Construction Document Set of Undergrad Project

Page 1

The Design/Build School of Chicago Chicago, Illinois

Douglas William Sharpe Construction 2 Winter 2010 University of Michigan


Contents Occupancy 01.01 01.02 01.03 01.04 01.05 01.06

Occupancy Diagram - Ground Floor Room Schedule - Ground Floor Occupancy Diagram - Second Floor Room Schedule - Second Floor Occupancy Diagram - Typical Tower Floor Room Schedule - Typical Tower Floor

Egress 02.01 02.02 02.03 02.04

Egress Axonometric Diagram Egress Plan & Summary - Ground Floor Egress Plan & Summary - Second Floor Egress Plan & Summary - Typical Tower Floor

Cost Control 03.01 Cost Estimation Chart & Graph

Structure 04.01 04.02 04.03 04.04 04.05

Structural Framing Plan - Ground Floor Structural Framing Plan - Second Floor Structural Framing Plan - Typical Tower Floor Structural Axonometric Sections Structural Wall Section

Plumbing / Electrical 05.01 Plumbing / Electrical Axonometric Diagram 05.02 Plumbing Fixture Requirements & Restroom Detail

Heating & Cooling 06.01 HVAC Plan - Ground Floor 06.02 HVAC Plan - Second Floor & Typical Tower Floor

Enclosure 07.01 07.02 07.03 07.04

Building Envelope Wall Section Building Envelope Wall Section Details Rendered Partial Elevation Building Envelope Diagrams


2

11 4 6 5

Space Description

Occupancy Type

Area (sq. ft)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

Gallery Storage Greenhouse Telecom Grounds Equip. Medical Suite Student Activity Student Store Book Storeroom Janitor Closet Administration Records Guidance Library Reading Area

A-3 S-1 U F-1 F-1 I-1 A-3 M S-1 F-1 E S-1 E A-3 A-3

4,729 net 421 net 8,511 net 266 net 266 net 824 net 1,067 gross 356 net 1,067 gross 36 net 2,349 gross 900 gross 2,473 gross 6,249 net 961 net

Floor Area (sq. ft per Occupant) 15 net 300 gross 300 gross 300 gross 300 gross 100 gross 15 net 60 gross 300 gross 300 gross 50 net 300 gross 50 net 100 gross 50 net

Maximum Allowable Occupants 315 1 28 1 1 8 71 5 3 1 46 3 49 62 19

Student: Douglas William Sharpe Unique Name: dwsharpe Original Date: 1-13-10 Date Revised: 4-14-10 LAB Instructor: Vivian Lee

1

Space #

12 3 Occupancy Type Legend A-3 (Assembly)

7 11

E (Educational)

I-1 (Institutional)

8

M (Mercantile) 9

S-1 (Moderate-hazard Storage) 13 15

U (Utility & Miscellaneous)

Fire Wall Rating Legend

10

3 Hour

14

Symbol Legend Main Entrance

N

Floor Plan - Ground Floor Scale: 1” = 40’-0”

N

Partial Site Plan Scale: NTS

The Design/Build School of Chicago Occupancy

13

Occupancy Diagram - Ground Floor

F-1 (Factory Industrial, Moderate-hazard)

01.01


1-121

1-101

1-125

1-104 1-127

1-102 1-105

1-126

1-106 1-103 1-137 1-108 1-107 1-128

1-120

1-109 1-122

1-129

1-111 1-110

1-130 1-117 1-131

1-114 1-112

1-136

1-113

1-132

1-115

1-116

1-133 1-134

1-135

1-119

1-138

1-118

N

Floor Plan - Ground Floor Scale: 1” = 40’-0”

Area (sq. ft)

Floor Area (sq. ft per Occupant)

Maximum Allowable Occupants

1-100 1-101 1-102 1-103 1-104 1-105 1-106 1-107 1-108 1-109 1-110 1-111 1-112 1-113 1-114 1-115 1-116 1-117 1-118 1-119 1-120 1-121 1-122 1-123 1-124 1-125 1-126 1-127 1-128 1-129 1-130 1-131 1-132 1-133 1-134 1-135 1-136 1-137 1-138

Main Entrance Admin. Waiting Conference Room Conference Room Admin. Office Admin. Office Storage/Records Storage/Records Corridor Faculty Workroom Guidance Waiting Guidance Waiting Guidance Office Guidance Office Guidance Office Guidance Office Career Resources Corridor Library Reading Area Atrium Corridor Corridor Gallery Storage Telecom. Grounds Equipment Medical Suite Student Activity Student Activity Student Store Book Storeroom Book Storeroom Girls Restroom Boys Restroom Janitors Closet Corridor Greenhouse Covered Courtyard

N.A. E E E E E S-1 S-1 N.A. E E E E E E E E N.A. A-3 A-3 N.A. N.A. N.A. A-3 S-1 F-1 F-1 I-1 A-3 A-3 M S-1 S-1 N.A. N.A. F-1 N.A. U N.A.

