From: noreply@cityofboise.org
Sent: Saturday, April 1, 2023 9:58 PM
To: ZoningRewrite
Subject: A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted
The following information was submitted:
Name
Andrew Bennett
Email bennett.andrew1234@gmail.com
Address
4020 N Delmonte Dr
Comment
Dear Mayor,
I Sincerely ask for a longer period of time to review the news only laws, because the new 611 page document takes me a long time to read after many hours of work during the day. I ask for more time to read over the document and the proposed changes to the zoning because this will affect my community and my neighborhood.
Thank you for extending the period of time to review these important documents.
Sincerely,
Andrew Bennett
If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot
1
Madison Lockhorn
From: noreply@cityofboise.org
Sent: Saturday, April 1, 2023 9:58 PM
To: ZoningRewrite
Subject: A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted
The following information was submitted:
Name
Andrew Bennett
Email bennett.andrew1234@gmail.com
Address
4020 N Delmonte Dr
Comment
Dear Mayor,
I Sincerely ask for a longer period of time to review the news only laws, because the new 611 page document takes me a long time to read after many hours of work during the day. I ask for more time to read over the document and the proposed changes to the zoning because this will affect my community and my neighborhood.
Thank you for extending the period of time to review these important documents.
Sincerely,
Andrew Bennett
If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot
1
Madison Lockhorn
From: George E. Bernick <jgbernick@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, April 3, 2023 7:47 AM
To: ZoningRewrite
Subject: [External] Tim Keane
What did Tim Mean actually accomplish in Atlanta and why did Atlanta decide it was time for him to go? Important questions to be made public before his plan to increase population density in Boise is put into effect.
1
Madison Lockhorn
From: George E. Bernick <jgbernick@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, April 3, 2023 7:47 AM
To: ZoningRewrite
Subject: [External] Tim Keane
What did Tim Mean actually accomplish in Atlanta and why did Atlanta decide it was time for him to go? Important questions to be made public before his plan to increase population density in Boise is put into effect.
1
Madison Lockhorn
From: wblair4318@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of William Blair <wblair4318 @everyactioncustom.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 6, 2023 4:50 PM
To: ZoningRewrite
Subject: [External] Vote Yes on the Zoning Code Rewrite
Dear Planning and Zoning Commission,
I am writing to express my support for the Zoning Code Rewrite. The sustainability, affordability, and open space protections included in the new zoning code rewrite are exactly what Boise needs to plan for and address our rapidly growing city.
Sincerely,
Mr William Blair
622 BRAMPTON Dr Boise, ID 83709 wblair4318@aol.com
1
Madison Lockhorn
From: wblair4318@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of William Blair <wblair4318 @everyactioncustom.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 6, 2023 4:50 PM
To: ZoningRewrite
Subject: [External] Vote Yes on the Zoning Code Rewrite
Dear Planning and Zoning Commission,
I am writing to express my support for the Zoning Code Rewrite. The sustainability, affordability, and open space protections included in the new zoning code rewrite are exactly what Boise needs to plan for and address our rapidly growing city.
Sincerely,
Mr William Blair
622 BRAMPTON Dr Boise, ID 83709 wblair4318@aol.com
1
Madison Lockhorn
Madison Lockhorn
From: noreply@cityofboise.org
Sent: Wednesday, April 5, 2023 12:02 PM
To: ZoningRewrite
Subject: A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted
The following information was submitted:
Name Stephen Cox
Email stephenscox@yahoo.com
Address
5190 N EDENBURGH WAY, Boise 83714
Comment
The proposed code changes to the R‐1C Zone are unacceptable. We purchased our home in 2002 because of the neighborhood characteristics of single‐family homes on moderate‐sized lots (generally 7,000 to 10,000 square feet. The new code would allow these homes to be redeveloped into multi‐family, multi‐story units jammed onto lots 1/2 the size of existing lots and without requiring any P&Z Commission review and therefore no public comment. Multiple new uses would also be permitted without any public comment or review. Although the proposed code retains the R‐1C zoning for our area (Coventry Manor Sub., our proximity to State Street, the existing "apartmentalization" east of Pierce Park, and the proposed high‐density development on the former Plantation golf course across State Street would place our neighborhood at risk of invasion by new development that would destroy the very characteristics that we have enjoyed for over 20 years.
I do not know who served on the "citizen advisory committee" for the rezone process, but they did not do a good job of protecting long‐standing neighborhoods across Boise. They seem to have been selected for their support of a Mayor and Council‐driven agenda rather than providing a true community perspective. Also, it appears that Planning staff have been directed, either overly or covertly, to provide a new code that enhances the power of the planning bureaucracy at the expense of citizen review by removing the P&Z Commission from many of the decisions that will drastically affect our neighborhoods.
This new code should not receive consideration until after City Council elections by districts have been held and a new Council seated.
If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot
1
Madison Lockhorn
From: noreply@cityofboise.org
Sent: Wednesday, April 5, 2023 12:02 PM
To: ZoningRewrite
Subject: A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted
The following information was submitted:
Name Stephen Cox
Email stephenscox@yahoo.com
Address
5190 N EDENBURGH WAY, Boise 83714
Comment
The proposed code changes to the R‐1C Zone are unacceptable. We purchased our home in 2002 because of the neighborhood characteristics of single‐family homes on moderate‐sized lots (generally 7,000 to 10,000 square feet. The new code would allow these homes to be redeveloped into multi‐family, multi‐story units jammed onto lots 1/2 the size of existing lots and without requiring any P&Z Commission review and therefore no public comment. Multiple new uses would also be permitted without any public comment or review. Although the proposed code retains the R‐1C zoning for our area (Coventry Manor Sub., our proximity to State Street, the existing "apartmentalization" east of Pierce Park, and the proposed high‐density development on the former Plantation golf course across State Street would place our neighborhood at risk of invasion by new development that would destroy the very characteristics that we have enjoyed for over 20 years.
I do not know who served on the "citizen advisory committee" for the rezone process, but they did not do a good job of protecting long‐standing neighborhoods across Boise. They seem to have been selected for their support of a Mayor and Council‐driven agenda rather than providing a true community perspective. Also, it appears that Planning staff have been directed, either overly or covertly, to provide a new code that enhances the power of the planning bureaucracy at the expense of citizen review by removing the P&Z Commission from many of the decisions that will drastically affect our neighborhoods.
This new code should not receive consideration until after City Council elections by districts have been held and a new Council seated.
If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot
1
Madison Lockhorn
From: dahlinsm@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Samuel Dahlin <dahlinsm@everyactioncustom.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 6, 2023 1:23 PM
To: ZoningRewrite
Subject: [External] Vote Yes on the Zoning Code Rewrite
Dear Planning and Zoning Commission,
I am writing to express my support for the Zoning Code Rewrite. The sustainability, affordability, and open space protections included in the new zoning code rewrite are exactly what Boise needs to plan for and address our rapidly growing city.
Thank you for your work!
Sincerely,
Mr. Samuel Dahlin 4303 W Plum St Boise, ID 83703‐4420 dahlinsm@gmail.com
1
Madison Lockhorn
From: dahlinsm@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Samuel Dahlin <dahlinsm@everyactioncustom.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 6, 2023 1:23 PM
To: ZoningRewrite
Subject: [External] Vote Yes on the Zoning Code Rewrite
Dear Planning and Zoning Commission,
I am writing to express my support for the Zoning Code Rewrite. The sustainability, affordability, and open space protections included in the new zoning code rewrite are exactly what Boise needs to plan for and address our rapidly growing city.
Thank you for your work!
Sincerely,
Mr. Samuel Dahlin 4303 W Plum St Boise, ID 83703‐4420 dahlinsm@gmail.com
1
Madison Lockhorn
From: jvandinter@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of James Van Dinter <jvandinter@everyactioncustom.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 6, 2023 2:32 PM
To: ZoningRewrite
Subject: [External] Vote Yes on the Zoning Code Rewrite
Dear Planning and Zoning Commission,
I am writing to express my support for the Zoning Code Rewrite. The sustainability, affordability, and open space protections included in the new zoning code rewrite are exactly what Boise needs to plan for and address our rapidly growing city.
Sincerely,
Mr. James Van Dinter
12088 W Tidewater Dr Boise, ID 83713‐6638 jvandinter@centurylink.net
1
Madison Lockhorn
From: jvandinter@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of James Van Dinter <jvandinter@everyactioncustom.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 6, 2023 2:32 PM
To: ZoningRewrite
Subject: [External] Vote Yes on the Zoning Code Rewrite
Dear Planning and Zoning Commission,
I am writing to express my support for the Zoning Code Rewrite. The sustainability, affordability, and open space protections included in the new zoning code rewrite are exactly what Boise needs to plan for and address our rapidly growing city.
Sincerely,
Mr. James Van Dinter
12088 W Tidewater Dr Boise, ID 83713‐6638 jvandinter@centurylink.net
1
Madison Lockhorn
From: Slobodanka Hodzic <shodzic@jannus.org>
Sent: Wednesday, April 5, 2023 1:02 PM
To: ZoningRewrite
Subject: [External] Support for the update of local zoning code
Hello,
I would like to express support for the update of Boise zoning code. It has been long overdue, and we are really in need of more inclusive housing opportuni es. As somebody who arrived as a refugee and has been working with new Americans for the last twenty years, I have seen huge changes in housing availability and affordability. Also, as a parent of young adults who are looking to buy their first home, I have seen how much younger genera ons and lower income families have been struggling to find affordable housing opportuni es. Housing is a building block for safety, security, and prosperity. Without secure housing all other plans and services are impossible to achieve.
Changing the zoning code to allow more affordable and inclusive housing is the only way to address the need to increase housing opportuni es. We cannot close our eyes and pretend that Boise is growing. Addressing the growth in strategical way is the right way to work on this issue.
Thank you,
Slobodanka Hodzic
(pronouns: she, her Why pronouns are important!
Program Director
Agency for New Americans
1614 W. Jefferson St. Boise, ID 83702
shodzic@jannus.org
I http://www.anaidaho.org/ 208.955.0160
1
Madison Lockhorn
From: Slobodanka Hodzic <shodzic@jannus.org>
Sent: Wednesday, April 5, 2023 1:02 PM
To: ZoningRewrite
Subject: [External] Support for the update of local zoning code
Hello,
I would like to express support for the update of Boise zoning code. It has been long overdue, and we are really in need of more inclusive housing opportuni es. As somebody who arrived as a refugee and has been working with new Americans for the last twenty years, I have seen huge changes in housing availability and affordability. Also, as a parent of young adults who are looking to buy their first home, I have seen how much younger genera ons and lower income families have been struggling to find affordable housing opportuni es. Housing is a building block for safety, security, and prosperity. Without secure housing all other plans and services are impossible to achieve.
Changing the zoning code to allow more affordable and inclusive housing is the only way to address the need to increase housing opportuni es. We cannot close our eyes and pretend that Boise is growing. Addressing the growth in strategical way is the right way to work on this issue.
Thank you,
Slobodanka Hodzic
(pronouns: she, her Why pronouns are important!
