Architecture portfolio

Page 1

architecture portfolio


table of contents

self taken photograph


.....adaptive reuse

....branch library

....net zero home

3 A3.10

.....design build

Q

R

P

N

M

L

2 A3.01

1 UP

FEC

STAIR

CORRIDOR X66

DN

S2

2

3

4

A5.02

A5.02

A5.02

EXISTING UNIT X28

3

2 BDRM UNIT

4 A4.01

1

A3.01

2A

A6.02

X54

EXISTING UNIT

2

2

A3.10

1 BDRM UNIT

A3.10

X27

3

....chapel project X53

1 BDRM UNIT

EXISTING UNIT

X26

4A

X29

1 A6.06

X55

4

1 A4.13

EXISTING UNIT

A3.10

OPP

5 FEC

1

1

A6.05

1

A6.01

VIF

A6.07

6A

1 ALIGN

A6.08 1 A4.13

2 BDRM UNIT

X70

X56

1BDRM UNIT

8

A4.12

OPP KITCHEN EXHAUST

IDF

2

X69

MATCH LINE "A"

A4.12

OPP

1 BDRM UNIT

1 BDRM UNIT

X51

X50

OPP

2

7

X30

8 OPP A4.13

MECH. ELEC

MATCH LINE "B"

X25

ALIGN

.....urban market X52

1 BDRM UNIT

EXISTING UNIT

EXISTING UNIT

A4.13

X24

X68 FD @ EQUIPMENT RMS. REFER TO P. SERIES

8

STORAGE X31

ELEC

4

--

A3.01

OPEN TO BELOW

FEC

CORRIDOR STORAGE

X57

X71

8

FEC

X65

1 BDRM UNIT

A8.10

MATCH LINE "B"

N.I.C.

MATCH LINE "A"

CORRIDOR X65

STORAGE

1

9

X32

A6.04

1

X58

A4.13 1

OPP

.....co-operative education internship 2

A5.04

FEC

A3.10

5

4

4.11

4.13 AT FLOOR 4

SIM.

OPP

1 BDRM UNIT

1 BDRM UNIT

X63

X64

LAUNDRY 400 FEC

EXJ-03

8

-

A4.12

-

X40

X39

1 A3.10

1BDRM UNIT

2 BDRM UNIT

X33

X62 3

EXISTING UNIT

EXISTING UNIT

ALIGN

1 BDRM UNIT

EXISTING UNIT

10

X38

8

A4.13

2

A4.12

11A

A4.13

VIF 8 4.11 1 4

A3.01

A3.10

1 BDRM UNIT X59

....freehand drawing

EXISTING UNIT X34

EXISTING UNIT X37

5 A4.13

1 BDRM UNIT X61

12A


resume contact

Colleen Goodwin 18723 Reynard Lane Wildwood, MO 63069

314-703-7895 colleengoodwin02@gmail.com references available upon request

self taken photograph


education ......College

University of Kansas Lawrence, KS 5 year Masters of Architecture Program, Graduation: 2015

......Study Abroad

Barcelona, Spain (Barcelona Architecture Center through Clemson University) 1 semester, Fall 2012, studying architecture

......High School

Cor Jesu Academy St. Louis, MO High School Diploma, Graduation: 2010

experience

......Intern at the architecture firm Solomon Cordwell Buenz (Chicago) from June-December 2014 ......Intern at the architecture firm Architextures (St. Louis), summer 2013, winter 2014 ......Worked with Helix Architecture + Design (Kansas City) on a volunteer project to generate Revit drawings and building code analysis for the repurposing of a church basement turned community center in Kansas City. ......Shadowed at the architecture firm Mackey Mitchell (St. Louis) ......Shadowed at the architecture firm Gray Design (St. Louis) ......Shadowed architect Dennis Tacchi (St. Louis) ......Shadowed at the architecture firm PGAV (St. Louis) ......Can use the following programs: Revit, AutoCad, Sketchup, In-Design, Photoshop, Illustrator, Ease

employment

......Solomon Cordwell Buenz (Chicago), June-December 2014 I was a summer through fall intern at this Chicago based architecture, interior design and planning firm.

......Architextures (St. Louis), June-August 2013, January 2014

I was a summer and winter intern at this woman owned Interior Design + Architecture firm.

......Enduro Binders (St. Louis), December 2012-January 2013

I worked in the warehouse and offices of this company creating parts for binders and filing records.

