11 minute read

Annex 1: Benefits of Green Roofs

Annex 1: Benefits of Green Roofs

Public Benefits

Advertisement

AESTHETIC IMPROVEMENTS

§ Urban greening has long been promoted as an easy and effective strategy for beautifying the built environment and increasing investment opportunity.

WASTE DIVERSION

§ Green roofs can contribute to landfill diversion by: o Prolonging the life of waterproofing membranes, reducing associated waste. o Using recycled materials in the growing medium. o Prolonging the service life of heating, ventilation, and HVAC systems through decreased use.

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT

§ With green roofs, water is stored by the substrate and then taken up by plants from where it is returned to the atmosphere through transpiration and evaporation. § In summer, green roofs can retain 70-90% of the precipitation that falls on them. § In winter, green roofs can retain between 25-40% of the precipitation that falls on them. § Green Roofs not only retain rainwater, but also moderate the temperature of the water and act as natural filters for any of the water that happens to run off. § Green roofs reduce the amount of stormwater runoff and also delay the time at which runoff occurs, resulting in decreased stress on sewer systems at peak flow periods.

MODERATION OF URBAN HEAT ISLAND EFFECT

§ Through the daily dew and evaporation cycle, plants on vertical and horizontal surfaces are able to cool cities during hot summer months and reduce the Urban Heat Island (UHI) effect. The light absorbed by vegetation would otherwise be converted into heat energy. § UHI is also mitigated by the covering some of the hottest surfaces in the urban environment - black rooftops. § Green roofs can also help reduce the distribution of dust and particulate matter throughout the city, as well as the production of smog. This can play a role in reducing greenhouse gas emissions and adapting urban areas to a future climate with warmer summers.

IMPROVED AIR QUALITY

§ Plants on green roofs can capture airborne pollutants, atmospheric deposition, and also filter noxious gases. § The temperature moderating effects of green roofs can reduce demand on power plants, and potentially decrease the amount of CO2 and other pollutants being released into the air.

NEW AMENITY SPACES

§ Green roofs help to reach the principles of smart growth and positively affect the urban environment by increasing amenity and green space and reducing community resistance to infill projects. Green roofs can serve any number of functions and uses, including: o Community gardens (e.g. local food production or co-ops). o Commercial space (e.g. display areas and restaurant terraces). o Recreational space (e.g. lawn bowling and children's playgrounds).

Private Benefits

ENERGY EFFICIENCY

§ The greater insulation offered by green roofs can reduce the amount of energy needed to moderate the temperature of a building, as roofs are the site of the greatest heat loss in the winter and the hottest temperatures in the summer. § For example, research published by the National Research Council of Canada found that an extensive green roof reduced the daily energy demand for air conditioning in the summer by over 75%.

INCREASED ROOFING MEMBRANE DURABILITY

§ The presence of a green roof decreases the exposure of waterproofing membranes to large temperature fluctuations, that can cause micro-tearing, and damage by ultraviolet radiation.

FIRE RETARDATION

§ Green roofs have much lower burning heat load (the heat generated when a substance burns) than do conventional roofs.

REDUCTION OF ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION

§ Green roofs are capable of reducing electromagnetic radiation penetration by 99.4%.

NOISE REDUCTION

§ Green roofs have excellent noise attenuation, especially for low frequency sounds. An extensive green roof can reduce sound from outside by 40 decibels, while an intensive green roof can reduce sound by 46-50 decibels.

MARKETING

§ Green roofs can increase a building's marketability. They are an easily identifiable symbol of the green building movement and can act as an incentive to those interested in the multiple benefits offered by green roofs. § Green roofs, as part of the green building movement, have been identified as facilitating

o Sales o Lease-outs o Increased property value due to increased efficiency o Easier employee recruiting o Lower employee and tenant turnover o Design specific benefits

INCREASED BIODIVERSITY

§ Green roofs can sustain a variety of plants and invertebrates and provide habitat for various bird species. By acting as a steppingstone habitat for migrating birds they can link species together that would otherwise be fragmented. § Increasing biodiversity can positively affect three realms:

o Ecosystem § Diverse ecosystems are better able to maintain high levels of productivity during periods of environmental variation than those with fewer species. o Economic § Stabilized ecosystems ensure the delivery of ecological goods (e.g. food, construction materials, medicinal plants) and services (e.g. maintain hydrological cycles, cleanse water and air, store and cycle nutrients).

o Social § Visual and environmental diversity can have positive impacts on community and psychological well-being.

IMPROVED HEALTH AND WELL-BEING

§ The reduced pollution and increased water quality that green roofs provide can decrease demands for healthcare.

