G4.2 Ex5

Sanitation in Society

Socioeconomic

disparity and planning policy during the industrial revolution.

“Design is the very basis of social life... but design also engineers inequalities and new forms of neglect”

from hell. History Extra. Available at: https://www.historyextra.com/period/victorian/life-in-19th-century-slums-victorian-londons-homes-from-hell/.

Summary

An analysis of how health policies as well as urban planning policies in the industrial revolution, allows us to examine the interconnection between socioeconomic inequality and how planning reforms were enacted to address the sanitation challanges of the era.The Industrial Revolution brought rapid urbanization, exacerbating overcrowding and unsanitary living conditions in cities like Paris and London.In both cities, socioeconomic disparities shaped urban planning and health policies, with initiatives often prioritizing the interests of the elite over marginalized communities.Socioeconomic inequalities profoundly impacted the extent and efficacy of planning and health policies in Paris and London during the Industrial Revolution, highlighting the need for more equitable approach to urban development and public health.

Kingston-Cox, W. 2023. To what extent can Stalin’s policy of industrialisation be considered a success?, Kleio Historical Journal . Available at: https://www.kleiohistoricaljournal.com/post/to-what-extent-can-stalin-s-policy-of-industrialisation-be-considered-a-success.

Industrialisation

The industrial revolution was a time of unprecedented and massive levels of advancements in both technology and manufacturing around the world. Peter Stearns recognised that the urbanisation that was triggered by the industrial revolution created unfounded opportunities for employment in factories all over the world. As massive amounts of people flocked to cities and industrial centres, overcrowded cities and unsanitary living conditions were rampant and became the norm. These dense urban areas were lacking in sufficient infrastructure for both waste disposal as well as clean water supplies, which led to widespread disease outbreaks that triggered a major shift in hygiene and health practices.

Some of the notable consequences of this mass urbanisation caused by the Industrial Revolution that CharlesEdward Amaroy Winslow reflects on was the spread of infectious diseases such as cholera, typhoid fever, and tuberculosis. The poor sanitation as well as the contaminated water supplies, due to the factories and human waste, facilitated the greater spread of these infectious diseases which in turn resulted in high mortality rates, which were predominant amongst the working class population withing areas of over crowded living in slums near the factories.

Rich Vs Poor

Marie’s experience serves as a prime example of the stark contrast in health outcomes between the wealthy and the underprivileged. In affluent districts of Paris and London, access to clean water, improved sanitation, and spacious living conditions acted as protective measures against severe diseases. However, for Marie, a factory worker residing in overcrowded tene-

Factory System. Britannica. Available at: https:// www.britannica.com/topic/ factory-system.

ments filled with dirt and squalor, falling ill was not merely an individual misfortune but a reflection of widespread neglect within the system.

Within the historical context of urbanization outlined by Paul M. Hohenberg and Lynn Hollen Lees in “The Making of Urban Europe,” Marie’s struggles are placed against the backdrop of rapid city growth during the In-

dustrial Revolution that outstripped infrastructural and public health advancements, deepening the divide between the affluent and the impoverished1.

R.J. Morris’ examination in “Cholera. 1832: The Social Response to an Epidemic” delves into how cholera outbreaks in London spurred actions towards implementing public health reforms2. Dorothy Porter’s re-

Notes:

Charles-Edward Amory Winslow’s insights from “The Conquest of Epidemic Disease” further underscore the critical role of public health endeavors in lessening the impact of epidemics on vulnerable communities5.

search on urban rejuvenation efforts in Paris and London also highlights how crises prompted policy interventions aimed at improving living conditions for urban dwellers3. Karl Polanyi’s assertions in “The Great Transformation” emphasize how laissez-faire policies of that era failed to address the social repercussions of industrialization, perpetuating a cycle of poverty and illness4.

1 Paul M. Hohenberg, and Lynn Hollen Lees, 1995, The making of urban Europe, 1000-1994. Cambridge, (MA: Harvard University Press)

2 Morris, R.J. 1976, Cholera, 1832: The Social Response to an Epidemic, (Holmes & Meier Pub)

3 Dorothy Porter, 2005, Health, civilizaEon and the State, doi:10.4324/9780203980576.

4 Polanyi, K. 1957, The Great Transformation, (MA: Beacon Press)

5 Charles-Edward Amory Winslow, 1944, The conquest of epidemic disease, (Princeton: N.J)

Struggle Against Filth and Germs

Paris and London faced significant socioeconomic disparities that had a profound impact on their urban planning strategies and health policies, notably observed in the sanitation initiatives. The book “Paris Reborn” by Stephane Kirkland showcases the extensive urban transformation orchestrated by Napoleon III and Baron Haussmann in Paris6. driven by a vision to modernize and improve the city’s cleanliness. Conversely, Steven Johnson’s work “The Ghost Map” delves into London’s battle against epidemics, particularly highlighting the transformative effects of the Great Stink7. Both cities experienced worsening conditions due to rapid industrialization, resulting in overcrowding, unsanitary living environments, and

How the Industrial Revolution transformed urban Britain’s public health (no date) History Skills. Available at: https://www.historyskills.com/classroom/year-9/urbanisation-reading/.

widespread diseases. Scholars such as Paul M. Hohenberg, Lynn Hollen Lees, and Peter N. Stearns emphasize in their works the severe repercussions of swift urban growth on public health during this period8.

The responses of Paris and London to these challenges were influenced by political, economic, and societal factors. Karl

Notes:

Polanyi’s “The Great Transformation” sheds light on how economic considerations shaped governmental decisions9, while R.J. Morris’s study on sanitary reforms in Victorian Britain and David S. Barnes’s analysis of the Great Stink crisis underline the crucial role of public pressure in compelling authorities to take action10.

era epidemic of 1854 served as a catalyst for implementing sanitation measures.

Charles-Edward Amory Winslow’s “The Conquest of Epidemic Disease” underscores the pivotal role played by scientific advancements in advancing knowledge about infectious diseases and developing effective countermeasures11.

In London, the chol-

6 Kirkland, S. 2014,Paris Reborn (Picador Paper)

7Steven Johnson, 2006, The ghost map: The story of London’s most terrifying epidemic--and how it changed science, CiEes, and the modern world, (New York: Riverhead Books)

8 Paul M. Hohenberg, and Lynn Hollen Lees, 1995

9 Polanyi, K, 1957

10 Morris, R.J, 1976

11 Charles-Edward Amory Winslow, 1944

History.com Editors. Child Labor, HISTORY. Available at: https://www.history. com/topics/industrial-revolution/child-labor.

Economy, Politics and Science

The rapid growth of cities, expanding industries, and political turmoil emphasized the critical necessity for thorough planning and efficient health strategies. However, the implementation and effectiveness of these measures varied significantly due to economic, political, and scientific factors.

tails this ambitious project, highlighting the economic motives driving Haussmann’s creation of grand boulevards and architectural changes12. Nonetheless, these endeavors primarily favored the wealthy, widening socioeconomic gaps and leaving marginalized groups susceptible to health emergencies.

In Paris, Napoleon III’s forward-thinking leadership and Baron Haussmann’s innovative urban development aimed to modernize the city. Kirkland’s “Paris Reborn” de-

Meanwhile, London faced its own difficulties as portrayed in Johnson’s “The Ghost Map”13 and Barnes’s “The Great Stink of Paris.”14 The severe impact of the cholera

Goodman, P. 2023. 10 Facts on the Industrial Revolution, Owlcation. Available at: https://owlcation.com/humanities/12-Facts-on-the

https://owlcation.com/humanities/12-Facts-on-the-Industrial-Revolution.

Notes:

12Kirkland, S. 2014

13Steven Johnson, 2006

outbreak underscored the urgent need for sanitation reforms. Nevertheless, entrenched political interests and laissez-faire economic beliefs impeded unified actions. Morris’s “Sanitary Reform in Victorian Britain” delves into the political obstacles surrounding public health initiatives, exposing authorities’ hesitance to intervene in private matters15.

Furthermore, advancements in understanding disease transmission significantly influenced health policies. Winslow’s “The Conquest of Epidemic Disease” and Weisz’s “Urbanization and the Epidemiologic Transition” il-

14 Barnes, D.S, 2018, The Great Stink of Paris and the nineteenth-century struggle against filth and germs, (BA: Johns Hopkins University Press)

15 Morris, R.J, 1976

16 George Weisz, 1994, ‘The development of medical specializaMon in Nineteenth-Century Paris’, French Medical Culture in the Nineteenth Century, doi:10.1163/9789004418356_009, p 149-188

luminate the evolving scientific discussions during this era16. Despite progress in germ theory, disparities in healthcare access and sanitation persisted, deepening the health gap between affluent individuals and those living in poverty.

Lessons from History

The socioeconomic disparities that emerged during the Industrial Revolution had profound effects on health and urban planning policies, shaping the landscape of modern cities and public health approaches. The rapid industrialization led to overcrowded and unsanitary living conditions for the working class, which resulted in widespread health problems and highlighted the need for urban reform. These historical lessons underscore the critical importance of equitable urban planning and public health policies.

A notable parallel can be drawn between the exploitation of factory workers during the Industrial Revolu-

tion and the contemporary exploitation of labor in modern factories, particularly in developing countries. The harsh working conditions, low wages, and inadequate health provisions that characterized the 19th-century factories are alarmingly similar to those faced by many workers today. This continuity of exploitation reflects a persistent double standard, where the West often benefits from cheap labor while failing to address or adequately respond to the poor conditions that sustain their consumer markets.

The exploitation of workers in modern factories, much like during the Industrial Revolution, is driven by the

pursuit of profit at the expense of human welfare. Western countries, while enjoying the economic benefits of inexpensive goods, often overlook the ethical implications of such practices. This perpetuates a cycle of inequality and neglects the need for comprehensive labor reforms that ensure fair wages, safe working conditions, and access to healthcare for all workers.

The historical context of the Industrial Revolution serves as a crucial reminder of the need for vigilance and advocacy in addressing labor exploitation. It highlights the importance of implementing and enforcing policies that protect workers’ rights and promote sustainable, equitable development. As we reflect on the lessons of the past, it is imperative to hold corporations and governments accountable for ensuring that progress does not come at the cost of human dignity and health.

Bibliography

Amory, W.C.E. 1944. The conquest of epidemic disease. Princeton: N.J.

Barnes, D.S. 2018. The Great Stink of Paris and the nineteenth-century struggle against filth and germs. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Hohenberg, P.M. and Lees, L.H. 1995. The making of urban Europe, 1000-1994. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Johnson, S. 2006. The ghost map: The story of London’s most terrifying epidemic--and how it changed science, CiMes, and the modern world. New York: Riverhead Books. Polanyi, K. 1957. The Great Transformation. Boston. Massachusetts: Beacon Press.

Porter, D. 2005. Health, civilization and the State. doi:10.4324/9780203980576.

Morris, R.J. .1976. Cholera, 1832: The Social Response to an Epidemic. Holmes & Meier Pub.

Weisz, G. 1994. ‘The development of medical specialization in Nineteenth-Century Paris’, French Medical Culture in the Nineteenth Century, pp. 149–188. doi:10.1163/9789004418356_009.

https://issuu.com/elenazekirias12/docs/g4.2-ex.

Checklist

⃝ Adhered to the word limit in the summary and the article.

⃝ Inserted the main quote by C+W on the inside of the front cover.

⃝ Followed the 5-sentence template in writing of the summary.

⃝ Inserted word count of the summary.

⃝ Inserted word count of the article.

⃝ Adhered to the prescribed number of spreads.

⃝ Adhered to the prescribed number of images.

⃝ Researched and cited the required number of sources.

⃝ Uploaded PDF file on issuu.com and provided active link on the from cover.

⃝ Inserted the checklist on the back cover.

⃝ Uploaded final PDF file on MyUni and Box.

⃝ Uploaded final Black+Blue word file on MyUni and Box.