Our Land by jeromy johnson

OUR LAND by Howard Zinn

Zinn

(GET OFF) O Non-Fiction US $37.99 CAN $42.99 UK £ 27.99 ISBN- 13: ISBN- 10:

567-0-548-65478-0 0-548-65478-05

OUR LAND by Howard Zinn

Zinn

Non-Fiction US $37.99 CAN $42.99 UK £ 27.99 ISBN- 13: ISBN- 10:

567-0-548-65478-0 0-548-65478-05

OUR LAND

OUR

LAND

OUR

LAND by Howard Zinn

Our Land. Copyright ÂŠ 1980, 1995, 1998, 1999, 2003 by Howard Zinn. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. No part of this book may be used or reproduced without written permission except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles and reviews. For information address Harper Collins Publishers, 10 East 53rd Street, New York, NY 10022. HarperCollins books may be purchased for educational, business, or sales promotional use. For information, please write: Special Marketing Department, Harper Collins Publishers, 10 East 53rd Street, New York, NY 10022. First Perennial Classics edition published 2001. Reissues in Harper Perennial Modern Classics 2005. Designed by Jeromy Johnson in partial fulfillment for the requirements of GR 601 MS: Type Systems, Academy of Art University, Fall 2010. The Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available upon request. isbn-10: 0-06-083865-5 (pbk) isbn-10: 978-0-06-083865-2 (pbk)

This book design is dedicated to my first-born son, Caleb. May you grow to respect the dignity and story of every person you meetâ&#x20AC;&#x201D;â&#x20AC;&#x160;knowing that your story shapes their story, your dignity helps you respect theirs, and your actions make ripples all throughout history.

CONT

Invasion: Colonization of America

Exiled: Forced Westward

Voices: They Speak

Index

Colophon

TENTS

INVA

ASION

The Mussel Gatherer Edward S. Curtis, Prior to 1930

Our Land

Arawak men and women, naked, tawny, and full of wonder emerged from their villages onto the island’s beaches and swam out to get a closer look at the strange big boat. When Columbus and his sailors came ashore, carrying swords, speaking oddly, the Arawaks ran to greet them, brought them food, water, gifts. He later wrote of this in his log: The brought us parrots and balls of cotton and spears and many other things, which they exchanged for the glass beads and hawks’ bells. They willingly traded everything they owned. They were well-built, with good bodies and handsome features. They do not bear arms, and do not know them, for I showed them a sword, they rook it by the edge and cut themselves out of ignorance. They have no iron. Their spears are made of cane. They would make fine servants. ‘With fifty men we could subjugate them all and make them do whatever it is we want them to do.’

Invasion: Colonization of America

These Arawaks of the Bahama Islands were much like Indians on the mainland, who were remarkable (European observers were to say again and again) for their hospitality, their belief in sharing. These traits did not stand out in the Europe of the Renaissance, dominated as it was by the religion of popes, the government of kings; the frenzy for money that marked Western civilization and its first messenger to the Americas, Christopher Columbus. Columbus wrote: On October 12, 1492 Columbus landed on Watlingâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Island in the Bahamas, West Indies. The discoverers named the island San Salvador. Columbus believes that he has reached the passage to India and China.

As soon as I arrived in the Indies, on the first Island which I found, I took some of the natives by force in order that they might learn and might give me information of whatever there is in these parts. The information that Columbus wanted most was: Where is the gold? He had persuaded the king and queen of Spain to finance an expedition to the lands, the wealth, he expected would be on the other side of the Atlanticâ&#x20AC;&#x201D;the Indies and Asia, gold and spices. For, like other informed people of his time, he knew the world was round and he could sail west in order to get to the Far East. Spain was recently unified, one of the new modern nation-states, like France, England, and Portugal. Its population, mostly poor peasants, worked for the nobility, who were 2 percent of the population and owned 95 percent of the land. Spain had tied itself to the Catholic Church, expelled all the Jews, driven out the Moors. Like other states of the modern world, Spain sought gold, which was becoming the new mark of wealth, more useful than land because it could buy anything. There was gold in Asia, it was thought, and certainly silks and spices, for Marco Polo and others had brought back marvelous things from their overland expeditions centuries before. Now that the Turks had conquered

Our Land

Columbus before the Queen, Emanuel Gottlieb Leutze, 1843

Invasion: Colonization of America

Constantinople and the eastern Mediterranean, and controlled the land routes to Asia, a sea route was needed. Portuguese sailors were working their way around the southern tip of Africa. Spain decided to gamble on a long sail across an unknown ocean. In return for bringing back gold and spices, they promised Columbus 10 percent of the profits, governorship over new-found lands, and the fame that would go with a new title: Admiral of the Ocean Sea. He was a merchantâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s clerk from the Italian city of Genoa, part-time weaver (the son of a skilled weaver), and expert sailor. He set out with three sailing ships, the largest of which was the Santa Maria, perhaps 100 feet long, and thirty-nine crew members. Columbus would never have made it to Asia, which was thousands of miles farther away than he had calculated, imagining a smaller world. He would have been doomed by that great expanse of sea. But he was lucky. One-fourth of the way there he came upon an unknown, uncharted land that lay between Europe and Asia-the Americas. It was early October 1492, and thirty-three days since he and his crew had left the Canary Islands, off the Atlantic coast of Africa. Now they saw branches and sticks floating in the water. They saw flocks of birds. These were signs of land. Then, on October 12, a sailor called Rodrigo saw the early morning moon shining on white sands, and cried out. It was an island in the Bahamas, the Caribbean Sea. The first man to sight land was supposed to get a yearly pension of 10,000 maravedis for life, but Rodrigo never got it. Columbus claimed he had seen a light the evening before. He got the reward. So, approaching land, they were met by the Indians, who swam out to greet them. The Arawaks lived in village communes, had a developed

Our Land

agriculture of corn, yams, cassava. They had no iron, but they wore tiny gold ornaments in their ears. This was to have enormous consequences: it led Columbus to take some of them aboard ship as prisoners because he insisted that they guide him to the source of the gold. He then sailed to what is now Cuba, then to Hispaniola (the island which today consists of Haiti and the Dominican Republic). There, bits of visible gold in the rivers, and a gold mask presented to Columbus by a local Indian chief, led to wild visions of gold fields.

Invasion: Colonization of America

Christopher Columbus Landing in Hispaniola John Vanderlyn, 1847

Our Land

On Hispaniola, out of timbers from the Santa Maria, which had run aground, Columbus built a fort, the first European military base in the Western Hemisphere. He called it Navidad (Christmas) and left thirtynine crew members there, with instructions to find and store the gold. He took more Indian prisoners and put them aboard his two remaining ships. At one part of the island he got into a fight with Indians who refused to trade as many bows and arrows as he and his men wanted. Two were run through with swords and bled to death. Then the Nina and the Pinta set sail for the Azores and Spain. When the weather turned cold, the Indian prisoners began to die. Columbus’s report to the Court in Madrid was extravagant. He insisted he had reached Asia (it was Cuba) and an island off the coast of China (Hispaniola). His descriptions were part fact, part fiction:

On December 5, 1492 the ship, Santa Maria, sinks off the cost of Hispaniola.

Hispaniola is a miracle. Mountains and hills, plains and pastures, are both fertile and beautiful…the harbors are unbelievably good and there are many wide rivers of which the majority contain gold. There are many spices, and great mines of gold and other metals. The Indians, Columbus reported, “are so naive and so free with their possessions that no one who has not witnessed them would believe it. When you ask for something they have, they never say no. To the contrary, they offer to share with anyone....’ He concluded his report by asking for a little help from their Majesties, and in return he would bring them from his next voyage “as much gold as they need… and as many slaves as they ask.” He was full of religious talk: “Thus the eternal God, our Lord, gives victory to those who follow His way over apparent impossibilities.” Because of Columbus’s exaggerated report and promises, his second expedition

Invasion: Colonization of America

was given seventeen ships and more than twelve hundred men. The aim was clear: slaves and gold. They went from island to island in the Caribbean, taking Indians as captives. But as word spread of the Europeansâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; intent they found more and more empty villages. On Haiti, they found that the sailors left behind at Fort Navidad had been killed in a battle with the Indians, after they had roamed the island in gangs looking for gold, taking women and children as slaves for sex and labor. Now, from his base on Haiti, Columbus sent expedition after expedition into the interior. They found no gold fields, but had to fill up the ships returning to Spain with some kind of dividend. In the year 1495, they went on a great slave raid, rounded up fifteen hundred Arawak men, women, and children, put them in pens guarded by Spaniards and dogs, then picked the five hundred best specimens to load onto ships. Of those five hundred, two hundred died en route. The rest arrived alive

Our Land

in Spain and were put up for sale by the archdeacon of the town, who reported that, although the slaves were “naked as the day they were born,” they showed “no more embarrassment than animals.” Columbus later wrote: “Let us in the name of the Holy Trinity go on sending all the slaves that can be sold.” But too many of the slaves died in captivity. And so Columbus, desperate to pay back dividends to those who had invested, had to make good his promise to fill the ships with gold. In the province of Cicao on Haiti, where he and his men imagined huge gold fields to exist, they ordered all persons fourteen years or older to collect a certain quantity of gold every three months. When they brought it, they were given copper tokens to hang around their necks. Indians found without a copper token had their hands cut off and bled to death. The Indians had been given an impossible task. The only gold around was bits of dust garnered from the streams. So they fled, were hunted down with dogs, and were killed. Trying to put together an army of resistance, the Arawaks faced Spaniards who had armor, muskets, swords, horses. When the Spaniards took prisoners they hanged them or burned them to death. Among the Arawaks, mass suicides began, with cassava poison. Infants were killed to save them from the Spaniards.

When Columbus came back from Spain during his second voyage, on November 27, 1493 he arrived hoping to see a bustling village. When he landed, however, he saw eleven corpses of his men on the beach and discovered that La Navidad had been destroyed. He was told by nearby Tainos that the settlers had mistreated the natives, who retaliated by killing all of them.

In two years, through murder, mutilation, or suicide, half of the 250,000 Indians on Haiti were dead. When it became clear that there was no gold left, the Indians were taken as slave labor on huge estates, known later as encomiendas. They were worked at a ferocious pace, and died by the thousands. By the year 1515, there were perhaps fifty thousand Indians left. By 1550, there were five hundred. A report of the year 1650 shows none of the original Arawaks or their descendants left on the island.

Invasion: Colonization of America

Our Land

The chief source—and, on many matters the only source—of information about what happened on the islands after Columbus came is Bartolomé de las Casas, who, as a young priest, participated in the conquest of Cuba. For a time he owned a plantation on which Indian slaves worked, but he gave that up and became a vehement critic of Spanish cruelty. Las Casas transcribed Columbus’s journal and, in his fifties, began a multivolume History of the Indies. In it, he describes the Indians. They are agile, he says, and can swim long distances, especially the women. They are not completely peaceful, because they do battle from time to time with other tribes, but their casualties seem small, and they fight when they are individually moved to do so because of some grievance, not on the orders of captains or kings. Women in Indian society were treated so well as to startle the Spaniards. Las Casas describes sex relations: Marriage laws are non-existent: men and women alike choose their mates and leave them as they please, without offense, jealousy or anger. They multiply in great abundance; pregnant women work to the last minute and give birth almost painlessly; up the next day, they bathe in the river and are as clean and healthy as before giving birth. If they tire of their men, they give themselves abortions with herbs that force stillbirths, covering their shameful parts with leaves or cotton cloth; although on the whole, Indian men and women look upon total nakedness with as much casualness as we look upon a man’s head or at his hands.

Invasion: Colonization of America

The wife may abandon her husband if he maltreats her or fails to provide enough food. In such cases the children generally remain with the mother.

