are African American, Hispanic, learning English, and/or from impoverished homes fall behind and stay behind in far greater proportion than students who are white and middle class. The rate of weak reading skills in these groups is 60-70 percent, according to the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP).7 This figure alone explains much about the lower average academic achievement of minority students and why they are underrepresented in professions that depend on higher education. The environment outside of school, however, does not explain all. Education matters. Many children from more economically advantaged households have trouble learning to read, and many children from high-risk environments do learn to read quite well when they receive good instruction. One-third of weak readers nationwide are from college-educated families (who presumably value literacy and expose their children to reading in the home). In international comparisons of literacy rates, the United States is doing less well than many other industrialized societies.8 The tragedy here is that most reading failure is unnecessary. We now know that classroom teaching itself, when it includes a range of research-based components and practices, can prevent and mitigate reading difficulty. Although home factors do influence how well and how soon students read, informed classroom instruction that targets specific language, cognitive, and reading skills beginning in kindergarten enhances success for all but a very small percentage of students with learning disabilities or severe dyslexia. Researchers now estimate that 95 percent of all children can be taught to read by the end of first grade, with future achievement constrained* only by students’ reasoning and listening comprehension abilities.9 It is clear that students in high-risk populations need not fail at the rates that they do. When placed into schools with effective principals, strong curricula, and well-supported teachers, virtually all students can learn to read as well as the most advantaged students. Further, students who lack prerequisites—such as awareness and knowledge of sounds, symbols, sound-symbol connections, vocabulary, and/or oral language—can develop all the knowledge and skills they need for reading success. Teachers, however, must incorporate these critical skills into direct, systematic, engaging lessons. While parents, tutors, and the community can contribute to reading success, classroom instruction is the *It is important to note that students’ reasoning and comprehension abilities can also be enhanced through informed instruction. As students’ subject-matter knowledge and vocabulary grow, so will their capacity to think critically.
Informed classroom instruction that targets specific language, cognitive, and reading skills beginning in kindergarten enhances success for all but a very small percentage of students.
critical factor in preventing reading problems and must be the primary focus for change.10 To be clear: although the day-to-day work is teachers’ responsibility, students’ reading success is our shared responsibility. From preparation programs to standards and assessments to curricula and professional development, the policies and systems currently impacting how reading is taught need to improve—dramatically and rapidly. Teaching reading is rocket science. But it is also established science, with clear, specific, practical instructional strategies that all teachers should be taught and supported in using.
Where We Are: Research-Validated Ideas That Should Drive Instruction A well-validated concept that should underpin the design of instruction is called the Simple View of Reading.11 It states that reading comprehension is the product of word recognition and language comprehension. Without strong skills in either domain, an individual’s reading comprehension will be compromised. A reader’s recognition of printed words must be accurate and automatic to support comprehension. The development of autoTeaching Reading Is Rocket Science, 2020 | 9