Program Director
Agency for New Americans
1614 W. Jefferson St. Boise, ID 83702
shodzic@jannus.org
I http://www.anaidaho.org/ 208.955.0160
1
Madison Lockhorn
From: Dave Kangas <davekangas@msn.com>
Sent: Friday, March 31, 2023 5:35 PM
To: ZoningRewrite
Subject: [External] Fw: Zoned out March 30 event results
Attachments: 20230331_153135.jpg; processed-673c6705-90fd-40ec-bd85-e60dc96d46d3_UVwQYVbc.jpeg; processed-e5905f7a-02b6-4848-b916-47444902bab4_tkSNBUVP.jpeg; QUESTIONNAIRE MARCH 30 ZONED OUT EVENT.docx
On March 30 Boise Working Together/RejectBoiseUpzone held an event at Hillcrest library where we watch the ZonedOut video from Austin, TX. The video was followed up with an open q and a with members of the RBU effort.
This event was attended by 52 attenndees, 25 of whom filled out a questionnaire we put together at the last minute. Here are the results of that questionaire and some follow up comments that were added. The questionnaire numerical order was not proof read before printing, I left it alone for forwarding.
I think the result speak for themselves. A couple of the questions could be clearer. I believe there is a distinct difference in support for ZCR based on age group. Since the majority of our attendees are seniors I can't speak for the other age groups though. If you need copies of the individual filled out forms to be included in the record, let me know. We did not ask for names, etc on these forms, just on the check in registration forms.
Dave Kangas President
Boise Working Together
208-841-0580
davekangas@msn.com
From: Dave Kangas
Sent: Friday, March 31, 2023 4:18 PM
To: davekangas@msn.com <davekangas@msn.com>
Subject: Zoned out March 30 event results
Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
Get Outlook for Android
1
QUESTIONAIRE 25 responses from
50+
Zoned Out screening event- Hillcrest Library
1- From the video do you think Austin compares to Boise? 20 YES, 1 NO, 4 NA
2- Do you think Boise should wait for final approval until a City Council is elected and seated representing all 6 districts? 24 YES, 1 NO
3- Do you support funding and building infrastructure for transit? 9 YES, 14 NO
4- Do you support increasing density on main corridors for transit? 6 YES, 19 NO
5- Do you support increasing density with multifamily homes and small apartments in neighborhoods to support transit? 2 YES, 22 NO, 1 NA
6- Do you think the state legislature should fund transit? 11 YES, 12 NO 1 NA
7- Do you think the state legislature will ever fund transit? 3 YES, 20 NO, 2 NA
8- Do you support new multifamily up to 4 units in neighborhoods?0 Y, 22 N,3 NA
9- Do you support remodeling current single-family homes in neighborhoods into multfamily homes or small apartments of up to 12 units? 0 YES, 25 NO
10- Do you support the idea of new developments in single family homes neighborhoods being up to 40 ft high and 3 stories? 0 YES, 24 NO, 1 NA
11- Do you support increasing height limits in r-2 (45 feet) and r-3 (55 ft)medium density and high-density zones? 1 YES, 23 NO, 1 NA
12- Do you feel the city is doing well in educating you on the zoning code rewrite? 1 YES, 24 NO
13- Do you support the idea of increasing density, height and allowed uses to promote more growth in Boise? 0 YES, 23 NO, 2 NA
14- How did you find out about the zoning code rewrite? the City-5 local news-1 yard signs-7 Reject Boise Upzone- 16 NestDoor- 2
16- Have you submitted comments on the zoning code rewrite? 11-Y, 13 N, 1 NA
17- Do you support the zoning code rewrite as currently written? 1-Y, 23-N,1-NA
18- Do you support required parking reductions for new multifamily and apartment projects? 0 YES, 20-NO, 5- NA
19- Would support higher density if code required affordable units? 2-YES, 15-NO ,8 NA
20- Do you support what RejectBoiseUpzone is trying to do?19-YES, 2- NO, 4 NA
21- Do you own a car or truck? 24-YES, 1 NO
22- How many registered vehicles(cars/atvs/boats) does your household have?
53 ttl from 22 responses= 2.4 vehicle avg 1- excluded with 11 vehicles.
23- How old are you? (20-30)-O (30-40)-2 (40-50)-1 (50-60)-1 (60+)-18
24- Employment- empoyed?-5 self employed -0 retired-20
25- Do you consider yourself- low/med income- 2 middle income- 22 upper income- 1
26- What concerns you the most about the zoning code rewrite? choose all that apply
Lack of education by the city of Boise- 13
Change - 5 New construction changing your neighborhood - 18
More traffic- -21 Higher housing costs-19 Higher taxes -18
More people-18 More crime-17 Loss of privacy (higher buildings)-18
28- Do you think the impacts of the zoning code rewrite will be spread across the city equally? 0- YES, 24- NO, 1- NA
29 Where do you live? Bench-8 West Boise-6 SW-0 NW-2 North end-1 NE Boise- 1 SE- 5
27- Would support density for requiring home ownership? 1 YES, 12 NO, 12 NA (question not written well)
28- Final thoughts? 11 had \additional written comments see attached photos.
Madison Lockhorn
From: Dave Kangas <davekangas@msn.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 4, 2023 10:06 AM
To: ZoningRewrite
Subject: [External] Minimum lot width R1C and R2
The issue of minimum lot width has already been proven by trial and error through the substandard lot ordinance.
Back in the early 2000's a builder/developer- Chuck Storey obtained 12 contiguous substandard lots on Lemhi, just west of Vista. at that time, PDS wanted him to create a drive and alley behind is properties, incurring a great expense, a lot of time and losing two buildable lots. Instead, he just decided to build what current allowed, 12 homes with front load garages.
This style had already been across the street on Lemhi 2-3 times. In the ensuing years 2-4 more were also built across the street.
The issues came about dues to lack of on-street parking in front of these residences, due to 25' widths and driveways. Other residences on Lemhi had issues with garbage collection, mail delivery, blocked driveways.