The Indians, Las Casas says, have no religion, at least no temples. They were known to live in: large communal bell-shaped buildings, housing up to 600 people at one time, were made of very strong wood and roofed with palm leaves. They prize bird feathers of various colors, beads made of fish bones, and green and white stones with which they adorn their ears and lips, but they put no value on gold and other precious things. They lack all manner of commerce, neither buying nor selling, and rely exclusively on their natural environment for maintenance. They are extremely generous with their possessions and by the same token covet the possessions of their friends and expect the same degree of liberality. In Book Two of his History of the Indies, Las Casas (who at first urged replacing Indians by black slaves, thinking they were stronger and would survive, but later relented when he saw the effects on blacks) tells about the treatment of the Indians by the Spaniards. It is a unique account and deserves to be quoted at length: Endless testimonies prove the mild and pacific temperament of the natives. But our work was to exasperate, ravage, kill, mangle and destroy; small wonder, then, if they tried to kill one of us now and then. The admiral, it is true, was blind as those who came after him, and he was so anxious to please the King that he committed irreparable crimes against the Indians. Las Casas tells how the Spaniards “grew more conceited every day” and after a while refused to walk any distance. They “rode the backs of Indians if they were in a hurry” or were carried on hammocks by Indians running in relays. “In this case they also had Indians carry large leaves to shade them from the sun and others to fan them with goose wings.”

Our Land

Total controlled to total cruelty. The Spaniards “thought nothing of knifing Indians by tens and twenties and of cutting slices off them to test the sharpness of their blades.” Las Casas tells how “two of these so-called Christians met two Indian boys one day, each carrying a parrot; they took the parrots and, for fun, beheaded the boys.” The Indians’ attempts to defend themselves failed. And when they ran off into the hills they were found and killed. So, Las Casas reports, “they suffered and died in the mines and other labors in desperate silence, knowing not a soul in the world to whom they could turn for help.” He describes their work in the mines: Entire mountains are stripped from top to bottom and bottom to top a thousand times; they dig, split rocks, move stones, and carry dirt on their backs to wash it in the rivers, while those who wash gold stay in the water all the time with their backs bent so constantly it breaks them; and when water invades the mines, the most arduous task of all is to dry the mines by scooping up pansful of water and throwing it up outside. After each six or eight months’ work in the mines, which was the time required of each crew to dig enough gold for melting, up to a third of the men died. While the men were sent many miles away to the mines, the wives remained to work the soil, forced into the excruciating job of digging and making thousands of hills for cassava plants. Thus husbands and wives were together only once every eight or ten months and when they met they were so exhausted and depressed on both sides they ceased to procreate. As for the newly born, they died early because their mothers, overworked and famished, had no milk to nurse them, and for this reason, while I was in Cuba, 7000 children

Invasion: Colonization of America

The cassava root is long and tapered, contain high amounts of vitamin C but are poor in protein and other nutrients. It was commonly used to make a sweet manioc beer.

died in three months. Some mothers even drowned their babies from sheer desperation. In this way, husbands died in the mines, wives died at work, and children died from lack of milk and in a short time this land which was so great, so powerful and fertile was depopulated. My eyes have seen these acts so foreign to human nature, and now I tremble as I write. When he arrived on Hispaniola in 1508, Las Casas says, “there were 60,000 people living on this island, including the Indians; so that from 1494 to 1508, over three million people had perished from war, slavery, and the mines. Who in future generations will believe this? I myself writing it as a knowledgeable eyewitness can hardly believe it.“ Thus began the history, five hundred years ago, of the European invasion of the Indian settlements in the Americas. That beginning, when you read Las Casas—even if his figures are exaggerations (were there 3 million Indians to begin with, as he says, or less than a million, as some historians have calculated, or 8 million as others now believe?)—is conquest, slavery, death. When we read the history books given to children in the United States, it all starts with heroic adventure (there is no bloodshed) and Columbus Day is a celebration. Past the elementary and high schools, there are only occasional hints of something else. Samuel Eliot Morison was the most distinguished writer on Columbus, the author of a multivolume biography, and was himself a sailor who retraced Columbus’ route across the Atlantic. In his popular book Christopher Columbus, Mariner, written in 1954, he tells about the enslavement and the killing: “The cruel policy initiated by Columbus and pursued by his successors resulted in complete genocide.“

Our Land

In the North American English colonies, the pattern was set early, as Columbus had set it in the islands of the Bahamas. In 1585, before there was any permanent English settlement in Virginia, Richard Grenville landed there with seven ships. The Indians he met were hospitable, but when one of them stole a small silver cup, Grenville sacked and burned the whole Indian village. Jamestown itself was set up inside the territory of an Indian confederacy, led by the chief, Powhatan. Powhatan watched the English settle on his people’s land, but did not attack, maintaining a posture of coolness. When the English were going through their “starving rime” in the winter of 1610, some of them ran off to join the Indians, where they would at least be fed. When the summer came, the governor of the colony sent a messenger to ask Powhatan to return the runaways, whereupon Powhatan, according to the English account, replied with “noe other than prowde and disdaynefull Answers.” Some soldiers were therefore sent out “to take Revendge.” They fell upon an Indian settlement, killed fifteen or sixteen Indians, burned the houses, cut down the corn growing around the village, took the queen of the tribe and her children into boats, then ended up throwing the children overboard “and shoteinge owtt their Braynes in the water.” The queen was later taken off and stabbed to death.

On May 14, 1607, the Virginia Company explorers landed on Jamestown Island to establish the Virginia English colony on the banks of the James River, 60 miles from the mouth of the Chesapeake Bay.

Twelve years later, the Indians, alarmed as the English settlements kept growing in numbers, apparently decided to try to wipe them out for good. They went on a rampage and massacred 347 men, women, and children. From then on it was total war. Not able to enslave the Indians, and not able to live with them, the English decided to exterminate them. Edmund Morgan writes, in American Slavery, American Freedom:

Invasion: Colonization of America

Since the Indians were better woodsmen than the English and virtually impossible to track down, the method was to feign peaceful intentions, let them settle down and plant their corn wherever they chose, and then, just before harvest, fall upon them, killing as many as possible and burning the corn. Within two or three years of the massacre the English had avenged the deaths of that day many times over. In that first year of the white man in VIrginia, 1607, Powhatan had addressed a plea to John Smith that turned out prophetic. How authentic it is may be in doubt, but it is so much like so many Indian statements that it may be taken as, if not the rough letter of that first plea, the exact spirit of it: I have seen two generations of my people die. I know the difference between peace and war better than any man in my country. I am now grown old, and must die soon; my authority must descend to my brothers, Opitchapan, Opechancanough and Catatoughâ&#x20AC;&#x201D;then to my two sisters, and then to my two daughters. I wish them to know as much as I do, and that your love to them may be like mine to you. Why will you take by force what you may have quietly by love? Why will you destroy us who supply you with food? What can you get by war? We can hide our provisions and run into the woods; then you wiJl starve for wronging your friends. Why are you jealous of us? We are unarmed, and willing to give you what you ask, if you come in a friendly manner, and not so simple as not to know that it is much better to eat good meat, sleep comfortably, live quietly with my wives and children, laugh and be merry with the English, and trade for their copper and hatchets, than to run away from them, and to lie cold in the woods, feed on acorns, roots and such trash, and be so hunted that

Our Land

The Indians Columbus met were hospitable, but when one of them stole a small silver cup, Grenville sacked and burned the whole Indian village.

Invasion: Colonization of America

I can neither eat nor sleep. In these wars, my men must sit up watching, and if a twig break, they all cry out “Here comes Captain Smith!” So I must end my miserable life. Take away your guns and swords, the cause of all our jealousy, or you may all die in the same manner. When the Pilgrims came to New England they too were coming not to vacant land but to territory inhabited by tribes of Indians. The governor of the Massachusetts Bay Colony, John Winthrop, created the excuse to take Indian land by declaring the area legally a “vacuum.” The Indians, he said, had not “subdued” the land, and therefore had only a “natural” right to it, but not a “civil right.” A “natural right” did not have legal standing. The Puritans also appealed to the Bible, Psalms 2:8: “Ask of me, and I shall give thee, the heathen for thine inheritance, and the uttermost parts of the earth for thy possession.” And to justify their use of force to take the land, they cited Romans 13 :2: “Whosoever therefore reslsteth the power, resisteth the ordinance of God: and they that resist shall receive to themselves damnation.” See also The Pequot Massacre At Fort Mystic, a third person account by Captain John Mason.

The Puritans lived in uneasy truce with the Pequot Indians, who occupied what is now southern Connecticut and Rhode Island. But they wanted them out of the way; they wanted their land. And they seemed to want also to establish their rule firmly over Connecticut settlers in that area. The murder of a white trader, Indian-kidnaper, and troublemaker became an excuse to make war on the Pequots in 1636. A punitive expedition left Boston to attack the Narragansett Indians on Block Island, who were lumped with the Pequots. As Governor Winthrop wrote:

Our Land

Invasion: Colonization of America

They had commission to put to death the men of Block Island, but to spare the women and children, and to bring them away, and to take possession of the island; and from thence to go to the Pequods to demand the murderers of Captain Stone and other English, and one thousand fathom of wampom for damages, etc. and some of their children as hostages, which if they should refuse, they were to obtain it by force. The English landed and killed some Indians, but the rest hid in the thick forests of the island and the English went from one deserted village to the next, destroying crops. Then they sailed back to the mainland and raided Pequot villages along the coast, destroying crops again. One of the officers of that expedition, in his account, gives some insight into the Pequots they encountered: “The Indians spying of us came running in multitudes along the water side, crying, What cheer, Englishmen, what cheer, what do you come for? They not thinking we intended war, went on cheerfully.“ So, the war with the Pequots began. Massacres took place on both sides. The English developed a tactic of warfare used earlier by Cortés and later, in the twentieth century, even more systematically: deliberate attacks on noncombatants for the purpose of terrorizing the enemy. This is ethnohistorian Francis Jennings’s interpretation of Captain John Mason’s attack on a Pequot village on the Mystic River near Long Island Sound: “Mason proposed to avoid attacking Pequot warriors, which would have overtaxed his unseasoned, unreliable troops. Battle, as such, was not his purpose. Battle is only one of the ways to destroy an enemy’s will to

Our Land

fight. Massacre can accomplish the same end with less risk, and Mason had determined that massacre would be his objective.” So the English set fire to the wigwams of the village. By their own account: “The Captain also said, We must Burn Them; and immediately stepping into the Wigwam brought out a Fire Brand, and putting it into the Matts with which they were covered, set the WIgwams on Fire.” William Bradford, in his History of the Plymouth Plantation written at the time, describes John Mason’s raid on the Pequot village: Those that scaped the fire were slaine with the sword; some hewed to peeces, others rune throw with their rapiers, so as they were quickly dispatchte, and very few escaped. It was conceived they thus destroyed

Invasion: Colonization of America

about 400 at this time. It was a fearful sight to see them thus frying in the fyer, and the streams of blood quenching the same, and horrible was the stincke and sente there of, but the victory seemed a sweete sacrifice, and they gave the prayers thereof to God, who had wrought so wonderfully for them, thus to inclose their enemise in their hands, and give them so speedy a victory over so proud and insulting an enemy. As Dr. Cotton Mather, Puritan theologian, put it: “It was supposed that no less than 600 Pequot souls were brought down to bell that day.” The war continued. Indian tribes were used against one another, and never seemed able to join together in fighting the English, Jennings sums up. The terror was very real among the Indians, but in time they came to meditate upon its foundations. They drew three lessons from the Pequot War: (1) that the Englishmen’s most solemn pledge would be broken whenever obligation conflicted with advantage; (2) that the English way of war had no limit of scruple or mercy; and (3) that weapons of Indian making were almost useless against weapons of European manufacture. These lessons the Indians took to heart. A footnote in VIrgil Vogel’s book This Land Was Ours (1972) says: “The official figure on the number of Pequots now in Connecticut is twenty-one persons.” Forty years after the Pequot War, Puritans and Indians fought again. This time it was the Wampanoags, occupying the south shore of Massachusetts Bay, who were in the way and also beginning to trade some of their land to people outside the Massachusetts Bay Colony. Their chief, Massasoit, was dead. His son Wamsutta had been killed by English, and Wamsutta’s brother Metacom (later called King Philip by the English) became chief. The English found their excuse, a murder which they attributed to

