Colby Ray Cline
Portfolio of Architecture & Urban Design 2019
2
Contents MTA TOD Studies: Monocacy Station Zac Rive Gauche in Indianapolis Blumlux Residence Grindstone on the Monon Supplemental Materials
04-17 18-27 28-33 34-37 38
3
oc ac
on
yR
iv er
e Pik
M
ana Urb
4 e
r
Target
E k Lin
rD sta
D
swic
Brun
B FL OO DP
A IN
LA
Home Depot
Gen
C
MTA TOD Studies: Monocacy Station FIRM: Design Collective LOCATION: Monocacy, Maryland CLIENT: Maryland Transportation Authority Commissioned by the Maryland Transportation Authority, Design Collective was tasked with studying three separate train station locations to develop & propose TOD infill concepts. The MTA desired to create mixed-use districts around station areas to promote ridership, grow TOD within Maryland, and create significant land improvements to MTA owned parcels along current stations. Three station location were selected for the study, including Monocacy, Odenton, and Bowie State. This portfolio will focus on the Monocacy Station proposal.
5
Best Farm at Monocacy National Battlefield
Monocacy National Battlefield Map, Natl. Parks Service 2014
MARC Transit Network
Background MARC Train Network
The Monocacy Station sits along the Brunswick Line, part of the Maryland Area Regional Commuter (MARC) network which links Baltimore, Frederick, DC, and other small cities throughout the greater Maryland region. Ridership of all three of the MARC lines have been growing in recent years and
6
many stations are estimated to be at max capacity by the year 2025. The Brunswick Line primarily serves commuters working in or around the DC area during the work week. Outgoing morning trips to DC from Monocacy Station occur at 5:06, 6:11, and 7:16 AM. Inbound trains arrive in the evening at the Monocacy Station at 5:19, 6:49, and 8:11
PM. Current station parking is at 814 spaces and in the busiest seasons has been utilized at 634 spaces.
History
The Monocacy area has been historically significant primarily due to its importance during the Civil War. The area is home to the
Monocacy National Battlefield (a unit of the National Park Service since 1973) which has been recorded as the location of “The Battle that Saved Washington, DC”. The national battlefield has over 1500 acres of land which brings national and local visitors. In more recent times, Monocacy has built up as a major shopping hub in and around the Francis Scott Key Mall. Retailers, automotive lots, light industrial districts, and other big-box stores occupy most of the surrounding region of Monocacy around Urbana Pike, which serves the population of Frederick.
Frederick, MD
Caroll Creek
I-70
US 1
Frede Frede rick City rick C ounty
Marietta Quarry
70
I-2
Francis Scott Key Mall
Monocacy Station a Urb na e Pik
cy oca
er R iv
SW
IC
KL
IN
E
n Mo
BR UN
The Monocacy River is a major ecological asset to the region. The river links a plethora of parks together and also connects into the Carroll Creek waterway which runs through downtown Frederick. Carroll Creek has experienced a great transformation within the last decade, transitioning from an old canal waterway into a very popular linear park which includes plazas, shopping, and outdoor dining. The Monocacy Station holds a rather advantageous position in relation to the surrounding natural features. The station sits nearby the Monocacy River due east, the Monocacy National Battlefield directly south, just south of the Marietta Quarry, and just a few miles from downtown Frederick and Carroll Creek. There has been creating a riverwalk along the Monocacy River, and with the coming transformation of the Marietta Quarry, there is an opportunity to bring this shared-use path directly through the Monocacy Station TOD.
5
Natural Features Network
Regional Natural Features
Monocacy National Battlefield
0’
4000’
7
Existing Conditions Diagrams
Existing conditions diagrams were created to ensure any future development would be successful with the following considerations in mind: land use, zoning, topography, street connectivity, and topography. Detailing the current zoning map described the county’s current assessment and vision for the area. Single use, commercial zoning has historically dominated the area and limited the ability to build any sort of mixed-use districts. Any future TOD development would likely work as a catalyst for a overall rezoning and land use assessment. The land use analysis also showed a disconnect between what the zoning measures had intended, and what current uses preside. Identifying the current street network pattern helped to illustrate the need for a more local street grid in and around the parcel owned by the MTA. Blocks are relatively undefined, and connections often occur through large parking lots with poorly defined edges. The topography of the site was also sure to be one of the larger challenges with any proposed development. The proximity to mining industries and the natural grading from thousands of years of water runoff has given the site a complex topographical condition. Coordination of new roads, buildings, and open spaces would all have to work within this landscape.
Monocacy Station
The Monocacy Station sits directly behind a prominent Target shopping plaza, which
8
is roughly 24’ in height. Many residents of the area do not even know the depot exists due to its secluded nature, and those who use the station refer to it as “the hidden gem of Monocacy”. The winding nature of Genstar Drive ends the viewpoints to the station and the possibility of the station being discovered by those who aren’t intentionally searching for the station. Sidewalks leading into the site are quite accessible from Urbana Pike, although few pedestrians are likely to make their way to Urbana Pike in the first place. Genstar Drive provides a pleasant tree-covered path into the Target shopping plaza which helps to keep the walk rather cool, even on warmer sunny days. Genstar passes between the north edge of Target and the south edge of the Home Depot, which are approximately 380’ apart between building faces, suggesting some sort of infill could be proposed between the two structures. The two buildings are in alignment along the eastern faces, towards Urbana Pike. Architecturally, the depot building for Monocacy Station is a charming building designed to emulate the historic structures across various B&O railroad lines around the country. The parking lot supporting the MARC commuters was oriented so that the depot would be the terminus of the road. Trees were planted to line the perimeter of each commuter lot, yet in past years nearly all have died due to disease or excessive salting.
To the north of the site, at an elevation roughly 30’ higher than the commuter lots, sits the outside edge of the Marietta Quarry. The quarry has created significant topographical challenges for the site due to the buildup of soil which was placed around the edges of the Marietta property. This was both a challenge for grading, but also an opportunity in viewpoints if any sort of overlook were to be constructed. A large bus turnaround sits at the base of this hill, creating a very large paved circle at the base of the hill, which will need to be addressed in future uses. Target utilizes the back of their building for employee parking, trash, and truck delivery. With future development, new roads would need to respect the need for large trucks to access the area behind Target. Methods of screening these spaces were also put into consideration so they might be both functional and aesthetic. South of the MTA commuter lot exists a sizable stormwater basin, which was likely created to support the water runoff for all of the paved surfaces of the Target shopping plaza. The basin is roughly 20’ deep and has a chain link fence around the edges.
