Hobcaw Studio_Part 2 by Clemson School of Architecture

HOBCAW STUDIO

CLEMSON ARCHITECTURE | LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE | FALL 2017

198

199

Hobcaw Studio | Overview

200

The primary objective of the studio was to create a comprehensive campus site plan for Clemson's Belle W. Baruch Institute of Coastal Ecology and Forest Science. Using the extensive property and natural beauty of Hobcaw Barony as the inspiration and site, a group of 37 students came together in a single collaborative studio to produce a design for the institute under the direction of Professors Dan Harding and Dustin Albright (School of Architecture) and Professor Paul Russell (School of Landscape Architecture). The students chose which aspect of the design they were interested in addressing.Some students designed housing for researchers and visiting faculty. Others designed a laboratory expansion plus renovation of the existing research facilities. All the while, landscape architecture students created a unifying site design. The site design, located in the extraordinary context of the Hobcaw Barony itself, was required to take the specific programmatic needs of the Institute into account. Important design considerations included the relationship between existing and future buildings, the interaction between the Institute and its neighbors, the unique environmental concerns of the site (i.e. controlled burns, flooding), and the best solutions to accomodate those needs considering the Baruch Institute's commitment to supporting sustainable resource management. The housing designs were situated on four different locations within Hobcaw Barony, an - "entry" site where the current housing for the Institute is located, and three sites within Clemson's Pate Forest. The three Pate Forest sites were named according to their access location, with the Pate Forest Clemson site being located just off of Highway 17, the Pate Forest Baruch site just off of Boundary Rd, and the Pate Forest DeBordieu site being accessed from the existing DeBordieu community nearby. Students were asked to give attention to student needs, including private/quiet spaces and social/interaction spaces that were suited to the variety of occupants that would be served by the new housing facilities (graduate and undergraduate students, post-doctoral students, visiting faculty members, etc.). Another vital consideration was each house's connection with the surrounding landscape and site, its landscape, and the research to which it plays host. in which the housing was situated and the occupants would be engaged in researching was also a vital component of each house's design. Students were asked to use Clemson University's patented SimPLY plywood OSB framing system for the structure of their housing designs. The laboratory designs all shared the same site of an open, low-lying clearing adjacent to the existing lab building. Students were tasked with creating new lab facilities while also envisioning a renovation of the existing facility. The existing facilities were cramped, leaving researchers and faculty in need of more laboratory space in which to carry out their research. Students were asked to use massive-timber strategies, including cross-laminated timber, for the construction and structure of their laboratory designs.

201

Hobcaw Studio | Studio Culture

202

The culture of Hobcaw Studio was highly collaborative, with students from varying backgrounds and experience levels coming together to work together in design groups. The studio included graduate and undergraduate students from both architecture and plus undergraduate students from landscape architecture and architecture students from both the undergraduate and graduate school programs. Students began the semester separated, as individuals working individually in either the housing, laboratory, or site designgroups concentration, and continued as such in this manner until the conclusion of the first review. After this, students in the laboratory studio were assigned to groups that would work on one unified design, and housing students, while continuing to work on their individual housing designs, were assigned groups grouped according to a given site design locations. Collaboration between the students really then began in earnest. The move from individuals to groups was not without its challenges and tension. Communication between group members was quickly determined to be an essential component moving forward, especially for the Housing Entry group which was comprised of eight students (three landscape architecture students, four undergraduate architecture students, and one graduate architecture student). The studio was located in two studio bays on the ground floor of Lee III near the main entrance. With 37 students, the physical space occupied by the studio was quite large and was often the first studio that faculty, students, and visitors walked through on their way through the building. A typical day of studio often began at 2:00pm with a group meeting, whether of the housing or laboratorystudio sections individually, or of the entire studio altogether. The group(s) would then return to their desks to work and await the arrival of their respective professor at their desk for a conversation desk critiques with their respective professors. Groups would also commonly meet around the communal community table in the studio to converse with their two studio profesoors about their design progress.

203

Hobcaw Studio | By the Numbers

204

2 Architecture Professors

1 Landscape Architecture Professor

7 Graduate Architecture Students

21 Senior Undergraduate Architecture Students

10 Undergraduate (9 Seniors, 1 Junior) Landscape Architecture Students

1 Graduating Senior Undergraduate Architecture Student

205

RJ Johnson (undergraduate, architecture) assembles his SimPLY housing model in studio

Emily Heezen (graduate, architecture) assembles a basswood model of her group's laboratory design 206

Hannah Carlton (undergraduate, architecture) assembles her simPLY house section model

Prof. Dustin Albright discusses a simPLY model with Cole Robinson (undergraduate, architecture) 207

Landon Hannah and Austin Allen (undergraduates, landscape architecture) collaborate

Prof. Dan Harding conducts a desk crit with Chris Sandkuhler (graduate, architecture) 208

Prof. Paul Russell and Megan Schoonmaker (undergraduate, landscape architecture) discuss her design

Profs. Paul Russell and Dustin Albright meet with a laboratory group 209

Emily Heezen (graduate, architecture) cuts out pieces for her group's laboratory model 210

Chelsea Anderson (graduate, architecture) at work on her group's laboratory design 211

Profs. Dustin Albright and Dan Harding meet with Kristen Cullen (undergraduate, architecture)

Prof. Dan Harding communicates an idea to Kristen Cullen (undergraduate, architecture) 212

Yarely Martinez (undergraduate, architecture) works on her housing design

Jackson Burke (undergrad landscape architecture) works on his Pate-Forest Clemson project. 213

Hobcaw Studio | Site Visits

214

The studio hit the ground running working in teams doing all of the research they could in preparation for their first studio site visit as a complete studio to the Hobcaw Barony. This first site visit was August 30th, 2017, and came with all of the trials that the Low Country can offer in the peak of summer. Students came prepared with bug spray, sunscreen, and plenty of water to resist the heat and mosquitos, and did their best to watch out for snakes and gators. Experiencing the site at its most extreme gave students a true perspective of the experience researchers may have while working and living at the Hobcaw Barony. You will see most of these lessons learned implemented in their designs. The studio was given tours of all existing facilities, and everyone was able to see the challenges BICEFS is facing as it grows. With the help of Paula Sisson, a biologist from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, students were able to step into the habitat of the Red-Cockaded Woodpecker and visualize the flight patterns they take daily to look for food. They learned how to spot out cavity trees for possible nesting, and including trees that were currently nested, or recently abandoned. The landscape architecture students went on a second site visit shortly following to investigate deeper into specific site conditions. The entire studio returned to Hobcaw in October where they presented their proposals to some representatives of BICEFS and received constructive feedback to bring back with them to Clemson for the final review. This visit landed a few days before Halloween and everyone enjoyed a spooky evening watching scary movies in the woods of the Hobcaw Barony.

215

Chris Sandkuler (graduate, architecture) and Jimmy Woods (graduate, architecture) walk the boardwalk.

Eric Scardo (undergraduate, landscape architecture) explores the Tar Kiln Swamp. 216

Prof. William Conner (BICEFS) educates the group on his tour on Forestry.

Kristen Cullen (undergraduate, architecture) walks the thin boardwalk in the Tar Kiln Swamp. 217

Paula Sisson (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service) points out the RCW cavity trees. (photo by Prof. Conner)

Prof. Albright, Kristen Cullen and Yarely Martinez (architecture) look for the RCW. (photo by Prof. Conner) 218

A gator was found roasting on the boardwalk in the Tar Kiln Swamp. (photo by Prof. Conner)

Snake found in the Tar Kiln Swamp. (photo by Prof. Conner) 219

The studio presents their research to BICEFS faculty and staff. (photo by Prof. Conner)

Prof. Albright (architecture) explains objectives for the site visit to the lab group. (photo by Prof. Conner) 220

Student sketches from Friendfield Village. (photo by Prof. Conner)

Prof. Harding (architecture) meets with the group of students working on housing. (photo by Prof. Conner) 221

222

Lab Team 1 | Over the Water Chelsea Anderson | Emily Heezen | Allison Chan

223

Abstract The site for the new BICEFS Laboratory facility lies between the existing lab and the education building. This site was chosen to keep the campus tight, to protect from fires, take less of the RCW habitat, and allow easy access between buildings. First, a back of house road was devised to allow easy access for scientists going and coming from their field work. This road doubles as a fire barrier. The form of the new building was lifted above the flood plain, leaving only program below that could withstand flooding. The floor plates are narrow to provide natural daylight and ventilation, and arranged linearly for most efficient circulation. The loading zone to the back provides a dirty work area as well as a transition for scientists and technicians to drop their gear and clean up before entering the clean labs above. Within the existing lab building, the Wildlife Lab was expanded and the Coliform Lab was opened up into a communal graduate and intern area. The structure of the new lab building is comprised of "massive timber" components and demonstrates BICEFS' commitment to sustainable forestry while standing as a positive example of lowcarbon construction to the community. The faรงade is covered with a rain screen system to filter light, while protecting from moisture and high winds. It is also intentionally designed to protect the surrounding birds. The new lab building and associated wetland site features are designed to support and enhance the research of the BICEFS scientists, while also respecting and highlighting the ecosystems these scientists call home. 224

Site Diagrams The Site

The Site Forest Fires: Controlled burns are to be done annually, although this is a challenge with the buildings close to the forest.

Endangered Wildlife: Red-cockade Woodpecker habitat with cavity trees to north and south of site. Fly-through west of existing lab.

Flooding: Due to a low elevation spot, flooding frequently occurs at the site during high rain events.

Storage: The site lacks common storage for boats and outdoor gear.

The Proposal

Access: The site lacks access for dirty functions, and coverage for unloading in the rain.

The Proposal Fire Barrier: A back of house road is initiated, allowing 50’ of clearance from the forest and drive up access to the lab for dirty-work.

Form: Elevate building above water line, and a narrow eastwest orientation for daylighting.

Bioswale: The low-elevation spot is used for a rain garden with overfill to lower elevations, providing research with its contact to the built environment.

50’

Gear Shed: Common storage for boats and outdoor gear located at the end of the loop.

Connection: Easy access to existing buildings.

225

Site Diagrams

Existing Flooding

Proposed Swale

Forest Existing

Forest Proposed

226

Break Room/Kitchen

Office

Program Diagrams

Locker Room Carpentry Workshop

Transformer, Switchgear, Water Pumps

people Faculty, Staff, PHD, Post-Doc, Lab Technicians, Extension Specialists, Graduate Students & Interns

user groups

Wildlife

Soil

Plants

Coliform

Biogeochemistry

Forestry

sq.ft.

New Lab Building conditioned space

227

Site Plan / Ground Level

1 Tech/Staff Offices

5 Carpentry Workshop (442 sq.ft.)

11 Outdoor Experiments

2 Intern/Grad Student Desks

6 Walk-in Cooler

12 Transformer, Switchgear, Water Pumps

3 Break Room/Kitchen

7 Sensor Lab (567 sq.ft.)

13 Outdoor Classroom

4 Locker Room (370 sq.ft.)

8 Copier & Printer

14 Gear Shed

9 Wildlife & Hydrology Lab (1409 sq.ft).

15 Rainwater Cisterns

10 Loading Area

16 Greeter/Office

1 1 1

1 3

5 10

4 10

N N

Ground Level

1 Tech/Staff Offices

5 Carpentry Workshop (442 sq.ft.)

11 Outdoor Experiments

2 Intern/Grad Student Desks

6 Walk-in Cooler

12 Transformer, Switchgear, Water Pumps

3 Break Room/Kitchen

7 Sensor Lab (567 sq.ft.)

13 Outdoor Classroom

4 Locker Room (370 sq.ft.)

8 Copier & Printer

14 Gear Shed

9 Wildlife & Hydrology Lab (1409 sq.ft).

15 Rainwater Cisterns 16 Greeter/Office

Loading Area

9 9 13 15 12

4 5

228

Level 2

1 Tech/Staff Offices (584 sq.ft.)

6 Walk-in Cooler (366 sq.ft.)

2 Biogeochemistry (1349 sq.ft.)

7 Sensor Lab

3 Break Room/Kitchen (380

8 Printer & Copier

4 Plant, Soil & Coliform (2383 sq.ft.)

9 Lab Manager Office

5 Screened-in Porch

1 8

1 1 1 3

6 4 7

Roof

1 Access

6 Weather Sensor

2 Packaged VAV Unit

7 Green Roof

3 Generator

8 Porch Roof

4 Photovoltaic Panels 5 Solar Collectors

5 3

229

SCREEN: Used to block sun heat, protect windows during hurricanes, and protect birds from flying into glazing.

EVAPORATIVE COOLING: From water and vegetation in courtyard

NARROW FLOORS:

CISTERNS:

Provide natural daylighting and ventilation.

Rainwater storage for flushing toilets

TRANSVERSE SECTION

SOLAR COLLECTORS: Provide hot water throughout the building.

LONGITUDINAL SECTION

230

PHOTOVOLTAIC PANELS: Cover the south-facing roof, on frames to change the altitude at solstices.

SENSOR LAB: The 20â&#x20AC;&#x2122; lab allows sensor towers to be constructed. Weather stations are mounted on the roof.

VIEW INSIDE BIOGEOCHEMISTRY LAB TOWARD COURTYARD

PLANT, SOIL & COLIFORM LAB

CARPENTRY WORKSHOP: Useful for building necessary items for field research and miscellaneous use.

LOCKER ROOM: Includes showers to use when returning from the field.

BACK OF HOUSE STORAGE: Useful for storing extra materials, kayaks, canoes, UTVs, etc.

VIEW TOWARD BACK OF HOUSE FROM THE REAR ACCESS ROAD

231

Details

Green Roof

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

1 1/2” S.S. Pipe Post 1 5” Growing Media 2 Anchor Plate 3 2’ x 2’ IPE Floor Paneling 4 6” Roof Paving Risers 5 Gravel Fill 6 Filter Fabric 7 Waterproof Membrane 8 Metal Deck Cover 9

232

Lobby Boardwalk

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

3’-0” x 11’-0” Bar Grating 1 3x3 1/4” Metal Tubing 2 1/4” L Bracket 3 6” R Sonotube footing 4 2x8 Decking 5 2x6 Joist 6 Joist Hanger

2x6 Beam

Poured in place Concrete 9

Back Access Road

1’-0”

3”

1’-0”

6”

233

50’-6” Highest point

3 21

6 7

39’-0” Level 2 Finished Floor 15

Cedar battens Galvonized steel standing seam roofing

Aluminum flashing

R-15 rigid insulation

Coreten panel cladding system

Coreten steel frame

Reclaimed Cyprus wood

Steel connection Glulam beam

9 10

Steel cable

Double pane Low-E glass

2x6 southern pine framing

Finished floor, 1” concrete skim coating Cypress cladding 1x Coreten steel columns, 8”

Cypress decking

Pressure-treated southern pine 2x8

Concrete

Steel rebar

Air & Vapor Barrier

28’-0” Level 1 Finished Floor

25’-6” Ground

234

Window flashing

Carbon CarbonSequestration Sequestration Carbon Carbon Carbon Carbon Carbon Carbon Sequestration Sequestration Sequestration Sequestration Sequestration Sequestration Carbon Sequestration

