A Nation In Reverse

By STATE SENATOR KEVIN PARKER

In the recent past, the powers that be in Washington, D.C., have been steering this nation on a reverse collision course by rolling back several civil liberties enshrined in the Constitution. The 14th Amendment established the theory of “substantive due process” and “the equal protection of the laws” for citizens. It’s a concept that underpins many liberties that we, as Americans, take for granted today. In particular, the privacy right to contraception, the right to marry another of a different race or the same sex, and a woman’s right to choose, are all constitutional rights and freedoms imperil at the gavel of today’s Supreme Court. In what uncomfortably feels like a systemic maneuver to take us back through the dark doors of our nation’s history, the Supreme Court has been viciously ripping these rights at the seams, thus destroying the very fabric of our democracy.

plan. “We have to have a Plan B because those who created Plan A, that I inherited, obviously didn’t.” Despite being halfway through his term, Mayor Adams has not come up with a Plan B and is still following Plan A. This means that the next mayor will have to deal with the consequences, and the taxpayers will continue to bear the burden of billions of dollars wasted with no results.

We proposed a Plan B www.rikersreset.com that involves staying on Rikers and sharing it with LaGuardia Airport. Why not stay on Rikers and transform it into a beacon, showing the rest of the world how reducing recidivism, rehabilitation, and ending generational incarceration can look if done correctly? It is worth noting similar advancements were made on Roosevelt Island, when known as Blackwell Island, over 70 years ago. Turning the tarnished island and ruins of dilapidated jail facilities, mental asylums, and alehouses into today’s Roosevelt Island. New York City is no stranger to these kinds of advancements.

Member

for

Kristin Fayne-Mulroy: Managing Editor

Nayaba Arinde: Editor

Cyril Josh Barker: Digital Editor

Damaso Reyes: Investigative Editor

Siobhan "Sam" Bennett: Chief Revenue Officer and Head of Advertising

The most recent example is the Supreme Court’s decision to roll back affirmative action in higher education. Affirmative action was first established in a 1965 executive order that instructed employers to “take affirmative action to ensure that equal opportunity is provided in all aspects of their employment.” The Supreme Court then sanctioned affirmative action for university admissions constitutional in 1978 and subsequently on two other occasions. But late last month, the conservative justices of our highest court rendered a deadly blow to the future of affirmative action with a majority ruling erroneously recognizing the vestiges of slavery — the Black Codes, Jim Crow, and the New Jim Crow as relics, rather than the current reality for Black and Brown people. The conservative justices mistakenly believe that the adverse effects of generations of discrimination have been cured. Today’s Court concluded that the educational benefits that flow from a diverse student body are no longer a compelling government interest in admissions decisions to allow states to craft narrowly tailored affirmative action policies. In her dissenting opinion, Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote that the court’s ruling “rolls back decades of precedent and momentous progress,” adding that it cements “a superficial rule of colorblindness as a constitutional principle in an endemically segregated society where race has always mattered and continues to matter.” I couldn’t agree more.

Though the decision was rendered in the context of educational opportunities, the ruling provides a bleak forecast for other areas of affirmative action, like in the awarding contracts to increase opportunities for minority-owned women businesses.. Moreover, universities have warned that eliminating affirmative action would significantly impact student diversity on campus. For instance, administrators at Harvard University posit that taking race out of its admissions process would reduce enrollment of Black students from 14% to 6% of its student body, and Hispanic enrollment from 14% to 9%.. The dire prediction also indicates that the ruling will result in a 14% drop in students studying the humanities.

This wave of reverse action began when the Supreme Court completely decimated one of the most important decisions in our modern era – the 1973 landmark case affirming a woman’s constitutional right to an abortion. In June 2022, the Supreme Court, in one of its most gutwrenching reversals, dismantled Roe v. Wade, Here again, the disproportionately affected people are Black women who, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, are 3 to4 times more likely to die from pregnancy-related complications than white women.

But before the ink had dried on the recent affirmative action ruling, another Supreme Court decision signaled that LBGTQ rights and marriage equality are on a precarious legal footing. Ear-

See NATION IN REVERSE on page 29