ericlyons
contents
european place design // cologne, germany
01
participatory design // state college, pa
03
planting design // penn state west campus
05
student service learning // tanzania, africa
07
ecosystem study // baltimore, md
09
eco-tourism exploration // sullivan county, pa
11
community design // state college, pa
13
regional planning // spring creek watershed, pa
15
stormwater conveyance // state college, pa
17
technical drawings 19 render variations // penn state campus
21
model exploration // penn state campus internship studies // beechbrook LA
22 23
photography 25 contact 27
01
european place design // cologne, germany With the redevelopment of the Cologne Green Belt in the process of masterplanning, this site design focuses on the adjacent corridor to the Grossmarkt Hall, a historical wholesale market for the city. The importance of a versatile and attractive space for this area is vital to the success of the green belt restoration. As the Grossmarkt Hall‘s program changes, the landscape surrounding must also reflect the development in the new city quarter. The design focuses on the historical aspects of the Grossmarkt floor plan and past rail line axes while incorporating new program to draw visitors from not only the new quarter, but the entire city. The creation of a new parcel of land dedicated to community gardens will provide much needed green activity future inhabitants. Connecting the community garden aspect to the main plaza of the Grossmarkt Hall will be a farmers market occuring during the Site for Plan 1:1000 week, providing fresh, local foods as well as a lunchtime market for the community. When the Grossmarkt houses large crowds, the plaza acts as an overflow space as well as a formal entrance from Bonner Strasse. The goal of the design is to continue the greenbelt to the River Rhine and to act as a social, cultural, and economic hub for the city of Cologne.
Concept Statement With the redevelopment of the Cologne Green Belt in the process of masterplanning, this site design focuses on the adjacent corridor to the Grossmarkt Hall, a historical wholesale market for the city. The importance of a versatile and attractive space for this area is vital to the success of the green belt restoration. As the Grossmarkt Hall‘s program changes, the landscape surrounding must also reect the development in the new city quarter. The design focuses on the historical aspects of the Grossmarkt oor plan and past rail line axes while incorporating new program to draw visitors from not only the new quarter, but the entire city.
Program n Gree
d Tree
Belt
Circulation
ons
ecti onn
C
a
Plaz
, rain le, T
Vehic
cle Bicy
ns
arde
ity G
mun
Com
The creation of a new parcel of land dedicated to community gardens will provide much needed green activity for future inhabitants. Connecting the community garden aspect to the main plaza of the Grossmarkt Hall will be a farmers market occuring during the week, providing fresh, local foods as well as a lunchtime market for the community. When the Grossmarkt houses large crowds, the plaza acts as an overow space as well as a formal entrance from Bonner Strasse. The goal of the design is to continue the greenbelt to the River Rhine and to act as a social, cultural, and economic hub for the city of Cologne.
ian estr Ped
Tram
02
03
participatory design // state college, pa For this design, the project worked with a 3rd grade class at Park Forest Elementary School to develop an outdoor classroom. Through design charettes, the design developed from ideas from students and teachers. The final package was a “how to� packet with construction and installation instructions as well as student involvement and cost estimate.
04
the mixed bed
05
planting design // penn state west campus
Design Statement Design Statement
Illustrative IllustrativeSketch SketchPlan Plan
NorthView ViewEntrance EntrancePath Path North
Eastern Redbud
The concept of this mixed bed is to create a planting design that flows in and out of the The concept of athis mixed bedpath. is toThe create a planting design thatthe flows in and outtoofevoke the building along meandering pattern of waves allows planting bed building along a meandering The pattern waves allows the planting bed to evoke movement along the sidewalk.path. A diverse array ofofflowering perennials and ornamental trees movement sidewalk. A diverse array of flowering perennials andend ornamental trees will create aalong wavethe as the blooming seasons evolve. As one plant nears the of a bloom, the will create wave asmimicking the blooming seasons evolve. As thetoend of a bloom, the next flowera begins, a wave throughout theone bedplant fromnears spring winter. The heights next flower begins, mimicking a wave throughout the bed from spring to winter. The heights of the plants were also selected to create a physical wave in the form. of the plants were also selected to create a physical wave in the form.
the mixed bed 14. 14. 14.
1. 1. 1.
24” x 48” Tree Grate (2 sides)
Tree Grate Frame In-Grate Light Fixture
Rootball See Note 8; L1 4” PVC Irrigation/ Aeration Pipe
Planting Information Planting Information
18. 18. 18.
6. 6. 6.
Ground Cover Spring Bloom Ground Cover Spring Bloom
26. 26. 26.
Illustrative Sketch Plan
5. 5. 5.
1. 1. 1.
21. 21. 21.
11. 11. 11.
1.
Design Statement Creeping Phlox Creeping Creeping Phlox PhloxPhlox subulata Phlox Phlox subulata subulata
Planting Information
Ground Cover Summer Summer Bloom Bloom Ground Cover Blue Fumeroot
18. 6.
Ground Cover Blue Spring Bloom BlueCorydalis Fumeroot Fumeroot 5. flexuosa 5. 5. Corydalis Corydalis flexuosa flexuosa
26. 19. 19. 19. 5.