10961 ft3 10961 ft3 volume of products volume ofwood wood products 10961 10961 10961 10961 10961 ft3 ft3 ft3 ft3 ft3 10961 ft3 volume volume volume volume volume volume ofof ofof wood of wood of wood wood wood wood products products products products products products volume of wood products

304 metric tons of CO2 304 metric tons Carbon stored in 304 304 304 304 304 metric metric metric metric metric tons tons tons tons tonsof of ofof of ofCO2 CO2 CO2 CO2 CO2 Carbon stored in the the wood wood 304 metric tons CO2 Carbon Carbon Carbon Carbon Carbon Carbon stored stored stored stored stored stored inin inin the in the in the the the wood the wood wood wood wood wood Carbon stored in the wood

128 metric tons of CO2 128 metric tons 128 128 128 128 128 metric metric metric metric metrictons tons tons tons tons of of of of ofCO2 CO2 CO2 CO2 CO2 Avoided greenhouse gas emissions 128 metric CO2 Avoided greenhouse gas emissions Avoided Avoided Avoided Avoided Avoided Avoided greenhouse greenhouse greenhouse greenhouse greenhouse greenhouse gas gas gas gas gas gas emissions emissions emissions emissions emissions emissions Avoided greenhouse gas emissions

433 metric tons of CO2 433 metric tons 433 433 433 433 433 metric metric metric metric metric tons tons tons tons tons of of of of ofCO2 CO2 CO2 CO2 CO2 433 metric CO2 Total potential carbon benefit Total potential carbon benefit Total Total Total Total Total Total potential potential potential potential potential potential carbon carbon carbon carbon carbon carbon benefit benefit benefit benefit benefit benefit

= = = =

91 cars off the road 91 91 91 91 91 cars cars cars cars cars off the road for a year cars off off off off off the off the the the the road the road road road road road for for for for for afor for aayear ayear ayear year year off the road aayear year 46 homes 46 46 46 46 homes homes homes homes homes energy to power for a year energy 46 homes energy energy energy energy energy energy toto toto power to power to power power power power for for for for for afor for aayear ayear ayear ayear year energy to power ayear year

Total potential carbon benefit

Daylight/Energy Analysis Daylight/Energy Analysis Daylight/Energy Daylight/Energy Daylight/Energy Daylight/Energy Daylight/Energy Daylight/Energy Analysis Analysis Analysis Analysis Analysis Analysis Daylight/Energy Analysis Daylight Analysis: No Shading Daylight Analysis: No Shading Daylight Daylight Daylight Daylight Daylight Daylight Analysis: Analysis: Analysis: Analysis: Analysis: Analysis: No No No No No Shading No Shading Shading Shading Shading Shading Daylight Analysis: Shading

43 43 kBTU 43 kBTU 43 43 kBTU 43 43 kBTU kBTU kBTU kBTU

Cooling System Cooling Cooling Cooling Cooling Cooling Cooling System System System System System Cooling System

Energy Use Intensity Energy Use Intensity Energy Intensity Energy Intensity Energy Energy Energy Energy Energy Use Use Use Use Use Intensity Use Intensity Intensity Intensity Intensity Intensity Energy Energy Energy Energy Energy Use Use Use Use Use Intensity Use Intensity Intensity Intensity Intensity Intensity Energy 2030 ChallengeIntensity = 81 2030 Challenge = 81 2030 2030 2030 2030 2030 Challenge Challenge Challenge Challenge Challenge Challenge ===== 81 = 81 81 =81 =81 81 2030 2030 2030 2030 2030 Challenge Challenge Challenge Challenge Challenge == 81 81 81 = 81 =81 81 2030 Challenge 81 2030 Challenge == 81 2030 Challenge 81 2030 Challenge == 81

off the road for a year off the road for a year off off off off the off the the off the road the road the road road road for road for for for aafor aayear afor year ayear year ayear ayear year off off off off the off the the off the road the road the road road road for road for for for afor aafor year ayear ayear ayear year off the road for off the road for year off the road for year off the road for aayear year

Mostly Well Lit Mostly Well Lit Mostly Mostly Mostly Mostly Mostly Well Well Well Well Well Lit Lit Lit Lit Lit Mostly Well Energy Use Intensity

Energy Use Intensity Energy Energy Energy Energy Energy Energy Use Use Use Use Use Intensity Use Intensity Intensity Intensity Intensity Intensity Energy Intensity 2030 Challenge = 81 2030 2030 2030 2030 2030 2030 Challenge Challenge Challenge Challenge Challenge Challenge === 81 81 81 = =81 81 2030 Challenge 81 2030 Challenge === 81

Daylight Analysis: Shading Daylight Daylight Daylight Daylight Daylight Daylight Analysis: Analysis: Analysis: Analysis: Analysis: Analysis: Shading Shading Shading Shading Shading Shading Daylight Analysis: Shading

43 kBTU 43 kBTU 43 43 43 kBTU 43 kBTU 43 kBTU kBTU kBTU 43 kBTU Energy Use Intensity

Energy Use Intensity Energy Energy Energy Energy Energy Energy Use Use Use Use Use Intensity Use Intensity Intensity Intensity Intensity Intensity Intensity 2030 Challenge = 81 2030 2030 2030 2030 2030 2030 Challenge Challenge Challenge Challenge Challenge Challenge === 81 = 81 81 =81 = 81 81 2030 Challenge 81 2030 Challenge == 81

off the road for a year off off off off the off the the off the road the road the road road road for road for for for afor for ayear afor year aayear ayear year year off the road aayear off the road for year

Cooling System System Cooling Cooling Cooling Cooling Cooling Cooling System System System System System Cooling System Energy Use Intensity

Use Intensity Energy Energy Energy Energy Energy Energy Use Use Use Use Use Intensity Use Intensity Intensity Intensity Intensity Intensity Energy 2030 Challenge = 81 2030 2030 2030 2030 2030 2030 Challenge Challenge Challenge Challenge Challenge Challenge === 81 = 81 81 = =81 81 Challenge 81 2030 Challenge ==81 81

Mostly Well Lit Mostly Mostly Mostly Mostly Mostly Mostly Well Well Well Well Well Well Lit Lit Lit Lit Lit Lit Mostly Well Lit Energy Use Intensity

Energy Use Intensity Energy Energy Energy Energy Energy Energy Use Use Use Use Use Intensity Use Intensity Intensity Intensity Intensity Intensity Energy Use 2030 Challenge = 81 2030 2030 2030 2030 2030 2030 Challenge Challenge Challenge Challenge Challenge Challenge === 81 = 81 81 == 81 =81 81 2030 Challenge 2030 Challenge 81

off the road for a year off off off off the off the the off the road the road the road road road for road for for for afor for afor year afor year ayear aaayear ayear year off the road year off the road year

235 235 235 235 235 235 235 235

Site Model: 1/16" = 1'

236

237 237 237

Structure Structure Model: Model: 1/8" 1/8" == 1' 1' Structure Model: 1/8" = 1'

238 238

238

239

240

241

Abstract The new BICEFS laboratory building follows several defining design strategies that were inspired from the Hobcaw Barony site as well as research and precedent studies of contemporary lab spaces. What was evident both after talking to the current staff and touring the Hobcaw Barony grounds was a need for an efficient consolidation of lab and storage space. The current situation of the BICEFS campus includes an old lab building that is both cramped and poorly organized, a new education center and a handful of small storage sheds scattered through the woods. The proposal is a building that could consolidated all of the current lab spaces while increasing each of their respective square footages, while also providing space for dirty lab work and vehicle storage. The new lab building is long and linear and divided between open lab space and a lab support space. The first floor provides ample room for dirty work under a covered area for vehicle storage. This area would incorporate the wildlife lab as well as an area for the grittier work of the other labs in a naturally ventillated space. The second floor is defined by a central line of circulation that runs between open lab spaces and respective support zones with storage and hardware. The gable roof is open and left clear of dividing walls on the second floor and paired with windows and skylights give the lab an open feel desired by the current faculty.

242

TOTAL CONDITIONED LAB AREA: 15,155 SF

243

Site Plan

Ground Floor

244

Building Assembly Exploded Axonometric 1. Graduate Study Area 2. Conference Room

3. Intern Office 4

CLT Roof Panel

4. Office 5. Kitchen

CLT Roof System CLT Roof System

6. Gator Storage 7. Mechanical Room

8. Tool Storage

Roof Cladding Roof cladding

9. Field Gear Storage

10. Laundry

11. Shop Space

Cable Truss

12. Storage

13. Open Collaborative Space

Timber Rafters

11 2nd Fl. Exterior

Second Floor Exterior System

Renovations Proposed to Exisiting Lab Ground Floor 2nd Fl. Program

Second Floor Program

CLT Flooring Panels CLT Flooring Pannels

5 4 3

6 Timber Rafters

Timber Rafters

New Ground Floor Timber Beams Timber Beams

1st Fl. CLT Walls

First Floor CLT Load Bearing Walls

1st Fl. Structure

First Floor Structual System

10 11

1st Fl. Program

First Floor Program

New Lab 2nd Floor Ground Slab

Ground Slab

1. Garage Entrance

7. Plat/Soil Lab 1710 SF

2. Wildlife Lab 3474 SF

8. Biochemistry Lab 3078 SF

3. Office 150 SF

9. Instrumentation 425 SF

4. Elevated Lab 667 SF

10. Hydrology Lab 2672 SF

5. Flexable Space 3643 SF

11. Storage 350 SF

Base & Flooring Base and Foooting

6. Mechanical Room 253 SF

245

Longitudinal Sections

Carbon Sequestration

246

X-Ray Section

247

Flex Space Render

Interior Lab View

248

Night to Day Section

Lab Interior

249

Model: 1/16" = 1' 250

251

252

Lab Team 3 | Connecting Nodes Nicholas Day | Chen Liang | Megan Schoonmaker | Yin Xia

253

The BICEFS Laboratory design focuses on three main concepts; efficiency, transparency, and connectivity, to maximize the use across the site. The new laboratory holds a spacious lab, with transparent views to the inner courtyard and wetland. All the walls perpendicular to the views through the courtyard to the wetland are transparent curtain walls. The furniture parallels the view route as well, allowing a clear line of sight through the lab. Vertical Louvers wrap the new lab building, and along the east facade of the existing building, providing shade from harsh morning and afternoon sunlight. Within the inner courtyard, new canopy trees are planted to provide shade in the summer. You may reach the education building via a wide central boardwalk, over a constructed wetland. This axis continues toward the proposed boathouse, where boats, and any other equipment can be stored.

254

MOVE ALL LAB FUNCTIONS INTO NEW BUILDING WETLAND

TO HOBCAW HOUSE

MOVE GRADUATE SPACE DOWNSTAIRS

WETLAND

EXISTING LAB

WORKING ZONE

GREEN LAND INBETWEEN EXISTING BOAT SHED

EDUCATING ZONE

STORAGE ZONE BUILD A NEW BOATHOUSE TO REPLACE THE EXISTING BOAT SHED

EDUCATION BUILDING

PUMP HOUSE

CUTTING THROUGH THE NEW LAB

LOADING DOCK EQIUPMENT STORAGE SOILED ENTRANCE OUTDOOR MEP

OPEN THIS BRANCH AS OUTDOOR SPACE

WORKING COURTYARD LENGTHEN THE NEW LAB

ADD SERVICE ROAD AT SOUTH

TO HOBCAW HOUSE

CENTRAL COURTYARD ORIGINAL ECOLOGY PLANTS ANIMALS

SOCIAL COURTYARD PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION FROM EXISTING LAB TO EDUCATION BUILDING OUTDOOR LOUNGE OPEN-AIR STUDENT LECTURE PUBLIC COMMUNICATION CAFE TIME

PEACEFUL COURTYARD

SUNLIGHT PARK CENTRAL WETLAND PLANTS OUTDOOR EXERCISE

PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION FROM EDUCATION LAB TO BOATHOUSE

ORIGINAL WETLAND

CULV

ERT

BICEFS WETLAND RAIN POND

CULV

ERT

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Existing Conditions Program Zoning Landscape Zoning Axis & Connection Transparency Sunlight Analysis Hydrology

255

1 4

11 9

Offices

Detention Pond

Loading Dock

Firebreak

Courtyard

Outdoor Classroom

Dirty Lab

10 Education Building

Clean Lab

11 Boathouse

Boardwalk

Site Plan

Skyline Analysis

256

after expansion & renovation

before expansion & renovation

Program Reorganization

OFFICE ENTRANCE GRADUATE STUDENTS ENTRANCE CLEAN LAB ENTRANCE

OFFICE 172 SF

LOBBY RM 360 SF

LOBBY RM 333 SF

GRADUATE STUDENT SPACES (18)

ADMIN

LAB SUPPORT/

OFFICE 167 SF

STORAGE 380 SF

HYDROLOGY LAB

COPY CENTER 162 SF

767 SF

BIOGEOCHEMISTRY LAB 767 SF

STORAGE 150 SF

MEN WOMEN 94 SF 94 SF

MEETING RM 445 SF

COMMON SPACE KITCHEN & COMMON SPACE 753 SF

MEP MEPSF 198

DEER PEN

PLANT & SOIL LAB 1513 SF OUTDOOR MEP

COLIFORM LAB 1513 SF

ORGANIC/ INSTRUMENT 393 SF

LOADING AREA

LOADING DOCK

OUTDOOR MEP

WILDLIFE LAB 310 SF

LAB SUPPORT/ STORAGE 346 SF

MEP 166 SF

DIRTY LAB ENTRANCE

Lab Plan 257

Volume of wood products used:

293 cubic meters (10,342 cubic feet) U.S. and Canadian forests grow this much wood in:

1 minutes

Carbon stored in the wood:

294 metric tons of carbon dioxide Avoided greenhouse gas emissions:

113 metric tons of carbon dioxide Total potential carbon beneďŹ t:

406 metric tons of carbon dioxide Equivalent to

cars oďŹ&#x20AC; the road for a year

Energy to operate

43 homes for a year

Using louvers on east & west facade can: - save

656 kbtu energy per year which is able to power a Tesla Clemson to New York.

traveling from

-reduce overlit working spaces by

13%.

Exploded Axonometric Diagram

To maximize the connection to the courtyards around the new lab, there both a physical pathway running through the building and glazed exterior walls which provide transparency. Visibility from the labs into the courtyards is clear and uninterrupted. All of the load bearing walls are made from cross laminated timber panels and run parallel to the organizing boardwalk in order to preserve the transparency of the glazed east and west walls. Glue laminated timber frames also run parallel to the path and guide the view of the occupants out to the courtyards. Since the east and west facades are mostly glazed, vertical louvers were required for shading the lab spaces during the morning and late afternoon hours.