......LifeCafe Team Member at Lifetime Fitness (St. Louis), JuneAugust 2012

I worked in the cafe at the cash register and prepared and served food.

......Swim America (through Rockwood School District in St. Louis), October 2008-2012

I taught children ages 3-13 how to swim. I taught both group lessons and individual private lessons focusing on helping the children acclimate to the water in the beginning levels and in the advanced levels teaching them the four strokes of swimming.

talents & interests

......speak conversational spanish ......photography ......exploring other cultures ......urban renewal and community development ......urban agriculture ......historic preservation and adaptive reuse ......interior design

involvement

......Am a member of the KU Student Endowment Board, which raises awareness on campus of the importance for the need of outside funding for the university. In 2014 I acted as the Alumni Relations chair of the organization. ......Attend Spanish Round Table meetings to help keep up my Spanish language skills. ......Am involved in Jayhawk Exchange Friends Program where recent study abroad returnees are paired with a new exchange student at KU to welcome them and help them adjust. .....In the Spring semesters of 2013 and 2014 I participated in The Big Event. This is a day of community service that takes place in surrounding neighborhoods around KU. ......Participate in intramural sports through KU. ......On Halloween 2011 I participated in Trick-or-Treat So Others Can Eat where I collected canned goods for a local food pantry. ......Am a member of Habitat for Humanity. I also volunteer for fundraising events with the organization. ......Participated in a fundraising activity for the University of Kansas through a volleyball competition put on by KU Endowment. ......Volunteered to help coach at my high school’s summer lacrosse sports camp for 2 years. ......Volunteered at St. Joseph’s Institute for the Deaf working with preschool children for a summer. ......Volunteered to teach Vacation Bible School for 6 years. I taught preschool, 2nd grade, 3rd grade, 4th grade, 5th grade, and 6th grade teaching the students about Bible stories, doing related crafts with them, and helping them prepare for the culminating theatrical play.


adaptive reuse year 4

The site of this project was the Riverview Neighborhood Community in Kansas City, Kansas. The semester began with individual and group research of the needs of this community so as to create our own proposals for the neighborhood. Each proposal was unique but had its core in the betterment of the health of this community in Wyandotte County, which statistically has one of the lowest incomes in the state of Kansas. Involved in the proposal was the adaptive reuse of a building within the area that would play a significant role in each of our projects. My proposal aimed to enhance the health and sense of community of the Riverview Neighborhood Area by bridging the gap between education and community. It would be accomplished through: 1) a creation of a network of lit trails linking parks and schools, 2) the addition of activities to neighborhood parks and the re-programming of vacant lots to strengthen this network, 3) the transformation of the McKinley Elementary School building into an anchor for community life. Within this building, existing educational organizations and programs in the area would make this building their permanent location. Such activities to happen within the adapted building would be a community kitchen, with related cooking classes for students and parents, nutrition classes, fitness classes, a greenhouse, a garden tool rental program, and a mobile food cart production shop. To make our proposals possible for the community to achieve we also each researched applicable grants. From this project I learned how to go about Public Interest Design successfully. Through research, mapping, and diagramming I was able to learn to develop a much more expansive and well rounded proposal that fully integrated the building into its site and surrounding community.


This map shows my research into a focus area within the Riverview Neighborhood Area. It illustrates the relationship of parks to schools. The schools are highlighted in yellow and the parks are measured by distance from schools through a color gradient.


The image on the left describes a half mile, or ten minute walking radius around parks. As the community currently has limited walking paths this shows that the neighborhood is much more walkable than is currently being treated as. The maps indicated a specific residential area to work in with many available community assets such as parks, schools, gardens, and vacant lots. The image below utilized Photoshop and an existing photo of the area to display the potential of walking trails.


e tt Av

e Barn

The left image shows the site of the existing McKinley Elementary School building.

4th N1 St Gra

nd

w vie

d Blv

The bottom image shows the floors within the building and their connection into the greenhouse addition on the southern facade. Each floor and its program extends as a balcony into the greenhouse creating a vertical experiential journey through the greenhouse.


This image explains the floor levels within the building and their relation to the ground plane through dividing the building into thirds.


The right image explains the form development of the greenhouse stemming from the structural core of the building running north to south. Green space, which bookends the building north and south, is pulled through the structural core of the building. The program is placed into the building and extended out into the greenhouse.



The left image shows the greenhouse and the building functioning together as a trombe wall and thermal chimney to promote passive heating and cooling. The right image shows a sectional perspective to describe the platforms and planter beams inside the greenhouse. These beams function as structure to support the platforms, safety railings, and planters to promote the verticality of the greenhouse.


