Printed on 7-22-2012
Chad D. Reineke B. of Architecture Southern Polytechnic State University B.Sc. in Architecture & Associates of Art Bowling Green State University
Architecture is not an inspirational business, it’s a rational procedure to do sensible and hopefully beautiful things; that’s all. Harry Seilder(Architect)
Table of Contents Chad D. Reineke 2012 Portfolio
Educational Work Southern Polytechnic State University
Professional Work Northwest, Ohio & Atlanta, Ga
B. Architecture
Atlanta Culinary Arts Center (Atlanta, Ga) 4th Year Senior Studio
SPSU D Building Renovation (Marietta, Ga) 4th Year Senior Studio
Apartment R50 (Dhaka, Bangladesh) 4th Year Senior Studio
Cubism Study for Urban Design Process 4th Year Senior Studio
Bellwood Country Club & Botanical Center (Atlanta, Ga) 4th Year Senior Studio
Lighting & Electrical Application Project (Atlanta, Ga) 4th Year Environmental Studio
Educational Work Bowling Green State University B. Sc. in Technology; Major: Architecture/ Environmental Design
Efficient Travel (Bowling Green, Ohio) 4th Year Senior Studio
Technology Crossing (Bowling Green, Ohio) 2nd Year Design Studio
The Solar line (Toledo, Ohio) 4th Year Urban Studio
Watcher’s Retreat (Unspecified) 1st Year Graphics Studio
Mechanical Systems (Unspecified) 4th Year Systems Studio
The Secor Studios
2004 - 2009 425 N. Jefferson Ave. Toledo, Ohio
Diva Restaurant 2006 - 2007 N. Huron. Toledo, Ohio
SSOE Inc.
2006 - 2009 1001 madison Ave. Toledo, Ohio
Jacobs Engineering
2011 - 20XX 1 Concourse Pkwy NE # 600, Atlanta, GA
Atlanta Culinary Arts Center; AC2(Atlanta, Georgia)
4nd Year Design Studio, SPSU ACSA 2011-2012 Steel Competition Entry, SPSU Comprehensive Design Competition 1st Place
Presective View from Southwest Not to Scale
-Location (Site) Atlanta’s culinary scene reflects both its southern heritage and a much broader world influence. The metropolitan area has many high-end restaurants recognized at national status. It has many diverse ethnic and southern restaurants as well. At the turn of the century, Atlanta came to forefront as a foodie’s city, with many new and exciting restaurants opening in the gentrifying neighborhoods of the city. The site for the Atlanta Culinary Arts Center (AC2) is on the corner of 5th and Spring St. in the heart of Atlanta’s downtown district. The site is also adjacent to the developed Georgia Technical University’s midtown campus. The utilities and amenities of the college campus setting that Georgia Tech’s midtown campus supplies put the site at the top of the list out of many possible sites mainly due to transportation access and the adjacencies of an urban location
The orientation of the site which is 175’-0” longitude and 230’-0” latitude gives the site a longer axis in the north/ south direction and is also buried within a gridded urban fabric of taller buildings. The three adjacent roads are Spring St., which travels south bound only, and 5th St. which has single lane traffic in both directions and a heavy pedestrian presence due to the fact that it is an axis of Georgia Tech’s main campus, just to west across I-75/85 highway and is accessed by a planted bridge structure. The remaining immediate two lane street is 6th and ends in Spring St. at a T. The location is also supported by the four lanes of West Peachtree to the east.
Site Analysis
Not to Scale
Site Plan Not to Scale
-Typology (Design) The design of AC2 is composed of rectilinear elements hanging within the exposed steel structural frame. These elements, which started out as one long box with an intersecting fragment, were then punctured by a void stretching a connection between the two green spaces adjacent to the site. A vertical plane was then added onto the hanging end of the fragment to frame in the courtyard to the south, which is the major pedestrian route. Focusing back on the long box the point of intersection between it and the fragment was highlighted by the addition of a third perpendicular mass which remained solid while the fragment became a framed void. Continuing with the concept of penetrating voids, a canyon, which became structural elements, was then cut diagonally through the long box and the solid mass separating the two north and south blocks, then into a quad, presenting a centralized means of egress. After all these gestures combined, the lower two floors were pushed in along the North, South and West sides as a means of solar shading and to emphasize the hanging concept presented earlier in the design scheme. The long box was then transparent for clarity and views but still wrapped with a sleeve of horizontal louvers so that its mass would read. This sleeve was then carved away along the roof in the places where it was not needed and a portion wrapped down along the lower two floors to give continuity to that faรงade. The concept of the slicing continues through to interaction of the site where the paving demonstrates the aisle. The placement of the paving focuses on the corners of the site that are being divided by the vertical mass supporting the fragment. The tree line on the west perimeter, along with the water elements on the north and south of the site clearly marks the boundaries of the courtyard.
Insert 1
Insert 6
Insert 2
Insert 3
Insert 4
Insert 5
Insert 7
Insert 8
Insert 9
Insert 10
Study Site Model w/ Insert 10 Not to Scale
K
A
M
B
R
C J
S
Q
D
H
N
E F
N
G
First Floor Plan Not to Scale
P
N
Second Floor Plan Not to Scale
A- STAFF ROOM B- DIRETOR’S SUITE C- ADMISSIONS OFFICE D- LOBBY E- BAKE SHOP F- PASTRY KITCHEN
L
N
Southeast Corner View Not to Scale
H- STUDENT LOUNGE J- FOOD STORAGE K- LECTURE HALL L-MECHANICAL ROOM (LOWER FLOOR) M- LIBRARY N- CAREER SERVICES
P- TEACHING KITCHEN Q- RECEIVING/ TRASH R- MECHANICAL CLOSET S- LIBRARY PATIO
Interior Resturant Balcany Not to Scale
A- CLASSROOM B- TEACHING KITCHEN C- RESTAURANT D- RESTAURANT KITCHEN
E- RESTAURANT BAR F- FOOD STORAGE G- CLASSROOM H- DEMONSTRATION KITCHEN
J- TEACHING KITCHEN K- WINE ROOM L- TEACHING KITCHEN M- TEACHING KITCHEN
N- FACULTY AREA P- FOOD STORAGE Q- TEACHING KITCHEN R- ROOF GARDEN
A
R
H G
J
Q
B K F
P N
C
L D
M
E
N
Third Floor Plan Not to Scale
N
Fourth Floor Plan Not to Scale
North Elevation
Section B
Not to Scale
Not to Scale
West Elevation Not to Scale
Main Enterence Not to Scale
Southwest view Not to Scale
Section C
Section D
Not to Scale
Not to Scale
Section A Not to Scale
-Ecology (Sustainability) The sustainable systems within the building are not clearly evident to the occupant; rather they blend and hide within the structure. Sustainability is just good design, therefore, it doesn’t need to call attention to itself to be seen. Urban zones have tremendous issues with heat island effect. Atlanta is no different than any other major urban zone. AC2 has addressed this by using a green roof system of planted grass and permeable paving on the ground. Where these two systems are not acceptable the materials used have an SRI (Solar reflectance index) of 78 in an attempt to minimize solar heat gain across the site. Following the same concept into the building, the façade along the West and portions of the East are covered in a louvered system. This is heavy evident along the west side due to the significance of solar heat gain in the afternoon for the majority of the year. This approach allows for the solar radiation to be dispersed before it enters the building and allows for large window openings and operations. The extensive curtain wall system throughout the building is operable. When combined with the center hallway, with its operable glazing allows for the building to be opened up so that it might “breath” with the air flow currents that pass through the site along the structures dominate aisles. This reduces the heating and cooling loads on the building mechanical systems.
Green Roof Detail Not to Scale
Environmental Systems Diagram Not to Scale
Building Components Diagram Not to Scale
The green roof system also allows for a reduction of water run-off is not captured within the gray water system, and supplies some of the water for water closets throughout the building. The remaining units that do not require water would be waterless, and those that do would be mechanically monitored usage systems. Additional monitored systems would include artificial lighting and public space thermal control though electronic sensors. With the growing trend of on-site power generation, the HVAC system would be equipped with a micro turbine system that generates power from the air flow within a heating and cooling system, allowing AC2 to sell this power back to the utility company when not using it themselves.
Northwest Corner View Not to Scale
Building/ Site Isometric Not to Scale
Building Skin Attachment Diagram Not to Scale
Materiality The thought behind the materials going into AC2 was to accent steel, not just structurally but all the uses of it. The building is supported by a steel W columns and long span beams which rest in the middle on structural tilt-up concrete wall, all of this is exposed so that the structural mechanics of the ridged frame with its cross bracing is clearly evident, displaying the strength of steel. The next component of AC2 is its steel façade which is square white metal panels and is visible in various places across the building. The panels, with their shine and clean rounded edges, display steel’s ability to be beautiful, clean and flawless. The thin metal frame of the curtain walls and screen supports show the versatility and flexibility of the material in usage. The corrugated siding is painted to show each panel as a panel so that each one can be singled out, reminding us that steel can be mass produced and remain attractive despite being so. The use of Steel with various other materials, poured concrete, glass and wood in materially correct forms strikes to heart of what architecture is; expressing the components of structure and design in the ways that compliment the materials used to create them. AC2 takes these materials and applies them in complementary forms using them to express what they are: beautiful in any form. Wall Section F & Details
Not to Scale
Building Skin Rendering Not to Scale
SPSU D Building Renovation(Marietta, Georgia) 4nd Year Design Studio, SPSU SPSU Design Challenge Competition 1st Place
Apartment R50 (Dhaka, Bangladesh) 4nd Year Design Studio, SPSU
Cubism Study for Urban Design Process 4nd Year Design Studio, SPSU
EXERCISING ANALYSIS OF CUBISM ANALYSIS(ES)
ORIGINAL ARTWORK
2D ANALYSIS ORIGINAL ARTWORK
RESULTS OF 1ST ANALYSIS
PROJECT SUMMARY-
COMPARITIVELY CUBISM ARTWORK AND THE STUDY OF URBAN DESIGN HAVE VERY CLOSE SIMILARITIES; MANY COMPLEX IDEAS AND ACTIONS INHABITING THE SAME SPACE, AS WELL, AS TO UNDERSTAND BOTH YOU HAVE TO "UN-PACK" THE SPACE.
R
eineke
FOR THIS ANALYSIS, WHICH ENDED UP BEING AN ANALYSIS WITHIN ANOTHER, AND YET ANOTHER, ONLY TO YEILD ANOTHER (ANALYSIS X 4). FOR THIS THE PAINTING BY GRIS WAS USED. IT WAS FIRST DIVIDED INTO -PROMINATE LINES -SHAPES -DEPTH OF FEILD -SHADOW.
EXERCISING ANALYSIS OF CUBISM ANALYSIS(ES) SECOND AND THIRD ANALYSIS
1
2
3
4
5
5 4 3 2 1
SECOND MODEL ANALYSIS
A
B
A
B
C
C
D
E
D
E
EXERCISING ANALYSIS OF CUBISM ANALYSIS(ES)
R
eineke
Bellwood Country Club and Botanical Center(Atlanta, Georgia) 4nd Year Design Studio, SPSU SPSU Urban Design Competition Finalist
Lighting & Electrical Application Project(Atlanta, Georgia) 4nd Year Environmental Studio, SPSU
Architecture is a science arising out of many other sciences, and adorned with much and varied learning; by the help of which a judgment is formed of those works which are the result of other arts. Marcus V. Pollio (Architect)
Table of Contents Chad D. Reineke 2012 Portfolio
Professional Work Northwest, Ohio & Atlanta, Ga
The Secor Studios
2004 - 2009 425 N. Jefferson Ave. Toledo, Ohio
Diva Restaurant 2006 - 2007 N. Huron. Toledo, Ohio
SSOE Inc.
2006 - 2009 1001 madison Ave. Toledo, Ohio
Jacobs Engineering
2011 - 20XX 1 Concourse Pkwy NE # 600, Atlanta, GA
Educational Work
Bowling Green State University
B. Sc. in Technology; Major: Architecture/ Environmental Design
Efficient Travel (Bowling Green, Ohio) 4th Year Senior Studio
Technology Crossing (Bowling Green, Ohio) 2nd Year Design Studio
The Solar line (Toledo, Ohio) 4th Year Urban Studio
Watcher’s Retreat (Unspecified) 1st Year Graphics Studio
Mechanical Systems (Unspecified) 4th Year Systems Studio
Efficient Travel (Bowling Green, Ohio) 4nd Year Senior Studio Computer Generated
Project SummaryDesign a commuter train station for Amtrak in the Bowling Green, Ohio city limits using existing rail lines. The station is to include the normal amenities of a small train station, plus the addition of a Station Master’s office, and lay-over lounge for employees. This station will function as the Wood County base of operations for AmTrak so a conference room is also needed for the Station Master. AmTrak has also requested that their color palette of blue and red be used in the design of the station.
Project StatementA train is an energy efficient method of transportation; moving many people with less energy than would be used by other methods. With this in mind the station that the train stops at should also demonstrate the same energy conciseness. With bright but simple technology and passive systems, a station that is efficient and environmentally friendly is the best option to meet this idea.
Green Roof System
Metal Wall Panel System
Isometric Rendering
10
8
16
8 9
15
14
3
18 17
12
4 2
11
5 6
1
5
7
13
7
19
First Floor Plan
Second Floor Plan
Roof Plan
Not to Scale
Not to Scale
Not to Scale
First Floor Legend-
Second Floor Legend-
Roof Plan Legend-
5.Elevator 14.Conference Room 7.Stairwell 1 15.Maint. Area 8.Stairwell 2 16. Mech. Room 11. Employee Lay-over 17. Open to Below 12. Station Master Office 13.Second Floor Elevator Closet
18. Green Roof 19. Open to Below
1.Entry 2.Lobby 3.Ticket Office 4.Baggage 5.Elevator 6.Elevator Closet 7.Stairwell 1 8.Stairwell 2
9.Women’s Resroom 10.Men’s Restroom
North Elevation Not to Scale
West Elevation Not to Scale
Site Plan Not to Scale
Site Selection-
South Elevation
The site selected within the block of Pike St. and E. Court St. west of Thurstin Ave. was selected due to its proximity to other various utilities within the area, such as a Bus station and Bowling Green’s downtown to the west, BGSU’s Main Campus to east as well as I-75.
Not to Scale
Rendering Front Entry
East Elevation Not to Scale
Raised FloorThe main use of a raised floor system is to locate all the utilities of a structure under the floor. In this case allowing utilities to be ran in a centralized location to service both the upper and lower floors. This system also allows for greater climate and utility control for the users of the building.
Section A-A Not to Scale
Section B-B Not to Scale
Raised Floor Diagram
Interior Rendering of Lobby
Passive Systems Diagram Not to Scale
Useful Heat Loss-
With clerestory windows and the raised floor the opportunity for passive cooling becomes available as demonstrated by the wave lines with arrows. By opening vents in raised floor and opening clearstory windows the interior heat will rise to the ceiling where it could then exit through the outer windows.
Solar Heat-
The interior wall which is made of solid concrete adjacent to the glass facade on the eastern side gives it the ability to act as a Thromb wall. As solar rays pass through the low-e glass most of the heat still exists, allowing it to be trapped within the stone of the interior wall, then later on as the sun dissipates and the room temperature drops and the heat will be slowly released into the nearby areas.
Sound Control-
The use of acoustic block on the outer wall combined with the solid concrete of the inner wall dampens the sounds of arriving and departing trains greatly in the Lobby area of the station, making the comfort greater for the users.
Wall Sections-
Wall Section 1 Not to Scale
Wall Section 2 Not to Scale
Wall Section 3 Not to Scale
Wall Section 4 Not to Scale
Technology Crossing (Bowling Green, Ohio) 2nd Year Design Studio Computer Generated, Hand Rendered
Isometric Renderings
Project SummaryDesign a Pedestrian bridge that will cross E. Mary st. connecting the College of Technology to the main campus, with special focus on the A.D.A. (American Disability Act) guidelines and rules. The project must contain one ADA ramp and elevator as well as being a piece of ascetic value to the campus. College of Technology
1 Ramp 1
2
Parking Lot 2 Bridge
3 3
E. Mary St. Elevator & 4 Stairs Psychology Building
N Site Map
Floor Plan
Not to Scale
Not to Scale
N 4
Design StatementThe crossing is designed to allow the user to take in the environments that surround the installation by experiencing the views through unique situations ex. The latticed stairs, Shattered glass sidewalls of the bridge portion, and the spiral ramp all give a different perspective on the surrounding area to the user.
Isometric Southwest
East Elevation Not to Scale
South Elevation
North Elevation
Not to Scale
Not to Scale
West Elevation
Isometric
Not to Scale
Northeast
The Solar line (Toledo, Ohio) 4rd Year Urban Studio Computer Generated
Project Summary-
Design Statement-
Study the urban Toledo, Ohio area and select several joining blocks within those blocks create an architectural work that will help bolster community involvement, commerce, and civic pride.
The footbridge links the 5/3rd-field area to the river front. Traveling on the bridge will provide unique scenery of the river front and warehouse neighborhood while being of service through three focal points along its axis. The Bridge its self has an industrial look which enforces its connection to past industrial warehouse district in which in passes through. The three towers are similar in design to the nearby 5/3rd Field for look & feel but also because the field is an integral part of Toledo culture.
3D Bridge on Site
Downtown Toledo Figure Ground-Red is I75, Pink is Route 24, Yellow is civic locations. Arrows indicate traffic flows from major surface streets. Site- St. Clair Village was selected due to it heavy retail already existing, location to civic locations, and high traffic surrounding
Rendered Elevations of Major Points Summit St.,Depot St., St. Clair st., Erie St.
The use of Solar Panels makes the structure not only a renewable energy source but, brings about an example of the interest Northwest Ohio is pioneering in solar energy. (ect. First Solar and the local universities) Solar Panel Grid I-Beam
Glass canopy System Elevator (behind)
29’ 11” F.G.
HSS Columns
Bar Joist Pre-cast Slab
Hand/Guardrail
Angle Iron
31’ 2” F.G.
Glass Curtain Wall Canopy
15’ 11” F.G.
15’ 11” F.G.
Pre-cast pillister
Bar Joist
W Column
Maint/ Storage Stone Pavers
VCT Flooring
Broken Section of bridge
Section of Tower
Typical of length
Typical of 3
Lobby
Watcher’s Retreat (Unspecified) 1st Year Graphics Studio Hand drafting
Project SummaryDesign a minimalist structure upon the existing site; which consists of columns, ground slab and 1 story of stairs. That will allow the user to take part in wildlife watching while interfering with the surrounding site as little as possible. Requirements are to be above the ground level with a restroom and storage space for chairs and various other materials.
Design StatementThe design of the retreat was to meet the requirements of the users while creating as few new interfering surfaces to the view. The introduction of a pergola to the site was to better integrate the built structure within the wild site connecting the user and their surroundings.
N
N
Restroom
Isometric
Ground Floor
Main Floor
Northwest
Not to Scale
Not to Scale
Storage
PergolaA structure of parallel colonnades supporting an open roof of beams and crossing rafters or trelliswork, over which climbing plants are trained to grow.
South Elevation
East Elevation
Not to Scale
Not to Scale
North Elevation
West Elevation
Not to Scale
Not to Scale
East-West Section
North-South Section
Not to Scale
Not to Scale
Mechanical Systems (Unspecified) 4nd Year Systems Studio Computer Generated
Sanitation Design SummaryDesign the water supply and drainage components of a three story office building Water supply size schedule-From water main 2” - Waterstack 2” -Main feed off stack 1 1/4” - All other piping 1/2” -10 FU flush value water closet (Public) - 1.5 FU lavatory (Public)
Supply Riser Iso. Not to Scale
College of Technology
Example Procedures for water supply Run 2” pipeline from city water main into building base. Continue 2’ line up to floor of third story. From waterstack run 1 1/4” line through floor until paralle with water heater. Once paralle with water heater run 1/2” line perpendictural to far walls. Run cold line into water heater, then run both hot water line and cold water line terminating into sink. Return to 1 1/4” line off stack and run 1/2” line terminating into the water closet fixtures.
Restroom Piping Plan Spouts over exaggerated for clarity
Sewage Riser Iso. Not to Scale
Sewage size schedule-From sewage main 4” - Wastestack 4” -Main feed off wastestack 4” - All other sewage piping 2” -flush value water closet (Public) - lavatory (Public)
Example Procedures for water supply Run 4” pipeline from city sewer main into building base. Contiue 4” line up to floor of third story. From wastestack run 4” line through floor until paralle with sinks. Once paralle with sinks run 2” line perpendictural to far walls. Terminate sewage lines into sink U traps. Terminate 2’ lines from wastestack into water closet U traps.
Women’s Restroom Supply Iso.
Men’s Restroom Sewage Iso.
Not to Scale
Not to Scale
HVAC Design SummaryDesign the HVAC system for 1 story of an office building. Demonstrate understanding of Heating and Cooling system through 2D paper presentation
Typical Iso. & Floor Plan South Zone HVAC Plan Not to Scale
Hot AirRed Cold Air- Blue Air Return- Green
Mechanical Room 3D & Floor Plan South Zone HVAC Iso. Not to Scale
Hot AirRed Cold Air- Blue Air Return- Green
Electrical Design SummaryDesign the electrical system for single apartment unit. Proccedure1000 sq. ft. residence having the following: 2Kw Heating, 12Kw Range, 5Kw Dryer, 5Kw Water heater, 1.2Kw Clothes Washer Step 1. Determine general lighting/ receptacle load. 1000 sq ft x 3VA/sq ft =
3000 VA
Step 2. Find Kitchen area/ laundry small appliance load. Kitchen Area laundry Area
4 x 1000 = 4000 0x0 =0 Total =
Calculating the Service Neutral Feeder; Step 1. Add the demand loads, as found previously for all the strictly 120 volt circuit items; A. General lighting/ kitchen/ Luandry loads... B. Clothes washer ( @75% demand)
Total = 3900VA
Step 2. List the 120/240 V circuit devices with their appropriate demand loads and add these together A. Range 12000VA @ 70% demand B. Dryer 5000VA @ 70% demand
8400VA 3500VA
Total =
11900VA
Step 3. Add totals from step 1 and step 2;
3900VA + 11900VA = 15800VA And divide this by 240 volts to determine the current carrying capacity of the service neutral conductor. 15800VA = 65.8333A 240VA
4000
Step 3. Apply totals from step 1 and step 2. 3000VA + 4000VA = 7000VA Apply code demand factors to this total 1st 3000VA @ 100% Remander 4000VA @ 35%
3000VA 900VA
3000VA 1400VA Total = 5400VA
Step 4. Specail and fixed appliances are now considered.
A. Cooling load...@ 100% demand 2400VA B. Dryer load... @ 100% demand 5000VA C. Range load. The code allows a demand factor to be applied based on size (rating) and number of ranges... 12000VA D. Other fixed appliances Water heater 5000VA Clothes washer 1200VA Total = 6200VA Demand factor applied to the total 6200VA x 75% = 4650VA
Electrical Line Diagram
Step 5. Add together all the demand loads determinded through the previous steps. - General Lighting/ Kitchen/ Luandry -Cooling -Dryer -Range -Other fixed appliances
5400VA 2400VA 5000VA 12000VA 4650VA
Demand load total
29450VA
Step 6. Dividing the demand load total by the voltage supplied, the required current capacity of the phase conductors. (service enterance hot legs) 29450VA = 122.708 A 240VA
Electrical Floor Plan Not to Scale
Circuit Panel Schedule
Lighting Design SummaryDesign the lighting system for a insureance office. ProccedureLuminare Data Manufacturer; Catalog Number; Lamp Data Type and color; Number per luminaire; Total lumens per luminaire;
Insight Lighting F96T12CW/ VH0
Typical Section Not to Scale
Rapid start, high output, white 1 15200
Selection of Coefficient of Utilization
RCR = CCR = FCR =
1.14 .41 .41
Pcc = Pfc = CU =
74 11 .63
Selection of light loss factors Unrecoverable Luminaire ambient temperature; Voltage to luminaire; Luminaire surface depreciation; Other factors (components);
.90 .90 .90 .90
Recoverable Room surface dirt temperature; Lamp surface depreciation; Lamp burnouts factor; Luminaire dirt depreciation; Total light loss factor, LLF;
.92 .88 .93 .84
Calculations (Average maintained illumination level) Number of Luminaires = 75 (3790.8
= 52 Lights
Lux (footcandles) =
= 74.87 (75) Footcandles
(15200 x .63)(.57) (52 x 15200)(.63)(.57) (3790.8)
.57
Lighting Floor Plan Not to Scale
Architecture doesn’t come from theory. You don’t think your way through a building. Arthur Erickson (Architect)
Table of Contents Chad D. Reineke 2012 Portfolio
Professional Work Northwest, Ohio & Atlanta, Ga
The Secor Studios
2004 - 2009 425 N. Jefferson Ave. Toledo, Ohio
Diva Restaurant 2006 - 2007 N. Huron. Toledo, Ohio
SSOE Inc.
2006 - 2009 1001 madison Ave. Toledo, Ohio
Jacobs Engineering
2011 - 20XX 1 Concourse Pkwy NE # 600, Atlanta, GA
The Secor Studios 2004 - Present 425 N. Jefferson Ave. Toledo, Ohio
Project SummarySecor Studios The Secor building is a mixed-use building, housing three art galleries, 2 schools, artist studios and office spaces. The building was built in 1904 to be the Secor Hotel until the late 50s since then the building has been owned and renovated by several different owners. Until the mid 90s when Jim Zaleski purchased the location, upon this time the build slowly made its change to be the Secor Studios.
Since all the renovations above the first floor have been restorative or cosmetic the only plan to be created since the insurance review in 1950s is above. This shows the major changes to the first floor.