§ Green roofs can serve as community hubs, increasing social cohesion, sense of community, and public safety.

URBAN AGRICULTURE

§ Using green roofs as the site for an urban agriculture project can reduce a community’s footprint through the creation of a local food system. § These projects can serve as a source of community empowerment, give increased feelings of self-reliance, and improve levels of nutrition.

EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES

§ Green roofs on educational facilities can provide an easily accessible site to teach students and visitors about biology, green roof technology, and the benefits of green roofs.

Endnotes

i https://www.un.org/development/desa/en/news/population/2018-revision-of-world-urbanization-prospects.html. Accessed 28 December 2019. ii Ibid. iii Or as defined by the Convention on Biological Diversity as "the variability among living organisms from all sources including, inter alia, terrestrial, marine and other aquatic ecosystems and the ecological complexes of which they are part; this includes diversity within species, between species and of ecosystems”. https://www.cbd.int/convention/articles/?a=cbd-02 iv Maibritt Zari, The Importance of Urban Biodiversity – an Ecosystem services approach, Biodiversity International Journal Volume 2 Issue 4. 2018 DOI: 10.15406/bij.2018.02.00087 v Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Current State and Trends. Washington, DC: Island Press; 2005. vi Marion Potschin, Roy Haines-Young. Defining and measuring ecosystem services. Routledge Handbook of Ecosystem Services. Routledge, London, New York; 2016. p. 25‒44. vii https://www.un.org/development/desa/en/news/population/2018-revision-of-world-urbanization-prospects.html. Accessed 28 December 2019. viii Ibid. ix Or as defined by the Convention on Biological Diversity as "the variability among living organisms from all sources including, inter alia, terrestrial, marine and other aquatic ecosystems and the ecological complexes of which they are part; this includes diversity within species, between species and of ecosystems”. https://www.cbd.int/convention/articles/?a=cbd-02 x Maibritt Zari, The Importance of Urban Biodiversity – an Ecosystem services approach, Biodiversity International Journal Volume 2 Issue 4. 2018 DOI: 10.15406/bij.2018.02.00087 xi Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Current State and Trends. Washington, DC: Island Press; 2005. xii Marion Potschin, Roy Haines-Young. Defining and measuring ecosystem services. Routledge Handbook of Ecosystem Services. Routledge, London, New York; 2016. p. 25‒44. xiii UN. “68% of the world population projected to live in urban areas by 2050”. Accessed November 15, 2019. https://www.un.org/development/desa/en/news/population/2018-revision-of-world-urbanization-prospects.html xiv Walter V Reid, Stephen R. Carpenter, Harold Alfred Mooney, Kartik Chopra, Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC. xv xv Costanza, R., De Groot, R., Sutton, P., Van Der Ploeg, S., Anderson, S.J., Kubiszewski, I., Farber, S. & Turner, R.K. 2014. Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change, 26, 152–158. xvi Maibritt Pedersen Zari, Regenerative Urban Design and Ecosystem Biomimicry xvii https://www.biologicaldiversity.org/programs/biodiversity/elements_of_biodiversity/extinction_crisis/. Accessed 28 December 2019. xviii CBD, Biodiversity and the 2030 agenda for sustainable development technical note Accessed on November 18, 2019. https://www.cbd.int/development/doc/biodiversity-2030-agenda-technical-note-en.pdf xix Pavan Sukhdev, Heidi Wittmer, Christoph Schröter-Schlaack, Carsten Nesshöver, Joshua Bishop, Patrick ten Brink, Haripriya Gundimeda, Pushpam Kumar and Ben Simmons. TEEB (2010) The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A synthesis of the approach, conclusions and recommendations of TEEB. xx CBD, Biodiversity and the 2030 agenda for sustainable development technical note Accessed on November 18, 2019. https://www.cbd.int/development/doc/biodiversity-2030-agenda-technical-note-en.pdf xxi Evenson, R.E. & Gollin, D. 2003. Assessing the impact of the green revolution, 1960 to 2000. Science, 300, 758–62. xxi Mooney, H., Larigauderie, A., Cesario, M., Elmquist, T., Hoegh-Guldberg, O., Lavorel, S., Mace, G.M., Palmer, M., Scholes, R. & Yahara, T. 2009. Biodiversity, climate change, and ecosystem services. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 1, 46–54. xxi Hallström, E., Carlsson-Kanyama, A. & Börjesson, P. 2015. Environmental impact of dietary change: A systematic review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 91, 1–11.