The bottom site section looking at the western facade of the building locates the viewpoint of the image on the next page. The exterior perspective looking up at the building from the southwest corner of the site includes terraced seating, an orchard, terraced gardens, and a pathway for the mobile food carts into the building and through the greenhouse. This building and its site serve as a hub for the trail network. It is the generator for all of the programmatic activities happening along the trails and parks linked by mobile food carts.



branch library year 2

In this project we were assigned to design a 25,000 square foot branch library on an urban site in downtown Lawrence, Kansas. We were given a full program to include in our libraries, chose materials for the entire building, and designed outdoor courtyards to address a nine foot level change on the site. In the end, we submitted hand-drawn plans, elevations, and sections and a basswood model all at a scale of 3/32 inch equals one foot. Throughout this semester I learned for the first time how to create a design for an entire building, inside and out, and to do it all completely by hand, as no computers were allowed.



net zero home year 4

In this group project my four member team competed in the U.S. Department of Energy Challenge Home Student Design Competition, receiving the award of Excellence in Construction Documents. The purpose of this competition was to create a net zero home, using passive and active systems, at an affordable cost. To make this project as applicable as possible we worked with a non-profit housing authority in Kansas City, Kansas called Community Housing of Wyandotte County. We were assigned a site and worked to make this house fit in with and contribute to its culturally diverse neighborhood through its profile and functionality. To ensure we met our goal of affordable net zero, we researched and met with consultants on sustainable products, tested our house in the HERS Rem Rate Program, and calculated our construction cost vs sales price. Our goal was to create a prototype for future homes that may be applied to a full range of communities. However, through this process we discovered that these systems are most successful through Eco Districts. By planning an entire community of passive houses that work together it greatly reduces the cost that each home has to pay, making it more affordable and efficient. This also allows the opportunity to create better planned communities that take into account ecological opportunities and help to generate a sense of place. Overall, through this project my team strived to redesign the single family home experience.


Porch Ledger Detail SIPs (see SIPs detail) DN

UP

Hardie Panel Deck Bedroom 1

Kitchen

REF

Living Room

2x6 pt SYP Decking w/ 2-31/2� Wood Screws

Dining Room Jack & Jill Bathroom

Powder Room

Gap for drainage

UP

DN

Pressure-treated Band Joist

DW

Copper or Galvanized Steel Flashing

Corrosion-resistant Bolts or Lag Screws

Pressure-treated Ledger

DN

2x10 SYP Joist Master Bedroom Bedroom 2 Master Bath DN

Corrosion-resistant Joist Hanger (Simpson Lus 28)

In addition to sustainable systems research, this project included renderings and a full set of construction documents. The bottom left image shows an example of the level of detail we explored in this project. The bottom right images give a description of the open layout of the house to allow effective use of natural light. Through a kitchen rendering, the top image describes some sustainable systems and materials used.


sustainable systems diagram


This page describes the research we did into creating a potential Eco District in a local community in Lawrence, Kansas. One step in the process included exploration of the social aspects of the culture of surrounding neighborhoods to see how and where residents interact and to what level so as to develop a community that promotes interaction. We wanted to discover how we could rearrange parts of the public space in the bottom left image in a way that makes the public spaces also some of the most personal. Another significant aspect included studying solar orientation and exposure as seen in the bottom right image. This helped us to generate a community layout. In total we focused on 5 key aspects which include passive house design, shared sustainable systems, front porch lifestyles encouraging a more social atmosphere, the replacement of a standard lawn and street with a more usable stormwater treatment system landscape, and the transformation of private backyards into a shared open space. This new community layout can be seen in the top image.

B.6 Exterior Rendering

B.7 Site & Sun Path

Our process began by taking a typical house for the neighborhood (two stories, three bedrooms, and a pitched roof) and manipulating it through a series of formal moves. First, the

N

E

W

envelope was streamlined, making it easier to insulate and seal the building’s shell. Then, unneeded

Ann Avenue

E

W

new sidewalk existing sidewalk

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

W

E

W

10' min front setback

W

the entry to one side and setting it into the building. All movement within the house is also focused along the corridor it creates. Next, the roof-lines were raised or lowered to respond to the spaces

E

E

planter bed

they enclose. This minimizes material use and results in a dynamic exterior. Finally, penetrations to

front porch wood steps

E

W

E

W

the envelope were minimized. Windows were made smaller, tighter, and more insulated. They were strategically placed to let in light only where it is needed. The combination of these smart strategies has elevated our design above other repeatable house plans.

front porch elevated 30" off ground

property line

10' min street side setback

E

W

E

W

W

E

W

E

W

E

W

1202 Ann Avenue

W

E

Lot 2

W

W

W

W

12th Street

E

W

3' min side setback

E

property line, no setback due to narrow lot ordinance E

W

water catchment system E

W

permeable pavers

E

W

E

W

new sidewalk planter bed E

W

E

W

large caliper trees spaced 30' o.c. E

W

E

W

permeable pavement drive

35’

30’

public

private

20

5’

5’

25’

4’

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

E

4’

E

E

E

SS

SS

SS

S

21


This project was an entire studio design build done with the help of Zahner, an architectural metal company in Kansas City, who helped with fabrication. We began in three small groups developing a design and building a scaled mock up for an exterior metal wall facade, meant to study the limits and abilities of metal when used as a movable sun shade system. We then competed against each other to choose a design to focus on as an entire class for the second half of the semester. After this, we began to experiment with different forms of the selected design, and so the project slowly transformed itself from something less a facade to more a study of metal as a material. However, the design always held on to a strict set of rules created in a parametric definition in Grasshopper that set the pattern of“fin� shapes. In the end we created a free standing metal installation that could stand alone and support itself. One half contains the fins, or metal strips, built by Zahner, while the other half was fully built by our studio. By placing the two next to each other, this created a comparison of the response of the metal to being professionally machine made and student hand made. It was set up in an area on campus where students walking to class would be encouraged to interact with it by sitting on the wooden benches incorporated into the design. Through this project I was able to learn just how challenging it is to try and make a computer design reality, especially in the case of the curved wooden benches whose development and production team I was a part of. The process of actually building our design proved to be very difficult and I now have a better understanding of the importance of details in creating a well functioning and successful physical product.

design build year 3


curved wood bench

plan view of scale model


second half of the semester

bench construction documents


A36 1

11/2” STEEL BAR

1/8” SCREW

11/2”

SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE DESIGN AND PLANNING

STEEL BAR

1/8” 1

ELEVATION OF THE CURVED PLYWOOD BENCHAT THE BACK OF THE KU FINS NOT TO SCALE

2

ARCH 409 PAOLA SANGUINETTI

KU FIN TO FIN CONNECTION SECTION DETAIL NOT TO SCALE A36 2

STEEL BAR

1/2” A36 2

DESIGN FOR FABRICATION STUDIO IN COLLABORATION WITH

ZAHNER PROJECT NAME

TURBO SYSTEM CURVED WALL INSTALLATION DATE

PIN JOINT(1/4” BOLT)

SPRING 2013 DRAWN BY

1/8” SCREW

11/2”

22”

A36 1 STEEL BAR

fin assembly construction documents

3

KU FIN TO FIN CONNECTION-PLAN DETAIL NOT TO SCALE

COLLEEN GOODWIN

SHEET NUMBER

A36


perforation pattern for plywood on benches

back elevation side elevation

plan

exploded back elevation

The image above displays the fabrication with the supports of each bench while the bottom left image describes the associated drawings of the structure.


bench seat profile: highlighted in blue


first half of the semester

process flowchart


These images show the development of the form of the individual hinged pod, which functions as a moveable sun shade. The far right image shows pod detailing. (Rhino+ Grasshopper)

The pod was further developed through experiments of light and shadow to determine folds and slits. It was then hinged, with each half on sliders, to allow the pod to fold in half and let maximum sunlight into the building.


The top left image explains the double skin structure of facade. (Rhino + Grasshopper)

The bottom left image describes the pods applied to entire facade. (Rhino + Grasshopper)



chapel project year 2

In this first project of the fall semester we were assigned to design a non-denominational chapel to be made entirely of wood and then build a model of it. It would be placed on campus near a cemetery and would be about 800 square feet inside. The challenge of this project was to use wood in both an aesthetically pleasing and structurally sound way. The building consists primarily of one large, open space with the exception of a bathroom, changing room, and storage rooms tucked in between the end interior walls which lean against the end exterior walls.



urban market year 3

I worked on this project during my semester abroad in Barcelona, Spain. It was a partner project requiring us to create a public market, as those play a significant role in the daily life of the residents of Barcelona. They are also an important part of each of the different neighborhoods in the city and through our research we better learned how these communities so successfully use and value their public space. The site of this project was divided up into three spaces: the beach, the boulevard, and La Barceloneta neighborhood. In our design we wanted to better connect these three zones but at the same time preserve the identity of each. We wanted everyone, tourists and locals alike, to be able to enjoy the market. However, since Barcelona is already a very touristy city we did not want tourism to take over. In order to fulfill these two goals of connection and preservation we first used the vertical geometry of the site to promote connections. We began with section cuts of the site and then altered these cuts to create more access points between the zones. This promoted a better physical integration of the different zones. Second, we used program distribution within the market to ensure preservation. Those items most important to locals were placed closest to the neighborhood while those most useful to tourists were placed along the busy boulevard and above the beach where many tourists go to relax. This encouraged locals and tourists to shop in different areas thus protecting the neighborhood feel of La Barceloneta. From both this project and semester in Europe I gained a much greater understanding for how successful public space is designed and used in Barcelona as well as in the many other countries I traveled to. By living in Barcelona and visiting other cities I was able to see firsthand that when space is tight every detail has to be thought out and fully functional. Through this I also developed a stronger interest in urban planning and how cities function successfully.


site perspective, highlighting primary path of circulation throughout market


form development

cross-sectional perspective line drawing of site + boulevard

string used to connect altered section cuts of boulevard together in a new, model form orange = building boundaries green = pathway

line drawing of new market building form generated from string connections of boulevard in cross-section

model of new building form: progression of string model, now with connected planes between section cuts



program development

Barceloneta/Boulevard Limit

Limit

h

Boulevard/Beach Limit

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

The top image shows the modes of activity in the site. yellow = moderate pace of residents’daily life green = fast pace of boulevard traffic red = slow pace of tourists on beach

The tope right image is a cross-section of the modes of activity on the site along two axes on either side of the boulevard. The image directly to the right describes a programmatic path of circulation. It is a translation of site modes of activity to the market program. The far right image displays the resulting program of the market.


le el2 level le el1 level le el0 level le el le el le el

Section through Tunnel

section through underground tunnel between La Barceloneta neighborhood and beach

Section through Tunnel le el le el le el le el2 level le el1 level level le el0

Section ro

rcelonet

section from La Barceloneta Section ro rcelonet


3 A3.10

Q

R

P

N

M

L

K

J

2 A3.01

1 UP

FEC

STAIR

CORRIDOR X66

DN

S2

2

3

4

A5.02

A5.02

A5.02

EXISTING UNIT X28

3

2 BDRM UNIT

4 A4.01

1

A3.01

2A

A6.02

X54

EXISTING UNIT

2

2

X27

A3.10

1 BDRM UNIT

A3.10

3

X53

EXISTING UNIT

1 BDRM UNIT

X21

X26

4A

X29

1 A6.06

X55

4

1 A4.13

EXISTING UNIT

EXISTING UNIT

A3.10

OPP

5 FEC

1

1

A6.05

1

A6.01

VIF

A6.07

6A

1 ALIGN

A6.08 1 A4.13

2 BDRM UNIT

OPP 2

X70

A4.13

X56

MECH.

X51

X50

OPP

2

X22

A4.13

EXISTING UNIT

EXISTING UNIT

X24

X23

ELEC. 178 SQ

FD

X69

MATCH LINE "A"

1 BDRM UNIT

X68

ELEC

MATCH LINE "B"

A4.12

OPP

1 BDRM UNIT

EXISTING UNIT

7

X30

8

OPP KITCHEN EXHAUST

IDF

1 BDRM UNIT

X25

1BDRM UNIT

8 A4.12

ALIGN

X52

EXISTING UNIT

@ EQUIPMENT RMS. REFER TO P. SERIES

8

STORAGE X31

ELEC

4

--

A3.01

OPEN TO BELOW

FEC

CORRIDOR X65

1 BDRM UNIT

STORAGE

X57

X71

8

FEC

A8.10

1

STORAGE

A6.04

X32

MATCH LINE "B"

CORRIDOR 4520 SQ

N.I.C.

MATCH LINE "A"

CORRIDOR X65

9 LOCKERS 178 SQ

LAUNDRY 400

A4.13 1

2

SIM.