258

Section a-a

Section b-b

Soil Lab Interior Perspective

259

C-C SECTION Standing seam roofing EPDM water proofing Rigid insulation board Vapor barrier 6” CLT roof panel Glue Laminated Timber Beam

Standing seam roofing EPDM water proofing Rigid insulation board Vapor barrier 6” CLT roof panel Glue Laminated Timber Beam

Standing Metal copping seam roofing EPDM EPDM water water proofing proofing Rigid Pivoting insulation louvers board driving system Vapor Pivoting barrierlouvers 6” CLT roof panel Glue Laminated Timber Beam

Vertical wood siding Air space / Siding bracket EPDM water proofing Rigid insulation board Air space / Siding bracket Interior wood finish

Metal copping EPDM water proofing Pivoting louvers driving system Pivoting louvers

Vertical wood siding Air space / Siding bracket EPDM water proofing Rigid insulation board Air space / Siding bracket Interior wood finish

Standing seam roofing EPDM water proofing Rigid insulation board Vapor barrier 6” CLT roof panel Glue Laminated Timber Beam

C-C SE

Standing seam roo EPDM water proofi Rigid insulation bo Vapor barrier 6” CLT roof panel Glue Laminated T

Ve Air EP Rig 6”

Self-leveling concrete finish Concrete slab Water proofing Gravels Packed soil

WALL SECTION 01

260

Self-leveling concrete finish Concrete slab Water proofing Gravels Packed soil

WALL SECTION 01

3/4” = 1’

WALL SECTION 3/4” = 1’ 02

WALL SECTION 02

3/4” = 1’

WALL 3/4” SECTION = 1’ 03

WALL SECTIO

261

Boathouse Rendering

Boathouse Plan 262

Site Storage

Circulation & Sustainability Analysis 263

Section c-c

Section d-d

264

Standing seam roofing EPDM water proofing Rigid insulation board Vapor barrier OSB panels Glue Laminated Timber Beam

265

Canopy Vegetation Analysis

ORIGINAL WETLAND

CUL VER TS

BICEFS WETLAND

CUL VER TS

RAIN POND

Wetland & Culvert Strategy 266

Courtyard Perspective

DRAINAGE

EVAPORATION &PERCOLATIO N

MULCH BIORETENTION SOIL MIX GRAVEL

TR FIL

O AT I

ACORUS CALAMUS PANICUM VIRGATUM CAREX PENSYLVANICA ILEX GLABRA

MEABLE SURSLOPE WITH PER HOUT FACES THROUG

Wetland Section Perspective 267

268

269

270

Lab Team 4 | COL-Lab Josh Rowell | Robert Kirkland | Eric Scardo | Mackenzie Conlon

271

Abstract This project is not a 9000 square foot lab, but instead a 16,000-acre lab. Our proposal extends the lab space, figuratively and literally, past the boundaries of the walls. The 16,000 acres of the Hobcaw Barony site as our lab, and our building as the hub. Material transparency and connection to the site were both very important in creating this collaborative environment. Furthermore, the interior structure is aligned with the exterior vegetation to continuously direct the occupantsâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; eye outward towards this research landscape. The new building is practically divided into "dirty work" and "clean work" environments. The back-of-house and dirty work spaces are designed to facilitate researchers coming and going between this hub and the larger Hobcaw Barony property.

272

Alignment

Campus Views

Collaborative Spaces

Clean vs. Dirty Workspace

Exterior Circulation

Field Research

Program

Site Link

273

Site Plan

North Perspective

274

7 1 6

21 12

11 5

1st Floor Plan

17 19 20 18

2nd Floor Plan

1. Hydrology Lab

8. Histology Lab

15. Dining 1230 SF

2. Plants & Soils Lab

9. Mechanical Room 328 SF

16. Kitchen

3. Garage 750 SF

10. Incubator 425 SF

17. Conference Room 600 SF

4. Field Prep Area 480 SF

11. Walk-in Cooler 200 SF

18. Office 450 SF ea.

5. Mud Room 400 SF

12. Refridgerators 200 SF

19. Biochemical Lab 2160 SF

6. Organics Lab 4620 SF

13. Graduate Study Area 1900 SF

20. Electrical Closet 300 SF

7. Coliform Lab

14. Storage 400 SF

21. Cistern 320 SF

275

Interior Perspective

276

Interior Circulation

Personel Use

277

East Elevation

South Elevation

North Elevation

West Elevation

278

Structural Grid

Lab Square Footage 1913 sq ft 2697 sq ft 4668 sq ft

279

propagate

install

repeat

carbon sequestration volume of wood products used 15,893 of (206,492 CLT and Glulam 12,906ft3ftÂł board

feet) of lumber and sheathing

U.S. and Canadians forests grow this much wood in 1 1 minute minute

carbon stored in the wood: 421 metric tons of CO2

290 metric tons of CO2 avoided greenhouse gas emissions

163 tons of CO2 610metric metric tons of CO2

Equivalent to 124 offoff the the roadroad for a year 172cars cars for a

year

Energy to operate 62 homes for a year

Energy to operate 76 homes for a year

280

grey water collection roof area: 9600 sq. ft. 5950 gallons of grey water per 1â&#x20AC;? of rain average anual rainfall in region: 48â&#x20AC;? 286,752 gallons of gray water collected annually 3,000 gallon cistern

Longitude Section

Section Perspective 281

Clean Lab Conditioning

Skylight

282

283

284

285

286

287

288

Lab 5 | Baruch Living Lab Ian Timmerman

289

FANS LOCATED IN THE OHALLORAN TOWER HELP WITH MECHANICALLY ASSISTED NATURAL VENTILATION IN JUNCTION WITH CHOSS VENTILATION AND STACK VENTILATION TO CIRCULATE AIR FLOW THROUGH DIFFERENT AREAS OF THE STRUCURE

NORTH FACING SECTION

NORTH AND SOUTH FLOWING WINDS FLOW THROUGH THE BUILDING AT THE THE FRONT AND REAR OF THE STRUCTURE BY MEANS OF CROSS VENTILATION.

SOUTH FACING SECTION

PERSPECTIVE RENDERING

Abstract Treating the structure as if were a living entity and drawing inspiration from the forestry aspect of the BICEFS. Analyzing the way the building will deal with three specific elements as if it were a tree. These elements are air/wind, solar energy/light, and water. Also exploring how this lab can harness and exploit these factors in the most efficient method possible. In essence applying architectural methods in the design process that will in turn enhance the notion that the structure is not solely four walls and a roof, but that it can also be alive.

