BLVD PMB396 Boise, ID 83716 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:09 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Ms. Marian L Packard mlpackard8@gmail.com 8484 W Holbrook Crt Boise, ID 83704 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 6:12 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. ELLEN PAGET ellen.d.connolly@gmail.com 1723 E. RIDGECREST DR. BOISE, ID 83712 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Thursday, April 20, 2023 4:15 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Emily Pape Email pape.emilyr@gmail.com Address 4106 W Irving St 83706 Comment Dear Planning & Zoning Commission, I am a lifelong Boisean, and I love my hometown more than any place else on earth. It is out of the love for this place and its people that I wholeheartedly support the new zoning code. Boise and its residents deserve more choices for housing, walkable and safe neighborhoods, affordable housing options, and sustainable and responsibly‐managed growth. The new zoning code puts us on the road of making those goals a reality. Boise has been growing for the past 150 years with little to no consideration for retaining open space, affordable housing, or transportation planning to accommodate growth like we are experiencing. The Boise zoning code has not been addressed appropriately for over fifty years. If this trend continues Boise will end up being just another North American city who turned a charming small community into a sprawling mess, like Phoenix, Denver, Seattle, and others. We can’t stop growth, but we can decide how we grow. Boise is in a unique position, compared to other North America urban centers, to address the oncoming growth and intentionally and methodically decide where this growth should best be directed and what open spaces need to be preserved, and how to contemplate a variety of housing choices for all ages and income levels. The current rezone proposed by city staff is comprehensive, very thoughtful and deserves your support. Of course there will be some unintended consequences and not all members of the community will support this effort. Putting it simply, we cannot use the rules of the past to build the Boise of the future. Higher density is absolutely necessary to slow the past practice of sprawling communities that require new infrastructure investment. Boise needs to grow more where this infrastructure is already in place. The proposed new zoning code provides for thoughtful design and putting the higher density where it belongs and allowing existing neighborhoods to retain their unique character and appeal. Please support this new zoning code effort. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:34 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Kacey Paporello kcjoypappy@gmail.com 3772 East Wormwood Court Boise, ID 83716 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Friday, April 14, 2023 10:25 AM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Richard Parker richard@raparkerholdings.com 1804 S Satellite Way Boise, ID 83712 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

Robin Parker <hugrobin@gmail.com> Tuesday, April 18, 2023 9:04 AM ZoningRewrite [External] Walkable bikeable neighborhoods!

I love the way the zoning code rewrite allows for neighborhood cafes! This will build character in our neighborhoods and increase the chances for community connections among neighbors. Walkable and bikeable neighborhoods reduce traffic and increase human interactions and exercise, leading to mental and physical health benefits as well as environmental benefits and boise reductions from reduced vehicle use. I believe Boise should have neighborhoods where residents can walk to a café, restaurant, and corner grocery store within 5 min. Thanks for the opportunity to comment, Robin Parker 2206 S Annett St, Boise, ID 83705

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

alli@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Alli Parker <alli@everyactioncustom.com> Thursday, April 20, 2023 4:30 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Please Support the Zoning Code Rewrite

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Thursday, April 20, 2023 2:32 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Aryan Parthor Email parthor.aryan@gmail.com Address 5358 N Blue Ash Pl, Boise, ID 83713 Comment I am in support of the zoning code rewrite. As a lifelong Boisean, I believe that we need to build more walkable communities and the changes proposed in the zoning code rewrite helps us achieve that. Thank you If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Friday, April 14, 2023 11:35 AM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Patricia Email pat77ent@gmail.com Address 433 S. Whisperwood Way, Boise, ID 83709 Comment I LOVE the idea of returning to the old‐style neighborhoods, putting goods and services where the people live. I would, however, want the commercial facilities to fit in with the neighborhoods. Let's return to using bus services, sidewalks, and walking paths, walking to where we need to go ‐ to small neighborhood stores and cafes, etc. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:54 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Amy Payn mapayn@gmail.com 4452 E Parkcenter Blvd Boise, ID 83716 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 7:55 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Ms. Martha Pearson pearsonmarty@hotmail.com 3314 W. Hillcrest Lane Boise, ID 83705 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 8:18 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Valerie Pease valeriepease@gmail.com 5626 S Zonetailed Way Boise, ID 83716 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 6:07 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Sherry Pence ajpence@hotmail.com 2738 E. Mendota Dr. Boise BOISE, ID 83716 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject:

l Pennisi <lppennisi@yahoo.com> Thursday, April 20, 2023 4:26 PM ZoningRewrite Mayor McLean; Jimmy Hallyburton; Timothy Keane; Holli Woodings; Luci Willits; Patrick Bageant; Latonia Haney Keith; Colin Nash [External] ZOA23-00001, CPA23-00001

Dear ZCR Team, My compliments to the team for their community meetings, impromptu meetings, and answering the many questions and concerns of residents. Often these meetings were after work hours and I appreciate giving their time to this process and residents. These are my brief comments about ZCR, how I see it affecting my West End neighborhood, and my general observations about the proposal. Diminished public participation in the process Process should always include input from impacted residents. Continue to use the existing notification process within the area of impact, usually within 300 feet of change. Any ZCR changes should favor residents over developers. Each neighborhood has its own character/flavor/quirks that developers (especially out-of-state developers) are not interested in preserving. Most developers don't live in my neighborhood, and from my interactions during past projects, they want to build their project and leave. Plus, they don't have to deal with problems or unintended consequences but the residents will. I do not understand why this ZCR puts more control and options to developers but not residents. And, does the City have a process for handling unintended consequences from developers? ZCR should also include design standards and requirements that match the existing character of the affected neighborhood. Even with today's process, there is not coordination or cooperation between P&Z and Design Review. This ZCR does nothing to fix that problem. Expanding allowed uses in R-2 zone will severely limit a resident's ability to comment and be effective in participating in changes in their neighborhood. Most of the West End was developed with standard 50 x 100 lots. This ZCR will allow minimum lot size of 25 x 100 (2500 sq ft). So is the intended effect to allow developers to buy single-family homes to demolish them, split the lot, and build 2 houses? Or, demolish two houses, join the lots, and then build a multi-family building? Either scenario would be allowed and would effectively change the West End neighborhood to something it was never meant to be. Past Results 1

Housing Bonus Ordinance was meant to solve housing problem by giving incentives to developers. Based on this article, the results fell far short of the goal. Only four projects take advantage of Boise's housing bonus ordinance a little over a year since approval Other cities have implemented upzoning with mixed results. How does the City of Boise know that this ZCR will have a positive effect? What happens if it doesn't? Are there are corrective action plans? What are benchmarks or goals to know that this ZCR is effective? How will success be monitored? How does P&Z know whether this proposed ZCR will accomplish the goals of housing types, adds character, and creates opportunities for all at all income levels? To date, in my neighborhood, projects focus on multi-family housing with medium density. Developers proposing these projects design them using the downtown buildings as justification for the same design in our neighborhood. There is no focus on character today and I do not see how this goal will be met based on the proposed ZCR. The current P&Z process and Design Review do not emphasize "character" and the ZCR does not include a process to consider "character" as stated in Modern Zoning Code flyer by the City of Boise. Allowed uses Changes to R-2 zoning will affect the West End neighborhood dramatically and not in a good way. I'm basing my opinion on the development that is in progress right now on 27th Street and the Jordan parcel. In both instances these projects dominate and change the neighborhood. Why is this necessary? The West End has a comfortable mix of apartment complexes, duplexes, multi-family housing, single-family homes, and small businesses. The additional 10 ft height allowance to 45ft (in R-2) would mean that these buildings would tower over existing single-family homes and change our suburban neighborhood into an urban center. That type of change does not look like progress to me. Campaign issue This ZCR draft should be voted on after November's election. This is a perfect campaign issue that allows candidates to debate and present their views to citizens. Thank you for the opportunity to share my opinions with the team. Lauren Pennisi 2411 W Pleasanton Ave

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:13 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Ms. Tina Peoples tinapeoples@comcast.net 4682 N. Eyrie Way Boise, Idaho, ID 83703 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 7:21 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Ms. Kathy Perez brain_gift.0@icloud.com 3404 N Hawthorne Dr Boise, ID 83703 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Wednesday, April 19, 2023 8:05 AM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Melissa Perkey Email perkey408@gmail.com Address 3421 n yonkers Comment Where is the affordable housing? If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 5:12 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Douglas Perkins perkinsc2003@gmail.com 7063 W Coho Dr Boise, ID 83709 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 3:31 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Nora Peters nlp81@hotmail.com 2023 travertine way Boise, ID 83712 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:47 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Amanda Peterson apetersonrd@gmail.com 5021 West Outlook Ave. Boise, ID 83703 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 11:24 AM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. James Phillips jamesphillipsboise@gmail.com 4301 W Quail Point Ct Boise, ID 83703 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 4:18 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Gary Pickens blackbear849@yahoo.com 9584 West Lorinda ct Boise, ID 83704 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Thursday, April 20, 2023 8:46 AM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Alexis Pickering Email alexis@alexispickering.com Address Comment Greetings, To stay true to our values of building a city that is livable and thriving for all, I deeply urge you to support the City of Boise Zoning Code Rewrite. The zoning rewrite is massively overdue and we need more flexibility to build all kinds of housing for folks and make it easier to build more housing where we need it. Living on the West Bench, you can see the impact of sprawl and lack of connections to other parts of town by bike or transit due to the growth patterns. Although some neighbors may disagree, we need more infill and density here to support the things we’re all clamoring for: local businesses to support, places for our kids, friends, and teachers to live, and a connected and buzzing part of town. The zoning rewrite will be a big step in realizing the vision so many of us have for our community. If passed, this zoning rewrite will make it easier for regular folks like me to maybe one day build a mother‐in‐law apartment for my aging parents (because they can’t afford to move here), or there’s an existing place for my son to live when he's grown. Right now, those two options are impossible. Our community has been on the front lines of the housing crisis and it would be a dangerous and short‐sighted decision to reject a tool we and other communities across the country know works to support and increase housing. We’re at a crossroads and I urge you to do the right thing, the smart thing, the common sense thing. Please support the zoning code rewrite so Boiseans can live here, stay here, and thrive. Respectfully, Alexis If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments:

Ken Pidjeon <COMMO23@msn.com> Thursday, April 20, 2023 3:43 PM ZoningRewrite [External] ZOA23-0001 & CPA23-0001 P&Z_Transit_MN.pdf

I request the following comments be entered into the record for ZOA23‐0001 & CPA23‐0001.

I am opposed to the proposed Zoning Code Rewrite as it is currently written. Both current and proposed densities, whether computed in dwelling units per acre or population per square mile, are far too high when compared to, say, the five boroughs of New York City ‐ the most densely populated city in the nation. I urge you to reject the current proposal and send it back for refinement, lower densities than currently permitted, and more direct public input for the following reasons. Boise has about 2,800 people per square mile, New York City (NYC) about 29,000 per square mile. Those numbers come from the 2020 U.S. Census. That Census data also notes Boise has about 2.37 persons per household but for easy math purposes lets call it 2. The current code, and proposed code, allows up to 43 dwelling units per acre (86 plus people per acre) in some cases. That equates to over 55, 000 people per square mile or nearly double that of NYC. Granted roads, open space (hopefully), other amenities, and other requirements will lower that 55,000 number but does Boise City, once proclaimed itself as one of the most livable cities in the nation, really what that type of density? As one who grew up in Philadelphia proper, I think not. Boise City recently approved three high density projects in the Vista Neighborhood, within less than a mile of each other, that equate to over 150,000 persons per square mile when extrapolated to a full square mile. Another proposed project on Federal Way proposes more than 80 units per acre, allowed under current and proposed codes, which equates to over 100,000 people per square mile when extrapolated. It is time to make both rational and realistic decisions about population density. 43 dwelling units per acre is neither rational nor realistic. Neither is unlimited density. What affect do these mind boggling densities have on schools, traffic, and neighborhood quality of life, etc? Shouldn't those factors be a consideration when determining density levels? Perhaps a dwelling unit number in the 10 to 15 range would be sufficient with allowances for higher densities in very limited areas. Dwelling units per acre in the 10 to 15 range are more than sufficient to support a transit system per St. Paul, MN Metropolitan Council guidelines (attached). And please do not use the excuse Boise needs even more density to support transit services. That’s simply not true. Boise Urban Stages (BUS), in the late 1970s, carried twice as many passengers, on a per capita basis, than the current VRT Boise operation does and BUS carried those passengers on a significantly less dwelling unit density than the current one. Number of routes and buses on the street were about the same as now. I know these numbers are accurate because I was the BUS Assistant General Manager at the time. 1

While I agree there is some correlation between dwelling unit density and transit ridership, I also would argue that the quality of transit service provided has a significantly greater affect on transit ridership than dwelling unit density alone. You can have thousands of people within a quarter mile of a transit line but if transit system service is perceived to be poor those folks aren’t going to ride the system unless they no other choice. Lastly, please have City planners provide all of us with a map showing the projected population density per square mile if the proposed code rewrite were to be adopted and what that density is now. The now numbers would be based on 2020 Census data. Thank you for considering these comments. Kenneth L Pidjeon 1829 W Canal St Boise, ID 83705

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Wednesday, April 19, 2023 12:22 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Sarah Email splate86@gmail.vom Address 1701 S Hervey Street, Boise Comment I support the Boise zoning code rewrite. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 4:37 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. John Pollard johnpollard4@hotmail.com 1756 S Magic Mill Pl Boise, ID 83709 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:31 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Anthony Poncia tonyponcia@gmail.com 4353 S Pinerest Way Boise, ID 83716 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Deanna Dupuy From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Wednesday, April 19, 2023 3:15 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Alastair Powell Email apowell856@gmail.com Address 9825 W. Caraway Ct., Boise, ID 83704 Comment I oppose rewriting the zoning code. I believe the code as currently written should remain intact. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

Larry Price <larry.rick.price@gmail.com> Tuesday, April 18, 2023 1:14 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Strong Support from Sunset!

I am writing to voice my strong support for the zoning rewrite. I live in the Sunset neighborhood and we have a complete lack of spaces where I can go to get to know my community in this area. Every business currently resides on State Street, which is wholly unpleasant to visit. Being on State Street, those businesses also fail to offer a "neighborhood vibe" as they appeal to a more general audience of commuters on that street. Boise will become a much more livable area if neighborhoods like mine are able to install cafes, lunch spots, and maybe even small grocers in the residential area. These changes will improve the walkability and bikeability of our neighborhood and decrease our car dependency (helping us reduce our carbon emissions!) Thank you for your time and your energy in this initiative. Larry Price 2608 N 31st St, Boise, ID 83703

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Thursday, April 20, 2023 2:10 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Ashley Prince Email ashlex.prince@gmail.com Address 1424 S Loveland St, Boise, ID 83705 Comment I'm writing in support of the Zoning code rewrite. As a renter, I believe strongly that the rewrite makes a bold step forward to help increase affordable housing. I'm hopeful that if the rewrite is approved, it would significantly increase my chances at finding and owning a home in the place that I know and love. Thank you If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

ZoningRewrite From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:27 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. William Proctor william_p_proctor@msn.com 10260 West Petearana Street Boise, ID 83704 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 8:24 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Richard C. Briggs rcbriggs4@gmail.com 1025 E. Congress St. Boise, ID 83706 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 8:55 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Holli Woodings, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Ricky O. Campbell rickc8185@gmail.com 1514 N. 9th St. Boise, ID 83702 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 6:26 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Rich Petersen r4rich@gmail.com 12774 W Goldenbrook Ct Boise, ID 83713 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 5:45 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Richard Shurtleff divotandme@gmail.com 8834 W Northview Street Boise, ID 83704 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Deanna Dupuy From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Wednesday, April 19, 2023 3:19 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Rachel Email Address Comment I would like to see the city zoning support density in downtown Boise and affordable housing throughout the city. I want policies that mitigate sprawl and protect important historical buildings and landscapes, and I am fine with taller buildings as long as they are affordable for people who work in the area. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:04 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Ms. Shelby Rallis srallis111@gmail.com 1204 W Highland View Dr Boise, ID 83702 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:19 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Julie Randall julie.randall77@yahoo.com 3805 W. Taft st Boise, ID 83703 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Friday, April 14, 2023 10:18 AM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Lacey Raphael lacer_888@yahoo.com 2840 W Lemhi St Boise, ID 83705 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

ZoningRewrite From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Tuesday, April 18, 2023 10:06 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Jay Rasgorshek Email jrasgor@gmail.com Address 2839 Venus Pl, Boise, ID. 83704 Comment My name is Jay Rasgorshek. I live in the Winstead Park neighborhood and I am writing in to voice my opinion In support of the zoning rewrite. I am a scientific illustrator and am quite active in the local art, science and service communities. Many of my peers are being priced out of living in their home town of Boise and leaving the city/state at an alarming rate. The same can be said by my two teaching friends. This is quite scary as I consider the arts to be the soul of the community.. (Blues=Orleans, Classic House=Chicago etc) Without the soul of the city, what is keeping people here? If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

jrasmussen9999@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Lee Rasmussen <jrasmussen9999 @everyactioncustom.com> Thursday, April 20, 2023 2:37 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Please Support the Zoning Code Rewrite

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:11 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Ms. Emily Reaves 08‐plural‐border@icloud.com 2709 E Migratory Dr Boise, ID 83706 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Wednesday, April 19, 2023 9:54 AM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Reed Email lobby.wag_0w@icloud.com Address Boise, ID 83716 Comment I’ve lived in Boise for a little over a year and am renting in an apartment complex. I’m a single 24 years old and work full time for a Fortune 500 company, and I honestly feel like I’ll never be able to afford a house in Boise on a single income. Personally, I believe we need to balance protecting our foothills/trails with developments, and I do agree with increasing the density of dwellings per acre. Boise homes tend to be larger, and with changing family dynamics, I think we need to change our focus to smaller family homes in a non‐condo format (townhome style is fine, just less apartment/condo style—if more private single/double garages were added to condos, I would be more open to this). Right now, I feel like a lot of the new homes have 3‐4 bedrooms; why not put a little more emphasis on 2‐3 bedrooms homes? This will allow younger individuals an opportunity to afford an appropriately sized home while also enabling the community to fit more homes on a plot of land. When doing this, I think it will be important to balance this with amenities. My mind goes to more of the Bown Crossing/Harris Ranch Area that I view as an oasis: local restaurants, convenient shops, and walkability. Also focus on cleaner energy (solar panels on homes). I spend a lot of time in Park City (Kimball Junction), and I think the development team(s) did a very good job there with balancing home size with parking/garage options while being surrounded by conveniences and trails. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Thursday, April 20, 2023 4:29 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Zach Reider Email zreider@gmail.com Address Boise, ID 83706 Comment I'm writing in support of Boise's Modern Zoning Code Rewrite. As someone who was born and raised in Boise, I'm proud to call Boise home. But I'm concerned at the lack of affordable housing options and increasingly worried that I'll never be able to afford a house here. Our zoning code is long overdue for a rewrite, and it's time we get serious about housing affordability for all residents. The rewrite will support complete, walkable neighborhoods and ensure we grow sustainably and responsibly for years to come. Please pass Boise's Modern Zoning code. Thank you! If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Friday, April 14, 2023 3:08 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Robert Reiner rreiner006@gmail.com 3932 W Quail Ridge Dr Boise, ID 83703 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:45 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Ms. Kali Reno kali.a.reno@gmail.com 10747 W Irving Ct Boise, ID 83713 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

ZoningRewrite From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Tuesday, April 18, 2023 8:28 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Jeff Reynolds Email thinkjeffthink@gmail.com Address Boise, ID 83702 Comment In general, I support the code rewrite... but we need to maintain strict standards in character overlay districts. Do not lose the character, especially historical character — we can never get it back. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:13 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Steven Rice riceclan0@msn.com 5907 W. Elmer St. Boise, ID 83703 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

joolierichy6@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Julie Richardson <joolierichy6 @everyactioncustom.com> Thursday, April 20, 2023 10:35 AM ZoningRewrite [External] I support the zoning code rewrite

Dear Planning and Zoning Commission, I'm writing to you today because I'm in favor of Boise's new zoning code rewrite. This is because I care about walkable communities! Sincerely, Ms. Julie Richardson 2027 W Pandora Dr Boise, ID 83702‐0262 joolierichy6@gmail.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:34 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Luci Willits, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Cindy Ries vote4annexation@hotmail.com 12285 W. Ginger Creek Dr. Boise, ID 83713 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:06 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Rob Rinard rjrinard7905@gmail.com 6231 W Edgewater Dr. Boise, ID 83709 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Deanna Dupuy From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Wednesday, April 19, 2023 8:02 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Jake Rippert Email jakerippert@u.boisestate.edu Address 4488 e arborvitae dr Comment We need less people and housing ‐ more restaurants and commercial spaces. If the population and housing goes up, it will be unlivable and expensive instead of just expensive. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:48 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Stanley Roach sdjroach@me.com 2203 W State Street Boise, ID 83702 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:39 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Bob Roark bobroark36@gmail.com 12371 w Edna Dr Boise, ID 83713 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 4:41 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Kathleen Robinson katrobin@live.com 11667 W Abram Ct Boise, ID 83713 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Thursday, April 20, 2023 1:58 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Jenna Rodrigues Email jenna.r.rodrigues@gmail.com Address Boise, ID 83705 Comment I support increased density in Boise to help accommodate the population growth of our region and to help residents have greater access to housing within city limits. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:05 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Zachary Rodriguez zrexrodriguez@gmail.com 301 ruby street boise, ID 83705 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:34 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Danita Rodriguez danitarod@hotmail.com 6656 W Hammermill Dr. Boise, ID 83714 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

Shellan Rodriguez <shellan@smrdevelopment.com> Wednesday, April 19, 2023 12:18 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Support of zoning code

Good A ernoon, I am wri ng in support of the new zoning code ordinance. As a member of the Ci zen's Advisory Commi ee, and an affordable and workforce housing developer and consultant, I think the code is step in the write direc on. It is certainly not perfect, but I do not believe a “perfect” zoning code is possible, there are simply too many diverging perspec ves and opinions when it comes to land use. This modernized code is a step in the right direc on for our community as it does the following: 1) Allows a range of housing types around Boise. (Boiseans need be er access to all types of housing in order to create affordability overall. Zoning, by itself will not create affordable housing, but the code does provide incen ves for affordable housing). 2) This code enables density in strategic areas‐ i.e., transit corridors with access to services. This is cri cal. 3) This code provides a path for neighborhood commercial to exist. 4) From a mul family residen al developer’s perspec ve this code provides more certainty for neighbors and developers alike, which is valuable and saves everyone me and money. In the event you are seeking modifica ons ‐ a few you may want to consider are as follows: 1) Include incen ves specific to sustainability – i.e., if you are Net Zero or mee ng other intensely sustainable/ efficient measures you can get addi onal units, more height, less parking, or fastpacked. 2) De‐couple affordable incen ves from sustainability incen ves to be er incen vize both. This relates to the item above‐ there should be separate incen ves for the development of highly sustainable buildings as well as incen ves for truly affordable housing. Currently the incen ve is a package deal and, arguably, decreases the “value” of both incen ves making them harder to u lize. 3) Large daycares are not an allowable use in many zones, perhaps revising the defini on of large daycare from 25 kids to 50 is reasonable. Thank you for your public service and thank you for considering my comments. I support the adop on of the new zoning code as is currently dra ed or with modifica ons generally described above. If possible please confirm your receipt. Shellan M. Rodriguez SMR Development (406) 531-0401 www.smrdevelopment.com

Deanna Dupuy From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Wednesday, April 19, 2023 8:56 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Jaret Rogers Email jaretrogers@gmail.com Address 650 E. Gentlewind Ct., Boise, ID Comment There's a reason Boise is a desirable place to live, and this proposal will take away much of the charm that the city has. I am strongly against this proposal and believe that you should maintain the character of the city, and not open it up to unchecked high density development. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Wednesday, April 19, 2023 2:37 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Dana Rommerdahl Email drommerdahl@gmail.com Address 7810 Wesley Drive Comment I am largely in support of this code for our community as it does the following: Allows a range of housing types around Boise. (Boiseans need better access to all types of housing in order to create affordability overall. Zoning, by itself will not create affordable housing, but the code does provide incentives for affordable housing). This code enables density in strategic areas‐ i.e., transit corridors with access to services. This code provides a path for neighborhood commercial to exist. This code provides more certainty for neighbors and developers alike, which is valuable and saves everyone time and money. Please consider the following modifications: Include incentives specific to sustainability – i.e., if you are Net Zero or meeting other intensely sustainable/ efficient measures you can get additional units, more height, less parking, etc De‐couple affordable incentives from sustainability incentives to better incentivize both. This relates to the item above‐ there should be separate incentives for the development of highly sustainable buildings as well as incentives for truly affordable housing. Large daycares are not an allowable use in many zones, perhaps revising the definition of large daycare from 25 kids to 50 is reasonable. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Friday, April 14, 2023 10:54 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Darlene Root darlene@fkroot.com 10270 W Shiloh Dr Boise, ID 83704 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Deanna Dupuy From: Sent: To: Subject:

chip.roser@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Louis Roser <chip.roser@everyactioncustom.com> Wednesday, April 19, 2023 6:17 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Please Vote Yes on the ZCR

Deanna Dupuy From: Sent: To: Subject:

mtnrosser@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Michael Ross <mtnrosser@everyactioncustom.com> Wednesday, April 19, 2023 4:33 PM ZoningRewrite [External] I Support the Zoning Code Rewrite

Dear Planning and Zoning Commission, I am writing to express my support for the Zoning Code Rewrite. The sustainability, affordability, and open space protections included in the new zoning code rewrite are exactly what Boise needs to plan for and address our rapid growth. Growth is inevitable, and we need a modern zoning code to ensure we are following the best practices to grow sustainably and responsibly. It has been clear that Boise City Staff have put in the effort to make an inclusive and extensive community input process to develop the zoning code our city needs and deserves. Boise has become increasingly unaffordable for everyone, especially for new home buyers, renters, students, low‐ income residents, refugee families, and elderly folks on fixed incomes. This code helps address those issues. I specifically appreciate that this zoning code protects our green spaces, improves our tree canopy, incentivizes energy and water efficiency that saves money over the lifetime of a home, allows for smart and targeted density, increases opportunities for multi‐family homes like duplexes, removes unnecessary parking space minimums, protects pollinators, and makes our communities more walkable and bikeable. I strongly encourage the Boise Planning and Zoning Commission to support this zoning code rewrite that staff and residents have spent so much time and effort to shape. Sincerely, Dr. Michael Ross 4636 N Torridon Way Boise, ID 83702‐1672 mtnrosser@yahoo.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Wednesday, April 19, 2023 11:12 AM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Josh Rothbard Email josh.rothbard@gmail.com Address Boise, ID, 83712 Comment In a city of never ending sprawl and insane housing cost increases it is remarkable to see that the most desirable places to live are consistently those with the most multi family housing and smallest minimum required land lots for development. By implementing up‐zoning policies that allow for more homes to be built in smaller spaces we can directly affect the supply and demand to lower the price of housing and make it more equitable for those who wish to walk, bike, or use public transportation as their primary mode of transit. Those who appose adding additional housing clearly already "have theirs" and are only looking out for their best interests, not those of the community. A rising sea lifts all ships. We must rise the sea for all with more equitable access to housing, not just single family zoning. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 6:07 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Thomas Roush tomroush2@icloud.com 1967 S. Springbrook Lane Boise, ID 83706 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:53 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Sharron Rovedo peeling_oldies_0l@icloud.com 8515 W Pocono St. #101 Boise, ID 83714 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Wednesday, April 19, 2023 9:24 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Ashton Rowles Email ashton@canyondata.tech Address Meridian, ID 83646 Comment The city has long outgrown the previous zoning code, which was implemented in a different generation. It’s like insisting on using a typewriter while there are modern computers available or going going elk hunting with a .22 caliber. It’s just not going to get the job done. Just like the science of farming has taught us how to better keep soils rich and replenished long‐term, the science of urban planning will assure the city is equipped to deal with the future human beings that will undoubtedly show up on our doorstep. Any citizen, regardless of political persuasion, ought to be able to lift their head up once in a while and realize there is a smarter way of doing things. Refusing to change the zoning code will not keep people from moving to Idaho. But it will manage traffic, make better use of our community resources, and make us more competitive long term. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 12:06 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Anne Ruark aruark@msn.com 3122 N Sycamore Dr Boise, ID 83703 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Wednesday, April 19, 2023 10:12 AM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Josh Email joshrussellmail@gmail.com Address Boise, ID 83706 Comment If we don't let supply increase to meet demand in the walkable/bikeable downtown cores of the Treasure Valley, the only supply increase will be out in the suburban sprawl, and the whole region will see more traffic, pollution, open space destruction, and travel costs while central housing becomes even more costly. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 4:24 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Judy Rust judyrust89@gmail.com 6005 S. Wallflower Pl Boise, ID 83716 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 5:05 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Michael Ryan mtrcircle@gmail.com 2803 N. Tamarack Dr. Boise, ID, ID 83703 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Thursday, April 20, 2023 11:19 AM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Joel Ryman Email Joel@gatesofhope.com Address Boise, Idaho, 83714 Comment Dear Planning & Zoning officials, I appreciate the platform to voice my approval of the much needed zoning rewrite. I am in favor for the following reasons: 1. It allows for more creative solutions to the housing crisis 2. It promotes collaboration 3. It gives homeowners more power to use their property for the good of others 4. It has the tenants of smart growth with density along transit corridors 5. It promotes diverse housing options which in return promotes social capital and strengthens the fabric of our community 6. It promotes walkability and relational connectivity via neighborhood cafes 7. It streamlines the process for smart growth instead of acting as a barrier 8. Its human‐centric and not car‐centric 9. It gives legs to a culture of hospitality and kindness that I want to be a part of 10. And most important it promotes AFFORDABILITY! Thank you for all you do! Seriously, I know it's not easy. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Deanna Dupuy From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Wednesday, April 19, 2023 7:42 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Sally Mitchell Email mitchellluck@gmail.com Address 8454 W. Rifleman St. Comment It's time to make Boise a more walkable, affordable, and liveable city. Mixed use areas and affordable housing are key. I've owned my townhouse for 21 years and I've never been able to move because I can just barely afford it (about $800/month). We need to find a way to prioritize families that need housing and limit fat cats who want to snatch up investment properties. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:04 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Ms. Shelby Rallis srallis111@gmail.com 1204 W Highland View Dr Boise, ID 83702 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 8:57 AM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Sharon R Walker sharonwalker53@gmail.com 11900 W. Blueberry Court Boise, ID 83709 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Deanna Dupuy From: Sent: To: Subject:

sawhite500@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Scott White <sawhite500 @everyactioncustom.com> Wednesday, April 19, 2023 6:43 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Please Vote Yes on the ZCR

Dear Planning and Zoning Commission, I am writing to express my support for the Zoning Code Rewrite. Boise is at a crossroads of sorts ‐ we used to be a small Western city that didn't have to manage traffic, affordability, and environmental impact as much places like SLC or Denver. We are now becoming a major metropolitan valley that needs to grapple with the issues of our larger peers. Boise does not have to look like Phoenix or Denver. We have a choice to make it walkable, rideable, liveable, and affordable with smart policies about residential density, carving out room for affordable housing in the heart of the city, and making it not just possible but attractive to move through the city without a car. We also have an incredible collection of natural "attractions" ‐ from the river to the hills and our amazing park system in between. I've lived here for the better part of 30 years. I've also been fortunate enough to be temporarily work in Spain for 2 of the last 8 years. During my time abroad, in a city of 4 million people, I literally NEVER got in my car during the work week. I took a train and a bus to work (a 25 mile round‐trip), walked for all of my basic daily needs for groceries and other necessities, and only took the car out of the garage for weekend outings. I try to emulate that lifestyle here in Boise, but there are many practical barriers. I highly encourage the committee to think first of what a city experience might look like where the majority of people didn't have to get behind the wheel multiple times per day and where the zoning provisions encourage density and mixed use developments within the geographical footprint of a small city. The quality of life benefits are massive, and it automatically plays into a lower carbon footprint for the city. Boise can be an exceptional exception to the Western rule if we get in front of it BEFORE we are too far down the typical sprawl mentality of the typical Western American metropolis. I recognize that there are a lot of cultural and administrative headwinds to bucking the status quo, but I believe this city is up to the challenge. Thanks for being visionary! Scott Sincerely, Mr. Scott White 102 E Crestline Dr Boise, ID 83702‐3022 sawhite500@hotmail.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 9:56 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Dennis Sager seagriz@gmail.com 25 S Wallace St Boise, ID 83705 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 12:07 AM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Chris Sala chrissala80@gmail.com 3073 N. Five mile rd. Boise, ID 83713 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

Eli Sanders <eli.b.sanders@gmail.com> Friday, April 14, 2023 8:34 AM Eli Sanders; CityCouncil; Holli Woodings; Jimmy Hallyburton; Luci Willits; Mayor McLean; Patrick Bageant; Timothy Keane; zoninginfo; ZoningRewrite [External] Zoning Code Rewrite Public Comment for ZOA23-00001 & CPA23-00001

Dear Mayor, City Council, and Planning and Zoning Commission: Please reject the Zoning Code Rewrite. The zoning code rewrite only benefits the economics for out‐of‐state, deep‐pocketed developers, while destroying the character of single‐family neighborhoods for hard‐working Boise families. The tax base (i.e. the hard working, taxpaying Boise citizens) will leave Boise in droves if ill‐advised, one‐sided plans like this zoning rewrite are passed. Failing cities like Seattle, that passed similar zoning rewrites, are losing tax paying families as their neighborhoods have been destroyed by similarly failed rezoning policies. Do you want Boise to be like Seattle? Would you want a towering, multi‐unit apartment building with zero parking to tower over your residence? Most Boise citizens would answer 'no' if they were fully informed of the consequences of the proposed re‐write despite what the City of Boise staff are publicly suggesting. Please abandon this ill‐advised proposed zoning rewrite. Additional considerations are noted below. Sincerely, Eli Sanders 1607 N 14th St, Boise, ID 83702 The process of writing this code has occurred without widespread public input as a top‐down effort, and neighbors have been left in the dark about its impacts. The majority of Boise citizens did not ask for these changes. The City has yet to directly tell the public how dramatically their neighborhoods will change due to the Boise Zoning Code Rewrite (ZCR). No prototypes showing “worst case” scenarios of infill in neighborhoods have been shown to the public so they may ascertain the impact on their homes. Now, in a very short period of time, the public must decode over 1000 pages of the ZCR and a Comprehensive Plan amendment without any guide to exactly what has changed from the current code. A city council vote on the Zoning Code Rewrite must fully represent the voters instead of using appointed members of the city council. One‐third of the city council will be appointed instead of elected, deciding the fate of the Zoning Code Rewrite a few short months before the November election. Only duly elected representatives should decide what to do about the ZCR. Proceeding to a decision with mayoral appointees is anti‐democratic in principle, especially given the sweeping changes contemplated for a city council decision. Moreover, the final ZCR draft was only recently released. As citizens begin to learn and rush to learn how their neighborhoods will be affected by such a ZCR, the need is clear: this radical zoning change for the entire city requires a vote by everyone affected by the ZCR to decide who should decide the fate of the ZCR. 1

If implemented, the Boise Zoning Code Rewrite (ZCR) will worsen our lack of affordable housing. 77% of the City’s identified need for additional housing is for those who make 80% of the median income (City of Boise Housing Needs Analysis, 2021) while “affordability” incentives in Boise's largest zone (R1‐C) only provide a small number of homes for those making 120% AMI (Area Median Income). By increasing density allowances, the new code incentivizes the redevelopment of existing affordable housing without any requirement to replace it. The result will be gentrifying existing neighborhoods with market‐rate or above‐market‐rate multi‐units. Reducing the minimum lot size in R‐2 and R‐1C planning zones will not necessarily contribute to housing diversity nor affordability. High‐density housing does not lead to affordability. If this were true, apartment rents in Boise would all be affordable. Additionally, the proposed fifty‐year deed restriction on maintaining a dwelling unit as affordable is only enforceable if a special compliance office with enforcement authority is established. New development standards will destabilize existing neighborhoods. Reducing lot sizes in R‐1C and R‐2 encourages lot splits and incompatible infill much denser than existing neighborhoods, destabilizing them and breaking faith with neighbors who believed the neighborhoods they were buying into were stable. Many of these areas are in parts of the city designated as “stable neighborhoods” in Blueprint Boise. Raising the height limit in residential zones will radically change the character of neighborhoods, reducing privacy, sunlight, and vegetation. Increasing housing density in the neighborhoods will contribute to increased congestion, traffic, on‐ street parking, and safety hazards for children and individuals with accessibility limitations. Changes to the Boise City Zoning Code should be written to protect neighbors rather than to destabilize their neighborhoods. Boise’s R‐2 zone has been re‐conceived as a higher‐density apartment zone similar to today’s R‐3 zone. The East End, the old South Boise neighborhoods off Broadway, most of State Street, the Pleasanton neighborhood west of downtown, and established neighborhoods of the near Bench, among others, are envisioned to transform into highly urban areas with four‐story buildings and no limit on density. These areas are currently single‐family, mixed with duplexes and small apartments. Medium‐density neighborhoods like these now contain many more dwelling units than suburbs, often from ten to 15 dwelling units per acre. Other areas – especially those south of Boise State University ‐‐ also bear a high‐density burden in vehicles, noise, and short‐term occupancies; the ZCR exacerbates those problems. Neighborhoods near Fairview, State and Vista will become unrecognizable. The proposed code would rezone neighborhoods within 660 feet (about two blocks) of those corridors from R‐1 to R‐2 with 45‐foot height limits and no limit on density, destabilizing modestly scaled interior neighborhoods. Instead, higher‐density development should happen only on the corridors themselves with strict step‐down height standards to the existing neighborhoods. Owner occupancy for homes with ADUs will be removed and allowed ADU size will be increased. Today, a home with an accessory dwelling unit must have owner‐occupancy of at least one of the two units. The new draft eliminates the owner‐occupancy requirement for accessory dwelling units if one of the units is affordable. Boiseans loudly defended owner occupancy in a recent attempt by the City to eliminate it. This change will destabilize neighborhoods by creating de‐facto duplexes in areas where they are not now allowed, de‐ incentivize homeownership, increase commercialized short‐term rentals, and promote renting by the room in existing single‐family houses. In addition, increasing the allowable size of an accessory dwelling unit from 700 to 900 square feet reduces livable green space. It essentially allows for building a second house in the backyard of an existing home. Under the current zoning code, ADU applicants must provide proof of owner‐occupancy on the property. However, it does not appear that adequate procedures are in place to ensure that the owner is actually occupying the dwelling. Lack of owner occupancy is widespread now. Why should Boiseans be confident that the City will enforce new standards that require affordability? 2

The ZCR does nothing to incentivize homeownership. Instead, the Boise Zoning Code Rewrite (ZCR) should incentivize the sale of individual units of cottage developments and other higher‐density diverse housing (e.g. halves of duplexes, condos rather than apartments, etc.) to encourage owner‐occupied housing and more resilient neighborhoods. The ZCR encourages higher density in historic districts. Except for homes that are currently recorded as “contributing,” redevelopment and or demolition of non‐contributing homes in Historic Districts under the Boise Zoning Code Rewrite (ZCR) will encourage higher density units with modern designs that will negatively impact existing homes and damage the historic character of these neighborhoods. The new code lacks objective concrete standards to protect residential neighborhoods. For example: • Industrial uses in the I‐1 district “should” be buffered from adjacent residential, rather than “must.”  Live/work unit standards say “The work activities shall not create adverse noise or operational impacts on adjacent residential properties.” Yet no measurable standards are included to ensure compliance.  In the R‐1B, R‐1C, R‐2, R‐3, MX‐1, and MX‐2 zones, the standards for multifamily buildings state: “Building and site design shall provide for adequate transition into the surrounding neighborhood to ensure compatibility between the development and the context around it. Factors to be considered are setbacks, building height, building materials, bulk, roof design, parking area locations, and landscaped area locations.” The code should provide objective standards to ensure functional transitions. The findings for conditional use permits are entirely subjective and have been loosened, to the detriment of neighbors. The current standards read: “The proposed use, if it complies with all conditions imposed, will not adversely affect other property of the vicinity.” The proposed language says, ”The proposed use will not create any material negative impacts to uses in the surrounding area, or any material negative impacts will be mitigated to the maximum extent practicable, or the public benefits of the proposed use outweighs any material negative impacts of the proposed use that cannot be mitigated;” (Italics added) Intrusive uses will be allowed without public notice requirements. Uses like retail and neighborhood cafes, including those that sell alcohol, will be allowed by right side‐by‐side with existing single‐family homes in R‐1C and R‐2 zones. Operating hours will be between 7 am and 8 pm, with no specified time limit on delivery and maintenance times, which will likely occur before and after open hours. Nothing in the new code specifies that these will be locally owned businesses and that the properties may indeed be owned by large investors purchasing residential housing units to operate commercial businesses. While envisioned as walkable amenities by the code, such businesses will very likely negatively impact neighboring residents’ ability to quietly enjoy their property. The proposed notification requirements need to be revised.The draft Boise City Zoning Code limits the requirements of notification for changes in the use of single‐family/household property to the adjacent property owner and occupants, including properties across the street and alleys. Following the Planning Director’s decision, the notice for appeal is only provided to residents within 300 feet of the proposed change of use. Change of use from single‐family/household use to duplex, triplex, fourplex, or accessory dwelling units concern the entire neighborhood, not just those nearby. Notification requirements must be neighborhood‐wide and include opportunities for comment and appeal prior to the Planning Director’s decision. Proposed parking reductions will shift parking from on‐site to on‐the‐street. To increase affordability, parking requirements have been reduced from two spaces per unit for single‐family homes and duplex units to one space. The new standards do not mandate affordability in return for fewer spaces; the City pins affordability on hope instead of requiring it. This change reduces builders’ costs and increases their profits by pushing parking onto public streets, often already crowded due to existing infill development. In the current code, each building or dwelling requires a specific number of off‐street parking based upon the occupancy and visitation capabilities and expectations based upon the approved uses of the building. Zoning‐required off‐street parking is necessary to 3

avoid unsafe congestion on the street. It has been shown that on‐street parking congestion is a major contributing factor to pedestrian/vehicle accidents involving young children and individuals with mobility hardships. Only when a serious urban transit system is actually in place will it be realistic to plan for reductions in traffic instead of merely hoping for fewer cars and trucks on the road and parking on neighborhood streets. The highly urban form the new code promotes will reduce non‐built space.This will create significant tree and green space loss, and minimal permeable areas. Other likely results will include reduced wildlife habitat, reduced vegetation to absorb CO2, lower temperatures and buffer climate stress. Public and scientific recognition of the importance of urban greenspace has increased greatly in recent decades. Current parcel zoning and development changes that City bodies are granting already erode greenspace and urban forest canopy in our Boise neighborhoods. As written, the ZCR will accelerate these greenspace losses and rob the public of our right to comment on greenspace‐altering development in the heart of our neighborhoods. The Zoning Code Rewrite will eliminate Boise's power to negotiate with developers on a site‐specific basis. Currently, Idaho law allows cities to require 'Development Agreements' (DAs) when developers request individual rezones. These DAs are essentially open‐ended negotiations between Boise and developers to provide public benefits that otherwise are not required by city or state ordinance. For example, Boise can negotiate for truly affordable housing, for upholding policies of Blueprint Boise, for requiring access to a trailhead, or for dedication of public open space. However, because the ZCR grants these higher densities with one decision, the city will forever lose this critical power to negotiate. In so doing, the City of Boise will also abdicate most of its future power to respond to site‐specific information and concerns from local residents. The new code picks winners and losers. Increased density and height limits, reduced lot sizes, and more allowed uses will not affect neighborhoods with covenants, conditions, and restrictions mandating only one dwelling unit per existing lot. New rules will primarily affect older neighborhoods often inhabited by residents of modest income, whose only protections from incompatible development come from the Zoning Code and conditional use permits. The new code is a radical plan to eliminate single‐family homes across large areas of Boise. It will displace and disrupt large segments of Boise's at‐risk populations of tenants and senior citizens. The controversy of this proposal will tear Boise apart, creating controversy, resentment, and anger that will linger for decades and affect outcomes at election time. The Boise City Zoning Code Rewrite suffers from overall poor quality of writing and is complex and cumbersome to use. The major terms used throughout the document are not consistently used and the document is full of unexplained terms, which are either not defined in the definition section or are not used in the ways that terms are defined. For example, using the term “Creative Housing Design” is neither a design nor a development standard. Creative housing design, therefore, is not a definable nor enforceable code standard for the design of buildings in R‐2 or R‐1C zones.

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Thursday, April 20, 2023 2:39 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Yvonne "Sam" Sandmire Email samsandmireidaho@gmail.com Address 800 W. Ranch Rd. Comment I am in favor of the new zoning proposal because Boise residents need affordable housing close to work places. Prices of houses exceed most young people's means, so if we want our children to stay & work in Boise, we need more apartments, ADUs and multi‐family dwellings. I find it ironic & sad that some of the same people who express the greatest concern about Boise "turning into Portland/Seattle" are the same people who oppose plans that make affordable housing possible. If Boise does not encourage, allow & invest in affordable housing, more people will experience homelessness and Boise will more closely resemble larger cities who struggle to solve this issue. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Thursday, April 20, 2023 4:24 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Abigail Sanford Email abirsanford@gmail.com Address 2000 N Mountain Cove Rd, Boise, ID 83702 Comment I am in favor of the new zoning code proposal. Boise is need growth and development that is sustainable and conscious of the needs of our communities. This new zoning code can allow for more affordable housing, more walkable communities, and provide more amenities located within neighborhoods. Please support changing the zoning code for creating a city that can meet the needs of Boiseans! If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject:

Courtney Santillan <clester777@hotmail.com> Thursday, April 20, 2023 2:06 PM ZoningRewrite; Courtney Santillan howdy@greenacresboise.com; jhallyburton@cityofboise.com; John Mooney Jr [External] Zoning rewrite: New Boise Code_Food Truck Courts

Hello, As an owner of a food truck court, I would like to offer my thoughts below in red regarding changes to zoning codes. Also, please know that I would be happy to participate in discussions moving forward. Thank you, Courtney Santillan The Switchback 208.866.6657

G. Food Truck Court (1) General (a) Food Trucks operating within a Food Truck Court shall meet all applicable city, state, and federal licensing requirements and shall be in good operating condition. This came up recently via an email I received from the city. In my opinion, the food trucks are independent businesses (regulated by health dept, etc). If the food trucks are rotating through the food truck courts just like they do for local events, breweries, street parking, etc, I'm not sure why it is our responsibility to manage these independent businesses. I would question if this is also required of all places food trucks go. In addition, "good operating condition" is very vague and subjective. I would also argue that there are many food trucks outside of a food truck court that might not meet this definition. And then, who regulates those? (b) Motorized vehicular drive‐through service from individual food trucks is prohibited. (2) Location (a) Food Trucks and associated seating areas shall not be located in any required landscaping area, access easement, driveway, or fire lane(s). I don't like the term required landscaping in this one. (b) All eating, drinking, service, and delivery activity shall occur outside of setbacks, landscaping, and the public right‐of‐way. This seems too subjective. (3) Site Design (a) There shall be at least three feet of clearance between each individual Food Truck and between each permanent or accessory structure and at least 10 feet of unobstructed clearance for Food Trucks parked side‐by‐side. This 10 feet between trucks is difficult to manage. What is the purpose? (b) Seating for the consumption of food and drink shall be provided. (c) Accessible restroom facilities, including handwashing facilities, shall be provided. (d) Each Food Truck Court shall provide trash receptacles sized to meet expected demand and shall empty or remove them on a daily basis. The site shall include a trash collection facility, including but not limited to a designated dumpster location accessible by trash collection vehicles. Another thing that we can't manage is the pick up of garbage. We are often limited to the schedule of trash services. I think we need to do it based on usage and not daily. 1

(e) The Food Truck Court shall be designed to allow for continuous pedestrian ingress and egress to and from the site as well as accessible internal walkways or passageways between Food Trucks, restroom facilities, trash receptables, and seating areas. (4) Operations (a) When located adjacent to a residential zoning district, the hours of operation shall be limited between 6:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. (b) Any amplified sound shall comply with Title 5, Chapter 7 of the Boise City Code regarding permissible levels of noise.

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 4:46 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Troy Sappington troysappington@yahoo.com 13411 W Bluebonnet Dr Boise, ID 83713 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

sburney3@gmail.com Thursday, April 20, 2023 2:10 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Zoning code rewrite comments/party of record

My biggest beef is that the CUP impact restriction language is being modified to allow more ways to approve impactful uses. The application will not create any material negative impacts on adjacent properties; or any material negative impacts have been mitigated to the maximum extent practicable and the public benefits of the application outweigh any material negative impacts that cannot be mitigated; There are also significant changes to increase density, including re‐ zoning a large swath along State Street from R‐1 to R‐2 ‐ which has smaller minimum lot sizes and higher maximum heights...encouraging redevelopment of this area into denser units, which likely results in increased property value for the rezoned properties. In my opinion the affordability incentives are pretty week, so I think the densification will result in more units, but I don't think affordability will be a benefit. Also the code allows more duplex/triplex/fourplex etc. in single family zoning...which I don't think is terrible, but I believe it acutally allows up to 12‐plex in single family zones, which seems more like an apartment building than a 'plex' to me.

