Earth In Brackets What colour is the economy? The Rio+20 Conference was supposed to be a reflection on the success (or not) of the past 20 years spent trying to implement sustainable development. Governments, business, and civil society would come to renew their commitment to sustainable development--which includes economic, social, and environmental pillars--and work out a plan for “The Future We Want.”However, the focus of the conversation has shifted heavily to centre around the notion of a “Green Economy.” But what exactly does that mean? Well, it depends who you ask... The UNEP, in the 2011 paper “Towards a Green Economy,” says “Practically speaking, a green economy is one whose growth in income and employment is driven by public and private investments that reduce carbon emissions and pollution, enhance energy and resource efficiency, and prevent the loss of biodiversity and ecosystem services.” In short, the Green Economy is billed as one that improves human wellbeing by means of economic growth, while at the same time protecting nature. But not everybody sees it as such...
La via campesina “[...] another phase of what we identify as ‘green structural adjustment programs’ which seek to align and re-order the national markets and regulations to submit to the fast incoming ‘green capitalism.’”
Status quo in disguise? Many civil society organizations, especially in the global south, have spoken out against the Green Economy idea. Here are some of the reasons.
Subsidies
ignores overconsumption
Developing countries cannot compete with developed north in subsidising research and development of ‘green’ industry. Developed world agro subsidies are not covered by WTO restrictions, so they maintain monopolies
Resource scarcity is caused by the large demand for resources. Mostly that demand is not for satisfying basic human needs. but for supporting over-consuming, excessive lifestyles, mostly in the developed world.
Cupula dos povos “[...] opens new territories to the economy that exploits people and environment, increasing the myth that unlimited economic growth is possible.”
TWN
Third world Network
“an increasing trend of relying on ‘markets’ whereby companies and countries can pollute beyond their assigned limit by buying pollution or emission certificates from other companies or countries.”
New conditionality Could be used as requirements to access loans or financial aid
Risks
Narrow Approach Efforts aimed at development and social advancement are being diverted to environmental conservation
Commodification of nature
Environmental Standards as trade barriers
Reducing human-nature interaction to a mercantilist relationship is not only alienating but also denies the intrinsic value of nature regardless of its utility.
Emerging economies and developing countries wouldn’t be able to meet high standards of more developed and modernized countries
Sources
Cupula dos povos: http://cupuladospovos.org.br/en/2012/05/what-is-at-stake-at-rio20/ Via Campesina: http://www.climate-justice-now.org/la-via-campesina-call-to-action-reclaiming-our-future-rio-20-and-beyond/ TNI: http://www.tni.org/sites/www.tni.org/files/download/green-economy.pdf Stakeholder Forum: http://www.unep.org/civil-society/Portals/59/Documents/13_GMGSF/additional_Resources/Principles_for_a_ green_economy.pdf
Trans National Institute “[...] new tool for global powers to appear to incorporate criticisms of the destructive model of civilisation on the understanding that the assumptions and underlying logics of this model must remain unquestioned?” “[...] effort to demonstrate that [we can resolve planetary crises] without altering existing power structures, nor the relations of domination and exploitation. [...] it is argued that the same market mechanisms and scientific and technological patterns [...] of sustained growth, can save life.” “... opportunistic manipulation of the ecological and social crises. Rather than addressing the real structural causes of inequality and injustices, capital is using “green” language to launch a new round of expansion. Corporations and the financial sector need governments to institutionalise new rules [...] to guarantee them against risks and to create the institutional framework for the financialisation of nature. Many governments are willing partners [...]
BASIS FOR A JUST ECONOMY While fleshing out the details of what a good green economy should be is far beyond the scope of this piece, we believe there should be some principles built in. Below is a word-cloud with some of these principles, many of which have been elaborated on elsewhere. Fundamentally, we question the notion that the only way for human to interact with and protect nature is by subsuming it into a market economy. Rio is not the beginning or the end of the tug-o-war over the Green Economy idea, but it is an important battle. When entering the discussion, we ask you to consider the following: “What is the future you really want? What is the future you need? And what will it take to get it?
new development indicators
rights to nat ur e
right to development
Internalizing externalites
i n t e r g e n e r at i o n a l e q u i t y
beyond growth resilience sustainable consumption and production
approach
balanced
dignity precautionary
inclusion democratizing natural resource management
accountability
Harmony with Nature
Rights-based
redefining well-being
common but differentiated responsibility
Another world is possible...