290

Site Plan

291

water. Also exploring lab harness and exploit these factors the efficient possible. Inofessence applying Treating the Treating structure the Treating structure as if were the how structure as a living ifthis were entity asacan living if were and entity drawing a living and inspiration entity drawing andinspiration drawing from theininspiration forestry frommost theaspect forestry from the ofmethod aspect the forestry Baruch ofaspect the Institute. Baruch theAnalyzing Institute. Baruch Institute. AnalyzingAna architectural methods in the design process that will in turn enhance the notion that the structure is not solely four walls and a the way the thebuilding way the the will building way dealthewith will building three deal with will specific deal threeelements with specific threeas elements specific if it were elements as aiftree. it were as These ifa tree. it elements were These a tree. are elements These air/wind, elements aresolar air/wind, energy/light, are solar air/wind, energy/light, and solar energy/ligh and roof, but that it can also be alive. water. Alsowater. exploring Also water. exploring how Also this lab exploring howcan thisharness lab howcan this and harness lab exploit canand harness these exploit factors and these exploit in factors thethese mostinfactors efficient the most inmethod efficient the most possible. method efficientIn possible. method essencepossible. Inapplying essence Inapplying essence ap Treating the structure asainliving ifthe were a living and drawing inspiration from the forestry of the Baruch Treating the structure asain ifliving were entity and drawing from forestry ofaspect the Baruch Analyzing architectural architectural methods architectural inmethods design methods the process design that process design will inthat process turnentity will enhance inthat turninspiration will the enhance innotion turn the enhance thatnotion the aspect structure the that notion the structure isthat not the solely structure isInstitute. not four solely walls isInstitute. not four andsolely walls a Institute. four andwalls a Anaa Treating the structure as ifthe were entity and drawing inspiration from the forestry ofaspect the Baruch Analyzing the way the building will deal with three specific elements as if it were a tree. These elements are air/wind, solar energy/ligh thebuilding way the will building will deal threeroof, specific elements as ifaitbut itbe were aittree. Thesebeelements are air/wind, solar energy/light, and but that roof, that roof, also can alive. that also be can alive. also alive. the way the deal with threewith specific elements as ifitbut itcan were tree. These elements are air/wind, solar energy/light, and water. howcan thisand labexploit canand harness and exploit these in method the mostpossible. efficientpossible. method possible. Inapplying essence ap water. Also exploring howcan thisharness lab harness exploit these factors infactors the most efficient method In applying essence water. Also exploring howAlso this exploring lab these factors in the most efficient In essence 3 3 in the3 design 3 process that will in turn enhance the notion that the structure is not solely four walls a architectural methods 2methods = 1932 SQ FT four 1 the architectural in theprocess design process that willenhance in turn enhance notion that the structure is not solely LOBBY methods in the design that will in turn the notion that the structure is not solely four walls andwalls a and a 1 architectural roof, but that itKITCHEN/BREAK canalive. also beROOM alive. Treating the structure as if the werestructure a living entity and drawing inspiration the aspect of forestry the Baruch Institute. Treating as if were a living entity and drawing inspiration from the aspect of theAnalyzing Baruch Institute. Ana roof, but that itfrom can also be 2 forestry roof, but that it can also be alive. Treating the structure as if were a living entity and drawing inspiration from the forestry aspect of the Baruch Institute. Analyzing the way the building deal threewill specific elements if it were a tree.asThese elements areThese air/wind, solar energy/light, and energy/ligh thewill way thewith building deal with three as specific elements it were a tree. elements are air/wind, solar = 483.5 SQ FT 3 ifPOST-DOC/TECHNICHIAN OFFICES 3 3 3with3 three 3 3 3 elements 3 specific 3 3 as if it were a tree. These elements are air/wind, solar energy/light, and the 2way the building will23 deal 5can harness 2 Also = 1932 SQ FT = 1932 SQ FT = 1932 FT 1in LOBBY 1 1 water.1 Also exploring how this exploring lab can these factors thethese most efficient method possible. In essence applying LOBBY LOBBY 6 harness water. how5 thisand labexploit and exploit factors in the most efficient method possible. In SQ essence ap 4 LAB 265 SQ FT In essence TECHNICIANS OFFICES method =possible. water. Also8 exploring how this lab can harness and exploit these factors in the most efficient applying architectural methods in the design process thatdesign will inprocess turn enhance the notion that the structure is not solely four walls and a architectural methods in the that will in turn enhance the notion that the structure is not solely four walls a ROOM2 KITCHEN/BREAK ROOM 2 KITCHEN/BREAK 2 KITCHEN/BREAK = 396.8 SQ FT four walls and a 5 the BATHROOMS architectural methods in the design process that will in turn enhance notion that theROOM structure is not solely roof, but that it 3canroof, also3but bePOST-DOC/TECHNICHIAN alive.it3can that also be alive. 3 3 3 = 483.5 SQOFFICES FT =FT 483.5 SQ FT = 483.5 SQ FT POST-DOC/TECHNICHIAN OFFICES OFFICES = 115 SQ 3 roof, but that it can also 6 HVAC SYSTEMS bePOST-DOC/TECHNICHIAN alive. 3 ROOM 3 3 3 13 2 3 3 11 3 3 = 1932 SQ FT 2 = 1932 SQ FT 1 LOBBY 1 LOBBY 1

WILDLIFE LAB

HYDROLOGY LAB

DLIFE LAB

HYDROLOGY LAB

WILDLIFE LAB

PLANT AND ECOLOGY LAB

DLIFE LAB

HYDROLOGY LAB

COLIFORM LAB PLANT AND ECOLOGY LAB

STORAGE COLIFORM LAB

FLOOR PLAN

HYDROLOGY LAB

HYDROLOGY LAB WILDLIFE LAB STORAGE

LAN FLOOR PLAN FLOOR PLAN COLIFORM LAB

COLIFORM LAB

HYDROLOGY LAB

FLOOR PLAN FLOOR PLAN 1 PLAN HYDROLOGY LAB

WILDLIFE LAB

DLIFE LAB

STORAGE

PLAN 7 FLOOR PLAN FLOOR PLAN

HYDROLOGY LAB

1213

IOR

INTE TER

IOR

1289 13

ULA

13 12

13 9

13 10 12 9

/EX PRIV

TIO

INTE

RC IRC

ULA

ULA VATTI EO

TER

R/E XTE

RIO

PRI

RIO

ES PAC

RC IRC

ULA

PUB

LIC

TIO

PRI ES PAC

RIO

TIO

IRC

ULA

RIO

TIO

RIO

ULA

ECTIONS IRC ULA

RIO

TIO

ECTIONS

T FACING SECTION

292

ECTIONS

BUI

LDI

VIEW

BUI

LDI

UB HRO LIC UG SPA H B CE UIL

/GA

THE

BUI

LIGH

BUI

TIL

LDI

DIN

/GA

RIN

VEN

LDI

VIEW

PUB

LIC

ERM

/GA

EAT

RIN

ION

VEN

LAB

IRC

ULA

PLUABBO

LIC

IRC

ULA

TIO

PHOTOVOLTAIC PANELS ALIGNED ON THE NORTHERN ROOFING ALLOWS FOR THE CAPTURE OF SOLAR ENERGY AND USE THE ENERGY COLLECTED TO OFFSETS POWER USAGE AND CONSUPTION AND EFFECTIVELY LOWERING THE ENERGY COSTS FOR THE BUILDING

LAB

SPA

CES

ATO

SPA

CES

NAT

ATO

SPA

CES

CROSS VENILATION THROUGHOUT THE BUILDING ALLOWS FOR FRESH AIRFLOW THROUGH THE STRUCTURE

PHOTOVOLTAIC PANELS ALIGNED PHOTOVOLTAIC ON THE NORTHERN PANELSROOFING ALIGNED PHOTOVOLTAIC ON THE NORTHERN PANELS ALIGNED ROOFINGON THE NORTHERN ROOFING ALLOWS FOR THE CAPTURE OFALLOWS SOLAR ENERGY FOR THEAND CAPTURE USE THE OF ALLOWS ENERGY SOLARFOR ENERGY THE CAPTURE AND USE OF THESOLAR ENERGY ENERGY AND USE THE ENERGY COLLECTED TO OFFSETS POWER COLLECTED USAGE AND TO CONSUPTION OFFSETS POWER COLLECTED ANDUSAGE AND TO OFFSETS CONSUPTION POWER AND USAGE AND CONSUPTION AND EFFECTIVELY LOWERING THE ENERGY EFFECTIVELY COSTSLOWERING FOR THE BUILDING THEEFFECTIVELY ENERGY COSTS LOWERING FOR THETHE BUILDING ENERGY COSTS FOR THE BUILDING