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Wednesday, April 19, 2023 7:17 AM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Katelyn Scanlin Email Address Comment I was priced out of Boise eight years ago and have watched the city I grew up in grow further and further out of reach since then. I've given up on going back, because all of my friends have also been priced out. They're scattering all over the country. They are good people, hard workers, programmers, chefs, artists and musicians, people who made Boise a place worth living in. They aren't leaving Boise because their houses didn't have enough parking, or because their neighborhoods had too much density, they're leaving because there aren't enough places for them to live. If the city doesn't address the housing affordability crisis today you will not need to worry about whether or not your children can afford to stay, they won't want to. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

teamscantling@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Leslie Scantling <teamscantling@everyactioncustom.com> Thursday, April 20, 2023 3:43 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Please Support the Zoning Code Rewrite & Protect Boise for the Next Generation

Dear Planning and Zoning Commission, I am writing in support of the Zoning Code Rewrite because I want Boise to keep the integrity of our open spaces and the beauty of the foothills is part of the legacy we believe in as Treasure Valley citizens. We need to protect it for the next generation! Sincerely, Leslie Scantling 1806 N Harrison Blvd Boise, ID 83702‐1016 teamscantling@msn.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Thursday, April 20, 2023 3:05 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Nina Schaeffer Email nschae5@gmail.com Address 117 Dot St, Boise ID 83705 Comment I am writing in support of the Modern Zoning Code Rewrite. I grew up in Boise, my family is in Boise, and passionate for the community we are so lucky to have. Over the years I have seen people leave for so many reasons, but housing has been a large factor in this. I am a renter, a young person and a local that enthusiastically supports the rewrite! The modern zoning code provides Boise an opportunity to be different. Different from all the other cities throughout the nation that have seen uncontrolled growth that not only costs more in taxes, infrastructure, water, etc., but equally importantly that growth is not sustainable to building a resilient community. The modern zoning code addresses smarter infill, allowing for more density in neighborhoods that haven’t seen it since the current zoning code was adopted decades ago. We can address the oncoming growth and intentionally and methodically decide where this growth should best be directed and what open spaces need to be preserved, and how to contemplate a variety of housing choices for all ages and income levels. When I see the rewrite, I see an opportunity to stay where I’ve built my community. I see the opportunity to find a home and begin the homeowner journey. I see the opportunities it brings for entrepreneurs who would benefit from more small scale commercial spaces within neighborhoods. I see more people walking and biking to nearby gathering spaces (but still driving!) and getting to know their neighbor. I see a code that invites camaraderie, rather than the isolation we’ve seen grow ever since suburbs were introduced in the 50s. I see it protecting what makes Boise so special while providing opportunities to build on that uniqueness. Please support this new zoning code effort. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

mark.schlag@yahoo.com Thursday, April 20, 2023 3:22 PM ZoningRewrite [External] City of Boise Zoning Code Re-write

Commissioners, I am wri ng in support of the new City of Boise Zoning Code re‐write with a few excep ons noted below. I am a Boise na ve and a long me commercial real estate agent and as such have a vested interest in both crea ng a code which to preserve open space, control sprawl, and allow for neighborhoods to have the local services and ameni es which residents desire, as well as a code which is workable within the market dynamics and doesn’t result in just pushing developments to outlying municipali es and exacerba ng sprawl in our valley. Areas of the dra code which I support include more neighborhood retail and a mix of uses within zones which allow developers greater flexibility to meet the market’s demands. I addi onally support the expansion of the MX5 zone into the downtown planning areas not currently zoned C5. I however, do not support the expansion of that to proper es immediately bordering the river as the dra implies. I think lack of height limit immediately adjoining the river and greenbelt areas will dras cally change the aesthe c and recrea onal aspects the public currently appreciates. I would encourage the commissioners to give though ul special considera on to those areas con guous to the greenbelt. Areas of Concern with the dra would include the provision for the minimum building height of 4 stories in MX3, MX4, and MX5 and the associated parking alloca on capped at the minimum number of stalls for that use. A large percentage of the proper es within the MX3 zoning are not by defini on of their physical a ributes not candidates for 4 story redevelopment and I would argue that the minimum height should only be applicable to those areas previously designated as ac vity centers. Lastly The city has clearly stated its vision for development of commercial zones to include mul level development containing a mix of uses. The issue which is occurring now even in areas such as southeast Boise is that residen al pricing is pushing out the opportuni es for commercial uses and thereby actually exacerba ng the traffic issues as residents have to con nue to drive distances to daily needs and other services. I commend the City for efforts to update a code which was cra ed at a very different me and is definitely needed to provide a healthy as built environment for everyone going forward. Mark Schlag

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 11:37 AM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Cathy Schleif rcschleif@gmail.com 10659 West Geronimo Court Boise, ID 83709 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Thursday, April 20, 2023 2:58 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Teresa Schmalz Schmalz Email teresa.schmslz@gmail.com Address Boise, ID 83704 Comment I support Boise’s proposed building code. I appreciate that the code has options for people of different backgrounds and income levels. I like the emphasis on walkable neighborhoods. Thank you also, for focusing on sustainable and responsible growth. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:48 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Ms. Robin Schoenemann rnschoenemann@yahoo.com 2085192512 412 South 13th Street,, Apt 412 Boise, ID 83702 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

April 19, 2023

Boise Planning and Zoning Commission Re: City of Boise Zoning Code Re-Write,

Commissioners, I am writing in support of the new City of Boise Zoning Code re-write. As you know, we currently operate under a zoning code, first adopted in 1966, with minor modification over time. This code doesn’t work for Boise today. The current code restricts access for many people to find affordable, accessible housing. The new proposed code offers substantial improvements to the existing code by allowing for the desired type of dense, mixed-use development to occur as Boise grows. I support this vision and believe it is the proper way to save Boise from becoming a sprawling auto-dependent metropolis like Las Angeles or Phoenix. Sprawl is expensive and drives up costs and property taxes. Attainable housing will continue to be a challenge in Boise. The new code allows for more flexible options providing both short and long-term solutions to bring back a state of abundant housing for everyone in our city. Boise is way behind on the number of homes for essential people who make our community run, like school teachers and restaurant workers. Lowering the costs and simplifying the process will help us catch up on badly needed housing inventory. Boise should strive to be an accessible, useful and vibrant place to live. I believe this new zoning code directs mixed-use development in strategic places that will support walkability, transit, and local economic opportunities. I think the new zoning code incentivizes efficient and sustainable growth, near existing streets and pathways and future transit, which is right where we need it.

Thank you for considering my feedback and please approve this important code re-write. Sincerely, Carol Schoenherr 255 S. Capitol Blvd., Suite 1606 Boise, ID 83702

April 19, 2023

Boise Planning and Zoning Commission Re: City of Boise Zoning Code Re-Write,

Commissioners, I am writing in support of the new City of Boise Zoning Code re-write. As you know, we currently operate under a zoning code, first adopted in 1966. This code was specifically designed to prohibit small, multi-family housing types within single family zones. This restricts access for many people to find affordable, accessible housing. The new proposed code offers substantial improvements to the existing code by allowing for the desired type of dense, mixed-use development to occur as Boise grows. This type of development is critical to ensuring Boise works for all its citizens. The City has articulated a clear vision for its desired development of our commercial zones, including: dense multi-story development, containing a mix of uses, with active ground floors, limited parking, limited automotive uses, pedestrian friendly scale and access, and integrated open spaces. We support this vision and believe it is the proper way to save Boise from becoming a sprawling auto-dependent metropolis like so many other American cities. Sprawl is expensive and drives up both costs and property taxes. Needless to say, attainable housing will continue to be a challenge in an area growing at Boise’s rate. The new code allows for more flexible options providing both short and longterm solutions to bring back a state of abundant housing for everyone in our city. We are behind on the number of homes for essential people who make our community run. Removing unnecessary red tape and administrative process will help us catch up on badly needed housing inventory. Complete cities are accessible, useful and vibrant places to live and our new zoning code directs mixed-use development in strategic places that will support walkability, transit, and local economic opportunities. The new Zoning code incentivizes efficient and sustainable growth, right where we need it, near existing streets and pathways and future transit. I commend Tim Keane, Andrea Tuning and the rest of the committee and City staff for their work on this effort. Thank you for considering my feedback and please approve this important code re-write. Sincerely, Scott Schoenherr Rafanelli & Nahas 702 W. Idaho Street, Suite 825 Boise, ID 83702

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 6:10 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Michael Schrader mschrader0@protonmail.com 11949 W Silverking Dr Boise, ID 83709 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:58 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Lauren Schulz lauren.schulz12@gmail.com 3613 n Manchester Boise, ID 83704 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Deanna Dupuy From: Sent: To: Subject:

schwenpen@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Denise Schwendener <schwenpen@everyactioncustom.com> Wednesday, April 19, 2023 8:43 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Please Vote Yes on the ZCR

Dear Planning and Zoning Commission, I am writing to express my support for the Zoning Code Rewrite, because I love my Boise foothills for hiking and running. I love our safe streets for my children to ride their bikes safely or walk to their friends house. The new zoning code provides for the things I love most. Sincerely, Ms. Denise Schwendener 2307 W Irene St Boise, ID 83702‐0429 schwenpen@yahoo.com

Deanna Dupuy From: Sent: To: Subject:

ksscriver <ksscriver@aol.com> Wednesday, April 19, 2023 8:03 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Zoning Code Rewrite Objection

I do not support the Zoning code rewrite. There has not been sufficient, detailed information provided to residents as to the impacts to their neighborhoods. The devil is in the details, and the details were not presented at the various community meetings. BoiseDev did a much better job explaining many impacts to zoning changes than the city staff. But, I suspect that your evasive communication may have been on purpose. After the Interfaith Sanctuary debacle, there is no trust in Boise City Leadership and P&Z. When are you going to address what your plans are to deal with homeless shelters since I last heard you are setting that part of the zoning code aside for now? Although, I don't trust you will do that, regardless. You will put some slippery slope code in the rewrite so IFS can expand on State Street. Until you actually have some decent transportation options, you should expect people will be driving cars, yet you allow minimal parking, which ends up impacting innocent homeowners whose driveways get blocked by jerks. The code changes will only make that much worse. Allowing cafes to be built in residential areas is inappropriate and invasive to neighbors who will have to listen to noise all day and deal with parking issues. The Zoning Code changes should not be voted on until a new Mayor and City Council members are in place to properly represent each of the new, impending districts. I was born in Boise, my Mom was born in Boise over 100 years ago. I have never been so disappointed in my City Leadership and P&Z in my life. Karen Scriver ..

Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Friday, April 14, 2023 6:42 AM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Angela Searl angie4383@hotmail.com 3503 E Tallow Ln Boise, ID 83716 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 12:33 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Gary Seaton garyaseaton@hotmail.com 12095 W Coleen Ct Boise, ID 83709 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Wednesday, April 19, 2023 2:04 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name John Segar Email segar.john@gmail.com Address 3109 s crossfield way Comment I support the adoption of the proposed Boise zoning code, and hope that the city council will adopt it ASAP. I would urge city council members to recognize 1) The current zoning is broken, 2) The proposed zoning revision is full of compromises but takes boise in the right direction, and 3) because it is full of compromises and changes ‐‐ there are plenty of opportunities for good meaning people to to take offense to portions of the proposal ‐‐ but still be unable to suggest how else to solve the problems we face. Zoning will never be possible, but it can be fair and effective. This proposal is fair and effective and I hope that it gets everyone's support. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Deanna Dupuy From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Wednesday, April 19, 2023 3:28 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Ben Semple Email benjaminsemple@gmail.com Address Boise, ID 83706 Comment I am in full support of the zoning code rewrite being proposed by the City of Boise. The zoning code is long‐past due for an update to reflect the current conditions of our City, changing needs and desires of the current and future residents, and to plan for a sustainable future that is not reliant on cars to go everywhere. More residents of Boise should be supportive of this rewrite as well, since it will reduce the instances of greenfield and suburban sprawl development patterns that occur places that are often pointed to as places that people don't want to see Boise become. To avoid that in our community, we need to learn from the mistakes that other communities made in their lack of planning, and continue to look to our urban spaces for vertical density and mixed use development to reduce dependence on cars and improve the quality of life for all. The zoning code rewrite is the first step in helping achieve the goal of a Boise for everyone. I believe, based on what I've reviewed in the modules that the zoning code rewrite actually protects Boise's neighborhoods and increases the level of design and aesthetics of all spaces. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Deanna Dupuy From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Wednesday, April 19, 2023 8:17 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name JUSTIN SHANK Email idshank11@gmail.com Address Boise, ID 83704 Comment I am writing in favor of the zoning code re‐write. Every neighborhood in Boise needs to have the flexibility to address its housing needs that isn't supported by the current plan. The current code is sterile, homogenous, and does not allow for innovation or promote neighborhood health and diversity. The NIMBY movement that is overtaking parts of the city concerns me. Future generations of Boiseans like my children should not need to bear the burden of today's shortsighted mistakes. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Thursday, April 20, 2023 12:59 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Linda Q Shanks Email lkq2@msn.com Address 2031 East Warm Springs Avenue Comment No to Up Zoning! I frequently traveled to Ballard WA for the last 30 years to visit friends and relatives. Unbelievable what the change in zoning laws did to the liveable Norwegian community. People were priced out of homes, overcrowding, traffic, no off street parking and crime have escalated. No long a great place to live! We do not want it in Boise! You do not enforce the zoning rules now, what will happen when you relax them more. Why would you relax zoning when Street and School are maxed and people are out raged. AKA Warm Springs Ave and Adams Elementary. Where was the planning and zoning, and City Council when Harris Ranch did not follow what they said they would do. No just redesign and build forget the infrastructure. "People will use alternate transportation they won't drive." Research how many cars per house hold. Is the off street parking for all, trips in car every day. No to Up Zoning. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 6:11 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Robert Shannon rvshannon52@gmail.com 2060 S Creekside Lane Boise, ID 83706 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:23 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Jerold G Sharp Jr jeroldsharp@gmail.com 7127 West Cascade Drive Boise, ID 83704 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:53 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Ms. Kathleen Shaw kshaw100@yahoo.com 1707 N 27Th St Boise, ID 83702‐0118 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Monday, April 17, 2023 8:58 AM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Sharon Sheesley slsheesley@gmail.com 3022 W Sunset Boise, ID 83703 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 10:30 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Richard Shields rch_shields@yahoo.com 5625 S. Caper Pl. Boise, ID 83716 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 4:15 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. David Shurrleff dsboise@gmail.com 2609 N. 36 Street Boise, ID 83703 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 1:25 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Jacqui Shurtleff idahojacqui@reagan.com 2609 N. 36th Streert Boise, ID 83703 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Thursday, April 20, 2023 1:10 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Bonnie Shuster Email bjshuster@msn.com Address Boise, ID 83702 Comment I support the Zoning Code Rewrite and I urge you to vote to approve it. A rewrite is urgently needed both to respond to current conditions and to provide future direction that will help preserve the things about living in Boise that we cherish. The changes appear to be thoughtfully designed to increase the supply of affordable housing while at the same time promoting neighborhoods that are visually appealing, sustainable, and friendly to pedestrians, bicyclists and transit users. Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 4:34 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Luci Willits, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Richard Sieber rich@richsieber.com 3794 North Lakegrove Way Boise, ID 83713 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

ZoningRewrite From: Sent: To: Subject:

Cole Siemion <colesiemion@gmail.com> Tuesday, April 18, 2023 7:49 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Thank you

I would like to thank Mayor McLean and the Boise City Council for their leadership on rezoning Boise. I support these efforts for the following reasons. First, denser neighborhoods will provide more housing units and therefore reduce prices. I am grateful to have barely been able to afford to buy a first home with my wife four years ago. We would find it far more difficult today. Both renters and those currently seeking home ownership deserve affordable options. If we are serious about housing affordability and reducing homelessness, denser neighborhoods are a critical step in the right direction. Second, I am so pleased to see a reorientation toward mixed use neighborhoods. We should have the option to walk to a cafe or access amenities nearby without always having to drive to a distant commercial center. This will also optimize our neighborhoods for enhanced social interaction. Third, this rezone supports property rights. Property owners should be permitted greater freedom and flexibility to redevelop with less regulatory burden or other outside interference, particularly when the outcome will tend to help those currently unable to afford housing. Fourth, the status quo will continue to encourage sprawl, traffic, dirty air, vehicle crashes, noise, and parking lots. Los Angeles and so many other American cities already have tried historically to respond to increasing populations by building massive highways and sprawling neighborhoods. If Boise charts a different course, it will at least open some opportunity to plan a different future that is calmer, safer, cleaner, and more humane. Fifth, the status quo is fiscally irresponsible and taxpayers shoulder the burden. Public infrastructure can be built and maintained more efficiently in denser communities than sprawling ones. If we are serious about getting maximum value from our property taxes, then we should support greater freedom of property owners to develop tighter communities if they so choose. Thank you and keep up the good work. Cole Siemion

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:47 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Jon Simmons jonsimmons72@gmail.com 9949 Mossy Cup St. Boise, ID 83709 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Wednesday, April 19, 2023 12:41 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Megan Skinner Email megskinner12@gmail.com Address Boise, ID 83702 Comment I’m not in a position to buy a house yet, so am a current renter. I have a partner, we have duel income, and I am a teacher here in Boise for a Title 1 school. Apartments are simply not affordable. 1400‐1600 a month for a one bedroom, the average price here, is not affordable, even for full time working Americans‐ we still feel like we are living paycheck to paycheck. I am disgusted that more modernized condos are being built by wealthy property managers every day in Boise, that are not affordable to most of us. Please advocate for us. Thank you. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Deanna Dupuy From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Wednesday, April 19, 2023 5:43 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Tasha Smagula Email tsmagula@gmail.com Address Boise, Idaho 83706 Comment I support the zoning code rewrite. Thank you for working to provide affordable housing in Boise and trying to provide opportunities for people to buy or rent here. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:23 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Allen Smith lazlor@lotaris.org 11893 W Rader Dr Boise, ID 83713 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

April 19, 2023 Boise Planning and Zoning Commission Re: City of Boise Zoning Code Re-Write, Commissioners, I am writing in support of the new City of Boise Zoning Code re-write. We feel it is a welcome change to our current city code first adopted in 1966. This code was specifically designed to prohibit small, multi-family housing types within single family zones. This restricts access for many people to find affordable, accessible housing. The new proposed code offers substantial improvements to the existing code by allowing for the desired type of dense, mixed-use development to occur as Boise grows. This type of development is critical to ensuring Boise works for all its citizens. For one of our sites (Grove Street between 10th and 11th) we were required to obtain a variance from the current city code in order to build over the 4.0 floor area ratio (FAR). The current code in the downtown area restricts commercial development square footage to this ratio, when an urban center should welcome density and height. Much has changed since 1966 and we think pushing for a dense urban core is one those welcome blessings that the new code allows. We support this vision and believe it is the proper way to save Boise from becoming a sprawling auto-dependent metropolis like so many other American cities. Sprawl is expensive and drives up both costs and property taxes. Needless to say, attainable housing will continue to be a challenge in an area growing at Boise’s rate. The new code allows for more flexible options providing both short and long-term solutions to bring back a state of abundant housing for everyone in our city. We are behind on the number of homes for essential people who make our community run. Removing unnecessary red tape and administrative process will help us catch up on badly needed housing inventory. Complete cities are accessible, useful and vibrant places to live and our new zoning code directs mixed-use development in strategic places that will support walkability, transit, and local economic opportunities. The new Zoning code incentivizes efficient and sustainable growth, right where we need it, near existing streets and pathways and future transit. I commend Tim Keane, Andrea Tuning and the rest of the committee and City staff for their work on this effort. Thank you for considering my feedback and please approve this important code rewrite. Sincerely,

Jared S. Smith Boise Office – P.O. Box 1327, Eagle, ID 83616 208.938.2404 (phone) 888.881.4891 (fax) Salt Lake Office – 14241 S Redwood Road, Suite 150, Bluffdale, UT 84095 801.571.2801 (phone) 888.881.4891 (fax)

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Thursday, April 20, 2023 4:19 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Karen Smith Email stablewoman2@gmail.com Address 3416 Hawthorne Drive, Boise, Idaho 83703 Comment First, I request that you delay a vote on this issue until more of us have had a chance to get through the lengthy proposal (and the changes therein) and comment. I currently have no representative that I elected on the council to speak through. It would be great to wait until i do. I do not see a board member of the CDDC as an impartial participant. Second, I think many of us who attended the outreach meetings over the past three years came away with the same feeling we might get when someone makes us sit through a timeshare sales pitch—that we were being told what would happen instead of being asked. The questions I asked, such as whether land was being set aside to build new schools in neighborhoods where the population was likely to quadruple (at best) due to higher density, or how a tree canopy can exist with all the setbacks reduced to a point that no tree will ever reach maturity, were not answered. I have also not heard of any western city that has used this model successfully providing affordability, reducing traffic, or reduce sprawl. All of our young cities came to life after the invention of automobiles, and our suburban infrastructures were unfortunately created with a priority of accommodating cars. Piling more people on top of each other and making it harder to park will not get them out of their cars. The infrastructure needs to be addressed first. We need something better than this upzone model. Especially since Eagle, Meridian, Kuna, and Mountain Home do not seem to share Boise’s goals, although they seem happy to use our parks, trail system, and other amenities. Third. In some respects, I am happy to see an issue that has united both the left and the right in Boise, but I am sorry it is this one. People across the board do not seem happy about this proposal. I have generally been a great supporter of the Mayor and City Council on most of your progressive decisions. It will be a great loss to the city if you all lose your seats over this single issue. I mean that. Thank you. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

wessno@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Welsey Snodgrass <wessno@everyactioncustom.com> Thursday, April 20, 2023 4:22 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Please Support the Zoning Code Rewrite

Dear Planning and Zoning Commission, I support the Zoning Code Rewrite because I am worried about building outwards into agricultural land and I support targeted density. Sincerely, Welsey Snodgrass 2507 W Anderson St Boise, ID 83702‐0248 wessno@gmail.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Wednesday, April 19, 2023 2:48 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Justin Snyder Email mail@justin‐snyder.com Address 2905 N 38th St, Boise, ID 83703 Comment As a lifelong resident of Boise and a local business owner, I strongly support the adoption of the new zoning code as it is currently written with the following exception: A "Large Child Day Care Center" should be redefined from 26+ children to 50+ children to more conform to the reality of childcare in Boise. Centers with fewer than 50 children are small in nature and should be allowed to open with the lower burden of what is currently defined as "Small Child Day Care Centers," as their impact on neighbors is low and the effect of their expansion in our city would have vast positive implications for our economy and families. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:24 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Karen Solus karen.solus@yahoo.com 3309 E Echo Court Boise, ID 83712 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 10:30 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. George H Solverson lcesfire@yahoo.com 9890 W JAVA CT BOISE, ID 83704 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Wednesday, April 19, 2023 1:22 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Jamie Somma Email jamie.somma@naturecallinghome.com Address 4247 E Arborvitae Ct Comment Dear Planning & Zoning officials, Thanks for considering our public comments. I support the improved direction of the proposed Zoning Code Rewrite for the following reasons: 1. The greater density it encourages should result in more sustainable and fiscally responsible development wrt city and county infrastructure which should reduce pressure on property taxes 2. It reduces legal and financial barriers to more diverse development by locals who want to be a part of developing a strong Boise that can more readily adapt to changes 3. It gives specific requirements for affordability and sustainability in order to build more densely, which helps reduce greater speculative land grab & development pressure driving up housing costs. 4. It increasingly honors the private property rights of landholders over those of a vocal few of their neighbors. 5. It increasingly allows for a more diverse development patterns based on diverse groups of residents to build the kind of people‐oriented places that honors people over cars; and helps builds stronger safer communities where people from different walks and stages of life can flourish together. Please vote in support of recommending passage the Zoning Code Rewrite. Thanks, Jamie Somma 512‐659‐4085 If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Thursday, April 20, 2023 7:56 AM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Amanda Somma Email amaleighs@gmail.com Address 4247 E ARBORVITAE CT Comment Thank you for considering our public comments. I support the improved direction of the proposed Zoning Code Rewrite for the following reasons: 1. The greater density it encourages should result in more sustainable and fiscally responsible development wrt city and county infrastructure which should reduce pressure on property taxes 2. It reduces legal and financial barriers to more diverse development by locals who want to be a part of developing a strong Boise that can more readily adapt to changes 3. It gives specific requirements for affordability and sustainability in order to build more densely, which helps reduce greater speculative land grab & development pressure driving up housing costs. 4. It increasingly honors the private property rights of landholders over those of a vocal few of their neighbors. 5. It increasingly allows for a more diverse development patterns based on diverse groups of residents to build the kind of people‐oriented places that honors people over cars; and helps builds stronger safer communities where people from different walks and stages of life can flourish together. Please vote in support of recommending passage of the Zoning Code Rewrite. Thank you! If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

4/20/2023 Dear Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council Please find below comments from the Southwest Ada County Alliance Neighborhood Association regarding ZOA23-00001, CPA23-00001.

Open Space Requirements 

11-03-03.G(3) Dwelling, Duplex, Triplex, or Fourplex Page 152

As Written: Each unit shall have a minimum of 200 square feet of open space. This open space must be usable and shall not include driveways or parking areas. A minimum of 25 percent of the required open space shall consist of permeable ground surface with landscaping. Comment: The term ‘usable’ should be defined. Also, medians, sidewalk buffers and berms should also be added to the list of things that are not considered open space. 

11-03-03.2H (1)(a) Dwelling, Multiple-Family Pg. 155

As Written: The minimum usable open space or recreational space requirement shall be equal to 30 percent of the land area occupied by residential structures. Open space shall have a minimum dimension of 15 feet in length and width. For the purpose of this Section, usable open space or recreational space shall include landscaped areas, court yards, internal pathways, balconies, patios, sun decks, pedestrian walkways, playground areas, swimming pools, and all other exterior or interior recreational areas. Such areas shall be accessible according to the ADA guidelines and available to the occupants and guests of the building. Usable open space or recreational space shall not include driveways, parking areas, or loading areas. The open space or recreational space requirement may be reduced for projects that abut open space or recreational facilities, or that are within an Activity Center in which publicly available open space or recreational facilities have been incorporated. Comment: Open space is only calculated on the footage of the first floor of each residential building. When individual units occupy only one floor (without an upstairs and downstairs) consider extra open space requirements for each additional floor of units. Open space should be accessible to all residents and should not include private balconies, patios or sundecks. Also, medians, sidewalk buffers and berms should also be added to the list of things that are not considered open space. Consider adding this requirement, which is found in the duplex, triplex, fourplex section ‘A minimum of 25 percent of the required open space shall consist of permeable ground surface with landscaping.’ Could add to this with ‘Unless property is adjacent to a public park’.

Demolition and Adaptive Reuse To preserve the history and character of neighborhoods outside the overlay districts SWACA would like to see it difficult to demolish a house or other building that could be saved through remodel or adaptive reuse. Comment: Consider making city wide some of the restrictions found on Page 75 11-02-07.1E(1)(e) NC-O: Near North End Character Overlay Prohibit demolition of structures for parking lots or new office developments; and. Comment: Consider a city-wide ordinance to deal with demolition by neglect. See Pg. 17 11-0207.2(8). 

11-04-04.7(a)(i) Adaptive Reuse Incentive Pg. 213

As Written: The existing primary building being adaptively reused may be increased or reduced in size a maximum of 10 percent; or Comment: Could the building increase percentage be higher? Perhaps up to 25%? Keeping the reduction at 10%.

Drive Throughs 11-03-03.4(R) Pg. 183 The current code has 11-06-05 3.A.2.c Additional Requirements In C-1 districts, a 200-foot setback from residential use or zone is required for the drive through window or lane where the primary use of the window is food service. The 200-foot setback shall be measured from any part of the window or drive through lane to the nearest lot or parcel used or zoned for a residence. As Written: Pg 184. 11-03-03.4(12)(b) Drive-through lanes shall be set back at least 10 feet from each Residential zoning district or residential use; and. Along with some additional requirements for landscaping, sound abatement walls and sound decibel restrictions from speaker boxes Comment: Though the city has required additional requirements for drive throughs in most MX zones, SWACA would still like to see the 200 ft buffer remain in place and be expanded to all MX zones. There are areas like Harris Ranch, with their specific plan, that will continue to have this 200 ft buffer. Section 11-07-01 (10), Pg 531. It is unequitable to remove this from some areas of Boise, while others will still have this protection. Additionally drive-throughs or drive-through lanes should not be allowed within 200 feet of private or public parks, schools, daycares or other areas where increased traffic and fumes from idling cars can impact the health, safety and general welfare of residents. Landscaping requirements should include evergreen trees between any drive through lane and residential area to prevent car headlights from creating light pollution.

Bicycle Parking 11-04-08.9 Table 11-04.13 Pg. 265. Minimum Bicycle Parking Requirements for Multiple Family Dwellings are: Long Term: 1 space per DU Short Term: 1 space per 10 DU The biggest difference is Short Term bike parking can be out in the open and Long Term is enclosed, covered, and secured. Contrast this with the minimum off-street parking for cars at Multiple Family Dwellings Pg. 253. Studio/Efficiency: 0.5 per DU 1BR: 1 per DU 2BR: 1.25 per DU 3+BR: 1.5 per DU Guest: 1 per 10 DU Comment: It is assumed in the proposed code that in Multi-Family Units with more than one bedroom there may be a need for more than one car. However, it does not presume that same thing for bikes. If a unit is occupied by a couple or has 1 or more children, they will likely have more than just one bike and must hope that a neighbor has no need for the long-term bike parking. Multi Family Long Term Bike parking should be scaled similar to how car parking is, according to the number of bedrooms to ensure adequate space for all. Additionally, the City should require some percentage of short-term bicycle parking to be covered if they want to further encourage biking. All Short Term parking at schools, conference centers, or other places people may be spending longer amounts of time should be covered.

Sincerely, Southwest Ada County Alliance Neighborhood Association Board of Directors by Marisa Keith, President 3279 S Cloverdale Rd Boise ID 83709

Deanna Dupuy From: Sent: To: Subject:

Sally <sally.spaulding@gmail.com> Wednesday, April 19, 2023 8:04 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Boise Zoning Code Rewrite

Hi there, Thank you for undertaking the process of updating Boise's code! I am writing to support the re‐write. The new proposed code is a big step forward ‐‐ allowing for the desired type of dense, mixed‐use development to occur as Boise grows. This type of development is so important to make sure that Boise works for everyone. Sprawl detracts from community and the lovely "friendliness" that makes Boise a nice place to live. I fully support this effort and appreciate a code that will bring Boise into the future with efficient, sustainable growth in places that have the infrastructure to support it. Thank you, Sally Spaulding, owner Sally Spaulding Public Relations 728 N. Santa Paul Pl. Boise, ID 83712

ZoningRewrite From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Tuesday, April 18, 2023 7:53 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Patrick Spoutz Email PSPOUTZ@GMAIL.COM Address 753 W Sandstone Ct Comment I'm excited to express my strong support for the zoning code rewrite. This series of moderate steps to help our city grow and plan for the future will provide more places for people to live, more predictable development, while preserving the basic structure of our city. It's a great step towards providing a home for everyone in Boise. I especially appreciate the changes to parking minimums, the mixed use zones, the changes to minimum lot sizes, and options for triplexes and affordable units in fourplexes within neighborhoods. Respectfully, Patrick Spoutz If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Wednesday, April 19, 2023 11:34 AM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Kodie Stanley Email kodie.stanley@gmail.com Address Boise, Idaho 83704 Comment Upzoning needs to happen in Boise. Period. With all of the nastiness coming out of the state house, how does Boise plan on retaining young/professional talent when the cost or renting/buying a home is through the roof? There's really no benefit for me to stay here anymore when i could rent in a major city and get all of the benefits that go along with it for LESS than what i would spend in Boise. I once remember someone at a city council meeting saying "well we don't want urban sprawl like Phoenix or Denver, BUT we also dont want to grow up like Manhattan or San Francisco!" That thought is entirely misguided. Time for everyone to grow up and realize we have a real problem ‐ and building single family homes farther and farther from the city center is not the answer. Does Boise want to be a shinning city on a hill or continue to be mediocre? Allow for more/different housing and allow for people to actually achieve the american dream vs making us live in a NIMBY hell‐scape. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

taylornstans@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Taylor Stansbury <taylornstans@everyactioncustom.com> Thursday, April 20, 2023 2:58 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Please Support the Zoning Code Rewrite

Dear Planning and Zoning Commission, I am writing to express my support for the Zoning Code Rewrite. The sustainability, affordability, and open space protections included in the new zoning code rewrite are exactly what Boise needs to plan for and address our rapid growth. Growth is inevitable, and we need a modern zoning code to ensure we are following the best practices to grow sustainably and responsibly. It has been clear that Boise City Staff have put in the effort to make an inclusive and extensive community input process to develop the zoning code our city needs and deserves. Boise has become increasingly unaffordable for everyone, especially for new home buyers, renters, students, low‐ income residents, refugee families, and elderly folks on fixed incomes. This code helps address those issues. I specifically appreciate that this zoning code protects our green spaces, improves our tree canopy, incentivizes energy and water efficiency that saves money over the lifetime of a home, allows for smart and targeted density, increases opportunities for multi‐family homes like duplexes, removes unnecessary parking space minimums, protects pollinators, and makes our communities more walkable and bikeable. I strongly encourage the Boise Planning and Zoning Commission to support this zoning code rewrite that staff and residents have spent so much time and effort to shape. Sincerely, Taylor Stansbury 2510 S Ormond St Boise, ID 83705‐4444 taylornstans@gmail.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 8:23 AM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Diana Starr dianastarrboise@gmail.com 4125 W. Quail Ridge Drive Bosie, ID 83703 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Deanna Dupuy From: Sent: To: Subject:

deborahbstevenson@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Deborah Stevenson <deborahbstevenson@everyactioncustom.com> Wednesday, April 19, 2023 8:47 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Please Vote Yes on the ZCR

Dear Planning and Zoning Commission, I'm writing to you today because I am in support of Boise's zoning code rewrite. I want to see our foothills preserved and protected. I'm also very concerned about environmental issues in general. Please approve the new zoning code and protect our environment! Sincerely, Ms. Deborah Stevenson 1601 N 23rd St Boise, ID 83702‐0411 deborahbstevenson@gmail.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 3:57 AM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. David Stewart dwstewart@adacounty.id.gov 7200 Barrister Dr, Ada County Sher Boise, ID 83704 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Deanna Dupuy From: Sent: To: Subject:

T Stewart <tlsgath@hotmail.com> Wednesday, April 19, 2023 4:07 PM ZoningRewrite [External] No to the up-zoning of Boise

To Boise City Planning and Zoning. I am against the zoning code rewrite, why because a sample of this code has already been built. I live near the corner of Alpine and Latah, where you have allowed a eatery/ice cream shop. This was done without required parking for the capacity of people. All done on the premise that the patrons of said establishments would be walking or biking. This type of development has lead to a general traffic hazard on that intersection. This has lead to on street parking all the way along Alpine street to Roosevelt street. And into the connecting streets, which has resulted in homeowners driveways being blocked. Twice now for me personally. So to summarize that particular part of up‐zoning code, done before the rewrite with no public input or mail notification. Is a total failure and a assault on the quality of life to the exiting long time homeowners that are being negatively affected on a regular basis now. Now on to the next part of the up‐zoning code witch you have already allowed to be constructed. I am going to refer to allowing multi‐story high density housing to be built in or near single family homes and subdivisions. I have seen several examples now of this being allowed, and the negative results to the existing homeowners. The worst one that I have seen is on Ustick near Five mile, where a three story high density housing unit was built on the north side of the street. Despite strong objections from all the homeowners in Camelot subdivision against this development. The 3rd story balconies of this unit overlook the backyards of a dozen homeowners on the south side of Ustick. Effectively destroying all the privacy of there backyards, kitchens, and dining rooms that they have been investing in as a homeowner. This is just one example of so many another failures on multiple levels. The third and most important fail of this up‐zoning, is removing the voice of the people in the name of development. This is just wrong, something I’ve noticed since Mayor Bieter was elected and Mclean was hired to head P&Z, was the lack of mail notification on developments that were schedualed. On‐line notifications and meetings are not serving all the people. A lot of homeowners rely on mail to let them know, and should not have to find out second hand on a development that is going to effect them. In closing as a tax paying homeowner in this home for 23yrs now, and a native of Boise for 57yrs, I’m strongly against this up‐zoning and all the building variances that have been allowed prior to introducing the new code. They all have had a negative effect on the character of Boise and its homeowners. Signed Todd Stewart

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 12:28 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Luci Willits, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Darron Stone stoned@slhs.org 12123 W. Alfred St. Boise, ID 83713 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Friday, April 14, 2023 9:30 AM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Aletha Stone glstone84@gmail.com 2533 N Fry St Boise, ID 83704 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:40 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Ms. JoEtta Stott fjstott@q.com 11699 W Dallan Dr Boise, ID 83713 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 4:31 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Debra Stredder 1debsown@gmail.com 11361 Powderhorn St. Boise, ID 83713 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Thursday, April 20, 2023 11:09 AM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Michael Strollo Email mkstrollo@yahoo.com Address 5972 S Sturgeon Way Comment I am in favor of the new Zoning code. I have recently moved to Boise from New Jersey and as I was able to sell my home in New Jersey and am a retired person I was able to buy a home. I was in a great position financially, but this is not the case for so many young folks trying to get a home here. Affordable neighborhoods are not available because of the cost of new homes and Lack of affordable apartments, condos etc. The new zoning would give these young folks a vibrant neighborhood to live in. It would also help our environment and create walking and biking as a healthy clean way of living. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 6:38 AM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Timothy STROUSE timiks1@msn.com 10348 UTAHNA RD BOISE, ID 83714‐3734 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 4:56 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Holli Woodings, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Tyler stroz relyt87@gmail.com 1317 S Jackson St Boise, ID 83705 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

dialedeyes <dialedeyes@protonmail.com> Thursday, April 20, 2023 11:55 AM ZoningRewrite [External] Zoning Code Rewrite

I am writing to let you know that I reject the zoning code rewrite as it is currently proposed. There has not been proper amount of time nor public input to put this on the agenda right now. Boise was claimed to be a desirable place to live the past few years. These new zoning codes that will bring high density and destroy our neighborhoods will end all that. Who wants to live surrounded by high rises and concrete? What happened to the city's commitment to neighborhoods? Look to other cities and see what been done. High density has devastated them, increased rents and taxes for homeowners. And to implement this rewrite under the guise of affordable housing is simply not true. Putting high rise apartment buildings along bus corridors like Vista - has it raised the ridership? I'm sure it has not. Instead it's brought more cars into the neighborhood. Have you been on the roads during rush hour lately? It will continue to get worse. As a homeowner, I have taken pride in my home in the Vista Neighborhood for many years. That is up until last year when multiple homes were demolished and a 4 story, 46 unit apartment building started being built behind me. The past year has been nothing but noise and dirt 5-6 days a week, making it impossible to not only enjoy my yard but for my husband and I to work from home. Do I want to live in this kind of neighborhood? NO! Do I want to leave? YES. I do not want my lot (or my neighbors lots) rezoned to 45 feet, therefore allowing more high rises to be built around my property. Why don't we, as homeowners get a bigger voice? Instead, Council members, some of which are new and temporary, get to vote on the future of my neighborhood?!? The rush to rewrite is inappropriate. I'm sure (mostly out of state developers) are knocking on your door to rush in and buy up everything they can. There has to be more public input, time allotted and the vote deferred until the new council has been seated. Don't Upzone Boise! Kim Stuart 2421 Ona St.

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:32 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Matthew Stubbs mkstubbs@gmail.com 10585 W Country Squire Ln Boise, ID 83704 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 9:51 AM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Holli Woodings, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, nate suekel usscout.ns@gmail.com 4315 West Irving Street, Boise, ID 83706 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 4:22 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Ms. Veronika Surbeck vcheeky@hotmail.com 5932 W. Poplar drive Boise, ID 83704 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 5:37 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Geoff Surbeck gsurbeck@hotmail.com 5932 Poplar Dr. Boise, ID 83704 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 5:25 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Ms. Kristi Swanson kristicantdance@gmail.com 2810 w sunset Boise, ID 83703 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

aaron.swisher@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Carlton Swisher <aaron.swisher@everyactioncustom.com> Thursday, April 20, 2023 12:06 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Support for the Zoning Code Rewrite

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Thursday, April 20, 2023 1:25 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Kelsey Swope Email kelseyswopemusic@gmail.com Address 4319 Plum St Comment When i took Environmental Science in high school 15 years ago my teacher showed us a map of projected growth and told us Boise had a faster growth curve than Southern California in the 70’s. It became very clear to me then, 15 years ago, that as an adult planning and zoning would be very much a part of my life should I choose to stay in Idaho‐ and it has. I’m very privileged to own a small home, with my husband and two kids, near 36th and State‐ in a wedge of older residential homes with grandfathered agricultural rights. I have honey bees and chickens, as do nearly all my neighbors. We want those things protected, and they have been honored in the new code. It is my personal opinion that this zoning code protects Boisean’s ways of living while making smart planning decisions so we don’t experience the traffic, sprawl and waste of precious resources like water that comes without strategy for where we are projected to keep going. Change is hard. I’ve felt that consistently as a native Boisean. We don’t want to see the foothills clogged up with new tracts and subdivisions, we want better more accessible public transportation, we want to see the growth of our city captured in ways that makes it an ever better place to live. We are becoming a “real city”‐ with a population that can’t rely just on driving a car down State st or across town. Planning for denser, affordable, walkable communities is key for all of us, but especially for keeping folks who can’t afford single family homes in our neighborhoods, at our schools and in our communities. I know, from living near the collister area‐ my family loves being walkably‐close to restaurants, a coffee shop, an ice cream shop, a hardware store, school, and natural spaces. Most of my peers are priced out of home buying (I’m 30 y/o)‐ and will not be able to buy a home in this city they have lived maybe their whole lives. Let’s design this city for everyone and most importantly for a future that doesn’t depend on cars or wealth (or debt) most will not be able to attain. Thank you‐ Kelsey Swope If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 4:37 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Thomas Cushing tom.cushing576@gmail.com 4818 W Willow Ln Boise, ID 83703 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Deanna Dupuy From: Sent: To: Subject:

loisanntaylor60@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Lois Taylor <loisanntaylor60 @everyactioncustom.com> Wednesday, April 19, 2023 4:32 PM ZoningRewrite [External] I Support the Zoning Code Rewrite

Dear Planning and Zoning Commission, I am writing to express my support for the Zoning Code Rewrite. The sustainability, affordability, and open space protections included in the new zoning code rewrite are exactly what Boise needs to plan for and address our rapid growth. Growth is inevitable, and we need a modern zoning code to ensure we are following the best practices to grow sustainably and responsibly. It has been clear that Boise City Staff have put in the effort to make an inclusive and extensive community input process to develop the zoning code our city needs and deserves. Boise has become increasingly unaffordable for everyone, especially for new home buyers, renters, students, low‐ income residents, refugee families, and elderly folks on fixed incomes. This code helps address those issues. I specifically appreciate that this zoning code protects our green spaces, improves our tree canopy, incentivizes energy and water efficiency that saves money over the lifetime of a home, allows for smart and targeted density, increases opportunities for multi‐family homes like duplexes, removes unnecessary parking space minimums, protects pollinators, and makes our communities more walkable and bikeable. I strongly encourage the Boise Planning and Zoning Commission to support this zoning code rewrite that staff and residents have spent so much time and effort to shape. Sincerely, Miss Lois Taylor 1275 N Gawaine Pl Boise, ID 83704‐8082 loisanntaylor60@gmail.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Wednesday, April 19, 2023 9:58 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Reuben teague Email rbteague@gmail.com Address 3154 s Longleaf Ave Boise, ID 83716 Comment I support the proposed changes to the zoning code. If we don’t allow for more housing units to be added to infill lots, we will face greater housing cost increases in the future. Boise should grow to add new neighbors ‐ the alternative is a future where our young people can’t afford to stay. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

rachelterhune@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Rachel Terhune <rachelterhune@everyactioncustom.com> Wednesday, April 19, 2023 1:14 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Vote Yes on the Zoning Code Rewrite

Dear Planning and Zoning Commission, I am writing to express my support for the Zoning Code Rewrite. The sustainability, affordability, and open space protections included in the new zoning code rewrite are exactly what Boise needs to plan for and address our rapid growth. Growth is inevitable, and we need a modern zoning code to ensure we are following the best practices to grow sustainably and responsibly. It has been clear that Boise City Staff have put in the effort to make an inclusive and extensive community input process to develop the zoning code our city needs and deserves. Boise has become increasingly unaffordable for everyone, especially for new home buyers, renters, students, low‐ income residents, refugee families, and elderly folks on fixed incomes. This code helps address those issues. I specifically appreciate that this zoning code protects our green spaces, improves our tree canopy, incentivizes energy and water efficiency that saves money over the lifetime of a home, allows for smart and targeted density, increases opportunities for multi‐family homes like duplexes, removes unnecessary parking space minimums, protects pollinators, and makes our communities more walkable and bikeable. I strongly encourage the Boise Planning and Zoning Commission to support this zoning code rewrite that staff and residents have spent so much time and effort to shape. Sincerely, Ms. Rachel Terhune 12340 W Rockbury Ct Boise, ID 83709‐0017 rachelterhune@gmail.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 5:15 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Ryan Theurer rtchevythunder@hotmail.com 1044 S Pikesville Ave Boise, ID 83709 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

ZoningRewrite From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:27 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Ben Thiel bjthiel32@gmail.com 9753 W. Red Berry Ct. Boise, ID 83709 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Deanna Dupuy From: Sent: To: Subject:

george.e.thoma@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of George Thoma <george.e.thoma@everyactioncustom.com> Wednesday, April 19, 2023 4:27 PM ZoningRewrite [External] I Support the Zoning Code Rewrite

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:37 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. James W Thomas james@thomas.net 668 S Whisperwood Way Boise, ID 83709‐5215 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Thursday, April 20, 2023 2:37 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Riley Thomason Email thomason.riley@gmail.com Address Boise, ID 83705 Comment Please support the zoning code rewrite. I believe we need more mixed use neighborhoods that bring in diverse communities from all economic backgrounds. As a resident that was born and raised in Boise, we need to move in this direction to build a Boise for everyone. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 8:08 AM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Randy E. Thornton randythornton326@gmail.com 6395 N. Portsmouth Ave Boise, ID 83714 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Cc:

Robert Tiedemann <ecodesigninc@mac.com> Wednesday, April 19, 2023 8:56 AM ZoningRewrite Adam Bass; Tamsen Binggeli; Ben Everson; Christy Hinman Meyer, FP-C, CERP; Michael Homza P.E.; Marisa Keith; Darryl Kuhrt; Jonathan Lucas; Will Tiedemann; Madeline Wyatt [External] Testimony Relevant to Your Hearing - Officially Known as ZOA23-0001 and CPA23-0001

Subject:

Attachments available until May 19, 2023

Good Morning Commissioners! Please accept into the public record my testimony relevant to your hearing ‐ officially known as ZOA23‐0001 and CPA23‐ 0001‐ for the proposed new zoning code. Attached are two letter previously shared with the principal author(s) of the zoning code rewrite that I wish to give you. My hope is you will provide due diligence to insure these comments were fully considered, and suggested changes incorporated into the final documents you will consider and vote upon. This message is also meant to give my deep appreciation to those authors, Tim Keene (Director, Boise City Plaaning and Community Development), you the Commissioners, and all others who are a part of this continuing effort. Please acknowledge you have received my testimony. I look forward to providing brief remarks at the hearing. Thank you . . . Rob

Click to Download 04cCityBoiseZoningCodeRewriteModule2LetterComment(March31,2022)w:Additions(June27,2022)PDF.pdf 178 KB

Click to Download 04eCityBoiseZoningCodeRewriteModule2LetterComment(March31,2022)SupplementalLetter(June27,2022)PDF.pdf 159 KB

Click to Download BoiseRiverEnhancementPlan2015.pdf 33.4 MB

Rob Tiedemann, Ph.D. Certified Professional Wetland Scientist ‐ Society of Wetland Scientists No. 0000702 Certified Wetland Delineator ‐ US Army Corps of Engineers April 15, 1994 Certified Fisheries Scientist ‐ American Fisheries Society No. 1,717 Certified Wildlife Biologist ‐ The Wildlife Society December 10, 1986 Certified NPDES BMP Designer ‐ Idaho Transportation Department 1996

Principal Ecological Design, Inc. and 1

Clean Water Partners / Professionals, LLC 217 North Walnut Street Boise, ID 83712 208.484.0680 ecodesigninc@mac.com and Visiting Scholar Center for Ecohydraulics Research University of Idaho, College of Engineering

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 6:18 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Bob Tikker bobt@tikkerengineering.com 2313 N. Claremont Drive Boise, ID 83702 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Deanna Dupuy From: Sent: To: Subject:

Leslie Sanders <lesliesanders208@yahoo.com> Wednesday, April 19, 2023 7:21 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Increase Density and Get Rid of Parking Minimums

Dear Boise City, We have a comment for your re-zoning efforts. The cost of housing in Boise has skyrocketed. One of the only ways we can combat this is with higher density and lower parking (NO) parking minimums. We are highly supportive of the city's efforts to greatly increase density and reduce or eliminate parking minimums in the West End neighborhood where we live. Many people are scared of having an apartment building or a 4-plex next door. Not us. We see new development as a positive thing that lowers housing costs while boosting property values at the same time. Thank you, Leslie and Tim Sanders 926 N 32nd St Boise ID 83702

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 7:38 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Philip Toomey patoomey@gmail.com 351 S. Pierce Pl. Boise, ID 83712 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Thursday, April 20, 2023 12:32 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Peter torma Email peter2torma@gmail.com Address 2213 s Ormond street Comment This is a supplement to a comment I submitted. About 2‐3 months ago I found out about the code rewrite. I submitted a request to have information or notices be sent to me. Today is the first email I received from the City of Boise. The email is a reminder that comments were due today and of public hearings. If the goal is community engagement I would say this is not great. It looks more like you don’t want comments but instead are just checking the box to say we kept you in the loop or u lost my email. This project is to big for this type of communication. You need to start over with a new plan and then hold public meetings with maps, analysis and staff who can answer questions. 600 plus page document is to much to read , digest, understand. Thank you. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 7:35 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Patricia Toshcoff ctosh34@hotmail.com 4281 N. Forest Meadow Ave. Boise, ID 83704 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

ZoningRewrite From: Sent: To: Subject:

Kathy Treacy <treacykat@gmail.com> Tuesday, April 18, 2023 7:32 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Cafes in neighborhoods.

I love the idea of more neighborhood businesses in the neighborhood but all the rules and limitations are ridiculous. Getting through the standard permit process is expensive and daunting. Don't make it worse. If it's a neighborhood place it should not need parking. Why so small? The average size of an existing home may be 1886 ft but look at the monster homes being built all over the place. The Northend with the enormous new homes and additions, and the 4000, 5000, square foot homes for 3 people all over SE Boise. It is a ridiculous proposal to rewrite the entire building code in one go. Slow down and get it right for All of us. Not just the developers and the the tax collectors. Kathy Treacy

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Thursday, April 20, 2023 4:46 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Casey Tschikof Email caseyt84@gmail.com Address Boise, Idaho, 83709 Comment I am writing in support of the zoning modernization. I believe that everyone deserves a place to live and the zoning update is one way we can work to address our housing crisis. I understand there has been vocal opposition to the zoning update — and plenty of disinformation distributed by zoning update opponents. But I'd like to please urge you to take action on the zoning update now while we still have time to make proactive moves to avoid sprawl, increased traffic, worsening pollution, strained resources, and worsening housing affordability. Thank you for your time. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

alicynturner@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Alicyn Turner <alicynturner@everyactioncustom.com> Thursday, April 20, 2023 3:05 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Please Support the Zoning Code Rewrite

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 8:36 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Dale Tustison mynonr@gmail.com 10811 W. Sandhurst Dr Boise, ID 83709 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

Tim Tyree <tim@tyreebauer.com> Wednesday, April 19, 2023 1:38 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Public Comment

Dear Planning and Zoning Commissioners, My name is Tim Tyree. I live at 618 W. Franklin St., Boise, within the near north end historic district, right behind the Capitol building and a five blocks away from Boise High. Parking on Franklin Street is limited to one hour without a resident permit. The foregoing facts are relevant to my comments on the proposed zoning code amendment as discussed below. I am in favor of the zoning code amendment. Sprawl consumes necessary open space and farmland, increases air pollution, and decreases critical habitat for flora, fauna, and insects. I suspect those reasons, among many, are driving the need to update the City’s zoning code. If you amend the zoning code, please consider the collateral consequences, specifically parking enforcement. The proposal allows increases in density without onsite parking, and I agree with that policy, but the policy relies on adequate on-street parking. The problem comes with parking enforcement. My neighborhood cannot support an increase in density and cannot support neighborhood businesses because the available parking is consumed by others violating the parking limits. People working downtown and students at Boise High consume all available parking on Franklin Street. I rarely see City parking enforcement in my neighborhood and the online complaint link through the City’s website has never resulted in action. If you amend the zoning code to allow for increased density, which I hope you do, please recognize you create an unfunded mandate to accommodate on-street parking. Therefore, any increase in density should be coupled with an increase in the budget for parking enforcement and meaningful and consistent implementation of the parking laws. Thank you for your time and I wish you the best as you work through the public hearing process. Sincerely, TIM TYREE O: 208.918.8118 C: 208.345.5885

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

megomeltyree@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Meg Tyree <megomeltyree@everyactioncustom.com> Thursday, April 20, 2023 11:11 AM ZoningRewrite [External] In Favor of Zoning Code Rewrite

Dear Planning and Zoning Commission, I support the Zoning Code Rewrite because I want to see more affordable housing! Sincerely, Ms. Meg Tyree 1921 N 22nd St Boise, ID 83702‐0511 megomeltyree@gmail.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:41 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Ms. Patricia M Ullman patty.ullman@gmail.com 913 E Riverpark Ln Boise, ID 83706 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 10:15 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Terry Vallin tvallin@hotmail.com 4624 S Morning Light Place Boise, ID 83716 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

Jeffrey Varga <jeffvarga@me.com> Friday, April 14, 2023 9:09 AM Mayor McLean; CityCouncil; Timothy Keane; zoninginfo; ZoningRewrite [External] Zoning Code Rewrite Public Comment for ZOA23-00001 & CPA23-00001

Dear Mayor, City Council, and Planning and Zoning Commission,

I’m opposed to the upzoning in Boise. I live in the N. End historic district and allowing for multi family apartments and housing will detract from everything the north end stands for. I recently went through a remodel and had to spend a lot of time and money coming up with a design that didn’t change the look of the neighborhood. I wasn’t allowed to add a 2nd story since none of my neighbors have 2 story homes. Now all of a sudden they are going to allow 2-3 story apartments next to or across from me? There is plenty of room and land in Idaho to allow for growth. Keep pushing the city wider not higher and more congested. The roads in the north end are already at capacity and it gets more congested with each home that is built in the foothills. The infrastructure in the north end isnt able to handle the kind of growth being proposed. Another issue is that most of the people who will be buying the land and properties don’t even live in Idaho and will never occupy these homes! Don’t allow our city to become overcrowded and congested. It’s the residents of the city who will be footing the bill to improve roads, utilities and emergency services…not the giant developers who will come in, overdevelop and then move on to the next desirable small city. Our neighborhoods should remain how they are which is the reason we moved here and why other contributing members of society want to move here. This is a big change for Boise and I feel that the majority of homeowners aren’t even aware of this happening. I would ask that you please extend the timeline for public comment by at least 90 days. All residents and homeowners in Boise should be given more time to learn about and respond to the changes being proposed. Don’t let politics and money be the reason beautiful Boise changes from the amazing city it is to an overcrowded smog filled metropolis like we have seen happen to so many other great cities. Thank you for your time and consideration, Jeffrey Varga 1411 N. 14th St. Boise, ID 83702 303-329-3103 Jeff

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

bridgetvaughanlaw@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Bridget Vaughan <bridgetvaughanlaw@everyactioncustom.com> Thursday, April 20, 2023 4:07 PM ZoningRewrite [External] I support the Zoning Code Rewrite

Dear Planning and Zoning Commission, I support the Zoning Code Rewrite because we need to be cautious about rapid growth! Sincerely, Bridget Vaughan 2279 N 20th St Boise, ID 83702‐0834 bridgetvaughanlaw@msn.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:44 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Christina Velten cvelten_2001@hotmail.com 2127 W Lemhi St Boise, ID 83705 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 11:33 AM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Mechel Velten svelten_2008@hotmail.com 2127 W Lemhi St. Boise, ID 83705 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 8:27 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. RImma Victorino rimmavictorino@gmail.com 11093 W Wagon Pass St Boise, ID 83709 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

VETERANS PARK Neighborhood Association PO Box 6598 Boise, ID 83707

Apirl 20, 2023

City of Boise Planning and Development Services Boise City Hall 150 N Capitol Boulevard – 2nd Floor Boise, Idaho 83702 Attention:

Planning & Zoning Commission

Subject:

VPNA Comments on Zoning Code Rewrite

Commissioners: Veterans Park Neighborhood Association (VPNA) is submitting this letter to provide comment on Boise’s Zoning Code rewrite. While Veterans Park supports many of the stated goals of the Zoning Code Rewrite, such as improving walkability and promoting active, engaged communities, our board is frustrated that the Rewrite has not included any attempt to remedy deficiencies in our Code or its interpretation that have led to many controversial project proposals, even over only the last two years. For example:  The Blue Valley Community and Southwest Boise Community near the Airport impact area have both struggled against proposed industrial parks being constructed adjacent to residentially zoned lands. Future occurrences of these issues could be prevented by including use-specific standards for each industrial use that can be considered to be a health risk if adjacent to a residential use (such as a diesel trucking terminal), to require that specific use type to have an appropriate buffer from residential uses.  Southwest Boise has seen two different proposals for re-zoning of parcels designated as park space, and the City of Boise is now applying deed restrictions to individual parks. Why don’t we incorporate a zoning designation for permanent park space in the draft code?  Veterans Park Neighborhood Association has brought substantial evidence documenting the potential impacts of shelter home, but review bodies found that it was not appropriate to use professional judgement to require construction or operation to any analogous use standard not specified at code to mitigate the impact of the use, unless the applicant was independently willing. Why doesn’t the draft include any use specific standards to protect surrounding areas from impact, ensure minimum standards of care, and smooth this process in the future?  If consideration of shelter home use specific standards are separated into a future community conversation as alluded to by the Planning Director, then related services (such as temporary www.vpnaboise.org

VPNA Comments on Zoning Code Rewrite April 20, 2023 Page 2 safety facilities, food kitchens, and (possibly temporary) group homes, should be included in that discussion, not given sweeping new by-right accommodations in code. In addition, VPNA has noted that the changes between the last circulated Module 3 draft and the current Adoption Draft of the ZCR are significant, and undocumented – there is no easily accessible differences document, so we assume we have missed many of the changes made, as has the majority of the public. We object to the short review time given the broad and detail-oriented scope of the changes (including a previously unmentioned amendment to the Comprehensive Plan.) We also object to the comprehensive change approach, rather than addressing one type of change at a time such that all changes may be clearly understood at any given time. Outside of these overarching comments, VPNA has identified the following specific areas of concern or recommended edits to the Adoption Draft of the Zoning Code Rewrite: PROCEDURES 



The section of Boise’s current code guaranteeing that Neighborhood Associations are allotted equal time to the applicant presentation in public hearings has been removed. The provision of an allotted time is an important provision to allow the collective public representative to provide a cohesive presentation. This provision should be reinstated. In contrast, he proposed adoption draft grants the applicant and staff 30 minutes for oral presentations but only 5 minutes for neighborhood associations. o It should be clarified whether applicant and staff presentation s are allowed 30 minutes each or a shared total of 30 minutes. o Neighborhood Associations should be provided a minimum presentation length of 20 minutes or equal time to the applicant, whichever is greater. The Decision Criteria (11-05-04.6.b; 11-05-05.3.3.a.iv, for example) related to mitigating impact have been SIGNIFICANTLY weakened. 

Adoption Draft impact criteria: The application will not create any material negative impacts on adjacent properties; or any material negative impacts have been mitigated to the maximum extent practicable and the public benefits of the application outweigh any material negative impacts that cannot be mitigated.



Current code impact criteria: The proposed use, if it complies with all conditions imposed, will not adversely affect other property of the vicinity; The new text introduces several undefined terms including “material impact” “maximum extent practicable” and “public benefit”. The revised wording will significantly reduce the City’s ability to make a finding of impact because of the lack of an express standard related to any of these terms, allowing any applicant to argue that the code explicitly allows projects to impact the surrounding area when either mitigation would incur a financial cost to the applicant or when they argue that their project will benefit the public in any way, which most projects do. The new text reduces the area of consideration to “adjacent properties” rather than “other properties of the vicinity” or the prior ZCR draft, which referred to the “surrounding area”. This revision explicitly allows impacts to accrue in our communities without recourse. We request that this clause revert to its original language from our current code. www.vpnaboise.org

VPNA Comments on Zoning Code Rewrite April 20, 2023 Page 3

HEIGHT AND DENSITY CHANGES VS AFFORDABILITY Much of Veterans Park Neighborhood has been designated as an “area of change” and we recognize that the City of Boise has a goal to build increased density along the State Street transit corridor. However, Veterans Park residents value the mixed-socioeconomic nature our neighborhood is developing. We would object to policies that either aim to exacerbate the concentration of poverty present in our neighborhood demographic1 or drive out the poor and median income residents of our neighborhood. We advocate for the new construction in our area to focus on mixed-income construction, with affordable housing included in each development providing multiple housing units; however, the mild affordability and sustainability incentives coupled with the sweeping new density entitlements seem unlikely to incentivize that future. The proposed code revisions come with height and density changes that will significantly alter the built environment of Veterans Park. The entire length of the State Street Corridor, which bisects our neighborhood, will be granted a minimum 33% by-right height increase, from 45 feet to 60 feet. Affordability incentives grant only decreased parking minimums. On the order of 40% of our neighborhood’s residentially zoned lots are either R-2 or will be rezoned to R-2 as part of the Zoning Code Rewrite. The existing minimum lot size in the R-2 zone is 5,000 square feet, but the proposed rewrite reduces this to minimum lot sizes of 2,500 square feet for detached homes, or 2,000 square feet for attached homes. Each R-2 parcel can now be split into two parcels. This means, by definition, nearly 40% of our neighborhood will have an implicit incentive to be demolished and redeveloped into two (or more) properties, to be sold or rented at market value. (This is before accounting for allowances for multi-unit builds such as duplexes, tri-plexes, and four-plexes). Many of our R-1C lots are also large enough to be split into two 3,500 square feet lots under the new code. While Veterans Park currently hovers near a 50-50 split of owner-occupied vs. rental occupied housing units,2 which helps promote a stable and engaged community, the density focused redevelopment encouraged by this re-write is likely to shift this balance significantly toward renters, which reduces the opportunity for Veterans Park current and future residents to build wealth through home ownership and results in higher turnover of residents in the community. Simultaneously, the lack of affordability requirements may result in exclusively market-rate construction driving gentrification of our area and pushing out working class owners and renters. The new wealth created by the allowed density increases will largely be accrued by professional developers with the capital and expertise to redevelop these lots, rather than local residents. A recently published study (Land-Use Reforms and Housing Costs: Does Allowing for Increased Density Lead to Greater Affordability?; Urban Studies; March 21, 2023; see Appendix A) used a machine learning algorithm to collect data across 1,136 cities in eight US metropolitan regions from 2000 to 2019 that passed zoning changes during this period and subsequent housing supply and cost change figures. The study abstract concludes: We find that reforms that loosen restrictions are associated with a statistically significant, 0.8% increase in housing supply within 3 to 9 years of reform passage, 1 2

As documented in the City of Boise Community Development Analysis submitted by Vitruvian Planning. City of Boise Neighborhood Data Almanac, Volume 1, March 2020 www.vpnaboise.org

VPNA Comments on Zoning Code Rewrite April 20, 2023 Page 4 accounting for new and existing stock. This increase occurs predominantly for units at the higher end of the rent price distribution; we find no statistically significant evidence that additional lower-cost units became available or moderated in cost in the years following reforms. In Boise’s market, accelerating housing costs are not deriving exclusively from the local population or being fed by the local job market – the population growth Boise continues to experience is largely driven by in-migration of remote workers and/or retirees with income sources outside of the local job market. This means that there is not a clearly defined sufficient number of units, as demand for additional housing may continue to rise from in-migration to meet any supply provided. As such, the proposed changes to the code to allow the free market to produce increased density, while they may increase the amount of supply, are unlikely to provide relief on housing affordability. Instead, they are likely to follow the pattern identified in the above-referenced study, where increased capacity appears in the high-end market. We strongly recommend accompanying changes in the code with significantly stronger affordability requirements, rather than limiting affordability considerations only to the limited incentives provided in the current adoption draft of the code. We recommend the following changes, for example:  Rather than providing a blanket entitlement for increased height allowances in MX-3, keep the height limit at 45 ft, but allow an increase to 70 ft only under the affordability and sustainability incentive (or a stronger version of affordability and sustainability requirements). o In fact, this strategy could be applied broadly to all increased density allowances at code – make them available only when meeting affordability targets.  Do not provide an “unlimited” height exemption in MX-4, even with affordability requirements Set a height maximum.  MX-3 and MX-4 zones along the State Street transit corridor tend to be quite narrow, and this code specifies rezoning the adjacent 1/8 mile of residential properties to R-2. o The Building Height Stepdowns (11-04-03.5.C.) applies only to buildings abutting R-1 zones - this should be applied to the R-2 zone as well, with a step down to 45 ft.  We note that this is much already weaker than the Module 2 version, where one technique recommended was to step down the building to a maximum of 35 feet in height within 100 feet of any R-1C lot line. The other technique was to increase the building set back. We should consider reinstating the module 2 version, and ensuring that this requirement applies to ‘areas of change’. The north-south orientation of streets along the north side of State Street means that lack of building step-downs creates significant shadow impacts on the adjacent buildings.  Set affordability incentive for sales to 80% of AMI, rather than 120%.  Set framework and/or incentives to allow for individual unit sale of higher density developments, including cottage village units, condos instead of apartments, etc.  Include a provision for cottage villages and ADUs that allow tiny homes “on wheels” in addition to tiny homes – RVs are not typically included in the definition of tiny homes on wheels. This allows tiny home residents to participate in ownership of their home with lower lot rent, and provides more flexibility to maintain their investment if they need to move. It also allows property owners with space on their lot for an ADU to provide additional housing density without needing the capital investment of constructing an ADU themselves. www.vpnaboise.org

VPNA Comments on Zoning Code Rewrite April 20, 2023 Page 5 



Recommend adding anti-displacement mechanisms into code such as freezing land values for properties experiencing “land lift” due to the upzoning and/or introducing rent controls to protect renters from having leases terminated or rents raised exorbitantly to drive them out in order to redevelop. Recommend developing a city program to provide loans and/or professional direction to aid existing owners if they'd like to increase the density by adding 1 or more units to their properties. This could allow our local owners to retain ownership, and could be provided in exchange for the units being added to the affordable housing stock rather than market rate, for example.

In addition, we have previously shared comments with the planning department regarding the inconsistency of the zoning conversions to MX-3 and MX-4 and rezones to R-2. These comments are attached here as Appendix A. HOMELESSNESS AT CODE Upon questioning from City Council to the Planning Director on the prior proposal to add low standards for shelter home to the code, Mr. Tim Keane stated that no changes to shelter would be made as part of the zoning code rewrite, and that a later community engagement process could be held to discuss homelessness and its treatment in Boise’s Zoning Code. However, subsequent to this statement, several changes have appeared in the Zoning Code Rewrite draft that expand the by-right use sites for shelter and other services for those experiencing homelessness, without participation in any community engagement surrounding those. We recommend reverting these use designations to zones and Conditional entitlements to match Boise’s current code or prior drafts of code, as listed below: 

"Safety Facility" – is a new use added in the summer of 2022 after these comments were made.  Defined as: A facility that is designed to protect public safety on a temporary basis following the annexation of land, or in times of natural disaster or emergency circumstances, which may include but is not limited to a temporary station for fire protection and police protection, or a temporary facility to provide relief or assistance services to the public or to a facility to provide services related to the administration or management of such relief or assistance services  This use as been expanded to be allowed in all zones.  Prior iterations of the draft code specified that this could be used for facilities serving those experiencing homelessness. Nothing in the current wording precludes use of these facilities as “temporary” shelter home sites. o "Temporary" and "emergency circumstances" are undefined. o PDS has indicated via e-mail that the intent is to allow additional shelter space to open during winter weather, but the definitions do NOT clearly limit this use to that use case, and the "Allowed" designation means that no impacts will be considered. o We recommend one of the following edits to the proposed code to avoid expanding byright allowances for shelter prior to specific community-wide engagement on shelter in Boise’s code:  Specify that temporary shelters are not allowed to be sited under this use  Revise use to “Conditional” rather than “Allowed” to match the Shelter Home use requirements. www.vpnaboise.org

VPNA Comments on Zoning Code Rewrite April 20, 2023 Page 6 



Strictly define “temporary”, “emergency circumstance”, and “natural disaster” to clearly outline the allowed term and circumstance where this use may be applied, while ALSO adding a use-specific restriction that a temporary shelter may not occupy the same space as any prior temporary shelter over the preceding 5 years, as a regularly-used seasonal emergency shelter should be subject to CUP review. “Group Home, FHAA Large” and “Group Home, FHAA Small” are new uses to Boise’s code, which have been consistently morphing the definition and increasing the number of zones allowed in each iteration of the draft. (See “Supportive Housing” and "Temporary Housing” large and small in prior drafts.)  Currently Defined as: A residential dwelling or facility where {Large: nine or more/ Small: eight or fewer} persons are living, together with staff, as a single housekeeping unit providing care, supervision, and treatment for the exclusive use of citizens whose rights to live together or without undue restrictions are protected by the provisions of the federal Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988, as defined in that Act and interpreted by the courts, or by any similar legislation of the State of Idaho, including but not limited to facilities providing housing for people with disabilities or with mental illnesses.  We recommend adding a term such as “permanent” or “long-term” or specifying a minimum tenancy in the definition to ensure that these group homes are for long-term residency, not used to respond to nightby-night needs, as overlapping with the term defined as “Shelter Home”. (Prior iterations of this definition have included terminology making it clear that the prior intent was to allow temporary occupation, including by persons experiencing homelessness, in this definition. While the terms have been removed, nothing in the current definition precludes this use.)  Both uses have been expanded to "Allowed" in R-2, R-3, and all Mixed Use Zones, and “Small” has also been expanded to include “Allowed” R-1 zones; the original rewrite draft for this definition, under the title “Supportive Housing,” classified this use as “Conditional”, with “Large” conditionally allowed only in Mixed Use Zones, and “Small” also conditionally allowed in R-2 and R-3 zones.  We recommend that a maximum size be defined for “Group Home, Large” and/or the allowed uses should reflect this by removing it from exclusively residential zones due to the potentially large size of the facilities, and making it a conditional use only such that the size and impact can be allowed on a case-by-case basis. "Food Kitchen" - has been updated from a conditional use in our current code to an allowed use in MX-2, MX-3 and MX-U and a conditional use in MX-4 and MX-5 in the adoption draft. o We recommend reverting “Food Kitchen” to a Conditional use in the equivalent zones currently allowed at code, prior to specific community-wide engagement on homelessness in Boise’s code. “Shelter Home” - this use has reverted to the definition and conditional designation equivalent to our current code. o If the above recommendations on similar land uses are not incorporated, pending a community-wide engagement on homelessness in Boise’s Zoning Code, then keeping “Shelter Home” unchanged from our current code loses some meaning. In this case, we www.vpnaboise.org

VPNA Comments on Zoning Code Rewrite April 20, 2023 Page 7 would recommend the following minimum additional use-specific standards for shelter, focused on reducing impacts to surrounding areas:  Re-incorporate the proposed 300 ft residential buffer present in the Zoning Code Rewrite of Module 1 (or larger).  Require a minimum buffer from other “Shelter Home” (and similar uses, if not redefined for clarity) of 1,320 linear feet, measured from property boundary to property boundary. This buffer distance was proposed in the prior iteration of the Zoning Code Rewrite for “Dwelling, Co-Housing” and for “Cottage Village”. It is present in the current draft as a 400 foot buffer for “Cottage Village”. The intent of this buffer is to avoid concentrating impacts inherent to this use type in a single area.  Use specific standards governing shelter operations for the benefit of shelter guests are also appropriate and encouraged. However, these standards should be arrived at through community-wide engagement. The proposed standards that Our Path Home presented to the Citizen Advisory Committee are not appropriate to be the only standards at code, but could be incorporated into a tiered approach if desired, with higher standards present for shelters located around more vulnerable surrounding use types and/or serving more vulnerable populations where specific operational standards are appropriate, such as the medically fragile.  We have also compiled a summary and references of ways other cities have regulated shelter home in their zoning codes, along with VPNA’s recommendation for a tiered approach for zoning shelter homes of different sizes (including tiered residential buffers). These comments were formerly submitted to the planning department as part of the CUP21-00026 application, and are reattached here in Appendix B. Thank you for your consideration. Respectfully,

Katy Decker President, on behalf of VETERANS PARK NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION

www.vpnaboise.org

APPENDIX A Proposals for Additional Shelter Standards in Code Land-Use Reforms and Housing Costs: Does Allowing for Increased Density Lead to Greater Affordability?; Urban Studies; March 21, 2023

www.vpnaboise.org

Land-Use Reforms and Housing Costs: Does Allowing for Increased Density Lead to Greater Affordability?

Christina Stacy, Christopher Davis, Yonah Freemark, Lydia Lo, Graham MacDonald, Vivian Zheng, and Rolf Pendall Published in Urban Studies, March 21, 2023. This is the pre-proof version of the article. Find the full, proofed version here: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00420980231159500

------

Abstract: We generate the first cross-city panel dataset of land-use reforms that increase or decrease allowed housing density and estimate their association with changes in housing supply and rents. To generate reform data, we use machine-learning algorithms to search US newspaper articles between 2000 and 2019, then manually code them to increase accuracy. We merge these data with US Postal Service information on per-city counts of addresses and Census data on demographics, rents, and units affordable to households of different incomes. We then estimate a fixed-effects model with city specific time trends to examine the relationships between land-use reforms and the supply and price of rental housing. We find that reforms that loosen restrictions are associated with a statistically significant, 0.8% increase in housing supply within 3 to 9 years of reform passage, accounting for new and existing stock. This increase occurs predominantly for units at the higher end of the rent price distribution; we find no statistically significant evidence that additional lower-cost units became available or moderated in cost in the years following reforms. However, impacts are positive across the affordability spectrum and we cannot rule out that impacts are equivalent across different income segments. Conversely, reforms that increase land-use restrictions and lower allowed densities are associated with increased median rents and a reduction in units affordable to middle-income renters. Keywords: Zoning, Housing, Land Use, Affordable Housing

1. INTRODUCTION The United States is facing a housing affordability crisis that is exacerbating economic and racial inequities (Matlack and Vigdor 2006; Popov 2019). Rental prices were at an all-time high before the COVID-19 pandemic (Joint Center 2018), and as of March 2021, an estimated 10.7 million adults were delinquent on rent (CBPP 2021). These challenges disproportionately affect households with low incomes and people of color since they are more likely to rent than own their homes (Montgomery 2018). One explanation for the affordability crisis is that supply has not matched demand. While demand for rental units rose across all income bands between 2005 and 2015, the supply of rental housing costing less than $800 a month (2016 dollars) dropped as the national rental vacancy rate fell to a 30-year low (Joint Center 2018). Many metropolitan areas have experienced increases in housing prices and decreases in new construction over the past 25 years (Freemark 2022). The debate over how to increase the supply of affordable housing, however, stands unresolved. Many housing economists posit that inadequate supply stems from overly restrictive land-use regulations. Loosening these restrictions might increase housing production and thus decrease prices (Glaeser, Gyourko, and Saks 2005; Malpezzi 1996; Quigley and Raphael 2005). Research on housing filtering—the process by which properties age and depreciate into affordability— shows that new construction, even if rented or sold at prices above the market average, eventually opens less-expensive housing units for lower-income residents (Liu, McManus, and Yannopoulos 2020; Mast 2021). But others argue that loosening land-use restrictions (e.g., by increasing height limits) may not increase housing supply because loosened zoning may simply standardize common requests for variations from by-right rules that local zoning commissions already systematically approve for

developers (Lo et al. 2020). Moreover, even if a regulatory change yields a supply increase, prices may not fall (or stop rising) accordingly. In rezoned areas, builders might convert existing lowercost units into higher-cost ones; the amenity effects resulting from these conversions plus associated neighborhood retail and public safety improvements may, in turn, increase surrounding housing values (Jacobus 2016). As such, additional research is necessary to identify the effects land-use reforms have on housing supply and price. To examine these issues, we undertake the first cross-city panel analysis of the impact of landuse reforms on housing supply and rents. While other studies have examined the effect of land-use reforms on supply for individual cities or individual reforms (e.g., Kuhlmann 2021), we are the first to use a machine-learning approach to identify a diversity of reforms, and then examine their effects in multiple cities simultaneously. We also examine reform impacts on rents rather than sales prices—a unique contribution—and offer insight into how regulations impact unit availability at varying rent levels. We are specifically interested in housing that is affordable, which we define as units that cost no more than 30% of income for low- and moderate-income families, in both subsidized and non-subsidized projects (these units could be newly constructed or filtered down). We limit our investigation to reforms and impacts within individual cities, not across metropolitan areas. We generate a dataset of a variety of land-use reforms across eight US metropolitan regions encompassing 1,136 cities from 2000 to 2019. We also collect data on housing supply and costs. We then develop a random-trend model to estimate outcomes. We find that cities that passed reforms loosening land-use regulations (increasing allowed housing density, or “upzoning”) saw a statistically significant increase in their housing supply compared to cities without reforms. This increase, however, occurred predominantly for rental units affordable to households with higher-

than-middle-incomes over the short- and medium-term following reform passage; effects for units affordable to those with extremely low incomes and very low incomes were positive but not significant, perhaps due to the small number of such units at baseline in each city. Cities with reforms that increased regulatory restrictiveness (reducing allowed housing density, or “downzoning”) did not experience a change in housing supply compared to cities without reforms, though downzonings were associated with a significant increase in median rents and a reduction in rental units affordable to middle-income households. These results suggest that reforms loosening restrictions are, on average, associated with an uptick in new housing supply. But this increase is likely inadequate to increase the availability of housing affordable to low- and middle-income households in the short-term, at least within the jurisdictions that execute reforms, and among the reforms that we studied. Reforms tightening regulations are associated with increased rents, potentially worsening conditions for low- and moderate-income renters. Cities should consider pairing direct investments in housing subsidies, such as immediate investments in housing vouchers and project-based subsidies for publicly assisted housing, with reforms loosening restrictions to address both short-term and long-term housing affordability. 2. CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK Land-use regulations like zoning are generally implemented in the United States by local governments under rules set by states. Urban economists and housing scholars have for years sought to understand how they affect housing supply and prices. Though research has identified how regulation restricts construction and raises prices, they have yet to come to consensus on the degree to which loosening regulations reverses those effects. Nor have they specified impacts on the supply of rental housing affordable to low- and moderate-income households.

One common approach to evaluating regulations begins by breaking down home price into the sum of its components: labor, materials, neighborhood attributes, land, and process costs. Higher labor and materials do not appear to dramatically increase housing costs (Gyourko and Saiz 2006); inflation-adjusted construction costs have remained essentially flat since the 1990s while housing prices have trended upward (Gyourko and Molloy 2014). Land-use regulations, however, may be partially to blame for high costs. Zoning, impact fees, building codes, review processes, and other regulations have proliferated since the 1970s. These restrictions act as a component part of housing costs and dampen supply (Glaeser 2017; Kok, Monkkonen, and Quigley 2014). Glaeser, Gyourko, and Saks (2006) explore the wedge between marginal construction costs and market price, labeling the gap a “regulatory tax” ranging from zero in a few low-demand and low-regulation cities to upwards of 50% of home values in the Bay Area and Manhattan. These studies suggest that regulation reduces supply elasticity, resulting in larger price increases and slower growth in quantity as demand increases, as well as lower responsiveness to demand shocks (Saiz 2010). Several cross-sectional, point-in-time studies further explore these phenomena. Using a dataset on lot size, environmental, and subdivision laws in Boston-region jurisdictions, Glaeser, Schuetz and Ward (2006) find that stricter regulations have a negative effect on construction and lead to higher prices. Other cross-sectional studies of specific land-use policies’ effects on construction capture effects on a state-wide or national level. Schuetz and Murray (2019) find that cities with less restrictive zoning issued more permits for multifamily development. Similarly, Mawhorter (2018) finds that a higher proportion of single-family zoning and higher parking requirements in a jurisdiction were negatively associated with multifamily housing production. Using a national survey, Gyourko, Saiz, and Summers (2006) identify positive correlations between component

measures of regulatory restrictiveness (i.e., strict regulations in multiple dimensions, like parking requirements and height limits, are related), as well as higher housing prices. Several of these studies use surveys to assess regulatory stringency, but -these surveys raise concerns because planners assessing their own land-use rules may not offer an objective view of regulatory stringency (Lewis and Marantz 2019). Moreover, despite the comparative lessons the above studies offer, they are limited because static cross-sectional data cannot confirm the effects a policy reform would have over time, nor can their averaged housing-price data discern variations in housing production at different levels of affordability. Other researchers have focused on changes in regulations. Zabel and Dalton (2011) find that larger minimum lot size requirements significantly increased prices over time. Glaeser and Ward (2006) find that those lot size increases decreased housing permits issued. Similarly, Kahn, Vaughn, and Zaslov (2010) examine a reform that increased restrictiveness on construction, finding that it increased prices. Broad-scale regulatory changes that increase allowed housing-unit density are rare, thus few studies have captured their effects on prices—and those that do typically examine jurisdictions one by one. Dong (2021) finds that increased allowed density in Portland was associated with a greater probability of long-term development—though the number of new units developed was small. Freemark (2020) finds that a Chicago reform allowing for higher densities and reduced parking requirements raised prices without affecting supply. Kuhlmann (2021) and Zhou, McMillen and McDonald (2008) report similar findings in other cities. Greenaway-McGrevy et al. (2021) show significant increases in parcel costs for underdeveloped land in Auckland, New Zealand after allowed densities were increased. While such studies are suggestive of the impacts of loosened

regulations on land values and sales prices, none looks at impacts on rents, nor do they estimate average treatment effects across multiple jurisdictions. Given these findings, telling a consistent story about zoning reform impacts is difficult— especially when it comes to affordable housing. New construction creates positive spillovers for existing neighborhoods by improving aesthetics, removing eyesores, and adding neighborhood vibrancy (Zahirovich-Herbert and Gibler 2014). These amenity effects exert upward pressure on housing prices (Rossi-Hansberg, Sarte, and Owens 2010; Damiano and Frenier 2020), and newly constructed homes tend to cost more than the older buildings they replace or abut (Zillow 2020). We may thus expect reforms reducing restrictiveness to decrease affordable housing supply. Alternatively, the economic principles of supply and demand indicate that an increase in housing availability should reduce scarcity and increase competition among sellers, reducing prices. Additionally, scholarship on housing filtering tells us that supply increases create a chain of outmigration into newer units, creating newly affordable residences (Mast 2021). Thus, we may expect supply allowances to add units to the market that are affordable for low- and moderateincome families. A recent series of working papers examining the impacts of new housing largely find that such construction reduces rents in the surrounding area, potentially limiting displacement (Asquith et al. 2019; Li 2022; Pennington 2021; Phillips et al. 2021). That said, it is possible that outcomes vary by market segment, with more of an effect on moderating the costs of higher-end housing (Damiano and Frenier 2020). This latter phenomenon could reduce affordable housing in neighborhoods where amenity affects outweigh supply effects in the context of upzoning, but an increase in affordable housing in the region overall. Unlike studies leveraging surveys to identify regulatory stringency, we focus on the parameters of actual reforms in individual municipalities, where land-use regulations are written. This allows

us to avoid potential biases inherent in survey-based analysis. Unlike studies that examine zoning reforms in individual cities, we use machine-learning approaches to develop a cohort of changes in multiple cities. We also provide insight into unit availability by rent level, unlike most studies that examine home sales. Our research links reforms passed within an individual jurisdiction with outcomes within that same jurisdiction. We acknowledge that reform impacts, however, vary based on scale; it is possible that reforms passed in one jurisdiction have impacts across an entire metropolitan area. A reform increasing housing production in one city could have limited effects therein because of amenity effects surrounding construction—yet at the same time reduce prices in the region overall due to increased supply. This is a key finding in Buechler and Lutz’s (2021) examination of zoning changes in Zurich, Switzerland. The latter effect may ultimately be more important for residents seeking housing, since households have the ability to choose between multiple jurisdictions to live in a metropolitan real-estate market, but we do not have adequate data to measure such outcomes. By focusing on housing supply variations in multiple cities in the years following reform passage, our research adds evidence on how housing markets change in jurisdictions overall. We do not specifically investigate the number of new units built or their sales costs (as most aforementioned studies emphasize), but rather evaluate the total units available and their rents, with a focus on those units affordable to low- and moderate-income families. 3. DATA Land-Use Reform Data To generate a novel dataset of land-use reforms, we used machine-learning algorithms to analyze newspaper articles from Access World News, a comprehensive database of major newspapers.

This approach to data generation builds on other methods for textual data proxies from newspapers for urban phenomena (Ginsberg et al. 2009; Saiz and Simonsohn 2013). We first assigned newspapers to their respective 40 US metropolitan regions. We prioritized regions with relatively better news coverage and higher population growth, since we hypothesize that those growing regions are more likely to experience affordability challenges, while also having cities that implement reforms that reduce land-use restrictions (to ease affordability) or reforms that increase restrictions (in response to resident concerns about growth). Next, we identified 21 types of regulations that we hypothesize could affect housing production and availability, a list developed based on our prior research, and constructed a string of search terms relevant to those 21 policies to use in the machine-learning and article identification process. We then used the search string to narrow down the articles, only including those from between January 1, 2000 and January 13, 2019, producing 76,410 articles. We then relied on a machine-learning algorithm to tag articles. Articles were identified as describing reforms that are more or less restrictive (i.e., producing lower or higher allowed housing density, respectively), tied to a specific neighborhood or the whole city, occurring in a particular month and year (i.e., when policies were passed by respective city councils), and tied to a specific land-use reform type. We trained a team of four manual taggers with a background in housing and land-use policy to tag 568 randomly selected articles. The machine used this “training set” to “learn” to tag the full article set. While the machine-learning procedure successfully tagged many articles, the algorithm identified many articles merely discussing zoning reforms that did not indicate reform passage. Though we optimized the machine-learning algorithm to eliminate false negatives, this continued lack of reliability necessitated that the team verify all variables within the dataset for each article.

A team of land-use experts including the authors of this study and analysts from a national research organization with experience researching land-use reforms then hand-coded the data by reading each article and correcting machine-coded data.1 Since the dataset was large, we reduced the sample for hand coding, selecting eight metropolitan regions with a higher number of cities tagged as having implemented reforms loosening restrictions. We selected the most frequent reform types to hand code, including those related to accessory dwelling units (ADUs); floor-area ratio (FAR) or housing density; general rezonings (city-initiated zoning map amendments); height limits; lot sizes; minimum setbacks; and mixed residential and non-residential development. Some articles lacked sufficient information to identify the exact reform type; we coded such reforms as general rezonings. We then randomly selected a set of reforms for manual analysis and independently identified other sources confirming 90% of regulations, suggesting that our approach effectively identified reforms. Table 1 lists the various reform types, noting examples of more or less restrictive versions of each.

For additional detail on the machine-learning methods used to create this dataset, see: [Blinded for peer review]

Table 1: Reform Types

Reform Type Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs)

Description Secondary housing units on single-family residential lots, such as tiny homes in the backyard (“granny flats”) or basement apartments Floor-AreaRatio of a building's Ratio (FAR) or total floor area to the size of density the parcel where it is built General Land-use reforms with a Rezoning broad purpose, but with implications for housing density Height limits Limitations to building heights Minimum lot Requirement that every parcel sizes be larger than a minimum square footage Minimum Minimum distance for a setbacks building from its property line Mixed Blending of residential, residential and commercial, cultural, or non-residential institutional uses into one development space

More Restrictive, i.e., allowing lower housing densities Raise minimum lot sizes for ADUs, ban ADUs

Less Restrictive, i.e., allowing higher housing densities Lower minimum lot sizes for ADUs, allow ADUs

Lower allowed density or FAR

Higher allowed density or FAR

Lower density or FAR

Higher density or FAR

Lower height limit

Higher height limit

Minimum allowed size increased

Minimum allowed size decreased

Minimum setback increased Minimum setback decreased Reduced use types allowed in a zone, increased specificity on types of allowed uses in mixed-use zones

Lowered restrictions on allowed use, lower specificity in allowed-use subtypes

We identified 180 major reforms during the study period in the eight regions’ 1,136 cities (table 2). We intentionally excluded small-scale reforms, since our interest is in municipality-wide impact. We did not include reforms affecting only one or two neighborhoods, but we did include reforms that, for example, reduced minimum lot sizes on all parcels. Of reforms identified, 84 increased development restrictions and 96 loosened them. Most reforms related to ADUs and minimum lot sizes, though many also related to height limits and floor-area-ratio requirements. About one-third of reforms were in the Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA Metropolitan Statistical Area. Because of our choice to specifically examine regions with many reforms loosening restrictions, the ratio of less restrictive reforms to more restrictive reforms should not

be interpreted as nationally representative. Our dataset contained reforms passed by local governments between 2005 and 2019 (figure 1).

Table 2: Land-Use Reform Summary Statistics Frequency Type of Reform ADUs FAR General rezoning Height limits Minimum lot size Minimum setbacks Mixed residential and non-residential development Metropolitan region Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia NC-SC Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN-WI Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX Los Angeles – Long Beach – Anaheim, CA Miami – Fort Lauderdale – West Palm Beach, FL Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA Total

Total Reforms 50 34 22 37 33 1 3 Total Reforms 17 16 20 15 57 17 17 21 180

More Restrictive 15 19 11 24 14 1 0 More Restrictive 11 7 11 3 28 9 6 9 84

Less Restrictive 35 15 11 13 19 0 3 Less Restrictive 6 9 9 12 29 8 11 12 96

Note: General rezonings refer to land-use reforms that were major, but for which specifics of the type of reform are unclear. We designated regions using Census-defined metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs). Source: Authors’ analysis of land-use reform data.

Figure 1: Municipal Land-Use Reforms

Source: Authors’ analysis of land-use reform data.

Census and Address Data We merged reform data with rent levels and population from the 2000 decennial census and each five-year American Community Survey (ACS) available at the time of writing (2005-2009 to 2015-2019) from the IPUMS National Historic Geographic Information System (Manson et al. 2018). Because census-designated places (generally equivalent to municipalities) and tracts change geographies over time, we created city-level information from census-tract data with consistent boundaries based on 2010 tracts. We used Brown University’s Longitudinal Tract Database to standardize tracts (Logan, Xu, and Stults 2014). Our findings incorporate error due to ACS

estimates, but that error is distributed across all studied communities, no matter whether they undertook a reform. The ACS publishes data on the number of rented housing units by the gross rent paid. These data are in bucket form; each bucket has a range of gross rent for units. To create our measures of affordable housing units, we calculate the rent that would be affordable to people in the relevant geography. We then sum the housing units in each rent bucket below the calculated affordable rent. We then approximate the number of units within the bucket that contains the calculated affordable rent by multiplying the number of units in the bucket by the difference between the calculated affordable rent and the minimum value of the bucket over its dollar range. For example, if the bucket between $80,000–$100,000 has 1000 units, and the relevant affordable rent for the calculation is $90,000, we would count 500 units. Finally, we integrated quarterly US Postal Service (USPS) data on the total number of addresses within each place, provided by the US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) between 2005 and 2018. These data represent the count of units as a housing-supply measure. Our decision to use this as an outcome measure limited our reform universe to cases between 2005 and 2018. USPS address data are available at the tract level, so a geographic transformation from tract to place was necessary to match the datasets. We used a geographic crosswalk to transform the data (Missouri Census Data Center 2020). Summary Statistics Cities that institute reforms (more or less restrictive) tend to be much more populous than those that never institute reforms (table 3). We identify similar statistically significant variation with respect to population change, rent levels, and other municipal characteristics. These differences

could be exacerbated by bias in our data collection method since smaller cities are less likely to feature robust news coverage.

Table 3: Baseline Municipal Characteristics by Reform Status Means

Characteristic Population Population change Addresses Change in number of addresses Median gross rent Change in median gross rent

Per-capita rental units available by income

Aggregate gross rent Change in aggregate gross rent Extremely low income (ELI) Very low income (VLI) Low income (LI) Median income (MI) Above MI Above 50% AMI Under 50% AMI

Never had a reform 19,700 1,612

Ever had a more restrictive reform 189,585** 8,473**

Ever had a less restrictive reform 212,003** 7,635**

8,884 213

89,385** 1,003**

96,686** 1,230**

$945

$1,122**

$1,034**

2000$67 2007 2000 $1,846,465 2000$739,340 2007 2007 0.005

$100

$89

$26,129,489** $11,637,144**

$28,536,468** $12,151,556**

0.008**

0.007

Data year 2000 20002007 2005 20052006 2000

2007 2007

0.012 0.038

0.011 0.046*

0.012 0.043

2007 2007 2007 2007

0.015 0.019 0.033 0. 056

0.025** 0.051** 0.071** 0.071

0.023** 0.045** 0.084** 0.066

Note: Stars indicate significant differences in mean between cities that instituted reforms and those that never instituted a reform. ** p ≤ 0.01; * p ≤ 0.05.

Cities that institute reforms that increase restrictiveness and those that reduce restrictiveness tend to have an increasing number of housing units leading up to a reform, though their trends diverge in the years after (figure 2). These overall increases in the number of units do not appear in cities that never instituted land-use reforms. This is likely due to reverse causation; cities may be more likely to institute land-use reforms because of observed changes in their housing supply. Therefore, controlling for these pre-trends helps identify the causal impacts of the reforms, since

parallel trends prior to the treatment are necessary for a fixed-effects model. Figure 2: Average number of addresses before and after reforms, normalized

Source: Authors’ analysis of HUD USPS Vacancy Data and land-use reform data.

4. METHODS We estimate a random-trend, fixed-effects model that compares housing-related changes within cities that implemented land-use reforms to changes within cities that did not. Fixed effects allow us to remove unobserved heterogeneity within places and control for national trends (Wooldridge 2002). We also include random trends, providing each city its own linear time trend in addition to the separate level effect. This approach reduces the potentially endogenous

relationships between municipal interest in passing land-use reforms in response to changing housing conditions in that community, and helps to fulfill the parallel-trends assumption. We estimate the following equation using multinomial quasi-conditional maximum likelihood estimation (Wooldridge 1999):

𝑌!" = 𝑅𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑅𝑒𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑠𝐼𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛!" + 𝐿𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑅𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑅𝑒𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑠𝐼𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛!" + 𝑅𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑅𝑒𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑠𝑃𝑜𝑠𝑡!" + 𝐿𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑅𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑅𝑒𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑠𝑃𝑜𝑠𝑡!" + 𝜆! + 𝜃" + 𝜍! 𝑡 + 𝜀!"

where 𝑌!" is a series of outcome measures related to housing supply and costs, including total address count (2005-2018, quarterly), median rents (2000-2017, annually), aggregate gross rents (2000-2017, annually), and the count of rental units affordable to households at different income levels based on national median incomes (2000-2017 yearly).2 Note that the latter measure is not quantifying the number of available subsidized units, but rather the number of units affordable to people based on their means: units included could thus be subsidized or not. 𝑅𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑅𝑒𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑠!" and 𝐿𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑅𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑅𝑒𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑠!" are counts of the number of reforms that increased restrictions in city i in year t or any year before (i.e., it is specified as a stock variable). The model includes city-level fixed effects that capture time-invariant characteristics, 𝜆! , and fixed effects for each year or quarter (depending on the outcome) to account for trends in the economy or real-estate market, 𝜃" . Standard errors are clustered at the city level and are robust to heteroskedasticity and arbitrary forms of error correlation within each city.

We put dependent variables into natural logged form when both the variables themselves and the residuals from their regressions show a logged distribution. Once we log the variables, the residuals produce a normal distribution. The measure of units affordable to households at different income levels includes subsidized and non-subsidized units.

Variables are split into an implementation period of two years before a reform, the year of the reform, and two years after the reform, plus a post period (three or more years after). The implementation period controls for anticipation effects that could cause an Ashenfelter dip or spike (e.g., a reform being discussed but not yet having been passed influencing developer behaviors). The post-period allows time for reforms to take effect; knowledge about reforms may take time to spread. The two-year period after reforms considers short-term impacts and accounts for the fiveyear averages in the ACS data to ensure that outcome years do not include pre-periods due to averaging. Because of this averaging, we cannot separate anticipatory effects from construction effects, so we do not split this implementation period into two. The longer-term post period reform impacts identify outcomes more than two years after reforms versus the three years before the reforms. These estimates represent average treatment effects for all years, three or more years after reform passage. This varies between cities, based on the reform. We split the treatment variable into reforms increasing restrictions on land use and those reducing restrictions on land use. This is because we believe that their effects are not symmetric: removing restrictions may not have the opposite effects on housing affordability, at least in the short run, as increasing restrictions. This is because loosening land-use restrictions may simply standardize requests for variations from by-right rules that local zoning commissions already systematically approve (Lo et al. 2020), and because in rezoned areas, builders might convert existing lower-cost units into higher-cost ones. The amenity effects resulting from these conversions plus associated neighborhood retail and public safety improvements may, in turn, increase surrounding housing values (Jacobus 2016).3

Results are similar when the treatment variable is run as a single reform variable, but they are attenuated and less informative since we cannot determine whether the effects are symmetric. Authors can provide these results upon request.

As a robustness check, we estimate the models using area median incomes (AMIs) to calculate affordability (rather than the national median incomes in the standard models) to confirm that our results are not sensitive to this calculation. Though we do not prefer this approach, these findings can help confirm our national-data-based findings related to the lower end of rental affordability. We also run falsification tests to explore whether future hypothetical reforms could predict changes in outcome measures. If significant, these results might suggest that endogeneity exists in the model and that results are not reliable. We acknowledge several limitations in our approach. Because of our reliance on news articles to identify reforms, we may be undercounting changes occurring in some cities. Our control group (cities without reforms) may include some treated, but unmeasured, cities with reforms. This may attenuate our estimates of reform impact, though we expect that most reforms, especially the largest, were covered in the news. There may also be underlying conditions in cities that pass reforms that cause them to pass reforms; cities facing affordability problems, for example, may be more likely to loosen construction regulations. But our models’ use of city linear trends and controls for regional context aid us in addressing this concern. Moreover, though our incorporation of fixed effects and random trends aid efforts to achieve identification, we cannot fully assert a causal relationship between reforms and outcomes as there remain potential endogenous relationships for which we cannot account, plus time-varying, unobserved characteristics. For example, cities passing reforms reducing construction restrictions may have simultaneously invested in increased subsidized housing support. And cities experiencing increasing rents may be more likely to implement reforms loosening restrictions, thus violating the exogeneity assumption of the model.

We also face limitations in our ability to link specific land-use regulations with outcomes. We do not examine specific parcels experiencing zoning changes at the neighborhood level; we assume that reforms we identified impacted cities overall. We also do not differentiate between relative impacts of different changes, and we do not have the power to assess the varying impacts of reform types, like ADU or height-limit policy. It is likely that reform effects varied based on neighborhood, which we do not measure. Nor do we measure effects across entire metropolitan areas, which constitute the broader housing market. And it is possible that our method for identifying reforms was incomplete, particularly in smaller cities with a less active press. Despite these limitations, by providing the first multi-city, multi-reform dataset, we offer new insight into the short- and medium-term impacts of land-use regulatory changes. Our models provide unique information about how different types of changes may be associated with changes in housing production and affordability.

5. FINDINGS To identify relationships between land-use reforms and housing supply, we estimate reform impacts on the overall housing supply (measured by address counts), housing costs (median gross rents to represent average rental costs, plus aggregate gross rents to understand how total rents in cities change, which could be affected by both the number of rental units and their individual rents), and the supply of units affordable to households in different income buckets. We include subsidized and non-subsidized housing. Using a fixed-effects model with city-level random trends, we find that the reforms loosening restrictions were associated with a statistically significant, 0.8% increase in the total number of addresses over the medium- to long-term post reform, meaning at least three years after reform

(table 4).4 These estimates are the average treatment effects for all post-reform years, compared to three years pre-reform, each of which varies by city based on when reforms passed. These results pass a falsification test (section 6). We find no effects on total address counts in the implementation period (meaning two years pre-reform to two years after) for these reforms. Among reforms loosening restrictions, we find no significant effects of reforms during either the implementation period or the post-reform period on rent levels. Reforms increasing land-use restrictiveness, such as those increasing minimum lot sizes, were associated with a significant, $50 increase in median rents in the post-reform period, but not in the implementation period. These results, interestingly, are somewhat symmetrical to those related to the reforms loosening restrictions. This finding also passes a falsification test. We found no effect of increasing land-use restrictions on the address count in either period.

4 We identify similar results when we run the regression with the treatment variable run as a single reform variable. This implies that the results are somewhat symmetrical (meaning loosening restrictions may have the opposite effect as increasing them), though more research is necessary to confirm this finding.