969 476 238 238 150 150 465 425 522 485 490 510 143 143 150 150 524 247 6,249 961 6,515 492 162 4,792 421 266 266 824 525 525 356 525 525 225 225 36 1,468 8,511 4,466

N.A. 50 net 50 net 50 net 50 net 50 net 300 gross 300 gross N.A. 50 net 50 net 50 net 50 net 50 net 50 net 50 net 50 net N.A. 100 gross 50 net N.A. N.A. N.A. 15 net 300 gross 300 gross 300 gross 100 gross 15 net 15 net 60 gross 300 gross 300 gross N.A. N.A. 300 gross N.A. 300 gross N.A.

N.A. 10 5 5 3 3 2 2 N.A. 10 10 11 3 3 3 3 11 N.A. 63 20 N.A. N.A. N.A. 320 2 1 1 9 35 35 6 2 2 N.A. N.A. 1 N.A. 29 N.A.

Student: Douglas William Sharpe Unique Name: dwsharpe Original Date: 1-13-10 Date Revised: 4-14-10 LAB Instructor: Vivian Lee

1-100

Occupancy

The Design/Build School of Chicago Occupancy

1-124

Room Name

Room Schedule - Ground Floor

1-123

Room #

01.02


Space Description

Occupancy Type

Area (sq. ft)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Dining/Kitchen Custodial Office Custodial Lockers Locker Rooms Janitor Closet Gym Storage Gymnasium Weight Room Nutrition Office

A-2 B B E F-1 F-1 A-4 E E

12,627 gross 303 net 213 net 2,668 gross 49 net 283 net 10,637 net 1,241 net 385 net

Floor Area (sq. ft per Occupant) 15 net 100 gross 50 gross 50 gross 300 gross 300 gross 576 fixed seats 50 net 50 net

Student: Douglas William Sharpe Unique Name: dwsharpe Original Date: 1-13-10 Date Revised: 4-14-10 LAB Instructor: Vivian Lee

Space #

Maximum Allowable Occupants 842 3 4 53 1 1 576 24 7

Occupancy Type Legend A-2 (Assembly) 1

A-3 (Assembly) B (Business) E (Educational)

2

F-1 (Factory Industrial, Moderate-hazard)

2 Hour 3 Hour

5 6

7

9

8

N

Floor Plan - Second Floor Scale: 1” = 40’-0”

The Design/Build School of Chicago Occupancy

Fire Wall Rating Legend

4

Occupancy Diagram - Second Floor

3

01.03


2-100 (Lower Floor)

2-101 (Upper Floor)

2-102

Room Name

Occupancy

Area (sq. ft)

Floor Area (sq. ft per Occupant)

Maximum Allowable Occupants

2-100 2-101 2-102 2-103 2-104 2-105 2-106 2-107 2-108 2-109 2-110 2-111 2-112 2-113 2-114 2-115 2-116 2-117

Cafeteria (Lower Floor) Cafeteria (Upper Floor) Faculty Dining Kitchen Custodial Office Custodial Lockers Visitor Locker Room Boys Locker Room Girls Locker Room Janitors Closet Gym Storage Gym Foyer Corridor Gymnasium Nutrition Advisor Office Weight Room Corridor Corridor

A-2 A-2 A-2 A-2 B B E E E F-1 F-1 N.A. N.A. A-4 E E N.A. N.A.

5,664 1,924 775 4,135 303 213 640 946 1,047 49 283 829 480 10,637 385 1,241 2,260 1,229

15 net 15 net 15 net 15 net 100 gross 50 gross 50 gross 50 gross 50 gross 300 gross 300 gross N.A. N.A. 576 fixed seats 50 net 50 net N.A. N.A.

378 129 52 276 4 5 13 19 21 1 1 N.A. N.A. 576 8 25 N.A. N.A.

Student: Douglas William Sharpe Unique Name: dwsharpe Original Date: 1-13-10 Date Revised: 4-14-10 LAB Instructor: Vivian Lee

2-117

Room #

2-103

2-104 2-116 2-105

2-111

2-108

2-109 2-112

2-114

2-113

N

2-115

Floor Plan - Second Floor Scale: 1” = 40’-0”

The Design/Build School of Chicago Occupancy

2-110

2-107

Room Schedule - Second Floor

2-106

01.04


Space Description

Occupancy Type

Area (sq. ft)

1

Classroom

E

5,688 gross

Floor Area (sq. ft per Occupant) 50 net

Maximum Allowable Occupants 114

Student: Douglas William Sharpe Unique Name: dwsharpe Original Date: 1-13-10 Date Revised: 4-14-10 LAB Instructor: Vivian Lee

Space #

Occupancy Type Legend E (Educational) 1 1 Note: The total area of the classrooms was calculated by considering all of the modular classrooms plugged into building. (16 classrooms) x (711 sq. ft) = 5,688 gross sq. ft.

