Weighing the Cloud Thesis work of David Bellona Class of 2012
MFA Interaction Design School of Visual Arts
Front Cover: Clouds over Lake Ontario.1 Back Cover : Microsoft Data Centre, Dublin, Ireland.2
“The planet is fine. The people are fucked.” – George Carlin
Contents
7
Primer
8
Inspiration
11
Statement of Purpose
13
Starting Out
15
Initial Statement of Purpose
16
Summertime
23
A Three-Month Detour
24
Squidfingers Twitter Mention Shelving Unit
26
Detour Statement of Purpose
30
Thesis Presentation to Frank Chimero & Liz Danzico
35
Back to What Matters Most & Early Explorations
36
Outlining the Issues
42
Going Back to the Future, or to July 2011
46
Understanding Server Farms, Data Centers, and Cloud Computing
50
Seed Cloud and Read Cloud Projects
54
Determining the ‘What’
61
Research
63
On Emerging Themes of Digital Production and Consumption
66
Interviews
76
User Survey
80
Defining an Audience
82
Adjacent Entities for Competitive Analysis
March 2011 – July 2011
August 2011 – October 2012
November 2011 – January 2012
January 2012 – March 2012
97 Concept & Experience Development
February 2012 – April 2012
102 Emission Bricks Prototype 116 Carry Your Cloud Prototype 130 Defining Features, User Stories, and a Name 132 The Problem Space 134 Coal Button 137 Canary 140 Concept Map 152 Wire Flows 154 Wireframes 164 TAP Prototype 166 Final Designs & Use Cases 177 References & Influence 183 Thanks
March 2012 – May 2012
Primer “Thesis is process”, I’ve been told. In my persistent approach to a consistent idea [sic], I discovered that the cloud (p.46) is an awesome invention that I absolutely love. I assume you do as well. It allows ubiquitous and convenient access to nearly all world knowledge and an ability to communicate with our friends and family at any moment.
There is an unsaid promise of the cloud: as we move
from physical to digital products and documents, our environmental impact is lighter. However, our production of digital content is exponentially increasing every day. To house this growing data, we are building a vast physical infrastructure that depends on non-renewable energy resources.
This infrastructure comes in the form of data centers
– the factories of the Information Age. Similar to the massive structures of the Industrial Age, we are again building systems that are out of balance with the amount of energy this planet has provided. We have an opportunity to create our supporting physical infrastructures sustainably and utilize renewable energy resources. Yet we are missing that opportunity.
One challenge is the transparency of the IT industry to
report fully on energy and CO2 emissions, and establish a set of standards that they and we can build a sustainable system upon. With continued pressure by Greenpeace, recent literature on the physical infrastructure of the Internet and the paradox of efficient consumption, I have hope that we are moving in the right direction. The work contained in this book is only another step.
7
Sunset at Donahue Pass on the John Muir Trail, Yosemite National Park, California. September 18, 2006
8
Inspiration
me
In 2005, I went for my first solo hike in Haleakala National Park on the Hawaiian Island of Maui. I had hiked a few three-day loops with my Dad in New Hampshire and Vermont, but this was my first time solo. I stayed at the Paliku campsite in the Haleakala crater and from my tent, I could look south over the Kaupo Gap with distant clouds passing by at eye level. Observing the landscape, I was able to see a history of how the earth beneath me formed, slowly eroded, and allowed for plants to take root. As night fell, clouds rolled over the top of the cliffs behind me to cover my tent; when morning came, the clouds dissipated and a daily cycle was renewed. In a simple moment, I saw the macro and micro systems of this planet we inhabit.
In the years since, I’ve sought these simple moments
in nature, going on solo hikes in Montana, California, Arizona, Oregon, Washington, and soon on the Long Trail in Vermont. I, along with others I’ve met along the way, have found inspiration and mused at the most basic of landscapes, wondering how a pile of large rocks, setting sun, or falling water can be so damn beautiful.
9
Statement of Purpose I’m investigating the environmental effects of our overfed
As users, we are comfortable with not knowing the sys-
data diets, in particular the disconnect that we as produc-
tems that house our data, specifically how much data
ers and consumers of digital content have with the physi-
we actually have amassed, where it is actually physically
cal infrastructure of the computing cloud. To frame my
located, and that the government can access our data
hypothesis, I asked the question. “Does demonstrating the
regardless of 4th amendment protections.6 As producers
correlation of cloud-based computing with carbon dioxide
and consumers of massive amounts of digital content,
emissions lead to a decrease in digital consumption?”
we are growing more and more distant and dependent,
on vast systems that we increasingly do not understand.
I’m talking about the environmental impact of our
data, specifically, the carbon footprint of bytes (kilobytes, megabytes, gigabytes) which requires infrastructure and energy to transmit and store. These bytes exist in large data centers, some powered in part by renewable resources with energy efficient architecture, while many others receive all their energy from non-renewable resources. Globally, data centers accounted for 1.5% of total electric-
The goals of my thesis are threefold: • To educate users of cloud-based media about the physical structures supporting online interactions. • To facilitate environmentally conscious behavior in the production and distribution of digital content.
ity use and 2.2% of energy use in the US in 2010. These
• To pressure the providers of digital services to
figures increased 36% (globally) and 56% (US) from 2005;
conduct and build their businesses in an environ-
research estimated in 2011 that global electricity use of
mentally sustainable manner.
data centers increased by 19%.1
I’m not the first to look into the environmental ef-
fects of cloud-based computing. The work of Greenpeace and Mike Berners-Lee, author of the Carbon Footprint of Everything, has calculated the carbon dioxide emissions (CO2e) of a text message, Google search, email, and the world’s data centers which weigh in at a staggering 130 million tons of CO2e per year.2 Google has also calculated the carbon footprint of a search request at 0.2g CO2e.3 The amount is seemingly small, but with an estimated 200 million to 500 million search queries per day, 1.3 million tons of CO2e are produced per year just from Google searches.4
Notwithstanding any explanation of environmen-
tal consequences, this issue may seem to be too small to bother. After all, there is an inherent efficiency and environmental benefit that comes with digitization. But as we exponentially produce more data, we encounter a phenomenon called the rebound effect: as technology allows faster and easier access to a resource, the cheaper that resource becomes and the faster it is used. The consequence is a low-carbon interaction resulting in a high-carbon lifestyle simply because we do it more.5
More notably is the cloud computing phenomenon. 11
Starting Out March 2011 – July 2011
Thesis Preparation class with Liz Danzico
Buying a 50 lb bag of sand at Home Depot for our framework assignment.
14
Benjamin bravely volunteering to build a drizzle castle in class.
March 22, 2011
Success! Water + sand = framework.
Initial Statement of Purpose A few terms immediately come to mind in brainstorming
frameworks of individual decision making and as David
a thesis: nature, sustainability, green, climate change,
Foster Wallace describes, our inability in, “being able truly
materials economy, renewable, permaculture. Before
to care about other people and to sacrifice for them over
placing these terms on a cartesian plot of past/future
and over in myriad petty, unsexy ways every day.”8
and environment/moment, there are seven other terms
not typically associated with the aforementioned: shock,
zeitgeist and recent advent of cloud-based computing,
denial, anger, bargaining, depression, testing, and accep-
creates a curious relationship. Cherished physical objects
tance. These terms are the seven stages of grief, reserved
such as photos no longer need to be carefully stored and
for breakups or passing of a loved one, but when applied
documented. In great excess, we can consume digitally
the looming energy and environmental crisis, ring true to
at near infinite levels which (I postulate) further removes
our emotion and psyche surrounding the subject.
us from the consequences of our actions. The removal of
Rather than portend the current trends and shifts, let
meaning from the actual object offers another opportu-
us turn our attention to a term that overshadows much
nity for investigation on how we consume and ultimately
of the environmental movement and is a pillar of our
experience these virtual forms.
economy: consumption. Consumption is an interchange-
able term describing how we, the consumer, use energy,
architecture and frameworks, the second is a study on
food, and goods. Strict definitions aside, we are in the
the construction of current consumption (energy, food,
midst of an enormous shift in economy, world politics,
goods) behavior. These two approaches will be informed
environment, and energy. It all requires a sea change in
by inspiration from previously and soon-to-be read books
how we perceive, discuss, and participate in our consump-
during the summer, interviews with workers in energy,
tion. It’s what Bruce Mau calls “massive change”and is a
infrastructure, food production, and product design in-
seemingly impossible, all-encapsulating wicked problem.
dustries, as well as ethnographic research with individuals
and in group settings.
Consumption as convenience has been established
This concept, coupled with the current consumption
While the first approach involves a study of choice
and fortified over the last half of the 20th century. Government initiatives to develop the middle class in post World War II America as well as banking innovations such as the credit card expanded purchasing power to the masses. Through the removal of these financial barriers, we are given the freedom of more choice to consume. How we express this freedom – either through consumption or conservation – is an interesting opportunity for investigation. Environmental concerns aside, how individuals
Feedback
April 21, 2011
“How can you design interactions to be both a positive experience and reduce consumption and/or affect behavior? Or, can you at all?” - Liz Danzico
decide to use their purchasing power can be applied to small localities to more macro situations.
By focusing on the behavior of an individual, the
choices we make everyday allow for more granular opportunities. However, it is not as simple as Bill Hicks suggests as a choice, “between fear and love”,7 but rather understanding the spectrum of choices, whether active or passive, that are presented to us every time we consume. This idea lends itself into a first approach, exploring 15
Summertime Reading The majority of my reading was done on the subway or in
from my statement of purpose as well as find inspiration
Union Square Park during my lunch break from my intern-
in the thoughts of David Foster Wallace and Bob Dylan.
ship at Case Commons. I wanted to explore relevant topics
(No notes taken)
“ Trust (is) time based, not tech based.” “ The opportunities for service innovation are endless if only we shift focus of innovation from work to everyday life.” “ The design task is to make information digestible, not to keep it out.” -John Thackara
16
“ Privacy is something you can sell, but you can’t buy it back.” “ Happiness isn’t a road to anything, Happiness is the road.” -Bob Dylan
“ While our information technology may be digital in nature, the human beings interacting with it will always be infuriatingly and delightfully analog.” “ Focus on the task, not the tool.” “ Graceful degradation.” -Adam Greenfield
Summertime Thought Phrases Based on my reading, conversations with friends and family, and daydreaming, I wrote in my Evernote journal what my buddy Steve calls, “thought phrases”. It helped to quickly get my ideas down without self editing to formulate a foundation for thesis. Brevity and spell check not included. Note: In this section and throughout the book, moments of clarity and breakthroughs are highlighted pink in notes, emails, blogs, and sketches.
Evernote Entries /
an environment in which a person
way of eliminating some clutter,
On Systems & Service Design
moved fro place to place easily.
maybe also for a park directing
#intro
The challenge in designing a
people for different events.
#service_design
service or system is in the
#system_design
research of the problem, namely
7/21/2011
with my initial topic ‘consump-
The idea of designing in a
tion’. What type of consumption
smaller system that represents,
should I focus on? Why are we
microcasim, of a larger system
driven to over consume?
of behavior. Take for instance
7/18/2011
9/4/2011
The idea of a service being able
Chris Fahey’s design a human
to know who you are and adjust
assignment. again hinting the
your experience to your prefer-
analogy of the emergency services
ences or past behavior for an
button in a train/subway station.
interaction designed just for
Given the facts on what we know
you why isn’t this done with
in energy consumption, economy,
ATMs? Greenfield talks about
rather than targeting the effi-
hotel rooms in the Mandarin that
ciency of a consumer’s lifestyle
are preset for you on check in,
in information processing and
same with car seats.
sorting, how we communicate with
#thesis #thought_phrases 7/10/2011 Although I keep coming back to the design of objects, making things with my hands, playing around with an arduino board, the larger impact of my thesis lies in the design of a system or service. When I was in undergrad, I had an urge to redesign signage and way finding systems for airports and public transportation. I think this was rooted in a new discovery of typography and my fascination with Swiss design. I liked the idea of a framework, not just the appeal of designing an icon or typographic system, but rather
one another, (this has become 7/19/2011
the primary role of interaction
The idea of programmable way
designers, they have been rele-
finding in a stadium, city (see
gated to this role and am curious
GAUDI) seem like a promising
of the similarities to semiotics 17
18
used by graphic designers. to
the seamlessness of ubiqio-
“wet the whistle”.
merely create efficiencies in how
tuos computing by Greenfield,
we communicate or flow through
and Berg’s ice berg analogy of
into the data or cloud, so that
a process regarding information
the amount of hidden activity
the object itself has lost
exchange) seek out inefficien-
required to provide a service.
importance or meaning, that
cies, etc the daily jobs of
Over the course of our first
the data we are accessing has
gov’t workers, janitors, garbage
year, we have covered the idea
more importance than the actual
collectors, etc.
of smart objects, “the inter-
object. Furtehrmore, it is that
The idea that a human’s job
net of things”. These object
access to that data that we now
can be mapped into a serious
carry with them touch point or
place emphasis on, the effcie-
of yes/no statements is disin-
different interface than that
iny ,intuitiveness, etc. Why not
genuous to the process of human
of a digital screen, and some
create object that can display
behavior, ie digital versus
do embody one data point. The
this data, the data that is most
analog. If the human specifica-
interesting and fascinating to
importance to us in an ambiance,
tions are followed to the T, that
notion is the objects ability to
or passive sense.
process would be successful in
surface data, process, function-
“The hallmark of such services
it’s function. however, a number
ality that was otherwise lost
(self-service) is that they take
of issues, discovered by in the
in the cloud. An object that
place with little or no human
field research, interviews, etc,
places more emphasis on a piece
contact; the customer does the
reveal multiple issues in the
of data so much so that other
work once done by an employee.”
ability for the human speci-
types of data patches or fixes
Thackara, p.219
fication to be successful. In
are not required to be layered on
finding those pain points and
top. of the old data to increse
fallacies in the flow, create
it’s functionality. it harkens
Evernote Entries /
a solution that targets that
back to the idea of time, the
On Natural Design
issue. In the case of a grbage
idea of creating efficiency, the
#ideas
collector, the daily decision
layering of design solutions on
process is governed by the ease
top of one another that only add
#intro
of that decision, the weight
to the complexity rather than
of that cognitive load. The
simplify the problem, or merely
creation of change in that work
offer a different perspective
flow can be facilitated by the
on the solution outside of a
injection of q service, object,
digital one.
solution that changes the weight
of that cognitive load, makes
the metaphor further in how
it lighter, tips the scale so
a natural cloud functions and
to speak, so that the behavior
how a computing cloud func-
is shifted and the work flow,
tions. Water vapor, packets,
efficiency, is changed. Perhaps
are combined and the gain more
this is what is meant by being
weight so much so that they fall
intuitive - where the “right”
to earth in the form of rain
decision has a lighter cognitive
droplets, data. Getting infor-
load that the “wrong” one, and
mation from the cloud, rain,
the path of least resistance
downpour, lightning. (Also, find
presents itself or lends itself
the passage of wanting only some
to the work flow that makes the
simple content, water, but we as
systems successful.
consumers are drowned in a sea
Thackara talks about the
of info formation ,when all we
disappearance of computing,
were asking for is a drink to
Cloud computing. Taking
App objects. we have windows
#system_design #thesis #thought_phrases 7/19/2011 The other day, I was reading ‘Everywhere’ by Adam Greenfeild. In an early thesis, he was talking about ubiquitous computing being invisible to behavior, computing that the user is unaware of - but benefits from - it’s ability to do computation, data collection, regulation, information processing, etc. He began to allude to and then talked briefly about the misnomer that ubiquitous means natural, and that technology is in fact separate from nature. (p.28)
But I am wondering about
different traits and see what
service. While that service may
how ubiquity, placing sensors
happens, but do this millions of
not be “natural”, an obtuse,
into object that basically
times over thousands sometimes
regimented way of interfacing
collect data and information
millions of years. The result
with a service through a computer
to be fed into a larger data-
is a highly evolved animal that
is eliminated by creating an
base and then be reinterprted
can be aware and conscious of
experience with that service,
by another system, screen that
nature’s process.
not an experience with the form
will change our behavior is a
of that service.
hope for computing to be more
this consciousness, the abil-
like an environment.
ity to recognize nature’s bounty
8/1/2011
In ‘In The Bubble’, Thackera
in whatever form and manipulate
In urban design, “In the Bubble”
talks about speed being a tenant
it. Only now, we are beginning
p.94 talks about how certain
for better design, talking how
to see for the first time in
areas of a city, namely Belgrade,
our modern way of life has
history the consequences of our
is unplanned and allows it’s
created burdensome efficiencies,
actions - pollution, extinction,
citizens to fill in, create,
speedy processes that compound
climate change, etc. With this
make, design areas of a city that
exponentially over time, driv-
realization, we are beginning
have been vacated. he coined the
ing us further away from the
to modify our design process
term “urban genetics”
natural, undulating cycle that
to create objects, services,
the earth provides, especially
systems that are returning to
9/4/2011
when it comes to agriculture,
the natural rhythms of nature.
“Networks and systems in nature
p.33 (dolce farniente mean-
But there are opposing forces -
generally start out small and
ing sweet doing nothing, p.35)
albeit man made ones - that are
develop during a process of
Furthermore, he mentions another
slowing down the shift, namely
gradual growth. That’s also how
thought phrase I had about how
economic systems, political
we should design man-made ones:
nature designs things through
systems. I wonder what systems
Act lightly, sense the feedback,
evolution, ie. a slow, agile,
can be created that while they
act again.” Thackara, p.215
iterative design process.
are in some ways governed and
guided by the aforementioned,
Theory: With the sustainable
Perhaps, we wrestle with
movement, green, environmental,
that
et al, permeating our marketing,
designed more holistically, to
can
be
strengthened,
materials, behavior, and design,
trump, out compete, change the
Design is moving towards a more
larger systems. QUESTION: what
natural way of prototyping,
are those systems that provide
designing, building, produc-
opportunities for a more massive
ing, computing. This can also
change?
be construed as “humanizing the
machine” or “making an experi-
approaching?) situation of peak
ence more natural”. The way we
of natural resources, carry-
8/3/2011
communicate through devices is
ing capacity, etc. that would
Reading “Everywhere” by Adam
being patched together and fixed
make the more agile, “natural”
Greenfield on the morning commute,
by hundreds of smaller startups,
systems a viable choice, a sound
he talks about the “discourse of
most of whom will die before
economic choice, and advanta-
seamlessness” (p.137), and how
maturation, to find or evolve
geous political choice.
seamlessness erases the bound-
a better way of design. Sex is
In ‘Web Form Design’ by Luke
aries of interactions from one
one was that nature has come
Wroblewski,
“gradual
experience to the next. This,
up with a very simple way for
engagement” as a way for people
in conjunction with Thackera’s
variety in it’s experiments.
to interface with a form or
writings on Situation, namely
Combine two things together with
signup by actually using the
airports, can lead to a person’s
Insulating against the (fast
using
Evernote Entry / Time #intro #seamlessness #thesis #thought_phrases #time
19
disorientation in space and
why would i care about the other
- closed vs. emergent
time, giving them no sense of
tasks done by others as long as
- artifacts vs. behaviors
place or what time frame they
it doesn’t impact my own abil-
- predetermined vs. present
are in. This type of discon-
ity to complete”? These situa-
* How can you design interac-
nect/removal from time refer-
tions where this is apparent is
tions to be both a positive
ence can be not only detrimental
HD television viewing (becomes
experience and reduce consump-
to a person’s psyche, but also
artifacted), capping bandwidth
tion and/or affect behavior? Or,
to their connection with other
for internet surfing.
can you at all? - feedback from
people, places, nature, smaller
liz, april 21, 2010
and larger systems. As a result,
television in terms of sense of
this could fortify a state of not
place? What is the experience of
i have not yet explored yet i
knowing, and subsequently not
travel? What is the experience
have a gutteral reaction to,
caring about, the consequences
of the work day?
deep down.
of their actions., aka, Eloi.
Also to note, thought on
MacColl introduce the notion
determined by distance and inti-
how devices are a window to a
of beautiful seams so the user
macy level of the interpersonal
world of data, and interaction
knows when they are moving from
relationship of the two people.
design in about the design of
one interaction to the next.
Letter, call, email, text, chat.
the experience with accesses,
space design within an experi-
location of call (on the street
filtering, consuming that data/
ence
vs. in the home) new ways of
What is the experience of
Matthew Chalmers and Ian
Communication frequency is
information. The importance
creating, organic, agile. what
of form of the object takes a
is the necessity of gesture?
backseat to the experience that
Evernote Entries /
the user is having with their
On Praxis or Sketching in
face: side-to-side/forward-back
information. Also, the gravity/
Hardware, Lingua Granca
button vs. swipe.
weight of their information,
#gestures
in consumption and covet, is lightened/lessened as it becomes digitized. I no longer have to rescue photos from a burning home as they are stored in the
#intro
On Cities
#thesis
#cities
#thought_phrases
experience.
8/12/2011
Lingua franca
Appropriation as ownership
example of espn iphone inter-
Evernote Entry /
#object_design
#ideas
cloud, the impetus is on the
#intro #research #thought_phrases
of a piece of technology, but
20
taking my thesis to a place
only if the user knows to an
8/21/2011
extent how the technology works,
“Manifesto for Agile Development
9/2/2011
knowing how the system works.
Individuals and interactions
After watching the 8-part series
If the user is left in the dark
over processes and tools
on New York, my perspective on
or doesn’t know how technol-
Working software over compre-
cities shifted from my ideals of
ogy works, subsequently doesn’t
hensive documentation
a livable streets, multi-modal
care, and just wants “it” to
Customer collaboration over
transportation, remove cars,
work, there is an unappreciation
contract negotiation
mixed use buildings, buildings
for the system at large, or the
Responding
impacts of their own behavior on
following a plan” p.111
what all those things entail. I
the larger system. “I am only
also, the structure of Clas-
knew all these when used meant
concerned with my own task at
sical as being a closed frame-
a better city to live in. I
hand, and b/c my concentration
work and Jazz being an emergent
can bike everywhere, not have
is only on that task at hand,
framework.
to maintain a car, close to
to
change
over
of old and new, csa’s to actually
cultural events, walk places,
turing away.
friends all around, exchange
ideas. But over the last month
a destination not of living. Of
- especially triggered by a
having conversations with shop
throughout phrase when looking
keepers, etc. These ideas are
at the Grand Army monument - all
romanticized in many people of
these separate things began to
my generation, where European
come together, encouraged by the
cities are for more “livable”,
doc I watched, and now affirmed in
or just more conducive to being
reading “In The Bubble” by John
a home. My Grand Army monu-
Thackara. He states “a sustain-
ment realization sparked when I
able city... has to be a working
looked at the monument, seeing
city, a city of encounter and
the fine craftsmanship, intri-
interaction - not a city for
cacies, imaging the grandeur
passive participation in enter-
when it was just built, all
tainment.” p.75
now contrasted by the swaths of
The NYC doc talks about our
pavement, noisy traffic, spiral-
view of cities and what they
ing exhaust. It looked more like
are. I sometimes wonder about
a memorial to the past rather
the opinions of urbanites from
than a war memorial. The origi-
ancient times, or even just
nal intent of the memorial was
before the industrial devo-
lost/forgotten, and seemed to
tion. and even at the begin-
shift to a memorial to an age.
Point is: we view cities as
ning of the industrial revolution. Did people think a city as home? With neighbors, families, gossip, local stories, jobs, short commutes, conversations with strangers and shop keepers? I think about a statement from a friend of mine, more offhand comments about the safety of a city, and how they were basically very dangerous, more dangerous than a suburb, implied. Could this have stemmed from the economic downturn of cities in the 1970’s? The flight from cities to the burbs and exurbs formed a crater of density, a volcanic eruption whereby the population densities oozed out into open, available land. This was enabled, predicated? encouraged by the housing policies in the new deal, GI Bill, loans, economic stimulus through “community” real estate development, pushing manufac21
A Three-Month Detour August 2011 – October 2011
Squidfingers Twitter Mention Shelving Unit I wanted to create a shelf for my studio desk that could
Arduino, I plan on lighting up the center panel with LED’s
hold my books, work, and pictures as well as a public
every time I get mentioned on Twitter, publicly notifying
extension of my Twitter account. I’ve always admired
myself and others.
Squidfingers’ set of patterns for web use, and use pattern #108 for my Twitter account background. For the
Note: I never wired up the shelving unit, the time involved
shelving unit, I extended the pattern to use on a physical
and project became a distraction, but in the end, I had
display, etching it into the center acrylic panel. Using an
additional storage for supplies and books.
Finished shelving unit at my desk.
24
Process & Details
September 17, 2011 – October 8, 2011
Squidfingers pattern #108.
Cutting and sizing up the pieces at my parents’ home.
Samples from the laser etching vendor.
Setting up shop in the chat room at school.
Spraying fixative on the laser etched pieces.
Re-assembling and gluing the shelving unit.
Adding the trim and sanding at the SVA sculpture studio.
Painting in the chat room.
Side panel detail.
Back panel pattern details.
Routed space under acrylic panel for the LED strip.
Back view of the shelving unit.
25
Detour Statement of Purpose “Our windows to the digital world have been confined to flat rectangular screens and pixels – ‘painted bits’. But while our visual senses are steeped in the sea of digital information, our bodies remain in the physical world. ‘Tangible bits’ give physical form to digital information, making bits directly manipulable and perceptible.” 1 – Hiroshi Ishii, Founder, MIT Tangible Media Group
Information Appliances & New Nows
26
Dr. Ishii is proposing an exploration in an area of com-
ing rather than recognition. This impacts the library of
puting foreign to the mainstream use of the personal
gestures that a designer can assume his/her audience pos-
computer. Through graphical user interfaces (GUI), we
sesses, and is reflected in the limited way we interact with
access digital information via a desktop or laptop com-
our touchscreen devices. Symbolic, gestural languages
puter as well as mobile device. The narrow framework
such as sign language and semaphore provide a platform
and office-centered metaphors we are conditioned to
for rich communication, but as Jun Rekimoto, Director of
reinforce interactions that limit our ability to meaning-
the Sony Interaction Laboratory, states, gestures, “should
fully communicate and access information. Currently,
be mimetic rather than symbolic”.2 This means our ges-
however, other methods are being implemented and
tures should be learned through imitation, mimicking
explored to shift our perspectives from the keyboard and
the behavior of others. In pursuing newer methods of
desktop metaphor toward gestural and haptic interfaces.
interactions with computers, there are opportunities
for reshaping and repurposing established gestures of
With the recent implementation of touch screen
technology in consumer electronics, gestures allow open
interaction – especially those with physical objects.
up new tangible channels for us to communicate with a
computer. However, our hands have become nothing more
affordances have been limited to instructional buttons
than giant meathooks [sic], arching down onto a device to
rather than physical items and tools whose interactions
simply push a digital representation of a physical button.
are inherent and self-evident in form. Gestures involved
In many touchscreen interactions, we are simply following
with using these objects include twisting, turning, pull-
instructions to “play”, “delete”, or “reply”. Furthermore,
ing, pushing, and lifting. Through the study of past forms
gestural futures typically default to lofty user journey
and rituals, namely in interpersonal communication
videos or science fiction movies, most notably Minority
mediums, juxtapositions with forms and rituals of con-
Report.
temporary communication may lend new insight into
As a seemingly faster way to access information, an
physical interfaces that affect perceived speed, value, and
established set of gestures require recollection of mean-
experience of sending and receiving messages. In this
In the contemporary consumer electronic landscape,
pursuit, the possibility of discovering what Fiona Raby
methods used to parse received message, the value and
and Anthony Dunne call “alternative nows” – “how things
meaning of this information can be imbued through social
could be right now if we had different values”3 – rather
objects in the home. These social objects or physical sig-
than casting some future state.
nifiers can create instances that bridge a communication
gap, promoting triangulation – serendipitous moments
These “alternative nows” can be represented by an
object or series of objects that give a user an analog or
brought on by a shared interface.
physical interface, instead than graphical, to interact and access digital information. The end format will be an ecosystem of Jef Raskin’s “Information Appliances”, computers that are designed for a specific purpose and used only in context.4 By utilizing rapid prototyping techniques, physical prototypes will be produced to pilot form and interaction with users. In this way, a praxis of ideas, based on initial research, can be implemented to test the affects of physical, haptic interfaces on value of filtering data and receiving messages.
We access digital content and engage in interpersonal
communication through all-in-one electronic devices, e.g. laptop or smart phones, and have little time to ponder the affects this interaction has on information and messages. In pursing a thesis with possible physical artifacts as its outcome, there is an opportunity to shift digital content away from a their current format to new forms of physical mediums. Through a broad study of digital content and 27
Blog Entry : 10/2/2011 Talkin’ Thesis Revisions Before I continued to revise my thesis proposal, I wanted to bounce a few ideas around to get the writing wheels turning. I talked with my classmate Allison Shaw about thesis while I was sanding my new studio shelving unit. Two main themes began to emerge as I explained what I wanted to do: + Create physical objects, namely physical displays, that allowed users to get digital information from a single source. + Study past forms of interpersonal communication to discover opportunities for new methods of send-
Blog Entry : 10/12/2011
ing and receiving messages, or accessing data.
Got my touchatag reader today and immediately
Allison asked some tough questions, namely on
almost a pure plug-n-play, had to download two
how I was going to innovate both on the sending and receiving, and if my thesis was more about receiving and filtering. She also had some great insight and suggestions about knowing the readiness of a system, inserting bumps or roadblocks into a “seamless” experience to facilitate mindfulness,
and referring me to recent graduate
Eric St. Onge’s thesis project on distraction.
opened it up. The install was really easy, drivers from the site, launch the touchatag application, and start using their online platform for building one-task applications. I set up two tests: one to send a tweet and the other send an email. The email test went well, sending an email within seconds of the RFID tag being read, but the Twitter test was a fail, bouncing back “Not Authorized” and “Bad Gateway”. seems like the Auth is not working on the touchatag side so I reached out to support for answers. I’m hoping they’re responsive, am really excited to build some quick RFID-enabled prototypes.
Sketchbook Entry : 10/18/2011 Subsequent Blog Entry : 10/22/2011 When I think of interpersonal communication, I see a gap being bridged between a sender and a receiver. For example, distance is a gap. If you are sitting right in front of me, it is fairly easy, fairly quick to send a message to you (I say “hi”). The gap gets more and more difficult to bridge as the distance increases. I can’t just send you my message by yelling if you’re a few miles away - I have to figure out a way to get my message from A, where I’m located, to B, where you are located. 28
Back in the day, and I’m talking way back
in the day, distance could only be bridged by a person transporting a physical or memorized message. This took more time as distance increased. It could be days, even weeks, before you would receive my message. Ingenuity and technology have of course bridged that gap, “bringing us closer� as the saying goes with any cellphone company. But we have more recently seen development of communication technology that moves away from utility, and move closer to fodder. I believe the way in which we develop communication technology is like spilling a glass of water on a table - filling all cracks and crevices, covering the entire table.
In a recent article by Scott Jensen, he
is concerned that as we create utility to fill the small cracks and crevices, we only create a greater need for technological solutions to quell cognitive overload and calm user anxiety. Gaps in time and space are being filled without much thinking about the consequences of the bridges being made, or if there is need for them at all. New channels, such as Twitter or Instagram, facilitate an ability to communicate information immediately about experiences as they happen to a mass audience. Arab Spring aside, I question the utility of subdividing my interests, friends, and experiences into more subdivided categories that are filled with apps and bookmarklets.
29
Thesis Presentation to Frank Chimero & Liz Danzico Presentation Slides
October 24, 2011
Thesis
Devices are not evil + Laptops + Netbooks + Digital music players
+ E-readers + Tablets + Smart phones
What of clocks and coffee tables? Public Space
Home
Opportunity
+ How does the digitzation of content and communication effect our expectations, experiences, and sharing of information in the home?
+ Focus on creating digital products that filter, share, and manage digital content. + Fixated on the idea of robust and ubiquitous mobile communication. + Context of the home is forgotten.
30
Approach + Study at past forms and rituals of communication and household social objects for opportunities. + Alternative Nows – how things could be right now if we had different values rather than casting some future state. + Internet with Things
Purpose + Discover new forms of social objects in the home. + Create physical signifiers for digital content and communication. + Use discursive design to explore solutions.
Pitch For a household, who need to access digital content and engage in interpersonal communication, these physical information appliances are social objects that facilitate shared experiences. Unlike current mobile computing devices, these products are social signifiers.
Thanks
Feedback
October 24, 2011
“ Simply interesting explorations of an interaction design student.” - Liz Danzico
31
Sketchbook Entry : 11/1/2011 Subsequent Blog Entry : 11/3/2011 Digital-to-Analog Display A sketch for an analog display of one’s online data. Consisting of acrylic and wood layers, the display could be mounted to a wall in a kitchen, living room, or office. Core idea is to communicate data central to the user to other occupants of the room, but with specific quantity ambient referenced. The display would not have any controls, only an ‘on/off’ switch, with controls through a smart phone interface.
Blog Entry : 11/11/2011 They are but improved means to an unimproved end. — Henry David Thoreau
32
33
Back to What Matters Most & Early Explorations November 2011 – January 2012
Sketchbook Entry : 11/7/2011
Blog Entry : 11/11/2011
Why, Who For, What, When, Who By, How exercise
What’s the carbon footprint of email?
in Thesis Workshop with Rachel Abrams. (right)
Today, my fellow classmate Catherine Young passed along a link to an article directly relating to my thesis. (did I mention I pivoted? I pivoted). It begins to address the seemingly impossible task of quantifying an individual’s carbon dioxide output from using the Internet, most notably email. Apart from a rough estimation, the article mentions an important concept - the rebound effect. The rebound effect is a consequence of our evermore efficient technology; as technology allows faster use of a resource, the more of that resource is used. (This might explain our lament of having no time.) When applied to our increased use of computers, the result is, as the article states, “a low-carbon technology resulting in higher-carbon living simply because we use it more.”
Blog Entry : 11/13/2011 Headline from the future (ongoing) Online point system created to increase awareness of one’s digital consumption habits with environmental impact.
Blog Entry : 11/15/2011 Thesis question v.27.1 I’m getting closer to a solid thesis question that encapsulates the “why?” with the “so what?”. Here’s the latest iteration (oh yea, I pivoted): “Does demonstrating the correlation of cloud-based computing with carbon dioxide emissions lead to a decrease in digital consumption?”
36
37
Sketchbook Entries : 11/19/2011
38
39
40
41
Going Back to the Future, or to July 2011 An Alternate 1985 In the movie Back to the Future Part II, the main charac-
Plunging into the Shonash Ravine
ter Marty McFly commits the ultimate snafu by leaving
Staying on the Robert Zemeckis’ riff, Back to the Future
a sports almanac in plain sight of an aged version of his
Part III finds Marty stuck in 1885 with only one way to get
arch nemesis, Biff, in the year 2015. Old Biff then hijacks
out: get a locomotive to push his time-traveling Delorean
the time-traveling Delorean to travel back to 1955 to
up to 88 miles per hour, thus enabling time-travel (duh)
give his younger self the sports almanac from the future.
to send him back to 1985. The kicker, apart from getting a
Over the next 30 years, Biff uses it to amass a vast sum
locomotive to go that fast, was the Shonash Ravine cutting
of money from gambling on sports, always knowing the
off extra miles train tracks, leaving little room for accel-
winner. When Marty arrives back to 1985, he discovers an
eration and error. Marty’s sidekick, the slapstick genius
“alternate 1985” where Biff is his step-dad, mayor of his
Doc Brown, calculated a point of no return whereby they
hometown Hill Valley, and owns just about everything.
must commit to reach 88 mph or plunge into the ravine.
Way to go, Marty.
Spoiler alert: Marty makes it back to 1985.
By comparison, Fiona Raby and Anthony Dunne
from the Royal College of Art camp put forward the idea of “alternative nows”, offering visions of “how things could
done so much damage to the environment that human
be right now if we had different values”. Excluding Biff’s
beings can no longer inhabit the planet. Doc Brown knew
iron fist, their work remains in the noir, suggesting, for
the exact point of no return on the train tracks, but unfor-
example, a reality where children grow meat to power
tunately, we cannot agree when or what that point of no
their television. Notwithstanding Guy Montag 2 knock-
return is for our planet. Bill McKibben, outspoken author
ing on your door right now, I’d like to imagine a current
of The End of Nature, offers a number of 350 parts per mil-
state where the Knowledge Navigator3 actually caught on
lion of carbon dioxide in our atmosphere as the marker,
and gestural interfaces – rather than a mouse – were our
and has founded a non-profit around the concept. As of
means of interacting with a computer.
October 2011, we are currently at 388 PPM.5
1
Coupled with a growing momentum behind the
So are we going to plunge into a metaphorical ravine?
internet with things, these themes formed an area of ex-
Yes and no. The ability for our air, land, and water to ab-
ploration of my thesis for about four months. The notion
sorb pollution and then provide its bounty is debatable.
of creating new forms of internet-embodied objects as a
Moreover, our behavior, particularly around consumption
graduate thesis is very appealing; rants about the need
of natural resources, is so far removed from the extrac-
for more tangible interfaces along with explorations by
tion, production, distribution, and disposal processes
firms such as Berg are evidence that interaction design
that we have difficultly measuring our collective impact,
can extend beyond the screen. Earlier sketches of my
let alone an individual one. Lester R. Brown of the Earth
thesis included a built shelving unit that glowed when
Policy Institute summarizes, “We are crossing natural
I got mentioned on Twitter (I’ve got 78 followers so not
thresholds that we cannot see and violating deadlines
that often).
that we do not recognize.”6
4
But as I focused more on the making physical objects,
it became apparent that I needed to go beyond, as our chair Liz Danzico put it, “interesting explorations of an interaction design student”. I decided to shift my focus from investigations in academia to what I had outlined in July 2011 – consumption. 42
Among many environmentalists, there is a consensus
that a point of no return exists for Earth, where we have
Back to July 2011 Earlier this year, I drafted a thesis proposal that outlined my exploration for the summer. It stated: “In great excess, we can consume digitally at near
infinite levels which (I postulate) further removes us
the location and design of new facilities, many others, old
from the consequences of our actions. The removal
and new, still run on greenhouse gas-emitting fossil fuels.
of meaning from the actual object offers another
opportunity for investigation on how we consume
of our consumption. How much power does it take to
and ultimately experience these virtual forms.”
send an email? Consequently, how much carbon dioxide
To put it plainly, the further removed from the con-
sequences of our actions, the more we will engage in those actions. Pertaining to our digital consumption habits, there are little to no barriers to produce, save, share, and consume digital content. It’s even the M.O. of internet-based services to make sure our digital lifestyle is seamless and without barriers.
As we shift our content and communication chan-
nels to a digital format, we begin to loose sight of exactly how much data we amass. On a personal computer, it’s
Now for July 2011, thinking about the consequences
is produced when I do so? Thankfully, research has been conducted around this question, and Mike Berners-Lee, founder of Small World Consulting, even wrote a book on the topic, How Bad Are Bananas? The Carbon Footprint of Everything. But do we keep building more data centers as our data cloud exponentially grows? What happens in 10, 20, 50 years? Are all my pictures and sent emails saved in a virtual shoebox forever? These questions and others help lay the groundwork for my thesis as I move forward with my research, and I can’t wait to get started. Again.
easy to notice how much hard drive space we’ve filled, but do you know how much data you have in your Gmail account? Facebook? Flickr? What about all of your online content collectively? One New York based startup, Dispatch, is looking to bring all your cloud-based content into once place; a benefit for those who need to manage their content, but not for those who want to know where their content is physically located (Note: this is nearly impossible with cloud-based computing). As John Thackera puts it, “These technologies are supposed to give us a clearer image-but by sanitizing the subject, they prevent us from knowing reality itself.”7
This brings me to server farms or data centers or
whatever they’re called. They make cloud-based computing possible and can be found in the form of a small stack in a work closet or come by the thousands, housed in a massive building in Oregon. What’s curious about these (we’ll call them data centers) data centers is they consume vast amounts of power. In 2010, global data centers “accounted for between 1.1% and 1.5% of total electricity use.”8 The industry recognizes the monetary and environmental costs involved with powering and maintaining such large facilities; With recent advances, companies are making data centers more energy efficient, however, as more extreme “green” measures are taken in 43
Sketchbook Entry : 11/20/2011 Understanding the Materials Economy and data centers. (above) Meeting notes with Rachel Abrams in Thesis Workgroup. (opposite) 44
45
Understanding Server Farms, Data Centers, and Cloud Computing A few weeks ago, I headed up to my old stomping grounds in Cambridge to celebrate my buddy’s Ryan’s birthday and have an early Thanksgiving dinner. Ryan is a Sloanie (MIT) and now works for the big boys at Intel. I had the chance to talk shop with his co-worker, Greg Lord, and his friend, Joe Swanson, a network engineer for the Federal Reserve. Having a fresh perspective on my thesis topic, I wanted to inform my ignorance around server farms, data centers, and cloud computing. Greg and Joe were graciously up to the task. This is what I gleaned. Over the last 15 years or so, the terms “server farms” and “data centers” have become interchangeable. For the most part, the guts of each are similar; there are a collection of computer servers, usually clustered in stacks, forming rows and rows of servers depending on the size of the facility. Minus a monitor and audio jack, an individual server is made of the same components as your computer: central processing unit (CPU), hard drive, processor, memory, fan for cooling, and famously in Google’s case, a battery (I’m told the speed of a CPU is not as critical for servers).
I say “famously” because until a few years ago, Google
was extremely hush hush about their server architecture.9 You can’t blame them; servers are a multi-billion dollar industry10 with tiny advances in engineering creating substantial competitive advantage. Unlike other companies, Google designs and builds their own servers (kinda badass if you’re a nerd). Google remains secretive; however, they have offered up some larger operational and structural schematics to highlight a few innovations. For example, they moved the uninterruptible power supply (UPS) battery from a separate unit to the server itself. This creates efficiencies in AC/DC conversions from the power grid to a server.11 But I digress.
While similar, server farms are intended for serving up
data, not necessarily storing it. Data centers on the other hand do both. They have rows and rows of server stacks 46
as well as extensive cooling systems, a control center,
this very question and responded by renting out their
telecommunications, security, and tons of redundancy.
server space, creating Amazon Web Services. They provide
Redundancies are backups of server components includ-
the server backbone for Foursquare, Netflix, and Yelp
ing power supply, network connections, and data storage.
among others, and even host projects for Harvard Medi-
If one source fails, no problem. It’s backed up. “The more
cal School and NASA to run complex analysis models.
redundancies, the better”, says Joe.
Currently, Amazon Web Services owns one-fifth of the
12
Typically, servers follow a “one to many” or model,
where components have at least one backup. Extending
cloud computing market, becoming a major player in providing cloud-based content.13
this concept beyond power supply and data connection, innovations in optimizing and creating redundancy
Epilogue
for data storage, i.e. virtualization, have allowed cloud
This is my basic understanding of how all this works
computing to happen. Depending on who you talk to,
without delving into the infinite details of information
virtualization is an over-arching term that allows us to
technology. I’d like to thank Greg and Joe for talking about
put our data virtually all over the globe and access that
server farms, data centers, and cloud computing. I should
data faster by serving it up locally.
let it be known that we did not talk about nerdy topics for
the entire time, only most of it.
Imagine for a moment you physically divided you
computer’s internal components and placed them at multiple locations around your neighborhood. You still have your keyboard, monitor, and audio jack, but the guts are all over the place. However, this all doesn’t matter to your computer. The operating system (OS) keeps purring along as if nothing happened, and you can merrily go about your day using your computer, accessing your data as if it were all located in one place. This is basically how netbooks or ultrabooks function.
In the world of servers, technology such as storage
area networks (SAN) and redundant array of independent disks (RAID) abstracts where information is held and allows data to be replicated. By spreading the data and traffic load across multiple servers in different locations, data centers optimize their physical real estate. Back in the day, companies overbuilt their servers to make room for data expansion and to protect themselves against large spikes in traffic. I like to think of this method as a giant mall parking lot; every mall has built a parking lot that accounts for the maximum amount of visitors on the biggest shopping day of the year. For the other 364 days, there are scores of spaces being unused.
But why pay for inactive server space? Amazon asked 47
Sketchbook Entry : 12/11/2011 Initial drawings for the Seed Cloud (below) and Read Cloud (opposite) projects.
48
49
Seed Cloud Project A discursive design approach that makes the act of uploading data to a cloud-based service perceptible to others. The Seed Cloud generates steam relative to the upload size: the larger the upload, the more steam produced. The user connects the Seed Cloud to his/her computer via USB, fills the device with water, and can activate it through the Seed Cloud website.
Finished Seed Cloud.
50
Process & Details
December 13, 2011 – December 18, 2011
Seed Cloud logo.
Mocking up the smokestack in foam core.
Measuring the foam core model for smokestack angle and hinge placement.
Setting up the files for the laser cutter.
Adhering acrylic pieces together to build the base and smokestack.
Scouting hardware at various stores.
Cutting the screws for the smokestack hinge.
Sanding down the smokestack for the proper base angle.
In progress at the SVA sculpture studio.
My desk mid-fabrication at the IxD studio.
Final assembly.
Applying the decals.
51
Read Cloud Project A product that measures data stored in your cloud. By installing an a browser extension and plugging in the Read Cloud, a user can measure the mount of data he/she had produced on various social media sites, measured by the day, week, month, and all-time use. If users were given feedback about how much data they produce, would it have an impact on how they produce/consume digital content?
Screens from the Read Cloud Demo Video. http://vimeo.com/33872944
52
Process & Details
December 13, 2011 – December 18, 2011
Read Cloud logo.
Picking up some lumber at Home Depot.
Planning out the day for fabricating and video shoot.
In progress at the SVA sculpture studio.
Painting the exterior.
Inserting the device button.
My desk mid-fabrication at the IxD studio.
Attaching the USB cable.
Sketching storyboards.
Camera mounted on a mini-boom for the video shoot.
Lighting setup for the video shoot.
Post-production in AfterEffects.
53
Send or receive Internet content Send 50KB photo
Socket Unix
... checks if the data packet has the correct IP address, is in the proper order, and is complete.
TCP/IP Stack
requests for data to be sent through the...
received by
Socket Unix
converts data into
My Laptop
87 IPv4 Data Packets
Disruptions Dropped connection Power outage
Router
Modem ISP Server Network
A Cybernetic Model of TCP/IP Protocol.
54
Destination Server
Determining the ‘What’ To the left is a cybernetic model14 of TCP/IP protocol in the
Protocol version 4) data packets and then sent out across
context of sending or receiving a 50 KB photo. The TCP/
the Internet. The TCP/IP protocol checks if any packets are
IP protocol functions as a comparator - a component of
missing, request packets from the sending computer, and
a closed-loop system that compares information coming
notify the sender that the transmission is complete. This
from a sensor to the system goal. In the case of TCP/IP,
operation of error checking is called “cyclic redundancy
the protocol checks if a data transmission (divided into
checking” and used by networked devices when sending
packets) is complete and assembled in the right order.
and receiving transmissions.
Anything less, the protocol can request for parts of that
data to be transmitted again.
and take time (think of a landline phone call), is an ob-
Direct transmission of data, which can be inefficient
This model seeks to determine the ‘what’ of my thesis,
solete method of transmission for the Internet. However,
the content; it does not necessarily refer to the overall
due to the non-linear nature of the IP protocol, a Google
topic, but the actual category and detail of content so as
search request for example is not handled by one server,
to define the ‘why’, ‘how’, ‘who for’, ‘who by’, ‘where’, and
but by several, to give faster, more relevant results. There
‘when’. This exercise is not a linear process where defin-
is actually a carbon footprint estimated by Google for
ing ‘what’ first is necessary, rather to grasp exactly what
the average search request: about 0.2 grams of CO2.16
is being studied, however granular.
Along with the power a laptop consumes, Mike Berners-
On pursuing a thesis about the environmental effects
Lee estimates a Google search creates 0.7 grams of CO2.
of cloud-based computing, I need to better understand
Multiply that by the 200 to 500 million search requests
what I am measuring as well as the infrastructure (so I
per day, and Google searching actually accounts for 1.3
can determine ‘where’ and ‘when’ is the best point for
million tons of CO2 emissions per year.17
intervention). The ‘what’ in my case is data - little bits of 0’s and 1’s that live on your hard drive, and are subsequently stored and transmitted by remote server(s). The more data, the more energy consumed by the server.
Data is measured in bits and bytes (8-bits); you’ve
most likely seen the data on your computer in megabytes (MB) or gigabytes (GB). When you send any type of data over the Internet such as an email, photo, or gchat message, your data is divided up into packets. On average, the size of these packets are 576 bytes or 4,608 bits,15 and consist of a header and trailer, with the data in between. You may or may not know that your computer has an IP (Internet Protocol) address - a unique numerical identifier for every device on a network. Even websites have IP addresses. The header of each data packet would contain information on the origin or sending IP address, destination or receiving IP address, and total size of the packet. The trailer of each data packet would contain information on how many packets there are and in what order to reassemble them back into the original data.
If I were to send a friend a 50 KB photo, the photo
would be broken up into approximately 87 IPv4 (Internet 55
Visualizing Rob’s Tweets Over winter break and into the second semester, I was still wrestling with the idea of visualizing the invisible. Stuck on the idea of signifying tweets (p.24), I experimented with a different technique: dropping all 1,660 of Rob Giampietro’s tweets from 3 feet (as of 1/2/12). I quickly set up shop in the studio, counted Rob’s tweets, hand punched each one, and captured the result in epoxy. The act of taking something ephemeral and making it permanent in a physical snapshot was an enjoyable exploration, but further pursuit will have to wait until after graduation. Note: Rob is a principal at Project Projects, a design studio in New York. As of 4/30/2012, he has 1,790 tweets.
56
Process & Details
January 10, 2011 – January 13, 2011
Setting up the dust shield.
Lining up the cone for the tweets.
Detail of the cone and the trap door cover.
Initial drop test.
3rd drop test.
Prep work ready for the final drop.
The final drop with Mod Podge coating to help the tweets stick.
Attaching the USB cable.
The result.
57
Sketchbook Entry : 1/24/2012 #meta Reviewing thesis process book formats from the Class of 2011. (opposite)
58
59
Research January 2012 – March 2012
On Emerging Themes of Digital Production and Consumption Over the past months, I’ve been reading several books on
our various communication devices, are we loosing our
consumption, culture, design, and the environment. Be-
ability to be satisfied with our current place in life by
fore I close out the bulk of my secondary research, I want
chasing digital bits of potential affirmation?
to highlight a few emerging themes regarding our digital production and consumption habits. (I still have to read
II. Seamlessness and Time
The Information by James Gleick and Glut by Alex Wright)
A longtime priority of interaction designers has been to erase the boundaries between experiences with technol-
I. Either Never Satisfied or Always Curious
ogy, i.e. create a seamless experience. This can range from
“Our inventions are but improved means to an unim-
how easily a user can charge or sync an iPod with his/her
proved end”, as Neil Postman paraphrases Henry David
computer to the consistency of content design across de-
Thoreau in Technopoly. A lofty statement, but one that
vices (phone, tablet, computer, television). A fundamental
addresses a fundamental question underlying the torrent
promise of technology: save the user from the drudgery
of technological advancement in the last 20 years - where
of tasks and make the ones required of them easier.
is all this headed? While some believe the innovations in
In Everywhere, Adam Greenfield points out that, as
technology are leading to a singularity as futurist Raymond
does computer scientist Mark Weiser, seamlessness can
Kurzweil proposes, other thought leaders question the
make experiences, “hard to tell when one thing ends and
insatiable demand for new information and our dissat-
something else begins”.6 Think of it this way: where and
isfaction with the here and now.
when can you check your email? text or call a friend?
1
John Thackara, author of In The Bubble, illustrates
Practically anywhere. With this ubiquitous power, our
our growing dissatisfaction with the analogy of a boy,
divisions of time – work time, family time, play time – are
sitting under a tree, looking out over a landscape. In one
removed. Thackera also warns that even the design of our
case, the boy exists before the invention of the Internet,
spaces can make our bodies, “physically desensitized from
cellphones, pagers; the other case describes the boy exist-
its sense of time”.7 Moreover, Postman laments that the
ing now. Which boy is more thoughtful in the moment,
promise of technology is to give us more time by accom-
satisfied with the solitude of thought? Those not part of
plishing tasks faster, “Time, in fact, became an adversary
the Millennial generation relate to the latter. Some, such
over which technology could triumph.”8
as writer Clive Thompson, argues otherwise, saying the
boy is actively seeking inspiration to share rather than
and task completion begets more space for other activi-
waiting for some serendipitous apple to drop.3
ties; this space however is often filled with more of the
With his analogy, Thackara references the Italian
same activity – a consequence described as the rebound
concept of “dolce far niente”, describing one’s ability to
effect. The concept explains as technology allows easier
find pleasure in idleness, literally meaning “sweet doing
access and faster use of a resource (time), the more of that
nothing”. Elizabeth Gilbert also writes about the con-
resource is used. The effect leaves us wondering where
cept in her book, Eat, Pray, Love.4 Both authors question
all our time went.
2
Our attempts to create efficiencies with technology
whether we can enjoy a moment to ourselves without being able to communicate that feeling to others. In On
III. Information as Metaphor: Water, Garbage, Food
Paradise Drive, David Brooks criticizes Americans who
Open access to a seemingly infinite amount of informa-
have never been satisfied with what they have and who
tion is often framed as metaphor. In The Middle Mind,
are constantly pursuing the next best thing. Applied to
Curtis White describes the abundance of information as
5
63
a deluge, leaving us to drown in sea of entertainment and
Seemingly irrational, our digital lifestyle has become a
communication when all we wanted was a drink. Postman
paradox of loss aversion, a decision theory determined
moves up the pessimism scale, declaring, “Information
by Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman. Loss aversion
has become a form of garbage”. Beyond subjectivity, his
states that we can make decisions based on our desire to
point is reinforced with the advent of content farms –
avoid loss rather than acquire gains; fears of loosing our
creating content on a mass scale as quickly as possible
digital information forever can be alleviated by storing that
to seed hundreds of websites for daily use, only to then
information in the cloud. In his classic routine, George
be forgotten and “thrown away” into a far off database.
10
Carlin jokes that our homes are just places to store all our
The most consistent metaphor used is information
stuff.14 I would argue that our cloud-based services are
as food. Douglas Rushkoff quotes Shakespeare in his
not only means to access our content anywhere, but are
Frontline report, Digital Nation, saying “we are consumed
actually digital attics where we can just store all our stuff.
9
by that we are nourished”. The more quickly we snack 11
on tiny morsels of information [sic], the more our ideas are shaped into bursts of disconnected thought. In his report, Rushkoff points out as undergraduate college students produce and consume information through endless multi-tasking, their ability to defend a thoughtful, consistent argument in an essay is diminished. Gone are the days musing by Walden Pond.
Exploring similar themes in his new book, The Infor-
mation Diet, Clay Johnson states, “information consumption is as active an experience as eating”, equating our cravings for salt, fat, and sugar in cheap foods with our desire for affirmation.12 By quickly viewing and sharing information, we fall prey to our desires of affirmation and recognition (as many media companies have learned), resulting in “information obesity”. Similarly, this rapid, cyclical behavior leads Microsoft researcher danah boyd to describe social media as being the “psychological equivalent of obesity”.13
Way back in 2001, David Brooks wrote Bobos in Paradise, which described a new upper class of now grey-haired bohemians who express their values with a bourgeois budget. It’s not enough to eat “morally neutral sausages”; Bobos must eat sausage made from local, free-range pork using a recipe passed down through the generations, costing far more than any offering from Jimmy Dean. “Shopping, like everything else, has become a means of self-exploration and self-expression”, he writes.15 Through conspicuous consumption, we display our values and beliefs.
It is now 2012. Our consumption as communicating
success has shifted to boasting through production of content. We are all our own PR firm and with the tools of social media, we can broadcast our lives and interests with a simple click or tap. This sentiment is echoed by Kickstarter co-founder Yancy Strickler and entrepreneur Zach Klein in a recent blog post,16 pointing out that con-
IV. The Cloud as a Virtual Attic and Digital Hoarding
spicuous production is now our means for transmitting
While Postman describes information as garbage, more
values. With every upload and post, we are not only show-
and more it seems to be something we can stash away
ing the world what we have or what we find interesting,
in our cloud. Given the amount of storage available for
but we are also searching for affirmation. I doubt anyone
various cloud-based services (generally advertised as
would continue to post content without feedback from
being “unlimited”), producing and saving information is
friends, family, or strangers.
effortless. We are no longer limited by available storage
on our computers and devices; we can save our digital
he mentions the ancient Greek concept of thumos,17 the
content on nearly infinite levels. For example, as of today,
human desire for recognition of one’s own existence.
I’m only using 88 MB of 7,671 MB available to me on my
With today’s social media tools, our ability to fulfill our
GMail account. Why delete an email when I can just have
own personal thumos is for the taking (or clicking); but
it on hand?
the question remains – if everyone is seeking recognition,
can we all respond to one another despite the cacophony
To me, this is a form of hoarding – saving items of little
or no utility for the chance of possible use in the future. 64
V. Conspicuous Consumption vs. Conspicuous Production
In another book by David Brooks, The Social Animal,
of requests?
VI. Starting to Lean Back Apple founder Steve Jobs, in addressing a conference, said, “We think basically you watch television to turn your brain off, and you work on your computer when you want to turn your brain on.”18 What Jobs is referring to is the notion of “hot” and “cool” media, a concept first introduced by the late theorist Marshall McLuhan (also recently covered by Paul Ford in our Content Strategy class). “Hot” media are highly defined mediums which engage one sense of the viewer and require very little participation. On the other hand, “cool” media are low definition mediums that demand more viewer participation and require more attention.19
Another closely related classification of media are
“lean-forward” and “lean-back” mediums. Television is a “lean-back” medium where viewers want to be entertained and are in a relaxed, passive state. In “lean-forward” mediums, the Internet, for example, viewers are more engaged users of the medium and are in a more active state. But as Eli Pariser points out in The Filter Bubble, the Internet is becoming a “lean-back” medium.20
Increasingly, we are watching more video content
online. In fact, nearly a third of all Internet traffic is from watching movies and shows on Netflix.21 Both YouTube and Vimeo have recognized this trend and designed LeanBack and Couch Mode features respectively, so users can watch content on a television or by simply “leaning-back” in a chair. Never mind online video content, our Internet tools and apps allow us to sort through and parse vast amounts of information, easing the burden of search. This does not sound bad at all, but Eli Pariser warns, “as personalized filtering gets better and better, the amount of energy we’ll have to devote to choosing what we’d like to see will continue to decrease.”22
65
66
INTERVIEW : Deena Rosen, Senior Manager of User Experience, OPower Notes (opposite) 1/24/2012
67
INTERVIEW : Stephan Von Muehlen, Co-Founder, Energy Hub Notes 1/31/2012
68
69
DISCUSSION : Allan Chochinov, Chair, SVA MFA Products of Design; Partner, Core77 Notes (below) 1/31/2012
70
71
INTERVIEW : Don Carli, Founder, Institute for Sustainable Communication Notes 2/10/2012
72
73
INTERVIEW : Steve Berry, User Experience Designer, Efficiency 2.0 Notes (opposite) 2/15/2012
Blog Entry : 2/14/2012
closer to the average (using more energy). However,
#interviews
if I’m given a qualitative measure - “Great Job,
#summary
Dave!” - then I will most likely maintain that
#findings
lead. Conversely, if I’m falling behind the group, qualitative encouragement will not work. Given
Interviews n’ Making In late January, I spoke with two Deena Rosen, Senior Manager of User Experience at OPower, and Stephan Von Muehlen, co-founder of Energy Hub. Both companies are redesigning our relationship with utility companies by giving customers realtime and historical data of their energy consumption. I first talked with Deena, who described how OPower’s product platform is rooted in cognitive psychology, in particular the work of Dr. Robert Cialdini. Researching the motivations behind energy consumption, Dr.Cialdini found that across all financial and environmental reasons that the only true motivator was what he called normative comparison.
Normative comparison is a concept where we
compare our status and performance to people similar to ourselves, and we want to “normalize” our behavior with others. As individuals, we do not want to do any worse than a larger group in our energy consumption. In discussing this with Stephan, he mentioned that people also don’t want to do any better. He described a paradox of normative comparison, pointing out that we tend to take advantage of quantitatively “doing better” than others; if I’m conserving more energy than the majority of people I’m compared with, I will use that lead as an allowance and end up moving 74
quantitative data, I would treat my consumption like a game and try to conserve energy more.
In my conversations with Deena and Stephan,
we covered many topics around methods for encouraging behavior change. Don Carli, director of the Institute for Sustainable Communication, has a different approach in working towards a sustainable future. Don is a fascinating character. He worked as a production artist for Robert Motherwell and others during the 1970’s in the New York art scene, and he helped develop standards for inkjet printer technology in the 1980’s. Now, he is advocating for industry standards on sustainable communication. Pursuing large companies with massive advertising budgets such as Proctor & Gamble and Unilever, he hopes to establish a series of measures that: identify the materials used to advertise/market a product, define them in a lifecycle, quantify those materials so as to track them, and then have companies make informed decisions around those agreed upon measures. In doing so, he hopes to prevent “greenwashing” in corporate communication and disclose resources used in advertising and promoting products/services.
Moving forward, I plan to incorporate
two core concepts uncovered from my interviews: normative comparison and established measures.
75
User Survey Being Online and the Environment
Being Online and the Environment
I. Intro
*8. What steps do you take to save electricity? Turn off lights when I leave a room
This survey is conducted by David Bellona, an MFA candidate in the Interaction Deisgn program at the School of Visual Arts. The survey is for academic purposes only. David will be the only person viewing your answers and your privacy will be respected for all responses. The survey will take approximately 15-20 minutes. You will be entered for the chance to win a $25 gift certificate to Amazon.com. Winner will be announced on 2/17. Questions 1-6. For the first section, you will be answering some general questions about who you are and where you live. Cool? Cool.
Installed energy efficient lightbulbs
Other (please specify)
Added insulation around my home/apt (electric heat)
Updated my appliances
Not important
Somewhat
Very important
Overall Cost
Cost per kWh
Usage (Power
Consumption)
*3. What is your gender?
Damage to the
environment
*10. Do you know where your electricity comes from?
Non-renewable energy resources
*4. What is your age?
Renewable energy resources
Both
*5. Where do you live? (city, state)
*11. How concerned are you about the carbon footprint of your electricity consumption?
II. Electricity and the Environment
I have no idea
6. What do you do for work?
Not at all
Somewhat
-
Very concerned
*12. Would you pay for a service to offset the carbon footprint of your electricity
consumption?
Questions 7-17. The following 10 questions are about your electricity consumption and the environment.
Yes
*7. Do you know what a kilowatt hour (kWh) is?
No
Yes No
Installed motion sensors for certain lights
Unplug certain appliances or turn off power strips
2. What is your email address? (optional but needed for the raffle)
Female
Installed timers for certain lights
*9. Which of the following concerns you about your electricity bill?
1. What is your name? (first and last name, optional but needed for the raffle)
Male
Turn off lights when I leave my home/apt
Maybe
Kinda
13. Why or why not?
Page 1
Being Online and the Environment
Being Online and the Environment
*22. How frequently do you use the following services? Facebook
Page 2
Don't use
Not that often
Weekly
Daily
All the time
*26. How do you backup files on your computer? External hard drive Dropbox
Google +
iCloud
Foursquare
I don't back up my data
Yelp
Flickr
Path
Tumblr
Gimmie Bar
Snip.it
YouTube
Vimeo
*23. Would you use a service that helped you keep track of the amounts of your online
content? (pictures, videos, comments, etc)
Other (please specify)
*27. What cloud-based applications do you use? Google docs
Google calendar Gmail
Other email service (AOL, Hotmail, Yahoo) iCloud
Evernote Dropbox
Maybe
28. How would you define 'cloud computing'?
24. Why or why not?
*29. How concerned are you losing your online files? (uploaded pictures, videos, emails,
IV. Your Files and Cloud Computing
etc)
Not at all
-
etc)
Not at all
Very concerned
Yes No
I have no idea
Page 5
76
Flickr photos)
*25. How concerned are you losing your files on your computer? (pictures, documents,
Very concerned
*30. Do you know where your online files are physically located? (ex.Facebook content,
Questions 23-32. The following 10 questions are about your files and cloud computing. (You're almost done!)
-
Other (please specify)
Yes No
Page 6
Being Online and the Environment
Being Online and the Environment
*14. Have you ever calculated your own 'carbon footprint' using online tools/calculator?
Yes No
Desktop Computer
Laptop Computer
Can't remember
iPad
iPhone
iPod Touch
Yes
Other Smartphone (ex.Android)
*16. Do you believe in man-made global warming?
Other Tablet (ex. Samsung Galaxy)
No
Ultrabook Computer (ex.Macbook Air)
15. How would you define 'carbon footprint'?
*19. What device do you use the most to access the Internet?
*20. What device do you use the most to share content?
Not Sure
Desktop Computer Laptop Computer
17. Why or why not?
Ultrabook Computer (ex.Macbook Air)
iPad
III. Online and On The Go
Other Tablet (ex. Samsung Galaxy)
iPhone
*18. How frequently do you use the following devices?
iPod Touch
Don't own
Not that often
Weekly
Daily
Nonstop
Desktop Computer
Laptop Computer
Ultrabook Computer
(ex.Macbook Air) iPad Other Tablet (ex. Samsung
Galaxy) iPhone
Other Smartphone
Other Smartphone (ex.Android)
Questions 18-24. The following 7 questions are about your electronic devices and online services you use.
*21. When visiting a website, how do you share/post the content you are using? Don't use
Not that often
Weekly
Daily
Nonstop
'Like' button
'Tweet' button
'Retweet' button
'LinkedIn' button
'Email a friend' function
'Digg' button
'Reddit' button
(ex.Android) iPod Touch
Page 3
Page 4
Being Online and the Environment
*31. How concerned are you about the physical location of your online files/content? Not at all
-
Very concerned
*32. Do you know how your online services are powered? Non-renewable energy resources Renewable energy resources Both
I have no idea
*33. How concerned are you about the carbon footprint of your online behavior? (posting videos, commenting, tweeting, 'liking', etc) Not at all
-
Very concerned
*34. Would you pay for a service to offset the carbon footprint of your online behavior?
Yes No
Maybe
35. Why or why not?
Page 7
77
environmental impact of data centers. A few even noted they would rather change their behavior than pay extra money. + People use Facebook. Not a typical “Eureka!” moment of clarity, but as affirmation, 80% of 21-45 year olds surveyed use Facebook on a frequent basis (weekly, daily or ‘all the time’). Also, 21-30 year olds use Facebook as their primary means of sharing information on the Internet. Facebook was by far the most used online service, with Twitter a somewhat distant second. Nearly half of 21-30 year olds use Instagram and over 75% of those 45 or older use Google + (yep). + We’re just not that into data. A majority of Blog Entry : 2/18/2012
the digerati might be obsessed with the quantified
#survey
self, but many people surveyed don’t think it’s
#summary #key_findings After little convincing from my classmates Allison and Cooper (“It’s incredible”), I dropped $25
that important. Merely tracking the amount of one’s online content is not enough to change consumption habits – people need a reason and connection to a benefit or consequence. Many wouldn’t know what to do with just straight data; it needs context.
and signed up for SurveyMonkey; it absolutely destroys Google Docs survey. I set up my survey into 4 categories: demographics, electricity and the environment, online behavior, and file management and cloud-based computing. Over the course of two weeks, I had a great response, 102 people, with the majority of respondents in the range of 21-45. A few insights from the survey: + We do care, just not sure what about. The majority of people are concerned with the carbon footprint of their electrical consumption in the home, but are not worried about the carbon footprint of their online habits. It should also be noted that 92% of respondents had no idea how their online services are powered. A key quote , “I don’t have a method of easily understanding what my current carbon footprint is and how to reduce/offset it.” + Transparency is key. Many people would pay for a service that would offset the carbon dioxide emissions of their electrical consumption. 60% also noted that they would be willing to pay for an offset of their cloud-based data. In both cases, this depended on how and where the money was being spent, as well as information on the 78
Sketchbook Entry : 2/17/2011 Survey summary notes. (opposite)
79
Defining an Audience Psychographics Rather Than Demographics For my thesis, I am focusing on the production and distribution of social, fluid, ephemeral content. This includes the reuse of pre-existing content on the Internet as well as the subsequent saving of this content. When I say “saving”, I am referring to the automatic storage of short-lived content that is quickly forgotten by the producer – rather digitally disposed – after a few days. In this regard, these behaviors represent a linear process of consumption, recreating tiny, rapid versions of the Materials Economy millions of times per day. The Materials Economy Made digestible through her video, The Story of Stuff, Annie Leonard explains the Materials Economy: the vast, linear system that is the basis for our consumer culture.23 It consists of five general phases: extraction, production, distribution, consumption, disposal (ref.1). For example, the MacBook I am writing this text on contains dozens of materials - precious metals, glass, plastic - that were
Sketching out model iterations on the blackboard.
infrastructure powered by non-renewable energy resources can have a huge impact on the environment. In fact, carbon emissions from powering the world’s data centers are about the same as produced by the airline industry, or even a medium-sized country.25
processed, manufactured, and assembled in factories all
Dividing the Cloud
over the world. In the case of my laptop, it was shipped
Because the term “the cloud” has become a catch all for
from a factory to a distribution center, then loaded onto
everything dealing with data centers, I need to determine
a truck and delivered to the Apple store in Chelsea. I
specific data center transactions I am targeting as well as
purchased my laptop there and eventually will hand back
user behaviors. Cloud computing is nearly synonymous
over to Apple for “recycling” aka disposal.
with the Internet. Amazon Web Services powering the
This linear process has been critiqued again and
likes of Netflix and Yelp; the ubiquitous access to Gmail;
again, most notably by Ms. Leonard, and William Mc-
Apple’s iCloud service for device syncing; dozens of social
Donough and Michael Braungart.24 What is fascinating
media services such as Facebook and Instagram – all fall
about the Materials Economy are the vast systems involved
under the cloud.
with creating our everyday objects, from my MacBook
or the shirt you’re wearing. We do not to think about this
streaming media (music, tv shows/movies, live events),
massive infrastructure on a day-to-day basis; it simply
work related communications such as emails and file shar-
would not be practical. However, shifting from tangible
ing, and services used for backing up digital content. For
to virtual products, we are completely unaware of the
instance, online services Backupify and Dropbox are for
physical infrastructure that support our digital systems.
general consumer use, but do not share similar behavior
As consumers, we are setting a dangerous precedent if we
patterns with the consumption of physical products as
are moving forward in the adoption of digital products
do Tumblr or Instagram.
Aspects of cloud computing I will not address are:
with, “It just works”
80
While the movement towards everything online (i.e.
Consumption vs. Production vs. Distribution
“the cloud”) has the potential to be more environmentally
Pre-Internet days we expressed ourselves in the real world
sustainable than current practices, a growing Internet
(IRL) through the products we bought. Clothing, shoes,
(ref.1)
(ref.2)
(ref.3)
Model of the Materials & Virtual Economies
jewelry, furniture, cars, books, music – these objects served
ourselves sharing and distributing massive amounts of
as signifiers that communicated who we thought we were
content through rapid click or tap cycles, leaving us won-
in the eyes of others. Our consumption of physical prod-
dering where the last 20 minutes of our day went.
ucts, “has become a means of self-exploration and self-
expression”, writes David Brooks in Bobos in Paradise.
26
are given allow for this behavior. Without limits of cost
We still buy physical products, but we also have
or material, we can produce/curate/distribute seemingly
shifted self-expression and affirmation to the production
infinite amounts of information. More often than not, we
of online content (ref.2). We broadcast our feelings through
do just that. For instance, Facebook handles approximately
comments and ‘likes’; reblog, repost, or retweet images
200 million photo uploads per day.27 Furthermore, we are
and ideas we find interesting; upload first-person views
redistributing existing content through social curation.
of our world through various social media tools (ref.3).
According to Matt Mullenweg, co-founder of WordPress,
Most of our online behavior is reinforced by red circles
for every one piece of content on Tumblr, there are 9 cop-
with white numbers - tiny confirmation alerts that our
ies of that same content being reposted.28 As a collective,
friends, family, and strangers are paying attention. These
our behaviors require a rapid expansion of the physical
mini feedback loops give us hits of dopamine, enabling
infrastructure of the Internet.
Right or wrong, the online and mobile tools that we
ephemeral highs that can be terribly addictive. We find 81
Adjacent Entities for Competitive Analysis
The competition.
I have divided up “the competition” into six categories:
sought to bring awareness around CO2 output, using
Frameworks/APIs, Incoming/Outgoing Data Manage-
540 of black balloons to illustrate an individual’s carbon
ment, Environmental Visualizations, Backup & Cloud
output per day (62 pounds). Carbon Bytes is an iPad app
Management, and Electricity Consumption. They are
exploration of Mr.Murray, tracking personal online habits
charted along a Physical/Digital spectrum paired with
and consequences, such as hours online, downloads, and
six verticals: Practical vs. Abstract, Social vs. Individual,
CO2 output.
Real Time vs. Summary, Expert vs. Layman, Stationary vs.
Mobile, Commercial vs. Residential. My thesis projects
petitive analysis nor fully inclusive of all products/services
are added on each of the six main charts to illustrate their
in any given category. Furthermore, this study is a soft
attributes as well as identify opportunities in different
science, and is an exploration of adjacent industries to
markets. I also performed an audit of consumer labels (e.g.
determine mediums, audiences, techniques, and func-
WindMade) and offset programs, but these categories are
tionality that may apply to my own thesis projects.
It should also be noted this is not a traditional com-
not mapped as they do not fit the selected cartesian axes.
82
Of the few dozen entities, there are two projects that
Note: I refer to a potential thesis project, Cumulus Alpha
can be considered “direct competitors”, both student
in this analysis. This project eventually became Canary,
projects and in the Environmental Visualizations category:
but at the time, was only a placeholder and representa-
Mark Nystrom’s Carbon Emissions Project (2005) and
tive of certain qualities born from this exercise. Also, the
Elwyn Murray’s Carbon Bytes (2011). As a public installa-
At Capacity project was scrapped and became part of the
tion at the RISD MFA show, the Carbon Emissions Project
Carry Your Cloud prototype.
Process
Using sticky notes to plot out the competition on one of the studio blackboards.
I plotted out four axes at a time, documented each session, then rotated to the next set.
February 28, 2011 – February 29, 2011
After plotting all sets, I brought the photos into Illustrator to cleanup the analysis.
83
Practical vs. Abstract
Practical
Backup & Cloud Management Cumulus Alpha
Electricity Consumption
Emission Bits
Green Button
Environmental Visualizations Read Cloud
Frameworks/APIs Practical
Electricity Meter Incoming/Outgoing
Utility Co. Monthly Bill
Efficiency 2.0 Reports OPower Paper Report
Smart Meter Data Management
Eco-Eye Monitors Thesis
Practical Energy Score Cards
Utility Co. Efficiency 2.0 Website Dashboard OPower Dashboard Utility Co. Email Physical Lucid Design Group OPower/Facebook Dashboard Social Energy App Simple Energy Social Game Energy Hub Dashboard
Energy Hub Project Devices
Ambient Devices
Nest Thermomstat
Physical
Digital
Carry Your Cloud
Gilles Belley Energy Saving Adaptor
Gilles Belley EDF Semaphore
Changers Social Solar Power
Digital Neighborhood Score Cards
Physical
Elwyn Murray Carbon Bytes
Physic
Digital
Coal Button REALiTREE
Seed Cloud Mark Nystrom Carbon Emissions Report
At Capacity Natalie Jeremijenko STATIC! Power Aware Cord
Abstract Abstract
Abstract
Practical vs. Abstract Practical
Natalie Jeremijenko creates Practical amazing projects that expose
Practical
the mystery of natural systems and use theirCisco process to
Dispatch.io
IOS NetFlow
Dropbox Tumblr Backup
External Hard Drive
illustrate our impact on the environment.Apple While a few Activity Monitor
are conceptual and abstract, they serve as entry points Tout Email Management
to discussions around our relationship with nature. The purpose of my abstract projects are also to serve as a
Institute for Sustainable Communication
Tendril
of storage and bandwidth, Carry Your Cloud on storage as Digital
digital attics, Seed Cloud on signifying data creation, Your Flowing Data and
Brighter Planet TripSquare AMEE Location Footprinter Clean Web Hackathon Digital
Physical
Tweets
2 Martin the Coal Button onAmy CO emissions from digital behavior. Bloom Email
Physical
Silke Hilsing Weight of Data Christian Gross Paper Plane SMS
Abstract
Abstract
Backup & Cloud Management
Abstract
84
Backupify Gimmie Bar
Green Button Project
gateway around related topics: At Capacity on limitations Physical
AMEE
Digital
Physic
Electricity Meter Electricity Meter
Practical
Practical Energy ScoreEnergy Cards Score Cards
Practical
Practical
Utility Co. Utility Co. Smart Meter Smart Meter Monthly Bill Monthly Bill Eco-Eye Eco-Eye Energy Hub Energy Hub Monitors Monitors Efficiency 2.0Efficiency 2.0 Devices Devices Reports Reports
. Abstract
p& nt Management
city umption
nmental izations l Physical eworks/APIs
ing/Outgoing g Management t
s Project Physical
Utility Co. Utility Co. 2.0Efficiency 2.0 Efficiency Website Website Dashboard Dashboard OPower OPower Dashboard Dashboard Utility Co. Utility Co. Email OPower OPower Practical Practical Email Lucid DesignLucid Group Design Group Paper ReportPaper Report OPower/Facebook OPower/Facebook Dashboard Dashboard Ambient Devices Ambient Devices Social EnergySocial App Energy App Simple Energy Simple Energy Social Game Social Game Cumulus Alpha Cumulus Alpha Energy Hub Energy Hub Emission Bits Emission Bits Dashboard Dashboard Green Button Green Button Nest Nest ThermomstatThermomstat Read CloudRead Cloud
Physical
Digital
Digital
Physical
Gilles Belley Gilles Belley Gilles Belley Gilles Belley Energy Saving Energy Adaptor Saving Adaptor EDF Semaphore EDF Semaphore Physical
Digital
Digital
Physical
Changers Changers Social Solar Power Social Solar Power Electricity Meter Electricity Meter
Practical
Practical
Utility Co. Utility Co. Smart MeterSmart Meter Neighborhood MonthlyNeighborhood Bill Monthly Bill Eco-Eye Eco-Eye Score Cards Score Cards Energy HubEnergy Hub Monitors Monitors Efficiency 2.0 Efficiency 2.0 Devices Devices Reports Reports
Elwyn MurrayElwyn Murray Energy Score Energy CardsScore Cards Carbon Bytes Carbon Bytes
Utility Co. Utility Co. Efficiency 2.0 Efficiency 2 Website Website Dashboard Dashboard OPower OPower Dashboard Dashboard Utility Co. Utility Co. Email Email OPower OPower Lucid Design Lucid Group Design GroupOPower/Facebook Paper Report Paper Report OPower/Faceb Dashboard Dashboard Ambient Devices Ambient Devices Social Social AppEnergy A Physical Digital DigitalEnergy Simple Energy Simple Energy REALiTREE REALiTREESocial GameSocial Game Energy HubEnergy Hub Dashboard Dashboard Mark Nystrom Mark Nystrom Carbon Emissions Carbon Report EmissionsNest Report Nest Thermomstat Thermomstat Physical
Digital
Digital
Natalie Jeremijenko Natalie Jeremijenko Gilles BelleyGilles Belley Gilles BelleyGilles Belley Energy Saving Energy Adaptor Saving Adaptor EDF Semaphore EDF Semaphore
STATIC! STATIC! Power AwarePower Cord Aware Cord Coal ButtonCoal Button
Carry Your Cloud Carry Your Cloud Seed CloudSeed Cloud Abstract
Abstract
Practical
Practical
STATIC! STATIC! Abstract Abstract Power Aware Power CordAware Cord
At Capacity At Capacity
Electricity Consumption
Environmental Visualizations
Abstract
Abstract
Practical Cisco Cisco IOS NetFlow IOS NetFlow
Abstract
Practical
Practical
lanet
Abstract
Practical
Tout Tout Email Management Email Management
Practical
Physical
Physical
Physical
DigitalPlanet Digital Planet Brighter Brighter Your FlowingYour DataFlowing Data TripSquare TripSquare Tweets Tweets Amy Martin Amy Martin AMEE AMEE Bloom Email Bloom Email Location Footprinter Location Footprinter Clean Web Clean Web Silke Hilsing Silke Hilsing Hackathon Hackathon Weight of Data Weight of Data Digital Digital
Christian Gross Christian Gross Paper Plane Paper SMS Plane SMS
Backupify Backupify Gimmie Bar Gimmie Bar Cisco Cisco IOS NetFlowIOS NetFlow Apple Apple Activity Monitor Activity Monitor
AMEE AMEE Tendril Tendril Institute for Institute for SustainableSustainable Communication Communication Green Button Green Project Button Project Physical
Dispatch.io Dispatch.io Dropbox Dropbox Tumblr Backup Tumblr Backup
External HardExternal Drive Hard Drive
Apple Apple Activity Monitor Activity Monitor
ct
Practical
Physical
Physical
Tout Tout Email Management Email Management Digital Digital
Physical
Physical
Digital
Amy Martin Amy Martin Bloom EmailBloom Email
Digital
Your Flowing Your Data Flowing Data Tweets Tweets
Silke HilsingSilke Hilsing Weight of Data Weight of Data
Abstract
Abstract
Frameworks/APIs
Abstract
Abstract
Christian Gross Christian Gross Paper PlanePaper SMS Plane SMS
Abstract
Abstract
Abstract
Abstract
Incoming/Outgoing Data Management
85
Social vs. Individual
Social
Backup & Cloud Management Electricity Consumption Environmental Visualizations
Cumulus Alpha Green Button
Emission Bits
Frameworks/APIs Social
Incoming/Outgoing Data Management Thesis Project
Social OPower/Facebook Social Energy App Simple Energy Seed Social Game
Coal Button Cloud
Neighborhood Score Cards
Physical
Lucid Design Group Gilles Belley Dashboard Energy Saving Adaptor
Gilles Belley EDF Semaphore
OPower Paper Report
Changers Digital Social Solar Power
Natalie Jeremijenko
Physic
OPower Dashboard
Energy Hub Devices Ambient Devices Eco-Eye Energy Hub Monitors Dashboard STATIC! Power Aware Cord Nest Thermomstat
Physical
REALiTREE
At Capacity
Efficiency 2.0 Dashboard Digital
Smart Meter
Physical
Mark Nystrom Carbon Emissions Report
Carry Your Cloud
Digital
Read Cloud
Energy Score Cards Efficiency 2.0 Reports
Utility Co. Website Utility Co. Email
Utility Co. Monthly Bill Electricity Meter
Individual
Elwyn Murray Carbon Bytes
Individual
Individual
Social vs. Individual
Social
Social For my main thesis project, Cumulus Alpha [Canary], I
Social
want it to be easy-to-use, mobile, practical, and social; Berlin-based Changers and stateside OPower are doing all four. Changers is an innovative startup that sells portable solar panel units that can power personal electronics. Us-
Clean Web Hackathon
Institute for Sustainable Communication
Christian Gross ers can broadcast how much energy he/she has created as Paper Plane SMS Silke Hilsing well as CO2 prevented from being released onCisco their social Weight of Data
Physical
IOS NetFlow
networks. Likewise, OPower uses normative comparison Digital
Physical
Digital
whereby we compare our status with people similar to
Gimmie Bar
Tout Email Management
ourselves (friends, family), and want to “normalize� our
TripSquare
Physical
behavior by comparison. Already implemented Your Flowing on Data their Tweets
Apple Activity Monitor
use normative comparison in their upcoming app, in
Backupify Tumblr Backup External Hard Drive
Amy Martin Defense Council (NRDC). Bloom Email
AMEE Individual Location Footprinter
Individual
Backup & Cloud Management
Individual
86
Dropbox Dispatch.io
paper reports and online dashboard, OPower will also partnership with Facebook and the Natural Resources
Digital
Physic
Social
Social
Social OPower/Facebook OPower/Facebook Social EnergySocial App Energy App Simple Energy Simple Energy Social Game Social Game
dividual
p& nt Management
city umption
nmental izations Physical eworks/APIs
ing/Outgoing g Management t
s Project Physical
Social Social Lucid Design Lucid GroupDesign Group Gilles Belley Gilles Belley Dashboard Dashboard Energy Saving Energy Adaptor Saving Adaptor Gilles Belley Gilles Belley OPower OPower Energy Hub Energy Hub EDF Semaphore EDF Semaphore Dashboard Dashboard Devices Devices Ambient Devices Ambient Devices Efficiency 2.0Efficiency 2.0 Eco-Eye Eco-Eye Energy Hub Energy Hub Dashboard Dashboard Monitors Monitors Dashboard Dashboard Cumulus Alpha Cumulus Alpha STATIC! STATIC! Physical Digital Physical Digital Green Button Green Button Power AwarePower Cord Aware Cord Emission Bits Emission Bits Nest Nest ThermomstatThermomstat OPower OPower Paper ReportPaper Report Smart Meter Smart Meter Seed CloudSeed Cloud
Coal ButtonCoal Button
Physical
Digital Digital Energy ScoreEnergy Cards Score Cards
Efficiency 2.0Efficiency 2.0 Reports Reports At Capacity At Capacity Utility Co. Utility Co. Monthly Bill Monthly Bill Electricity Meter Electricity Meter
Physical
Neighborhood Neighborhood Score Cards Score Cards Natalie Jeremijenko Natalie Jeremijenko
Social
REALiTREE REALiTREE Social
Changers Social Changers Social Solar Power Social Solar Power
OPower/Facebook OPower/Facebo Social Energy Social AppEnergy A Simple Energy Simple Energy Social GameSocial Game
Lucid Design Lucid Group Design Group Mark NystromMark Nystrom Gilles BelleyGilles Belley Dashboard Dashboard Carbon Emissions Carbon Report Emissions Report Digital Physical Digital Energy Saving Energy Adaptor Saving Adaptor Gilles BelleyGilles Belley OPower OPower Energy HubEnergy Hub EDF Semaphore EDF Semaphore Dashboard Dashboard Devices Devices Ambient Devices Ambient Devices Efficiency 2.0 Efficiency 2 Eco-Eye Eco-Eye Energy HubEnergy Hub Dashboard Dashboard Monitors Monitors Dashboard Dashboard STATIC! STATIC! Physical Digital Digital Power Aware Power CordAware Cord Nest Nest Thermomstat Thermomstat OPower OPower Paper Report Paper Report Smart MeterSmart Meter
Utility Co. Utility Co. Website Website Utility Co. Utility Co. Email Email
Energy Score Energy CardsScore Cards Elwyn MurrayElwyn Murray Carbon BytesCarbon Bytes
Efficiency 2.0 Efficiency 2.0 Reports Reports
Carry Your Cloud Carry Your Cloud Individual ReadIndividual Cloud Read Cloud
Utility Co. Utility Co. Monthly Bill Monthly Bill Electricity Meter Electricity Meter
Electricity Consumption
Individual
Individual
Social
Social
Environmental Visualizations Social
Social
Individual Individual
Social
Utility Co. Utility Co. Website Website Utility Co. Utility Co. Email Email
Individual Individual
Social
Social
Social
Christian Gross Christian Gross Paper Plane SMS Paper Plane SMS Silke Hilsing Silke Institute forHilsing Institute for Weight of Data WeightSustainable of Data Sustainable Communication Communication Physical
Clean Web Clean Web Cisco Hackathon Cisco Hackathon IOS NetFlow IOS NetFlow Digital
Physical
Digital
Physical
Christian Gross Christian Gross Paper PlanePaper SMS Plane SMS
Tout Tout Email Management Email Management
Physical
Your Flowing Your DataFlowing Data TripSquare TripSquare Tweets Digital Tweets Digital
Physical
Digital
Physical
Silke HilsingSilke Hilsing Weight of Data Weight of Data Physical
Cisco DropboxCiscoDropbox IOS NetFlowIOS NetFlow
Physical
Digital Dispatch.io Digital Dispatch.io
Apple Apple Activity Monitor Activity Monitor
Tout Tout EmailBackupify Management Email Management Backupify Tumblr Backup Tumblr Backup External HardExternal Drive Hard Drive
Your Flowing Your Data Flowing Data Tweets Tweets
Amy Martin Amy Martin Bloom Email Bloom Email Individual
AMEE AMEE Location Footprinter Location Footprinter Individual
Digital
Gimmie Bar Gimmie Bar
Individual
Individual
Apple Apple Activity Monitor Activity Monitor
Amy Martin Amy Martin Bloom EmailBloom Email Individual Individual
Frameworks/APIs
Individual Individual
Incoming/Outgoing Data Management
87
Commercial vs. Residential
Commercial
Backup & Cloud Management Electricity Consumption Environmental Visualizations Frameworks/APIs Commercial
Commercial
Incoming/Outgoing Data Management Thesis Project
Physical Gilles Belley EDF Semaphore Eco-Eye Monitors
Digital
Green Button
Lucid Design Group Dashboard Energy Score Cards
Physical
Natalie Jeremijenko Digital
Physical
Electricity Meter
Emission Bits At Capacity
Energy Hub Devices Ambient Devices Efficiency 2.0 Reports OPower Paper Report Utility Co. Monthly Bill
Digital
Simple Energy Social Game
Smart Meter
Gilles Belley Energy Saving Adaptor STATIC! Power Aware Cord Energy Hub Dashboard Nest Thermomstat
Physic
Efficiency 2.0 Dashboard OPower/Facebook Seed Social Energy App
Coal Button
Neighborhood Score Cards
REALiTREE Cumulus Alpha Changers Social Solar Power
Read Cloud
Cloud Carry Your Cloud OPower
Elwyn Murray Carbon Bytes
Utility Co. Dashboard Email Utility Co. Website
Mark Nystrom Carbon Emissions Report Residential
Residential
Residential
Commercial vs. Residential Commercial
The focus of my thesis is an individuals ability – based Commercial
Commercial
on environmental impact – to consciously produce, distribute, and dispose of digital content. In doing so, all of my projects and prototypes are under the Residential
Institute for Sustainable Communication
AMEE
category. Features such as normative comparison and real time feedback from physical devices areCisco distinctive IOS NetFlow
attributes that I will include in Cumulus Alpha [Canary]. Tout Email Management Physical
Digital
Physical
Digital
Tendril Brighter Planet Digital
Physical Apple Activity Monitor
Silke Hilsing Weight of Data Christian Gross Paper Plane SMS
Amy Martin Bloom Email
Dropbox
Clean Web HackathonTumblr Backup
External Hard Drive
Backupify
Your Flowing Data Tweets
Gimmie Bar
Green Button Project Residential
Residential
Backup & Cloud Management AMEE
Location Footprinter TripSquare
88
Dispatch.io
Residential
Physic
Commercial Commercial
ntial vs. Residential
p& Management nt
city mption
nmental zations l Physical works/APIs
g ng/Outgoing tanagement
Commercial Commercial
CommercialCommercial Gilles Belley Gilles Belley EDF Semaphore EDF Semaphore Eco-Eye Eco-Eye Monitors Monitors
CommercialCommercial
Lucid DesignLucid Group Design Group Dashboard Dashboard Energy ScoreEnergy Cards Score Cards Digital Digital
Physical
Physical
Simple Energy Simple Energy Social GameSocial Game
Smart Meter Smart Meter Electricity Meter Electricity Meter
Project
et l
Physical
Physical
Digital Digital Physical Energy Hub Energy Hub Efficiency 2.0Efficiency 2.0 Devices Devices Dashboard Dashboard Ambient Devices Ambient Devices OPower/Facebook OPower/Facebook Efficiency 2.0Efficiency 2.0 Gilles Belley Gilles Belley Social Energy Social App Energy App Green Button Green Button Reports Reports Energy Saving Energy Adaptor Saving Adaptor OPower OPower STATIC! STATIC! Utility Co. Utility Co. OPower OPower Power AwarePower Dashboard Dashboard Cord Aware Cord Email Email Paper ReportPaper Report Energy Hub Energy Hub Utility Co. Utility Co. Dashboard Dashboard Website Website Utility Co. Utility Co. Nest Nest Monthly Bill Monthly Bill ThermomstatThermomstat Coal ButtonCoal Button Emission Bits Emission Bits Cumulus Alpha Residential Residential Cumulus Alpha At CapacityAt Capacity
Electricity Consumption Seed CloudSeed Cloud Carry Your Carry CloudYour Cloud
Natalie Jeremijenko Natalie Jeremijenko Physical Gilles Belley Gilles Belley EDF Semaphore EDF Semaphore Eco-Eye Eco-Eye Monitors Monitors Neighborhood Neighborhood Score Cards Score Cards
Digital
Lucid Design Lucid Group Design Group Dashboard Dashboard REALiTREE REALiTREE
Physical Smart Meter Smart Meter
Energy Score Energy Cards Score Cards Digital Digital Changers Changers Social Solar Power Social Solar Power Simple Energy Simple Energy Social Game Social Game
Electricity Meter Electricity Meter
Elwyn MurrayElwyn Murray Carbon BytesCarbon Bytes Mark Nystrom Mark Nystrom Energy HubEnergy Hub Carbon Emissions Carbon Report Emissions Report Efficiency 2.0 Efficiency 2. Devices Devices DashboardDashboard Ambient Devices Ambient Devices OPower/Facebook OPower/Facebo Efficiency 2.0 Efficiency 2.0 Gilles Belley Gilles BelleyResidential Residential Social Energy Social AppEnergy A Reports Reports Energy Saving Energy Adaptor Saving Adaptor OPower OPower STATIC! STATIC! Utility Co. Utility Co. OPower OPower DashboardDashboard Power Aware Power CordAware Cord Email Email Paper Report Paper Report Environmental Visualizations Energy HubEnergy Hub Utility Co. Utility Co. DashboardDashboard Website Website Utility Co. Utility Co. Nest Nest Commercial Commercial Monthly BillMonthly Bill Thermomstat Thermomstat
Read CloudRead Cloud
Commercial Commercial ResidentialResidential
ResidentialResidential
CommercialCommercial
CommercialCommercial
Institute forInstitute for SustainableSustainable Communication Communication
Cisco Cisco AMEE AMEE IOS NetFlow IOS NetFlow Tout Tout Email Management Email Management
Physical
Digital
Physical
Digital
Physical
Digital
Physical
Digital
Cisco Cisco IOS NetFlow IOS NetFlow
Web hon
ct
Digital
Tendril Physical
Tendril Brighter Planet Brighter Planet Digital Digital Apple Apple Activity Monitor Activity Clean Web CleanMonitor Web HackathonHackathon
Physical Silke Hilsing Silke Hilsing Weight of Data Weight of Data Amy Martin Amy Martin Christian Gross Christian Gross Paper Plane Paper SMS PlaneBloom SMS Email Bloom Email
Physical
Tout ToutDispatch.io Dispatch.io Email Management Email Management Dropbox Dropbox Digital Digital
Physical External HardExternal Drive Hard Drive
Tumblr Backup Tumblr Backup Backupify
Your FlowingYour DataFlowing Data Tweets Tweets Green Button Green Project Button Project Silke Hilsing Silke Hilsing Weight of Data Weight of Data
Residential Residential AMEE AMEE Location Footprinter Location Footprinter
Backupify
Gimmie Bar Gimmie Bar
Residential Residential Amy MartinAmy Martin Christian Gross Christian Gross Bloom Email Bloom Email Paper Plane Paper SMS Plane SMS
Apple Apple Activity Monitor Activity Monitor Your Flowing Your Data Flowing Data Tweets Tweets
TripSquareTripSquare
ResidentialResidential
Frameworks/APIs
ResidentialResidential
Incoming/Outgoing Data Management
89
Real Time vs. Summary
Real Time
Backup & Cloud Management Electricity Consumption
Seed Cloud
Cumulus Alpha
At Capacity
Environmental Visualizations
Green Button
Frameworks/APIs Real Time
Real Time
STATIC! Incoming/Outgoing Power Aware Cord Data Management Smart Meter
Gilles Belley EDF Semaphore
Coal Button
Lucid Design Group Dashboard Thermomstat Gilles Belley Energy Saving Adaptor Physical
Eco-Eye Thesis Monitors
Project Nest
Read Cloud Digital
Energy Hub Devices Ambient Devices
Emission Bits
Energy Hub Dashboard
Electricity Meter
Physic
REALiTREE Physical
Digital
Physical
Simple Energy Social Game OPower/Facebook Carry YourApp Cloud Social Energy Energy Score Cards Efficiency 2.0 Dashboard Efficiency 2.0 Reports
Digital
Natalie Jeremijenko
Elwyn Murray Carbon Bytes Changers Social Solar Power
Neighborhood Score Cards
OPower Dashboard Utility Co. Website
OPower Paper Report Utility Co. Monthly Bill
Utility Co. Email
Summary Mark Nystrom
Carbon Emissions Report Summary
Summary
Real Time vs. Summary
Real Time
Real Time when compared to electriUnique to online behavior
cal consumption, we have the ability to track usage in Cisco
Real Time
Clean Web Hackathon
External Hard Drive
IOS NetFlow
real-time. With cloud-based service providers utilizing
Dropbox
Dispatch.io
virtualization, they can determine if a server is about to Apple that load crash due to a spike in online traffic and shift Activity Monitor
to other servers. This capability is a dream for utilities: Amy Martin
we all crank our air conditioners during Tout peak-hours on Bloom Email
Tendril
Email Management
Physical
hot summer days, leading to potential blackouts. While Digital
Silkehold Hilsing the promise of real-time electricity smart meters
TripSquare
Physical
Brighter Planet Digital
Physic Tumblr Backup
Many of the physical devices such as Giles Belley’s
Backupify
EDF Semaphore and Energy Saving Adaptor signify electrical Christian consumption in real time. While they are conceptual Gross Paper Plane SMS
pieces, their abstract nature is surpassed by the practicality and function. In developing Cumulus Alpha [Canary],
Institute for Sustainable Communication
Summary
while being aesthetically pleasing.
AMEE Location Footprinter Summary
I hope to create an interface that offers real time utility Backup & Cloud Management
Summary
90
Digital
AMEE
Weight of Data
Yourthe Flowing Datahave management, only 13% – 18% of homes in U.S. Tweets
them installed.29
Gimmie Bar
Green Button Project
Physical
y. Summary
& Management ent
Real Time Real Time STATIC! STATIC! Power AwarePower Cord Aware Cord Smart Meter Smart Meter Lucid Design Lucid GroupDesign Group Eco-Eye Eco-Eye Dashboard Dashboard Nest Nest Monitors Monitors ThermomstatThermomstat Gilles Belley Gilles Belley Gilles Belley Gilles Belley EDF Semaphore EDF Semaphore Energy Saving Energy Adaptor Saving Adaptor Real Time Real Time Energy Hub Energy Hub Devices Devices Ambient Devices Ambient Devices Electricity Meter Electricity Meter Seed Cloud Seed Cloud
ity mption
mental zations Physical al works/APIs s
Real Time
Energy Hub Energy Hub Dashboard Dashboard Cumulus Alpha Cumulus Alpha
At Capacity At Capacity
Green Button Green Button Digital
Physical
Digital
Physical
Real TimeReal Time STATIC! STATIC! Power Aware Power Cord Aware Cord Smart Meter Smart Meter Lucid Design Lucid Group Design Group Eco-Eye Eco-Eye DashboardDashboard Nest Monitors Monitors Nest Thermomstat Thermomstat Gilles Belley Gilles Belley Gilles Belley Gilles Belley EDF Semaphore EDF Semaphore Energy Saving Energy Adaptor Saving Adaptor REALiTREE REALiTREE Energy Hub Energy Hub Physical Digital Devices Devices Ambient Devices Ambient Devices
ng/Outgoing ng nt anagement
Project
Utility Co. Utility Co. Monthly Bill Monthly Bill
Utility Co. Email
Carry YourCarry CloudYour Cloud
Summary
Elwyn MurrayElwyn Murray Carbon BytesCarbon Bytes Digital Digital Changers Changers Social Solar Power Social Solar Power
Simple Energy Simple Energy Social Game Social Game OPower/Facebook OPower/Facebo Social Energy Social App Energy Ap Energy Score Energy Cards Score Cards Efficiency Efficiency 2.0 2.0 DashboardDashboard
Utility Co. Website
Utility Co. Email
Mark NystromMark Nystrom Efficiency Efficiency 2.0 Emissions 2.0 Report Carbon Carbon Emissions Report Reports Reports Summary
Summary
Summary
OPower OPower Paper Report Paper Report
Electricity Consumption
Utility Co. Utility Co. Monthly Bill Monthly Bill
Real Time
Real Time
External HardExternal Drive Hard Drive
Cisco Cisco IOS NetFlow IOS NetFlow
Summary Summary
Real Time Utility Co. Utility Co. Email Email
Summary Summary
Amy Martin Amy Martin Bloom Email Bloom Email Physical
Digital Tendril
Digital
Gimmie Bar Gimmie Bar Physical
Apple Apple Digital Activity Monitor ActivityDigital Monitor
Physical
Tendril
Green Green Project Button Project YourButton Flowing Your Data Flowing Data Tweets Tweets AMEE AMEE Brighter Planet Brighter Planet TripSquareTripSquare Digital Digital
Physical Physical
Dropbox
Cisco Cisco IOS NetFlow IOS NetFlow
Tout Tout Email Management Email Management
Silke Hilsing Silke Hilsing Weight of Data Weight of Data
Dropbox
Real TimeReal Time Apple Apple Clean Web Clean Monitor Web Activity Monitor Activity HackathonHackathon
Physical
Utility Co. Utility Co. Website Website
Dispatch.io Dispatch.io
Real TimeReal Time
ect
OPower OPower DashboardDashboard
Environmental Visualizations Real Time
Web hon
et al
Utility Co. Website
Digital
Energy Hub Energy Hub DashboardDashboard
Electricity Electricity Meter Meter Simple Energy Simple Energy Coal Button Coal Button Social Game Social Game Natalie Jeremijenko Natalie Jeremijenko OPower/Facebook OPower/Facebook Read Cloud Read Cloud Social EnergySocial App Energy App Energy ScoreEnergy Cards Score Cards EfficiencyDigital 2.0Efficiency 2.0 Physical Physical Physical Physical Digital Dashboard Dashboard Neighborhood Neighborhood Efficiency 2.0Efficiency 2.0 OPower OPower Score Cards Score Cards Reports Reports Emission Bits Dashboard Dashboard Emission Bits OPower OPower Paper ReportPaper Report
Real Time
Amy Martin Amy Martin Bloom Email Bloom Email Physical Physical Silke Hilsing Silke Hilsing Weight of Weight Data of Data
Tout Tout Email Management Email Management Tumblr Backup Tumblr Backup Digital Digital Backupify
Backupify
Your Flowing YourData Flowing Data Tweets Tweets AMEE AMEE Christian Gross Christian Gross Location Footprinter Location Footprinter Paper Plane SMS Paper Plane SMS Institute for Institute for Sustainable Sustainable Communication Communication Summary
Summary
Summary
Summary
Christian Gross Christian Gross Paper Plane Paper SMSPlane SMS
Summary Summary
Frameworks/APIs
Summary Summary
Incoming/Outgoing Data Management
91
Expert vs. Layman
Expert
Backup & Cloud Management Electricity Consumption Environmental Visualizations Frameworks/APIs Expert
Expert
Incoming/Outgoing Management
Electricity Meter Data
At Capacity Seed Cloud
Thesis Project Smart Meter
Physical Energy Score Cards
Utility Co. Monthly Bill
Ambient Devices
Physical
Physic
Digital
Eco-Eye Monitors
Utility Co. Energy Hub Email Lucid Design Group Devices Dashboard Energy Hub Dashboard Nest Thermomstat
Efficiency 2.0 Reports
OPower Paper Report
Digital Utility Co. Website
Emission Bits
Gilles Belley Energy Saving Adaptor
Digital
Cumulus Alpha
Natalie Jeremijenko
Elwyn Murray Carbon Bytes
REALiTREE
Carry Your Cloud
Coal Button Green Button
Mark Nystrom Carbon Emissions Report
Efficiency 2.0 Dashboard
Read Cloud
OPower Dashboard
Changers Social Solar Power
Simple Energy Social Game OPower/Facebook Social Energy App
STATIC! Power Aware Cord
Gilles Belley EDF Semaphore
Physical
Neighborhood Score Cards
Layman
Layman
Layman
Expert vs. Layman Expert
The majority of the entities Expert I audited fall into the Layman
Expert
category, as many are for residential use. Those in the Cisco
IOS NetFlowsuch Expert category are APIs; enterprise-scale software
as Cisco’s IOS NetFlow; and the Institute for Sustainable
AMEE Tendril
Communication, creating a framework of standards for the advertising industry. Meaningful change can occur Apple Activity Monitor
Institute for Sustainable Communication
from the top-down or the bottom-up, and I because prefer Physical
Hilsing the latter,30 I Silke hope to create awareness and provide tools Weight of Data Digital
for individual users toMartin become advocates for sustainably Amy
Green Button Project Clean Web Hackathon Brighter Planet
Physical
Physical
products such as OPower’s Social Energy App and Simple
Digital
External Hard Drive
Your Flowing Data
Tumblr Backup
Energy’s Social Game are accessible with a Facebook Tweets
Dropbox
Connect, intended for the majority. My abstract concepts
Gimmie Bar
intend to follow the STATIC! Power Aware Cord’s simplicity.
Layman
AMEE Layman Location Footprinter Backup & Cloud Management
Layman
92
Digital Backupify
Bloom Email
Tout powered services and products. Christian cloud-based Gross Email Easy-to-use Management Paper Plane SMS
Dispatch.io
TripSquare
Physic
Expert
Expert
Expert
Expert
Electricity Meter Electricity Meter
Smart Meter Smart Meter
ayman
Expert
p& nt Management
city mption
nmental zations l Physical works/APIs
Expert Energy ScoreEnergy Cards Score Cards
Utility Co. Utility Co. Monthly Bill Monthly Bill
Physical
Expert
Expert
Electricity Meter Electricity Meter
Smart MeterSmart Meter
Ambient Devices Ambient Devices
Digital
Digital
Physical
Utility Co. Utility Co. Eco-Eye Eco-Eye ng/Outgoing g Website Website Monitors Monitors Management t Utility Co. Utility Co. At CapacityAt Capacity Energy Hub Energy Hub Email Email Project Seed CloudSeedDevices Cloud Lucid DesignLucid Group Design Group Devices Dashboard Dashboard Efficiency 2.0Efficiency 2.0 EfficiencyDigital 2.0Efficiency 2.0 Physical Reports Physical Reports Digital Physical Energy Hub Energy Hub Dashboard Dashboard Dashboard Dashboard Nest Nest OPower OPower ThermomstatThermomstat Dashboard Dashboard OPower OPower Simple Energy Simple Energy Paper ReportPaper Report STATIC! STATIC! Social GameSocial Game Power AwarePower Cord Aware Cord OPower/Facebook OPower/Facebook Gilles Belley Gilles Belley Social EnergySocial App Energy App Gilles Belley Gilles Belley EDF Semaphore EDFEmission Semaphore Bits Emission Bits Saving AdaptorCumulus Alpha Energy Saving Energy Adaptor Cumulus Alpha Carry Your Cloud Carry Your Cloud Layman
Layman Read CloudRead Cloud
Electricity Consumption Expert
Coal ButtonCoal Button Green Button Green Button
Expert
Layman
Layman
Expert
Expert
Physical
Digital Energy Score Energy CardsScore Cards
Utility Co. Utility Co. Monthly Monthly BillJeremijenko NatalieBill Jeremijenko Natalie
REALiTREE REALiTREE Ambient Devices Ambient Devices Mark Nystrom Mark Nystrom Physical Carbon Emissions Carbon Report Emissions Report
Digital
Layman
Layman
Expert
Expert
ct Web hon
l
Tendril Physical
Physical
Digital DigitalData Your Flowing Your DataFlowing Tweets Tweets
Physical
Digital
Cisco Cisco IOS NetFlow IOS NetFlow
Apple Apple AMEE AMEE Activity Monitor Activity Monitor Tendril
Silke Hilsing Silke Institute forHilsing Institute for Green Project Button Project Weight Sustainable of Data WeightSustainable of Data CommunicationGreen Button Communication Physical Digital Digital Clean Web Clean Web Hackathon Hackathon Amy Martin Amy Martin Bloom Email Bloom Email Tout Tout Brighter Planet Brighter Planet Christian Gross Christian Gross Email Management Email Management Paper Plane Paper SMS Plane SMS
Elwyn MurrayElwyn Murray Carbon BytesCarbon Bytes
Utility Co. Utility Co. Eco-Eye Eco-Eye Website ChangersWebsite Changers Monitors Monitors Social Solar Social Solar Utility Co.Power Utility Co. Power Energy HubEnergy Hub Email Email Neighborhood Neighborhood Lucid Design Lucid Group Design Group Score Cards Score CardsDevices Devices Dashboard Dashboard Efficiency 2.0 Efficiency 2.0 Efficiency 2.0 Efficiency 2 Energy HubEnergy Hub Reports Reports Dashboard Dashboard Dashboard Dashboard Nest Nest OPower OPower Thermomstat Thermomstat Layman Layman Dashboard Dashboard OPower OPower Simple Energy Simple Energy Paper Report Paper Report STATIC! STATIC! Social Game Social Game Power Aware Power CordAware Cord OPower/Facebook OPower/Facebo Environmental Visualizations Gilles BelleyGilles Belley Social Energy Social AppEnergy A Gilles BelleyGilles Belley Expert Expert EDF Semaphore EDF Semaphore Energy Saving Energy Adaptor Saving Adaptor
Cisco Cisco IOS NetFlow IOS NetFlow
et
Digital
Dispatch.io Dispatch.io Physical
Physical
Digital
Digital
Backupify Backupify Apple Apple Activity Monitor Activity Monitor Tumblr Backup Tumblr Backup Physical
External HardExternal DriveSilke Hard Drive Hilsing Silke Hilsing Weight of Data Weight of Data
Physical
Digital Dropbox Digital Dropbox
Amy MartinAmy Martin Bloom EmailBloom Email Christian Gross Christian Gross Paper PlanePaper SMS Plane SMS
Gimmie Tout Tout Bar Gimmie Bar Email Management Email Management
Your Flowing Your Data Flowing Data Tweets Tweets Layman
AMEE AMEE Location Footprinter LaymanLocation Footprinter
Layman
Layman
TripSquare TripSquare
Layman
Frameworks/APIs
Layman
Layman
Layman
Incoming/Outgoing Data Management
93
Stationary vs. Mobile
Stationary
Backup & Cloud Management
Seed Cloud
Electricity Consumption
At Capacity
Environmental Visualizations Incoming/Outgoing Data Management Thesis Project
Emission Bits
Read Cloud
Physical
Green Button Coal Button Digital
Phy
Carry Your Cloud Cumulus Alpha
Mobile
Stationary vs. Mobile Many of the traditional forms for electricity and data
Stationary
monitoring and communicating environmental impact are stationary. However, traditional forms such as the Christian Gross
electric bill are highly portable, but are a summary of SMS Paper Plane activity. Recently developed applications from OPower, Efficiency 2.0, and Simple Energy can be access through a smart phone, but the content - electricity use - is still in a
Silke Hilsing Weight of Data Amy Martin Bloom Email
summarized format. One new product on the market, the Nest thermostat, allows for users to control heating and
Cisco IOS NetFlow Apple Activity Monitor Your Flowing Data Tweets
cooling from a mobile app. While a few of my prototypes and projects fall in the Stationary category, my main projPhysical
Digital
ect will be mobile allowing for remote access and action.
Tout Email Management
94
Mobile
Phy
Stationary
Stationary
Stationary
Stationary
Electricity MeterElectricity Meter
Mobile
& Management
ty mption
mental ations
Physical g/Outgoing anagement
Smart Meter Smart Meter STATIC! STATIC! Gilles Belley Gilles Belley Power Aware Cord Power Aware Cord EDF Semaphore EDF Semaphore Stationary Stationary Gilles Belley Gilles Belley Eco-Eye Energy Eco-Eye Saving Energy AdaptorSaving Adaptor Monitors Monitors Energy Seed Cloud Seed CloudHub Energy Hub Lucid Design Group Lucid Design Group Devices Devices Dashboard Dashboard Simple Energy Simple Energy Ambient Devices Ambient Devices At Capacity At Capacity Social Game Social Game Energy Hub Energy Hub Utility Co. Utility Co. Dashboard Dashboard Website Website Nest Nest Energy Score Cards Energy Score Cards Thermomstat Thermomstat Physical Digital Digital
Neighborhood Neighborhood Score Cards Score Cards Mark Nystrom Mark Nystrom Carbon Emissions Carbon Report Emissions Report Stationary
Stationary
Natalie Jeremijenko Natalie Jeremijenko Electricity Meter Electricity Meter
Physical
Efficiency 2.0 Efficiency 2.0 Dashboard Utility Co. Utility Dashboard Co. Project Email Email OPower/Facebook OPower/Facebook Emission BitsEmission Bits Utility Co. Utility Co. SocialGreen Energy App Social Energy App Read Cloud Read Cloud Green Button Button Monthly Bill Monthly Bill OPower CoalOPower Button Coal Button Efficiency 2.0 Efficiency 2.0 Dashboard Dashboard Physical Reports Physical Reports Digital Digital Physical OPower OPower Paper Report Paper Report
Smart Meter Smart Meter STATIC! STATIC! Gilles Belley Gilles Belley Power AwarePower Cord Aware Cord EDF Semaphore EDF Semaphore Gilles Belley Gilles Belley REALiTREE REALiTREE Eco-Eye Energy Eco-Eye Saving Energy Adaptor Saving Adaptor Monitors Monitors Digital Physical Digital Energy Hub Energy Hub Lucid Design Lucid GroupDesign Group Devices Devices Dashboard Dashboard Simple Energy Simple Energy Ambient Devices Ambient Devices Game Social Game ChangersSocialChangers Energy Hub Energy Hub Social Solar Power Social Solar UtilityPower Co. Dashboard Dashboard Utility Co. Website Website Nest Nest Energy Score Energy Cards Score Cards ThermomstatThermomstat Physical Digital Digital Utility Co. Email
Utility Co. Utility Co. Monthly Bill Monthly Bill Efficiency 2.0Efficiency 2.0 Reports Reports OPower OPower Paper ReportPaper Report
Carry Your Cloud Carry Your Cloud Cumulus Alpha Cumulus Alpha Mobile
Mobile
Elwyn Murray Elwyn Murray Carbon Bytes Carbon Bytes Mobile
Electricity Consumption
Efficiency 2.0Efficienc Dashboard Dashboa Utility Co. Email OPower/Facebook OPower/Fac Social EnergySocial App Energ OPower OPower Dashboard Dashboard
Mobile
Environmental Visualizations Stationary Mobile
Stationary Mobile
Mobile
Mobile
Stationary
Stationary
Tumblr BackupTumblr Backup External Hard Drive External Hard Drive Stationary
low
Stationary Backupify
nitor
Data
Physical
Christian Gross Christian Gross Paper Plane SMS Paper Plane SMS Silke Hilsing Silke Hilsing Weight of Data Weight of Data Amy Martin Amy Martin Bloom Email Bloom Email Physical
ment
Dispatch.io
Backupify
Dispatch.io
Tumblr Backup Tumblr Backup External HardExternal Drive Hard Drive
Cisco Cisco IOS NetFlow IOS NetFlow
Backupify
Digital Digital Apple Apple Activity Monitor Activity Monitor
Backupify
Dispatch.io Dispatch.io
Your Flowing Your Data DataBar Gimmie BarFlowing Gimmie Tweets Tweets Physical
Digital
Physical
Digital
Physical
Physical
Digital
Tout Tout Email Management Email Management Dropbox
Mobile
Gimmie Bar Gimmie Ba
Dropbox
Mobile Dropbox
Mobile
Digital
Mobile
Incoming/Outgoing Data Management
Mobile
Dropbox
Mobile
Backup & Cloud Management
95
Concept Development February 2012 – April 2012
98
Initial Concepts + Consumption Dashboard or Bookmarklet in browser + Green Like button for earth day, user can From Competitive Analysis Mobile, social, practical, layman, real-time, social, residential
choose to click either green or blue to donate a penny (think March of Dimes) + Defining a set of standards to establish carbon credit trading for IT industry + Consumer labeling system for websites or services, similar to ‘organic’ or ‘energy star’ + Green uploader or green-cloud hosting service + Balloon limiter: user only has an alotted amount of uploading capacity per day, in the form of the balloon volume + Carry your cloud: physical component of your cloud, must carry it with you at all times just as you have your a data always available
99
Prototyping for Possible Features EMAIL: 2/10/2012 TO : Adrian Westaway, Vitamins #prototyping #design_research Hey David, Thanks for getting in touch, it sounds like you’re back in the thesis zone pretty quick! The energy thing sounds interesting, and I love the idea of IFTTT, it’s awesome. Have you seen pachube? and shodan? One’s a way of collecting loads of data from things and the other is a way of searching for those things. I don’t use them but they could be useful? I’m insanely busy this and next week, but maybe we could try to chat the following week? As for tips I would say - don’t be scared of going out and talking to people, try to design a journey to take them on that will inform where you want to go, be happy to chuck the [plan out the window if it doesn’t work because at the end of the day it’s about you connecting with them and trying to see things from their point of view, and document everything beautifully! Speak soon, and good luck! Oh and please say hi to Liz from clara, duncan and me!