Mineral Mining General GI Industrial General GC Commercial Light LI Industrial Study Area
MM 14 15 21 22
Commercial Industrial Cropland Pasture Deciduous 41 Forest 73 Bare Ground Study Area
Existing Conditions - Land Use Code
0’
2000’
Existing Conditions - Zoning
0’
Interstate State Highway Local Roads Study Area
Existing Conditions - Street Network
0’
2000’
2000’
10’ Contours 2’ Contours Study Area
Existing Conditions - Contours
0’
2000’
9
6
1
7
2
3
4
5
10
8
Home Depot
6
rD sta
FL OO DP
LA
IN
8
4
r e
Gen
k Lin
2
Brun
3
1
swic
Target
5
ana Urb
M
on
oc ac
yR
iv er
e Pik
7
Monocacy National Battlefield
Existing Illustrative Plan
0’
75’
150’
300’
11
M onocacy Station
9/18/2019
Phasing
Phase One
Block/Building
Block A Block B Block C Block D Block E
TOTAL # of Stories
6 6 6 1
TOTAL # of Typical Floorplates
Restaurant (GSF)
2 2 2
Subtotal
Development Assumptions
General Retail (GSF)
Office Lobby (GSF)
Office Office Floorplate Typical (GSF)
0
0
0
37,000
Station Area Parking 0.80 850 4.00 3.00 4.00 8.00 4.00 10.00 1.25 0.50 1.00 0.75
Proposed Conditions
Existing Utilized
12
M onocacy Station
PARKING 9/18/2019 Parking Provided Parking Required Office MF Residential MF Residential Wrapper MF Typical MF MF MF On-Street Surface Station # of Retail Structured # of Typical Structured TOTAL Total Parking NON-RESIDENTIAL Total Floorplate Lobby (GSF) Levels Wrapper Residential Residential Residential Parking Parking Parking Parking Parking Retail Parking Parking Required (not Parking Typical RESIDENTIAL Retail Office Reta Level (GSF) (GSF) Typical (GSF) Level (GSF) Ground Floor Floors Total (Units) Levels Levels (GSF) Levels Provided shared) Restaurant Fitness (GSF) General Office Office Office MF Residential MF Residential TOTAL Wrapper Typical MF Fitness TOTAL # of # of MFRestaurant (GSF) TOTAL # (GSF) of # of (GSF) Retail (GSF) Lobby Floorplate Total Floorplate TOTAL Lobby (GSF) Typical Levels Wrapper (GSF) Residential Phasing Block/Building Typical Phasing Block/Building Stories (GSF) Typical (GSF) (GSF) Typical (GSF) Stories Floorplates Floorplates Level (GSF) Ground Floor 33 59,500 2,400 2 27,400 14,400 190,600 179 4.0 48,360 628 311 (GSF) 64 56,400 2,400 2 38,970 43,900 237,040 223 4.0 29,867 432 322 74 38,000 2,400 3 28,400 23,360 186,960 176 28 4.0 33,600 516 238 Block A 6 2 21,600 Block A 59,500 62,400 22 27,400 14,400 26 26 112 10,800 Block B 6 2 Block B 56,400 62,400 22 38,970 43,900 4,600 Phase One Phase One Block C 6 2 Block C 38,000 62,400 23 28,400 23,360 0 153,900 7,200 81,660 614,600 578 111,827 1,601 983 28,000 Block D 1 Block D 1 Block E Block E Subtotal 0 0 37,000 0 Subtotal 0 0 153,900 7,200 0 81,660 0
814 634
As retail trends continue to grow towards online shopping, direct-to-door delivery, and boutique shopping, cities struggle with what will become of large shopping districts. Shopping plazas which are still performing well today are often those which have committed to creating a walkable shopping experience and provide ample greenspace. The Target shopping plaza is no exception to the national trends and will hold the same challenges in future years. Parking counts for the shopping plaza are excessive, pedestrian access is minimal, neighborhood connections are near non-existent, and roadways are designed for regional connectivity over neighborhood functionality. The building setbacks from Urbana Pike are nearly 600’, making infill and view-sheds a challenge moving forward. With this in mind, the goals for new future develop were set to be as follows: 1. Grow MARC ridership in Monocacy 2. Created a TOD district behind the Target retail plaza 3. Connect to pedestrian networks along the Monocacy National * Residential Parking for Single-Family For-Sale units is accommodated on lots. Additional, on-street parking shall be provided for visitors at a ratio of .25/du.
M onocacy Station
NON-RESIDENTIAL
21,600 10,800 4,600 28,000 0
MF Residential Efficiency MF Unit Average sf Gen. Retail Parking/ 1000 sf Gen. Office Parking/ 1000 sf Med. Office Parking/ 1000 sf Restaurant Parking/ 1000 sf Pharmacy Parking/ 1000 sf Fitness/Assembly Parking/ 1000 sf Residential Pkg.: MF Rental Residential Pkg.: MF Rental Senior Residential Pkg.: SF For-Sale* Hotel/ room
Goals
Retail Fitness (GSF)
9/18/2019
RESIDENTIAL
Development Assumptions MF Residential Efficiency MF Unit Average sf Gen. Retail Parking/ 1000 sf Gen. Office Parking/ 1000 sf Med. Office Parking/ 1000 sf Restaurant Parking/ 1000 sf Pharmacy Parking/ 1000 sf Fitness/Assembly Parking/ 1000 sf Residential Pkg.: MF Rental Residential Pkg.: MF Rental Senior Residential Pkg.: SF For-Sale* Hotel/ room
Station Area Parking 0.80 850 4.00 3.00 4.00 8.00 4.00 10.00 1.25 0.50 1.00 0.75
Existing Utilized
Battlefield 4. Create a step towards a larger, longterm land use strategy for a larger study area boundary * Residential Parking for Single-Family For-Sale units is accommodated on lots. Additional, on-street parking shall be provided for visitors at a ratio of .25/du.
Approach
The first step was to align Genstar Drive as a straight road which diverts into two branches. One branch would bring traffic into the Monocacy Station, and the other would provide access to any future development which could occur in future phases when land is acquired from the Marietta Quarry. Aligning the street provides enough room for a small retailer to wrap the corner and create an entrance into the Monocacy Station, and gateways and signage would be located here. Three separate structures were placed into the MTA owned land.