Table 4: Effect of Land-Use Reforms on Address Count and Rents

Reforms Post Period increasing Implementation restrictions Period Reforms Post Period loosening Implementation restrictions Period Quarter/year fixed effects City-level fixed effects City specific time trends Observations Adjusted R-squared

(1) Ln Total Addresses 0.004 (0.003)

(2) Median Gross Rent $49.54* (24.42)

(3) Ln Aggregate Gross Rent -0.003 (0.026)

0.001 (0.002) 0.008** (0.003)

$20.42 (12.87) -$60.52 (36.05)

0.002 (0.014) 0.008 (0.031)

0.003 (0.002) Yes Yes Yes 68,634 0.785

-$23.55 (21.21) Yes Yes Yes 12,176 0.446

0.008 (0.020) Yes Yes Yes 12,178 0.606

Note: Results for logged outcomes are semi elasticities from a fixed effects model with random trends that includes place and quarter or year fixed effects (quarter for number of addresses, year for rent) and city specific time trends (or random trends). Sample is a quarterly panel of 1,136 cities in 8 MSAs from 2005 quarter 4 to 2021 quarter 1 for total addresses, and a yearly panel from 2008 to 2017 for median and aggregate gross rent. Robust standard errors in parentheses, clustered at the place level. ** p ≤ 0.01; * p ≤ 0.05.

We also estimate the effect of reforms on the price distribution of rental units. We developed a set of cut points for affordability (assuming families are to pay no more than 30% of income to rent), by year, for families at or below 30% of the median income (extremely low income, or ELI); 30 to 50% of median income (very low income, VLI); 50 to 80% of median income (low income, LI); 80 to 100% of median income (middle income, MI); and above.5 We find statistically significant increases in housing supply at the top end of the rent distribution (i.e., for rental units affordable to households making more than the national median income) in both the implementation period and the post period for reforms loosening restrictions, meaning those allowing for increased density (Table 5). After such reform passage, we find an increase in units affordable to families with incomes above the national median of 43% in the short

We also test for effects on number of rental units by affordability at the regional level using Area Median Income (AMI) as a robustness check later. Authors will provide cut-point data on request.

run and 63% in the medium to long run. These estimates are large, but note that based on the 95% confidence interval, these estimates could range from 15% to 70% for the short-run implementation period and 15% to 112% at least three years post-reform. We can rule out that the estimate is zero, however. These results also pass a falsification test. These results suggest, perhaps unsurprisingly, that allowing additional housing construction compared to the baseline attracts investment in “market-rate” units, which are generally not affordable to low- or moderate-income households. While we do not find statistically significant evidence that existing units become less expensive in the implementation period or post period the estimates for every affordability category for reforms that loosened restrictions are positive, and the effects on the number of rental units that are affordable to extremely-low income and very lowincome households are much larger in magnitude than the effects on higher-cost units. The standard errors on the ELI and VLI unit estimates are much larger, likely because the base number of units in those affordability ranges are small to begin with in many of the cities in our study. Therefore, we cannot disprove that the impacts are positive and equivalent across the difference affordability categories.

Table 5: Effect of Land-Use Reforms on Address Count by Affordability Level

Reforms increasing restrictions

Post Period

Reforms loosening restrictions

Post Period

Implementation Period

Quarter/year fixed effects City-level fixed effects City specific time trends

Observations Adjusted R-squared

(1) Ln ELI -0.365 (1.263)

(2) Ln VLI -1.523 (2.188)

(3) Ln LI -0.063 (0.053)

(4) Ln MI -0.241* (0.111)

(5) Ln above MI -0.335 (0.216)

0.434 (0.577) 2.047 (3.303) 1.393 (1.773) Yes Yes Yes 12,177 0.276

-0.527 (0.353) 1.264 (1.393) 0.454 (0.646) Yes Yes Yes 12,175 0.221

-0.026 (0.029) 0.122 (0.083) 0.063 (0.053) Yes Yes Yes 12,177 0.126

-0.050 (0.061) 0.051 (0.126) 0.078 (0.072) Yes Yes Yes 12,172 0.132

0.000 (0.162) 0.632* (0.248) 0.430** (0.140) Yes Yes Yes 12,177 0.178

Note: Results for logged outcomes are semi elasticities from a fixed-effects model with random trends that includes place and year fixed effects and city-specific time trends. Sample is a yearly panel from 2008 to 2017. Robust standard errors in parentheses, clustered at the place level. ** p ≤ 0.01; * p ≤ 0.05.

For reforms that tighten land-use restrictions and reduce allowed density, we find a 24% decline in housing units affordable for middle-income families in the post period at least three years after reforms (regressions show negative coefficients for unit counts across all income ranges for these types of reforms, though these changes are not statistically significant). However, this finding fails a falsification test—and has no effect for other income levels—so we cannot rule out that this is a continuation of that pre-trend. 6. ROBUSTNESS CHECKS Using Area Median Income to Define Affordability We run additional models to ensure our results are robust to misspecification. Because national median incomes may not capture local income differentials and costs of living, we run the analysis using an outcome measure for affordable units based on AMI. In other words, we consider the

impact of reforms on the count of rental units affordable to people in each metropolitan region based on that region’s median income. Using AMIs to calculate affordability is not our preferred specification for two reasons. First, there is value in having a standard nationwide affordability definition, since some areas may have such high median incomes that what is considered affordable there based on AMI may not be affordable to people earning minimum wage, or even for teachers or police officers. For example, since 2019 San Francisco-region median household incomes were $121,795 in 2019, using that AMI we might claim that a monthly rent of $2,436 is affordable for a low-income family. The average salary for a teacher in San Francisco is $62,123, however, meaning that the rent calculated to be “affordable” there based on AMI is almost twice what a single teacher can afford, or $2,436 compared $1,242 (local median incomes may be more appropriate for two-earner households). We therefore prefer to use national medians to calculate affordability since these rents are more universally affordable to low-wage households. Second, the highest rent bucket in the ACS is lower than the cut point for what is affordable to households above middle income in our sample’s more expensive cities, so we can only observe the number of rental units affordable to households that are ELI, VLI, and above VLI. For example, in Boston, affordable rent for someone at 100% of AMI would be $2,696 per month, but the highest rent bucket in Census data is $2,000 or more. We would therefore not be able to ascertain how many units are affordable for that income level. Nevertheless, we re-run the models using AMI as a robustness check on our primary results. We find evidence that reforms increasing restrictions reduce the availability of units affordable for households with low incomes or above on average—but with no statistical significance. We

also find no statistically significant impacts for reforms that loosened restrictions, though this result may reflect limited data availability.6 Long-Run Effects We also trace out the full adjustment path for the reforms, as per Wolfers (2006), allowing us to monitor changes year-by-year. This helps to confirm that the inclusion of place-specific time trends created using effects post-reform is not biasing our results. It also helps to identify effects over time of reforms that are more or less restrictive. Due to our dataset having a relatively short panel, some of the results in our average treatment effects are not significant in this model, but the results generally confirm our main findings in terms of directionality of coefficients (table 6). The fully lagged model shows that less restrictive reforms reduce median gross rents the first, fourth, and fifth years after reform passage. It also shows that more restrictive reforms reduce the supply of rental units affordable to people at and above middle income the fourth and fifth years after such a reform.

The authors can provide tabular results on request.

Table 6: Falsification Test: Effects of Future Land-Use Reforms on Address Count and Rents

Future reforms that increase restrictions Future reforms that loosen restrictions Quarter/year fixed effects City fixed effects City-specific trends Observations Adjusted R-squared

(1) Ln Total Addresses -0.000 (0.003) 0.000 (0.003) Yes Yes Yes 68,634 0.785

(2) Median Gross Rent -$29.97 (15.89) $15.20 (17.90) Yes Yes Yes 12,176 0.446

(3) Ln Aggregate Gross Rent -0.002 (0.019) -0.034* (0.017) Yes Yes Yes 12,178 0.606

Falsification Tests Finally, we run falsification tests to examine whether impacts are detectable in cities prior to actual reforms, which, if demonstrated, might suggest that the results above are the product of endogeneity and selection bias rather than the reforms themselves. To do so, we include a variable for three years (or quarters, for USPS data) prior to each reform in the models to see whether that coefficient is statistically significant (in essence, we are testing for the effects of a hypothetical reform that never occurred). We use three years prior since many of our outcomes are based on five-year ACS estimates, so one and two years prior to the reform could produce significant outcomes due to averaging. Additionally, three years prior to reform is the year before our implementation period control variable. We find no evidence of endogeneity in terms of housing supply. These results confirm our table 4 finding showing an increase in address count following reforms loosening housing regulations. But there may be some endogeneity in terms of rent prices leading up to a reform.

Specifically, cities that institute reforms that loosened restrictions experienced decreases in aggregate gross rents prior to instituting a reform (table 7, model 3). We also find some evidence for a pre-existing decline in middle and above-middle-income units in cities that increased restrictions (models 7–8). That said, we find no evidence for pre-trends pointing toward increased above-middle-income units in cities that loosened restrictions, confirming table 5. Table 7: Falsification Test: Effects of Future Reforms on Addresses by Affordability Level

Future reforms that increase restrictions

(1) Ln ELI 0.834 (1.542)

(2) Ln VLI 2.300 (1.441)

(3) Ln LI -0.010 (0.059)

(4) Ln MI -0.261* (0.105)

(5) Ln above MI -0.361* (0.174)

Future reforms that loosen restrictions Year fixed effects City fixed effects City-specific trends Observations Adjusted R-squared

-3.746 (1.996) Yes Yes Yes 12,177 0.277

-1.990 (1.908) Yes Yes Yes 12,175 0.221

-0.031 (0.046) Yes Yes Yes 12,177 0.126

0.003 (0.200) Yes Yes Yes 12,172 0.132

-0.030 (0.252) Yes Yes Yes 12,177 0.178

7. CONCLUSION This analysis is the first cross-city, panel analysis of the effect of land-use reforms on the supply of affordable housing. We offer preliminary evidence of the potential for using machinelearning to identify where zoning changes are occurring. We find that land-use reforms that reduce restrictions to increase allowed density lead to a 0.8% increase in housing supply, on average, in the cities we study. However, we find no statistically significant evidence that these reforms lead to an increase in affordable rental units within 3 to 9 years of reform passage. We do find that such

reforms are associated with an increase in units affordable for above-middle-income households, and that effects on units affordable to those with extremely low incomes and very low incomes are positive but with large standard errors, likely because of the small number of units affordable at these levels at baseline. Therefore, we do not have enough data to conclude that the impacts are significant.. We theorize that these outcomes may be produced by amenity affects occurring when a reform takes place; new buildings increase housing supply, but not only are new units likely to be more expensive than existing units, they may also bring amenities that improve the attractiveness of a city’s housing market overall. This could outweigh the effects of the supply increase on reducing prices for more affordable units—at least in the jurisdiction where zoning reforms occur. In other words, certain zoning reforms may induce more construction, but rather than opening up existing units in the surrounding area for lower-income families, existing housing units maintain relatively stable rents due to increased demand. Even so, at the metropolitan scale and in the longer run, we expect that more construction reduces costs. These results indicate that policies targeting affordable housing may need to accompany measures designed specifically to increase supply. Direct development or preservation of affordable units through non-profit housing developers may be more successful at increasing the supply of low-cost units in the short run than regulatory reform alone. If supply grows at pace with household growth, then income or rent supplements could also ease affordability problems for low-income households. Conversely, we find that reforms that increase restrictions on housing construction are associated with an increase in median rents over the longer term, combined with a decline in units affordable for middle-income households. This indicates that tightening restrictions on housing

construction is, as predicted by economic theory, associated with less housing supply and less affordability.These results are not without their limitations. It is likely that heterogeneity exists among reforms; some reform types probably work better than others in terms of increasing housing supply and affordability, and the marginal impacts of loosening restrictions may be relatively small in cities surrounded by other municipalities that were also relaxing regulations. We do not have enough power in our datasets to test for heterogeneous effects. Our methods also do not entirely resolve endogeneity concerns that are endemic to all studies on housing regulations, supply, and cost. Moreover, while we have successfully measured associations between reforms and the housing market in the years following reforms, we acknowledge that the effects over a much longer term, such as a decade after, may vary significantly. And it is possible that reform impacts occurred across metropolitan areas as a whole rather than within the jurisdictions we studied, but we did not have the data to measure those outcomes. Finally, since we selected our metropolitan regions to be those that were most likely to include cities that instituted reforms, and because our data collection method does not guarantee that we identified all reforms, it is likely that our estimated effects are a lower bound on the true impact since some of our control cities also likely had reforms that were not reported. Future studies should expand the types of policies examined to include those that directly require or incentivize affordability and should explore effects over a larger set of cities. The use of additional datasets, such as building permit information, could further inform this research. And detailed investigations of the metropolitan-scale effects of the zoning reforms introduced by individual jurisdictions could vital new evidence on the impacts of this type of public policy.

Continued advancements in machine learning could help researchers examine policies such as these at a larger scale.

REFERENCES Asquith B, Mast E, and Reed D (2019) Supply Shock Versus Demand Shock. Working paper no. 19-316, Upjohn Institute. Buechler S., and Lutz E (2021) The local effects of relaxing land use regulation on housing supply and rents. Research paper no. 21/18, MIT Center for Real Estate. CBPP (Center on Budget and Policy Priorities) (2021) Tracking the COVID-19 Recession’s Effects on Food, Housing, and Employment Hardships. Damiano A and Frenier C (2020) Do New Housing Units in Your Backyard Raise Your Rents? Working paper, Center for Urban and Regional Affairs, University of Minnesota. Dong H (2021) Exploring the Impacts of Zoning and Upzoning on Housing Development. Journal of Planning Education and Research. Epub ahead of print 1 Feb 2021. DOI: 10.1177/0739456X21990728. Freemark Y (2020) Upzoning Chicago. Urban Affairs Review 56(3): 758-789. Freemark Y (2022) Homing In: What Types of Municipalities Are Adding Residential Units, And Which Are Mounting Barriers to Housing? Report, Urban Institute. Ginsberg J, Mohebbi M, Patel R, Brammer L, Smolinski M, and Brilliant L (2009) Detecting influenza epidemics using search engine query data. Nature 457: 1012-1014.

Glaeser E, Gyourko J, and Saks R (2005) Why have housing prices gone up? American Economic Review 95(2): 329-333. Glaeser E, Gyourko J, and Saks R (2006) Urban growth and housing supply. Journal of Economic Geography 6(1): 71-89. Glaeser E, Schuetz J, and Ward B (2006). Regulation and the rise of housing prices in Greater Boston. Policy brief no. 2006-1, Rappaport Institute. Glaeser E and Ward B (2006) The causes and consequences of land use regulation. Working paper no. 12601, National Bureau of Economic Research. Greenaway-McGrevy R, Pacheco G, and Sorensen K (2021) The effect of upzoning on housing prices and redevelopment premiums in Auckland, New Zealand. Urban Studies 58(5): 959-976. Gyourko J and Saiz A (2006) Construction costs and the supply of housing structure. Journal of Regional Science 46(4): 661-680. Gyourko J and Molloy R (2015) Regulation and housing supply. In: Mills E (ed) Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics. Elsevier, pp. 1289-1337. Gyourko J, Saiz A, and Summers A (2008) A new measure of the local regulatory environment for housing markets. Urban Studies 45(3): 693-729. Jacobus R (2016) Why We Must Build. Shelterforce. Available at: https://shelterforce.org/2016/03/10/why_we_must_build/. Accessed 20 Jan 2022.

Joint Center for Housing Studies of Harvard University (2018) The State of the Nation's Housing. Kahn, M, Vaughn R, and Zasloff J (2010) The housing market effects of discrete land use regulations. Journal of Housing Economics 19(4): 269-279. Kok N, Monkkonen P, and Quigley J (2014) Land use regulations and the value of land and housing. Journal of Urban Economics 81: 136-148. Kuhlmann D (2021) Upzoning and Single-Family Housing Prices. Journal of the American Planning Association 87(3): 383-395. Lewis P and Marantz N (2019) What Planners Know. Journal of the American Planning Association 85(4): 445-462. Li X (2022) Do new housing units in your backyard raise your rents? Journal of Economic Geography 22(6): 1309-1352. Liu L, McManus D, and Yannopoulos E (2020) Geographic and Temporal Variation in Housing Filtering Rates. SSRN. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3527800. Accessed 20 Jan 2022. Lo L, Noble E, Levy D, and Pendall R (2020) Land Use Reforms for Housing Supply. Report, Urban Institute. Logan J, Xu Z, and Stults B (2014) Interpolating US Decennial Census Tract Data from as Early as 1970 to 2010. The Professional Geographer 66(3): 412-420.

Malpezzi S (1996) Housing prices, externalities, and regulation in US metropolitan areas. Journal of Housing Research 7(2): 209-241. Manson S, Shroeder J, Van Riper D, and Ruggle S (2019) National Historical Geographic Information System. IPUMS. Available at: http://doi.org/10.18128/D050.V14.0. Accessed 20 Jan 2022. Mast E (2022) The effect of new market-rate housing construction on the low-income housing market. Journal of Urban Economics. Epub ahead of print 27 July 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.jue.2021.103383. Matlack J and Vigdor J (2006) Do Rising Tides Lift All Prices? Working Paper no. 12331, National Bureau of Economic Research. Mawhorter S, Garcia D, and Raetz H (2018) It All Adds Up. Report, Terner Center for Housing Innovation at UC Berkeley. Missouri Census Data Center (2020) Geocorr 2014: Geographic Correspondence Engine. Available at: http://mcdc.missouri.edu/applications/geocorr2014.html. Accessed 20 Jan 2022. Popov I (2019) Housing Markets and Income Inequality. Apartment List Rentonomics. Available at: https://www.apartmentlist.com/research/housing-markets-and-income-inequality. Accessed 20 Jan 2022. Quigley J and Raphael S (2005) Regulation and the high cost of housing in California. American Economic Review 95(2): 323-328.

Pennington K (2021) Does Building New Housing Cause Displacement?. Working paper. Phillips, S, Manville M, and Lens M (2021) Research Roundup: The Effect of Market-Rate Development on Neighborhood Rents. Report, UCLA Lewis Center for Regional Policy Studies. Rossi-Hansberg E, Sarte P, and Owens R (2010) Housing externalities. Journal of Political Economy 118(3): 485-535. Saiz A (2010) The geographic determinants of housing supply. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 125(3): 1253-1296. Saiz A and Simonsohn U (2013) Proxying for unobservable variables with internet documentfrequency. Journal of the European Economic Association 11(1): 137-165. Schuetz J and Murray C (2019) Is California’s apartment market broken? Report, The Terner Center for Housing Innovation. Thorson J (1997) The effect of zoning on housing construction. Journal of Housing Economics 6(1): 81-91. Wooldridge J (1999) Distribution-free estimation of some nonlinear panel data models. Journal of Econometrics 90(1): 77–97. Wooldridge J (2002) Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT Press. Zabel J and Dalton M (2011) The impact of minimum lot size regulations on house prices in Eastern Massachusetts. Regional Science and Urban Economics 41(6): 571-583.

Zahirovich-Herbert V and Gibler K (2014) The effect of new residential construction on housing prices. Journal of Housing Economics 26: 1-18. Zhou J, McMillen D, and McDonald J (2008) Land values and the 1957 comprehensive amendment to the Chicago zoning ordinance. Urban Studies 45(8): 1647-1661. Zillow (2020) New construction or existing homes: the pros and cons of both. Available at: https://www.zillow.com/home-buying-guide/buying-a-new-home/. Accessed 20 Jan 2022.

APPENDIX B Proposals for Additional Shelter Standards in Code

www.vpnaboise.org

Shelter Home in Zoning

The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) notes that certain land uses are inherently incompatible and, in some circumstances and when co-located without adequate buffering and mitigation, could cause a significant impact. All projects must consider how the project will be adversely impacted by ill-suited land uses or, conversely, how the project itself could impose or create adverse impacts. Shelter is considered a high impact use, and it is therefore addressed in zoning codes by restricting the potential locations where shelter can be sited. This is typical nationally. 1.1

CURRENT BOISE CODE REQUIREMENTS

Under Boise’s current Code Requirements (B.D.C. § 11–06–01(5)), a Shelter Home is zoned to be allowed conditionally in commercial districts designated C-2, general commercial; C-3, service commercial; C-4, planned commercial; and C-5, central business. Shelter Home is defined as “a facility providing basic services that may include food; personal hygiene support; information and referrals; employment, mail and telephone services; including overnight sleeping accommodations, to people with limited financial resources, including people who are homeless.” (B.D.C. § 11–012–02(1.P.2) Although Shelter Home is defined as a type within a list of residential uses in Boise Code, it is not zoned in Boise to be allowed in a residential district (even conditionally). This is a reflection of the high-impact character of a shelter home on surrounding properties. Furthermore, it should be highlighted that being designated as conditionally allowed in most commercial districts is explicitly not an assurance that the use will be permitted, as noted in the requirements for conditional uses in Boise Code are (B.D.C. § 11–06–02(C)) (emphasis added in blue): (1) In the respective zoning district the use is allowed only if reviewed and approved in accordance with the procedures of Section 11-03-04.6, Conditional Use Permits. Conditional Uses are subject to all other applicable regulations of this Code, including the use-specific standards in this chapter and the requirements of Chapter 7, Development and Design Standards. (2) The "C" designation in Table 11-06.1 in a given district does not constitute an authorization or an assurance that such use will be permitted. Rather, each Conditional Use permit application shall be evaluated as to its probable effect on adjacent properties and surrounding areas, among other factors, and may be approved or denied as the findings indicate appropriate. The conditions conditional use permits are evaluated against are summarized in Section 7 of this report, with more detailed discussion of impacts in subsequent sections. 1.2

BOISE DRAFT ZONING CODE REWRITE REQUIREMENTS

Boise is currently working toward a significant comprehensive update to its development code. Draft Module 1 of Boise’s Zoning Code Re-write states with regard to a Shelter Home: This use may not be

located within 300 feet of a Residential zoning district. (Zoning Code Rewrite, Module 1; Section 11-0303-3.D; April 2021 1). Overall, the proposed modification with regard to shelter home is minor. Shelter home is still included as a conditionally allowed use in the proposed new district(s) that are equivalent to the four commercial districts a shelter home is currently conditionally allowed in. In addition, current districts designated RO, Residential Office; HS, Health Services District; and T-1, Technological-Industrial Park would also be included in a new classification conditionally allowing shelter home, as long as a proposed site was not within 300 feet of a residential zoning district. Residential Zoning districts in the proposed new code, from which a shelter must be buffered, encompass both single family and multi-family parcels across the spectrum of residential densities. Our view of the proposed update to the zoning code with regard to shelter home is that it further clarifies where within the conditionally allowed zones a shelter home may be appropriate (and conversely, where within these zones it is certainly not appropriate due to its high impact nature: e.g. within 300 feet of a residentially zoned property). We do not view the proposed update as a change from the existing standard set at code, in which conditional uses are required to review the “probable effects on adjacent properties and surrounding areas” and may be denied, as appropriate. Under the current code, high-impact use types should not be allowed adjacent to residential zones 2. 1.3

SHELTER HOME SITE CODE RESTRICTIONS IN OTHER JURISDICTIONS

The consulting partner the city is working with on the ongoing zoning code rewrite, noted that for shelters and social service facilities a spacing standard between these uses and residential zones is common and 300 feet is about the shortest spacing distance seen in newer codes 3. A 2010 article in the American Planning Association’s Zoning Practice publication regarding social service institutions reaches the following conclusion following a review of regulation of social service facilities across many municipalities 4 (emphasis added): Certain social service facilities must be regulated to protect the rights of property owners and the economic well-being of a municipality. If corporations or industries were negatively impacting low-income, high-poverty neighborhoods, this would be an environmental justice issue. The controversial nature of the issues surrounding poverty, homelessness, mental illness, and addictions makes the regulation of social service facilities exceptionally difficult. However, like every other land use, social service providers should strive to be a good neighbor. Their missions must include provisions for community improvement in addition to improvement to lives of those in need. https://www.cityofboise.org/media/11746/boise_zoning_ordinance_module_1_public_draft.pdf This is illustrated by the existance of the designation under current Boise Code of L-OD, defined as “intended to accommodate office space in locations that are served by primary access, but are inappropriate for commercial development because of proximity to residential uses.” 3 City of Boise Recommendations from Shelter Better Task Force, Recommendations Report; updated September 2021; pg. 9. https://www.cityofboise.org/media/13257/shelterbettertaskforce_report.pdf 4 Wuerstle, Margaret. “A Sound Approach to Regulating Social Service Facilities.” Zoning Practice, January 2010. 1 2

Zoning cannot regulate people’s behaviors or activities that occur on the streets or sidewalks, but it can regulate land uses where these behaviors occur and control their proximity to sensitive uses such as schools, parks, and residences. Only limited change will be brought about by a zoning strategy alone. It will take a comprehensive strategy and many tools to address issues as complex as poverty and homelessness. However, zoning can be one of the tools used to sustain the quality of our neighborhoods and protect them from deteriorating influences. The study was careful to note that not all social service programs have negative impacts on surrounding neighborhoods, but explicitly identifies homeless shelters in the category of facilities more likely to be associated with negative behaviors or activities in close proximity: Not all social service facilities that provide programs for the needy have negative impacts on neighborhoods. The negative behaviors and impacts repeatedly identified by residents and municipalities are more related to drug abuse and mental illness. The social service facilities providing services to chronically homeless individuals are more likely to have negative behaviors or activities occurring in close proximity. The types of uses that largely provide programs for chronically homeless individuals include addiction treatment facilities, halfway houses, homeless shelters, supportive housing, offender transitional housing, and food and meal distribution. 1.3.1 Inventory Survey of Jurisdictions throughout the United States and Canada on Regulations Regarding Homeless Shelters (Gilderbloom, Squires, & Wuerstle, 2013) Another study 5 provides the results of two different inventory surveys regarding regulation of homeless shelters and similar social services, which were conducted across multiple municipalities, including the survey referenced above. This study acknowledges that impact of shelters on residential neighborhoods is poorly studied in academic literature, but that many cities were struggling with impact on neighborhoods and how to regulate shelter. This study was intended to help spread information on how other jurisdictions approach this issue. 1.3.1.1

Distance Buffers

Of the 47 municipalities included in one survey, 31 reported having zoning regulations requiring some distance of separation between uses such as homeless shelters and vulnerable uses such as other shelters, residential zones, nursing homes, parks, and schools (Table 3). The following points summarize

John I. Gilderbloom, Gregory D. Squires & Margaret Wuerstle (2013) Emergency Homeless Shelters in North America: An Inventory and Guide for Future Practice, Housing and Society, 40:1, 1-37, DOI: 10.1080/08882746.2013.11430607; See Tables 1- Responses Regarding Regulations, 2- Responses Regarding the Ideal Size for an Emergency Homeless Shelter, 3-Types of Regulations for Homeless Shelters, 4-Regulations Regarding Distance Separation Requirements, 5- Regulations Regarding Ratio of Shelters to Population, 6 – Regulations Regarding Size Limitations on Shelters, 7 – Regulations Regarding Licensing of Shelters, 8- Regulations Regarding Good Neighbor Plans, and 9 – Additional Reguations. 5

the distance separations reported in other jurisdictions (Table 4) compared to the distances from the proposed site in Interfaith Sanctuary’s application and the referenced use type in Boise: •

•

Cities reported requiring spacing between like uses (other shelter, halfway house, group living facility, etc) ranging from approximately 1,000 feet up to one mile. o In Boise, there is another emergency shelter approximately 400 feet from the proposed site, and a permanent supportive housing facility approximately 200 feet from the proposed site. Cities reported requiring spacing between shelter and residential zones ranging from 150 feet to 500 feet (although a residential buffer was not the main focus of the survey, this response was included in several municipalities’ responses) o In Boise, the site proposed in this conditional use permit application shares a property line with several residentially zoned properties along the northern boundary (in addition to a high density residential use in the commercially zoned property along the east fence line). The proposed site includes 0 feet of buffer to a residential zone. Cities reported requiring spacing between shelter and child care facilities/parks/schools 300 feet to 1,200 feet o In Boise, the proposed site is 600 feet from a park, 700 feet from a child care, and 1,650 feet from a school.

The jurisdictions reporting distance separation requirements in this study were: Anchorage, Alaska; Atlanta, Georgia; Boston, Massachusetts; Broward County, Florida; Cleveland, Ohio; Columbus, Ohio; Covington, Kentucky; Dallas, Texas; Detroit, Michigan; Elko, Nevada; Gainesville, Florida; Green Bay, Wisconsin; Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Henderson, Nevada; Knoxville, Tennessee; Lacey, Washington; Little Rock, Arkansas; Marshall Township, Pennsylvania; Miami, Florida; Miramar, Florida; Ottawa, Canada; Palmdale, California; Portland, Oregon; Prescott, Arizona; Rochester, Minnesota; Rochester, New York; Roseville, California; Sacramento, California; San Diego, California; Shelby, North Carolina; Spokane County, Washington; and Toronto, Canada. 1.3.1.1.1

Additional Municipalities with Residential Buffers Required for Shelter Siting

Anecdotally, we are aware of additional cities listed below with zoning codes mandating specific buffers between emergency shelter and residential zones: •

Puyallup, Washington – 1000 foot buffer public or private schools, preschools, or daycares, and 500 foot buffer from various other “sensitive uses” (e.g. library, parks, special needs senior care, residential zones) in which such homeless-serving daytime drop in centers and overnight shelter facilities may not be sited 6

•

Clarksville, Tennessee / Montgomery County – 500 foot buffer between a homeless shelter any zoning district where residential uses are permitted, or within 300 feet of a child care facility. 7

1.3.1.2

Maximum Shelter Size

https://www.cityofpuyallup.org/1415/Homeless-serving-Zoning; Ordinance No. 3195 Clarksville-Montgomery County Regional Planning Commission; Montgomery County Zoning Resolution - 5.2.5.2 – Standards for Institutional Uses Permitted on Review - Homeless Shelter (C-2, C-4, C-5 districts) 6 7

The Gilderbloom, Squires, & Wuerstle study survey responses (Table 2) indicated that the majority of the cities (60.6% of those who responded to the question) felt that the ideal shelter size should be 25 or fewer beds. The least popular shelter size was 250 beds or more. Table 6 reported that several jurisdictions have regulations for maximum number of beds that a homeless shelter in that jurisdiction may have. Individual cities surveyed reported size limits of 200 beds, 40 residents, 15 persons, 50 beds, 100 beds, 15 persons, 40 beds, 4 families or unrelated persons, and 12 residents. (An additional 10 cities reported restrictions on capacity of halfway houses or other social service types.) Some cities also included regulations dictating minimum space per person. Separately, Allen’s research published as a Master’s thesis in 1997 and later published as a book in 2000 concluded that “Small shelters of no more than thirty residents are better able to meet the diverse needs of the homeless and near-homeless.” 8 1.4

LOOKING FORWARD: RECOMMENDATIONS FOR POTENTIAL CHANGES IN BOISE ZONING CODE REWRITE

The Gilderbloom, Squires, and Wuerstle study has the following to say regarding single-site vs. multi-site models (emphasis added): While providing facilities throughout neighborhoods seems to be preferred by neighborhood groups, de-concentration of shelter facilities is a double-edged sword because the more remote and isolated a homeless facility is, the less effective it is at getting people off the streets. However, concentrating large numbers of homeless facilities and service in one location also isolates individuals by not integrating the individuals into a stable neighborhood environment. Therefore, it is vital that shelters for those experiencing homelessness are located throughout a city. To get the individuals transitioned to independent living, they must have shelter located near public transportation, jobs, social services, and schools. This is best accomplished by locating shelters in residential and commercial areas and not solely in industrial or deteriorating neighborhoods. As this quote, and indeed, the entire study, acknowledges, shelter siting requires tradeoffs between quality of service and efficiency of delivery. While the study explicitly opens the possibility of locating shelters in residential (and commercial) areas rather than solely industrial or deteriorating neighborhoods, this is in context of recommendations for smaller shelters spread throughout the city. In this context we can agree with the study conclusions, and, in fact, have advocated for similar solutions this year. 1.4.1

By-Right Zoning

Califonia’s SB2 requires jurisdictions to include a by-right allowance in their zoning code for emergency shelter. We recognize that, given the highly contentious nature of shelter siting, social service providers are faced with an uphill battle when attempting to open new emergency shelters. We would recommend that the City of Boise work to mitigate this issue for shelter providers by means of providing a carefully considered by-right allowance for shelter in their future Development Code.

Allen, Thomas. “Someone to Talk to: Care and Control of the Homeless”. Simon Fraser University, 1997.

1.4.2

Potential Code Recommendations

Our initial recommendations would be as follows: •

•

Provide by-right approval for a shelter home serving 25 or fewer residents in any residential, commercial, or industrial zone given that the project meets the following minimum conditions: o The facility is sized to a minimum of 300 square feet per person of floor space; o Residents are provided with private rooms with doors for each individual or household; o We recommend that other minimum requirements such as staff ratios, participation in off-site coordinated entry and data collection efforts, and other best practices be included as well. o The facility is located a minimum distance of 2,000 feet from a similar facility to prevent over-concentration in any area; Allow for shelters over 25 people as conditional uses in commercial and light industrial areas, but include minimum conditions as well: o Provide scaled residential buffers required; for instance  a shelter of 26-100 residents requires a minimum 300 foot buffer to any residential use, and  a shelter for greater than 100 residents requires a minimum 1,000 foot buffer to any residential use. o The facility is located a minimum distance of 2,000 feet from a similar facility to prevent over-concentration in any area. o We recommend including other minimum best practice requirements such as staff ratios, security requirements, coordinated entry and reporting participation, facility size per person, etc. also.

This tiered approach could incentivize construction of scattered site model shelters, while still allowing operators who do not feel capable of implementing this business model to construct larger shelters with appropriate zoning setbacks from other vulnerable uses. The downsides of scattered site shelters are considered to be higher difficulty in “getting people off the streets” and lower cost-effectiveness in providing shelter. The benefits can be providing smaller shelters closer to the homes or workplaces where people experiencing housing insecurity and entering first time homelessness are located. Based on the distributed locations, these shelters may be better suited to serving those families and individuals experiencing first time homelessness than those experiencing chronic homelessness. Documentation of this dichotomy, coupled with the smaller size and by-right zoning, may also increase community acceptance. A best practice strategy for addressing chronic homelessness is to provide permanent supportive housing. Permanent supportive housing is also typically provided in lower numbers per facility, and studies typically find lower impact on the surrounding area than for shelter, as housing provides permanent private space, stability, and self-determination without the restrictions required in a shelter space. The above examples are initial suggestions – we would suggest that, in light of the city-wide conversation that has been occurring through 2021, the city specifically highlight changes to the shelter home zoning for public input in the zoning re-write process.

1.5

AVAILABILITY OF SHELTER-SUITABLE LOCATIONS IN BOISE

In the applicant’s letter of explanation dated April 27, 2021, they further elaborate their description of the C-2 zone as follows: The C-2 Zone is an inherently strip commercial type of development as evidenced by the fact that it is largely found along major arterials in the City of Boise, immediately adjacent to residentially zoned properties. Similar areas with strip commercial adjacent to residentially zoned properties are found along other arterials such as Vista Avenue, Broadway Avenue, Fairview Avenue, Overland Road, and Orchard Street, all of which have corridors of various commercial and services uses immediately adjacent to the arterial, with residential zoning immediately adjacent to such commercial uses. The applicant appears to argue that the existing zoning code presumed that shelter homes and residential land use were inherently compatible based on their observation that C-2 parcels are frequently along major arterials immediately adjacent to residential, thereby making a residential buffer impossible. However, we would like to point out that there are in fact many C-2 zoned properties which are not residentially adjacent. In the image below showing color coded C-2 zoned properties, teal properties are residentially adjacent, blue properties have a residential buffer of less than 300 feet, and purple through pink properties have greater than 300 feet of buffer to the nearest residentially zoned property. We assert that inclusion of the C-2 zone in conditionally allowed sites for shelter homes in City of Boise Code was done to include the multitude of properties which have residential buffers (shown in purple and pink), as potential sites, rather than to imply blanket approval of siting shelter homes in residential areas.

C-2 Zones Color Coded by Distance to Residentially Zoned Property

The map below provides the same color coding for properties zone C-3 through C-5, with purple and pink properties having a buffer of 300 feet or greater to residentially zoned properties. As you can see, it is common for these categories to have a buffer to residential zones, as proposed in Boise’s Zoning Update. C-3, C-4, and C-5 Zones Color Coded by Distance to Residentially Zoned Property

Further, the applicant’s letter ignores the site-specific impacts unique to shelter use and for which the Boise City Code demands consideration. Do the examples the applicant cites include uses likely to create impact into the wee hours of the night? Do the examples include use impacts associated with dispersal from the commercial facilities into neighborhoods? Not likely. The City Code commands consideration of those impacts on a case-by-case basis, impacts which—here—cannot be mitigated by condition, and which are not reasonably foreseeable for other commercial uses which may be compatible with adjacent residential use. 1.5.1

Light Industrial

As we will explore in Section 4 of this report, other cities have often sited shelter in industrial zones. Industrial siting is typically frowned upon by homeless advocates due to a perception of forced segregation of the population experiencing homelessness from areas with shopping, banks, and other daily needs. However, a review of Boise’s zones shows that Light Industrial Zones frequently border commercial zones (and sometimes residential zones), such that there are industrially zoned properties with equally good access to grocery stores and banks as the adjacent commercial properties have. In short, allowing shelter to be located in light industrial zones, also with a required buffer to residential zones, as well as commercial zones could open up additional options for social service providers seeking to site shelters. This is also reflected to a degree in Boise’s proposed Zoning Updates, in which Technological-Industrial Parks are added to the categories in the new conditionally allowed zones for Shelter Homes.

As shown in the color coded map below, many sites within the current Light Industrial (M-1) zoning designation have appropriate residential buffers (shown in pink and purple). M-1 Zones Color Coded by Distance to Residentially Zoned Property

1.5.2

Property Rezones

In a conversation regarding availability of suitable shelter sites in Boise, it is disingenuous to disregard the possibility of rezones of otherwise suitable properties to be used as shelter. The City of Boise is currently mired in an affordability crisis, exacerbated by the complete lack of construction of affordable units between 2011 and 2015. 9 In the current City leadership’s attempt to address this crisis, several properties have been identified for use as affordable housing or permanent supportive housing that would also meet shelter criteria, including existing residential buffers. In the Housing Presentation given during the City Council Work Session dated August 24, Our Path Home staff recommended to council that these properties could be rezoned to provide housing. There is no reason that they could not

Boise City, Idaho 2016 - 2020 Five-Year Consolidated Plan; July 20, 2016

instead be rezoned to provide shelter, especially given the difficulty social service providers have reported in finding properties centrally located but also with a residential buffer.

Shelter Home in Other Cities

This section provides examples of shelter size, location, and resident density in other cities. The cities presented in line here were chosen because they correspond to the Primary Peer Cities identified in the Idaho Policy Institute piece “City of Boise Peer Cities Selection 2020,” which the Shelter Better Task Force Our Path Home organizer provided as a list of cities to use as relevant examples for shelter. We note that the peer city selection was not specifically aimed at comparing issues of social service provision or homelessness. As such, per the first criteria of peer city comparison variable selection (“Be associated with the goal of analysis.”), it is possible that selection of other variables would yield a suite of peer cities more applicable to issues of homelessness. However, since the City of Boise endorsed these peer cities and these specific shelters 10, we are presenting them as a comparison. 2.1

TYPICAL SHELTER PLACEMENT IN OTHER JURISDICTIONS

We conducted a review of the land use surrounding shelters in the peer cities identified, and also included the newly constructed shelters in Salt Lake County (including Salt Lake City and South Salt Lake), Utah, as Mayor McLean frequently referenced these shelters as an example of a similar model and large shelters in her “Addressing Homelessness” public engagement sessions. Our peer cities had an average residential buffer of 404 feet around an emergency shelter. The new Salt Lake County shelters had an average buffer of 101 feet to any residential use, or 150 feet to any marketrate residential housing. The proposed State Street location does not have any residential buffer; it adjoins residentially zoned and/or used properties along the north and east property boundaries.

Shelter Capacity (bed 1 City, State Shelter count ) Residential Buffer Spokane, WA House of Charity 100 90 ft to LIH, 266 ft to PSH, 469 ft to market rate Reno, NV Nevada Cares Campus 704 220 ft to first, 990 ft to second Lincoln, NE People's City Mission 304 1,600 ft Little Rock, AR3 Little Rock Compassion Center - Men's 200 50 ft 3 Little Rock, AR Little Rock Compassion Center - Women's 40 350 ft Greensboro, NC Weaver House 125 320 ft to student housing building (property adjoins) Des Moines, IA Central Iowa Shelter & Service 207 200 ft Average residential buffer distance (nearest residence) 404 ft Salt Lake City, UT Geraldine E. King Women's Resource Center 200 304 ft (LIH), 830 ft to single family residential zone Salt Lake City, UT Gail Miller Resource Center (men and women) 200 0 ft (LIH), 145 ft to multi-family, 645 ft to single family residential South Salt Lake, UT Men's Resource Center 300 0 ft (2+ acre lots, agricultural use; redevelopment potential) Salt Lake City and County Purpose Built Shelters, opened in 2019- Average 101 ft

Salt Lake

Primary Peer Cities

The following table summarizes the residential buffer distances observed for the sites of the largest shelter in each peer city:

Boise, Idaho

Proposed IFS State St location

225

None - 0 ft to single family residential zone

1. Bed count includes overflow capacity and co-located transitional or publicly supported housing 2. Peer Cities identified in the Week 4 handout Our Path Home generated are used here 3. The Little Rock, AR shelter is split across two sites, and will be opening an additional 75 bed family center soon.

Shelter Better Task Force Week 4 Homework, “Emergency Shelter System and Size Review”

2.1.1

Peer Cities

The following images show visual representations of the information above for our peer cities, followed by the proposed site. Additional cities can be viewed in Appendix C. Red denotes an emergency shelter; pink denotes permanent supportive housing or other social service organization owned or operated facility; blue denotes single family residential properties; and green denotes multi-family developments.

Note: The nearest multi-family housing development shown for the Nevada CARES Campus is actually a commercial motel property. However, because it advertises weekly and monthly rates, we considered it as effectively housing targeting a low income demographic and included it in our residential buffer calculations as housing.

While Little Rock is the peer city with the smallest residential buffers, the two Little Rock shelters are located on the opposite side of a road from the majority of the residential development in the area, with no amenities within the neighborhood to explicitly encourage shelter guests to move through the neighborhood.

Although the Greensboro, North Carolina shelter is adjacent to a multi-family housing parcel, the portion of the parcel abutting the shelter is dedicated to the property entrance and parking facility.

There is a 320 foot buffer between the shelter and the actual student housing building occupying the parcel.

Our analysis indicates that it is uncommon amongst our peer cities to locate shelter without a buffer for either single family residential or multi family residential developments. When residential properties are located adjacent to or near a shelter development, they are frequently publicly supported housing properties, such as low-income housing (LIH) or permanent supportive housing (PSH). 2.1.2

State Street Comparison

In contrast, as shown below, the proposed State Street site is firmly embedded in a residential neighborhood. Furthermore, access to the amenities promoted by the applicant as beneficial to the project, such as Willow Park and the Greenbelt, also draw guest traffic through a residential area. We note that in these images, duplexes and other multi-family structures that appear visually similar to single-family housing are coded as blue for single family housing, although duplexes are considered multi-family. In the case of the proposed State Street location, shown below, there is a duplex (4233 and 4235 Plum Street) abutting the property.

2.1.2.1

Other Shelter Home

We understand that the Women’s and Children’s Alliance (WCA) maintains there public facing internet present as an “undisclosed location” because of their sensitive mission of serving domestic violence survivors. However, we note that their location is a matter of public record – we easily obtained this information via review of the Assessor’s Office property information online and also through a public records request for a CUP for the property address. Because the presence of two shelter homes in close proximity is germane to code restrictions typical in many jurisdictions (as demonstrated in Section 3), which demonstrates an impact, it is necessary for us to include this location in our comments on record. The WCA property line is approximately 400 feet from the proposed site boundary. We will continue to choose to identify it as “Other Shelter,” as shown in the above figure whenever possible, and choose to minimize publicaly-facing comments on this issue. 2.2

SHELTER NUMBER OF BEDS

A review of HUD’s database of all shelters in the United States from their annual Housing Inventory counts shows that the proposed shelter, in terms of nominal bed capacity of 205 beds (not including 20+ adult overflow floor mats or up to 50 uncounted children in cribs or toddler beds, as discussed in Section 5.1.1 of this report), is larger than 96.6% of emergency shelters offered in the US (once shelters of under 6 beds are removed, as a large number of single bed shelters were included in the database).

When the comparison area is constrained to adjoining western states only, which includes such major metropolitan jurisdictions as Seattle, Portland, Las Vegas with significantly larger homeless populations than Boise, the nominally proposed shelter side is even larger - larger than 98.2% of the shelter stock in other adjacent western states, as shown below.

These comparisons raise the question of why Boise is continuing to pursue large shelters concentrating and segregating our unhoused population into a few large shelters. Boise’s homeless population has consistently been estimated below 900 individuals during annual Point in Time (PIT) counts, and at 650 individuals during the 2020 PIT count, which preceded COVID shut downs:

In fact, in 2020, the number of emergency shelter beds (692) included in the Housing Inventory Count (HIC) in Boise City/Ada County (BCAC) exceeded the number of homeless individuals counted in Boise City/Ada County, though emergency shelter beds were not fully utilized during the PIT count (497 of 692 beds were in use). By comparison, other, larger, major metropolitan areas in the west such have PIT counts ranging from around 4,000 in Portland to around 7,500 in Salt Lake City in 2020. Similarly sized shelters in these jurisdictions serve a significantly smaller percentage of the total homeless population of each area. 2.3

SHELTER SPACE PER PERSON

Nationally, one of the foundational concerns associated with provision of services to those experiencing homelessness is overcrowding in shelter facilities and other social services. While social service providers are currently moving toward the best practice of providing daytime services collocated with overnight shelter, as is being proposed in this CUP application, overcrowding in a facility could still discourage guests from using the daytime facilities and services provided. The Gilderbloom, Squires, & Wuerstle 2013 study recorded two jurisdictions that regulate the provision of minimum space per person in shelters – Table 6 records regulations of 150 square feet per resident in one jurisdiction (Anchorage, Alaska) and, in another (Des Moines, Iowa), 300 square feet lot size per resident and a minimum 80 square feet of unencumbered floor space per bed. 2.3.1

Normalized Facility Square Footage per Person

City, State Spokane, WA Reno, NV Lincoln, NE 3 Little Rock, AR 3 Little Rock, AR Greensboro, NC Des Moines, IA

Salt Lake

Primary Peer Cities

The following table has been normalized to compare space available per resident on a facility-wide scale (the same measure as Anchorage, Alaska’s regulation): Shelter Shelter Building Capacity Size (bed count1) (square ft) Shelter House of Charity 100 28,666 Nevada Cares Campus 704 45,900 People's City Mission 304 71,870 Little Rock Compassion Center - Men's 200 70,346 Little Rock Compassion Center - Women's 40 13,200 Weaver House 125 36,004 Central Iowa Shelter & Service 207 44,490 Primary Peer City Average Shelter Square Footage per Guest

Building Area per Shelter Guest (square ft) 287 65 236 352 330 288 215 253

Salt Lake City, UT Geraldine E. King Women's Resource Center 200 60,000 Salt Lake City, UT Gail Miller Resource Center (men and women) 200 62,600 South Salt Lake, UT Men's Resource Center 300 79,134 Salt Lake City and County Purpose Built Shelters, opened in 2019

300 313 264 292

Boise, Idaho

133

Proposed IFS State St location

225

30,000

1. Bed count includes overflow capacity and co-located transitional or publicly supported housing 2. Peer Cities identified in the Idaho Policy Institute "City of Boise Peer Cities Selection 2020" work, as endorsed by Our Path Home in Shelter Better Task Force, Week 4 3. The Little Rock, AR shelter is split across two sites, and will be opening an additional 75 bed family center soon.

To be clear, the values provided for building area per shelter guest are not reflective of individual private space – these values include all administrative and functional areas of the shelter in addition to guest sleeping and day use spaces. In addition, we note that these values do not account for the full occupant load of a building – they include the nominal shelter bed count, as well as any stated overflow capacity 11 and any co-located transitional housing bed count. These numbers do NOT include staff or volunteers who are also present in the building, nor do they include young children or infants who are sheltered in a crib or toddler bed provided as needed, rather than in one of the facility’s counted beds. This also does not account for the potential presence of pets onsite. However, these numbers still provide a useful normalized reference point, but should be understood that family shelters with young children and shelters with higher staffing or volunteer ratios may have correspondingly less space “per Shelter Guest” than this value indicates. In any case, as these values show, the proposed Interfaith Sanctuary project relocation to State Street provides notably less space than almost any other shelter among our primary peer cities or among the Utah Resource Centers that Mayor McLean has referenced. The only shelter with less space per person is the Nevada CARES Campus, a very large congregate shelter with closely spaced dorm beds in large The value for the proposed IFS State Street location is recorded as 225 – this includes their nominal application bed count of 205, plus 20 mats, per their written response to questions, provided in Appendix B. However, during the 10/21/2021 neighborhood meeting, Interfaith’s representatives clarified that they typically host between 10 and 14 guests on overflow mats per night, but this typically increases to 20 during colder months. They clarified that because their mission is to serve the homeless, if they can accommodate a higher number of overflow guests, they will. They did not specify a maximum overflow value. 11

open plan rooms that opened recently in 2021, but which has already gained a negative reputation among the population it intends to serve 12. Our peer city shelters typically provide between 200 and 350 square feet of building space per person sheltered (and an average of 253 square feet per guest, even when the Nevada CARES campus is included). The Salt Lake City and County, Utah shelters, which use a resource center model with 24-hour services, programming and case management, which is the model Interfaith is proposing in this application, provide between 264 and 313 square feet of building space per person. In contrast, Interfaith’s proposal to serve 205 beds plus 20 overflow mats in 30,000 square feet equates to 133 square feet per guest -- less than half of the average square footage of the Utah shelters it is modeled after, and below Anchorage, Alaska’s regulated minimum! We note that, as a family shelter, the total number of guests served is likely to exceed the number of beds, as small children and infants are not included in that total; this further decreases the space available per person 13. Anecdotally, the emergency shelter facility providing the most space per person that we are aware of – nearly three times as much as in Interfaith’s proposal, is a recently opened shelter in King County, near Seattle, Washington. The shelter serves 280 guests and has 135,000 square feet of space; this is normalized to 482 square feet per guest 14. They also provide wrap-around services, case managers, mental health specialists, and housing navigators; again, similar to the model Interfaith proposes. While we do not condone the large shelter sizes that have been recently opened in Seattle and Salt Lake City and County, these shelters have been considered to follow the ‘scattered site’ model due to the much larger metro areas and correspondingly higher population experiencing homelessness in those jurisdictions. However, we can at least acknowledge that these metro areas are choosing to provide services in facilities providing sector-leading amounts of space per person. It is our conclusion that the proposed space at 4306 State Street is simply not large enough to provide both the quality and the quantity of service that Interfaith has characterized. We fear that an undersized facility on a per-guest basis will be ‘built to fail,’ so to speak, as early reports following the opening of Nevada’s CARES Campus have demonstrated. While we recognize that the space available at the proposed State Street site is larger than the existing 1620 River facility, comparison to shelters in other cities show that the proposal is well below ‘industry standard,’ so to speak, in the homeless services sector. 2.3.2

Unencumbered Floor Space

With regard to unencumbered floor space, one Iowa jurisdiction regulated 80 square feet of unencumbered floor space per bed with a minimum of 8 feet free in at least one dimension. One sector Concerns from Homeless Over Safety at Nevada CARES Campus; KTVN news, Channel 2; June 4, 2021. 13 Interfaith has not responded to our questions regarding what age range of children are sheltered in cribs or toddler beds rather than standard beds, nor to how many children in this age range they may ‘typcailly’ shelter. Interfaith has indicated that up to 2 cribs per each of the 25 family rooms are allowed in their proposal. If we assume that the 100 family beds include an additional 50 children in cribs or toddler beds, for a new total guest count of 275 guests. This equates to a normalized value of 109 square feet per guest. 14 Seattle, King County open large congregate shelter with Salvation Army; The Seattle Times. Nov. 7, 2020 12

in which unencumbered floor space criteria is common is in jail management (where at least seven feet are required in one direction). We reviewed American Correctional Association standards manuals dated May 1990 and June 2010, which contain the following standards: • • •

Prior to May 1990, a minimum size was required of: o 60 square feet per single cell, and o 50 square feet per person in shared cells. In May 1990, standards were revised to require a minimum size of: o 35 square feet of unencumbered space per occupant In June 2010, the published standards were: o 35 square feet of unencumbered space and at least 70 square feet total if confined for 10 hours/day for a single cell, and o 25 square feet of unencumbered space per occupant or 35 square feet of unencumbered space per occupant if confined for 10 hours/day in a multi-person cell.