The fix was to require a minimum lot width of 37.5 feet when a property did not have alleys at the rear of the property. 37.5 feet was half the width of 3 contiguous substandard lots.
I believe this lot width criteria has been removed. I do not think it wise to repeat past mistakes when proven solutions have been created and successfully implemented. reducing the minimum lot size to 3500 sq ft and 2500 sq ft in r2 with minimum lot widths of 25' will duplicate this past issue.
Please put the 37.5 ft wide minimum lot width for properties without alleys back in. It just makes sense and it works.
Dave Kangas ‐ Realtor
208.841‐0580 | dave@callisongroup.com
Callison Group Real Estate Dave.Callisonhomes.com
For personal communications, not related to real estate: davekangas@msn.com
1
Madison Lockhorn
From: Dave Kangas <davekangas@msn.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 4, 2023 10:06 AM
To: ZoningRewrite
Subject: [External] Minimum lot width R1C and R2
The issue of minimum lot width has already been proven by trial and error through the substandard lot ordinance.
Back in the early 2000's a builder/developer- Chuck Storey obtained 12 contiguous substandard lots on Lemhi, just west of Vista. at that time, PDS wanted him to create a drive and alley behind is properties, incurring a great expense, a lot of time and losing two buildable lots. Instead, he just decided to build what current allowed, 12 homes with front load garages.
This style had already been across the street on Lemhi 2-3 times. In the ensuing years 2-4 more were also built across the street.
The issues came about dues to lack of on-street parking in front of these residences, due to 25' widths and driveways. Other residences on Lemhi had issues with garbage collection, mail delivery, blocked driveways.
The fix was to require a minimum lot width of 37.5 feet when a property did not have alleys at the rear of the property. 37.5 feet was half the width of 3 contiguous substandard lots.
I believe this lot width criteria has been removed. I do not think it wise to repeat past mistakes when proven solutions have been created and successfully implemented. reducing the minimum lot size to 3500 sq ft and 2500 sq ft in r2 with minimum lot widths of 25' will duplicate this past issue.
Please put the 37.5 ft wide minimum lot width for properties without alleys back in. It just makes sense and it works.
Dave Kangas ‐ Realtor
208.841‐0580 | dave@callisongroup.com
Callison Group Real Estate Dave.Callisonhomes.com
For personal communications, not related to real estate: davekangas@msn.com
1
Madison Lockhorn
From: Dave Kangas <davekangas@msn.com>
Sent: Friday, March 31, 2023 5:21 PM
To: ZoningRewrite; Andrea Tuning; Timothy Keane
Subject: [External] implementation date/ approved rezonnes reapplying/ displacment zones
A concern came up, about developers with projects already approved for rezones with DA's, not starting construction until the rewrite is approved and then re submitting applications based on the revised new zoning laws.
For example, the development on Palouse, coming back with their original application for 47 units, 3 stories tall, etc. which would be okay in r2 zoning.
Any thoughts?
I also feel that R2 and R3 willl nneeds some displacement protections/conditions for trailer courts. The VNA has four significant ones in these zones.
Dave Kangas ‐ Realtor
208.841‐0580 | dave@callisongroup.com
Callison Group Real Estate Dave.Callisonhomes.com
For personal communications, not related to real estate: davekangas@msn.com
1
Madison Lockhorn
From: Dave Kangas <davekangas@msn.com>
Sent: Friday, March 31, 2023 5:21 PM
To: ZoningRewrite; Andrea Tuning; Timothy Keane
Subject: [External] implementation date/ approved rezonnes reapplying/ displacment zones
A concern came up, about developers with projects already approved for rezones with DA's, not starting construction until the rewrite is approved and then re submitting applications based on the revised new zoning laws.
For example, the development on Palouse, coming back with their original application for 47 units, 3 stories tall, etc. which would be okay in r2 zoning.
Any thoughts?
I also feel that R2 and R3 willl nneeds some displacement protections/conditions for trailer courts. The VNA has four significant ones in these zones.
Dave Kangas ‐ Realtor
208.841‐0580 | dave@callisongroup.com
Callison Group Real Estate Dave.Callisonhomes.com
For personal communications, not related to real estate: davekangas@msn.com
1
Madison Lockhorn
From: dkemper398@gmail.com
Sent: Thursday, April 6, 2023 10:31 AM
To: ZoningRewrite
Subject: [External] Comment on the Zoning Rewrite
The zoning rewrite is absolutely needed to posi on Boise for a livable future. Things I like the most:
Smaller lot sizes (less impact on the coming water crises)
More walkable and bikeable solu ons for daily life
Less focus on cars and less space wasted on parking.
More affordable op ons for teachers, police, firefighters, librarians and others on limited public salaries.
More density around corridors that will promote public transporta on and eventually reduce traffic jams. Stay the course. These changes are what we need to keep Boise the great place to live that it has always been.
Don Kemper
1821 Edgecliff Terrace 83702
1
Madison Lockhorn
From: dkemper398@gmail.com
Sent: Thursday, April 6, 2023 10:31 AM
To: ZoningRewrite
Subject: [External] Comment on the Zoning Rewrite
The zoning rewrite is absolutely needed to posi on Boise for a livable future. Things I like the most:
Smaller lot sizes (less impact on the coming water crises)
More walkable and bikeable solu ons for daily life
Less focus on cars and less space wasted on parking.
More affordable op ons for teachers, police, firefighters, librarians and others on limited public salaries.
More density around corridors that will promote public transporta on and eventually reduce traffic jams. Stay the course. These changes are what we need to keep Boise the great place to live that it has always been.