Our Land

Metacom, and they began a war of conquest against the Wampanoaga, a war to take their land. They were clearly the aggressors, but claimed they attacked for preventive purposes. As Roger Williams, more friendly to the Indians than most, put it: “All men of conscience or prudence fly to windward, to maintain their wars to be defensive.”Jennings says the elite of the Puritans wanted the war; the ordinary white Englishman did not want it and often refused to fight. The Indians certainly did not want war, but they matched atrocity with atrocity. When it was over, in 1676, the English had won, but their resources were drained; they had lost six hundred men. Three thousand Indians were dead, including Metacom himself. Yet the Indian raids did not stop. For a while, the English tried softer tactics. But ultimately, it was back to annihilation. The Indian population of 10 million that lived north of Mexico when Columbus came would ultimately be reduced to less than a million. Huge numbers of Indians would die from diseases introduced by the whites. A Dutch traveler in New Netherland wrote in 1656 that “the Indians ... affirm, that before the arrival of the Christians, and before the smallpox broke out amongst them, they were ten times as numerous as they now are, and that their population had been melted down by this disease, whereof nine-tenths of them have died.” When the English first settled Martha’s Vineyard in 1642, the Wampanoags there numbered perhaps three thousand. There were no wars on that island, but by 1764, only 313 Indians were left there. Similarly, Block Island Indians numbered perhaps 1,200 to 1,500 in 1662, and by 1774 were reduced to fifty-one. Behind the English invasion of North America, behind their massacre of Indians, their deception, their brutality, was that special powerful drive born in civilizations based on private property. It was a morally

Invasion: Colonization of America

Our Land

ambiguous drive; the need for space, for land, was a real human need. But in conditions of scarcity, in a barbarous epoch of history ruled by competition, this human need was transformed into the murder of whole peoples. Roger Williams said it was: a depraved appetite after the great vanities, dreams and shadows of this vanishing life, great portions of land, land in this wilderness, as if men were in as great necessity and danger for want of great portions of land, as poor, hungry, thirsty seamen have, after a sick and stormy, a long and starving passage. This is one of the gods of New England, which the living and most high Eternal will destroy and famish. What did people in Spain get out of all that death and brutality visited on the Indians of the Americas? For a brief period in history, there was the glory of a Spanish Empire in the Western Hemisphere. As Hans Koning sums it up in his book Columbus: His Enterprise:

The richest two percent of the population owned close to ninety-five percent of Spain.

For all the gold and silver stolen and shipped to Spain did not make the Spanish people richer. It gave their kings an edge in the balance of power for a time, a chance to hire more mercenary soldiers for their wars. They ended up losing those wars anyway, and all that was left was a deadly inflation, a starving population, the rich richer, the poor poorer, and a ruined peasant class. Beyond all that, how certain are we that what was destroyed was inferior? Who were these people who came out on the beach and swam to bring presents to Columbus and his crew, who watched CortĂŠs and Pizarro ride through their countryside, who peered out of the forests at the first white settlers of Virginia and Massachusetts? Widely dispersed over the great land mass of the Americas, they numbered approximately

Invasion: Colonization of America

75 million people by the time Columbus came, perhaps 25 million in North America. Responding to the different environments of soil and climate, they developed hundreds of different tribal cultures, perhaps two thousand different languages. They perfected the art of agriculture, and figured out how to grow maize (corn), which cannot grow by itself and must be planted, cultivated, fertilized, harvested, husked, shelled. They ingeniously developed a variety of other vegetables and fruits, as well as peanuts and chocolate and tobacco and rubber. On their own, the Indians were engaged in the great agricultural revolution that other peoples in Asia, Europe, Africa were going through about the same time. While many of the tribes remained nomadic hunters and food gatherers in wandering, egalitarian communes, others began to live in more settled communities where there was more food, larger populations, more divisions of labor among men and women, more surplus to feed chiefs and priests, more leisure time for artistic and social work, and materials for building houses. About a thousand years before Christ, while comparable constructions were going on in Egypt and Mesopotamia, the Zu単i and Hopi Indians of what is now New Mexico had begun to build villages consisting of large terraced buildings, nestled in among cliffs and mountains for protection from enemies, with hundreds of rooms in each village. Before the arrival of the European explorers, they were using irrigation canals, dams, were doing ceramics, weaving baskets, making cloth out of cotton. By the time of Christ and Julius Caesar, there had developed in the Ohio River Valley a culture of so-called Moundbuilders, Indians who constructed thousands of enormous sculptures out of earth, sometimes in the shapes of huge humans, birds, or serpents, sometimes as burial sites,

Our Land

Invasion: Colonization of America

sometimes as fortifications. One of them was 31/2 miles long, enclosing 100 acres. These Moundbuilders seem to have been part of a complex trading system of ornaments and weapons from as far off as the Great Lakes, the Far West, and the Gulf of Mexico. About A.D. 500, as this Moundbuilder culture of the Ohio Valley was beginning to decline, another culture was developing westward, in the valley of the Mississippi, centered on what is now St. Louis. It had an advanced agriculture, included thousands of villages, and also built huge earthen mounds as burial and ceremonial places near a vast Indian metropolis that may have had thirty thousand people. The largest mound was 100 feet high, with a rectangular base larger than that of the Great Pyramid of Egypt. In the city, known as Cahokia, were toolmakers, hide dressers, potters, jewelrymakers, weavers, saltmakers, copper engravers, and magnificent ceramists. One funeral blanket was made of twelve thousand shell beads. The Iroquois refer to themselves as the “Hadenosaunee”, which means “People of the Longhouse.” According to their tradition, The Great Peacemaker introduced the name at the time of the formation of the League. It implies that the nations of the League should live together as families in the same longhouse.

From the Adirondacks to the Great Lakes, in what is now Pennsylvania and upper New York, lived the most powerful of the northeastern tribes, the League of the Iroquois, which included the Mohawks (People of the Flint), Oneidas (People of the Stone), Onondagas (People of the Mountain), Cayugas (People at the Landing), and Senecas (Great Hill People), thousands of people bound together by a common Iroquois language. In the vision of the Mohawk Chief Hiawatha, the legendary Dekaniwidah spoke to the Iroquois: “We bind ourselves together by taking hold of each other’s hands so firmly and forming a circle so strong that if a tree should fall upon it, it could not shake nor break it, so that our people and grandchildren shall remain in the circle in security, peace and happiness.”

Our Land

In the villages of the Iroquois, land was owned in common and worked in common. Hunting was done together, and the catch was divided among the members of the village. Houses were considered common property and were shared by several families. The concept of private ownership of land and homes was foreign to the Iroquois. A French Jesuit priest who encountered them in the 1650s wrote: “No poorhouses are needed among them, because they are neither mendicants nor paupers. Their kindness, humanity and courtesy not only makes them liberal with what they have, but causes them to possess hardly anything except in common.” FamIlies were matrilineal. That is, the family line went down through the female members, whose husbands joined the family, while sons who married then joined their wives’ families. Each extended family lived in a “long house.” When a woman wanted a divorce, she set her husband’s things outside the door. Families were grouped in clans, and a dozen or more clans might make up a village. The senior women in the village named the men who represented the clans at village and tribal councils. They also named the forty-nine chiefs who were the ruling council for the Five Nation confederacy of the Iroquois. The women attended clan meetings, stood behind the circle of men who spoke and voted, and removed the men from office if they strayed too far from the wishes of the women.

The Iroquois kids had corn husk dolls, toys, and games, such as one game where kids tried to throw a dart through a moving hoop.

The women tended the crops and took general charge of village affairs while the men were always hunting or fishing. And since they supplied the moccasins and food for warring expeditions: they had sole control over military matters. As Gary B. Nash notes in his fascinating study of early America, Red, White, and Black: “Thus power was shared between

Invasion: Colonization of America

Our Land

A Nakoaktok Chief’s Daughter Edward S. Curtis, Prior to 1930

“The Death of Minnehaha”, 1892 painting by US artist William de Leftwich Dodge. Minnehaha is a fictional Native American woman documented in Henry Wadsworth Longfellow’s 1855 epic poem The Song of Hiawatha.

Invasion: Colonization of America

the sexes and the European idea of male dominance and female subordination in all things was conspicuously absent in Iroquois society.” Children in Iroquois society, while taught the cultural heritage of their people and solidarity with the tribe, were also taught to be independent, not to submit to overbearing authority. They were taught equality in status and the sharing of possessions. The Iroquois did not use harsh punishment on children; they did not insist on early weaning or early toilet training, but gradually allowed the child to learn self-care. All of this was in sharp contrast to European values as brought over by the first colonists, a society of rich and poor, controlled by priests, by governors, by male heads of families. For example, the pastor of the Pilgrim colony, John Robinson, thus advised his parishioners how to deal with their children: “And surely there is in all children a stubbornness, and stoutness of mind arising from natural pride, which must, in the first place, be broken and beaten down; that so the foundation of their education being laid in humility and tractableness, other virtues may, in their time, be built thereon.” Though some scholars disagree, a growing number believe that the Americas were highly populated prior to the European invasion with natives numbering in the hundreds of millions.

So, Columbus and his successors were not coming into an empty wilderness, but into a world which in some places was as densely populated as Europe itself, where the culture was complex, where human relations were more egalitarian than in Europe, and where the relations among men, women, children, and nature were more beautifully worked out than perhaps any place in the world. They were people without a written language, but with their own laws, their poetry, their history kept in memory and passed on, in an oral vocabulary more complex than Europe’s, accompanied by song, dance, and

Our Land

A modern Native American in a field on the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation.

ceremonial drama. They paid careful attention to the development of personality, intensity of will, independence and flexibility, passion and potency, to their partnership with one another and with nature. John Collier, an American scholar who lived with the Indians in the 1920s and 1930s in the American Southwest, said of their spirit: “Could we make it our own, there would be an eternally inexhaustible earth and a forever lasting peace.” Perhaps there is some romantic mythology in that. But the evidence from European travelers in the sixteenth, seventeenth, and eighteenth centuries, put together recently by an American specialist on Indian life, William Brandon, is overwhelmingly supportive of much of that “myth.” Even allowing for the imperfection of myths, It is enough to make us question, for that time and ours, the excuse of progress in the annihilation of races, and the telling of history from the standpoint of the conquerors and leaders of Western Civilization.

Invasion: Colonization of America

EX Our Land

XILED

A Gray Day in the Badlands Edward S. Curtis, Prior to 1930

Our Land

Indian Removal, as it has been politely called, cleared the land for white occupancy between the Appalachians and the Mississippi, cleared it for cotton in the South and grain in the North, for expansion, immigration, canals, railroads, new cities, and the building of a huge continental empire clear across to the Pacific Ocean. The cost in human life can not be accurately measured, in suffering not even roughly measured. Most of the history books given to children pass quickly over it. Statistics tell the story. We find these in Michael Raginâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Fathers and Children: In 1790, there were 3,900,000 Americans, and most of them lived within 50 miles of the Atlantic Ocean. By 1830, there were 13 million Americans, and by 1840, 4,500,000 had crossed the Appalachian Mountains into the Mississippi Valleyâ&#x20AC;&#x201D;that huge expanse of land criss

Exiled: Forced Westward

crossed by rivers flowing into the Mississippi from east and west. In 1820, 120,000 Indians lived east of the Mississippi. By 1844, fewer than 30,000 were left. Most of them had been forced to migrate westward. But the word “force” cannot convey what happened. The Revolutionary War (1775 to 1783), which began as a war between the Kingdom of Great Britain and the thirteen British colonies in North America, and concluded in a global war between several European great powers.

