2022 Graduate Comprehensive Studio | PART 04

This book contains the work of the 2022 Graduate Comprehensive Studio at Clemson University. This project involved a close collaboration with the United States Coast Guard and its Base Charleston. This was the third in a series of design studies conducted at Clemson University, in which students and their faculty explored the use of highly-sustainable, advanced timber systems for Department of Defense and Department of Homeland Security buildings. This work was conducted in conjunction with Clemson’s multidisciplinary Wood Utilization + Design (WU+D) Institute, and it was funded by the U.S. Endowment for Forests and Communities. Concurrent studios, looking at other DOD / DHS sites, were conducted at the Universities of Arkansas and Oregon. Together, we thank the U.S. Endowment for Forests and Communities for its generous support.

As the United States Coast Guard undertakes the largest construction program in our Service’s history, the Clemson University School of Architecture students brought a unique blend of creativity, advances in technology, and out of the box thinking to this project. Their presentations combined conventional concepts of space planning and resiliency with innovative ones like sustainability and carbon emission avoidance. This approach has made us think differently about the way we construct future shore facilities in Charleston and around the globe.”

- Captain John Berry, Commanding Officer USCG Facilities Design and Construction Center

Thank you to the staff and students at Clemson University’s School of Architecture for the remarkable partnership while designing facilities and infrastructure in support of the United States Coast Guard Base Charleston build-out. The proposed site presents unique challenges related to environmental impact, project phasing, coastal resiliency, and user experience. All of the final presentations exceeded expectations, incorporating creative design features and cutting edge practices that would ensure mission support and operational success at an installation positioned to become the premier Coast Guard center of gravity on the east coast.

- Lieutenant John Houk, USCG Base Charleston Facilities Engineer

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROJECT SITE AND AREA OF FOCUS

MULTIFAMILY HOUSING - NICK HAROLD, BAKER RODDEY, LANDON HANNAH...................................................................................... 10

CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER - MOLLY PARK, SARAH MILEY................................................................................................................ 28 CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER ALTERNATE - MATTHEW BOUREAN....................................................................................................... 46

SECTOR COMMAND - BRITTANY LAPPLE, MICHAELA CHRISMAN............................................................................................................ 52

BASE COMMAND - THALY JIMENEZ, TATE DELUCCIA................................................................................................................................. 70

SUPERTEAM 2

MULTIFAMILY HOUSING - HAILEY KRABBE, LYDIA LEHMAN

CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER - JENN DUTT, TAYLOR WAHLER ............................................................................................................114

SECTOR COMMAND - COLIN BLAND, ERIC BELL

BASE COMMAND - CARLEY DOWNS, DANNY CASANOVA, RJ GROSS

COURTNEY WOLFF

GEOFFREY POWELL LAUREN PRAEUNER

DANIEL MECCA

JESSICA LONGHURST

KIMANI GRAYSON

ZACHARY STUEMER

SYDNEY PARKER

EMMA GIBSON

MULTI FAMILY HOUSING CHILD DEVELOPMENT SECTOR COMMAND BASE COMMAND

Our design planning sought to address four concerns: unaddressed flooding, parking, a reduction in building frontage, and the role of green space as a filler. We studied our proposal as both a logical next step in the evolution of the site and an ecologically responsible path to the site’s future. The Coast Guard Headquarters in Washington, DC, was used as a precedent case study to develop strategies to filter and manage water, grade the site, and incorporate native landscapes in courtyards. The strategies we relied on the most from this case study were green roof water collection, stormwater gathering areas, filtration systems, and regional landscaping.

When placing buildings on the site, we initially mapped out placement based on adjacencies and incorporating natural green space. The Child Development Center was established on Dyess Avenue as a more formal frontage road to accommodate parent pick-up zones and serve as our neighborhood’s face. The Sector Command and Base Command are placed on the working waterfronts to accommodate workflow, while medical and dental are placed across the street to provide ambulance access. We also manipulated the flat topography to create purposeful high and low points to filter water and people through the site. Throughout this process, we considered the movement of these elements across the site and the connections and relationships that movement created between our different buildings.

At the start of this project, we recognized the minimal importance of working with the floodplain program on the first floor, and manipulating the topography means that parts of the site are elevated above flood levels. In all buildings, any portion of the building below the plane is a concrete structure podium.

CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT

ANNOTATED EXCERPT FROM FLETC/USCG MASTERPLAN

SITE ANALYSIS DIAGRAM

FLOODPLAIN ANALYSIS DIAGRAM

SUN STUDY DIAGRAMS

LONGITUDINAL SITE SECTIONS

VIEW OF SITE FROM PARKING

MULTIFAMILY HOUSING

FOR SUPERTEAM 4 SUB-MASTERPLAN

Premise Material Performance + Contexual Experience

Context

Ecological Dwelling

The home is an architecture deeply connected to the person, thus providing an excellent opportunity for influencing an occupant’s way of life. It is an opportunity to redefine behavior patterns by understanding that humans and nature are tied together through processes and time. Usually, integrated systems refer to integrating a building’s mechanical systems with the building’s structural systems, but this project also integrates ecological processes and systems. The Charleston Coast Guard Base is an opportunity to leverage architecture as a mediator in negotiating a more balanced relationship between humans, carbon, energy, and water. The project leverages natural systems as building systems to redefine modern dwelling patterns.

The site’s location and history are of industrial use, but within the proposed United States Coast Guard base, there is a need for multi-family housing. With its domestic use, housing has typically been in opposition to industrial areas in the US since the creation of zoning laws. Additionally, architecture and the USCG are responsible for accounting for the context offered. With this responsibility to the context in mind, how can we negotiate between the domestic and the industrial? This negotiation requires leveraging material qualities to hybridize new and old experiences of these two uses.

One of the main underlying goals of the United States Military is to construct a healthy and effective base operation by building community and fostering camaraderie among military personnel and their families. This ground-up ideology starts at home, and its effects ripple throughout the rest of the base. Thus, it is critical to the design success of a multifamily housing complex at the Charleston Coast Guard Base to consider this fellowship and camaraderie. By orienting the interiors of the units around shared areas, providing large transitional zones between private and public spaces, and integrating a multitude of programmed communal regions throughout, this building will inspire as much engagement as possible among occupants and thus enhance the overall operation of the base

Question

How can we express natural systems through design to motivate and inform occupants’ patterns of being towards a more sustainable and ecologically integrated way of life?

How can the performance of materials be used to provide for contexual experiences?

How can the building effectively engage the user and foster community to enhance the overall experience of the occupant?

GEOFFREY POWELL

COURTNEY WOLFF GEOFFREY POWELL

Communal + Engaging

ZACHARY STUEMER

Working within the design context of the Coast Guard Base Charleston along the Cooper River with the typology of multi-family housing, our project merges three premises. The project represents “ecological dwelling,” spaces that are “communal and engaging,” and an overall architecture about “material performance and contextual experience.” The result is the primary combined goal of creating a building designed to provide an experience that engages the user with the architecture, their community, and their environment. Our multi-family housing building has 82 bedrooms within 36 units, approximately 76,000 sq. ft. In addition to the dwelling units, there is an indoor sports court, workout room, laundry, community garden, and community room.

Water, wind, and sun are major driving factors for this design proposal. The design also embraces the constraints of flooding and sea level rise at both the site and building scale. Importantly, our design handles the high base flood elevation issue while maintaining a pedestrian experience from the ground level. This goal is achieved by creating a hill composed of soil displaced from other constructions, etched with paths around natively vegetated bioswales and filter strips. These paths terminate at a shared courtyard space that harbors the community garden.

Overall, the design proposal we have created is a building designed directly to the site context and the local climate while simultaneously providing an experience that engages the user with the architecture, their community, and the environment. We achieve our design intent by implementing appropriate materials that protect the construction from flood damage and create a habitable atmosphere, integrating shared spaces to foster community, and incorporating design details that inspire the user to embrace their surroundings.

MULTIFAMILY HOUSING LOCATION ON

BUILDING FORM DIAGRAM

BUILDING FORM

Our project starts with the base of a traditional courtyard apartment typology to prioritize community space. We manipulated the design’s form to respond to environmental and social conditions. At the bridge connection, our team oriented the units to face the southwest breeze and used the circulation to create shade. The local precedent of the Charleston single house and its contemporary derivatives informed this decision immensely. Following this local source, circulation space is composed of exterior egress balconies, which, in addition to providing community space, allow for natural ventilation through the units and offer a significant overhang for shading the units below.