21.
10. 7.7. 7.
17. 17. 17.
24. 24. 24.
Turf Grass Turf Grass Turf Grass
11. 2.
15.
19.
16. 16. 16. 7.
17.
24.
Turf Grass 3.3. 3.
9. 9. 9.
20. 20. 20. 22. 23. 23.
16. 13. 13. 13. 8. 8.8.
3.
0 00 1 11 2 22
4 44
1/4” 1/4” = 1’ 1’ 1/4” == 1’
feet feet 6 66feet
Creeping Phlox Wild Bleeding-heart Wild WildPhlox Bleeding-heart Bleeding-heart subulata Dicentra eximia Dicentra Dicentra eximia eximia
2. 7. 7. 7.
Alexander's White Coral Bells Coral CoralIberis Bells Bellssempervirens Heuchera sanguinea Heuchera Heuchera sanguinea sanguinea
20. 20. 20.
3. 8. 8. 8.
Barrenwort Plumbago Plumbago Plumbago Epimedium acuminatum Ceratostigma plumbaginoides Ceratostigma Ceratostigma plumbaginoides plumbaginoides
4. 9. 9. 9.
Sweet Woodruff Wineleaf Cinquefoil Wineleaf Wineleaf Cinquefoil Cinquefoil Galium odoratum Potentilla tridentata Potentilla Potentilla tridentata tridentata
15.
9.
Blue Fumeroot Chineese Begonia Corydalis flexuosa Chineese Chineese Begonia Begonia Begonia sinensis Begonia Begonia sinensis sinensis
6. 11. 11.
Wild Bleeding-heart Wavy Wavy Hosta Hosta eximia Dicentra Hosta tardiflora Hosta tardiflora
7. 12. 12.
Coral Bells Closed Closed Gentian Gentian Heuchera sanguinea Gentianaclausa Gentiana clausa
13. 13. 8.
Plumbago Yellow Patrinia Yellow Patrinia Ceratostigma plumbaginoides Patriniagibbosa Patrinia gibbosa
9.
Wineleaf Cinquefoil Potentilla tridentata
10.
Chineese Begonia Begonia sinensis
11.
Wavy Hosta Hosta tardiflora
12.
Closed Gentian Gentiana clausa
27. 27.
4. 4. 4.
25.
Yellow Patrinia Patrinia gibbosa
Tall Hosta Tall Tall Hosta Hosta Hosta elata Hosta Hosta elata elata
23.
Geotextile Fabric Earth Subgrade Sandy loam Backfill
CityGreen StrataCell 20” x 20” x 10” 3 course deep
WestView Viewof ofDetail DetailPlanting PlantingStructure Structure West
16.
Gypsophilapaniculata paniculata Gypsophila Gypsophila paniculata Crown Imperial Common Knautia Fritillaria imperialis Common Common Knautia Knautia Knautiaarvensis arvensis Knautia Knautia arvensis Dancing Crane Jack Arisaema heterophyllum Butterfly Weed Butterfly Butterfly Weed Weed Asclepiastuberosa tuberosa Asclepias Asclepias tuberosa Yellow Catmint Nepeta govaniana
MediumPerennials PerennialsFall FallBloom Bloom Medium
Common Sneezwood
Common Common Sneezwood Sneezwood 21. Medium Perennials Summer Bloom 21. 21. Helenium autumnale Helenium Helenium autumnale autumnale
17.Statement Concept 22. 22. 22.
Tall Hosta Bicolor BushClover Clover Bicolor Bicolor Bush Bush Clover Hosta elata Lespedeza bicolor Lespedeza Lespedeza bicolor bicolor
18. 23. 23. 23.
Plant Communit
Soft La
Gypsophilahupehensis paniculata Anemone Anemone Anemone hupehensis hupehensis
Mixed
Looking into depth of 3 layers of the design system, an overlay schematic was created. Each Common of the 3 systems, when put together, Knautia creates of the site. Plant communities, 19.the backbone to the design Knautia arvensis Ornamental Trees Trees spatialOrnamental sequence and human activities make up the basis behind the overall planting concept.
