Three Rivers Heritage Trail Network Dominic Mack | Summer 2017
2
Three Rivers Heritage Trail Network Pittsburgh, Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.
Friends of the Riverfront | 1994 (beginning construction) (See Appendix B.) Spiraling outward from downtown Pittsburgh, the 24-mile Three Rivers Heritage Trail traces the banks of three waterways—the Allegheny, Monongahela and Ohio—that lifted the city to prominence as America’s industrial powerhouse.1 The trail had been in development for more than 24 years in order to convert what was once a riparian brown-field after the fall of Pittsburgh’s main industry - steel. In what was thought of as “Steel City” is now in the works to become “Wheel City” through the usage of the trail networks that dot the surrounding context with parks, museums, sporting culture, and recreational activities that promote the engagement of the urban networking to provide for public health and accessibility. Built in phases over two decades, the trail was key to opening up the riverfront to residents who had been cut off from the water by industry for more than a century.2 The trail took advantage of an opportunity to re-purpose a series of under-utilized railroad passages and convert them to a hub of public health while still keeping an educational aspect to the heritage of the location by providing interpretative signs along the trail. The trail adds value as part of a growing web of interconnected trails spanning across parts of Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Ohio and New York - revolutionizing the concept of public health and transportation in America.
0 mi City-Scale Aerial Image | Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
2 mi
4 mi
0 mi Site-Scale Aerial Image | Three River’s Heritage
1 mi
2 mi
Table of Contents
5
CONTEXTUAL MORPHOLOGICAL ANALYSES
17
TOPIC-RELATED MORPHOLOGICAL ANALYSES
23
TOPIC-RELATED MORPHOLOGICAL ANALYSES
31
SWATs + OCs ANALYSES
31
APPENDICES APPENDIX A | End Notes APPENDIX B | Case Inventory APPENDIX C | References
3
4
view of the Three River’s Heritage Trail in downtown Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania credit: Friends of the Riverfront
5
Contextual Morphological Analyses Pittsburgh, Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, U.S.A. population climate
cultural attributes
major events
landmarks
305,704 Pittsburgh lies within the humid continental climate zone. The area has four seasons: winters are cold, cloudy, and moderately snowy; springs and falls are generally mild with moderate levels of sunshine; summers are warm to hot and humid.3 history was a center for industry of steel and rich ethnic traditions / reclaimed itself as a center for education, business and finance, as well as art and recreation.4 Restaurant Week, Craft Beer Week, Pittsburgh Three River Marathon, DICK’s Sporting Goods Marathon, triathlons and other engaging activities for the community. Phipps Conservatory, Point State Park, Heinz Memorial Chapel, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh Water Steps, PNC Park, Heinz Field, Andy Warhol Bridge
view of the Three River’s Heritage Trail in downtown Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania | credit: theodysseyonline.com
STASIS a reading of equilibrium vs. tension between built forms and open space
ARMATURE a reading of how space communicates the continuity of character and identity
NETWORK the interconnections of various systems at play
CIRCUITRY a reading of continuity and looping within and among collaborative systems
SPECTACLE a reading of where the urban patterning supports and invests in the public realm to create places of high “imageability”
PRESENCE analyzes the various degrees of habitation
INFERENCE analyzes impact of the scalability of circumstances
SOLVENCY analyzes the impacts of fragmentation and of disturbances
LEGIBILITY analyzes impacts of readings
DIMENSION analyzes impacts of surroundings
6
STASIS
PARKS
EXISTING TRAIL
PROPOSED TRAIL
3 RIVER HERITAGE
AG-Land Preservation
TENSILE AREAS
0
1
2
4
6
8 Miles
The network of trail systems created throughout Allegheny County formulate a language that ties in surrounding elements of the city. The tension between built form and the open spaces is developed through a hierarchy and dependence on the historical layout of the city. This enables a certain psycho-geographical value to the context, especially within the Downtown area - where mostly all the systems interrelate yet an equilibrium of built form and open space dominate.
7
ARMATURE
POPULATION - 0.5 MI RADIUS OF TRAIL
POPULATION DENSITY
TRAIL ACCESS
EXISTING TRAIL
PROPOSED TRAIL
3 RIVER HERITAGE
0
1
2
4
6
8 Miles
The “spine” of Pittsburgh is considered to be the junction of the three rivers that run throughout the county. The rivers (as well as the trails that hug them) systematically tie the city together by shaping the predominately open spaces in order to use them for the sustainable growth of the city. It provides the character and identity of the area, and within its boundaries, an influx of population density occurs because of the dependency of the area.
8
NETWORK
PARKS
EXISTING TRAIL
RAILWAY
3 RIVER HERITAGE
MAIN ROUTE
POPULATION DENSITY
AREAS WITH POOR NETWORK
0
1
2
4
6
8 Miles
Through the mapping of different networking patterns overlapped over the population density, a derivation of connection points surfaced. By reading the density of different networks at hand (parks, green spaces, highways, trains, etc.) and their interconnections, areas with poor networks became more evident and can become strategies for proposed trail routes in order to increase accessibility.
9
CIRCUITRY
PARKS
EXISTING TRAIL
PROPOSED TRAIL
3 RIVER HERITAGE
ALLEGHENY BELTWAY SYSTEM
0
1
2
4
6
8 Miles
The circuitry of the networks throughout the county provides an evident success of continuity and connection. The adjacencies of connections between waterways, trail networks and public transit provide for a continuous mean of travel throughout the context. Where these connections meet each other justify a great potential for an open space program in order to provide destination points throughout the city. The circuitry also provides for routes that avoids major arterials and congestion.
10
SPECTACLE
PARKS
EXISTING TRAIL
PROPOSED TRAIL
3 RIVER HERITAGE
TOURIST LANDMARKS
0
1
2
4
6
8
The urban patterning provides an balance between man-made and natural settings. A juxtaposition between the wooded areas and the urban fabric gives an opportunity to engage greenways to provide a systematic network of green spaces. Throughout these networks are areas of high “imageability� with activities and connections to the urban environment. A web of tourist attractions lines the spine giving the heritage of the community a threaded connection to the environment.
Miles
11
PRESENCE
PARKS
TOURIST AREA
CULTURAL AREA
3 RIVER HERITAGE
AREA OF PRESENCE
0
1
2
4
6
8 Miles
Throughout the city, there are a plethora of degrees habitation. Varying from tourist areas, cultural locations, populated areas and wooded areas - Allegheny County shows a greater presence within and along the junction of the three rivers that dissect Pittsburgh. This nucleic appearance of Pittsburgh gives principle to the idea of a cultural hub and provides great opportunity for a greater presence of activity that responds to the context.
12
INFERENCE
PARKS
EXISTING TRAIL
PROPOSED TRAIL
3 RIVER HERITAGE
AREAS OF POLLUTION
0
1
2
4
6
8 Miles
The history of Pittsburgh is prominently known for coal-reliant steel production. Although the main industry had fallen, the redevelopment of most of the areas still classify the context to be known as business districts. The districts have transformed into hubs of healthcare, education, technology and financial services. The city still holds concentration of pollution from production of services and when shown with green space - there is clear evidence that the two need to overlap more.
13
SOLVENCY
FLOOD
EXISTING TRAIL
3 RIVER HERITAGE
TRAIL ACCESS
RIVER ACCESS
LANDSLIDE PRONE
0
1
2
4
6
8 Miles
Although there is a well-developed pattern of networks throughout the county-wide scale, there are series of fragmentations in the connectivity of areas as well as disturbances that can play a role in public safety issues within the context of the area. Since the area is exposed to heavy bodies of running water, there are instances of flooding and even more so, since there are varying degrees of topography, landslides are susceptible to the area as well.
14
LEGIBILITY
PARKS
EXISTING TRAIL
PROPOSED TRAIL
3 RIVER HERITAGE
POPULATION - 0.5 MI RADIUS OF TRAIL
POPULATION DENSITY
0
1
2
4
6
8 Miles
Because of the extensive networking threads and juxtaposition of city and nature - there lies an interesting blend between the integration of both as well as the contrast. The proximity to the programming of the urban settlement in relation to the adjacencies of greenway networks displays a potential to expand the trail network throughout the county in hopes of making it a revolutionary main-means of travel.
15
DIMENSION
PARKS
EXISTING TRAIL
PROPOSED TRAIL
3 RIVER HERITAGE
0
1
2
4
6
8 Miles
The impacts the dense areas have on the city are increasingly resolving each other. Since there are green gaps in and around the denser inhabited areas, it provides an opportunity to increase public health. With the proposal of new trails, networks can be made in order to connect all other urban areas to each other.
16
view of the Three River’s Heritage Trail in downtown Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania credit: Friends of the Riverfront
17
Topic-related Morphological Analyses Three Rivers Heritage Trail, Pittsburgh, Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.
How can a lack of connectivity of blue and green spaces affect the public health of dense cities?
credit: theodysseyonline.com
vantage point along the Three Rivers Heritage Trail
ADJACENCIES -
analyze the context to understand the interaction between different systems and their immediate surroundings
The Three Rivers Heritage Trail has been constructed in phases over two decades. A systematic approach to the connection of these trails has been operated in an organized method of revitalizing abandoned railways and brownfields. Since the production of the trail: the access to water has increased, the amount of biking and walking activity has increased, as well as an increase in accessibility to the central business district, neighborhoods, municipalities, shopping venues and local attractions. It is therefore incumbent upon a traveler, commuter, etc. to know the various connection points and adjacencies of spaces in order to traverse through the network efficiently and safely. CONDITIONS FOR ANALYSES: • •
Explicit measure of regional patterns Accessibility of adjacencies
• •
Dense urban groupings and open spaces Networks of contexts and interactions
MOSAIC -
analyze the context for patterns of patches and their dynamic integration
The Three Rivers Heritage Trail has given life to the riverfront throughout Pittsburgh’s boundaries and edges. The ability of living near green and blue open spaces has increasingly affected one’s mental and physical well-being. The eudaimonic phase of this comes from the psychiatric characteristics of feeling better in a green space near an open blue space, and the hedonistic aspect ranges from arriving at a sense of balance in your body by increasing your physical health. Studying the mosaic patterning of these open spaces can lead to locating the areas that lack these variables. CONDITIONS FOR ANALYSES: • •
Visual and non-visual congregations of habitats, systems, etc. Dense areas versus dispersed systems
• •
Language of layouts of spaces Logic of spatial hierarchy and edge conditions
18
Topic-related Morphological Analyses Three Rivers Heritage Trail, Pittsburgh, Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.
LOCI -
analyze the context for genetic pieces that develop the spirit of place
The Three Rivers Heritage Trail provides easy access to nature which has a positive outcome on public health as well as cross-cultural contacts. Throughout the trail, there are stop-off locations where parks and other activities that are culturally tied lie. Instigating a community involvement through these hubs can increase public health in order to engage activity throughout the city. The ‘spirit of place’ has a factor on this site especially because of the history of the context. Throughout the trail, there are a multitude of interpretative signs throughout the multi-use riverfront system that highlight the history of the area as well as explain the role of the trail as a riparian buffer for the aquatic and plant life along it. CONDITIONS FOR ANALYSES: • •
Distinctive characteristics Definitive atmosphere of the city
• •
Historical foundations and preservations Cultural hubs and linkages
ADHESION -
analyze the context to understand the interconnection of the components of various systems as a structure for experience
How systems of blue and green open spaces come together is important in the aspect of public health to a personal degree and as well as an urban degree. If a city is healthy, then it can provide more opportunities for the users of the community to be healthy. Greenways and blueways contribute substantially to the ecological, social and economic health of the city. Developing opportunities of every-day psycho-physical regeneration without the need of using car transport, and developing an attractive network of walking and cycle lanes becomes the main category of research when mapping out the context of study. CONDITIONS FOR ANALYSES: • •
Comprehensive hub locations and response to context Green space adjacencies
• •
Connection point usage Problematic areas within context
POROSITY -
analyze the context for measures of void spaces in the material of the site
The conservation of unique and valuable nature and landscape complexes can be the starting foundation of where to link the next possible park and/or greenway system. Showing the voids in the natural settlements can ease the planning of densification and enable planning to be more tied into the conservation of useful natural areas to retain a standard for public health of the city.
CONDITIONS FOR ANALYSES: • •
Open spaces / green and blue Trail systems, under-utilized passages, roadways etc.
• •
Networks of connections of dense urban settlements Historical landmarks, touristed areas, etc.
19
ADJACENCIES
PARKS
EXISTING TRAIL
PROPOSED TRAIL
3 RIVER HERITAGE
TRAIL ACCESS
RIVER ACCESS
0
1
2
4
6
8 Miles
After mapping the accessibility of neighboring networks, various connection points and adjacencies of spaces in order to traverse through the network efficiently and safely surfaced. How all of these systems connect around the urban settlements shows that Downtown was/is still known as a hub for cultural activity. What derives from this observation is the question: do the adjacent spaces around the ‘hub’ provide a connection for public health?
20
MOSAIC
PARKS
3 RIVER HERITAGE
0
1
2
4
6
8 Miles
The ability of living near green and blue open spaces has increasingly affected one’s mental and physical well-being. By mapping out the patches of different variables such as: green spaces, greenway networks, and blueway networks - there is a more clear definition of what areas are lacking the healthy connection to these spaces (more often than not - a dense settlement).
21
LOCI
o t r e Ref
B x i d ppen
A PARKS
EXISTING TRAIL
PROPOSED TRAIL
3 RIVER HERITAGE
INTERPRETATIVE SIGNAGE
0
1
2
4
6
8 Miles
The interpretative signs throughout the multi-use riverfront system play a key factor in bringing the culture of the community to the trail. These points along the trail provide prime location for soft and hard goods to inhabit in order to bring a cultural identity to the trail and provide for an extensive network to lure more people to the trail for usage in order to increase activity.
22
ADHESION
PARKS
EXISTING TRAIL
PROPOSED TRAIL
3 RIVER HERITAGE
0
1
2
4
6
8 Miles
Hand-in-hand with adjacencies comes adhesion. The identity that develops out of the systematic role play of all the networks is important, but the location and function of those adhesive members can play a significant role in destination. More often than not, one will exercise more and enjoy the walk, bike, etc. more if the surrounding area is green, by water and/or safe - as well as provide a rewarding view or destination.
23
POROSITY
PARKS
EXISTING TRAIL
PROPOSED TRAIL
3 RIVER HERITAGE
0
1
2
4
6
Through the study of the contrast of dense areas of landscape, it can ease the planning of densification and enable planning to be more tied into the conservation of useful natural areas to retain a standard for public health of the city.