Don Kemper
1821 Edgecliff Terrace 83702
1
From: Michelle Larson <mmmlarson@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, April 3, 2023 10:05 AM
To: ZoningRewrite
Subject: [External] Support of New Zoning
I am a 40 year resident of Boise city and have watched the tremendous growth we have experienced at various times, especially in the last 10 years. I am in full support of the new zoning rewrite you have worked on so diligently for the past few years. I work with people who have come as refugees to the Treasure Valley and I also support Leap Charities to support low income housing in the Treasure Valley.
Thank you for your hard work and please add me to any additional mailing lists to help support this work.
All the best,
Michelle M Larson
4658 N Zimri Place
Boise, ID. 83713
1
Madison Lockhorn
From: Michelle Larson <mmmlarson@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, April 3, 2023 10:05 AM
To: ZoningRewrite
Subject: [External] Support of New Zoning
I am a 40 year resident of Boise city and have watched the tremendous growth we have experienced at various times, especially in the last 10 years. I am in full support of the new zoning rewrite you have worked on so diligently for the past few years. I work with people who have come as refugees to the Treasure Valley and I also support Leap Charities to support low income housing in the Treasure Valley.
Thank you for your hard work and please add me to any additional mailing lists to help support this work.
All the best,
Michelle M Larson
4658 N Zimri Place
Boise, ID. 83713
1
Madison Lockhorn
Madison Lockhorn
From: donnalooze@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Donna Looze <donnalooze@everyactioncustom.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 6, 2023 4:16 PM
To: ZoningRewrite
Subject: [External] Vote Yes on the Zoning Code Rewrite
Dear Planning and Zoning Commission,
I am writing to express my support for the Zoning Code Rewrite. The sustainability, affordability, and open space protections included in the new zoning code rewrite are exactly what Boise needs to plan for and address our rapidly growing city. I am elated to see the wonderful job that has been done. Having sat on the P&Z Board in Pocatello for a number of years, I am aware of all that is entailed in a zoning code rewrite. Please accept my congratulations on a job well done!
Sincerely,
Mrs. Donna Looze
3150 E Nature Dr Boise, ID 83706‐6920
donnalooze@gmail.com
1
Madison Lockhorn
From: donnalooze@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Donna Looze <donnalooze@everyactioncustom.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 6, 2023 4:16 PM
To: ZoningRewrite
Subject: [External] Vote Yes on the Zoning Code Rewrite
Dear Planning and Zoning Commission,
I am writing to express my support for the Zoning Code Rewrite. The sustainability, affordability, and open space protections included in the new zoning code rewrite are exactly what Boise needs to plan for and address our rapidly growing city. I am elated to see the wonderful job that has been done. Having sat on the P&Z Board in Pocatello for a number of years, I am aware of all that is entailed in a zoning code rewrite. Please accept my congratulations on a job well done!
Sincerely,
Mrs. Donna Looze
3150 E Nature Dr Boise, ID 83706‐6920
donnalooze@gmail.com
1
From: barbara_mark50@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Barbara Mark <barbara_mark50 @everyactioncustom.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 6, 2023 2:53 PM
To: ZoningRewrite
Subject: [External] Vote Yes on the Zoning Code Rewrite
Dear Planning and Zoning Commission,
I am writing to express my support for the Zoning Code Rewrite. The sustainability, affordability, and open space protections included in the new zoning code rewrite are exactly what Boise needs to plan for and address our rapidly growing city.
Sincerely,
Mrs. Barbara Mark
233 W Redfish Ln Boise, ID 83706‐4841 barbara_mark50@yahoo.com
1
Madison Lockhorn
From: barbara_mark50@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Barbara Mark <barbara_mark50 @everyactioncustom.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 6, 2023 2:53 PM
To: ZoningRewrite
Subject: [External] Vote Yes on the Zoning Code Rewrite
Dear Planning and Zoning Commission,
I am writing to express my support for the Zoning Code Rewrite. The sustainability, affordability, and open space protections included in the new zoning code rewrite are exactly what Boise needs to plan for and address our rapidly growing city.
Sincerely,
Mrs. Barbara Mark
233 W Redfish Ln Boise, ID 83706‐4841 barbara_mark50@yahoo.com
1
Madison Lockhorn
Madison Lockhorn
From: noreply@cityofboise.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 4, 2023 4:31 PM
To: ZoningRewrite
Subject: A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted
The following information was submitted:
Name Martha
Email marthastu@gmail.com
Address
263o E Starcrest Dr Boise 83712
Comment
I have lived at this address for 46 years. At 2642 there have been low income renters for past 18 years. It has been unbelievably horrible. They trash the place by destroying the inside and outside of the home which used to be a show place . Our neighborhood has had the police , hill protection services up here more times than I can count . Plus the city advertises for people to call to get help when they can not pay their rent. Thus prolonging the misery of the neighborhood
And Now the city wants to put low income housing units into already established neighborhoods along with cafes and Commerical buildings have you all gone mad?
As for riding transport buses in the city‐ crazy. No one wants to ride a bus or a trolly to get anywhere in the city of Boise.
What should have been done years ago, is to have highways built that circle the city like Phoenix and Salt Lake. But no , you did not and now we are in a mess . No long term thinking in that area.
Back to the city rewrite if the code ‐ please do not do this! I do not want a cafe next to my home with cars coming and going at all hours or my neighbor deciding their lot is so big they can build another small home or duplex. With parking being allowed all over the street. I am against the city code rewrite Do not vote for it ! No!No! No!
If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot
1
Madison Lockhorn
From: noreply@cityofboise.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 4, 2023 4:31 PM
To: ZoningRewrite
Subject: A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted
The following information was submitted:
Name Martha
Email marthastu@gmail.com
Address
263o E Starcrest Dr Boise 83712
Comment
I have lived at this address for 46 years. At 2642 there have been low income renters for past 18 years. It has been unbelievably horrible. They trash the place by destroying the inside and outside of the home which used to be a show place . Our neighborhood has had the police , hill protection services up here more times than I can count . Plus the city advertises for people to call to get help when they can not pay their rent. Thus prolonging the misery of the neighborhood
And Now the city wants to put low income housing units into already established neighborhoods along with cafes and Commerical buildings have you all gone mad?