In the Revolutionary War, almost every important Indian nation fought on the side of the British. The British signed for peace and went home; the Indians were already home, and so they continued fighting the Americans on the frontier, in a set of desperate holding operations. Washington’s war—enfeebled militia could not drive them back. After scouting forces were demolished one after the other, he tried to follow a policy of conciliation. His Secretary of War, Henry Knox, said: “The Indians being the prior occupants, possess the right of the soil.” His Secretary of State, Thomas Jefferson, said in 1791 that where Indians lived within state boundaries they should not be interfered with, and that the government should remove white settlers who tried to encroach on them. But as whites continued to move westward, the pressure on the national government increased. By the time Jefferson became President, in 1800, there were 700,000 white settlers west of the mountains. They moved into Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, in the North; into Alabama and Mississippi in the South. These whites outnumbered the Indians about eight to one. Jefferson now committed the federal government to promote future removal of the Creek and the Cherokee from Georgia. Aggressive activity against the Indians mounted in the Indiana Territory under Governor William Henry Harrison. When Jefferson doubled the size of the nation by purchasing the Louisiana Territory from France in I803—thus extending the western frontier from the Appalachians across the Mississippi to the Rocky

Our Land

The Jefferson Memorial in Washington D.C. To Jefferson, Indian removal was necessary for the opening of the vast American lands to agriculture, commerce, money, and the development of the modern capitalist economy.

Exiled: Forced Westward

Mountains—he thought the Indians could move there. He proposed to Congress that Indians should be encouraged to settle down on smaller tracts and do farming; also, they should be encouraged to trade with whites, to incur debts, and then to pay off these debts with tracts of land.“ Two measures are deemed expedient. First to encourage them to abandon hunting. Secondly, to multiply trading houses among them leading them thus to agriculture, to manufactures, and civilization. ”Jefferson’s talk of “agriculture, manufactures, civilization” is crucial. Indian removal was necessary for the opening of the vast American lands to agriculture, to commerce, to markets, to money, to the development of the modern capitalist economy. Land was indispensable for all this, and after the Revolution, huge sections of land were bought up by rich speculators, including George Washington and Patrick Henry. In North Carolina, rich tracts of land belonging to the Chickasaw Indians were put on sale, although the Chickasaws were among the few Indian tribes fighting on the side of the Revolution, and a treaty had been signed with them guaranteeing their land. John Donelson, a state surveyor, ended up with 20,000 acres of land near what is now Chattanooga. His son-in-law made twenty-two trips out of Nashville in 1795 for land deals. This was Andrew Jackson. Jackson was a land speculator, merchant, slave trader, and the most aggressive enemy of the Indians in early American history. He became a hero of the War of 1812, which was not (as usually depicted in American textbooks) just a war against England for survival, but a war for the expansion of the new nation, into Florida, into Canada, into Indian territory. Tecumseh, a Shawnee chief and noted orator, tried to unite the Indians against the white invasion:

Our Land

The way, and the only way, to check and to stop this evil, is for all the Redmen to unite in claiming a common and equal right in the land, as it was at first and should be yet; for it was never divided, but belongs to all for the use of each. That no part has a right to sell, even to each other, much less to strangers-those who want all and will not do with less. Tecumseh, a Shawnee chief and noted orator, tried to unite the Indians against the white invasion: The way, and the only way, to check and to stop this evil, is for all the Redmen to unite in claiming a common and equal right in the land, as it was at first and should be yet; for it was never divided, but belongs to all for the use of each. That no part has a right to sell, even to each other, much less to strangers-those who want all and will not do with less.

Daguerreotype of Andrew Jackson, possibly taken by Edward Anthony, 1844/45

Exiled: Forced Westward

Angered when fellow Indians were induced to cede a great tract of land to the United States government, Tecmnseh organized in 1811 an Indian gathering of five thousand, on the bank of the Tallapoosa River in Alabama, and told them: “Let the white race perish. They seize your land; they corrupt your women, they trample on the ashes of your dead.’ Back whence they came, upon a trail of blood, they must be driven.” The Creeks, who occupied most of Georgia, Alabama, and Mississippi, were divided among themselves. Some were willing to adopt the civilization of the white man in order to live in peace. Others, insisting on their land and their culture, were called “Red Sticks.” The Red Sticks in 1813 massacred 250 people at Fort Mims, whereupon Jackson’s troops burned down a Creek village, killing men, women, children. Jackson established the tactic of promising rewards in land and plunder: “ If either party, cherokees, friendly creeks, or whites, takes property of the Red Sticks, the property belongs to those who take it.” Not all his enlisted men were enthusiastic for the fighting. There were mutinies; the men were hungry, their enlistment terms were up, they were tired of fighting and wanted to go home. Jackson wrote to his wife about “the once brave and patriotic volunteers sunk to mere Whining, complaining, seditioners and mutineers.” When a seventeen- year-old soldier who had refused to clean up his food, and threatened his officer with a gun, was sentenced to death by a court-martial, Jackson turned down a plea for commutation of sentence and ordered the execution to proceed. He then walked out of earshot of the firing squad. Jackson became a national hero when in 1814 he fought the Battle of Horseshoe Bend against a thousand Creeks and killed eight hundred of them with few casual ties on his side. His white troops had failed in

Our Land

Exiled: Forced Westward

a frontal attack on the Creeks, but the Cherokees with him, promised governmental friendship if they joined the war, swam the river, came up behind the Creeks, and won the battle for Jackson.When the war ended, Jackson and friends of his began buying up the seized Creek lands. He got himself appointed treaty commissioner and dictated a treaty which took away half the land of the Creek nation. Ragin says it was “the largest single Indian cession of southern American land .” It took land from Creeks who had fought With Jackson as well as those who had fought against him, and when Big Warrior, a chief of the friendly Creeks, protested, Jackson said: Listen. The United States would have been justified by the Great Spirit. had they taken all the land of the nation. Listen—the truth is, the great body of the Creek chiefs and warriors did not respect the power of the United States—They thought we were an insignificant nation—that we would be overpowered by the British. They were fat with eating beef they wanted flogging, We bleed our enemies in such cases to give them their senses.

The white settlers called them Creek Indians after Ocmulgee Creek. They originally called themselves Isti, but began identifying themselves as Muskogee soon after Europeans arrived.

As Rogin puts it: “Jackson had conquered ‘the cream of the Creek country,’ and it would guarantee southwestern prosperity. He had supplied the expanding cotton kingdom With a vast and valuable acreage. Jackson’s 1814 treaty with the Creeks started something new and important. It granted Indians individual ownership of land: thus splitting Indian from Indian, breaking up communal landholding, bribing some with land, leaving others out—introducing the competition and conniving that marked the spirit of Western capitalism. It fitted well the old Jeffersonian idea of how to handle the Indians, by bringing them into “civilization.”

Our Land

From 1814 to 1824, in a series of treaties with the southern Indians, whites took over three-fourths of Alabama and Florida, one-third of Tennessee one-fifth of Georgia and Mississippi, and parts of Kentucky and North Carolina. Jackson played a key role in those treaties, and, according to Rogin, “His friends and relatives received many of the patronage appointments—as Indian agents, traders, treaty commissioners, surveyors and agents.“ Jackson himself described how the treaties were obtained: “we addressed ourselves feelingly to the predominant and governing passion of all Indian tribes, i.e., their avarice or fear.” He encouraged white squatters to move into Indian lands, then told the Indians the government could not remove the whites and so they had better cede the lands or be wiped out. He also, Ragin says, “practiced extensive bribery.” These treaties, these land grabs, laid the basis for the cotton kingdom, the slave plantations. Every time a treaty was signed, pushing the Creeks from one area to the next, promising them security there, whites would move into the new area and the Creeks would feel compelled to sign another treaty, giving up more land in return for security elsewhere. Jackson’s work had brought the white settlements to the border of Florida, owned by Spain. Here were the villages of the Seminole Indians, joined by some Red Stick refugees, and encouraged by British agents in their resistance to the Americans. Settlers moved into Indian lands. Indians attacked. Atrocities took place on both sides. When certain villages refused to surrender people accused of murdering whites, Jackson ordered the villages destroyed.

Exiled: Forced Westward

The word Seminole is a corruption of cimarrón, a Spanish term for runaway or wild one, historically used for certain Indian groups in Florida.

Another Seminole provocation: escaped black slaves took refuge in Seminole villages. Some Seminoles bought or captured black slaves, but their form of slavery was more like African slavery than cotton plantation slavery. The slaves often lived in their own villages, their children often became free, there was much intermarriage between Indians and blacks, and soon there were mixed Indian-black villages-all of which aroused southern slave owners who saw this as a lure to their own slaves seeking freedom. Jackson began raids into Florida, arguing it was a sanctuary for escaped slaves and for marauding Indians. Florida, be said, was essential to the defense of the United States. It was that classic modern preface to a war of conquest. Thus began the Seminole War of 1818, leading to the American acquisition of Florida. It appears on classroom maps politely as “Florida Purchase, 1819”-but it came from Andrew Jackson’s military campaign across the Florida border, burning Seminole villages, seizing Spanish forts, until Spain was “persuaded” to sell. He acted, he said, by the “immutable laws of self-defense.” Jackson then became governor of the Florida Territory. He was able now to give good business advice to friends and relatives. To a nephew, he suggested holding on to property in Pensacola. To a friend, a surgeongeneral in the army, he suggested buying as many slaves as possible, because the price would soon rise. Leaving his military post, he also gave advice to officers on how to deal with the high rate of desertion. (poor whites—even if willing to give their lives at first—may have discovered the rewards of battle going to the rich.) Jackson suggested whipping for the first two attempts, and the third time, execution.

Our Land

The leading books on the Jacksonian period, written by respected historians (The Age of Jackson by Arthur Schlesinger; The Jacksonian Persuasion by Marvin Meyers), do not mention Jackson’s Indian policy, but there is much talk in them of tariffs, banking, political parties, political rhetoric. If you look through high school textbooks and elementary school textbooks in American history you will find Jackson the frontiersman, soldier, democrat, man of the people-not Jackson the slaveholder, land speculator, executioner of dissident soldiers, exterminator of Indians. This is not simply hindsight (the word used for thinking back differently on the past). After Jackson was elected President in 1828 (following John Quincy Adams, who had followed Monroe, who had followed Madison, who had followed Jefferson), the Indian Removal Bill came before congress and was called, at the time, “the leading measure” of the Jackson administration and “the greatest question that ever came before congress” except for matters of peace and war. By this time the two political parties were the Democrats and Whigs, who disagreed on banks and tariffs, but not on issues crucial for the white poor, the blacks, the Indians although some white working people saw Jackson as their hero, because he opposed the rich man’s Bank. Under Jackson, and the man he chose to succeed him, Martin Van Buren, seventy thousand Indians east of the Mississippi were forced westward. In the North, there weren’t that many, and the Iroquois Confederation in New York stayed. But the Sac and Fox Indians of Illinois were removed, after the Black Hawk War (in which Abraham Lincoln was an officer, although he was not in combat). When Chief Black Hawk was defeated and captured in 1832, he made a surrender speech:

Exiled: Forced Westward

I fought hard. But your guns were well aimed. The bullets flew like birds in the air, and whizzed by our ears like the wind through the trees in the winter. My warriors fell around me. The sun rose dim on us in the morning, and at night it sunk in a dark cloud, and looked like a ball of fire. That was the last sun that shone on Black Hawk. He is now a prisoner to the white men. He has done nothing for which an Indian ought to be ashamed. He has fought for his countrymen, the squaws and papooses, against white men I who came year after year, to cheat them and take away their lands. You know the cause of our making war. It is known to all white men. They ought to be ashamed of it. Indians are not deceitful. The white men speak bad of the Indian and look at him spitefully. Bur the Indian does not tell lies. Indians do not steal. An Indian who is as bad as the white men could nor live in our nation; he would be put to death, and eaten up by the wolves. The white men are bad schoolmasters; they carry false books, and deal in false actions; they smile in the face of the poor Indian to cheat him; they shake them by the hand to gain their confidence, to make them drunk, to deceive them, and ruin our wives. We told them to leave us alone, and keep away from us; they followed on, and beset our paths, and they coiled themselves among us I like the snake. They poisoned us by their touch. We were not safe. We lived in danger. We were becoming like them, hypocrites and liars, adulterous lazy drones, all talkers and no workers. The white men do not scalp the head; but they do worse: they poison the heart. Farewell, my nation! Farewell to Black Hawk.

During the War of 1812, Black Hawk fought on the side of the British. Later he led a band of Sauk and Fox warriors against European and American settlers in Illinois and present-day Wisconsin in the 1832 Black Hawk War.

Black Hawkâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s bitterness may have come in part from the way he was captured. Without enough support to hold out against the white troops, with his men starving, hunted, pursued across the Mississippi, Black

Our Land

Hawk raised the white flag. The American commander later explained: “As we neared them they raised a white flag and endeavored to decoy us, but we were a little too old for them.” The soldiers fired, killing women and children as well as warriors. Black Hawk fled; he was pursued and captured by Sioux in the hire of the army. A government agent told the Sac and Fox Indians: “Our Great Father will forbear no longer. He has tried to reclaim them, and they grow worse. He is resolved to sweep them from the face of the earth . If they cannot be made good they must be killed.” The removal of the Indians was explained by Lewis Cass—Secretary of War, governor of the Michigan territory, minister to France, presidential candidate: A principle of progressive improvement seems almost inherent in human nature. We are all striving in the career of life to acquire riches of honor, or power, or some other object, whose possession is to realize the day dreams of our imaginations; and the aggregate of these efforts constitutes the advance of society. But there is little of this in the constitution of our savages. Cass—pompous, pretentious, honored (Harvard gave him an honorary doctor of laws degree in 1836, at the height of Indian removal)—claimed to be an expert on the Indians. But he demonstrated again and again, in Richard Drinnon’s words (Violence in the American Experience: Winning the West), a “quite marvelous ignorance of Indian life.” As governor of the Michigan Territory, Cass took millions of acres from the Indians by treaty: “We must frequently promote their interest against their inclination.” His article in the North American Review in 1830 made the case

Exiled: Forced Westward

American business men posing with Native Americans in this early photo.

Our Land

for Indian Removal. We must not regret, he said, “the progress of civilization and improvement, the triumph of industry and art, by which these regions have been reclaimed, and over which freedom, religion, and science are extending their sway.” He wished that all this could have been done with “a smaller sacrifice; that the aboriginal population had accommodated themselves to the inevitable change of their condition, but such a wish is vain. A barbarous people, depending for subsistence upon the scanty and precarious supplies furnished by the chase, cannot live in contact with a civilized community.” Drinnon comments on this (writing in 1969): “Here were all the necessary grounds for burning villages and uprooting natives, Cherokee and Seminole, and later Cheyenne, Philippine, and Vietnamese.” If the Indians would only move to new lands across the Mississippi, Cass promised in 1825 at a treaty council with Shawnees and Cherokees, “The United States will never ask for your land there. This I promise you in the name of your great father, the President. That country he assigns to his red people, to be held by them and their children’s children forever.“

Cass, who was also a Freemason Grand Master, was a central figure in formulating and implementing the Indian Removal Policy of President Jackson’s administration.

The editor of the North American Review, for whom Cass wrote this article, told him that his project “only defers the fate of the Indians. In half a century their condition beyond the Mississippi will be just what it is now on this side. Their extinction is inevitable.” Drinnon notes Cass did not dispute this, yet published his article as it was. Everything in the Indian heritage spoke out against leaving their land. A council of Creeks, offered money for their land, said: “We would not receive money for land in which our fathers and friends are buried.” A Choctaw chief said, responding, years before, to President Monroe’s

Exiled: Forced Westward

Three Native Americans riding their horses on a grassy plain.

Our Land

talk of removal: “I am sorry I cannot comply with the request of my father. We wish to remain here, where we have grown up as the herbs of the woods; and do not wish to be transplanted into another soil.” A Seminole chief had said to John Quincy Adams: “Here our navel strings were first cut and the blood from them sunk into the earth, and made the country dear to us.” Not all the Indians responded to the white officials’ common designation of them as “children” and the President as “father.” It was reported that when Tecumseh met with William Henry Harrison, Indian fighter and future President, the interpreter said: “Your father requests you to take a chair.” Tecumseh replied: “My father! The sun is my father, and the earth is my mother; I will repose upon her bosom.” As soon as Jackson was elected President, Georgia, Alabama, and Mississippi began to pass laws to extend the states’ rule over the Indians in their territory. These laws did away with the tribe as a legal unit, outlawed tribal meetings, took away the chiefs’ powers, made the Indians subject to militia duty and state taxes, but denied them the right to vote to bring suits, or to testify in court. Indian territory was divided up, to be distributed by state lottery. Whites were encouraged to settle on Indian land. However, federal treaties and federal laws gave Congress, not the states, authority over the tribes. The Indian Trade and Intercourse Act passed by Congress in 1802,. said there could be no land cessions except by treaty with a tribe, and said federal law would operate in Indian territory. Jackson ignored this, and supported state action. It was a neat illustration of the uses of the federal system: depending on their situation, blame could be put on the states, or on something even more elusive, the mysterious Law before which all men, sympathetic as

Exiled: Forced Westward

they were to the Indian, must bow. As Secretary of War John Eaton explained to the Creeks of Alabama: “It is not your Great Father who does this; but the laws of the Country, which he and every one of his people is bound to regard.” At Jackson’s request, the United States Congress opened a fierce debate on an Indian Removal Bill. In the end, the bill passed: The Senate 28 to 19; The House 102 to 97. Jackson signed the legislation into law June 30, 1830.

The proper tactic had now been found. The Indians would not be “forced” to go West. But if they chose to stay they would have to abide by state laws, which destroyed their tribal and personal rights and made them subject to endless harassment and invasion by white settlers coveting their land. If they left, however, the federal government would give them financial support and promise them lands beyond the Mississippi. Jackson’s instructions to an army major sent to talk to the Choctaws and Cherokees put it this way: Say to my red Choctaw children, and my Chickasaw children to listen: my white children of Mississippi have extended their law over their country. Where they now are, their father cannot prevent them from being subject to the laws of the state of Mississippi. The government will be obliged to sustain the States in the exercise of their right. Say to the chiefs and warriors that I am their friend, that I wish to act as their friend but they must, by removing from the limits of the States of Mississippi and Alabama and by being settled on the lands I offer them, put it in my power to be such—There, in possession of land of their own, which they shall possess as long as Grass grows or water runs. I am and will protect them and be their friend and father. That phrase “as long as Grass grows or water runs” was to be recalled with bitterness by generations of Indians. (An Indian veteran of Vietnam, testifying publicly in 1970 not only about the horror of the war but about his own maltreatment as an Indian, repeated that phrase and began to weep).

Our Land

As Jackson took office in 1829, gold was discovered in Cherokee territory in Georgia. Thousands of whites invaded, destroyed IndIan property, staked out claims. Jackson ordered federal troops to remove them, but also ordered Indians as well as whites to stop mining. Then he removed the troops, the whites returned, and Jackson said he could not interfere with Georgia’s authority. The white invaders seized land and stock, forced Indians to sign leases, beat up Indians who protested, sold alcohol to weaken resistance, killed game which Indians needed for food. But to put all the blame on white mobs, Rogin says, would be to ignore “the essential roles played by planter interests and government policy decisions.” Food shortages, whiskey, and military attacks began a process of tribal disintegration. Violence by Indians upon other Indians increased. Treaties made under pressure and by deception broke up Creek, Choctaw, and Cruckasaw tribal lands into individual holdings, making each person a prey to contractors, speculators, and politicians. The Chickasaws sold their land individually at good prices and went west without much suffering. The Creeks and Choctaws remained on their individual plots, but great numbers of them were defrauded by land companies. According to one Georgia bank president, a stockholder In a land company, “Stealing is the order of the day.” Indians complained to Washington, and Lewis Cass replied: Our citizens were disposed to buy and the Indians to sell. The subsequent disposition which shall be made of these payments seems to be utterly beyond the reach of the Government. ...The improvident habits of the Indian cannot be controlled by regulations. ...If they waste It, as waste It they too often will, it is deeply to be regretted yet still it is only exercising a right conferred upon them by the treaty.

Exiled: Forced Westward

Our Land

A sign signifying the border of the Lokata Nation within the United States.

Exiled: Forced Westward

The Creeks defrauded of their land, short of money and food, refused to go West. Starving Creeks began raiding white farms, while Georgia militia and settlers attacked Indian settlements. Thus began the Second Creek War. One Alabama newspaper sympathetic to the Indians wrote: “The war with the Creeks is all humbug. It is a base and diabolical scheme, devised by interested men, to keep an ignorant race of people from maintaining their just rights, and to deprive them of the small remaining pittance placed under their control.” A Creek man more than a hundred years old, named Speckled Snake, reacted to Andrew Jackson’s policy of removal: Brothers! I have listened to many talks from our great white father. When he first came over the wide waters, he was but a little man, very little. His legs were cramped by sitting long in his big boat, and he begged for a little land to light his fire on. But when the white man had warmed himself before the Indians’ fire and filled himself with their hominy, he became very large. WIth a step he bestrode the mountains, and his feet covered the plains and the valleys. His hand grasped the eastern and the western sea, and his head rested on the moon. Then he became our Great Father. He loved his red children, and he said, “Get a little further, lest I tread on thee.” Brothers! I have listened to a great many talks from our great father. But they always began and ended in this—”Get a little further; you are too near me.” Dale Van Every, in his book The Disinherited, sums up what removal meant to the Indian: In the long record of man’s inhumanity exile has wrung moans of anguish from many different peoples. Upon no people could it ever have fallen with a more shattering impact than upon the eastern

Our Land

Indians. The Indian was peculiarly susceptible to every sensory attribute of every natural feature of his surroundings. He lived in the open. He knew every marsh, glade, hill top, rock, spring, creek, as only the hunter can know them. He had never fully grasped the principle establishing private ownership of land as any more rational than private ownership of air but he loved the land with a deeper emotion than could any proprietor. He felt himself as much a part of it as the rocks and trees, the animals and birds. His homeland was holy ground, sanctified for him as the resting place of the bones of his ancestors and the natural shrine of his religion. He conceived its waterfalls and ridges, its clouds and mists, its glens and meadows, to be inhabited by the myriad of spirits with whom he held daily communion. It was from this rain-washed land of forests, streams and lakes, to which he was held by the traditions of his forebears and his own spiritual aspirations that he was to be driven to the arid, treeless plains of the far west, a desolate region then universally known as the Great American Desert.

With the election of Jackson as president in 1828, the Cherokee were in serious trouble. Gold was discovered that year on Cherokee land in northern Georgia, and miners swarmed in. Indian removal to west of the Mississippi had been suggested as early as 1802 by Thomas Jefferson and recommended by James Monroe in his final address to Congress in 1825.

There had been three voluntary Cherokee migrations westward, into the beautiful wooded country of Arkansas, but there the Indians found themselves almost immediately surrounded and penetrated by white settlers, hunters, trappers. These West Cherokees now had to move farther west, this time to arid land, land too barren for white settlers. The federal government, signing a treaty with them in 1828, announced the new territory as â&#x20AC;&#x153;a permanent home which shall under the most solemn guarantee of the United States be and remain theirs forever.â&#x20AC;&#x153; It was still another lie, and the plight of the western Cherokees became known to the three-fourths of the Cherokees who were still in the East, being pressured by the white man to move on.

Exiled: Forced Westward

With 17000 Cherokees surrounded by 900,000 whites in Georgia, Alabama, and Tennessee, the Cherokees decided that survival required adaptation to the white man’s world. They became farmers, blacksmiths, carpenters, masons, owners of property. A census of 1826 showed 22,000 cattle, 7,600 horses, 46,000 swine, 726 looms, 2,488 spinning wheels, 172 wagons, 2,943 plows, 10 saw mills, 31 grist mills, 62 blacksmith shops, 8 cotton machines, 18 schools. The Cherokees’ language—heavily poetic, metaphorical, beautifully expressive, supplemented by dance, drama, and ritual—had always been a language of voice and gesture. Now their chief, Sequoyah, invented a written language, which thousands learned. The Cherokees’ newly established Legislative Council voted money for a printing press, which on February 21, 1828, began publishing a newspaper, the Cherokee Phoenix, printed in both English and Sequoyah’s Cherokee. Before this, the Cherokees had, like Indian tribes in general, done without formal government. As Van Every puts it: The foundation principle of Indian government had always been the rejection of government. The freedom of the individual was regarded by practically all Indians north of Mexico as a canon infinitely more precious than the individual’s duty to his community or nation. This anarchistic attitude ruled all behavior, beginning with the smallest social unit, the family. The Indian parent was constitutionally reluctant to discipline his children. Their every exhibition of self-will was accepted as a favorable indication of the development of maturing character.

New York city street.

There was an occasional assembling of a council whose decisions were not enforced except by the influence of public opinion. A Moravian minister who lived among them described Indian society:

Our Land

Thus has been maintained for ages, without convulsions and without civil discords, this traditional government, of which the world, perhaps, does not offer another example; a government in which there are no positive laws, but only long established habits and customs, no code of jurisprudence, but the experience of former rimes, no magistrates, but advisers, to whom the people nevertheless, pay a willing and implicit obedience, in which age confers rank, wisdom gives power, and moral goodness secures title to universal respect.

Paiute Indian village.

Now, surrounded by white society, all this began to change. The Cherokees even started to emulate the slave society around them: they owned more than a thousand slaves. They were beginning to resemble that civilization the white men spoke about, making what Van Every calls “a stupendous effort” to win the good will of Americans. They even welcomed missionaries and Christianity. None of this made them more desirable than the land they lived on. Jackson’s 1829 message to Congress made his position clear: “I informed the Indians inhabiting parts of Georgia and Alabama that their attempt to establish an independent government would not be countenanced by the Executive of the United States, and advised them to emigrate beyond the Mississippi or submit to the laws of those States.” Congress moved quickly to pass a removal bill. There were defenders of the Indians. Perhaps the most eloquent was Senator Theodore Frelinghuysen of New Jersey, who told the Senate, debating removal: We have crowded the tribes upon a few miserable acres on our southern frontier; it is all that is left to them of their once boundless forest: and still, like the horse-leech, our insatiable cupidity cries, give! give! Sir, do the obligations of justice change with the color of the skin?

Exiled: Forced Westward

a speedy The North was in general against the Removal Bill. The South was for it. It passed the House 102 to 97. It passed the Senate narrowly. It did not mention force, but provided for helping the Indians to move. What it implied was that if they did not, they were without protection, without funds, and at the mercy of the states.

removal Now the pressures began on the tribes, one by one. The Choctaws did not want to leave, but fifty of their delegates were offered secret bribes of money and land, and the Treaty of Dancing Rabbit Creek was signed: Choctaw land east of the Mississippi was ceded to the United States in return for financial help in leaving, compensation for property left behind, food for the first year in their new homes, and a guarantee they would never again be required to move. For twenty thousand Choctaws in Mississippi, though most of them hated the treaty, the pressure now became irresistible. Whites, including liquor dealers and swindlers, came swarming onto their lands. The state passed a law making it a crime for Choctaws to try to persuade one another on the matter of removal. In late 1831 , thirteen thousand Choctaws began the long journey west to a land and climate totally different from what they knew. â&#x20AC;&#x153;Marshaled by guards, hustled

Our Land

by agents, harried by contractors, they were being herded on the way to an unknown and unwelcome destination like a flock of sick sheep.â&#x20AC;? They went on ox wagons, on horses, on foot, then to be ferried across the Mississippi River. The army was supposed to organize their trek, but it turned over its job to private contractors who charged the government as much as possible, gave the Indians as little as possible. Everything was disorganized. Food disappeared. Hunger came. Van Every again: The long somber columns of groaning ox wagons, driven herds and straggling crowds on foot inched on westward through swamps, forests, and across rivers and over hills, in their crawling struggle from the lush lowlands of the Gulf to the arid plains of the west. In a kind of death spasm one of the last vestiges of the original Indian world, was being dismembered and its collapsing remnants jammed bodily into an alien new world.

The Choctaw were descendants of the Mississippian culture and Hopewellian people, who lived throughout the east of the Mississippi River valley and its tributaries.

The first winter migration was one of the coldest on record, and people began to die of pneumonia. In the summer, a major cholera epidemic hit Mississippi, and Choctaws died by the hundreds. The seven thousand Choctaws left behind now refused to go, choosing subjugation over death. Many of their descendants still live in Mississippi. As for the Cherokees,. they faced a set of laws passed by Georgia: their lands were taken, their government abolished, all meetings prohibIted. Cherokees advising others not to migrate were to be imprisoned. Cherokees could not testify in court against any white. Cherokees could not dIg for the gold recently discovered on their land. A delegation of them, protesting to the federal government, received this reply from Jackson s new Secretary of War, Eaton: â&#x20AC;&#x153;If you will go to the setting sun

Exiled: Forced Westward

there you will be happy; there you can remain in peace and quietness; so long as the waters run and the oaks grow that country shall be guaranteed to you and no white man shall be permitted to settle near you.” The Cherokee nation addressed a memorial to the nation, a public plea for justice. They reviewed their history: After the peace of 1783 , the Cherokees were an independent people, absolutely so, as much as any people on earth. They had been allies to Great Britain. The United States never subjugated the Cherokees; on the contrary, our fathers remained in possession of their country and with arms in their hands . In 1791, the Treaty of Holston was made. The Cherokees acknowledged themselves to be under the protection of the United States, and of no other sovereign. A cession of land was also made to the United States. On the other hand, the United States stipulated that white men should not hunt on these lands, not even enter the country, without a passport; and gave a solemn guarantee of all Cherokee lands not ceded. Now they went beyond history, beyond law: We entreat those to whom the foregoing paragraphs are addressed, to remember the great law of love. “Do to others as ye would that others should do to you.” We pray them to remember that, for the sake of principle, their forefathers were compelled to leave, therefore driven from the old world and that the winds of persecution wafted them over the great waters and landed them on the shores of the new world, when the Indian was the sale lord and proprietor of these extensive domains—Let them remember in what way they were received by the savage of America, when power was in his hand, and his ferocity could Daniel Webster

Our Land

not be restrained by any human arm. We urge them to bear in mind, that those who would not ask of them a cup of cold water, and a spot of earth are the descendants of these, whose origin, as inhabitants of North America, history and tradition are alike insufficient to reveal. Let them bring to remembrance all these facts, and they cannot, and we are sure, they will not fail to remember, and sympathize with us in these our trials and sufferings. Jackson’s response to this, in his second Annual Message to Congress in December 1830, was to point to the fact that the Choctaws and Chickasaws had already agreed to removal, and that “a speedy removal” of the rest would offer many advantages to everyone. For whites it “will place a dense and civilized population in large tracts of country now occupied by a few savage hunters.” For Indians, it will “perhaps cause them, gradually, under the protection of the Government and through the influence of good counsels, to cast off their savage habits and become an interesting, civilized, and Christian community.” He reiterated a familiar theme. “Toward the aborigines of the country no one can indulge a more friendly feeling than myself. However: “The waves of population and civilization are rolling to the westward and we now propose to acquire the countries occupied by the, “red men of the South and West by a fair exchange.“ A white invasion of Creek lands began-looters, land seekers, defrauders, whiskey sellers, thugs-driving thousands of Creeks from their homes into the swamps and forests. The federal government did nothing. Instead it negotiated a new treaty providing for prompt emigration west, managed by the Creeks themselves, financed by the national government.

Black Elk

Exiled: Forced Westward

Northern political sympathizers with the Indian seemed to be fading away, preoccupied with other issues. Daniel Webster was making a rousing speech in the Senate for the “authority of law the power of the general government,” but he was talking about South Carolina’s nullification of the tariff. Despite the hardships, the Creeks refused to budge, but by 1836, both state and federal officials decided they must go. Using as a pretext some attacks by desperate Creeks on white settlers, it was declared that the Creek nation, by making “war” had forfeited its treaty rights. The army would now force it to migrate west. Fewer than a hundred Creeks had been involved in the “war,” but a thousand had fled into the woods, afraid of white reprisals. An army of eleven thousand was sent after them. The Creeks did not resist, no shots were fired, they surrendered. Those Creeks presumed by the army to be rebels or sympathizers were assembled, the men manacled and chained together to march westward under military guard, their women and children trailing after them. Creek communities were invaded by military detachments, the inhabitants driven to assembly points and marched westward in batches of two or three thousand. No talk of compensating them for land or property left behind. Georgia passed a law making it a crime for a white person to stay in Indian territory without taking an oath to the state of Georgia. When the white missionaries in the Cherokee territory declared their sympathies openly for the Cherokees to stay, Georgia militia entered the territory in the spring of 183 1 and arrested three of the missionaries, including Samuel Worcester. They were released when they claimed protection as federal employees (Worcester was a federal postmaster).

Our Land

Immediately the Jackson administration took away Worcester’s job, and the militia moved in again that summer, arresting ten missionaries as well as the white printer of the Cherokee Phoenix. They were beaten, chained, and forced to march 35 miles a day to the county jail. A jury tried them, found them guilty. Nine were released when they agreed to swear allegiance to Georgia’s laws, but Samuel Worcester and Elizur Butler, who refused to grant legitimacy to the laws repressing the Cherokees, were sentenced to four years at hard labor. This was appealed to the Supreme Court, and in Worcester vs. Georgia, John Marshall, for the majority, declared that the Georgia law on which Worcester was jailed violated the treaty with the Cherokees, which by the Constitution was binding on the states. He ordered Worcester freed. Georgia ignored him, and President Jackson refused to enforce the court order. Georgia now put Cherokee land on sale and moved militia in to crush any sign of Cherokee resistance. The Cherokees followed a policy of nonviolence, though their property was being taken, their homes were being burned, their schools were closed, their women mistreated, and liquor was being sold in their churches to render them even more helpless. The same year Jackson was declaring states’ rights for Georgia on the Cherokee question in 1832, he was attacking South Carolina’s right to nullify a federal tariff. His easy reelection in 1832 (687,000 to 530,000 for his opponent Henry Clay) suggested that his anti-Indian policies were in keeping with popular sentiment, at least among those white males who could vote (perhaps 2 million of the total population of 13 million).

Exiled: Forced Westward

A Paguate Entrance Edward S. Curtis, prior to 1930.

Our Land

A modern Native American smoking a cigarette outside of her screen door.