Orientation
The footprints were driven by both topography and parcel orientation. A large center green was designed centered to the depot to give the depot the major focus. Block A would force traffic towards the depot and establish
Development Assumptions 814 634
MF Residential Efficiency MF Unit Average sf Gen. Retail Parking/ 1000 sf Gen. Office Parking/ 1000 sf Med. Office Parking/ 1000 sf Restaurant Parking/ 1000 sf Pharmacy Parking/ 1000 sf Fitness/Assembly Parking/ 1000 sf Residential Pkg.: MF Rental Residential Pkg.: MF Rental Senior Residential Pkg.: SF For-Sale* Hotel/ room
Stat 0.80 850 4.00 3.00 4.00 8.00 4.00 10.00 1.25 0.50 1.00 0.75
* Residential Parking for Single-Family For-Sale units is accommodated on lots. Additional, on-street parking shall be provided for visitors at a ratio of .25/du.
viewpoints to the depot towards the southern portion of the structure, and this area would then be prime space for retail. The main intersection of the site created by Block A,B, & C would then be designed as the prominent retail intersection for the site. Parking would be screened mostly towards the Rail Station so active frontage exist within most of the proposed streets elsewhere.
Streets
Right-of-way distances were set to a standard width of 70 feet to incorporate appropriate sidewalk widths, on-street parking, street trees, planting strips, and space for programmable retail use. Tree coverage was able to shield the majority of the unsightly views into the back of the Target, and a small triangle aligned the streets into the open space around the depot, while allowing delivery trucks the ability to pull in and out of the loading decks of Target.
Existing Utilized
Home Depot
rD sta
r
FL OO DP
LA
IN
A B
D
Brun
swic
E
Target
k Lin
e
Gen
C ana Urb
M
on
oc ac
yR
iv er
e Pik Residential Retail Garage Open Space
Proposed Illustrative Plan
0’
75’
150’
300’
13
MARC Brunswick Line
E
C
Central Green
B
Future Boardwalk/ Overlook
Stormwater Basin
Overlook Green
A
Target Loading Zone
Target
Parking
Parking for the site needed to maintain the amount of existing parking spaces at the commuter lot, as well as support all additional residential and retail uses. Three garages were designed to carry most of the parking counts, while on street parking and a small surface lot maintained what else was needed to make satisfactory counts. The drive lane around the perimeter of the green splits into one-way
14
traffic to provide a continuous loop of kissand-ride drop offs.
Building Heights
Building heights were maximized at 4-5 stories, which was the most building use which could be supported by the parking which was provided. The wings of block B and block C were created to bring a rooftop dining
experience into the space while also trying to create a scene of activity which people could see over the top of Target when traveling down Urbana Pike. The height of these rooftops was poised to be approximately 45-50’ in height, which allows direct visibility from Urbana Pike and elsewhere within the Target shopping plaza.
15
Existing
Proposed
16
Vision Looking Forward
When analyzing the existing zoning (p12), it was determined that the light industrial areas to the west of Urbana Pike were significantly disconnected from the TOD district. The constraints of the area were determined to be the lack of east-west pedestrian connections across Urbana Pike. When crosswalks and sidewalk conditions are improved, the light industrial uses to the east can of the Target shopping plaza can begin to occupy the land to the south of the Target shopping plaza. A long-range connectivity and block plan can then be introduced into the area and may be slowly built up as/if retail uses begin to phase out. Residential uses can begin to infill the regions within the currently owned Marietta Quarry, providing a live-work-play neighborhood into the Monocacy region.
Major Street Minor Street Trail Scenic Street
Proposed Concepts - Connectivity & Block Plan
0’
2000’
Proposed Concepts - Long Range Land Use Strategy
0’
2000’
17
Zac Rive Gauche in Indianapolis LOCATION: Indianapolis, IN CLIENT: MUD Studio Project The ZAC Rive Gauche in Indianapolis is an adaption of the ZAC Rive Gauche mixed-use building posed for development in Paris. After studying the complex character of the project, the building was imposed into Indianapolis as a study. The following graphic proposal visually displays why and how this complex structure can fit within the Courthouse district of Indianapolis. Some adaptations were implemented for site specific context.
18
Context Map In
di
an
a
Av e
ZAC Rive Gauche
Ohio St
N Capitol Ave
W New York St
N Senate Ave
The ZAC Rive Gauche in Indianapolis sits just north of the Indiana State Capitol building. The site utilizes the access to four primary roads: Ohio St, Washington St, New York St, and Indiana Ave. The site offers a walkscore of 76 and a bike-score of an impressive 91, allowing future residents to enjoy the close proximity of urban amenities. Most day to day commutes and errands can therefore be achieved without an automobile, keeping the car as a convenience for travel, and not a necessity for daily life.
W Ohio St
Washington Street
N
19
Form Progression The ZAC Rive Gauche is comprised of two structures. The first structure begins with two stacked cubes, each layered into 12’ floors. Each floor is then stepped back per level to create outdoor gardens for each level. An exterior ramp wraps around the structure, uniting the two primary greenroofs. Every second level is then extruded outwards to create balcony spaces for the residential units directly above, which also creates a ledge to maintain privacy for the units below. The second structure shares the same width as the first, but introduces spaces for retail and public use on the ground level. A large stair brings people into the sunken plaza from the north.
Stamp Drop Circulate
20
Cultural Trail
Connecting Lane
Canal Walk
21
Establishing A Culture Sitting near the historic Indiana Ave, the ZAC Rive Gauche in Indianapolis will reestablish the cultural legacy that the many jazz clubs, bars, and theaters once provided in the early 1900’s. The ZAC Rive Gauche will offer citizens a “third place” environment which is currently missing in this neighborhood. The project will build upon the lost legacy of arts and entertainment by providing programmable event spaces and host various activities during seasonal festivals, marathons, and music performances. The project can fill many of the currently missing amenities of living in downtown Indianapolis today, such as a lack of dog parks, greenspaces, and pedestrian oriented entertainment districts. Those who visit can enjoy the only public greenroof in the city. A combination of apartments and condominiums will allow both renters and prospective owners to live within, providing an equitable environment that allows the Courthouse district to grow with both new and existing residents.
