NUR504 ( all weeks discussions and assignments ) Entire Course
https://homeworklance.com/downloads/nur504-all-weeks-discussions-and-assignments-entire-course/
NUR504 ( all weeks discussions and assignments ) Entire Course NUR504 Week 1 Write a summary of 750-1,000 words that includes the following criteria: 1. An introduction that explains the focus of the article. 2. A summary of key points of the article. 3. A list of the steps taken by nursing to develop and implement an EBP. 4. Application of the learned information to a practice setting where the student either identifies an EBP that has been applied to your setting or a practice problem that would benefit from the implementation of an EBP. 5. A clear and concise conclusion. This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment. Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Refer to the directions in the Student Success Center. Only Word documents can be submitted to Turnitin. NUR504 week2 Choose two scholarly, peer-reviewed articles about research studies. The articles can be found using the GCU Library or any of the sources recommended in the readings. Address the following: 1. One article must be an example of a qualitative research study; the other must be a quantitative example. 2. These articles will be utilized for assignments in Modules 3, 4, 6 and 8. 3. Write a 350-500-word statement which includes: 4. A description of why each research study is categorized as quantitative or qualitative. 5. A justification for your selections. 6. The journal page reference for the research study selected and the reasons why it was selected. 7. A link to the selected articles or an attached copy of each article. APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected. You are not required to submit this assignment to Turnitin, unless otherwise directed by your instructor. If so directed, refer to the Student Success Center for directions. Only Word documents can be submitted to Turnitin NUR504 week3 This is a CLC Assignment.
You will be assigned to a CLC group by the instructor. Within your group, follow the instructions provided in the CLC Assignment: Evidence-Based Practice Project (EBP). Finalize the CLC Agreement. CLC Assignment: Evidence-Based Project (EBP) Group work has benefits and liabilities. Everyone assigned to a CLC is expected to equally participate in the work in terms of time and quality of effort. The assignment should be apportioned to make the best use of the strengths of individual team members. Some of you are natural leaders. Your strengths can be your greatest liabilities. No one wants to be bossed around no matter how skilled the boss. Honest communication is critical to effective group work. The best way to avoid conflict is to set very clear expectations. Then, if someone does not do what is expected, he or she can be referred to the original agreement rather than have the confrontation become personal. At the end of the project, students will have an opportunity to evaluate each other. These evaluations will be taken into consideration when grading individuals within the group. The grade will be given for the project as compared to the rubric for evaluation. Depending on your evaluations, individual grades will be equal to or less than the overall grade. Course faculty are able to observe the process in the CLC forum. If your work takes place outside the forum, this information will be absent. Be certain, even if you communicate via e-mail, phone, or face-to-face, to record the communication in the CLC forum. NOTE: The final course of your program will require you to develop and implement an EBP guideline. This is your opportunity to learn the process and perhaps even identify an area of interest. Your choice of a topic for the capstone course should be related to your area of specialty. Each course you take will provide you with the opportunity to investigate theory and empirical literature to identify the relevant evidence you will need to complete this project. The more effort you expend now to learn this process, the easier it will be for you to complete the program efficiently. Topic 1: Collaborative Learning Community: EBP Agreement 1) Check into your CLC group. a) Describe your prior experience with evidence-based practice (EBP) includingparticipation in developing EBP guidelines or protocols for changing practice. CLC Agreement 1) Review the CLC Agreement a) Choose one member totransfer the CLC Agreement to the CLC forum, input the CLC’s responses for all sections of the Agreement, and submit the CLC Agreement. b) Each member should provide their contact information on the CLC Agreement and decide what tasks in the Project Management Specifics section they will be responsible for. c) In the CLC Forum, discuss and provide responses for each component of the CLC Agreement. The CLC Group Review Process will be completed at the end of your project. d) Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of working in a team environment. 2) Record all communication in the CLC Forum. 3) Complete the CLC agreement, except for the CLC Group Review Process. 4) Submit the completed CLC Agreement to the instructor at the end of Topic 2. Topic 2: Collaborative Learning Community: EBP Agreement. Brainstorm: Initiate conversation regarding potential topics of interest. 1) This should be a nursing related problem, that is, a problem related to nursing practice, advance practice,
leadership, or education. . 2) Identify several topics of interest and have individual group members do a quick survey of the literature to be sure that there is evidence available. 3) In order to develop a guideline/protocol, you will need credible resources. Read pages 29-34 for guidance in identifying sources of evidence. a) The course readings include all of the information needed to complete this project. Chapters 1 and 2 provided the necessary information regarding EBP and how to find evidence. Chapter 5 provides strategies for locating credible information. The sooner these chapters are read carefully, with the project in mind, the easier it will be. 4) Record all communication in the CLC Forum. Topic 3: Collaborative Learning Community: EBP Identification of Clinical Question 1) Refer to Figure 2.2 in the textbook for the model you will use to complete this project. a. Note that you will not complete the entire process in this model, you will reach the step entitled,Pilot the change in practice. 2) As a group, finalize your choice of topic. a. Review the literature regarding clinical problems presented in the previous topic in order to ensure that there is adequate evidence for your choice. b. State your topic in the form of a problem statement and a foreground question. c. The course readings include all of the information you need to complete this project. d. Record all communication in the CLC Forum. 3) Choose one team member to submit the completed assignment and initial reference list to the instructor by the end of Topic4. Topic 4: Collaborative Learning Community: EBP Literature Search/Appraisal of Evidence 1) UseFigure 2.1, Evidence hierarchy pyramid, inthe textbook as your guide for the levels of evidence in your reference list. 2) Locate case studies, relevant clinical articles written by experts, research articles,, evidence based guidelines and protocolsand theory that may guide the identification of appropriate solutions. This can include the articles reviewed from topic 3. Note, not all theories will have research that allows them to have a level assigned to them. This does not mean they are not good theories. 3) Appraise the evidence using the guidelines provided on pages 37-40 in the textbook. a. Use these guidelines to discard references that are untrustworthy or irrelevant. b. Use Box 2.2 to help with this decision-making process. 4) Use the following to organize the evidence by commonalities and/or contrary findings: a. Chapter 5in the textbook provides information regarding how to synthesize the article findings. b. Use the EBP Project Evaluation tool located in resources to consolidate and present the findings 5) Record all communication in the CLC Forum. Topic 5: Collaborative Learning Community: EBP Literature Search/Appraisal of Evidence 1) Continue with the articles used inTopic 4. 2) Complete the Synthesis Table for the evidence and variables for the guideline. a. Limit the articles to no more than ten; two per student in the CLC group would be reasonable.
b. A true proposal would require a comprehensive review of the literature and inclusion of all relevant works. 3) Record all communications in the CLC Forum. Topic 6: Collaborative Learning Community: EBP Develop Clinical Guideline and Implementation Plan 1) Initiate work on developing a guideline or protocol based on your search of the literature. 2) Consider how to implement the intervention to test the protocol. 3) Identify potential barriers and describe strategies to gain cooperation from individuals who will be implementing the change. 4) Record all communication in the CLC Forum. Topic 7: Collaborative Learning Community: EBP Development Guidelines and Implementation Plan 1. Complete the protocol and write the plan to pilot the change in practice. 2. The Clinical Guidelines should include the problem statement, EBP question, literature review, along with all the tables used to arrive at the conclusion (can be appendices), the clinical protocol, and the implementation plan.. There is no specific template for this guideline/assignment. 3. The Implementation Plan for the protocol should include a timeline with criteria for evaluating the outcomes. 4. Use APA style headings for each section with subheadings as appropriate. a. References should include all documents used for literature review along with sources used to guide the process. 1. Record all communication in the CLC Forum. 6. Submit the completed assignment to the instructor on the last day of Topic 7 and have one CLC member post the completed assignment all together in Topic 8 discussion forum. Address the following: 1. Write one research summary that uses a quantitative research design. 2. Write one research summary that uses a qualitative research design. 3. Each summary should be 250-500 words and should follow the template, Summarize Research Articles. 4. Use APA Level Heading 2 to separate the distinct parts of the study. These article summaries will form the basis of the Critique of Research Studies Parts 1-3 assignments in modules 4, 6, and 8. Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment. You are not required to submit this assignment to Turnitin, unless otherwise directed by your instructor. If so directed, refer to the Student Success Center for directions. Only Word documents can be submitted to Turnitin. NUR 504 Summarize Research Articles Directions: Use the templates below when summarizing your research articles. Include a cover page, and start a new page for each article summary. Use level 1 and 2 headings when composing the summaries to separate distinct parts. Title of Quantitative Article (Example of text: This article was authored by Watson and James and published in the Journal of Nursing Research
in 2008. This article was selected as an example of a quasi-experimental design.The model summary selected for this paper is found on page 90 to 91of the textbook.This is a summary of a quasi-experimental study in which though there is a comparison group; subjects were not randomly assigned to groups. The research article being summarized also is an experiment that used a comparison group without randomization.) Problem Statement Statement of Purpose Research Question(s)/Hypothesis Study Methods Key Findings Citation Title of Qualitative Article (Example of text:Ramirez (2008) studied adolescent depression and the influence of significant adults on the course of the depression.The model summary utilized is found on page 91of the textbook. It was selected because it is an example of a grounded theory study as is the article selected.) Problem Statement Statement of Purpose Research Question(s) Method Key Findings Citation NUR 504 week4 This is a CLC assignment. Follow the instructions provided in “CLC Assignment: Evidence-Based Project (EBP).� Utilize the Synthesis Table, Table of Evidence and EBA Project Evaluation Tool to complete your CLC assignment. Submit these documents in Topic 5 as the CLC assignment. APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected. You are not required to submit this assignment to Turnitin, unless otherwise directed by your instructor. If so directed, refer to the Student Success Center for directions. Only Word documents can be submitted to Turnitin. Synthesis Table Example Synthesis Table Example Name of Article Name of Article Name of Article Name of Article Levels of Evidence Study Design Variable to be studied Variable to be studied Variable to be studied Compare template above to my table below. At a glance you can see the names of the most important articles I choose, the level of evidence of that study, what the design was, and what variables were important to know about in each article. As you study the table, the reader can clearly see more studies in support of BiPAP than IS along with other information that would be of interest to the provider to support standards of care. Table 2 Synthesis of IS and NIPPV Evidence /Types of Surgery Follow the instructions provided in Critique of Research Studies Instructions. Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment. You are not required to submit this assignment to Turnitin, unless otherwise directed by your instructor. If so directed, refer to the Student Success Center for directions. Only Word documents can be submitted to Turnitin.
Critique of Research Studies Instructions Directions: Complete a critique of the quantitative and qualitative articles that were submitted in Module 3. This assignment will be completed in three parts. Refer to the information below as a guide to the information that should be included in each part. Follow the guidelines for the quantitative and qualitative article critiques in Chapter 5, Box 5.2, pages 112-114 and Box 5.3, pages 115-117 of the textbook. 1) Utilize a central heading to indicate that what follows is the critique of the articles. 2) The side headings of the critique for each article should follow the headings in Box 5.2 and 5.3. 3) Note that within these BASIC guidelines, there are additional references to Detailed Critiquing Guidelines found in various boxes in chapters focused on the various elements of a research study report. Use these to expand the research study and to learn specific terminology appropriate to the critique of research. When turning in the final submission, please put in the the following order: Quantitative Article Critique, Qualitative Article Critique, References (should include the two articles, the text, and any other additional sources). Critique of Research Studies – Part 1: Due Module 4 For Part 1 of the critique, focus only on the following segments for each article: Quantitative Qualitative • Title • Title • Abstract • Abstract • Introduction • Introduction o Statement of the problem o Statement of the problem o Hypotheses or research questions o Research questions o Literature review o Literature review o Conceptual/theoretical framework o Conceptual underpinnings Critique of Research Studies – Part 2: Due Module 6 For Part 2 of the critique, focus only on the following segments for each article: Quantitative Qualitative • Method • Method o Protection of human rights o Protection of participants’ rights o Research design o Research design and research tradition o Population and sample o Sample and setting o Data collection and measurement o Data collection o Procedures o Procedures o Enhancement of trustworthiness Critique of Research Studies – Part 3: Due Module 8 For Part 3 of the critique, focus only on the following segments for each article: Quantitative Qualitative • Results • Results
o Data analysis o Data analysis o Findings o Findings • Discussion o Theoretical integrations o Interpretation of findings • Discussion o Implications/recommendations o Interpretation of the findings • Global Issues o Implications/recommendations o Presentation • Global Issues o Researcher credibility o Presentation o Summary assessment o Researcher credibility o Summary assessment NUR504 week5 This is a CLC assignment. Follow the instructions provided in CLC Assignment: Evidence-Based Project (EBP). Utilize the Synthesis Table, Table of Evidence and EBA Project Evaluation Tool to complete your CLC assignment. Submit these documents for this weeks CLC assignment. While APA format is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment. You are not required to submit this assignment to Turnitin, unless otherwise directed by your instructor. If so directed, refer to the Student Success Center for directions. Only Word documents can be submitted to Turnitin. Synthesis Table Example Name of Article Name of Article Name of Article Name of Article Levels of Evidence Study Design Variable to be studied Variable to be studied Variable to be studied Compare template above to my table below. At a glance you can see the names of the most important articles I choose, the level of evidence of that study, what the design was, and what variables were important to know about in each article. As you study the table, the reader can clearly see more studies in support of BiPAP than IS along with other information that would be of interest to the provider to support standards of care. Table 2 Synthesis of IS and NIPPV Evidence /Types of Surgery NUR504 week6 Follow the instructions provided in Critique of Research Studies Instructions. Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.
You are not required to submit this assignment to Turnitin, unless otherwise directed by your instructor. If so directed, refer to the Student Success Center for directions. Only Word documents can be submitted to Turnitin Critique of Research Studies Instructions Directions: Complete a critique of the quantitative and qualitative articles that were submitted in Topic 3. This assignment will be completed in three parts. Refer to the information below as a guide to the information that should be included in each part. Follow the guidelines for the quantitative and qualitative article critiques in Chapter 5, Box 5.2, pages 112-114 and Box 5.3, pages 115-117 of the textbook or the Research Critique Additional Template Resource. 1) Utilize a central heading to indicate that what follows is the critique of the articles. 2) The side headings of the critique for each article should follow the headings in Box 5.2 and 5.3. 3) Note that within these BASIC guidelines, there are additional references to Detailed Critiquing Guidelines found in various boxes in chapters focused on the various elements of a research study report. Use these to expand the research study and to learn specific terminology appropriate to the critique of research. When turning in the final submission, please put in thefollowing order: Quantitative Article Critique, Qualitative Article Critique, References (should include the two articles, the text, and any other additional sources). NUR504 week7 This is a CLC assignment. Follow the instructions provided “CLC Assignment: Evidence-Based Project (EBP).� Utilize the Synthesis Table, Table of Evidence, and EBA Project Evaluation Tool to complete your CLC assignment. Submit these documents at the completion of the CLC assignment. While APA format is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment NUR-504: Table of Evidence Study 1 Study 2 Study 3 Study 4 Study 5 Author Study title Research Questions Design Setting/Sample Methods: intervention/instruments Analysis Key findings Recommendations How this supports EBP/Capstone EBP Project Evaluation NUR504 week8
Follow the instructions provided in Critique of Research Studies instructions. When turning in the final submission, please put in the following order: Quantitative Article Critique, Qualitative Article Critique, References (should include the two articles, the text, and any other additional sources). Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment. You are not required to submit this assignment to Turnitin, unless otherwise directed by your instructor. If so directed, refer to the Student Success Center for directions. Only Word documents can be submitted to Turnitin. Critique of Research Studies Instructions Directions: Complete a critique of the quantitative and qualitative articles that were submitted in Topic 3. This assignment will be completed in three parts. Refer to the information below as a guide to the information that should be included in each part. Follow the guidelines for the quantitative and qualitative article critiques in Chapter 5, Box 5.2, pages 112-114 and Box 5.3, pages 115-117 of the textbook or the Research Critique Additional Template Resource. 1) Utilize a central heading to indicate that what follows is the critique of the articles. 2) The side headings of the critique for each article should follow the headings in Box 5.2 and 5.3. 3) Note that within these BASIC guidelines, there are additional references to Detailed Critiquing Guidelines found in various boxes in chapters focused on the various elements of a research study report. Use these to expand the research study and to learn specific terminology appropriate to the critique of research. When turning in the final submission, please put in thefollowing order: Quantitative Article Critique, Qualitative Article Critique, References (should include the two articles, the text, and any other additional sources). Critique of Research Studies – Part 1: Due Topic 4 For Part 1 of the critique, focus only on the following segments for each article: Quantitative Qualitative • Title • Title • Abstract • Abstract • Introduction • Introduction o Statement of the problem o Statement of the problem o Hypotheses or research questions o Research questions o Literature review o Literature review o Conceptual/theoretical framework o Conceptual underpinnings Critique of Research Studies – Part 2: Due Topic 6 For Part 2 of the critique, focus only on the following segments for each article: Quantitative Qualitative • Method • Method o Protection of human rights o Protection of participants’ rights o Research design o Research design and research tradition o Population and sample o Sample and setting o Data collection and measurement o Data collection o Procedures o Procedures o Enhancement of trustworthiness Critique of Research Studies – Part 3: Due Topic 8 For Part 3 of the critique, focus only on the following segments for each article: Quantitative Qualitative • Results • Results
o Data analysis o Data analysis o Findings o Reliability and Validity o Findings • Discussion o Theoretical integrations o Interpretation of findings • Discussion o Implications/recommendations o Interpretation of the findings • Global Issues o Implications/recommendations o Presentation • Global Issues o Researcher credibility o Presentation o Summary assessment o Researcher credibility o Summary assessment