RULERS OF PORTUGAL 1385-191 0
HOUSE OF AVIZ
Joa o I , 1385-143 3
Duarte , 1433- 8
Affonso V , 1438-8 1
Joa o II , 1481-9 5
Manuel I , 1495—1521
Joa o III , 1521-5 7
Sebastian, 1557—78
Henry , 1578—80
HOUSE OF SPANISH HABSBURGS
Phili p II (I of Portugal) , 1580-9 8
Phili p II I (II of Portugal) , 1598-162 1
Phili p IV (III of Portugal) , 1621-4 0
HOUS
E O F BRAGANCJA
Joa o IV , 1640—56
Affonso VI , 1656-6 7
Pedr o II , 1667—1706
Joa o V , 1706—50
Jose , 1750-7 7
Maria I , 1777—92
Joa o VI , 1792—1826
Pedr o IV , 1826-3 4
Miguel , 1828—34
Maria II , 1834—53
Pedro V , 1853-6 1
Luis I , 1861—89
Carlos I , 1889—1908
Manuel II , 1908-1 0
VICEROY S AN D GOVERNOR S OF PORTUGUES E INDI A 1505-196 1
All viceroys were also governors. Thus the serial number refers to governorships; those governors who were further honoured by being called viceroys have an asterisk. Gaps in the sequence, as between numbers 53 and 54, are because in these years there was a Council of Government. With a few exceptions, I have not includedtitles.
1* Francisc o d e Almeida , 1505- 9
2 Afonso d e Albuquerque , 1509—15
3 Lopo Soares d e Albergaria , 1515-1 8
4 Diog o Lopes d e Sequeira , 1518-2 2
5 Duart e d e Meneses , 1522—4
6 * Vasco d a Gama , 152 4
7 Henriqu e d e Meneses , 1524—6
8 Lop o Vaz d e Sampaio , 1526- 9
9 Nun o d a Cunha , 1529-3 8
10 * Garci a d e Noronha , 1538-4 0
11 Esteva o d a Gama , 1540—2
12 Marti m Afonso d e Sousa, 1542- 5
13 * Joa o d e Castro , 1545- 8
14 Garci a d e Sa, 1548- 9
15 Jorg e Cabral , 1549-5 0
16 * Afonso d e Noronha , 1550- 4
17 * Pedr o Mascarenhas , 1554- 5
18 Francisc o Barreto , 1555- 8
19 * Constantin o d e Bragan^a , 1558—61
20 * Francisc o Coutinho , 1561—4
2 1 Joa o d e Mendon^a , 156 4
22 * Anta o d e Noronha , 1564- 8
23 * Lui s d e Ataide , 1568-7 1
24 * Antoni o d e Noronha , 1571- 3
2 5 Antoni o Moni z Barreto , 1573- 6
2 6 Diog o d e Meneses , 1576—8
27 * Luis d e Ataide , 1578-8 1
VICEROY S AND GOVERNOR S 1505-196 1
28 Fernao Teles de Meneses, 1581
29 * Francisco Mascarenhas, 1581—4
30 * Duart e de Meneses, 1584—8
31 Manuel de Sousa Coutinho , 1588—91
32 # Matias de Albuquerque , 1591—7
33 * Francisco da Gama , 1597—1600
34 * Aires de Saldanha, 1600—5
35 * Marti m Afonso de Castro, 1605- 7
36 Frei Aleixo de Meneses, 1607- 9
37 Andre Furtado de Mendonga, 1609
38 * Rui Lourenc:o de Tavora, 1609-1 2
39 * Jeronim o de Azevedo, 1612—17
40 * Joao Coutinho , 1617-1 9
4 1 Fernao de Albuquerque , 1619-2 2
42 * Francisco da Gama , 1622- 8
4 3 Frei Luis de Brito e Meneses, 1628—9
44 * Miguel de Noronha , Conde de Linhares, 1629—35
45 * Pero da Silva, 1635- 9
4 6 Antoni o Teles de Meneses, 1639—40
47 # Joao da Silva Telo e Meneses, 1640- 5
48 * Filipe Mascarenhas, 1645-5 1
49 * Vasco Mascarenhas, Conde de Obidos , 1652—3
50 * Rodrigo Lobo da Silveira, 1655—6
51 Manuel Mascarenhas Homem , 1656
52 * Antoni o de Melo e Castro, 1662—6
53 * Joao Nune s da Cunha , 1666—8
54 * Luis de Mendonc^a Furtado e Albuquerque , 1671—7
55 * Pedro de Almeida Portugal , 1677- 8
56 * Francisco de Tavora, 1681- 6
57 Rodrigo da Costa, 1686-9 0
58 Miguel de Almeida, 1690- 1
59 * Pedro Antoni o de Noronh a de Albuquerque , 1692- 8
60 * Antoni o Luis Gongalves da Camara Coutinho , 1698-170 1
6i # Caetano de Melo e Castro, 1702—7
62 * Rodrigo da Costa, 1701-1 2
63 * Vasco Fernandes Cesar de Meneses, 1712—17
64 Sebastiao de Andrade Pessanha, 1717
65 * Luis Carlos Inacio Xavier de Meneses, 1717—20
66* Francisco Jose de Sampaio e Castro, 1720- 3 xiv
VICEROY S AN D GOVERNOR S 1505-196 1
67 Cristovao de Melo , 1723
68 * Joa o de Saldanha da Gama , 1725—32
69 * Pedr o Mascarenhas, 1732—41
70 * Luis Carlos Inacio Xavier de Meneses, 1741- 2
71 * Pedr o Migue l de Almeid a Portugal , 1744—50
72 * Francisco d e Assis d e Tavora, 1750—4
73 * Luis Mascarenhas, 1754- 6
74 * Manuel de Saldanha e Albuquerque , 1758—65
7 5 Joa o Jos e d e Melo , 1768-7 4
7 6 Filip e de Valadares Sotomaior, 1774
77 Jos e Pedro da Camara, 1774- 9
7 8 Frederico de Guilherm e de Sousa Holstein , 1779-8 6
7 9 Francisco da Cunh a e Meneses, 1786—94
8 0 Francisco Antoni o da Veiga Cabral da Camara Pimentel , 1794-180 7
8 1 * Bernardo Jos e Maria da Silveira e Lorena, 1807—16
82 * Diog o de Sousa, 1816-2 1
8 3 Manuel da Camara, 1822- 5
84 * Manue l Francisco de Portuga l e Castro , 1826—35 (Prefect) Bernardo Peres da Silva, 1835
85 Simao Infante de la Cerda de Sousa Tavares, 1837- 8
8 6 Jos e Antoni o Vieira da Fonseca, 183 9
87 Manuel Jos e Mendes , 1839-4 0
8 8 Jos e Joaqui m Lopes de Lima, 1840- 2
8 9 Francisco Xavier da Silva Pereira , 1842- 3
9 0 Joaqui m Mourao Garces Palha , 1843—4
9 1 Jos e Ferreira Pestana , 1844-5 1
92 Jos e Joaqui m Januari o Lapa, 1851—5
9 3 Antoni o Cesar de Vasconcelos Correia, 1855—64
9 4 Jos e Ferreira Pestana , 1864—70
95 Januari o Correia de Almeida , 1870- 1
9 6 Joaqui m Jos e de Macedo e Couto , 1871- 5
97 Joa o Tavares de Almeida , 1875- 7
9 8 Antoni o Sergio d e Sousa, 1877- 8
9 9 Caetano Alexandre de Almeid a e Albuquerque , 1878—82
100 Carlos Eugeni o Correia da Silva, 1882—5
101 Francisco Joaqui m Ferreira d o Amaral , 188 6
102 August o Cesar Cardoso de Carvalho, 1886- 9
103 Vasco Guedes de Carvalho e Meneses, 1889-9 1
VICEROYS AND GOVERNOR
S 1505-196 1
104 Francisco Maria da Cunha, 1891
105 Francisco Teixeira da Silva, 1892—3
106 Rafael Jacome Lopes de Andrade, 1893—4
107 Elesbao Jose de Bettencourt Lapa, 1894- 5
108 Rafael Jacome Lopes de Andrade, 1895- 6
109* Infante Dom Afonso Henriques , 1896
n o Joaquim Jose Machado, 1897-1900 in Eduardo Augusto Rodrigues Galhardo, 1900—5
112 Arnaldo Nogueira Novais Guedes Rebelo, 1905- 7
113 Jose Maria de Sousa Hort a e Costa, 1907-1 0
114 Francisco Manuel Couceiro da Costa, 1910—17
115 Jose de Freitas Ribeiro, 1917-1 9
116 Augusto de Paiva Bobela da Mota, 1919
117 Jaim e Alberto de Castro Morais, 1919—25
118 Mariano Martins , 1925- 6
119 Acursio Mendes da Rocha Dinis , 1926
120 Pedro Francisco Massano de Amorim , 1926- 9
121 Alfredo Pedro de Almeida, 1929
122 Joao Carlos Craveiro Lopes, 1929-3 6
123 Francisco Higin o Craveiro Lopes, 1936- 8
124 Jose Ricardo Pereira Cabral, 1938-4 5
125 Jose Silvestre Ferreira Bossa, 1945- 8
126 Fernando Quintanilh a e Mendonga Dias, 1948-5 2
127 Paulo Benard Guedes, 1952- 8
128 Manuel Antonio Vassalo e Silva, 1958-6 1
GLOSSAR Y
This glossary is intended solely for the convenience of readers of this book. It makes no claim to being authoritative; nor does it cover all possible meanings of all the words; nor is it a work of linguistic reference.
aforamento alvard
araq bhakti cafila
Camara carreira da India cartaz
Casa da India casado
castico chettyar
choli
Christdo-Novo colecta
Conselho da Fazenda cruzado descendente
dhoti
Estado da India fidalgo foro
gaunkar hajj
Indiatico
jama masjid
juiz
keling
quit-ren t
royal order or decree
spiri t distille d from palm s
Hind u devotionalis m convoy municipa l council
Lisbon—Goa roun d tri p passport ; licence
Indi a House , in Lisbon marrie d man ; householder Portugues e bor n in Indi a membe r of Coromande l Hind u merchan t communit y Hind u blouse
Ne w Christian ; a convert from Judais m tax on food
financial council coin wort h 40 0 reis, abou t 4 Englis h shilling s mixed blood ; mestizo
Hind u mal e nether-garmen t th e Portugues e stat e in Indi a a noble or gentleman ; 'son of somebody' land revenue land controlle r
Musli m pilgrimag e t o Mecca Portugues e born in Indi a congregationa l mosqu e judg e
Tamil-speakin g Hind u
mestizo ndo
padroado pan pandit paroe quintal reinol rendas roteiro ryotwari
satyagraha
Senado da Cdmara soldado sudra taluka tanador-mor vania
vedor da fazenda zamorin
GLOSSARY
Eurasian; a person of Indo-Portugues e ancestry large shi p patronag e bete l leaf
Hind u teacher light , oared boat
abou t i hundredweigh t (5 1 kgms ) Portugues e bor n in Portuga l tax-farming contract s rutter ; navigationa l guid e Hind u system unde r whic h th e stat e takes a proportio n of th e actual productio n of every cultivatin g family
'trut h force'; Gandhia n pacifist resistance municipa l council soldier; an unmarrie d ma n botto m grou p in th e Hind u caste hierarchy distric t
overseer
membe r of Gujara t Hind u or Jai n merchan t communit y chief financial official
titl e of th e ruler of Calicu t
Malindi Mombasa
GUJARAT
Diu">Dama n BENGAL Hughli Mocha Aden
Bay of Bengal SaoThome Arabian Sea (\CEYLON Colombo\J SR I LANKA ) Macassar DUTCH EAST INDIES (INDONESIA) imor
Map i . Th e Portugues e and Asia
PHILIPPINES
INDIAN
'Lahor e M U G H A L • Delhi •Agr a
E M P I R E
Ahmadabad Cambay
L Hughlil
G O LCO N D A
VI J AYANAGA R
Honavary^
BhatkalW * VIJAYAZ NAGAR
Mangalore
Cannanore
Cochin
Quilon
SaoThome
Cape Comonn I \ C E Y L O N Colombow I \ J
Ma p 2 Th e Portugues e and Indi a
500 km - i 30 0 miles
I L H A S
Ma p 3 . Goa
BENGA
BARDE S
INTRODUCTION
Portuga l is th e oldest territoria l stat e in Europe ; Indi a is one of th e world' s newer nations . Ye t ironically histor y is muc h mor e important , and controversial , for Portugues e tha n for Indians . I t is tru e tha t historical writin g played a role in th e India n nationa l movement , for some of th e writin g of th e first half of th e twentiet h centur y was designe d t o foster patriotis m and pride . Today however Indian s are commendabl y relaxed abou t thei r history , as can be seen in vigorous controversies over historica l matter s in whic h i t seems tha t all possible point s of view can be , and are , presented . These debate s are intellectual ; th e validit y of th e India n natio n is no t dependen t on th e outcome . Thi s has usually no t been th e case in Portugal ; too often thei r histor y has had presen t politica l meanings . Rober t Southey visite d Portuga l in 1796 , and 1800—1, enjoyed himself, and spen t years workin g on a huge , and never completed , histor y of Portugal I t was goin g t o be a wonderful book:
I believe no history has ever yet been composed that presents such a continuous interest of one kind or another as this would do, if I should live to complete it . The chivalrous portion is of the very highest beauty; much of what succeeds has a deep tragic interest; and then comes the gradual destruction of a noble national character, brought on by the cancer of Romish superstition. (Quoted in Rose Maccaulay, They Went to Portugal, London, 1946, p . 164)
I n Portuga l histor y is indeed of interest , no t only t o historian s bu t also t o th e general populatio n and especially t o th e governin g elite . A famous savant wrot e in 189 8 tha t 'Perhap s one could say tha t th e memory of and prid e in those past time s of real althoug h transitor y greatness is stil l today one of th e mai n bond s of our nationalism , one of th e thing s whic h fortified, and stil l fortifies, us in those hard time s whic h we later passed through ' (Conde de Ficalho , Viagens de Pedro da Covilham, Lisbon, 1898 , pp . vi-vii) . Al l thi s was exacerbated durin g th e Salazar-Caetan o period . Histor y joined religio n as an opiate . I t was blatantl y used for presen t politica l purposes Portuga l trie d t o retai n her colonies, disingenuousl y renamed overseas provinces . A n importan t bolste r was th e claim tha t all were equal in Portugal , bot h metropolita n
THE PORTUGUESE IN INDIA
and overseas Th e criterio n was no t race bu t degree of'civilization' I n a dictatorshi p where contro l over informatio n was give n a hig h priority , historian s were enliste d t o prove thi s claim for th e past I n a countr y lik e Portugal , small , insignificant, thank s t o D r Salazar th e poorest in Europe , histor y was used t o foster prid e and unity
Since 1974 it has been possible for Portugues e t o writ e wha t they like abou t thei r past and some have availed themselves of thi s opportunity . Ye t amon g all classes and politica l tendencies , Portugal' s pas t is stil l seen as 'important' , and usually stil l as one in whic h th e countr y can tak e pride .
Th e aim of my book is , naturally , t o assess th e influence or impac t of th e Portugues e on India . Thi s is an ambitiou s and difficult task ; i n particular , sweeping generalization s mus t be avoided. Rathe r we need , as they say, t o 'disaggregat e th e data' . Whe n thi s is done , we find Portugues e influence varying very widely , rangin g from massive t o minuscul e according t o thre e criteria : time , place and category (for example , social, religious , economic , political) . A t a particula r time , in a specified place , we may find a substantia l Portugues e impac t on a particula r category of India n life; change one or more of these criteri a (say a different tim e or place) and th e influence may well decrease t o a considerable extent .
Th e conclusion , if I may anticipat e th e centra l finding of thi s book , is tha t i n many areas th e Portugues e impac t was minor ; in a few i t was substantial . Overall ther e was muc h mor e co-operatio n and interactio n tha n dominance . Let thi s not be misunderstood . Thi s conclusion was reached on th e basis of th e evidence before me , and also, I believe, reflects an emergin g consensus amon g specialists in th e field. For those like myself who thin k in th e mos t general way tha t i t is 'wrong ' for one grou p of peopl e t o impose thei r values, thei r politica l control , on others , th e them e of thi s book wil l correctly be seen as one which is positive towards th e Portugues e imperia l effort True , thei r leaders hoped t o produc e major change in India ; mos t of th e tim e they failed, and this , even if inadvertently , mad e thei r empir e muc h less deleteriou s tha n th e later mor e complet e achievement of th e British . Needless t o say, my conclusions are in no way influenced by anti-Portugues e or anti-Catholi c feeling (whatever these tw o term s may mean) . Several Englis h author s in th e late nineteent h centur y wrot e books which criticized th e Portugues e on invalid grounds , ground s whic h showed thei r own ethnocentris m (as indeed di d Rober t Southey).
INTRODUCTION
Ther e is a vast difference between racist attack s on th e Portuguese , and a dispassionate investigatio n of thei r imperia l career in India Thi s book attempt s th e latter
C. R . Boxer said tha t his classic Portuguese Seaborne Empire (London, 1969) was 'th e produc t of over forty years' reading , research, reflection and publicatio n on and around it s subject matter ' (p . 392) . I can only claim an interes t goin g back twent y years. As I have trie d t o sum u p wha t I have learn t in thi s time , I have become acutely aware of th e hug e gaps in our knowledge . Thi s is th e case for th e whole perio d from th e end of Spanish rul e over Portuga l in 1640 t o th e end of Portugal' s India n empir e in 1961 . Vast material s are available; so far they have hardly been sifted. I n a book whic h attempt s t o reflect th e existin g stat e of scholarship , thi s wil l explain th e brevity , and no doub t superficiality, of my coverage of thi s later period . Ye t even for th e comparatively well-researched sixteent h centur y ther e are stil l hug e gaps . Consider only Vasco da Gama . W e know almos t nothin g of his early career. O n his fateful voyage i n 1497—8, why di d he (correctly) tak e an outwar d rout e whic h involved a hug e loop far west int o th e Atlantic ? Wh y was he so ill-informed abou t India n condition s tha t he knew nothin g of th e statu s and power of th e opulen t zamorin of Calicut , and persistentl y mistoo k Hinduis m for some sort of devian t Christianity ? All thi s book can do is t o attemp t a synthesis of existin g knowledge . Obviousl y I have draw n heavily on th e work of others , and on my own past efforts. Th e gaps and errors in th e book reflect in par t th e presen t feeble stat e of th e field, in par t my own ignorance .
Tw o guidin g principle s underli e thi s book I t is par t of a series abou t India n history , and by a person whose speciality is India n history ; I hope Indi a is always t o th e fore i n wha t I have written Indeed , I have consciously trie d t o assess th e Portugues e and thei r activitie s from an India n angle , rathe r tha n from a European one Thu s in th e centra l and crucial matte r of evaluatin g th e Portugues e impac t on India , I have t o some exten t discounte d large claims mad e the n and now by Portugues e and othe r European authors , and been more influenced by th e very silence of India n records on th e whole presence of th e Portuguese . Ye t I also found i t necessary t o includ e fairly detaile d discussions of wha t may seem t o be purel y Portugues e matters . I di d thi s because I strongl y feel tha t th e Portugues e in Indi a canno t be seen in isolation: thei r actions , policies and prejudices were a resul t of a world view derived from thei r own European milieu . I had t o mak e some attemp t t o describe this . If
THE PORTUGUESE IN INDIA
ther e is too muc h Portuga l and no t enoug h Indi a - and I earnestly hope thi s is no t th e case — the n I mus t fall back on blamin g th e sources Portugues e sources are relatively full, and accessible; India n sources for th e topi c and perio d are neither . Ther e are obvious problem s i n usin g mostl y sources from one side; I hope I have been able t o transcen d th e limitation s of Portugues e records for one intereste d in India n history . My second guidin g principl e was t o be as comparativ e and analytical as possible . Her e also I hope my book makes some contribution , for muc h existin g writin g on th e Portugues e in India , and on th e histor y of early European activitie s in Indi a in general , is antiquaria n in th e extreme . Years of painstakin g work in th e archives produces only an elaboratio n on a politica l narrative , or mor e detail s abou t th e life of some grea t man . I have trie d t o discuss such broad historica l theme s (related , of course, t o th e histor y of th e Portugues e i n India ) as th e natur e of western 'impacts' ; th e peddlin g trad e of Asia; European contac t wit h Asia in wha t Ja n Kieniewicz has called th e 'pre-colonial ' period , tha t is th e perio d (which he extend s throug h mos t of th e eighteent h century ) of European expansion, bu t no t dominatio n ('Contact and Transformation , th e European pre-colonial expansion in th e India n Ocean world-syste m in th e 16th—17th centuries' , Itinerario, VIII , 2 , 1984 , pp . 45-58) ; and even wha t J . H . Plum b called society 'before th e human-conditio n was radically changed by th e growt h of industry ' ('Th e Undersid e of History' , Guardian Weekly, Jul y 1982 , p . 18). Even whe n such theme s are no t overtly stated , they have been in my mind .