22
Pedestrian Connectivity Railing
Elevated Platform Bike Ramp
The ZAC Rive Gauche in Indianapolis will introduce a free-form elevated platform into the rigid, orthogonal architecture. This provides a convenient walkway for those who wish to pass through the site to access neighboring parking garages and buildings. A 3 foot railing will wrap around the edges of the platform and allow people to peer into the sunken plaza and enjoy the active scenes from the dog park and various seasonal events below. Ground level storefronts will be visible from the upper levels and draw people down into the site. In order to engage more cyclists, a proposed bike ramp will tie the existing Cultural Trail through the site and over to the Indianapolis Canal Walk. The bike ramp will be placed underneath the elevated platform and provide a convenient link for cyclists and walkers alike. The soft grade of the ramp will be smooth for cyclists and negligible for those walking through.
23
Internal Views
BUS
Balancing the need for privacy in residential units and the need for publicity within public places is always a challenge when there is substantial variation in building height within the surrounding urban context. Providing enough visual access from surrounding structures to places such as rooftop greens and public spaces will maintain a high priority, while coordination of residential units and positioning of glazing will respect the privacy of the residential units.
24
Designed for every Season The sunken plaza will provide ample opportunities to for seasonal festivities. Ice skating can occupy the plaza in the winter months, outdoor concerts in the summer months, and carnivals, beer tours, and other outdoor festivals during the rest of the year.
Trail
The sunken plaza creates natural walls, which is beneficial for keeping kids safely inside when the park is open, and allowing the space to be gated off when needed for ticketed events as well.
25
Shadow Studies A shadow study of the surrounding urban context provided a better understanding of seasonal solstice pattern to the project site. The study shows that the site will be largely covered by shadows during the morning hours due to the large structures to the east which block the morning sun. During the midday hours, the site receives ample sunlight due to the lower height of the statehouse to the immediate south. Views of the southern sky offer ample opportunity for greenery on the upper levels. Evening hours suggest the rooftop locations will provide pleasant views to the evening sun setting to the est.
26
9 am
2 pm
5 pm
Spring
Summer
Fall
Winter
27
28
Blumlux Residence FIRM: Phänomen Design LOCATION: Indianapolis, IN CLIENT: Residential The client approached Phänomen with a vision to create an amazing residential experience within an old downtown factory building. While here, it was my job to layout the building in construction sets, verify existing field measurements, and schedule for walls, doors, and windows.
29
WC WC
WC
WC
A 30
1
SCALE :: 1/2" = 1'-0"
WC
DRAWING TITLE SCALE :: 1/4" = 1'-0"
CONTRACTOR:
GLASS GARAGE DOOR
NA
1
SCALE :: 1/4" = 1'-0"
1
NA
CONTRA OWNER:
Nick Blum 825 S. Downing St. Denver, CO 80209 720.323.1512 -
-
-
-
-
FOR REVIEW
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ISSUE -
-
-
-
-
May 31, 2016
-
-
DESCRIPTION
-
-
ISSUE
-
May 31, 2016 -
KITCHEN COUNTERTOP ELEVATION KITCHEN COUNTERTOP ELEVATION 1 KITCHEN COUNTERTOP ELEVATION 1 KITCHEN COUNTERTOP ELEVATION SCALE :: 1/2" = 1'-0" 1 SCALE :: SCALE 1/2" = 1'-0" :: 1/2" = 1'-0"
1
SCALE :: 1/2" = 1'-0"
DESIGNER:
Phänomen Design DESIGNER: DESIGNER: DESIGNER: 850 College Ave. Indianapolis, IN 46202 Phänomen Phänomen Phänomen Design Design Design 303.562.6666 850 850 850 College College College Ave. Ave. Ave. Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indianapolis, INININ 46202 46202 46202 303.562.6666 303.562.6666 303.562.6666 NA
CONTRACTOR: CONTRACTOR: CONTRACTOR:
NA NA NA
CONTRACTOR: OWNER:
- --
- --
DESCRIPTION
DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION -
WC
SCALE :: 1/2" = 1'-0" SCALE :: SCALE 1/2" = 1'-0" :: 1/2" = 1'-0" SCALE :: 1/2" = 1'-0"