A5.04

X58

OPP

OPP

5

X63

X64

FEC

4.13

8

-

X39

1

EXISTING UNIT

EXISTING UNIT

X40

X41

A3.10

1BDRM UNIT X33

X62

AT FLOOR 4

EXISTING UNIT

EXJ-03

2 BDRM UNIT

4

4.11

1 BDRM UNIT

A4.12

FEC

A3.10

1 BDRM UNIT

3

ALIGN

1 BDRM UNIT

1

10

EXISTING UNIT

EXISTING UNIT

X38

X42

8

A4.13

A4.12

2

11A

A4.13

VIF 8 4.11 1 4

A3.01

A3.10

1 BDRM UNIT X59

EXISTING UNIT X34

12A

EXISTING UNIT

EXISTING UNIT

X37

X43

1 BDRM UNIT

5 A4.13

X61

EXISTING UNIT X44

co-operative education internship 1

A6.03

2 BDRM UNIT

13A

X60

FEC

CORRIDOR X67

DN

STAIR S1 UP

2

3

4

A5.01

A5.01

A5.01

1

EXISTING UNIT

EXISTING UNIT

A4.40

X35

X36

14

ADD ALTERNATE 01

15

EXISTING UNIT X45

3

A3.10

year 5

The above image shows a drawing produced by SCB in which I worked on. 1

TYPICAL FLOOR PLAN (2 - 4)

SCALE:

1/8" = 1'-0"

I spent the summer and fall semester of my fifth year working a co-operative education internship at Solomon Cordwell Buenz (SCB) in Chicago. The focus of the internship was Health and Wellness Architecture so I worked primarily on Senior Living Facilities for a number of clients. I was given the opportunity to participate on a couple of other project genres such as a school and high rise residential building along with a variety of stages ranging from digital model development to construction documents, in both Revit and AutoCad. On one particular Senior Living Facility project I was involved from Schematic Design through Construction Documents, which is shown above and on the next page. In addition to these tasks I also began work in developing a database of unit prototypes and elements to be used internally in Senior Living projects at SCB. Overall, I felt that a seven month internship gave me the opportunity to be much more deeply involved in the projects and their processes from start to finish.


1. REFER TO SHEET A8.30 FOR FINISH SCHEDULES, ACCESSIBILITY SCHEDULES & ABBREVIATIONS. 2. REFER TO A2.02A & A2.02B FOR DEMISING WALL PARTITION TAGS.

HATCH REPRESENTS EXISTING AREAS TO REMAIN WITH NO WORK HATCH REPRESENTS EXISTING WALLS AND STRUCTURE TO REMAIN HATCH TO REPRESENT STRUCTURE

FEC

FEC

AED

FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINET (SEMI RECESSED) FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINET (SURFACE MOUNTED) DEFIBRILLATOR CABINET (SEMI RECESSED) COORDINATE LOCATION W/ OWNER

GENERAL NOTES NEW STRUCTURAL GRID MARKERS

A

EXISTING STRUCTURAL GRID MARKERS

N

The top image shows the Senior Living Facility that I was involved LIVING in from SD-CD. Although I worked on aspects throughout the entire set, the unit types and elevations were designated to me to detail. The bottom image shows a typical unit plan, one of nine, which populate the entire secondENLARGED through REFLECTED CEILING PLAN (UNIT X56) 2 floors of the fourth building. CEILING HT. 8'-0"

SCALE:

KITCHEN CEILING HT. 8'-0"

elevations created by Solomon Cordwell Buenz

1/2" - 1'-0"

26

36

CLOSET

39

02

01

BATHROOM 3 6

A6.01

22

4

5

BEDROOM

X06 X04 X05A 02

02

01

07

X02C X03

OOM NO.

12.19.2014

ISSUED FOR BID

12.03.2014

ISSUED FOR PERMIT

10.17.2014

ISSUED FOR DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

08.22.2014 DATE

HALL

ISSUED FOR SCHEMATIC DESIGN

21 01

61

62

63

DESCRIPTION

MATHER PLACE OF WILMETTE

12.19.2014

01

61

61

PHASE II ADDITION

1

A8.05

NO. 21

2801 OLD GLENVIEW ROAD WILMETTE, IL

07

01

KITCHEN

LIVING

Checked By: Project Number:

2014025

OOM

DATE

ISSUED FOR SCHEMATIC DESIGN DESCRIPTION

MATHER PLACE OF WILMETTE PHASE II ADDITION

2013 Solomon Cordwell Buenz

Drawn By: AR, LJ

ISSUED FOR PERMIT ISSUED FOR DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

08.22.2014

X01

ISSUED FOR BID

12.03.2014 10.17.2014

7 10

A6.01

8

9

Sheet Number:

