F E AT U R E Going Through the Motions—An evaluation of REAL project planning that is more than checking boxes
by Gregg Schoppman, FMI
All organizations are busy. Most likely the understatement of the last decade but a true definition epitomizes the state of the industry. Even in the deepest recessionary market, rarely are construction firms sitting idly with little to do. Frequently the feeling of elation on “Bid/Tender Award Day '' is quickly replaced with deep anxiety – who will manage the project, who will supervise the project, what crews will we use, how we will EVER do it for that number? Whether the time from award to mobilization is two days or two months, the ability to position an operational team for success should be of the utmost focus. However, how many great organizations ``Yadda Yadda” their way through a true preconstruction process.
32
O C T O B E R
2 0 2 1
Put another way, is your preconstruction planning more about pencil whipping a meeting agenda, setting the world speed record for project strategy rather than devolving into a foundation for excellence?
Ask the challenging questions There is no question that a standardized agenda and process are essential to any organization’s operations. Consistency in application provides fertile training ground for new associates as well as some measurable component to create performance standards for all associates. The first question a leader should ask themselves
T H E
is this – Do we have an operational standard for preconstruction that every project manager, estimating and superintendent/foreman utilizes? If the answer is “no”, that is the first obstacle to overcome. However, many firms have agendas and meetings which brings us to the second question – Is the process stale and stagnant? Is the process too focused on checking boxes and less about constructive dialogue about project challenges? Does the process resemble more of a DICTATION rather than a COLLABORATION? Short of this being three questions and not one, leaders must address the albatross draped over the neck of their project teams.
C O N T R A C T O R ’ S
C O M P A S S