PHOTOVOLTAIC PANELS ALIGNED ON THE NORTHERN ROOFING PHOTOVOLTAIC PANELS ALIGNED THETHE NORTHERN ALLOWSONFOR CAPTUREROOFING OF SOLAR ENERGY AND USE THE ENERGY PHOTOVOLTAIC PANELS ALIGNED ON THE NORTHERN ROOFING ALLOWS FOR THE CAPTURECOLLECTED OF SOLAR ENERGY AND POWER USE THEUSAGE ENERGY TO OFFSETS AND CONSUPTION AND ALLOWS FOR THE CAPTURE OF SOLAR ENERGY AND USE THE ENERGY COLLECTED TO OFFSETS POWER USAGE AND CONSUPTION AND COSTS FOR THE BUILDING EFFECTIVELY LOWERING THE ENERGY COLLECTED TO OFFSETS POWER USAGE AND CONSUPTION AND EFFECTIVELY LOWERING THE ENERGY COSTS FOR THE BUILDING EFFECTIVELY LOWERING THE ENERGY COSTS FOR THE BUILDING CROSS VENILATION THROUGHOUT CROSS THEVENILATION THROUGHOUT CROSSTHE VENILATION THROUGHOUT THE BUILDING ALLOWS FOR FRESHBUILDING AIRFLOWALLOWS FOR FRESH BUILDING AIRFLOW ALLOWS FOR FRESH AIRFLOW THROUGH THE STRUCTURE THROUGH THE STRUCTURE THROUGH THE STRUCTURE

NAT

EAT

ERM

EAT

ION

TIL

EAT

ATI

LIGH

NAT

ATI

ERM

EAT

ION

VEN

TIL

EAT

ION

ERM

EAT

ION

VEN

TIL

ATI

VEN

TIL

ATI

TIL

ATI

VEN

TIL

ATI

ION

DIT

CON

ABS

LAB

ION

IT ND

LAB

VEN

TIL

ERM

ATI

NAT

NAT ATI

TIL

ED D HERI NE ERI NG ITION NG ITIO D D ON CON

ATH

VEN

ABS

VEN

ATI

VEN

NAT

NAT TIL

NAT

ATI

VEN

ATE

GALTABS

NG NDIT CO

ION

TIL

LIGH

LIG

HT VEN PERM

ION

VEN

SPA

NAT

ATO

SPA

CES

LAB OR

NAT CES

CES

LAB

SPA

CES

ATO

SPA

LAB ATO

CES

ATO

TIO

LAB

LAB ULA

ATO

SPA

LIGH

SPA

ION

ERM

IC/

ION

ERI

TIL

TIL ATE DL ABS BS A L B S IC/G PUB /GA D AL S E THE LIC N TH O LAB I / E RIN T GAT RIN I ED G G HER OND ON ITI INGC LIGH LIGH D TP TP CON ERM ERM EAT EAT ION ION

EAT

LAB

ERM

LIGH

LIC

SPA

CES

SPA

CES

LIC

PUB

PUB LAB

ATO

PUB

SOPRAY S

CEPA

SPA

LIGH

T G DI

S BL

ATE

LIC

LIRCAT

SPA

TIO

IRC

APBUS BLI

/ VEN

ED GATH

ION

RIN

CON TIL ATE DL ABPU

C/G

THE

VEN

ATE

PUB

ST VIEW HR ST OU GH HR BUI OU BUI GH LDI LDI PUNBG BUI PUB NG LDI LIC LIC NG SPA SPA

INTE RC

SPA

LIC

TIO

RIO

PUB

IRC

VIEW

INTE

ES PAC

INTE

RIO

IONS

LIC

VAT

PS T

PUB

ES PAC

ULA

VIEW

VAT

IRC

BUI

LDI

LATE SP ION ACE

INTE

VAT

VIEW

= 1932 SQ FT 1 LOBBY 4 LAB TECHNICIANS 4 LAB TECHNICIANS 4 LAB FT SQ = 265 OFFICES OFFICES= 265 OFFICES =SQ 1800 FT SQ FT= 265 SQ FT LABTECHNICIANS 7 BIOGEOCHEMISTRY ROOM 2 KITCHEN/BREAK ROOM 2 KITCHEN/BREAK ROOM 2 KITCHEN/BREAK = 1071 SQ FT SQ FT 8 SOILS LAB/DIRTY SPACE = 396.8 SQ FT = 396.8 = 5 BATHROOMS 5 BATHROOMS 5 WORK BATHROOMS = 396.8 483.5 SQ SQ FT FT 3 POST-DOC/TECHNICHIAN OFFICES 483.5 SQ FT 3 POST-DOC/TECHNICHIAN = 483.5 SQSQ=FTFT 3 POST-DOC/TECHNICHIAN OFFICES OFFICES = 200 9 WALK-IN REFRIGERATOR = 115 SQ FT = 115 SQ FT = 115 SQ FT 6 HVAC SYSTEMS 6 HVAC 6 HVAC ROOM SYSTEMS ROOM SYSTEMS ROOM 4 = 265 SQ FT LAB TECHNICIANS OFFICES 4 LAB TECHNICIANS OFFICES = 265 4 LAB10TECHNICIANS SQSQSQ FT=FT265 SQ FT OFFICES = 73 FREEZER 1932 LOBBY WALK-IN = 1932 17 LOBBY SQ FTFT = 1800 SQ FT 1800 SQ FT BIOGEOCHEMISTRY LAB BIOGEOCHEMISTRY LAB ==1800 LAB 71 BIOGEOCHEMISTRY = 396.8 SQ FT = 1932 5 157 LOBBY BATHROOMS =FTFT 396.8SQ SQFT FT BATHROOMS = 396.8 SQ 52 BATHROOMS 11 = 315 SQ O’HALLORAN TOWER ROOM KITCHEN/BREAK ROOM KITCHEN/BREAK 28 SPACE =ROOM 1071 FT= 1071 SQ FT = 1071 SQ FT 8 SOILS 8 SOILSWORK LAB/DIRTY LAB/DIRTY SOILSWORK LAB/DIRTY SPACE WORKSQSPACE = 115 SQ FT 6 HVAC SYSTEMS ROOM= 240.5=SQ115 KITCHEN/BREAK ROOM 26 HVAC SYSTEMS ROOM 12 SYSTEMS = 115 SQ FTFT FT SQ FT= 483.5 SQ FT MUDROOM 6 HVAC ROOM 483.5 POST-DOC/TECHNICHIAN OFFICESREFRIGERATOR POST-DOC/TECHNICHIAN OFFICES ==200 SQ SQ FT = 200 SQ FT 200 SQ FT 93 WALK-IN 9 WALK-IN 39REFRIGERATOR REFRIGERATOR WALK-IN =AREA 1800 SQ FT = SQFT FT LAB 37 POST-DOC/TECHNICHIAN 7 BIOGEOCHEMISTRY = 483.5 1800 SQ 13 BACK BACKSQDOCK/SERVICE BIOGEOCHEMISTRY LAB OFFICES DOCK/SERVICE = 265 1800 FT BIOGEOCHEMISTRY LABLABAREA 7 LAB TECHNICIANS OFFICES SQFTFT TECHNICIANS OFFICES ==73 SQSQ FTFT= 73 SQ FT = 265 73 SQ 104 WALK-IN 10FREEZER 104FREEZER WALK-IN WALK-IN FREEZER = 48 LAB = 265 SQ FT 8 SOILSWORK LAB/DIRTY WORK SPACE TECHNICIANS OFFICES = 1071 SQ FT 1071 SQ FT SOILS LAB/DIRTY SPACE = 396.8 1071 SQ FT 8 SOILS LAB/DIRTY WORK SPACE = SQ FT 5 BATHROOMS 11 O’HALLORAN 11 O’HALLORAN 115 BATHROOMS = 315ROOM SQ FT = 315 SQ FT= 396.8 315 SQSQFTFT TOWER ROOM O’HALLORAN TOWER ROOM TOWER = 200 SQ FT WALK-IN REFRIGERATOR = 59 BATHROOMS 200 SQSQFTFT WALK-IN 9REFRIGERATOR = 115 200 SQ FT FT= 396.8 9 HVAC WALK-IN REFRIGERATOR = SYSTEMS ROOM126 HVAC SQSQ FTFT 240.5SQ SQ FT = 240.5 SQ = FT = 115 240.5 SYSTEMS =ROOM 126 MUDROOM 12 MUDROOM MUDROOM 10FREEZER WALK-IN SQFT FT = 73 SQ FT 6 HVAC SYSTEMS ROOM FREEZER = 115 73 SQ WALK-IN = 1800 73 SQSQ FT= 10 BIOGEOCHEMISTRY WALK-IN10FREEZER = FT LAB = 1800DOCK/SERVICE SQAREA FT 137 BACK 13 BACK DOCK/SERVICE 137AREA BACK DOCK/SERVICE BACK DOCK/SERVICE AREA BACK A BIOGEOCHEMISTRY LAB DOCK/SERVICE BACK DOCK/SERVICE AREA AREA 11 O’HALLORAN TOWER ROOM = SQFTFT= 315 SQ FT 117 BIOGEOCHEMISTRY = 1800 315 SQ O’HALLORAN TOWERLAB ROOM 11 O’HALLORAN = 1071 315 SQ FTFT TOWER ROOM SQ 8 SOILS LAB/DIRTY WORK SPACELAB/DIRTY=WORK = 1071 SQ FT 8 SOILS SPACE VEN = 240.5 SQ FT 12 MUDROOM LAB/DIRTY WORK SPACE TIL= 240.5 SQ = =FT1071 240.5SQ SQFT FT 128 SOILS MUDROOM 129 WALK-IN ATE MUDROOM D200 = REFRIGERATOR = 200 SQ FT 9 WALK-IN REFRIGERATOR LAB SQ FT S P 13REFRIGERATOR A BACK DOCK/SERVICE AREA = 200DOCK/SERVICE SQLAFT UBL BS BACK DOCK/SERVICE 139 WALK-IN BACK AREA BACK DOCK/SERVICE AREA IC/ 13 BACK DOCK/SERVICE BACK DOCK/SERVICE AREA GAT = ED 10 WALK-IN FREEZER 10 AREA = 73 SQ FT WALK-IN FREEZER HER 73 SQ FT ION ING DIT = C73 10 WALK-IN FREEZER ON SQ FT 11 O’HALLORAN TOWER11ROOM = 315ROOM SQ FT = 315 SQ FT O’HALLORAN TOWER 11 O’HALLORAN TOWER ROOM = 315 SQ FT = 240.5 SQ FT 12 MUDROOM = 240.5 SQ FT 12 MUDROOM VEN VEN VEN = 240.5 TIL TIL TIL SQ FT 12 MUDROOM ATE ATE ATE D L BACK DOCK/SERVICE DL DAREA 13 BACK DOCK/SERVICE13AREA L DOCK/SERVICE A ABS ABACK BACK AREA ABPS BS PUB DOCK/SERVICE P S S S UBL 13 BACK DOCK/SERVICE BACK DOCK/SERVICE LIC AREA UBLIC IC LAB LAB AREA LAB

