2009 MidYear Trust Barometer

Page 1

2009 Special Midyear Trust Survey

August 3, 2009


Overview •

Conducted a special abridged version of the annual Edelman Trust Barometer. We surveyed 1,675 opinion leaders in six of the world’s largest markets: China, France, Germany, India, UK and US.

To gauge impact of last six months – the bankruptcies, bailouts, nationalizations, and exec comp scrutiny-- on trust in business and brands:

Has business regained its footing?

Who are opinion leaders looking to for leadership to solve key societal issues– business or government?

What are the new expectations for business and its role in society?

How do companies restore lost trust?

How does trust – or the lack of it – affect product brand decisions?


January 2009 In U.S., trust in business was at lowest level, including post-Enron How much do you trust business to do what is right? 60%

58%

US

20-point drop

UK/France/Germany

55%

53% 51% 49%

50%

Enron, the dot-com bust and September 11 45%

44%

48%

48%

44%

41% 40%

40% 38%

38% 36% 35%

36% 36%

34%

35% 32%

30%

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

Informed publics 35-64 in the United States and UK/France/Germany Responses 6-9 only on 1-9 scale; 9=highest 3

2006

2007

2008

2009


July 2009 Trust in business stable to up How much do you trust business to do what is right? Jan 09

Jul 09

100% 90%

+12

80%

+11

71%

75%

70%

62%

60%

60%

48%

50% 40%

46%

44%

41%

39%

36%

34%

30% 30% 20% 10% 0% US

UK

France

Germany

India

China

The 12-point increase in U.S. includes the younger sample of 25- to 34- year-olds, whose overall trust in business increased 26 points in six months. Informed publics ages 25 to 64; responses 6-9 only on 1-9 scale; 9 = highest 4


Trust in government stable to up

How much do you trust government to do what is right? Jan 08

Jan 09

Jul 09

100%

+13

90%

+12

80%

74% 72%

78%

70% 60% 50%

55% 43%

42%

40%

35%

40% 38%

38%

30%

44%

40%

44% 42%

36%

34% 26%

30% 20% 10% 0% US

UK

France

Germany

India

China

The 12-point increase in U.S. includes the younger sample of 25- to 34- year-olds, whose overall trust in government increased 24 points in six months. Informed publics ages 25 to 64; responses 6-9 only on 1-9 scale; 9 = highest 5


Why? Tangible, quantifiable actions

Would you trust a company more or less if that company took this action?

Repaid bailout or loan money to the government

81%

Reduced CEO and executive pay

80%

Fired non-performing management teams

78%

Closed non-profitable business units

62%

Reduced marketing budgets

61%

Continued to spend money on philanthropy

58%

0%

10%

Informed publics ages 25 to 64 Responses 6-9 only on 1-9 scale; 9=highest 6

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


July 2009 The state of trust in six countries How much do you trust each institution to do what is right? NGOs

Business

Government

Media

100% 90% 80%

78%

75% 70%

67%

70%

60% 60% 50% 40%

51% 48% 42% 37%

52%

51% 44% 38%

55%53%

46% 41%40% 35%

50%

44% 39% 39%

28%

30% 20% 10% 0% US

UK

France

Germany

Informed publics ages 25 to 64; responses 6-9 only on 1-9 scale; 9=highest 7

India

China


January 2009 In U.S., trust in every industry had declined; banks and automotive led the way 100%

-33

How much you trust businesses in each of the following industries to do what is right? -27

90%

2008

2009

80%

80% 73% 70%

64% 60%

54% 50%

49%

50%

30%

62% 63%

58%

60%

40%

73%

69%

42%

33%

31%

54%

49%

44%

36%

54%

33%

25%

20% 10% 0%

Informed publics ages 35 to 64; responses 6-9 only on 1-9 scale; 9=highest 8

40%

42%


Technology most trusted industry in five of the six countries How much do you trust businesses in each of the following industries to do what is right? 100%

Technology #3 in France (66%)

90%

81%

80% 80%

72%

72%

71%

70%

93% 86%

88% 84%

69%

62% 56%

60%

50% 40% 30%

20% 10% 0%

US

Technology

UK

Food

France

Germany

Healthcare

Biotech/life sciences

Informed publics ages 25 to 64; responses 6-9 only on 1-9 scale; 9 = highest 9

India

China

Retail

Banks


But We’re Still in the Middle of the Game


Reputation of MNCs struggling in West How would you describe the overall reputation of large global businesses?

71%

69%

100% 90%

12%

30%

29%

24%

13%

5%

5%

2%

1%

10%

Reputation rated good or excellent

12%

Excellent

24%

Good

28%

Neither good nor bad

23%

25%

24%

80% 70%

19% 60%

59%

59%

18%

24%

50%

22% 40%

29% Fair

30%

37% 12%

20%

17%

10%

34% 17%

24%

Poor

10% 0%

34%

10%

1%

1%

India

China

US

Germany

Informed publics ages 25-64 in six countries; Responses Excellent, Good, Neither good nor bad, Fair, and Poor 11

France

UK


Business is not doing enough to help solve economic crisis 100%

90% 80% 70%

Has government intervened enough in global business?

Have global businesses cooperated enough with government?