The Table below shows room sizes and number of beds typical of each room type Interfaith proposes; it has been normalized to compare space available per resident on a facility-wide scale. These dimensions are based on the Maps and Drawings Interfaith provided with their application, scaled based off of the family rooms, which are labeled as 12’ x 12’. Unencumbered floor space was calculated based on the size of furnishings shown on the drawings.

Other Regulations for Comparison

Proposed Room Sizes (from CUP21-00026 Maps and Drawings)

Total and Unencumbered Room Area per Person, by Interfaith Proposed Room Type

Room Type Family Medical Men - Single Men - Incentive Men - Dorm Women - Double Women - Incentive Women - Dorm

Dimensions ft x ft 12' x 12' 12' x 10.5' 8' x 8' 10' x 12' 25.5' x 19' 8' x 8' 9.5' x 17.5' 9.5' x 20.5'

Area (sq ft) 144 126 64 120 484.5 64 166.25 194.75

Des Moines, Iowa Regulation June 2010 ACA, single cell June 2010 ACA, shared cell June 2010 ACA, shared cell &May 1990 ACA Pre-May 1990 - single cell Pre-May 1990 - shared cell

Beds/Room 4 2 1 2 18 2 3 6

Area (sq ft) /Bed 36 63 64 60 27 32 55 32.5

Unencumbered Area (sq ft) /Bed 24.3 45 40 42 18 20 37 23.5

-70 --60 50

80 35 25 35 ---

All room types in Interfaith’s proposal would fail to meet the minimum standard space available regulated for emergency shelter in Des Moines, Iowa.

For comparison to the American Correctional Association (ACA) total area standards, all rooms would fail to meet the June 2010 single cell standard for spending 10 hours per day in a cell, but medical rooms and men’s single rooms would meet the pre-May 1990 standards for total available area for single or shared cells; the women’s incentive rooms would also meet the shared cell standards prior to May of 1990. Family rooms, women’s ‘semi-private’ (double) rooms, men’s dorm rooms, and women’s dorm rooms would fail the total area per person standards. We also note that Idaho State fire code (Table 1004.12) also includes a requirement for all dormitories to include 50 sq ft/person in total area 15 – equivalent to the ACA standard prior to May of 1990. For unencumbered space standards from the ACA from May of 1990 and June of 2010, medical, men’s single, men’s incentive, and women’s incentive rooms would meet both standards. Family rooms, women’s ‘semi-private’ (double) rooms, men’s dorm rooms, and women’s dorm rooms would fail the unencumbered area per person standards. Family rooms, men’s dorms, women’s ‘semi-private’ (double) rooms, and women’s dorm rooms in the Interfaith proposal would fail all of the ACA standards. We note that additional child guests staying in cribs or toddler beds are not accounted for in the calculation of total square footage per person or unencumbered floor space per person; inclusion of these children and the mobile cribs or toddler beds would significantly reduce both counts.

https://up.codes/viewer/idaho/ibc-2015/chapter/10/means-ofegress?calc_key=min_exits_per_space#table_1004.1.2 15

APPENDIX C Inconsistent Re-Zoning Examples (prepared based on prior Module)

www.vpnaboise.org

Conversion of R-1A/B/C zoning districts to R-2 The Zoning Code Rewrite updated module 1 & 2 draft, p. 7, shows the following zoning map conversion for proposed residential zoning districts R-1A, R-1B and R-1C: “Within 1/8 mile of the edge of ROW from a Best-in- Class Transit Route: R-2” The use of “within” means that any R-1A, R-1B, and R-1C parcel that is fully inside the 660’ buffer for State St, Fairview Ave and Vista Ave, is proposed to be up-zoned to R-2. But we note that the conversion maps actually show an inconsistent application. And, although the maps shown here are for the State St corridor, similar inconsistencies along Fairview Ave and Vista Ave are noted. Below are three example maps of current R-1A, R-1B, R-1C properties and their proposed zoning along the State St corridor. The first image below shows most of the VPNA stretch of State St with its 1/8-mile buffer on both sides in light blue. R-1A, R-1B and R-1C properties that remain R-1 are shown in yellow, where as those that are proposed to be up-zoned to R-2 are shown in red. Overall we would like to see clarification of the district conversion policy that is being proposed in Module 2. When the term “within” is employed, we assume its formal definition such that within explicitly means that only those parcels fully inside the buffer would be proposed for up-zone. Does the city have that interpretation as well? If so, we would request corrections to the proposed code to remove properties from the up-zone that are only partially within the buffer.

This map covers most of the VPNA stretch of State St. In the area North of State St near Plum St and Taft St (circled in red) there are both parcels (in yellow) that are completely or partially inside the buffer that are not up-zoned to R-2; as well as parcels in red that only have a very small amount inside the buffer, that are up-zoned to R-2. But, if we cross Plum St to the West (circled in blue), we note that only parcels that are completely within the buffer are upzoned to R-2. Unlike the parcels north of State St, those that are only partially in the buffer are not up-zoned to R-2. We believe this latter conversion policy is correct.

If we go further Northwest up State St to the Pierce Park area, we note a similar inconsistency where numerous R-1 parcels completely within the buffer are not proposed as R-2

Likewise, if we head towards 21st street. Here we note numerous R-1 parcels completely within the buffer not proposed as R-2

Conversion of zoning districts to MX-4 The Zoning Code Rewrite updated module 1 & 2 draft, p. 7, proposes the following zoning map conversion for the proposed MX-3 district: “Previous R-O, N-O, L-O, C-1, C-2, C-3, C-4, and T-1 zoning districts located within ¼ of the State & Whitewater, State & Collister, State & Glenwood, or State & Horseshoe Bend transit stations”

This conversion is mapped and examined below for consistency. We note that although there is explicitly no proposed rule to convert currently P-C zoned parcels to MX4, there are a number of those conversions near the Collister node. There is also a current A zoned parcel conversion (ITD campus) to MX-4 further down State St. for which there is no proposed rule for the conversion. With this spot-zoning such as the ITD campus and P-C parcels being proposed for MX-4, should there be a broader conversion rule? We also note that without knowing the specific location of the transit stations themselves, that we will use the ¼ mile of the node itself (i.e. intersection of State St and Collister centerlines) for the purposes of applying the proposed MX-3 conversion rules. This appears consistent with the City’s zoning conversion maps.

At the Collister TOD node we expect to see RO, NO, LO, C1,2,3,4 and T-1 parcels (potential parcels) proposed for MX-4. What we see in the map is Yellow are potential parcels, Green are potential parcels that are proposed MX-4, and Blue are proposed MX-4 parcels that were not potential parcels (the ones shown were zoned P-C). It is noted there is a parcel (circled in blue) just East of Sycamore that barely touches the ¼ mile buffer, but IS included. Conversely, circled in red, are large parcels, proximate to the node that were not proposed to be MX-4, due to their current R-3 or R-2 designations. Though a similarly developed multi-family residential parcels (zoned C-2 and developed with apartment complexes) have been upzoned to MX-4. In light of the ITD campus arbitrary rezone from A (next map), why aren’t these parcels considered for rezone? Based on proximity to the transit hub, if future redevelopment were to occur, mixed use would be beneficial.

At the Whitewater node we also see a nonpotential parcel converted to MX-4 without a rule for the conversion in the draft. This is the zoned “A” ITD property. There are also parcels at State & Vine, on Grace and on 33rd (circled in red) that arguably are not within the ¼ mile buffer for the node but yet are proposed MX-4.

At the Glenwood node, we note that there is a large apartment complex (outlined in blue) that is oddly converted / notconverted. Arguably only a small amount of this parcel is inside the buffer – as such it is debatable that it should be converted to MX-4. Likewise, there are also some commercial parcels (circled in red) near those apartments that are potential parcels but are not proposed to be converted to MX-4.

At the Horseshoe Bend node, we note a zoned PC parcel at Jennie that is converted to MX-4 without a proposed rule for that conversion. It is also worthwhile noting that there are R1C parcels (circled in red) abutting or across Jennie from parcels proposed for MX-4 that are proposed to remain R-1C rather than being converted to R-2 as a buffer around the MX-4. This underlines the inconsistent application of the re-zone rules (though residential zoning is not highlighted here).

Conversion of zoning districts to MX-3 The Zoning Code Rewrite updated module 1 & 2 draft, p. 7, shows the following zoning map conversion for the proposed MX-3 district (underlining added): “Previous R-O, N-O, L-O, C-1, C-2, C-3, C-4, and T-1 zoning districts with frontage or within 1/8 of a mile of the edge of ROW from State St., Fairview St., Vista Ave., the Greenbelt, and Federal Way Trail, and Previous R-O, N-O, L-O, C-1, C-2, C-3, and C-4 zoning districts located within 1/8 mile radius of a Blueprint Boise designated Community Activity Center or 1/2 mile of a Regional Activity Center”

This is a very complex conversion which is mapped and examined here for consistency. Note that the conversion mapping specifies Blueprint Boise as the reference for Community Activity Centers. Also, Regional Activity Centers seem harder to define their perimeters, and what it means to be ½ mile from the RAC. This is very poorly defined in both the draft ZCR as well as Blueprint Boise. The only city mapping resource for the RACs is layer that is simply called “1/4 mile”. It is not clear what the extents of the area enclosing a RAC in this layer represents – but it may not be the ½ mile specified in conversion rule for MX-3 specified in the ZCR draft on p. 7. A few inconsistencies, outside of the comments above, are also noted on the below maps for parcels being proposed to be converted to MX-3

Near the North edge of Lake Harbor we see a P-C zoned parcel (circled in blue) which was converted to MX3. Once again noting there is no rule for converting P-C to MX3. Just past Ellen’s Ferry, the northern strip of parcels which were converted, barely even touch the buffer zone. And, we note that the parcel circled in red is not converted though will likely have access via parcels that are converted. We expect to see only parcels that are within the buffer (and not only partially inside it) be converted. On the southern end of the State St buffer, we note that there are a number of P-C properties (circled in red) that were converted to MX-3 even though there is no proposed rule for that conversion.

As noted earlier, Regional Activity Center boundaries are ill defined. The proposed rule for conversion to MX-3 proposes a ½ mile buffer from the RAC. Though the city has a map layer for a ¼ mile (shown on the map to the right), we note that there are a number of parcels (circled in blue) within this RAC buffer layer which are not converted to MX-3. There is also a P-C parcel in a CAC buffer zone proposed to be MX-3 (circled in red) for which there is no proposed conversion rule from PC to MX3. In the Regional Activity Center around the HP Industrial area (now State of Idaho) there are parcels (circled in blue) which should be converted to MX-3 but are not.

ZoningRewrite From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:27 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Jerry K Wagner jerry_k_wagner@yahoo.com 13046 West Elmspring Street Boise, ID 83713 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Friday, April 14, 2023 12:06 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Greg Walker gregwalker1717@gmail.com 1414 N. McKinney Ln. Boise, ID 83704 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 5:06 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Susan Walsh wasabistar@hotmail.com 2120 N. 15th Street Boise, ID 83702 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Wednesday, April 19, 2023 8:14 AM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Nate Walsh Email nathanielwalsh53@gmail.com Address 1821 S Gourley ST Comment I agree with the city's proposed changes to the zoning code. Increased density isn't perfect but the current situation regarding the dearthif housing is untenable. Moreover, increase to the tax base could continue to improve services in our community. Lastly. Increased commercial activity in neighborhoods like the Vistas and The Central Bench could help to revitalize these areas. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Thursday, April 20, 2023 12:29 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Richard Walth Email Rwalth5@gmail.com Address 6620 Hummel Drive, Boise, ID 83709 Comment I am writing you today in support of the new zoning code ordinance (ZOA23‐0001 & CPA23‐0001). Boise is desperately in need of the code rewrite to stay in line with current zoning and housing needs. Please count this as support in the affirmative for the new ordinance. Thank you. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Saturday, April 15, 2023 12:43 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Teresa Wardhaugh teresa@medalist‐engineering.com 1872 W SILVER CREST DR Boise, ID 83703 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Geoffrey M. Wardle (208) 388-3321 gwardle@clarkwardle.com

April 20, 2023 Boise City Planning and Zoning Commission 150 N. Capital Blvd. Boise, ID 83702 Re:

ZOA23-00001 and CPA23-00001

Dear Commissioners: As land use attorneys who regularly represent property owners in matters before Boise City, we write in support of the Boise Zoning Code Rewrite. We respectfully request your affirmative recommendation of ZOA23-00001 and CPA23-00001 to the Boise City Council. A.

Introduction

Under Idaho law, comprehensive plans are guides to future decisions. Such plans are not zoning ordinances, so to be implemented, they require adoption of zoning ordinance incorporating those goals as objective requirements. Ideally, this effort would have occurred in conjunction with the adoption of Blueprint Boise in 2011. However, with the work that began four years ago, the efforts of Boise City’s staff, consultants, and citizen advisors have brought us to this point where many of the goals that were articulated for this community will in fact finally be incorporated in Boise City Code. In evaluating a proposed zoning ordinance amendment, it is important that the creation and regulation of zoning districts “be in accordance with the policies set forth in the adopted comprehensive plan” as required by Idaho Code 67-6511. We believe that the Boise Zoning Code Rewrite reflects the culmination of the community planning effort that produced Blueprint Boise. Blueprint Boise recognized that meeting its identified goals necessitated both “a range of housing choices”, as well as “a mix of housing types”, and “increase[ing] housing options”. 1 Blueprint Boise acknowledged that provision of a “mix of uses” providing for “a range of commercial/retail services” is necessary to reduce the need for vehicular trips.2 Blueprint Boise provided guidance on desired design

1 2

Blueprint Boise, p. 2-2 Blueprint Boise, p. 2-34

Boise City Planning & Zoning April 20, 2023 Page 2

and development principles for the community, to “ensure future development in the city’s eleven planning areas is compatible with the unique characteristics of each area”.3 The Boise Zoning Code Rewrite furthers, and is in accordance with, all three of those goals: (1) promoting diverse housing, (2) facilitating true mixed-use development, and (3) establishing design and development standards. We will address each below. B.

Diverse Housing

Boise City is to be commended for the modification to the Table of Allowed Uses to include more diverse and alternative types of housing in more zones of the City. Appropriately, such are coupled with clear and objective use specific standards. It is important to remember that the ability to zone property was held to be constitutionally permissible in Village of Euclid, Ohio v. Ambler Realty Co., 272 U.S. 365 (1926), where the zoning ordinance at issue was specifically adopted to restrict housing other than detached single family residences. Unfortunately, many of the objections voiced regarding the Boise Zoning Code Rewrite sound as if lifted directly from the decision of the Supreme Court which noted that “the development of detached house sections is greatly retarded by the coming of apartment houses, which has sometimes resulted in destroying the entire section for private house purposes; that in such sections very often the apartment house is a mere parasite.” Id., at 394. History has not been kind to this analysis. Housing should be recognized as housing, regardless of its form, configuration, or ownership. Use-Specific Standards for various residential uses found in Section 11-03-03.2 of the Boise Zoning Code Rewrite are appropriate. They not only satisfy the housing goals of Blueprint Boise but they also further the development principles articulated therein. The provision of housing focused incentives is appropriate as such further both the goals associated with housing and sustainability in Blueprint Boise. We are particularly in agreement with the proposed amendments associated with Accessory Dwelling Units as we successfully defended a client’s ADU permit in 2022 from a neighborhood appeal and believe that the revised ordinance would have improved our client’s plan to house an aging parent on their property, and would have permitted it to be processed through the neighborhood appeal in a more expeditious matter. Housing, of any type, should be the easiest land use to approve. Housing is a fundamental human need. Housing is a necessity. Housing should be provided via a variety of housing types, detached single family residences should not be the default or the predominant type of housing. The Boise Zoning Code Rewrite does a commendable job of providing for a variety of diverse housing types and overcoming the historic bias in favor of detached single family residences ever since Village of Euclid. C.

Mixed-Use Development

Blueprint Boise was clear in the desire of this community to ensure that mixed-use development was encouraged throughout the City. With respect to the nonresidential uses that will be permissible within 3

Blueprint Boise, p. 3-1

Boise City Planning & Zoning April 20, 2023 Page 3

residential zoning districts, the use standards which have been developed are consistent with the historic mixed-use patterns found in the vicinity of Hyde Park, Lowell Elementary, and the Ustick Townsite. These are the types of uses that existed prior to the spread of Euclidean Zoning, uses that were organic, and uses inherent in all neighborhoods. We appreciate the simplification that has been undertaken in the Boise Zoning Code Rewrite with respect to the consolidation of the various commercial, office, and institutional zoning designations. It is clear that significant thought has gone into the resulting mixed-use zones which recognize the fundamental desire to ensure that specific uses and zones are defined not by paint on a map but rather by the function and relationship that such uses have with a specific land use or development type. The organization of the MX-1, MX-2 and MX-3 zones, in particular, are logical and reflect easily articulable development typologies. The classification of uses and consolidation of uses are reflective of the described intensities and the specified dimensional standards. Most importantly, the inclusion of residential uses within all of the MX zones will be an important means of accomplishing the goals in the future associated with providing housing in this community. If we have learned anything from the nearly 100-year history America has had with zoning since Village of Euclid, it has to be that the strict separation of uses has resulted in a society that has become car dependent, economically segregated, and sprawling. To accomplish the underlying goals of Blueprint Boise, a true commitment to promotion and facilitation of mixed-use development is imperative. D.

Design and Development Standards

Finally, the attention paid to design standards is a commendable element of the Boise Zoning Code Rewrite. As set forth in Section 11-04-03, attention has been paid to ensure that dimensional standards are reflective of actual development requirements and to promote the goals of Blueprint Boise. Bringing improvements closer to the street while addressing setbacks at higher floor levels will further the goals relating to scale and design in a meaningful and satisfactory manner. Moreover, the inclusion of specific building design standards as part of the actual zoning code is to be commended. As set forth in Section 11-04-06, this is an appropriate step in ensuring that some of the disputes over design review in the past are minimized. We would recommend, however, that the Citywide and Downtown Design Standards and Guidelines be evaluated next and conformed to the Boise Zoning Code Rewrite to eliminate any conflict in the future and ensure consistency with the Idaho Local Land Use Planning Act. We are also supportive of the provision that addresses many of the encroachments or exceptions to the various dimensional standards. By establishing clear design standards for elements that frequently require and frequently are granted waivers, the Boise Zoning Code Rewrite simplifies many design issues that have historically necessitated a conditional use permit. Cupolas, screening of HVAC, necessary structural elements, and other design elements that make buildings more functional and more attractive and do not increase the underlying density should be treated as such. This will reduce the unnecessary administrative load that has arisen from requiring conditional uses permits that are wholly unrelated to the actual use and only relate to dimensional standards.

Boise City Planning & Zoning April 20, 2023 Page 4

Most importantly, the design and development standard make the desired development pattern under Blueprint Boise the default form. This then results in enhanced review when there is deviation from the desired development pattern. E.

Conclusion

Far too often we hear at hearings the claim that decisionmakers are not implementing Blueprint Boise. We believe that Boise City is now in fact implementing Blueprint Boise with a comprehensive code rewrite that will encourage the type of development that this community, its neighborhoods, and its residents supported in 2011 with the adoption of Blueprint Boise. We recognize that with any change, the unknown is the source of fear for many. We recognize that there will be provisions of the Boise Zoning Code Rewrite that will prove to be impractical, uneconomical, or ineffective when implemented. We recognize that there are elements here which will need to be revisited in the future but those issues can be addressed as they arise. We believe that the Boise Zoning Code Rewrite should be recommended for approval to the Boise City Council. This four-year process, which is really an extension of the planning exercise initiated more than twelve years ago with the adoption of Blueprint Boise, implements the goals that the citizens of Boise said they valued in 2011 when it was adopted. We strongly support the Boise Zoning Code Rewrite. Very truly yours,

Geoffrey M. Wardle

T. Hethe Clark

Joshua J. Leonard

Preston B. Rutter

CASE Numbers: ZOA23-00001 & CPA23-00001 To: City of Boise, Planning & Zoning Commission The Warm Springs Mesa Neighborhood is a unique and beau�ful area whose residents value the adjacent foothills and preserva�on of its natural beauty, which includes the abundant wildlife. We see the value in rezoning in order to sustain our current and future growth, but we do ques�on if increasing the density to our mature and established neighborhood is the right solu�on for us. Our neighborhood faces many unique challenges due to our loca�on on a plateau within a Wildland Urban Interface (WUI). These geographical constraints and our limited access causes concern for the safety of our residents in the event of an emergency. The Table Rock fire was a perfect example of why increased density in our neighborhood would be a hinderance during an evacua�on event. In a future emergency, we are concerned about our evacua�on routes and the exis�ng roads because the rezoning does not ini�ally appear to be in collabora�on with any transporta�on partners. Is it possible that density would increase in our neighborhood without solu�ons for our aging roads? As part of the WUI and a designated Firewise community we work hard to maintain defensible space among homeowners and create fire fuels reduc�on plans in prepara�on of a future fire, as well as work with our emergency services to have strategies in place. We do this through collabora�on, educa�on and various projects on the Mesa. Our goal is to be prepared for a wildfire or any other emergency event so that our neighbors are safe. To provide a safe environment for our community is important for us to collaborate with various agencies and partners and communicate with each other. We are concerned that we will lose transparency and communica�on from the City of Boise if affordable housing applica�ons are approved internally without public no�fica�on. We rely on no�fica�ons to help inform decisions and we hope to be informed in the future as well. A blanket solu�on to zoning does not address the individual needs of our unique neighborhood and our geographical constraints. We love our growing Boise community and appreciate the hard work it takes to meet those needs including higher density, affordable housing and beter access to ameni�es and services. As many of those changes take place we hope for the safety of our neighborhood, without an increased density designa�on, as well as request that not all affordable housing permits get approved administra�vely, but require public no�fica�on. Thank you for your �me and allowing us to provide feedback. Sincerely, Kellee Adams President Warm Springs Mesa Neighborhood Associa�on

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

garyewashburn@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Gary Washburn <garyewashburn@everyactioncustom.com> Friday, April 14, 2023 10:48 AM ZoningRewrite [External] Vote Yes on the Zoning Code Rewrite

Dear Planning and Zoning Commission, I am really impressed with the code rewrite, in particular, the changes affecting urban sprawl. I have seen the yard signs which, in my mind, suggest that dragging the past into the future is the best alternative. Change is always difficult, but given the tremendous opportunity before us there is no reason to delay. I was impressed with the video with the CVI Director and the Boise Planning Director. I suggest putting this type of information everywhere you can. Meetings are fine but not very effective in reaching the majority of citizens. Given today's communication means, the meeting model resembles 1966 zoning codes. Naysayers tend to dominate meetings and normally do not represent the interests of others. Thank you. Sincerely, Mr. Gary Washburn 1318 N 10th St Boise, ID 83702‐4137 garyewashburn@aol.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 4:20 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Edgar Watts ebrl@msn.com 3995 E. Aphrodite Dr., Boise, Id. Boise, ID 83716 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject:

Craig Watts <craig@hwatt.com> Monday, April 17, 2023 9:31 AM ZoningRewrite Mayor McLean; Holli Woodings [External] Zoning Re-write comments; ZOA23-00001 and CPA23-00001

Hi, My name is Craig Watts. I have lived in East Boise at 6931 E Greybull Drive (83716) for 5 years. Before that I lived in West Boise, over near Centennial High School for twelve years. I am worried about our beloved Boise, and oppose any quick approval of the new Boise Zoning Re-write. These are my main comments: 1. There should be a ‘General Summary’ of the 600 pages …something that let’s the average Boisean understand the basics w/o reading a document that is almost as long as “War and Peace”. 2. There should be a ‘Referendum Vote” on this; it is a huge change; it seems like it matters enough that we should find out if the voters are for it or against it. 3. The language regarding protecting “Stable Neighborhoods” should be a lot more specific. The current language does not really protect, and it looks like it encourages change w/o protection. 4. I don’t like the elimination of notification to neighbors, elimination of Appeals, and appointment of a new Hearing Examiner who is not accountable to voters. How long is the “Term of Appointment” for the Hearing Examiner? I prefer some accountability to the people of Boise 1

who are affected by change, and not a new “Administrative System” that is efficient, but has no heart or ears. 5. Making the new rules not require adequate parking is mistake. Even the people who love to ride bicycles drive some of the time. And old people can’t ride bikes to get groceries, etc. And, there is NO adequate public transportation system to get people to work, hospitals, airport, etc at this time. 6. I am totally for affordable housing, so that young people have a chance to live somewhere in Boise. But, what is the enforcement mechanism for the new “Affordable Housing”? Are we going to have to also build a new tax-payer funded bureaucracy to make sure people keep their promises to supply the affordable housing ? Finally: Thanks to the folks who were on the rewrite committee; that is a lot of hard work! Best Regards, Craig Watts 6931 E. Greybull Dr. Boise, Idaho 83716 The content of this message is confidential. If you have received it by mistake, please inform us by an email reply and then delete the message. It is forbidden to copy, forward, or in any way reveal the contents of this message to anyone. The integrity and security of this email cannot be guaranteed over the internet.

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 9:55 AM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Gloria Webb redeem@q.com 3346 E Eastgate Dr Boise, ID 83716 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:46 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Darlene Weber darweber@sbcglobal.net 13529 W Wittenburg St Boise, ID 83713 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Tuesday, April 18, 2023 11:34 AM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Miss Barbara Weirick barbyrick@aol.com 5110 N Allamar Dr Boise, ID 83704 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Friday, April 14, 2023 9:19 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Richard wensel Email richwensel@gmail.com Address Boise, ID 83702 Comment I like the new zoning proposals, they support sustainability by offering better housing density, more opportunities for biking and walking transportation, less water use, and friendly neighborhoods with pockets of businesses like we enjoy in Hyde Park. The one thing I am currently frustrated by is all of the garages being converted to so‐called ADUs. People seem to use this n am excuse to put in a giant garage without ever actually renting it out. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 1:45 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Janice Werle werlejan1@gmail.com 6430 W Fairfield Av Boise, ID 83709 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject:

Kelley Tagg <vivsmom2003@yahoo.com> Thursday, April 20, 2023 3:54 PM ZoningRewrite Kelley Tagg; West Downtown [External] RE: New zoning code ordinance (ZOA23-0001 & CPA23-0001)

Attention Boise City Planning RE: New zoning code ordinance (ZOA23-0001 & CPA23-0001) The West Downtown Neighborhood Association (WDNA) is writing in regard to the proposed zoning code rewrite, ZOA23-0001 & CPA23-0001. We thank you for the opportunity to share our thoughts about this new ordinance that will have a big impact on our neighborhood. The WDNA finalized a neighborhood plan in November of 2019 and on December 8th, 2020 the Boise City Council accepted the plan to be included in Blueprint Boise. The complete plan can be seen on our neighborhood association website, https://westdowntownboise.com/neighborhood-plan/ . The primary goals of the plan are to ensure developments are cohesive with the existing sense of community, create an affordable community, encourage growth, and attract and retain the familyoriented nature of the neighborhood. The overall vision is to develop spaces within the neighborhood that facilitate, invite, and reinforce the current sense of community. Projects are to provide places in the WDNA where neighbors, families, and friends can recreate. With the vision for the neighborhood in mind, the WDNA Board discussed the zoning rewrite in our spring meeting held on April 12th, with seven of ten board members present. The board believes this new modern code aligns with the WDNA goals in our neighborhood plan, allowing many types of housing options, creating a walkable neighborhood, and encouraging sustainable, responsible growth. The WDNA plan addresses the missing middle housing and creative reuse of existing properties, this also aligns with the modern zoning code. So, overall, the WDNA Board supports the new zoning code ordinance, but do have requests for a few changes in relation to the Neighborhood Transition Standards being applied to R2 and R3 zones and expand neighborhood communication to Type 2 administrative reviews. Neighborhood Transition Standards as described in 11-04-03.5 of the new zoning code apply only to residential neighborhoods with the R1 zones that are bordered by MX3 mixed use zone. The northern boundary of the WDNA is along the State St. best in class transportation corridor and has been assigned the MX3 zone. The WDNA and several other neighborhoods located along the MX3 zones that include R2 and R3 and are comprised of a mixture of a variety of housing types that are shorter than the 45ft and 50ft maximum heights allowed in these zones. The WDNA is a mix of town homes, duplexes, triplexes, fourplexes, apartments, and single-family homes converted into multi-unit housing, and single family occupied homes. The WDNA has nearly every type of housing and the overall majority are not at the max height of 50ft allowed in R3. Our neighborhood has existed in its current state for a 100 years, it is well established stable neighborhood that will not likely change rabidly to majority structures of max 50ft height and therefore needs to be considered for building area and parking set-backs, building height step-downs, lighting, screening, and buffering and detailed in the Neighborhood Transition Standards for residential properties that abut the MX3 zone. 1

Neighborhood communications for type 2 administrative reviews; the WDNA Board feels that a letter should be required to be sent to adjacent properties that may be impacted by a development of redevelopment project with project details, estimated timeline, and manner in which the developer can be contacted is there are issues or emergencies. The project tracker created by Boise City Planning Department is an excellent tool, but most citizens are not likely to register for notifications and neighborhood associations may become dormant or leadership unavailable due to illness or travel, to pass along notifications. A simple letter informing residents in adjacent properties seems like the neighborly and very easy thing to do. The WDNA Board and residents thank you for the opportunity to share our thoughts in relation to modern zoning code ordinance. Sincerely, West Downtown Neighborhood Association c/o wdnaboise@gmail.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:24 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Mary Westover momsiewestover@gmail.com 6609 N Prescott Boise, ID 83714 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Saturday, April 15, 2023 8:24 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Rachel White insurgent@protonmail.ch 10451 W Woodhaven Ct Boise, ID 83704 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

601 W. Bannock Street PO Box 2720 Boise, ID 83701 Main: 208-388-1200 www.givenspursley.com

Preston N. Carter Direct: 208-388-1222 prestoncarter@givenspursley.com

April 20, 2023 VIA Hand Delivery and Email Planning and Zoning Commission City of Boise 150 N. Capitol Blvd Boise, ID 83702-5920 zoningrewrite@cityofboise.org Re:

Intermountain Gas Company’s Comments on new zoning code ordinance (ZOA23-00001 and CPA23-00001)

Dear Planning and Zoning Commissioners, City Staff, and Elected Officials: Please accept these comments on behalf of Intermountain Gas Company (Intermountain Gas) in response to Boise’s Zoning Code Rewrite. These comments address the restrictions on energy source (limited to electricity or geothermal) in Section 11-03-03.2H(1)(f)(i) (amenities for multi-family housing developments) and throughout Section 11-04-03.7(D) (incentives available for exemption from density limits in various zoning districts) in the February 2023 Adoption Draft (Draft Ordinance). Intermountain Gas provides natural gas service to approximately 405,000 customers throughout Idaho, including customers within the City of Boise (City). Intermountain Gas values its relationship with its customers, the City, developers, and other stakeholders, and appreciates the opportunity to provide comments on the Draft Ordinance. As a general matter, Intermountain Gas understands and appreciates the time, energy, and effort that has gone into the Draft Ordinance. Intermountain Gas shares many of the goals embodied in the Draft, including encouraging affordable and fair housing and promoting the use of environmentally friendly development practices and energy conservation.1 Intermountain Gas does, however, have concerns with the Draft Ordinance. Two sections of the Draft Ordinance appear to regulate the source of energy available to new developments by providing preferential treatment to developments that use only electricity or geothermal energy rather than natural gas. First, under Section 11-03-03.2H(1)(f), a multi-family housing development must provide at least two of the six listed “amenities” in certain zoning districts. The Draft Ordinance considers a prohibition on natural gas connections as an “amenity” for

Draft Ordinance Section 11-01-03 (Purpose).

April 20, 2023 Page 2 of 4 purposes of this section.2 Stated another way, the Draft Ordinance regulates the source of energy for certain new, multi-family dwellings by classifying a natural-gas-free development as an “amenity.” Indeed, it appears that a restriction on natural gas connections would satisfy one-half of the developer’s obligation regarding amenities for the development. Second, throughout Section 11-04-03.7(D), housing developments are exempted from density standards, parking requirements, and height restrictions if they meet certain requirements. One of these requirements is prohibiting natural gas connections to the development.3 Stated another way, under the Draft Ordinance, a developer is entitled to an exemption from certain density standards only if the developer prohibits natural gas connections within the development. Intermountain Gas submits that these sections of the Draft Ordinance should—and indeed must—be removed. As a legal matter, recent legislation prohibits this type of energy-source restriction in a city’s zoning code. See Idaho Code §§ 50-346, 39-9701.4 House Bill 106, codified as Idaho Code Section 50-346, prohibits a city from “enact[ing] or implement[ing] any resolution, policy, or ordinance that: . . . (2) Restricts, or has the effect of restricting, the source of the electricity, natural gas, propane, or other energy utility service provided by a public utility, municipality, or cooperative utility; or (3) Requires residents or businesses within the municipality to use a particular type or generation source of electricity, natural gas, propane or other fuel.” The text of House Bill 106 prohibits the energy-source restrictions contained in the Draft Ordinance. Designating “electricity or geothermal” as an “amenity” both “has the effect of restricting[] the source of the electricity, natural gas, propane, or other energy utility service” as well as requires “residents or businesses” to use a “particular type or generation source,” namely electricity or geothermal. See Section 11-03-03.2H(1)(f)(i). Similarly, the density exemption— eligibility for which requires a natural-gas-free development—has “the effect of restricting” the energy source. See Sections 11-04-03.7(D)(1)(b)(i), (3)(c)(i), (4)(b)(i), (5)(b)(i). In turn, residents or businesses in those developments will be required to use a particular type or generation source. The legislative history confirms that the Legislature intended to prevent the energysource restriction contained in the Draft Ordinance. In the Senate’s debate on House Bill 106, Senator Rabe explained that it would prohibit a voluntary program that creates incentives,

Specifically, the Draft Ordinance designates, as an amenity, a building that restricts the source of energy to “electricity or geothermal” to meet all “heating, hot water, and appliance energy needs” for all dwelling units. Section 11-03-03.2H(1)(f)(i) (Use-Specific Standards for Residential Uses). 3 One of the requirements to earn these exemptions is that the “building shall use electricity or geothermal energy to meet all of its heating, hot water, and appliance energy needs” in all dwelling units. Sections 11-04-03.7(D)(1)(b)(i), (3)(c)(i), (4)(b)(i), (5)(b)(i) (Incentives to Create Affordable and Sustainable Housing). 4 Even if these statutes didn’t directly apply, the City of Boise would still lack authority for this type of action. Idaho is a Dillon’s rule state; cities lack inherent authority to legislate. Rather, their lawmaking power derives from grants of authority expressly granted or necessarily implied by the Idaho Constitution or statute. Caesar v. State, 101 Idaho 158, 160, 610 P.2d 517, 519 (1980). While the Local Land Use and Planning Act grants Idaho cities authority to make land-use decisions, including zoning decisions, cities lack authority to regulate sources of energy.

April 20, 2023 Page 3 of 4 including the City of Boise’s ability to incentivize connections to geothermal. Senator Wintrow’s comments reflected a similar understanding of the Bill.5 House Bill 287, codified as Idaho Code Section 39-9701, “preempt[s], eliminate[s], and prohibit[s] cities . . . from adopting energy code or energy-related requirements through any code, ordinance, process, policy, or guidance that differ from or are more extensive than the requirements of the Idaho energy conservation code as provided for in this chapter.” (emphasis added). As previously discussed, in order to obtain the exemption from certain density standards, developers are required to use only electricity or geothermal energy. This is an energy-related requirement that differs from or is more extensive than the requirements of the Idaho energy conservation code. Accordingly, these provisions of the Draft Ordinance are expressly preempted. As a factual matter, these provisions are contrary to the City’s stated goals of promoting affordable housing. Natural gas is an affordable and stable energy source. The American Gas Association notes that households that use natural gas for heating, cooking, and clothes drying save an average of $1,068 per year compared to homes using electricity for those applications. In addition, the U.S. Energy Information Administration projects that natural gas will continue to be 30–50% less than the price of other fuels through 2050.6 Natural gas is not only cheaper than electricity, but also provides more heating comfort and better cooking performance.7 Removing these provisions would align the Draft Ordinance with the City’s goals regarding affordable housing. In sum, the current energy-source restrictions in the Draft Ordinance are inconsistent with Idaho law as well as the City’s affordable-housing goals. As discussed above, both Bills were recently passed, likely after the drafting of the proposed ordinance. However, the Draft Ordinance can be brought into conformance with the law by simply removing these provisions. Thank you for your consideration of these comments. If you would like to discuss any of these comments further, please contact me at (208) 388-1200. Sincerely,

Preston N. Carter Morgan D. Goodin Givens Pursley, LLP Attorneys for Intermountain Gas 5

See Senate Chambers Digital Media Archive (Mar. 14, 2023). Video at 2:19:18-2:32:50, available at https://lso.legislature.idaho.gov/MediaArchive/ShowCommitteeOrMedia.do;jsessionid=70CF07950B33C6E96D09F 40A3840B827. Senators Rabe and Wintrow both advocated against House Bill 106, as they both appeared to support the type of energy-source restrictions contained in the Draft Ordinance. 6 U.S. Energy Information Administration, Annual Energy Outlook 2020, available at, https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/aeo/data/browser/#/?id=3-AEO2020&region=10&cases=ref2020&start=2019&end=2050&f=A&linechart=ref2020-d112119a.3-3-AEO2020.1-0~ref2020d112119a.5-3-AEO2020.1-0&map=ref2020-d112119a.4-3-AEO2020.10&ctype=linechart&chartindexed=0&sid=ref2020-d112119a.5-3-AEO2020.1-0&sourcekey=0. 7 See Kenneth W. Costello, Why Kill Natural Gas?, REGULATION, Spring 2022, at 27, attached as Exhibit 1.

April 20, 2023 Page 4 of 4

cc:

Tim Keane, Director of Planning and Development Services Jayme B. Sullivan, Boise City Attorney

16714498_6.docx

EXHIBIT 1 EXHIBIT 1

26 / Regulation / SPRING 2022 E N E R GY & E N V I R O N M E N T

Why Kill Natural Gas? The push for “artificial electrification” will hurt consumers and the environment.

✒ BY KENNETH W. COSTELLO he U.S. natural gas industry has enjoyed great success over the last decade-plus. It has contributed to the economy by creating new, productive jobs and significantly reducing households’ and businesses’ energy bills. This was particularly important during the Great Recession when a boost from a major industry prevented the further downward spiral of the economy. Natural gas also benefited the environment by accelerating the retirement of coal-fired generating plants. The shift from coal to natural gas was a major factor in lowering U.S. power industry carbon emissions by 33% between 2005 and 2019. Even after accounting for methane emissions, the most credible studies show that switching from coal to natural gas has mitigated climate change. Moreover, and possibly more important for human health, natural gas emits less air pollutants — like sulfur-dioxide, mercury, and nitrogen oxide — than coal. Because of its abundant shale gas, the United States expects to be a net exporter of natural gas in the coming years. Until a little more than a decade ago, the worry was that the country would have to import increasing amounts of liquefied natural gas (LNG) from politically unstable parts of the world. Overall, because of environmentally prudent development of natural gas resources using advanced technology for hydrocarbon extraction, natural gas would seem to have a bright future. About 80% of U.S. natural gas production comes from “fracking” techniques applied in shale formations, whereas just 15 years ago that percentage was virtually zero.

NATURAL GAS’S FOES

Until around seven years ago, most environmental groups viewed natural gas favorably as a bridge fuel in facilitating the transition to a low-carbon environment. Today, these groups and other climate activists have radically changed their position. They now see natural gas as an obstacle to achieving greenhouse gas (GHG) targets KENNETH W. COSTELLO is a regulatory economist and independent consultant. He previously worked for the National Regulatory Research Institute, the Illinois Commerce Commission, the Argonne National Laboratory, and Commonwealth Edison.

that, in their minds, will help protect against climate catastrophe. They favor phasing-out, as promptly as possible, the consumption of natural gas for various uses like electricity generation and space and water heating in new buildings. Opponents of natural gas have also attempted, with some success, to block the building of new gas-infrastructure projects (like LNG export terminals and gas pipelines). These opponents include homeowners, people who generally oppose development, and environmentalists. ADVOCACY FOR ELECTRIFICATION

Given concerns over climate change, policymakers (e.g., state utility regulators), electric utilities, and environmentalists are championing the idea of “electrification.” That is, they want to phase out fossil fuels and replace them with electricity for direct energy end uses like transportation and water and space heating. Electric vehicles and heat pumps are the “electrification” technologies that have received the most attention up to now. Other

IURII GARMASH / GETTY IMAGES

SPRING 2022 / Regulation / 27

than power plants, the two largest sources of carbon emissions are motor vehicles and buildings. For buildings, the two largest emitting sources of carbon are for space and water heating. Environmental groups and others warn that stringent climate goals are out of reach if widespread use of fossil fuels — including natural gas — continues to power home appliances and vehicles. The numbers just do not add up for deep decarbonization if fossil fuels remain a major source of energy for transportation and buildings. According to some climate activists, the safe level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is 350 parts per million. They argue that, to stay within that limit, it is necessary to transition the global economy away from fossil fuels immediately. This means an extremely short bridge for natural gas. The electric industry sees electrification as an opportunity for revitalizing sales and revenues. A growing number of utilities now consider electrification an integral part of their future business plan. With smart dispatching, utilities can realize the added benefit of improving their capacity utilization from electrification of transportation and water heating. Supporters contend that electrification should occur sooner than later, preferably over the next two or three decades, accelerated by subsidies and other governmental inducements. Some even advocate mandated electrification to avoid climate catastrophe. Others point to the less lofty goal of revitalizing the electric industry. Another group argues that electrification is already economical for end uses, like water and space heating, but it faces serious market and regulatory impediments. THE SELF-DEFEATING “ENVIRONMENTALISM” OF NATURAL GAS BANS

Political attempts to curtail gas supply and demand have met

with limited success. Methane rules, drilling restrictions on public land, and opposition to new pipelines have incrementally slowed the growth of natural gas in the United States. But the anti-fossil-fuel lobby and their allies want much more: additional restrictions on natural gas production and new gas service and bans on natural gas usage and appliances as policy tools to foster “artificial electrification” (i.e., electrification induced by governmental mandates or inducements that fail a cost–benefit test). Bans by municipal jurisdictions with (presumably) the legal authority to do so are in the news. In July 2019, Berkeley, CA prohibited the use of natural gas in new buildings. Since then, dozens of cities in other jurisdictions have adopted similar measures. In December of last year, New York City enacted a new law that mandated phasing out fossil fuels in new buildings. The law requires that new construction after 2027 use electricity for stoves, space heaters, and water boilers instead of gas or oil. Some cities have even considered banning or restricting natural gas appliances from existing homes and businesses. The main purpose of these efforts is to mitigate climate change, however infinitesimal in the whole, by supposedly making buildings zero-carbon. Problem is, banning the direct use of natural gas by end users lowers energy efficiency when accounting for the full fuel cycle. It also may increase carbon emissions if utilities continue to rely on natural gas and other fossil fuels in electricity generation. At least half of the energy embedded in fossil fuels is lost during the generation, transmission, and distribution processes. An older, inefficient coal-fired plant may lose as much as two-thirds of its energy input in electricity generation. As a public policy tool, a ban is much more drastic than just creating a tax to discourage consumption of a product. With a tax, consumers can still purchase the product, but they will have added incentive to economize on its use. This tax, called a Pigouvian tax, can counter a negative externality that is unaccounted for in the decisions of either suppliers or consumers. Such taxes have been used to reduce other forms of pollution and second-hand smoke. In contrast, a natural gas ban extinguishes consumer choice for meeting space and water heating needs, not to mention a flame for what experts consider a superior form of cooking. A natural gas ban forces consumers to do something they otherwise would not do. In effect, the ban confines energy consumers to relying largely on electricity (at least in urban areas) to meet their space and water heating demands. Its intent is to accelerate electrification beyond that achieved by the market alone or by special incentives (e.g., rebates for heat pumps and electric water heaters) offered to consumers for switching or choosing electricity over natural gas. A natural gas ban is contrary to a free market, where consumers enjoy the right to purchase a product if they so desire. Energy consumers may find natural gas cheaper, in addition to providing more heating comfort and better cooking performance than electricity. Consumers cannot go without space or water heating, which means that consumers must find some substitute energy

28 / Regulation / SPRING 2022 E N E R GY & E N V I R O N M E N T

form. Also, unlike some banned products, it would be impracticable to create a black market (e.g., illegal purchase of natural gas for homes or office buildings) for natural gas. In economic terms, a gas ban fails miserably, with the benefits virtually zero and the costs likely more than minimal. As public policy, a ban is off the charts as being exceptionally bad. Here is why: Less than 9% of U.S. carbon emissions comes from direct use of natural gas in homes and buildings. The United States emits about 15% of world carbon emissions. Thus, converting all buildings to all-electric and assuming that all electricity is produced from “clean” sources (which won’t occur for some time) reduces worldwide emissions by less than 1.5%. According to climate models, that would not have a detectable effect on global climate, temperature, or sea level. GHG emissions mitigation is a global public good. It can’t benefit anyone without benefiting everyone, and no matter how much one country or region benefits, there always are benefits for others. So, even if a natural gas ban has a detectable effect on climate change, the locale implementing it would receive a trivial share of the global benefits. A ban can look good politically by giving the appearance that a severe problem is receiving immediate, absolute attention. And a ban is certainly less noticeable than a carbon tax or a budget gap from new taxpayer subsidies. But at least a carbon tax and subsidies preserve for consumers the right to choose their energy source rather than preclude them from doing so. Strange bedfellows (akin to Baptists and Bootleggers) support government-promoted electrification: electric utilities and environmentalists who, of course, have different objectives. This is a particularly strong coalition and is likely to grow more popular in the years ahead. The problem is that vocal minorities who stand to gain economically or ideologically drive governmental action, overriding the wishes of the relatively unorganized majority who lose a lot in total but little individually. The claim that the support for a natural gas ban derives primarily from a “religious” opposition to fossil fuels is credible given the lopsided cost–benefit calculus. Climate activists regard natural gas as a competitor for renewable energy in power generation and for electricity in end-use applications. Their position seems to be that “getting rid of the competitor” would make it easier to have more renewable energy and clean electricity. But is natural gas really bad? THE BENEFITS OF NATURAL GAS EXCEED THE COSTS

The good that comes to energy consumers and society from natural gas far exceeds the bad. Natural gas has: abundant domestic availability low prices for the foreseeable future ■ relative cleanliness compared to other fossil fuels ■ promising technological prospects (e.g., blue hydrogen) for a more benign environmental footprint ■ flexibility in electric power production, one application being a back-up to renewable energy ■ ■

■

economic use across a wide range of consumers and energy services

It seems absurd to ban or even restrict a product that has done, and is expected in the future to do, so much good for both energy consumers and the economy. A SENSIBLE POLICY

Is it only because of special interests that policymakers would even consider prohibiting consumers from choosing natural gas as an energy source to meet their cooking and heating needs? After all, in most parts of the country where natural gas is available, it is the most economical and desired source of energy. It is not a stretch to say that natural gas bans and other forms of artificial electrification are little more than symbolic virtue signaling. This reflects a stance of “we have to do our part,” or, perhaps more accurately, do “whatever it takes,” even if bans resoundingly fail a cost–benefit test. Instead of artificially promoting electrification through natural gas bans, subsidies, and other out-of-market inducements, we should wait to see where the technology takes us. Technology will determine the ultimate success of electrification, not subsidies and other governmental actions that could distort the diffusion of electric appliances and vehicles with possible obstruction of their long-term viability. Technological advancements are already moving in a direction that favors electrification with its emphasis on digitization (like smart meters, appliances, and power grids) and clean energy. If these developments continue on their current path, we should see a more electrified economy with less dependence on fossil fuels to meet future energy demands. But let’s not prematurely promote electrification or phase out natural gas. Artificially promoting electrification can be a win–win for electric utilities and environmentalists, but it is likely a loser for the rest of society. The problem of new electric technologies subsidized by utility customers and taxpayers with only a distinct minority benefiting is hard to ignore, both politically and economically. Policymakers should place more trust in markets to assure that electrification, when it occurs, will be for the good of society, not just for special interests. If we eliminate natural gas from the energy mix too quickly, then either (1) the likely increased use of coal for electric power generation would damage public health and aggravate climate change for a longer period, or (2) expensive renewable energy would lead to higher electricity bills and a less secure and reliable electric power system. Neither outcome would be good for society. Good public policy balances economic and environmental objectives to advance the public interest. A natural gas ban — command-and-control policy at its worst — would have virtually no effect on global climate and is likely to increase costs and reduce quality for energy consumers. One would have to look far and wide to find another governmental action that is so intrusive, R imbalanced, and detrimental to society’s welfare.