8 Miles
24
view of Downtown Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania from Northshore segment credit: Friends of the Riverfront
25
Precedent Study
Root River Trail System, Fountain - Lanesboro - Whalan - Peterson - Rushford - Houston, Minnesota, U.S.A
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Division of Parks and Trails | 1985 (opening of last segment) The Root River State Trail meanders 42 miles alongside the Root River from Fountain to Houston. In what was an abandoned rail grade now lies a connective route that promotes public health to all its users while tieing in the cultural and historical image of the context. The Harmony-Preston Valley State Trail runs for approximately 18 miles, connecting the towns of Harmony and Preston, both settled in the 1850s. The trail rises and falls with the bluffs, winding through historic towns tucked into hillsides, past rolling farm fields, milling districts, and relics of the railroads, heyday. Lush and verdant stretches present the visitor with views of the area’s natural beauty. Both trails are designed for hiking, biking, in-line skating, and cross-country skiing. Because most of this trail segment was constructed on an abandoned rail grade, most of the inclines and curves are quite gradual. Historical buildings and rural communities along the trail provide sites of interest as well as many services. Campgrounds, bed-and-breakfasts, restaurants, museums, outfitters and unique stores can be found in many of the trail towns.5
FILMORE COUNTY
HOUSTON COUNTY
0 mi City-Scale Aerial Image | Houston-Filmore Counties
6 mi
12 mi
0 mi
4 mi
Site-Scale Aerial Image | Fountain - Lanesboro - Whalan - Peterson - Rushford - Houston, Minnesota, U.S.A
8 mi
Precedent Study
Root River Trail System, Fountain - Lanesboro - Whalan - Peterson - Rushford - Houston, Minnesota, U.S.A
Intersection of the Blueway Network and Greenway Network of Root River Trail
View towards Downtown segment of both greenway and blueway
credit: rootrivertrail.org
credit: rootrivertrail.org
Bed and breakfast waypoint along the trail network
Greenway overpass crossing over blueway network
26
credit: rootrivertrail.org
credit: rootrivertrail.org
Precedent Study
Root River Trail System, Fountain - Lanesboro - Whalan - Peterson - Rushford - Houston, Minnesota, U.S.A
Blasted pathway through forested area
Narrow segment of greenway network
credit: rootrivertrail.org
credit: rootrivertrail.org
Campground waypoint
Wayfinding signage along paved pathways
27
credit: rootrivertrail.org
credit: rootrivertrail.org
Precedent Study
Root River Trail System, Fountain - Lanesboro - Whalan - Peterson - Rushford - Houston, Minnesota, U.S.A
Forested segment towards Downtown
Wayfinding along greenway network
credit: rootrivertrail.org
credit: rootrivertrail.org
Directed set of rules: stay to the right so others may pass
Beautiful scenery along blueway network
28
credit: rootrivertrail.org
credit: rootrivertrail.org
29
Precedent Study
Root River Trail System, Fountain - Lanesboro - Whalan - Peterson - Rushford - Houston, Minnesota, U.S.A
credit: rootrivertrail.org credit: rootrivertrail.org
30
view of the Pittsburgh Water Steps credit: Friends of the Riverfront
SWATs and OCs Analysis Pittsburgh, Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.
STRENGTHS • Provides safe, healthy, and economical recreational as well as educational value to the entire region. • The project allowed for greater access to green areas for residents which ensures good living standard and increase of public health. • Constitutes a critical element of overall efforts to improve the attractiveness of the region. • An increase in foot-traffic through business districts along the network with amenity values. • Increased land value of properties overlooking the greenspaces/attractive waterways. • Provides a hindrance to the rapid increase of urbanization disconnecting humans and nature; reconnects humans to nature. • Preserves the historical aspect of the city’s previous industry with interpretative signage and way-points. • Connects green areas within the city and around it, which improves integration of ecological processes. • The local support of the community cuts maintenance costs because of the volunteering efforts throughout the trail. • The urban parks and greenways create environments that facilitate social contacts and community attachment. WEAKNESSES • Placement of functional trail amenities for trail users is lacking outside of Downtown and Northshore areas. • Better wayfinding signage along the path as well as courtesy signs (Shared Path - Multiuse Path). • Not all segments are compliant to the guidelines developed in the masterplan and some show poor lack of connectivity to other systems. • The access to open greenspace is limited within the dense urban areas. • There are limited access points for the blueway (river) and even fewer rental agencies for kayaks, paddle boards, etc. • Most segments of the trail are geared more towards bicycle improvements. • Little room for extra green spaces for gardens or art unless there is a call for redevelopment and coding. • There is a high demand and dependence for community involvement in terms of maintenance and funding. • There are few activities and docking stations for boats, kayaks, etc. which does not enable one to traverse properly. • The alignments provided in the masterplan do not focus on linkage to parks. ASSETS • There is a strong public interest in the project which provides the organization with feedback and volunteer services. • The trail network is part of two larger mega-greenways which gives momentum to keeping up with the maintenance of the trail. • The trail is viewed as part of the quality of life for the local communities, and more importantly seen as an economic driver. • Develops every-day psycho-physical regeneration without the need of using car transport, and developing network of walking and cycling. • Increased amenities in the urban and rural communities. • Increased greenspace and off-road cycleways promoting physical recreation and increasing a sense of wellbeing. • Increased connectivity between neighborhoods and parks. • Connecting destinations for commuters and visitors. • Maintaining and protecting the cultural and spiritual values of the context. • The phasing strategy of the project has allowed it to develop with no cost deficiencies.
31
SWATs and OCs Analysis
32
Pittsburgh, Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.
TH R EATS • The topography North of the Downtown segment is prone to landslides which can hinder expansion northbound. • Climate change (4 seasons) plays a significant role on the maintenance of the project and can provide unsafe conditions. • The water conditions are often polluted around the Downtown and Northshore areas. • There is a lack of connection to green areas in the urban settings which can unmotivate one to go to the trail. • Traditional flood protection methods are utilized in the site’s boundaries which destroys the natural form and ecological edges of the waterway. • Concerns about trails that are too narrow and may need to be shared with the road and with bicycle traffic. • Some of the trail networks run adjacent and through active railroad passage which can provide unsafe conditions. • By paving over or activating abandoned railways, we are taking over the habitats formed by the natural world. • After heavy rainfall there are potential landslide and flooding issues within the Northshore and Downtown segments. • When trail portions close, the alternate route directs travelers onto busy road segments that are not yet Complete Street compatible. OPPORTUNITIES • • • • • • • • • •
Several existing riverfront parks that can be connected as part of the larger trail system (Sharpsburg, O’Hara Trail, Springdale, etc.). Key riverfront acquisitions with vacant lots can be found to use as blueway access points. An increase in community connections can enable road and trail connections for further accessibility and linkage. The implementation of Complete Streets can further develop the pedestrian-friendly environment. Possible residential development along waterway. Revitalization methods can be used to increase tourism/migration. Can create more partnerships to improve the water quality of the river from pollution damage. Can create more partnerships to protect and restore wildlife habitats along riverfront properties. Future planting along river’s edge can protect from flood events and protect property. Promotion of existing network flows for continuity in order to facilitate urban networking and avoid barriers.
CONSTRAINTS • Not all communities have the same opportunities for the most practical alignment and connections. • There are various ROW conditions to be dissected in order to make the most ADA compliant trail. • Most of the riverfront properties are privately owned. • The railroad properties throughout the county are private property owners and create hazardous safety conditions. • There are various environmental patches along the trail such as urban, suburban, agriculture and natural with different conditions. • Due to private property, active railroads or other industrial property it is not always possible to provide a trail directly on the riverfront. • Most widths of the paths are more inclined to sustain bike travelers with lessened width for passing - not accompanying room for walkers. • Many conditions need re-pavement over cracked concrete surfaces but lack of funds may not cover upkeep costs. • Most of the trail traverse through noisy environments because of the cluster of population density in-and-around the trail. • There are not a lot of bike parking opportunities around the landmarks and destination points.
Critical Task Analysis
33
Pittsburgh, Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.
CTs • A project regarding green and blue open spaces should develop a holistic approach to connect and manage the two elements in conjunction as a blue/green network - while recognizing their relationship to urban gray space - in order to have an interconnected urban system to achieve a sustainable development to increase public health. • Create opportunities for linkages of greenspaces for recreational activation of the spaces in order to improve social wellbeing and spiritual connections. • Provide opportunities for economic development by creating vibrant spaces for engagement along the waterways and in urban parks. Increased incentives will arise through enhanced connected spaces between areas of economic activity. • Provide a safe environment that enables healthy habits and economical transportation options for all ages, abilities and incomes to improve commutes and public health. • Be context-sensitive to the area in order to reflect a setting or desire by respecting the integrity of the natural, scenic, and historical environment. • Facilitate partnerships among communities and organizations to effectively market and promote trail systems by maximizing trail groups and continually identifying new trail projects and opportunities as they emerge. • Identify locations and address existing trail accessibility problems that inhibit use by disabled in order to create a network for all users. • Prioritize the development of off-street and on-street linkages to and from trails and in-between trails to close gaps in the network of systems. Through usage of complete streets, a continuous flow can be obtained at a regional scale. • Amenities shall be thoughtfully considered and strategically placed for the convenience of the users. A development of trail signage guidance shall be implemented to give the most convenient wayfinding methods for users. • Phasing strategies shall be conducted for precise implementation procedures.
CONCLUSION AND FINDINGS
34
WAS THE THREE RIVERS HERITAGE TRAIL SUCCESSFUL AT ADDRESSING THE THESIS QUESTION? The Three Rivers Heritage trail partially addresses the topic of a lack of connectivity of blue and green open spaces within a dense city affecting public health successfully. The trail traces the banks of three waterways—the Allegheny, Monongahela and Ohio—that lifted the city to prominence as America’s industrial powerhouse. By taking advantage of converting abandoned and under-utilized railroads within the context of these rivers opened a door to an opportunity of increasing public health by restoring these brownfields into a trail network of greenways and blueways. This, in-turn, will cohesively influence a better quality of life. Since the production of the trail: the access to water has increased, the amount of biking and walking activity has increased, as well as an increase in accessibility to the central business district, neighborhoods, municipalities, shopping venues and local attractions. Throughout the trail, there are various connection points and adjacencies of spaces in order to traverse through the network efficiently and safely. The trail also links to major greenspaces through greenways which provide great accessibility to parks. Improving access to public open spaces not only increases levels of physical activity, but can have other positive effects such as mental health benefits and reduced health care costs which can have a profound impact on people and on the larger community. Adults and children with access to parks, open spaces and playgrounds have better over-all general health than those who do not and tend to experience reduced levels of stress and lower rates of depression. The World Health Organization has declared physical inactivity to be a growing global public health risk.6 Having access to parks and open spaces has been shown to make people three times more likely to engage in recommended levels of daily physical activity, making them an essential component of any healthy urban space.
HOW COULD THE PROJECT BE IMPROVED? •
The trail could be improved by providing greater accessibility to the outskirts of the population density to facilitate connections to the dense areas of the city without means of travel through cars. Although there are successful linkages and greenway networks, the edge conditions of the project can allow for more activity and larger open spaces especially along the riverfront. A system to build more waterway access as well as recreational opportunity can enhance the users experience to want to engage in the water. Aside from the riparian edge condition developed around the Downtown area, there is not too many action steps taken in order to improve or retain the rivers edge. The Three Rivers Heritage Trail can become more than just a buffer between land and water. The edges and boundaries of the project can enable water to integrate within to supply the cities vegetative habitats more diversity.
CONCLUSION AND FINDINGS
35
HOW DID THE PRECEDENT STUDY FACILITATE FINDINGS AND IMPACT THESIS QUESTION? The Root River State Trail was chosen not only because of the similar conceptual strategies as the Three Rivers Heritage Trail, but also the success rate of public health from the trails influence. Since the precedent is essentially doubled in size and has been built for nearly 10 more years than Three Rivers Heritage - the experiential value and responsiveness that the trail has given has been an influential study for preceding trail networks. The network successfully connects several communities and what the Root River System has an upper hand in is the ability to supply proper amenities throughout the journey. The projects strengths towards the thesis question lie within its ability to provide a means of safer travel, greenway networking that connects threads of patches to provide a systematic approach to public health, as well as provide easy access to water while providing activities. The weakness of the project that make it fall short of the thesis asked lie within its extensive route. More opportunities can be taken in order to provide more way points at a community scale so that travelers can prioritize the trail network as a means of travel rather than roads.
ADDITIONAL RESEARCH SHOULD BE CONDUCTED... More research should be conducted on the positive aspects of restoring river edges in order to provide habitual practices of the ecology to promote a larger scale of biodiversity. In terms of a lack of connectivity, safer routes should be provided in areas where there is a disconnect from the trails main pathways. Research should also be continued on ways to expand the trails limits in order to reach out to more communities and provide more access points. The more accessibility there is for the communities, the higher increase in public health and safety there will be. Investigating the adjacent boundaries and edges of the context can allow one the explore the natural states of living as well as exposure to more activities. An outreach to find more parking units by access points would be a beneficial aspect to the project in order to allow and entertain tourists to explore the network of trail systems.
36
Appendix A
37
End Notes
1.
Rails-to-Trails Conservancy, “Three Rivers Heritage Trail 2014 User Survey and Economic Impact Analysis,” Friends of the Riverfront, 2014, https://friendsoftheriverfront.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Three-Rivers-Heritage-Trail-Users-SurveyLORES.pdf.
2. Laura Stark, “Pennsylvania Three Rivers Heritage Trail,” Rails-to-Trails Conservancy, 2014, https://www.railstotrails.org/trailblog/2017/april/07/pennsylvania-s-three-rivers-heritage-trail/. 3. US Climate Data, “Climate Pittsburgh - Pennsylvania,” US climate data, 2017, http://www.usclimatedata.com/climate/pittsburgh/pennsylvania/united-states/uspa3601. 4. University of Pittsburgh, “Pittsburgh Culture | Cool Pittsburgh,” University of Pittsburgh, 2015, http://www.coolpgh.pitt.edu/eating/pittsburgh-culture.php. 5. Department of Natural Resources, “Root River State Trail,” Department of Natural Resources, 2017, http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/state_trails/root_river/index.html. 6. Christopher Black, “Urban Green Spaces,” World Health Organization, 2017, http://www.who.int/sustainable-development/cities/health-risks/urban-green-space/en/.
38
Appendix B Case Inventory
Role of Key Participants: • • • • • • •
Friends of the Riverfront is responsible for development and maintenance of the 24-mile trail network Community/municipal volunteers assist in stewardship efforts (2014 - 1,702 Volunteers contributed 5,326 hours to 50 events) Allegheny and Armstrong County GIS and Mapping Departments provided GIS Data Southwest Pennsylvania Commission allied for a Conservation Partnership Rails-to-Trails Conservancy analyzed data configuration based off user-input surveys Paying members of the trail organization provide contributions for upkeep and management Management services were offered by the Pennsylvania Environmental Council
Financial Issues: • •
Partially funded by a grant from the Community Conservation Partnership Program administered by the Department of Conservation and Natural Resources (DCNR), Bureau of Recreation and Conservation (Bureau), and Keystone Recreation Park and Conservation Fund Donations were received from Allegheny River Towns Enterprise Zone (ARTEZ), Allegheny County, Aspinwall Borough, Blawnox Borough, Borough of Etna, Fox Chapel Borough, Fox Chapel District Association, Friends of the Riverfront, and Pennsylvania Environmental Council COST: • Right-of-way (20 foot tract of land): $20,000-$100,000 / acre • ROW Total Estimate Range: Practical Alignment: $540,000 - $2,700,000 Preferred Alignment: $1,180,000 - $5,900,000 Engineering Cost: $50,000 - $150,000 • Design and Environment: $150,000 - $300,000 Existing Roadways: $20,000 - $50,000 / mile • Construction: New Asphalt Pavement: $250,00 - $300,000 / mile •
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION:
•
Maintenance: $1,500 / mile
Proposed Practical Alignment: $2,880,000 - $3,950,000 Proposed Preferred Alignment: $6,330,000 - $7,700,000
39
Appendix B Case Inventory
PROCESS: •
PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT • List of Stakeholders
Members of the Allegheny Valley Trails Community Trail Initiative include: Allegheny County, Friends of the Riverfront, Pennsylvania Environmental Council, Department of Conservation & Natural Resources, Allegheny River Towns Enterprise Zone, Township of O’Hara Parks and Recreation Committee, Fox Chapel District Association, Natrona Comes Together, Springdale Team of Active Residents(ST AR), Alli-Kiski Historical Society, Boyd Center, Audubon Society of Western PA, Allegheny Ridge Corporation, Pittsburgh to Harrisburg to Mainline Canal Greenway, Rachel Carson Trail and the City of Pittsburgh, Millvale Borough, Shaler Township, Borough of Etna, Sharpsburg Borough, Aspinwall Borough, Fox Chapel Borough, Township of O’Hara, Blawnox Borough, Harmar Township, Cheswick Borough, Springdale Borough, Springdale Township, Frazer Township, Tarentum Borough, Brackenridge Borough, Harrison Township, Freeport Borough, and Allegheny Township.
•
Public and Project Stakeholder Meeting
•
Property Owners
An extensive public involvement program was maintained throughout the feasibility study process that included stakeholder, municipality, and general public meetings. The involvement extended to meetings and regular correspondence with community leaders. In all, twelve (12) informational presentations were made before various municipalities and community leaders as well as (3) advertised public meetings during the study process. At each meeting the public was given the opportunity to discuss sections of the proposed trail that would pass through their municipalities and indicate an alignment. These alignments were analyzed for right-of-way impacts, physical restraints, flood plain and environmental impacts and accessibility. As recreational use of the riverfronts grow, working with private property owners has become more critical.