WILLIAMS TERRACE APARTMENTS

Charleston, South Carolina

KEY CONCEPTS

• Critical application of regional vernacular that responds to local climate

• Similar life safety and code conditions; R-2 over a S-2 podium

• Varied types of community spaces ranging between public and private

CASE STUDY

McMillian Pazden Smith and David Baker Architects

FLOOR PLAN ROOF

STRUCTURE

STRUCTURE EXPLODED AXONOMETRIC DIAGRAM

GROUND LEVEL STRUCTURAL PLAN

STRUCTURAL PLAN FLOOR 1

LEVEL 1 STRUCTURAL PLAN

The expression and experience of exterior egress balconies determined our structural system. A steel frame hanging from the roof’s glulam beams, made possible by the back span of the beams, supports the balconies. DLT floors supported by a network of CLT walls, glulam beams, and columns comprise adjacent dwelling units. These units, in turn, are supported by a combination of concrete beams, columns, and a hollow core slab. Below the concrete podium, foundations contain piles to negotiate the poor soil conditions.

MULTIFAMILY HOUSING | COURTNEY WOLFF + GEOFFREY POWELL + ZACHARY STUEMER

STRUCTURAL PLAN FLOOR 2

STRUCTURAL PLAN FLOOR 3

B A.1.5 A.1.4 A.1.3 A.1.2 A.1.1

C.2

10'

A.A.1 A.B A.B.1 A.B.2 A.B.3 A.C. A.C.1 A.C.2 A.C.3 A.D

E.2

10"

A.E.1 A.E.2

A.G

13'

8-1/2” 33” GLULAM BEAM, KNOTCHED TO 8-1/2” 11” 5-PLY CLT SHEAR WALL BELOW

B.1 B.1

8-1/2”

B.4 B.2 B.1.3 B

B.1.2

A.1.6 B.A

5-PLY CLT WALL PANELS

A B.C B.D

C C

A.D.1 A.D.2 A.D.3 A.E B.E

C.2.1

C.2.3 C.1.1 B.3

D D

G.1 E.2.1 B.B

2.1 2.3

2 2.2 2.4 4 3.1 6

7” PRECAST CONC. WALL PANELS 7” PRECAST CONC.

G.1.1 F.1.1 E.1

H G G

3 3 A.A.2

5 8 9 10 11 12 13.1

B.1.1 B.2.1 C.1.2 C.2.2 4.1 5.1 6.1 7.1 8.1 9.1 10.1 11.1 12.1 14

13 13.2 H

WALL PANELS BELOW 33” GLULAM BEAM, KNOTCHED TO 8-1/2” 11” 5-PLY CLT SHEAR WALL BELOW 8-1/2” 33” GLULAM BEAM, KNOTCHED TO 8-1/2” 11” 8-1/2” 33” GLULAM BEAM, KNOTCHED TO 8-1/2” 11” 5-PLY CLT SHEAR WALL BELOW 8-1/2” 33” GLULAM BEAM, KNOTCHED TO 8-1/2” 11” 5-PLY CLT SHEAR WALL BELOW 8-1/2” 33” GLULAM BEAM, KNOTCHED TO 8-1/2” x 11” 5-PLY CLT SHEAR WALL BELOW STRUCTURAL PLAN ROOF LEVEL 2 STRUCTURAL PLAN LEVEL 4 STRUCTURAL PLAN LEVEL 3 STRUCTURAL PLAN ROOF STRUCTURAL PLAN

17 LEVEL 32'-0" to 34'-0" 28 ROOF 8-1/2" 28-7/8" GLULAM BEAM SYP 44'-6" SMARTLAM (DOTHAN, AL) LOWER ROOF 8-1/2" 33" GLULAM BEAM (KNOTCHED TO 8-1/2" 11") SYP 44'-6" 21 SMARTLAM (DOTHAN, AL) ROOF 44'-6" 24 LEVEL 10-1/2" 28-7/8" GLULAM BEAM SYP 44'-0" SMARTLAM (DOTHAN, AL) LEVEL 44'-0" ROOF 44'-0"

ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS

MECHANICAL PLAN FLOOR 1

MECHANICAL PLAN FLOOR 2

MECHANICAL PLAN FLOOR 3

MECHANICAL PLAN FLOOR 4

MECHANICAL PLAN ROOF

MULTIFAMILY HOUSING | COURTNEY WOLFF + GEOFFREY POWELL + ZACHARY STUEMER

INTEGRATED SYSTEMS

SYSTEMS DIAGRAM HEATING + COOLING

DIAGRAM SOLAR

SYSTEMS

INTERIOR DWELLING KITCHEN + DINING

INTERIOR DWELLING LIVING ROOM

MULTIFAMILY HOUSING | COURTNEY WOLFF + GEOFFREY POWELL + ZACHARY STUEMER

EXTERIOR VIEW: PORCH AT NIGHTTIME

EXTERIOR VIEW: COURTYARD SPACE

MULTIFAMILY HOUSING | COURTNEY WOLFF + GEOFFREY POWELL + ZACHARY STUEMER

PHYSICAL MODEL

CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER

FOR SUPERTEAM 4 SUB-MASTERPLAN

Premise Context

DANIEL MECCA LAUREN PRAEUNER

Occupant Interaction + Circulation Fostering Creativity

When designing any building, circulation is one of the first things we look at as an architect. How are people moving through the site? How are people using the site? How can we bring people to the site? Most importantly, how do people move through the building? While this is true for any building, it is especially true when considering a child’s safety and playful nature. So, in the case of a child development center, how does a child walk through a building.

The way a child experiences the world is much different than how an adult does, and spaces designed for small children should consider a child’s scale. By viewing space through the eyes of a child, we may aim to create intriguing environments that promote learning and creativity. Additionally, I would like to study how children’s spaces merge with adult spaces and how the architecture of a building can reflect the scale of activity.

Question

How can the building provide spatiality that gives freedom for autonomy, self-expression, and the discovery of creative identity in children?

How can design slow someone down and allow them to be fully aware of what they are doing now?

Designed to be a secure yet accessible building in the heart of our Charleston Coast Guard base, the Child Development Center began by designing a mixed circulation scheme. The design required programs including childcare, pre-k care, toddler care, a public library, and a public maker space, making the separation of access one of the most critical aspects.

This Child Development Center integrates ease of circulation and the separation of programs with the idea of scale and childinfluenced design. These two premises offer an extensive range of programs (both childcare and public) and highlight the importance of undulating scale for the well-being of children. The shape of this building came from the need for a permeable base that allowed public circulation routes through the building without it going through any child programs to keep it secure. The fortyfive-degree angles that house the public programs speak to the angle of the pier. The roof was decided upon to not only control water and allow sunlight into the spaces but also create a fun ceiling condition in a space where kids will be playing all day long in the form of an underwater atmosphere. The site’s topography slopes up to our building for ease of public access to our library on the second floor and as an emergency exit for small children that keep them from needing to be corralled down flights of stairs.

The mass timer aspect of the project also plays an important role. As seen through the structural drawings and diagrams, the beams, columns, and cross-laminated panels all play a role that communicates with the other systems in the building and creates a playful and lighthearted atmosphere for the children using the program.

CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER LOCATION ON SITE

OUTDOOR RECREATION

INDOOR RECREATION 3250 SF

MULTIPURPOSE PUBLIC USE 2500 SF

WASTE CENTER 260 SF

RISER ROOM 200 SF

2ND FLOOR PLAN

GREENHOUSE 560 SF

INFANT ROOM 725 SF

GROUND FLOOR PLAN O

OPEN OFFICE 1050 SF

SHOP OFFICE 175 SF

LAB/ TECH. SPACE 350 SF

LEVEL 1 FLOOR PLAN

CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER | DANIEL MECCA + LAUREN PRAEUNER

