Research and Scholarshipinsight

• William Sands (Appropriations from Senator Padilla, and from Senator Feinstein)

• Rebecca Moazzez (National Institutes of Health)

• Elisa Chavez (Health Resources & Services Administration, and Department of Health Care Access and Information)

• Andrew Young (National Institutes of Health)

• Darren Cox (Stanford Head and Neck Cancer SPORE)

• David Ojcius (National Institutes of Health, and Department of Defense)

• Tori Xiao (Tobacco Related Disease Research Program)

• Kim Benton (Department of Health Care Access and Information)

• Xiaoyuan Han (National Institutes of Health)

• Des Gallagher (San Francisco Department of Health)

• Nejat Duzgunes (National Institutes of Health)

• Cassio Silva (Tobacco Related Disease Research Program, and National Institutes of Health)

• Tamer Alpagot (Tobacco Related Disease Research Program)

Research in the Spotlight

Three-dimensional digital applications for implant space planning in orthodontics

What is it?

An overview of 3D imaging tools for implant treatment planning.

What problem does it aim to solve?

Implant failure rates are as high as 20%; good visualization is essential for planning before surgery. “Before, only two-dimensional examinations such as panoramic images were available to clinicians, limiting the capacity of the evaluation to only vertical and horizontal dimensions of the space while evaluating the edentulous area and planning implants.”

How does it work?

Combining multisource images such as Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) and 3D digital dental models is essential for proper planning and managing implant surgery combined with orthodontic treatment. In addition, the use of data science approaches, advances in the image analysis field, and new AI approaches are becoming more popular among clinicians because of translational research and software availability. Therefore, better and more personalized treatment can be available, helping the clinical decision making and the prognosis.”

What are the real-world implications?

“The orthodontist needs to analyze each patient individually and use different software or tools that better fit their practice, allowing efficient treatment planning and satisfactory results with an adequate prognosis.”

What are the next steps?

While clinicians can benefit from these tools today, ongoing research alongside the ongoing development of and feature enhancements to these tools will help inform best practices.

Source

“Three-dimensional digital applications for implant space planning in orthodontics: A narrative review”, Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists 11 (2022) 207–215 https://is.gd/izokof