•
POTENTIAL USE OF TRAIL • Market Analysis • Trail linkages/Connections to Existing Trails • Trail Survey and Results
•
CONCEPTUAL DESIGN • Trail Corridor Typical Sections • Trail Corridor Description • Trial Corridor Definitions
•
TRAIL OPERATION, MAINTENANCE, AND SECURITY
•
FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY • Cost Estimates • Phase Implementation Plan
•
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS
•
CONSTRUCTION
CHRONOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT: • North Shore - 1994, 1997, 1998 • Lawrenceville - 1996 • Eliza Furnace - 1998 • Southside - 1991, 1998, 1999, 2005 • Chateau - 1998, 2000 • Panther Hollow - 1999 • Duck Hollow - 2001 • Washington’s Landing - 1999 • Station Square - 2002
• • • • • • • • •
Strip District - 2002 Baldwin Borough - 2002 Millvale - 2002 Hot Metal Bridge - 2007 Casino - 2009 Mon Warf - 2010 Route 28 - 2010 Convention Center - 2012 Hazlewood & Keystone/GAP - 2012
Appendix B
40
Case Inventory
PROBLEM DEFINITION: •
An industrial wasteland consisting of an under-utilized riparian brownfield provides an opportunity to convert a unused railroad into a multi-use regional trail connecting to an existing trail network while retaining its historical context of the city. Before the trail network, the city had little to no public access to the riverfront because of the coal-inclined industry of the production of steel from factories that lined the rivers edge. After the decline of the main industry, there was a shift in the economic base of Pittsburgh to tourism, education, health care, high technology and finance.
GOALS: • • • • •
Develop the trail along the Allegheny River with strong connections from the river into communities at key trailheads Connect people to communities, work places, schools, transit sites, attractions and residences Provide a safe, clean and green way to get around through a linkage of urban trails Provides municipalities’ opportunities to develop safe walking routes to schools, on road biking opportunities and ideas to develop safe and sustainable active transportation Maintain the historical integrity of the trails pastime and historical city references
PROGRAM: NORTH SHORE SEGMENT • The North Shore segment of the Three Rivers Heritage Trail is located on the 7-mile stretch of continuous trail from Westhall Street on the Chateau segment through Millvale Riverfront Park on the Millvale segment. The North Shore segment typifies the urban trail system experience, touching areas of historic significance, the popular and expansive entertainment district, and natural areas with green space right within the city. • Culture & Entertainment • Manchester Craftsmen’s Guild • National Aviary • Rivers Casino • Children’s Museum of Pittsburgh • Carnegie Science Center • PNC Park • Heinz Field • Andy Warhol Museum • Bikes & Kayaks • Amenities / Parks / Open Spaces • Bicycle Heaven • Connected throughout the trail system • Iron City Bikes-Lawrenceville • Love Bikes • Kayak Pittsburgh-North Shore • Transportation • Allegheny T Station • 14 North Shore T Station
Appendix B
41
Case Inventory
PROGRAM (cont.): SOUTH SECTION / ELIZA FURNACE • The South Side/Eliza Furnace loop between the Hot Metal and Smithfield St. Bridges is a popular 5-mile trip. The Eliza Furnace segment links to Downtown Pittsburgh while the South Side segment offers convenient access to the popular Carson Street business district. The Panther Hollow segment allows easy access to Oakland’s universities, parks and cultural attractions • Culture & Entertainment • Amenities / Parks / Open Spaces • Gateway Clipper Fleet • Connected throughout the trail system • Just Ducky Tours • Carnegie Museums of Art & Natural History • Phipps Conservatory • Bikes & Kayaks • Golden Triangle Bike Rental • REI • Thick Bikes • 9 Iron City Bikes-Oakland • Ted’s Excellent Bike Repair •
•
Transportation • Duquesne Incline • Monongahela Incline • Station Square T Station
The Three Rivers Heritage Trail offers a nearly complete public route on both sides of all three rivers in Pittsburgh and Allegheny County. Over 30 miles of additional trail are in planning or development phases. The Three Rivers Heritage Trail also connects to many regional trails and trail networks like the Great Allegheny Passage (GAP), the developing Erie-to-Pittsburgh Trail, and the Pittsburgh to Harrisburg Main Line Canal Greenway.
2
M ile 1
Appendix B 279
28
42
Case Inventory Mile 11
19
PROGRAM (cont.): Fox Cha
ARCH ST
pel Rd
5
8
Etna
illv ale
Mile
el Rd
delafield ave
r av e
e
Cente
ave
rn av
rd
brilliant
easte
delafield
ave
Ave Stanton
ll
tA
R dB
Baldwin Rd
ood ew om NH
885 19
Allegheny Aqueduct 130
9
Riverfronts Naturally
10
H.J. Heinz
11
Saint Nicholas Church & Mala Jaska
12
Canal Lift Lock No. 4
13
Herr’s Island
14
Thomas Carlin’s Sons Foundry
15
31st Street Bridge
16
Rowing in Pittsburgh
17
Washington in PA
18
East Ohio Street Corridor
19
Allegheny Arsenal
20
Smithfield St. Bridge
21
Lewis & Clark
22
Steamboats
23 24
Trees and Our Riverfront 380 Black Diamonds
25
Ormsby Farms
26
Coal Transportation
27
Panhandle Railroad
28
PA Canal
29
Glass Manufacturing
30
Oliver Iron & Steel
31
Immigrant Steel Workers
32
Ferry Landing
33
Mon Lock & Dam
34
Prehistoric Rivers
35
B&O Railroad
36
Hot Metal Bridge
37
Ling-Temco-Vought (LTV)
38
Jones & Laughlin
39
Eliza Furnace
40
376 Iron and Steel Workers
41
Panther Hollow
42
Frank Lenz
130
43
Hub of Activity
44
Shaping Steel
45
Open Hearth Steel
46
Materials Handling
47
Mon Con Railroad
48
J&L Steel
49
Making Steel
50
The Stacks
51
World War II Expansion
52
Homestead Steel Works
53
The Ward
54
The Monongahela
55
Ethnic & Religious Organizations
56
The 12,000 Ton Press
57
The Battle of Homestead
58
Carrie Furnaces
59
The Pump House
60
Spirit of Homestead
61
The Ingot Buggy
R LB
M
ay lW
ze Ha
ile
837
9
HO at
All
eg
he
ny
Pa
ss
ag
e to
BR
th
E7
Gre
e Av
Cu
mb
IN
58
TM ETA
59
52
erl
an
d
This project was completed in partnership with the Rivers of Steel Heritage Corporation. Funding was provided in part by a grant from the Pennsylvania Department of Conservation & Natural Resources, Bureau of Recreation and Conservation, Educational Stewardship Fund, administered by the Rivers of Steel Heritage Corporation.
Homestead 837
ST
Map and guide designed by Bally Exhibit www.ballyexhibit.com
West Homestead Mile
Baldwin Borough
Three Sisters
8
IN
St th 29 er h
Glass Run Rd
N
Allegheny City
7
56
G
TO
ER
RIV
51
kA ve
a re
roa
6
ail
ST
GLENWOOD BR
XR Mile
Baseball in Pittsburgh
6
NK
llo w Ho ck Du CS
h eg
5
Verona
RA
2nd Ave
N
SO
AR 42
Call us at: 855-93-SPORT
y en
ss Pa
oc
57
Mil e
r St
Respect others.
Dr
54
7
Gloste
No littering.
front
ater EW
61
e ag
Native Americans
Braddock
60
50
Bra
dd
8th AVE 51
Hazelwood
S
Carrie Furnace
53
EC
Trail is open from dawn to dusk.
St
11
AD TE . ES R M SB HO RAY G
Ave
5
Clean up after your dog.
Bro
10
Mile
Dogs must be on a leash.