As for riding transport buses in the city‐ crazy. No one wants to ride a bus or a trolly to get anywhere in the city of Boise.
What should have been done years ago, is to have highways built that circle the city like Phoenix and Salt Lake. But no , you did not and now we are in a mess . No long term thinking in that area.
Back to the city rewrite if the code ‐ please do not do this! I do not want a cafe next to my home with cars coming and going at all hours or my neighbor deciding their lot is so big they can build another small home or duplex. With parking being allowed all over the street. I am against the city code rewrite Do not vote for it ! No!No! No!
If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot
1
Madison Lockhorn
From: Deanna Dupuy
Sent: Monday, April 3, 2023 4:32 PM
To: ZoningRewrite
Subject: FW: [External] Meeting on Rezone options
Attachments: 1112171235a.jpg
Comments for the record.
‐‐‐‐‐Original Message‐‐‐‐‐
From: Brent Mathieu <bmathieuboise@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, March 31, 2023 11:30 AM
To: Deanna Dupuy <ddupuy@cityofboise.org>
Subject: [External] Meeting on Rezone options
Hi Deanna,
Here is my email again.
Thank you for our meeting.
A summary:
1) Provide incentives for affordable housing, especially rentals, by agreement not to own/park a vehicle onsite. Benefits: Less parking pavement, less traffic. This might be combined with public transportation, mixed use for work onsite (decreased commutes) or fleets of alternative vehicles such as electric vehicles, e‐bikes or scooters for short term use.
2) Balance loss of topsoil to buildings/pavement with roof top gardens, green houses, hydroponics, and trees (edible forests too) and pollinator landscapes.
3) Promote and model solar with microgrids for a building complex, or neighborhood such as State and Arthur.
4) Provide alternatives and diversity for development, affordable housing and infill. Such as ADUs, and above.
5) Take a tour of my urban homestead, ole MacMathieu Boise farm. 4130 W Plum street. Google earth for satellite or come visit. Attached photo of solar powered greenhouse hydroponics.
1
Brent ‐‐ Brent B Mathieu
Thanks again,
Boise, Idaho
Madison Lockhorn
From: Deanna Dupuy
Sent: Monday, April 3, 2023 4:32 PM
To: ZoningRewrite
Subject: FW: [External] Meeting on Rezone options
Attachments: 1112171235a.jpg
Comments for the record.
‐‐‐‐‐Original Message‐‐‐‐‐
From: Brent Mathieu <bmathieuboise@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, March 31, 2023 11:30 AM
To: Deanna Dupuy <ddupuy@cityofboise.org>
Subject: [External] Meeting on Rezone options
Hi Deanna,
Here is my email again.
Thank you for our meeting.
A summary:
1) Provide incentives for affordable housing, especially rentals, by agreement not to own/park a vehicle onsite. Benefits: Less parking pavement, less traffic. This might be combined with public transportation, mixed use for work onsite (decreased commutes) or fleets of alternative vehicles such as electric vehicles, e‐bikes or scooters for short term use.
2) Balance loss of topsoil to buildings/pavement with roof top gardens, green houses, hydroponics, and trees (edible forests too) and pollinator landscapes.
3) Promote and model solar with microgrids for a building complex, or neighborhood such as State and Arthur.
4) Provide alternatives and diversity for development, affordable housing and infill. Such as ADUs, and above.
5) Take a tour of my urban homestead, ole MacMathieu Boise farm. 4130 W Plum street. Google earth for satellite or come visit. Attached photo of solar powered greenhouse hydroponics.
1
Brent ‐‐ Brent B Mathieu
Thanks again,
Boise, Idaho
Madison Lockhorn
From: Molly Lynn <mollynn78@yahoo.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 4, 2023 3:57 PM
To: ZoningRewrite
Subject: [External] Collister area concerns
I live in a neighborhood just off Collister Street and I disagree with the new zoning code rewrite. I am not interested in our neighborhood becoming higher density. Our neighborhood is quaint and special and a great place for families. We need to preserve what we cherish about our neighborhood.
Some people do like higher density housing, such as some newer communities in east Boise, and it is great for people to have that option. I just do not believe that established neighborhoods should have their zoning codes rewritten in such a drastic and radical fashion.
Please listen to the citizens of Boise and do not force a code rewrite that it unwanted.
Sincerely,
Molly McMillan
1
Madison Lockhorn
From: Molly Lynn <mollynn78@yahoo.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 4, 2023 3:57 PM
To: ZoningRewrite
Subject: [External] Collister area concerns
I live in a neighborhood just off Collister Street and I disagree with the new zoning code rewrite. I am not interested in our neighborhood becoming higher density. Our neighborhood is quaint and special and a great place for families. We need to preserve what we cherish about our neighborhood.
Some people do like higher density housing, such as some newer communities in east Boise, and it is great for people to have that option. I just do not believe that established neighborhoods should have their zoning codes rewritten in such a drastic and radical fashion.
Please listen to the citizens of Boise and do not force a code rewrite that it unwanted.
Sincerely,
Molly McMillan
1
4-3-2023: ZCR Commentary: Duplex, Triplex, & Fourplex in the R1-C Zone
The following questions need to be answered for the Duplex, Triplex, & Fourplex in the R1-C zone:
1) Do we want to have lot coverage?