CRC DRAWN DRAWN DRAWN BY: BY: BY: CRC CRC CRC
1
KITCHEN COUNTERTOP ELEVATION KITCHEN COUNTERTOP ELEVATION 1 KITCHEN COUNTERTOP ELEVATION 1 KITCHEN COUNTERTOP ELEVATION SCALE :: 1/2" = 1'-0" 1 SCALE :: SCALE 1/2" = 1'-0" :: 1/2" = 1'-0"
SCALE :: 1/2" = 1'-0"
SCALE :: 1/2" = 1'-0"
SCALE :: 1/4" = 1'-0"
WC
Nick Blum OWNER: OWNER: OWNER: 825 S. Downing St. Denver, CO 80209 Nick Nick Nick Blum Blum Blum 720.323.1512 825 825 825 S.S.Downing S.Downing Downing St.St. St. Denver, Denver, Denver, CO CO CO 80209 80209 80209 720.323.1512 720.323.1512 720.323.1512
DRAWN BY: CRC
DRAWN BY: CRC 1
Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indianapolis, INININ
KITCHEN ISLAND ELEVATION
[114] 12-15 KITCHEN DRAWING TITLE
WC
1
SCALE :: 1/2" = 1'-0" SCALE :: SCALE 1/2" = 1'-0" :: 1/2" = 1'-0" SCALE :: 1/2" = 1'-0"
WC
KITCHEN COUNTERTOP ELEVATION COUNTERTOP ELEVATION 1KITCHEN KITCHEN COUNTERTOP ELEVATION 1 KITCHEN COUNTERTOP ELEVATION 1
SCALE :: 1/4" = 1'-0"
1
SCALE :: 1/4" = 1'-0"
KITCHEN COUNTERTOP ELEVATION COUNTERTOP ELEVATION 1KITCHEN KITCHEN COUNTERTOP ELEVATION 1 KITCHEN COUNTERTOP ELEVATION 1
DRAWING TITLE
September 17, 2019
OWNER:
KITCHEN [114]TITLE 11 1 TITLE DRAWING DRAWING 1
Nick Blum 825 S. Downing St. Denver, CO 80209 720.323.1512
10 DINING [113]
SCALE :: 1/4" = 1'-0"
1
1
1
KITCHEN COUNTERTOP ELEVATION KITCHEN COUNTERTOP ELEVATION 1 KITCHEN COUNTERTOP ELEVATION 1 KITCHEN COUNTERTOP ELEVATION SCALE :: 1/2" = 1'-0" 1 SCALE :: SCALE 1/2" = 1'-0" :: 1/2" = 1'-0" SCALE :: 1/2" = 1'-0"
1
1
SCALE :: 1/2" = 1'-0"
KITCHEN ISLAND ELEVATION SCALE :: 1/2" = 1'-0"
SHEET NUMBER:
A6
Project Location
KITCHEN ISLAND ELEVATION
KITCHEN COUNTERTOP ELEVATION KITCHEN COUNTERTOP ELEVATION 1 KITCHEN COUNTERTOP ELEVATION 1 KITCHEN COUNTERTOP ELEVATION SCALE :: 1/2" = 1'-0" 1 SCALE :: SCALE 1/2" = 1'-0" :: 1/2" = 1'-0"
SHEET NUMBER:
DRAWN BY: CRC
SCALE :: 1/4" = 1'-0"
WC
Indianapolis, IN
BUILT-IN MEDIA CENTER
DESIGNER:
SCALE :: 1/4" = 1'-0"
Phänomen Design 850 College Ave. Indianapolis, IN 46202 303.562.6666
WC
Blum Building
WC
1
ISSUE
WC
SCALE :: 1/4" = 1'-0"
- --
WC DOUBLE-SIDED FIREPLACE SEE ALLOWANCES A301
A6
- --
HVAC PIPE
SHEET NUMBER:
DRAWING TITLE
SCALE :: 1/4" = 1'-0"
FOR REVIEW
SUSPENDED CEILING SEE RCP
A6 A61
SHEET NUMBER:
FOR FOR FOR REVIEW REVIEW REVIEW - -- -- -- --
SCALE :: 1/4" = 1'-0"
Phänomen Design 850 College Ave. DESCRIPTION Indianapolis, FOR REVIEWIN 46202 303.562.6666 -
BED [112] 9 GUEST SHEET NUMBER:
SCALE :: 1/2" = 1'-0"
ISSUE
1
SCALE :: 1/2" = 1'-0" SCALE :: SCALE 1/2" = 1'-0" :: 1/2" = 1'-0" SCALE :: 1/2" = 1'-0"
ISSUE ISSUE ISSUE
DRAWING TITLE BUILT-IN1MEDIA CENTER
GLASS GARAGE DOOR GLASSGLASS GARAGE DOORDOOR 1 GARAGE 1 GLASS GARAGE DOOR 1
-
SCALE :: 1/4" = 1'-0"
SCALE :: 1/4" = 1'-0"
1
May 31, 2016
SCALE :: 1/4" = 1'-0"
BUILT-IN MEDIA CENTER
720.323.1512
SCALE :: 1/2" = 1'-0"
-
SCALE :: 1/4" = 1'-0"
-
1
DRAWING TITLE DRAWING SCALETITLE :: 1/4" = 1'-0"
-
A6
KITCHEN ISLAND ELEVATION
-
1
1
1
-
SCALE :: 1/4" = 1'-0"
DRAWING TITLE
1
DRAWING TITLE
-
1
MASTER BATHROOM [105] 8 ENTRY ROOM [101] KITCHEN ISLAND ELEVATION SCALE :: 1/2" = 1'-0"
1
-
SCALE :: 1/4" = 1'-0"
7
SCALE :: 1/4" = 1'-0" SCALE :: 1/4" = 1'-0"
KITCHEN ISLAND ELEVATION ISLANDISLAND ELEVATION 1KITCHEN KITCHEN ELEVATION SCALE :: 1/2" = 1'-0" 1 KITCHEN ISLAND ELEVATION SCALE :: 1/2" = 1'-0" 1 SCALE :: SCALE 1/2" = 1'-0" :: 1/2" = 1'-0"
-
DRAWING TITLE
1
-
6 KITCHEN [114]
WC
KITCHEN ISLAND ELEVATION
-
1
SCALE :: 1/4" = 1'-0"
5 CORRIDOR [109]
DRAWING TITLE DRAWING TITLE SHEET NUMBER: 1
1
May May May 31, 31, 31, 2016 2016 2016 - -- -- -- --
SCALE :: 1/2" = 1'-0"
G TITLE
SCALE :: 1/4" = 1'-0"
Blum Building Indianapolis, IN Blum Blum BlumBuilding Building Building DRAWN BY:
WC DOUBLE-SIDED FIREPLACE SEE ALLOWANCES A301
DESCRIPTION
KITCHEN ISLAND ELEVATION
DRAWING TITLE
Indianapolis, IN
HVAC PIPE WC
Blum Building
CEILING
HVAC PIPE WC DOUBLE-SIDED FIREPLACE SEE ALLOWANCES A301
WC
-
SUSPENDED CEILING SEE RCP
-
CEILING
1
-
WC
BELOW FINISHED FLOOR
WC
05
15' 6 1/2"
-
INTERIOR WALL WC
WC WC
SUSPENDED CEILING SEE RCP
Indianapolis, IN
WC
-
WC
EXTERIOR WALL
1' 5 1/2"
-
WC
A5
CRC -
SECTION HATCH KEY
SCALE :: 1/4" = 1'-0"
SCALE :: 1/4" = 1'-0"
-
WC
FOR REVIEW