Butterfly Weed Crape Myrtle Crape Crape Myrtle Myrtle sequential tree plaza tuberosa will be a place of rest 24. 20. order. As designed, the 24. 24. Asclepias Lagerstroemia indica Lagerstroemia Lagerstroemia indica indica
with many benches for seating and a canopy of trees. Vignette 1 (Tree Plaza) depicts a view through the tree canopy towards the entrance to the EES Building. The meadow will consist of a multiJapanese Tree Lilac Japanese Japanese Tree Tree Lilac Lilac 25. tude25. ofMedium plants creating a mesmerizing scene of colors and scents. Perennials Fall Bloom 25. Syringa reticulata Syringa Syringa reticulata reticulata In Vignette 2, the path through the meadow is shown with the treed plaza in the background. Vignette 3 shows the small gatherCommon Sneezwood 21. within the meadow ing space with a small glimpse of the mixed Helenium Fringe Tree autumnale Fringe Fringe Tree Tree 26. 26. bed26. in the background. The mixed bed will create an intimate Chionanthus Chionanthus virginicus Chionanthusvirginicus virginicus space for visitors to sit down and enjoy many native plant species. Other general soft landscapeBicolor areas will connect the Bush Clover space to the Purpleleaf Plum Plum Purpleleaf Plumfrom the parking buildings physical screening 22. as well as providePurpleleaf Lespedeza bicolor 27. 27. 27.strong winds. Prunus Prunus cerasifera Prunuscerasifera cerasifera lot and These plant communities create the volumetric spatial sequence. The idea in the planting communities is to create a Chinese Anemone layered system that allows for a variation of enclosures. The buildAnemone hupehensis 23. ings create the dominant mass within the courtyard, towering over the meadow, mixed bed, treed plaza, and other soft landscape. The treed plaza and soft landscapes break up the sudden image the right displays ofof Ornamental Trees The imageto the right displays thevolume volume dropThe from building toto ground plane to allow for athe much softer edge to the building.planting The mixed bed creates volumetric enclothe mixed bed isisa denoted inin this the mixed planting bed denoted this sure at intimate scale for those interested in a human scale space. Crape Myrtle simple diagram. The black represents the simple diagram. The black represents the is created in the central Finally, 24.the lowest amount of volume Lagerstroemia indica positive wave of through meadow. Tall grasses create the enclosure, but thethe view tospace the and positive wave ofvolume volume through thespace and surroundings is virtually unobstructed the averaged size the represents the ofofstructure. The thewhite white represents thetovoid void structure. The person. Japanese Tree Lilacthat creates a forms the wave like arrangement forms the wave like arrangement that creates a As for circulation and human activities in the space, there 25. Syringa reticulata are arhythm few majoras pathways as displayed. Seating along thethe walls moves along rhythm asaapedestrian pedestrian moves along thepath. path. around the edge of the meadow allow for quiet viewing overtop Along with this the gray-scale mimics a wave of Along the area gray-scale mimics a wave of of the space. Awith majorthis gathering occurs in the treed plaza as Tree blooming seasons that 26.seen in Vignette can different be 1. A Fringe smaller, more intimate spacewill within different blooming seasons that will only only Chionanthus virginicus the enhance meadow (vignette 3) also acts a gathering/learning area the the idea ofofasmovement through enhance the idea movement through the within the space. The entry points to the space occur at the mixed bed. Purpleleaf corners or edges of the site with the mainPlum travel moving diagonalmixed bed. 27. the center of the site. Prunus cerasifera ly across
The image to the right displays the volume of the mixed planting bed is denoted in this simple diagram. The black represents the
Jan
Legend West View of Detail Planting Structure
The concept of the overall design is to engage visitors in a Babys Breath variety of plant communities. ThroughAnemone various planting styles, Chinese Anemone Chinese Chinese Anemone
20.
13.
North View Entrance Path
Overall Planting Concept
5. 10. 10.
13.
23. 23. 23.
1” Sand Base See Detail 2: 4 L3
Babys Breath Medium Perennials Spring Bloom Babys Babys Breath Breath
1. 6. 6. 6.
Ground Cover Fall Bloom
25. 25. 12. 25.
17. 17. 17. 18. 18. 18. 14. 19. 19. 19.
Ground Cover Summer Bloom Ground Cover Fall Fall Bloom Bloom Ground Cover
12. 12. 12. 22. 22. 22.
Crown Imperial Crown Crown Imperial Imperial Fritillaria imperialis Fritillaria Fritillaria imperialis imperialis
movement along the sidewalk. A diverse array of flowering perennials andCatmint ornamental trees Yellow Yellow Yellow Catmint Catmint 16.one plant nears Nepeta govaniana Barrenwort 3. create a wave will asEpimedium the blooming seasons evolve.16. As the endgovaniana of a bloom, the 16. Nepeta Nepeta govaniana Barrenwort Barrenwort acuminatum 3. 3. Epimedium Epimedium acuminatum acuminatum next flower begins, mimicking a wave throughout the bed from spring to winter. The heights of the plants were also selected to create a physical wave in the form. Sweet Woodruff MediumPerennials PerennialsSummer SummerBloom Bloom Sweet Sweet Woodruff Woodruff 4. Galium odoratum Medium 4. 4. Galium Galium odoratum odoratum
2. 2. 2.
15. 15. 15.
Medium Perennials Spring Bloom Medium Perennials Spring Bloom 14. 14. 14.
Dancing Crane Jack 15. Alexander's White Dancing Crane Crane Jack Jack The this mixedWhite bed is to create a planting flows in and out of the 2. concept of Alexander's 15. design thatDancing Arisaema heterophyllum 15. Alexander's White Iberis sempervirens 2. 2. Arisaema Arisaema heterophyllum heterophyllum Iberis Iberis sempervirens sempervirens building along a meandering path. The pattern of waves allows the planting bed to evoke
10. 10. 10.
14.
Brick Pavers
Planted
Treed P
VolumetricSchematic Schematic Volumetric
Volumetric Spac
Volumetric Inte
1 Mead
2 Mixe 3 Tree
4 Build
Human Activitie
Volumetric Schematic
Quiet S
Gather
Primar
Second
Primar
Second
06
07
student service learning // tanzania, africa This project was done during a study abroad trip in Tanzania. As a pair, we looked at food production and food security in the village of Kisawasawa. Modeling current population trends and sizes of croplands we made educated predictions of when the village would be out of productive land. With this, we looked at alternative methods of food production that increased efficiency and modeled that development with the current population growth. This project informs the village leaders of the implications in the future in regards to population growth and food security. Serengeti Kilimanjaro Kilombero Valley
Mkomazi
Tarangire
UMNP Mikumi
Tanzania Mikumi
150
300
km 450
¯
Kilombero Valley Villages
Udzungwa Mountains
¯ 0
Kisawasawa Ward
Udzungwa Mts.
Katavi Ruaha
Kisawasawa Village Selection
0
30
60
km 90
¯ 0
3.5
7
km 10.5
Land Coverage Aquaponics and ROW Regulations Year Population House 2013 2023 2028 2033 2043 2053
3256 5668 7478 9867 17176 29901
Other Shamba Shamba Paths Structures (Ha) Size
Available Land
2.6% 4.5% 5.9% 7.8% 13.6% 23.7%
Fuelwood Fuelwood Reserve Reserve (Ha) Remaining 47.5 100.0% 82.7 100.0% 109.1 98.0% 100.3 93.8% 80.1 74.9% 45.0 42.1%
2.4% 25.2% 0.5 0.3% 41.6% 4.2% 25.2% 0.8 0.5% 17.7% 5.5% 25.2% 1.1 0.6% -1.3% 7.3% 25.2% 1.5 0.9% -3.9% 12.7% 25.2% 2.5 1.5% -15.7% 22.1% 25.2% 4.4 2.6% -36.3% *Population growth at 5.7% annually Green = Available Land, Orange = Decreasing Fuelwood Reserve, Red = No Land Available
Land Coverage Of Current Growth Pattern and Shamba Other Shamba Shamba Year Population House Paths Structures (Ha) Size
Legend
2013 2023 2033
Village Boundary Kisawasawa Focus Plot Available Land
3256 5668 9867
2.6% 4.5% 7.8%
Fuelwood Fuelwood Reserve Reserve Created Remaining (Ha) 62.9% 0 0% 38.3% 0 0% -4.4% 0 0%
Available Land
2.4% 4.0% 48.0 28.1% 4.2% 4.0% 83.5 49.0% 7.3% 4.0% 145.3 85.2% *Population growth at 5.7% annually Green = Available Land, Orange = Decreasing Fuelwood Reserve, Red = No Land Available
Land Coverage Drip Irrigation and ROW Regulations
Food Production House Other
¯
Railroad Primary Road 0
0.1
0.2
Kilometers 0.3
Projection: Cylindrical_Equal_Area Data Set: LArch 499F
Secondary Road Tertiary Road Stream
Other Shamba Shamba Year Population House Paths Structures (Ha) Size 2013 2023 2028 2033 2039
3256 5668 7478 9867 13760
2.6% 4.5% 5.9% 7.8% 11%
Available Land
Fuelwood Fuelwood Reserve Reserve Created Remaining (Ha) 25.9 100.0% 45.1 100.0% 59.5 96.3% 36.2 60.8% -1.8 -3.0%
2.4% 25.2% 22.1 12.9% 41.6% 4.2% 25.2% 38.4 22.5% 17.1% 5.5% 25.2% 50.7 29.7% -1.3% 7.3% 25.2% 66.9 39.2% -20.4% 10.2% 25.2% 93.3 54.7% -34.6% *Population growth at 5.7% annually Green = Available Land, Orange = Decreasing Fuelwood Reserve, Red = No Land Available
08 2013
Current Shamba - Business as usual
Drip Irrigation System
Aquaponics
2033
2039
2053
09
ecosystem study // baltimore, md This masterplan concept was proposed for a redevelopment of the Middle Branch in Baltimore. The project worked with collaborators from the Baltimore Ecosystem Study (BES). The focus of this design was to improve overall bay water health through restoration of oyster reefs. Oysters area native to this area. They are filter feeders and can filter 50 gallons of water a day. A restored oyster reef would decrease organic matter in the water and boost dissolved oxygen levels, leading to a healthy ecosystem. The project included a video presentation as well as a physical model, all presented to the collaborators at the end of the semester.
10
11
eco-tourism S u i t a b i lexploration i t y A n // a lsullivan y s i scounty, M a pa p Legend !
DUSHOre
Towns
!
154 ¬ «
State Roads
¬ «
487
¬ « 87
Forksville
State Lands
Mildred
!
Value
220 £ ¤
6
¬ «
154
87 ¬ «
7 8
220 £ ¤
11 12 14 15
!
!
10
13
Laporte
Eagles Mere
9
¯
0
1
2
4
6 Miles
!
487 ¬ «
Through analysis of Sullivan County, myself and another partner looked at alternative economic growth outside of the natural gas industry that is dominating this region. Our idea was to put the natural beauty of the endless mountains on display through an eco-tourism destination. I compiled a GIS site suitability analysis to determine the best location within the county to place such a site. We then developed programs based on occurrence of resorts in the Poconos. From this, we created a master plan and renderings of what some of the activities might look like, all while analyzing food, energy, and water sustainability. Following completion of the project, we presented our idea at a town meeting in Sullivan County with good response from the community members.