A2.02 21

2801 OLD GLENVIEW ROAD WILMETTE, IL 2013 Solomon Cordwell Buenz

37

62 01

Drawn By: CG

1

ENLARGED PLAN UNIT X56 - (SIM. UNITS: X58)

SCALE:

1/2" - 1'-0"

Checked By: Project Number:

Sheet Number:

A6.01


MIC

RANGE

TYPICAL "X56" UNIT - KITCHEN

8

SCALE:

7

1/2" - 1'-0"

MIC

RANGE

accessible kitchen elevation

8

TYPICAL "X56" UNIT - KITCHEN

SCALE:

1/2" - 1'-0"

FLUSH

accessible bathroom elevation

6

TYPICAL "X56" UNIT - BATHROOM

SCALE:

1/2" - 1'-0"

5


BASE

LINE OF FLOOR STRUCTURE

ASE - 1 HR

SCALE:

3"=1'-0"

SECTION VIEW

STRUCTURE

BASE

DETAIL @ MEDICINE CABINET 5 36 DEMISING CHASEWALL - 1 HR SCALE:

31

3" = 1'-0"

SCALE:

LIMITING HEIGHT: 13'-2" FIRE RATING: 1 HOUR (UL#U420) ASTC RATING: 55

3"=1'-0"

LIMITING HEIGHT: 13'-2" ASTC RATING: FIRE RATING: 1 HOUR (UL#U420)

6" DE SCALE:

3"=

PLAN VIEW

TAPE JOINT

HEAD

LINE OF STRUCTURE CONTINUOUS ACOUSTICAL SEALANT AT EACH SIDE

HEAD

CONTINUOUS ACOUSTICA SEALANT AT EACH SIDE

LATERAL BRACING 1

2"

LATERAL BRACING

CEMENT BOARD FOR WET LOCATION

CEMENT BOARD FOR WET LOCATION

5/8" TYPE X GYPSUM BOARD, TWO LAYERS AT CORRIDOR SIDE

5/8" TYPE X GYPSUM BOARD, TWO LAYERS AT CORRIDOR SIDE

UNIT

PLAN CORRIDOR

5/8" TYPE "X" GYPSUM BOARD, TWO LAYERS AT CORRIDOR SIDE

2"

20 GA. 3 5/8" STEEL STUD @ 16" O.C.

TILES

TILES

VAPOR BARRIER, SEAL TO TOP AND BOTTOM RUNNER TRACK

VAPOR BARRIER, SEAL TO TOP AND BOTTOM RUNNER TRACK

3" MINERAL WOOL SAFB INSULATION

EXTERIOR LAYER TO COVER NAILING FLANGES @ SHOWER ENCLOSURE

PLAN NO. CORRIDOR

PHASE II ADDITION

1 1/2" SOUND ATTENUATI BATT INSULATION

CONTINUOUS STEEL RUNNER

CONTINUOUS ACOUSTICAL SEALANT AT EACH SIDE

CONTINUOUS ACOUSTICAL SEALANT AT EACH SIDE

LINE OF FLOOR STRUCTURE

BASE

- 1 HR

BASE

6" CORRIDOR PARTITION

23

LIMITING HEIGHT: 13'-2" ASTC RATING: FIRE RATING: 1 HOUR (UL#U420)

SCALE:

3"=1'-0" EXTERIOR

LIMITING HEIGHT: 13'-6" FIRE RATING: 1 HOUR (UL #U404) ASTC RATING: 48

STANDING SEAM METAL - SLOPE TO MATCH EXISTING

LAN DETAIL @ UNIT DEMISING WALL NOTE: MAINTAIN 1" LINE OF STRUCTURE UNDERLAYMENT

SLIT TAPE JOINT ROOF W/CONTINUOUS ACOUSTICAL SHEATHING SEALANT, TYP.

7

LINE OF FLOOR 2013 Solomon Cordwell Buenz

22

BASE 6" COLD FORMED METAL STUD FRAMING

6" CORRIDOR PARTITION

HEAD

SLIT TAPE JOINT W/CONTINUOUS ACOUSTICAL SEALANT, TYP.

FASTENERS 5/8" TYPE "X" GYPSUM BOARD (1 LAYER) EACH SIDE

PLAN

3 5/8" STEEL STUD @ 24" O.C.

ALTERNATE: 5/8" x 12" x CHASE WIDTH GYPSUM BOARD CROSS BRACING W/ 6 - 1" TYPE "S" SCREWS. SPACE BRACING 48" O.C. VERT. 10 3/4" MAX. CHASE WIDTH 1 1/2" SOUND ATTENUATION BLANKET, TYP.