DRAWINGWC TITLE
WC
WC
SCALE :: 1/4" = 1'-0"
DRAWING TITLE
Indianapolis, IN -
1
1
ISSUE
SCALE :: 1/4" = 1'-0"
-
SCALE :: 1/4" = 1'-0"
-
1
DRAWN BY: CRC
PROJECT TITLE
CONTRACTOR:
WC
OWNER: DESCRIPTION Blum Building Nick Blum 825 S. Downing St. Blum Building Denver, CO 80209 DRAWN BY:
Project Location
DRAWING TITLE
NA
DRAWN BY: CRC
Indianapolis, IN
1
Blum Building
SCALE :: 1/4" = 1'-0"
DRAWING TITLE
DESIGNER:
SCALE :: 1/4" = 1'-0"
DRAWING TITLE
OWNER:
SCALE :: 1/4" = 1'-0"
1
Nick Blum 825 S. Downing St. Denver, CO 80209 720.323.1512
BUILT-IN MEDIA CENTER BUILT-IN MEDIA CENTER CEILING 1
FLOOR
DRAWING TITLE
Indianapolis, IN
1
INTERIOR WALL
Phänomen Design 850 College Ave. Indianapolis, IN 46202 303.562.6666
EXTERIOR WALL
-
1
CONTRACTOR: ISSUE
WC WC
3 LIVING ROOM [102]
CEILING
WC
1
SCALE :: 1/4" = 1'-0"
WC
WC
SCALE :: 1/4" = 1'-0"
SCALE :: 1/4" = 1'-0"
WC
SCALE :: 1/4" = 1'-0"
WC
DRAWING TITLE
DRAWING TITLE
HVAC PIPE
WC
BELOW FINISHED FLOOR
WC
1
1
DESIGNER: DESCRIPTION
1
DRAWING TITLE
-
-
-
-
WC
DOUBLE-SIDED FIREPLACE SEE ALLOWANCES A301
BUILT-IN MEDIA CENTER
SCALE :: 1/4" = 1'-0"
WC
1
SCALE :: 1/4" = 1'-0"
SCALE :: 1/4" = 1'-0"
FOR REVIEW
1
SCALE :: 1/4" = 1'-0"
CEILING
DRAWING TITLE
-
SCALE :: 1/4" = 1'-0"
SCALE :: 1/4" = 1'-0"
-
ISSUE
1
SCALE :: 1/4" = 1'-0"
2 LIVING ROOM [102] SECTION HATCH KEY
INTERIOR WALL
BELOW FINISHED FLOOR DRAWING TITLE DRAWING TITLE
1
DRAWING TITLE
WC
HVAC PIPE
Blum Building
EXTERIOR WALL
SUSPENDED CEILING SEE RCP
-
May 31, 2016
WC DOUBLE-SIDED FIREPLACE SEE ALLOWANCES A301
DRAWING TITLE
1
HVAC PIPE WC SUSPENDED CEILING SEE RCP DOUBLE-SIDED FIREPLACE SEE ALLOWANCES A301
CEILING
-
WC
SECTION HATCH KEY DRAWING TITLE ROOM [102] 1 1LIVING
DRAWING TITLE
May 31, 2016
WC
1
SCALE :: 1/4" = 1'-0"
-
SUSPENDED CEILING SEE RCP
-
1
-
DESCRIPTION
WC
1
DRAWING TITLE
SCALE :: 1/4" = 1'-0"
-
1
CEILING
OWNER:
CEILING
DRAWING TITLE
-
1
CEILING
-
SCALE :: 1/4" = 1'-0"
CONTR
BELOW FINISHED FLOOR
CEILING
FOR REVIEW
INTERIOR WALL
BELOW FINISHED FLOOR
WC
NA
CEILING INTERIOR WALL
WC
-
EXTERIOR WALL
WC
May 31, 2016
CEILING EXTERIOR WALL
OWNER:
BELOW FLOOR SECTION HATCH KEY FINISHED SECTION HATCH KEY
WC
-
INTERIOR WALL
May 31, 2016
EXTERIOR WALL
Nick Blum NA OWNER: 825 S. Downing St. Denver, CO 80209 Nick Blum 720.323.1512 825 S. Downing St. Denver, CO 80209 720.323.1512
Nick Blum 825 S. Downing St. Denver, CO 80209 720.323.1512
SECTION HATCH KEY
FOR REVIEW
CEILING
SCALE :: 1/2" = 1'-0" SHEET NUMBER: SHEET NUMBER: SHEET NUMBER: SHEET NUMBER:
A7A7 A7
PR
7) 8)
FOR Y
D INSIDE
18
5.
WT2
CONTRACTOR:
10.
PROVIDE SOUND GASKET AT LAUNDRY ROOM DOORS.
11.
WOODAND STUDS @ 16" O.C. PROVIDE SOUND GASKET NON-COMBUSTIBLE STONE OR METAL THRESHOLD AT UNIT TERMINATED AT 9' FINISHED. ENTRY DOOR.
WT2
CONSTRUCTION: ADD ONE LAYER OF CONTINUOUS 5/8" FIREFIRE RATED SEALANT AT JOINTS.
NEW WALL CONSTRUCTION: 2 X 4
WT3
A34
1
A10
WT1
120
A34
120
5
A14
1
WT4
19
1 6 9 A34
GUEST BED 112
WT1
A13
A34
DINING 113
A34
13
A34
117 18
12
15 A34
11 A34
9
12 13
7
ARCHITECTURAL FLOOR PLAN 1CONSTRUCTION PLAN 1 SCALE :: 1/4" = 1'-0"
N
EXISTING ELECTRICAL.
GLAZING SYSTEM: ADD ONE LAYER OF CONTINUOUS 5/8" FIRERESISTNAT GYP. BOARD INSTALLED FLOOR PLAN ON FINISHED SIDES ANDKEYNOTES INSTALL FIRE RATED SEALANT ATDEMO JOINTS SALVAGED DOOR. REFER TO SHEET, A100
4 EXISTING GLAZING AND DOORS SYSTEM.
3 4
7 OVERHEAD GARAGE DOOR. REFER TO DETAILS A301. SALVAGED DOOR. REFER TO DEMO SHEET, A100
5
8 KITCHEN CABINETRY. REFER TO DETAILS A301. RIBBON WINDOW SITS ABOVE WINDOW "D". REFER TO DOOR+WINDOW SHEET A201.
6
9 OVEN RANGE. REFER TO DETAILS A301. WALL MOUNTED CLOSET SHELF-RACK SYSTEM.
7
10 REFRIGERATOR. REFER TO DETAILS A301. OVERHEAD GARAGE DOOR. REFER TO DETAILS A301.
8
11 KITCHEN SINK. REFER TO DETAILS A301. KITCHEN CABINETRY. REFER TO DETAILS A301.
9
12 DISHWASHER. REFER TO DETAILS A301. OVEN RANGE. REFER TO DETAILS A301.
10
13 COUNTERTOP. REFER TO DETAILS A301. REFRIGERATOR. REFER TO DETAILS A301.
11
14 EXISTING REFRIGERANT LINES. KITCHEN SINK. REFER TO DETAILS A301.
12
15 FREESTANDING TUB. DISHWASHER. REFER TO DETAILS A301.
13
PLATFORM EDGE. EXTEND PLATFORM EDGE OVER STRUCTURE. REFER TO DETAILS SHEET 16 FOR MORE INFO. COUNTERTOP. REFER TO DETAILS A301.