WATER COLLECTION AREA 1100 SF

BUILDING STORAGE 260 SF

GALLERY 675 SF COMMUNITY PLAZA

INFANT ROOM 550 SF

COMMUNITY LIBRARY 2725 SF

MOTHERS’ ROOM 200 SF

MECHANICAL 1200 SF

PARENTS LOUNGE 780 SF

MECHANICAL 625 SF

PRE-K ROOM 660 SF

MULTIPURPOSE SPACE 1375 SF

KITCHEN 200 SF

PRE-K ROOM 640 SF

PRE-K ROOM 590 SF

MECHANICAL 385 SF

PRE-K ROOM 650 SF

PRE-K ROOM 625 SF

MECHANICAL 625 SF

KITCHEN 180 SF

PATIO

MULTIPURPOSE SPACE 1375 SF

TODDLER ROOM 500 SF

PATIO TODDLER ROOM 600 SF

TODDLER ROOM 575 SF

DESIGN STRATEGIES DIAGRAMS

CENTER | DANIEL MECCA + LAUREN PRAEUNER

BUILDING AXONOMETRIC PERSPECTIVE DRAWING

CIRCULATION AND SCALE

ATRIUM

ROOF DRAINAGE

DRAINS THROUGH THE PARAPET TO THE DRAINS CONNECTED TO COLLECTION

STAIRS

STAIRS ARE HUNG FROM TRUSS BY TENSION RODS

SMOKE PROTECTION

A B B C

GLASS PARTITIONS WORK WITH EXHAUST ON EACH LEVEL AROUND THE ATRIUM TO KEEP SMOKE FROM ENTERING ATRIUM

INDOOR PLAY AREA

CIRCULATION POINTS BREAK THIS LARGE SPACE INTO 3 DIFFERENT SCALE HEIGHTS

INDOOR GARDEN

2-STORY SPACE ALLOW FOR GROUNDGROWN PLANTS AND HANGING PLANTS. DRAINAGE THROUGH FLOOR BACK TO WATER RETENTION.

OUTDOOR PLAYGROUND

SANDPIT WITH EQUIPMENT SCALED FOR ALL AGE GROUPS

INTERIOR VIEW: ATRIUM

INTERIOR VIEW: CLASSROOM SPACE

DEVELOPMENT CENTER | DANIEL MECCA + LAUREN PRAEUNER

EXTERIOR VIEW: MAIN APPROACH FROM PARKING LOT

INTERIOR VIEW: LOBBY SPACE

EXTERIOR VIEW: SOUTHEAST CORNER

CENTER | DANIEL MECCA + LAUREN PRAEUNER

PHYSICAL MODEL BREAKDOWN DIAGRAM

SECTOR COMMAND

FOR SUPERTEAM 4 SUB-MASTERPLAN

Premise

SYDNEY PARKER EMMA GIBSON

Structure + Space Environmental Responsiveness + Seamless Interior/Exterior

Context

In design, structural systems often feel more like a design constraint than a design opportunity. Though managed by two different design disciplines, the fusion of architectural and structural design in the conceptual and developmental phases has the potential to enrich the overall design rather than become a roadblock to the spaces we desire to create.

We were tasked with designing a building that welcomes the public in some spaces while restricting access in others. Our design utilizes vertical and horizontal programming, complimentary materials, and varying degrees of visibility to combat the possibility of isolation that can occur with secure programming.

Question How can the structure be used to create, respond to, and celebrate space instead of merely constraining space?

Can a building house both public and secure programs and remain cohesive?

The Sector Command building has the unique condition of serving as the public entrance to the site while also housing the Coast Guard’s most secure programming. The project’s primary goal was to create a building that integrates public and secure programming into a cohesive space. We consistently referred to the larger site theme of filtration throughout the design process. The structural systems and programming strategies work in tandem to establish spatial neighborhoods using egress cores, a centralized atrium, and continuous perimeter circulation paths. Furthermore, the building offers several environmental solutions, the most developed being a water management system that begins with the native plant garden on the roof and ends with a bioswale in the ground. The result is a building centered around a fluid relationship between the occupant and the earth.