April 20, 2023

Mayor Lauren McLean and Boise City Council Boise City Hall, 150 North Capitol Boulevard Boise, Idaho 83702 RE: ZOA23-00001 and CPA23-00001. The Boise Zoning Code Rewrite (ZCR) has been developed without adequate public participation and input, as the process has been dominated by industry and the city of Boise's consultants. The lack of public involvement is evident in the absence of detailed information about the changes that will be made and the failure to provide models and maps to depict "worst-case" scenarios of infilling areas. In addition, the unelected council members are making decisions about the ZCR, which is unethical governance. The proposed code will reduce affordable housing and increase gentrification while destabilizing existing neighborhoods. Lack of public involvement and notice. The process of making this code has been carried out from the top down, without the needed input from the public. Neighbors haven't been told in detail what it means. Evidence for this point is found in a review of public participation at city lead public events, surveys, and now a lack of neighborhood association feedback. A significant number of neighborhood associations have decided not to formally respond. Another very important fact is that the public advisory committee, which was dominated by industry, did not have the opportunity to bring agenda items to their regular meetings. All agendas were set by the city of Boise and their consultants. Most people in Boise did not ask for these changes to be made. The city hasn't disclosed to people directly how much the Boise Zoning Code Rewrite (ZCR) will change their neighborhoods. Models have not been shown to the public that depict "worst case" scenarios of infilling areas so that citizens can see what will happen to their neighborhoods. What is frustrating is that such models and scenarios have been created by city staff and consultants via land use computer technology such as GIS. Why have these maps and models not been shared with the public? Now, the public has a very short time to figure out what has changed from the current code without any direct support or help from the city. The public is forced to read over 1000 pages of the ZCR and a Comprehensive Plan update. The public's opportunity to figure all this out in such a rushed manner is in violation of the Boise Code of Ordinances: TITLE 11 DEVELOPMENT CODE – 11-03-04: SPECIFIC PROCEDURES – 11-03.3 Rezone Procedure. Unelected Council The Zoning Code Rewrite vote, must represent the desire of the citizens. Instead, we face appointed council members. One-third of the municipal council has been appointed, and the Zoning Code Rewrite will be decided a few months before the November election. This is unethical governance. Only elected officials should make ZCR policy. Mayoral appointees are

anti-democratic, given the considerable changes recommended for a municipal council decision. The final draft of the ZCR has recently been revealed. As residents scramble to grasp how a ZCR would affect their neighborhoods, one thing is clear: this major zoning change for the entire city necessitates a vote by everyone affected by the ZCR to determine who will decide its fate. ZCR reduces affordable housing and increases gentrification. The Boise Zoning Code Rewrite (ZCR) would reduce affordable housing. 77% of the City's housing requirement is for individuals making 80% of the median income (City of Boise Housing Needs Analysis, 2021), however, "affordability" incentives in Boise's largest zone (R1-C) only supply a few dwellings for those making 120% AMI. The revised code encourages affordable home redevelopment without replacement by increasing density permits. Market-rate or above-market-rate multi-units will gentrify communities. Reducing R-2 and R-1C planning zone minimum lot sizes may not increase housing variety or affordability. The city has not provided proof for this. High-density housing isn't affordable. It’s pure logic. Development is expensive. If high-density was affordable, Boise apartment rents would be cheap and affordable. They are not. If this model worked, there would be similar models in other communities. No such models or examples have been presented. They don’t exist. A dedicated compliance agency with enforcement authority is needed to implement the planned fifty-year deed limitation on affordable housing. This obligation is beyond what the city has detailed. There is no plan for this. This is poor planning, and is further proof that they are making this up as they go. Proposed development requirements will destabilize neighborhoods. Reducing lot sizes in R-1C and R-2 encourages lot splits and incompatible infill that is far denser than existing communities, destabilizing them and breaking faith with neighbors who purchased into stable neighborhoods. Subdivisions have CC&Rs to provide stability, and lenders have expectations for this too. There are many older neighborhoods that have done away with the CC&Rs because the neighborhood is stable. The current code supports this stability. Blueprint Boise considers these neighborhoods "stable." The city hasn't proven these measures won't destabilize neighborhoods. Raising residential zone height limitations will significantly reduce privacy, sunshine, and greenery. This is destabilizing. Increased traffic is disruptive. Trees disappear from backyards and front yards due to density. This is destabilizing. Congestion, traffic, on-street parking, and child and accessibility dangers will grow as places get denser. Boise City Zoning Code revisions should protect existing neighbors and neighborhoods, not change the code to gentrify them. R-2 in Boise is now a higher-density apartment zone like R-3. The East End, older South Boise communities off Broadway, the majority of State Street, Pleasanton west of downtown, and existing neighborhoods of the near Bench are expected to become very urban with four-story structures and without a density limit. These sections are single-family with duplexes and modest apartments. These medium-density areas have 10–15 residential units per acre, far more than suburbs. The ZCR worsens traffic, noise, and short-term occupancy in other regions, notably south of Boise State University.

Fairview Ave., State St., and Vista Ave., will radically change with the ZCR. The proposed code will rezone areas within 660 feet (two blocks) of key routes from R-1 to R-2 with 45-foot height limitations and no density limit, destabilizing modestly scaled internal neighborhoods. Higher-density construction should only occur on corridors with tight step-down height requirements to existing communities. ADU size will be expanded by 30%, and owner occupancy will be removed. An additional housing unit must be owner-occupied today. The revised draft removes the owner-occupancy criterion for affordable auxiliary housing units. Owner occupancy was recently defended by Boiseans. This change would destabilize neighborhoods by generating de-facto duplexes in locations where they are not allowed, de-incentivize homeownership, boost commercialized short-term rentals, and encourage room rents in single-family homes. Increasing the auxiliary living unit size from 700 to 900 square feet also diminishes usable green space. It permits building a second house in the backyard. ADU applicants must show owner-occupancy under existing zoning. However, it appears that proper processes are not in place to confirm that the owner is inhabiting the house. Owner vacancy is prevalent. As previously stated, without a plan, it isn’t going to happen without enforcement. Why should Boiseans trust the city to implement affordability standards? ZCR doesn't encourage homeownership. Instead, it encourages the sale of individual units in cottage complexes and other higher-density diversified housing (e.g., half of duplexes, condominiums rather than apartments) to promote owner-occupied housing and resilient neighborhoods. Boise has already been under attack by outside investors who are only buying homes to rent. The ZCR intensifies this crisis and makes it worse. This reality has been proven in other communities, such as Nashville, TN. Reduced parking requirements will shift vehicles onto the street. This is why the rule for off street parking was established in the first place. Have we lost a sense of reality in the pursuit of providing a home for everyone? ZCR parking restrictions for single-family houses and duplexes have been decreased from two to one to promote affordability at the expense of safety and livability. The city hopes for affordability in exchange for fewer parking spaces under the new requirements. In the present code, each structure or home requires a particular quantity of off-street parking depending on occupancy and visitor capabilities and expectations based on its allowed uses. To reduce dangerous street congestion, current zoning requires off-street parking. On-street parking congestion is a major cause of child and disabled pedestrian/vehicle accidents. Traffic reductions can only be planned for when a substantial urban transit system is in place. Special roadway/street width considerations. Boise has numerous neighborhood roads that are uniquely narrow. The ZCR does not take this into account. This is a failure, and this issue is real. With the ZCR a large project could be approved and built on such a street, and the process for approval does not have safeguards in

place to prevent it. I live on just such a street. There are lots on my street that are large enough to meet the development criteria for a 12 plex. The paved street is 25 feet wide. For those who don’t know, the standard lane width is 12 feet. A 25 foot wide street does not have room for on-street parking. My street is without sidewalks, curbs, or gutters. It’s absurd to suggest that the infill parcel construct a curb, gutter, and sidewalk that leads to nowhere with the expectation that eventually all lots on my street will do the same. Another problem for my street is that the lot lines along the street don’t line up; some places are wider and others narrower. Next, there are open irrigation ditches that we enjoy, and large shade trees that line the street. Those would all disappear with the ZCR vision. Our quaint country feel would be gone. As it stands today, when trash day comes each week, our street becomes very congested. When a neighbor has a few friends over, it becomes very congested. It’s absurd for our city to have a zone policy that does not address this inevitable crisis that would come with just one lot doing a 12 plex. Conclusion: The Boise Zoning Code Rewrite will have far-reaching consequences on the city's neighborhoods and residents. The lack of public involvement and input in the development process has resulted in a code that does not reflect the needs and desires of the people it will impact. The proposed changes to the code will reduce affordable housing, increase gentrification, and destabilize existing neighborhoods. It is imperative that the city provide detailed information about the changes and their potential impacts, including maps and models of worst-case scenarios. The people of Boise must have a say in the decision-making process and be given the opportunity to vote on the proposed changes to the code. Ultimately, the ZCR should be revised to ensure that it protects existing neighborhoods and residents and does not lead to the gentrification of the city. Respectfully,

Henry and Jennifer Wiebe 2255 S. Ormond St., Boise, ID 83705

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

lucaswilber@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Lucas Wilber <lucaswilber@everyactioncustom.com> Thursday, April 20, 2023 4:31 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Please Support the Zoning Code Rewrite

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Monday, April 17, 2023 4:19 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Diana Wilhite djurbanite@gmail.com 6685 W HAMMERMILL DR BOISE, ID 83714 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

ZoningRewrite From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Tuesday, April 18, 2023 9:34 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Luci Willits, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Linda Wilkinson stampingismybiz@gmail.com 5323 Skipper Ave Boise, ID 83713 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject:

Eric Willadsen <eric.willadsen@sierraclub.org> Thursday, April 20, 2023 10:39 AM ZoningRewrite Timothy Keane; Mayor McLean; Holli Woodings; Jimmy Hallyburton; Luci Willits; Patrick Bageant [External] Re: please increase neighborhood association time to testify on Zoning Code Rewrite

I haven't been on a NA board since 2020, and do not agree nor support any of the asks in this email. I do not know why Dave Kangas, who I have never met, included me.

To help protect y ou r priv acy , Microsoft Office prev ented automatic download of this picture from the Internet. photo

Eric Willadsen (he/him) Campaign Representative Clean Transportation for All Phone: (860) 985-7501 Shoshone-Bannock Land

I may send emails at odd hours. I don't expect you to reply to me at those times.

On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 9:28 AM Dave Kangas <davekangas@msn.com> wrote: Mayor McLean, Council President Woodings, Council Pro Tem Hallyburton, Planning Director Keane: On behalf of the Board of Directors of Boise Working Together, We respectfully ask that the time for neighborhood association testimony be increased. It is our understanding that the City plans to allow only 5 minutes of testimony for each Neighborhood Association who may choose to comment on the Zoning Code changes at the upcoming Planning & Zoning meeting. The proposed Code changes are very complex and sweeping in nature. They will profoundly impact the character of Boise neighborhoods, homeowners' investment in property, and the quality of life of Boiseans. We request that Neighborhood Associations be allowed 15 minutes (at a minimum) to articulate concerns about how the changes will impact neighborhoods in this upcoming public forum. Respectfully, Dave Kangas President Boise Working Together 208-841-0580 davekangas@msn.com 1715 W Canal St. Boise ID 83705 1

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 5:06 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Janae Willey marykaybeautyexpert@gmail.com 3910 N Buckingham Pl Boise, ID 83704 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:46 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Sheila williams swilliams1154@gmail.com 4070 w hill rd Boise, ID 83703 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

mikiwilliams22@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Milt Williams <mikiwilliams22 @everyactioncustom.com> Thursday, April 20, 2023 11:16 AM ZoningRewrite [External] Please Vote for the Zoning Code Rewrite

Dear Planning and Zoning Commission, I'm writing to you because I support the Zoning Code Rewrite. Forward thinking is always wise. Sincerely, Mr. Milt Williams 2000 N 24th St Boise, ID 83702‐0205 mikiwilliams22@me.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:14 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Holli Woodings, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Dan Wilmot dan.wilmot@microsoft.com 807 N 24th Street, Boise, ID, 83702 Boise, ID 83702 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Thursday, April 20, 2023 3:15 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Andrea Wilson Email csa.andrea@gmail.com Address 838 N Carmen Ave. Boise, ID 83704 Comment I am in favor of the new zoning proposal because we need more affordable housing options. Prices of houses exceed most people's means, whether they are young or old, in our state where the minimum wage is tied at the lowest in the nation. so if we want our children to stay & work in Boise, we need more apartments, ADUs and multi‐family dwellings. If Boise does not encourage, allow & invest in affordable housing, more people will experience homelessness and Boise will more closely resemble larger cities who struggle to solve this issue. Unless we raise taxes and appropriate funds to help people with their financial needs or raise the wages in our state dramatically, people can’t afford to live here. So, we must address the housing problem. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 8:37 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Kristina Winterling calls_04_green@icloud.com 752 , E Curling Dr Boise, ID 83702 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 3:19 AM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. MARK WIRZ mark.r.wirz@gmail.com 1809 S RUSTIC MILL PL BOISE, ID 83709 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Friday, April 14, 2023 7:17 AM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Koleen Wiskirchen bkwiskirchen@me.com 1674 S. Ridge Point Place Boise, ID 83712 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 6:07 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Holli Woodings, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Gabriel witkin gw77@protonmail.com 999 Main st Boise, ID 83702 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 4:02 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Luci Willits, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Valerie Wixom wixomfam@gmail.com 10793 W. Ashburton Dr BOISE, ID 83709 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Wednesday, April 19, 2023 2:45 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Christopher C Woerz Email chriswoerz@gmail.com Address 110 E Highland View Dr Comment We have more people than ever and that requires more homes. More homes will lower the cost of entry for many Boisians to live and work near services and amenities in our city. Please enable more homes and apartments and duplexes and the rest to be built in our city. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Wednesday, April 19, 2023 11:16 AM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Jenny Wolf Email jenniferwolf.lynn@gmail.com Address 412 S. 13th street, Boise Idaho, 83702 Comment I grew up in Boise, then moved away for around 10 years. When I returned as an adult to the city I love and consider home, I found my housing options were incredibly limited. I ended up purchasing a small condo in downtown Boise. The reasons for this were cost, but also that after living in other cities and countries, I found I wanted to live in a walkable neighborhood. Boise is limited in walkable, interesting neighborhoods with businesses, cafes, and grocery stores, particularly in comparison to other places I lived. I want all Boiseans, new arriving and home‐towners to have access to interesting, walkable neighborhoods, because I know how it has enriched my life. Living in Boise as an adult in a walkable downtown has been like being in a new town compared to where I grew up on Pierce Park. However, eventually, I'd like to consider having a family in Boise, and I'll need to upgrade from my one‐bedroom. As I look around, I don't see a lot of locations that meet what I think would be best: enriching, walkable neighborhoods with multiple types of housing so I might be able to afford moving a family to them. I want townhouses and multi‐family housing with more than 1 bedroom. I want to live in a city that's more than roads. I know how "old Boise" was and I can confidently say we deserve better! If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

laurawolsten@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Laura Wolstenholme <laurawolsten@everyactioncustom.com> Thursday, April 20, 2023 11:09 AM ZoningRewrite [External] I'm In Support of Boise's New Zoning Code

Dear Planning and Zoning Commission, I support the Zoning Code Rewrite because I want to preserve the beauty and health of what we have. Let's not degrade what we have for money. Sincerely, Ms. Laura Wolstenholme 2061 N Blaine Way Boise, ID 83702‐0513 laurawolsten@gmail.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:47 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Bonnie Wood bwood0428@gmail.com 4413 W Rim St Boise, ID 83706 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 8:50 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Greg&Debie Wood greganddebiewood@hotmail.com 3003 N Overlook Rd Apt 27 Boise, ID 83704 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Wednesday, April 19, 2023 7:43 AM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Jay Wood Email inrealm@zoho.com Address 181 N LIBERTY ST, Trlr 54, Comment More growth means more small business owners, which means more employers and progress. This isn't the Oregon Trail anymore, we need real roads and sidewalks for our kids. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Wednesday, April 19, 2023 7:41 AM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Stephanie Wood Email mystisai14@gmail.com Address 181 N LIBERTY ST, Trlr 54, Comment We need new homes, we need new infrastructure to support the growth. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:17 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Allison Woodcock allisonbreitzman@hotmail.com 3121 N Woody Dr Boise, ID 83703 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Saturday, April 15, 2023 4:09 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Matt Woodmansee Email woody098@gmail.com Address Boise, ID 83709 Comment 11‐03‐03.2 G – For zoning districts R‐1A, R‐1B, and R‐1C there should be a restriction against building a Duplex, Triplex, or Fourplex on lots where a primary single family residence exists. 11‐03‐03.2 H (1) (f) i – This should not be one of the “at least two” amenities. It eliminates the option of natural gas which is a clean burning fuel that is very plentiful and cost effective. Contrary to what is being promoted politically, natural gas harvesting is far less destructive to the environment than the mining required for solar panels, wind turbines, and batteries for energy storage. In addition, these materials create substantial landfill waste at the end of their useful life cycles. Not sure if this is in other sections of the proposed code, but if so, same comment. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Wednesday, April 19, 2023 1:07 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Avery Worrell Email heyaves@gmail.com Address 219 N 26th St Boise, ID 83702 Comment I'm pro‐density and think we need a lot more mixed use zoning! We need more walkable neighborhoods, more more affordable housing, and less sprawl. We can achieve a better balance without sacrificing quality of life — I think more MX1 in particular could do wonders for positive community growth. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Deanna Dupuy From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Wednesday, April 19, 2023 9:13 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Lori Wright Email loriwright7020@gmail.com Address 3520 W MEADOW DR Comment Dear Planning and Zoning Commissioners, I am writing in support for the new zoning update. I am a third generation Idahoan, business owner, and property owner. It makes sense to increase density over spreading out in our beautiful foothills, sagebrush and farmland. I hope these changes provide more affordable housing, lessen environmental impact of growth, keep farmland as farmland, and provide neighborhood walkability. I have a couple of concerns. My first is, lowering the parking requirements for apartments, duplexes, townhouse, prior to improving public transit. Parking is a major difficulty in the neighborhoods surrounding BSU. We own a small block of commercial property on Broadway and I have watched the neighborhood south of Beacon and east of Broadway change. Obviously it's not just parking that has spurred this change but parking is a difficulty for residents. The second concern is the change in public notice being given to neighborhood associations and not residents. This is a heavy lift for a volunteer group of neighbors. The lack of ability to comment prior to approval and then only through an appeals process, after approval, may be more streamlined while limiting possible valuable information to both developer and neighbors prior to approval. All this to say, I want my city to be a place my young friends and family can afford, raise a family and enjoy for years. Please approve the zoning rewrite but maybe make a few minor changes. Thank you If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

Cameron Wright <ccameronwright@gmail.com> Thursday, April 20, 2023 3:04 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Zoning Rewrite Comment

Dear Zoning Rewrite Committee, I like the changes to the zoning code. The changes to make certain roads have higher density along them so that future public transportation is easier to set up. Along with allowing mixed use development to allow cafes and corner stores in neighborhoods are all great ideas. Thank you, Cameron Wright

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:33 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Hilary wrigley wrigdogjr@hotmail.com 3246 n Bryson way Boise, ID 83713 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 5:42 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Charity Young blakenchar@gmail.com 13227 W Picadilly Way Boise, ID 83713 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

lilliej5@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Jane Young <lilliej5@everyactioncustom.com> Thursday, April 20, 2023 4:28 PM ZoningRewrite [External] In Support of the Zoning Code Rewrite

Dear Planning and Zoning Commission, I support the Zoning Code Rewrite because it will help accommodate Boise's current growth and development. Sincerely, Jane Young 1213 N 17th St Boise, ID 83702‐3308 lilliej5@yahoo.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:51 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Genevieve Ysursa genevieve.ysursa@gmail.com 3628 E. Warm Springs Boise, ID 83716 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 13, 2023 8:36 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Miss Diana Yurkovich d.yurkovich@gmail.com 2601 W Boise Ave #33 Boise, ID 83706 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Deanna Dupuy From: Sent: To: Subject:

elaine.zabriskie@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Elaine Zabriskie <elaine.zabriskie@everyactioncustom.com> Wednesday, April 19, 2023 4:07 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Vote Yes on the Zoning Code Rewrite

Dear Planning and Zoning Commission, I am a fourth generation Idahoan, and was born and raised in this state. I've called Boise my home for the past five years, during which time I've lived in the West End, Southeast Boise, and on the Depot Bench. With a master's degree in landscape architecture and professional experience in urban planning, I want to say how strongly and unequivocally I support the Boise Zoning Code Rewrite. Here's why: Most developers want to build to "code minimum," which presently allows unsustainable structures to be built every day and creates sprawling developments that prioritize cars over people. Let's be clear ‐‐ sustainability is not about "being green." It's about handing off the baton to our children and grandchildren. Sustainable building is what will give the next generation a thriving, beautiful, opportunity‐filled place to live. The present code, by failing to create sustainable development in our city, degrades our environment and leaves economic prosperity entirely up to chance. After all, if we sprawl during an economic boom, then the bubble bursts, how will we pay to maintain our roads? Our utilities? Walkable, sustainable development saves residents money and is good for small businesses. It helps people get to know their neighbors and encourages the kind of community that makes Boise, Boise. As an Idahoan and a professional, I strongly encourage the city to adopt the new Zoning Code Rewrite. Let's support the Idaho we all believe in and grow intelligently. Sincerely, Ms. Elaine Zabriskie 2505 W Pendleton St Boise, ID 83705‐2539 elaine.zabriskie@gmail.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 5:42 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Jackie zarr jzmomma@gmail.com 9020 W Pattie dr Boise, ID 83704 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Wednesday, April 12, 2023 5:42 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Michael Zeltner mzeltner@gmail.com 1649 S McCormick Pl. Boise, ID 83709 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

ZCR Upzone to R-2: Destroys Residential Character • ZCR claims to protect the character of residential areas • New permitted uses destroy that character, and the quiet enjoyment of one’s property

Source: ZCR Adoption Draft

Now your upzoned neighbors could be: • • • • • • •

• The ZCR deals a double-whammy of upzoning plus further zoning permissiveness impacting thousands of residential property owners and their neighbors

Subdivided into tiny 2,500 sq. ft. lots of unlimited density, 45’ high buildings with no step-down A neighborhood café serving alcohol A boarding house A food truck A prison-release halfway house A mortuary, etc.. And if a CUP is needed, the City just has to say “it’s a public benefit”

• The ZCR rationalizes upzoning if within 1/8 mile of City defined “Best-in- Class Transit Route” • An arbitrary definition made by the City – and not even adhered to

Source: ZCR Adoption Draft

Source: Summary table created from content in the ZCR Module 3 Public Draft

G Zimmerman Testimony – Pg 1

ZCR Upzone: Adhoc and Inconsistent • The City ultimately decided to include whatever properties they wanted in the upzone • Example – near State and Alamosa: • SW of State only properties fully with-in the 1/8 mile are included

? ? ?

• NE of State - properties are upzoned that should not be (and vice-versa)

Alamosa

• City rationalizes they were following streets, but that is misleading as that wasn’t done on the SW side

• At a minimum the Starred properties should not be in the upzone G Zimmerman Testimony – Pg 2

ZCR Upzone: Lack of Meaningful Outreach • An over 600 page document • No differences document • Only scripted interaction sessions for the public • Why didn’t the City specifically reach out to property owners who would be directly impacted by the upzone?

The City must… • Directly engage likely impacted owners • Let the public vote on the ZCR process and key changes G Zimmerman Testimony – Pg 3

Thank You

G Zimmerman Testimony – Pg 4

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

stan.zuckerman@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Stan Zuckerman <stan.zuckerman@everyactioncustom.com> Thursday, April 20, 2023 4:43 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Help Support a Better Boise By Supporting the Zoning Code Rewrite

Dear Planning and Zoning Commission, The sustainability, affordability, and open space protections included in the new zoning code rewrite are exactly what Boise needs to plan for and address our rapid growth. That said, I am writing in support of the Zoning Code Rewrite! Growth is inevitable, and we need a modern zoning code to ensure we are following the best practices to grow sustainably and responsibly. It has been clear that Boise City Staff have put in the effort to make an inclusive and extensive community input process to develop the zoning code our city needs and deserves. Boise has become increasingly unaffordable for everyone, especially for new home buyers, renters, students, low‐income residents, refugee families, and elderly folks on fixed incomes. This code helps address those issues. I love the outdoors and specifically appreciate that this zoning code protects our green spaces, improves our tree canopy, incentivizes energy and water efficiency that saves money over the lifetime of a home, allows for smart and targeted density, increases opportunities for multi‐family homes like duplexes, removes unnecessary parking space minimums, protects pollinators, and makes our communities more walkable and bikeable. I strongly encourage the Boise Planning and Zoning Commission to support this zoning code rewrite that staff and residents have spent so much time and effort to shape. Sincerely, Stan Zuckerman 3909 W Camas St Boise, ID 83705‐2140 stan.zuckerman@gmail.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Wednesday, April 26, 2023 5:41 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Christine Aiken Email cea_aiken@hotmail.com Address 1903 S. Broadmoor Drive, Boise ID 83705 Comment As an architect and resident within an older neighborhood (Hillcrest) I am deeply concerned with the proposed zoning re‐write that is intended to increase building density while making the city a more 'walkable' urban city. While I can understand the need to adequately address the urban growth of Boise, the wholesale application of the zoning re‐write which would allow 3 story apartments buildings, with reduced sets backs and reduced lot sizes to be built within established older neighborhoods is quite frankly ‐ scary. Putting the impetus on developers to be respectful of established neighborhoods, and to maintain logical neighborhood scale and provide adequate parking will just not happen. As an architect I know this – as planners you should know this. They will do the bare minimum and they will spend the bare minimum. Additionally, eliminating the publics opportunity for feedback further confirms that the city is beholden to developers, and really don’t care what the citizens want. You are entrusting the developers to have the neighborhood’s best interest in mind. What we will lose are all of the old historic homes; smaller lots will be combined with other smaller lots in order to create one monstrosity after another. No Charm, just another Portland. I agree some upzoning is needed, but it needs to be done more tactfully and precisely‐ otherwise we will have just piecemeal city neighborhoods, with no sense of place and no sense of community. Please revise the zoning re‐write to more directly target appropriate areas for the up zoning., such as Urban street corridors such as Franklin or Overland. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Thursday, April 20, 2023 9:06 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Jacob Anderson Email ajakef@gmail.com Address 1022 E McKinley St, 83712 Comment Boise's housing has a big demand‐supply mismatch. We don't control demand but we can affect supply. Leaving our zoning code as it is will force the city's housing to stagnate, driving the region's new residents to distant suburbs, forcing them to drive everywhere, and forcing us to breathe their smog and suffer from traffic they create. The proposed zoning code rewrite is a great step in the right direction. Let's increase density in the city, so the region's new residents can live here instead of in the suburbs, and walk and bike to nearby destinations. We'll all be more active and also be breathing healthier air, and the increased density will make transit more viable in town. To frame this, I was a grad student at BSU 10 years ago and I just spoke with grad students today about their housing. Current grad students have much more limited options than 10 years ago. Almost nobody I knew drove to campus 10 years ago; now, it's the norm, and it's because it's hard to find affordable places to live near campus. It would be heartless and selfish for people who are already established in permanent homes to retain policies that price out younger people from central neighborhoods. Please support the zoning code rewrite. It's the best thing we can do now to make Boise more sustainable and inclusive. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

JJ Baldwin Anderson <jerijoed@gmail.com> Monday, April 24, 2023 6:56 PM ZoningRewrite [External] ZOA23-00001, CPA23-00001

To Whom It May Concern, The zoning rewrites leave much to be desired. Allowing developers to provide less parking will not improve our situation. We all know that developers will find the bare minimum needed to fulfill the "affordable housing" and "renewable/environmentally friendly" requirements, thus not only failing to meet the city's goals but also making quality of living worse for communities. In addition, denser development will make neighborhoods less desirable. Please reassess.

Thank you, JJ Anderson

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Thursday, April 20, 2023 5:44 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Katie Bauman Email baumankatherine@yahoo.com Address 1483 Kenyon Road Twin Falls, ID 83301 Comment I grew up in Boise before things blew up. Now it’s unaffordable for most working people to live there. The house I lived in as a child is over 100 years old and it is selling for over $600,000.00. My parents rented it for under $500 a month. If you want to keep Idahoans in Idaho, then increase affordable living. It’s the only logical solution. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

jdbengts@gmail.com Thursday, April 20, 2023 5:24 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Modern Zoning Code

Hey City Officials, My name is John Bengtson. I live in the Morris Hill Neighborhood at 717 N Pond Street. I am writing to voice my support for the current version of the zoning code rewrite. I am certain that more knowledgeable citizens will write more convincingly about all of the reasons this code is needed; my most urgent comment concerns the timing of this rewrite. Our population began skyrocketing several years ago with little sign of stopping. We need places to house those people. Delaying this decision will have a disproportionate effect because of the huge increase in the valleys population. We are in an acute housing crisis and a climate crisis. You have put 8 years into this decision. It is the right one.

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Thursday, April 20, 2023 6:40 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Benjamin Email drskeetrix@gmail.com Address Boise ID 83705 Comment Boise needs a modern zoning code that includes multi family dwellings interspersed with single‐family dwellings to increase housing options for all individuals in our city If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Friday, April 21, 2023 1:44 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Brittany D Brand‐Cabrera Email brittanybrand@boisestate.edu Address Boise, Idaho 83702 Comment Yes to the new zoning code! It would provide the housing and transportation our community needs to thrive. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Friday, April 21, 2023 11:55 AM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Diego Breedlove Email diegobreedlove@gmail.com Address 1866 S Colorado Ave, Boise, ID 83706 Comment I have been a Boise resident for 8 years and have enjoyed living here. I am 26 years old and an active member of the community. My vision for the future of Boise would be one with ample mixed use zoning that allows for more dense and compact cities and neighborhoods. We struggle with a housing affordability issue in Boise. This can be solved through building more housing and density is the key. This housing will need to be met with upgraded facilities such as better public transportation and improved walking and biking facilities. I understand some people dislike living in dense environments and that is totally ok. But at the same time many people enjoy it. When we have a city that has plenty of mixed use zoning allowing for apartments, duplexes, triplexes, etc, the price of housing decreases allowing those who wish to live in single family homes the ability to do so. Its a win win for all. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Thursday, April 20, 2023 9:40 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Hailey Brown Email gotlegs@att.net Address Boise, ID 83714 Comment I am opposed to blanket upzoning. I do think strategic higher density could be done in ways that preserve, or even improve the character of an area, but the existing residents don't deserve to be crowded out. Developers should always have to pay school impact fees. Land should be reserved for new schools in the future to accommodate projected growth (the folks hosting community meetings had very unsatisfactory answers about that). Changing the parking space requirements to one vehicle per dwelling is completely unrealistic in our particular city (I don't care what that survey said, most families have one car per adult). The entire plan seems to disproportionately favor Developers over actual affordability and offers the current homeowners nothing but less elbow room, more traffic, less parking, and overcrowded schools. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Friday, April 21, 2023 1:02 AM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Miss Rachel Brown rachel.brown789@yahoo.com 698 Avenue H Boise, ID 83712 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Saturday, April 22, 2023 11:26 AM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Paula J Brown Email pjbrown12@hotmail.com Address 8829 W Lancelot St Boise 83704 Comment I am a 75 year old native Boisean. The new zoning proposal states it doesn't want "urban sprawl" but does want "density without changing the character of Boise". The character of Boise has already been negatively impacted and the new proposal will only make things worse in my opinion. The non‐stop unplanned growth is unsustainable. I see 3 and 4 story apartment building adjacent to or within single‐family house neighborhoods. Each apartment will add at least one and probably two cars to our horrible traffic situation. Is there no way to stop adding all these ugly apartment buildings within our city?? perhaps a moratorium on building until the traffic situation can be improved? More and more apartment buildings and subdivisions are approved. It makes one wonder if Developers aren't giving kick‐backs to city officials. most citizens do NOT want this unrestrained growth. Developers should pay the cost for additional schools and services‐‐ not long‐term owners via property taxes. If it continues, I suspect owners will institute a California style Proposition that allows old residents not to see increases and for newcomers and developers to assume those higher costs. They are the ones creating the cost‐‐ not natives. Please, please fix the traffic problems first. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Thursday, April 27, 2023 1:30 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name William Brudenell Email bbruden@gmail.com Address Boise, Idaho 83712 Comment Whatever the new, 'modern' zoning code finally becomes, it is my hope that the people involved consider the likelihood that, in the near future, transportation and building temperature control will be by methods that exclude fossil fuels. This could consist of pooled ownership of electric vehicles, electric commercial taxis (Uber, Lyft), electric mass transit, roof‐top solar and earth‐based geothermal, pedal‐powered bicycles and tricycles, and other things yet to be invented and developed. Minimizing space allocated to parking and automobile access is a very good and forward‐looking goal. Thank you. William Neal Brudenell If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

zoninginfo Thursday, April 27, 2023 4:18 PM ZoningRewrite FW: [External] I hope City of Boise rethinks about planning and zoning code

From: Sikha Bhusal <sikhabhusal@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2023 1:04 PM To: zoninginfo <zoninginfo@cityofboise.org> Subject: [External] I hope City of Boise rethinks about planning and zoning code Respected Council member, I would like to thank everyone who has helped in rewriting Boise Planning and Zoning code. I am a property owner who lives at 3753 S Williamsburg Way, Boise, ID 83706. Me and my family will be deeply affected by your code. We used to live at 12505 W Azure St, Boise 83713, this subdivision has an HOA. HOA would send us a letter even if there was clover growing on a 5'x5' green space in the front yard. But HOA would not do its part of the work. We wanted to get out of HOA's regulation and always dreamt of living near Boise river. When we had the opportunity, we bought the house at Williamsburg Way. We don't have HOA but we have wonderful neighborhood. This neighborhood would not be the same with your new planning and zoning. More people in the community means more vehicles on the road. My kids are 2.5 and 1.5 years old. They won't be able to ride their bike on the road. Last year and this year we paid more on power and water and gas. this will increase the demand on infrastructure. Especially water. What is City going to do about water? Every year drought and wildfire is getting bigger and out of control. though we had good precipitation that does not guarantee no wildfire season. The more impervious surface we have, less groundwater recharge and more drought and flood. the more building build, more impervious area. Also why the property owners who were affected not notified. Its a 600 pages document with more than 200k words. Not everyone has time to read it through. Sincerely, Sikha Bhusal

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Tuesday, May 2, 2023 3:25 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Anna Canning Email abcanning@centengr.com Address 2323 S Vista Ave, Suite 206 Comment Section 11‐04‐04.3(l) mentions a "Record of Survey for a Minor Land Division", but that is the only mention of a minor land division that I was able to find in the code rewrite. Will that very useful and valuable option for lot division still exist in the new code? Given the expense and time needed for even a simple subdivision, the ability to add affordable housing lots in the City of Boise will be greatly diminished without a minor land division process. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

PDS Tuesday, April 25, 2023 6:45 AM ZoningRewrite FW: Contact Form Submitted to PDS

From: noreply@cityofboise.org <noreply@cityofboise.org> Sent: Monday, April 24, 2023 6:35 PM To: PDS <PDS@cityofboise.org> Subject: Contact Form Submitted to PDS

CREATING A CITY FOR EVERYONE

CONTACT FORM SUBMITTED TO PDS From Stephen Cox stephenscox@yahoo.com Phone Number: 2088531678 The proposed code changes to the R‐1C Zone are unacceptable. We purchased our home in 2002 because of the neighborhood characteristics of single‐family homes on moderate‐sized lots (generally 7,000 to 10,000 square feet). The new code would allow these homes to be redeveloped into multi‐family, multi‐story units jammed onto lots 1/2 the size of existing lots and without requiring any P&Z Commission review and therefore no public comment. Multiple new uses would also be permitted without any public comment or review. Although the proposed code retains the R‐1C zoning for our area (Coventry Manor Sub)., our proximity to State Street, the existing "apartmentalization" east of Pierce Park, and the proposed high‐density development on the former Plantation golf course across State Street would place our neighborhood at risk of invasion by new development that would destroy the very characteristics that we have enjoyed for over 20 years. I do not know who served on the "citizen advisory committee" for the rezone process, but they did not do a good job of protecting long‐ standing neighborhoods across Boise. They seem to have been selected for their

support of a Mayor and some Council member‐driven agenda rather than providing a true community perspective. Also, it appears that Planning staff have been directed, either overly or covertly, to provide a new code that enhances the power of the planning bureaucracy at the expense of citizen review by removing the P&Z Commission from many of the decisions that will drastically affect our neighborhoods. This new code should not receive consideration until after City Council elections by districts have been held and a new Council seated. Contact Form Submitted On: https://www.cityofboise.org/CityWideContactForm?contactId=10754

208-608-7000 info@cityofboise.org 150 North Capitol Boulevard, Boise, ID 83702

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

John Davis <john@43rdholdings.com> Saturday, April 22, 2023 9:38 AM CityCouncil [External] Boise Rezone Comment

Re: Zoning Code Rewrite Public Comment for ZOA23‐00001 & CPA23‐00001 Dear City Council Members, The public has not been given adequate time to read, analyze, and comment meaningfully on the 611 page Zoning Code Rewrite, which are an almost complete replacement of the laws that, for the last half century, have established Boise as a highly desirable place to call home. The City of Boise is allowing only three weeks to submit comments by the March 22 deadline – the date that must be met for public testimony to be included in the Project Report. The Project Report will contain the staff analysis, and be provided to the Planning and Zoning Commission for their review well‐ahead of the later public hearings. In an incredibly complex rule‐change, it is imperative that the public is able to have their comments included in the Zoning Code Rewrite Project Report. The City only released its final version of its Zoning Code Rewrite on February 28, 2023 – a document that does not show the numerous changes from the last draft released in October of 2022. This timeline has even put citizens that have carefully followed the process at an extraordinary disadvantage. Federal guidelines call for up to 180 days of public comment for rule changes that may have a large impact. The proposed changes to the Zoning Code Rewrite may lead to the most significant impacts many Boise residents will ever experience near their homes – rules that range from new allowances for alcohol serving commercial establishments within residential zoning districts, for tall apartment buildings next to single family homes, and even landfills within city limits. Given the enormity of the decision coming before the Planning and Zoning Commission on the week of April 23, it is essential that these volunteer public servants are able to consider written testimony for more than a few days over the weekend. Nonetheless, that is all the time they will have for those public comments that simply cannot be meaningfully submitted by the extremely short deadline of March 22. Please extend the timeline for public comment by at least 90 days. Sincerely, John Davis 2815 West Teton Street Boise, Idaho 83705

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments:

zoninginfo Thursday, April 27, 2023 4:10 PM ZoningRewrite FW: [External] testimony for the record Code Rewrite Dalton Gardens EXECUTED_Ord_278.pdf

Jeff Lowe, AICP, CFM

Senior Planner Planning and Development Services Office: (208)608-7075 jtlowe@cityofboise.org cityofboise.org

Creating a city for everyone.

From: David DeHaas <coachidaho@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2023 4:13 PM To: zoninginfo <zoninginfo@cityofboise.org> Subject: [External] testimony for the record Code Rewrite To: Boise City Planning and Zoning From David DeHaas 1116 S. Vista #261 Boise Idaho 83705 I am against the Zoning code as written. I ask that more time be given to for the public to fully understand all the changes to this zoning code update. I do not agree with streamlining the process, which means less ability for neighbors to be able to respond to new projects. IN 2021 we and members of Idahoans For Safe Technology came before you on the wireless code rewrite. At that time you, the council, staff and attorneys believed that you were preempted from being able to determine IF, and WHERE cell towers could be located. You are not preempted at all. Since that time Ada County Commissioners have denied two cell towers from being placed in or near homes. Kootenai County Commissioners have also denied a cell tower. Dalton Gardens, Idaho, passed a wireless ordinance that only allows towers if they can prove a substantive gap in coverage by providing drop call records. That’s for telecommunications towers. Like Eagle, Idaho they will not allow internet towers, 5G Small Cells to be put in their cities. We provided Director KEENE last fall with a copy of the Dalton Gardens ordinance as a model for this administration to follow. Our Issue is that the new 5G small cells cause a horrendous problem to our health, to the bees, to birds, animals, and humans. We have testified before this body that this technology is Not needed as it only provides internet service. I have interviewed no less than 7 experts on my radio show who have clearly delineated cell towers being placed as close as 20’ from homes is an existential threat to humanity.

This body talks about following the Boise Blue Print, The Towers alone obliterated the Boise Blue Prints goal to have a healthy and sustainable city. The high frequencies from 5G cell towers can kill birds, bees and humans. Further on August 13th, 2021 the DC Court of Appeals found the FCC to be arbitrary capricious and negligent as they have never provided any safety studies that these towers are safe. You have had a physicist testify before this body, and he has shared with you that these towers can be used as weapons. I can point to the neighborhoods where your neighbors are suffering from Afib, Glioblastoma brain cancer, memory loss, brain fog, and tinnitus, St Lukes has told us that they are now backlogged 18 months to schedule Heart ablation surgery to those with Afib. This problem did not exist 2 years ago. We warned you then, and we are warning you again. The big reason you took away the right for citizens to contest any of these cell towers is that the staff stated they didn’t have the time to listen to the citizen complaints and since this body wrongly believed that you were prompted from denying cell towers, you took away the conditional use permit process, whereby citizens can object to these towers. It seems you are doing this again in some part of this code for housing. Because of the reasons mentioned above and the fact that fiber optic cable is the safer and faster way to deliver high-speed internet service to our homes and Cities in Idaho, We ask that you follow the lead of Eagle, Idaho and Dalton Gardens and Keep Cell towers out of residential neighborhoods and away from Schools by rewriting the wireless section. Further the requirement for only 1 car park per housing unit will create a parking nightmare. People will not be able to give up their cars just because you build more structures. Putting Multi-Family structures in R1c will destroy property values and the ascetics of our neighborhood. When we bought our homes in R1C we knew what rights we had. Now mid-stream you are changing what we bought. Increasing density without infrastructure is failed planning. And last, voting on this code with 2 newly appointed council members who were not voted in by their neighborhoods is improper representation. Sincerely. David DeHaas

‐‐ David DeHaas 208‐378‐1234 Naturopathic Health Coach Healing from a Spiritual Perspective Start Fresh. Rebirth yourself. www.livingwaterscleanse.com The information contained in this transmission is privileged, confidential and intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, the reader is hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify me immediately by calling (208) 378‐1234 and return the original to me at the address indicated above. Thank you.

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

CityCouncil Tuesday, April 25, 2023 4:49 PM ZoningRewrite FW: [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

From: myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com <myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com> Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2023 11:34 AM To: CityCouncil <CityCouncil@cityofboise.org> Subject: [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Ms. Karen Denney kmd4186@gmail.com 879 N Mercer St Boise, ID 83703 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

Andrea Tuning Monday, April 24, 2023 11:35 AM ZoningRewrite FW: CSIM from Mayor's Office re - ZCR comment...

From: noreply@cityofboise.org <noreply@cityofboise.org> Sent: Saturday, April 22, 2023 6:31:54 PM (UTC‐07:00) Mountain Time (US & Canada) To: Info <info@cityofboise.org> Subject: Contact Form Submitted to City of Boise

Contact Form Submitted to City of Boise From Patricia Ann Dudziak Kerr patydudziak@gmail.com Phone Number: (208) 570‐1884 Please stop the rezoning of the Boise Bench this is not the place to do this, many families with small children and the elderly live here and it will destroy the community of families. other places in Boise areas that have already been zoned for this kind of building. We all love our single family homes and the quite streets where kind and families can walk safely. we also have Schools here and this rezoning could make the schools unsafe for the children to walk there on there own. Adding more people and businesses to this area will hurt so many families and life styles. Most of us moved to the bench because it was the last area close to Boise were a family can have a back yard and also get to know there neighbors. We have a great Neighborhood. I Reject the rezoning of the bench Please do not do this. Bad idea for so many reasons. The only people that will benefit from this are developers and investors who do not live here. and most likely do not live in Idaho, in my option.

Suezann Yorita

PDS Receptionist Planning and Development Services Office: (208)608-7066 syorita@cityofboise.org cityofboise.org

Creating a city for everyone.

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Tuesday, May 9, 2023 6:14 AM CityCouncil Contact Form Submitted to City Council

Follow Up Flag: Flag Status:

Follow up Completed

CREATING A CITY FOR EVERYONE

CONTACT FORM SUBMITTED TO CITY COUNCIL From Steven Dunlap sd060126@hotmail.com Phone Number: 2089212578 Dear City Council Members Hallyburton, Bageant and Nash, As a resident of southeast Boise and Boise City Council District #4, I have no dedicated City Council representative so I’ll address this Boise Zoning Rewrite issue to the three At‐Large council persons. For nearly twenty years I have lived in the SE Boise neighborhood of East Meadow Park. This neighborhood of 151 homes is governed by covenants so it will be largely unaffected by changes in the ZCR. However, I live on the north perimeter of this neighborhood and the adjacent property at 2323 E Boise Ave is a 1.040 acre lot with one single‐family home; a prime candidate for subdivision and development under the proposed new zoning code. My question about this situation is this: If the ZCR is adopted and if a developer builds “by right”, several 3 story buildings fifteen feet away from my back fence, my use and enjoyment of my home will be significantly impaired. The city expects several benefits to result from implementation of the new zoning code, and this is an example of one of the costs to be incurred from the changes that may produce those benefits. In this particular case not only will the use value of my property be devastated, but the exchange value; the marketability will probably be impaired also. It is unreasonable for the city to expect me to bear the entire cost of this change and the benefits that the city will claim. What mechanism will the city use to

compensate me for this legal taking of the use and exchange values of my property? Thank you for considering this, and I very much look forward to your reply. Steve Dunlap 2342 E Independence Dr Boise, ID 83706 (208) 921‐2578 Contact Form Submitted On: https://www.cityofboise.org/CityWideContactForm?contactId=1890

208-608-7000 info@cityofboise.org 150 North Capitol Boulevard, Boise, ID 83702

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Friday, April 21, 2023 1:59 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Emily Erickson Email Address Boise, Idaho 83702 Comment I'm in favor of rezoning our city ‐ we deeply need more affordability and non‐car‐centered transportation options! If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

Andrea Tuning Monday, April 24, 2023 10:16 AM ZoningRewrite FW: Contact Form Submitted to PDS

From: noreply@cityofboise.org <noreply@cityofboise.org> Sent: Saturday, April 22, 2023 11:44 AM To: PDS <PDS@cityofboise.org> Subject: Contact Form Submitted to PDS

CREATING A CITY FOR EVERYONE

CONTACT FORM SUBMITTED TO PDS From Rory Felton r@roryfelton.com Phone Number: 3108954930 Dear planning, My family and neighbors have recently reviewed the proposed new zoning plan for Boise. First, I agree that some rewrites should be assessed, especially as it pertains to downtown. However we adamantly oppose the rewrite for the zone spreading east and west of Vista that changes R1 zones to R2 zones including on our street in our quaint and mature residential neighborhood. This proposed rewrite will turn an established residential community into a land grab for corporate developers who will insert several homes into properties that only contain one. This will permanently ruin the established and mature residential community that we have established. This will force families to relocate to suburbs outside of Boise and reduce business to the surrounding businesses as middle class families will desire to transition to R1 communities that don't share a street with R2 zoning. It's also noted that no changes were proposed to any areas within the North End, East End, and foots hills communities. This stark and obvious choice clearly shows a favoritism to 'higher income' residential communities while disproportionality changing middle income residential communities. The proposed changes wouldn't appear

so glaring if all neighborhoods shared in the changes together. Our hope is that Boise protects and recognizes it's mature middle class community in the Depoe Bench and doesn't penalize them while showing favoritism to higher income communities in the North End and East End. I'm available to discuss at your convenience. Sincerely, Rory Contact Form Submitted On: https://www.cityofboise.org/CityWideContactForm?contactId=10754

208-608-7000 info@cityofboise.org 150 North Capitol Boulevard, Boise, ID 83702

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Friday, April 21, 2023 9:09 AM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Patrick Bageant, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mrs. Megan Fink breathejoymegan@gmail.com 710, W. Pueblo St. Boise, ID 83702 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

Suezann Yorita Monday, April 24, 2023 11:56 AM ZoningRewrite CSIM from Mayor's Office re ZCR

*I have closed out the CSIM From: Cathie Galdos <cgaldos1020@gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, April 23, 2023 10:29:52 AM (UTC‐07:00) Mountain Time (US & Canada) To: Info <info@cityofboise.org> Subject: [External] For Chris Blanchard Mr. Blanchard. Wow. Definite hostility here, which is an alarming thing to see just ahead of the hearings. No surprise that most of Boise wants more time, more information, and more perspectives on this ZCR, which, because it is so complex, involving such arcane subject matter, and with such power to change the Boise we know, NEEDS more study. It is sad, but true, that much of the "information" that has been put out by City Admin is propaganda, that has already been discredited by research. Similar to what happened with the Interfaith Sanctuary relocation, which Planning and Zoning voted to deny due to unmitigable adverse impacts after public input that contributed much research and expert testimony. Also sad but true that the City Council that will consider this measure is not representative of the voting public, as fully one third of the members were recently appointed by the mayor, author of the code, and before an election that will seat members according to the new districts (and before the lawsuit by Lisa Sanchez seeking to delay votes until/unless she is re‐seated, is heard.) Many cities have jumped the gun on zoning code re‐writes and come to rue the unintended consequences, including lawsuits. I hope you find some mental and emotional space for public input on this matter (the biggest thing to hit Boise in fifty years,) which is the cornerstone of democracy. It is we, the people testifying, whose quality of life is on the line. Please give us the time and understanding we need to come to grips with this legislation. Thanks for your time. Catherine Galdos

Suezann Yorita

PDS Receptionist Planning and Development Services Office: (208)608-7066 syorita@cityofboise.org cityofboise.org

Creating a city for everyone.