1

N

Floor Plan - Typical Tower Floor Scale: 1” = 40’-0”

The Design/Build School of Chicago Occupancy

1

Occupancy Diagram - Typical Tower Floor

1

01.05


3-113

3-101 3-108 3-102

3-109

Room Name

Occupancy

Area (sq. ft)

Floor Area (sq. ft per Occupant)

Maximum Allowable Occupants

3-100 3-101 3-102 3-103 3-104 3-105 3-106 3-107 3-108 3-109 3-110 3-111 3-112 3-113 3-114 3-115

Corridor Classroom Classroom Classroom Project Platform Classroom Classroom Project Platform Studio Project Platform Computer Lab Project Platform Boys Restroom Girls Restroom Stairwell Stairwell

N.A. E E E E E E E E E E E N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.

6,382 711 711 711 711 711 711 711 1,458 711 1,458 711 273 294 415 432

N.A. 50 net 50 net 50 net 300 gross 50 net 50 net 300 gross 50 net 300 gross 50 net 300 gross N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.

N.A. 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 30 15 30 15 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.

Student: Douglas William Sharpe Unique Name: dwsharpe Original Date: 1-13-10 Date Revised: 4-14-10 LAB Instructor: Vivian Lee

3-114 3-112

Room #

3-103

3-104

3-100

3-106 3-111

3-107

3-115

N

Floor Plan - Typical Tower Floor Scale: 1” = 40’-0”

The Design/Build School of Chicago Occupancy

3-105

Room Schedule - Typical Tower Floor

3-110

01.06


First Floor Exits

N

Egress Axonometric Scale: NTS

The Design/Build School of Chicago Egress

Egress Axonometric Diagram

Tower Stairs

Floor Plates

Atrium Stairs

Elevator

02.01

Student: Douglas William Sharpe Unique Name: dwsharpe Original Date: 1-13-10 Date Revised: 4-14-10 LAB Instructor: Vivian Lee


Egress Summary - Ground Floor Student: Douglas William Sharpe Unique Name: dwsharpe Original Date: 1-13-10 Date Revised: 4-14-10 LAB Instructor: Vivian Lee

All applicable egress codes are based on IBC 2009. Entire building is sprinklered, all egress codes shall comply with requirements allowed by an automatic sprinkler system. Ground Floor Gross Square Footage - 41,970 s.f. Total Occupancy - 613 L2

Largest Room Occupancy - Gallery 315 Maximum Occupants Required exits: 2 - Proposed exits: 2 L1

Elev.

Diagonal Distance Egress Code - Gallery L1 = 84’ L2 = 54‘ Satisfies: Diagonal distance from corner to corner of room divided by 2 has to be equal to or less than the distance from egress exits.

70’-6”

Atrium Stairs

Room with furthest distance from exit - Student Activity/Club Room Maximum allowed distance: 250’ - Proposed distance: 248’ Room with longest common-path-of-egress travel - Medical Suite Maximum allowed distance: 75’ - Proposed distance: 70‘-6”

Symbol Legend Door exit to exterior Egress maximum distance point

Atrium Stairs #

Maximum egress path & distance number

#

Maximum common-path-of-egress & distance number Single-path-of-egress (where common path branches)

248’

N

Floor Plan - Ground Floor Scale: 1” = 40’-0”

N

Partial Site Plan Scale: NTS

The Design/Build School of Chicago Egress

Atrium Stair Widths - ((517 + 1511 occupancy) x .3)/ (2 stairs) Minimum allowed stair width: 25’-5” Proposed stair width: 25’-6”

Egress Plan & Summary - Ground Floor

To comply with fire/smoke regulations, the atrium stairs will be contained within glass enclosures and include smoke exhaust equipment systems.

02.02


Student: Douglas William Sharpe Unique Name: dwsharpe Original Date: 1-13-10 Date Revised: 4-14-10 LAB Instructor: Vivian Lee

Egress Summary - Second Floor All applicable egress codes are based on IBC 2009. Entire building is sprinklered, all egress codes shall comply with requirements allowed by an automatic sprinkler system. Second Floor Gross Square Footage - 33,054 s.f. Total Occupancy - 1,511 Elev.

Largest Room Occupancy - Student Dining/Kitchen 842 Maximum Occupants Required exits: 2 - Proposed exits: 3 Room with furthest distance from exit - Gymnasium Maximum allowed distance: 250’ - Proposed distance: 248’

Atrium Stairs

Room with longest common-path-of-egress travel - Girls Locker Room Maximum allowed distance: 75’ - Proposed distance: 84‘-4” (*This will need to be addressed in next design phase*)

Atrium Stairs 84’

Symbol Legend Door exit to exterior Egress maximum distance point #

Egress path & distance number

#

Maximum common-path-of-egress & distance number

248’

General Note: As per design requirement, no corridors in this building were to be less than 12’-0”.