SECTOR COMMAND LOCATION ON SITE

CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT

PROCESS DIAGRAMS

SECTOR COMMAND | SYDNEY PARKER + EMMA GIBSON

DEGREES OF VISIBILITY DIAGRAM TRANSPARENT TRANSLUCENT OPAQUE

SYDNEY’S PREMISE DIAGRAM EMMA’S PREMISE DIAGRAM

SECOND FLOOR PLAN THIRD FLOOR PLAN

FOURTH FLOOR PLAN FIFTH FLOOR PLAN

AXONOMETRIC LOAD TRACING DIAGRAM

AXONOMETRIC DIAGRAM

FOUNDATION AND GROUND FLOOR FRAMING PLAN SECOND FLOOR FRAMING PLAN

THIRD FLOOR FRAMING PLAN FOURTH FLOOR FRAMING PLAN

FIFTH FLOOR FRAMING PLAN

ROOF FRAMING PLAN

ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS

SECTION PERSPECTIVE SHOWING MECHANICAL SYSTEMS MECHANICAL DISTRIBUTION DIAGRAM

PASSIVE SYSTEMS DIAGRAM

GROUND FLOOR MECHANICAL PLAN SECOND FLOOR FRAMING PLAN

THIRD FLOOR FRAMING PLAN FOURTH FLOOR MECHANICAL PLAN

FIFTH FLOOR MECHANICAL PLAN

ROOF MECHANICAL PLAN

ENVIRONMENTAL STRATEGIES + ANALYSIS

SECTOR COMMAND | SYDNEY PARKER + EMMA GIBSON

EXTERIOR VIEW FROM PIER

INTERIOR VIEW OF ATRIUM

SECTOR COMMAND | SYDNEY PARKER + EMMA GIBSON

FOURTH FLOOR OPEN OFFICE

SECOND FLOOR CORRIDOR

EXTERIOR VIEW OF GARDEN THIRD FLOOR OFFICE

BASE COMMAND

FOR SUPERTEAM 4 SUB-MASTERPLAN

Premise

Building as a Filter Community + Occupant interaction

Context

Three essential aspects of this design are integration, resources, and community. How can we create a permeable highfunctioning space?

The Base Command program requires very private and public space. My premise focuses on how we can meet the program’s privacy needs while also supporting community and occupant interaction and integration while supporting user wellbeing.

Question

How can we create efficient, accessible spaces used to filter people, water, and light?

How can we design for the community without impeding on the importance of the program?

Base Command is the communal hub for the proposed Coast Guard site. It has a permeable presence on the site and acts as a transitional space from work to life. Our Statement

Base Command is the permeable programming of the proposed FLETC/USCG site that moves users, water, light, and the HVAC system throughout its cores to disperse users to their desired location. It provides a place of connection and airiness within the communal dining center located in the southern mass. The cores also act as circulation centers to divide users from public to private spaces while maintaining a sense of security associated with the Base Command and Sector Command. A sky bridge connects the base and sector command to allow for shared programming. The base command structure consists of a concrete foundation, beam, and column system, that transforms into an aesthetically pleasing timber glulam system with five-ply CLT floors and a three-ply CLT roof—finishing off with a curtain wall system that wraps the entirety of the structure. These decisions allow for a visual and physical connection for the public and private users of the site.

LONGHURST + KIMANI GRAYSON

JESSICA LONGHURST

KIMANI GRAYSON

BASE COMMAND LOCATION ON SITE

CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT

SECOND FLOOR PLAN THIRD FLOOR PLAN

FOURTH FLOOR PLAN

ROOF PLAN

STRUCTURE

STRUCTURAL AXONOMETRIC DIAGRAM

BASE COMMAND | JESSICA LONGHURST + KIMANI GRAYSON

THIRD FLOOR FRAMING

MAIN SUPPLY DUCT SIZE: 20 IN2

MAIN RETURN DUCT SIZE: 20 IN2

WATER PIPES SIZE 1 INCH IN DIAMETER

ACTIVE CHILLED BEAM SYSTEM:

A RADIATION/CONVECTION HVAC SYSTEM DESIGNED TO HEAT AND COOL LARGE BUILDINGS.

ACTIVE CHILLED BEAMS HAVE DUCTWORK SUPPLIED PROVIDING A SPECIFIC AMOUNT OF PRIMARY AIR TO THE PRESSURIZED PLENUM WITHIN THE DEVICE TO BE DISCHARGED THROUGH INDUCTION NOZZLES, MIX WITH ENTRAINED AIR, AND VENTILATE THE ROOM.

WHY ACTIVE CHILLED BEAMS?

ALLOWS FOR SMALLER DUCTWORK AND AIR-HANDLER UNITS THAN A TYPICAL VAV SYSTEM

CAN ACHIEVE RELATIVELY LOW SOUND LEVELS

USES SIGNIFICANTLY LESS ENERGY THAN A VAV SYSTEM

GROUND FLOOR MECHANICAL PLAN SECOND FLOOR FRAMING PLAN

THIRD FLOOR FRAMING PLAN FOURTH FLOOR MECHANICAL PLAN

BUILDING ENVELOPE

COMMUNAL DINING

FISHERIES CENTER

BASE COMMAND | JESSICA LONGHURST + KIMANI GRAYSON

EXTERIOR VIEW PHYSICAL MODEL