12
13
community design // state college, pa This design was to take an existing strip mall where many of the storefronts had vacancies. Taking the amount of sure footage of utilized by the current visitors, and re-designing the space to develop high density housing. This team design was to have a focus on a sustainable, livable, walkable community for families and students to coexist within one space. Pedestrian pathways created access ways to surrounding bus stops and other foot traffic destinations. By re-zoning the site, we were able to restrict certain types of development in specific areas.
14 Typical Street Design
Streetscape Typical Street Design
Main Entrance
15
regional planning // spring creek watershed, pa This regional planning compiled multiple layers of GIS mapping data to complete a suitability analysis of stormwater management practices. Each of the categories was rated at a 1-3 scale of concern to identify the most prioritized areas. After a full analysis of the watershed, specific areas were selected to focus a phased design approach to combat the stormwater issues.
Riparian Buffers
Riparian Buffers
Curb Cuts
Curb Cuts
Green Roof Cover
16
17
stormwater conveyance // state college, pa
Slope
11
110
1109.20
C
1109
32.2%
1108.80
2.38%
DI 2
H
O
TC BC 1109.14 1108 .64 DI 13 Rim
1109
.30
TC BC 1110.43 TC 11 BC 1110.45 09.93 1109 .95
m 11
09.20
I
.60
TC BC 1110.25 1109 .75
1108.80
10
DI 14
DI 7
J Rim
1109.50
Rim1
109.3
B
.10
0
1103
1109
1109
.70 TC 11 10 BC 1109 .17 .67
TC BC 1109.89 TC 11 BC 1109.48 09.39 1109 .48
1110.50
1109.50
K TC BC 1109.67 1109 .17
11 11
1102
1105
1104
1103
.00
1107 1106
9 110 1108
1112 .00 BS 1118 @ 6" .00
.70
TS
1112 BS .00 1118
sers
1110
TS
e Slop 5% 5.8
1112 .40
1112
.50
Sid
Revision
01
ew
1102
.43
11
alk
1102
.25 1102
.0
.50
1108
08
G
.45
1107 .50
.50
07
1107
BS
10
02
11
06
11
05
11
04
11
03
11
Rise
TW BW 1105 1102 .50 TW .50 BW 1105 1102 .50 .42
10 Rise rs @ 6" TW BW 1114 1112 .50 Ma .50 x Slo pe .44
TS
1112
20.0%
1103
11
Swale Center Line
Slop e
1112
.50
TS
.50
1108
.45
.50
.90
1107
1107
.70
1107
1107 .50
9
0 11
0%
DI 10 Rim 1108.20
08
11
1
111
TS
TS
.12
TW BW 1114 1109 .50 .00
BS rs @ 1102 .50 6" TW BS BW 1107 1102 1102 .50 .50 TW .25 BW 1107 1102 .50 .25
Flow Splitter Drain Pipes HPS 0.00 High Point Swale LPS 0.00 Low Point Swale TC 0.00 Top of Curb BC 0.00 Bottom of Curb TS 0.00 Top Stair BS 0.00 Bottom Stair 0.00 Spot Elevation TFFE 1112.5 Top Finished Floor Elevation BFFE 1102.5 Bottom Finished Floor Elevation 0.00% Slope Slope Direction Contour Label 0000 A DI 1 Rim 0.00
Pipe Label
Drain Inlet # and Rim Elevation
Date
5' Existing Contour 1' Existing Contour 5' Proposed Contour 1' Proposed Contour Drain Inlets
BFFE 1102.5
No.