14
17 GAS DOUBLE SIDED FIREPLACE. PROVIDE NECESSARY GAS LINE. EXISTING REFRIGERANT LINES.
15
18 EXISTING DUCT LINES. PROTECT DURING NEW CONSTRUCTION. FREESTANDING TUB.
16
19 EDGE. EXISTING WOOD COLUMNS. TO REMAIN EXPOSED. REFER TO DETAILS SHEET PLATFORM EXTEND PLATFORM EDGE OVER STRUCTURE. FOR MORE INFO.
17
20 SLIDING TRACK DOOR. WRAP IN FIRE RATED DOOR PROTECTANT. GAS DOUBLE SIDED FIREPLACE. PROVIDE NECESSARY GAS LINE.
18
EXISTING DUCT LINES. PROTECT DURING NEW CONSTRUCTION.
19
EXISTING WOOD COLUMNS. TO REMAIN EXPOSED.
20
SLIDING TRACK DOOR. WRAP IN FIRE RATED DOOR PROTECTANT.
11
10
3
14
WT1
8
11
ADDITION EXISTING STUDGYPSUM BOARD ADDED. SEE WALL TYPE SYMBOLS EXISTING WOODTO FRAME WITHOUT CONSTRUCTION ABOVE EXISTING ON A 200.
5 RIBBON WINDOW SITS ABOVE WINDOW "D". REFER TO DOOR+WINDOW SHEET A201. EXISTING WOOD FRAME WITHOUT GYPSUM BOARD ADDED. SEE WALL TYPE SYMBOLS ON A 200. 6 WALL MOUNTED CLOSET SHELF-RACK SYSTEM. EXISTING ELECTRICAL.
A34
8° 10
A12
1 2
14
A34
OFFICE 115
PROVIDE 3-1/2" R11 UNFACED INSULATION IN STUD CAVITIES AND FINISH BY FASTENING 5/8" TYPE 'X' GYPSUM BOARD (OR DUROCK AT TILE LOCATIONS) TO FINISHED SIDE(S) OF STUDS FOR DRYWALL ON WOOD STUD PLAN KEYNOTES FLOOR CONSTRUCTION. REFERENCE SECTION 3/A200 FOR TYPICAL EXISTING GLAZING AND DOORS SYSTEM. DETAIL.
2
WT4
13
KITHCHEN 114
10
NA
EXISTING BUILDING RESISTANT ELEMENTSGYP. THATBOARD ARE DAMAGED INSTALLED OR MODIFIED DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE PATCHED AND REPAIRED TOAND MATCH THEIR EXISTING ADJACENT CONDITIONS. ON FINISHED SIDES INSTALL
TYPICAL DETAIL.
-
ENTRYWAY 100
16
WT4
119
CLOSET 111
9.
2
117
WT1
116
11. FRAMING, PROVIDE SOUND GASKET AND NON-COMBUSTIBLE OR METAL THRESHOLD AT UNIT WALL SHEATHING, AND INSULATION EXTEND FROMSTONE TOP OF SLAB TIGHT TO ADDITION TO EXISTING STUD ENTRY DOOR. UNDERSIDE OF DECK UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.
WOOD STUD CONSTRUCTION.
-
A10
GUEST BATH 110
8. 1
116
WT1
REFERENCE SECTION 3/A200 FORROOM AT ELEVATORS LAUNDRY DOORS. 10. VERIFY PROVIDE GASKET FIELD TOP OFSOUND SLAB HEIGHTS AT AND STAIRS PRIOR TO FABRICATION.
-
17
7.
-
8 A34
3
9. EXISTING LOCATIONS) BUILDING ELEMENTS THAT ARE DAMAGED OR MODIFIED DURING CONSTRUCTION PROVIDE FIRE-SAFING AT EACH FLOOR LEVEL BETWEEN THE EDGE OF THE SLAB AND INSIDE TO FINISHED SIDE(S) SHALL BE WALL. PATCHED AND REPAIRED OF STUDS FOR DRYWALL ONTO MATCH THEIR EXISTING ADJACENT CONDITIONS. FACE OF EXTERIOR
-
A34
BOARD (OR DUROCK AT TILE
6.
-
116
-
WT1
3
-
MASTER BEDROOM 103
CORRIDOR 109
-
WT1
20 WT2
NEW INTERIOR UNIT WALL
6. FINISHPROVIDE FIRE-SAFING ATISEACH LEVEL BETWEEN EDGE OF THEWITH SLAB AND INSIDE ALL MILLWORK/CASEWORK TO BEFLOOR COMPLETED IN STRICTTHE ACCORDANCE FACE OF EXTERIOR NEW WALLWALL. CONSTRUCTION: 2X4 A.W.I. STANDARDS, PREMIUM GRADE. SHOP DRAWINGS SHALL BE SUPPLIED TO ARCHITECT WOOD STUDS @ 16" O.C. PRIOR TO FABRICATION. TERMINATED AT CEILING 7. FIELD VERIFY TOP OF SLAB HEIGHTS AT ELEVATORS AND STAIRS PRIOR TO FABRICATION. ASSEMBLY. PROVIDE 3-1/2" R11 STRUCTURAL, MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING ELEMENTS SHOWN ARE FOR WT1 UNFACED INSULATION IN STUD 8. WALL FRAMING, SHEATHING, AND INSULATION EXTEND FROM TOPNOTIFY OF SLAB TIGHT TO REFERENCE ONLY. VERIFY EACH ELEMENT WITH ENGINEERING DRAWINGS. CAVITIES AND FINISH BY UNDERSIDE OF DECK5/8" UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. ARCHITECT OF ANYFASTENING CONFLICTS. TYPE 'X' GYPSUM
-
A11
4.
16
DRAWN BY: CRC
LIVING ROOM 102
OWNER:
WT1
ENTRY ROOM 101
A34
Nick Blum 825 S. Downing St. Denver, CO 80209 720.323.1512
3. 2
CLOSET 104
DESCRIPTION
AT UNIT 118
2.
4 A34
-
MASTER BATHROOM 105
FOR REVIEW
A34
SHOWER 107
1 A.100
118
ISSUE
7
UTILITY 108
1.
15
119
-
RUCTION ONS.