Blog Entry : 2/20/2012 #behavior #prototype #design_research #Emission_Bricks I’m designing and building my first prototype, with some inspiration and advice from Adrian Westaway 100
of Vitamins. When designing for design research,
their dashboards first thing in the morning. For
Adrian suggested, “try to design a journey to
the remote testing, I set up an opt-in Tumblr
take them (participants) on”. Yesterday, I created
blog and Twitter feed so participants can follow
6 Gmail accounts, 5 ifttt accounts, 50 ifttt
their own and others’ statistics. The prototype is
tasks to send emails from 5 of the newly created
going really well, but am finding that keeping all
Gmail accounts to 1 “master” Gmail account (This
the data up-to-date is terribly time intensive.
sentence could’ve been written in code). For the second week of testing, I’m trying out a All the repetition set up a prototype that tracks
few different approaches with individual users:
participants’ production and distribution of public
+ Tash (User 1) will receive an SMS everytime she
digital content. Using the collected data, I plan
checks-in at a location on Foursquare, alerting
to publicly display behaviors such as amounts of
her of the CO2 emissions of that behavior. I chose
tweets, uploaded photos, and status updates with
Foursquare as it is her most active social media
Legos. Yes, Legos, a physical embodiment of data
account, even though it has one of the lowest
and my childhood. With insight from my survey, I
totals of CO2 emissions.
will also be equating each behavior with a CO2
+ Cooper (User 3) will receive an SMS at the end
emission, updating up the totals daily to the
of the day summarizing the total CO2 emissions
physical display as well as an online component.
of all his daily social media activity. + Jess (User 5) will receive an SMS every time
With this prototype, I hope to test a few biases/
she takes a photo with Instagram stating, “The
assumptions:
Instagram photo you just took released 17 grams
+ The quantified feedback should positively impact
of CO2 into the air. That’s the same as driving
participants’ production and distribution of
1/13th of a mile!” (I’m trying out comparisons
online content.
to behaviors that we all can relate to).
+ The public display will create a “shaming”
+ All participants must subscribe to the Twitter
effect: first with the sheer amounts of content
feed, updated once a day with running totals.
being produced by each participant and secondly with the subsequent creation of CO2 emissions.
With Emission Bricks, I’m tracking a running total
+ By observing each participants display, non-
output of social media behavior and subsequent
participants will have an increased awareness of
CO2 emissions. In different approach (if given
their own online habits and CO2 emissions.
the time), I should test for limiting behaviors.
+ Incentive to conserve does not have to involve
Right now, there are no ceilings for how much one
monetary motivation, and can be based solely on
can use Twitter or Facebook. However, setting a
normative comparison to similar groups of people.
fixed allowance that a participant may use for the week, say, “Only 10 tweets per week”, would hypothetically result in different behaviors.
Blog Entry : 3/6/2012 #behavior
Both approaches are very different, but valid,
#prototype
and can inform how I choose to build key inter-
#design_research
actions later in the design process.
#Emission_Bricks #Carry_Your_Cloud After a week of user tracking and documenting, I’m at the halfway mark testing out my Emission Bricks prototype. I’ve got into the daily routine of logging all the user behaviors and updating
101
Emission Bricks Prototype With Emission Bricks, I wanted to test my main hypothesis
amount of energy needed to transmit and serve up digital
(p.11) as well as normative comparison: the concept that
content. For purposes of this prototype and wanting to
states we compare our status and performance to people
avoid over estimating CO2 emissions, I assumed that a
similar to ourselves, and we “normalize” our behavior
Google search was only 1 kilobyte (k) and a tweet was 100
with them.
bytes (.1 k). From this assumption, 1 k = 1 kj = .02g / CO2
emissions. Estimates for other interactions are below:
Each participant had their Facebook, Flickr, Four-
square, Instagram, Tumblr, Twitter, Vimeo, and YouTube accounts connected to IFTTT.com, which triggered an email sent to a prototype Gmail account for each interac-
• Vimeo Movie ≈ 240g / CO2 emissions • Instagram Photo ≈ 17g / CO2 emissions
tion (Tweet, Check-in, etc). I would then log each email
• Facebook Photo ≈ 17g / CO2 emissions
into a spreadsheet for each participant and update a
• Tumblr Post ≈ .4g / CO2 emissions
physical Dashboards using legos to visualize the data. Each Dashboard would also be published on Tumblr and Twitter. CO2 Emission Methodology My estimates for CO2 emissions of digital interactions
• Facebook Link ≈ .2g / CO2 emissions • Facebook Share ≈ .1g / CO2 emissions • Foursquare ≈ .1g / CO2 emissions • Twitter ≈ .02g / CO2 emissions
are based on the work of Mike-Berners Lee as well as estimates from Google and Twitter. For example, Google estimates that a search request requires 1,000 joules (1 kj) of energy or 0.0003 kilowatt hours (kWh)1 ; a request that is spread across thousands of servers. The consequence of generating enough energy to power this tiny request is the release of 0.2 grams of CO2 into the atmosphere.2
I based my estimates on the size of the interaction
in kilobytes (k-size), equating a larger k-size to a larger
Emission Bricks Tumblr feed. http://legotracker.tumblr.com
102
Emission Bricks Twitter feed. http://twitter.com/#!/emissionbricks
Process & Details
February 21, 2012 – March 11, 2012
Calculating Lego size with energy, data, and CO2 equivalents.
Sorting the studio Lego collection as well as my own.
Figuring out placement for the Dashboard.
Setting up triggers in IFTTT.com to send an email to my prototype Gmail account.
Spreadsheet of each participant’s digital production and CO2 emissions.
Jess’ Dashboard a few days in; she was the only fully-remote participant.
Tash’s Dashboard at her studio desk.
I ran out of black Legos (CO2) so my Mom had to mail some backup from my collection.
Recording the daily tally and counting out Lego amounts for each participant.
Documenting each participant’s Dashboard for the Tumblr and Twitter feeds.
103
Participant 1 Daily Dashboard / Week 1
February 27, 2012 – March 4, 2012
Name / Tash Wong Location / New York, NY Occupation / Graduate Student Exit Interview
“Nobody thinks of tweets as being an actual thing; it’s ephemeral.” “(The Dashboard) made me feel guilty that I wasn’t doing more. There’s this push in our class that I need to publish it more, and felt anxiety to produce more.” Final Dashboard After Two Weeks
104
March 11, 2012
Week 2
March 5, 2012 – March 11, 2012
Digital Content Production Total Interactions
Interactions per Day
127
9.1
Key
Tweets per Day
Vimeo Movie ≈ 240 g / CO2 Instagram Photo ≈ 17 g / CO2 Facebook Photo ≈ 17 g / CO2 Tumblr Post ≈ .4 g / CO2 Facebook Link ≈ .2 g / CO2 Facebook Share ≈ .1 g / CO2 Foursquare ≈ .1 g / CO2
3.6
20
Went to SXSW 2 Photos 4 Check-ins 9 Tweets
15
1 Movie Upload 10
Most Used
Foursquare
5
Twitter ≈ .02 g / CO2
Week 1
Week 2
Total CO2 Emissions Total CO2 (grams)
Daily Median CO2 (grams)
553.8 17.9 Total CO2 Equivalent to
Daily CO2 from Twitter (grams)
2.4
Miles Driven by a Car
0.071
Total CO2 Could Fill
Largest CO2 Source
20
700
600
1 Movie Upload
Went to SXSW
500
400
300
200
100
12" Party Balloons Week 1
Week 2
105
Participant 2 Daily Dashboard / Week 1
February 27, 2012 – March 4, 2012
Name / Tom Harman Location / New York, NY Occupation / Graduate Student Exit Interview
“I felt it had the opposite effect, made me want to do it more because I got more legos.” “I didn't think about other people looking at my dashboard.”
Final Dashboard After Two Weeks
106
March 11, 2012
Week 2
March 5, 2012 – March 11, 2012
Digital Content Production Total Interactions
Interactions per Day
71
5.1
Key
Tweets per Day
Vimeo Movie ≈ 240 g / CO2 Instagram Photo ≈ 17 g / CO2 Facebook Photo ≈ 17 g / CO2 Tumblr Post ≈ .4 g / CO2 Facebook Link ≈ .2 g / CO2 Facebook Share ≈ .1 g / CO2 Foursquare ≈ .1 g / CO2
3.5
20
Uploads 2 Movies Over Next 2 days
15
Participates in 24-Hour Design Competition 10
Most Used
5
Twitter ≈ .02 g / CO2
Week 1
Week 2
Total CO2 Emissions Total CO2 (grams)
Daily Median CO2 (grams)
720.4 17.1 Total CO2 Equivalent to
Daily CO2 from Twitter (grams)
3.1
Miles Driven by a Car
0.07
Total CO2 Could Fill
Largest CO2 Source
26
Vimeo
700
Uploads 2 Movies Over Next 2 days
600
500
400
Participates in 24-Hour Design Competition
300
200
100
12" Party Balloons Week 1
Week 2
107
Participant 3 Daily Dashboard / Week 1
February 27, 2012 – March 4, 2012
Name / Cooper Smith Location / New York, NY Occupation / Graduate Student Exit Interview
“I never really thought about this shit before, at all. I put stuff online so I can save space on my hard drive, but I never think of other people having to store that.”
Final Dashboard After Two Weeks
108
March 11, 2012
Week 2
March 5, 2012 – March 11, 2012
Digital Content Production Total Interactions
Interactions per Day
231
15.5
Key
Tweets per Day
Vimeo Movie ≈ 240 g / CO2 Instagram Photo ≈ 17 g / CO2 Facebook Photo ≈ 17 g / CO2 Tumblr Post ≈ .4 g / CO2 Facebook Link ≈ .2 g / CO2 Facebook Share ≈ .1 g / CO2 Foursquare ≈ .1 g / CO2
7.8
40
“Spring Break” Working at School 2 Photos 2 Photos 1 Post 1 Link 5 Check-ins 22 Tweets
30
20
Most Used
10
Twitter ≈ .02 g / CO2
Week 1
Week 2
Total CO2 Emissions Total CO2 (grams)
Daily Median CO2 (grams)
425.3 26.4 Total CO2 Equivalent to
Daily CO2 from Twitter (grams)
1.8
Miles Driven by a Car
0.56
Total CO2 Could Fill
Largest CO2 Source
12" Party Balloons
Facebook Photos
15
700
600
500
Spring Break Working at School
400
300
200
100
Week 1
Week 2
109
Participant 4 Daily Dashboard / Week 1
February 27, 2012 – March 4, 2012
Name / Erin Rouston Location / New York, NY Occupation / Graduate Student Exit Interview
“Looked at everybody’s (Dashboard) and compared myself to others, gauging my own activity and seeing the emissions of others.” “The Dashboard was in my Tumblr to check as well. The emails, not so much, I get a thousand and it’d get lost.” Final Dashboard After Two Weeks
110
March 11, 2012
Week 2
March 5, 2012 – March 11, 2012
Digital Content Production Total Interactions
Interactions per Day
110
7.9
Key
Tweets per Day
Vimeo Movie ≈ 240 g / CO2 Instagram Photo ≈ 17 g / CO2 Facebook Photo ≈ 17 g / CO2 Tumblr Post ≈ .4 g / CO2 Facebook Link ≈ .2 g / CO2 Facebook Share ≈ .1 g / CO2 Foursquare ≈ .1 g / CO2
2.7
Returns to New York City 1 Photo 1 Post 1 Check-in 2 Tweets
20
15
10
Traveled to Cleveland 1 Photo 3 Check-ins 2 Tweets
Most Used
Foursquare
5
Twitter ≈ .02 g / CO2
Week 1
Week 2
Total CO2 Emissions Total CO2 (grams)
Daily Median CO2 (grams)
538.2 18.1 Total CO2 Equivalent to
Daily CO2 from Twitter (grams)
2.3
Miles Driven by a Car
0.054
Total CO2 Could Fill
Largest CO2 Source
19
700
Returns to New York City
600
500
Traveled to Cleveland
400
300
200
100
12" Party Balloons Week 1
Week 2
111
Participant 5 Daily Dashboard / Week 1
February 27, 2012 – March 4, 2012
Name / Jessica Lord Location / San Francisco, CA Occupation / Code for America Fellow Exit Interview
“It did make me think about it per Instagram, but I Instagram a lot less than the people I follow.” “The text alerts for each Instagram were kinda annoying.”
Final Dashboard After Two Weeks
112
March 11, 2012
Week 2
March 5, 2012 – March 11, 2012
Digital Content Production Total Interactions
214
Interactions per Day
30
Tweets per Day
20
17.8
Key Vimeo Movie ≈ 240 g / CO
2
Instagram Photo ≈ 17 g / CO2 Facebook Photo ≈ 17 g / CO2 Tumblr Post ≈ .4 g / CO2 Facebook Link ≈ .2 g / CO2 Facebook Share ≈ .1 g / CO2 Foursquare ≈ .1 g / CO2
6.9 Most Used
Returns to SF from Georgia 2 Links 2 Check-ins 2 Tweets
10
Twitter ≈ .02 g / CO
2
Week 1
Week 2
Total CO2 Emissions Total CO2 (grams)
Daily Median CO2 (grams)
560.4 35.5 Total CO2 Equivalent to
Daily CO2 from Twitter (grams)
2.4
Miles Driven by a Car
0.14
Total CO2 Could Fill
Largest CO2 Source
20
700
600
Returns to SF from Georgia
500
400
300
200
100
12" Party Balloons Week 1
Week 2
113
Emission Bricks Insights & Opportunities Insight #1
Insight #4
Participants were aware of others in the prototype study,
Frequent messages from the system (SMS) were annoy-
but compared themselves to friends and colleagues out-
ing to the participant. A daily summary was more gentile
side of the study, especially in online services they were
and effective, but after a few days, participants defaulted
most comfortable with and used frequently. They nor-
to messages from social media services they were most
malized behavior compared to their own groups, not the
comfortable with.
group dictated by the system.
Opportunity #4
Opportunity #1
Integrate messaging into touch points of an online or
Create a product or service that integrates with the online
mobile service. Default to weekly summaries of use, driv-
services and social networks of the user, rather than create
ing the user to the website for a deeper dive into data as
a separate destination for the user.
well as surfacing preferences.
Insight #2
Insight #5
Participants had a difficult time remembering their own
Participants unfamiliar with ‘grams’ as a unit of measure
production levels when looking at other dashboards.
as well as pounds.
Opportunity #2
Opportunity #5
Need side-by-side comparison. Show a summary of other
Need to use familiar units of measurement for describing
similar users or friends content production/CO2 emissions
CO2 emissions. Devise a universal measure that is relat-
next to the user’s own production.
able to a variety of users.
Insight #3
Insight #6
A few participants noted they use social media for their
Some participants are willing to change their behavior, but
career, namely Twitter and Vimeo. They did not want to
not necessarily pay money/penalty/’offset’ as motivation.
feel guilty for publishing what they saw were necessary communications.
Opportunity #6 Set default goals based on users social groups and similar
Opportunity #3
users. Allow users to set own personal goals.
Allow users to opt-in to specific online services they wish to track. For instance, Facebook could be a strictly social service for all users whereas Twitter could be, in part, for professional use.
115
Carry Your Cloud Prototype
Blog Entry : 3/19/2012 #digital_attic #prototype #design_research
Blog Entry : 2/17/2012 #digital_attic
I’m testing out my assumptions for two potential
#prototype
features in my final product with the Carry Your
#design_research
Cloud prototype. For the last 5 days, I asked a few participants to either: carry around a physi-
On Tuesday, February 14th, I ordered all 1,566
cal representation of their tweets (I’ve been
photos on my Flickr to be printed as 4”x6” photos
carrying around all my my Flickr photos) or carry
and shipped to the SVA Ixd studio. On Friday
a “wallet” with tweet coins to cash in each time
(that was fast), they all arrived in a somewhat
they tweet. As users of cloud-based services, I
smaller box than I had expected. This was the
want to know how aware we are of amassed data that
first step for a series of prototype experiments
we now store in our digital attics (aka tweets
dealing with cloud-based services as a digital
from 2 years ago, forgotten and in the cloud). I
attic. Apart from myself, I intend on recruiting
also want to test the concept of placing limits
participants to carry around physical embodiments
on an unlimited resource and understanding our
of their own cloud.
digital activity as currency.
Carry Your Cloud packages, Twiiter container, and journals.
116
Process & Details
February 17, 2012 – March 25, 2012
Carry Your Cloud logo.
Printing all 1,566 of my Flickr photos.
Receiving the all my Flickr photos by mail, about 11 lbs worth.
Wrapping up the packages with kraft paper and twine.
Adhering acrylic pieces together to build the base and smokestack.
Divvying up the Twitter coins for each container.
Twitter container and journal.
My Flickr package.
117
Carry Your Cloud Invisible as Visible
Carrying my cloud for a week around New York.
118
Barbara’s Twitter package.
Barbara at her studio desk.
Participant 1 Name / Barbara Eldredge Location / New York, NY Journal Entry
“Brought my cloud to yoga. No one seemed to think it was odd.”
Josh’s Twitter package.
Josh opened his Tweets! Need to write better instructions.
Participant 2 Name / Josh Silverman Location / Providence, RI Journal Entry
“Makes me think differently about the physical aspects of my digital life. Much in the same way when there’s a series of threaded replies & responses.”
119
Carry Your Cloud Tweets as Currency EMAIL: 3/13/2012 TO : 5 Participants #prototyping #design_research #Carry_Your_Cloud #Tweets_as_Currency dear participant, you have two items: a 6-part container and journal. the container has the days for the prototype testing, wednesday - sunday, filled with 2 legos
David Brahler’s Twitter containter at the end of the prototype session.
(tweet coins) per bin as well as an empty one with a twitter logo (depository). please take a picture of the container contents before you start on wednesday and when you’re done on sunday for documentation.
during the testing time, carry your twitter
container where ever you go! think of it as an accessory to your mobile phone.
you are limited to 2 tweets per day or the
amount of tweet coins you have in each bin. each time you tweet, you spend a tweet coin and place it in the depository. if you’ve spent all your tweet coins for the day, no more tweets for you! however, if you have any left at the end of the day, you may transfer any remaining tweet coins to the next day. for example, if you tweet once on thursday, you may transfer your coin to friday.
Kezra Cornell’s journal at the end of the prototype session.
you now have 3 tweets for friday!
at least once a day, record what you are
feeling (musings, thoughts, ideas, complaints, etc) in your journal. one word, a haiku, or a few paragraphs, whatever is comfortable. this prototype is about placing limits on an unlimited resource and understanding our digital activity as currency.
when you are done, please mail back your
journal next week. i did not enclose prepaid postage (and should have) but i can get you back on paypal (shop@eloicollective.com) or venmo. just charge me. Michael Yap’s Twitter containter and journal at the end of the prototype session.
120
Participant 1 Name / Jeff Kirsch Location / New York, NY Journal Entry
“Oddly, I’d say the prototype made me tweet more than I would have. Which may seem odd, but I tweet very little.”
Participant 2 Name / David Brahler Location / Cleveland, OH Journal Entry
“It affected my content creation but did not affect my content consumption… I just became my own personal Twitter editor or social network strategist.”
Participant 3 Name / Kezra Cornell Location / Milwaukeem WI Journal Entry
“I’m hesitant to tweet, as my tweets seem more valuable now. Limiting the quantity of tweets = increasing the value & content of a tweet.”
Participant 3 Name / Michael Yap Location / New York, NY Journal Entry
“Started prototype late, got an extension. I only have 8 tweets, hard when you have new knowledge you want to share.”
121
Carry Your Cloud Insights & Opportunities Insight #1
Insight #3
Increased awareness around the amount of data and
Did not affect content consumption, just content
data production.
production.
Opportunity #1
Opportunity #3
Prototype was physical and this insight may be a fallacy.
Focus only on digital content production, not on browsing or consumption.
Insight #2 For those who typically tweeted below the allowed
Insight #4
amount, they felt compelled to use up the remainder of
A few participants noted they use Twitter for their career.
their allowance. For those who tweeted more than the
They felt hindered by the limit and had negative feelings
allowed amount, they felt constrained, but also were
about the experience.
more careful and selective of the content they published.
Opportunity #4
Opportunity #2
Allow users to opt-in to specific online services they wish
Set default limits based on users social groups and similar
to track. For instance, Facebook could be a strictly social
users. Allow users to set own limits.
service for all users whereas Twitter could be, in part, for professional use.
123
CONSULTATION : Jonathan Berger, Engineering Manager, Pivotal Labs Sketches & Notes (opposite) 2/10/2012
124
125
unapologetic cynic, but also an optimist, and he makes his audience realize that we can be both as well. When he asks, “Why are we doing this?”, he wonders why we waste our attention on trivial distractions when the world is filled with awe and wonder.
Fuse these guys together. Boom - you get
my thesis brand personality. Postscript: My classmate Allison Shaw had a great point about selecting Louis CK: he makes us laugh at the shame we feel for doing stupid, idiosyncratic behaviors. However, I don’t want to make people feel ashamed; by internalizing shame, we set ourselves up for freezing discussion around Blog Entry : 2/27/2012
why we feel
#design_persona
it. laughing and discussing shame: good. feeling
shame and not doing something about
ashamed: bad. Emotional Branding Working from Aaron Walter’s design persona template, fellow classmate Cooper Smith and I began to develop the personality, traits, voice, and visual lexicon of our thesis projects. Design personas are similar to user personas in the sense that they are a representation of a personality -
a mindset - to be used as a guide for design-
ing an experience. Starting off with the quesiton, “If your thesis was a person, who would it be?”, Cooper and I began to define the emotional framework for our thesis’ brand.
When brainstorming for my thesis, two
people immediately came to mind: Marty Stouffer and Louis CK. Marty Stouffer produced Wild America for PBS in the 1980’s and early 90’s. His inviting, honest, informative delivery of content became a standard for nature programs. He had the authenticity of a new anchor, the honesty of Mr.Rogers, and the soft spoken adventurous spirit of John Muir.
On the other hand, Louis CK is a self-
deprecating comedian who has the innate ability to rattle off humorous truisms. He is an
Brand Traits from whiteboard session.
Sketchbook Entry : 3/7/2012 Initial interface sketches for choosing an offset amount and offset project. Am starting to believe a mobile app is the way to go. (opposite) 126
127
Sketchbook Entry : 3/24/2012 Sketches for displaying and scrolling charts on the iPhone. (opposite) After reviewing my competitive analysis, feedback from my Emission Bits prototype, and discussing with classmates, I decided to design a mobile app for the iPhone.
128
129
Defining Features, User Stories, and a Name Blog Entry : 3/17/2012 #features #user_stories Thursday, 3/15 More process book work. Met with “the band” (Cooper, Chris, and Tina) for two hours to review one another’s work. Outlined Cumulus Alpha’s [Canary]features and got great feedback. Will be flushing those out more as I review my user story cards and brainstorm around 2-3 key feature with Cooper on Saturday, 3/17. Left the studio late night feeling like a million bucks and couldn’t stop smiling. Wrote a post on the subway ride home.
First sketches of Venn diagram and logo concept from sketchbook. March 23, 2012
Blog Entry : 4/1/2012
sensor”. After an inspired breakfast in the park,
#branding
out came Canary - the original gas sensor.
#design_persona
#coal_button
the name did have some negative implications and
Some classmates of mine warned me that
was a bit dramatic. But Michael Yap encouraged A Trip to Central (Way Upstate) New York It’s currently day 3 of my visit to my parent’s home in good ol’ Oneida County. I consider the opportunity visit one filled with home cooked meals, sleeping beyond the usual 6 hours per night, and of course, gettin’ work done.
While I’m developing a narrative to pres-
ent my thesis, I’ve been outlining the features I wish to highlight of my recently branded product, Canary.
Having multiple meetings with Cooper,
Sera, and a few first-years, I came away with a few great ideas to guide my branding process, namely (pun intended): including the word of what is being measured, bytes; using action words; and playing with encouraging words of creation, more specifically around Nike Fuel’s efforts eg: Nike Fuel is to Calories what (my product) is to
me to redefine old words with updated definitions for modern times, stating “Words are containers: you can empty existing meanings and fill them with new ones.”
With a name under my belt and branding
sketches drawn on my train ride heading upstate, I sketched out concept maps for both the problem space as well as the Canary product. This laid the groundwork for my current workload: finalizing features and wireframe development. Taking a peek at my schedule of deliverables, I will spend the next 4 days flushing out user flows and wireframes while developing the website shell for my product launch. This development work (which by the way I’m starting to love front-end coding again, HT to Zeldman, Jason Santa Maria, and schoolmates) is also part of another project I’m about to launch, The Coal Button.
Bytes. Despite our efforts, I was still stuck. Then, I remembered something Cooper wrote down on a whiteboard a few weeks ago, “service as 130
User stories based on four key features: track and compare, set targets, offset payment, and service contact. Developed late March. (opposite)
Feature Set System 0
Track 1
Actor
I want
so that
Priority
User User User User User
to connect a service to Canary to invite my friends to signup to customize my avatar to enter my email address to set my notification preferences
I can track my use of those services they may also track/offset their data production the world can see me as I see myself I can receive emails from Canary I will only receive notifications when I want them
1 5 5 3 3
User
I can be aware of the total data I have produced
1
I can know how much data I have produced over a specific time range I can be aware of how much data I have produced I can be aware of how much CO2 I have produced I can be aware of the total CO2 I have produced I can know how much CO2 I have produced over a specific time range I can know if my data production is excessive
1
User User
to view a summary of all my data production from my data production to view a summary of all my data production based on a time selection to view the data production from a specific service to view the CO2 production from a specific service to view a summary of my CO2 production to view a summary of my CO2 production based on a time selection to compare my data production with people similar to me to compare my data production with my friends to post my data production stats to a service
1 3
User
to post my CO2 production stats to a service
I can know if my data production is excessive I can show how much data I have produced to my followers I can show how much CO2 I have produced to my followers
System
to set the default of data production based on similar people to a user to set the default of data production based on a user's friends to customize a limit for my data production for a select service to notify a user that they are reaching a data threshold for a specific service to notify a user that they are reaching a CO2 threshold for a specific service to be notified of my data production as I approach a limit set by Canary to be notified of my data production as I approach a limit set by my friends
I can display a common limit for my user
2
I can display a common limit for my user
2
I can adjust my behavior to a goal I am comfortable with I can let the user make a decision about their data production I can let the user make a decision about their data production I can adjust my data production is too much
3
I can adjust my data production is too much
2
I can offset my data production
2
I can pay an amount I am comfortable with I can pay my offsets easily I can offset my data production with a project I am familiar with I can make others aware of a project I care about
3 3 3
I do not have worry about paying incrementally
4
I can demand they use ecologically sustainable business practices I can demand they use ecologically sustainable business practices I can use a channel I am most comfortable with I can contact a service in the manner I am most comfortable with
1
User User User User User User
Targets 2
System User System System User User Offsets 3
User User User User User User
Contact 4
to select a sustainability project based on Canary’s recommendations to set my donation amount for my offsets to connect my PayPal account to select a sustainability project based on my own preferences to recommend a sustainability project to a friend or followers on a service to set my payments to automatic deduction based on consumption amounts
User
to contact a service
User
to select a service to contact
User User
to select the method to contact a service to choose to remain anonymous
1 2 2 2 1
4
2 2 2
4
1 2 4
131
The Problem Space The concept map below illustrates the problem space of my thesis exploration, namely the lack of feedback to the user from the production of digital content and subsequent CO2 emissions.
ONLINE SERVICES (FACEBOOK, TWITTER, INSTAGRAM, ETC.)
SERVICE
PRODUCERS
USERS
GENERATE
CONTENT (TEXT, IMAGE, VIDEO, ETC.)
ARE
CONSUMERS
ENABLED THROUGH
OBSERVE
VIEWED THROUGH
COMPUTER OR MOBILE DEVICE SERVICE
132
SOLAR PANELS
CAPTURE
INSTALL
HOSTED BY
DATA CENTERS
RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES
NON-RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES
USE
POWER
ENERGY UTILITIES
PRODUCE
CO2 EMISSIONS
POWER
133
Coal Button
In late 2011, there were 509,147 data centers worldwide, covering an area equivalent of 5,955 football fields.1
EMAIL : 4/5/2012 To : 101 Recipients #coal_button #project #key_findings #problem_space Hello, Today, I’m introducing the Coal Button http://coalbutton.com As part of my thesis work at SVA, I’ve been researching the promises, efforts, and missed opportunities of building an environmentally sustainable infrastructure to support and main-
Sketches of Coal Button site from sketchbook entry, 3/21/2012.
tain our digital lifestyle aka. ‘the cloud’. The Coal Button site is an entry point, albeit cheeky, into the problem space of my thesis project. Enjoy, and remember - behind every click there’s a little lump of coal. Dave
Button mockup from the Coal Button website.
134
Illustration of the problem space from the Coal Button website.
Huh?
W3Schools as well as ShareThis and AddThis, the Coal
Our Facebook profiles, YouTube videos, and Gmail ac-
Button has been featured on numerous sites, including:
counts are reliant on a computing phenomenon called
The New York Times, Fox News, Slate, A List Apart, and
“the cloud”. Made up of millions of servers, the cloud’s
Treehugger.8 Comparable to emission estimates for a
infrastructure is a multi-billion dollar industry, quickly
Google search, every click consumes 0.0003 kilowatt hours
growing to keep pace with our demand. In fact, Former
(kWh) of energy, or 1 kilojoule, releasing 0.2 grams of CO2
CEO of Google, Eric Schmidt, estimates every two days we
into the atmosphere.9
2
generate as much information as we did from the dawn of civilization up until 2003.3
These millions of servers are housed in data centers:
physical embodiments of the cloud. Some cost as much
The annual C02 emissions of U.S. data centers is 170 million tons, more than Argentina produced in 2010.10
as $1 billion to build, reach upwards of 300,000 square feet, and consume enough energy to power 80,000 aver-
CO2 Counter
age U.S. homes.4 To power these facilities, the majority
The IT industry has finally agreed upon a set of standards
of IT companies rely on coal for between 50% – 80% of
for measuring its CO2 emissions.11 The CO2 Counter uses
their energy needs. Consuming nearly 2% of all global
these standards to track all CO2 emissions of “one-click”
electricity and growing at a rate of 12% a year, total CO
interactions on the Internet - buttons that like, tweet,
5
2
emissions from the IT industry are equal to that of the
share, reblog, pin, and yes, exclusively produce CO2.
airline industry.
Greater demand due to efficiency is not a new issue.
tions on the web subsequently produce pollution; even
Jevons paradox describes the increase in coal consump-
a Google search produces 0.2 grams. With an estimated
tion due to efficient steam engines. Today, known as the
200 to 500 million search queries per day, 1.3 millions
rebound effect, it explains as technology allows for faster
tons of CO2 emissions are generated each year, just from
and easier access to a resource, that resource becomes
Google searches.12
cheaper and used more quickly. For instance, an email
has about one-sixteenth the carbon footprint of a letter.7
been estimated to be 0.02 grams of CO2.13 While this mi-
Over the past year, how many emails do we send versus
nuscule emission weighs 0.02 grams, by volume, it takes
letters?
up roughly 10ml of space. 50 tweets and enough CO2 has
6
The Button The Coal Button is a new type of interaction that allows us to simply pollute with every click. It does not like, tweet,
Research has shown that even the tiniest interac-
Even smaller are emissions from a tweet which has
been released to fill the lungs of an average human breath. Not to fear, the CO2 Counter can track even the smallest button clicks, including tweets.
share, reblog, or pin; it simply emits CO2. Endorsed by 135
Canary March 2012 – May 2012
Canary
Pitch For users of social media, who want to live an environmentally sustainable lifestyle, Canary is a mobile app that tracks and offsets your digital carbon footprint. Unlike TerraPass, Canary tracks CO2 emissions in real-time and enables voluntary, immediate donations to local offset programs. Four Key Features 1 Track and compare a user’s data production and CO2 emissions from Facebook, Twitter, Foursquare, and Instagram with everyone, similar users, or friends. 2 A user can compare their own data production and CO2 emissions with default targets based on similar users or set his/her own targets. 3 Offset payments can be made voluntarily or paid automatically by month to a choice of three local, environmentally sustainable projects. 100g/CO2 = $0.10. 4 A user can share their targets with specific services via Twitter or email, communicating his/her conservation and demand for more sustainable business practices. More Information http://canaryinthecloud.com Canary profile screen with Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram connected.
138
vapor vapor
vapor vapor
vapor
canary
canary
canary canary
canary
canary
canary
canary
canary
canary
canary
canary
canary
canary
CANARY
CANARY
Canary logo development.
139
Concept Map The concept map for Canary is a hybrid of a service blueprint model and traditional concept map, outlining the core interaction and four key features of the mobile app. The following pages are from a booklet that separates the different layers of the map, illustrating the components of the system. The full concept map is on the last page of this section. Note: Features #2 and #4 have been combined into the ‘Target’ section for the final designs, but are still considered separate features. Also, offset projects described in feature #3 are limited to three regional options for the user in the final design. Offset project and payment selection are outlined in the wireframes. (p.162)
140
CONCEPT MAP FOR SERVICE / CORE INTERACTION / FEATURE SET
DAVID BELLONA / THESIS RESEARCH / SVA MFA INTERACTION DESIGN / APR.5.2012
141
CONCEPT MAP FOR SERVICE / CORE INTERACTION / FEATURE SET MAINMain ACTORS Actors 1 of 9
USER
CANARY
USERS
PAGE 1/9
142
CANARY SERVICE
EXTERNAL
ONLINE SERVICES (FACEBOOK, TWITTER, INSTAGRAM, ETC.)
DAVID BELLONA / THESIS RESEARCH / SVA MFA INTERACTION DESIGN / APR.5.2012
CONCEPT MAP FOR SERVICE / CORE INTERACTION / FEATURE SET USER UserACTIONS Actions 2 of 9
USER
USERS
SIGN UP
CANARY SERVICE
OBSERVE
NOTIFICATIONS & INFORMATION COMPARE
SET
FRIENDS & SIMILAR USERS
TARGETS
FUND
SUSTAINABILITY PROJECTS
MAKE
CONTACT
PAGE 2/9
TO DEMAND
ONLINE SERVICES (FACEBOOK, TWITTER, INSTAGRAM, ETC.)
TO USE
ECOLOGICALLY SUSTAINABLE BUSINESS PRACTICES
DAVID BELLONA / THESIS RESEARCH / SVA MFA INTERACTION DESIGN / APR.5.2012
143
CONCEPT MAP FOR SERVICE / CORE INTERACTION / FEATURE SET CANARY KEY Key ACTIONS Canary Actions 3 of 9
CANARY IS TRACKED BY
CANARY SERVICE
CONNECTS WITH
GENERATES
IS TRACKED BY
ONLINE SERVICES (FACEBOOK, TWITTER, INSTAGRAM, ETC.)
GENERATE
DISPLAYED ON
CO2 EMISSIONS
VISUALIZE
NOTIFICATIONS & INFORMATION
SETS
BASED ON
TARGETS
SUGGESTS
BASED ON
SUSTAINABILITY PROJECTS
PROVIDES
CONTACT
PAGE 3/9
144
DAVID BELLONA / THESIS RESEARCH / SVA MFA INTERACTION DESIGN / APR.5.2012
CONCEPT MAP FOR SERVICE / CORE INTERACTION / FEATURE SET CORE CoreINTERACTION Interaction 4 of 9
USER
CANARY
CORE INTERACTION
IS OBSERVED BY
USERS
PAGE 4/9
SIGN UP WITH
EXTERNAL IS TRACKED BY
CANARY SERVICE
CONNECTS WITH
IS TRACKED BY
ONLINE SERVICES (FACEBOOK, TWITTER, INSTAGRAM, ETC.)
GENERATE
CO2 EMISSIONS
DAVID BELLONA / THESIS RESEARCH / SVA MFA INTERACTION DESIGN / APR.5.2012
145
CONCEPT MAP FOR SERVICE / CORE INTERACTION / FEATURE SET O FEATURE 1 / Track GENERATE ABOUT DATA PRODUCTION & CO2 EMISSIONS FeatureN#1: andINFORMATION compare user’s dataUSER’S production and CO2 emissions with other users 5 of 9
USER
CANARY
EXTERNAL
IS OBSERVED BY
USERS
CANARY SERVICE
ONLINE SERVICES (FACEBOOK, TWITTER, INSTAGRAM, ETC.)
GENERATE
CO2 EMISSIONS
FEATURE NO 1 OBSERVE
GENERATES
DISPLAYED ON
VISUALIZE
NOTIFICATIONS & INFORMATION COMPARE
FRIENDS & SIMILAR USERS
PAGE 5/9
146
DAVID BELLONA / THESIS RESEARCH / SVA MFA INTERACTION DESIGN / APR.5.2012
CONCEPT MAP FOR SERVICE / CORE INTERACTION / FEATURE SET O 2 FEATURE 2 / Set SET default DEFAULTtargets GOALS OF DATA & CO EMISSIONS FeatureN#2: based onPRODUCTION similar users and allow users to set their own targets 6 of 9
USER
CANARY
EXTERNAL
IS OBSERVED BY
USERS
CANARY SERVICE
NOTIFICATIONS & INFORMATION
FEATURE NO 2 SET
SETS
BASED ON
BASED ON TARGETS
PAGE 6/9
FRIENDS & SIMILAR USERS
DAVID BELLONA / THESIS RESEARCH / SVA MFA INTERACTION DESIGN / APR.5.2012
147
CONCEPT MAP FOR SERVICE / CORE INTERACTION / FEATURE SET O FEATURE 3 /Offset SUGGEST SUSTAINABILITY PROJECTS TO BE FUNDED FOR OFFSETTING FeatureN#3: payment for environmentally sustainable projects 7 of 9 CO2 EMISSIONS
USER
CANARY
EXTERNAL
IS OBSERVED BY
USERS
CANARY SERVICE
CONNECTS WITH
ONLINE SERVICES (FACEBOOK, TWITTER, INSTAGRAM, ETC.)
GENERATE
CO2 EMISSIONS
TO OFFSET
TARGETS
FEATURE NO 3 FUND
SUGGESTS
BASED ON
SUSTAINABILITY PROJECTS
BASED ON
FACEBOOK INTERESTS & PERSONAL PREFERENCE ENCOURAGE
ECOLOGICALLY SUSTAINABLE BUSINESS PRACTICES
PAGE 7/9
148
DAVID BELLONA / THESIS RESEARCH / SVA MFA INTERACTION DESIGN / APR.5.2012
CONCEPT MAP FOR SERVICE / CORE INTERACTION / FEATURE SET O FEATURE 4 /Provide PROVIDEusers USERSwith WITHchannel A POINT to OF contact CONTACTonline WITH ONLINE SERVICE(S) FeatureN#4: service(s) 8 of 9
USER
CANARY
EXTERNAL
IS OBSERVED BY
USERS
CANARY SERVICE
CONNECTS WITH
ONLINE SERVICES (FACEBOOK, TWITTER, INSTAGRAM, ETC.)
GENERATE
CO2 EMISSIONS
TO OFFSET
FEATURE NO 4 MAKE
PROVIDES
CONTACT
PAGE 8/9
TO DEMAND
ONLINE SERVICES (FACEBOOK, TWITTER, INSTAGRAM, ETC.)
TO USE
ECOLOGICALLY SUSTAINABLE BUSINESS PRACTICES
DAVID BELLONA / THESIS RESEARCH / SVA MFA INTERACTION DESIGN / APR.5.2012
149
CONCEPT MAP FOR SERVICE / CORE INTERACTION / FEATURE SET SYSTEM Canary System 9 of 9
USER
CANARY
CORE INTERACTION
EXTERNAL
IS OBSERVED BY
USERS
SIGN UP WITH
IS TRACKED BY
CANARY SERVICE
CONNECTS WITH
IS TRACKED BY
ONLINE SERVICES (FACEBOOK, TWITTER, INSTAGRAM, ETC.)
GENERATE
CO2 EMISSIONS
FEATURE NO 1 OBSERVE
GENERATES
DISPLAYED ON
VISUALIZE
NOTIFICATIONS & INFORMATION TO OFFSET
COMPARE
FEATURE NO 2 SET
SETS
BASED ON
BASED ON TARGETS
FRIENDS & SIMILAR USERS
FEATURE NO 3 FUND
SUGGESTS
BASED ON
SUSTAINABILITY PROJECTS
BASED ON
FACEBOOK INTERESTS & PERSONAL PREFERENCE ENCOURAGE
FEATURE NO 4 MAKE
PROVIDES
CONTACT
PAGE 3/9
TO DEMAND
ONLINE SERVICES (FACEBOOK, TWITTER, INSTAGRAM, ETC.)
TO USE
ECOLOGICALLY SUSTAINABLE BUSINESS PRACTICES
DAVID BELLONA / THESIS RESEARCH / SVA MFA INTERACTION DESIGN / APR.5.2012
151
152
Blog Entry : 4/9/2012 Wire Flows Moving from concept map to wireframing, there seemed to gap in process. Cooper, Sera, and I have been discussing various mobile UI patterns for the iPhone (navigation styles, actions, pages, and sorting structures) and different techniques of wireframing/prototyping - figuring out a few approaches to fill this gap. For me, a wire flow exercise seemed to do the trick. Wire flows for the Canary iPhone app: highlevel wireframes outlining overall structure, global functions, key features based on my concept map, and user flows for common tasks. The intention is for these wire flows to inform my wireframes, which I’ll be working on and prototyping over the next 3 days. Version 1.0 of wire flows with notes.(shown)
153
Initial Wireframes I went through four rounds of wireframing during a very fast paced week in mid-April. I initially had the four key features – track and compare, set targets, offset payment, and service contact – as the main navigation items at the bottom of the app along with global navigation at the upper left. After meeting with Mari Sheibley, lead designer at Foursquare, and a few breakthrough meetings with my classmate Cooper, I made revisions and got a TAP prototype together (p.164) for some quick feedback. Note: The updates I made for later rounds were not included in the final wireframes (again, moving fast) but were implemented in the final designs. However, I did update my user signup flow and settings in the wireframes. (p.162)
Concept sketches of wireframes from a whiteboard session, late March.
Version 2 of wireframes with note from meetings with Mari and Cooper. (above, opposite)
154
155
Wireframes Signup & Add Launch AT&T
12:45 PM
AT&T
12:45 PM
Signup AT&T
12:45 PM
Canary Messages
Calendar
Photos
Hello!
Camera
Get started by connecting an account to Canary.You can always connect more services later on. Calculator
Maps
Stocks
Weather
Connect with Facebook
Canary Clock
App Store
Canary
or
Newstand
Connect with Twitter Loading... Social
Notes
Contacts
Already Have an Account?
Reminders
5
Log In Phone
Safari
Music
Add Another Service Updated Profile AT&T
12:45 PM
AT&T
12:45 PM
AT&T
12:45 PM
Canary
Sera Koo
Sera Koo Since 10/1/2011
Since 10/1/2011
Daily Avg. g/CO2
Total g/CO2
2,054 32.6 This Week
O
N
D
Total CO2
34.7
is equal to
g
54
J
F
M
32.6
8,435 32.6
Connected! O
A
Connect with Twitter
J
F
M
could fill
21
326
Add Another Service
62
10.4
Add Friends
27
459
Settings
Add Another Service
Interactions g/CO2
Connect with Instagram
A
Party Balloons
54
Interactions g/CO2
Tweets
Pictures
g/CO2
g/CO2
Add Friends Settings
156
D
Total g/CO2
g
Connect with Foursquare
N
This Week
834.7
Miles Driven by a Car
326
Daily Avg. g/CO2
g/CO2
Connect more services to your account!
AT&T
12:45 PM
AT&T
Profile AT&T
12:45 PM
Canary
Canary
12:45 PM
Sera Koo
Join
Since 10/1/2011
Name
Daily Avg. g/CO2
Total g/CO2
2,054 32.6
Sera Cancel
Koo
Allow
Email Address
This Week
sera.koo@gmail.com Canary may post to this service on your behalf.
34.7
•••••• Confirm Password
N
D
is equal to
g
Password
About Canary Canary allows you to track your data production and subsequent CO2 production. It also allows you to offset your carbon footprint and contact this service to demand they build their business in an ecologically sustainable manner.
Total CO
O
2
54
J
F
M
A
32.6
Miles Driven by a Car
326
Interactions g/CO2
•••••• Add Another Service
Join Add Friends Settings
Add Friends AT&T
12:45 PM
AT&T
Sera Koo
12:45 PM
Add Friends
Since 10/1/2011
Daily Avg. g/CO2
g/CO2
8,435 32.6
Phone Book Facebook
O
N
D
J
F
M
A
This Week Total g/CO
2
834.7
g
could fill
21
326
62
10.4
27
459
Interactions g/CO2
Pictures
Party Balloons
54
Tweets
132 friends from Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram Rachel Abrams
g/CO2
Sarah Adams Allan Chochinov
g/CO2
Tony Chu
Add Another Service Add Friends Settings
157
Wireframes Track, Compare, Adjust Target, and Contact Service Select a Service AT&T
Select a Friend
12:45 PM
AT&T
12:45 PM
Sera Koo
Data
Daily Avg. g/CO2
g/CO2
27
8,435 32.6 O
N
D
J
F
M
A
This Week Total g/CO2
834.7
21
could fill
g
Party Balloons
54
326
62
10.4
27
459
9 6
3
27
Pictures
3
M
T
W
T
F
S
This Week
S Share
29 5 31 16
Tom Harman Cooper Smith Jessica Lord Erin Rouston
g/CO2
Sera Koo
6
g/CO2
Pictures
CO2
Pictures
9
Interactions g/CO2
Tweets
12:45 PM Data
Sera Koo
Since 10/1/2011
AT&T CO2
Stats
Targets
Tom T Harman W
M
This Week
29
T
F
Pictures S S
press & drag
Share
Pictures Pictures
Cooper Smith
Pictures
Jessica Lord
Pictures This Week
Erin Rouston
Offsets
5 31 16
Stats
Pictures Pictures Pictures This Week
Targets
Offsets
Add Another Service Add Friends Settings
Adjust Target AT&T
Share with Service AT&T
12:45 PM
Your Target
27 | 14 Pictures
459 g/CO2
Pictures
|
408 g/CO2
This Week
Pictures
158
Pictures
459 g/CO2
|
408 g/CO2
+
Share Target with Instagram
Targets
Your Target
27 | 14
Adjust Weekly Target
Stats
AT&T
12:45 PM
Adjust Weekly Target
Weekly Target This Week
12:45 PM
Offsets
Targets
This Week
Your Target
27 | 14 Pictures
459 g/CO2
Pictures
|
408 g/CO2
Adjust Weekly Target
1 Picture ≈ 17 g / CO2
Stats
Weekly Target
Offsets
Share Target with Instagram
Stats
Targets
Offsets
Compare AT&T
AT&T
12:45 PM Data
12:45 PM
+2
Tom Harman
AT&T
Data
CO2
Sera Koo
Adjust Time Scale 12:45 PM
CO2
Data
Sera Koo
27
Pictures
CO2
Sera Koo
27
Pictures
61
9
9
9
15
6
6
6
10
3
3
3
M
T
W
T
F
S
This Week
S Share
Cooper Smith Jessica Lord Erin Rouston Benjamin Gadbaw Stats
5 31 16 29
Targets
M
T
W
T
F
S
This Week
Pictures
Tom Harman
Pictures
Cooper Smith
Pictures This Week
Jessica Lord
Pictures
Erin Rouston Stats
Offsets
Targets
Pictures
5
S M
T
Share This
29 5 31 16
Sera Koo
Pictures
W
T
F
S
Week
2
S
Pictures
Tom Harman
Pictures
Cooper Smith
Pictures
Jessica Lord
Pictures This Week
Erin Rouston
Offsets
9
29 5 31 16
Stats
16
23
This Month
Share
Targets
Pictures Pictures Pictures Pictures This Week Offsets
Tweet Service AT&T
AT&T
12:45 PM
Weekly Target This Week
Cancel
Your Target
27 | 14 Pictures
AT&T
12:45 PM
Tweet Instagram
Tweet
|
408 g/CO2
10 5
2
@
#
1
Cost to Offset
Stats
Targets
Offsets
_123Stats
9
Tom Harman
Jessica Lord
Targets space
x
Offsets return
16
This Month
Cooper Smith
$1.47
H JNow A S D F G Offset K L Z Autopay X C V- Off Monthly B N M
Cancel
Pictures
15
Total Since 10/1/201 3,435 g/CO2 I O P
Share Target with Instagram Email
61
202 Pictures Q W E R T Y U
Adjust Weekly Tweet Target
CO2
Sera Koo
hey @instagram, i'm limiting my use of your service to 14 pictures per week until you use 100% renewable energy resources for your servers.
Pictures
459 g/CO2
12:45 PM Data
Erin Rouston Stats
23
30 Share
104 58 247 94 Targets
3
Share
Pictures Pictures Pictures Pictures This Week Offsets
159
Wireframes Offset Payment Offset/ View Photo Equivalent AT&T
12:45 PM
Instagram Offsets You’ve Offset
Remaining Amount
1,962
1,473
g/CO2
g/CO2
86
116
Pictures
Pictures
Total Since 10/1/201 202 Pictures 3,435 g/CO2
Cost to Offset
$1.47
Offset Now
Monthly Autopay is OFF | Set Autopay
Stats
160
Targets
Offsets
Manual Offset AT&T
Pay with iTunes AT&T
12:45 PM
Remaining Amount
1,962
12:45 PM
Instagram Offsets
Instagram Offsets You’ve Offset
Remaining Amount
1,962
1,473
g/CO2
AT&T
12:45 PM
Instagram Offsets You’ve Offset
iTunes Password
You’ve Offset
1,473
g/CO2
g/CO2
g/CO2
Ok
Cancel
Total Since 10/1/201 202 Pictures 3,435 g/CO2
Total Since 10/1/201 202 Pictures 3,435 g/CO2
Pay with iTunes Account
Cost to Offset
Cost to Offset
$1.47
Offset Now
$1.47
Offset Now
Pay with Credit Card
Monthly Autopay is OFF | Set Autopay
Targets
Offsets
Confirm AT&T
Stats
Targets
AT&T
12:45 PM
Offsets
Share 12:45 PM
1,473
1.47
$
$1.47
_123Stats
Targets space
Iowa Farms Wind Project You will offset 1,473 g / CO2 by paying with your iTunes Account.
12:45 PM
Remaining Amount 0
You’ve Offset g / CO2
3,435
$1.47 Huzzah!
g/CO2
202
Pictures
You sent $1.47 to the to the Offset Project Iowa Farms Wind Project.
Iowa Farms Wind Project
Total Since 10/1/201 202 Pictures 3,435 g/CO2
Cost to Offset
Done Pay Now
Pay Now
Offsets return
Instagram Offsets
by paying with your iTunes Account
Your Offset Project
x
Updated Offset AT&T
You will offset
You are paying
Cost to Offset
H JNow A S D F G Offset K L
Instagram Offsets
Instagram Offsets
Cancel
Total Since 10/1/201 3,435 g/CO2 I O P
202 Pictures Q W E R T Y U
Z Autopay X C V- Off Monthly B N M
Monthly Autopay - Off Cancel
Stats
Amount
sera.koo@me.com
password 1,962
1,473
g/CO2
g/CO2
Apple ID Password Remaining
$0.00
Offset Now
Share Monthly Autopay is OFF | Set Autopay
Stats
Targets
Offsets
Stats
Targets
Offsets
Monthly Autopay is OFF | Set Autopay
Stats
Targets
Offsets
161
Wireframes Settings Settings
Profile
AT&T
12:45 PM
AT&T
12:45 PM
Sera Koo
AT&T
12:45 PM
Profile
Settings
Since 10/1/2011
Daily Avg. g/CO2
g/CO2
8,435 32.6
Name
Profile
Sera
Password O
N
D
J
F
M
A
This Week Total g/CO2
834.7
g
could fill
21
326
62
10.4
27
459
Payment
Interactions g/CO2
g/CO2
g/CO2
sera.koo@gmail.com
Services Iowa Farms Wind Project
Offset Program
54
Pictures
Email Address
Party Balloons
Tweets
Koo
Notifications
iTunes Account
Monthly Autopay
Off
100 g / CO2 = $0.10 Log Out
Add Another Service Add Friends Settings
Password
Notifications
AT&T
12:45 PM
AT&T
Password Change Your Password Current Password
12:45 PM
Notifications Target Warnings
Push to Service
ON
New Password
Mobile
OFF ON
Confirm Password
Stats Summary
Weekly Email Save
162
OFF
Services
Offset Program
AT&T
AT&T
12:45 PM
Services Facebook
12:45 PM
Disconnect
Iowa Farms Wind Power Select This Project
Never
Help build two new wind turbines in a northern Iowa farming community.
Daily
Carbon Project Type: Wind Energy Location: Northern Iowa, U.S.A. Year: 2011 Volume: 92,000 metric tons Standard: Verified Carbon Standard Capacity: 3.2 MW
Weekly Monthly
Project Website
12:45 PM
Payment Payment Method
iTunes Account Credit Card ending 8462 iTunes Account
sera.koo@me.com
Linked
Credit Cards
ending 8462
Disconnect
Municipal Biogas Generator
Tweet Canary Stats:
Add a Credit Card
Select This Project
Never
Help build a renewable biogas generator at the Essex Junction Wastewater Treatment Facility in Vermont.
Daily Weekly
Carbon Project Type: Biogas Energy Location: Essex Junction, Vermont, U.S.A. Year: 2011 Volume: 3,123 metric tons Capacity: 60 kW
Monthly Instagram
AT&T
Offset Program
Post Canary Stats my wall:
Payment
Disconnect
Project Website
Autopay Robeson County Landfill
AT&T
Autopay
Select This Project Help reduce the amount of greenhouse gases (methane) that would otherwise be released from the landfill. Carbon Project Type: Landfill gas capture Location: St. Pauls, North Carolin Year: 2012 Standard: Climate Action Reserve Verifier:RMA
12:45 PM
Autopay will automatically pay all your your service offsets every month with your preferred payment method.
Autopay
OFF
Project Website
163
TAP Prototype Blog Entry : 4/15/2012 #prototyping #fireworks #TAP #iphone Over this past week, I’m up to three cups o’ coffee (sometimes four) and wireframing/prototyping the Canary app. With a little help from my classmates, I quickly learned two awesome rapid prototyping tools for the iPhone: TAP and LiveView. Seriously, these are my new favorite applications. Using these new tools, I created some key screens, killed a few, modified others, and got ready for my a review with Mari Sheibley, lead designer at Foursquare (thanks to Michael Yap for setting it up). The review went awesome and Mari gave me some super valuable feedback. Soon after, I met with Cooper to discuss our wireframes, stripping out features and complexity. After a solid weekend of work and a visit to the Brooklyn Botanic Garden, I shored my wireframes and prepped for final designs.
Try out the TAP prototype on your iPhone at: http://folio.davidbellona.com/canary_v4
164
TAP Prototype Development
April 12, 2012 – April 16, 2012
Add the prototype to your home sceen.
Signup through Facebook or Twitter.
Adjust your info and choose a password.
Profile with one connected service.
Profile, Password, Notifications, Services, Offset Programs, Payment, and Autopay.
Choosing an Offset Program.
Adjusting Notification Settings.
Scrolling in Profile.
Viewing Instagram photo production stats in Month view.
Weekly Target.
Offset Payment.
Offset payment complete.
165
Final Design & Use Cases
166
167
Launch, Track, and Compare
Launch
Select a Friend
168
Profile
Compare
Select a Service
Stats
Adjust Time Scale
Data Mode
CO2 Mode
169
Adjust Target, Contact, and Notifications
Share with Service
170
Target with Photo Count
Tweet Service
Adjust Target
Notification
Alert Comment Instagram
Target with Photo Count
171
CO2 Offset Payment
iTunes Password
172
CO2 Offset
Confirm
View Photo Equivalent
Manual Offset
Pay with iTunes
Share Updated CO2 Offset
173
Landscape Mode
Compare by Week
Compare by Month
174
Adjust Time Scale
CO2 Mode
175
References & Influence
Cover 1 Junnie Arreza. Rice, Spoon, and Fork Blog, August 28, 2010. http://www.ricespoonandfork.com/2010/08/28/wel come-clouds-on-a-great-weekend, accessed April 29, 2012. 2 Microsoft Press Centre. “Microsoft Expands Cloud Computing Capabilities & Services in Europe”, September
24, 2009. http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/emea/presscentre/pressreleases/DublinDataCentrePR_240909.
mspx, accessed April 29, 2012.
Starting Out 1 Jonathan G. Koomey, Ph.D. “Growth in Data Center Electricity Use 2005 to 2010,” Analytics Press, August 1, 2011. 2 Mike Berners-Lee. How Bad Are Bananas? The Carbon Footprint of Everything. Vancouver: Greystone, 2011. p.000 3 Urs Hölzle. “Powering a Google Search,” Google Blog, January 11, 2009. http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/01/ powering-google-search.html, accessed December 3, 2011. 4 Berners-Lee 2011, pp. 18–19 5 Berners-Lee 2011, p.21 6 Eli Pariser. The Filter Bubble. New York: The Penguin Press, 2011. pp.145–146 7 Bill Hicks. Video: “Revelations”. HBO. 1993. 8 David Foster Wallace. “This is Water”. Commencement Speech, Kenyon College. 2005.
A Three-Month Detour 1 Bill Moggridge. Designing Interactions. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2006. p. 525 2 Moggridge 2006, p. 637 3 Moggridge 2006, p. 589 4 Moggridge 2006, p. 298
Back to What Matters Most & Early Explorations 1 Moggridge 2006, p. 589 2 Ray Bradbury. Fahrenheit 451. New York: Ballantine Books, 1953. 3 Apple Computer. Video: “Knowledge Navigator”. 1987. 4 Bret Victor. “A Brief Rant on the Future of Interaction Design” Worry Dream, November 8, 2011. http://worrydream. com/ABriefRantOnTheFutureOfInteractionDesign, accessed November 9, 2011. 5 U.S. Department of Commerce, Earth System Research Laboratory. “Trends in Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide”
http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends, accessed November 30, 2011.
6 Lester R. Brown. Plan B 3.0: Mobilizing to Save Civilization. New York: W.W.Norton, 2008. p.000 7 John Thackera. In the Bubble. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2006. p.183 8 Koomey 2011. 9 Stephen Shankland. “Google uncloaks once-secret server,” CNET News, April 1, 2009 http://news.cnet.com/8301 1001_3-10209580-92.html, accessed December 2, 2011. 10 IDC. “Worldwide Server Market Revenues Increase 17.9% in Second Quarter as Market Demand
Remains Strong,” International Data Corporation press release, August 23, 2011 http://www.idc.com/getdoc.
jsp?containerId=prUS22998411, accessed December 2, 2011. 11 Google Green. “Overview - Google Data Centers” http://www.google.com/green/efficiency/datacenters, 178
accessed December 3, 2011.
12 Joe Swanson. Interview by author. Written notes. Cambridge, MA., November 20, 2011. 13 Steven Levy. “Jeff Bezos Owns the Web in More Ways Than You Think,” Wired, November 13, 2011. http://www. wired.com/magazine/2011/11/ff_bezos, accessed December 2, 2011. 14 Hugh Dubberly and Paul Pangaro. “Introduction to Cybernetics and the Design of Systems,” January 2010. 15 Greg Ferro. “Average IP Packet Size,” Ethereal Mind, March 18, 2010 http://etherealmind.com/average-ip-packet size, accessed December 18, 2011. 16 Urs Hölzle. “Powering a Google Search,” Google Blog, January 11, 2009. http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/01/ powering-google-search.html, accessed December 3, 2011. 17 Berners-Lee 2011, pp. 18–19
Research 1 Neil Postman. Technolopy. New York: Vintage Books, 1992. p.000 2 Thackera 2006, p. 000 3 Clive Thompson. “The Instagram Effect,” Wired, January 2012. http://www.wired.com/magazine/2011/12/st_ thompson_instagram, accessed January 19, 2012. 4 Elizabeth Gilbert. Eat, Pray, Love. London: Penguin, 2006. 5 David Brooks. On Paradise Drive. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2004. 6 Adam Greenfield. Everywhere. Berkley: New Riders, 2006. p. 000 7 Thackera 2006. p. 163 8 Postman 1992. p. 45 9 Curtis White. The Middle Mind. New York: HarperOne, 2003. 10 Thackera 2006. p. 69 11 Douglas Rushkoff. Video: “Digital Nation,” Frontline. Produced by Rachel Dretzin. Boston, MA:
WGBH Studios, 2010.
12 Johnson 2012. p. 6 13 danah boyd. “Streams of Content, Limited Attention: The Flow of Information through Social Media”. Web 2.0
Expo Talk, New York, NY. 17 November 2009.
14 George Carlin. Video: “Stuff”. Comic Relief. 1986. 15 David Brooks. Bobos in Paradise . New York: Simon & Schuster, 2001. p. 101 16 Zach Klein. “Conspicuous Production,” Zach Klein’s Blog, January 14, 2012. http://blog.zachklein.com/ post/15833998640/conspicuous-production, accessed January 14, 2012. 17 David Brooks. The Social Animal. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2011. p. 96 18 Pariser 2011. p.67 19 Marshall McLuhan. Understanding Media. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1994. 20 Pariser 2011. p.67 21 Peter Svensson, “Netflix’s Internet traffic overtakes Web surfing,” MSNBC. May 17, 2011. http://www.msnbc.msn. com/id/43059955/ns/technology_and_science-tech_and_gadgets/t/netflixs-internet-traffic-overtakes-web surfing, accessed January 18, 2011. 22 Pariser 2011. p.69 23 Annie Leonard. Video: “The Story of Stuff.” Produced by Erica Priggen. Washington, DC:
Free Range Studios, 2007.
24 William McDonough and Michael Braungart. Cradle to Cradle. North Point Press. 2002. 25 Dan Ilic. Video: “How Green Is Your Internet?” Produced by Patrick Clair. 2011. 26 Brooks 2001. p.101 179
27 Cameron Camp, “How much photo data does Facebook really have?”, ESET Threat Blog, September 30, 2011.
http://blog.eset.com/2011/09/29/how-much-photo-data-does-facebook-really-have
accessed February 14, 2012.
28 Matt Mullenweg. Lecture by author. Written notes. New York, NY., March 1, 2012. 29 Katie Fehrenbacher. “Smart meters now make up 13 to 18% of meters in U.S.,” GigaOM, November 15, 2011.
http://gigaom.com/cleantech/smart-meters-now-make-up-13-to-18-of-meters-in-u-s,
accessed March 7, 2011.
30 Howard Zinn. A People’s History of the United States. New York: HarperCollins, 2003 ed.
Concept & Experience Development 1 Urs Hölzle. “Powering a Google Search,” Google Blog, January 11, 2009. http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/01/ powering-google-search.html, accessed December 3, 2011. 2 Heimbuch, Jaymi. “Twittering Adds How Much to Your Carbon Footprint?” Treehugger, April 19, 2010. http:// www.treehugger.com/clean-technology/twittering-adds-how-much-to-your-carbon-footprint.html,
accessed February 20, 2012.
Two Projects 1 Rich Miller. “How Many Data Centers? Emerson Says 500,000.” Data Center Knowledge, December 14, 2011.
http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2011/12/14/how-many-data-centers-emerson-says-500000,
accessed March 15, 2012.
2 IDC. “Worldwide Server Market Revenues Increase 17.9% in Second Quarter as Market Demand
Remains Strong,” International Data Corporation press release, August 23, 2011 http://www.idc.com/getdoc.
jsp?containerId=prUS22998411, accessed December 2, 2011. 3 MG Siegler. “Eric Schmidt: Every 2 Days We Create As Much Information As We Did Up To 2003.” Tech Crunch,
August 4, 2010. http://techcrunch.com/2010/08/04/schmidt-data, accessed March 22, 2012.
4 Gary Cook. “Apple’s growing iCloud: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly.” Greenpeace. http://www.greenpeace.org/ international/en/news/Blogs/Cool-IT/apples-growing-icloud-the-good-the-bad-and-th/blog/39202,
accessed March 28, 2012.
5 Gary Cook and Jodie Van Horn. “How Dirty Is Your Data?” Greenpeace International, April 2011. 6 Dan Ilic. Video: “How Green Is Your Internet?” Produced by Patrick Clair. 2011. 7 Berners-Lee 2011, p.21 8 Not really, but every button on these sites are coal buttons. 9 Urs Hölzle. “Powering a Google Search,” Google Blog, January 11, 2009. http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/01/ powering-google-search.html, accessed December 3, 2011. 10 Lucente, Edward J. “The Coming ‘C’ Change in Datacenters.” HPC Wire, June 15, 2010. http://www.hpcwire.com/ hpcwire/2010-06-15/the_coming_c_change_in_datacenters.html, accessed March 28, 2012. 11 Not really, but they should. 12 Berners-Lee 2011, pp.18–19. 13 Heimbuch, Jaymi. “Twittering Adds How Much to Your Carbon Footprint?” Treehugger, April 19, 2010. http:// www.treehugger.com/clean-technology/twittering-adds-how-much-to-your-carbon-footprint.html,
180
accessed February 20, 2012.
Thanks Rachel Abrams
Erik Guzman
Deena Rosen
Mary Banas
Tom Harman
Erin Routson
Jon Bellona
Randall Hoyt
Michael Scarola
Steve & Kris Bellona
Ben Jones
Allison Shaw
Jonathan Berger
Steve Kakowski
Josh Silverman
Steve Berry
Jeff Kirsch
Cooper Smith
Andrew Bowman
Sera Koo
Susan Solomon
David Brahler
Jessica Lord
SVA Classes of 2011, 2012, 2013
Don Carli
Roger Mader
SVA Faculty
Christopher Cannon
Sara McBeen
Joe Swanson
Frank Chimero
Erin Moore
Stephan Von Muehlen
Allan Chochinov
Andrew Morse
Jake Vigneri
Kezra Cornell
Luis Navarro
Adrian Westaway
Liz Danzico
Steph Opitz
Tash Wong
Sara Dierck
Paul Pangaro
Michael Yap
Barbara Eldredge
Mrs. Phillips
Tina Ye
Nathan Felde
Daniel Rahl
183