.50 1102
.43
University Park, PA
.35
.50
1112 .42
.50 1112
1102
1102
Vegetation Pedestrian Path
Slop
East Campus
.30 1112
1112
0%
e
TFFE 1112.5
BS
1113
LPS 1108.50
11
LPS 1110.20
Legend 1.0
.40
0
.22
1108
13
e
4.83% Slope
alk Sid
F
1 11
1113
2
11
4 Ri
.74
1109 1110
.06
try En .10
DI 9 Rim 1111.30
TC BC 1112.35 1111 .85
111
1111
e
E
Slo
pe
Slop
1.0
1113
2.0
pe
Slo
09
.73
1.18% .20
11
1113
TC BC 11113.4 1112 7 .97 1.82 % Slo pe
1112
1112
11
13
TC BC 1113.73 1113 .23
7%
10
ff
TW BW 1103 1102 .60 .00
1112
.25
TS
.18
1.6
12
Slope
11
1.00%
TS
.20
1112
11
pO
.34
.25
1111
1110.95
2 Risers @ 6"
TC BC 1111.59 1111 .09
1111 .20
%
2.38
.10 BS
1111
12
11.20
BS
11
Dro
1113
1112
m 11
.15
11
TC BC 1113.24 1112 .74
LPS 1111.80
6 Ri
TC BC 1112.58 1112 .08
6" Trench Drain 1111
1111
11 TC BC 1112.88 1111 .38 TC BC 1111.89 1111 .39 pe Slo
TW BW 1109 1102 .50 .50
.47
11
3
0%
11
1110.70
111
HPS 1112.70
.14
1111.10 DI
2.00% Slope
1111
1111
1111
HPS 1111.29 .19
TC BC 1112.08 1111 .58
1
TC BC 1112.84 1112 .34
1112
e
1
1111
.12
111
Slop
111
1111
11
TC BC 1112.58 1112 .08
TC BC 1110.90 1110 .40
TC BC 1112.15 1111 .65
0%
.35 11 11.42 1111 .41
ew
ch 8"
Tren
2.38% Slope
TC BC 1112.35 TC BC 1112.43 1111.85 1111 .93
1111
11.20
6.0
1111
e
TC BC 1112.35 1111 .85 TC BC 1112.43 1111 .93
m 11
20.0% Max Slope
.12
.18
Slop
1112
1111.10
1 Ri
1110 1110 1110
TC BC 1110.77 1110 .27
.03
9%
1110.70
DI
TC BC 1112.35 1111 .85
TC BC 1110.53 1110 .03 DI 11 Rim 1110
11
11
11
TC BC 1112.15 1111 .65
12/5/2013
1110
0'
10'
20'
40' 1"=20'
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
Drain
TC BC 1112.08 1111 .58
TC BC 1111.73 1111 .23
2.4
y
TC BC 1111.79 1111 .29
3
111
1109
11
A
1109.50
.64
L
11
TC BC 1111.79 1111 .29
Drive
TC BC 1112.88 TC BC 1111.89 1111.38 1111 .39
Slop
13
1109
TC BC 1111.09 1111 .09
e
TC 1113.69 BC 1113.19
.20
10.20
2.0%
11 3.
TC 1113.83 BC 1113.33
M
1108.70 1109
m 11
op
Sl 47%
Rim
TC BC 1109.92 1109 .42
1109.70
3 Ri
12
Slo
1112
DI
11 TC 1113.48 BC 1112.98
TC 1113.64 BC 1113.14
DI 8
pe
%
2.38
L1
Sheet 1 of 1
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
TC BC 1110.43 1109 .93 TC BC 1110.45 1109 .95
1109.50
1108
TC BC 1109.74 1109 .24
11
1110.50
1110.50
1109.20
1108.51
1109
Rim 1109 TC .70 BC 1110.25 1109 .75
1109
Roadwa
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
Rim
1108.70
4 Ri
.11
DI 15
1110 DI
1109
1109.20
TC BC 1110.17 1109 .67
Slope
1109.50
1108.51
Rim
By
1109.50
1109.50
TC BC 1109.70 1109 .20
TC BC 1109.74 1109 .24
1109 TC BC 1109.89 1109 .39 TC BC 1109.48 1109 .48
1104.40
6
1109DI 16
1109 TC BC 1109.61 1109 .11
08.20
1109.20
7
1108.51
110
TC BC 1109 Rim 1108 .14 1108 .64 .60
1107.70
m 11
1105
P
1109.20
DI 12
1108.50
5 Ri
04
N
1109
Larch 431
Eric Lyons 1105
1108.50
D
DI
4
110
1104.05
1104.24
1104 1105 1106 1107 1108
Sustainability Education Center Final Grading
3
110 1103.18
Lyons+E_Final_Grading
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
18 46
47 45
48 47
48
49
46
50
9
51
52
9
52.4
52
52.5
52.152 0
9 51.7 TC 1.29 5 BC
9 50.83 TC .33 0 DI 5
52.9
51
51
50
%
3.58
50
51
52.60
0
TS
52.7
2.05%
0%
2.0
5.35%
3.95%
FE
47.4
5
.7 44.7 9 9
TFF BFF E 53.7 9 E4 4.7 9
44.7
0%
9
03
47 0
48.1
9
0
47.8
48
48
47
47
46
46 45
9
9
BW
44.9
0
BW BW
46.2
2
46.5
46
44.9
0
0
LPS 44.80
5
43
48 42
47
46
41
4
4
BW
4
46.4
BW
4
45.4
45.4
4
45.2
45
.24
46
0
6.7 W4
T
45
44
45.4
47
44.7
44.5
44
BW
45
8
45.2
44
43
42
42
41
41
48 LPS
2
45.9
%
44.5
TW
43
49
8 A AD E 50.4 8 TFF E 41.4 BFF
47.1
2.68%
0
BFF
4 4.4 E5 4 TFF E 45.4 BFF
48
2.00
44.6
2.0
BW TW 44.82 46.5 0
BW
8.88%
5
0
41
%
9 .98 492.7 4 TC 5 9.29 54.44 4.4 4 E BC PFF E5 9 4 4.1 % 5 2.4 490% 49.7 TFF E 45.4 2.88 51.7 5% TR 9.29 2 2 F .30 4 E4 9 F 9.5 C 4 B B 9 TR C 4.7 4 2 T 49.02 47.4 51.0 9 52.84 47.1 5 C4 4.4 6 TR TFF 6 E 5 B4 .447 51.3 51.21 F BR 0.3 5 F E .6 .9 5 1 50.7 9 4 49 7 TC 9.86 T R 4E BFF 5523.3.7 48 46.1 6 5 4 TC 52 E 50.8 0 6 BR 45.9 5 TC441.879 BTFF 49.78 0 TC 6 5.7 BC 2.81 3 52.0 6 9.5 51 4 .8 C 5 C 9 2 5 9 B T TC 53.09 5 4 .6 BW 2.31 BR 0 BC 51.5 6 BR 50.8 .96 4 52.1 1 T BC BC 52.59 49.8 6 W 4 5 4.82 1 51.6 6.520.7 .16 .96 1 2 51.3 1 9 4 5 4 3 44.7 50 9 .15 5.47 1 8 51.8 TC 4 47 BW 51.1 9 49.7 51.5 % 51.7 5 50.4 49.88 51.6 0 44.6 5 TC 1.29 51.3 1 6 BC 2.34 1 44.7 4 0 50.3 5 51.8 1 5% 9 51.8 458.4 BC 8 51.3 0 BS 4 4.7 49.9 4 44.5 1 B HPS 52.84 1 50.4 0 50.3 51 BW 51 45.2 S5 9 .44 BS 2.14 52.3 44.9 8 50 51.8 W 45 PFF 9 52.4 4 0 50.4 5.2 B T4S RS 0 44.5 52.77 E5 BS E E 2 9 BW 9.2 4 6 9 52.1 1.8 5 4 46 4 RIS PFF 46.40 TS S4 4 1 51.7 4 52.48 46.22 52.0 52.6 HP " BW 51.8 51.0 52.5 TW 4 51.7 @6 TS 0 52 .94 3 46.5 .7 9 1 6 5 4 52.1 52 0 W04 51.1 AD T.8 0 1 8 B 5 50 4 P W .2 A E FFE 44.9 45 51.1 44 PFF TFF 52.6 0 49 BW 52.1 8 A 4 45 RS 0 AD E 50.4 BFF E 51.8 ISE 6 52.69 4 4R " 8 51 52.2 E4 1 52.4 51.20 52.9 53.1 53 TFF E 41.4 5.3 TS 2.8 @6 0 4 LPS1.3 44.80 52.60 2 5% 52.8 6 F 1 .30 5 F 1.2 1 4 5 5 B B 52.9 TFF S5 1.80 3.29 53 4 4 4 .1 E5 0 0 52.4 BFF E 53.1 54.4 TS BS 2 PFF BS 48.1 TFF E 42.8 4.44 TS 53.7 53.2 48 4 E4 E5 E5 4 50 9 9 3.7 4.1 PFF 54.4 TS 0 9 BFF 0 4 53.7 52.59 TS 47.8 52.7 9 LPS 8 52.8 PFF 4 52.9 4 9 .4 4 E5 5 TFF 54.4 4 3.7 FFE E P 9 F 51.9 5 49 47 TF E 45.4 BF E 53 8 51.7
46.1
44
1.80 E5 0 TFF E 42.8 BFF
2.68%
47.4
42
TFFE BFFE TC BC TR BR
0
49.2
S HP
4.84%
46 45
50
3.36%
46
45
6 4 52.2 52.4 51.20 TS 0 2 51.3 51.30 49.6 TC 9.16 4 4 BC 54.4 S 4.44 T E5 4 PFF 54.4
% 2.00
48 47
43
51
LEGEND
0
49.5 7
49.7
4.70%
44
0%
2 4 9
RS ISE 4R " @6 6 51.2 4 52.4 BS
3.86%
49
47
5%
4.7
4 .62 .76 5T2C.049 651 .1 .9C4 49 51B 5
%
2 49.5 TC .02 9 HPS DI 4 51 4 52.84 50.5 TC 0.04 5 BC 9 52.48 49.7 52 TC 9.29 4 1 BC 50 50.8 TC 0.31 5 BC
52.77
9
03
5.35%
52.3
9 51.7 TC 1.29 5 BC
48
ERIC LYONS LARCH 231 PROJECT 2 4/21/12
46
8.88%
50
49
51
6 52.0 TC 1.56 5 BC
49
6
52.1
0
49.3
4.84%
4
45
TC 5 BC 2.34 51.8 4
5%
TC 53.09 BC 52.59
52.7 50 1
49
50 45
8%
50.4
TC 5 DI 4 0.34 9.8 4
3.1
7 52.3 TC 1.87 5 BC
52
TC 5 BC 2.81 52.3 1
TC 5 BC 2.61 52.1 1
52.69 1.10 53.1 53 5T.3 C55 .60 4 2 52.8 % 50 4 BS BC 52.9 53.2 5 .06 4 9 3T .1C 52 6 52.87 TS BS 2 51.5 PFF 53.7 5B3C E5 .29 9 3.7 TS 9 53.7 52.59 9 52.8 TC 9 2.37 PFFE 52.8 C 5 .87 53.7 BT T 1 CF 1 5F 9 5 2 TC 53.09 51.9 BC BF .3E1 53BC 8 5 .7 52.59 F
2.8
46