Follow all traffic rules.
e
Ave oo lw Ha
ze
ll Rd ns Hi
ers
ial
Brow
Old
Flow
erc
Mile 8
sH
837
15mph speed limit.
mm
d
wn
12
Rd
Co
R ill
55
Trail Rules
Stay right, pass on left.
nC
Greenfield dA ve
ood elw Haz
w
Ave
ollo
2nd
nth
St
Pa
ne
Irvi
Dog Park
e
885
gh orou
Great Allegheny Passage Overlay
40.4143,-79.9165
Run Becks
ld Av
ALMONO construction affects Hazelwood trail usage. Please visit the Trail Status page for condition updates.
in B
Trail System Map
nfie
CAUTION!
Baldw
Great Allegheny Passage
Ave
St
St
Trail Parking
ld
fie
en
gre
ne
Public Restrooms
Share the Road
Gree
St
irvi
Chemical Toilets
Trail Connector
duck hollow @ old browns hill rd. Paved lot. 30 spaces available.
St ier
ave
Business Districts
40.4112,-79.9452
Mile 4
lin e St
Sa
d
40.4259,-79.9532
hazelwood ave. @ gloster St Gravel lot. 10 spaces available.
ER
xis
ard
30
St
2n
9
22
ale
ier Fraz
S
ood Blvd
Beechw
30
Forw
is St
RIV
urn
St
b win
ace
Panther hollow trailhead 22 279 (boundary St. @ Four Mile run rd.) Paved lot. 25 spaces available.
Mount Oliver
River Mileage from the Point
e
rn Fu
Trail: Planned
30
376
FRICK PARK
Greenfield Ave
8
LA
Water Access
St
HE
Trail Dead End
Trail: Walking
za eli
40.4259,-79.9532
eliza Furnace/ Panther hollow Connection
Trail Access Point
Trail: Crushed Stone Surface
Beechview
eliza Furnace trailhead @ Swinburne St. Paved lot. 25 spaces available.
Saline 38 39 40
GA
40.4315,-79.9727
nd Av
eE
37
376
The Point
4
NK
M
Fraz
$
ary St bound
Trail: Paved Surface
Bo u
41
Alex
South Side
T
HO
36
Firsts in the World
3
RA
48 49
46
BR
Hobart St
Ru n
45
L TA ME
SCHENLEY PARK
ile
47
3
Panther Hollow
Rd
Nin eM
44
35
Squirrel Hill Murray Ave
43
ile
nd ary
St
GHAM BR BIRMIN
M
r
MAP KEY & LEGEND
South Side riverfront Park @ 18th St. Paved lot. 50 spaces available.
Pen
MF OO BL
2 ile M
yD
ide
Hollow
FORBES AVE
Rd
S 22nd St
S 9th St
log
Panther
Life onISLAND the River
2
Rivers of Steel Signage:
14
FORBES AVE
9
Eli za Fu rn Te ac ch e no
S 23rd St
ER
10TH ST
TY
BR
BR
FIE ITH SM
h St
South S
Dr
1
blvd
St
ld
13
nley
fie
S 6th St
32
Sche
Blvd of the Allies
33 34
7
E AV
Allentown
40.4401,-80.0171
Chapel Harbor
Point Breeze
en
E CARSON ST
SOUTHSIDE RIVERFRONT PARK
Ave
Gre
Bingham St
31
S 18th St
BR
LIB
30
t
e
McKean St
S
tS
ON
Station Square trailhead @ duquesne incline Gravel lot. 20 spaces available.
ue
rn inbu Sw
S 4t
27
376 Mile 2
28 29
GRANDVIEW PARK
19
uq
ON
Mt. Washington
23
ircl
GE
DB IEL
St St field
Gra nt S t Ros sS t
ix S t
Woo d
Sm ith
nw
ST LD
22
UPMC Lighthouse Pointe
Shady Ave
$
E AV
10
Bo
E AV ES RB FO
TH
BE
25 26
A)
Shady Ave
S.
Oakland
son St
1
olds
Wilk
Daw
9
NA VE
St
Sta
aig
BR
N Cr
1
ority (PWS
Ave
Rdw
Mile
Sewer Auth
AVE
PEN
FIFTH AVE
R FO 24
WN
Water &
CAUTION!
Freeport rd
MELLON PARK
Shadyside
ve eA
FORBES AVE
Blvd of the Allies 2nd Ave
Pittsburgh
eny river
Reyn
FIFTH AVE
$
Waterworks Mall
ri v
This segment of trail is under development. Please visit the Trail Status page of friendsoftheriverfront.org for complete details and opening dates.
8
FIF
21
t rd
UPMC St. Margaret Hopital
allegh
Ce
Hill District
EL
St
$
East Liberty
ins
3
KSTO
ron
BLV
Downtown Pittsburgh
579
6th Oliv Ave er
28
CAUTION!
St
Her
St
th
15
END
380
ntr
e
11
2
BAUM
epor
Aspinwall Marina
FRAN
. BLVD
y
e
E AV
D.
BIG
L
380 AV E
Fre
Future site of ASPINWALL RIVERFRONT PARK
oop
St
8
Av ntre
LIB
OW
TY
E AV
st
ER
Bro
PE
St
TY
ST
LIB
2nd
ley exp
St
Aspinwall Riverfront Park is under development. Please be alert for changing conditions.
ad
ER
NN
$
Ea
.
NA VE
St
WES T
th
24
t
21
11th
r
y
40.4717,-79.9664
Ra
nd st E
Blvd
PEN
Bloomfield
St
Ce
ty Av
Liber
1
Equals one mile
ad
4th
ny Val
er
TLER
Y AVE
Polish Hill ilro
berty
O'Hara Township
alleghe
vd.
n Bl
le Neg
E. Li
Friendship
PENN AVE
LIBERT
St
lawrenceville trailhead @ 40th St. Gravel lot. 10 spaces available.
ER
N Hi ghla
Highland Park
ST
St
Ave
y Ru
BR
th
vd
WASHINGTON
e y Av
ille
3
ev nc
Mile
nton
RID
Riv
ST
Sta
St
Lawrenceville
BU 31ST
Strip District
LM
13
0
AN
V
SM
$
R
50
N
Dis
AL
.B
rdle
rip
EM
McA
RI
Y
tric
St
M
qD
$
T’S
279
nS
VE
re
tio
E GH
BLVD
ill St
N Ne gle
rd
20
ua
Sta
BR
Sq
E LL
ST
W
A
TH
ion
Ave Blv 3rd d of Ave the 1st Allies Ave
e Av
16
ix St
at
Ave
4
4th
9
1
ne Bl
es Duqu
Penn
5
10
$
BR
St
N
Millvale riverfront Park @ river Front dr. Paved lot. 80 spaces available.
Stanw
r
PJ
40.4638,-79.9780
BR
qD
BR
nS
22
51
washington’s landing under 31st St. bridge Paved lot. 50 spaces available.
6TH ST
tio
Ft
7
$
$
POINT STATE PARK 6 WS ta
7TH ST
4
Mile 0
30
40.4536,-79.9905
PARK
Ave
R
8
Mile
6
$
SHORE NORTH 5
ST 8
279
9TH ST
n St
Robinso
FT DUQUESNE BR & WALKWAY
ER
r ive
l St
R IV
gre
2
St
St er ss Riv
Pro
Federa
IO
ON
Ave
RS
3
$
inz
28
t
CA
Duquesne Heights
60
$
W Gen. 2
E
Ohio St
t
West End
6
Casino Dr
W
river ave. @ heinz St. 60 Gravel lot. 8 spaces available. Additional parking available at River Ave. and Veterans Bridge (downriver) and River Ave. and Washington’s Landing Bridge (upriver).
monsS
7
837
westhall St. On street parking. 10 spaces available. 40.4720,-80.0433
Ave
65
e St
OH
monsS
Reed
W Com
Kroll Dr
Recommended Trail Access and Parking
W Ohi
Ridge
E Com
ST
n Ave
Wester
sdal
14 Pro Bikes
N
13
12
Sh
11
Ave
WEST PARK
o St
ny Ave
ON
Elliott
1
W North
Alleghe
RS
(additional shops on opposite side)
th or
He
Cedar
u St
Manchester
CA ile
East Allegheny
l St
N Frankl
e or
S 16th St
in St
Chatae
ver Ave
Ave
North Side
Federa
Preble
New Bea
W
M
Mile 9
130
M 43
5
La wre er A ve
14
2
Bike Shop
Rd
LAN HIGH il P l W e
py ex
Rd
3
WASHINGTON’S LANDING
Liverp
Rd
Fox Chapel
HIGHLAND PARK
BR
16
15
l St
Mile
13 Carnegie Library of Pittsburgh South Side
11
Va lle y
Fineview 279
ool St
12 Carnegie Library of Pittsburgh Hazelwood
10
ny
St
Federa
ton
ST
18 17
Ave
11 Carnegie Library of Pittsburgh Sheraden Downtown
8
he
ale illv
Av e lure
East
ve aA
orni
ILR
10 Carnegie Library of Pittsburgh Main
Freeport
Mile 8
Bun
19
ST
Calif
Ave
u
ea
ver
at
Bea
Ch
New
19
TH
35th
gh
Libraries
7
E
IO OH
40
Perry South
RA
9 Monongahela Incline
4
MILLVALE RIVERFRONT PARK
Marshall - Shadeland
Island
Mile 7
Stanton Heights
r td
riv
Bri
Brunot Island
River Ave
Y RIVER BLVD
n
ro
erf
D OA
8 Duquesne Incline
Friends ofSYCAMORE the Riverfront Signage:
Squaw Valley Riverfront Trail
ALLEGHEN
Stanton Ave
M cc
65
$
Lake Dr
4
Ave
51
7 Allegheny T Station
6
ile
M
M
Run
d
1 Doerr St
40.4710,-79.9731
St
ler
But
Millvale
Future site of ASPINWALL RIVERFRONT PARK
kerh
6 North Shore T Station
5
alle yV
en
gh
alle
a
Vehicle access to Millvale riverfront Park
nR
1
5 Gateway T Station
4
ave
hto
WESTHALL ST
4 Wood Street T Station
3
y
av e
Stanton
g Bri
Tracy St
2 First Avenue T Station
2
nt
28
28
On
ra
p ex
lle g
lvd ts B eigh ghto
nH
g
Woods Run Ave
ds Woo
1 Station Square T Station
1
St ohio y
RIVERVIEW PARK
Brighton Heights
Transportation
3 Steel Plaza T Station
n Ave
Termo
10
r St
e
The Three Rivers Heritage Trail is an expansive 24-mile urban riverfront trail system along both sides of all three rivers in Pittsburgh and Allegheny County. The trail provides opportunities for recreation and commuting for both residents and visitors to the region, and allows access to dense urban areas, popular shopping and entertainment districts, and green space.
HIGHLAND PARK LOCK & DAM #2
Butle
av e
Chap
ln
Fox
co
Interpretive Signage
O'Hara Township
28
Aspinwall SIX MILE ISLAND
Delafield
ey
lin
Mile 6
.
all
5 Mile
BR
4
av e
RK BR
en
de
D PA
re
ea
62ND ST
ile
Shaler
erg
M
h e r i ta g e t r a i l M
Sharpsburg Main St
three rivers
ev
Bri
Mile
11
30
Appendix B
43
Case Inventory
MAINTENANCE AND MANAGEMENT: •
• •
• •
Typically Friends of the Riverfront aids in the development of new sections of the Three Rivers Heritage Trail. As part of this process there is a high probability that the municipality will own and maintain the trail and adjacent amenities. If however the municipality is unable or unwilling to do so Friends of the Riverfront is set up as a land trust to hold properties or in some cases Allegheny County may assume the role of ownership. In all instances Friends of the Riverfront will offer aid in maintaining the trail corridor through a license and maintenance agreement. Easement or lease agreements do not necessarily need to be described in the metes and bounds, but can simply identify logical termini and reserve corridor improved to set specifications necessary for the defined use and maintenance of the trail. An excellent overview of operation and maintenance cost is provided by the Rails to Trails Conservancy Northeast Regional Office in their July 2005 publication Rail-Trail Maintenance & Operation. This publication compares the maintenance and operation costs of 100 rail-trails in the Northeast and Mid-west. The maintenance & operation costs reported ranged from a low of $500 to a high of $800,000 per year; with an average M & 0 cost of $50,000. The average trail surveyed was 23 miles long, and reported maintenance & operation· costs of just under $1,500 per mile, regardless of whether it had a paved or unpaved surface. Much of this cost can be covered by volunteers and trailtender groups. The more the community takes ownership and is involved in maintenance and operation of the trail, the less there is likely to be vandalism and incidents of illegal activity along the trail corridor. Support from the host municipalities is very important, because it is the local communities that will most likely be responsible for maintenance and operation of the trail once it has been constructed.
SITE PHOTOGRAPHS:
44
Appendix B Case Inventory
USE/USER ANALYSIS: • • • •
The primary use of the trail is walking or biking. The target group for the trail was focused on communities who would use the trail and also adjacent property owners/ businesses that provide products and services for trail users. Economic development in communities that are along the alignment. Benefits come both from visitors to communities who spent money while they are using the trail. An increase in property values as a result of the trail development and creation of new businesses that cater specifically to trail users. In 2014, Rails-toTrails Conservancy conducted a study of the users of the Three Rivers Heritage Trail (image below of generalized content study of users)
FRIENDS OF THE RIVERFRONT THE
Highlights from the Three Rivers Heritage Trail 2014 User Survey and Economic Impact Report
TRAIL
PEOPLE
Friends of the Riverfront is responsible for development and maintenance of the 24-mile Three Rivers Heritage Trail. Volunteers assist Friends of the Riverfront in its stewardship efforts. In 2014, 1,702 volunteers contributed 5,326 hours of service to Friends of the Riverfront at 50 Three Rivers Heritage Trail events. For more information, visit friendsoftheriverfront.org.
$8.3million estimated total annual economic impact
!!
82.5%
®
65%
use the trail year-round
65%
bird watch study wildflowers observe wildlife
Influence 83.9%
83.9% said the trail has influenced their frequency and type of activities
822,873
rate the safety & security of the trail good or excellent
85.2%
Three Rivers Heritage Trail Visits Annually
Primary Activity
rate the cleanliness of the trail good or excellent
User Profile
44.1% Biking
32.7% Walking
20.8% Running
2.4% Rollerblading
0.4% 15 & younger 4.9% 16 –25
59.7% male 40.3% female
22.4% 26–35 16.6% 36–45
© Friends of the Riverfront
20.2% 46–55 24.4% 56–65 11.2% 66 & older
Rails-to-Trails Conservancy conducted the User Survey and Economic Impact Analysis.The report was developed with assistance from the Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Bureau of Recreation and Conservation, Community and Conservation Partnership Program. The report was released March 27, 2015.
45
Appendix B Case Inventory
PERCEPTION AND MEANING: • •
The area maintains great justice for the historical impact of the industry before the redevelopment of Pittsburgh. The place provides an outstanding sense of connectivity to its context and increases the ability for an increase in public health.
SCALE:
TIME:
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
•
24 miles City of Pittsburgh/Township of O’Hara Sec. 2/Blawnox = 0.8 miles Shaler / Etna Segment = 1.7 miles Sharpsburg Segment = 1.8 miles Township of O’Hara Section No. 1 Segment = 0.4 miles Aspinwall Segment ~ varies from 0.4 miles City of Pittsburgh Segment~ 0.7 miles Township of O’Hara Section No. 2 Segment~ 1.4 miles Blawnox Segment~ varies from 0.8 miles to 1.0 miles Township of O’Hara Section No. 3 Segment~ varies from 1.8 miles Harmar Segment ~ varies from 3.0 mile Cheswick Segment ~ varies from 0. 7 miles to 0.8 miles Springdale Borough Segment ~ varies from 1.5 miles to 1.9 miles Springdale Township Segment~ 1.3 miles East Deer Segment ~ varies from 2.2 miles to 3.1 miles Tarentum Segment ~ 1.5 miles Brackenridge Segment ~ 0.6 miles Harrison Township Segment ~ varies from 4.6 miles to 5.6 miles Freeport Borough/ Allegheny Township Segment ~ 2.5 miles
Throughout the years the project has steadily phased, opening up a new section within a couple of years from each other. There is constant analysis done by the organizations involved to map out the next possible segment that can open in order to link to existing trails in order to create a new wave of movement throughout the city.
UNIQUE CONSTRAINTS/INFRASTRUCTURE: • •
Since the trail is built either on top or adjacent to existing railways, there arises certain concerns pertaining to safety hazards, cost efficiency, practicality, as well as engineering. There were two methods of conceptualization that were drafted in order to be applied to areas which favor one over the other: • The practical alignment is defined as the alignment that may be most feasible in the immediate future. This route may be on road more often and away from the river. The preferred alignment provides close proximately to the riverfront. Both alignments overlap in areas.
ENVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVITY: • • •
Environmental Hazards - Based on preliminary assessments, determine the need for environmental assessment studies relative to toxic waste disposal or other environmental hazards. The cost for engineering and environmental services to design and obtain environmental clearance for construction of the proposed trail will vary greatly due to the diverse land types along the riverfront. However, it is conceivable that all design and environmental clearance for the proposed trail could be attained for between $150,000 and $300,000. The once brownfield is now a riparian buffer zone to increase and restore vegetation habitats along water’s edge as well.
Appendix B
46
Case Inventory
COMMUNITY: • • •
The Pittsburgh region has a rich heritage dating back to the 1700s, before the area was an industrial center. The three rivers have served as the backdrop to Native American settlements, Fort Pitt, the sendoff of Lewis and Clark’s exploration, and important developments in the coal, railroad, and steel industries. Other cultural heritages such as neighboring trail networks, sporting hubs, etc. become loci throughout the trail. In order to reflect the transformations our city has undergone over the decades, Friends of the Riverfront developed an Interpretive Sign system along the Three Rivers Heritage Trail. These colorful signs, created by a team of graphic designers, writers, and archeologists, provide trail-goers with a range of interesting information about the area, highlighting notable historical events, areas of cultural significance, and facts about native wildlife. As you travel along the trails, keep an eye out to learn something you may not have known about that trail segment, and stay posted—as Friends expands our trails, we are hard at work developing new signs to reflect the unique past lives of each new segment.
Appendix B Case Inventory
COMMUNITY (cont.):
47
Appendix B Case Inventory
COMMUNITY (cont.):
48
Appendix B Case Inventory
COMMUNITY (cont.):
49
Appendix B Case Inventory
COMMUNITY (cont.):
50
Appendix B
51
Case Inventory
IMPACT ON PROFESSION: • •
Ability to create connected system of greenways and trails that promote economic development, facilitate public access to a context’s natural environment, and advance health, recreation, transportation, and tourism. Advancements in health, recreation, transportation, and tourism can derive from the implications of these systems as well.
LESSONS LEARNED: • • • •
Due to private property, active railroads or other industrial property it is not always possible to provide a trail directly on the riverfront and frequently riverfront trails need to veer away from the riverfront and utilize either roads or property that may be available for trail development. Thus projects take on a more practical alignment due to specific circumstances. This solidifies that private partnerships and community involvement are very important to the site’s success and ease of construction. As recreational use of the riverfronts grow, working with private property owners has become more critical. This study area presents some challenges and opportunities with the significant number of private property owners. The study area has identified several miles of railroad property that would be necessary to traverse in order to develop a trail near the riverfront. This is a challenging proposition due to safety concerns identified by the railroad. Property owned by the railroad is used by railroad personnel to monitor and repair track activity and is part of the track infrastructure. Safety is of paramount concern to the railroad and a distance of eighty (80) feet from the tracks is necessary for any type of trail development.
Appendix C
52
References
A guide to the Three Rivers Heritage Trail interpretive signs. Pittsburgh, PA: Friends of the Riverfront, 2010. (Administrator), VincentTroia. “Three Rivers Heritage Trail Map Guide.” Ohio River Trail Council Membership. Accessed July 15, 2017. http://www.membership.ohiorivertrail.org/. Barton, Hugh, and Catherine Tsourou. Healthy urban planning: a WHO guide to planning for people. London: Spon Press, 2006. “Benefits of Greenways.” Greenways, Inc. - Planning and design for open space, parks, trails and alternative transportation. 2017. http://www.greenways.com/benefits-of-greenways. Corburn, Jason. Toward the healthy city people, places, and the politics of urban planning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2009. Coutts, Christopher. Green infrastructure and public health. London; New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2016. Duhl, L. “Health and greening the city; relation of urban planning and health.” Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health 56, no. 12 (2002): 897. doi:10.1136/jech.56.12.897. Forman, Richard T. T. Land mosaics: the ecology of landscapes and regions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008. Francis, Mark. “Case Study Method for Landscape Architecture.” Landscape Architecture Foundation. Accessed July 16, 2017. https://lafoundation.org/research/case-study-method/. Frank, Lawrence D., Peter O. Engelke, and Thomas L. Schmid. Health and community design: the impact of the built environment on physical activity. Washington, D.C.: Island Press, 2003. Gauper, Beth. “Bicycling in bluff country.” Bicycling the Root River from Lanesboro to Houston, Preston to Harmony. https://midwestweekends.com/plan_a_trip/outdoors_recreation/bicycling/bicycling_root_river_trail.html. Golany, Gideon, and Toshio Ojima. Geo-space Urban Design. New York: John Wiley. 1996. Greenway neighborhood study: a staff working paper prepared for the Pittsburgh City Council, Urban Redevelopment Authority and potential housing developers. Pittsburgh: Publisher not identified, 1962. Harnik, Peter. Urban Green: Innovative Parks for Resurgent Cities. Washington, DC: Island Press. 2010. Landry, Sheryl. “Health Cities: Public Health through Urban Planning.” International Social Science Review 91, no. 2 (2015): 1-2.
Appendix C
52
References
McTsih, Kunkel & Associates. “Feasibility Study for Community Trails Initiative Multi-municipal Trails & Greenways Development Partnership September 2001.” September 2011. Nicols, Wallace J. Blue Mind: The surprising science that shows how being near, in, on, or under water can make you happier, healthier, more connected, and better at what you do. New York, NY: Little, Brown and Company. 2014. Northridge, Mary Evelyn, and Lance Freeman. “Urban Planning and Health Equity.” Journal of Urban Health 88, no. 3 (2011): 582-97. “Pittsburgh,Allegheny County SHAPEfiles.” Geographic Information Systems | Welcome. Accessed July 11, 2017. http://pittsburghpa.gov/dcp/gis/. “Public open space, physical activity, urban design and public health: Concepts, methods and research agenda.” Health and Place 33 (May 2015): 75-82. “Quality or quantity? Exploring the relationship between Public Open Space attributes and mental health in Perth, Western Australia.” Social Science & Medicine 74, no. 10 (May 2012): 1570-577. Rails-to-Trails. “Three Rivers Heritage Trail 2014 User Survey and Economic Impact Analysis.” Friends of The Riverfront. 2014. https://friendsoftheriverfront.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Three-Rivers-Heritage-Trail-Users-SurveyLORES.pdf. “Root River State Trail.” Root River State Trail: Minnesota DNR. http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/state_trails/root_river/index.html. Root River State Trail master plan. St. Paul, MN: Minnesota Dept. of Natural Resources, 1983. Sarkar, Chinmoy, Chris Webster, and John Gallacher. “Healthy Cities: Public Health through Urban Planning.” Population and Development Review 41, no. 1 (March 2015): 167-68. Thoren, Roxi. Landscapes of Change: Innovative Designs and Reinvented Sites. 2014. “Three Rivers Heritage Trail.” Friends of the Riverfront. Accessed July 15, 2017. https://friendsoftheriverfront.org/trails/three-rivers-heritage-trai l/. THREE RIVERS HERITAGE TRAIL. http://bikeitorhikeit.org/three_rivers_heritage_trail.htm. “Urban Sprawl and Public Health.” Journal of Environmental Health 68, no. 2 (2005): 43. (accessed July 12, 2017). Volker, Sebastian, Jasmin Matros, and Thomas Claszen. “Determining Urban Open Spaces for Health-related Appropriations: A Qualitative Analysis on the Significance of Blue Space.” Environmental Earth Sciences 75, no. 13 (2016):