TIL

CIPR RIVAT

IOR

SNPA

VIEW OU

VIEW

RIO

/EX

TIO

VIEW

TIO

13 5

56 13

RIO

TER ATE IOR SP CIR ACE CU LA

LDI

ULA

R/E XTE

RC IRC

135 5 3

13 5 5 6 11 33 3 3

10 11 5 136

6 13 8 10 9

VIEW

ION

RIO

11 35 6 133

TIO

LAT

INTE

119

RIO

CIR

IOR

11 63 8

R/E XTE

ULA

129

RIO

/EX

ATI

IOR

IRC

12 9 13

RIO

Floor 4Plan

R/E XTE

8 129

1 7

47 INTE

8 9

55 6

5 6

ATE

P A UB

ITI

D ON

LAB

IOR

CIR

RAT

LAT

YS PAC

ION

SECTIONS PHOTOVOLTAIC PANELS ALIGNED ON THE NORTHERN ROOFING ALLOWS FOR THE CAPTURE OF SOLAR ENERGY AND USE THE ENERGY COLLECTED TO OFFSETS POWER USAGE AND CONSUPTION AND EFFECTIVELY LOWERING THE ENERGY COSTS FOR THE BUILDING

CROSS VENILATION THROUGHOUT THE BUILDING ALLOWS FOR FRESH AIRFLOW THROUGH THE STRUCTURE

East Facing Section

EAST FACING SECTION

Nouth Facing Section

NORTH FACING SECTION

NORTH AND SOUTH FLOWING WINDS FLOW THROUGH THE BUILDING AT THE THE FRONT AND REAR OF THE STRUCTURE BY MEANS OF CROSS VENTILATION.

SOUTH FACING SECTION

South Facing Section

293

WALL SECTIONS C COPING SYSTEM COVER COPING SYSTEM BASE SPACING BLOCK 1.25” RIGID INSULATION 3-LAYER CLT ROOFING PANEL COVERBOARD MOISTURE BARRIER 45 DEGREE CANT

METAL SHEET ROOFING MOISTURE MEMBRANE 1.25” RIGID INSULATION 1.25” RIGID INSULATION 3-LAYER CLT ROOFING PANEL GLULAM STRUCTURAL BEAM

MOISTURE BARRIER CONCRETE ROOFING SLAB 1.25” RIGID INSULATION 1.25” RIGID INSULATION 3-LAYER CLT ROOFING PANEL .5” SHEETROCK

WALL SECTIONS WOOD USED (CUBIC FEET)

WALLAX SECTIONS O N O M E T R I C D I A G R A M

FINIS

HED

SRTU

COPING SYSTEM COVER COPING SYSTEM BASE SPACING BLOCK 1.25” RIGID INSULATION 3-LAYER CLT ROOFING PANEL COVERBOARD MOISTURE BARRIER 45 DEGREE CANT

METAL SHEET ROOFING MOISTURE MEMBRANE 1.25” RIGID INSULATION 1.25” RIGID INSULATION 3-LAYER CLT ROOFING PANEL GLULAM STRUCTURAL BEAM

18,094

CTU

ANODIZED ALUMINUM FLASHING ANODIZED ALUMINUM SIDING 1.25” RIGID INSULATION MOISTURE MEMBRANE GLULAM STRUCTURAL GIRDER SPACING BLOCK

COPING SYSTEM COVER COPING SYSTEM BASE SPACING BLOCK 1.25” RIGID INSULATION 3-LAYER CLT ROOFING PANEL COVERBOARD MOISTURE BARRIER 45 DEGREE CANT

METAL SHEET ROOFING MOISTURE MEMBRANE 1.25” RIGID INSULATION 1.25” RIGID INSULATION 3-LAYER CLT ROOFING PANEL GLULAM STRUCTURAL BEAM

MOISTURE BARRIER CONCRETE ROOFING SLAB 1.25” RIGID INSULATION 1.25” RIGID INSULATION 3-LAYER CLT ROOFING PANEL .5” SHEETROCK

KAWNEER STOREFRONT SYSTEM DOUBLE-PANED INSULATED GLASS