April 25, 2023 Bob Schafer Planning and Zoning Chair City of Boise Planning and Zoning Commission 150 N. Capitol Blvd. 83701 Dear Bob Schafer, I am writing to acknowledge our gratitude for the opportunity for the Code Compliance and Community Resource (CCCR) team to be involved in the planning and editing process related to the Modern Zoning Code. The CCCR team has been an active participant in the process of reviewing and editing the proposed ordinances. Along with our partners within Planning and Development Services it is incumbent upon our team to be subject matter experts with regards to the Code. Our ability to answer difficult questions and resolve thorny neighborhood disputes depends on our broad knowledge base. More specifically our expertise is called to the fore as we proactively work with neighborhood associations to address common and broad concerns such as overgrown grasses and weeds in the open spaces/WUI or more specifically, encroachment along the Boise River, so-called group homes or NIMBY magnets such as the Interfaith Sanctuary project. As CCCR plans for the near-and long-term future, anticipating how neighborhoods or whole sections of Boise may evolve organically and within the guidelines of the proposed Code will guide us as we strategically plan for our own potential personnel growth, and necessary resource commitment, technology, education, and certification goals. Thank you for your active engagement and support of our team as we navigate this process and positively contribute to the goal of making Boise a City for Everyone. Sincerely,

Michael Garner Code Compliance Officer

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

STEPHEN C GERMAN <steve_german@msn.com> Friday, April 28, 2023 1:54 PM ZoningRewrite [External] "Upzoning" Application numbers: ZOA23-00001, CPS23-0001

I am opposed to the new proposed "Upzoning" rules / Codes. As written, the new codes will destroy the quality of life we enjoy in Boise and Ada County. We live in a single family home neighborhood (Countryman Estates) and have lived in our current home for more than 40 years. The propsed changes in the codes will completely eliminate the single family home environment so many of us want to preserve. Single family residence neighborhoods should remain as currently established. The new proposed codes will allow existing homes to be demolished and multi‐unit buildings to be constructed in their place. We are already seeing single family homes being purchased and occupied by mult‐generational families causing excessive on‐street parking. Multi‐unit contruction will only make this worse. Additionally, the proposed Accessory Dwelling Unit size of 900 square feet is far too large. Any ADU should be restricted to current size requirements and must be owner occupied only. I believe trying to restrict the purchase or renting to "mean‐income restricted tenants" is non enforceable. Is every purchase or rental agreement going to be reviewed by the city? And finally, keep the current 4.8 units/acre requirement in place. The proposed changes will not slow growth in currently undeveloped land. Homes will still be built wherever current landowners are willing to sell their property. Stephen C. German 10357 W. Harvester Drive, Boise 83709

Testimony to The City of Boise Planning & Zoning re Boise Zoning Code Rewrite 4/25/23 My name is Sherry Gorrell and I live at 716 W. Franklin St. #1, Boise, 83702; 208-880-8670; sherry@pinkguesthouse.com I was born and raised in Boise, am a global traveler, a mom, a grandma, a retired facilitator and mediator and owner of the Pink Guest House. BOISE IS GROWING. How populated do we allow it to become? And HOW do we grow INTENTIONALLY while honoring the INTEGRITY & DIVERISITY of our individual neighborhoods? We need to retain our community members who call this beautiful place HOME by meeting their needs & not outpricing them with skyrocketing costs of housing and property taxes. Then grow in a transparent, thoughtful, sensible, safe and healthy way. I AM CURIOUS, ARE YOU? Why did housing prices explode not only in Boise but most cities around the country the last 3 years. Between 2020 & 2021 under the name of the Covid “Pandemic” concerning things happened within our City of Boise & its leadership and we came “this close” to stepping in the pit of hell that Portland, Oregon is now in. VERY CLOSE. Our HEALTH FREEDOMS WERE COMPROMISED. After living here all my life and serving as a contributor to our community, I put my 1901 Pink Guest House on the market. Not to make crazy high $$ prices in an unprecedented real estate market, NO. It was because I couldn’t bear to see our beloved City go the way of the destructive influences of BIG PHARMA, BIG TECH, BIG AG, BIG ROCK and the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. I want to live in a City that has the balls to stand up to these big Corporate influences. I chose NOT TO SELL to some out of town developer and STAND UP for our Community, FREEDOM and RIGHTS. I AM SUSPICIOUS of the current intentions of our City Leaders. These are my thoughts and suggestions:

1. The City of Boise needs to be transparent with our community members (most … 95%?! … do not even know this zoning change is happening. And who, in their right mind, would be able to read a 611 page document being proposed?) A DRAFT Executive Summary needs to be developed, widely distributed through different information sources, and more gatherings with a new set of community members and neighborhood associations. 2. We need to honor the integrity of individual neighborhoods. We cannot allow single family homes to be quietly torn down and replaced with overly tall expensive 4 plexes. There are so many other options such as allowing people to add apartments above their garages or in their sunny basements or tiny houses in their back yards. Then the people can benefit from creating extra housing … NOT some out of state developer owned by BIG ROCK. The City must not rush this and must NOT allow BIG MONEY influencers to change the landscape of Boise based on their 2030 AGENDA, “You will own nothing and you will be happy”. (ie “rent from us, stay poor, and bike to work”) 3. We need to feel and be SAFE in our City. We need to update the Telecommunications or Wireless Ordinance Code and continue to build fast Fiber Optic Networks underground. We DO NOT want to have dangerous radiation pulsating 5G small and large cell towers 20 ft from our homes. These cause harm to people, defoliate trees

and kill bees. We do NOT want our City of Trees to become the City of 5G Towers and High Density Apartments. 4. We need to protect the Air we Breath and the Water we Drink. We continue to hear the term “Climate Change” when our skies are being plummeted DAY after DAY with Criss Cross Chem Trails also referred to as Geo Engineering or Weather Modification. These toxic chemicals should not be allowed in our skies over our beautiful City. 5. The best TEAM is a diverse Team with different viewpoints. Our current Mayor and City Council do not hold diverse viewpoints nor do they truly represent the Citizens of Boise as new members were hand-picked by the Mayor within the last couple months. We need to WAIT to vote and finalize the official Zoning Code rewrite until AFTER the Mayor and City Council elections. 6. Tim Keane, as Boise’s new Planning Director, I have heard your interviews and feel HOPEFUL that you will lead The Planning Department and the Boise Zoning Code Rewrite in a way that is transparent, intentional, beneficial and SAFE as we step into the next decade! 7. I OPPOSE THE BOISE ZONING CODE AS WRITTEN.

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Friday, April 21, 2023 9:08 AM CityCouncil Contact Form Submitted to City Council

CREATING A CITY FOR EVERYONE

CONTACT FORM SUBMITTED TO CITY COUNCIL From Don Grimes dongrimes126@mac.com Phone Number: 419‐581‐1759 Boise proposed zoning changes: April 21, 2023 Contractors and developers will take advantage of this change in zoning. It will lower the quality of life all over Boise, even force some long term residents (retirees) to move out of Boise. The Boise city council should be trying to preserve the beautiful quality of life that was advertised in 2010, which brought me back to the west from Ohio when I retired in 2014. I grew up in Montana and mountains. Respectfully, Don Grimes near 5 Mile and Overland Road Contact Form Submitted On: https://www.cityofboise.org/departments/city‐ council/

208-608-7000 info@cityofboise.org

150 North Capitol Boulevard, Boise, ID 83702

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Friday, April 21, 2023 8:18 AM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Tim grimmond Email tjgrimmond@sbcglobal.net Address 587 N Strata Via Way, Boise Comment Califonia imposed a ADU policy statewide and we had 4 plexus in R‐1 neighborhoods. No parking requirements , be within a mile of a bus or have a bike. If you want to destroy a community just look at California. That is one of the reasons I came here. Please think of the consequences of this folly. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

Walker Grimshaw <walker.grimshaw@gmail.com> Thursday, April 20, 2023 10:48 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Comment in support of modern zoning code

To Whom it May Concern, My name is Walker Grimshaw, and I am writing to express my support for the updated zoning code for the City of Boise. I missed this afternoon's deadline for public comment but hope that this email will still be included in the public record for the modernized zoning code. I am a 32 year old Boise renter who also had the great pleasure of growing up in Boise, attending both North Junior High and Boise High School. I strongly support the adoption of the new modernized zoning code and would further encourage the City to revisit and update the zoning code on a more frequent basis than in the past, perhaps every ten to 15 years. The zoning code helps set the trajectory of the City for the coming decades and needs to do so in a forward‐looking manner that proactively improves the density and livability of Boise for all residents. Boise, the Treasure Valley, and Idaho are all rapidly changing, and we need to make sure Boise continues to be the accessible and welcoming place in which I grew up. Facilitating increased housing density will in turn facilitate more affordable housing, improved public transit, and more bikeable and walkable routes to schools, work, and for recreation. Future zoning code rewrites should continue to facilitate and explicitly create affordable housing so that every Boisean can thrive in an equitable city. Thank you, Walker Grimshaw 917 N 10th St. Boise, ID 83702

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

Marilyn Grisham <run4moab@gmail.com> Tuesday, May 9, 2023 9:56 AM Mayor McLean; Timothy Keane; ZoningRewrite; zoninginfo; CityCouncil [External] Reject the Boise Upzone

I am writing to request a delay on the vote on the zoning code rewrite until the next City Council is elected and seated. As a 40 year resident of Boise, I have seen, and supported, a great amount of change. Although I don’t agree with all the development, I must say that overall it has lead to positive changes. Boise has, as you know, become a very desirable place to live. People move here because, in part, of the lifestyle it provides. I have traveled across the country, many times, and have never found a city I appreciate more than Boise. As an active person, it is without comparison. However, not all is well in the City of Trees. Perhaps the problem I find most distressing is that the cost of living is forcing out the younger generation. Our children and grandchildren cannot afford to buy a home, and a certain segment will never be able to realize the American dream of home ownership. How sad that our children have to move, when they desperately want to stay. Where will we be in 20 more years? We won’t be a city for families, we’ll be a city designed for the upper class. We will have squeezed out the majority of citizens in favor of developers and investors who don’t care what the city looks like once they have made their money. Where will we be when we no longer have a work force to provide necessary services? Take a look at what is happening in resort communities all over the west. I think it’s time to consider our long term vision and say no to development that destroys our quality of life. I for one, want a healthy city where I can access the outdoors and quality healthcare and more. Thank‐you for taking the time to read this email. Marilyn Grisham

April 20, 2023

City of Boise Attn: Planning and Zoning Commission 150 N Capitol Blvd Boise, ID 83702

Dear Planning and Zoning Commissioners, The North End Neighborhood Association (NENA) has conducted a review of the Adoption Draft of the City’s Modern Zoning Code. We’d like to thank City staff, especially Deanna Dupuy, for attending our March neighborhood meeting. That support enabled us to carefully walk through the code and ask important technical questions. NENA’s current position remains consistent with the Board’s comments in our last letter (dated December 23, 2022). In a similar manner, we would like to highlight areas of concern and offer suggested solutions. 1. NEIGHBORHOOD NOTICING IS A PRIMARY CONCERN. As drafted, the onus for notification shifts to neighborhood associations. We are volunteer organizations, oftentimes with limited resources. This approach creates the potential for residents to hold neighborhood associations accountable for receiving information. That isn’t responsible or feasible. Our solutions include: a.

Re-introduce neighborhood notifications for clearly defined project types. Not all development should require noticing, but we suggest Change-in-Use applications when use transitions from major categories (e.g., residential to retail, residential to office), as well as residential projects that will exceed the previous density by more than 200%.

b. Place the onus of notification for these projects on the applicant. This can reside in an additional application fee to cover mailed notices handled by the City, or require proof of notification with the submittal. c.

Continue investing in the Community Development Tracker. It is an excellent resource, and it should be sustained.

2. SCALE OF DEVELOPMENT. As NENA has discussed the new residential dimensional standards, we’ve opted to do so mostly without a historic overlay lens. Not all of the North End is within the overlay and this creates parity with other neighborhoods. In our last letter, we encouraged holding single-family detached homes to the same dimensional standards as dwellings with higher densities. The Adoption Draft appears to go in the opposite direction by broadly removing lot coverage requirements. We believe there is an appropriate scale for development within compact neighborhoods like the North End, and the concern is less about the number of dwellings within a development, but the size itself. Thanks to illustrative buildout examples from other NAs, it’s clear that very large residential developments will be allowed via the Adoption Draft. For example, duplexes could see individual units exceeding 4,000sf in size. Our suggested solution: a.

Introduce a floor area ratio (not lot coverage) for R1-C lots. Floor area will control the overall massing of a structure whereas lot coverage does not. We believe that a 0.6 - 0.7 FAR for R1-C lots, with garage and basement space exempted, replicates a desirable massing and form found throughout our neighborhood. An

example: 0.7:1 FAR on a 6,000 square foot lot would allow a 4,200 square foot structure. If additional space is desired, the code would then naturally incentivize less visibly obtrusive below-grade space. It matters much less to NENA if that 4,200 square foot structure is occupied by a single-family home or a fourplex. 3. ADAPTIVE REUSE SHOULD BE INCENTIVIZED. The preservation of existing homes is a worthy goal, for both historical context and sustainability. The adaptive reuse of an existing home should unlock flexibility for the remainder of the site, not hinder it. For example, the Adoption Draft makes it difficult to have separate detached structures on a parcel when the existing dwelling is preserved due to blanket dimensional and use-specific standards. Our suggested solution: a.

Relax use-specific or dimensional standards when an existing structure is adaptively reused. For example, a stringent requirement for street-facing front doors should not make or break creative infill development. If a FAR model is applied, the overall development of the property will also be naturally controlled, and could be divided between more than one structure.

4. INVEST RESOURCES INTO ‘CITIZEN GUIDES.’ As mentioned in Part 2 of this letter, a thorough understanding of this code was only possible due to qualified professionals and citizens volunteering their time to illustrate the suggested changes. The City of Boise should invest adequate resources to ensure the code is communicated effectively to all. 5. CONDUCT NEW SURVEYS FOR THE HISTORIC OVERLAYS. The City’s existing historic inventories are between 30 and 50 years old. Best practice states that these inventories should be redone every 10 to 15 years to update and expand the protection afforded by the historic districts. Previous inventories disqualified all homes built after the 1940s as being “too new” to be considered historic. A new survey would consider any home built before 1973 to be eligible, so many of the homes currently listed as “non-contributing” are, in fact, contributing to the current historic district but are in danger of being lost because they do not have “contributing status.” A new survey would address this issue, as well as update the status for many homes that have been altered over the years. Hundreds of homes built between the 1940s and 1973 (including all of our mid-century modern homes) are currently unprotected by the historic guidelines that exist to preserve them. Additionally, the City regularly relies on this data to make determinations about the appropriateness of changes, additions, demolitions and infill. Relying on outdated or inaccurate information can have a significant and potentially devastating consequence for applicants, the character and integrity of a neighborhood and the city as a whole. It’s crucial that Boise conduct new historic surveys for all the historic districts to provide appropriate protection for our historic structures. Ultimately, NENA appreciates the City’s effort on the Modern Zoning Code, and believes it creates a framework for successful community development into the future. The improvements we’ve suggested are not major departures from the current draft, but ways to earn public trust, encourage compatible but innovative design, and still allow neighborhoods to evolve responsibly as Boise grows. NENA has always been a neighborhood with housing diversity, and we’re eager to keep that intact.

Sincerely,

Erik Hagen, AIA LEED NENA President

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Saturday, April 22, 2023 6:47 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Walter F Hartje IV Email wallyhartje4@hotmail.com Address Boise id 83702 Comment Increasing density is crucial to Bringing more units to boise. Increasing Supply will decrease cost and make Boise livable for more people If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

Rachel Headley <rheadley@gmail.com> Friday, April 21, 2023 7:43 PM ZoningRewrite [External]

Hello, I realize I'm late on this, but I just wanted to register my support for the new zoning plan. I'm a Boise resident in the Sunset neighborhood, and I've lived in many places from Milwaukee to the DC area to Seattle, and I think that the new zoning plan would be excellent for keeping neighborhood personality as well as limiting sprawl.

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Tuesday, April 25, 2023 5:41 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Rachel Headley Email rheadley@gmail.com Address 3020 N Canterwood Pl, Boise, Idaho Comment I just wanted to register my support for the new zoning plan. I'm a Boise resident in the Sunset neighborhood, and I've lived in many places from Milwaukee to the DC area to Seattle, and I think that the new zoning plan would be excellent for keeping neighborhood personality as well as limiting sprawl. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

Alice Hennessey <ahennessey1520@gmail.com> Friday, April 21, 2023 2:07 PM ZoningRewrite [External] I support the proposed changes to the zoning code

I have been a homeowner in Boise since 1959. Boise was a charming little town when my husband I bought our first home. Change is inevitable, and it has certainly happened here. Today Boise is a thriving, growing, dynamic, highly desirable place where I would like my grandchildren and grandchildren to stay and be able to afford homes. Pleasant as the past was, we can’t stay there—frozen in time. To avoid spreading out over the valley like an amoeba, devouring farm land—and to provide affordable housing for our citizens, we need more density— especially along transit corridors—as well as more height. We also need to create neighborly neighborhoods by allowing small cafes and businesses in appropriate places. It will also help if we convert existing commercial zones (already well‐served by infrastructure) into areas where people can also live. Excellent, thoughtful work has been done on the revised zoning code. I totally support it. Alice Hennessey 614 E Highland View Dr Boise, ID 83702

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Thursday, April 20, 2023 9:29 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Charles Hill Email chaaarleshill@gmail.com Address Boise, Idaho 83702 Comment This zoning code rewrite is a great step towards becoming a better city. Property owners and people looking for a home need more choices and more supply. I urge you to pass this zoning code. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com Thursday, April 20, 2023 5:13 PM CityCouncil [External] Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board

Re: Send Blueprint Boise Back to the Drawing Board Councilmember Jimmy Hallyburton, Boise is a unique place. Let’s keep it that way. We all know housing is an issue, but the Blueprint Boise plan isn’t the right solution. Our local neighborhoods shouldn’t be forced to bear the brunt of this change. I am asking you to protect the character of our neighborhoods. I am asking you to please send Blueprint Boise back to the drawing board and come back with a solution that doesn’t force density on our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mr. Douglas Hughes hughesdouglas63@gmail.com 316 Hot Springs Dr Boise, ID 83712 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

Idahoans for Safe Technology <idahoforsafetech@gmail.com> Monday, April 24, 2023 11:04 PM CityCouncil [External] BOISE ZONING CODE - PUBLIC HEARING ALERT

To help protect y our priv acy , Microsoft Office prev ented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.

Idahoans for Safe Technology Protecting Tomorrow’s Future Today

Boise’s Mayor and City Council changed the Wireless Communication section of the city code over a year ago, thus ignoring the recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission NOT to remove the processes of conditional use permitting, notification, and public hearings! Now is the chance to once again ask the City to go back and modify that code based on new evidence. The evidence is that we have stopped three towers - proving once again that governments are not preempted from deciding if, when, and where wireless communications facilities can be placed. Planning and Zoning Commission is now taking public testimony on the Zoning Code Rewrite (use this link and scroll down to "Upcoming Meetings"

Zoning Code | City of Boise). This is the

critical time to get your concerns on the record about the lack of public involvement and extremely limited time for the public to review the final consolidated draft. Plus the undemocratic process of allowing the current city council to vote on this code considering 2 of the 6 city council members were recently appointed by the Mayor and 3 district seats (2,3,4) are unrepresented. Below are additional details about the P&Z Hearing. 1

1. Comments from Neighborhood Associations will be taken on Monday April 24th. Public testimony will be taken Tuesday, April 25 (5-10pm) and Wednesday, April 26 (5-10 pm). Here is the link to sign up to testify for Tuesday, April 25th:Planning and Zoning Commission | Event | City of Boise. Here is the link to sign up to testify on Wednesday, April 26th:Planning and Zoning Commission | Event | City of Boise. 2. You will be allowed 3 minutes for your testimony. This doesn't need to be some amazing speech, what is most important is for the public to come out in large numbers and testify in opposition to the code. P&Z needs to be shown in public that the current Boise residents/homeowners don't support the code as currently proposed. Now through your testimony both written and in person, the Mayor and City Council will now know that most Boiseans do not support the Zoning Code Rewrite. It will be through your public testimony that we can get the Planning and Zoning Commission to not recommend adopting the proposed code. PLEASE make it a priority to attend, you can do it! It is important! Now, through your testimony both written and in person, the Mayor and City Council will now know that most Boiseans do not support the Zoning Code Rewrite. It will be through your public testimony that we can get the Planning and Zoning Commission to not recommend adopting the proposed code. PLEASE make it a priority to attend, you can do it! It is important!

To read about the Zoning Code Rewrite: https://www.cityofboise.org/departments/planning-and-development2

services/planning-and-zoning/zoning-code-rewrite/zoning-codedocuments/modern-zoning-code-project-report/ THANK YOU ON BEHALF OF IDAHOANS FOR SAFE TECHNOLOGY AND THE REJECT BOISE UPZONE TEAM!

Want to get involved? Want to learn what is being done in your community for safe technology? Idahoans for Safe Technology invites you to join us for our monthly Zoom meetings the second Monday of each month at 8 pm Zoom meeting link

Stay up to date, learn what’s going on! You don’t need a cell tower installed 100 feet from your home to get reception. Help us keep cell towers OUT of residential areas.

DONATE TODAY

Copyright © 2023 IDAHOANS FOR SAFE TECHNOLOGY FOUNDATION, INC., All rights reserved. Our mailing address is: idahoforsafetech@gmail.com Want to change how you receive these emails? You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list.

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Friday, May 12, 2023 10:12 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Amanda Inglet Email amommabear@msn.com Address Boise, ID 83716 Comment Thank you for preserving the foothills. Save the foothills and Boise boundaries!! If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Friday, April 21, 2023 10:08 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Ayad Jabir Email Address Comment I am in favour of the new zoning code. This city desperately needs more density, more affordable homes, and more walkable communities. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

Tim Jackson <tjackson@unitedwaytv.org> Friday, April 21, 2023 7:55 AM ZoningRewrite [External] Up Zone Public Comment - United Way

Dear Members of the Boise City Council, United Way of Treasure Valley commends your thoughtful work and acknowledges the complexity of addressing the proposed up zone in our city. We understand that striking the right balance in developing a zoning code requires careful consideration of various factors. At United Way we work to advance the education, health, and financial stability of all in our community and recognize attainable housing as a key component to community well‐being. While we are not experts in this arena, we do encourage the development of an updated zoning code that addresses housing attainability and is designed to meet the needs of diverse community stakeholders. Through our ALICE (Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed) dataset **link** we understand the difficult reality of our community members and the profound consequences of housing instability on kids and families. Engaging in open dialogue and collaboration will help us develop equitable solutions that benefit our entire community. We appreciate the challenges you face in crafting a zoning code that best serves the people of Boise. As representatives of the United Way of Treasure Valley, we are committed to supporting your efforts to create a diverse and vibrant city where all can thrive. Together, let's prioritize getting it right for the sake of our community's future. Sincerely, United Way of Treasure Valley Tim Jackson, MPA

President & CEO

United Way of Treasure Valley Direct: 208.807.2934 Email: tjackson@unitedwaytv.org Physical: 3100 S. Vista Ave., Ste.100, Boise, ID 83705 Mailing: PO Box 16330, Boise, ID 83715

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

Dona Jeka <donajeka@gmail.com> Tuesday, April 25, 2023 8:06 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Applications ZOA23-00001 & CPA23-0001

In reference to the applications mentioned above. Yes, infill will happen as our city grows, but with the traffic currently on our roads, our subdivision roads, it is unthinkable to build a 4 plex in an older subdivision, and only require ONE parking space per unit. Please tell me how many households only have 1 car. Even if you look at the single parents, as soon as the kids reach 16, there will be additional cars looking for parking. In my opinion, this is just the developers trying to save money and cram more units onto a parcel. On the part of the application that states if a unit has more than 4 bedrooms, then the parking is reduced to .75 per unit. will someone please tell me how you park three‐quarters of a car? "listening". Dona Jeka ‐ Homeowner 10398 W Southerland Dr Boise, ID 83709 208‐794‐3371

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Saturday, April 22, 2023 10:03 AM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Seth Joslin Email seth.joslin123@gmail.com Address Boise, Idaho 8370 Comment I support the Zoning Code Rewrite. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Boise Planning and Development Services I’m writing in support of adopting Boise’s Zoning Code Rewrite—with minor modifications—as soon as is practical. The ability to anticipate and adapt to change is the key to survival in nature: the same applies to individuals, neighborhoods, businesses and communities. Boise is changing all around us as more people move here and compete for land and resources. Unless we can adapt to that change and create informed policies that reflect this reality, Boise will eventually lose what attracts and keeps people here. Planning ahead is always more cost efficient and satisfying than planning behind. Housing choice and equity, social mobility and access to opportunity matter Our current conventional/exclusionary zoning limits the type and density of housing that can be built in a particular area. Low-density, exclusionary zoning was purpose-designed to prevent the development of affordable housing and keep low-income and minority residents out of neighborhoods. It still does that, but is also excludes essential workers, artists, musicians, care workers, students, young families, seniors, teachers and first responders—the people who make our community functional, who keep us provisioned, safe, and connected socially and culturally. If we’re smart, we will create a city for our children and grandchildren—but we also need to design for these essential workers, and for the their children and grandchildren. To succeed as a species and society, we need to learn how to extend empathy outward in space and forward in time. This may mean asking ourselves what we’re willing to concede or contribute in order to create a stronger Boise for ourselves, our neighbors, and future generations. And it means thinking beyond election cycles. Creating more distributed and diverse housing options—and reducing or eliminating exclusionary zoning—is explicitly identified as a requirement under HUD’s requirement to Affirmatively Further Fair Housing. Failure to do so deprives residents of the benefits of living in a diverse community, which formed the basis of the first Fair Housing case to reach the Supreme Court. (Trafficante v Metropolitain Life). Exclusionary zoning also limits social mobility for those locked out, and prevents access to essential community assets like employment, education, recreation, healthy food, etc. Social mobility—the ability of individuals to move up or down the economic ladder—is a key determinant of the economic opportunity available to children over their lifetimes. Zoning policies affect social mobility by either creating or limiting access to affordable housing, quality schools, and good jobs. According to Raj Chetty and his research team at Harvard, children from low-income families have better outcomes as adults when their families inhabit neighborhoods with secure, affordable housing and less segregation by income. Providing more affordable housing in all areas can promote economic mobility and help reduce poverty. (Source: Chetty, R., Hendren, N., & Katz, L. F. (2015). The effects of exposure to better neighborhoods on children: New evidence from the Moving to Opportunity experiment. American Economic Review, 106(4), 855-902.) Additional research shows the benefits of “…affordable housing subsidies or changes in zoning laws” that lead to greater social mobility and mixing. (Source: Neighborhoods Matter, Opportunity Insights/Neighborhoods) When children and families have greater opportunities to build social capital in diverse communities, their earning increases and their overall dependence on public programs is dramatically lower. This mean taxpayers win in the long run.

Walkable neighbors with a mix of compatible uses Opponents point to concerns over parking and traffic. Transportation planners and place makers all agree: ‘if you design for cars you get more cars; if you design for people you get more people.’ We’ve lived in our East End home since 1995; we have never had off-street parking, and we’re doing just fine. We have dropped down to a one-car family since most of what we need can be accessed by bike or on foot. Neighborhoods designed for walking and biking support individual health and reduce public health costs of chronic diseases tied to inactivity. Mixed-use neighborhoods with easy access to shops, restaurants, and services improve social connections and overall wellness and a stronger community. (Source: Ewing, R., & Cervero, R. (2010). Travel and the built environment: A meta-analysis. Journal of the American Planning Association, 76(3), 265-294.) Moving away from exclusionary zoning promotes more equitable access to high-opportunity areas. It reduces economic and social segregation and promotes more diverse communities. (Source: Rosenblatt, E., & Shinn, M. (2017). Housing and neighborhood quality among recipients of housing choice vouchers: Implications for residential mobility. Housing Policy Debate, 27(1), 54-73.) Housing Affordability: what went wrong and how do we fix it? It’s generally acknowledged that Boise’s housing costs have been impacted by investment patterns that view housing as an asset-class investment as opposed to a human right. To be sure, this is one factor. Another is the influx of new residents relocating from higher cost primary markets on the coast who can afford to make cash offers well over asking prices. Local speculators and house flippers have also capitalized on Boise’s popularity. But it’s not clear if investment patterns were entirely the cause of price inflation or were the effect (i.e, investment dollars flow to rising markets.). Another driver of housing costs is self-inflicted: NIMBY. When residents object to sprawl, density or repurposing of land for affordable housing, they in effect reward private equity hedge fund investors. Atlantic author Jerusalem Demsas researched this dynamic extensively and I’ll include a long quote since she makes the case quite well: “Housing is primarily unaffordable in this country because of persistent undersupply. In fact, institutional investors are entering the single-family-home market precisely because supply constraints have led to skyrocketing prices. One institutional investor’s SEC filing admitted just that, celebrating a “decline” in supply that has “driven strong rental rate growth and home price appreciation.” The filing also lamented the possibility that “continuing development … will increase the supply of housing and exacerbate competition for residents.”** A lack of supply is caused by a complex web of rules and regulations that prevent developers—profit and nonprofit alike—from building enough housing to meet demand. A recent report from Freddie Mac estimates a shortage of 3.8 million housing units. For decades the United States has been underbuilding in employment hubs (such as San Francisco, New York, and Boston) and the surrounding suburbs, pushing prices up. Elected officials have allowed the home-building process to become hijacked by unrepresentative opposition and gummed up in legal challenges, many under the guise of bogus environmental concerns.

If elected officials want to fix the problem, they should eliminate those constraints, such as bans on duplexes, triplexes, and multifamily buildings. And they should curtail the various legal pathways that are used to obstruct new housing. As the Brookings Institution expert Jenny Schuetz explained to the House Financial Services Committee last summer: “Targeting a small subset of landlords without addressing underlying market conditions and policy gaps will not meaningfully improve the well-being of renters and prospective homebuyers.” *Emphasis mine **Invitation Homes, Inc. Sustainable development patterns and local housing control = perpetual social and tax benefits Low-density development is a notoriously inefficient way to deliver infrastructure, utilities and services. By contrast, missing middle housing or ‘neighborhood-friendly’ development with two or more units collocated (whether in a cottage courtyard or shared-wall form) provides housing and services for more households at a lower cost per door. Small-footprint residential options conserve building materials, energy and other resources, and make more efficient use of land near amenities and transportation. Slight increases in overall density—coupled with more predictable, by-right permitting policies—allow small local developers a better chance to create housing capacity in their own communities. Sustainable development, which incorporates environmentally friendly practices and reduces waste and pollution, can help reduce the impacts of climate change and improve economic efficiency. This can lead to cost savings for developers and homeowners, as well as improved environmental outcomes. (Source: Daly, H. E. (2007). Ecological economics and sustainable development: Selected essays of Herman Daly. Edward Elgar Publishing.) Housing affordability supports sustainable economic development in many ways.* Employers benefit from diverse housing types and price points near employment centers. They know a stable labor force supports planning, productivity, and competitiveness, and long commute times or financial strain can impact performance and reliability. Economic development professionals recognize housing as critical infrastructure―like schools, broadband or health care― essential to recruiting and retaining outside investment, good-paying jobs and dynamic workforce development. Economists know local housing control keeps wages circulating in the local economy. Distributed, modest density reduces the pressure for urban sprawl and the conversion of agricultural land to residential subdivisions. Accepting some density (conditioned on genuine affordability) helps preserve natural areas and reduce the environmental impact of development. See also: The impact of housing affordability on the economy Benefits for taxpayers and residents. Modernizing zoning codes can lead to improved economic outcomes for cities, including increased tax revenues and job creation. It can also promote more equitable access to resources and opportunities for residents, leading to improved social outcomes. (Source: Schuetz, J., Meltzer, R., & Been, V. (2018). Zoning and land use regulation. Handbook of regional and urban economics, 5, 429-506.). There are several tangible benefits to distributed density and diversity: •

Economic growth: Building new housing units creates jobs and demand for local goods and services.

•

Improved public transportation: Higher density supports expansion of public transportation systems, which can make it easier for residents to get around car-free if they choose.

•

Enhanced walkability: More walkable, mixed-use neighborhoods.

•

Reduced commute times, traffic and parking issues. When people live near the workplaces, save money that can be spent in the local economy air quality.

•

Increased social interaction: Dense, diverse communities can facilitate social interaction and help to build a sense of community among residents.

•

Improved access to public services: When more people live in an area, it can support the development of public services like schools, libraries, and parks.

•

Reduced carbon footprint: By reducing the need for car travel and promoting energy-efficient buildings, increasing density can help to reduce carbon emissions and fight climate change.

•

Increased tax revenue: The development of new housing units can increase tax revenue for local governments, which can be used to fund public services and infrastructure improvements.

Why move quickly I’m primarily concerned with demands from some groups to delay adoption until after the fall election. They say they need more time. Requesting another few weeks to a month might be reasonable if it were only about reviewing recent changes to serve Boise’s needs, but a six month delay is about politics and an attempt to use this as a wedge issue in an election. There has been ample public outreach for this process: Dozens of Community Conversations, Citywide Advisory Committee Meetings, stakeholder meetings, council presentations and local government meetings. Multiple surveys and thousands of responses seem to represent genuine engagement. Some people simply don’t want anything to change, and are willing to create chaos if they don’t get what they feel entitled to. Judging from Austin’s experience, capitulating to opponents of zoning modernization would be bad for Boise residents, businesses and taxpayers, and would in fact undermine affordability, equity and walkability. Concerns and suggestions Change is hard. Many homeowners have legitimate concerns about the potential of multi-story apartments being built next door. I’d recommend seriously thinking through the strong concerns expressed by opponents fearful of losing control of their surroundings. Finally, I’ll propose the same question I pose to community residents: What are you (Planning and Development Services) willing to concede or contribute to make Boise stronger? Respecfully, Erik Kingston, PCED 1010 E Jefferson Boise, 83712

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Thursday, April 20, 2023 8:55 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Kristen Email kristenraese@gmail.com Address 1022 E. McKinley St. Comment I support the zoning code rewrite overall and would like to see it passed. We need to increase our housing supply as Boise’s population and demand for housing continues to grow. Increasing density as this code rewrite addressees will assist with housing availability and affordability. It will also allow for the reduction of urban sprawl and ensures that our city will grow in ways that help reduce environmental impact. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Thursday, April 20, 2023 8:04 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Alicia Lachiondo Email alachion@gmail.com Address 1516 E Warm Springs Ave, Boise, ID, 83712 Comment So much in Boise has changed in 60+ years, it’s time for our housing codes to be updated as well. The Boise of my youth/childhood is not coming back, but creating more access for more people to the things I loved — proximity to the library, downtown, discovery center, foothills—while also avoiding worsening traffic and sprawl is necessary. If that includes more higher density housing in my neighborhood that has an excellent bus line, so be it. I can still walk to our preserved foothills, our beautiful greenbelt, even if there are bigger buildings/denser housing around. Plus, would love for my mom to move into a smaller condo like building in her/our neighborhood as she gets older, not having to relocate from all of her friends to do so. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

m.lawford@lawfordmedia.com Thursday, April 27, 2023 10:06 AM ZoningRewrite [External] I was scheduled to comment last night but my Zoom kept turning off ...

I was scheduled to comment last night but my zoom kept cutting out and sometimes the whole thing stopped working. I would respectfully request that my short comments be added to the comments from last night. Regards, Mary Ann Lawford This is what I was going to say. Mary Ann Lawford 5199 S. Paiute, Boise I have 3 areas of concern with this plan.

I thank all of the Commissioners for their hard work on the very important project. I appreciate the need for changes to our zoning in Boise, but do have some concerns.

First: Comments have to do with transparency and outreach to the public about this Zoning Rewrite. It is being promoted by the City as a "Modern Zoning" plan that will "retain our neighborhoods" and "bring affordable housing" to Boise. The facts of the plan are far from that description.

In my opinion, the OUTREACH should have entailed sending out a simple postcard to all residents of Boise with side by side comparisons.

On one side it would say "This is what are "Allowed Uses" currently for your neighborhood, and the other side would say "This is what will be "Allowed Uses" under the new plan in your neighborhood.

Instead they sent out links to a 600 page document where upon first glance, most people saw that their "Zoning Designation" ie: R1 ‐ R1C , etc hadn't changed. The only real ZONE changes were to those who were changed to MX designations. So, since they didn't want to read 600 pages, they thought ... as I did... that phewww. Nothing is changing for me. What they didn't know was that the "devil was in the details" in the chart for "Allowed Uses" ... this chart told me that virtually ALL zones would now Allow ... BY RIGHT ... without neighborhood notification or input ... MULTI FAMILY Dwellings in what are now Single Family neighborhoods. While some may say this plan is NOT an UPZONE … technically that may be correct… but in actual practice it totally IS an upzone.

Although it touts “Affordable Housing”, there are, in fact NO provisions in the plan that explicitly guarantee affordable housing …. Because there is no way to guarantee affordable housing unless the government builds and provides it. So this big “buzz word” used to promote the plan is a lie.

How does the city in any way ... describe this as TRANSPARENCY ... or Truthful Outreach. This plan is totally EXPERIMENTAL ... there are no cities where it has been implemented and working for any length of time. Should Boise be an Experiment ? An exercise in Ideology ?

My second area of concern has to do with Neighborhood Notification. In this plan, nearly all projects will be allowed by RIGHT. So no notification to neighbors or neighborhoods will be required before a drastic change to the neighborhood is built. Treating Citizens & Taxpayers like they don’t matter. When there are hearings, the Neighborhood Associations time to speak is CUT … how is that transparency ? The people with the most to lose or gain should be given MORE time to speak.

My 3rd concern is that this plan will be voted on by 33% UNELECTED Council members.. appointed by the very person who spearheaded this plan … the Mayor. This is not, by any stretch of the imagination, fair to Boise residents.

I am asking that you DENY this plan and send it back with further recommendations for transparency and changes.

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Tuesday, May 2, 2023 4:59 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Ethan Mansfield Email mansfield.ethan@gmail.com Address 4409 W Albion St. Comment Please see current development code section 11‐09‐02.1.A(8)(f): "All new parcels that abut the public right of way shall be improved with sidewalk, curb, and gutter, and if applicable, a paved driveway apron that extends to the edge of street pavement will be required. All right‐of‐way improvements, license agreements, and/or bonding shall be completed prior to the Planning Director's approval of the Minor Land Division." Importantly, right‐of‐way improvements are required with minor land divisions. Please consider extending the administrative timelines to allow for a thorough review from Public Works to ensure that their guidelines are being met. To allow for smaller lots without allowing for a way to create smaller lots without significant pain and suffering on the part of the applicant will not yield the result of increasing small‐lot, missing middle development, especially by small‐scale, local developers and home‐owners. Bring on the notification, just process it administratively! There are significant implications for subdivisions that extend outside of the City's approval timelines and requirements that affect developers in a major way that can take up to a year to fulfill, even AFTER City Council approval. Please consider the effect that this will have on the creation of missing middle housing, especially one off development by local developers and homeowners. Cheers, Ethan If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Sunday, April 23, 2023 9:06 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name JeNelle McEwan Email jenellemcewan@gmail.com Address Boise, ID 83705 Comment April 23, 2023 To: mayormclean@cityofboise.org, citycouncil@cityofboise.org, tkeane@cityofboise.org, zoninginfo@cityofboise.org, zoningrewrite@cityofboise.org

Re: Zoning Code Rewrite Public Comment for ZOA23‐00001 & CPA23‐00001 Dear Mayor, City Council, and Planning and Zoning Commission: I am writing in opposition to the Boise City Zoning Code rewrite. The current proposal is almost a complete replacement of the laws that have created such a unique community in which my family has lived since the 1950’s, the Boise Depot Bench. While I understand that change is inevitable, some of the proposed changes in the rewrite will eliminate many of the wonderful characteristics of our neighborhood north of Overland in the Kootenai, Latah, and Shoshone streets area. As someone who walks daily and frequently bikes through the neighborhood to go downtown, grocery shopping or to work, I’ve seen my neighbors build and maintain a community of lovely homes with landscaping and beautiful mature trees that provide shade and a walkable, livable environment for all age groups. Unfortunately, I’ve also seen high density development with minimal attention to planting trees, reducing traffic, and encouraging pedestrian safety. As currently drafted, the Zoning Code Rewrite has the potential to change the character of the neighborhood I love by increasing traffic and noise, and reducing the charm, safety, and shady livability of this walkable, charming area. Please consider amending the rewrite to include the following: High density development should happen in the corridors, NOT into the R1, R2, and R3 residential neighborhoods. There should be STRICT stepdown height standards, ideally 2 stories or less in the transition between mixed use and residential zones. The height limit in residential zones should remain at the current height, not be increased to 45 ft. Accessory dwelling units should remain at 700sqf or less. Owner occupancy should be maintained. Sincerely, 1

JeNelle McEwan 1421 Gourley Boise, ID 83705 (208)424‐8986 If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Thursday, April 20, 2023 5:11 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Laura Miller Email lauramiller53@icloud.com Address Boise Id 83703 Comment I do like the idea of increasing the density of our housing. I am concerned about reducing the amount of public comment. I think that it is important for there to public discourse about our concerns for our community in order to mitigate potential issues. I am a strong proponent of the concept of a 15 minute city, which is the idea that you should be able to walk to your basic necessities within 15 minutes. I would like to see something included to require developers to include some small degree of mixed use in their development to encourage this. I think neighborhoods like Hyde park or hidden springs are ideal because they have public amenities easily walkable and accessible to the community. Wouldn’t it be nice to just walk 15 minutes to the corner store to buy the eggs you forgot? It would make our communities so much more enjoyable and community oriented with a more “village” type construction. I know there is an inclusion to allow this in certain residential zones. But I think it should be required as a condition of large developments. I think that the developers who are installing these large developments should be required to encourage this sort of positive community growth. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Monday, April 24, 2023 12:20 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Natalie Email natalie@leaphousing.org Address 670 E Riverpark Ln Suit 170 Boise, ID 83706 Comment I am writing to you today in support of the new zoning code ordinance (ZOA23‐0001 & CPA23‐0001). Boise is desperately in need of the code rewrite to stay in line with current zoning and housing needs. Please count this as support in the affirmative for the new ordinance. Thank you. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Friday, April 21, 2023 8:14 AM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name T. Nelson Email Address Comment This is not in the best interest of elderly and low income home OWNERS. I know u want apartments but we need to have a mix of home to own and apartments for the fabric of what makes boise. You will price out low income home owners and ruin property values like California and denver did with similar legislation. We want equal representation on the city council!! If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Wednesday, April 26, 2023 2:58 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name John Newton Email claytonllc@protonmail.ch Address 1796 S. Annett Street, 102 Comment I am a lifelong Boise native and I oppose this upzone on multiple levels. The housing shortage and out of control cost of living here is real and tangible. Allowing out of state developers and private equity firms carte blanche to turn Boise into a concrete jungle of overpriced multi‐story apartment complexes is not the answer. Our infrastructure, schools and emergency services can barely support the massive influx of people who have already moved here. This upzone needs to be taken to the people thru a public vote as we did when the former mayor wanted a new library. Boise is on the precipice of becoming unlivable for anyone but the most financially fortunate. As public servants I would ask that you open this to public vote. Thank you. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Sunday, April 23, 2023 8:11 AM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Patricia obrien Email tobrien@undergroundmining.com Address 3164 s shortleaf ave Boise Idaho 83716 Comment I am against this move to ruin our neighborhoods ,you need to listen to what the e citizens of Boise want, not your progressive views. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

CityCouncil Friday, April 28, 2023 11:25 AM ZoningRewrite FW: [External] Zoning Rewrite

From: Amanda Brown <ABrown@cityofboise.org> Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2023 9:53 AM To: CityCouncil <CityCouncil@cityofboise.org> Subject: FW: [External] Zoning Rewrite

From: Gregg Ostrow <geo@greggostrow.com> Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2023 9:51 AM To: Holli Woodings <hwoodings@cityofboise.org> Cc: Amanda Brown <ABrown@cityofboise.org> Subject: RE: [External] Zoning Rewrite I am missing something here. I know the rewrite will be approved and I support it. I just do not understand why FAR and Height Transition were removed. I hear the argument about single family homes. They should be restricted in the R1‐C zone. I can construct a two‐story 8,000 sf house on my property. This does not include the basement. Isn’t that big enough? What I do not understand, is why I feel like I am “butting heads” with the people who also believe in affordability and sustainability. I will tell you I am disappointed to receive your “boiler plate” response.

Gregg D. Ostrow, AIA 208‐866‐3168

From: Holli Woodings <hwoodings@cityofboise.org> Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2023 8:53 AM To: Gregg Ostrow <geo@greggostrow.com> Cc: Amanda Brown <ABrown@cityofboise.org> Subject: Re: [External] Zoning Rewrite Good morning Gregg, Thanks for you additional comments and analysis. We will take this into consideration as we continue to evaluate the draft zoning code. Holli Sent from my iPhone

On Apr 27, 2023, at 7:54 AM, Gregg Ostrow <geo@greggostrow.com> wrote:

Good Morning, I am really confused. I presented last night proposed townhomes for my property at 4,000 sf. each that meet the zoning requirements. The city took out the Floor Area Ratio and Height Transition in the R1‐C zone in the last Adoption Draft. This allows R1‐C properties to double the size of their units and provide taller floor to floor heights. In addition, demolition in the R1‐C zone is not limited. This appears to go backwards on the affordability and sustainability goals of the City. Am I missing something here? It appears that nobody cares. Thanks

Gregg D. Ostrow, AIA 208‐866‐3168 2

To: City of Boise Fr: Idaho Manufactured Housing Association Karyn Felix, President Ginger Bidegaray, Executive Director Teri Ottens, Planner Re: Boise Zoning Ordinance Draft Our organization apologizes for the lateness of our comments. This was not on our radar until very recently. However you will find the majority of our comments concern language conflicts or clarifications and not changes to content. Below are our comments (in italics) concerning the City of Boise Zoning Draft. 11-03-93.2 General Standards, Residential Units K. Manufactured Home It is unclear in this section that the design standards which are included in this section only apply to manufactured homes placed on individual lots and not within a land leased Manufactured Home Community (we also have concerns with Manufactured Home Community (MHC) definition which is delineated below). A suggested clarification is added below (underlined section) (1) Except in the R-1A zoning district or when placed within a land leased Manufactured Home Community, it shall be multi-sectional and enclose a space of not less than 1,000 square feet. L. Manufactured Home Community A land leased Manufactured Home Community (MHC) and a Manufactured Home subdivision are two entirely separate things and should not be combined into one. Manufactured homes placed in communities should not be required to be placed on a foundation that is “similar in appearance and durability to the masonry foundation or other foundation systems on single family dwelling in the nearby area.” In MHC’s, homes are not permanently affixed to the land on foundations but are affixed temporarily by approved HUD tie down systems and more often than not have metal or other type of temporary skirting around the home. In addition most MHC’s are not located in single family areas, are often fenced away from surrounding uses which raises the question on how can a comparison be made to similar “exterior siding and roofing material”. While appearance standards can be made for MHC’s these listed in the ordinance are entirely inappropriate (Note that most MHC’s set their own standards for the appearance of the homes). (2) Dwelling Unit Design Features (b) and (c) Each dwelling unit shall comply with the following standards: (a) It shall have a roof pitch of at least two inches of rise to 12 inches of run (2:12).

(b) It shall have a foundation fascia that is similar in appearance and durability to the masonry foundation or other foundation systems on Single-Family Detached Dwellings in the nearby area. The foundation fascia shall surround the entire perimeter of the structure and completely enclose the space between the siding and the finished grade. (c) It shall have exterior siding and roofing that in material and appearance is similar to the exterior siding and roofing material commonly used on residential dwellings within the city or that is comparable to the predominant material used on surrounding dwellings. L. Manufactured Home Community We recommend that the City separate land leased Manufactured Home Communities from Manufactured Home subdivisions in your draft. These are two entirely separate options in providing housing and should be treated separately. To try and tie these together as this draft does creates confusion and will cause issues for the City in the future. Some examples – 11-06-03 - Definitions Floodplain Protection Manufactured Home Community or Subdivision - A parcel (or contiguous parcels) of land divided into two or more Manufactured Home lots for rent or sale. Manufactured Home Community or Subdivision - A parcel (or contiguous parcels) of land divided into two or more Manufactured Home lots for rent or sale. Chapter 11-06 Definitions Section 11-06-03. Definitions Boise Zoning Code Rewrite 474 Adoption Draft Mobile Home A transportable, factory-built home designed to be used as a year-round residential dwelling and built prior to enactment of the National Housing include and Safety Standards Act of 1974, which became effective July 15, 1976. Mobile Homes are not permitted within the City. Manufactured Home Community - Any site, lot, tract, plot, or parcel of land, designed for the placement of 10 or more Manufactured Homes or Tiny Houses, located and maintained for dwelling purposes on a permanent basis on individual lots, pads, or spaces; whether those lots, pads, or spaces be individually owned, leased, or rented. Note – land leased communities lease their lots and when the lease expires the home should be able to be moved and therefore cannot be affixed permanently. Our recommendations: Manufactured Home Community or Subdivision - A parcel (or contiguous parcels) of land divided into two or more Manufactured Home lots for rent or sale. Chapter 11-06 Definitions Section 11-06-03. Definitions Boise Zoning Code Rewrite 474 Adoption Draft Mobile Home A transportable, factory-built home designed to be used as a year-round residential dwelling and built prior to enactment of the National

Housing include and Safety Standards Act of 1974, which became effective July 15, 1976. Mobile Homes are not permitted within the City. Manufactured Home Community - Any site, lot, tract, plot, or parcel of land, designed for the placement of 10 or more Manufactured Homes or Tiny Houses, located and maintained for dwelling purposes on a permanent basis on individual lots, pads, or spaces; whether those lots, pads, or spaces be individually owned, leased, or rented. Under the definition below you use the terms park and community interchangeably. But nowhere is the ordinance do you use the term manufactured term “park” again Floodplain Protections Existing Manufactured Home Park or Subdivision - A Manufactured Home community or subdivision for which the construction of facilities for servicing the lots on which the Manufactured Homes are to be affixed (including, at a minimum, the installation of utilities, the construction of streets, and either final site grading or the pouring of concrete pads) is completed before the Effective Date of the adopted floodplain management regulations. Other things to consider not in the ordinance draft – 1) Single wide manufactured homes are not like the old mobile homes of the past. They can have eaves, pitched roofs and look like a site-built home. And are much more affordable and less expensive to transport. Could the city consider allowing these under a conditional use in areas where lot sizes are small, similar to your “skinny homes” exceptions allowed in the past? 2) The industry is now starting to do manufactured homes built to HUD code as duplexes. Could there be verbiage that allows manufactured home duplexes as HUD now does allow multi family construction of manufactured homes? Again this provides an affordable housing option to sitebuilt. IMHA would be happy to work with you on why these changes are necessary, including testimony before the City Council if needed. Contact information is: Ginger Bidegaray, Executive Director 208-841-5959 ginger@stokemanagementsolutions.com Teri Ottens, Planner 208-869-6832 tottens@amsidaho.com

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

Suezann Yorita Thursday, April 27, 2023 8:22 AM ZoningRewrite CSIM from Mayor's Office re ZCR

*I will close this out

Suezann Yorita

PDS Receptionist Planning and Development Services Office: (208)608-7066 syorita@cityofboise.org cityofboise.org

Creating a city for everyone.

