3.4
METHODOLOGY
Methods & Process Our aim was to approach our research strategy in an interactive format that could be reviewed and rearranged based on the information gathered while onsite. During our preparation stages, we acknowledged and expected the current situation to guide the conversations and exercise that will help us situate the systems of care and the subjectivities of food in their production. Our methods of inquiry were guided by the following questions:
us to look at survival strategies that have been woven within individual, social and political bodies that cannot be detached from wider structural inequities. Our inquiry sought to find answers but was not limited to the following questions. • Who is responsible for care production? • Where are care structures located? • Who are the actors that maintain the systems of care and respond dynamically to the changing narratives and requirements of individuals and
• How can diasporic geographies be framed as living heritage? • What type of socio-spatial strategies can be imagined in adapting just and inclusive urban transformations to foster the legacies of diasporic communities?
the community as a whole? • How does the City of Sheffield care for SADACCA and its community members? The focus was to review these questions in two scales: the meso and macro. That of SADACCA/the Wicker Building and throughout Sheffield.
Narrowing our focus through the lens of systems of care and solidarity, we created an action plan that enabled
Fig 7.
Methodology Framework (Source: Authors)
104