TC 5 BC 0.61 50.1 1
51 48
0.4
50
50.7 6 50.8 6 50 50.8 .96 6 51.3 1
9 49.7 TR 9.29 2 4 49.5 BC TC 9.02 4 BC 6 .3 0 7 4 5 9.9 49.6 TC 9.86 R4 4 T 8 BR .61 49.7 3 47 9.8 TC .1 7 R 14 6 B DI 4 49.8 6 49.9 50 8 0 5 .4 49.88 0 50.3 8 8 0 BS 49.9 48 50.4 0 50.3 BS 51.8 S S 0.48 T R E5 ISE PFF 0 4R " 4 .8 51 51.0 @ 6 48.32 TS 4 51.1 1.80 4 E5 51.1 PFF
48
50 46
1
51.8 51.5 51.6 51.3 1 6 1 1 5 51.8 BC 1.44 51.31 1 B 50.9 S5 4 2.14 PFF E5 BS 52.1 1.8 TC 5 1D 1.62 TS 52 4 .64 51 I 51 TC .73 .12 5 BC 1.69 52.1 51.1 AD PFF TC 0 9 A E 5 52.3 TFF BC2.64 4 51.8 BFF E 51.8BTC 51.89 4 E4 1C 51.3 9 2.8 2.0 1 0% TC TFF 5 2 C 5 .71 BFF E 53B.1 2.21 4 E4 47.4 4.1 5 4
TC
44.1 8 0%
52
4.70%
TC 5 BC 0.61 50.1 1
BR
51.6
51.1 TC5
5148 BC 550.99 47
BR
47
9 49.7 TC 9.29 47 BC 4
3.86%
49 TC 5 BC 0.99 50.4 9
51
TC DI 5 50.72 0.2 2
7 52.3 TC 1.87 5 BC
52.84
45
2 49.6 TC 9.16 4 BC
%
3.36%
49
50
49
50
TR 51.0 6 TR 51.3 51.21 1
50
3.58
51
48.32
49
4.
5%
52.87
TC 5 BC 2.81 52.3 1 TC 53.09 BC 52.59
%
2.88
2.4
6 52.0 TC 1.56 5 BC
1 50.8 TC 0.31 5 BC
51
0 51.1 TC 0.60 5 BC
49
4
3.95%
50.4
50
52
3 50.8 TC .33 0 DI 5
9 51.7 TC 1.29 5 BC
52
TC 5 BC 2.71 52.2 1
8%
49
(48.64)
0%
TC 5 DI 4 0.34 9.8 4
49 50
2.0
TC 5 BC 0.61 50.1 1
TC 5 BC 2.34 51.8 4
TC 5 BC 1.89 51.3 9
48 2 49.6 TC 9.16 4 BC
9 49.7 TC 9.29 4 BC
4.1
51
50
2.8
48
TC 5 BC 1.69 51.1 9
2 49.5 TC .02 9 DI 4
4 50.5 TC 0.04 5 BC
51
TC 5 DI 5 1.62 1.12
48
50
51
47
51
TC 5 BC 0.61 50.1 1
49
50 TC 5 BC 1.44 50.9 4
TC BC 50.99 50.4 9
0%
TC 5 BC 0.99 50.4 9
4.1
50
4.
TC DI 5 50.72 0.2 2
49
(48.64)
2.05%
48.89
1 47.6 TC .11 7 DI 4
49
40
40
TOP FINISHED FLOO BOTTOM FINISHED TOP CURB BOTTOM CURB TOP RAMP ERIC LYONS BOTTOM RAMP LARCH 231 0.00% PERCENT SLOPE PROJECT 2 EXISTING CONTOU 4/21/12 PROPOSED CONTO PROPERTY LINE LEGEND CENTER LINE SWAL TS TOP STEP TFFE TOP FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION BS BOTTOM STEP BFFE BOTTOM FINISHED ELEVATION PFFEFLOORPORCH FINISHED F TC TOP CURB BW BOTTOM OF WALL BC BOTTOM CURB TW TOP OF WALL TR TOP RAMP + SPOT ELEVATION BR BOTTOM RAMP HPS HIGH POINT SWALE 0.00% PERCENT SLOPELPS LOW POINT SWALE EXISTING CONTOURS ADA HANDICAP ACCESI PROPOSED CONTOURS PROPERTY LINE CENTER LINE SWALE TS TOP STEP BS BOTTOM STEP PFFE PORCH FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION BW BOTTOM OF WALL TW TOP OF WALL + SPOT ELEVATION HPS HIGH POINT SWALE LPS LOW POINT SWALE ADA HANDICAP ACCESIBLE HOME
19
technical drawings
20
21
render variations // penn state campus
22
model exploration // penn state campus
23
internship studies // beechbrook LA These elements were completed during my summer internship study with Beechbrook Landscape Architecture in Baltimore, Maryland. The firm focuses on high end residential and small commercial projects. The variation of tasks as displayed included hand sketches, grading plans, construction documents, and 3D modeling.
BEECHBROOK
landscape architecture
t 410.685.5263 f 410.685.5264 beechbrookla.com
24
25
photography
26
27
eric j. lyons
the pennsylvania state university landscape architecture lyonseric15@gmail.com 717.405.2901