Single-path-of-egress (where common-path branches)

9’-0”

12’-0”

Must be less than 7” N

Floor Plan - Second Floor

Typical Corridor Condition

Scale: 1” = 40’-0”

Scale: NTS

The Design/Build School of Chicago Egress

Atrium Stair Widths - ((517 + 1511 occupancy) x .3)/ (2 stairs) Minimum allowed stair width: 25’-5” Proposed stair width: 25’-6”

Egress Plan & Summary - Second Floor

To comply with fire/smoke regulations, the atrium stairs will be contained within glass enclosures and include smoke exhaust equipment systems.

02.03


Student: Douglas William Sharpe Unique Name: dwsharpe Original Date: 1-13-10 Date Revised: 4-14-10 LAB Instructor: Vivian Lee

Tower Stairs

All applicable egress codes are based on IBC 2009. Entire building is sprinklered, all egress codes shall comply with requirements allowed by an automatic sprinkler system.

90’-0”

Tower Floors Gross Square Footage (10 floors) - 99,902 s.f. Corridors: 7,409 x 10 = 74,090 s.f. Classrooms: 711 x 24 = 17,064 s.f. Computer Labs: 1,458 x 2 = 2,916 s.f. Studios: 1,458 x 4 = 5,832 s.f. Total Occupancy - 517

179’ Elev.

Room with furthest distance from exit - Classroom Maximum allowed distance: 250’ - Proposed distance: 179‘ Room with longest common-path-of-egress travel - Classroom Maximum allowed distance: 75’ - Proposed distance: 90‘-0” (*This will need to be addressed in next design phase*) To comply with fire/smoke regulations, the tower stairwells will be contained within separated enclosures and include smoke exhaust equipment systems. Tower Stair Widths - ((517 occupancy) x .3)/ (2 stairs) Minimum allowed stair width: 6’-6” Proposed stair width: 6’-6”

Tower Stairs

Symbol Legend Door exit to exterior Egress maximum distance point #

Egress path & distance number

#

Maximum common-path-of-egress & distance number Single-path-of-egress (where common-path branches)

N

Floor Plan - Typical Tower Floor Scale: 1” = 40’-0”

Egress Plan & Summary - Typical Tower Floor

Largest Room Occupancy - Studio 30 Maximum Occupants Required exits: 1 - Proposed exits: 2

The Design/Build School of Chicago Egress

Egress Summary - Tower Floors (Total)

02.04


A Substructure A1010

A1030 A2010 A2020 B Shell B1010

B1020

B2010 B2020

B2030

B3010

B3020

C Interiors C1010

C1020 C1030

C2010 C3010

C3020

C3030 D Services

Costs are derived from a building model with basic components. Scope dierences and market conditions can cause costs to vary significantly. Parameters are not within the ranges recommended by RSMeans.

Standard Foundations KSF, 12" deep x 24" wide 7' - 6" square x 18" deep Slab on Grade Slab on grade, 5" thick, heavy industrial, reinforced Basement Excavation site storage Basement Walls thick

% of Total Cost Per S.F. 2.10% $2.30 $0.88

Cost $403,000 $154,000

$0.98

$172,000

$0.01

$2,500

$0.43

$74,500

$38.95 $22.13

$6,812,500 $3,871,500

34.60% Floor Construction column, 25'x30' bay, 29" deep, 100 PSF superimposed load, 145 PSF total column, 25'x30' bay, 29" deep, 100 PSF superimposed load, 145 PSF total 3 hour rating, 17 PLF Roof Construction 25" deep, 40 PSF superimposed load, 60 PSF total load 25" deep, 40 PSF superimposed load, 60 PSF total load, add for column Exterior Walls Metal siding, steel, corrugated or ribbed, 20 ga, .0359" thick, colored Exterior Windows no intermediate horizontals Glazing panel, insulating, 1/2" thick, 2 lites 1/8" float glass, clear Exterior Doors hardware, 6'-0" x 7'-0" opening 0" opening 0" opening 0" opening Roof Coverings Roofing, single ply membrane, EPDM, 60 mils, fully adhered Insulation, rigid, roof deck, polyisocyanurate, 2#/CF, 2" thick, R14.29 Roof edges, aluminum, duranodic, .050" thick, 6" face Flashing, aluminum, no backing sides, .019" Roof Openings steel, 165 lbs operator 24.40% Partitions Concrere block (CMU) partition, light weight, hollow, 6" thick, no finish 1/2" fire ratedgypsum board, taped & finished, painted on metal furring Interior Doors 3'-0" x 7'-0" x 1-3/8" Fittings Toilet partitions, cubicles, ceiling hung, stainless steel Chalkboards, liquid chalk type, aluminum frame & chalktrough Stair Construction Stairs, steel, cement filled metal pan & picket rail, 16 risers, with landing Wall Finishes Painting, masonry or concrete, latex, brushwork, primer & 2 coats Painting, masonry or concrete, latex, brushwork, addition for block filler Wall coatings, acrylic glazed coatings, maximum Ceramic tile, thin set, 4-1/4" x 4-1/4" Floor Finishes Carpet, tufted, nylon, roll goods, 12' wide, 36 oz Carpet, padding, add to above, minimum Terrazzo, maximum Vinyl, composition tile, maximum Ceiling Finishes channel grid, suspended support 38.00%

