International News

OBSERVERS FAULT SIERRA LEONE ELECTION FOR ‘IRREGULARITIES’

with 56% of the vote. His opponent, Samura Kamara, reportedly trailed in the low 40s.

security services and the opposition party on the day after elections further flared political tensions.

(GIN) — Recent national elections in Sierra Leone were swiftly rejected by the main opposition party, citing “glaring irregularities” and “violations of established electoral procedures.”

“We can no longer tolerate injustice, tyranny, or usurpation of power,” the opposition All People’s Congress (APC) wrote in an official statement. African and European observers also reported statistical inconsistencies in the balloting.

President Julius Maada Bio carried the election for a second term in office by a narrow margin

Bio’s victory came as a surprise, what with soaring inflation, high rates of poverty and unemployment, and widespread food insecurity over the past year. Popular protests were met with a deadly state response. Polls have shown that 60 percent of Sierra Leonians believe their country is headed in the wrong direction, which led many to expect a decisive number of “change” votes in the June 24 general election. Few expected the incumbent to be re-elected in the first round, which required that he take over 55 percent of the votes cast. But as the votes were tallied, key logistical challenges were noted, such as the late delivery of election materials to polling centers and delayed opening of polling stations. Some cases of inadequate public communication from the Electoral Commission were noted, as were gaps in levels of transparency. Skirmishes, police arrests, and attacks on polling officials and political party agents further undermined the exercise. A confrontation between

Members of the African Union, West African Elders Forum, and Ecowas expressed dismay over inflammatory language being used on social media. A joint statement from the U.S., UK, Ireland, Germany, France, and the EU delegation went further. In the joint statement, they wrote: “We note that significant logistical problems hampered voting on election day in certain areas. We share the concerns of national and international observation missions about the lack of transparency in the tabulation process.”

However, the note ended with a positive spin: “Despite these difficulties, we remain committed to supporting democracy and the aspirations of the Sierra Leonean people. We urge everyone to exercise restraint, respect the rule of law,and engage in peaceful dialogue to resolve disputes.”

This was Kamara’s second and possibly final run for the presidency. He sold himself as an economic czar, the candidate with the expe- rience to fix the economy, which he believes has been poorly managed. An economist with the World Bank, the IMF, and as the country’s Minister of Finance, he promised to fix the economy. However, those with a longer memory recalled his brushes with the law.

Kamara faced allegations of fraud in dealings that led to the sales of the country’s shares in the mining company Sierra Rutile. His case was later referred to the country’s anti-graft body, the Anti-Corruption Commission, in what he and his party dismissed as a “witch hunt.”

Later, he and other former government officials were named in a $2.5 million corruption case involving a contract for Sierra Leone’s Chancery building in New York. The case focuses on his role in the deal as foreign affairs minister. After 18 months, the case has been adjourned to continue after the elections in July.

While both candidates served in the military junta under Valentine Strasser, known as the National Provisional Ruling Council (NPRC), Bio