New Statesman: For their attackers, mosques are seen as places of difference - 2013 by Chris Allen

11/19/13

For their attackers, mosques are seen as places of "difference" Se arch

Home The Staggers Politics Economics Business Culture Blogs Events Podcast Magazine Archive The Staggers Cultural Capital Mehdi Hasan Laurie Penny David Allen Green Helen Lewis Gavin Kelly Nelson Jones From The Archive The V Spot Samira Shackle Alan White Martha Gill Alex Hern Juliet Jacques Alex Andreou Nicky Woolf Frances Ryan

Voices Views from elsewhere RSS

For their attackers, mosques are seen as places of "difference" Chris Allen's research has shown that mosques are rarely just seen by as places of worship. BY CHRIS ALLEN

PUBLISHED 07 JUNE 2013 8:28

Tw eet

It remains to be seen whether the blaze which destroyed a community centre and mosque in Muswell Hill, north London this week was a reprisal attack against Muslims in Britain for the murder of drummer Lee Rigby in Woolwich a fortnight ago. If so, it will be another to add to the dramatically increased number of incidents to have been reported to Tell MAMA, the government-funded third party monitoring project which records anti-Muslim attacks. In this climate however, it is no surprise that mosques have come under attack. According to Tell MAMA, around 12 have been targeted of late, the most worrying incident being in Grimsby where three petrol bombs were thrown. This is no surprise to me though because as my research over the past decade has shown, mosques have become convenient targets onto which the fears and anxieties about Muslims and Islam that ordinary people have are projected. From research undertaken in the Midlands, mosques are rarely seen by Fire officers survey the fire damaged Bravanese Centre in Muswell Hill. Photograph: Getty Images

ordinary people as mere places of worship. Instead, they are seen as places of "difference", physically embodying all that is perceived to be wrong or problematic about Muslims and Islam. Because of this, opposition to mosques is regularly voiced on the basis of them being seen to go against "our" culture and "our" way of life, against who "we" think "we" are and what "we" stand for. This is something which resonates loudly with the rhetoric of some far-right groups including the English Defence League (EDL) which claims to “not let our culture and traditions be eroded...[to]preserve English values”. Focusing on Islamophobic incidents the Midlands, my research highlighted how opposition towards mosques was growing. With Birmingham being a notable exception most likely because of its significant and well established Muslim population, this was most evident in a variety of locations on the periphery of cities: in Hanley, Nuneaton, Solihull and others, and particularly in the "Black Country", the former industrialised area to the north west of Birmingham, where negotiations to build a new mosque in Dudley had been ongoing for a decade. Having highlighted the failings of many stakeholders – the public spats between the local authority and some Muslim organisations especially – there a vacuum was created which gave space to the far right. As one community leader I interviewed put it, this vacuum afforded the EDL an opportunity to use “Dudley as its flagship… coming here to use the mosque as an excuse”. In the two year period I focused on Dudley, the EDL organised two significant protests in the town. On another occasion, EDL supporters barricaded themselves into the building currently on the site of the proposed mosque with the intention of broadcasting the Islamic call to prayer five times a day. Alongside this, the British National Party had won seats on the local council alongside UKIP, both parties succeeding on the back of explicit anti-mosque campaigns. Of the community leaders in the area – both Muslim and non – I spoke to, there was a direct link: the more active the far right, the more tensions there were amongst local residents about Muslims and Islam. For them, the mosque offered the far right a convenient opportunity to exploit those fears and anxieties by exaggerating the perceived threat the mosque – all mosques in fact – present. And this maybe manifested itself in the fact that while the far right was at its most active in the town, there were a number of attacks on nearby mosques. So in nearby Cradley Heath, the mosque was subjected to two separate arson attacks, the second burning the mosque to the ground on Boxing Day 2009. A further stone’s throw away in Langley, a building set to be taken over by the local Muslim organisation was similarly destroyed by an arson attack1. From those ordinary people I engaged with, it became clear that they could only speculate about what went on behind the closed doors of a mosque. This was clear in Dudley where one local resident opposing the proposed mosque told me how mosques are “hotbeds of extremism”. Another, more worryingly spoke about how “the minarets resemble look out posts...” before adding, “I know what they say they are but the design of the buildings seem more fortified castles than spiritual houses to me”. In the aftermath of the bloody and barbaric incident in Woolwich, it will be very easy to exploit the pre-existent fears and anxieties that ordinary people have about mosques as also being about Muslims and Islam. Given the increased activity of those such as the EDL and BNP in recent weeks, it is likely that these fears and www.newstatesman.com/voices/2013/06/their-attackers-mosques-are-seen-places-difference

1/4

11/19/13

For their attackers, mosques are seen as places of "difference"

anxieties will be heightened and in some instances exploited. While mosques may be mere places of worship for Muslims as indeed others, it is worth remembering that for many, they represent something much more threatening and fearful. _______ 1

Express & Star, Oldbury community centre gutted in arson attack, 15 June 2010.

Tags: Woolwich attack

More from New Statesman

Peaches Geldof Can pornography comes out on top be art? against 'rent-a-gob' Katie Hopkins on This Morning

Dear The Internet, This Is Why You Can't Have Anything Nice

What happens when a piece of feminist artwork is turned into antiIslamic propaganda? Provided by Outbrain [?]

www.newstatesman.com/voices/2013/06/their-attackers-mosques-are-seen-places-difference

2/4

11/19/13

For their attackers, mosques are seen as places of "difference"

Comments for this thread are now closed.

4 comments Best

0 Share

Community

Avatar

liz

•

6 months ago

"If so, it will be another to add to the dramatically increased number of incidents to have been reported to Tell MAMA, the governmentfunded third party monitoring project which records anti-Muslim attacks." And the majority of these were insults on social media. How does a non-Muslim report an insult to non-Muslims on social media? Or indeed in the street? 4

Avatar

• Share ›

1proudk afir

•

5 months ago

The mosques are our barracks, the domes our helmets, the minarets our bayonets and the faithful our soldiers... “The Soldiers Prayer,” written (in 1912) by Turkish nationalist poet Ziya Gokalp, 2

Avatar

liz

• Share ›

•

6 months ago

"Chris Allen's research has shown that mosques are rarely just seen by as places of worship." Not by Muslims either. A mosque is a proto local council and debating chamber. Hence women not being required to attend a) at all b) in a position where they can influence proceedings. 2

Avatar

• Share ›

S hauna P ili

•

5 months ago

I'd be very interested in visiting one of my local mosques but I don't think any of them has ever had an Open Day. I know very little about Islam apart from reading a few basic webpages but have worked with several Muslims and they've always struck me as exceptionally nice people with high moral standards. I've seen a lot of anti-Muslim rhetoric on Facebook and Twitter recently, and much of it seems illinformed (one poster referred to the "Kerrang" rather than the Qur'an). It would be great if more mosques threw open their doors to the local communities and had a day of tea and talking, as the mosque in Y ork did. 1

• Share ›

ALSO ON NEW STATESMAN

WHA T ' S T HI S ?

Why can't we accept that women enjoy casual sex too?

How Duncan Smith misled MPs on child poverty

70 comments • 4 days ago

26 comments • 16 hours ago

Mrs Left y Opinions — The Media's obsession with women's

Jonault — This man should be sacked for his incompetence. We all

enjoyment of sex never seems …

remember Betsygate (he's a …

Cameron finally challenges the Tory climate change deniers

Viral video philosopher Jason Silva: "nature's just …

23 comments • 3 days ago

1 comment • 18 hours ago

Cons ider it denied — Using capitals where they don't belong tends to

s pac emonk ey 82 — great article!

give that impression …

Su b s cri b e

Ad d D i s q u s to yo u r s i te

www.newstatesman.com/voices/2013/06/their-attackers-mosques-are-seen-places-difference

3/4

11/19/13

For their attackers, mosques are seen as places of "difference"

More from New Statesman New Statesman team:

Online writers:

Columnists:

Critics:

Services:

Jason Cowley

Rhiannon and Holly

M ichael Brooks

Leo Robson

Helen Lewis

Alan White

Eleanor M argolis

Rachel Cooke

RSS feeds

Rafael Behr

Glosswitch

Hunter Davies

Jenny Diski