I have attached some site models for the duplex, triplex and fourplex on a 60 ft. X 120 ft. lot with an alley in the East End. Without lot coverage, a duplex with unit sizes over 4,400 sf. can be constructed. Obviously, they do not have to be that large. The market and construction costs will drive what size units will be constructed.
Current zoning has a 55% lot coverage requirement. Based on my site modeling, I am recommending the following:
Duplexes: 55% (Allows 2 – 1,980 sf. units on a 60 ft. X 120 ft. lot)
Triplexes: 65% (Allows 3 – 1,560 sf. units on a 60 ft. X 120 ft. lot)
Fourplexes: 75% (Allows 4- 1,350 sf. units on a 60 ft. X 120 ft. lot)
My personal take on it is if you are going to remove the lot coverage, then you need to use a “Form-Based” code that will limit the size of the units to the ones needed to meet the city’s goals.
Information and Commentary provided by Gregg Ostrow, AIA 208-866-3168
Do we want to keep the proposed 40 ft. – 3-story maximum height limit?
Adding 5 ft. to the current maximum height does not increase density and creates taller ceilings. If you look at the attached models, you will see that a 3-story unit can be constructed in 35 ft. with 12 ft. floor to floor heights on the first 2 floors and 11”-0 floor to top of roof on the 3rd floor. Most apartment units are constructed with 10 ft. floor to floor heights.
Having the maximum height for pitched roofs and flat roofs will encourage flat roof boxes. You can see that with a lot of the new “boxes” being built around the city. My recommendation is to have a maximum height limit of 35 ft. for flat roofs and 40 ft. to the top of a pitched roof. A roof needs to be above 3 in 12 to qualify as a pitched roof.
2)
3) Should balconies and sun decks be allowed to qualify as open space?
Currently, duplexes, triplexes, and fourplexes are limited to open space on grade level. This is very restrictive for constructing stacked units. But I will caution you, if you allow all the open space to be above grade, you will have buildings built to the setbacks. Personally, I think this is bad “Form-Based” code.
The Adoption Draft of the rewrite allows for 5 ft. setbacks for all floors for townhomes is not being constructed next to a single-story structure. As planners, you must make the decision if you want 40 ft. tall boxes constructed 10 ft. apart. Once again, I think this is bad “Form-Based” code.
3) 375 sf. open space or 200 sf open space?
Current zoning has the open space has the 375-sf. open space requirement with a 15 ft. minimum dimension on one side. 375/15 = 25 ft. means a 15 ft. X 25 ft. minimum open space requirement.
The Adoption Draft changed this to 200 sf. and “usable” space with no minimum dimensions.
Lowering the open space requirement will not increase density but will increase unit size. I feel you should at least have a minimum dimension with the 200-sf. requirement.
Townhomes should have the same side yard step backs as duplexes, triplexes, and fourplexes.
In addition, do we want buildings constructed from setback line to setback line?
89% 89% LOT COVERAGE SHOWN
4-3-2023: ZCR Commentary: Duplex, Triplex, & Fourplex in the R1-C Zone
The following questions need to be answered for the Duplex, Triplex, & Fourplex in the R1-C zone:
1) Do we want to have lot coverage?
I have attached some site models for the duplex, triplex and fourplex on a 60 ft. X 120 ft. lot with an alley in the East End. Without lot coverage, a duplex with unit sizes over 4,400 sf. can be constructed. Obviously, they do not have to be that large. The market and construction costs will drive what size units will be constructed.
Current zoning has a 55% lot coverage requirement. Based on my site modeling, I am recommending the following:
Duplexes: 55% (Allows 2 – 1,980 sf. units on a 60 ft. X 120 ft. lot)
Triplexes: 65% (Allows 3 – 1,560 sf. units on a 60 ft. X 120 ft. lot)
Fourplexes: 75% (Allows 4- 1,350 sf. units on a 60 ft. X 120 ft. lot)
My personal take on it is if you are going to remove the lot coverage, then you need to use a “Form-Based” code that will limit the size of the units to the ones needed to meet the city’s goals.
Information and Commentary provided by Gregg Ostrow, AIA 208-866-3168
Do we want to keep the proposed 40 ft. – 3-story maximum height limit?
Adding 5 ft. to the current maximum height does not increase density and creates taller ceilings. If you look at the attached models, you will see that a 3-story unit can be constructed in 35 ft. with 12 ft. floor to floor heights on the first 2 floors and 11”-0 floor to top of roof on the 3rd floor. Most apartment units are constructed with 10 ft. floor to floor heights.
Having the maximum height for pitched roofs and flat roofs will encourage flat roof boxes. You can see that with a lot of the new “boxes” being built around the city. My recommendation is to have a maximum height limit of 35 ft. for flat roofs and 40 ft. to the top of a pitched roof. A roof needs to be above 3 in 12 to qualify as a pitched roof.
2)
3) Should balconies and sun decks be allowed to qualify as open space?
Currently, duplexes, triplexes, and fourplexes are limited to open space on grade level. This is very restrictive for constructing stacked units. But I will caution you, if you allow all the open space to be above grade, you will have buildings built to the setbacks. Personally, I think this is bad “Form-Based” code.
The Adoption Draft of the rewrite allows for 5 ft. setbacks for all floors for townhomes is not being constructed next to a single-story structure. As planners, you must make the decision if you want 40 ft. tall boxes constructed 10 ft. apart. Once again, I think this is bad “Form-Based” code.
3) 375 sf. open space or 200 sf open space?
Current zoning has the open space has the 375-sf. open space requirement with a 15 ft. minimum dimension on one side. 375/15 = 25 ft. means a 15 ft. X 25 ft. minimum open space requirement.
The Adoption Draft changed this to 200 sf. and “usable” space with no minimum dimensions.
Lowering the open space requirement will not increase density but will increase unit size. I feel you should at least have a minimum dimension with the 200-sf. requirement.
