Citations

(Living and Learning Through Liquid Crystals)

1. Freiser MJ. 1970. Ordered States of a Nematic Liquid. Phys Rev Lett. 24: 1041.

2. Scharrer E. 2017. RUI: Investigations of the cybotactic nematic phase in bent-core liquid crystals. National Science Foundation. Award No.:1709148.

3. Madsen LA, Dingemans TJ, Nakata M, Samulski ET. 2004. Thermotropic Biaxial Nematic Liquid Crystals. Phys Rev Lett. 92(14):145505.

(Waughop Lake)

1. “Waughop Lake” by B.D.’s world, licensed under CC BY-SA 2.0. https://www.flickr.com/photos/bdsworld/14339473153/

2. “Farm at Fort Steilacoom Park” by Jett Brooks, licensed under CC BY 2.0. https://www.flickr.com/photos/ revjett/7146242099.

(Support for the Democratic Party)

1. Nielsen, François. “The Flemish Movement in Belgium After World War II: A Dynamic Analysis.” American Sociological Review 45, no. 1 (1980): 76-94. Accessed December 2, 2020. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2095244.

2. California Secretary of State. (2020). Statewide Election Results. Retrieved December 11, 2020, from https://www.sos. ca.gov/elections/prior-elections/statewide-election-results

3. Myers, D., Pitkin, J., Park, J. (2005, February). Full 2005 Report: California Demographic Features. Retrieved December 16, 2020, from https://cpb-use1.wpmucdn.com/ sites.usc.edu/dist/6/210/files/2018/08/2005Myers−Pitkin− ParkCA − Demographic − Futures − Projections − 2030 − 1ix789z.pdf

4. Stoops, N. (2004, June). Educational Attainment in the United States: 2003. Retrieved December 11, 2020, from https:// www.census.gov/prod/2004pubs/p20-550.pdf

5. US Census Bureau. (2001). Profile of Selected Social Characteristics: 2000. Retrieved December 11, 2020, from https://data.census.gov/cedsci/table?g=0400000US06

6. US Census Bureau. (2011). Selected Social Characteristics in the United States. Retrieved December 10, 2020, from https://data.census.gov/cedsci/ table?q=california+social+characteristics

(White Supremacy in the Port of Tacoma)

1. Ballantine, A. (2017). The river mouth speaks: Water quality as storyteller in decolonization of the Port of Tacoma. Water History, 9(1), 45–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12685-016-01795

2. Smithsonian National Museum of the American Indian (2014). Medicine Creek Treaty 1854. Nation to Nation: Treaties Between the United States and American Indian Nations.

3. Ybarra, M. (2021). Site Fight! Toward the Abolition of Immigrant Detention on Tacoma’s Tar Pits (and Everywhere Else). Antipode, 53(1), 36–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/ anti.12610

4. Ashby, H., Vazin, J., & Pellow, D. (2020). Superfund Sites and Juvenile Detention: Proximity Analysis in the Western United States. Environmental Justice, 13(3), 65–74. https:// doi.org/10.1089/env.2019.0029

5. 5. Walsh, T., Arcas, D., Venturato, A., Titov, V., Mofjeld, H., Chamberlin, C., & González, F. (2009). Tsunami Hazard Map of Tacoma, Washington: Model Results for Seattle Fault and Tacoma Fault Earthquake Tsunamis. Washington Division of Geology and Earth Resources & NOAA Center for Tsunami Research. https://www.dnr.wa.gov/Publications/ ger_ofr2009-9_tsunami_hazard_tacoma.pdf

(DMN)

1. Raichle ME. 2015. The brain’s default mode network. Ann Rev Neurosci. 38: 433-447.

2. Zhou H, Chen X, Shen Y, Li L, Chen N, Zhu Z, Castellanos FX, Yan C. 2020. Rumination and the default mode network: Meta-analysis of brain imaging studies and implications for depression. NeuroImage. 206.

3. Jia W, Zhu H, Ni Y, Su J, Xu R, Jia H, Wan X. 2019. Disruptions of frontoparietal control network and default mode network linking the metacognitive deficits with clinical symptoms in schizophrenia. Hum Brain Mapp. 41: 1445-1458.

4. Wheeler SW, Dyer NL. 2020. A systematic review of psychedelic-assisted psychotherapy for mental health: An evaluation of the current wave of research and suggestions for the future. American Psychological Association. 7(3): 279-315.

5. Silberstein RB, Pipingas A, Farrow M, Levy F, Stough CK. 2016. Dopaminergic modulation of default mode network brain functional connectivity in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Brain and Behavior, 6(12): 1-12.

6. Nour MM, Evans L, Nutt D, Carhart-Harris RL. 2016. Ego-dissolution and psychedelics: Validation of the egodissolution inventory (EDI). Front Hum Neurosci. 10: 269.

7. Lebedev AV, Lövdén M, Rosenthal G, Feilding A, Nutt DJ, Carhart-Harris RL. 2015. Finding the self by losing the self: Neural correlates of ego-dissolution under psilocybin. Hum Brain Mapp. 36: 3137–3153.

8. Carhart-Harris RL, Roseman L, Bolstridge M, Demetriou L, Pannekoek JN, Wall MB, Nutt DJ. 2017. Psilocybin for treatment-resistant depression: FMRI-measured brain mechanisms. Scientific Reports. 7.

9. Schmalzl L, Powers C, Blom EH. 2015. Neurophysiological and neurocognitive mechanisms underlying the effects of yoga-based practices: Towards a comprehensive theoretical framework. Front Hum Neurosci. 9: 235. 10. Ives-Deliperi VL, Solms M, Meintjes EM. 2011. The neural substrates of mindfulness: an fMRI investigation. Soc. Neurosci. 6: 231–242.

(Perpetual Plastic Puzzle)

1. American Chemical Society. April 3, 2017. “Ridding the Oceans of Plastics by Turning the Waste into Valuable Fuel.” EurekAlert! https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_ releases/2017-04/acs-rto030717.php.

2. Bpf. 2014. “A History of Plastics”. https://www.bpf.co.uk/ plastipedia/plastics_history/Default.aspx.

3. Brown, Sally, and Hanson, Susan. 2019. “Don’t Squander Sand - save It for Sea-level Rise.” Nature (London) 572(7769): 312.

4. C.T. Au, K.D. Chen, H.X. Dai, Y.W. Liu, J.Z. Luo, C.F. Ng. 1998. “Oxidative Dehydrogenation of Ethane to Ethene over BaO- and BaBr2-Modified Ho2O3Catalysts”, Journal of Catalysis. 179(1): 300-308, ISSN 0021-9517, https://doi.org/10.1006/ jcat.1998.2227. (http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/S0021951798922278)

5. Marlin, Dana S., Emeric Sarron, and Ómar Sigurbjörnsson. September 7, 2018. “Process Advantages of Direct CO2 to Methanol Synthesis.” Frontiers. https://www.frontiersin.org/ articles/10.3389/fchem.2018.00446/full.

6. Mohanan, Nisha, Montazer, Zahra, Sharma, Parveen K, and Levin, David B. “Microbial and Enzymatic Degradation of Synthetic Plastics.” Frontiers in Microbiology 11 (2020): 580709.

7. Schaefer, C., Kupwade-Patil, K., Ortega, M., Soriano, C., Buyukozturk, O., White, A., & Short, M. 2017, October 09. Irradiated recycled plastic as a concrete additive for improved chemo-mechanical properties and lower carbon footprint. Retrieved from https://www.osti.gov/servlets/ purl/1481413

8. Shi, Changxia, McGraw, Michael L, Li, Zi-Chen, Cavallo, Luigi, Falivene, Laura, and Chen, Eugene Y.-X. 2020. “Highperformance Pan-tactic Polythioesters with Intrinsic Crystallinity and Chemical Recyclability.” Science Advances. 6(34): Eabc0495.

9. Sun, Y, S.M. Campbell, J.H. Lunsford, G.E. Lewis, D. Palke, L.M. Tau. 1993. “The Catalytic Conversion of Methyl Chloride to Ethylene and Propylene over Phosphorus-Modified Mg- ZSM-5 Zeolites”, Journal of Catalysis. 143(1):32-44, ISSN 00219517, https://doi.org/10.1006/jcat.1993.1251. (http://www. sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021951783712510

10. Thiounn, Timmy, and Rhett C. Smith. 2020. “Advances and Approaches for Chemical Recycling of Plastic Waste.” Journal of Polymer Science. 58(10): 1347–64. https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.1002/pol.20190261.

11. Yoshida, Shosuke, Hiraga, Kazumi, Takehana, Toshihiko, Taniguchi, Ikuo, Yamaji, Hironao, Maeda, Yasuhito, Toyohara, Kiyotsuna, Miyamoto, Kenji, Kimura, Yoshiharu, and Oda, Kohei. 2016. “A Bacterium That Degrades and Assimilates Poly(ethylene Terephthalate).” Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science) 351(6278): 1196-199.

12. Zassa, Della, Micol & Favero, M. & Canu, Paolo. 2010. “Twosteps selective thermal depolymerization of polyethylene. 1: Feasibility and effect of devolatilization heating policy”. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis - Jw ANAL APPL PYROL. 87. 248-255. 10.1016/j.jaap.2010.01.003.

(Caesarean Sections)

1. Gibbons, L, Belizán, J, Lauer, J, Betrán, A, Merialdi, M, and Althabe, F. 2010. The Global Numbers and Costs of Additionally Needed and Unnecessary Caesarean Sections Performed per Year: Overuse as a Barrier to Universal Coverage. World Health Report 2010. 30: 1-32.

2. Johanson, R, Newburn, M and Macfarlane, A. 2002. Has the Medicalisation of Childbirth Gone Too Far? British Medical Journal. 324.

3. Martin, J. A., Hamilton, B. E., Osterman, M. J., & Driscoll, A. K. 2018. Births: Final Data for 2018. National Vital Statistics Reports 27: 1-47.

4. United Health Foundation. 2020. Low-Risk Cesarean Delivery.

5. Davis-Floyd, R. 2001. The technocratic, humanistic, and holistic paradigms of childbirth. International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics. 75(1): S5-S23.

6. Carter, Shannon K. 2010. Beyond Control: Body and Self in Women’s Childbearing Narratives. Sociology of Health & Illness, 32(7):993–1009.

7. Mayo Clinic. 2020. Cesarean Section.

8. McClelland, W., Oster, E. 2019 Oct 17. Why the CS Rate Is So High. The Atlantic.

9. Mattingly, Susan S. 1992. The Maternal-Fetal Dyad Exploring the Two-Patient Obstetric Model. The Hastings Center Report. 22(1):13–18.

10. Turner, C. E., H. 2008. Vaginal Delivery Compared with Elective Caesarean Section: the Views of Pregnant Women and Clinicians. BJOG : an International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 115(12), 1494–1502.

11. Benatar, Sarah, et al. 2013. Midwifery Care at a Freestanding Birth Center: A Safe and Effective Alternative to Conventional Maternity Care. Health Services Research. 48(5): 1750-1768.

12. Lavender, Tina et al. 2012. Caesarean section for nonmedical reasons at term. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 3.

Back cover art courtesy of Pauline Peterson