$0.97

$170,500

$7.23

$1,265,000

$7.41

$1,296,500

$0.51

$88,500

$0.54

$95,000

$0.15

$25,500

$27.44 $8.79

$4,800,000 $1,537,500

$1.46

$255,000

$1.74

$305,000

$1.58

$276,500

$3.49

$610,000

$6.55

$1,146,500

$3.83

$669,500

$42.80

$7,486,000

SubTotal Contractor Fees (General Conditions,Overhead,Profit) Architectural Fees User Fees Total Building Cost

100% 25.00% 7.00% 0.00%

$276,500

$3.49

$610,000

$6.55

$1,146,500

$3.83

$669,500

$42.80 $2.42

$7,486,000 $423,500

$4.08

$713,500

$0.18

$31,000

$0.11

$19,000

$8.22

$1,438,000

$12.55

$2,195,500

$1.29

$226,500

$1.59

$278,500

$9.79

$1,712,500

$2 . 4 5

$429,000

$0.11

$19,000

$1.05 $0.12

$184,000 $20,500

$0.93

$163,500

$0.00 $0.00

$0 $0

$112.54 $28.13 $9.85 $0.00 $150.52

$19,685,500 $4,921,500 $1,722,500 $0 $26,329,500

Student: Douglas William Sharpe Unique Name: dwsharpe Original Date: 1-13-10 Date Revised: 4-14-10 LAB Instructor: Vivian Lee

174926 Union No Year 2009 $150.52 $26,329,500

$1.58

The Design/Build School of Chicago Cost Control

Floor Area (S.F.): Labor Type: Basement Included: Data Release: Cost Per Square Foot: Building Cost:

Chalkboards, liquid chalk type, aluminum frame & chalktrough Stair Construction Stairs, steel, cement filled metal pan & picket rail, 16 risers, with landing C3010 Wall Finishes Painting, masonry or concrete, latex, brushwork, primer & 2 coats Painting, masonry or concrete, latex, brushwork, addition for block filler Wall coatings, acrylic glazed coatings, maximum Ceramic tile, thin set, 4-1/4" x 4-1/4" C3020 Floor Finishes Carpet, tufted, nylon, roll goods, 12' wide, 36 oz Carpet, padding, add to above, minimum Terrazzo, maximum Vinyl, composition tile, maximum C3030 Ceiling Finishes channel grid, suspended support 38.00% D Services D1010 Elevators and Lifts 1 - Hydraulic, passengerr elevator, 3500 lb, 2 floors, 100 FPM evator, 2500 lb., 2 floor, 125 FPM Hydraulic passenger elevator, D2010 Plumbing Fixtures Water closet, vitreous china, bowl only with flush valve, floor mount Urinal, vitreous china, wall hung ung, PE on CI, 20" x 18" Lavatory w/trim, wall hung, untertop, stainless steel, 44" x 22" triple bowl Kitchen sink w/trim, countertop, 20" Water cooler, electric, wall hung, dual height, 14.3 GPH plumbing wall* wall D2020 Domestic Water Distribution Gas fired water heater, commercial, 100< F rise, 500 MBH input, 480 GPH D2040 Rain Water Drainage le hub, 4" diam, 10' high Roof drain, CI, soil,single Roof drain, CI, soil,single le hub, 4" diam, for each additional foot add D3010 Energy Supply 10,000 SF, 100,000 CF, total 2 floors water, 10,000 SF bldg,100,000 100,000 CF, total, 2 floors D3030 Cooling Generating Systems 40,000 SF, 153.33 ton D4010 Sprinklers ems, steel, ordinary hazard, 1 floor, 50,000 SF Wet pipe sprinkler systems, D5010 Electrical Service/Distribution phase, 4 wire, 120/208 V, 800 A Feeder installation 600 V, including RGS conduit and XHHW wire, 800 A switchboard panels & circuit breaker, breaker 800 A Switchgear installation, incl switchboard, D5020 Lighting and Branch Wiring transformer Wall switches, 2.0 per 1000 SF Miscellaneous power, 2 watts Central air conditioning power, 4 watts fixtures @40 watt per 1000 SF D5030 Communications and Security wire, sound systems, 12 outlets detectors, includes outlets, boxes, conduit and wire wire, master clock systems, 10 rooms wire, master TV antenna systems, 30 outlets Internet wiring, 2 data/voice outlets per 1000 S.F. D5090 Other Electrical Systems gas/gasoline operated, 3 phase, 4 wire, 277/480 V, 11.5 kW 0.90% E Equipment & Furnishings E1020 Institutional Equipment steel E1090 Other Equipment 20 - Sound system, speaker, ceiling or wall 4 - Sound system, amplifier, 250 W 600 - School furniture, classroom, movable chair & desk type, minimum light, 25 W, 6 V each 2 - Directory boards, plastic, glass covered, 36" x 48" excl. wires & conduits 0.00% F Special Construction 0.00% G Building Sitework C2010

