Rfq for p3 design review services university of californai santa cruz crawfordarchitects corrected by David Murphy

STUDENT HOUSING WEST RFQ FOR P3 DESIGN REVIEW SERVICES University of California: Santa Cruz

Due Noon, October 20, 2017

CRAWFORD ARCHITECTS Kansas City, MO

â&#x20AC;&#x153;A design reviewer that has experience in the P3 procurement and delivery environment is a pre-requisite for this job.â&#x20AC;?

October 20, 2017

Adam Shaw, Executive Vice President WT Partnership (North America) 520 Broadway, Santa Monica, CA 90401 By email: adam.shaw@wtpnorthamerica.com STUDENT HOUSING WEST RFQ for P3 DESIGN REVIEW SERVICES University of California Santa Cruz Dear Adam, Crawford Architects and WRNS STUDIO, with IMEG are very pleased to submit our qualifications for your consideration for this project. Although Crawford and WRNS we were invited separately to submit, it became evident that our combined resources could be most beneficial to WT Partnership and your client. What we believe is paramount to achieving success for the west campus project will be attaining the Project Goals. Our role in assisting this accomplishment will be to ensure the University that Capstone delivers what has been agreed. Often in projects that are still to be fully defined and on accelerated timelines, there is a propensity on behalf of the developer to protect their “bottom line” and we see this manifest through such outcomes as design erosion, and other cost-cutting actions. Under the watch of the less experienced, this puts success in a precarious position. A design reviewer that has experience in the P3 procurement and delivery environment is a pre-requisite for this job. In Crawford you have just that; an experienced architect that has been on both sides of P3 projects representing both developer entities and clients. Further, it is extremely useful and relevant that Crawford is currently engaged by WT Partnership to provide design review management services to the UC Merced 2020 Project. This experience translates well and can be easily modified to suit the particularities of this project. In WRNS STUDIO we have a design review partner that is extremely experienced in campus projects for the University of California with an intimate knowledge of the relevant design and code requirements (CBO, DCFM, etc.). As this assignment also requires review of building services, civil, transportation and acoustics we have brought IMEG into our team. With their solid presence in California, deep bench and experience gained from more than 4,000 projects for 300 higher education clients, we have all the bases covered. I look forward to your favorable consideration of our submission and am available at any time to answer questions you may have. Sincerely, CRAWFORD ARCHITECTS LLC

Stacey Jones Owner | Senior Principal

CRAWFORD ARCHITECTS LLC 1801 McGee Street — Suite 200 Kansas City, MO 64108 816 421 2640 telephone 816 421 2650 facsimile

Q1::

Provide corporate overview including number and information as it relates to your specialist

â&#x20AC;&#x153;Our particular expertise in highe learning modalities and how to l novation within an academic con

ber of years trading, employee head count by location ist expertise in Higher Education

gher education benefits from the latest thinking in o leverage modern workplace efficiencies and incontextâ&#x20AC;?

www.crawfordarch.com

CORPORATE OVERVIEW

Our people and our collective experience are the backbone of this firm. Clients that hire Crawford receive the full attention of our partners and senior professionals from beginning to end. Our dedication, skill and perseverance are critical to the identification and delivery of our hallmark of adding value which is the common thread running through our master planning projects. Our people connect with our clients at a level that engenders trust. We listen to what our clients say, interpret their needs, and deliver innovative solutions with integrity, accuracy and speed. Crawford Architects is an international and an award-winning

Location

No. Staff

planning, architecture and interior design firm.

Kansas City, MO

Merced, CA

As a professional services firm, Crawford specializes in all

Sydney, AU

aspects of the planning and design of complex facilities for higher education, commercial mixed use, entertainment, professional

athletics,

hotels,

convention

centers,

restaurants, parking structure and healthcare. Our portfolio of work represents more than $5.6 billion of construction value.

“CREATING VALUE….. the common thread running through our master planning”

Crawford’s history traces back to 1976 in Sydney Australia

Much of Crawford’s master planning work is on college

where the firm first began as an architectural consulting

campuses around the nation where our skill in creating cohesive

practice and maintains a vibrant presence with 20 professional

environments through precinct development is a recognized

staff. Since 2001, Crawford has operated in the U.S. from our Kansas City, Missouri location where 20 staff are engaged across a broad spectrum of project types and project delivery initiatives. We now have a growing presence in California where we are currently engaged on the 2020 Project for the University of California in Merced expansion in the role of Lead Architectural Design Review where we are responsible for ensuring developer compliance across the master plan and all buildings within the new campus environment. What sets Crawford apart is our ability to create a big idea that guides all aspects of a project. This skill to create landmark designs is critical to creating projects that are feasible and fully integrated and cohesive to the eye. Crawford strives to create a strong “sense of place” with projects that function flawlessly. Our aim is to create distinguished architecture that is contextually well placed in high-quality environments.

The 2020 Project integrates new buildings, open spaces and recreational facilities within the University of California, Merced’s existing campus.

CORPORATE OVERVIEW

attribute. We have completed more than 24 master plans that have moved forward to design and construction. Our comprehensive master planning process is highly organized and always involves a diverse range of representatives from our client. Representative higher education institutions that have called upon Crawford’s planning expertise include The Pennsylvania State University, Montana State University, University of Pennsylvania, South Dakota State University, University of Notre Dame, University of Hawaii and many others.

Crawford Architects’ 2025 athletics facilities master plan is transforming South Dakota State University’s Division I intercollegiate sports teams. (above) For Montana State University, Crawford Architects prepared a 20-year master plan for athletic facilities as shown in the site plan above.

(at left) The LendLease consortium commissioned Crawford Architects to provide specialized stadium experience to the architectural team in the design of the 2000 Sydney Olympic Stadium. Crawford was one of only two finalists. www.crawfordarch.com

CORPORATE OVERVIEW

of 167 works in creative studios across typologies: workplace, civic, education, transportation, and urban mixed-use.

Our

particular expertise in higher education benefits from the latest thinking in learning modalities and how to leverage modern workplace efficiencies and innovation within an academic context. Long-time leaders within the Society for College and Joining the Crawford Team is WRNS Studio and IMEG Corporation. Corporate overviews for these firms follows. Recognized for identity-rich, site-specific design at any scale, WRNS Studio brings to each new project a point of view informed by all the other work in which we engage, resulting in fresh ideas that push us (and you) to imagine what’s possible. With offices in San Francisco, New York, and Honolulu, their staff of 157

University Planning (SCUP), we lead the planning of the Pacific Regional Conference, design bi-annual Microsymposia, and moderate panel discussions with thought leaders who are exploring the most salient topics in higher education. Likewise, we bring experience in a variety of collaborative delivery methods, including Public / Private Partnerships (including the UC Merced Project 2020), CM-at-Risk, Design-Build, Collaborative Design Build, and Lean Construction.

works in creative studios across typologies: Workplace, civic, education, transportation and urban mixed-use. Their particular expertise in higher education benefits from the latest thinking in learning modalities and how to leverage modern workplace efficiencies and innovation within an academic context. Long-time leaders within the Society for College and University Planning (SCUP), they lead the planning of the Pacific Regional Conference, design bi-annual Microsymposia, and moderate panel discussions with thought leaders who are exploring the most salient topics in higher education. Likewise, they bring experience in a variety of collaborative delivery methods, including Public / Private Partnership (including the UC Merced Project 2020), CM-at-Risk, Design-Build, Collaborative Design Build, and Lean Construction. Working

with

game-changing

“WE WORK WITH CAMPUSES…..creating master plans and design guidelines, followed by programming, design, and construction.” We work with campuses over many years, creating master plans and design guidelines, followed by programming, design, and construction. Our efforts serve to define and reconcile diverse

research

institutions,

entrepreneurs, and social impact groups such as The Trust for Public Land, Stanford University, University of California, Airbnb,

and complex programmatic needs while laying the foundation for the thoughtful development and realization of architecture specifically tailored to program and place.

Google, Facebook, Microsoft and Dolby, to name a few, has allowed us to explore our own curiosities and bring a distinct spirit of innovation to a national clientele. With offices in San Francisco, New York, and Honolulu, our staff

Location

No. Staff

San Francisco

129

New York

Hawaii

CORPORATE OVERVIEW

UC Davis Health & Wellness Center

and construction. Their efforts serve to define and reconcile diverse and complex programmatic needs while laying the foundation for the thoughtful development and realization of architecture specifically tailored to program and place. WRNS Studio’s higher education clients include: •

UC Davis

•

UC San Francisco

•

UC Merced

•

UC Berkeley

•

UC Davis Medical Center

•

Stanford University

•

Cal State LA

•

SF State

•

San Jose State

•

Chico State

•

Cal Maritime Academy

•

CSU East Bay

•

CSU Monterey Bay

•

Skyline College

•

Foothill College

•

Contra Costa Community College

•

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

UC Davis Segundo

UC San Francisco Medical Center Parking Structure

www.crawfordarch.com

CORPORATE OVERVIEW

building from classrooms, labs, libraries, and performing arts centers to residence halls, dining halls, student unions, stadiums and recreation centers. We understand the differing needs of public, private and community institutions. Their market-focused, IMEG has been providing engineering services for 62 years.

higher education specialists know their way around a campus

They are one of the largest design consulting firms in the U.S.

when it comes to IT support, acoustics, lighting, central systems

specializing in high-performing building systems, infrastructure,

and indoor air quality – evident by our high-performance design

program management, and construction-related services. With

buildings, including LEED and Net Zero Energy. Their education

a global footprint of more than 30 offices and a deep bench

experts have served nearly 300 higher education clients and

of nearly 1,000 team members, IMEG’s vast talent consists

have designed or consulted on more than 4,000 projects.

of program managers, design engineers, and dedicated construction administration personnel. Ranked as a Top 5 Engineering Firm in the U.S. (BD+C), IMEG was formed in 2015 through a merger of KJWW Engineering and TTG Engineers, and was joined by the FES Group in 2016 and JanCom Technologies and Taylor RyMar in 2017. IMEG strives to build long-lasting client relationships through our guiding principles, expertise, and iterative project approach. Colleges and universities account for nearly 30 percent of IMEG’s work. They have engineered every type of campus

Location

No. Staff

Location

Staff

Anaheim, CA

Ottawa, IL

Austin, TX (2 locations)

Pasadena, CA

119

Chicago, IL

Phoenix, AZ

Dallas, TX

Quad Cities, IL/IA

215

Des Moines, IA

Rockford, IL

Detroit, MI

San Antonio, TX

Flagstaff, AZ

San Diego, CA

Indianapolis, IN

San Francisco, CA

Overland Park, KS

St. Louis, MO

Lone Tree, CO

Waukegan, IL

Macomb, IL

Walnut Creek, CA

Madison, WI

Naperville, IL

Ahmedabad

130

Ontario, CA

Vizag

INTERNATIONAL

CORPORATE OVERVIEW

University of Wisconsin-Madison Leopold Resident Hall

University of Wisconsin-Madison Lacrosse Eagle Hall www.crawfordarch.com

Q2:: Provide examples of Higher Education projects

Q2::1 Two examples of student | staff | employ Q2::2 One example of experience as a principa Q2::3 One example of campus master planning Q2::4 Any experience working in the University Q2::5 Any other relevant examples.

cts delivered in past 7 years including, as a minimum

oyee housing developments > $50m; cipal designer or advisor on a Public Private Partnership; ning | development assignments; sity of California system; and

www.crawfordarch.com

Q2::1 Two examples of student | staff | employee ho

â&#x20AC;&#x153;The design challenge was to provide students with existing community-style housing program offered, w gathering spaces and amenities to encourage social

housing developments > $50m

th more privacy than their d, while providing ample cialization.â&#x20AC;? www.crawfordarch.com

COLLEGE AVENUE HOUSING

University of Missouri – Columbia

unit ‘clusters,’ single and double-bedroom suites opening onto

University of Missouri – Columbia

a lockable restroom shared by four students. Public spaces

Harriett Green-Sappington

adjacent to the central corridors, which include a large social

Associate Director

gathering lounge, quiet study rooms, and a kitchenette, are

Department of Residential Life Planning & Design

provided on every floor to host events and meetings, and to

Email: GreenSappingtonH@missouri.edu

encourage residents to interact. A computer lounge, vending

P: 573.882.3080

machines, mail and laundry facilities on the main floor enable students to take care of most of their needs around-the-clock

DESIGN START::

without having to leave the comfort and security of the building.

March 2003

College Avenue Hall’s public spaces feature floor-to-ceiling glazed openings, flooding the interior with natural light and

CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE::

providing panoramic views of the campus landscape.

IAA

August 2006

prescribed modern, minimal millwork, wall and ceiling forms, sleek, even, warm lighting, light earth tones and wood and

ACCOMMODATION::

ceramic tile finishes, comfy, yet durable lounge furniture, and

345 Beds

carpet with youthful patterns, creating a soothing and timeless environment that is easy to maintain; the resulting composition

PROJECT COST::

will functionally and aesthetically delight students and support

$27.5m

their educational, social, and living needs for many generations to come.

Project Designer/Architect: Doug Osborn (while at another firm) QUALITATIVE INFORMATION:: In order to accommodate its growing student population, the University of Missouri called for the design of a new 345-bed student housing facility with apartment-style dwelling units. ‘College Avenue Hall,’ aptly named for its prominent location at the intersection of College Avenue and Rollins Street, was to be situated on a constricted site, threaded between eight-story dormitories and two-story academic buildings to the south and east, a major highway, dining hall and four newly-constructed residence halls to the west, and a historic dairy building and landscaping to the north. The design challenge was to provide students with more privacy than their existing community-style housing program offered, while providing ample gathering spaces and amenities to encourage socialization. The design features a five-story ‘T’-shaped building, with a vertical circulation core at the intersection of the building’s three wings. Privacy was addressed by creating separate dwelling

www.crawfordarch.com

WOLPERS AND JOHNSTON RESIDENCE HALL AND DINING University of Missouri – Columbia

and invoke a sense of ‘home-away-from-home’, soothing

Department of Residential Life

environments reminiscent of those at endearing neighborhood

Harriett Green-Sappington

cafés or luxury hotels.

Associate Director Department of Residential Life

New floor plans were designed to suit the University’s ‘Living-

Planning & Design

Learning’ program, which called for increased common living

Email: GreenSappingtonH@missouri.edu

space on every floor to better support community activities and

P: 573.882.3080

opportunities including computer labs, lounge areas, and study halls. The entry level of both buildings was completely reworked

DESIGN START::

to suit today’s student needs and security / intake functions.

May 2011 For the dwelling units, much of the traditional double-room CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE::

layout was maintained for economy, a practical approach that

July 2015

allowed all HVAC, electrical, plumbing, and IT infrastructure to be upgraded to suit new efficiency standards / technology

ACCOMMODATION::

requirements.

612 Beds Dining Area 14,600sf PROJECT COST:: $52.5m PROJECT DESIGNER/ARCHITECT:

Doug Osborn (while at another firm) QUALITATIVE INFORMATION:: Two of the most popular residence halls on campus and home to 612 University of Missouri students, Wolpers and Johnston Halls, built in 1947 and 1963 respectively, were in need of renovation. The University required a phased renovation of the two buildings including a complete building systems upgrade, plan modifications to better suit student community functions, fully redesigned interior finishes, a new dining facility, and a new courtyard between the two buildings. In Johnston Hall, a new dining facility named ‘Sabai’ was added to serve Johnston and Wolpers residents, and attract students from the broader university community.

Sabai and other

common areas were designed to draw people together socially

www.crawfordarch.com

Q2::2 One example of experience as a principal des

â&#x20AC;&#x153;This project de can have a majo

designer or advisor on a Public Private Partnership

demonstrates how a single development major impact on the future of a whole cityâ&#x20AC;?.

www.crawfordarch.com

Aerial view of the development (all phases)

Existing industrial site (prior to abatement)

Site reclamation works and convention center under construction

Master plann (all phases)

DARWIN COVE WATERFRONT DEVELOPMENT Darwin Cove, NT, AUS

DATE COMPLETED::

Council, their project manager Pat Coleman (then CEO, Darwin

2008

Waterfront Corporation) and the Northern Territory Government Architect, Bob Nation (then RAIA President) embraced our

PROJECT VALUE:

winning design from those of our competitors recognizing the

$1B

master plan’s vision and community benefits as key determining features.

QUALITATIVE INFORMATION:: The Darwin Cove project resulted in a creative solution that was

The development proposal was sponsored by ABN AMRO who

economically delivered within an environmentally responsible

headed the consortium responsible for forming the public private

framework which were core requirements that were stipulated

partnership (P3/PPP) with the State and City. Our design had

by the client and their representative development authority,

to respond to a number of exactly financial and deliverability

Darwin Waterfront Corporation. The 62-acre site was a blighted

constraints yet still yielded an inspirational and unique outcome.

and obsolete industrial development with a water frontage of mangrove swamp rendered inaccessible by a daily tidal range of

The first phase of the $1 billion development opened in June 2008

between 23 feet and 27 feet and not fit for human habitation due

and has been recognized by the Urban Task Force of Australia

to environmental degradation caused by decades of unabated

“as one of Australia’s top seven development projects” earning

industrial activity.

the Task Force’s coveted 2008 Development Excellence Award for Mixed Use Development. Chairman of the panel of judges

Crawford conceived a master plan that directly engaged the

Professor Chris Johnson stated, “This project demonstrates how

site’s potential amenity by creating an accessible waterfront of

a single development can have a major impact on the future of

constant tidal height. To accomplish this, an engineered armor

a whole city”.

rock breakwater was built some distance off the shoreline at the point where the seabed deepened and was beyond the

Crawford Architects conceptualized the master plan and

influence of the large tidal variation. The breakwater forms an

designed and documented the convention center. The partner-

encircling element and contains a lock for admitting watercraft

in-charge, lead designer of the conceptualized master plan and

to the protected basin while permitting an influx of high water

lead designer of the convention center was Stacey Jones. He

to enable the basin to be regularly flushed and replenished with

was the primary interface between the design team and the client

fresh sea water.

body. He performed all personal presentation requirements of the design team before the city of Darwin and NT Government

The resultant stable waterfront created shoreline for development

during the stages of the project’s evolution.

consisting of several sites for residential apartment buildings, public recreational facilities including parklands, a swimming lagoon with a wave pool, an extensive waterfront promenade, and a magnificent site for the city’s new convention center and related facilities. We collaborated effectively with our design partners on the project, especially the civil engineers (Connell Wagner) who embraced the unique opportunity to derive a workable nonland-based design solution. Our ultimate client, Darwin City

www.crawfordarch.com

DARWIN COVE WATERFRONT DEVELOPMENT

Convention Center and wave pool.

www.crawfordarch.com

2020 PROJECT MERCED, CA

DATE COMPLETED::

WRNS also designed the Computational Laboratory Building

Ongoing

located at the Academic Research Quad and is currently designing the Academic Leadership and Office Enrollment

PROJECT VALUE:

Building, located in the new Town Center.

$1.3 billion As engaged members in the P3 model, WRNS and Crawford DETAIL OF ROLE PERFORMED:

have worked together successfully to bring the design intent and

Crawford Architects: Design Review Consultancy

technical requirements to bear. In doing so, a mutual respect and

WRNS Studio: Academic Architect

collaborative model has informed a constructive and proactive feedback loop that serves to enhance the ultimate outcomes

QUALITATIVE INFORMATION::

or measures for success, including the creation of student-first

The University of California, Merced (UCM) is setting a new

experiences on a campus, efficient and synergistic strategies

standard for 21st century research institutions. To achieve their

for building systems that keep in mind long-term, operational

ambitious goal of growing the student body to 10,000 students

viability, and preserving the financial backbone through careful

by 2020 and developing the facilities to house this influx, UCM

management of fee, changes and a data-driven process for

needed to employ an equally ambitious delivery model. Using

design.

the new Public Private Partnership (P3) delivery model, the 2020 Project team, which included design as a consortium of firms

The working relationship engendered between WRNS and

with specific design expertise, engineers and trade partners

Crawford demonstrates that two professional teams can bring

coordinating building systems, energy and sustainability

a high-level of professionalism to a relationship that may

consultants, financial planners and risk management team,

otherwise have been combative as each strives to serve the

construction team, and maintenance and operations partnersâ&#x20AC;&#x201D;

interests of their respective clients. In this instance no such

worked hand-in-hand with the University to realize a 24/7, live/

mutual exclusivity developed and the project so far has been

learn campus expansion. The result will be a compact and

delivered expeditiously and economically in service to all parties

environmentally sensitive place that will facilitate the Universityâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s

with equanimity and collegiality.

commitment to excellence in teaching, research and service while meeting the ambitious triple net zero goals for energy, water and waste. As such, every member of the 2020 Project team was required to be tenacious and highly collaborative. A key player in the design consortium, WRNS Studio brought design expertise in 21st century learning environments that break down silos and participate in a holistic, vibrant experience of place. As the academic architect, WRNS wove learning spaces into the fabric of the new campus, proto-typing the classroom and academic spaces that will be embedded in live | learn communities. (top left) The 2020 Project at the University of California, Merced, integrates new buildings, open spaces and recreational facilities within the existing campus to maintain compactness and to create a sense of completion. (at left) The Computational Laboratory | Academic Office (Building-2B) creates a relationship between the Academic Quad to the north and the natural landscape to the south. www.crawfordarch.com

Q2::3 One example of campus master planning | development assignments;

“The plan…further supports achieving the University’s strategic goal of expanding the reach of the University throughout the state, across the region and nationally.”

Merced www.crawfordarch.com

(top) Aerial view of the picturesque South Dakota State University campus. Crawford Architectsâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; sports complex is at the upper left corner. (above) The plan shows the first phase of the master plan implementation

SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY Brookings, SD

DATE COMPLETED::

•

2016

Provide student-athletes the best opportunity to become lifelong champions, to compete and succeed at the conference and NCAA championship level, and to achieve

PROJECT VALUE: $200M

academic success; •

Optimize the quality of overall student-athlete experience, student-life experience, coaching and staff experience and

DETAIL OF ROLE PERFORMED:

fan experience;

Master Planning, Feasibility Study, Conceptual Design, Interiors,

•

Assure financial integrity;

Sustainable Design

•

Align with the University’s strategic plan and the goal to expand the reach of the University; Align with the University’s

QUALITATIVE INFORMATION:: South Dakota State University’s Master Plan for Athletic

2025 Facility Master Plan of October, 2008; and •

Guide the development of the intercollegiate athletics

Facilities brings alive the vision for essential intercollegiate

functional area in the northeast section of campus over the

athletic competition and practice facilities reflective of South

next 15 years.

Dakota’s comprehensive land-grant nationally-distinct flagship university and in support of over 450 student-athletes.

In support of these principles the master plan incorporates the following facilities.

The plan provides context for the location and purpose of athletic facilities in the northeast precinct of campus and supports the

Indoor Practice and Human Performance Facility – A multipurpose

implementation of the University’s 2025 Facility Master Plan.

practice facility with an indoor track and state-of the-art space

It remains true to the University’s unique identity and stature

for sports medicine, training and human performance, and

by preserving the best architectural, landscape and planning

rehabilitation.

elements of the historic campus that dates to 1881 and by incorporating these elements into new areas of development.

•

The plan as implemented further supports achieving the

•

Softball Stadium – Update to include permanent seating and press box.

University’s strategic goal of expanding the reach of the University throughout the state, across the region and nationally.

space to support men’s and women’s programs. •

The plan enables the University and its athletic program to create an environment that propels student-athletes to be

Soccer Stadium and Practice Field – Multi-field competition and practice facility.

•

opportunity to compete and excel in conference play and NCAA championships.

Baseball Stadium – Update to include permanent seating and press box.

•

lifelong champions. The plan will provide high-quality, modern practice and competition facilities enabling student-athletes the

Golf Practice Facility – Indoor and outdoor practice

Football Practice Fields – Realign current space to include three practice fields.

•

Football Stadium – Expand and modernize stadium to provide students, fans and supporters a unique game-

With the professional assistance of Crawford Architects, the plan drew from a thorough physical and functional assessment

day experience. •

Aquatics Competition and Practice Facility –

of existing practice and competition facilities setting forth a

Competition-caliber facility to be shared with students

comprehensive plan that complies with these principles:

and the Brookings community.

www.crawfordarch.com

In the inaugural season in 2016, fans have attended games at the Dana J. Dykhouse Stadium in record numbers. The Sanford-Jackrabbit Athletic Complex (SJAC) is in th ground at right. The SJAC is a premier training facility in Division I intercollegiate athletics and accommodate year-round training.

is in the back-

SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY Brookings, SD

•

Stanley J. Marshall Building – Update and modernize

student-athlete football players, of alumni and coaches.

current athletics offices and administration support

The following features are provided:

space. • • •

Frost Arena – Update with modern seating, remodeled

•

Approximately 20,000 to 22,000 seats (First Phase)

restrooms and concession venues.

•

Suites and Stadium Club

Wrestling Practice Facility – Expand practice area

•

Press Box and Media Facilities

and team support areas.

•

Modern Restrooms and Concessions

Basketball/Volleyball/Wrestling Practice and Competition Facility – A multi-court practice facility

Indoor Practice and Human Performance Facility. This facility

for basketball and volleyball that also will be used as

contains two related but distinct components – indoor practice

a competition venue for volleyball and wrestling is

space and human performance space. The provision of indoor

proposed.

practice space that accommodates year-round training for all outdoor sports will impact the largest number of student-athletes.

The top priority facility projects are the Indoor practice and

Human performance space will influence over 450 student

Human Performance Facility, the Football Stadium and Phase I

athletes and is essential to achieve the highest level of physical

modernization of Frost Arena. Each priority project is introduced

performance, training and conditioning, wellness and nutrition,

on the following pages.

These introductions draw from the

injury prevention, sports medicine and rehabilitation. In addition,

master planning process. Specific design, facility and financial

the human performance space will enable the integration of

plans for each of the priority projects are important next steps.

intercollegiate athletics and the support of student-athletes with

The specific plan for each priority project will build from the

several academic programs including athlete training, health

introduction.

promotion, physical therapy, human nutrition and dietetics.

Football Stadium. Coughlin Alumni Stadium, opened in 1962,

The indoor practice space is 180,000 sf. accommodating a 300

has served students, fans, the state and the University well for

meter track for indoor training and NCAA competition, an 80

50 years. The master plan identifies the need for a 20,000 to

yard synthetic field for training of all field sports but particularly

22,000 seat football stadium with appropriate amenity seating

football and soccer. An 80 yard field can accommodate nine-

(suites, loge seating and club seating). A classic ‘horseshoe’

man high-school football competition. Additional areas outside

configuration for the stadium is oriented toward the existing

of the track provide for specialized practice needs for football,

Dykhouse

for track and field, baseball and softball.

Student-Athlete

Center

and

the

new

Indoor

Practice and Human Performance Facility (by Crawford). The fundamentals of the stadium draw on similar stadiums at

The human performance space accommodates the sports

Football Championship Subdivision (FCS) conference and peer

medicine and athletic training, injury prevention, rehabilitation,

institutions.

strength and conditioning and wellness needs of student-athletes as well as flexible space for additional programming. Diagnostic,

The design of the stadium (by Crawford) builds on the tradition

athletic training and rehabilitation facilities for the human

of Coughlin Alumni Stadium and provides both the highest level

performance space are also provided. Space configurations

of fan amenities with a formidable home field advantage in

support individual and group training, treatment and preventive

mind. The stadium makes a strong positive contribution to the

sports medicine. There are special areas that support research

campus programmatically and architecturally. The unique areas

projects including testing and observation space, graduate

designed into the stadium showcase the tradition of Jackrabbit

students’ offices and collaboration areas. 12,000 sf is provided

football and feature current and past achievements of teams, of

to meet human-performance needs of student-athletes and for additional programming flexibility. www.crawfordarch.com

SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY Brookings, SD

Phase I:

Frost Arena Modernization. Frost Arena was

the existing building perimeter over three evels to include new

constructed in 1972 and will be renovated and modernized to

entrances to the east and west, new concourses, suites and

support the men’s and women’s basketball programs and the

concourse access, concessions and restrooms, new elevators

volleyball program. Phase I will reseat the arena which entails

and vertical circulation, plus new back of house/operational

retrofitting existing seating and replacing bleacher seating with

space under the seating bowl.

permanent, fixed seats. Phase II may involve amenity seating and concourse facilities. Additional restroom facilities for men

A consolidated Women’s Suite including team rooms and locker

and women as well as larger modern concession areas are

rooms (with showers for Volleyball and Basketball) on the west

needed.

side of Level 1 with direct access to the arena floor is feasible. These facilities could be developed in conjunction with new

Reseating

6,000

visiting locker rooms on the east side of Level 1 with direct

permanent seats including ADA compliant wheel chair positions

the

arena

will

provide

approximately

access to the arena floor plus the modernization of building

and companion seats with enhanced sightlines. Subsequent

systems including HVAC systems will be undertaken.

phases of the project will include the expansion to the south of

(top left) The SJAC boasts an 8-lane, 300-meter track with dedicated areas for field events and seating for 1,000 spectators. (above) The Frost Arena Modernization was identified through Crawford Architect’scomprehensive master planning process tht established renovation and new construction priorities as well as budgeting and phasing strategies for multiple facilities. (below) Athletes train in a state-of-the-art weight room that overlooks the indoor practice field and track and has ample daylighting for a light and vibrant environment. www.crawfordarch.com

MARITIME ACADEMY Vallejo, CA California State University

WRNS Studio led the effort to develop CSU Cal Maritime’s 2032 Campus Master Plan, which will help the university become a 21st century leader in the transportation and related industries of the Pacific Rim — a campus known for excellence in business, engineering, operations and policy. This scope covered assessing the campus’ ecology, circulation, landscape character, existing built environment/infrastructure, campus connectivity, and more — evaluating our findings alongside growth projections, development budgets, evolving pedagogy and the university’s vision for the future. With a commitment similar to that evidenced by UC Santa Cruz’s Master Plan, the CSU Cal Maritime’s Master Plan makes use of the campus’ current assets by redeveloping existing building sites, taking advantage of underutilized lands, and where appropriate, increasing densities. As part of this effort, WRNS also developed long-term growth projections for the campus, gathering metrics and data to help the university understand the campus’ capacity at various phases of growth, including needs for academic housing. This strategic approach is most visibly articulated in the Academic Core, where six new buildings and two renovations are proposed. The master plan shifts the Main Quad east to open up the Academic Core to the waterfront and organize the arrangement of existing and new buildings. At the entrance to campus, a new “campus gateway” is envisioned in the Upper North Campus to provide a welcoming face for Cal Maritime and to provide parking and recreational facilities.

www.crawfordarch.com

Q2::4 Any experience working in the University of C

â&#x20AC;&#x153;Lead Design for manageme

f California system

gn Review for the UC Merced 2020 Project. Responsible ment of design reviews for all buildings.â&#x20AC;?

www.crawfordarch.com

(clockwise) Undergraduate Residential Hall and Academic Classroom Athletics Facilities Master Plan; Computation Laboratory Building UC Merced Housing 1A/3B: Housing and Student Life Spaces

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SYSTEM EXPERIENCE

UC Merced Lead Design Review for 2020 Project. Responsible for management of design reviews for all buildings with specific design review responsibility for Residence Halls, Recreation and Athletics Facilities and Student Life Facilities (excluding Dining). Master Plan advice/guiding principles for Athletic Facilities and post-2020 Project campus expansion. Consultancy services for research and implementation assistance of a new Space Management and Scheduling system for all 2020 Project buildings.

www.crawfordarch.com

(clockwise) UC Merced Student Services and Athletics Building UC San Francisco Mission Hall Global Health & Clincial Sciences UC San Francisco Medical Center Parking Structure UC Merced Computational Laboratory Building

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SYSTEM EXPERIENCE

UC Merced Student Services and Athletics Center (completed 2012; Architect, Design-Build; $8.5m) Computational Laboratory Building (completion 2020; Architect; $47m) UC San Francisco Master Plan Design Guidelines Mission Hall: Global Health & Clinical Sciences (completed 2014; Architect, Design-Build; $99.5m) Medical Center Parking Structure (completed 2012; Architect, Design-Build; $15.52m) UC Berkeley Berkeley Way Academic Office Building (completion 2017; Architect; $113m) UC Davis Betty Moore School of Nursing (completed 2017; Architect; $39.5m) Health and Wellness (completed 2010; Architect; $34.9m) Segundo Student Services Center (completed 2011; AOR, Design-Build; $18.7m) Veterinary Medicine Student Services and Administration Center (completed 2017; Architect; $16.8m)

www.crawfordarch.com

(clockwise) UC Davis Betty Moore Nursing School UC Davis Student Health UC Davis Segundo UC Davis Veterinary Medicine Student Services and Administartion Center UC Berkley Berkley Way

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SYSTEM EXPERIENCE

www.crawfordarch.com

Q2::5 Any other relevant examples.

â&#x20AC;&#x153;Our education experts have serv have designed or consulted on m

erved nearly 300 higher education clients and n more than 4,000 projects.â&#x20AC;?

Dana J. Dykhouse Stadium www.crawfordarch.com

Currently under construction, McNeese State Universityâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Health and Human Performance Education Complex building consists of a 130,000-gross-square-foot multi-stor ti-purpose arena for the universityâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s athletics and a Health and Human Performance programs.

The 245-bed Hospital Hill Apartments for the University of Missouri-Kansas City is a LEED certified development that houses students in one-, two- and four-bedroom units. ( by James Franklin of Crawford Architects while employed with another firm.)

OTHER RELEVANT INFORMATION

The projects on the following three pages represent some of the collective firmsâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; work in the areas of collegiate master planning, academic facilities, residential halls and sports facilities in the context of college campuses. University of Missouri-Kansas City Hospital Hill Apartments (245 beds) (completed 2014; Design Architect (James Franklin while at another firm; $30.3m)

ulti-story and mul-

units. (Completed

University of Pennsylvania Intercollegiate Weight Training Facility (Weiss Pavilion) (completed 2012; Architect $30m) University of Pennsylvania Tse Ping and Cheng Cheung Ling Sports Center (completed 2015; Architect $27m) Crawford Architects conducted a thorough feasibility study and evaluated past building plans for the former Palestra and Hutchsinson Gymnasium, now Tse Ping and Cheng Cheung Lind Sports Center. Based on this work, Crawford identified a redevelopment option that maintained the historical significance of the Day and Klauder architecture and allowed for the renovation to the interior.

McNeese State University Basketball Arena (completed 2017; Architect; $35m) University of Notre Dame Purcell Pavilion Basketball Arena (completed 2010; Architect $35m) University of Northern Iowa McLeod Center Basketball Arena (completed 2005; Architect $25m) Montana State University Athletic Facilities Master Plan (completed 2017; Master Planner / Concepts Architect) Minnesota NFL Vikings Headquarters | Training Facility (completed 2018; Architect; $122m)

After reviewing a previously completed feasibility of Franklin Field, Crawford Architects identified a solution to preserve and restore the historical design of Charles Klauder. Because of Crawfordâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s thorough research, space behind the exterior facade could be excavation since the structural piers went all the way to bedrock. The found space allowed the weight training and fitness facilities to be contained within the footprint of the original building. www.crawfordarch.com

Pegula Ice Arena at The Pennsylvania State University has contributed to the rise of the Division 1 Nittany Lionsâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; hockey success.

www.crawfordarch.com

The McLeod Center Arena and Human Performance Center is first-class facility and only one of a handful on-campus integrated sports psychology and physiology faciliti and out-patient services.

To tackle the first major changes to the Joyce Center arena since 1968, home to the Fighting Irish menâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s and womenâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s basketball and volleyball teams, the University of Notre Dame turned to Crawford Architects.

(above) Crawford Architects is serving on a team to create a complex master plan, fundraising documents, plans and specifications for athletic facilities at Montana State University. The purpose of the master plan is to prioritize improvements, renovations, new construction and maintenance projects to promote and advance the athletic programs into the future. facilities with teaching The Minnesota NFL Vikings training facility and corporate offices are located on a 194+acre site master planned by Crawford Architects. Crawford is also serving as the AOR for the project.

www.crawfordarch.com

San Francisco State University Mashouf Wellness Center

Stanford University Jill and John Freidenrich Center for Tran

California State University, Chico Arts & Humanities Building

California State University, Monterey Bay Academic III (College of Arts, Humanities & Social Studies)

or Translational Research

Building

OTHER RELEVANT INFORMATION

Stanford University Jill and John Freidenrich Center for Translational Research (completed 2012; Architect; $14.5m) CJ Huang Asian Liver Center and Academic Medical Office Building (completed 2015; Architect; $16.5m) California State University, LA Parking Structure E Administration and Student Affairs Building San Francisco State University Mashouf Wellness Center (completed 2017; Architect; $86.5m) California State University, Chico Arts & Humanities Building (completed 2016; Architect; $42m) California State University Maritime Academy Recreation & Aquatic Center (completed 2014; Architect; $26m) California State University, East Bay CaChico Arts & Humanities Building California State University, Monterey Bay Academic III (College of Arts, Humanities & Social Sciences) (completed 2017; Architect; $16m)

www.crawfordarch.com

Recreation and Aquatic Center at California State University Maritime Academy

www.crawfordarch.com

Valparaiso University Campus Master Pl UCLA DeNeve Plaza Housing New Facility

UC Santa Barbara Storke Housing

University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Bousfield Hall

Skyview Mixed-Use High-Rise Tower

ster Plan

OTHER RELEVANT INFORMATION

University of California, Los Angeles, CA DeNeve Plaza Housing - New Facility (completed 2006; $88.2m) University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL New 450-Bed Residence Hall â&#x20AC;&#x201C; LEED Platinum (completed 2013; $54.6m) Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ Energy Upgrades (completed 2010; $$) Valparaiso University, Valparaiso, IN Campus Master Plan. (completed 2012; $NA) University of California, Santa Barbara, CA Storke Housing, Cogen - Feasibility Study (completed 2001; $45m) Skyview, Tempe, AZ Mixed-Use High-Rise Tower (in design; $120m estimated)

www.crawfordarch.com

Q3::

Provide an example of your experience workin (with project managemment lead acting on be

â&#x20AC;&#x153;Crawfordâ&#x20AC;Ś.worked extensively during stages of budget establis

rking in an integrated delivery team behalf of an owner).

ely with the developer and their construction partner blishment, scheduling and financial closure.â&#x20AC;?

www.crawfordarch.com

(top) Crawford Architects was engaged by ABN AMRO to redevelop an 80-acre historic waterfront in Branson, Mo., transforming it into a shipping, dining and entertainment destination that has has a major economic impact to the city. (at right) The boardwalk and waterfront promenade offer breathtaking views of Lake Tanneycomo at the Branson Landing Development.

BRANSON LANDING DEVELOPMENT Branson, MO

The Branson Landing project was a public private partnership

beyond. Public access to the lake is preserved via a new

(PPP) that required close coordination between the design

boardwalk, which also serves as an esplanade for shoppers and

team, our client (ABN AMRO) and the city of Branson. Funding

nature lovers.

for the project was provided by diversion of state sales tax that would have been generated by the project’s economic activity

A renowned fountain designer, working with a unique concept

toward the amortization of the development costs. ABN AMRO

for a water and fire display, created a major extravaganza with

engaged Crawford Architects to redevelop this historic waterfront

performances coordinated to music and dynamic lighting.

that had, over decades of underutilization, deteriorated into an area of economic blight. The 80-acre site situated between US

Originally, the city of Branson wanted to procure an element

Route 65 and Lake Taneycomo in the city of Branson, Missouri,

of public infrastructure that would encourage further economic

has been transformed into a master planned, lifestyle retail,

development within the city’s tourism precinct. Their initial idea

restaurant and waterfront entertainment district for the entire

was to procure private sector assistance in the development

region possessing significant elements of public amenity and

of a monorail that would run from the airport into the town and

infrastructure.

connect to many of the existing entertainment venues. Our team was successful in convincing the city to abandon this initiative

Crawford Architects was responsible for the master plan for

and instead put their resources into the creation of a convention

the development; performed all public engagement activities

center. The city is a major tourist attraction with well in excess

to introduce the project to the Branson community and relevant

of eight million visitors per year and a convention center was

stakeholders; was the design architect for the waterfront

viewed as an excellent civic investment to garner future

precinct, retail shopping precinct, convention center and

economic development.

convention center hotel; was the architect of record for the water front precinct, retail portion of the project and the convention

In order to fund the rest of the development’s cost and provide

center hotel.

tourist-destination elements that did not already exist in the city, it was further agreed that an adjoining parcel of waterfront land,

Crawford Architect’s partner-in-charge and lead designer of

currently underutilized as sites for low-quality hotels and camp

the master plan was Stacey Jones who worked extensively

grounds, should be developed into an entertainment and retail

with the developer (ABN AMRO) and their construction partner

shopping precinct. The city gave authority to our client to begin

during stages of budget establishment, scheduling and financial

land assemblage of the 30 or so disparate land parcels that

closure. Crawford’s David Murphy developed the master plan

led to the amalgamation of the current 80-acre site. Within just

detail and guided it through the federal agency approval process

two weeks our client’s real estate broker performed the task of

due to the project site’s location on a controlled waterway. He

securing options to purchase all of the required land. At that time,

was responsible for programming development for all project

design was commenced for a mixed-use development featuring

components. He managed the community development

a convention center, waterfront promenade, town square and

workshops, stakeholder participation and local government

car parking as publicly funded elements of the development;

presentations and reviews.

and a retail, residential and hotel precinct as private initiatives. At this point our client was appointed master-developer for the

The team recognized that the waterfront redevelopment was an

delivery of all elements, both public and private, of the Branson

unprecedented opportunity to create a landmark destination. At

Landing waterfront project.

the center of the development is a new town square that has become the premier meeting and gathering place in Branson

A series of public presentations (in open forum, town hall-style),

with a backdrop of the beautiful Lake Taneycomo and palisade

were made at regularly scheduled council meetings. In all, 12

www.crawfordarch.com

BRANSON LANDING DEVELOPMENT Branson, MO

meetings were carried out during the design and approvals process to ensure that any public concerns were heard and addressed. Although Branson residents numbered less than 5,000 persons, the annual tourism number is huge; eight million visitors. Therefore, the many local merchants comprising restaurateurs (400 restaurants | 32,000 seats), hoteliers (200 hotels | 18,000 rooms) and theatre owners (60 theaters) formed a very important and influential block of stakeholder and political interest. Initially, they were mostly opposed to this development due to their belief that competition would be against their interests, while residents mostly were in favor of the development due to their desire for employment opportunities. The city council ran a very balanced and impartial process to hear all points of view and was ultimately convinced of the community-wide benefits from supporting the developmentâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s approval.

(top) At the heart of the Branson Landing Development is a vibrant town square terracing down to the spectacular water attraction that features the first-ever merging of water, fire, light and music. (at right) The dazzling display of water fountains shooting 120-foot geysers and fire cannons blasting are choregraphed to light and music. The spectacle was created by internationally renowned Wet Design.

www.crawfordarch.com

Q4::

Provide details of nominated team members • Firm Executive (1) • Lead Design Reviewer (1) • Design Reviewer (multiple, max of 5)

“Mitch the la fornia

rs for the following roles;

itch has led 20 projects on university campuses during e last 21 years, including numerous projects for the Calinia State University and the University of Californiaâ&#x20AC;?.

www.crawfordarch.com

NOMINATED TEAM MEMBERS STACEY JONES CORPORATE ROLE:: Owner | Senior Principal

PROPOSED ROLE:: Firm Executive

PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS:: A defining characteristic of Stacey Jones is his ability to listen to his clients, lead visioning sessions and build consensus to bring his client’s vision to fruition.

KEY INDIVIDUALS Firm Executive: Stacey Jones Lead Design Reviewer: James Franklin Design Reviewers: Doug Osbourn, James Pastine, Kristen Klint, Brent Simmons

He has over two decades of experience in alternative project delivery. He had an instrumental role as project originator for the highly acclaimed and nationally recognized BRANSON LANDING development; one of the first and most original Public Private Partnerships in the U.S. at the time. He currently leads Crawford’s design review role for the firm’s involvement with UC MERCED’S 2020 PROJECT.

ACADEMIC QUALIFICATIONS:: Master of Architecture, 1988, University of Pennsylvania Bachelor of Architecture with First Class Honors, 1982, University of Newcastle, Australia Bachelor of Science (Architecture) with Merit, 1979, University of Newcastle, Australia Registered Architect, NSW, Australia

RELEVANT SECTOR EXPERIENCE:: •

2020 Project Student Housing (DBFOM), University of California: Merced, CA • Housing 1A/3B • Housing 1B • Housing 3-C • Hosing 3-D • Dining 1D

•

Hilton Promenade at Branson Landing: Branson, MO

•

Hilton Branson Convention Center Hotel: Branson, MO

•

School of Osteopathic Medicine, Missouri Southern State University: Joplin, MO

JAMES FRANKLIN

DOUG OSBORN

CORPORATE ROLE::

Project Manager | Project Architect

Senior Graduate Project Architect

PROPOSED ROLE::

Lead Design Reviewer

Design Reviewer

PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS::

James Franklin is a highly skilled architect with exceptional

Doug Osborn designs some of the firm’s most high profiled

motivation and listening skills and commitment to excellence.

projects. Over the course of his career, he has proved his ability

He has design expertise in sports venue facilities and brings

to lead a project from inception to completion.

AIA, LEED BD+C

his valuable project leadership to the team. James is also passionate about incorporating sustainable principles in all

He manages multiple projects across a broad spectrum

projects because he understands the value high performance

of building types and is effective at all stages of a project.

buildings bring to owners.

He is involved in programming, schematic design, design development, construction documents, bid support and

James is currently based in Crawford Architects’ Merced, CA

construction observation and administration. Doug is the

office and assigned as a designer reviewer on the $1.3 billion

embodiment of the versatile and valuable all-rounder.

2020 Project, which will integrate more than one million square feet new buildings, open spaces and recreational

ACADEMIC QUALIFICATIONS::

facilities within the existing University of California’s campus.

Bachelor of Architecture, 2003, Kansas State University

ACADEMIC QUALIFICATIONS::

RELEVANT SECTOR EXPERIENCE::

Bachelor of Architecture, 2003, Kansas State University

•

California: Merced, CA

RELEVANT SECTOR EXPERIENCE:: •

2020 Project Student Housing (DBFOM), University of • Housing 1A/3B

2020 Project Student Housing (DBFOM), University of

• Housing 1B

California: Merced, CA

• Housing 3-C

• Housing 1A/3B

• Hosing 3-D

• Housing 1B

• Dining 1D

• Housing 3-C

•

Hilton Promenade at Branson Landing: Branson, MO

• Hosing 3-D

•

Hilton Branson Convention Center Hotel: Branson, MO

• Dining 1D

•

School of Osteopathic Medicine, Missouri Southern State

•

Hilton Promenade at Branson Landing: Branson, MO

•

Hilton Branson Convention Center Hotel: Branson, MO

•

School of Osteopathic Medicine, Missouri Southern State

University: Joplin, MO

www.crawfordarch.com

BRENT SIMMONS

KRISTEN KLINT

CORPORATE ROLE::

Project Designer

Project Interiors Designer

PROPOSED ROLE::

Design Reviewer

PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS::

Brent Simmons is a highly versatile architect in possession of

Kristen Klint has led the design and planning of corporate

an enviable array of business and technical capabilities.

interior, hospitality, club sports and restaurant design projects, coordinating with a wide range of disciplines. She has managed

proficient

commercial

design,

construction

junior staff, external architectural, MEP and other design

administration, BIM management and information technology.

consultants as well as has experience in the preparation of

He is involved with Crawford’s design review role for UC

construction documents and specifications for bid, fabrication

MERCED’S 2020 PROJECT. Brent is a fluent user of standard

and construction administration. Kristen is experienced in

design and productivity tools, including Revit and SketchUp,

communicating and facilitating the internal process and job

and he also leads the firm’s explorative endeavors into the

flow, tracking reports on each project phase while tending to

realm of virtual reality design.

client requests and inquiries. She knows that collaboration is

ACADEMIC QUALIFICATIONS:: Bachelor of Architecture, 2010, University of Kansas

RELEVANT SECTOR EXPERIENCE:: • • • • • • • • • • •

2020 Project (DBFOM), University of California, Merced: Merced, CA TCO Performance Center & Stadium: Eagan, MN Sandbox Office Remodel: Kansas City, MO Edmon Low Library Reutilization Study, Oklahoma State University: Stillwater, OK* Student Success Center, University of Missouri, Kansas City: Kansas City, MO* Mosier Hall Renovation, Kansas State University: Manhattan, KS* Lenexa Civic Center: Lenexa, KS* Blue Valley Hilltop Campus: Overland Park, KS* KC Zoo Tuxedo Grill: Kansas City, MO* Bayer Veterinary Pharmaceuticals Production Facility: Shawnee, KS* Indigo Wild Production Facility: Kansas City, MO*

*Prior experience

the key to success at every level.

ACADEMIC QUALIFICATIONS:: Master of Architecture, 1999, University of Kansas Bachelor of Arts, Psychology, 1985, William Jewell College

RELEVANT SECTOR EXPERIENCE:: •

andbox Office Remodel, Kansas City, MO

•

TCO Sports Medicine Clinic: Eagan, MN

•

TCO Medical Office Building: Eagan, MN

•

TCO Performance Center and Stadium: Eagan, MN

•

AllScripts Office Remodel: St. Louis, MO

•

VA Housing: Des Moines, IA

•

Housing Authority of Kansas City Retail and Commercial, Kansas City, MO*

•

Couteau Youth Center, Kansas City, MO

•

RJI - MU Journalism Institute, University of Missouri, Columbia*

•

Gangwish Library and Gibson Student Center, Ottawa University, Ottawa, KS*

•

Bob Dole Family Life Center Addition and Sensory Garden Addition, Lakemary Center, Paola, KS*

• 1144 Pennsylvania Residence, Lawrence, KS* *Prior experience

AWARDS AND PUBLICATIONS

2014 AIA Building Information Model Award, Pegula Ice Arena at The Pennsylvania State University 2014 SCUP Merit Award, George A. Weiss Pavilion at Franklin Field, University of Pennsylvania 2012 Grand Jury Award, Preservation Alliance for Greater Philadelphia Achievement Awards, Weiss Pavilion at Franklin Field, University of Pennsylvania 2009 Finalist for Shopping Center of the Year, ICSC, Branson Landing Waterfront Development 2009 Best Project of the Year, CMAA Pacific NW Chapter, Virginia Mason Athletic Center 2009 Tracy Memorial Award, Australian Institute of Architects Northern Territory, Darwin Convention Centre 2008 International Arena of the Year Finalist, CIC Pollstar Awards, Vector Arena 2004 Winner, APA Awards for Design & Manufacturing Excellence, Lambeau Field 2000 Honor Award/Special Commendation, Kansas City Chapter, American Institute of Architects, The Perth Convention and Exhibition Center 1992 Excellence in Urban Design, American Institute of Architects, The Camden Yards Sports Complex 1992 Merit Award, Urban Design, American Society of Landscape Architects 1991 Grand Design Award, AIA Baltimore Chapter, The Camden Yards Sports Complex

www.crawfordarch.com

NOMINATED TEAM MEMBERS MITCH FINE AIA, LEED AP

CORPORATE ROLE:: Partner, Project Manager

PROPOSED ROLE:: Firm Executive

KEY INDIVIDUALS Firm Executive: Mitch Fine Lead Design Reviewer: Lilian Asperin Design Reviewers: Laura Stedman and Eileen Ong

PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS:: Mitch has led 20 projects on university campuses during the last 21 years, including numerous projects for the California State University and the University of California. He has been with WRNS since its founding in 2005. As Project Manager, Mitch is the day-to-day contact, with responsibility for facilitating communication with the design team, ensuring alignment of cost, quality, and schedule with expectations, and collaborating with the PIC to lead all client meetings and presentations on behalf of the design team.

ACADEMIC QUALIFICATIONS:: Master of Architecture,University of Pennsylvania Bachelor of Architecture, University of North Carolina

RELEVANT SECTOR EXPERIENCE:: •

UC Santa Cruz, Biomedical Sciences Laboratory, Santa Cruz, CA

•

UC Davis Student Health and Wellness Center, Davis, CA

•

UC Berkeley Mixed Use Academic Office Building, Berkeley, CA

•

UC Davis Betty Moore Nursing School, Sacramento, CA

•

UC Davis Segundo Student Services Building, Davis, CA

•

UC Davis Student Veterinary Medicine Administrative Complex, Davis, CA

•

SF State Recreation Wellness Center, San Francisco, CA

•

Chico State University Arts & Humanities Building, Chico, CA

•

California Maritime Academy Physical Education & Aquatic Center, Vallejo, CA

•

Cal Maritime Academy Physical Masterplan, Vallejo, CA

•

California State University, Sacramento, Science II Building Programming, Sacramento, CA

•

California State University, East Bay Renovations to Nursing Simulation Labs, Chemistry Lab and Skills Lab, Hayward and Concord Campuses, CA

LILIAN ASPERIN AIA, LEED AP BD+C CORPORATE ROLE::

RELEVANT SECTOR EXPERIENCE::

Associate, Project Manager

•

Classroom Planning Study & Design Guidelines, Hayward,

PROPOSED ROLE::

Lead Design Reviewer

•

PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS::

•

California State University Maritime Simulation Center, Vallejo, CA (Completed while with NBBJ)

•

University of San Francisco Center for Science and Innovation, San Francisco, CA (Completed while with

ACADEMIC QUALIFICATIONS:: Bachelor of Environmental Design, University of California,

San Jose State University Student Recreation & Aquatic Center Design Criteria, San Jose, CA

•

all project deliverables. Lilian is a leader within the Society for College and University Planning (SCUP).

San Jose State University Academic Facility Development Plan, San Jose, CA

•

all design work and manages the project team, working closely with the consultants and internal team to monitor the quality of

University of California, Merced Academic Leadership Office Building, Merced, CA

•

communication with the design team and ensuring alignment of cost, quality, and schedule with client expectations. She approves

University of California, Merced Computational Lab Building, Merced, CA

Lilian helps lead the design process and build teams that deliver aspirational outcomes. She is responsible for facilitating

California State University, East Bay 21st Century

NBBJ) •

Berkeley

University of Utah, L.S. Skaggs Pharmacy Research Building, Salt Lake City, UT (Completed while with NBBJ)

•

Salk Campus Master Plan, La Jolla, CA (Completed while with NBBJ)

•

Salk Chemistry & Proteomics Laboratory Tenant Improvements, La Jolla, CA (Completed while with NBBJ)

•

Salk Animal Facility, La Jolla, CA (Completed while with NBBJ)

•

Salk Day Care Facility & Fitness Center Conceptual Design, La Jolla CA (Completed while with NBBJ)

www.crawfordarch.com

LAURA STEDMAN

EILEEN ONG

CORPORATE ROLE::

Associate, Project Designer

Associate, Senior Project Architect

PROPOSED ROLE::

Design Reviewer

PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS::

ASSIGNED TO UC MERCED P3

(PARKING STRUCTURES)

Laura’s role at WRNS Studio is a similar mesh of manager,

With 35 years of experience, Eileen specializes in facilities for

collaborator, and designer. Design intent and the pedestrian

education and transportation, working closely with leadership.

scale compel her practice, and she believes that embedding

As Senior Project Architect, Eileen is responsible for technical

sustainability in design is critical to improving quality of life.

coordination,

Lauded for her project management approach, Laura is strategic

administration. She facilitates internal communication for the

and proactive; she isn’t one to let action items linger, and she

design team, as well as interaction between the client, user

works to build and foster strong client relationships.

groups and sub consultants.

ACADEMIC QUALIFICATIONS::

Master of Architecture, Columbia University; Bachelor of

Associates Degree in Architecture Technology from San

Architecture, Edinburgh College of Art; Erasmus Scholarship,

Francisco City College

Krunstakademiets Arkitektskole, Copenhagen

RELEVANT SECTOR EXPERIENCE:: •

UC Berkeley Mixed Use Academic Office Building, UC Merced Recreation Center North, Merced, CA

•

Stanford University School of Medicine, CJ Huang Asian

•

approvals

and

construction

RELEVANT SECTOR EXPERIENCE:: •

Cal Maritime Phys Ed & Aquatics Center, Vallejo, CA

•

UC Davis Student Veterinary Medicine Admin Complex,

Berkeley, CA •

documentation,

Davis, CA •

Stanford Hoover Pavilion Medical Office Building & Parking Structure, Palo Alto, CA

Liver Center & Academic Medical Office Building, Palo

•

UC Berkeley, Underhill Parking Structure, Berkeley, CA

Alto, CA

•

UC Davis Medical Center Parking Structure II, Davis, CA

UCSF Mission Bay Campus Medical Center Parking

•

Sonoma State University Darwin Hall Science Building

Structure, San Francisco, CA

Renovation, Rohnert Park, CA •

Hillsborough City School District Master Plan and Design - Technology, Lecture & Band Building, Multipurpose Building & Districtwide Modernizations, Hillsborough, CA

•

Sacred Heart Lower and Middle Schools Campus Master Plan and Design - Classroom Buildings, Library, Assembly Hall & Performing Arts Building, Atherton, CA

AWARDS AND PUBLICATIONS

AWARDS AND PUBLICATIONS: WRNS Studio

CAL MARITIME ACADEMY PHYSICAL EDUCATION & AQUATICS CENTER, VALLEJO, CA

# 1 Firm in the U.S., Architect magazine, 2013

Published on the Vallejo Times Herald online (January

2015 San Francisco Department of the Environment 2015

2014)

Green Business Award

2015 ENR Best Sports/Entertainment Project

WORKPLACE + PUBLIC REALM BOOK, LEAD EDITOR (2016) Published in Metropolis, June 2017 Presented at Society for College and University Planning North Atlantic Regional Conference Presentation, November, 2016 Presented at Northeastern University, November, 2016 UC DAVIS STUDENT HEALTH AND WELLNESS CENTER, DAVIS, CA 2012 ASHRAE Technology Award 2011 AIA California Council / Concrete Masonry Association of California & Nevada Design Honor Award, Education Category 2010 California Construction “Best of” Merit Award Published in Sacramento Business Journal, September 2011; Inhabitat, March CHICO STATE UNIVERSITY ARTS & HUMANITIES BUILDING, CHICO, CA 2017 AIA California Council Merit Award 2017 AIA San Francisco Design Award Presented at Society for College + University Planning Pacific Regional Conference, Spring 2016 UCSF MISSION HALL: GLOBAL HEALTH & CLINICAL SCIENCES, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 2015 Design Build Institute of America National Award of Merit 2015 Engineering News Record Award of Merit Published in San Francisco Business Times, October 2014; Curbed SF, July 2013

www.crawfordarch.com

NOMINATED TEAM MEMBERS CHRIS MARONEY PE

CORPORATE ROLE:: Project Executive

PROPOSED ROLE:: Lead Design Reviewer

KEY INDIVIDUALS Firm Executive: Chris Maroney Lead Design Reviewer: Dan Simpson Design Reviewers: Roy Sickler and Rick Gilson Civil Reviewer: Mike Jackson

ACADEMIC QUALIFICATIONS:: MBA, University of Arizona Bachelor of Science, Mathematics, University of Arizona

PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS::

Acoustics Reviewer: Jon Mooney

Christopher directs engineering design services and provides

Resumes for IMEG’s professionals follow.

and construction management. He is active with coordinating

mechanical and plumbing engineering, project management inter-discipline communication and project quality control. Christopher has provided mechanical (HVAC), plumbing, process piping and fire protection design services for numerous new facility, tenant improvements and renovation projects including health care, municipal, commercial, industrial, aerospace and educational applications. Designs include heating, ventilating, air conditioning systems, process piping, plumbing systems, med gas piping and exhaust systems for dust collection, fume scrubbing and general exhaust. Professional Engineer 2003, Arizona, California, Colorado, Nevada, Oregon, Washington

RELEVANT SECTOR EXPERIENCE:: •

Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ

•

Renovation of Hotel into Lake Havasu Student Dorm

•

Energy Efficiency Upgrades

•

Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ

•

Enrollment and Student Affairs Building Remodel

•

Rio Salado Community College, Tempe, AZ

•

Green Learning Lab: Conversion of 5,000-sf building into an educational technology lab

•

Adult Learning Center: 15,000-sf LEED Certified alternative learning center including classroom, office and lab space.

•

Flagstaff Medical Center, Flagstaff, AZ

•

Women’s Center Remodel

DANNY SIMPSON

ROY STICKLER

CORPORATE ROLE::

Senior Engineer | Associate Principal

Senior Engineer

PROPOSED ROLE::

Design Reviewer

PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS: :

Professional Engineer 2001, Arizona, California, Tennessee,

Professional Engineer 2013, Arizona

Texas, Virginia

ACADEMIC QUALIFICATIONS:: Bachelor of Science, Electrical Engineering, 1996, Missouri University of Science and Technology

PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS::

ACADEMIC QUALIFICATIONS:: Bachelor of Science, Mechanical Engineering, Arizona State University

PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS:: Roy began his tenure as a mechanical designer, advancing

Danny, an Associate Principal, has a broad base of engineering

into a mechanical engineer role. He provides mechanical and

experience which includes commercial, industrial, municipal,

plumbing engineering design services, while also providing

utility, data center, renewable energy, and healthcare projects.

construction administration. He is active with coordinating inter-

This experience makes him uniquely qualified to oversee the

discipline communication and project quality control. He has

management and engineering of technically sophisticated

experience with design/build and CMaR delivery methods, and

projects. Danny’s technical background includes generator

his ability to communicate with construction teams helps to

standby power systems, UPS power systems, DC power

improve the constructability of complex and technical projects.

systems, critical electrical infrastructure design, photovoltaic

During his career, Roy has gained experience and proficiency

systems, short circuit and coordination studies, and power

in HVAC design (wet and dry), equipment selections, load

systems modeling.

calculations, and plumbing/medical gas design.

He has worked closely with architects,

engineers, owners and user groups to provide safe, cost effective systems that meet the needs of the owner.

RELEVANT SECTOR EXPERIENCE:: •

Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ

•

Photovoltaic Installation at Main Campus Student Services, Student Rec Center, and Hayden Library

RELEVANT SECTOR EXPERIENCE:: •

Central Plant Energy Assessment, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ

•

HonorHealth John C. Lincoln Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ 2,000-SF Renovation for Private Patient Rooms

•

City of Chandler, Chandler, AZ

•

Phase 2 Mechanical Upgrades

Tumbleweed Recreation Center HVAC

•

University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ

Public Safety Training Center

•

Photovoltaic Additions at Various Campus Buildings including Student Rec Center and McClellan Hall Building

•

University of Colorado, Boulder, CO

•

2.5MW Photovoltaic Arrays on 6 Locations on Campus

www.crawfordarch.com

RICK GILSON

MIKE JACKSON

CORPORATE ROLE::

Senior Engineer

Department Manager, Civil Engineer

PROPOSED ROLE::

Design Reviewer

Civil Reviewer

ACADEMIC QUALIFICATIONS::

Bachelor of Science, Electrical Engineering, 1979, Bradley

Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering, 1988, University of

University

Washington

PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS::

Rick brings more than 36 years experience as a Project

Mike has 19 years of experience in civil engineering

Manager and Lead Electrical Engineer and leads many of the

design and management.

firm’s largest, most complex healthcare projects. Rick has been

owner representation, site development, drainage design,

actively engaged in all aspects of design and construction for

infrastructure, geotechnical design, and project management for

medium and low-voltage power distribution systems, standby

both Public and Private sector projects. Mike has experience on

and critical power systems, lighting systems, and various special

assignments ranging from small, rapid turn around projects to

systems including security, closed circuit television, intercom,

complex, long term, multi-agency projects.

PE, LEED AP

His experience encompasses

public address, telephone, data, intrusion detection systems, lightning protection systems, and life safety systems. He is well

Professional Civil Engineer 2002, Arizona, Colorado, Texas,

versed in integrating practical, sustainable concepts into design.

New Mexico, Hawaii

Rick is adept at infrastructure assessments and master planning including analysis of existing systems, operating requirements,

RELEVANT SECTOR EXPERIENCE::

and economics. Rick has extensive experience working with

•

governmental reviewing and licensing agencies, including IDPH.

University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ Grading, Drainage, Utility Design, and Coordination for Chemistry Building

CDB Project Management 2011

•

Grading, Drainage, Utility Design, and Coordination for

RELEVANT SECTOR EXPERIENCE:: • •

Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ

Main Campus Project •

Tucson Unified School District, Tucson, AZ

Central Plant Energy Assessment

Projects Included New Parking Lots and Drainage

Rim County University, Payson, AZ

Improvements to New Buildings

60,000-SF New Payson Campus - Pursuing Net Zero Energy Payson Campus - Two New 45,000-sf Dorms and 1,000-sf Dining Hall - Goal of Net Zero •

Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ

University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 100,000-SF Reitz Union Expansion and 50,000-SF Renovation - Pursuing LEED Platinum

JOHN MOONEY PE

CORPORATE ROLE:: Senior Engineer

PROPOSED ROLE:: Acoustics Reviewer

ACADEMIC QUALIFICATIONS:: MBA, 2015, St. Ambrose University Bachelor of Science, Aerospace Engineering, 1980, University of Cincinnat

PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS:: Jon Mooney, an experienced acoustics consultant, directs IMEG’s Acoustics Team, collaborating with our mechanical, electrical, technology and structural engineers to find practical solutions to acoustics, dynamics, noise, and vibration challenges. Drawing from his experience in sonar engineering, he has been successful in developing advanced simulation and testing methods for the acoustics analyses of IMEG’s projects. His background includes healthcare and educational institutions, performing arts centers, auditoriums, office buildings, religious centers, community noise issues, industrial noise control, and transportation noise control. Jon is an active member of the Acoustical Society of America and also serves as architectural acoustics editor for the trade journal,”Walls and Ceilings” and is a frequent book reviewer for the Noise Control Engineering Journal.

RELEVANT SECTOR EXPERIENCE:: •

Butler University, Indianapolis, IN 260,000-SF Schwitzer Hall Student Housing Expansion and 50,000-SF Renovation

•

Covenant Theological Seminary, St. Louis, MO 9,000-SF Common Space and Chapel Renovations Pursuing LEED Silver

•

Renaissance Hotel, Chicago, IL 500,000-SF Hotel Renovations, Including Meeting Rooms, Ballroom, Lobby, Lounge and Guest Rooms

•

University of Illinois - Urbana/Champaign, UrbanaChampaign, IL 160,000-SF Lincoln Hall Historic Renovation - LEED Platinum

www.crawfordarch.com

Q5::

Provide a written narrative on your approach t in service to UC Santa Cruz

â&#x20AC;&#x153;Over the past 20 several P3 initiati

ch to partnering with WT Partnership

20 years or so, Crawford and WTP have partnered on atives across a broad project base.â&#x20AC;?

www.crawfordarch.com

APPROACH TO PARTNERING WITH WT PARTNERSHIP Crawford Architects and WT Partnership (WTP) have an established working relationship that stems from common professional ground in Australia. Over the past 20 years or so, Crawford and WTP have partnered on several P3 initiatives across a broad project base involving the master planning and delivery of significant mixed-use developments including residential, retail and commercial components that are usually underpinned by an element of social infrastructure such as a convention center, sports stadium, event center or other significant civic piece. In these P3 projects Crawford and WTP have been introduced early to the process while the entire development team is still in the formation and the pursuit is often just beginning. While P3 procurement and delivery is often cited as a fast process delivering results that traditional delivery cannot match for speed and scale, the P3 process from project origination to completion is still measured in years. Itâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s a pressured environment and the development team must have a working relationship that is robust, flexible and nimble as the demands come fast and at times the team must dig deep to meet them and quite often change course to meet a strategy shift, budget crunch, design innovation or a construction constraint. Crawford and WTP have been in environments like these many times and have been across both sides of the P3 transaction working as either part of the developer team or as an advisor to the client. The UC Merced 2020 Project is a perfect example of the Crawford WTP working relationship. Initially were both on the developer side of the project with WTP providing cost management and Crawford interfacing with WTP providing benchmarking and plan efficiency information. Our developer client (one of the shortlisted parties for the 2020 Project) decided to withdraw from the competition on the eve of the preferred developer announcement and we found ourselves out of the transaction. Fortuitously, around that time UC Merced was in the process of engaging its own advisor. Through the ensuing solicitation WTP was engaged by the University with Crawford (and Woods Bagot) in the role as Design Review Manager. While not the only reason for our engagement, it was compelling for the University that WTP and Crawford had been previously involved with the project and on the developer side of the transaction as our relevant experience brought a balanced understanding of the many dynamics and pressing exigencies. What followed immediately for WTP and Crawford was an intense period between the University and the preferred developer (Plenary Group) while the parties worked to reduce the project cost, calibrate the financial variables, re-cast elements of the master plan, and offer advice for building design alternatives. WTP managed the Best and Final Offer (BAFO) period over the course of the ensuing few weeks, advising the University on all aspects of the transaction leading to the successful appointment of Plenary Group as the developer.

APPROACH TO PARTNERING WITH WT PARTNERSHIP Specific to the design and construction of the project there is in place a highly engaged process involving the University staff, Plenary Group, Webcor (Plenary’s construction partner), Webcor’s architects and sub-consultants, involving an interactive and iterative process of design reviews and progress submissions. Exhibit 1, Schedule of Design Reviews (UC Merced 2020 Project). Exhibit 1, Schedule of Design Reviews (UC Merced 2020 Project).

THIRD DELIVERY ‐ OTHER FACILITIES

SECOND

FIRST DELIVERY

2016 FACILITY

90%

100%

LOADING DOCK

7/28

10/7

12/6

1/6

UNDERGRAD RESIDENTIAL HALL 1a

9/9

10/21

11/18

12/20

UNDERGRAD RESIDENTIAL HALL 1b

7/28

9/9

10/21

12/23

CENTRAL DINING 1d

7/28

10/7

12/20

2/3

SITEWORK: HARDSCAPE, PATHWAYS & LANDSCAPE

7/28

9/9

10/7

11/4

WET/DRY LAB 2a

9/23

12/6

2/17

4/29

COMPUTATIONAL LAB + ACADEMIC OFFICES 2b

1/6

4/1

6/27

9/7

COMPETITION FIELDS

1/24

4/19

7/14

9/23

MIXED LAB 3a

5/13

8/9

11/2

2/1

GREENHOUSE 3a2

6/27

8/9

9/21

11/2

STUDENT HOUSING 3b

8/9

11/2

1/4

3/2

STUDENT HOUSING 3c

8/23

11/16

2/15

4/13

STUDENT HOUSING 3d

3/4

5/27

8/23

11/2

EARLY CHILDHOOD 3f

12/16

3/16

6/9

9/5

CONFERENCE CENTER 3g

9/7

12/2

3/2

5/11

A.L.O. ENROLLEMENT 3h

10/19

1/18

4/13

7/10

COMPETITION POOL 3k

4/27

7/24

10/17

11/30

WELLNESS 3m

1/25

4/6

6/2

7/31

SPORTS FIELDS SF

7/7

10/31

12/14

1/30

JUL

SEP

2017

OCT

NOV

DEC

FEB

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

2018 AUG

SEP

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

2019

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

FEB

X X

X X X

X X

2 3 2

1 1

1 2 2

1 1

2 2 1

1 2 1 2

1 2

1 1

1 1 1

1 1

1 1 1

1 1 1 1

X 1 1

1 1

2 1

X X

TOTALS

JAN

2 2

DEC

X X

NOV

X X

MAR

JAN

SD DD 90% 100%

SUBMISSIONS

AUG

1 1

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

CUMULATIVE SUMMARY OF SUBMISSIONS

2016 SD DD 90% 100%

SCHEMATIC DESIGN DESIGN DEVELOPMENT CDs to 90% CDs to 100%

2017

2018

2019

CRAWFORD REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY WOODS BAGOT REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY

Throughout the design and construction documentation period for the site and each building comprising the 2020 Project, it is Crawford’s role as Lead Design Reviewer to ensure that the developer carries through with what has been contractually agreed to with regards the size, efficiency, quality and performance of all buildings. The review periods come quickly and they must be dealt with deftly and accurately. The University relies very heavily on the design review services to ensure that what has been agreed is what the developer delivers. In order for the tight timeframes for review turn-around to be met, resources have to be available and planned out in advance. Crawford devised the work allocation between Crawford and Woods Bagot and produced various schedules in advance to demonstrate that the man-power was available when it was required. Exhibit 2, Allocation of Resources (UC Merced 2020 Project) on the following page.

www.crawfordarch.com

APPROACH TO PARTNERING WITH WT PARTNERSHIP Exhibit 2, Allocation of Resources (UC Merced 2020 Project). UC MERCED 2020 PROJECT FIRST DELIVERY

J C Loading Dock, Tunnel & Basement Structure

2016 S O

C Residential Hall 1a.

2017 N

110 120

WB Residential Hall 1b.

100 115

120

WB Central Dining 1d.

115

C Sitework: Hardscape, Pathways & Landscape

2018 J

2019 F

Crawford Hours

190

380

405

125

390

105 105

390

960 FIRST DELIVERY TOTAL HOURS

WB Hours

270 250 440 215 405

125

795 1755

SECOND DELIVERY

J WB Wet / Dry Lab 2a.

2016 S O

100

2017 N

115

WB Computational Lab 2b.

125

2018 J

2019 F

Crawford Hours

135

WB Hours

475

100

115

125

195

170 135

200

210

430

C Competition Fields 310

310 SECOND DELIVERY TOTAL HOURS

100

115

905 1215

Crucial to the design review role was presenting to and advising the various UC Merced stakeholders. It was incumbent upon the design review team that user group input also find its way into the review period. Managing this process is an important job. Exhibit 3, Allocation of Resources (UC Merced 2020 Project) on the following page.

APPROACH TO PARTNERING WITH WT PARTNERSHIP Exhibit 3, Stakerholder Review Schedule (UC Merced 2020 Project). UC MERCED 2020 PROJECT STAKEHOLDER REVIEW SCHEDULE

SCHEMATIC DESIGN

DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

2016

F I R S T D E L I V E R Y

Sitework: Hardscape Pathways & Landscape

S 24 31 7 14

M 25 1 8 15

T 26 2 9 16

JULY/AUGUST W 27 3 10 17

T 28 4 11 18

F 29 5 12 19

S 30 6 13 20

S 4 11 18 25

M 5 12 19 26

SEPTEMBER/OCTOBER T W T 6 7 8 13 14 15 20 21 22 27 28 29

F 9 16 23 30

S 10 17 24 1

Undergraduate Residential Hall 1b

S 24 31 7 14

M 25 1 8 15

T 26 2 9 16

W 27 3 10 17

T 28 4 11 18

F 29 5 12 19

S 30 6 13 20

S 4 11 18 25

M 5 12 19 26

SEPTEMBER/OCTOBER T W T 6 7 8 13 14 15 20 21 22 27 28 29

F 9 16 23 30

S 10 17 24 1

Loading Dock

S 24 31 7 14

M 25 1 8 15

T 26 2 9 16

W 27 3 10 17

T 28 4 11 18

F 29 5 12 19

S 30 6 13 20

S 2 9 16 23

M 3 10 17 24

T 4 11 18 25

OCTOBER W 5 12 19 26

T 6 13 20 27

F 7 14 21 28

S 8 15 22 29

Central Dining 1d

S 24 31 7 14

M 25 1 8 15

T 26 2 9 16

W 27 3 10 17

T 28 4 11 18

F 29 5 12 19

S 30 6 13 20

S 2 9 16 23

M 3 10 17 24

T 4 11 18 25

OCTOBER W 5 12 19 26

T 6 13 20 27

F 7 14 21 28

S 8 15 22 29

Undergraduate Residential Hall 1a

S 4 11 18 25

M 5 12 19 26

SEPTEMBER/OCTOBER T W T 6 7 8 13 14 15 20 21 22 27 28 29

F 9 16 23 30

S 10 17 24 1

S 16 23 30 6

M 17 24 31 7

OCTOBER/NOVEMBER T W T 18 19 20 25 26 27 1 2 3 8 9 10

F 21 28 4 11

S 22 29 5 12

It is our recommendation that the system in place for the UC Merced 2020 Project should be utilized for UC Santa Cruzâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Student Housing West. It has proven to be an effective system for UC Merced and one that could be easily translated to this project. We have every reason to believe that Crawford can continue to work effectively with WTP on the UC Santa Cruz project.

www.crawfordarch.com

Q7::

Fee proposal

www.crawfordarch.com

FEE PROPOSAL

Stacey Jones

Project Manager

$275

Doug Osborn

Lead Design Reviewer

$195

James Pastine

Design Reviewer

$165

Kristen Klint

Design Reviewer

$165

Mitch Fine

Firm Executive

$275

Lilian Asperin

Lead Design Reviewer

$195

Laura Stedman

Design Reviewer

$165

Eileen Ong

Design Reviewer

$165

Chris Maroney

Lead Design Reviewer

$245

Danny Simpson

Design Reviewer (Electrical)

$165

Rick Gilson

Design Reviewer (Mechanical)

$165

Mike Jackson

Design Reviewer (Civil)

$165

Jon Mooney

Design Reviewer (Acoustics)

$165