CONTINUOUS STEEL

6" CO

A

HEAD

The images on this page show E-PLS-01 FINISH COAT some of the details I was also SCRATCH COAT asked to draw forLATH this project. METAL OVER BUILDING is PAPER The top left image a partition type. The topE-INSUL-03 right image is an elevation of DRAINAGE the mechanical MAT access panelE-WRB-01 in each unit. The 5/8" THICK bottom image a section GWBis SHEATHING through a portion of roof in thePLAN CONTROL JOINT project.

SLIT TAPE JOINT W/CONTINUOUS ACOUST SEALANT, TYP.

CONTINUOUS 2" DEFLECT TRACK - DO NOT FASTEN STUDS FASTENERS 5/8" TYPE "X" GYPSUM BOARD (1 LAYER) EACH SIDE 3 5/8" STEEL STUD @ 24" O.C.

COLD FORMED METAL STUD FRAMING

E-RF-03 - STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF 3" = 1'-0"

21

3"=1'-0"

FASTENERS

SCALE:

STRUCTURE

6" NOMINAL The images on the previous LIMITING HEIGHT: SCALE: 3"= 13'-6" REINFORCED CMU WALL FIRE RATING: 1 HOUR (UL #U404) page show accessible kitchen ASTC RATING: 48 and bathroom elevations Drawn By: She associated withGARAGE the previously MT MECHANICAL WALL - POOL 5 SCALE: 3" = 1'-0" displayed enlarged unit type ACCESS PANEL ELEVATION Checked By: plan. I was given the task of Project Number: drawing these for each unit LINE OF STRUCTURE LINE OF STRUCTURE type. 2014025

SCALE:

CONTINUOUS 2" DEFLECTION TRACK - DO NOT FASTEN TO STUDS

5/8" TYPE "X" GYPSUM BOARD (1 LAYER) EACH SIDE

CONTINUOUS ACOUSTICA 2801 OLD GLENVIEW SEALANT AT EACH SIDE WILMETTE, IL

E-INSUL-05

LINE OF FLOOR STRUCTURE

CONTINUOUS 2" DEFLECTION E-INSUL-04 TRACK - DO NOT FASTEN TO STUDS 2 1/2" STEEL STUD CROSS BRACING W/ 2 - 3/8" PAN GALVANIZED HEAD SCREWS. SPACE ROOF DECK 48" O.C. VERT. BRACING 3 5/8" STEEL STUD @ 24" O.C. FIRE RESISTIVE 1MATERIAL 5/8" STEEL STUD @ 24" O.C.

CONTINUOUS STEEL RUNNER

1

CLIP & FASTENER CLEARANCE BETWEEN PER MANUF. DUCTWORK AND STUDS DETAIL

3" = 1'-0"

E-VB-02

CONTINUOUS STEEL RUNNER

3 5/8" STEEL STUD 12.19.2014 ISSUED FOR BI TYP: @ 24" O.C. DATE DESCRIPTION KITCHEN CABINETS: @ 16

MATHER PLAC OF WILMETTE

3" MINERAL WOOL SAFB INSULATION

0 FOR OR WALL

LINE OF STRUCTURE

CONTINUOUS ACOUSTICAL SEALANT AT EACH SIDE

LATERAL BRACING

UNIT

TYP.

HEAD

LINE OF STRUCTURE

1

20 GA. 3 5/8" STEEL STUD @ 16" O.C.

PLAN

TAPE JOINT

TAPE JOINT

IRE EXTINGUISHER CABINET

LE:

STRUCTURE

DEMISING CHASE - 1 HR

37

LIMITING HEIGHT: 13'-2" FIRE RATING: 1 HOUR (UL#U420) ASTC RATING: 55

BASE

1 1/2" SOUND ATTENUATION BLANKET, TYP. CONTINUOUS STEEL RUNNER

4

EXTERIOR INSULATED FACADE WALL SCALE:

3" = 1'-0"

CONTINUOUS STEEL RUNNER


topics in drawing year 1

CONTOUR We were taught to see objects in their simplest forms through basic lines and shapes.To practice this, we were asked to create a blind continuous contour of the person sitting across from us. TEXTURE/TONE Next, we learned how to represent tone and texture.We used the four techniques of hatching, cross hatching, scribbling, and stippling. Some of these are shown in the images on the next page.



pencil, pen, acrylic



colleen goodwin

colleengoodwin02@gmail.com


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.