Exiled: Forced Westward

Jackson now moved to speed up Indian removal. There were still 22,000 Creeks in Alabama, 18,000 Cherokees in Georgia, and 5,000 Seminoles in Florida. The Creeks had been fighting for their land ever since the years of Columbus, against Spaniards, English, French, and Americans. But by 1832 they had been reduced to a small area in Alabama, while the population of Alabama, growing fast, was now over 300,000. On the basis of extravagant promises from the federal government, Creek delegates in Washington signed the Treaty of Washington, agreeing to removal beyond the Mississippi. They gave up 5 million acres, with the provision that 2 million of these would go to individual Creeks, who could either sell or remain in Alabama with federal protection. Private contracts were made for the march, the same kind that had failed for the Choctaws. Again, delays and lack of food, shelter, clothing, blankets, medical attention. Again, old, rotting steamboats and ferries, crowded beyond capacity, taking them across the Mississippi. “By midwinter the interminable, stumbling procession of more than 15,000 Creeks stretched from border to border across Arkansas.” Starvation and sickness began to cause large numbers of deaths. “The passage of the exiles could be distinguished from afar by the howling of trailing wolf packs and the circling flocks of buzzards,” Van Every writes. Eight hundred Creek men had volunteered to help the United States army fight the Seminoles in Florida in return for a promise that their families could remain in Alabama, protected by the federal government until the men returned. The promise was not kept. Creek families were attacked by land-hungry white marauders—robbed, driven from

Our Land

their homes, women raped. Then the army, claiming it was for their safety, removed them from Creek country to a concentration camp on Mobile Bay. Hundreds died there from lack of food and from sickness. When the warriors returned from the Seminole War, they and their families were hustled west. Moving through New Orleans, they encountered a yellow fever plague. They crossed the Mississippiâ&#x20AC;&#x201D;611 Indians crowded onto the aged steamer Monmouth. It went down in the Mississippi River and 311 people died, four of them the children of the Indian commander of the Creek volunteers in Florida. The Choctaws and Chickasaws had quickly agreed to migrate. The Creeks were stubborn and had to be forced. The Cherokees were practicing a nonviolent resistance. One tribeâ&#x20AC;&#x201D;the Seminolesâ&#x20AC;&#x201D;decided to fight. The pressure to move west, out of Florida, mounted, and in 1834 Seminole leaders were assembled and the U.S. Indian agent told them they must move west. Here were some of the repress of the Seminoles at that meeting:

An Indian agent was an individual authorized to interact with Native American tribes on the behalf of the United States government.

We were all made by the same Great Father, and are all alike His children. We all came from the same Mother, and were suckled at the same breast. Therefore, we are brothers, and as brothers, should treat together in an amicable way. Your talk is a good one, but my people cannot say they will go. We are not willing to do so. If their tongues say yes, their hearts cry no, and call them liars. If suddenly we fear our hearts from the homes around which they are twined, our heart-strings will snap. The Indian agent managed to get fifteen chiefs and sub-chiefs to sign a removal treaty, the U.S. Senate promptly ratified it, and the war department began making preparations for the migration. Violence between

Exiled: Forced Westward

Our Land

Native American war dance.

whites and Seminoles now erupted. A young Seminole chief, Osceola, who had been imprisoned and charmed by the Indian agent Thompson, and whose wife had been delivered into slavery, became a leader of the growing resistance. When Thompson ordered the Seminoles, in December 1835, to assemble for the journey, no one came. Instead, the Seminoles began a series of guerilla attacks on white coastal settlements, all along the Florida perimeter, striking In surprise and in succession from the interior. They murdered white families, captured slaves, destroyed property. Osceola himself, in a lightning stroke, shot down Thompson and a lieutenant. That same day, December 28, 1835, a column of 110 soldiers was attacked by Seminoles, and all but three soldiers were killed. One of the survivors later told the Story:

Exiled: Forced Westward

It was 8 o’clock. Suddenly I heard a rifle shot followed by a musket shot. I had not time to think of the meaning of these shots, before a volley, as if from a thousand rifles, was poured in upon us from the front, and all along our left flank. I could only see their heads and arms, peering out from the long grass, far and near, and from behind the pine trees. It was the classic Indian tactic against a foe with superior firearms. General George Washington had once given parting advice to one of his officers:. “General St. Clair, in three words, beware of surprise again and again, General, beware of surprise.” Congress now appropriated money for a war against the Seminoles. In the Senate, Henry Clay of Kentucky opposed the war; he was an enemy of Jackson,. a critic of Indian removal. But his Whig colleague Daniel Webster displayed that unity across party lines which became standard in American wars. General Winfield Scott took charge, but his columns of troops, marching impressively into Seminole territory, found no one. Today, The Trail of Tears National Historic Trail passes through the present-day states of Alabama and Arkansas, Georgia and Illinois, Kentucky and Missouri, Oklahoma, and Tennessee.

They became tired of the mud, the swamps, the heat, the sickness, the hunger—the classic plague of a civilized army fighting people on their own land. No one wanted to face Seminoles, in the Florida swamps. In 1836,103 commissioned officers resigned from the regular army, leaving only forty-six. In the spring of 1837, Major General Jesup moved into the war with an army of ten thousand, but the Seminoles just faded into the swamps, coming out from time to time to strike at isolated forces. The war went on for years. The army enlisted other Indians to fight the Seminoles. But that didn’t work either. Van Every says: “The adaptation of the Seminole to his environment was to be matched only by the crane or the alligator.” It was an eight-year war. It cost $20 million and 1,500 American lives. Finally, in the 1840s, the Seminoles began to get tired.

Our Land

Exiled: Forced Westward

They were a tiny group against a huge nation with great resources. They asked for truces, but when they went forward under truce flags, they were arrested, again and again. In 1837, Osceola, under a flag of truce, had been seized and put in irons, then died of illness in prison. The war petered out. Meanwhile the Cherokees had not fought back with arms, but resisted in their own way. And so the government began to play Cherokee against Cherokee, the old game. The pressures built up on the Cherokee community—their newspaper suppressed, their government dissolved, the missionaries in jail, their land parceled among whites by the land lottery. In 1834, seven hundred Cherokees, weary of the struggle, agreed to go west; eighty-one died en route, including forty-five children—mostly from measles and cholera. Those who lived arrived at their destination across the Mississippi in the midst of a cholera epidemic and half of them died within a year. The Cherokees were summoned to sign the Removal Treaty in New Echota, Georgia, in 1836, but fewer than five hundred of the seventeen thousand Cherokees appeared. The treaty was signed anyway. The Senate, including northerners who had once spoken for the Indian, ratified it, yielding, as Senator Edward Everett of Massachusetts said, to “the force of circumstances...the hard necessity.” Now the Georgia whites stepped up their attacks to speed the removal. The government did not move immediately against the Cherokees. In April 1838, Ralph Waldo Emerson addressed an open letter to President Van Buren, referring with indignation to the removal treaty with the Cherokees (signed behind the backs of an overwhelming majority of them) and asked what had happened to the sense of justice in America:

Our Land

The soul of man, the justice, the mercy that is in the heartâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s heart in all men, from Maine to Georgia, does abhor this business, a crime is projected that confounds our understandings by its magnitude, a crime that really deprives us as well as the Cherokees of a Country for how could we call the conspiracy that should crush these poor Indians our government, or the land that was cursed by their parting and dying imprecations our country any more? You, sir, will bring down that renowned chair in which you sit into infamy if your seal is set to this instrument of perfidy; and the name of this nation, hitherto the sweet omen of religion and liberty, will stink to the world. Thirteen days before Emerson sent this letter, Martin Van Buren had ordered Major General Winfield Scott into Cherokee territory to use whatever military force was required to move the Cherokees west. Five regiments of regulars and four thousand militia and volunteers began pouring into Cherokee country. General Scott addressed the Indians: Cherokees, the President of the United States sent me with a powerful army, to cause you, in obedience to the treaty of 1834, to join that part of your people who are already established in prosperity on the other side of the Mississippi. The full moon of May is already on the wane, and before another shall have passed every Cherokee man, woman, and child, must be in motion to join their brethren in the far West, My troops already occupy many positions in the country that you are about to abandon, and thousands and thousands are approaching from every quarter, to tender resistance and escape alike hopeless, Chiefs, head men, and warriors,Will you then, by resistance, compel us to resort to arms? God forbid, or will you, by flight, seek to hide yourselves in mountains and forests, and thus oblige us to hunt you down?

Exiled: Forced Westward

Some Cherokees had apparently given up on nonviolence: three chiefs who signed the Removal Treaty were found dead. But the seventeen thousand Cherokees were soon rounded up and crowded into stockades. On October 1, 1838, the first detachment set out in what was to be known as the Trail of Tears. As they moved westward, they began to die of sickness, of drought, of the heat, of exposure. There were 645 wagons, and people marching alongside. Survivors, years later, told of halting at the edge of the Mississippi in the middle of Winter, the river running full of ice, â&#x20AC;&#x153;hundreds of sick and dying penned up in wagons or stretched upon the ground.â&#x20AC;? Grant Foreman, the leading authority on Indian removal, estimates that during confinement in the stockade or the march westward four thousand Cherokees died. In December 1838, President Van Buren spoke to Congress: It affords sincere pleasure to apprise the Congress of the entire removal of the Cherokee Nation of Indians to their new homes west of the Mississippi. The measures authorized by Congress at its last session have had the happiest effects.

Our Land

has had the happiest effect.

Exiled: Forced Westward

VOIC 82

Our Land

CES Voices: They Speak

Standing Bear tells how the Indians felt about the whites: The way I felt about this question is that I felt that the white men would just simply wipe us out and there would be no Indian nation. I felt this when I was a [boy, old enough to realize]. Black Tail Deer tells how the Indians felt about the whites: From what I heard from old people, I thought I would just have to do my part. We roamed the country freely, and this country belonged to us in the first place. There was plenty of game and we were never hungry. But since the white men came we were fighting all the time. The white man was just going to kill all of us. I was so scared that I rode one horse all night just guarding. I learned a great deal because my parents taught me everything. The band I was in got together and said they were not going to let the white men run over them and down deep in my heart I was going to defend my fellow men to the last. At the age of ten or eleven I had a sixshooter and a quiver full of arrows to defend my nation. Fire Thunder tells how the Indians felt about the whites: When I was old enough, about fourteen, I remember that the white men were coming and that they were going to fight us to the finish and take away our land, and I thought it was not right. We are humans too and God created us all alike, and I was going to do the best I could to defend my nation. So I started out on the warpath when I was sixteen years old Standing Bear tells about fighting and killing the white soldiers: We went into battle naked because it is more handy. You can get around quickly and are more swift in every way. With clothes on you would be much slower. We had the ponyâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s bridle fastened to our belt to keep the

Our Land

we went into battle naked because it is more handy. pony from getting away when the rider would fall off. We wouldn’t have fought the white men if they hadn’t fought us. We would have allowed them to live among us in peace. The white cavalry did not know how to fight. They stuck together and thus made an easy target for us. When we started fighting, we would probably be under the horse’s belly and after we were on the ground we would jump around, and it was pretty hard to hit us. We’d zigzag toward them. It was open order fighting. We fought in circles because when we go around them it would scare the soldiers and then we would charge on them at this time. Some would go one way and the others would go another way, thus disorganizing the soldiers. We would hang on our ponies at times with one leg. This is a real trick to know how to do. Then we would shoot under the horse’s neck, while the other leg is cramped up on the side. Black Elk tells about fighting in the Custer Battle in his youth: At daybreak my father woke me up and told me to go with him to take the horses out to graze. A cousin of mine and I were getting ready to take several tipis’ horses out to graze. Then as I started my father told me to be careful and I ought to have one horse with a long rope on it, easy

Voices: They Speak

to catch, and we should keep our eyes on the camp and look around us always. He said, “If anything happens bring horses back to camp right away as soon as you can.” We took the horses out and herded them as the sun was coming out. We stood out there until the sun came up higher. We just let the horses go and I tied a long rope to one of them and turned them all loose. We went back to the camp. It was getting warm now and so the people were all swimming in the river. Some men went out hunting and women were out digging turnips and it was about eight or nine o’clock. We had no breakfast and had to go back to get it. Everyone took his horses to water. I did not feel right—I had a funny feeling all this time, because I thought that in an hour or so something terrible might happen. The boys were all swimming and I did not go down because I did not feel very good. I made up my mind I would go swimming anyway, so I greased up my body. At the Hunkpapas I heard the crier saying: “They are charging, chargers are coming. Where the tipi is they say the chargers are coming.” (The tipi where they had put their dead before when they came down to the Greasy Grass.) Then the crier at the Oglalas announced it and then each village announced it one after the other . We heard the cry going from village to village.