xxii UNEP. 2011. Keeping Track of our Changing Environment: From Rio to Rio+20 (1992–2012), Nairobi, Division of Early Warning and Assessment (DEWA), United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). xxiii Pfeiffer, D.A. 2006. Eating Fossil Fuels. Oil, Food and the Coming Crisis in Agriculture, Gabriola Island, New Society Publishers. xxiv Eshel, G. & Martin, P.A. 2006. Diet, Energy, and Global Warming. Earth Interactions, 10, 1–17. xxv xxv Tilman, D. & Clark, M. 2014. Global diets link environmental sustainability and human health. Nature, 515, 518–522. xxvi Costanza, R., d'Arge, R., de Groot, R. et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387, 253–260 (1997) doi:10.1038/387253a0 xxvii https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/cities-need-to-prepare-for-water-day-zero/ Accessed 28 December 2019. xxviii Shanley, P. & Luz, L. 2003. The impacts of forest degradation on medicinal plant use and implications for health care in Eastern Amazonia. BioScience, 53, 573–584. xxix Beattie, A.J., Barthlott, W., Elisabetsky, E., Farrel, R., Kheng, C.T., Prance, I., Rosenthal, J., Simpson, D., Leakey, R., Wolfson, M. & Kate, K.T. 2005. New products and industries from biodiversity. Chapter 10. In: Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (ed.). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Current State and Trends, Washington, DC, Island Press. xxx Mooney, H., Larigauderie, A., Cesario, M., Elmquist, T., Hoegh-Guldberg, O., Lavorel, S., Mace, G.M., Palmer, M., Scholes, R. & Yahara, T. 2009. Biodiversity, climate change, and ecosystem services. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 1, 46–54. xxxi Levin, S. 1999. Fragile Dominion, Cambridge, Perseus Publishing. xxxii Flavie Mayrand and Philippe Clergeau, 2018. Green Roofs and Green Walls for Biodiversity Conservation: A Contribution to Urban Connectivity?, Sustainability 2018, 10, 985; doi:10.3390/su10040985. xxxiii Wood E, Harsant A, Dallimer M, Cronin de Chavez A, McEachan RRC and Hassall C (2018) Not All Green Space Is Created Equal: Biodiversity Predicts Psychological Restorative Benefits From Urban Green Space. Front. Psychol. 9:2320. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02320. xxxiv Uddin, Mohammad Nasir, 2006. The relationship between urban forestry and poverty alleviation : Dhaka as a case study. SLU, Department of Landscape Architecture, Planning and Management, Alnarp. Alnarp: SLU, Department of Landscape Architecture, Planning and Management. xxxv Costanza, R. & Folke, C. 1997. Valuing ecosystem services with efficiency, fairness, and sustainability as goals. In: Daily, G. (ed.). Nature Services, Washington, DC, Island Press. xxxvi Clothier, B.E., Hall, A.J., Deurer, M., Green, S.R. & Mackay, A.D. 2011. Soil ecosystem services. In: Sauer, T.J., Norman, J.M. & Sivakumar, M. (eds.). Sustaining Soil Productivity in Response to Global Climate Change, On-line, Wiley-Blackwell. xxxvii Maibritt Pedersen Zari, 2018. Regenerative Urban Design and Ecosystem Biomimicry, Routledge Taylor and Francis Group London and New York. xxxviii Krauss, J., Bommarco, R., Guardiola, M., Heikkinen, R.K., Helm, A., Kuussaari, M., Lindborg, R., Öckinger, E., Pärtel, M., Pino, J., Pöyry, J., Raatikainen, K.M., Sang, A., Stefanescu, C., Teder, T., Zobel, M. & SteffanDewenter, I. 2010. Habitat fragmentation causes immediate and time-delayed biodiversity loss at different trophic levels. Ecology Letters, 13, 597–605. xxxix Levin, S. 1999. Fragile Dominion, Cambridge, Perseus Publishing. xl Cities and climate change: global report on human settlements, 2011 / United Nations Human Settlements Programme. xli Christian Ledwell, https://www.weadapt.org/knowledge-base/cities-and-climate-change/building-a-climateresilient-city-urban-ecosystems. Accessed on November 21, 2019. xlii http://www.greeninfrastructurenw.co.uk/resources/6b4_Guide_Final_v3.pdf xliii https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/31430 xliv Jari Lyytimäki, 2014. Ecosystem disservices: Embrace the catchword. Ecosystem Services doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.11.008 xlv Petersen, L K, Lyytimäki, J, Normander, B, Hallin Pihlatie, L, Bezák, P, Cil, A, Varjopuro, R, Münier, B and Hulst, N. 2007. “Urban lifestyle and urban biodiversity. Towards conceptual framework for urban lifestyle-driven biodiversity change”. xlvi Maria Constanza Torri, 2011. Conservation, Reloction and the Social Consequences of Conservation Policies in Protected Areas: Case Study of the Sariska Tiger Reserve, India. Conservation and Society 9(1):54-64, DOI: 184.64.202.38

xlvii Scudder, T. 2005. The future of large dams: Dealing with the social, environmental and political costs. London: Earthscan. xlviii Gadgil, M., F. Berkes and C. Folke. 1993. Indigenous knowledge for biodiversity conservation. Ambio 2(2): 151–156. xlix Heltberg, R. 2001. Determinants and impact of local institutions for common resource management. Environmental and Development Economics 6(4): 183–208. l Agrawal, A. and K. Redford. 2006. Poverty, development and biodiversity conservation shooting in the dark? New York: Wildlife Conservation Society Working Paper No. 26. li https://www.cbd.int/doc/newsletters/development/news-dev-2015-2013-04-en.pdf lii Michael J. Novacek. 2008. Engaging the public in biodiversity issues. PNAS vol 105 doi: 10.1073/pnas.0802599105 liiifile:///C:/Users/User/Box/19030%20Biodiversity%20in%20Cities%20IADB/Data%20and%20Background%20Do cuments/Case%20studies/Cities-and-Biodiversity-Exploring-how-Edmonton-and-Montreal-are-Mainstreaming-theUrban-Biodiversity-Movement.pdf liv https://www.cbd.int/authorities/doc/Singapore-Index-User-Manual-20140730-en.pdf lv https://www.cbd.int/subnational/partners-and-initiatives/city-biodiversity-index lvi Faeth SH, Bang C, Saari S. Urban biodiversity: patterns and mechanisms. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2011;1223:69–81. lvii Urban Biodiversity and Landscape Ecology: Patterns, Processes and Planning Briony A. Norton & Karl L. Evans & Philip H. Warren lviii Lin BB, Fuller RA, Thompson D. Sharing or sparing? How should we grow the world’s cities? J Appl Ecol. 2013;50:1161–8. lix Gilchrist A, Barker A, Handley JF. Pathways through the landscape in a changing climate: the role of landscape structure in facilitating species range expansion through an urbanised region. Landsce Res. 2016;41:26–44. lx Evans KL, Hatchwell BJ, Parnell M, Gaston KJ. A conceptual framework for the colonisation of urban areas: the blackbird Turdus merula as a case study. Biol Rev. 2010;85:643–67. lxi Goddard MA, Dougill, Aj, Benton, TG. 2010. Scaling up from gardens: Biodiversity conservation in urban environments. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 25: 90-98 lxii Christopher A. Lepczyk, Myla F. J. Aronson, Karl L. Evans, Mark A. Goddard, Susannah B. Lerman, J. Scott MacIvor, Biodiversity in the City: Fundamental Questions for Understanding the Ecology of Urban Green Spaces for Biodiversity Conservation, BioScience, Volume 67, Issue 9, September 2017, Pages 799–807, https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/bix079 lxiii Alexander Wandl & Marcello Magoni (2017) Sustainable Planning of PeriUrban Areas: Introduction to the Special Issue, Planning Practice & Research, 32:1, 1-3, DOI: 10.1080/02697459.2017.1264191 lxiv Ksiazek-Mikenas, Kelly. (2014). The potential of green roofs to support urban biodiversity. lxv https://www.uclg.org/sites/default/files/curitiba.pdf lxvifile:///C:/Users/User/Box/19030%20Biodiversity%20in%20Cities%20IADB/Data%20and%20Background%20D ocuments/Curitiba%20Case%20Study.pdf lxvii https://www.urbanet.info/medellin-urban-biodiversity/ lxviii [2]http://www.idrc.ca/EN/Resources/Publications/Pages/ArticleDetails.aspx?PublicationID=740 lxix 3]http://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2014/apr/24/mexico-city-roof-gardens-pollution-smog lxx http://www.fao.org/ag/agp/greenercities/en/ggclac/rosario.html lxxi Piyush Dhawan, Montserrat Lara & Sana Mezoughi (2018) The growing importance of shrinking wetlands: a tale of three cities, Biodiversity, 19:3-4, 221-224, DOI: 10.1080/14888386.2018.1536562 lxxii https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/environmental-funding/tools-forapplying/writing-smart-objectives.html lxxiii https://waterfundstoolbox.org/regions/africa/cape-town-water-fund

lxxivlxxiv https://publications.iadb.org/publications/english/document/5_Key_Points_of_Ecuadors_Sovereign_Social_Bonds_ en.pdf

This article is from: