Biodiversity Strategy 2011–2015
Contents Mayor’s Message.......................................... 1
Our policies and plans................................ 24
Acknowledgements.......................................2
City of Tea Tree Gully Development Plan....................................................................24
Executive summary......................................3 Introduction..................................................5
Strategic Plan 2011–2015...............................25
What is biodiversity?......................................... 5
City Master Plan 2011–2040..........................26
Why is biodiversity important?........................ 6
Open Space Strategy 2011–2030...................26
Why prepare a biodiversity strategy for the City of Tea Tree Gully?....................... 7
Strategic Bushfire Management Plan............27
What does the Strategy aim to do?................. 7
Environmental policy......................................28
Aboriginal history.............................................. 8
Ecological mapping of the City of Tea Tree Gully............................................28
Issues and opportunities..............................9
Community land management plans............28
Issues................................................................... 9 Opportunities...................................................10
Pest Plan Management in Creeks and Waterways Policy..............................................29
Vision for the future.....................................11
Upper Cobbler Creek Corridor Action Plan.......................................................30
Goal...................................................................11 Biodiversity strategic objectives.....................11 Policy context.............................................. 16 International agreements................................16 National legislation, policies and programs...........................................................16
Vegetation management plans and surveys...............................................................30 Historical Policy...............................................31 A profile of the City of Tea Tree Gully...... 32 Open space.......................................................32
South Australian Government legislation, policies and plans.........................17
Geology.............................................................32
Regional plans..................................................19
Vegetation communities.................................35
Local government............................................19
Fauna.................................................................36
Relationships with other agencies.................20
The habitat mosaic..........................................36
Biodiversity strategies of other councils......23
Sites of high environmental value.................37
A changing landscape......................................33
City of Tea Tree Gully – Biodiversity Strategy 2011–2015
3
Our biodiversity programs.......................... 45 Pest Plant and Disease Management...........45 Revegetation.....................................................45 Bushcare............................................................45 Planning.............................................................46 Native Vegetation Marker Scheme................46 Appendix A – List of strategies, agreements, Acts, policies and plans.............................. 48 International, national, state and regional strategies and agreements................48 Acts........................................................................ City of Tea Tree Gully policies and plans....48 City of Tea Tree Gully surveys and vegetation management plans........................49 Appendix B – The importance of habitat connectivity.................................... 50 Appendix C – The importance of remnant vegetation..................................... 52 Appendix D – The importance of pest plants, animal and disease control programs..................................................... 54 Appendix E – Vegetation communities in the City of Tea Tree Gully.......................... 55 References................................................... 57 Author: Sabine Koolen – Project Officer, Biodiversity Policy 4
City of Tea Tree Gully – Biodiversity Strategy 2011–2015
Mayor’s Message
The City of Tea Tree Gully is fortunate to have generous open spaces and natural features that support a wealth of plants and animals in living ecosystems. The Biodiversity Strategy 2011–2015, together with the City Master Plan 2011–2040 and Open Space Strategy 2011–2030, have identified biodiversity as a significant environmental goal – one that is vital to the emotional, spiritual and recreational health of our citizens. Biodiversity provides essential human benefits,
As we engage in the planning and development of our City it is vital that we all ‘do our bit’ to ensure that biodiversity is protected and improved to guarantee the health of our natural environment for present and future generations. The Biodiversity Strategy will strengthen existing proven initiatives by Council and the community to: • Protect environmentally valuable sites and the unique plants and animals that live there • Create wildlife corridors
such as clean air, clean water and the natural
• Control pest plants and animals
removal of waste and pollution. These benefits
• Investigate new ways of operating.
are irreplaceable once lost, and so we must
The Strategy will guide us into the future as we continue to create a sustainable living environment to benefit our whole community.
work together to nurture biodiversity within our ecosystems.
Miriam Smith Mayor
City of Tea Tree Gully – Biodiversity Strategy 2011–2015
1
Acknowledgements Gratitude is expressed to the External Reference Group who provided invaluable feedback during the development of this document. We would like to acknowledge, with thanks, the following people: • Mark Ellis, Manager, Bush for Life (Trees for Life) • Hannah Ellyard, Manager Natural Resources Management Planning, Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges NRM Board • Gayle Greiger, Senior Natural Resources Management Officer, Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges NRM Board • Kate Smith, Biodiversity Project Officer Coordinator, Department for Environment and Heritage • Wendy Stubbs, Manager, Biodiversity Conservation (Adelaide Region), Department for Environment and Heritage
2
City of Tea Tree Gully – Biodiversity Strategy 2011–2015
Executive summary Biodiversity is recognised by the City of Tea Tree Gully as an essential element in the creation and preservation of a healthy, beautiful and rich environment for our residents to live in. This understanding is reflected in the ‘Naturally Better’ motto of the City. The City of Tea Tree Gully is committed to protecting the biodiversity of plants, animals and ecological communities that have existed since before European settlement — as well as acting to restore biodiversity in a now changed and developed landscape. The City is fortunate in retaining large areas of open space, much of which is natural in character, including majestic trees and pockets of precious remnant vegetation. Preparation of this Biodiversity Strategy 2011–2015 has involved reviewing relevant policies, plans, strategies and records, input from Council staff and community groups and inviting feedback from a professional reference group representing certain external agencies: the Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges Natural Resources Management Board, the Department for Environment and Heritage (now Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) and Trees For Life. The Biodiversity Strategy will be updated every five years.
conservation in the City • a vision for the future including goals, strategic objectives and targets • a summary of international agreements, national and South Australian legislation, policy, plans and programs, regional plans, local government responsibilities and powers, relationships with other agencies and policies, strategies and plans of the City of Tea Tree Gully • an outline of the City of Tea Tree Gully’s biodiversity and history • a profile of Council’s biodiversity initiatives and programs. To realise the vision for biodiversity as set down in the City of Tea Tree Gully Strategic Plan 2011–2015 City Master Plan 2011–2040 and Open Space Strategy 2011–2030, the Biodiversity Strategy will aim to provide a framework to achieve the following: • identify a network of open spaces (based on ecological principles) with biodiversity value that will enable the movement and reproduction of wildlife, protect natural values and support the sustainability of natural systems
The Biodiversity Strategy 2011–2015 includes:
• offer a rationale which can influence other corporate plans and strategies that have the potential to affect biodiversity
• issues and opportunities for biodiversity
• improve ecosystem-related services City of Tea Tree Gully – Biodiversity Strategy 2011–2015
3
• conserve and manage sites of high environmental value as identified in the City Master Plan 2011–2040 to provide robust habitat for local native fauna and to provide an ongoing source of local provenance seed for the re-creation of resilient habitats
Biodiversity actions and recommendations in the Action Plan must contribute to realising one or more of the biodiversity objectives. The seven Biodiversity Strategic Objectives are as follows:
• continue and improve pest plant and animal programs that allow indigenous plant and animal communities to survive in the urban landscape as a part of functioning ecosystems
2. Conserve and manage remnant native vegetation.
• promote self-perpetuating education, awareness and engagement programs that allow staff and the community to have a stake in their own sustainable future • design communications, operations, systems and processes that support rather than undermine biodiversity goals. To assist in delivering the Biodiversity Strategy 2011–2015 a Biodiversity Action Plan 2011– 2015 has been created.
1. Recognise and enhance a mosaic of habitat linkages across the City.
3. Reduce pest plant and animal competition to enable self-sustaining indigenous plant and animal communities. 4. Educate, raise awareness and engage staff and the community in biodiversity issues and programs. 5. Improve communication, operations, systems and processes that affect biodiversity. 6. Consider and address climate change when undertaking biodiversity initiatives. 7. Improve knowledge of urban ecology and strive for continuous improvement.
Progress made in implementing the Biodiversity Action Plan will be regularly reported to Council.
Diuris pardina Leopard Orchid
4
City of Tea Tree Gully – Biodiversity Strategy 2011–2015
Introduction The City of Tea Tree Gully Biodiversity Strategy 2011–2015 is connected to and consistent with Council’s strategic planning framework. The Biodiversity Strategy 2011–2015 is included
Strategy
Strategic Plan
Strategies, policies and initiatives, incl. City Master Plan 2011-2040
Delivery
Action plans
Department business plans
The City of Tea Tree Gully Strategic Plan 2011–2015 comprises nine themes of which ‘Our environment’ is theme four. Strategic direction 4.3 states that council wishes to conserve, improve, maintain and protect areas of environmental value. One of the outcomes of this direction is to develop and implement a biodiversity strategy that seeks to improve habitat connectivity, protect remnant vegetation and progress the control of pest plants, animals and diseases. The Biodiversity Strategy will set the future management directions for the protection and enhancement of biodiversity within the City of Tea Tree Gully and help it to meet both its statutory obligations and community expectations.
What is biodiversity?
Internal work plans
Council strategic planning framework
in the ‘Strategies policies and initiatives’ level behind the City Master Plan 2011–2040 and Open Space Strategy 2011–2030, with the Biodiversity Action Plan providing for the delivery of the Biodiversity Strategy.
Biological diversity or biodiversity refers to the variety of all living organisms – the plants, animals, microorganisms, the genes they contain and the variety of ecological systems that are created with the interactions between species and the non-living components of the environment. Clear air, clean water and soil formation are some of the essential services provided by the ecological processes that these life forms contribute to. Biodiversity is thus a key to not only the sustainability of our environment but also to the wealth of our economy, the wellbeing and cultural identity of our community and the
City of Tea Tree Gully – Biodiversity Strategy 2011–2015
5
aesthetic quality of our landscape. As councils undertake activities on a daily basis that affect biodiversity, protecting biodiversity is one of our greatest responsibilities.
Why is biodiversity important?
wellbeing through the provision of ecosystem services. The careful consideration of natural processes in existing urban environments and new developments will also help to reduce the negative impacts of climate change and water shortages (18).
Biodiversity is important in both urban and regional settings. However, prior to the 1990s, conservation efforts or ecological studies in the urban landscape were considered pointless as it was thought to be non-viable habitat for fauna populations (3, 11, 20). More recently there is recognition that urban areas do provide a surprisingly diverse range of natural and artificial habitat niches and conditions that can support a wide diversity of fauna species (14, 5).
Experts currently recognise four categories of ecosystem services provided by biodiversity (13):
Even within an urban environment, a diversity of species brings resilience to natural systems and improves the ability of these systems to remove waste products or to purify water and air(18).
• cultural services, i.e. cultural, intellectual and spiritual inspiration, recreational experiences, scientific discovery.
• provisioning services, i.e. water, energy, food • regulating services, i.e. carbon sequestration and climate regulation, waste decomposition and detoxification, purification of water and air, pest and disease control • supporting services, i.e.. nutrient dispersal and cycling, seed dispersal
The Australian National University makes this statement on their website: A field of growing interest world wide, ‘urban biodiversity’ seeks to understand how biodiversity promotes and maintains landscape health and human
6
City of Tea Tree Gully – Biodiversity Strategy 2011–2015
‘The economy is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the environment.’ Successful author and businessman, Paul Hawkins
Why prepare a biodiversity strategy for the City of Tea Tree Gully? As land managers the City of Tea Tree Gully has an obligation to the local community as well as the broader community to protect and enhance the biodiversity of its environment for this and future generations. The Biodiversity Strategy 2011–2015 has been prepared to set the future management directions for the protection and enhancement of biodiversity within the City of Tea Tree Gully and to meet its statutory obligations and community expectations. In addition the strategy will guide staff in undertaking activities that will result in the best possible environmental outcomes based on well-researched urban ecology principles. The strategy is intended for use by biodiversity staff and all other disciplines in ensuring that practices and decisions not only preserve biodiversity but actively seek to enhance biodiversity in the City. Although the strategy focuses on Council’s actions to conserve and enhance biodiversity in the City of Tea Tree Gully, this task must also involve residents, developers, institutions, non-government organisations and government and private sector managers.
Loss of biodiversity was recognised in the first national State of the Environment Report (State of the Environment Advisory Council 1996) as Australia’s most important environmental problem. There are many international conventions and agreements relating to the protection of biodiversity, as well as Commonwealth and South Australian legislation and strategies including the 30-year plan for greater Adelaide. The endorsement of this strategy is essential if we are to fully embrace our ‘Naturally Better’ vision.
What does the Strategy aim to do? The Strategy aims to: • set clear and specific policy direction and guidance for the conservation of the City of Tea Tree Gully’s biodiversity • generate and promote a shared understanding and willingness to protect and improve biodiversity values in the City • establish a strategic framework to guide advocacy, research, planning, education and action for the protection of biodiversity • provide input regarding biodiversity into council plans and operations • enhance the integration of biodiversity into key policy, planning, education and management programs.
City of Tea Tree Gully – Biodiversity Strategy 2011–2015
7
Aboriginal history For over 40,000 years prior to European settlement, the Adelaide Plains was occupied by the Kaurna (pronounced ‘Gaa-nah’) people. The Kaurna ‘country’ stretched from Cape Jervis in the south to the Light River in the north and was edged by the Adelaide Hills in the east and the coast on the west; it is one of approximately 120 indigenous nations that occupied Australia. Little is known of the Kaurna and their lifestyle on the Adelaide Plains, but the area would
naturally have been used as a hunting and gathering route. Sadly, it only took thirty years following the arrival of the first European settlers in 1836 to decimate the Kaurna population, primarily through introduced diseases. In developing and implementing this Biodiversity Strategy we acknowledge the Kaurna people, the traditional custodians of this land.
Drosera sp. Sundew
8
City of Tea Tree Gully – Biodiversity Strategy 2011–2015
Issues and opportunities Issues Degradation processes and other problems threaten the biodiversity of the City of Tea Tree Gully. Some of these are outlined below. Environmental weeds are invasive plants that compete successfully with indigenous (local native) plant communities. Some of these are garden escapes while others were introduced with agricultural and horticultural practices, e.g. the European Olive. Infestations of some weed species, such as Coolatai Grass, can significantly increase the fire risk of open space while Western Cape Bridal Creeper and Chilean Needle Grass (currently in relatively low numbers with the potential for eradication) could potentially do serious environmental damage if not managed decisively. Emerging weed species are an ever-present threat that must be monitored and appropriate integrated responses must be taken to prevent widespread infestations, while inappropriate reserve maintenance methods and communications can cause the spread of weeds and disease as well as the degradation of habitat. There is continuing incremental loss of the very limited remnants of indigenous vegetation (particularly in our urban City), ranging from patches of native grasses to mature South Australian Blue Gum or ancient River Red Gums. This is occurring on both private and public land from causes such as clearing for redevelopment, lack of regeneration
to replace ageing plants, lack of community awareness of the value of indigenous vegetation and sometimes inappropriate open space management techniques. Remnant vegetation communities are often irreplaceable as revegetation can only be a simplified imitation of a previous complex natural community. Remnants are therefore vitally important to the ecological health of the City, an essential part of the ‘habitat mosaic’ and the source of local provenance propagation material for revegetation projects. However, remnant vegetation has not had the level of protection necessary to ensure its survival for future generations. Maintaining a diversity of local genetic material is essential to provide opportunities for adaptation in the face of increasing temperatures and a reduction in rainfall due to climate change. The introduction of plants sourced well beyond the City of Tea Tree Gully, or the introduction of new varieties or species that easily hybridise with local populations, have the potential to pollute the local populations and make them more vulnerable to urban pressures and climate change. A number of indigenous species are vulnerable to extinction within the City of Tea Tree Gully. More information is needed about the declining trends in their populations and the current threats to their survival.
City of Tea Tree Gully – Biodiversity Strategy 2011–2015
9
A depleted and fragmented landscape has resulted in isolated patches of vegetation that do not allow indigenous fauna to move and breed. Introduced animal species can be predators of native fauna, cause disturbance and compete with them for food, shelter or nesting places. These include domestic cats, foxes, rabbits, feral bees and birds like the Noisy Miner. Pollution of waterways from siltation, nutrients, organic material via stormwater runoff and inappropriate waterway maintenance degrades aquatic habitats in creeks and wetlands. Reducing the fire risk in urban reserves requires careful planning and management, and very good communication with biodiversity managers to ensure that indigenous vegetation communities are not unnecessarily damaged or degraded. Similarly in enhancing areas of biodiversity significance, careful consideration of the bushfire threat to our residents needs to be addressed.
Opportunities The City of Tea Tree Gully has a number of opportunities to protect and enhance biodiversity, including the following: • the City has significant areas of open space adjacent to the River Torrens, Cobbler Creek, Dry Creek and associated tributaries which are of primary importance as habitat corridors • reserves, private open space and individual 10
specimens of indigenous vegetation provide ‘stepping stones’ for fauna and have the potential to be connected to or extend wildlife corridors • there is potential for planting indigenous trees, shrubs and groundcover plants in streetscapes, residential gardens, school grounds etc. to create further habitat linkages and to widen existing wildlife corridors • there is scope to influence other council policies and strategies that are complementary to biodiversity management, e.g. open space or stormwater management • we already have powerful tools for biodiversity planning purposes; e.g. our Ecological Mapping Report • a well-established and passionate biodiversity team currently operates within the council • community and educational institutions have a strong interest in taking environmental action and improving their knowledge of urban ecology • within council reserves there are areas suitable for revegetation with indigenous species and for initiatives to improve wildlife habitat We have links with other agencies and municipal councils which are already involved in biodiversity conservation, and which we know are likely to collaborate in partnership programs.
City of Tea Tree Gully – Biodiversity Strategy 2011–2015
Vision for the future The overall goal of this Strategy is to protect and enhance biodiversity across the City of Tea Tree Gully, and to support local, regional, state, national and international biodiversity initiatives.
Biodiversity strategic objectives Outcome 4.3.1 of the City of Tea Tree Gully Strategic Plan 2011–2015 describes the development and implementation of a biodiversity strategy that seeks to improve habitat connectivity, protect remnant vegetation and progress the control of pest plants, animals and disease. Biodiversity strategic objectives 1, 2 and 3 below address these outcomes specifically. Strategic Objective 1. Recognise and enhance a mosaic of habitat linkages across the City.
Rationale Remnant vegetation and other open space retained within the development of the urban landscape has resulted in fragmented habitat isolated from other populations of plants and animals. Without the ability to link these fragmented habitats, populations of plants and animals are put at risk due to ineffective seed dispersal and restricted wildlife movement. For further explanation refer to Appendix B.
Outcomes An ecological mapping tool, updated every five years, using scientific criteria to recognise the most ecologically suitable habitat mosaic throughout the City. A well-managed mosaic of connected landscapes linking high-quality remnant vegetation with other types of vegetation and including a range of different habitats, such as riparian strips, linear bushland, streetscape vegetation, parks and suburban gardens. This will maximise the movement and/or breeding ability of flora and fauna. Extension and improvement of revegetation programs. Improved delivery of ecosystem services to the City.
City of Tea Tree Gully – Biodiversity Strategy 2011–2015
11
Strategic Objective 2. Conserve and manage remnant native vegetation.
Rationale Remnant vegetation provides habitat for wildlife and supports a greater diversity of native fauna than other open space within the urban landscape. Existing remnant vegetation is our natural heritage and represents what the landscape of the urban and semi-rural Tea Tree Gully would have looked like prior to European settlement. It gives us some indication of the diversity and beauty of that landscape and a blueprint on which to model revegetation projects.
Outcomes Extension and improvement of Bushcare programs. Robust habitat for local native fauna. Retention and enhancement of accessible natural bushland that everyone can enjoy and learn from. Ongoing source of local provenance seed for the recreation of resilient habitats. Improved delivery of ecosystem services.
Conserving remnant vegetation allows us to maintain genetic material unique to the City of Tea Tree Gully. This is essential if we are to adapt to more extreme weather conditions due to climate change. For further explanation refer to Appendix C. CTTG Strategic Plan 2011– 2015 direction 4.3.
Outcome 4.3.2 Conserve and manage sites of Conserve, improve, maintain and high environmental value, as identified in the City Master Plan protect areas of environmental 2011–2040 value. 12
City of Tea Tree Gully – Biodiversity Strategy 2011–2015
Strategic Objective 3. Reduce pest plant and animal competition to enable self-sustaining indigenous plant and animal communities.
Rationale Weeds can harbour pests and disease, displace native plant species, create fuel loads for fire and disrupt waterways. Weeds therefore affect the structure and function of ecosystems, and impact negatively on indigenous fauna and flora.
Outcomes Continuation and enhancement of pest plant and animal control programs. Indigenous plant and animal communities that are better able to persist in the urban landscape as part of functioning ecosystems.
Pest animals compete with native Improved delivery of ecosystem fauna for food and shelter and in services to the city. some instances predate on other animals, affecting the ability of fauna to persist in the landscape.
4. Educate, raise awareness, and engage staff and the community in biodiversity issues and programs.
For further explanation refer to Appendix D. Through education and engagement people are better able to understand the importance of biodiversity and ways in which they can influence the health of our environment.
Self-perpetuating education and engagement programs that allow staff and the community to have a stake in their sustainable future.
City of Tea Tree Gully – Biodiversity Strategy 2011–2015
13
Strategic Objective
Rationale CTTG Strategic Plan 2011– 2015 Direction 4.1 Inform and educate our community regarding environmental issues.
Outcomes Outcome 4.1.1 Inform our community about environmental issues and initiatives, including sustainable water and energy use, biodiversity, the use of indigenous vegetation, and waste management. Outcome 4.1.2 Develop interpretive signage and other educational tools at key environmental sites in the city.
5. Improve communication, operations, systems and processes within the municipality that affect biodiversity.
14
History has shown that lack of communication between and within departments has caused damage to biodiversity. Poor, non-existent or inappropriate operations, systems and processes have at times resulted in damage to biodiversity values.
City of Tea Tree Gully – Biodiversity Strategy 2011–2015
Outcome 4.1.3 Explore partnerships with schools and the Department of Education and Children’s Services to promote awareness of environmental issues. Communication, operations, systems and processes that support biodiversity, rather than having the potential for harm.
Strategic Objective 6. Consider and address climate change when undertaking biodiversity initiatives.
Rationale Climate change has the potential to cause serious damage to biodiversity both directly (e.g. inability of plants to buffer extremes of temperature) and indirectly (e.g. emerging pest plants).
Outcomes Robust habitats able to withstand changes to the climate. Habitats that are created and maintained using minimal energy and chemical inputs.
In order to protect biodiversity we should not be using unnecessary energy which in turn causes excessive carbon emissions. CTTG Strategic Plan 2011– 2015 Direction 4.2
7. Improve knowledge of urban ecology and strive for continual improvement.
Adopt adaptation and mitigation measures as a response to climate change. Urban ecology is a relatively new field, placing local government in an ideal position to be at the forefront of developing knowledge and innovative approaches in biodiversity conservation and the maintenance and improvement of ecosystem services.
Partnerships with universities and organisations. Improvements using industry best practice and our own experience.
City of Tea Tree Gully – Biodiversity Strategy 2011–2015
15
Policy context The importance of conserving local, native (indigenous) flora, fauna and their habitats has been recognised in international agreements and legislation at Commonwealth and state levels; it is reflected in a variety of strategies and programs at all levels of government. In addition, a number of non-government organisations have developed biodiversity programs. Biodiversity conservation in the City of Tea Tree Gully should recognise and support these initiatives and work within the strategic frameworks already established. Policies of particular relevance to the City of Tea Tree Gully are highlighted below.
International agreements Australia is a signatory to the International Convention on Biological Diversity (1992), which aims to halt the global loss of biodiversity and ensure its sustainable use. The convention has three major goals: 1. Conservation of biodiversity 2. Sustainable use of its components 3. Fair and equitable sharing of benefits arising from genetic resources The habitats of birds that migrate annually between Australia and Japan or China are protected under the Japan–Australia Migratory Bird Agreement (1974) and the China–Australia Migratory Bird Agreement (1986).
National legislation, policies and programs The Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) establishes processes for listing and protecting threatened species and requires the assessment and approval of any proposed action that is likely to have a significant impact on any matter of national environmental significance, such as threatened species or migratory birds protected under international agreements. Australia’s Biodiversity Conservation Strategy 2010–2030 builds on the 1996 strategy on international commitments, including the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity, and on national, state and territory policies developed since then. The vision of the strategy is that Australia’s biodiversity should be healthy, resilient to climate change and valued for its essential contribution to our existence. In 1998 the National General Assembly of Local Government adopted the National Local Government Biodiversity Strategy. The strategy assists local government in being a key partner in biodiversity conservation and encourages commitment to, and the development of, biodiversity policies by councils. The strategy’s central aim is for biodiversity management to be a core function of local governments, subject to adequate funding and resources. The federal, state and territory governments
16
City of Tea Tree Gully – Biodiversity Strategy 2011–2015
all made commitments in 1997, through the Natural Heritage Trust, to reversing the longterm decline in the quality and extent of Australia’s native vegetation. In addition, the National Framework for the Management and Monitoring of Australia’s Native Vegetation (1999) notes the important role of local government. In July 2008 the Natural Heritage Trust and various other programs such as the National Landcare Program were replaced with the Caring for the Country Program. The Australian State of the Environment Report 2001 recommends 65 environmental indicators for biodiversity at the national level. They relate to pressures on biodiversity, condition of biodiversity and responses to loss of or perceived threats to biodiversity. The 2011 report is currently under development. The document Climate Change Adaptation Actions for Local Government, created by the national Department of Climate Change and Energy highlights areas of local government responsibility that climate change is likely to affect and suggests actions to mitigate potential risks. The document lists the following risks to biodiversity: • shifts in distributions of plant and animal species • increased risk of population and species extinctions • reduced ecosystem resilience to stress
• increased ecosystem and species heat stress • increased pressure on dunal systems • changes to mangrove habitats due to salt water intrusion • increases in ecological disturbances.
South Australian Government legislation, policies and plans The 30-year Plan for Greater Adelaide is a long term vision for the future of Adelaide. The protection and enhancement of the city’s natural values in a time of population growth will be a considerable challenge. Of the 15 principles, principles 12 and 13 give consideration to environmental protection and resources management. Principle 12: Environmental protection, restoration and enhancement Protect environmentally significant lands, waterways and marine areas for existing residents and future generations; and to allow native plants and animals to survive, thrive and adapt to climate change. Planning controls protect vital environmental assets through unambiguous mapping and designation of key assets. Principle 13: Natural resources management Maintain and improve the health of natural resources by: • ensuring land is appropriately zoned and sustainably used for current and future
City of Tea Tree Gully – Biodiversity Strategy 2011–2015
17
generations • planning to minimise adverse impacts and avoid irreversible damage • considering biodiversity and ecological integrity in land use decisions. ‘Biodiversity’ is the title of one of the five chapters of the ‘Attaining Sustainability’ objective of South Australia’s Strategic Plan 2011. The state government recognises that biodiversity provides us with the resources we need to live and so must be protected. In response to achieving targets in South Australia’s Strategic Plan, the report No Species Loss — A Biodiversity Strategy for South Australia 2006–2016 was prepared. No Species Loss presents a set of high-level goals, objectives and targets for communities and land managers at both the local and regional levels. The priority targets have relevance to and inform the planning strategy for South Australia and the state National Resources Management Plan (NRM Plan). The State Natural Resources Management Plan (NRM Plan) is a key component of integrated natural resources management arrangements set down in the Natural Resources Management Act 2004 (NRM Act). The NRM Act promotes sustainable and integrated protection and management of the state’s natural resources. Following on from this, the vision of the NRM Plan is to create a ‘capable and prosperous community, 18
managing natural resources for a good quality of life within the capacity of our environment for the long term.’ The plan guides all activities of government agencies, regional NRM boards, local government, community and industry partners, resulting in a more integrated approach to natural resources management. The Native Vegetation Act 1991 provides incentives and assistance to landowners to preserve and enhance native vegetation and to control the clearance of native vegetation amongst other goals. Provisions of this Act apply outside the urban part of the City of Tea Tree Gully, encompassing the Hills Face Zone and other semi-rural areas. Heritage agreements, which provide for the permanent protection of native vegetation of conservation value on private (or council) lands are also provided for under the Act. The Heritage Agreement Scheme is currently administered by the Department for Environment and Natural Resources on behalf of the Native Vegetation Council. The Native Vegetation Council administers the Act and assesses native vegetation clearance applications. The draft climate change adaptation framework for South Australia recognises the importance of biodiversity to the prosperity of the state and understands the need to manage major threats to biodiversity, many of which are likely to worsen with climate change. Strategy 3.1 of Objective 3 is to increase the resilience of South Australia’s terrestrial, aquatic and marine
City of Tea Tree Gully – Biodiversity Strategy 2011–2015
biodiversity. The following approaches and opportunities are suggested: • rehabilitate previously cleared or degraded natural systems if current land uses become unviable • adopt bio-sequestration • manage and restore key ecological assets • Create greater connectivity between fragmented habitats to enable species to adapt to changing conditions • use environmental water strategically to build resilience • develop ecosystem services through marketbased instruments; such as combining biosequestration with other eco-markets to make environmental plantings financially viable.
Regional plans South Australia is divided into eight natural resource management regions, each of which is managed by a board that develops a natural resources management plan for that region. These regional NRM plans set out details of activities that will be carried out in each region and identify funding sources. Regional NRM activities are funded by state and federal governments, regional NRM levies and through partner contributions to joint projects. The City of Tea Tree Gully is located within the Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges NRM region.
The Regional Environmental Plan 2008–2013 is a guiding framework to address environmental issues of regional importance. The plan was developed by the Eastern Region Alliance (ERA), comprising the Cities of Burnside, Campbelltown, Norwood Payneham & St Peters, Prospect, Tea Tree Gully, Unley and the Town of Walkerville. The plan identifies a range of opportunities for collaboration on cross-boundary environmental issues. The ‘conservation and enhancement of local biodiversity’ is listed as one of the six directions considered to be of priority to the ERA. The ERA have also partnered with the Department of Planning and Local Government to prepare a management plan for the eastern section of the River Torrens Linear Park. This River Torrens Linear Park Management Plan – Eastern Section is currently in draft form. The Plan addresses safety and risk management, recreational needs, cultural values, managing development and maximising environmental performances, focusing on biodiversity and stormwater management.
Local government Local government has a number of core functions that have a direct impact on native vegetation and biodiversity, including land use planning, granting development approvals, including significant tree controls, managing land in its ownership or under its care and
City of Tea Tree Gully – Biodiversity Strategy 2011–2015
19
control, and managing environmental risks. Local government leads by its action, and is also able to facilitate community involvement, establish local laws, operate grants and incentive programs, and provide financial and administrative support to encourage biodiversity conservation. Relevant legislation includes the Local Government Act 1999 and the Development Act 1993 and associated significant tree controls. In 1998 the National General Assembly of Local Government adopted the National Local Government Biodiversity Strategy. The strategy assists local government by being a key partner in biodiversity conservation and encourages the development of, and commitment to, council biodiversity policies. The strategy’s central aim is for biodiversity management to be a core function of local governments, subject to adequate funding and resources. The National Local Government Biodiversity Strategy encourages councils to do the following: • regulate land use • influence community behaviour by implementing biodiversity-friendly regulations and planning provisions • promote and demonstrate environmentally, ecologically and socially responsible behaviour • offer community education programs and 20
staff training • provide incentives for sustainable natural resource management on private land.
Relationships with other agencies State Government The Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges Natural Resources Management Board has provided grant funding to assist in the control of declared plants in the City of Tea Tree Gully, and regular liaison with NRM officers has assisted in appropriate control measures for pest plants and animals. In addition the City of Tea Tree Gully hosts a part time Regional Authorised Officer to administer the Natural Resources Management Act 2004 within the City of Tea Tree Gully. This role involves providing initial compliance and technical advice to landholders on declared pest plants and animals. Local government is vital to the successful delivery of many of the board’s programs. The Urban Forests Biodiversity Program and the Million Trees Program were established to conserve biodiversity across metropolitan Adelaide and to promote the restoration of vital habitat. These programs have provided numerous grants to the City of Tea Tree Gully for revegetation and for the preparation of vegetation management plans. This involvement has assisted the State Government in achieving its target of creating five well-established biodiversity corridors by 2010.
City of Tea Tree Gully – Biodiversity Strategy 2011–2015
The Department for Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) manages three conservation parks — Cobbler Creek Recreation Park, Anstey Hill Recreation Park and Angove Conservation Park — that are either entirely or partially located within the City of Tea Tree Gully. The City and the department have collaborated closely to manage cross-boundary issues, such as pest animal and plant issues, fire management, vandalism and other damaging activities. The Council has representation on the Cobbler Creek Stakeholder Management Group that meets quarterly to discuss the management of Cobbler Creek Recreation Park. Although focused on the recreation park, some members of the Friends of Cobbler Creek have assisted with revegetation, weed management and furniture construction activities in Cobbler Creek West Reserve.
works using minimal disturbance methods. Bush For Life trains, supports and equips volunteers from the community to undertake regular careful bush regeneration works on 20 sites of conservation significance within the City of Tea Tree Gully.
The Sustainable Landscapes Project is a private/ public partnership based at the Adelaide Botanic Gardens. The program aims to promote sustainability of landscape practice. While not specifically aimed at conserving biodiversity, the methods being researched will have a positive benefit for biodiversity.
The Friends of Angove Conservation Park contribute to the management of the park by maintaining walking trails and fire breaks, conducting weed control projects and educating the public about the park.
Non-government organisations Trees For Life has had an ongoing partnership with the City of Tea Tree Gully for more then 10 years through the Bush For Life program to undertake regular careful bush regeneration
The University of Adelaide has recently completed research on Phytophthora cinnamomi (or die-back) to better understand the underlying mechanisms to improve the management of this disease. A very similar plant disease Phytophthora citricola exists in a number of reserves within City of Tea Tree Gully. The city contributed $4000 for three years as partners in this project with other councils and agencies. The outcomes of this research will help the city to better manage these plant diseases. Community groups
The Friends of Anstey Hill was formed after a public meeting was called to object to a developer’s proposed plans which included the installation of chairlifts and a caravan park. The Friends Group currently has approximately 30 financial members and has propagated and planted native trees and shrubs within the Anstey Hill Conservation Park for 15 years.
City of Tea Tree Gully – Biodiversity Strategy 2011–2015
21
The annual program includes propagation and planting days as well as a mid-week working group that focuses on weed control. For more information go to members.ozemail.com. au/~davelane/. The Friends of Cobbler Creek (FOCC) formed twenty years ago to help the National Parks and Wildlife Service look after Cobbler Creek Recreation Park. FOCC is a small group of enthusiastic and dedicated local residents who care passionately about the park and the surrounding creek environment. They work closely with park rangers and the local councils to maintain the area for the local community. The park has a number of picnic areas and a series of walking trails which provide an opportunity for some relaxing suburban recreation but in a natural environment. The Friends are both a social and conservation group of volunteers who help maintain the character and quality of the park. Tea Tree Gully and Salisbury Councils have also been actively promoting improved management of the natural environment in the general area. There has been extensive woody weed eradication and control together with planting of native seedlings by local school children and a variety of community groups. FOCC participates actively in these activities and an excellent spirit of cooperation exists between the group and council staff. For further
22
details visit the website at: http://www. communitywebs.org/FriendsofParks/. The Friends of Kingfisher Wetlands is a community group active in the enhancement and maintenance of a catchment creek in Dry Creek Reserve just south of the Kingfisher Wetland. The group’s members are very experienced in bush care and regeneration with close links to the Friends of Dry Creek. The Action Plan for the Friends of Kingfisher directs the planning and on-ground activities undertaken by the group. In addition to the above groups, several service groups and schools have been involved with various biodiversity initiatives over the past decade or more. Local government Local government environment officers in the eastern region as part of the Eastern Region Alliance (ERA) have developed an Eastern Region Environment Plan that will be applied across local governments in the eastern region, including by the City of Tea Tree Gully. Opportunity exists for the strengthening of relationships with adjacent councils, including Adelaide Hills Council and the Cities of Playford, Salisbury, Port Adelaide Enfield and Campbelltown. Recent cross-border weed management has occurred with some of these councils.
City of Tea Tree Gully – Biodiversity Strategy 2011–2015
Biodiversity strategies of other councils
• City of Norwood, Payneham and St Peters Biodiversity Strategy 2006–2016
Councils across Australia are increasingly seeing the need for a biodiversity strategy or similar document. Such strategies can range from fairly broad statements to detailed studies.
• City of Burnside Biodiversity Strategy — Nature Conservation in an urbanised landscape
Councils with a biodiversity strategy or similar document in South Australia include:
• City of Port Adelaide Enfield Biodiversity Management Plan 2009–2014.
• City of Onkaparinga Native Vegetation Strategy 2010–2014
Clematis microphylla Old Man’s Beard
City of Tea Tree Gully – Biodiversity Strategy 2011–2015
23
Our policies and plans City of Tea Tree Gully Development Plan Development plans are the key on-the-ground development assessment documents in South Australia. They contain the rules that set out what can be done on any piece of land in the state and the detailed criteria against which development applications will be assessed. Development plans cover distinct and separate geographic areas of the state. There is a separate development plan for each one of the 68 local council areas, plus a handful of others that cover areas not situated within local government boundaries. Development plans outline what sort of developments and land use are thought suitable for particular zones (e.g. residential, commercial, industrial), as well as laying out various objectives, principles and policies that affect and control other aspects of proposed developments. Provisions within the City of Tea Tree Gully Development Plan have the potential to both protect and damage biodiversity of the City. Future amendments to the Development Plan will create opportunities to advance the vision of the Biodiversity Strategy 2011–2015.
24
City of Tea Tree Gully – Biodiversity Strategy 2011–2015
Strategic Plan 2011–2015 The Strategic Plan 2011–2015 incorporates nine themes: our buildings and infrastructure, our local economy, our housing and living, our environment, our transport networks, our population, our leadership, our community and our leisure, play and arts. Importantly, it recognises that many of the strategic directions in the plan have implications that affect more than one theme and should not be approached in isolation. The following strategic directions and intended outcomes of the Our Environment theme have particular relevance to biodiversity conservation and management. Strategic direction (5–30 years) 4.1 Inform and educate our community regarding environmental issues.
Outcomes (1–5 years) 4.1.1 Inform our community about environmental issues and initiatives, including sustainable water and energy use, biodiversity, the use of indigenous vegetation, and waste management, through a range of communication tools. 4.1.2 Develop interpretive signage and other educational tools at key environmental sites in the City.
4.3 Conserve, improve, maintain and protect areas of environmental value.
4.1.3 Explore partnerships with schools and the Department of Education and Children’s Services to promote awareness of environmental issues. 4.3.1 Develop and implement a biodiversity strategy that seeks to improve habitat connectivity, protect remnant vegetation and speed up the control of pest plants, animals and diseases. 4.3.2 Conserve and manage sites of high environmental value, as identified in the City Master Plan 2011–2040.
City of Tea Tree Gully – Biodiversity Strategy 2011–2015
25
City Master Plan 2011–2040 The City Master Plan 2011–2040 provides a vision for the future of the City of Tea Tree Gully over the next 30 years. In June and July 2010 Council initiated a project called create 20forty to gather community and stakeholder views on the future of the City. The City Master Plan 2011–2040 and Strategic Plan 2011–2015 will collectively guide the provision, location, design and development of housing, infrastructure, the environment, transport, the economy and connected services. The Plan identifies sites of high environmental value including reserves supporting remnant vegetation and open space corridors. These sites are a priority for biodiversity asset management.
Open Space Strategy 2011–2030 The City of Tea Tree Gully Open Space Strategy 2010–2030 is a strategic document that will guide the provision, development and management of open space across the City over the next 20 years, emphasising recreation, culture, landscape amenity, biodiversity and sustainability. The strategy responds to the needs of the community and highlights the opportunities and priorities for enhancing and managing open space. Five Open Space Themes or topics have been identified for the City of Tea Tree Gully Open Space Strategy 2010 – 2030. The potential to strengthen and enhance the quality, value and sustainability of the environment, biodiversity and landscapes through various ‘green initiatives’ is the focus for theme 4 ‘Sustainable Environment’. Theme 4 states that the natural environment and biodiversity are high priorities for the City of Tea Tree Gully and notes that the City is well-endowed with natural areas that require strategic management.
26
City of Tea Tree Gully – Biodiversity Strategy 2011–2015
Theme 4.1 Quality natural environment
Strategy Enhance the quality and biodiversity of the natural environment within the open space network, including the management of creek lines, woodlands, Hills Face and habitat ‘hot spots’ to create a robust mosaic of natural landscapes (in accordance with Council’s Ecological Mapping).
Rationale It is difficult to appropriately manage the large amount of natural area in the City of Tea Tree Gully. As a result there are significant issues relating to weeds, overgrown vegetation, creating and maintaining habitat for wildlife and vegetation suitability. A response to addressing these issues is required. Council is committed to enhancing biodiversity through its Biodiversity planning and Ecological mapping.
Of the six strategies contained within theme 4, the above strategy is considered to be the most urgent. The rationale for this prioritisation is that the City has a large amount of natural bushland that defines its unique character. However, some recreation open spaces are in poor condition with weed infestation and declining habitat quality. Council has identified biodiversity as a priority through its Biodiversity planning and Ecological mapping and opportunities to enhance natural areas should be pursued accordingly.
Strategic Bushfire Management Plan The intent of the City of Tea Tree Gully Strategic Bushfire Management Plan (2010) is to protect life and reduce the impact of bushfires. An audit of current factors that would contribute to the severity of bushfire, together with other relevant management plans and documentation, has enabled the level of risk across the City to be closely assessed. Ways of mitigating this risk were then identified and recommendations were made regarding changes to priorities, resourcing and goals. Significant changes to the management of open spaces in higher risk areas were included in the strategies. A collaborative approach is essential to ensure that biodiversity values are not unduly compromised in following these strategies. City of Tea Tree Gully – Biodiversity Strategy 2011–2015
27
Community Land Management Plans The Local Government Act 1999 requires Council to develop management plans for all community land either council-owned or under its care and control. These plans show the way in which the land is to be used, taking into account a diverse range of issues such as recreation or conservation. Management plans allow the identification of environmental value for any piece of land; this then leads to protection and appropriate management.
Environmental Policy The City of Tea Tree Gully’s Environmental Policy, adopted in August 2008 outlines a number of environmental policy principles. The Biodiversity Strategy 2011–2015 will fulfil all principles as follows: Leadership / Procedures / Continual Improvement — Develop and improve upon existing services that protect and enhance biodiversity by following best practice guidelines, scientific studies and adhering to regulatory requirements to ensure the most suitable and cost-effective environmental outcomes. Communication / Employees, Volunteers and Contractors — Recommend opportunities to raise the awareness of biodiversity philosophy, objectives, targets and issues to staff and the 28
community, provide training where necessary and give regular updates and reports on achieving actions in the Strategy. Resource efficiency / Pollution Prevention — Develop and improve on existing techniques and processes when carrying out biodiversity-related activities to ensure sustainable use of resources and minimise pollution. Sustainable Development / Sustainable Built form — Promote sustainable development options to minimise impact on the local and natural environment.
Ecological mapping of the City of Tea Tree Gully Ecology is the scientific study of the relationship between living organisms and the environment. The Ecological Mapping tool can assess the landscapes of the City against various environmental criteria developed through scientific research. These criteria test and consider what organisms need to survive and reproduce in what is an increasingly modified landscape. In this way the tool enables us to include the ecological value of open space in making planning and development decisions. This approach to decision making might include: • prioritising ecological restoration efforts such as weed control, revegetation and remnant vegetation protection • contributing to the strategic planning and
City of Tea Tree Gully – Biodiversity Strategy 2011–2015
reporting processes of the City • influencing revisions of the Development Plan from an ecological perspective. While ecological planning principles are well developed for application in rural landscapes, they are less often applied to urban areas, both in Australia and internationally. The Ecological Mapping tool is a welcome and unique initiative that has given strategic direction and strength to the City’s Biodiversity Strategy 2011–2015.
Pest Plant Management in Creeks and Waterways Policy The purpose of this policy is to state Council’s position regarding pest plant management in creek lines and waterways. The existence of this policy ensures the effective monitoring and control of pest plants in creeks and waterways within the City of Tea Tree Gully.
The policy states that Council will monitor and control pest plants (including declared pest plants and plants that are potentially environmental weeds) along creek lines and waterways in order to meet our natural resources management obligations under the State Natural Resources Management Plan, Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges Natural Resources Management Plan and State Biodiversity Strategy. A Targeted Pest Plants Species List is included in this policy. This list is used as the basis for deciding which species are programmed for control within the City’s creeks and waterways. The list includes declared plants, weeds of national significance and other problem pest plants in the area. The list is constantly revised as new species become problematic or as other listed species are found to be less of an issue than first thought.
City of Tea Tree Gully – Biodiversity Strategy 2011–2015
29
Upper Cobbler Creek Corridor Action Plan This action plan provides a vision as well as a set of strategic directions and associated actions to better manage the Cobbler Creek corridor as an important recreational and environmental asset. The plan covers the efficient use of resources, equity of access, protection of environmental assets and improvement of recreational and leisure uses. A number of priority projects are mentioned in the plan. Of particular relevance to biodiversity is the continuing implementation of measures to control pest plants and revegetate with local indigenous species.
Vegetation management plans and surveys Since the year 2000 several vegetation management plans have been created by the Biodiversity team within Council for reserves of natural character. These plans have been important in guiding protection and enhancement activities on these reserves; they have helped in the development of scoping studies when contractors are hired to undertake revegetation and weed control and have supported funding applications for on-ground projects. These plans identify existing ecological values on the site including: vegetation associations or plant species present, including those of conservation significance; identification 30
of fauna present; analysis of present problem issues, e.g. pest plants and animals or damage occurring from activities such as trail bikes. The plans also suggest recommendations for action, including revegetation where appropriate. These plans are essential tools in maintaining the integrity of these reserves and to counteract the many pressures that urban reserves experience. Other pressures, such as climate change, can also be addressed with the development of vegetation management plans as proposed by the Climate Change Adaptation Actions for Local Government document. This document suggests that ecological succession can be adversely affected by climate change and that this threat could be addressed by: • developing a Local Biodiversity Plan as a component of the Local Planning Strategy and Town Planning Scheme • implementing conservation management plans for local reserves and other councilowned land • encouraging conservation of privately-owned land, e.g. through incentives. A comprehensive flora survey of reserves with significant biodiversity value was undertaken in 2003. This invaluable document has led to better management of these reserves. Refer to Appendix A for a complete list of relevant management plans and surveys.
City of Tea Tree Gully – Biodiversity Strategy 2011–2015
Historical policy In 1995 an ecological advisory committee was established with representation from the local community. This committee was established in response to Local Agenda 21 (LA21) along with committees for infrastructure and cultural and economic development. LA21 was created at the 1992 Rio Earth Summit. This summit was a gathering of 150 heads of state from throughout the world that considered ways of addressing global environmental problems, including global warming, loss of biodiversity and salinisation. Agenda 21 outlined what national, regional and local governments could do to address these problems and promote ecologically sustainable development (ESD). The committee and its objectives were endorsed by Council. The initial role of the committee was to prepare a policy for ecology; this was divided into nine sections of which one was ‘the conservation, maintenance and enhancement of the biological diversity of flora within the City’. The proposed outcomes were both
broad and specific although the policy stopped short of spelling out the means to achieve them. It appears that this ecology policy never progressed past the draft stage due to the disbanding of the committee. In the early 2000s the Environmental Officer at the time prepared a Draft Local Biodiversity Action Plan. The document was divided into both short and long-term outcomes with a list of recommended actions. This document has provided some useful guidance for the development of the Biodiversity Strategy 2011–2015 although the outcomes and in many cases the actions are broad in nature and require a further level of detail to make the plan useful to practitioners on a day-to-day basis. Further background information is also required to align the recommendations with the current ecological health status of the landscape, and other biodiversity-related initiatives. Other departments, such as ‘Parks Assets’, were not consulted or asked to comment on the plan and it was not endorsed by Council.
City of Tea Tree Gully – Biodiversity Strategy 2011–2015
31
City of Tea Tree Gully profile The City of Tea Tree Gully is located between nine and 25 kilometres northeast of the Adelaide GPO. The City is bounded by the City of Playford to the north, the Adelaide Hills Council to the east, the City of Campbelltown to the south and the Cities of Port Adelaide Enfield and Salisbury to the west. Of the 95 square kilometres that make up the City, 60% of the area is residential with the remaining 40% being private rural holdings, extractive industries, and National Parks and Wildlife land. The suburban setting stops abruptly at the Hills Face Zone. Today, the City of Tea Tree Gully is an established residential area with a population of over 100,000.
Open space The City is fortunate in having approximately 800 hectares of open space located within its urban landscape. Although substantial in comparison to some other councils, this open space still only equates to 14% of the total urban area, with approximately 7% retaining a natural character. A further 3,820 hectares of open space within the City is rural and under private management or under the care of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources. Surface water drains into the Little Para catchment in the north, Cobbler, Slate and Dry Creeks in the central area and the Torrens River in the south. The Torrens River forms the 32
City’s southern boundary. The Hope Valley and part of the Little Para reservoirs are situated within the council boundary. Few watercourses have been modified into drains, although numerous sections of watercourse traverse urban backyards. Fortunately, watercourses in more recently developed suburbs have been retained in the Council’s network of reserves. The reserves associated with watercourses are particularly important in providing relatively large blocks of open space for recreation and to act as wildlife corridors. The City of Tea Tree Gully manages around 40 reserves for conservation and revegetation, as well as several sections of roadside with areas of remnant native vegetation.
Geology The following information was taken from The Geological and Historical Background in Report of the Tea Tree Gully Flora and Fauna Study Group, by M. Sharrad and F. Hall, The City of Tea Tree Gully, 1977.
The City of Tea Tree Gully comprises four main geological areas: the undulating flat lands which lead to the Adelaide Plains; the Eden Block, along which runs the Eden and Burnside Faults; the Para Block with its fault line, and the Hills district. The Eden Block, 330m above sea level, is the main catchment area for most of the surface water that runs down into the Adelaide Plains; it has many short escarpment gullies that direct
City of Tea Tree Gully – Biodiversity Strategy 2011–2015
the runoff from the hills and is also the source of much of the material found in the outwash aprons in the district. The Eden Block contains all rock types, including slate, limestone, dolomite, sandstone and quartzite and is therefore an important centre of quarrying activities. The Burnside Fault Block is probably a splinter fault hinged to the Eden Fault. It seems to become lost in the recent and tertiary sands of the foothills north of Highbury. The northern and western boundaries of the City lie along the Para Fault, which rises to about 150 m in places near the Little Para River gorge. The clays and sands of Golden Grove have resulted from the outwash off the fault block due to its general eastward tilting. These deposits extend across to Hope Valley — hence the existence of old clay mines in the Ridgehaven and St Agnes area. Open-cut mining continues in the Golden Grove area. The flat lands are really outwash aprons of sloping land that link the ranges to the plains. They consist mainly of clays, sands, gravels and boulders, resulting from outwash from the hills. The soil is ideal for cultivation of vines and fruits and was formerly used for this purpose along with mixed farming. The creeks that wind through this zone have deposited considerable quantities of alluvium along their valleys, providing an ideal environment for the many magnificent eucalypts that still remain.
The soils that cover these areas are varied and therefore it is to be expected that the remaining vegetation will vary. Higher rainfall associated with elevation will also affect vegetation composition.
A changing landscape European settlement dates from the late 1830s, with land used mainly for orcharding, cropping, farming and vineyards. A number of small townships developed, including Tea Tree Gully, Hope Valley and Modbury. The district of Highercombe, now known as the City of Tea Tree Gully was proclaimed in 1853. Primary activity was farming including growing wheat, barley, potatoes, cattle and pigs. Later, vineyards and orchards were developed (1). In 1855 a census revealed approximately 1,440 people resided in the District. In 1954 the population had only increased to 2,561. The district was still basically rural with the original townships of Tea Tree Gully, Houghton, Inglewood and Highercombe clearly identifiable and geographically remote from each other by horticulture and farmland (1). In the 1960s residential development exploded, with the southern half of the City established by the late 1970s, including Banksia Park, Tea Tree Gully and Modbury. Modbury changed very little during the first half of the twentieth century — in 1957 there were only 62 houses in the area(1). The development of Wynn Vale
City of Tea Tree Gully – Biodiversity Strategy 2011–2015
33
followed during the 1980s and 90s. A study in 1962 predicted a housing boom in the Golden Grove area. In 1973 the South Australian Land Commission began to acquire land for housing and in 1983 the developer Delfin was selected to work with the South Australian Urban Land Trust to develop the area. The last allotment was sold in 2002. Early descriptions of the landscape of the City of Tea Tree Gully are rare but those descriptions that are documented give a very picturesque view of the area, highlighting both its natural and cultivated assets. In 1906 Mr G. Holden, son of William Holden who settled and named Hope Valley, wrote the following: The early settlers used to mow the long grasses — kangaroo, spear, barley, and silver grass — for hay. The district was covered with forests of giant gums, sheoak and wattles and from Teatree Gully — so named because of the dense growth of native tea tree all along the course of the creek there — on to the River Torrens, there were thousands of yuccas or grass trees. Birds were very numerous, and it was a common thing to see a dozen wild turkeys, great fellows 20 pounds in weight, marching along. Cocakatoos were in thousands, and blue mountain grass, cockatoo shell, rosella, and other beautiful parrots, parakeets, quail, laughing jackasses and many other native birds were so plentiful. The flora and fauna were magnificent (25, 26). 34
Early settlers were quick to establish market gardens on the fertile flats of the River Torrens. The River Torrens was originally named ‘Karrawirraparri’ (karra = red gum; wirra = wood or forest; parri = forest. River of the Red Gum Forest (1). One settler who had settled on a section of the River Torrens remarked, ‘Cattle fattened rapidly upon the rich, succulent and nutritious grasses that there abounded’. Another account reads: The River Torrens was covered in the bed of the stream with a thick, close and beautiful growth of tea-tree with a great variety of aromatic flowers and shrubs which delighted us who had been so long at sea (1). Even the so-called ‘Bald Hills’ area beyond Golden Grove supported Kangaroo Grass that grew so high the cattle were hidden and the dairy yield of the herd was substantial (1). In its upper sections Dry Creek had many permanent water sources supporting magnificent River Red Gums and large stands of Silky Tea-tree (Leptospermum lanigerum), the species that gave the township its name. The tea trees were cleared with the rot-resistant wood used for fencing posts and the saplings used for weaving (1). With further farming and residential development, the Silky Tea-tree has now all but vanished from the City with only one population remaining on SA Water land adjacent to One Tree Hill Road at Golden Grove.
City of Tea Tree Gully – Biodiversity Strategy 2011–2015
By the late 1930s much of City of Tea Tree Gully had been transformed from natural vegetation and open woodland to countryside enclosed by hedgerows and fences, agriculture, vineyards and orchards. By 1936 nearly 150 varieties of introduced weeds had been declared noxious. The most common pest plants in the cultivated areas were the Scotch Thistle and the European Artichoke (1). Relatively recent accounts include one of Highbury, describing it as supporting over 160 plant species(9) . Springtime would have been particularly impressive with a magnificent show of wild flowers. Much of this biodiversity gave way to housing development in the early 1970s. Even more recently the shrubland in the vicinity of Golden Grove and Yatala Vale, dominated by Silver Banksia and Pink Gum on its deep sandy loams, was developed for housing. Very few examples of Silver Banksia shrubland still exist within the City of Tea Tree Gully. A degraded example can be seen at Player Reserve, Fairview Park (9). Before European settlement it is thought that Adelaide had the richest source of biodiversity in South Australia, most likely due to the considerable variation in topography, geology, rainfall, and microclimate. The decline in the number of native animal species across Adelaide is largely due to the clearance of habitat due to urban, agricultural and grazing practices (25) with less than 4% of the original vegetation species
now remaining on the Adelaide Plains (16). As many as 132 native species of plants and animals have become locally extinct in Adelaide alone, with 50% of the native mammal species being lost — highlighting why Australia has the worst record for mammal conservation of any country or continent in the world (25). Conversely, at least 648 species have been introduced to the Adelaide region with many of these being weed species (25). The challenge now is to protect and rehabilitate habitat in order to prevent further loss of species, to attract wildlife back into our city and facilitate their movement.
Vegetation communities The main vegetation associations that would have existed in the City of Tea Tree Gully prior to European occupation are Mallee Box Woodland (Eucalyptus porosa), Pink Gum / Long Leaf Box Woodland (Eucalyptus fasciculosa / Eucalyptus goniocalyx), River Red Gum / SA Blue Gum Woodland (Eucalyptus camaldulensis / Eucalyptus leucoxylon), Native Pine / Drooping Sheoak / Silver Banksia Woodland (Callitris gracilis / Allocasuarina verticillata / Banksia marginata). Vegetation would often have comprised of composites of these associations. For further information refer to Appendix E. Five vegetation associations in the metropolitan area are considered priorities for conservation. Of these, Silver Banksia Woodland (Banksia
City of Tea Tree Gully – Biodiversity Strategy 2011–2015
35
marginata) and Mallee Box Woodland (Eucalyptus porosa) still exist within the City with a third association, Silky Tea-tree Closed Heath (Leptospermum lanigerum), no longer existent within our metropolitan city. Surveys of council land in the City have revealed 271 different indigenous plant species of which 52 are of conservation significance. Species of conservation significance are any species with a conservation rating of uncommon, rare or vulnerable at a national, state or regional level.
Fauna With its proximity to the Hills Face Zone and its open space the City of Tea Tree Gully supports a variety of wildlife. Formal surveys and the collation of existing information is required to gain a greater understanding of the actual diversity of faunal species in the City and how this is changing over time. Recommendations in this regard have been included in the Biodiversity Action Plan. Of particular note to date is the existence of the Cunningham’s Skink (Egernia cunninghami ) within the River Torrens Linear Park at Highbury. This large skink, (some 25–30 cm in length) has varied colours and markings and is rated as vulnerable in South Australia.
The habitat mosaic The overall aim for the provision of habitat is to create a mosaic of suitable connected landscapes throughout a region. This connects high-quality remnant vegetation, such as that existing in national parks and conservation reserves, with other patches of vegetation found in a range of different habitats including biodiversity corridors (e.g. riparian strips and linear bushland), streetscape vegetation, parks and suburban gardens. Refer to Appendix B for the importance of habitat connectivity.
Habitat mosaic
Parks (state govt owned and managed)
Environmentally Valuable reserves/Sites managed by Council
Conservation reserves Habitat mosaic elements
36
City of Tea Tree Gully – Biodiversity Strategy 2011–2015
Other connecting open space and features
Biodiversity corridors
Sites of high environmental value The City Master Plan 2011–2040 identifies Environmentally Valuable Sites across the City of Tea Tree Gully that have significant biodiversity value (refer to ‘Sites of high environmental value’ map). The Plan also identifies a number of parks that exist entirely or partially within the City boundaries which are State Government owned and administered by the Department for Environment and Natural Resources. Most Environmentally Valuable Sites are managed by Council and are to be referred to using the Environmentally Valuable Sites classification system. Environmentally Valuable Sites classification The following classification system defines EVSs within Council’s control in terms helpful to appropriate management techniques. Environmentally Valuable Sites/reserves managed by Council
Conservation reserves
Conservation site
Conservation site — A site within a reserve or other public open space (e.g. verges) with significant remnant vegetation that is considered worthy of conserving and protecting. This vegetation will be physically identified on site using the Native Vegetation Marker Scheme (NVMS). Revegetation site — A site within a reserve that has been revegetated but not physically identified as such on site. Information is available as a revegetation layer in the City of Tea Tree Gully GIS. Roadside conservation site — Roadside vegetation of conservation significance and physically identified using the Roadside Marker Scheme (RMS).
Biodiversity corridors
Revegetation site
Conservation reserve — The whole reserve or a large portion of a reserve is remnant vegetation and of conservation value. Flora and fauna reserves would be re-named as ‘conservation reserves’ e.g. Abercrombie Conservation Reserve. This renaming is more consistent with the current terminology used to describe this type of open space. This vegetation will be physically identified on site using the Native Vegetation Marker Scheme (NVMS).
Roadside conservation site City of Tea Tree Gully – Biodiversity Strategy 2011–2015
37
Patch of Eutaxia microphylla var. microphylla Common Eutaxia at Fairleigh Reserve, Modbury Nroth
Kookaburras in Silver Banksia at Player Reserve, Fairview Park
38
City of Tea Tree Gully – Biodiversity Strategy 2011–2015
Sites of high environmental value
Locality Map ROSEWORTHY TWO WELLS
CITY OF PLAYFORD
GAWLER
TANUNDA
LYNDOCH
ANGLE VALE
VIRGINIA
WILLIAMSTOWN ELIZABETH
City of Tea Tree Gully
BIRDWOOD GUMERACHA LOBETHAL
ADELAIDE
URAIDLA
GULF ST. VINCENT
BALHANNAH MOUNT BARKER
LITTLE PARA RESERVOIR
ECHUNGA PORT NOARLUNGA
MACCLESFIELD
MCLAREN VALE ALDINGA BEACH WILLUNGA
Little Para
STRATHALBYN
MOUNT COMPASS
Gould Creek
Legend & Notes Council Boundary Roa H il l
28
ad
W
ay
T re e
Civic Centre / Civic Park / Library
ld e
Golden Grove Recreation and Arts Centre Council Depot G
Ro
h
ro
it
ve
w
ay en ld
d
Go
9
R
oa
d
Environmentally Valuable Open Space Aqueduct Land Creekline or River in public ownership
10
Upper Hermitage
1
X
ADELAIDE HILLS COUNCIL
yre Ro
5. Kaplan Reserve
ad
21
6. Mumford Reserve
Kel ly Ro ad
Tea Tree Gully
7
N o rt
h Ea st
7. Pine Park Reserve R oa
8. Player Reserve
d
9. Shannon Reserve
19 St Agnes
17
Sm ar t Ro ad ad To ll ey Ro
ad Res ervo ir Ro
14
11. Riverside Reserve
Vista
Anstey Hill Recreation Park
Ba l mo ral
r th
Ea
st
Ro
13. Abercrombie Reserve 14. Gifford Reserve
13 Lo
w
er
No
rt
h Ea s t R oad
15. Turramurra Reserve 16. Sandalwood Reserve 17. St Agnes Recreation Park
Val l ey Ro ad
Aw oo n ga R oa d
ad Va li an t Ro
No er
ad
12. Stevens Reserve
Houghton
6
ct io n R oa d Gra nd J un
HOPE VALLEY RESERVOIR
10. Sherwood Reserve
3 16 5
4
2. Gunda Reserve 3. Callitris Reserve 4. Doxiadis Reserve
18
Miln e Ro ad
Environmentally Valuable Sites 1. Taworri Reserve
2
oa d Ha i ne s R
In t
ad Han co ck Ro
Banksia Park
R oad
Low
an
Wetlands ad Gre nf el l R o
8
12
Modbury
Hope Valley
o
rm
d N
oa
G
R
Yatala Vale
Angove Conservation Park
Valley View
Reservoir Core Habitat
Fairview Park
Ridgehaven
18. Brightlands Reserve 19. Tea Tree Gully - Hills Reserve
Highbury
20. Dry Creek Reserve 21. Milne Reserve
15 24
22. Lyons / Willowbrook Creekline
Paracombe
23
23. River Torrens Linear Park 24. Aqueduct Land 25. Para Valley Reserve / Lot 101
Ro ad
Dernancourt
w
d
oa e R
en
W
Mc
Miln e Ro ad
22
ie
oa
ng
re
e
ad
ov
Redwood Park 11
Lyo n s R o ad
v ea
R
Ra
Gr
S
e R oa d Yat ala Val
Surrey Downs
Modbury Heights
Wri gh t Ro ad
O-Bahn Track
e
e
20
33
Holden Hill
On e
Golden Grove
ad Gre nf el l R o
CITY OF PT. ADELAIDE ENFIELD
Major Road
N
31
Mon t ag ue
Mount Lofty Ranges Rural Zone
Upper Hermitage
e
Wynn Vale
Gilles Plains
ad
Go
Th
30
Modbury North
Hills Face Zone
Th
29
Para Hills
Ro
n
Cobbler Creek Recreation Park
32
e
Cro uc h Ro ad
26
W yn n Va l e D r iv
ov
d
Ro
Gr
Built-Up Urban / Rural Land
oa
ll
R
CITY OF SALISBURY
Hi
an
et
en
ch
rg
ld
ra
27
Go
Greenwith
St
Salisbury Heights Ta
Golden Grove Suburb
d
25
26. Cobbler Creek East and West 27. Immanuel Reserve 28. Marengo Reserve 0
CAMPBELLTOWN CITY COUNCIL Black Hill Conservation Park
0.25 0.5
1
1.5
2 km
29. McIntosh Reserve 30. Verdant Reserve
Map Projection: Transverse Mercator Horizontal Datum: Geocentric Datum of Australia (GDA) Grid: Map Grid of Australia 1994, Zone 54
31. Horama Reserve
Map produced by GHD Services Pty Ltd - 3315711_Map1_Environment_A3_revA Data source: City of Tea Tree Gully / GHD (2010), NAVTEQ (2008), Planning SA (2010), DENR (2005), Geoscience Australia (2006). Created by: JJB © 2011. Whilst every care has been taken to develop this map, GHD, City of Tea Tree Gully, NAVTEQ, DENR, Planning SA and Geoscience Australia make no representations or warranties about its accuracy, completeness or suitability for any particular purpose. GHD, City of Tea Tree Gully, NAVTEQ, DENR, Planning SA and Geoscience Australia cannot accept liability of any kind (whether in contract, tort or otherwise) for any expenses, losses, damages and/or costs (including indirect or consequential damage) which are or may be incurred as a result of the product being inaccurate, incomplete or unsuitable in any way and for any reason.
JUNE 2011
32. Para Hills Reserve 33. Dalaston Reserve
City of Tea Tree Gully – Biodiversity Strategy 2011–2015
39
Parks Angove Conservation Park is a 5.2-hectare remnant vegetation site preserved within the suburb of Tea Tree Gully containing four vegetation associations made up of over 200 plant species. In the late 1800s Dr Angove set aside the area to remain relatively untouched by European settlement. Angove Conservation Park was proclaimed a Conservation Park on 24 September 1994. It followed a long battle by the then Friends of Angove Scrub against developers. Prior to this the City of Tea Tree Gully used the site as a seed bank for its replanting program. Since the proclamation of the park, the Friends of Angove Conservation Park have maintained the status of the park in conjunction with the Department for Environment and Natural Resources. In 2005 the Friends group took over general maintenance of the park. Anstey Hill Recreation Park, situated within the Hills Face Zone is bounded by Main North East Road to the North, Lower North East Road to the south, Perseverance Road to the west and Range Road South to the east. A small section of the park lies south of Lower North East Road in an area that includes the geological formation known as the ‘gun emplacement’. The 383-hectare park is divided by a number of short creeks and steep gullies and provides important core habitat. A total of 289 plant species have been recorded in the park. Anstey 40
Hill was named after George Alexander Anstey (1814–1895), a local viticulturalist. The park is administered by the Department for Environment and Natural Resources. Cobbler Creek Recreation Park was designated a recreation park in 1982 and was purchased in the early 1970s as part of the planned metropolitan open space (MOSS) network to provide for biodiversity conservation and community recreation as well as to act as an open buffer on the foothills between Salisbury and Golden Grove. The Park supports a variety of vegetation associations, including the threatened Mallee Box (Eucalyptus porosa) woodlands. The park covers 280 hectares, is divided into two by the Grove Way, and lies between Golden Grove and Greenwith to the east and Salisbury to the west. The park is administered by the Department for Environment and Natural Resources. Conservation reserves Abercrombie Conservation Reserve is located in St Agnes and can be accessed via Tolley Road or Abercrombie Drive. The two-hectare reserve is long and narrow, and dissected by a narrow channel. South Australian Blue Gum (Eucalyptus leucoxylon ssp. leucoxylon) is the dominant vegetation association, with Southern Cypress Pine (Callitris gracilis), Drooping She-oak (Allocasuarina verticillata), Sweet Bursaria (Bursaria spinosa), Kangaroo Thorn (Acacia paradoxa) and a mix of exotic and native species at ground
City of Tea Tree Gully – Biodiversity Strategy 2011–2015
level. The site is relatively weed-free compared to other urban reserves. The Bushcare program is the main biodiversity activity occurring at this site. Callitris Conservation Reserve Tea Tree Gully can be accessed via Parkview Drive from Hancock Road. The site covers approximately 2.5 hectares and is dissected by two ephemeral drainage lines that are tributaries of Dry Creek. South Australian Blue Gum (Eucalyptus leucoxylons ssp. leucoxylon) and River Red Gum (Eucalyptus camaldulensis var. camaldulensis) are the dominant vegetation associations, with Southern Cypress Pine (Callitris gracilis) a dominant understorey species — hence the name of the reserve. The ridge flat supports an excellent vegetation system with high species diversity. The Bushcare program is the main biodiversity activity occurring at this site. Doxiadis, Kaplan and Mumford Conservation Reserves are three separate reserves covering approximately 11 hectares that are part of the upper reaches of the Dry Creek river system in the suburb of St Agnes. They would once have been joined but are now separated by roads and housing. Three vegetation communities have been recorded at this site; these are River Red Gum Woodland (Eucalyptus camaldulensis var. camaldulensis), South Australian Blue Gum woodland (Eucalyptus leucoxylon ssp. leucoxylon) and a mix of the two communities. The Bushcare program is the main biodiversity activity
occurring at this site, as well as revegetation and woody weed control. Gunda Conservation Reserve is located on Gunda Road, Banksia Park. The 2-hectare section of this reserve considered to be of high biodiversity value is fenced and dissected by a creek. The developed portion of Gunda Reserve extends a further 3.5 hectares and some revegetation has occurred here. The reserve adjoins farmland to the north and east and suburban housing to the west and south. The dominant vegetation association is South Australian Blue Gum (Eucalyptus leucoxylon ssp. leucoxylon) with a subdominant Pink Gum (Eucalyptus fasciculosa) association. Kangaroo Thorn (Acacia paradoxa) and a variety of grasses dominate the understorey layers. The perched spring in the upper section of the reserve supports an interesting range of herbs and lilies, including the wet-loving Brown-back Wallaby Grass (Austrodanthonia duttoniana). The Bushcare program is the main biodiversity activity occurring at this site. Player Conservation Reserve lies between Grenfell Road and Player Drive in the suburb of Fairview Park; it covers approximately 2.5 hectares and is dissected by a tributary of Dry Creek. Sandy soils, particularly in the south-east corner of the reserve, are representative of the soils throughout much of Banksia Park and Fairview Park that once supported a heath-like vegetation dominated by plants such as Silver Banksia
City of Tea Tree Gully – Biodiversity Strategy 2011–2015
41
(Banksia marginata) prior to development. Silver Banksia (Banksia marginata) woodland exists in the fenced-off south-east corner of the reserve. Banksia woodlands have been identified as the third most threatened vegetation type in South Australia. It is estimated that less than one per cent, or approximately 10 hectares, of Banksia woodland remain in the greater metropolitan area. Six sites in northern Adelaide have been identified as having Silver Banksia (Banksia marginata) growing in areas of remnant vegetation. Although these sites are typically small, they are an important representation of pre-European vegetation. The vegetation communities on this site are predominantly River Red Gum (Eucalyptus camaldulensis var. camaldulensis), South Australian Blue Gum (Eucalyptus leucoxylon ssp leucoxylon) and Silver Banksia (Banksia marginata) communities. The Bushcare program is the main biodiversity activity occurring on this site. Taworri Conservation Reserve is located in the suburb of Banksia Park (off Taworri Road) and covers approximately three hectares. South Australian Blue Gum (Eucalyptus leucoxylon ssp. leucoxylon), Long-leaf Box (Eucalyptus goniocalyx ssp. goniocalyx) heath and Pink Gum (Eucalyptus fasciculosa) open forest are the dominant vegetation associations in the reserve. Some good quality remnant vegetation still exists within the reserve, providing excellent habitat for birds in particular. The Bushcare program is 42
the main biodiversity activity occurring at this site. Other reserves with a diversity of vegetation include a section of Pine Park Reserve, Shannon Reserve, Turramurra Reserve, Sandalwood Reserve, St Agnes Recreation Park, Brightlands Reserve and Milne Reserve. Biodiversity corridors Cobbler Creek East Reserve is located in the suburb of Golden Grove and is an important reserve for the City of Tea Tree Gully. Covering approximately 13 hectares, it is adjacent to Cobbler Creek West Reserve which then joins into Cobbler Creek Recreation Park and therefore acts as a link/buffer to these reserves, which together cover approximately 333 hectares. River Red Gum (Eucalyptus camaldulensis var. camaldulensis) open forest and South Australian Blue Gum (Eucalyptus leucoxylon ssp. leucoxylon) open forest are the dominant natural vegetation communities still existing in the reserve. Magnificent River Red Gums are an important feature of this reserve. Woody weed control and revegetation are the main biodiversity activities occurring on the site. Cobbler Creek West Reserve is located in the suburb of Golden Grove and is a highly significant reserve for the City of Tea Tree Gully. Covering approximately 43 hectares, it contains one of the last stands of Mallee Box (Eucalyptus porosa) woodland occurring in the Adelaide
City of Tea Tree Gully – Biodiversity Strategy 2011–2015
region. This vegetation type is considered to be poorly conserved in South Australia. The reserve is also adjacent to Cobbler Creek Recreation Park and acts as a link/buffer to the 290-hectare reserve. Mallee Box (Eucalyptus porosa) woodland and River Red Gum (Eucalyptus camaldulensis var. camaldulensis) open forest are the dominant natural vegetation communities still existing in the reserve. The magnificent River Red Gums are an important feature of this reserve. A Bushcare site is located adjacent to Valour Court, Golden Grove. Bushcare, woody weed control and revegetation are the main biodiversity activities occurring within Cobbler Creek West Reserve. Slate Creek/Martindale Reserve (not included on map) is located in the suburb of Golden Grove and is another important reserve for the City of Tea Tree Gully. Covering approximately 7 hectares, it is adjacent to Cobbler Creek West Reserve which then joins onto Cobbler Creek Recreation Park and therefore acts as a link/buffer to these reserves, which together cover approximately 333 hectares. River Red Gum (Eucalyptus camaldulensis var. camaldulensis) open forest and South Australian Blue Gum (Eucalyptus leucoxylon spp. leucoxylon) open forest are the dominant natural vegetation communities still existing in the reserve. Impressive River Red Gums are an important feature of this reserve. Woody weed control and revegetation are the main biodiversity activities
occurring on the site. The Dry Creek Reserve is made up of several smaller reserves, including Valley View, Dawson, Edinburgh, Solandra, Fairleigh, Oratanga, Drumminor, Kingfisher and Jubilee Reserves. Several tributaries run into the main spine of Dry Creek. Despite being severely degraded by human activity and weeds, Dry Creek has retained a reasonably intact overstorey, with many large remnant Red Gums (Eucalyptus camaldulensis var. camaldulensis), small pockets of native grassland and indigenous perennial species. Revegetation of areas along the river corridor with indigenous species has created some small, successfully rehabilitated areas. Today the river corridor serves many functions, not the least of which is to provide habitat and a wildlife corridor for native fauna. It has a strong recreational and educational focus as well as an effective stormwater capture and treatment function with the construction of several wetlands. Revegetation, weed control and Bushcare are the main activities that occur within this reserve. The northern side of the River Torrens Linear Park from Highbury through to Dernancourt is managed by the City of Tea Tree Gully with the southern side managed by Campbelltown City Council. The length of river within the City of Tea Tree Gully is approximately 5 km and prior to European settlement would have consisted of River Red Gum (Eucalyptus camaldulensis var.
City of Tea Tree Gully – Biodiversity Strategy 2011–2015
43
camaldulensis) woodland with South Australian Blue Gum (Eucalyptus leucoxylon ssp. leucoxylon) woodland on the upper slopes. Revegetation is the main biodiversity activity occurring on the site. The features known as ‘the Escarpments’ comprise gullies and open space located at the northern and western edges of the City of Tea Tree Gully, adjacent to the suburbs of Greenwith, Wynn Vale, Para Hills and Gulf View Heights. Together with the open space within the City of Salisbury these escarpments create an important corridor that link the hills to the foothills and then to the plains. Reserves within the escarpments are Para Valley Reserve, Immanuel Reserve, Marengo Reserve, McIntosh Reserve, Verdant Reserve, Horama Reserve and Para Hills Reserve. Weed control, including the control of Coolatai Grass (Hyparrhenia hirta), is the main biodiversity activity occurring on these sites although a Bushcare site was recently established at McIntosh Reserve to manage significant remnant vegetation.
and associated land is 58 hectares in size and includes a remnant Blue Gum (Eucalyptus leucoxylon ssp. leucoxylon) vegetation community of approximately four hectares. A diversity of species was surveyed at this site by SA Water. The aqueduct land is currently state government-owned. A staged handover of the land to TTG Council may occur as the state government completes agreed works at the site, including the construction of paths. The intention is to eventually link the aqueduct land with the River Torrens Linear Park.
Sherwood, Riverside and Stevens reserves are all linked and lie adjacent to a tributary of Dry Creek. Revegetation has occurred in all reserves under an existing overstorey of Red Gum (Eucalyptus camaldulensis var. camaldulensis) and Blue Gum (Eucalyptus leucoxylon ssp. leucoxylon).
Several roadside conservation sites (not included on map) containing remnant vegetation, and identified on-site using the roadside marker system, exist within the Hills Face Zone of the City of Tea Tree Gully. A number of these reserves are Bushcare sites actively managed by volunteers. The native vegetation within the council area is dominated by woodlands/forests of Eucalyptus goniocalyx ssp. goniocalyx (Longleaf Box) Woodland, Eucalyptus camaldulensis var. camaldulensis (Red Gum), or Eucalyptus leucoxylon spp. leucoxylon (Blue Gum). Exotic grasslands and shrublands are typical under native overstorey. The ‘City of Tea Tree Gully Roadside Vegetation Management Plan 2008’ includes guidelines for the management and protection of roadside reserves.
The open channel aqueduct at Highbury, dating back to 1870, was replaced by the Torrens pipeline in 2010. The now in-filled aqueduct
Other linking reserves on the map include Gifford Reserve, Lyons/Willowbrook Creekline and Dalaston Reserve.
44
City of Tea Tree Gully – Biodiversity Strategy 2011–2015
Our biodiversity programs The following descriptions provide an overview of the City of Tea Tree Gully biodiversity programs.
Pest Plant and Disease Management Declared pest plants and other problematic plants are abundant within the City and currently require considerable resources to manage. Declared plants are those species that must be controlled by law as outlined in the Natural Resources Management Act 2004. Contractors, council staff and, to a lesser degree, volunteers are involved in managing and undertaking the control of these weeds. In addition to council resources other organisations such as the Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges Natural Resources Management Board assist in the management of declared plants and animals by providing advice and grants as well as the services of a part-time Authorised Officer. This officer is a council employee who is delegated the powers of an Authorised Officer. The ‘Pest Plant Management in Creeks and Waterways Policy’ formalises Council’s responsibility for the management of pest plants in creeks and waterways and to highlight those plants that should be targeted. The policy was created in 2004 and is regularly updated. In 2003 Phytophthora citricola was identified in a number of reserves within the City. Phytophthora is a fungus like organism that
attacks the roots of plants, preventing the uptake of water and nutrients and leading eventually to the death of the plants. Some plant species are more susceptible then others. Phytophthora is difficult to manage and methods for the eradication of the disease are unknown. The University of Adelaide has undertaken research to better understand this disease. The City of Tea Tree Gully as well as other affected councils and agencies have contributed financially to this project.
Revegetation Reintroducing local native flora by way of Council’s revegetation program is an ongoing initiative that involves schools, volunteer groups, council staff and contractors. During the planting months of May to September, hundreds of people participate in National Tree Day, World Environment Day and other planting events, in a bid to provide habitat for native fauna and to create aesthetically pleasing landscapes. In addition these natural landscapes allow us to reduce traditional maintenance requirements and expenses, including mowing, and watering.
Bushcare ‘Bushcare’ is a highly skilled activity requiring training in minimal disturbance biodiversity management techniques. Programs and budgets are in place for the bringing in of contractors and other staff to undertake bushcare work on
City of Tea Tree Gully – Biodiversity Strategy 2011–2015
45
sites and reserves of conservation significance as well as for the installation of fencing and other infrastructure to better protect these areas. Budgets are also in place for the support of volunteers and organisations such as Trees For Life through its Bush For Life program that trains and supports volunteers to rehabilitate remnant vegetation on council-owned land.
Planning Appendix A lists the biodiversity-related management plans that have been created since the year 2000. These plans (often entitled vegetation management plans) are generally prepared by qualified and experienced consultants who can provide a level of expertise beyond the scope of council staff resources. These plans are vital in assessing the biodiversity values, needs and management options for our reserves and eventually it is hoped that all reserves in the City will have specific plans to ensure that their biodiversity values are understood and preserved.
46
As with other councils, staff at the operational level of the City of Tea Tree Gully saw an urgent need for the protection and enhancement of specific biodiversity assets and the management of biodiversity threats. This has seen a’ bottom-up’ approach to biodiversity protection and enhancement to date, whereby staff have advised management of the need for action, and resources have been allocated based on improved general knowledge and best practice guidelines set by the wider natural resources management community.
Native Vegetation Marker Scheme The Native Vegetation Marker Scheme (NVMS) was developed in 2009 to highlight patches of local native plants in urban Adelaide. The presence of a standard blue marker or stencil with leaf symbol means the site contains plants and animals that require specialised management.
City of Tea Tree Gully – Biodiversity Strategy 2011–2015
Kingfisher Reserve, Modbury Heights
City of Tea Tree Gully – Biodiversity Strategy 2011–2015
47
Appendix A List of strategies, agreements, Acts, policies and plans
• Australian State of the Environment Report 2001
International, national, state and regional strategies and agreements
• Native Vegetation Act 1991
• Japan–Australia Migratory Bird Agreement (1974)
• Development Act 1993
• China–Australia Migratory Bird Agreement (1986)
Acts • Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 • Local Government Act 1999
• International Convention on Biological Diversity (1992)
• Natural Resources Management Act 2004
• Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges Natural Resources Management Plan
• Asset Management Plan
City of Tea Tree Gully policies and plans
• National Local Government Biodiversity Strategy
• Strategic Bushfire Management Plan (2010)
• National Strategy for the Conservation of Australia’s Biological Diversity (1996)
• Development Plan
• Regional Environmental Plan 2008–2013 • River Torrens Linear Park Management Plan – Eastern Section (Draft) • South Australia’s Strategic Plan 2011 • State Biodiversity Strategy — No Species Loss: A Biodiversity Strategy for South Australia 2006–2016 • State Government Greenhouse Strategy 2007–2020
• Community Land Management Plans • Ecological Mapping of the City of Tea Tree Gully Report • Environmental Policy • Urban Landscape Master Plan • Open Space Strategy 2011–2030 • Pest Plants in Waterways Policy • Strategic Plan 2011–2015 • Tree Management Policy • Upper Cobbler Creek Corridor Action Plan
• State Natural Resources Management Plan • Local Government Biodiversity Strategy 48
City of Tea Tree Gully – Biodiversity Strategy 2011–2015
City of Tea Tree Gully surveys and vegetation management plans
• Restoring Riparian Vegetation Action Plan for Gunda Reserve, February 2000
The following is a list of plans and similar documents produced over recent years to assist Council’s biodiversity team.
• Restoring Riparian Vegetation Action Plan for Taworri Flora and Fauna Reserve, February 2000
• City of Tea Tree Gully Botanical Survey, R. Taplin, August 2003
• Protecting Banksia Woodland Action Plan for Player Reserve Bush For Life Site
• Additional plant species surveyed by R.Taplin, October 2003
• Protecting Banksia Woodland Action Plan for Range Road North Site
• Coolatai Grass (Hyparrhenia hirta) Management Plan for the Northern Adelaide Region, April 2005
• Dry Creek Vegetation Management Plan 2009
• Doxiadis, Kaplan and Mumford Reserves Vegetation Management Plan, May 2005
• River Torrens Management Plan Stage 2
• Martindale (Slate Creek) Reserve Vegetation Management Plan, March 2006 • Restoring Riparian Vegetation Action Plan for Callitris Reserve, February 2000 • Roadside Vegetation Management Plan 2008
• River Torrens Management Plan Stage 1 • River Torrens Weed Management Plan, October 2004 • Cobbler Creek West Reserve Vegetation Management Plan, May 2005 • Cobbler Creek East Reserve Vegetation Management Plan, February 2006
• Restoring Riparian Vegetation Action Plan for Abercrombie Reserve, February 2000
City of Tea Tree Gully – Biodiversity Strategy 2011–2015
49
Appendix B The importance of habitat connectivity Biodiversity is threatened across the globe by habitat loss and fragmentation (19). Within the Adelaide region, native species have decreased in all groups except the amphibians. Native plant species numbers have decreased by 7.5%, mammals by 50%, birds by 7.0%, and reptiles by 3.5% (25). Even when remnant vegetation is preserved within developing urban landscapes, such as those of the City of Tea Tree Gully, the eventual outcome can be fragmented habitat vulnerable to urban pressures and isolated from other populations of plants and animals. Garden et al. (2006) explained that habitat fragmentation increases the susceptibility of bushland to deterioration of ecosystem processes, loss of species diversity and the invasion of pest plant species. Without the ability to connect these fragmented habitats, populations of plants and animals are put at risk due to ineffective seed dispersal and restricted wildlife movements (21, 22). The greater the number of viable habitat patches, and the closer these patches are together, the greater the likelihood of colonisation (12). Connecting fragmented landscapes also allows species to better adapt to changing conditions, such as those associated with climate change. Ironically, scientists now think that the dynamic nature of 50
cities creates and maintains a complex mosaic of habitat niches, (many of which are unique to urban areas), which in turn support a high diversity of fauna species, including rare and threatened species (14, 11). ‘Connectivity’ in landscape terms therefore refers to linkages of habitat that may include reserve corridors (in particular riparian corridors that support more birds than other open space (2,10) ), features that can be stepping stones (such as isolated reserves and remnant trees) and streetscapes. The ability of wildlife to use the various components of the connectivity mosaic will depend on the species’ mobility and mode of movement. Relatively mobile species, such as birds, bats and insects, can thrive even in an urban environment where continuous stretches of habitat cannot be re-created, if there are ‘stepping stone’ linkages that can be utilised. (17). Terrestrial mammal species and, to a lesser extent, gliding species, have a lower probability of survival in urban environments due to their limited locomotion and dispersal abilities. Individuals dispersing between remnant vegetation patches face barriers such as walls, fences and roads, as well as increased risk of predation from introduced and domestic species (7) . Climate change has the potential to further exacerbate the loss of diversity in fragmented landscapes. The Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges Natural Resources Management Plan
City of Tea Tree Gully – Biodiversity Strategy 2011–2015
suggests a number of climate change response options with regards to biodiversity including: • identifying key biophysical and ecological components of biological communities that are vulnerable to climate change • creating mosaics, linkages and buffer zones across the landscape • supporting the protection of relatively undisturbed and connected ecosystems by extending, redefining and possibly supplementing reserves
• further developing flexible, integrated pest management and risk management approaches to compensate for climate change effects. The overall aim for the provision of habitat should be to create a mosaic of suitable, connected landscapes throughout a region. This would connect high-quality remnants with other patches of vegetation and exploit a range of different habitats, including riparian strips, linear bushland, streetscape vegetation, parks and suburban gardens (17).
City of Tea Tree Gully – Biodiversity Strategy 2011–2015
51
Appendix C The importance of remnant vegetation
The use of local seed and propagation material
Remnant vegetation refers to plants and plant communities that have existed in a natural state since European settlement. The plants have either survived since prior to settlement, or they are the progeny of plants that would have existed in the area at that time. The genetic makeup of this vegetation is therefore unique to the area and well adapted to a particular set of climate, soil type and other local conditions. In the City of Tea Tree Gully remnant vegetation can be found on roadsides, in bushland reserves, in open spaces that have retained some natural character and on private land. Remnant vegetation is an essential component of vegetation corridors; it is invaluable as habitat and as a source of seed and propagation material.
practice by the natural resources restoration
Complex vegetation communities, single trees or even small groups of grasses are all classified as ‘remnant vegetation’ within the City of Tea Tree Gully. In most urban environments (including the City) vegetation that has retained the complexities of vegetation structure and composition is rare. Sewell and Catterall (1998) suggest that remnant native vegetation as habitat is central to the successful recovery and maintenance of insectivorous bird species in urban areas — more so than replanting of native plant species. 52
for revegetation activities is considered best industry. The use of local seed is important to ensure that progeny are well adapted to the local conditions; that introduced seed do not pollute the local gene pool; and to maximise the genetic diversity of a species (4). In the City of Tea Tree Gully maintaining a seed source requires that remnant vegetation is protected and appropriately managed. Urban pressures which negatively impact on remnant vegetation in cities include pest plants and animals, pollution, fire and vandalism. Often city reserves are relatively small or narrow and cannot adequately buffer these external pressures. Without adequate intervention from land managers the degradation of vegetation communities and the loss of habitat typically results. Maintaining as many local species as possible is important and even the loss of rare species in a native ecosystem can unbalance the local ecology, increasing the systems susceptibility to invasion by pest plants and animals, resulting in the accelerated loss of entire groups of plants (26).
City of Tea Tree Gully – Biodiversity Strategy 2011–2015
In addition to providing wildlife habitat, the peace and inherent beauty of remnant vegetation provides the opportunity for city people to begin to understand and appreciate the natural environment.
The exotic vegetation that replaces indigenous plant communities in urbanising regions disassociates us from the rhythms and diversity of the native landscape and a sense of the place; and we are the poorer because of it. Michael Hough, Professor of Landscape Architecture, York University, Canada
City of Tea Tree Gully – Biodiversity Strategy 2011–2015
53
Appendix D The importance of pest plants, animal and disease control programs Pest Plants and animals are a major cause of land degradation and the loss of biodiversity. The World Wide Fund for Nature identified pest plants and animals as some of the biggest threats to Australia’s biodiversity. It is estimated that the cost to the Australian economy from the impact of weeds on agriculture is in the vicinity of $4 billion per annum (24). Weeds can harbour pests and diseases, displace native plant species and create fuel loads for fire (24). Weeds therefore affect the structure and function of ecosystems, and impact negatively on fauna and flora (3). Climate change may alter the potential range of some pest plants. This is particularly worrying for the southern regions of Australia where tropical weed species may extend further south and summer-growing species become more prevalent (24). Landholders, including councils, are responsible for controlling all declared pests listed under the Natural Resources Management Act 2004 that are present on their land and these must be controlled by and at the expense of the
54
landholder. Councils may also control other pest plant species on public land that are not declared if they are problematic in that area. The Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges Natural Resources Management Board is responsible for controlling declared pest plants on roadsides, but should adjacent landholders wish to undertake weed control on roadsides, councils have a role through the Local Government Act 1999 for giving permission. The Integrated Natural Resources Management Plan for the Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges Region prepared by the Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges NRM Board outlines recommendations for the management of pest plants and animals. This plan will be a guiding document for pest management in the City of Tea Tree Gully and future revisions of the City’s Biodiversity Strategy 2011–2015 will seek to reflect the recommendations of this document. An effective pest plant policy, supporting pest plant and pest animal programs and linked to state and regional polices, will return a long-term cost saving to council and will see improved biodiversity outcomes.
City of Tea Tree Gully – Biodiversity Strategy 2011–2015
Appendix E Vegetation communities in the City of Tea Tree Gully Mallee Box Woodland (Eucalyptus porosa) Mallee Box Woodland was the most widespread vegetation type on the Adelaide Plains, extending into the lower slopes at Golden Grove, Greenwith, Wynn Vale, Modbury North, Modbury Heights, Valley View and Holden Hill. Little of this vegetation association exists on the plains due to extensive clearance. The Mallee Box is a small tree, often contorted in shape, and found as a relatively sparse overstorey together with other small tree species such as Golden Wattle, Drooping Sheoak and Native Apricot. The middle layer includes such species as Kangaroo Thorn whilst the ground layer can have a diverse mixture of grasses, saltbush and annual and perennial herbs. Remnants of Mallee Box Woodland of varying quality can be found in Cobbler Creek West Reserve (Greenwith), Marengo Reserve (Greenwith), Immanuel Reserve (Salisbury Heights), McIntosh Reserve, Verdant Reserve, Kempson and Horama Reserves (Wynn Vale) and Para Hills Reserve (Gulf View Heights). Pink Gum / Long Leaf Box Woodland (Eucalyptus fasciculosa / Eucalyptus goniocalyx) Pink Gum Woodland exists into the Hills Face Zone extending down to the interface with the metropolitan area of the City and once would have existed in parts of Yatala Vale,
Banksia Park and Fairview Park. Pink Gum is a small, often contorted tree with a pale trunk, susceptible to attack by lerps. Gunda Reserve (Banksia Park) and Taworri Reserve (Fairview Park) have the few examples of Pink Gum vegetation that still exist within the metropolitan areas of the City. A small pocket of Pink Gum Woodland together with Long Leaf Box exists in Fairview Park / Yatala Vale. This association can be viewed at Taworri Reserve. Large stands of Pink Gum Woodland can be viewed at Anstey Hill Recreation Park, associated at times with Long Leaf Box. River Red Gum / SA Blue Gum Woodland (Eucalyptus camaldulensis / Eucalyptus leucoxylon) Majestic River Red Gums adjacent to waterways are an important feature that set the City of Tea Tree Gully apart from other Adelaide council areas. The understorey is varied, in many instances dominated by exotic species such as Kikuyu grass and woody weed species such as European Olive. Where native understorey still exists, species can vary from thickets of Kangaroo Thorn to grassy swathes. River Red Gum Woodland with some native understorey still present can be seen at Cobbler Creek West Reserve (Greenwith) and small sections of Dry Creek. SA Blue Gum can often be found together with River Red Gum as open forest. Examples can be seen at Kaplan Reserve (St Agnes) and Player Reserve (Fairview Park). Both these reserves still exhibit some intact
City of Tea Tree Gully – Biodiversity Strategy 2011–2015
55
native understorey. SA Blue Gum Woodland was common in suburbs such as Redwood Park, Ridgehaven, Modbury and Hope Valley prior to European settlement. Examples of this vegetation association can be seen at Abercrombie Reserve (St Agnes) and Callitris Reserve (Tea Tree Gully). Remnant trees of this species can be seen dotted across the skyline of City of Tea Tree Gully and they contribute considerably to the natural look of the City. Native Pine / Drooping Sheoak / Silver Banksia Woodland (Callitris gracilis / Allocasuarina verticillata / Banksia marginata) Golden Grove, Yatala Vale, Fairview Park
56
and St Agnes were home to these vegetation associations on varying soil types. The heaths of Golden Grove, Fairview Park and Banksia Park have sandy soils and this heath would have been florally magnificent, particularly during spring. Silver Banksia can now only be seen at Player Reserve (Fairview Park) and unfortunately the trees growing here are coming to the end of their life. Some examples of Silver Banksia woodland can also be seen on Range Rd. North and Seaview Road in the hills above Fairview Park. Native Pine Woodland can be seen at Gunda Reserve (Banksia Park) and Abercrombie Reserve (St Agnes) with Drooping Sheoak scattered throughout.
City of Tea Tree Gully – Biodiversity Strategy 2011–2015
References 1. Auhl, I. (1976). From Settlement to City: A History of the District of Tea Tree Gully 1836– 1976, Lynton Publications, Blackwood, South Australia. 2. Bentley, J.M. & Catterall, C.P. (1997). The use of bushland corridors, and linear remnants by birds in southeastern Queensland, Australia. Conservation Biology 11: 1173–1189. 3. Botkin D.B. & Beveridge C.E. (1997). Cities as environments. Urban Ecosyst 1: 3–19. 4. Bussell, J.D., Hood, P., Alacs, E.A., Dixon, K.W., Hobbs, R.J., Krauss, L. (2006). Rapid genetic delineation of local provenance seedcollection zones for effective rehabilitation of an urban bushland remnant. Austral Ecology 31: 164–175. 5. Collins J.P., Kinzing A., Grimm N.B. et al. (2000). A new urban ecology. American Scientist 88: 416. 6. Drinnan, I. (2005). The search for fragmentation thresholds in a southern Sydney suburb. Biological Conservation 124: 339–349.
conceptual domain. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 42: 3–16. 9. Kraehenbuehl, D.N. (1996). Pre-European Vegetation of Adelaide: A survey from the Gawler River to Hallett Cove. Nature Conservation Society of South Australia, Adelaide. 10. Martin, T.G., McIntyre, S., Catterall, C.P. & Possingham, H.P. (2006). Is landscape context important for riparian conservation? Birds in grassy woodland. Biological Conservation 127: 201–214. 11. McDonell, M.J., Pickett, S.T.A., Groffman, P., Bohlen, P., Pouyat, R.V. & Zipperer, W.C. (1997), Ecosystem processes along an urbanto-rural gradient, Urban Ecosyst 1: 21–36. 12. Metapopulation dynamics and conservation: a spatially explicit model applied to butterflies. Biological Conservation 68: 167–180. 13. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA) (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC. 14. Niemela, J. (1999a). Ecology and urban planning. Biodiversity Conservation 8: 119–31.
7. Garden J., McAlpine C., Peterson A., Jones D., & Possingham, H. (2006). Review of the ecology of Australian urban fauna: A focus on spatially explicit processes. Austral Ecology 31: 126–148. 8. Hanski, I. & Gilpin M. (1991). Metapopulation dynamics: brief history and
15. Niemela, J. (1999b). Is there a need for a theory of urban ecology? Urban Ecosystems 3: 57–65. 16. Oke, R. (1997). Conserving Adelaide’s biodiversity: a planned approach. Department for Environment and Heritage, Adelaide, Australia.
City of Tea Tree Gully – Biodiversity Strategy 2011–2015
57
17. Parsons, H., (2007). Best practice guidelines for enhancing urban bird habitat: scientific report. Birds in Backyards Program, New South Wales. 18. Roetman, P.E.J & Daniels, C.B. (2008). Including biodiversity as a component of sustainability as Australian cities grow: why and how? Treenet, 2008. 19. Rudd, H., Vala, J. & Scheafer, V. (2002). Importance of backyard habitat in a comprehensive biodiversity conservation strategy: a connectivity analysis of urban green spaces. Restoration Ecology 10: 368–375. 20. Savard, J.P.L., Clergeau P. & Mennechez G. (2000). Biodiversity concepts and urban ecosystems. Landscape Urban Planning 48: 131–42. 21. Schippers, P., Verboom, J., Knaapen, J. P., & van Apeldoorn R. C. (1996). Dispersal and habitat connectivity in complex heterogeneous landscapes: an analysis with a GIS-based random walk model. Ecography 19: 97–106.
58
22. Sewell, S.R. & Catterall, C.P. (1998). Bushland modification and styles of urban development: their effects on birds in southeast Queensland. Wildlife Research 25: 41–63. 23. Sharrad, M. & Hall, F. (1977). The geological and historical background in Report of the Tea Tree Gully Flora and Fauna Study Group. The City of Tea Tree Gully. 24. Sinden, J., Jones, R., Hester, S., Odom, D., Kalisch, C., James., R & Cacho, O. (2005). The economic impact of weeds in Australia. CRC for Australian Weed Management. Technical Series No. 8. Adelaide. p.39. 25. Tait C., Daniels, C.B. and Hill, R. (2005). Changes in species assemblages within the city of Adelaide, South Australia, 1836 to 2002. An urban ecological study. Ecological Applications 15: 346–359. 26. Zavaleta, E.S. & Hulvey, K.B. (2004). Realistic species losses disproportionately reduce grassland resistance to biological invaders. Science 306: 1175–77.
City of Tea Tree Gully – Biodiversity Strategy 2011–2015
City of Tea Tree Gully
571 Montague Road, Modbury SA 5092 PO Box 571, Modbury SA 5092 Telephone 08 8397 7444 www.teatreegully.sa.gov.au