Cost Estimation Chart & Graph

Building Type: Location: Story Count: Story Height (L.F.):

Square Foot Cost Estimate Report Chicago School Chicago School, Vocational with Steel Siding on Steel Studs / Steel Frame National Average 12 16.5

Estimate Name:

03.01


Student: Douglas William Sharpe Unique Name: dwsharpe Original Date: 1-13-10 Date Revised: 4-14-10 LAB Instructor: Vivian Lee

Note: The X1 & X2 gridlines are match lines of C & D

Structural Legend Steel Column, Wide Flange W14x82 Steel Column, Tube 12”x12” Steel Girder, Wide Flange W21x122 Steel Beam, Wide Flange W16x50 @ 6’-0” O.C.

Direction of metal deck span

Atrium Structural Layout Note: The Y7 gridline is a match line of 9.0

N

Structural Layout - Ground Floor Scale: 1” = 40’-0”

Brief Structural System Description The Main Structural System of floors 1 & 2 consists of wide flange steel columns & beams. At floors 1 & 2, the Atrium Structural System is integrated into the wide flange members and the purpose of the Atrium Structural System is to support the loads from the upper high-rise tower floors. All members of the Atrium Structural System consist of tube steel.

The Design/Build School of Chicago Structure

Shear Wall

Structural Framing Plan - Ground Floor

Steel Beam, Tube 12”x12”

04.01


Student: Douglas William Sharpe Unique Name: dwsharpe Original Date: 1-13-10 Date Revised: 4-14-10 LAB Instructor: Vivian Lee

Note: The intersection of X1 and Y1 occurs on gridline B3

Structural Legend Steel Column, Wide Flange W14x82 Steel Column, Tube 12”x12” Steel Girder, Wide Flange W21x122

Open Web Steel Joist 60DLH10 @ 8’-0” O.C. Shear Wall Direction of metal deck span

Note: The Y8 gridline is a match line of 9.0

Atrium Structural Layout

N

Structural Layout - Second Floor Scale: 1” = 40’-0”

The Design/Build School of Chicago Structure

Steel Beam, Tube

Structural Framing Plan - Second Floor

Steel Beam, Wide Flange W16x50 @ 6’-0” O.C.

04.02


Student: Douglas William Sharpe Unique Name: dwsharpe Original Date: 1-13-10 Date Revised: 4-14-10 LAB Instructor: Vivian Lee

Steel Column, Large Tube Custom size, stacked panels 4’-6” x 2’-0” x 4’-0” (ea.) Steel Column, Tube 12”x12” Steel Beam, Tube 12”x12”

Note: The Large Steel Tube Columns serve several functions: 1. Main support members for all tower floors 2. Vertical chases for distribution of mechanical, electrical, and plumbing supplies 3. The attachment mechanism for the modular, plug-in classrooms

Note: Because there are no shear walls on the tower floors, the horizontal cross bracing acts as the members that resist shear forces.

Steel welding plates

Prefabricated steel tube panels

Note: Steel tube panels are fabricated off-site and assembled on-site. To form the full height tower columns, the panels are stacked and fastened with steel welding plates. N

Structural Layout - Typical Tower Floor

Large Steel Tube Column Diagram

Scale: 1” = 40’-0”

Scale: NTS

Structural Framing Plan - Typical Tower Floor

Direction of metal deck span

The Design/Build School of Chicago Structure

Structural Legend

04.03


The Design/Build School of Chicago Structure

Structural Axonometric Sections

Steel columns @ Bottom Floors. Size: W14x82

Steel girders @ Bottom Floors. Size: W21x122

Open-web steel joists @ Gymnasium. Size: 60DLH10 Longest Span = 93’-0”

Steel tube columns & beams @ Atrium. Size: 12”x12”

Steel tube columns & beams @ Tower. Size: 12”x12”

Steel tube columns custom size, stacked panels @ Tower. Size: 4’-6” x 2’-0” x 4’-0” (ea.)

Note: The colors of the steel members in these axonometric drawings were coordinated to match the structural plans and legends on the previous structural sheets.

04.04

Steel Beams @ Bottom Floors. Size: W16x50

Steel tube columns & beams @ Atrium. Size: 12”x12”

Student: Douglas William Sharpe Unique Name: dwsharpe Original Date: 1-13-10 Date Revised: 4-14-10 LAB Instructor: Vivian Lee

Scale: NTS

Southeast Gym & Library Axon/Section

Scale: NTS

Northeast Tower Axon/Section


The Design/Build School of Chicago Structure

Structural Wall Section

Scale: NTS

Column/Girder/Beam Connection, typ.

