4 minute read

Senecas denounce Hochul’s veto of unmarked burial protection act

of the families of lineal descendants and other groups.” blatant disregard for Native issues and priorities coming from New York’s Executive Chamber is disturbing,” Armstrong said. “For more than two centuries, our governments, our people and our priorities have been greeted with a deafening silence and contempt from New York governors. We see little hope for change based on recent actions.”

The Seneca Nation plans to submit a resolution further condemning Governor Hochul’s veto to the National Congress of American Indians and the United South and Eastern Tribes for their consideration and support.

Advertisement

Armstrong said the Legislature acted to protect the many sacred Natives sites and to extend to Native nations the dignity and respect they deserve. With every vote cast in support of the bill, he said Hochul’s signature was the only thing needed.

SALAMANCA

— The Seneca Nation has denounced Gov. Kathy Hochul’s veto of a bill that would have protected unmarked Native American burial sites in New York state.

Seneca officials called the Dec. 30 veto a “continued pattern in Albany of turning a deaf ear to Native priorities.”

At its first official meeting of 2023 on Saturday, the Seneca Nation Council unanimously approved a resolution formally voicing the Nation’s opposition to the governor’s action.

“The importance of the Unmarked Burial Site Protection Act to Native people cannot be overstated, and its rejection by the governor was an affront to Native nations, our people and our ancestors,” said Seneca Nation President Rickey Armstrong, Sr. Hochul’s veto keeps New York as one of only four states without protective measures in place. The act was passed by both the state Senate and Assembly in late May and early June of 2022, respectively. Prior versions of the bill had been first introduced in 2009.

“The Seneca people have lived, raised our families and been laid to rest in our ancestral lands from time immemorial,” Armstrong said. “Because of our forced relocation from our expansive ancestral lands to our presentday territories over hundreds of years, the final resting places of all of our ancestors is likely unknowable.”

The Act would have required the “cessation of all ground-disturbing activities upon the discovery of a burial ground, human remains or funerary objects” and would have further required a determination of whether the remains were of Native American origin and, if so, the remains would have been returned to the Native Nation from which they likely originated.

Armstrong said the act would have finally given Native communities “a true voice in honoring our moral and ethical obligation to protect those most sacred sites from destruction and desecration.”

In her veto memo, Hochul wrote that the bill fails to “balance the rights of property owners with the interests

“Instead, New York decided to remain on the sidelines, allowing property and development interests to maintain their priority position over people,” he continued. “The governor’s decision demonstrates an utter disregard for the fundamental rights of Native nations, Native people and all New Yorkers.”

Seneca Nation officials accuse Hochul’s veto as the latest action in a long pattern of disrespect in Albany for the rights of Native nations and people.

“The continued

New York, New Jersey and Wyoming are among the four states that do not have a process when burials are unearthed on private property through unintentional excavation. Unmarked grave protection legislation was drafted in Ohio but failed to meet the threshold for introduction in the Ohio General Assembly.

In addition to vetoing the Unmarked Burial Site Protection Act, Hochul previously vetoed another bill that would have given the Montaukett Indian Nation on Long Island state recognition, which also passed the state assembly. A third bill that would have established an office of Native American affairs never made it out of committee.

The following are just a handful of the many great reasons to visit your local library.

• Reading may help improve long-term mental health. A 2001 study from researchers at Case Western Reserve University found that patients with Alzheimer’s disease were less active in early and middle adulthood in regard to intellectual, passive and physical activities than people who did not have AD. Young adults and middle-aged men and women who visit their local libraries and check out a good book might decrease their risk for cognitive decline later in life.

• Reading can improve your vocabulary, even as you get older. Reading for pleasure as a child has long been linked to helping young people age 16 and under develop strong reading and math skills. But a recent study from researchers at the University of London that examined how the vocabularies of more than 9,400 people developed between the ages of 16 and 42 found that vocabulary continued to improve long after teenage years. By continuing to read books from their local libraries into adulthood, adults can further develop their vocabularies.

• Libraries provide lots of free entertainment. Libraries are home to thousands of books, but that’s not all you can find at your local branch. Newspapers, magazines, CDs, and DVDs are some examples of the forms of entertainment available at local libraries. Better yet, such entertainment is free to card holders.

• Libraries offer age-appropriate programs for kids. Some parents may lament the lack of programs available for their youngsters. Such parents are urged to visit their local libraries, which are often home to many programs that can inspire kids to read and foster their creativity. The scope of kid-friendly programs at your local library is wide and may range from sing-a-long sessions for toddlers to group art programs for preschool-aged children to STEM-based programs for elementary and secondary school students.

The local library is an invaluable resource than can benefit people of all ages.

This article is from: