106 J. Magnuson
3. Joseph Stiglitz, “Nationalized Banks Are ‘Only Answer,’ Economist Stiglitz Says,” Deutsche Welle, February 6, 2009, posted on www. dw-world.de/dw/article/0,4005355,00.html. 4. See https://www.federalreserve.gov/aboutthefed/section13.htm. 5. Danielle Booth, Fed Up: An Insider’s Take on Why the Federal Reserve Is Bad for America (New York, NY: Penguin, 2017), p. 28. 6. Michael S. Derby, “Fed’s Dudley: ‘Deep Seated’ Cultural, Ethical Lapses at Many Financial Firms,” Wall Street Journal, November 7, 2013. 7. Thorstein Veblen, “The Higher Learning,” in The Portable Veblen (New York, NY: Viking Press, 1948), p. 511. 8. Allan Gruchy, Contemporary Economic Thought: The Contribution of Neo-Institutional Economics (Clifton, NJ: Augustus M. Kelley, 1972), p. 133. 9. Jens Beckert, “Institutional Isomorphism Revisited: Convergence and Divergence in Institutional Change,” Sociological Theory, Vol. 28, No. 2, June 2010, pp. 150–166. 10. See also Claus Offe, “Designing Institutions in East European Transitions,” in R.E. Goodin (ed.), The Theory of Institutional Design (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1996), p. 210. 11. William M. Dugger, Corporate Hegemony (New York, NY: Greenwood Press, 1989), pp. 44–45. 12. Ibid., p. 144. 13. John P. Lewis and Robert C. Turner, Business Conditions Analysis (New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 2nd ed., 1967 [1959]), p. 15. 14. Quoted in The Little Big Number, p. 105. 15. Philipsen, The Little Big Number, pp. 40–42. 16. Ibid., pp. 44–46. 17. Dugger, 1989, p. 157. 18. https://www.treasury.gov/press-center/press-releases/Pages/ls241.aspx. 19. Dugger, 1989, p. 46. 20. Ibid., p. 157. 21. Paul DiMaggio and Walter Powell, “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields,” American Sociological Review, 1983, p. 150. 22. Middle Tennessee State University. https://mtsu.edu/first-amendment/ article/1051/tillman-act-of-1907. 23. Cq Researcher. https://library.cqpress.com/cqresearcher/document.php?id= cqresrre1931070100#H2_2.