Scale: NTS

Girder/Beam Connection, typ.

04.05

Student: Douglas William Sharpe Unique Name: dwsharpe Original Date: 1-13-10 Date Revised: 4-14-10 LAB Instructor: Vivian Lee


Restrooms Typical Tower Stacked Elec. Rooms (7’ x 10’) & Telecom Rooms (7’ x 10’)

Janitors Closet Locker Room Toilets/Showers Electrical Room Telecom Room

Main Telecom Room 14’-0” x 20’-0”

Height Reference Lines Baseline 0’-0”

Mechanical Fan Room 28’-0” x 20’-0”

17’-0””

Ground Floor Restrooms

-4’-6”

-4’-6”

55’-6”

70’-6”

70’-6”

#

Main Electrical Room 28’ -0” x 20’-0”

Height call-out relative to baseline

Ground Floor Elec. & Telecom Rooms

N

Axonometric Diagram Scale: NTS

-4’-6”

Second Floor Locker Room Showers/Toilets, Elec. Room (17’-0” x 15’-8”), Telecom Room (17’-0” x 15’-8”) & Janitors Closet Ground Floor Restrooms & Janitors Closet

Plumbing / Electrical Axonometric Diagram

Mechanical Room

Student: Douglas William Sharpe Unique Name: dwsharpe Original Date: 1-13-10 Date Revised: 4-14-10 LAB Instructor: Vivian Lee

Plumbing/Electrical Legend

The Design/Build School of Chicago Plumbing / Electrical

General Note: The main Mechanical, Electrical and Telecom rooms are located at the upper-most height of the atrium - one floor below the tower. This design proposal allows the major systems and equipment to be centrally located between the lower floors and the tower. This provides a more even and efficient distribution of the networks and contents of the building services.

Typical Tower Stacked Restrooms & Janitors Closet

05.01


Plumbing Fixture Requirements Occupancy Type

Max. Occupancy

Water Closets

Lavatories

Water Fountains

A3

467

male: 1/125 = 4 female: 1/50 = 8

total: 1/200 = 3

total: 1/500 = 1

E

146

male: 1/50 = 3 female: 1/50 = 3

total: 1/50 = 3

total: 1/100 = 2

18

6

3

Totals:

Student: Douglas William Sharpe Unique Name: dwsharpe Original Date: 1-13-10 Date Revised: 4-14-10 LAB Instructor: Vivian Lee

First Floor

Second Floor Occupancy Type

Max. Occupancy

Water Closets

Lavatories

Water Fountains

A2

842

male: 1/75 = 12 female: 1/75 = 12

total: 1/200 = 5

total: 1/500 = 2

A4

576

male: 1/75 = 8 female: 1/40 = 15

male: 1/200 = 3 female: 1/150 = 4

total: 1/1000 = 1

E

93

male: 1/50 = 2 female: 1/50 = 2

total: 1/50 = 2

total: 1/100 = 1

51

14

4

Totals:

Typical Tower Floor Water Closets

Lavatories

Water Fountains

E

517

male: 1/50 = 11 female: 1/50 = 11

total: 1/50 = 11

total: 1/100 = 6

22

11

6

Totals:

Girls’ Restroom

Jan. Closet

Boys’ Restroom

N

First Floor Restroom Detail Plan Scale: 1/4” = 1’-0”

The Design/Build School of Chicago Plumbing / Electrical

Max. Occupancy

Plumbing Fixture Requirements & Restroom Detail

Occupancy Type

05.02


Sizes of HVAC equipment for 174,900 s.f. building Cooling capacity: 800 tons Total space for boiler room and chilled water plant: 7,000 s.f. Space for cooling towers: 1,000 s.f. Cooling air volume: 500,000 CFM Area of main supply or return ducts: 300 s.f. Area of branch supply or return ducts: 700 s.f. Area of fan rooms: 10,000 s.f.

HVAC Legend Main air ducts (line indicates both supply and return ductwork in tandem) Supply ductwork Return ductwork Diffusers Vertical chase

N

HVAC Plan - Ground Floor Scale: 1” = 40’-0”

Student: Douglas William Sharpe Unique Name: dwsharpe Original Date: 1-13-10 Date Revised: 4-14-10 LAB Instructor: Vivian Lee

Disadvantages: VAV is limited in the range of heating or cooling demand that may be accommodated within a single system. When one area of a building needs heating while another needs cooling, a VAV system cannot serve both areas without help from a secondary system.

Consideration for the heights of the mechanical ducts being introduced into the ceiling with the structural members, the solution to integration is the following: the ducts are able to span directly beneath the steel beams but will penetrate through cut-outs in the larger sized steel girders.

The Design/Build School of Chicago Heating & Cooling

Advantages: The system offers a high degree of local temperature control at moderate cost. Economical to operate and virtually self-balancing. Minimal system noise. Minimal visual obtrusiveness. Minimal system maintenance.