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Tuesday, May 2, 2023 3:04 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Gary Parkinson Email garydparkinson@gmail.com Address 505 W Broad St Apt 304 Comment I am thrilled with the successful modernization of the zoning code to set Boise on a path towards a vibrant, healthy, sustainable, equitable future. My only wish would be that car parking minimums were reduced further due to the negative externalities to society as well as the opportunity costs to the municipal budget when compared to devoting that land to uses which generate more tax revenue and prosperity in the community. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

CityCouncil Friday, April 28, 2023 10:11 AM ZoningRewrite FW: [External] Zoning and Planning Meeting, written testimony/declaration regarding ZOA23-00001 & CPA23-00001

From: Katie Keate <katiekeate@aol.com> Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2023 5:48 PM To: CityCouncil <CityCouncil@cityofboise.org>; zoninginfo <zoninginfo@cityofboise.org> Subject: [External] Zoning and Planning Meeting, written testimony/declaration regarding ZOA23‐00001 & CPA23‐00001 I realize this written testimony is late. Due to a sick child, I am no longer able to attend the meeting. I was planning to speak at the meeting this evening, and would appreciate having our written declaration accepted. Sincere thanks.

My name is Katie Peck. My husband and I and our family reside in Boise, Idaho. We are submitting our written declaration to oppose the Zoning Code Rewrite, as we are unfortunately not able to attend the meeting in person this evening. We fully support the efforts of "Reject Boise Upzone". Our concerns are regarding the business on the agenda of the Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting dated for today, 4/26/2023 at 5pm, to be held in the City Hall Council Chambers. We strongly oppose the recommendations to pass ZOA23-00001 & CPA23-00001 / City of Boise / Modern Zoning Code / Zoning Ordinance Amendment of Boise City Code Title 11 and the adoption of any new Zoning Map and any Comprehensive Plan Amendment with text changes to accompany the Zoning Ordinance Amendment. 1

Passing such amendments will directly and adversely affect the quality of life we have worked so hard to establish for our family. We did not move into an established, completed neighborhood to then have someone come in and build a multifamily structure next to our home. Did you? As residents of the City of Boise, this proposal is not acceptable. We do NOT want this in our neighborhood. We do not want this for our city. Please be respectful of our families and our homes. Facts: Adopting such amendments will adversely affect traffic, safety, impact our overcrowded school system, and our emergency services. The infrastructure around us (road works, green space, sanitation, water, and electrical grid) was designed to accommodate the homes built in our area, not that number of homes times however many stories high someone wants to build on top of an existing home. We don't have many renters in our neighborhood, and we would like to keep it that way. There is no way this amendment procures the CC&R's and policies we have in place for our neighborhood through our home owners association. We purchased a home in this location for a reason, and you should not have the power to take that away from us as private citizens. Every member of our neighborhood I have spoken with regarding this issue is absolutely in opposition of ANY Zoning Code Rewrite! We are deeply disappointed in the leadership of our beloved City of Boise. You are our city leaders. You can do better than this. Amendments ZOA23-00001 & CPA23-00001 are not in the best interest of our family, our neighborhood, our community, or our city. No. No thank you. Take it off the table. Please respect the hard work we have all given to this community, the years and years of working to provide for our families, and all we have invested in our homes. If this zoning rewrite passes, you will loose many hard working, tax-paying citizens. Many of us will consider selling our beautiful homes and move out of Boise, and even Ada County. We don't want that to be the case, but we will do what is necessary to preserve the quality of life we have worked so hard to establish for our family. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Katie Peck (& Aaron Peck) Boise, Idaho

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments:

l Pennisi <lppennisi@yahoo.com> Thursday, April 27, 2023 2:23 PM ZoningRewrite Luci Willits [External] Follow up to Wed ZCR testimony from Lauren Pennisi IMG_20230425_175530_HDR.jpg; IMG_20230426_154617_HDR.jpg

Hi, Technical difficulties made it impossible to communicate my points about Idaho and Bannock streets between 19th and 27th. They are zoned R-3 yet homes they should be R-1C to follow the pattern established on the north side of State street. This home on 2502 Bannock was purchased by an out-of-state developer IMG_20230425). It is in an R-3 zone with ZCR will allow 43 units/acre and max height of 45 feet. The result will look similar to this Jefferson property (IMG_20230426). Allowed use under current zone was a concern from residents and will be more so under ZCR proposed zone's allowed use. Thank you for your patience last night! Lauren Pennisi

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Wednesday, April 26, 2023 12:42 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Wayne Rancourt Email waynemrancourt@hotmail.com Address 3316 S Bridgeport Lane, Boise, ID 83706 Comment I am writing in support of the new zoning code ordinance. I believe this update will improve housing affordability as our city continues to grow. In addition to the housing affordability aspect, the new zoning code has the potential to meaningfully improve access to public transportation and childcare, and shrink the time spent commuting for families. This can have a significant impact on the discretionary time parents have available to spend with their children, which can improve educational outcomes and provide improved family dynamics. Having spent decades working on a volunteer basis with social support groups, discretionary time and the constant pressure of financial constraints are two things many in our community take for granted and they can be the biggest impediments to a family's success. This zoning rewrite makes progress on both of those issues. Thank you. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

brandon.rasmussen07@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Brandon Rasmussen <brandon.rasmussen07@everyactioncustom.com> Thursday, April 20, 2023 7:01 PM ZoningRewrite [External] In Favor of the Zoning Code Rewrite

Dear Planning and Zoning Commission, Hello, I want to send this message to strong encourage the Planning and Zoning Commission to support the Zoning Code Rewrite. As a citizen of Boise, I am impressed with the proposed code's attention to the issues that we face as a growing community. Not only would this make our city more traversable, but the density of family homes and protection of our canopy is fantastic preparation to ensure that Boise remains a great place to live long into the future. It's no secret that costs of living have been rising, and this code will also be a great help in the City's efforts to combat that. I appreciate that the community has been given the opportunity to weigh in on the details of this rewrite and I'm excited about the opportunities it presents. Once again, I urge the Boise Planning and Zoning Commission to support this new code that intelligently addresses our community's present and future needs. Sincerely, Brandon Rasmussen 3483 S Cadet Ave Boise, ID 83706‐5560 brandon.rasmussen07@gmail.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

Jbr4466@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Joseph Rhodes <Jbr4466@everyactioncustom.com> Thursday, April 20, 2023 7:23 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Please Do not support this rewrite.

Dear Planning and Zoning Commission, I am writing to express my concerns for the Zoning Code Rewrite. The sustainability, affordability, and open space protections included in the new zoning code rewrite are not what Boise needs to plan for and address our rapid growth. Please Vote NO ! Thank you, Joseph Rhodes. Sincerely, Joseph Rhodes 7580 W Kerry Dr Boise, ID 83714‐2081 Jbr4466@gmail.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Thursday, April 27, 2023 3:46 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Daniel Rooke Email rooke.daniel@gmail.com Address 2118 N.19th St. Comment Please consider that the neighborhoods in the Boise core need protections to ensure that there remains significant and meaningful historic districts. Boise has already sacrificed so much of its historical core in the name of urban renewal in the 1970s ‐ a decision that is rightly regarded as a colossal mistake. This lead to the loss of most of downtown Boise. Do not allow what remains of Boise's history to be sacrificed for quick profits in the name of supposedly necessary density. This will not make Boise more affordable. If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Monday, April 24, 2023 12:00 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Joseph C. Rutte Email jrutte16@gmail.com Address 6117 S. Settlement Way, Boise, ID 83716 Comment Thank you for this inclusive zoning process. I am a long‐time resident of Boise, having moved here first in 1996. The city has changed a great deal in those 25+ years, mostly for the better. I love our vibrant and growing downtown, extensive parks system, good schools, and strong rule of law. While I have personally benefitted from the sharp increase in housing prices, I think that rise in the cost of buying or renting a residence in Boise is a negative development. I don't believe the answer to this is housing subsidies and the like. The answer to more demand for housing is more supply of housing. To this end, I strongly encourage this commission to approve a rewrite of the zoning code that maximizes freedom for landowners to use their land. Allow higher‐density housing anywhere owners want to build it and avoid restrictions on building height, distances of buildings from property boundaries, and landscaping requirement. Please do not include parking requirements. Demand for on‐street parking should be tempered with parking meters that vary cost of parking with time of day. When I drive around Boise today and I see large apartment buildings going up it makes me happy and positive about the future of our city. While I know this is a zoning rewrite, I also want to advocate here to switch to a property tax system based on the amount of land used rather than one weighted to the value of improvements. We should be taxing land, not the structures and other improvements put on the land. This will incentivize land to be put to its highest‐value use and discourage land owners to sit on large lots and empty areas of land that are not contributing to more housing supply. Further, taxing improvements hinders construction, which reduces employment and tax revenue. Empty lots don't pay nearly as much in taxes as homes with people in them paying sales tax, income tax, etc. Thank you, Joe Rutte If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Monday, April 24, 2023 4:38 PM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Eli Sanders Email Address Boise, ID Comment From talking to many neighbors in the North End, none are aware of the zoning change implications (i.e. single family homes set to be crowded out by towering, multi‐story, multi‐unit properties built within 5 feet of the property line). This appears set to happen all across Boise. Please reject this zoning rewrite that only benefits wealthy out‐of‐town developers who will never live in these new homes. It also will do nothing for affordability while destroying the quality of life in neighborhoods across the city. The acute housing shortage that Boise's zoning rewrite seeks to solve was likely only a temporary phenomenon driven by the pandemic. Would we not be better served by pausing in rewriting the zoning code and reconsidering conditions as they are today rather than looking in the rearview mirror? If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

yogi scott <scotsdell@msn.com> Wednesday, April 26, 2023 1:06 PM ZoningRewrite [External] zoning changes

I live in Boise at 10299 W. Southerland Dr. I have recently been made aware of the publicized changes to the zoning ordinances for some of Boise. Specifically in reference to applications ZOA23‐00001 and CPA23‐0001. I am definitely not in favor of changing zoning ordinances to allow more density in areas currently zoned as single family residential. Much of what I read shows multiple housing units, such as fourplexes and adjoining townhouses in 1 acre or less with little off street parking. I believe little thought has been given to the area of southwest Boise where there is no local bus service. The local routes stop at Maplegrove and do not run west of that street. The only buses in this area are running between Canyon and Ada Counties. I see recommendations to build multiple family units with only a single off street parking place. The residents will not be biking or walking to work or shopping, they will use cars and clog the streets in parking. The streets in the subdivisions in our area are not built for higher capacity and children will be at danger especially while biking. I would hope that you are more restrictive to changing these codes so existing single family homes can count on their neighbors to always be in similar housing. When multiple story apartments, townhouses or fourplex units are built next to single family homes the existing residents give up any sense of privacy in their backs yards or inside their homes. Please think beyond the congestion of downtown Boise and leave the suburban residential zoning as is. Thank you, Dan Scott Boise resident for 61 years.

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

Thomas Setzer <setzertile@yahoo.com> Wednesday, April 26, 2023 10:39 AM ZoningRewrite [External] Application numbers ZOA23-00001and CPAa23

As a homeowner in a nice neighborhood I do no want a cottage, duplex, triplex or fourplex next door We already have a large rental home behind us with 3 separate families living in it and we have to do their yard work for them. It is hopeless to ask renters to do anything but pay the rent. We like our large 1/2 acre lots with a shop or two in the back. That is why we moved here. Leave well enough alone

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

debbie smalley <debbie_smalley@yahoo.com> Thursday, May 11, 2023 1:04 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Boise city rewrite building code

Note :Please inform technical team to remove the period on link for this address Because the address was written in a sentence It copies as zoningrewrite@cityofboise.org. This causes a failure when sending the email.

Dear City Planning: Without removing regulations & guidelines, I do believe we need to a rewrite of the building code, to allow more flexibility and freedom to residential homeowners, to more easily build, additional dwellings & develop their property. As the city grows, We need to be able to help familys adapt to the vastly growing need for housing, However::: To avoid congestion issues, homeowners, also need to include, a plan for extra allowable parking. With in this rewrite, I would like to see, residential homes/homeowners & the residents, be given the physical right to legally count the street surrounding thier property, as legal designated parking space,for that property.

Every homeowner should have the right to manage the parking on the street surrounding their property. This re‐ write, would be for ; registered cars, SUV & trucks only. (Excluding RV’s and ADU dwellings, trailers/ off road haulers) In this rewrite, The rights to park in front of ones own property, should be given to homeowners. When developing their property, Homeowners should not have to seek written permission, from nieghbors to use the street infront of their property, as legal parking space for that address. In addition, My nieghbors, should not have the legal right to use the street surrounding my property, as their overflow parking solution, without my permission. The new zoning code should put in place a home owners right, to manage the parking around their property. A homeowner should be given the right, to say, its not ok, for you to keep parking infront of my house. I believe we should develop & grow with great respect & consideration, for our nieghbors. No commercial or corporate company; should have the right, to buy up multiple houses or propertys, bulldoze a nieghborhood and/or build a multi‐level apartment complex, without getting permission, From the surrounding nieghbors or doing an environmental impact study. We can grow; without destroying our beautiful, City of Trees. We must have great respect and love of our neighbors & value the opinion of the citizens in the areas we are commercially developing. Commercial real estate & Cooperate companies, must be always be given rules, regulations and restrictions, when developing any project. 1

Private citizens and the residents in a nieghborhood, should never lose their right to have a vote or be notified in a timely manner, on a development issue or vote.

No company should be able to develop commercially in a residential area, without a hearing or vote from residents surrounding that property. The new building codes should be re‐written & voted on section by section. We (as the citizens of this great city) should get to vote on which sections we agree with. There should be no ,corporate, Riders in this re‐write. No laws or rewrites should remove our rights to have a voice, and advanced notice to vote on new building developments, in a residential area. This is our city. If you allow us to be the voice of change with great love & respect for the citizens. We will grow this city, into a city worth bragging about. Help keep us beautiful, inside and out. The City of Trees!!! To help protect our city & the safty of future generations to come. We safe gaurd our power grids & protect our city from warming, by biulding wisely. We need to designate, innercity development safeguards, by reserving properties & require room for parks, trees as we grow. All commercial and corporate development should be required to provide a certain percentage of property to grass & trees. Weather, nature, water & environmental development are essential. Trees, grass & wildlife, feed the environment & helps produce a cooling effect & rainfall. Large Cities all over the US & the world, are struggling to find ways, to bring back nature, to help cool down their cities. With the increase in temperature, the larger cities filled with concrete & overdevelopment are struggling to beat the heat. They are turning into ovens, baking their citizens. The residents, struggle to cooldown their cities, with AC. They are overloading their power grid, causing rolling blackouts, endangerIng, the elderly & the more fragile or compromised population. Their temperatures are soring to dangerous life threatening levels. While we rewrite our codes, please safeguard our future generations, DO NOT remove our rights to say, NO. Protect us, so we can make mindful decisions to protect the future of our great city. Re Writing the codes, is good…. De Regulating and removing the need for R1 C1 C2 etc… or commercial growth approval, is dangerous for our community & for the future generations in our beautifully majestic city. Please Change the rules, but never take our right to know about it or to vote about it. Thankyou Debbie Smalley

Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

madelynsorrentino@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Madelyn Sorrentino <madelynsorrentino@everyactioncustom.com> Thursday, April 20, 2023 9:22 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Please Support the Zoning Code Rewrite

Dear Planning and Zoning Commission, I am writing to express my support for the Zoning Code Rewrite. The sustainability, affordability, and open space protections included in the new zoning code rewrite are exactly what Boise needs to plan for and address our rapid growth. Growth is inevitable, and we need a modern zoning code to ensure we are following the best practices to grow sustainably and responsibly. I am a 26‐year old graduate student at Boise State University who recently moved to Boise to research issues pertaining to the health of Idaho's ecosystems. I have experienced firsthand that Boise is unaffordable seemingly for everyone, but especially for new home buyers, renters, students, low‐ income residents, refugee families, and elderly folks on fixed incomes. This code helps address those issues. As an advocate for the environment, I appreciate that this zoning code protects green spaces, improves our tree canopy, incentivizes energy and water efficiency that saves money over the lifetime of a home, allows for smart and targeted density, increases opportunities for multi‐family homes like duplexes, removes unnecessary parking space minimums, protects pollinators, and makes our communities more walkable and bikeable. I strongly encourage the Boise Planning and Zoning Commission to support this zoning code rewrite that staff and residents have spent so much time and effort to shape. Sincerely, Madelyn Sorrentino 909 North 10th Street Boise, ID 83702 madelynsorrentino@gmail.com

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

estans77@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Edie Stansbury <estans77@everyactioncustom.com> Thursday, April 20, 2023 5:01 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Please Support the Zoning Code Rewrite

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

claireternes@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Claire Ternes <claireternes@everyactioncustom.com> Thursday, April 20, 2023 9:22 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Please Support the Zoning Code Rewrite

Dear Planning and Zoning Commission, My name is Claire Ternes, and I'm 25 years old. I am a young professional living in the North End, and would love to be able to continue to live in Boise in the years to come. I believe that the new zoning codes will allow for more diverse and affordable housing, so that I may one day be able to afford to buy a house, or at least afford to continue living in this city that I love. This city is growing and changing in beautiful ways, and the zoning rewrite it essential to help it grow into itself, rather than around outdated constraints. Please support the zoning code rewrite! Sincerely, Claire Ternes 909 N 10th St Boise, ID 83702‐4130 claireternes@gmail.com

April 20, 2023 City of Boise Planning and Development Services 150 N. Capitol Blvd. Boise, ID 83702 Re:

Testimony on City of Boise Code Re-Write

To whom it may concern: Please accept this written testimony in response to the City’s proposed re-write of sections of the City Code pertaining to land development. We are a local real estate developer based right here in downtown Boise. Our history dates back over 45 years; since then we’ve completed more than 300 projects spanning 28 states and totaling over 13 million square-feet. We continue to manage over 4 million square-feet of commercial property, and we have over thousands of housing units constructed and in development. You might be familiar with our projects located in Boise, including Franklin Town Plaza, Milwaukee Marketplace, Main & Marketplace, Village East apartments, Kensington apartments and our headquarters located downtown at 9th and Broad, to name a few. Upon our review of the proposed Code re-write, we are generally supportive of the City’s efforts to promote greater residential development options; however, we have serious concerns about the parking limits. And we have additional concerns about several of the proposed commercial zoning terms. ▪

Boise Town Square Regional Activity Center – We suggest MX2 for this area instead of MX-3. As its name accurately states, this is a regional shopping destination. As such, customers and employees will continue to drive to access daily needs here for many, many years into the future. This will not change overnight, so the City should not make it harder for people who do not have the privilege of living in an area to access those services by vehicle. Many of the design requirements of the MX-3 zone are not sensitive to this.

▪

MX Zones, Parking Not Allowed in Front of Buildings – This requirement presents many issues. In commercial zones there are often pre-existing CC&Rs conflicting with this concept; due to the complexity in amending CC&Rs, such properties will be disincentivized to be redeveloped over time. Many other properties are bounded on 2-3 sides with roadways, which raises serious concern as to their potential for development or redevelopment. Another problem is that businesses on the interior of projects will struggle to survive without clear sightlines for visibility to customers. As a result of these concerns, we strongly urge the City not to apply this requirement in most zones—and certainly not to the proposed MX-2 and similar zones.

▪

Drive Through standards – A requirement to enclose drive-throughs entirely within buildings is something we have not seen from a city in more than 28 states where we have developed property. The extreme cost to comply with this requirement will obviously discourage new drive through businesses, but it will have no effect on demand for such businesses. As a result, as the City continues to grow, more people will drive further to visit pre-existing drive through businesses, which will become traffic hot-spots. Meanwhile, the greatly increased start-up cost

of enclosing drive-throughs will unfairly deter small local operators, and favor only large national tenants who can absorb the upfront cost. A few final safety concerns are that vehicles exiting such enclosed drive throughs may not have clear sightlines to pedestrians or other vehicles; and there may be a safety issue with enclosing vehicles, occupied by people, inside a building in the event of a vehicle fire. ▪

Airport overlay — This does not reflect 14 CFR Part 150 Noise Exposure Map Sound Study. This exposure map is redrawn every 5 years. The graphic in code is helpful to understand where noise exposure might exist, but it is NOT reflective of the current noise exposure map. The City is losing out on thousands of housing units by enforcing this map, which is not reflective of the sound study. The solution is to tie development to the 14 CFR Part 150 Noise Exposure Map Sound Study. The map could be included for reference, and planners could advise that it is the applicant’s responsibility to check with the airport if a proposed development falls within certain exposure areas. Ultimately, the airport would be able to make the final decision about what development is allowed and where from a noise exposure perspective. If the point is to protect future residents from sound exposure, then the latest science should be used to determine where these contours are located. This map does not achieve that purpose.

▪

We are concerned with the Code usage of the undefined term “vehicle-oriented facility.”

▪

Right now, “alternative form” requests only allow deviations from height and some parking requirements. There is no relief from Form and Layout Standards for each zone. Please allow “alternative form” requests to include deviations from all form and layout standards, including parking and “vehicle-oriented facilities” location.

▪

Parking Requirements – We have deep concern that proposed parking requirements do not accurately reflect the demand for parking for each use. Inadequate parking can be problematic to the ongoing viability of any development; and the only thing worse for a community than no development, is failed development. Certain development types require different amounts of parking in different places. We would appreciate a code that was sensitive to this fact.

Thank you for accepting this letter. We have other concerns that we plan to share in verbal testimony.

Very Sincerely, Ethan Mansfield Predevelopment Project Manager Hawkins Companies

April 20, 2023 Valley Regional Transit (VRT) Comments on Proposed Boise Zoning Ordinance: Dear Boise City Planning and Zoning Commission: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the draft zoning ordinance. The City of Boise has invested on average over $8.5 million a year on operations and capital expenses in our regional transit system in the last five years. Your representatives have supported many planning efforts and we agree that it is in the public interest to ensure new development supports and implements VRT’s Valley Connect 2.0 Plan, VRT Transit Development Plan, the VRT Transit Asset Plan, the State Street Transit and Traffic Operations Plan, the Boise Transportation Action Plan, and the Communities in Motion 2050 regional transportation plan. We support the direction the zoning code is moving in, adding more much needed housing, especially along transit corridors and ensuring the connections, the amenities and the design or those are supportive of transit access and use. Following are comments in specific places on the language of the draft code. 1.

We support 11.01.03 Purpose in general, and specifically section 5. Achieve an integrated approach to land use and transportation to provide a safe, efficient, equitable transportation system for pedestrians, bicyclists, transit, and vehicles. a. In light of that Statement of Purpose, we ask for one small amendment in section 11.01.04 2. A-D. Public Services Excepted; add a specific exception: Transit infrastructure such as bus stops and ADA compliant loading platforms as either Section B. moving all other sections to C.-E. or as a second phrase in Section A.

VRT supports the intensification of activities along existing and potential transit routes, and we support transit supportive elements in such development. a. Specifically, in 11.02.03.1 D.1.iii Amenities - in this section, and in following sections with the same requirement, we request that transit infrastructure be called out as one that may be allowed to meet this requirement, i.e.: iii. Another site feature that improves the experience of pedestrian and/or users of non-motorized vehicles experience, including transit infrastructure, as determined by the Planning Director. b. We support the requirement under 11.02.03.1 D (e) Connectivity, as this will ensure residents and other users of the neighborhood can access transit where it is available, and (f) Parking; No surface parking spaces may be

700 NE 2nd Street, Suite 100

•

Meridian, ID 83642

•

p: 208.345-7433

•

f: 208.846.8564

located between the building and any street adjacent to the property, as this will allow better access to and from transit. We support the same and added connectivity, parking, vehicle-oriented facilities and ground floor design requirements in the sections below, as they also support transit use. 3.

VRT supports the intensification of activities along existing and potential transit routes and the creation of the MX-4 zoning district (see page 38) to support transit-oriented development. We ask the City to strengthen this section and other sections such as MX-5 and MX-U that require coordination with transit infrastructure and service expansion further, with two small additions. a. We ask that you add a phrase in the Purpose statement to honor the planning work VRT has undertaken so that development is anticipating future transit service and not always needing to play catch-up when new service is attained; This zoning district will be expanded as new investments in Best-in-Class Transit Routes are added, new transit service is programmed in the VRT Transit Development Plan five-year work program, and transit stations locations are identified. b. We request a requirement be added in the section of the Code, that the city determines it is appropriate to require an applicant, especially in in the MX-4, MX-5 and MX-U developing adjacent to an existing transit route, or a transit route programmed in the five-year work program, to obtain comments from VRT prior to submitting any request for rezone, site plan (including subdivision), and/or design review application to Boise City. It is much easier for an applicant to incorporate VRT comments during the preliminary design of a project, and before the City begins its formal review of the application.

In the Capital Boulevard Overlay District standards on page 87, we request applicants proposing new or replacement bus stops and bus shelters should be required to submit VRT’s written approval of any proposed transit facilities with their land use and/or building permit application to Boise City. It is easier for the applicant to adjust their plans before they are submitted to the City and should streamline the City’s review of the project.

We support the requirement for a pedestrian connection and signage to the nearest transit stop for mixed-use and multiple-family dwellings on page 248.

Transportation Demand Management Requirements: On Page 260 11.04.08.7 F., the new code offers parking reductions in return for a Transportation Demand Management (TDM) agreement with the City of Boise. We would like to note that both VRT and ACHD currently offer TDM services and that VRT is in the process of evaluating our services with the goal of adding to and strengthening those services. To bring our experience, VRT requests that, as a minimum, we be allowed to review and comment on any Transportation Demand Management Agreement prior to approval by the City as provided for on page 260. Further, VRT offers to work as a partner on the agreements in this section and our team is

ready to work with the City on how that might be achieved. We also propose the following additions of two strategies to the list as numbers 17 and 18 as follows: a. (17) Provide website links to car sharing, ride hailing and other on-demand trip solutions whether public or privately administered. b. (18) Provide emergency ride home services Additionally, we offer the following comments on the TDM section: • We request the City consider how a greater combination of the TDM programs/strategies listed could be subject to a 50 percent limitation on overall parking reduction. Otherwise, developers may pick the easiest and often least meaningful solution(s). However, in combination with multiple programs/strategies the City could truly incentivize more parking reductions. One way to achieve that might be to consider identifying weighted values for proposed programs/strategies; this would add meaning to the following sentence, “Any TDM agreement, whether used independently or in combination with other allowed parking reductions, is subject to the 50 percent limitation on overall parking reduction.” •

We ask that the City explore requiring baseline TDM programs/strategies to be identified in any required Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA), while reserving the ability of the City to consider the full menu of additional options. The goal would be to incentivize a developer to do more TDM while receiving the benefit of parking reductions. This might take some burden off City staff, while requiring more permanent implementation from the developer. The City’s code enforcement officers could then assess compliance with required TDM strategies.

Thank you, again, for the opportunity to forward these comments and look forward to a conversation should you have any questions. Respectfully,

Elaine Clegg CEO Valley Regional Transit

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

Wes Van Dyke <wvandyke@yesco.com> Friday, April 28, 2023 1:32 PM ZoningRewrite; Bob Short [External] ZOA23-00001 & CPA23-00001

Thank you for the opportunity to provide feedback and better understand your proposed new zoning ordinance. I would love to be included on any updates and or events pertaining to the proposed ordinance. I know it covers a very wide array of topics and concerns. I’m sure many of the changes are needed and supported by the residence and business community in Boise. YESCO has had a business presence and 40‐50 employees in Boise for many years. We have enjoyed a great relationship with the Planning Department as well as the local residence. Reading though the sign section of the new ordinance we have a couple concerns regarding electronic signs. 1) Your ordinance 11‐04‐012.4 (7) (5) (b) iv. Pg. 315 references NIT output which is the concern. “The brightness or intensity of the EMD shall be factory set not to exceed 5,000 nits on clear days and 500 nits from dawn to dusk” For the past 20 plus years the number one complaint, in regards to electronic displays, is brightness. Both residence and business owners where frustrated by overly bright electronic displays. They were annoying the residence and too bright at night making it difficult to even read and very distractive. In an effort to regulate the light output many municipalities start using electronic manufacturing devises, NIT guns, to measure NIT output of a electronic display. This only compounded the problem since the NIT guns only calculated the direct output of light, in a controlled environment, and did not take into account the surrounding ambient light. The struggle is the surrounding environment plays such a crucial role on the measurement and what is termed too bright. If you are in a rural area with few street lights the effects of an electronic display, even at 500 NIT, can feel overwhelming. That same display on a well lit roadway with other ambient light will feel quite normal or even dim depending on how much ambient light is present. We have found that the measurement of change in ambient light, foot candles, is a better method to measure and regulate electronic displays. We would love to work with you to provide a better method of regulation, based on foot candles. 2) Once the brightness levels are correctly regulated it will remove the need for additional regulation regarding hold times and transitions. As referenced in 11‐04‐012.4 (7) (5) (b) iv. Pg. 315, Electronic Message Display Standards, “Each message or frame shall be displayed for a minimum of 20 seconds.” The Outdoor Advertising Association of America along with the Federal Highway Administration; have long established safety standards to balance the needs of the business community and concerns of residence to strike a balance. Even the Idaho DOT has adopted an 8 second hold time. This proposed change would mark a huge disadvantage to new electronic message boards; while creating a nighmare for regulators to uphold the new regulation; having different hold times for existing non‐conforming message boards vs new electronic message boards, in the same community.

We would appreciate the opportunity for further updates and dialog on these two specific areas of the new proposed ordinance. Best regards Wes VanDyke

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject:

John Vance <jvance@nwrecc.org> Tuesday, May 9, 2023 3:35 PM ZoningRewrite; Holli Woodings; Jimmy Hallyburton Timothy Keane; Andrea Tuning [External] Boise Zoning Ordinance - Suggested Language Change

Good afternoon, all! I wanted to make a suggestion regarding the proposed Zoning Ordinance for the City of Boise, which was inspired by the “Making the Leap from TOD to TOC” article published by the Urban Land Institute: https://urbanland.uli.org/public/making‐the‐leap‐from‐tod‐to‐ toc/?utm_source=realmagnet&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=HQ%20Urban%20Land%2005%2E8%2E23 The relevant section related to Transit‐Oriented Community is this: The best spaces are the result of a purposeful leap that developers and transit builders have to make together—from transit‐oriented development (TOD) to transit‐ oriented community (TOC). “TOD is a forest of towers beside a transit station,” says Matti Siemiatycki, a professor with Toronto Metropolitan University’s School of Cities. “TOC is exceptional places that people want to spend time in.” Siemiatycki says the difference can be boiled down to three ingredients: density, diversity, and design. “Density means it will be animated with people at all times of the day,” he says. “Diversity is about lots of different uses, so people have lots of different reasons to be there. And design means beautiful placemaking” with such elements as public squares, parks, and promenades. I think including the designation of Transit‐Oriented Community instead of Transit‐Oriented Development would help frame any discussion about what should be built in and around transit hubs within the City of Boise. In addition, the TOC designation should be included on Fairview Avenue where appropriate, particularly the intersections of Fairview and Cole, Fairview and Maple Grove, Fairview and Five Mile. Please let me know if you have any ques ons or require addi onal informa on. Thank you, John T. Vance Senior Property Developer

Northwest Real Estate Capital Corp. 210 W. Mallard Drive, Suite A Boise, Idaho 83706 Direct: (208) 387.7977 1

Oﬃce: (208) 375.9407 Mobile: (303) 638.9847 Email: jvance@nwrecc.org

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Subject:

zoninginfo Thursday, April 27, 2023 4:08 PM ZoningRewrite FW: [External] Support for zoning code rewrite

Jeff Lowe, AICP, CFM Senior Planner Planning and Development Services Office: (208)608‐7075 jtlowe@cityofboise.org cityofboise.org Creating a city for everyone.

‐‐‐‐‐Original Message‐‐‐‐‐ From: Katherine Vaughan <kayvaughan@msn.com> Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2023 9:39 AM To: zoninginfo <zoninginfo@cityofboise.org> Subject: [External] Support for zoning code rewrite I may be too late to comment.. I am a retired homeowner in east Boise. My spouse and I fully support the city’s zoning code rewrite. Thank you for your hard work related to this project. Katherine Vaughan 2194 E Roanoke Dr Boise, ID 83712 Sent from my iPad

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

Hilary S. Vaughn <HSVaughn@hollandhart.com> Thursday, April 20, 2023 5:10 PM ZoningRewrite [External] City of Boise Zoning Code Rewrite

Commissioners, I am writing in support of the proposed rewrite of the City of Boise’s Zoning Code and offering a few additional comments for consideration. As an initial matter, I would like to commend City staff and its consultants for a Herculean effort that included drafting and revising (and revising . . .) a new Code from scratch, researching both new and tested policies in our community and similar cities nationwide, and undertaking an extensive outreach program that sought to include as many Boise residents as possible. It is rare to see a City of any size go to the lengths the City of Boise has to engage its residents in such a transparent way, especially on something as emotional—and sometimes controversial—as this. I had the wonderful opportunity to be a part of the Citizens Advisory Committee that reviewed and provided formal input on the Zoning Code rewrite over the last couple of years and have been consistently impressed with the City’s and the Committee’s organization, professionalism, and respect for everyone involved. I believe the end result of the Zoning Code rewrite process is a Code that prepares the City for growth while preserving the fabric of what created our special community. The new use classifications provide greater flexibility for commercial uses, while focusing the areas where the most intensive development will occur in areas where that growth is already naturally occurring (e.g. downtown) or migrating, and where the City and other collaborating agencies anticipate future transit opportunities. The proposed Code also tackles one of the most pressing needs for the City—housing—by providing for a broader range of housing options and allowing for increased density where it makes sense—i.e. closer to commercial areas with a range of services and along anticipated transit corridors. That the proposed Code accomplishes both of those while largely allowing our existing neighborhoods to remain primarily low‐ and medium‐density residential areas was no small feat, and was very intentional. This thoughtful arrangement of higher and lower intensity uses also allows us to keep and plan for quality open spaces, which has always been a hallmark of our City. One side effect of continuing to rely upon our current, heavily outdated zoning code is that it allows for development to resemble a patchwork quilt, but with little ability to plan for the overall picture. Many developments have been funneled through CUPs or the PUD process for approvals, which has led to widely disparate outcomes and conditions of approval. The lack of certainty in the process increases cost and headaches for developers while also frustrates community members who feel like their voice doesn’t matter. I think a key benefit of the proposed Zoning Code is its ability to provide consistency—developers are able to plan under a clear set of rules and residents will know what standard they can expect developments to attain. I’m hopeful that this will ultimately lead to more confidence in the public process as a whole. Given that backdrop, my concerns with the new Code are small—suggested adjustments rather than grounds for opposition. I would like the Commission to consider the following: 



I would like to see the affordability and sustainability incentives de‐coupled. I think each set of incentives is warranted in its own right and I hate to see sustainability dumped on the back of affordable housing, which already has myriad challenges. I also think that tying these incentives together is likely to result in less affordable housing (and thus, less sustainable product); I’d rather see if we can maximize both categories by allowing these incentives to stand on their own. Demand for childcare facilities in Boise has already far outpaced supply. This problem will only grow as the City adds people and families. The economics of owning and running a day care are challenging enough that a lengthy public process is a non‐starter. I would like to see the City allow childcare facilities as a matter of right in 1



more zones—particularly residential zones—and change it’s classification of “large” daycares by increasing the square footage and number of kids in care. Drive‐throughs are still incredibly restricted under the new Code. While technically permitted in the more intensive MX zones, the requirement that they be fully enclosed imposes a huge hurdle in terms of cost and efficient use of space and isn’t always necessary in order to provide effective screening for pedestrians and neighboring uses. Drive‐throughs ultimately allow for parking reductions and public demand for drive‐through convenience is only increasing. I appreciate that the City is planning for a future with fewer car trips, but we’re decades away from that. Finally, I was very happy to see that the City added allowances for neighborhood markets and cafes in residential zones. We have small commercial pockets within our well‐established residential areas that are flourishing and are an integral part of those neighborhoods. I would like to allow even more of this—i.e. relaxing requirements for interior lots, allowing them to stay open until 10pm (roughly sunset in the summer), and allowing alcohol sales without food service (yes, bars).

Thank you for your consideration and for your service to the City of Boise. I support the adoption of the proposed Zoning Code and believe it is a enormous step in the right direction for our City, even without the modifications proposed above. Regards, Hilary Hilary S. Vaughn She / Her / Hers

(What’s this?)

Of Counsel HOLLAND & HART LLP 800 W. Main Street, Suite 1750, Boise, ID 83702 hsvaughn@hollandhart.com | T: (208) 383-3970 | M: (208) 286-5731 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This message is confidential and may be privileged. If you believe that this email has been sent to you in error, please reply to the sender that you received the message in error; then please delete this email.

May 8, 2023 (via email) Stephan L. Burgos, Works Department Director Haley Falconer, Environmental Division Senior Director Mary Grant, Deputy City Attorney City of Boise 150 N Capitol Blvd Boise, ID 83702 sburgos@cityofboise.org hfalconer@cityofboise.org mrgrant@cityofboise.org zoningrewrite@cityofboise.org Re:

Veolia’s submission of proposed substitute language for the “Assured Water Supply” provisions of Zoning Code Rewrite (ZOA23-00001 and CPA23-00001)

Dear Steve, Haley, and Mary, Thanks much for meeting with me and others from Veolia on April 21, 2023. It is always good to hear each other’s perspective. It is evident that there is substantial common ground with respect to the proposed Zoning Code Rewrite, particularly in the area of promoting water conservation. I will say again that Veolia commends and thanks the City for undertaking this important and long-needed comprehensive revision of the city zoning code. It represents visionary thinking at many levels. Our sole area of disagreement, as you know, is with the Assured Water Supply provisions. At our April meeting, at your suggestion, we agreed to draft an alternative proposal. We put our heads together and developed the enclosed draft language which I am pleased to share with you today. Our proposal includes a strong provision requiring “will serve” letters. This provision builds on and substantially strengthens your proposed section 11-04-010.5.A. We have also revamped and clarified the provisions applicable to individual applicants. Finally, we offer a substitute for the provisions applicable to municipal providers that we believe is consistent with the City’s limited regulatory authority vis-à-vis IDWR. Note that our proposal expands the definition of municipal provider to include anyone in the business of providing potable or non-potable water to municipal developments. This enables individual applicants to rely on multiple water providers to document their Assured Water Supply.

VEOLIA COMMENTS

Page 1 of 2

Veolia remains firmly committed to our ongoing dialog with the City. We would welcome a further opportunity to meet and discuss. In particular, we would appreciate a critique by your legal counsel of the memorandum of law we provided to you as an attachment to our comments of April 20, 2023. Finally, we ask that this letter and the attached proposed code language be included in the record in this proceeding. Sincerely,

Marshall Thompson V.P. & General Manger Veolia Water Idaho Inc. Enclosed: Proposed alternative code language for Assured Water Supply

VEOLIA COMMENTS

Page 2 of 2

PROPOSED SUBSTITUTE LANGUAGE FOR “ASSURED WATER SUPPLY” PROVISIONS IN BOISE CITY ZONING CODE REWRITE Submitted by Veolia Water Idaho Inc. May 8, 2023

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------11-04-010. ASSURED WATER SUPPLY 1. Effective date The requirements set out in this section become effective on July 1, 2024. 2.

Applicant’s Assured Water Supply

A. Applicants are required to submit documentation regarding their Assured Water Supply if and only if they are filing an application under this Code meeting one or more of the following criteria: 1. Any proposed development on previously undeveloped land; 2. Any development or redevelopment that includes the creation of five or more total dwelling units, and 3. All proposed development or redevelopment in a Groundwater Management District (GMD) governed by Chapter 51, Title 42, Idaho Code; Critical Groundwater Area (CGA) or Groundwater Management Area (GMA) defined by Idaho Statute 42-233A and 233B, respectively; or an Aquifer Recharge District (ARD) governed by Chapter 42, Title 42, Idaho Code. This requirement applies whether or not the proposed development requires a subdivision of land. {DRAFTING NOTE: The Adoption Draft contains an exemption for projects that will not increase total consumptive use. That exemption is omitted from this proposed draft. It is difficult or impossible to know how consumptive use may compare without knowing what will happen to the water previously used on the land. For this reason, the proposed draft includes a requirement in subsection 2.C requiring information on that issue. Also, the fact that the land was previously irrigated does not mean that the new water supply for the project (which may come from an entirely different source) is an “assured water supply.”} B. The applicant shall quantify the water demand to be met by its Assured Water Supply by documenting and explaining the amount and timing of water required to BOISE ZONING CODE REWRITE – PROPOSED LANGUAGE 16743048_5.docx (Printed 5/8/2023 10:18 AM)

Page 1 of 5

serve all purposes in the proposed development in all phases through full build-out, including water for domestic use, landscape or other irrigation, commercial use, aesthetic, recreational, or wildlife uses, ponds, water storage, fire protection and firefighting, and any other uses. C. The applicant shall document and explain how the development will comply with requirements respecting landscape irrigation set out in section 11-04-09.3.I. D. For those parts of the applicant’s Assured Water Supply that will not be provided by a water provider (as defined in section 11-06-03), the applicant shall document and explain the following: (1) How water will be supplied and delivered to the development for all purposes as required in subsection (B); (2) Who will provide, manage, and maintain the water supply, treatment works, and delivery system; (3) That the applicant has the financial capability to construct, operate, and maintain the water supply, treatment works, and delivery system, including a discussion of how funding will be provided over the long term; (4) What measures have been or will be put in place to assure the quality of water provided to the serve the development including documentation of current compliance or the future ability to comply with Idaho rules for Public Drinking Water Systems and/or the Recycled Water Rules; and (5) What measures, including redundancy measures, have been or will be put in place to minimize the risk of water shortage. E. If water is used or available for use on the subject property prior to the changes or development sought by the application, the applicant shall describe and explain whether and how that water and associated water rights or other entitlements will be used to serve the proposed development. If some or all water previously used on the property will not be used to serve the proposed development, the applicant shall explain why that water will not be used for the development and what use will be made of it instead. F. Except for that portion of an applicant’s Assured Water Supply that will be provided by a water provider (as defined in section 11-06-03), the applicant shall identify, describe, and quantify each of the water rights or other entitlements that it has acquired or anticipates acquiring in order to meet its Assured Water Supply. G. If the applicant is relying on a water provider to provide some or all of the water in the applicant’s Assured Water Supply, the applicant shall provide a “will serve” letter or other written documentation from each such water provider confirming the water provider’s ability and commitment to serve the development. This documentation from the water provider shall list any specific requirements that must be met by the applicant (such as new facilities that must be constructed, compensation BOISE ZONING CODE REWRITE – PROPOSED LANGUAGE 16743048_5.docx (Printed 5/8/2023 10:18 AM)

Page 2 of 5

payments, deadlines, etc.). The applicant, in turn, shall submit to the Planning Director or his or her designee documentation accompanying each “will serve” letter showing that the applicant is able and committed to satisfy each of those requirements within the timeframe or expiration date specified in the “will serve” letter. {DRAFTING NOTE: This subsection replaces and expands upon section 11-04-010.5.A of the City’s “Adoption Draft.” The City may wish to add a requirement that the applicant provide follow-up documentation showing that it has satisfied the requirements set out in the “will serve” letter and that municipal water service is or will be provided prior to the expiration of the “will serve” letter. That might be a code provision, or it might be simply a requirement added to the entitlement approval.} H. If the property is located in a Groundwater Management District (GMD), Critical Groundwater Area (CGA), Groundwater Management Area (GMA), or Aquifer Recharge District (ARD), the applicant shall demonstrate that applicable standards and requirement are or will be met. I. The applicant’s documentation of its Assured Water Supply as provided herein shall be submitted to the Planning Director or his designee on a form acceptable to the City Attorney and include a written representation by the applicant that: (1) The information is true and complete to the best of their knowledge; (2) The representations are binding upon the applicant and its successors in interest; and (3) The individual executing the written representation has any and all required authorization to submit the materials on behalf of the applicant. J. Upon review by the Planning Director or his/her designee of the applicant’s documentation of an Assured Water Supply, the Planning Director or his/her designee shall either certify that the applicant’s Assured Water Supply meets the requirements of this section, decline to certify it, or request additional information. The certification shall remain effective until the applicant is required to recertify. K. The applicant must submit updated documentation of its Assured Water Supply and seek re-certification by the Planning Director or his/her designee if any of the following occur: (1) More than ten years have passed since obtaining the last certification by the Planning Director or his/her designee; (2) The development that was the subject of the application has changed in scope such that there is a significant change in the extent of current or anticipated water demand or significant change in the source of water supply for the Assured Water Supply; or (3) The City has experienced extreme or exceptional drought, according to the United States Drought Monitor, for a BOISE ZONING CODE REWRITE – PROPOSED LANGUAGE 16743048_5.docx (Printed 5/8/2023 10:18 AM)

Page 3 of 5

majority of months within each calendar year for a period of three consecutive years. 3.

Water provider’s Assured Water Supply

All water providers serving customers within the city limits are requested to meet with appropriate City officials and staff from time to time to discuss the water provider’s ability to provide an Assured Water Supply sufficient to meet current and anticipated needs of its customers within the city limits over the course of the next 30 to 50 years. The City will also share information with the water provider regarding the City’s efforts and plans regarding its own municipal water supply and distribution system as well as its undertakings and plans regarding water quality and water reuse. This City and the water provider will also endeavor to cooperate in efforts by both the City and the water provider to maximize water conservation, efficiency, and reuse consistent with public health, water quality, other regulatory requirements. Finally, the City and the water provider will explore ways to effectively communicate with the public and to obtain public input regarding each of the matters described above. The purpose of these meetings is to enhance cooperation and to facilitate the exchange of information and ideas among the City, water providers, and the public.

11-06-03. DEFINITIONS Applicant An applicant is an individual, corporation, firm, group, or other entity that submits an application under this Code. If the applicant is not the property owner, the property owner’s written permission to submit the application shall be included with submittal materials. {DRAFTING NOTE: This modifies the definition in the City’s Adoption Draft in the following ways: First, it expands the list of entities who may be applicants (by adding “or other entity.” Second, it deletes “or who represents an applicant under this Code.” This is done to make clear that a consultant or lawyer is not obligated to submit an Assured Water Supply. Third, the provision regarding when the applicant is not the property owner should be moved to the substantive provisions. This does not belong in a definition.} Assured Water Supply In the context of an applicant, Assured Water Supply means a safe and reliable supply of water sufficient to meet the demand at buildout of the development for which the application is sought . In the context of a water provider, Assured Water Supply means a safe and reliable supply of water sufficient to meet the current and reasonably anticipated future demand of its customers within the city limits.

BOISE ZONING CODE REWRITE – PROPOSED LANGUAGE 16743048_5.docx (Printed 5/8/2023 10:18 AM)

Page 4 of 5

Water provider A water provider is any of the following: (a) a corporation or association authorized by the Idaho Public Utilities Commission to supply water for municipal purposes to customers within a service area that includes the City of Boise; (b) a corporation or association that supplies water for municipal purposes to persons or entities within the City of Boise through a water system regulated by the state of Idaho as a “public water supply” as described in section 39-103(12), Idaho Code; or (c) an irrigation district, canal company, or other corporation or association that supplies water for landscape or other irrigation to customers, members, or landowners within the City of Boise. {DRAFTING NOTE: This is a new definition. It expands the applicability set out in the Adoption Draft to include other entities, for example those providing irrigation water. This enables the applicant to rely on a combination of entities like Veolia and an irrigation district, for example, when documenting the applicant’s Assured Water Supply. Note also: IDWR and the Idaho Water Code define municipal provider differently that the term used here. Accordingly, this draft employs the term “water provider” to avoid confusion with “municipal provider.”}

BOISE ZONING CODE REWRITE – PROPOSED LANGUAGE 16743048_5.docx (Printed 5/8/2023 10:18 AM)

Page 5 of 5

Andrea Tuning From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments:

Thompson, Marshall <marshall.thompson@veolia.com> Monday, May 8, 2023 2:14 PM Steve Burgos; Haley Falconer; Mary Grant; ZoningRewrite Christopher H Meyer; Catherine Cooper; Jane Kreller; Ochner, Cynthia [External] Proposed Zoning Code Language ProposedCodeLanaguage_Final.PDF

Dear Steve, Haley, and Mary, Thank you for meeting with Veolia on April 21, 2023. It is always good to hear each other’s perspective. As discussed in our April meeting, Veolia has developed the enclosed draft language pertaining to several areas of the drafted code's assured water supply provisions. We remain committed to our ongoing dialog with the City on this matter, and look forward to our next opportunity to meet in person. Sincerely ‐‐ Marshall Thompson VP & General Manager Municipal Water, Idaho Utility Operations VEOLIA NORTH AMERICA, UNITED STATES tel

+1 208 362 7377 / cell

+1 208 571 0651

8248 W Victory Rd, Boise, ID 83709 marshall.thompson@veolia.com www.veolianorthamerica.com To help pr priv acy , M prev ented download from the In

To help protect y ou r priv acy , Micro so ft Office prev ented au tomatic download of this pictu re from the Internet.

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

jane wallace <janers.wallace@gmail.com> Sunday, April 23, 2023 3:33 PM ZoningRewrite [External] Upzoning

Please make sure developers are required to make a percentage of new apartments and townhouses 3‐bedroom units. That will make sure families can stay in the city and not have to move to suburbs if they don’t want to. Thank you, Jane Wallace 4512 W Kootenai St

Madison Lockhorn From: Sent: To: Subject:

noreply@cityofboise.org Sunday, April 23, 2023 7:58 AM ZoningRewrite A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted

The following information was submitted: Name Janice Werle Email werlejan1@gmail.com Address Boise, ID 83709 Comment 11‐07‐03b ‐ Trailers, camp trailers, boats, boat trailers, recreational vehicles, and all other vehicles not in daily use are restricted from parking in the front and street side yard setbacks or unimproved parking areas. [Comment: "all other vehicles not in daily use" says that I can't have a working vehicle sit in my driveway the 2‐3 days I may be off work; THIS IS AN UNREASONABLE AND ONEROUS REGULATION. Please update the timeframe to reflect the broadest possible valid timeframe ‐ 4 days? Medical and Jail/Prison personnel often work 12 hour shifts.] If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot