Bending the Curve on Health Spending: The CBO Is Not a Policy Philosop…II (Please Think About It Peter Orszag and Doug Elmendorf Department)
8/5/09 10:33 PM
Grasping Reality with Both Hands The Semi-Daily Journal of Economist Brad DeLong: A Fair, Balanced, Reality-Based, and More than Two-Handed Look at the World J. Bradford DeLong, Department of Economics, U.C. Berkeley #3880, Berkeley, CA 94720-3880; 925 708 0467; delong@econ.berkeley.edu.
Support this weblog | About This Website | About Brad DeLong | This Weblog | Weblog RSS feed | Brad DeLong's Egregious Moderation | Order of the Shrill | Office Hours: Evans 601, by appointment, email delong@econ.berkeley.edu | Academic C.V. | John Yoo and the Torture Memo | Audio and Video Read the comment policy: no drive-bys, and if you bring information and humor you will be fine... Medicare Health Coverage Find A Medicare Plan That’s Perfect For You! Get Free Quotes. Visit Us www.Online-Health-Insurance.com
Weblog Home Page Weblog Archives Econ 115: 20th Century Economic History Econ 211: Economic History Seminar Economics Should-Reads Political Economy Should-Reads Politics and Elections Should-Reads Hot on Google Blogsearch Hot on Google Brad DeLong's Egregious Moderation July 26, 2009
Bending the Curve on Health Spending: The CBO Is Not a Policy Philosopher-King Office II (Please Think About It Peter Orszag and Doug Elmendorf Department) Igor Volsky: Wonk Room: Will The CBO Score Obama’s MedPAC Proposal?: After Congressional Budget Office director Douglas Elmendorf suggested that the current reform legislation would do little to reduce the growth of health care spending, http://delong.typepad.com/sdj/2009/07/bending-the-curve-on-health-spe…y-philosopher-king-office-ii-please-think-about-it-peter-orszag.html
Page 1 of 4
Bending the Curve on Health Spending: The CBO Is Not a Policy Philosop…II (Please Think About It Peter Orszag and Doug Elmendorf Department)
8/5/09 10:33 PM
Elmendorf suggested that the current reform legislation would do little to reduce the growth of health care spending, the White House doubled down on its support for establishing a MedPAC-like commission — MedPAC is an independent agency advising Congress on issues affecting the Medicare program — that would help lower future health care spending. Every year, MedPAC publishes two reports chock full of the kind of payment reform that could truly transform the health care system from incentivizing quantity to quality and value of care and every year Congress ignores them. By giving a MedPAC-like panel the power to implement the kind of payment reforms that MedPAC has always advocated, the proposal would free the panel from the constraints of congressional politics and allow it to actually influence Medicare spending patterns.... The President could choose to submit all of MedPAC’s recommendations as a package deal. Congress would have 30 days to intervene, but they couldn’t pick and choose what proposals they’d like – they could only vote up or down on the whole package.” This kind of proposal kicks payment reform into high gear.... Greg Poulsen.... “Unless we get the incentives right, nothing else in health reform really matters.” Poulsen is part of a group of officials at so-called “integrated” institutions that already operate using MedPAC’s many of recommendations and are generally able to provide quality care more efficiently.... The administration is a strong proponent of these reforms, but the challenge lies in pleasing the CBO — which finds savings by following Potter Stewart rule life: “I know it when I see it.” However, since the MedPAC-like proposal is predicated on the President accepting its recommendations and Congress not voting them down, (and MedPAC is only required to not “increase in the aggregate level of net expenditures under the Medicare program,”) the CBO — which rarely defines the criteria of savings — is unlikely to “see” savings. For CBO to find real money in the transformation from MedPAC to IMAC, it would have to be willing to stand up and say: "We believe that this procedural reform would change your deliberations, Mesdames and Messieurs Congresspersons, in a healthy and cost-reducing direction." They were always very unlikely to do that--to say that congressional action could be constrained or limited by anything other than explicit congressional votes that had a dollar bottom line attached to them. I see two things that could be done going forward: 1. The Obama administration could, in its IMAC legislative proposal, mandate that each year IMAC come up with payments reform recommendations that it believes will cut $20 billion off the baseline for government health spending, and require as part of the legislative proposal that congress either (a) approve the IMAC recommendations, or (b) approve other alternatives that achieve the same scorable savings as those suggested by IMAC. For those who believe that IMAC would work, the baseline reduction requirement wouldn't impose additional pain on the system. And for those who don't believe that IMAC would work--well, time for them to put their cards on the table as to whether they want to bend the curve on health spending or not. Think about it, please, Peter... 2. The CBO already has gotten a little bit pregnant to the extent of forecasting what congressional action would be in that it presents not just a "baseline" for government spending but an "alternative fiscal scenario." It should score the IMAC proposal in an analogous way: report, first, the effect of approving IMAC on the baseline; and, second, the effect of approving IMAC on the alternative fiscal scenario. That way they could score savings without scoring savings, if you know what I mean. Think about it, please, Doug... RECOMMENDED (5.0) by 3 people like you [How? ] You might like:
Tax Policy Center on Twitter (@this site) The Republican Path to an Enduring Electoral Majority in Twenty-First Century America (@this site) 2 more recommended posts »
http://delong.typepad.com/sdj/2009/07/bending-the-curve-on-health-spe…y-philosopher-king-office-ii-please-think-about-it-peter-orszag.html
Page 2 of 4
Bending the Curve on Health Spending: The CBO Is Not a Policy Philosop‌II (Please Think About It Peter Orszag and Doug Elmendorf Department)
8/5/09 10:33 PM
Brad DeLong on July 26, 2009 at 03:50 PM in Economics, Economics: Health, Obama Administration | Permalink TrackBack TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00e551f08003883401157144316f970c Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Bending the Curve on Health Spending: The CBO Is Not a Policy Philosopher-King Office II (Please Think About It Peter Orszag and Doug Elmendorf Department):
Comments You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post. Unless Congress overrides or new law is put into place the sustainable growth rules will cause an average -21% change in physician Medicare fees for next year. The only good news would be a 6 - 8% increase for primary care physicians (likely 30 - 40% of primary care docs are not taking new Medicare of Medicaid patients, they need a patient mix that will keep them afloat). Posted by: save_the_rustbelt | July 26, 2009 at 05:04 PM Sorry, but I don't buy all this conventional wisdom that the current system "incentifizes quantity" at the expense of quality. If so, how come hospitals kick you out as soon as they possibly can? The major cost problem, which neither Elmendorf nor anyone else seems to get, is an irrational insurance system in which patients don't know whether (or how) they will be covered, providers don't know if and how they will get paid, and employers have no idea how much employee benefits will cost next year. Posted by: urban legend | July 26, 2009 at 06:53 PM Great idea actually, and one that can be extended across the board. It allows federal bureaucracies to make smaller changes more often so large programs do not get out of whack. Posted by: Mattyoung | July 26, 2009 at 09:43 PM It won't be long before Jim Cooper & Co. start pushing for this sort of authority for Syl Scheiber over at the Social Security Advisory Board. Posted by: crumudgeon | July 26, 2009 at 10:23 PM
Verify your Comment Previewing your Comment Posted by: | This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted. Post
Edit
Your comment could not be posted. Error type: Your comment has been posted. Post another comment The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again. As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments. Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate. Continue
Me:
Economists:
Juicebox Mafia: Moral Philosophers:
http://delong.typepad.com/sdj/2009/07/bending-the-curve-on-health-spe‌y-philosopher-king-office-ii-please-think-about-it-peter-orszag.html
Page 3 of 4
Bending the Curve on Health Spending: The CBO Is Not a Policy Philosop‌II (Please Think About It Peter Orszag and Doug Elmendorf Department)
Paul Krugman Mark Thoma Cowen and Tabarrok Chinn and Hamilton Brad Setser
Ezra Klein Matthew Yglesias Spencer Ackerman Dana Goldstein Dan Froomkin
8/5/09 10:33 PM
Philosophers: Hilzoy and Friends Crooked Timber of Humanity Mark Kleiman and Friends Eric Rauchway and Friends John Holbo and Friends
http://delong.typepad.com/sdj/2009/07/bending-the-curve-on-health-spe‌y-philosopher-king-office-ii-please-think-about-it-peter-orszag.html
Page 4 of 4