Black Elk participated, at about the age of twelve, in the Battle of Little Big Horn of 1876, and was injured in the Wounded Knee massacre in 1890. In 1887, Black Elk traveled to England with Buffalo Bill’s Wild West Show, an unpleasant experience he described in chapter 20 of Black Elk Speaks.

Just about this time my cousin had taken the horses to water and they were then just coming from the water. I had a buckskin mare and got her. Everyone was catching their horses at this time. We were lucky to get our horses—most of the peoples’ horses were out grazing yet and they were running after them. My older brother had a sorrel which he bridled and saddled. My father said: “Your brother has gone to the Hunkpapas. You had better take this gun over to him.” I got on my horse

Our Land

and as I went I could see the dust flying as I took the buckskin to my brother. When the dust parted, I could see the soldiers. These men looked big and husky and tall. Just then they began to shoot. The Hunkpapas began to retreat on foot and at this time there were lots of people swimming. I could see the little ones all naked running from the river. As I saw this all I wanted was to find my brother. Just then I saw him. The announcer cried that there was a boy who had gotten killed out there somewhere. My brother came up and took hold of his horse and told me to go on back, but I had a six-shooter with me, which my sister had given me; and I had given my brother his gun. There was a woods on the other side of the Hunkpapas. All the men got together and gathered in front of the woods. My brother hit for the brush. He told me to turn back, but I took after him. When I got to the timber the soldiers were shooting above us and you could see the leaves falling down off the trees where the bullets struck. I went in there and after that I did not know what happened back of me. We got under the brush little by little and we crossed the flat and the soldiers began to shoot at us and all we heard was: “Take courage, don’t be like a woman.” Some of them said: “Take courage, the helpless are out of their breath.” The women were running to the hills. Little bunches at a time began to cross the flat. I was underneath in the brush and I did not quite notice what happened above me. I stood there under the trees and recalled my vision and it made me feel stronger. Then I thought that my people in my vision had been Thunder-beings, but I didn’t see why the soldiers should be doing this. I thought then that perhaps the people had used some power because I knew that we were going to wipe out the soldiers.

Voices: They Speak

Close after the crying about courage we heard that Crazy Horse was coming. He was riding a white-faced horse. Everyone hollered: “Crazy Horse is coming!” Just then I heard the bunch on the hillside to the west crying: “Hokahey!” and making the tremolo. We heard also the eagle bone whistles. I knew from this shouting that the Indians were coming for I could hear the thunder of the ponies charging. A little above us I could hear the hoofs of the soldiers’ horses that went down into the brush. Then after a little while they [the soldiers] went back up again and I followed after them. It was a bad mixture then-soldiers, then Indians, etc. I could see nothing much but I heard shots and voices. We all hollered at each other: “Hurry, hurry!” The soldiers were running by this time up the stream—soldiers and Indians mixed up. Just then I could see a Sioux charge at one of the soldiers and try to get a hold of his horse and the soldier shot the Sioux off his horse with a revolver he had. Then I saw that this white man had shot two of the Indians at that time. (This white man was named Captain [Thomas H .] French.) Before we knew it, the soldiers were firing on us and the women and children were fleeing for their lives. Then the Indians were mad and it was hard to check them-they were plum crazy. We followed [Maj. Marcus A.] Reno’s retreat. Then when we got up the creek a little ways we went into the river- three of us boys about the same age together. I noticed a six-shooter so I got off and picked it up. Everyone was weaving in and out-that was really all I could see. I was very small and I had no chance to shoot anyone. There were a lot of Indians ahead of me. We stopped on a flat and everyone would get a soldier and strip him and put on his clothes for himself. We took everything they had—pistols, guns, ammunition, etc. We went to the river and turned back from there. As we turned from the river we saw a kicking soldier

Our Land

and a man came up and said: “Boy, get off and scalp him.” So I got off and began to take my knife. Of course the soldier had short hair so I started to cut it off. Probably it hurt him because he began to grind his teeth. After I did this I took my pistol out and shot him in the forehead. This was down by the river where we jumped in. We three boys turned back from here and downstream I could hear the battle going on. By this time I could see the soldiers [Lt. Col. George A. Custer’s troops] upon the hill in a bunch-about three miles away. Indians were below just like a bunch of swallows flying all around. I returned to where my mother was standing on top of the hill with the others. (Before the battle was on I saw a valley burning from a camp).25 I brought home an enemy’s scalp so my mother gave a shrill tremolo for me. The women could see the battle and they had given tremolos all over in encouragement for their men and they were also singing. I heard a very pretty single woman singing among the fighters where they were gathered under the brush.

Black Elk

Voices: They Speak

INDE 90

Hope Our Land

a 49, 53 6, 28 7, 27, 30, 42 40, 44, 47, 55, 56, 57, 61, 63, 69, 70, 74 39, 40, 47, 52, 54, 63, 70 4, 6, 16, 27, 34 2, 4, 39, 40 3, 4, 6, 11 4, 6, 9, 28

Adams, John Quincy Africa Agriculture Alabama

Americans Americas Appalachian Mountains Arawaks Asia

b 4, 6, 16 44 67, 83, 84, 87 49, 50, 51

Bahamas Battle of Horseshoe Bend Black Elk Black Hawk

49, 50

Black Hawk War

20, 25

Block Island

40, 46, 47, 50

British

c 6, 10 13 7, 11, 15 51, 53, 57 4

Caribbean Sea

Democrats

Casas, BartolomĂŠ de las

Dodge, William de Leftwich

Cassava plant

Cheyenne Indians

53, 56, 57, 64, 65 15, 25, 63 69, 74 3-11, 13, 16, 19, 25, 27, 34, 70 12, 42, 55-56, 61-63, 67, 74

Chickasaw Indians Children

Choctaw Indians Christians Clay, Henry

28, 30 76 4, 16-18, 20, 22, 24-27, 42, 62, 70, 84 4, 6, 9, 16, 24, 28, 31, 34-35, 40, 50 60

Congress Connecticut

22, 27

CortĂŠs

7, 9, 13, 15

Our Land

Egypt Emerson, Ralph Waldo England / English Europe / European Every, Dale Van

Creek Indians Cuba

f 42, 47-71, 73, 74

Florida

Florida Purchase of 1819

Fort Mystic

4, 40, 51

Eaton, John

Columbus, Christopher

20, 24

40, 44, 46, 57, 60, 64, 67-71

Dominican Republic

Catholic Church Cherokee Indians

2, 4, 10, 13-18, 20-22, 30-31, 34, 39, 44, 48, 51-56, 60, 62, 68, 71, 76, 86

Cass, Lewis

40, 53, 56, 61-62, 66-69, 76-78

42, 56

France

g 42, 74 40, 44-47, 55-57, 61, 63, 65, 68-69, 74, 76 4, 6, 7, 9-11, 14-15, 27, 56, 65 4, 40, 44, 47, 51, 56-57, 61-63, 65, 67, 68, 70-71, 76 51, 55, 60, 71

George Washington Georgia

Government (U.S.)

Great Father Great Spirit

Gulf of Mexico

h 40, 55

Illinois

Indiana

49, 56 Gold

7, 10, 11

40, 49, 50, 74

Haiti Harrison, William Henry

Harvard

Henry, Patrick

30, 33

Hiawatha

7-9, 16

Hispaniola

55 4, 13, 14 30, 31, 49

Indian Removal Bill Indian Trade and Intercourse Act Indies, East Iroquois Indians

j 42-44, 46-49, 53, 55-57, 60-61, 63, 65-69, 74 17 40, 41, 42, 49, 61 41

Jackson, Andrew

Jamestown Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Memorial

Hopewellian

47, 74

Hopi Indians

Kentucky Knox, Henry

Index

m 27

Maize (c0rn)

Marthaâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Vineyard

New Jersey

Mason, Captain John

New Mexico

Massachusetts

New Orleans

20, 22, 23 20, 24, 27, 76 20, 24

Massachusetts Bay Colony

Massasoit

Mesopotamia

24, 25 25, 28, 62 49 40, 55, 68-69, 77 63, 68-69, 76 2, 4, 30, 39-40, 44, 47, 49, 50, 53, 55-56, 61, 63-65, 70-71, 76-78

Metacom

12, 30, 49, 62 9

Navidad

New York Nina

25, 27, 40, 67

North America

42, 47, 74

North Carolina

Mexico Meyers, Marvin

Militia Missionaries Mississippi

Mississippi River

Mohawk Indians

Monmouth

Morison, Samuel Eliot

Moundbuilders

Our Land

9, 10-11

28, 40

Ohio

Ohio River Valley

Oneidas

Onondagas

71, 73-74

Osceola

p 2, 4, 39

Pacific Ocean

Paiute

Pennsylvania

20, 22-24

Pequot

Philippine

Pilgrims

Pine Ridge

Pinta

s 6, 9 48 74, 77 57

Santa Maria Schlesinger, Arthur Scott, Winfield Second Creek War

40, 55, 65

Secretary of War

47, 48, 53, 70, 71, 74

Seminole Indians

48, 70 56, 63, 64, 68, 71, 74, 76

Seminole War of 1818 Senate (U.S.)

Pneumonia

Senecas

Polo, Marco

Sequoyah

Portugal

17-18 40, 49, 53, 55, 69, 76, 77, 78 20, 24

Powhatan President (U.S.) Puritans

11, 20, 27, 40, 46, 50, 56-57, 61, 68 42-43, 53 51, 86 9, 10, 11, 13-14 16, 42, 47, 48, 49, 63, 71, 73

Settlers Shawnee Indians Sioux Indians Slavery / slaves

Smallpox

Smith, John

4, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13-14, 27, 47, 48, 70

Spain / Spaniards

Ragin, Michael

Speckled Snake

Red Sticks

Squatters

Removal Treaty

Standing Bear

71, 76-77 40

Revolutionary War

Index

Tallapoosa River

Wampanoaga

42-43, 55

Tecumseh

Wamsutta

47, 61, 74

Tennessee

16-18, 20, 22, 24-25, 40, 42, 46, 48-50, 56, 60, 68, 71, 73, 74

33 74, 78

The Death of Minnehaha Trail of Tears

Treaty of Dancing Rabbit Creek

Treaty of Holston

Treaty of Washington

42, 50

War of 1812

42, 74

Washington, George

66, 68, 74 49 24, 25

u 12, 16, 44, 46, 48, 53, 56, 58, 61, 63, 64, 66, 70, 77

United States

v 49, 76, 77, 78 8

Vanderlyn, John

60, 62, 70, 74 33

Van Every, Dale

16-17, 27

Van Buren, Martin

Our Land

Virginia

War

3, 10, 13, 17, 20, 28, 31, 34, 44, 50, 68-69, 70, 84-87 68, 69

Webster, Daniel Whigs Williams, Roger Women

Worcester, Samuel

Typefaces Primary: 9/13 Matrix II OT Book +10 tracking Pull Quote: 44 Univers LT Std (75) Black +10 tracking Chapter Heads: 160 Univers LT Std (75) Black -25 tracking Captions: 7/10 Matrix II OT Book +5 tracking Index: 7/10 Matrix II OT Book +5 tracking Running Feet: 7/13 Univers LT Std 45 Light

Colophon