6th Studio Gallery 6th Floor
Main Exhibit Gallery 1st Floor
6th Main Gallery 6th Floor
7th Studio Gallery 7th Floor
School Entry Lobby 1st Floor
Diva Restaurant 2006 - 2009 N. Huron. Toledo, Ohio
Project SummaryDiva Restaurant Diva could always be summed up with style and taste. Being one of Toledo’s only 5 star locations the atmosphere of the restaurant required the high end style that only Diva could offer, outside of mainstream locations..
The restaurant itself was designed by the travels and experience of its owner Jim Zaleski. From Berkley to New York, Jim’s personal taste created the atmosphere of the restaurant. As to my part I was merely a consultant and draftsman, however I did get to take part in many of the renovations that Jim and his associate Keith Corder (artist of the countertop to the right) did to the space both on paper and physically. It was truly a privilege to be able to work on such a beautiful location in Toledo, Ohio.
SSOE Inc. 2006 - 2009 1001 madison Ave. Toledo, Ohio
Project SummaryToyota Mississippi SSOE was contracted to render the future plant for Toyota Mississippi and put together the Press release package to be given out at the ground breaking and Press inquires. This was a team project between myself and 1 other SSOE staff member, we answered directly to Toyota’s marketing Director. And had a project deadline of 3 weeks to assemble the packets.
The 8 DTE Energy presentations were completed in their entirety including location research, site planning and visuals displays by myself, answering to the SSOE’s MichCon Project Manager. At which each presentation took approx. 32 hours to complete.
Project SummaryDTE Energy MichCon a gas utility company in Michigan contracted SSOE to design three gas sub-stations for them. Out of this agreement came the need for Zoning hearings and local code reviews. These presentation boards and others like it were created to allow the zoning and town hall meetings to see all the required information with visual displays of the stations.
Project SummaryNewman Technology Create several concepts for a new automotive supplier’s R&D facility, placing an emphasis on what the Japanese company’s interpretation of modern technical architecture.
Project SummarySSOE Marketing The material show was a marketing campaign by SSOE for the use of BIM modeling by the retail sector of the company. The rendering above was the starting location that was placed into the 4 page “White Paper� with other renderings that I wrote for the Marketing department. It was then followed up by being placed as a topic header on the company web site.
Project SummaryMarathon Oil This presentation came about when an interior renovation of Marathon’s Detroit, Michigan headquarters turn into an outside renovation. The design was an attempt to merge the new red portion seamlessly with the older gray building.
Project SummaryCummins Engine These presentations were created to give the management of Cummins an understanding of the final product for their plant renovation. The architectural design shown on the three sheets below were under great stress due to being in Columbus, Indiana where many famous Architects are having or had projects built.
0
4 8 12 16
1/16"=1'-0
32
48
0
2
4 6
8
16
24
1/8"=1'-0
0 1
2
4
6
8
10
12
0
1/4"=1'-0
1
2
3
4
5
6
3/8"=1'-0
7
8
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0
1/2"=1'-0
1
2
3
4
0
3/4"=1'-0
1
2
3
0
1
2
11/2"=1'-0
1"=1'-0
0
5 10 15 20
40
60
0
10
20
30
60
60
L
60
K
60
J
H
60
FF 60
G
F A-213
M
BLDG 60
60
N
90
0 10 20 30 40
80
120
1"=40' BID PACKAGE NUMBER: 06
BLDG 008
60
P
60
1"=30'
1"=20' 008
60
A A-317 EXISTING
D
PARTIAL NEW CONSTRUCTION AT TRUCK DOCK DOORS
JOB TITLE
STEEL PLATE CLOSURE (TYP) REFER TO STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS 4'-10"
THREE (3) MODIFIED PRECAST PANELS
EXISTING PRECAST CONCRETE WALL PANELS TO REMAIN
T/EXISITNG BUILDING EL + 658'-1"
1'-10"
T/COPING EL. ± 658'-8 5/8"
CUMMINS INC.
EXISTING STEEL PLATE JAMBS (TYP) REFER TO STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS 8'-6"
4'-10"
1'-10"
CEP RENOVATION LDD ENGINE PROGRAM COLUMBUS, INDIANA
11'-6"
0
CL ELECTRICAL FIXTURES EL + 644'-1"
4 8 12 16
32
1/16"=1'-0
48
0
2
4 6
8
16
24
0 1
1/8"=1'-0
2
4
6
8
10
12
0
1/4"=1'-0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
0
3/8"=1'-0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0
1/2"=1'-0
1
2
3
4
3/4"=1'-0
0
1
2
3
0
1
0 5 10 15 20
2
11/2"=1'-0
1"=1'-0
40
60
0
1"=20'
10
20
30
60
90
0 10 20 30 40
1"=30'
80
120
1"=40'
CONSULTANTS
T/COPING EL. ± 638'-8"
EXISTING FINISH FLR EL + 630'-9"
BID PACKAGE NUMBER: 06
T/FOUNDATION EL. ± 627'-9 1/8" GRADE EL. ± 623'-9 1/8" OVERHEAD DOORS, LEVELERS, SHELTERS, BUMPERS AND SAFETY RESTRAINTS (BY OWNER)
EXISTING RETAINING WALL
60
60
008
008
008
34
35
34
35
36
008
008
37
38
008
96
39
41
C
A-315
C
NEW INSULATED METAL SIDING BEYOND
1 A-415
BLDG 96
B
BLDG 008
BLDG 60
BLDG 008
A-213
JOB TITLE
D
CUMMINS INC.
A-320
CEP RENOVATION LDD ENGINE PROGRAM COLUMBUS, INDIANA
NEW INSULATED METAL SIDING BEYOND 4 8 12 16T/ EXIST. BLDG. 32 CURT. WALL 48 EL. +665'-10 1/2"
0
PARTIAL EAST ELEVATION (EXISTING BUILDING) BUILDING 60
SEAL
0
1/16"=1'-0
1/8"=1'-0"
2
4 6
8
16
24
0 1
1/8"=1'-0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1/4"=1'-0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
0
3/8"=1'-0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0
1/2"=1'-0
1
2
3
4
0
3/4"=1'-0
1
2
3
0
1
2
11/2"=1'-0
1"=1'-0
0 5 10 15 20
40
60
0
1"=20'
10
20
30
60
1"=30'
T/ COPING
EXISITNG STAINLESS STEEL WALL PANELS BEYOND
SG
EL. +646'-3"
B
B
SG
SG
SG B BT
BT
BT
BT
BT
A
C
B
SG
SG
B
B
BT
BT
0 10 20 30 40
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
82
26
25.9
BT
BT
BT BT
BT
BT
BT
D
25
24
23
22
21
20
19
18.1
18.05
18
17
16
15.1
25
SIM
CUMMINS INC.
SIM.
CEP RENOVATION LDD ENGINE PROGRAM COLUMBUS, INDIANA
A-317 SEAL
6
KEYPLAN
NEW ADDITION SOUTH ELEVATION
1
73 AA
008
008
008
008
008
008
60
FF 60
EE 60
DD 60
CC 60
BB 60
AA 60
42-2
008
42-2
008
42-2
H
G
F
E
D
C
B
A
A
B
B
C
C
A-212
60
D
CJ
CLIENT SSOE
PROJECT PROJECT
A
B
A
A-314
A-320
4
CJ
82
82
K
CJ
CJ
CJ
82
CJ CJ 1/4" PARGE COAT OVER NEW CONCRETE MASONRY WALL
82
G
F
82
82
82
E.1
E
D EXISTING TRANSLUCENT WALL PANELS AND SASH
CJ
6 A-610
CONSULTANTS
A-610
1/8"=1'-0"
82
J H MODIFIED TRANSLUCENT PANELS / SASH WINDOWS: 140'-4" +/-
CJ
CJ
CJ
CJ
73
73
K
L
73 AA
EXISTING PRECAST CONCRETE PANELS
CJ
12
PAINT NEW STEEL FRAMING, RAILINGS AND BOLLARDS, TYP.
SIM.
A-612
BID PACK 6
SEAL
A-212
B
SG
SG
SG
SG SG
B
B
B
B
SG
B
B
B
B
SG
SG
SG
SG
SG SG
SG 3'-9"
SG SG SG
SG
SG
BT
BT
BT
BT
BT BT
EL. +630'-9"
B
B
B
NTS
DRAWINGS FOR ALTERATIONS TO ACCOMMODATE DOCK LEVELERS 2 A-012
73
73
AA
AA.3
EXISTING INSULATING GLASS73PANELS AA.9
PARTIAL BUILDING 82 EAST ELEVATION
BT BT
BT
BT
BT
BT
BT
BT
BT
BT
BT
BT
BT
BT
BT
BT
BT
BT
BT
BT
BT
BT
BT
BT
BT BT BT
BT
SG
SG SG
B
B
B B
BT
BT
BT
B
NEW CONCRETE STEPS AND METAL FRAMING REFER TO STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS
NEW DOCK LEVELERS, SECTIONAL OVERHEAD DOORS, DOCK SEALS ETC. PROVIDED AND INSTALLED BY OWNER (TYPICAL ( 6 ) DOCKS)
3
1/8"=1'-0"
A-012
73
73
73
K.1
21
22
T/ COPING
BT BT
5 EXISTING FINISH FLOOR
KEYPLAN T/ EXIST. BLDG. CURT. WALL EXISTING CONCRETE FOUNDATION EL. +665'-10 1/2"WALL. REFER TO STRUCTURAL
CONTROL JOINT (CJ) , TYP.
B
8'-1"
3
CJ
PROPOSED RAMP, REFER TO STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS
NEW INSULATED METAL SIDING BEYOND
007-00229-00
B
73
73
73
73
73
73
23
24
25
25.9
K.1
K
A-310
SG
REFINISHED RIBBED METAL WALL PANELS
NEW FINISH FLOOR EL. +630'9"
B
5 4 3 2 1
02/29/08 01/21/08 01/10/08 12/14/07 12/10/07
NO.
PAINT NEW STEEL FRAMING, RAILINGS AND BOLLARDS
1/8"=1'-0" 73
73
L
AA.9
A
73
73
AA.3
AA
A-310
REFINISHED RIBBED METAL WALL PANELS
BP 6 - BULLETIN #4 BP 6 - BULLETIN #1 BP 6 - CONSTRUCTION ADDENDUM 1 - BP 6 BIDS - BP 6
DATE
PARTIAL BUILDING 73 WEST ELEVATION
REFINISHED RIBBED METAL WALL PANELS
EL. +646'-3"
BID PACK 01
SUBJECT
REVISION OR ISSUE
RE-INSTALL EXISTING REVOLVING DOOR ENTRY AT VESTIBULE
A-212
2
L
RE-INSTALL EXISTING SPACE FRAMED GLAZING BEYOND
METAL GUTTER AND DOWNSPOUT
SG
NUMBER
B
1
82
M
A-319
RELOCATED INSULATED STAINLESS STEEL WALL PANELS, TYP.
K. SMITH T. STEELE T. MEYER L. SCHLATTER R.HAMILTON / B.MAUK
NUMBER
DRAWING TITLE
PARTIAL EAST ELEVATION BUILDING 60 DRAWING NUMBER
82
SUBJECT
REVISION OR ISSUE
CHECKED
DESIGNED EXISTING PRECAST CONCRETE WALLAPPROVED PANELS PROJECT MANAGER
E A-311
BLDG 96
BP 6 - BULLETIN #4 BP 6 - CONSTRUCTION BIDS - BP 6
DATE
96
D BLDG 008
BLDG 60
02/29/08 01/10/08 12/10/07
008
2 A-612
C BLDG 008
3 2 1 NO.
THREE (3) MODIFIED DRAWN PRECAST PANELS
T/ EXISTING BUILDING EL. +658'-9"
PARTIAL BUILDING 73 NORTH ELEVATION
1 A-012
A-019, A-020 SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0"
NTS
B
120
JOB TITLE
8 A-610
EL. +630'-9" PAINT STEEL STAIR, FRAMING, COLUMNS AND RAILINGS
BID PACK 6 B
A
80
BID PACKAGE NUMBER: 01
73
27
EL. +646'-3" 9'-0"L X 20'-0"W FLEXIBLE STRIP DOOR; .160" THICKNESS; REINFORCED 16" WIDE STRIPS; 50% OVERLAP; LOW TEMPERATURE W/ HEADER MOUNTING AND GALVANIZED HARDWARE AS MANUFACTURED BY FROMMELT SAFETY PRODUCTS OR APPROVED EQUAL (TYP. 5 LOCATIONS AT CHIP BINS) NEW FINISH FLOOR
BT
BT
BT
EXISTING FINISH FLOOR EL. +630'-9"
73
REFINISHED METAL CORNER AND EDGE TRIM T/ COPING
B
BT
90
1"=40'
CONSULTANTS
T/ EXISTING BUILDING EL. +658'-9"
DRAWN CHECKED DESIGNED
A
APPROVED PROJECT MANAGER
CLIENT
2 A-019, A-020
NEW ADDITION EAST ELEVATION
SSOE
SPANDREL GLASS (SG), TYP.
CHIP SHED EAST ELEVATION
1/8"=1'-0" 4 A-411
1/8"=1'-0"
DRAWING NUMBER
1
2
3
4
PROJECT PROJECT
KEYPLAN
K. SMITH T. STEELE T. MEYER L. SCHLATTER R.HAMILTON / B.MAUK
NTS
NUMBER NUMBER
007-00229-00
DRAWING TITLE
SOUTH & EAST ELEVATIONS NEW ADDITION BUILDING 008
5 A-411
CHIP SHED SOUTH ELEVATION
6
1/8"=1'-0"
A-411
PARTIAL CHIP SHED WEST ELEVATION 1/8"=1'-0"
A-213
5 2 1
07/20/07 07/12/07
NO.
ADDENDUM #1 - BP 1 BIDS - BP 1
DATE
SUBJECT
REVISION OR ISSUE DRAWN CHECKED DESIGNED
A
APPROVED PROJECT MANAGER
CLIENT SSOE
PROJECT PROJECT
L. WANG T. MEYER T. JANOWIECKI L. SCHLATTER B. MAUK NUMBER NUMBER
007-00229-00
DRAWING TITLE
BUILDING 60, BRIDGE & STAIR TOWER DRAWING NUMBER
1
2
3
4
5
2 ENTIRE SHEET
A-210
Jacobs Engineering
2011 - 20XX 1 Concourse Pkwy NE # 600, Atlanta, GA
Project SummaryAthens, Tx
Produced video and still support graphics for the restructuring of the parking configuration around the main courthouse in the town.
Project Summary-
Marta Light Rail Stations Conceptual art work and design idea options for the light rail option stations around the city of Atlanta, Ga
Jacobs Engineering
2011 - 20XX 1 Concourse Pkwy NE # 600, Atlanta, GA
Project Summary-
DFW DART Visualization of a new Light rail system to be installed at DFW International Airport, deliverables included still images to be used in report and a video for presentation.
Jacobs Engineering
2011 - 20XX 1 Concourse Pkwy NE # 600, Atlanta, GA
Project Summary-
Bacardi Contracted to produce a Master planning video of the redevelopment stages to the Bacardi distillery in Catano, Puetro Rico for the Bacardi board of directors annual meeting.
Jacobs Engineering
2011 - 20XX 1 Concourse Pkwy NE # 600, Atlanta, GA
Project Summary-
TAM International Packaging 2 minute animated walkthrough video of new production plant and attached offices.
Jacobs Engineering
2011 - 20XX 1 Concourse Pkwy NE # 600, Atlanta, GA
Project Summary-
Caloosahatchee Bridge Production of several high quality photo-real still images for proposal report, photo-real project map and Non Photo-Real construction sequencing images.
Jacobs Engineering
2011 - 20XX 1 Concourse Pkwy NE # 600, Atlanta, GA