General Notes: The Variable Air Volume (VAV) system was chosen because it offers many advantages and is an efficient system for a large volume building.; however, the implementation of this specific heating/cooling system requires large mechanical equipment to be considered. The boilers, chilled water plant and cooling tower will be located on the roof of the gymnasium and the fan room will be located on a mezzanine floor within the atrium see 05.01 for visual location of the mechanical fan room. Locating the heating/cooling equipment at a central vertical height allows for shorter distances for conditioned air to travel up to the tower floors and down to the lower floors.

HVAC Plan - Ground Floor

Central All-Air System: Single Duct, Variable Air-Volume (VAV)

06.01


Main air ducts (line indicates both supply and return ductwork in tandem) Supply ductwork Return ductwork Diffusers Vertical chase

Rooftop location of boilers, chilled water plant and cooling tower

N

HVAC Plan - Second Floor Scale: 1” = 40’-0”

N

HVAC Plan - Typical Tower Floor Scale: 1” = 40’-0”

HVAC Plan - Second Floor & Typical Tower Floor

Note: The large steel tube columns of the tower act as vertical chases for each floor. The chases connect to a main supply line at each level and offer building services (conditioned air, plumbing, electrical) to the modular classrooms once they have been plugged into the main building.

The Design/Build School of Chicago Heating & Cooling

Student: Douglas William Sharpe Unique Name: dwsharpe Original Date: 1-13-10 Date Revised: 4-14-10 LAB Instructor: Vivian Lee

HVAC Legend

06.02


Scale: NTS

Section & Elevation Locations

The Design/Build School of Chicago Enclosure

Building Envelope Wall Section

N

07.01

Student: Douglas William Sharpe Unique Name: dwsharpe Original Date: 1-13-10 Date Revised: 4-14-10 LAB Instructor: Vivian Lee

Scale: 1/4” = 1’-0”

Envelope Wall Section


Scale: 1” = 1’-0”

Edge Condition Detail Scale: 1” = 1’-0”

Scale: 1” = 1’-0”

Ground Condition Detail Scale: 1” = 1’-0”

The Design/Build School of Chicago Enclosure

Student: Douglas William Sharpe Unique Name: dwsharpe Original Date: 1-13-10 Date Revised: 4-14-10 LAB Instructor: Vivian Lee

Parapet Roof Detail

Window Sill & Jamb Detail

Building Envelope Wall Section Details 07.02


Scale: 1/4” = 1’-0”

Partial Elevation

The Design/Build School of Chicago Enclosure

Rendered Partial Elevation 07.03

Student: Douglas William Sharpe Unique Name: dwsharpe Original Date: 1-13-10 Date Revised: 4-14-10 LAB Instructor: Vivian Lee

Concrete footing

-4'-0"

Fin. Sub-grade Floor

0'-0"

Ground Floor

Metal cladding panels

Concrete sill

Steel Column

Window jamb

16'-0"

Fin. Second Floor

Window sill

Glazing

Perforated metal skin

35'-0"

Height of Roof Slab

39'-0"

Top of Parapet

Perforated metal skin extends beyond


Sunlight

Tower floors atrium space

Rain water

Green roof

Water collection basins

Air movement

Bottom floors atrium space

Perforated metal exterior building skin

Student: Douglas William Sharpe Unique Name: dwsharpe Original Date: 1-13-10 Date Revised: 4-14-10 LAB Instructor: Vivian Lee

Clerestory operable windows

Interior air maintaining constant tempurature

Interior

Thermal Strategy The building skin absorbs heat and reduces unwanted solar heat gain within the interior.

Thermal Strategy The large volumes of the atriums provide an opportunity for the air to be recirculated naturally. The atrium that serves the bottom floors is equipped with operable windows at the top, thus creating a stack effect which will pull warm air from the lower level and out through the open windows. Similarly, the tower atrium is equipped with clerestory windows that open to pull warm air up through the tower floors.

Moisture Protection The design of the school specified for the roofs to be covered with green roofs. In order to reduce water runoff along the facade of the building and to the ground surface, the green roofs collect and retain the rainwater that falls on it. Thermal Strategy The green roofs provide a superior barrier of insulation for reducing the amount of heat that occurs from sunlight. Additionally, the green roof insulation reduces the amount of interior conditioned air that would normally escape from the building and be less affected by exterior temperature differences.

Exterior Skin Sectional Diagram

Building Section thru Atriums

Green Roof Sectional Diagram

Scale: NTS

Scale: NTS

Scale: NTS

The Design/Build School of Chicago Enclosure

Solar Strategy The building skin was designed to cover a significant amount of the glazing panels. The perforated metal skin material reduces glare within the interior by diffusing and reflecting excess amounts of sunlight.

Building Envelope Diagrams

Atrium operable windows

07.04


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.