3 minute read
PENCIL FULL OF LEAD
When it comes to retirement planning, nothing’s gonna bring Richard Harvey down - even if the UK’s tax rules sometimes fly in the face of common sense
Over the years, I’ve adopted the Squirrel Syndrome when it comes to pensions. In common with the furry nuthoarders, I invested my modest assets in several different places, although declining cognitive ability means that I hope I can remember where they all are.
Advertisement
I’ve been more than happy with the performance of the last pension pot I opened up a few years ago with Royal London. They keep me regularly updated in easily-readable, usefully informative letters on how my savings have grown, and what I might expect at retirement.
YER TIME’S UP OLD CHAP
But more recently, they have also been telling me that, sorry old son, your time’s up. By that I don’t mean they are forecasting my demise, but simply the fact that when I’m 75 I will no longer be able to make any further contributions as they won’t qualify for tax relief. Which begs the simple question: “Why?”
There appears to be a disconnect between the government’s attitude towards pension savings – i.e. that you really shouldn’t be working, earning and saving after State
pension age – and the realities of 21st century living for an increasingly healthy and motivated army of oldies.
If one of the big economic challenges now facing the world is how to sustain an ageing population, then isn’t it sensible to incentivise those in their 60s, 70s and beyond to keep working, stay fit, and continue to pay taxes?
WHAT’S THE ANSWER?
Every country in Europe is struggling to find a solution to the problem of funding the pensions and healthcare of its older citizens. For some, the route is to encourage young people to come, live and work in their countries. For others it’s encouraging their citizens to have more kids. Or, as Viktor Orban, that charmless guy in charge of Hungary puts it, “procreation over immigration”.
It’s entirely logical to try and plug the hole in the pensions and healthcare budget by raking in more taxes from the working young. But isn’t it equally logical that encouraging older people to carry on working will help swell the country’s tax take while keeping them out of the local care home?
AGEING WELL
In considering that, the policy wonks at the DWP might usefully read a book called ‘The Changing Mind: A Neuroscientist’s Guide to Ageing Well’.
Written by distinguished American neuroscientist Daniel Levitin, it delves into the ways in which older people can stave off the inevitable, at least for a few years.
It contains some unsurprising stuff about keeping fit, and recommends running through woods and fields rather than going to the gym (which will come as a merciful relief to many of us); getting out and meeting people, instead of spending time on Facebook et al; and knocking up an oily fish dish rather than popping a daily Omega-3 tablet.
But one of his most forceful arguments is about retirement. In essence, the advice is “don’t”. It’s a disaster. If you can’t keep working, volunteer instead.
The book also contains some intriguing info on the sex lives of seniors. He claims that conservative men stop having sex in their late sixties, while liberals go on into their eighties. So that’s the last time I vote Tory…
And, bizarrely, that castrated men live 14 years longer on average. I have half a mind to write to Royal London and declare I have no intention of retiring at 75, and and am off to a clinic in Morocco for a deeply personal surgical procedure.