Townhomes should have the same side yard step backs as duplexes, triplexes, and fourplexes.
In addition, do we want buildings constructed from setback line to setback line?
89% 89% LOT COVERAGE SHOWN
From: gregg.servheen@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Gregg Servheen <gregg.servheen@everyactioncustom.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 4, 2023 3:33 PM
To: ZoningRewrite
Subject: [External] Vote Yes on the Zoning Code Rewrite
Dear Planning and Zoning Commission,
I am writing to express my support for the Zoning Code Rewrite. The sustainability, affordability, and open space protections included in the new zoning code rewrite are exactly what Boise needs to plan for and address our rapidly growing city.
Sincerely,
Mr. Gregg Servheen
2816 S Colorado Ave Boise, ID 83706‐4730 gregg.servheen@me.com
1
Madison Lockhorn
From: gregg.servheen@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Gregg Servheen <gregg.servheen@everyactioncustom.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 4, 2023 3:33 PM
To: ZoningRewrite
Subject: [External] Vote Yes on the Zoning Code Rewrite
Dear Planning and Zoning Commission,
I am writing to express my support for the Zoning Code Rewrite. The sustainability, affordability, and open space protections included in the new zoning code rewrite are exactly what Boise needs to plan for and address our rapidly growing city.
Sincerely,
Mr. Gregg Servheen
2816 S Colorado Ave Boise, ID 83706‐4730 gregg.servheen@me.com
1
Madison Lockhorn
From: noreply@cityofboise.org
Sent: Saturday, April 1, 2023 12:25 PM
To: ZoningRewrite
Subject: A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted
The following information was submitted:
Name
Amy Steckel
Email amysteckel@msn.com
Address
718 W Ranch Rd, Boise, ID 83702
Comment
I support new zoning rules that prioritize affordable housing and improving public transportation as well as encouraging walking/biking.
If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here.
I am not a robot
1
Madison Lockhorn
From: noreply@cityofboise.org
Sent: Saturday, April 1, 2023 12:25 PM
To: ZoningRewrite
Subject: A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted
The following information was submitted:
Name
Amy Steckel
Email amysteckel@msn.com
Address
718 W Ranch Rd, Boise, ID 83702
Comment
I support new zoning rules that prioritize affordable housing and improving public transportation as well as encouraging walking/biking.
If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here.
I am not a robot
1
Madison Lockhorn
Madison Lockhorn
From: noreply@cityofboise.org
Sent: Friday, March 31, 2023 7:57 AM
To: ZoningRewrite
Subject: A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted
The following information was submitted:
Name
Brandi Venable
Email brandijvenable@gmail.com
Address
1910 W Salem Ct, Boise, 83705
Comment
The construction on the corner lot of Vista and Targee has already caused considerable congestion on a street regularly used by the public for school dropoffs/pickups and access to the Vista corridor. This congestion will continue after the construction has continued due to an increase in street parking, the amount of residents moving into the corner multi‐dwelling complex, and visitors to that building. Changing the zoning code to mix use will not address the housing shortage or cost of living crisis in Boise ‐ it will, instead, continue to drive out residents who live and work in the city and who will increasingly find it unaffordable as developers build housing that drives up property taxes, public taxes and is still for the native Boisean and/or longtime Idaho resident, quite out of the range of affordability. This code benefits developers and those residents or future residents whose income is already well above the local median income range. My neighbors are primarily older, retired folks who cannot afford the continual increases in taxes and who will, as they age, need to rely on public services for emergencies. Crowded streets that don't allow the timely passage of emergency vehicles and a strained infrastructure that cannot serve the growing population will negatively impact our most vulnerable residents. I would like the city leaders to show data that proves that upzoning makes housing more affordable and is the best path forward for current residents. How is Seattle, with its high‐rise multi‐dwelling buildings affordable? New York? I am staunchly opposed to the rewriting of the zoning code in its current proposal state, especially without further publicity that informs the residents, more opportunities for public input and feedback, etc.
If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot
1
Madison Lockhorn
From: noreply@cityofboise.org
Sent: Friday, March 31, 2023 7:57 AM
To: ZoningRewrite
Subject: A Zoning Code Rewrite formal comment has been submitted
The following information was submitted:
Name
Brandi Venable
Email brandijvenable@gmail.com
Address
1910 W Salem Ct, Boise, 83705
Comment
The construction on the corner lot of Vista and Targee has already caused considerable congestion on a street regularly used by the public for school dropoffs/pickups and access to the Vista corridor. This congestion will continue after the construction has continued due to an increase in street parking, the amount of residents moving into the corner multi‐dwelling complex, and visitors to that building. Changing the zoning code to mix use will not address the housing shortage or cost of living crisis in Boise ‐ it will, instead, continue to drive out residents who live and work in the city and who will increasingly find it unaffordable as developers build housing that drives up property taxes, public taxes and is still for the native Boisean and/or longtime Idaho resident, quite out of the range of affordability. This code benefits developers and those residents or future residents whose income is already well above the local median income range. My neighbors are primarily older, retired folks who cannot afford the continual increases in taxes and who will, as they age, need to rely on public services for emergencies. Crowded streets that don't allow the timely passage of emergency vehicles and a strained infrastructure that cannot serve the growing population will negatively impact our most vulnerable residents. I would like the city leaders to show data that proves that upzoning makes housing more affordable and is the best path forward for current residents. How is Seattle, with its high‐rise multi‐dwelling buildings affordable? New York? I am staunchly opposed to the rewriting of the zoning code in its current proposal state, especially without further publicity that informs the residents, more opportunities for public input and feedback, etc.
If you have additional comments that exceed the comment box limit, upload them here. I am not a robot
1