FINISHED DOOR OPENINGS IN ALL NEW PARTITIONS SHALL BE SET 6" FROM ADJACENT PERPENDICULAR PARTITION, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. GENERAL ARCHITECTURAL NOTES
UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO THE FINISHED FACE OF WALLS AND CENTERLINE OF COLUMNS. PROVIDE BLOCKING IN WALLS TO ACCOMMODATE ALL CASEWORK AND WALL MOUNTED 4. ALL FINISH MILLWORK/CASEWORK IS TO BE COMPLETED IN STRICT ACCORDANCE EQUIPMENT AND ACCESSORIES. ALL BLOCKING MUST MEET ALL APPLICABLE FIRE CODES. WITH A.W.I. STANDARDS, PREMIUM GRADE. SHOP DRAWINGS SHALL BE SUPPLIED TO ARCHITECT PRIOR OPENINGS TO FABRICATION. FINISHED DOOR IN ALL NEW PARTITIONS SHALL BE SET 6" FROM ADJACENT WALL TYPEUNLESS KEY NOTED OTHERWISE. PERPENDICULAR PARTITION, 5. STRUCTURAL, MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING ELEMENTS SHOWN ARE FOR EXISTING EXTERIOR WALL REFERENCE ONLY. ALL VERIFY EACH ELEMENT NOTIFY UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, DIMENSIONS ARE TOWITH THE ENGINEERING FINISHED FACEDRAWINGS. OF WALLS AND NEW WALL ARCHITECT OFDEMISING ANY CONFLICTS. CENTERLINE OF COLUMNS.
May 31, 2016
WC 106
14
2. 3.
Blum Building
6
TO
PROVIDE BLOCKING IN WALLS TO ACCOMMODATE ALL CASEWORK AND WALL MOUNTED EQUIPMENT AND ACCESSORIES. ALL BLOCKING MUST MEET ALL APPLICABLE FIRE CODES.
Indianapolis, IN
TION.
1.
DESIGNER:
6)
Phänomen Design 850 College Ave. Indianapolis, IN 46202 303.562.6666
ACCOUNT FOR ALIGNING OF WALL TYPES OR FLUSH CONDITIONS. WALL FRAMING, SHEATHING, AND INSULATION TO EXTEND FROM TOP OF SLAB TIGHT TO UNDERSIDE OF DECK UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. VERIFY FIRE RATINGS OF WALLS WITH FIRE RATING TABLE, LIFE SAFETY PLANS, AND OTHER NOTATIONS THROUGHOUT THE DRAWING SET. GENERAL ARCHITECTURAL NOTES VERIFY STRUCTURAL LOAD BEARING COMPONENTS OF WALLS WITH STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS. PROVIDE IN-WALL BLOCKING FOR OWNER PROVIDED FF&E ITEMS. COORDINATE WITH OWNER.
5)
WITH CHITECT
SHEET NUMBER:
A4
A 31
32
33
1
34
Grindstone on the Monon FIRM: Phänomen Design LOCATION: Westfield, IN CLIENT: Grindstone Charley’s Grindstone Charley’s added its latest location along the Monon Trail in the suburbs of Westfield, Indiana. The project featured 193 indoor seats, 21 bar seats, and 53 outdoor dining seats. Grindstone Charley’s was designed to be a social place, where family and friends could come and gather. Duties included renderings, space planning, modeling, and construction documents.
35
2
1
WEST EXTERIOR ELEVATION
3 NORTHWEST EXTERIOR ELEVATION
36
3
2 SOUTHEAST EXTERIOR ELEVATION
4 NORTHEAST EXTERIOR ELEVATION
1 4 3
3
Monon Trail
1
2
Back of House
2
5 ARCHITECTURAL FLOOR PLAN
N
37
Supplemental Materials TOD DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR THE CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS
The TOD Design Guidelines were designed to accompany future development along Bus Rapid Transit lines within Indianapolis. While interning with the Indianapolis Metropolitan Development Organization, my responsibilities with this document included graphic production, content, writing, and layout. https://indyconnect.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/DRAFT_TOD-DesignGuidelines.pdf
SHELBY STREET BEAUTIFICATION & COMMUNITY STYLE GUIDE
Part of the senior year MUD studio project, the SSB&CSG was part of an accompanying document to a new development occurring in the Garfield Park neighborhood. https://issuu.com/colbyclineportfolio/docs/ shelby_street_beautification_and_community_style_g
EXHIBIT COLUMBUS: PROJECT 49262
Ball State University’s 2017 Exhibit Columbus installation, Project 49262 was a sculptural installation which was featured in front of Central Middle School. Responsibilities included graphic and video production. https://www.youtube.com/ watch?v=dFnMjfnYEdc
US 202 REDEVELOPMENT
Design Collective was hired as the master
38
planner for a 6 mile stretch of a proposed master redevelopment for the Concord Pike/ US 202 corridor. Responsibilities included graphic production, community outreach through public workshops, existing condition analysis, site design, extensive proforma and zoning modeling, coordination amongst traffic consultants, and concept design. http://www.wilmapco.org/202-2/ https://www.wdel.com/news/video-the-future-of-concord-pike-and-what-it-might/article_243daaba-4b8a-11e9-8d7e-576bb9d9b166. html
NORA LOOKING FORWARD
Nora Looking Forward was the final presentation of a comprehensive studio project delivered by the MUD studio of 2018. This was a team project where 8 students who were tasked with determining multiple connectivity and design solutions along the 2.1 mile stretch of the Monon Trail within Nora. The presentation focuses on 4 plausible design concepts and 8 various focus zones. Responsibilities included coordination of overall presentation, development of design concept “The Wave” (slides 10-39), and analysis of the focus element “High School Connections” (slides 105-111). https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1T1aJV68tc6hECC5CwOfak-2b-ZP886z2lIpB-9kNc9w/ edit?usp=sharing
2018 ULI HINES COMPETITION: SUNLIGHT PARK (TEAM 181819)
Sunlight Park was the submittal fr the 2018 ULI Hines Competition. Our project group included 3 urban design students, 1 architectural student, and 1 finance student. Our project board, narrative, and proforma are included in the link below. Responsibilities included team leader, graphic layout, model manager, coordination, and development of diagrams, site plans, and some renderings. https://drive.google.com/open?id=1MFBV8KzAHG5Z7bWsohOqsKGV6lhojWhN
39
40
CRC | 2019