60%

55%

50%

40% 40%

38% 33%

30%

20% 20%

9%

10% 0%

Too much

Right amount

Not enough

Too much

Informed publics ages 25-64 in six countries; responses Too much, The right amount and Not enough 12

Right amount

Not enough


“The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits.� Milton Friedman, 1970


Stakeholder, not shareholder, world

How important do you believe the interests of each of the following stakeholders should be to a CEO’s business decisions? 100% 90% 80%

70% 70%

58%

60%

49%

50%

45% 40%

40% 30%

26%

20% 10% 0%

Customers

Employees

Investors

Society

* Communities where the business operates Informed publics ages 25-64 in six countries Extremely important responses only

14

Local Communites*

Government


“Hard and soft� measures needed to rebuild trust Would trust a company more or less for taking each of the following actions?

Treat employees well

94%

Keep producing quality products and services

93%

Transparent and honest business practices

93%

Communicate frequently and honestly

91%

Create and keep jobs

90%

Drive better innovation

89%

Make progress on environmental initiatives

82%

Partner with third parties to solve major global problems

82%

Increase profitability and performance

82%

Commit resources to the public good

81%

Reduce the gap between CEO and average workers pay

78%

Pay senior executives mostly in stock

75%

Communicate messages through multiple media channels

70%

Eliminate financial incentives for taking risks

70%

Discount pricing

69%

CEO appearances

69%

Increase shareholder value

66%

Protect profit margins

43% 0%

10%

Informed publics ages 25-64 in six countries Responses 6-9 only on 1-9 scale; 9 = highest 15

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


Business expected to take on global issues

How important do you believe it is for business to do each of these things?

85%

84%

82%

Manage business Ensure efficiency of Create solutions to operations to ensure business operations reduce energy costs companies survive global economic crisis

80%

Cooperate with government to help solve the global economic crisis

Informed publics ages 25 to 64 Responses 6-9 only on 1-9 scale; 9 = highest 16

76%

75%

Provide access to affordable healthcare

Create solutions to minimize global warming

73%

Promote free trade


But MNCs have not taken enough action Have global businesses taken too much, the right amount, or not enough action on each of these things?

“NOT ENOUGH� In U.S.: 62%

In U.S.: 68%

71%

70%

In U.S.: 65% 64%

In U.S.: 55% 55%

Create solutions to minimize global warming

Create solutions to reduce energy costs

Provide access to affordable healthcare

Informed publics ages 25 to 64; not enough responses only 17

Cooperate with government to help solve the global economic crisis

In U.S.: 57% 52%

Manage their business operations to ensure that their companies survive the global economic crisis

In U.S.: 56% 49%

Ensure efficiency of business operations


The Role of Trust in Product Marketing


Informed publics more likely to switch brands because of something positive they read, saw, or heard about that brand Have you taken any of the following actions in relation to product or service brands that you use?

Switched brands because of something positive you read, saw or heard about that brand

62%

Switched brands because another brand cost less

53%

Switched brands because of something negative you read, saw or heard about that brand

48%

Switched brands because you stopped trusting a brand

45%

Lost trust in a brand because of poor financial performance of the parent company

33%

Connected with a brand through a social networking site

29%

Informed publics ages 25 to 64 in six countries Yes responses only 19

In recession, cost only marginally more important than trust


Quality, reliability, and past personal experiences most important factors in determining how much one trusts a product or service brand How important are each of the following factors in determining how much you trust a product or service brand? Quality

96%

Reliability

94%

Past personal experiences

94%

Safety

90%

Value

88%

Company reputation

83%

Innovation

81%

Recommendation from friends or family

79%

Recommendation from a person like you

75%

Association with a good cause

68%

Recommendation from an expert

67%

Financial performance

59%

Positive media coverage

57%

Advertisements

42%

Endorsement by a public figure

39%

Endorsement by a celebrity

22%

Informed publics ages 25 to 64; responses 6-9 only on 1-9 scale; 9 = highest 20


Study conclusions •

Trust has either stabilized or risen, but we’re only in the middle of the game

Tangible, quantifiable corporate actions have led to trust rise – repaying loans, cutting executive comp, firing poor management

Moving from shareholder to stakeholder world

“Hard and soft” measures rebuild trust – quality products, treating employees well, transparency, frequent communication

Business expected to partner with government and NGOs to address economy, energy, environment, healthcare

Trust plays key role in brand choices


The way forward for business •

No quick fix through a single set of actions: long-term proposition

Play a broader role in society; collaborate more

Balance investor interests with customer and employee interests

Square mutual social responsibility and shared purpose with profit-making strategy

Communicate frequently and transparently


A Ten Year Overview of Trust

The 2009 Midyear Edelman Trust Survey was produced by research firm StrategyOne. Methodology: The survey consisted of 15-minute telephone interviews from May 26 to July 3, 2009. The survey sampled 1,675 informed publics in two age groups (25-34 and 35-64) in six countries: U.S., U.K., France, Germany, China, and India. The respondents were college-educated, in the top 25% of household income per age group in each country, and reported significant media consumption and engagement in business news and public policy. U.S.: N= 500 (ages 25-34: n=100; ages 35-64 n=400) China: N=375 (ages 25-34: n=75; ages 35-64 n=300) U.K., France, Germany, India (per country): N=200 (ages 25-34: n=50; ages 35-64 n=150)

For more information on the Edelman Trust Barometer and to view past results, please visit www.edelman.com/trust.

.


2009 Special Midyear Trust Survey

August 3, 2009


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.